-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Urequests updates #500
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Urequests updates #500
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5854ae1
urequests: Add ability to parse response headers.
pfalcon 924c207
urequests: Explicitly add "Connection: close" to request headers.
pfalcon 32eb7bc
urequests: Fix raising unsupported Transfer-Encoding exception.
andrewleech b4a3329
urequests: Added Basic Authentication support.
82a2afb
binascii: newline param in function b2a_base64
diefesson 1b8507d
urequests: Add support for requests with chunked upload data.
diefesson 5f48288
urequests: Added support for redirects.
diefesson b07b2f4
urequests: Always open sockets in SOCK_STREAM mode.
karfas fa9c852
urequests: Provide error message when server doesn't respond with val…
pi-anl c7e90c4
urequests: Add timeout, passed to underlying socket if supported.
be094ae
urequests: Release 0.7.0.
pi-anl File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ | ||
srctype = micropython-lib | ||
type = module | ||
version = 0.6 | ||
author = Paul Sokolovsky | ||
version = 0.7.0 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change doesn't seem to have anything to do with urequests, but otherwise it's OK to have here (it's a separate commit, which is good).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I'd thought it was related - was in the same original PR as the redirect/chunked change. Can confirm it was not actually used there, though looks like a clean change anyway.