Scribd
Upload
130 views1 page

Probation Evaluation

This probation evaluation assesses an employee's performance over their probation period across 16 criteria on a scale of outstanding, good, average, below average, and unsatisfactory. The employee received ratings of B for most criteria, with one C rating for adaptability to changes. Areas for improvement identified were training that may be needed or requested. The evaluator, department head, HR manager, and director of timeshare all signed off on confirming the employee's position after the probation period.

Uploaded by

Duong Le Thuy
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
130 views1 page

Probation Evaluation

This probation evaluation assesses an employee's performance over their probation period across 16 criteria on a scale of outstanding, good, average, below average, and unsatisfactory. The employee received ratings of B for most criteria, with one C rating for adaptability to changes. Areas for improvement identified were training that may be needed or requested. The evaluator, department head, HR manager, and director of timeshare all signed off on confirming the employee's position after the probation period.

Uploaded by

Duong Le Thuy
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

PROBATION EVALUATION

NAME PROBATION PERIOD POSITION DEPARTMENT


A) B) C) D) E) Outstanding Good Average Below Average Unsatisfactory : : : : :

From:
Performance was consistently and considerably above job requirements. Performance was competent and satisfactory. Performance sustained over the period on average to the job requirements. Performance was less than fully acceptable in some areas. Some targets were not achieved and definite need for improvement. Performance was inadequate and unacceptable.

No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6

Criteria
Job Knowledge Job Efficiency Working Attitude Co-operation & Team work Guest Courtesy Grooming Standard Adherence to the Resort / Department policy Adaptability to Changes For Supervisory Level Organization Ability Communication Skills Training Skills Delegation Skills Creativeness Management Experience OVERALL RATING

Remarks

Further Comments Areas that need improvement or development Training that need or requests After Evaluation Confirm Position Extend Probation Unit Discontinue Service Proposed change in position

Evaluator

Department Head

H R Manager

Director Of Timeshare

Date:

Date:

Date:

Date:

NVBHC/HR/SEVALUATION-PROPER FORM 16

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy