skip to main content
10.1145/3209281.3209370acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An instrument for evaluating open data portals: a case study in Brazilian cities

Published: 30 May 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Open data portals are fundamental tools for governments to achieve public transparency. Hence, several countries around the world have issued Freedom of Information (FOI) laws and acts, imposing that city administrations develop their own open data portals to publish local open data. However, many cities, specially in developing countries, lack the financial resources even to invest in basic IT services. These cities quite often do not have qualified people in open data best practices, transparency and IT solutions for constructing these portals, specially the middle and small-sized ones. There are many works pointing out guidelines and general problems in open data portals. However, there is a lack of an unified instrument for evaluating and suggesting good practices in constructing open data portals considering both open data portal requirements and FOI access laws and acts. In this work, we propose an instrument for evaluating open data portals that gathers functionalities present in platforms that support open data portals construction and recommendations from FOI access law. Specifically, we used recommendations from Brazilian Information Access Law, as it is an instance of FOI access recommendation. We evaluated and validated our instrument assessing portals of 26 Brazilian cities. Our case study shows that the instrument is effective for showing many problems in these portals, and also reveals the current scenario in these cities.

References

[1]
Article 19. 2017. Article 19: About Us. (2017). Available at https://www.article19.org/about-us/annual-report/.
[2]
Brazilian Federal Government. 2004. Presidential decree N. 5.296, of 2nd November, 2004. (2004). Available at http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2004-2006/2004/Decreto/D5296.htm (in Portuguese).
[3]
Brazilian Federal Government. 2009. Complementary Law N. 131, of 27th May, 2009. (2009). Available at http://www.planalto.gov.br/CCivil_03/leis/LCP/Lcp131.htm (in Portuguese).
[4]
Brazilian Federal Government. 2011. Law N. 12.527, of 18th November, 2011. (2011). Available at http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2011/lei/l12527.htm (in Portuguese).
[5]
Karin Breitman, Jose Viterbo, Percy Salas, Daniel Saraiva, Vinicius Gama, Marco Antonio Casanova, Regis Pires Magalhaes, Miriam Chaves, and Ednylton Franzosi. 2012. Open Government Data in Brazil. IEEE Intelligent Systems 3, 27 (2012), 45--49.
[6]
CKAN. 2017. Online Documentation. (2017). Available at https://ckan.org/ documentation-and-api/.
[7]
Walter Gonçalino da Silva Cruz, Cristiano Maciel, Fernando BM de Castilho, and Natalina Namie Hirata Girata. 2016. A Method of Inspecting and Applying Open Government Data in the Auditing Courts of Brazilian States. In International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective. Springer, 261--275.
[8]
D. Eaves. 2009. The Three Laws of Open Government Data. (2009). Available at http://eaves.ca/2009/09/30/three-law-of-open-government-data/.
[9]
Joint Declaration. 2004. International Mechanisms for Promoting Freedom of Expression. (2004). Joint Declaration from the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media and the OAS Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression. Available at http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/expression/showarticle.asp?artID=319&IID=1.
[10]
LIBRE. 2013. LIBRE documentation. (2013). Available at https://libre.readthedocs.io/en/latest/.
[11]
H. Lindén and J. Strale. 2014. An evaluation of platforms for open government data. (2014). Degree Project in Computer Engineering. KTH --- School of Technology and Health, Sweden.
[12]
R. Machado, J. Viterbo, C. Cappelli, D. Trevisan, and C. Maciel. 2015. Evaluating Brazilian Law of Information Access in Cities of Rio de Janeiro State. In Workshop of Transparency in Systems (WTRANS). In Portuguese.
[13]
R. Máchová and M. Lněnička. 2017. Evaluating the Quality of Open Data Portals on the National Level. J. THeoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 12, 1 (2017), 21--41.
[14]
R. Matheus and M.M. Ribeiro. 2014. Case Study --- Open Government Data in Rio de Janeiro City. (2014). Technical Report. Available at https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/55360/IDL-55360.pdf?sequence=1.
[15]
Matrix Group International. 2018. freedominfo.org: About Us. (2018). Available at http://www.freedominfo.org/about-us/.
[16]
T. Mendel. 2008. Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey. UNESCO. Available at http://www.foia.it/docs/foia-it_doc006.pdf.
[17]
Greg Michener. 2011. FOI laws around the world. Journal of Democracy 22, 2 (2011), 145--159.
[18]
OECD. 1961. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1961). Available at http://www.oecd.org.
[19]
OGDI-DataLab. 2014. OGDI-DataLab. (2014). Available at https://github.com/openlab/OGDI-DataLab.
[20]
OpenDataSoft. 2016. Welcome to OpenDataSoft documentation! (2016). Available at http://docs.opendatasoft.com/en/.
[21]
E. Osagie, M. Waqar, S. Adebayo, A. Stasiewicz, L. Porwol, and A. Ojo. 2017. Usability Evaluation of an Open Data Platform. In dg.o'17 --- Proc. 18th Annual Int. Conf. Digital Government Research. ACM, New York.
[22]
G.V. Pereira, M.A. Macadar, E.M. Luciano, and M.G. Testa. 2017. Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City context. Information Systems Frontier 19 (2017), 213--229.
[23]
Socrata Inc. 2017. Online Documentation. (2017). Available at http://docs.socratadiscovery.apiary.io/#.
[24]
Socrata Inc. 2017. Socrata Support. (2017). Available at https://support.socrata.com/.
[25]
United Nations - Commission on Human Rights. 2003. Civil and political rights, including the question of freedom of expression: The right to freedom of opinion and expression. (2003). Report of the Special Rapporteur, Ambeyi Ligabo, submitted in accordance with Commission resolution 2003/42. Available at https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G03/171/69/PDF/G0317169.pdf?OpenElement.
[26]
G. Wilke and E. Portmann. 2016. Granular computing as a basis of human-data interaction: a cognitive cities use case. Granular Computing 1, 3 (2016), 181--197.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A new perspective for longitudinal measurement and analysis of public education in Brazil based on open data and machine learningProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance10.1145/3680127.3680216(130-138)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Hacia la madurez de los portales de datos públicos abiertos en el sector público. Un análisis comparado del nivel local de gobierno en EspañaTowards the Maturity of Open Public Data Portals in the Public Sector. A Comparative Analysis of the Local Level of Government in SpainRevista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia10.69733/clad.ryd.n85.a233(117-160)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • (2023)What do data portals do? Tracing the politics of online devices for making data publicData & Policy10.1017/dap.2023.75Online publication date: 30-Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

dg.o '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age
May 2018
889 pages
ISBN:9781450365260
DOI:10.1145/3209281
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 May 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. open data portals evaluation
  2. open government data
  3. transparency
  4. urban data

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • CAPES Brazilian Ministry of Education

Conference

dg.o '18

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 23 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A new perspective for longitudinal measurement and analysis of public education in Brazil based on open data and machine learningProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance10.1145/3680127.3680216(130-138)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Hacia la madurez de los portales de datos públicos abiertos en el sector público. Un análisis comparado del nivel local de gobierno en EspañaTowards the Maturity of Open Public Data Portals in the Public Sector. A Comparative Analysis of the Local Level of Government in SpainRevista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia10.69733/clad.ryd.n85.a233(117-160)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • (2023)What do data portals do? Tracing the politics of online devices for making data publicData & Policy10.1017/dap.2023.75Online publication date: 30-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Verifying Open Data Portals Completeness in Compliance to a Grounding FrameworkElectronic Government10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_16(246-261)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Towards the Evaluation and Continuous Evolution of Open Government Data Portals: A Framework ProposalInformation Technology and Systems10.1007/978-3-031-33261-6_21(243-254)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2023
  • (2022)A New Approach for Assessing Metadata Completeness in Open Data PortalsInternational Journal of Electronic Government Research10.4018/IJEGR.31363618:1(1-20)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2022)A Review of Digital Era Governance Research in the First Two Decades: A Bibliometric StudyFuture Internet10.3390/fi1405012614:5(126)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2022
  • (2022)Unified vocabulary in Official Gazettes: An exploratory study on procurement dataProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance10.1145/3560107.3560301(195-202)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Assessing the Quality of Covid-19 Open Data PortalsElectronic Government10.1007/978-3-031-15086-9_14(212-227)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2022
  • (2021)Transparencia pública: análisis de su evolución y aportes para el desarrollo del gobierno abiertoInnovar10.15446/innovar.v32n83.9988432:83Online publication date: 1-Nov-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy