The Four-Color Problem: Concept and Solution: Steven G. Krantz
The Four-Color Problem: Concept and Solution: Steven G. Krantz
Steven G. Krantz
Steven G. Krantz
Steven G. Krantz
Prologue
Modern mathematics is a rich and complex tapestry of ideas that have evolved over thousands of years. Unlike computer science or biology, where the concept of truth is in a constant state of ux, mathematical truth is permanent. Ideas that were discovered 2000 years ago by Pythagoras are still valid today. Proofs (also millenia old) in the style of Euclid are as valid today as when they were rst created. As a result, modern mathematics can be quite complex and technical. It requires someone with considerable advanced training to understand the current problems, much less solve them. So it is particularly charming when we can nd problems that anyone can understand, but that still resist the best eorts of the worlds great experts.
Steven G. Krantz
The problem that we wish to discuss today is charming and simple. It is appealing because it is geometric, and it has an interesting and unusual genesis. In 1852 Francis W. Guthrie, a graduate of University College London, posed the following question to his brother Frederick:
Steven G. Krantz
Imagine a geographic map on the earth (i.e., a sphere) consisting of countries onlyno oceans, lakes, rivers, or other bodies of water. The only rule is that a country must be a single contiguous massin one piece, and with no holessee Figure 1.
Steven G. Krantz
not a country
not a country
this is a country
As cartographers, we wish to color the map so that no two adjacent countries (countries that share an edge) will be of the same color (Figure 2). How many colors should the map-maker keep in stock so that he can be sure he can color any map that may arise?
Steven G. Krantz
R Y G
G B
Steven G. Krantz
It is not dicult to write down an example of a map that surely needs 4 colors. Examine Figure 3. Each of the countries in this gure is adjacent to each of the others. There are four countries, and they all must be of a dierent color. Is there a map that will require 5 colors? Mathematicians at the best universities beat their collective heads against this question for many decades.
Steven G. Krantz
The eminent geometer Felix Klein (18491925) in Gttingen o heard of the problem and declared that the only reason the problem had never been solved is that no capable mathematician had ever worked on it. He, Felix Klein, would oer a class, the culmination of which would be a solution of the problem. He failed.
Steven G. Krantz
In 1879, A. Kempe (18451922) published a solution of the four-color problem. That is to say, he showed that any map on the sphere whatever could be colored with four colors. Kempes proof stood for eleven years. Then a mistake was discovered by P. Heawood (18611955). Heawood studied the problem further and came to a number of fascinating conclusions:
Steven G. Krantz
In 1879, A. Kempe (18451922) published a solution of the four-color problem. That is to say, he showed that any map on the sphere whatever could be colored with four colors. Kempes proof stood for eleven years. Then a mistake was discovered by P. Heawood (18611955). Heawood studied the problem further and came to a number of fascinating conclusions: Kempes proof, particularly his device of Kempe chains (a sequence of countries that alternates between just two colors), does suce to show that any map whatever can be colored with at most 5 (not 4) colors. We say that the chromatic number of the sphere is at most 5, but it could be 4.
Steven G. Krantz
In 1879, A. Kempe (18451922) published a solution of the four-color problem. That is to say, he showed that any map on the sphere whatever could be colored with four colors. Kempes proof stood for eleven years. Then a mistake was discovered by P. Heawood (18611955). Heawood studied the problem further and came to a number of fascinating conclusions: Kempes proof, particularly his device of Kempe chains (a sequence of countries that alternates between just two colors), does suce to show that any map whatever can be colored with at most 5 (not 4) colors. We say that the chromatic number of the sphere is at most 5, but it could be 4. Heawood found a formula that gives an estimate for the chromatic number of any surface that is geometrically more complicated than the sphere.
Steven G. Krantz
Here is how to understand Heawoods idea. It is known that any surface in space is geometrically equivalent to a sphere with handles attached. See Figure 4. The number of handles is called the genus, and we denote it by g . The Greek letter chi ((g )) is the chromatic number of the surfacethe least number of colors that it will take to color any map on the surface with genus g .
Steven G. Krantz
Heawood formula is (g ) so long as g 1. The torus (see Figure 5) is topologically equivalent to a sphere with one handle. Thus the torus has genus g = 1. Then Heawoods formula gives the estimate 7 for the chromatic number: (1) 1 1 7 + 48 1 + 1 = (7 + 7) = 7 . 2 2 1 7+ 2 48g + 1
Steven G. Krantz
We can show that this is the right (or best possible) estimate by rst performing the trick of cutting the torus apart. See Figure 6. By cutting the torus around the small rotation and then across the large rotation, we render it as a rectangle with identications.
Steven G. Krantz
With one cut, the torus becomes a cylinder; with the second cut it becomes a rectangle. The arrows on the edges indicate that the left and right edges are to be identied (with the same orientation), and the upper and lower edges are to be identied (with the same orientation). Now we can see in Figure 7 how to color the torus (rendered as a rectangle). For clarity, we call our colors 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
Steven G. Krantz
1 5 4 3 1 2 6 7
We may see that there are seven countries shown in our Figure 7, and every country is adjacent to (i.e., touches) every other. Thus they all must have dierent colors! This is a map on the torus that requires 7 colors; it shows that Heawoods estimate is sharp for this surface. For the double-torus with two handles (genus 2see Figure 8), Heawoods estimate gives an estimate of 8. Is that the best number? Is there a map on the double torus that actually requires 8 colors? And so forth: we can ask the same question for every surface of every genus. Heawood could not answer these questions. Nor could anyone else.
Steven G. Krantz
The late nineteenth century saw more alleged solutions of the four-color problems, many of which stood for as long as eleven years. Eventually errors were found, and the problem remained open on into the twentieth century. What is particularly striking is that Gerhard Ringel (1919 ) and J. W. T. Youngs (19101970) were able to prove in 1968 that all of Heawoods estimates, for the chromatic number of any surface of genus at least 1, are sharp. So the chromatic number of a torus is indeed 7. The chromatic number of a double-torus with two holes is 8. And so forth. But the Ringel/Youngs proof, just like the Heawood formula, does not apply to the sphere. They could not improve on Heawoods result that 5 colors will always suce. The 4-color problem remained unsolved.
Steven G. Krantz
Then in 1974 there was blockbuster news. Using 1200 hours of computer time on the University of Illinois supercomputer, Kenneth Appel and Wolfgang Haken showed that in fact 4 colors will always work to color any map on the sphere. Their technique is to identify 633 fundamental congurations of maps (to which all others can be reduced) and to prove that each of them is reducible to a simpler conguration. But the number of fundamental congurations was very large, and the number of reductions required was beyond the ability of any human to count. And the reasoning is extremely intricate and complicated. Enter the computer.
Steven G. Krantz
In those days computing time was expensive and not readily available, and Appel and Haken certainly could not get a 1200-hour contiguous time slice for their work. So the calculations were done late at night, o the record, during various down times. In fact, Appel and Haken did not know for certain whether the calculation would ever cease. Their point of view was this:
Steven G. Krantz
In those days computing time was expensive and not readily available, and Appel and Haken certainly could not get a 1200-hour contiguous time slice for their work. So the calculations were done late at night, o the record, during various down times. In fact, Appel and Haken did not know for certain whether the calculation would ever cease. Their point of view was this: If the computer nally stopped then it will have checked all the cases and the 4-color problem was solved.
Steven G. Krantz
In those days computing time was expensive and not readily available, and Appel and Haken certainly could not get a 1200-hour contiguous time slice for their work. So the calculations were done late at night, o the record, during various down times. In fact, Appel and Haken did not know for certain whether the calculation would ever cease. Their point of view was this: If the computer nally stopped then it will have checked all the cases and the 4-color problem was solved. If the computer never stopped then they could draw no conclusion.
Steven G. Krantz
Well, the computer stopped. But the level of discussion and gossip and disagreement in the mathematical community did not. Was this really a proof? The computer had performed tens of millions of calculations. Nobody could ever check them all. But now the plot thickens. Because in 1975 a mistake was found in the proof. Specically, there was something amiss with the algorithm that Appel and Haken fed into the computer. It was later repaired. The paper was published in 1976. The four-color problem was declared to be solved.
Steven G. Krantz
In a 1986 article, Appel and Haken point out that the reader of their seminal 1976 article must face
Steven G. Krantz
In a 1986 article, Appel and Haken point out that the reader of their seminal 1976 article must face 50 pages containing text and diagrams;
Steven G. Krantz
In a 1986 article, Appel and Haken point out that the reader of their seminal 1976 article must face 50 pages containing text and diagrams; 85 pages lled with almost 2500 additional diagrams;
Steven G. Krantz
In a 1986 article, Appel and Haken point out that the reader of their seminal 1976 article must face 50 pages containing text and diagrams; 85 pages lled with almost 2500 additional diagrams; 400 microche pages that contain further diagrams and thousands of individual verications of claims made in the 24 statements in the main section of the text.
Steven G. Krantz
But it seems as though there is always trouble in paradise. Errors continued to be discovered in the Appel/Haken proof. Invariably the errors were xed. But the stream of errors never seemed to cease. So is the Appel/Haken work really a proof? Well, there is hardly anything more reassuring than another, independent proof. Paul Seymour and his group at Princeton University found another way to attack the problem. In fact they found a new algorithm that seems to be more stable. They also needed to rely on computer assistance. But by the time they did their work computers were much, much faster. So they required much less computer time. In any event, this paper appeared in 1994.
Steven G. Krantz
It is still the case that mathematicians are most familiar with, and most comfortable with, a traditional, self-contained proof that consists of a sequence of logical steps recorded on a piece of paper. We still hope that some day there will be such a proof of the four-color theorem. After all, it is only a traditional, Euclidean-style proof that oers the understanding, the insight, and the sense of completion that all scholars seek.
Steven G. Krantz
And there are new societal needs: theoretical computer science and engineering and even modern applied mathematics require certain pieces of information and certain techniques. The need for a workable device often far exceeds the need to be certain that the technique can stand up to the rigorous rules of logic. The result may be that we shall re-evaluate the foundations of our subject. The way that mathematics is practiced in the year 2100 may be quite dierent from the way that it is practiced today.
Steven G. Krantz