0% found this document useful (0 votes)
97 views1 page

Weather Project Rubric

The document is a rubric for evaluating weather posters created by students. It evaluates the posters on four criteria: content, conventions, organization, and presentation. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to define levels of performance from exemplary to poor. The highest level earns 4 points and describes posters that have well-thought-out, accurate content from varied sources and no errors. The lowest level earns 1 point and describes posters with factually incorrect, inconsistent content from no sources and multiple errors.

Uploaded by

api-298773979
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
97 views1 page

Weather Project Rubric

The document is a rubric for evaluating weather posters created by students. It evaluates the posters on four criteria: content, conventions, organization, and presentation. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to define levels of performance from exemplary to poor. The highest level earns 4 points and describes posters that have well-thought-out, accurate content from varied sources and no errors. The lowest level earns 1 point and describes posters with factually incorrect, inconsistent content from no sources and multiple errors.

Uploaded by

api-298773979
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Teacher: Ms.

Schultz

Students Names:

Score

Weather Poster Rubric


Content

Conventions

Is well thought out and relates to


the topic

No spelling, grammatical, or
punctuation errors

High-level use of vocabulary


and word choice

Has clear goal that is related to


the topic

Is pulled from a variety of sources

Is accurate

Is well thought out and is mostly


related to the topic

Has clear goal that is related to


the topic

Is pulled from several sources

Is accurate

Rarely is related to the topic

Has no clear goal

Is pulled from a limited number of

sources

Has some factual errors or


inconsistencies

Provides inconsistent information


that is not related to the topic

Has no clear goal

Is pulled from no sources

Has significant factual errors,


misconceptions, or
misinterpretations

Few (1 to 3) spelling,
grammatical, or punctuation
errors
Good use of vocabulary and
word choice

Minimal (3 to 5) spelling,
grammatical, or punctuation
errors
Low-level use of vocabulary
and word choice

More than 5 spelling,


grammatical, or punctuation
errors
Poor use of vocabulary and
word choice

Organization

Information is clearly focused in


an organized and thoughtful
manner

Presentation

Format enhances the content

Presentation captures audience


attention

Information is constructed in a

logical pattern to support the topic

Information is organized in
meaningful way

Information supports the the topic


and is easy to understand

Project has a focus but might stray


from it at times

Information appears to have a


pattern, but the pattern is not

consistently carried out in the


project

Presentation is organized and well


laid out

Format is appropriate for the


content
Presentation captures audience
attention
Presentation is well organized

Format does not suit the content


Presentation does not capture
audience attention
Presentation is loosely organized

Information loosely supports the


topic

Content is unfocused and hard to


understand

Presentation appears sloppy and/or


unfinished

Information does not support the


topic

Information has no apparent


categories

Format does not enhance content

Presentation has no clear


organization

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy