AnII, Semi
AnII, Semi
Introduction in morphology
Types of morphemes:
- Free (to burn) vs. bound (burnt);
- Lexical/derivational (to create new words; they stay close to base) vs. grammatical/inflectional (to
create new forms; they stay at the very end of a word, after derivational morphemes – in English they
are suffixes only; they do not change the lexical class; they are highly systematic: they combine with
large classes of words, but not with each other; they are required by syntax: they typically signal
syntactic or semantic relations between different words in a sentence);
Example (1): misunderstandings: mis (d.m.) + understand (base) + ing (d.m.) + s (i.m.)
Example (2): rewrites: re (d.m.) + write (base) + s (i.m.)
Types of inflection:
- External: called, burnt, known
- Internal: meet/met
- Zero: cut/cut
- Suppletive: go/went/gone
- Word order (case relations): John sees Paul/Paul sees John.
Lexical classes:
- Open-class items: the verbs and the adverbs (dynamic), the nouns and the adjectives (stative); they are
indefinitely extendable;
- Closed-class items: the pronouns, the numerals, the articles, the conjunctions, the prepositions, the
interjections; they hardly allow any new lexical production, they are non-creative.
2. Classification of verbs
Criteria for classification: lexical morphology, form, predication, transitivity, function,
semantics.
In point of lexical morphology, the following verb-forming processes can be identified:
- Derivation:
* Class-changing affixation (empower, glorify);
* Class-preserving affixation (dislike, outlive, underestimate);
- Composition: (to) snowball, (to) whitewash;
- Conversion: to father, to empty, to mail;
- Back formation: donate > donation, negate > negation.
Formally, verbs are:
- Simple: to get, to stay, to know;
- Compound: to lip-read, to house-keep;
- Complex/phrasal verbs consisting of [V + adverbial particle]: to bring about, to come by;
- Verbal phrases made up of a verb with diminished lexical value accompanied by a noun/noun phrase
which completes its meaning: to be in a hurry, to have breakfast.
In point of predication, verbs can have:
- Complete predication, such as the intransitive verbs (rise, lie) and reflexive verbs (hide oneself);
- Incomplete predication, referring to auxiliaries, transitive verbs, verbs with obligatory preposition,
and verb which requires other obligatory elements;
- Double predication, in the case of intransitive verbs which are able to shift to the transitive class by
taking a cognate object: to laugh a merry laugh, to live a happy live.
In point of transitivity, there are:
- Monotransitive verbs [V + Od]: tell a story;
- Ditransitive verbs [V + Od + Oi]: do somebody a favour;
- Complex transitive verbs [V + Od + Co]: call somebody a hero;
- Intransitive verbs [V]: run, eat.
Functionally, verbs are:
- Lexical (principal), able to stand as separate entities and to form a predicate by themselves;
- Auxiliary, including primary auxiliaries (do, have, be), and modal auxiliaries (can, could, may, might,
shall, should, will, would, must, ought to, need, dare, used to);
- Semi-auxiliary: to have to, to have got to, and to be about to;
- Linking/copular;
- Catenative.
Type C (Progressive): AuxBE + V-ing (is taking) 6. Vtransitive + Od + AdvC: I put my head on his
C. Prospective aspect
- it has already been made clear that the perfect is retrospective, in that it establishes a relation between
a state at one time and a situation at an earlier time. Similarly, prospective aspect connects present and
future.
Typical English expressions of prospective meaning are periphrastic, consisting of constructions
with: to be going to (there is no implication of imminent futurity; it has no straight forward future time
reference), to be about to, to be on the point of (both of which describe the subject’s present state
relative to some future event; inchoative meaning).
Cf. Bill will throw himself off the cliffs. (Isn’t true)
Bill is going to throw himself off the cliffs. (Intention)
D. Perfect aspect
- while aspect in general is concerned with the different ways of representing the internal temporal
constitution of a situation, the perfect is rather different since it says nothing directly about the situation
itself, but rather relates some state to a preceding situation:
Cf. She has been an invalid all her life. (She’s alive)
She was an invalid all her life. (She’s dead)
Types of perfect:
- Perfect of result, where the present state is referred to as being the result of some past situation: John
has arrived (He’s here);
- Experiential perfect which indicates that a given situation has held at least once during some time in
the past leading up to the present: Bill has been to America (He’s back now);
- Perfect of persistent situation, describing a situation that started in the past but continues into the
present: I have studied English for ten years. / I have been studying English for ten years.
- Perfect of recent past, used when the present relevance of the past situation referred to is simply one
of temporal closeness (+ just, recently, already etc.): I have just met John.
Quasi-passives constructions
- Constructions including active verbs with passive value: The book sold quickly;
- Gerund with passive meaning: The garden needs watering;
- Constructions with factitive, causative, sufferative verbs (have, make, get);
I had my flat painted.
