Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Intraoperative navigation in hip surface arthroplasty: a radiographic comparative analysis study

  • Orthopaedic Outcome Assessment
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The goal of the current prospective randomised radiological study was to determine the accuracy of conventional and computer-assisted femoral component implantation in surface arthroplasty (SRA).

Methods

We analysed on standard radiographs the femoral component positions after 30 conventional instrumented (Group 1) and 30 navigated (Group 2) SRA femoral components. We evaluated: varus or valgus orientation, horizontal femoral offset and translation of the component.

Results

The tendency to implant the femoral component in mild valgus position (2.8° in Group 1 compared to 2.1° in Group 2), more distally and ventrally in the femoral neck (in Group 1) and with femoral off-set increase (4.8 mm in Group 1 compared to 3.4 mm in Group 2) was found.

Conclusions

The navigation system enables a more accurate insertion of the femoral component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Duff ML (2004) Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 86A:1874–1877

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Winzenrieth R, Plamondon D, Nuno N (2006) Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty. Hip Int 16(Suppl):106

    Google Scholar 

  3. Itayem R, Arndt A, Nistor L, McMinn D, Lundberg A (2005) Stability of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty at two years. A radiostereophotogrammetric analysis study. J Bone Joint Surg 87B:158–162

    Google Scholar 

  4. Glyn-Jones S, Gill HS, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW (2004) Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 86B:172–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW (2003) Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 86B:177–184

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF (2002) Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg 84A:1788–1792

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kishida Y, Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yamaguchi K, Yoshikawa H (2004) Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 86B:185–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Silva M, Lee KH, Heisel Ch, delaRosa MA, Schmalzried TP (2004) The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 86A:40–46

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bogoch ER, Fornasier VL, Capello WN (1982) The femoral head remnant in resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 167:92–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ito K, Minka MA, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R (2001) Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg 83B:171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of the anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg 84B:556–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T, Ganz R, Leunig M (2006) Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop 445:181–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. D´Lima DD, Chen PC, Colwell CW Jr (2001) Optimizing acetabular component position to minimize impingement and reduce contact stress. J Bone Joint Surg 83A:87–91

    Google Scholar 

  14. Berry DJ (1999) Dislocation. In: Steinberg ME, Garino JP (eds) Revision total hip arthroplasty. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 463–481

    Google Scholar 

  15. Beaulé PE, Lee JL, LeDuff MJ, Amstutz HC, Ebramzadeh E (2004) Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 86A:2015–2021

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bernsmann K, Langlotz U, Ansari B, Wiese M (2000) Computer assisted navigated cup placement in hip arthroplasty—application study in clinical routine. Z Orthop 138:515–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M, Simon DA, Morgan F, Moody JE, Nikou C, Colgan BD, Aston CA, Labarca RS, Kischell E, Kanade T (1998) The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively actabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop 355:8–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haaker R, Tiedjen K, Rubenthaler F, Stockheim M (2003) Computer assisted navigated cup placement in primary and secondary dysplastic hips. Z Orthop 141:105–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM, Blackwell M, Nikou C (1998) Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 354:70–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kiefer H (2003) OrthoPilot cup navigation—how to optimise cup positioning? Int Orthop 27(S1):S37–S42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ottersbach A, Haaker R (2005) Optimization of cup positioning in THA—comparison between conventional mechanical instrumentation and computer-assisted implanted cups by using the OrthoPilot navigation system. Z Orthop 143:611–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Saxler G, Marx A, Vabndervelde D (2004) A comparison of free-hand and computer assisted cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Z Orthop 142:286–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Štipčák V, Stoklas J, Hart R, Janeček M (2004) Implantation of a non-cemented acetabulum with the use of a navigation system. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 71:288–291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Richolt JA, Rittmeister ME (2006) Misinterpretation of the anteversion in computer-assisted acetabular cup navigation as a result of a simplified palpation method of the frontal pelvic plane. An untrasonographic assessment. Z Orthop 144:305–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Štipčák V, Hart R, Kučera B (2006) Our experience with an image guided navigation system for accurate alignment in total hip replacement by minimally invasive posterolateral surgery. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 73:350–352

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hess T, Gampe T, Köttgen C, Szawlowski B (2004) Intraoperative navigation for hip resurfacing. Methods and first results. Orthopade 33:1183–1193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Kalteis T, Grifka J (2007) Comparison of fluoroscopic and landmark-based technique with the Vector-Vision system. In: Stiehl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, DiGioia AM (eds) Navigation and MIS in orthopedic surgery. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 359–364

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Chandler M, Kowalski RSZ, Watkins ND, Briscoe A, New AMR (2006) Cementing techniques in hip resurfacing. Proc IMechE 220(part H):321–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Siebel T, Maubach S, Morlock MM (2006) Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR® hip resurfacing implantations. Proc IMechE 220(part H):345–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, General Hospital Znojmo, 11 Dr. Jana Janského, 669 02, Znojmo, Czech Republic

    Radek Hart, Pavel Šváb & Peter Filan

Authors
  1. Radek Hart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pavel Šváb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter Filan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radek Hart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hart, R., Šváb, P. & Filan, P. Intraoperative navigation in hip surface arthroplasty: a radiographic comparative analysis study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128, 429–434 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0540-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0540-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy