bpo-33810: Remove unused code from datetime.py. #7549
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Since implementation of bpo-25283, the objects returned by time.localtime always have tm_zone and tm_gmtoff attributes. Remove code that anticipates their absence.
3 tasks
serhiy-storchaka
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2025
Pranjal095
pushed a commit
to Pranjal095/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2025
It should have been removed in PR python#7549 (bcb032e).
taegyunkim
pushed a commit
to taegyunkim/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 4, 2025
It should have been removed in PR python#7549 (bcb032e).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes bpo-33810.
Since implementation of bpo-25283, the objects returned by time.localtime
always have tm_zone and tm_gmtoff attributes. Remove code that
anticipates their absence.
https://bugs.python.org/issue33810