John had his photo taken.
- Constructions with prepositions which can introduce quasi-agents (about, at, over, to, in, with):
We are interested in literature.
He is fascinated with her.
We were alarmed at this news.
I am worried about John’s health.
4. Mood is a grammatical category which stands for the linguistic means of expression used to
refer to a situation as factual or non-factual, real or unreal, assertive or non-assertive. In English mood
related distinctions rest upon the finite (indicative, subjunctive, imperative) – non-finite opposition
(infinitive, gerund, participle).
4.1. Finite verb forms have person and number distinctions; will necessarily pertain to the
past/present/future time sphere; are context-dependent, due to the high number of syncretic forms.
A. THE INDICATIVE is used to refer to real, factual situations or assertions; has a full range
of temporal references;
B. THE SUBJONCTIVE occurs in contexts involving non-factuality; can also be found in
main clauses.
Types of subjunctive:
- The mandative subjunctive (V) = occurs in clauses introduced by “that”, after a relatively small class
of verbs (verba dicendi) or after expressions of recommendation, resolution, surprise; it is used in
formal style: The Parliament voted that the present law be changed.
- The formulaic subjunctive (V) = occurs in certain stereotyped, conventional or traditional phrases
built on patterns of little productivity in the language:
Come what may
Heaven forbid
Long live friendship
So be it
Be it so
Suffice it to say
Far be it from me
Be as it may
God bless you
- The “were” subjunctive (V-ed1) = used to express factual remoteness in conjunction with conditional
constructions introduced by if/unless/suppose/supposing/imagine; it also occurs in clause functioning as
complement to the verb “wish” or after constructions with it is (high) time, would rather, had better:
If this were true, we would have to change our plans. (there is an irrealis “were”)
I wish we met more often.
!!! The time reference of the subjunctive = defective time reference: past & present;
I wish we had met you before that.
Subjunctive equivalents:
* SHOULD + INFINITIVE = it provides an alternative to the mandative subjunctive ( The Parliament
voted that the present law should be changed.); it also occurs after verbs denoting feeling, emotion,
doubt, mainly in impersonal constructions with introductory it (It is odd that he should resign);
* WOULD + INFINITIVE = it stands as a more colloquial variant of the subjunctive after WISH (I
wish you would behaved/I wish you behaved);
* MAY + INFINITIVE = it is an alternative to formulaic subjunctive (Long live our friendship); in
subordinate clauses it can express wish, purpose, comparison (May you never set foot in this house
again);
* MIGHT + INFINITIVE = it is a more tentative variant of MAY + INFINITIVE;
* INFINITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS: There was a suggestion to fire John.
C. THE IMPERATIVE displays certain features of syntactic structure;
- subjectless imperatives = occur in most common types of directive clauses; no tense, aspect or voice
distinctions (rare exceptions in: Have done with it!, Be prepared!, Be gone!, Get lost!);
- subject + imperative = You be quiet!, Don’t you worry!, Speak up you!;
- constructions with “let” = Let’s you and I do it!, Let everyone speak for himself!;
- negative imperatives = do → don’t; let’s/let us → let’s not/don’t let us;
4.2. Non-finite verb phrases
A. THE INFINITIVE
- Distribution:
* short (plain, bare) + modals, verbs of perception, causative “make”; + “wh-” questions; + modal
idioms (had rather/sooner/better);
* long (“to”) + auxiliaries (ought to, have to, be to, used to); + perception verbs in the passive; +
causative “make” in the passive;
- Infinitival constructions:
* Accusative + infinitive (I want you to come earlier);
* Nominative + infinitive (He was supposed to be out);
* “for-to” infinitive (It’s time for us to go);
* Absolute infinitival construction (He left home, never to return).
B. THE GERUND (V-ing)
- Distribution:
* + aspectual verbs (start, stop, finish, begin, take up, give up, quit);
* + verb + feeling (like, enjoy, hate, avoid);
* + verbs like need, went, require, deserve, in quasi-passive constructions;
* + impersonal constructions with introductory “it”;
* + word/expressions like busy, feel like;
- Constructions with the gerund:
* Genitive + Gerund (Nobody noticed his leaving earlier);
* Accusative + Gerund (Excuse me yawning).
C. THE PARTICIPLE (V-ing, V-ed2)
- Distribution:
* V-ing is usually found in complex VPs type C;
* V-ed2 is usually found in complex VPs type D;
- Present participial constructions:
* Accusative + participle (I felt him trembling);
* Nominative + participle (She was seen leaving the house at dawn);
* Absolute participial constructions (Weather permitting, we shall go on trip);
* Prepositional absolute participial construction (The Children were playing, with their mother
watching them);
- Past participial constructions:
* Accusative + participle (He heard his name called);
* Absolute past participial construction (Our work done, we went home).