Scribd
Upload
294 views2 pages

Case Presentation Evaluation Tool

The document is a case presentation evaluation checklist used by the University of the Philippines Manila School of Health Sciences Extension Campus in South Cotabato. It contains criteria for evaluating individual group members and the overall group on their oral presentation, the context and message of the study, and any exhibits or audiovisual aids used. Group members are rated on their mastery of content, ability to answer questions intelligently, command of language, and receptiveness to questions. The group is also rated on the context and message conveyed as well as the design, relevance, and cost of any materials used for visual aids.

Uploaded by

Charlie Cotoner Falguera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
294 views2 pages

Case Presentation Evaluation Tool

The document is a case presentation evaluation checklist used by the University of the Philippines Manila School of Health Sciences Extension Campus in South Cotabato. It contains criteria for evaluating individual group members and the overall group on their oral presentation, the context and message of the study, and any exhibits or audiovisual aids used. Group members are rated on their mastery of content, ability to answer questions intelligently, command of language, and receptiveness to questions. The group is also rated on the context and message conveyed as well as the design, relevance, and cost of any materials used for visual aids.

Uploaded by

Charlie Cotoner Falguera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

University of the Philippines Manila

School of Health Sciences


Extension Campus in South Cotabato
CASE PRESENTATION EVALUATION CHECKLIST
Year/Section/Group No.: __________________________ Date: _________________________
Case/Diagnosis:
______________________________________________________________________
Concept Covered:
____________________________________________________________________

Criteria for Individual


Rating
I. Oral Presentation (45%)
Mastery of content
Answer questions
intelligently
Good command of
language
Receptive &
commendable
attitude to questions
asked

Group Members

Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

Group Rating
II.
Context/Message of the Study
(45%)
III.
Exhibits Audio visual Aids
(10%)
Paradigmatic structure &
relevance of these resources
to the subject
matter/theme/activity.
Artistic design& presentation.
Materials used are reasonable
and inexpensive but worthy of
the theme/design/activity.

Score

Remarks

Recommendation:
_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________
Evaluator

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy