-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
Labels
app: operatorConcerns the OperatorConcerns the Operatorpriority: highIndicates a high priority issueIndicates a high priority issuetype: bugSomething isn't workingSomething isn't workingweight: 1An issue that has a very low development impactAn issue that has a very low development impact
Milestone
Description
I tried this:
Assigned a workflow to a specific operator using the synapse.io/operator
label
This happened:
A random operator, not necessarily the one specified by the synapse.io/operator
label, claimed and executed the workflow. The label was ignored, and the assignment was not respected.
I expected this:
Only the operator matching the synapse.io/operator
label to claim and execute the workflow, while all others ignore it.
Is there a workaround?
No response
Anything else?
This is similar to what happened with #515, but with workflows instead of their instances.
Platform(s)
No response
Community Notes
- Please vote by adding a 👍 reaction to the issue to help us prioritize.
- If you are interested to work on this issue, please leave a comment.name: Bug Report 🐞
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
app: operatorConcerns the OperatorConcerns the Operatorpriority: highIndicates a high priority issueIndicates a high priority issuetype: bugSomething isn't workingSomething isn't workingweight: 1An issue that has a very low development impactAn issue that has a very low development impact
Type
Projects
Status
Done