-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
py/objtype: Add __dict__ attribute for class objects. #5324
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | ||
|
||
class Foo: | ||
a = 1 | ||
b = "bar" | ||
|
||
if not hasattr(Foo, "__dict__"): | ||
print("SKIP") | ||
raise SystemExit | ||
|
||
print(Foo.__dict__ == {'a': 1, 'b': 'bar'}) |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you please put these changes to the instance
__dict__
lookup into a separate commit?@stinos as the original author of this code, what are your thoughts on this change? In particular do you think it's a good idea to set
is_fixed=1
to prevent modification of the returned dict (and so prevent subtle errors when the user tries to change the dict and expects those changes to be mirrored in the instance, which they are not)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would be my preference to reduce chances of things being misused yes. And looking at the original discussion in #1757, I actually wanted it to be like that but that wasn't possible back then.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, so let's keep the
is_fixed=1
part, to make the returned dict R/O. It will be a breaking change though, if users are relying on the dict being modifiable (eg because they know it's not reflected in the instance but they want anyway to reuse the dict for something else). But it'll fail pretty quickly now if someone is doing this and they can fix their code by simply doingd = dict(my_type.__dict__)