-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
feat: add new workflow file for automated pull request labeling #210
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | ||
name: PR Autolabeler | ||
|
||
on: | ||
# pull_request event is required for autolabeler | ||
pull_request: | ||
types: [opened, reopened, synchronize] | ||
|
||
jobs: | ||
draft-release: | ||
uses: commit-check/.github/.github/workflows/release-drafter.yml@main | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 💡 Codebase verification Use commit SHA instead of @main for workflow reference Replace the @main reference with the specific commit SHA: uses: commit-check/.github/.github/workflows/release-drafter.yml@fae5593179f0ab50401e4b42ff5a019fc488bfde 🔗 Analysis chainAvoid using @main branch reference directly. Using
Let's verify if the external workflow exists and check its recent changes: 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Verify the external workflow existence and its recent changes
gh api repos/commit-check/.github/contents/.github/workflows/release-drafter.yml
# Check recent commits to the workflow
gh api repos/commit-check/.github/commits \
--jq '.[] | select(.commit.message | contains("release-drafter.yml"))' \
| jq -r '["Date:", .commit.author.date, "Message:", .commit.message] | join(" ")'
Length of output: 2733 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Decode and examine the workflow content
echo "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" | base64 -d
# Get the commit SHA
echo "fae5593179f0ab50401e4b42ff5a019fc488bfde"
Length of output: 1269 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Define required permissions explicitly.
The workflow is missing explicit permissions configuration. This is important for security and following the principle of least privilege.
Add permissions configuration: