Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - For instructional content in documentation, use a direct and authoritative tone. Avoid expressions of politeness such as 'may' or 'please', and ensure the goal of the instruction is fronted.

• Apply the Microsoft Style Guide to ensure documentation maintains clarity and conciseness.
• In step-by-step instructions, front the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
• In step-by-step instructions, front the 'goal' in the instructional sentence.
• In step-by-step instructions, if in doubt what to front, front the 'goal' before the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
• do not hyphenate terms like 'top-right' or 'bottom-left' with 'corner'

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Use bold to mark UI strings.

• If "" are used to mark UI strings, replace them by bold.

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Be brief in your replies and don't add fluff like "thank you for..." and "Please let me know if"

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Use sentence-style capitalization also in headings.

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): do not comment on HTML used for icons

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): Avoid flagging inline HTML for embedding videos in future reviews for this repository.

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - For instructional content in documentation, use a direct and authoritative tone. Avoid expressions of politeness such as 'may' or 'please', and ensure the goal of the instruction is fronted.

• Apply the Microsoft Style Guide to ensure documentation maintains clarity and conciseness.
• In step-by-step instructions, front the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
• In step-by-step instructions, front the 'goal' in the instructional sentence.
• In step-by-step instructions, if in doubt what to front, front the 'goal' before the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
• do not hyphenate terms like 'top-right' or 'bottom-left' with 'corner'

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Use bold to mark UI strings.

• If "" are used to mark UI strings, replace them by bold.

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Be brief in your replies and don't add fluff like "thank you for..." and "Please let me know if"

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Use sentence-style capitalization also in headings.

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): do not comment on HTML used for icons

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): Avoid flagging inline HTML for embedding videos in future reviews for this repository.

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - For instructional content in documentation, use a direct and authoritative tone. Avoid expressions of politeness such as 'may' or 'please', and ensure the goal of the instruction is fronted.

• Apply the Microsoft Style Guide to ensure documentation maintains clarity and conciseness.
• In step-by-step instructions, front the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
• In step-by-step instructions, front the 'goal' in the instructional sentence.
• In step-by-step instructions, if in doubt what to front, front the 'goal' before the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
• do not hyphenate terms like 'top-right' or 'bottom-left' with 'corner'

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Use bold to mark UI strings.

• If "" are used to mark UI strings, replace them by bold.

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Be brief in your replies and don't add fluff like "thank you for..." and "Please let me know if"

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Use sentence-style capitalization also in headings.

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): do not comment on HTML used for icons

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): Avoid flagging inline HTML for embedding videos in future reviews for this repository.

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - For instructional content in documentation, use a direct and authoritative tone. Avoid expressions of politeness such as 'may' or 'please', and ensure the goal of the instruction is fronted.

• Apply the Microsoft Style Guide to ensure documentation maintains clarity and conciseness.
• In step-by-step instructions, front the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
• In step-by-step instructions, front the 'goal' in the instructional sentence.
• In step-by-step instructions, if in doubt what to front, front the 'goal' before the location phrase in the instructional sentence.
• do not hyphenate terms like 'top-right' or 'bottom-left' with 'corner'

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Use bold to mark UI strings.

• If "" are used to mark UI strings, replace them by bold.

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Be brief in your replies and don't add fluff like "thank you for..." and "Please let me know if"

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): - Use sentence-style capitalization also in headings.

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): do not comment on HTML used for icons

Pattern */**(html|markdown|md): Avoid flagging inline HTML for embedding videos in future reviews for this repository.

Let me try another verification approach to check the security implementations around this backup location.

Cloud backup location has proper access controls implemented

Based on the code analysis, the cloud backup location has several security measures in place:

1. Access is restricted to Home Assistant only:

   • The _validate_cloud_backup_location method ensures only Home Assistant can access the cloud backup location
   • Other components (including add-ons) are blocked with a 403 Forbidden response

2. File system security:

   • Cloud backups are stored in a dedicated directory separate from regular backups
   • The path is mounted as a bind mount with proper container isolation
   • The backup manager validates mount points before operations

3. API-level validation:

   • All backup operations (create/restore/remove) validate the caller's permissions
   • Home Assistant API state is checked before backup operations

The implementation provides adequate access controls for protecting sensitive backup data in the cloud backup location.

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for access control implementations around the cloud backup location

# Look for access control checks in API endpoints
echo "Checking API endpoints for access controls:"
rg -A 5 "LOCATION_CLOUD_BACKUP" --type python

# Look for permission/security related code
echo "Checking for permission validations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'def $_(self, $$$):
  $$$
  if not $security_check:
    raise $$$
  $$$
  $$$LOCATION_CLOUD_BACKUP$$$
  $$$'

Length of output: 386

Script:

#!/bin/bash

# Search for all files containing LOCATION_CLOUD_BACKUP
echo "Files referencing LOCATION_CLOUD_BACKUP:"
rg -l "LOCATION_CLOUD_BACKUP"

# Look for security-related code around backup operations
echo -e "\nChecking backup operation implementations:"
rg -B 3 -A 7 "cloud_backup|LOCATION_CLOUD_BACKUP"

# Check for permission/access control related code in backup modules
echo -e "\nChecking for permission checks:"
rg -B 2 -A 5 "permission|access|auth" supervisor/backups/

Length of output: 26723

Version compatibility is properly configured

The BACKUP_COMPLETE websocket event type is correctly set up with version compatibility in supervisor/homeassistant/websocket.py with minimum version "2024.11.99". This aligns with the cloud backup feature timeline and follows the same pattern as other backup-related events (BACKUP_START, BACKUP_END).

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check websocket event version compatibility setup
# Expected: Find MIN_VERSION entry for BACKUP_COMPLETE

# Search for version configuration
rg -A 2 "MIN_VERSION.*=.*{" | rg -A 5 "BACKUP_COMPLETE"

# Check for other backup-related websocket handlers
ast-grep --pattern 'async def $_(self, $$$):
    $$$
    WSType.BACKUP_COMPLETE
    $$$'

Length of output: 244

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for version configuration with fixed regex
rg "MIN_VERSION\s*=\s*\{" -A 5

# Search for BACKUP_COMPLETE usage in handlers
rg "BACKUP_COMPLETE" -B 2 -A 2

# Find all files that might contain version configurations
fd "const.py|version.py"

Length of output: 2295

Let me gather more specific information about the backup-related event patterns.

Standardize backup event naming pattern to maintain consistency

The verification confirms that existing backup events follow a simple two-level pattern (backup/start, backup/end), while the new event uses a three-level pattern (backup/supervisor/backup_complete). For consistency, the suggestion to use backup/complete is valid.

• supervisor/homeassistant/const.py: Change BACKUP_COMPLETE = "backup/supervisor/backup_complete" to BACKUP_COMPLETE = "backup/complete"

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check existing websocket event naming patterns
# Expected: Find consistent patterns across similar events

# Search for all defined websocket event types
rg 'WSType\.' | rg -v "class"

# Look for handler implementations using these events
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $$$
  WSType.$_ = "$_"
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 2006

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for backup event type definitions
rg -A 1 'class WSType' 

# Search for backup event constants and their values
rg 'BACKUP_\w+\s*=\s*"[^"]+"'

# Search for backup event usage in the codebase
rg '"backup/[^"]+"'

Length of output: 1758

Constant is properly used in the mount management system

The ATTR_USER_PATH constant is correctly integrated and used in the mount management system:

• Imported and used in supervisor/api/mounts.py to expose the container path information
• Used to serialize mount information by converting the container path to POSIX format
• Implementation aligns with its intended purpose for the cloud backup feature

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check where ATTR_USER_PATH is being used
rg "ATTR_USER_PATH" --type python

Length of output: 64

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ATTR_USER_PATH without file type restriction since rg doesn't recognize python
rg "ATTR_USER_PATH"

Length of output: 239

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the context of usage in mounts.py to understand how it's being used
rg "ATTR_USER_PATH" supervisor/api/mounts.py -B 5 -A 5

Length of output: 785

The new constant ATTR_LOCATIONS is properly integrated and used

The constant is correctly imported and used in supervisor/api/backups.py to expose backup locations in the API responses, which aligns with the PR's objective of supporting multiple backup locations. The usage appears in both detailed and summary backup information contexts, maintaining consistency across the API.

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check where ATTR_LOCATIONS is being used
rg "ATTR_LOCATIONS" --type python

Length of output: 64

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ATTR_LOCATIONS without file type restriction
rg "ATTR_LOCATIONS"

# Also search for potential imports of this constant
rg "from supervisor.api.const import.*ATTR_LOCATIONS|import.*ATTR_LOCATIONS"

Length of output: 489

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the context of usage in backups.py to ensure proper implementation
rg "ATTR_LOCATIONS" supervisor/api/backups.py -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 743

Paths have distinct usage patterns in the codebase

Based on the search results, these paths serve different purposes:

• PATH_HOMEASSISTANT_CONFIG_LEGACY is used specifically in addon.py for addon configuration mapping
• PATH_PUBLIC_CONFIG is used in both homeassistant.py and addon.py for general configuration access

The duplicate paths are intentional and used in different contexts, making the current implementation correct. No changes needed.

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of both config paths
echo "=== PATH_HOMEASSISTANT_CONFIG_LEGACY usage ==="
rg "PATH_HOMEASSISTANT_CONFIG_LEGACY" -A 2

echo "=== PATH_PUBLIC_CONFIG usage ==="
rg "PATH_PUBLIC_CONFIG" -A 2

Length of output: 1848

Let's gather more information about how these backup paths are used in the codebase.

This will help us understand:

1. How backup paths are used in mount configurations
2. The actual backup implementation's usage of these paths
3. Any security measures around these paths
4. Test cases that verify isolation

Let's check how these backup paths are used in mount configurations and backup operations to verify proper isolation.

This will help us understand:

1. How mount points are configured and managed
2. How backup paths are used in the backup system
3. Any security checks around these paths
4. Any potential path conflicts in mount configurations

Based on the analysis of the code, I can now provide a final response about the backup path isolation:

Backup paths are properly isolated and secured

The implementation shows proper isolation and security of backup paths through multiple layers:

1. Path Constants: The backup paths are defined as constants (PATH_BACKUP) and used consistently throughout the system.

2. Security Middleware: The security middleware (security.py) implements proper access control:

   • Only users with ROLE_BACKUP or higher (ROLE_MANAGER, ROLE_ADMIN) can access /backups.* endpoints
   • Path filtering prevents path traversal attacks
   • Token validation ensures only authorized access

3. Mount Management:

   • Backup mounts are handled through dedicated APIs
   • The mount system validates mount points before use
   • Default backup mount configuration is properly managed

4. Backup Implementation:

   • Backup operations use relative paths within their context (e.g., "./backup.json")
   • File operations are properly contained within their designated spaces

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any mount configurations using these paths
echo "=== Backup path mount configurations ==="
rg -A 5 "Mount\(.*(/backup|/cloud_backup)"

# Search for any existing backup path references
echo "=== Existing backup path references ==="
rg -l "/backup|/cloud_backup" --type py

Length of output: 652

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check mount configurations and usage in key files
echo "=== Mount configurations in test files ==="
rg -A 5 "Mount.*backup" tests/

echo "=== Backup path usage in supervisor/backups ==="
rg -A 5 "(/backup|/cloud_backup)" supervisor/backups/

echo "=== Mount configurations in supervisor ==="
rg -A 5 "Mount.*backup" supervisor/

echo "=== Security middleware checks ==="
cat supervisor/api/middleware/security.py

Length of output: 82315

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check mount configurations and usage
echo "=== Mount configurations in supervisor ==="
rg -A 5 "Mount.*(/backup|/cloud_backup)" supervisor/

echo "=== Backup path usage in mount manager ==="
rg -A 5 "(/backup|/cloud_backup)" supervisor/mounts/

echo "=== Backup path usage in backup manager ==="
rg -A 5 "(/backup|/cloud_backup)" supervisor/backups/

echo "=== Security checks for backup paths ==="
rg -A 5 "(/backup|/cloud_backup)" supervisor/api/middleware/

Length of output: 12240

Constant usage is consistent, but hardcoded paths still exist

The change to use PATH_PRIVATE_DATA.as_posix() is correctly implemented in the reviewed file. The constant is defined in supervisor/docker/const.py and used consistently in the few places where it's needed (audio.py and addon.py). However, there are still numerous hardcoded "/data" strings across the codebase, particularly in test files and frontend assets. Since these are primarily in test fixtures and compiled frontend assets, they don't impact the core functionality.

• supervisor/docker/const.py: Defines PATH_PRIVATE_DATA = PurePath("/data")
• Used correctly in:
  • supervisor/docker/audio.py
  • supervisor/docker/addon.py

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining hardcoded "/data" paths and verify PATH_PRIVATE_DATA usage

# Check for hardcoded "/data" paths in Python files
rg -l '"/data"' '**/*.py'

# Check PATH_PRIVATE_DATA usage
ast-grep --pattern 'PATH_PRIVATE_DATA.as_posix()'

Length of output: 314

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search without file pattern restriction
# Check for hardcoded "/data" paths
rg -l '/data'

# Check for PATH_PRIVATE_DATA usage without .as_posix()
ast-grep --pattern 'PATH_PRIVATE_DATA'

# Get content of files containing PATH_PRIVATE_DATA for better context
rg -A 2 'PATH_PRIVATE_DATA'

Length of output: 10155

Based on the gathered information from all the shell script executions, I can now provide a final response:

Mount paths are correctly initialized and managed.

The mount paths are properly handled through:

• Constants BACKUP_DATA and CORE_BACKUP_DATA defined in supervisor/config.py
• Path properties path_extern_backup and path_extern_core_backup in Config class
• Mount management through MountManager class with proper initialization and binding
• Docker mount configuration with correct source paths and propagation modes

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for mount path initialization in CoreSys configuration

# Search for path initialization in CoreSys
echo "Searching for backup path initialization..."
rg -A 5 "path_extern_backup|path_extern_core_backup"

# Search for path creation
echo "Searching for backup path creation..."
rg -A 5 "mkdir.*backup"

Length of output: 3804

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the initialization of these paths by looking at the CoreSys setup

# Check for BACKUP_DATA and CORE_BACKUP_DATA constants
echo "Checking backup path constants..."
rg -p "BACKUP_DATA.*=|CORE_BACKUP_DATA.*="

# Check for path creation in CoreSys initialization
echo "Checking CoreSys initialization..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class CoreSys:
  $$$
  def __init__($$$):
    $$$'

# Check for path setup in Config class
echo "Checking Config class initialization..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class Config:
  $$$
  def __init__($$$):
    $$$'

Length of output: 31771

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Config class implementation and path setup

# Check Config class implementation
echo "Checking Config class implementation..."
rg -p "class Config.*" -A 10

# Check for path creation or setup in the codebase
echo "Checking path creation and setup..."
rg -p "def setup.*|async def setup.*" -A 10 supervisor/

# Check for mount initialization
echo "Checking mount initialization..."
rg -p "def _init_mount.*|async def _init_mount.*" -A 10

Length of output: 24123

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for mount path creation and initialization

# Check for mount manager initialization
echo "Checking mount manager initialization..."
rg -p "class MountManager" -A 20

# Check for directory creation
echo "Checking directory creation..."
rg -p "makedirs.*backup|mkdir.*backup" -A 5

# Check for mount setup in supervisor startup
echo "Checking supervisor startup mount setup..."
rg -p "async def start" -A 20 supervisor/supervisor.py

Length of output: 1175

Constant usage is consistent across the codebase

The verification shows that:

• No instances of the old misspelled constant ATTR_LOCATON exist
• All usages of ATTR_LOCATION are consistent, defined in supervisor/const.py and used appropriately across the codebase
• Related constants like ATTR_LOCATIONS are properly differentiated

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of the old constant name and verify the new one's usage

# Check for any remaining instances of the old misspelled constant
echo "Checking for any remaining ATTR_LOCATON instances..."
rg "ATTR_LOCATON"

# Check usage patterns of the corrected constant
echo "Verifying ATTR_LOCATION usage patterns..."
rg "ATTR_LOCATION"

Length of output: 2057

Let me verify the backup paths consistency by searching for more usages of these paths in the codebase.

Based on the search results, I can verify that the backup paths are consistently defined and used across the codebase:

1. The constants are defined in supervisor/docker/const.py:

PATH_BACKUP = PurePath("/backup")
PATH_CLOUD_BACKUP = PurePath("/cloud_backup")

2. The configuration paths are defined in supervisor/config.py:

BACKUP_DATA = PurePath("backup")
CORE_BACKUP_DATA = PurePath("core/backup")

3. These paths are consistently used in:

• supervisor/docker/homeassistant.py (mount points)
• supervisor/docker/addon.py (addon mounts)
• supervisor/backups/backup.py (backup operations)
• supervisor/mounts/mount.py (mount handling)
• supervisor/mounts/manager.py (mount management)

The mount paths in the code under review correctly use the defined constants and align with the paths used throughout the backup-related code.

Backup path configuration is consistent across the codebase

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of backup paths in the codebase
rg -A 2 "path_extern_backup|path_extern_core_backup"

# Search for potential hardcoded backup paths that should use the new constants
rg -A 2 "/backup/|/\.cloud_backup/"

Length of output: 133257

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for backup path constants and their usages
rg -A 2 "PATH_BACKUP|PATH_CLOUD_BACKUP"

# Search for backup path configurations
rg -A 2 "BACKUP_DATA|CORE_BACKUP_DATA"

Length of output: 24576

Let me gather more information about directory initialization.

Let me search for directory verification before mounting.

Verification of backup directory is properly handled

The implementation is correct as directory verification is handled at multiple levels:

1. In supervisor/mounts/mount.py, the mount system verifies and creates directories before mounting:

if not self.local_where.exists():
    self.local_where.mkdir(parents=True)
elif not self.local_where.is_dir():
    raise MountInvalidError(...)

2. The backup directory path is derived from path_extern_backup which is initialized during system bootstrap along with other core directories, as seen in the test fixtures.

3. The mount manager includes additional safety checks before binding mounts.

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for backup directory initialization in the codebase
# Look for where path_extern_backup is created/initialized

# Search for path_extern_backup references
rg "path_extern_backup" -B 2 -A 2

# Search for backup directory creation patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'mkdir($$$backup$$$)'

Length of output: 1951

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for directory creation/initialization patterns in the codebase
# Look for mkdir, exists_ok, Path.mkdir, etc.

# Search for directory creation patterns
rg -B 3 -A 3 "mkdir\(|exists_ok|makedirs"

# Search specifically for backup directory setup
rg -B 3 -A 3 "BACKUP_DATA|backup.*directory"

Length of output: 63595

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for mount verification and directory checks
rg -B 3 -A 3 "is_dir|exists|mkdir" supervisor/mounts/

Length of output: 4071

Path creation is properly handled in the bootstrap process

The verification shows that path_core_backup is correctly initialized during system bootstrap, with appropriate logging and error handling:

# Core backup folder
if not config.path_core_backup.is_dir():
    _LOGGER.debug("Creating Core backup folder at '%s", config.path_core_backup)
    config.path_core_backup.mkdir(parents=True)

The implementation follows the same pattern as other critical system paths and includes proper directory creation with the parents=True flag for reliability.

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new backup paths are created during initialization

# Search for path creation patterns in bootstrap-related files
rg -A 5 "mkdir|create_dir|exists" supervisor/bootstrap.py

Length of output: 4164

The spelling correction is safe and all references are using the correct spelling

The verification shows that:

• No instances of the misspelled ATTR_LOCATON exist in the codebase
• All references use the correct spelling ATTR_LOCATION
• The constant is properly imported and used across multiple files in the supervisor module

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of the misspelled constant
# and verify all references are updated.

echo "Checking for any remaining instances of the misspelled constant..."
rg "ATTR_LOCATON"

echo "Verifying usage of the corrected constant..."
rg "ATTR_LOCATION"

Length of output: 2091

The mount path mapping implementation is correctly verified

The verification confirms:

• All PATH constants (PATH_BACKUP, PATH_MEDIA, PATH_SHARE) are properly defined in supervisor/docker/const.py
• These paths are consistently used across the codebase:
  • In mount path resolution (supervisor/mounts/mount.py)
  • In Docker container configurations for Home Assistant (supervisor/docker/homeassistant.py)
  • In addon configurations (supervisor/docker/addon.py)
  • In backup operations (supervisor/backups/backup.py)

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify PATH constants are correctly defined

# Check the imported PATH constants
rg "PATH_(BACKUP|MEDIA|SHARE)\s*=" supervisor/docker/const.py

# Verify these paths are used consistently across the codebase
rg "PATH_(BACKUP|MEDIA|SHARE)" -A 3

Length of output: 4674

Python version compatibility is verified

The project requires Python 3.12.0 or newer as specified in pyproject.toml. Pattern matching (match statement) was introduced in Python 3.10, so the implementation is compatible with the project's minimum Python version requirement.

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Python version requirement in project configuration

# Check for Python version specification in setup.py or pyproject.toml
fd -e toml -e py -x grep -l "python" {} \; | xargs cat

# Check actual Python version used in CI
fd "workflow|action" .github/workflows -x grep -l "python" {} \; | xargs cat

Length of output: 69670

Path configuration for cloud backup is correctly implemented

The path_core_backup directory creation aligns perfectly with the cloud backup implementation:

• The path is defined as core/backup in the supervisor config
• It's properly mapped to /cloud_backup in Docker context
• The location constant .cloud_backup is correctly referenced in the backup manager
• The directory creation in the test fixture mirrors the production bootstrap process

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the cloud backup directory path configuration
# Expected: Find the path configuration in supervisor config
ast-grep --pattern 'path_core_backup = $_'

Length of output: 44

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for backup path configurations
rg -l "path.*backup" --type py

# Then look for specific path configurations
rg "path_core_backup" --type py -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 3302

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the cloud backup location constant definition
rg "CORE_BACKUP_DATA|PATH_CLOUD_BACKUP" --type py -A 1 -B 1

# And check for any other related constants
rg "LOCATION_CLOUD_BACKUP.*=" --type py -A 1 -B 1

Length of output: 1889

RSLAVE propagation mode for backup mount is consistent with system design

The RSLAVE propagation mode for backup mounts is intentional and consistent across the codebase:

• Home Assistant container uses RSLAVE for all its mounts including backup (supervisor/docker/homeassistant.py)
• All add-on mounts (backup, share, media) consistently use RSLAVE propagation (supervisor/docker/addon.py)
• The propagation mode is required to ensure proper mount event propagation between host and containers for backup functionality, especially when dealing with network mounts and cloud backups

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if any other add-ons use different propagation modes for backup mounts
ast-grep --pattern 'Mount(
  $$$
  source=$_,
  target=$_,
  $$$
  propagation=$_
  $$$
)'

Length of output: 92

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for mount configurations and propagation modes in the codebase
rg -A 5 "propagation.*=" --type py

# Also check for any Mount class usage patterns
rg -A 10 "class.*Mount" --type py

# Look for backup-related mount configurations
rg -A 5 "PATH_BACKUP|MappingType.BACKUP" --type py

Length of output: 19760