gh-132898: Add a note in multiprocessing.Process docs about creating a process in a REPL session
#137118
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks! I took this and started looking around the docs to tie things together. reworded now, with cross references. |
…rocess description.
83344ec to
b9773c7
Compare
gpshead
approved these changes
Jul 27, 2025
multiprocessing.Process class documentation about how creating a process in a REPL sessionmultiprocessing.Process docs about creating a process in a REPL session
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2025
…reating a process in a REPL (pythonGH-137118) * Reword, expand, and clarify the limitation, highlighting the REPL case. * Mention in the high level Process description. * added a pointer to the GH issue from the doc note --------- (cherry picked from commit 4e40f2bea7edfa5ba7e2e0e6159d9da9dfe4aa97) Co-authored-by: Duprat <yduprat@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2025
…reating a process in a REPL (pythonGH-137118) * Reword, expand, and clarify the limitation, highlighting the REPL case. * Mention in the high level Process description. * added a pointer to the GH issue from the doc note --------- (cherry picked from commit 4e40f2b) Co-authored-by: Duprat <yduprat@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
|
GH-137154 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch. |
|
GH-137155 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
gpshead
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2025
…creating a process in a REPL (GH-137118) (#137155) gh-132898: Add a note in `multiprocessing.Process` docs about creating a process in a REPL (GH-137118) * Reword, expand, and clarify the limitation, highlighting the REPL case. * Mention in the high level Process description. * added a pointer to the GH issue from the doc note --------- (cherry picked from commit 4e40f2b) Co-authored-by: Duprat <yduprat@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This note explains the implications between the location of the function or callable object passed to the
targetargument and the selected start method when you create a newProcessobject in a REPL session.I wonder if I have to add a reference to the issue at end of the note..
This should be backport to: 3.14
__mp_main__has no attributeis_primeinProcessPoolExecutorexample #132898📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--137118.org.readthedocs.build/