Skip to content

[Security] make:security:custom #19809

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2025

Conversation

jrushlow
Copy link
Contributor

@jrushlow jrushlow commented Apr 21, 2024

Since MakerBundle v1.59.0 - you can call make:security:custom to generate a simple, no-frills, custom authenticator based off the example in the docs.

Since MakerBundle `v1.59.0` - you can call `make:security:custom` to generate a simple, no-frills, custom authenticator based off the example in the docs.
@carsonbot carsonbot added this to the 6.4 milestone Apr 21, 2024
@carsonbot carsonbot changed the title [security] make:security:custom [Security] make:security:custom Apr 21, 2024
Comment on lines +8 to +9
cases, you can use the ``make:security:custom`` command to create your own
authenticator.
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jrushlow jrushlow Apr 21, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm.. we reference the make:* command in the doctrine section like I have here.. But we use the code-block "syntax" else where in the doc's..

.. code-block:: terminal
I'm thinking we should make this a code block here?

Sidenote - I should probably change the

You can use the ``make:entity`` command to create this class and any fields you
reference to a "code-block" style as well for consistency. Thoughts?

Copy link
Member

@javiereguiluz javiereguiluz Apr 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I think the terminal code block would be better because it stands out a lot and it's easier to scan for readers. Thanks!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did this change while merging, so we now use a terminal code block.

@javiereguiluz
Copy link
Member

Merged. Thanks Jesse!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy