A Note On Pascal-T Triangles, Multinomial Coefficients, and Pascal Pyramids
A Note On Pascal-T Triangles, Multinomial Coefficients, and Pascal Pyramids
College,
RICHARD C. BOLLINGER
Pennsylvania
State
University,
(Submitted
August
1984)
1.
Erie,
PA 16563
INTRODUCTION
In what follows we give a formula for the entries in the Pascal-27 triangle
Tm in terms of the multinomial coefficients; this is the counterpart for these
arrays of the result of Philippou [1] on the elements of the Fibonacci &-sequences in terms of the multinomial coefficients. The proof is direct, and the
method also leads to a recurrence relation which gives the elements of a given
triangle Tm as a combination of certain elements of the "preceeding" triangle
Tm-i> t n e coefficients in the combination being binomial coefficients. Finally, because the multinomial coefficients provide the connection here, we offer
some remarks on those arrays of multinomial coefficients referred to in the
literature as "Pascal pyramids."
It will be convenient to recall the definition of the triangle Tm.
Definition 1.1: For any m ^ 0, Tm is the array whose rows are indexed by n = 0 ,
1, 2, ..., and columns by k = 09 1, 2, ..., and whose entries are obtained as
follows:
a)
b)
c)
Tm9 777^2, is the array whose n = 0 row is a one followed by zeros, whose
n= 1 row is m ones followed by zeros, and any of whose entries in subsequent rows is the sum of the m entries just above and to the left in
the preceeding row.
C2(n9 k) = (),
since T2 is the Pascal Triangle. There will be n(m - 1)+ 1 nonzero entries in
row n9 and the principal property we need is that these are the coefficients
(see, e.g., [2], p. 66) in the expansion
n(m-
(1 + t + t2
+ + t m " V
1)
Cm(n9
k)tk.
(1.1)
k=o
m- 1
Cm(n9
k) = Cm(n - 1, k - j ) ,
(1.2)
j=o
k)
(n
).
(2.1)
where the summation is over all m-part compositions nls n2s ..., n m of n such
that (1) n x + n2 + .-. + nm = n 9 and (2) 0n1 + ln2 + + (m - l)nm = fc.
Proof:
+Xz
...
+Xm)n
n
\ ri-^ $
\xixmxn.t
(2.2)
'frfi?/
... + t -l) = W
"
\ttlJ
...5
tz~1s
(2>3)
nmf
and when the coefficients of tk on the right-hand sides of (1.1) and (2.3) are
equated, (2.1) follows from conditions (1) and (2).
Example: ^ ( 4 , 4) - (^
Q>
Q)
+ (2>
2> 0
)+(
2 >
= 1 + 12 + 6 + 12 = 31
Another application of the multinomial expansions used partly as a binomial
expansions gives the following theorem.
Theorem 2.2:
(2.4)
j=o w /
Proof: If the left side of (2.2) is grouped as [x1.+ (x2 + + xm)]n9
as a binomials and again tv~x is substituted for x^s the result is
nirn1)
n- I)
t/ = o ^
eee
+ tm-2)J.
expanded
(2.5)
(2)^(2,
+ (3)^3(3, 1) + ( J H < 4 . 0)
= l-0 + 4 0 + 6-3 + 4-3 + l-l = 31
1986]
HI
3.
The device used in the previous theorem of bracketing off one term of a
multinomial in order to expand the result as a binomial cans of course, be repeated with the remaining multinomial parts, eventually running the unexpanded
part down to a binomial itself; this offers the possibility of obtaining the
multinomials entirely as products of binomial coefficients. In fact, this has
been done in [3] and [4] for a trinomial expansion, with the multinomial coefficients appearing in the successive powers of (x + x2 + x3) being associated
with points in triangular arrays, which form successive levels of a pyramidal
structurethe so-called Pascal pyramid. For example, Figure 1 shows the first
four levels, with each point labelled with both a multinomial coefficient and
the composition which gives rise to it (the compositions can be obtained by
designating the sides as first, second, third in some fashion, and letting n19
n29 n3 in the composition measure units of perpendicular distances from the
first, second, third sides, respectively). The law of formation for this trinomial case is clear (and also correct, as is easily verified by doing the reduction described earlier): just generate the ordinary Pascal triangle down to
level n9 and then multiply the rows successively upward by the numbers found
in the last line. For n = 3, e.g.,
1
1
1
1 3
_1 1
1
1
3
becomes
n=0
J 1
^
3
J 1
^
i (0,0, 0)
n= l
n=2
n=3
(3. 0. 0}
Figure 1.
142
(0, 3, 0)
x3)
[May
To
0
1
2
3
4
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
3
0
1
3
6
10
15
0
1
0
1
6
21
56
126
1
4
10
20
35
5
15
35
70
Here, the law of formation is that each entry is the sum of alt
those entries
above and to the left of it in the preceeding row, and we recognize the m = 3
row as the triangular numbers, the m = 4 as the pyramidal numbers, and so on.
The point here is that the square shows that the trinomials (m = 3) are simple
sequences of products of binomials; as in the example, the ten trinomials in
(x + x2 + x3)3 reduce to 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 products of binomials. But for m > 3,
we find not sequences, but sequences of sequences. The thirty-five terms in
(x + x2 + x3 + xh)h
[the (4, 4) entry], e.g., have to be obtained using the
sequence
15 = 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 ,
10=
4 + 3 + 2 + 1 ,
6 =
3+2+1,
3 =
2 + 1,
1 =
1,
of sequences of products of binomials. It would seem that in spite of the appeal of an array for multinomial coefficients similar to the triangle for
binomials, one is better off for most purposes using a convenient algorithm
(e.g., [5], pp. 46-51) to generate the m-part compositions of n, from which the
exponents on the x^ and the multinomial associated with a given term are immediately available.
1986]
1*3
A. N. Philippou. "A Note on the Fibonacci Sequence of Order k and the Mul-
2.
3.
4.
5.
Quarterly
21 (1983):82-86.
^<>*o*
ANNOUNCEMENT
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE
Philippou, A. (Greece) Chairman
Horadam, A.F. (Australia), Cochairman
Bergum, G. (U.S.A.)
Kiss, P. (Hungary)
Long, C. (U.S.A.)
Ando, S. (Japan)
H4
[May