-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.5k
gh-137308: Replace a single docstring with pass
#137318
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core_and_Builtins/2025-08-02-10-27-53.gh-issue-137308.at05p_.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very sorry for blowing up the test file but I think it's good if we have a strong way to detect future regressions :)
Thanks @sobolevn for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.14. |
…pythonGH-137318) This is required so we would never have empty node bodies. Refs pythonGH-130087 (cherry picked from commit b74f3bed51378896f2c7c720e505e87373e68c79) Co-authored-by: sobolevn <mail@sobolevn.me>
GH-137322 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch. |
Refs #130087
compile
fails on 3.14 on a valid expression when-OO
is set #137308