Skip to content

jws: improve fix for CVE-2025-22868 #774

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
jws: improve fix for CVE-2025-22868
The fix for CVE-2025-22868 relies on strings.Count, which isn't ideal
because it precludes failing fast when the token contains an unexpected
number of periods. Moreover, Verify still allocates more than necessary.

Eschew strings.Count in favor of strings.Cut. Some benchmark results:

goos: darwin
goarch: amd64
pkg: golang.org/x/oauth2/jws
cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz
                              │      old       │                 new                 │
                              │     sec/op     │   sec/op     vs base                │
Verify/full_of_periods-8        24862.50n ± 1%   57.87n ± 0%  -99.77% (p=0.000 n=20)
Verify/two_trailing_periods-8      3.485m ± 1%   3.445m ± 1%   -1.13% (p=0.003 n=20)
geomean                            294.3µ        14.12µ       -95.20%

                              │     old      │                  new                   │
                              │     B/op     │     B/op      vs base                  │
Verify/full_of_periods-8          16.00 ± 0%     16.00 ± 0%        ~ (p=1.000 n=20) ¹
Verify/two_trailing_periods-8   2.001Mi ± 0%   1.001Mi ± 0%  -49.98% (p=0.000 n=20)
geomean                         5.658Ki        4.002Ki       -29.27%
¹ all samples are equal

                              │     old     │                 new                  │
                              │  allocs/op  │ allocs/op   vs base                  │
Verify/full_of_periods-8         1.000 ± 0%   1.000 ± 0%        ~ (p=1.000 n=20) ¹
Verify/two_trailing_periods-8   12.000 ± 0%   9.000 ± 0%  -25.00% (p=0.000 n=20)
geomean                          3.464        3.000       -13.40%
¹ all samples are equal

Also, remove all remaining calls to strings.Split.
  • Loading branch information
jub0bs committed Mar 11, 2025
commit 3a82900f747798f5f36065126385880277c0fce7
34 changes: 25 additions & 9 deletions jws/jws.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -116,12 +116,12 @@ func (h *Header) encode() (string, error) {
// Decode decodes a claim set from a JWS payload.
func Decode(payload string) (*ClaimSet, error) {
// decode returned id token to get expiry
s := strings.Split(payload, ".")
if len(s) < 2 {
_, claims, _, ok := parseToken(payload)
if !ok {
// TODO(jbd): Provide more context about the error.
return nil, errors.New("jws: invalid token received")
}
decoded, err := base64.RawURLEncoding.DecodeString(s[1])
decoded, err := base64.RawURLEncoding.DecodeString(claims)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -165,18 +165,34 @@ func Encode(header *Header, c *ClaimSet, key *rsa.PrivateKey) (string, error) {
// Verify tests whether the provided JWT token's signature was produced by the private key
// associated with the supplied public key.
func Verify(token string, key *rsa.PublicKey) error {
if strings.Count(token, ".") != 2 {
header, claims, sig, ok := parseToken(token)
if !ok {
return errors.New("jws: invalid token received, token must have 3 parts")
}

parts := strings.SplitN(token, ".", 3)
signedContent := parts[0] + "." + parts[1]
signatureString, err := base64.RawURLEncoding.DecodeString(parts[2])
signatureString, err := base64.RawURLEncoding.DecodeString(sig)
if err != nil {
return err
}

h := sha256.New()
h.Write([]byte(signedContent))
h.Write([]byte(header + tokenDelim + claims))
return rsa.VerifyPKCS1v15(key, crypto.SHA256, h.Sum(nil), signatureString)
}

func parseToken(s string) (header, claims, sig string, ok bool) {
header, s, ok = strings.Cut(s, tokenDelim)
if !ok { // no period found
return "", "", "", false
}
claims, s, ok = strings.Cut(s, tokenDelim)
if !ok { // only one period found
return "", "", "", false
}
sig, _, ok = strings.Cut(s, tokenDelim)
if ok { // three periods found
return "", "", "", false
}
return header, claims, sig, true
}

const tokenDelim = "."
26 changes: 23 additions & 3 deletions jws/jws_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -41,9 +41,29 @@ func TestSignAndVerify(t *testing.T) {
}

func TestVerifyFailsOnMalformedClaim(t *testing.T) {
err := Verify("abc.def", nil)
if err == nil {
t.Error("got no errors; want improperly formed JWT not to be verified")
cases := []struct {
desc string
token string
}{
{
desc: "no periods",
token: "aa",
}, {
desc: "only one period",
token: "a.a",
}, {
desc: "more than two periods",
token: "a.a.a.a",
},
}
for _, tc := range cases {
f := func(t *testing.T) {
err := Verify(tc.token, nil)
if err == nil {
t.Error("got no errors; want improperly formed JWT not to be verified")
}
}
t.Run(tc.desc, f)
}
}

Expand Down
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy