THE TRUTH ABOUT LICENSE

Declaration and Affidavit of Fact and Truth

''Indeed, no more than (an affidavit) is necessary to make the prima facie case." United States v. Kis, 658
F.2d, 526, 536 (7th Cir., 1981); Certiorari Denied, 50 U.S.L.W. 2169; S. Ct. March 22, 1982
Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit
An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce
An unrebutted affidavit becomes the Judgment in commerce
Nihil possumus contra veritatem. We can do nothing against truth. Doct. & Stu. Dial. 2, c. 6.
In an attempt to bring peace, understanding and harmony to the whole world.
1). Persuint to, John Bouvier. Published 1856.
LICENSE, contracts. A right given by some competent authority to do an act, which without such authority
would be illegal. The instrument or writing which secures this right, is also called a license. Vide Ayl. Parerg,
353; 15 Vin. Ab. 92; Ang. Wat. Co. 61, 85.
2). It has been said A license is permission to do something that otherwise would be illegal
and there for a privilege. Therefor any FREEMAN needing to ask Permission to do a
Privilege cannot be a FREEMAN as FREEMEN dont need to ask Permission of no one.
Therefor only Slaves and Prisoner of war need LICENSE.
3). John Bouvier 1856. A right given by some competent authority to do an act, which without such
authority would be illegal. Maxim of Slave Law: The slave is the property of the Master and everything
acquired by the slave belongs to the Master. Therefor a slave would need to have their Masters
Permission or a LICENSE to do anything travel, carry a gun, marry, work for profit, fish or
hunt on Masters Land, carry on business and would require the slave to hand over any and
property, all titles to any acquired property or possession to the Master. But sense the
Slavery Convention 1926 and subsequent amendments all forms of slavery is outlawed
worldwide as well as all forms peonage and is an International crimes under the Rome
Statutes and a crime. If the license is for a SLAVE the name of said SLAVE would be in all
capital letters pursuant to capitis deminutio maxima. In Florida and most other states
Drivers License/Identification cards states on the back, The State of XXXXXXXX reserves
all property rights herein and it also states This is a non-commercial license, there is no
such thing as a non-commercial license except as a SLAVE or PRISONER OF WAR
4). John Bouvier 1856.LICENSE, International law. An authority given by one of two
belligerent parties, to the citizens or subjects of the other, to carry on a specified trade.
Lieber Code Art. 86.
All intercourse (commerce) between the territories occupied by belligerent armies, whether by traffic, by letter, by
travel, or in any other way, ceases. This is the general rule, to be observed without special proclamation.
Exceptions to this rule, whether by safe-conduct, or permission to trade on a small or large scale, or by
exchanging mails, or by travel from one territory into the other, can take place only according to agreement
approved by the government, or by the highest military authority. Contraventions of this rule are highly
punishable.
Lieber Code Art. 141
It is incumbent upon the contracting parties of an armistice to stipulate what intercourse (commerce) of
persons or traffic (traveling or driving) between the inhabitants of the territories occupied by the hostile
armies shall be allowed, if any If nothing is stipulated the intercourse(commerce) remains suspended, as

during actual hostilities. This would include everything that requires a License would therefore
be illegal

under Martial law. This would place all American citizen, civilians and States are under
Military occupation and Martial law as PRISONERS OF WAR under the Lieber code General
Order 100 and Geneva, Hague, United Nations convention on the customary laws of War.
And make all forms of commerce and traveling a Privilege and illegal without permission
and a License. If the license or Identification card is for a PRISONER OF WAR the name of
said PRISONER OF WAR would then be in all capital letters pursuant to capitis deminutio
maxima.
5). John Bouvier 1856. A right given by some competent authority to do an act, which without such
authority would be illegal. If the action being LICENSED is ILLEGAL and being LICENSED
and or SANCTIONED for some sort revenue and not under SLAVERY or as a Prisoner of
War it would constitute illegal and criminal activity and therefor would constitute RICO.
6). Geneva Convention (III) Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War; August
12, 1949 ARTICLE 17 Conference held at Geneva from April 21 to August 12, 1949,
for the purpose of revising the Convention concluded at Geneva on July 27, 1929
relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War,
Every prisoner of war, when questioned on the subject, is bound to give only his surname, first names and rank,
date of birth, and army, regimental, personal or serial number, or failing this, equivalent information.
If he wilfully infringes this rule, he may render himself liable to a restriction of the privileges accorded to his
rank or status.
Each Party to a conflict is required to furnish the persons under its jurisdiction who are liable to become
prisoners of war, with an identity card showing the owner's surname, first names, rank, army, regimental,
personal or serial number or equivalent information, and date of birth. The identity card may, furthermore, bear
the signature or the fingerprints, or both, of the owner, and may bear, as well, any other information the Party to
the conflict may wish to add concerning persons belonging to its armed forces. As far as possible the card shall
measure 6.5 x 10 cm. and shall be issued in duplicate. The identity card shall be shown by the prisoner of war
upon demand, but may in no case be taken away from him. Is this why Police demand to see your
license and take you to jail for not producing it?
See Kolender v. Lawson (461 U.S. 352, 1983) in which the United States Supreme Court
ruled that a police officer could not arrest a citizen merely for refusing to present
identification. U.S. Constitution Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure. The right of the
people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall
issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly
describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998 PUBLIC LAW 105318
7). Lieber Code General Order 100
Article 31,
A victorious army appropriates all public money, seizes all public movable property until further direction by its
government, and sequesters for its own benefit or of that of its government all the revenues of real property
belonging to the hostile government or nation. The title to such real property remains in abeyance during
military occupation, and until the conquest is made complete.
Article 38
Private property, unless forfeited by crimes or by offenses of the owner, can be seized only by way of military
necessity, for the support or other benefit of the army or of the United States.
If the owner has not fled, the commanding officer will cause receipts to be given, which may serve the spoliated
owner to obtain indemnity. See civil forfeiture

Eminent Domain, The power to take private property for public use by a state,
municipality, or private person or corporation authorized to exercise functions of
public character, following the payment of just compensation to the owner of that
property. Under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1791, which reads, "... nor
shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
Therefore if any private property is being taken without just compensation such as your
Manufactures

Certificate of Origin, car title, title to real or personal property, Certificate of live birth, it can
only be seized under the Lieber Code General Order 100 article 31, 38. This is where they
get authority over your alleged private property. According to 50 USCS 2204 [Title 50.
War and National Defense; Chapter 39. Spoils of War], spoils of war means enemy movable property
lawfully captured, seized, confiscated, or found which has become United States property in accordance with the
laws of war. This is how they confiscate/seize the manufactures Certificate of Origin and force
you to register yourself as the operator of their property (vehicle) and display a LICENSE
PLATE signifying said vehicle as State Property.
8). United State Constitution Article. I The Legislative Branch Section 8 Powers of Congress,
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
This does not give any power to Congress or any State, County or City the power to regulate
commerce or travel between the people only States and Indian Tribes. And nowhere in the
U.S. Constitution or State Constitution is the word LICENSE mentioned. And on the back of
all most every State Drivers License it states THIS IS A NON COMMRACAL LICENSE
there is no such thing as a non-commercial license unless youre a SLAVE or
PRISONER OF WAR. And sense there is no full faith and credit between any states
concerning any licenses what so ever the commerce clause would not apply any way.
9). Lieber Code General Order Art. 44.
All wanton violence committed against persons in the invaded country, all destruction of property not
commanded by the authorized officer, all robbery, all pillage or sacking, even after taking a place by main force,
all rape, wounding, maiming, or killing of such inhabitants, are prohibited under the penalty of death, or such
other severe punishment as may seem adequate for the gravity of the offense.
A soldier, officer or private, in the act of committing such violence, and disobeying a superior ordering him to
abstain from it, may be lawfully killed on the spot by such superior.
Lieber Code General Order Art. 47.
Crimes punishable by all penal codes, such as arson, murder, maiming, assaults, highway robbery, theft,
burglary, fraud, forgery, and rape, if committed by an American soldier in a hostile country against its
inhabitants, are not only punishable as at home, but in all cases in which death is not inflicted, the severer
punishment shall be preferred.
10). The Hague Convention (II) with Respect to the Laws and Customs of War on
Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on
Land. The Hague, 29 July 1899.
Art. 46. Family honours and rights, individual lives and private property, as well
as religious convictions and liberty, must be respected. Private property cannot be
confiscated.
Art. 47. Pillage is formally prohibited.
Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV); October 18, 1907
Art. 46. Family honour and rights, the lives of persons, and private property, as
well as religious convictions and practice, must be respected. Private property cannot be
confiscated.
Art. 47. Pillage is formally forbidden.

The Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 explicitly prohibits the looting of civilian property
during wartime. The Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 (modified in 1954) obliges
military forces not only to avoid destruction of enemy property, but to provide protection to
it.
Rule 51. In occupied territory: (a) movable public property that can be used for military
operations may be confiscated; (b) immovable public property must be administered
according to the rule of usufruct; and (c) private property must be respected and may not be
confiscated; except where destruction or seizure of such property is required by imperative military necessity. [IAC]
Rule 52. Pillage is prohibited. [IAC/NIAC]

11). Lieber Code General order 100 Art. 44.

All wanton violence committed against persons in the invaded country, all
destruction of property not commanded by the authorized officer, all
robbery, all pillage or sacking, even after taking a place by main force, all
rape, wounding, maiming, or killing of such inhabitants, are prohibited
under the penalty of death, or such other severe punishment as may seem
adequate for the gravity of the offense.
A soldier, officer or private, in the act of committing such violence, and
disobeying a superior ordering him to abstain from it, may be lawfully
killed on the spot by such superior.
This is pretty much self-explanatory. If you loot your superior is surpassed to shoot
you on the spot.

CONCLUSION
There is no such thing as a license or authority to create one in the U.S. Constitution or any
state Constitution for private civilians and therefor no authority to create one exist except
under the Lieber Code General Order 100 Art. 86, 141. And sense there is also no full Faith
and credit between any state concerning any license what so ever they do not fall under
the commerce clause of the Constitution. The TAKING of private property without just
consideration can only be done lawfully under a state of war and only involve public
citizens, and under rule 51 usufruct. The TAKING from private civilians without just
compensation is looting, sacking, plundering, despoiling, despoliation, and pillaging under a
state of war and is considered a war crime.
So the only three (3) ways you can be LICENSED for carrying on said illegal activity is if (1)
youre a Slave (2) your Prisoner of War or (3) their committing RICO. And the only three (3)
ways they can TAKE the title or possession to your private property without just
consideration under Eminent Domain is if youre (1) a Slave, (2) under the Lieber Code
General Order 100 a state of war as the enemy of the State or (3) they stole it as common
criminals.
The Federal and Supreme Courts of the United States have both continuously
ruled that the private civilian need no license to travel upon free and public

highways and to transport his property and or passengers. See EXIHIBIT A

below.

SOUTHERN COMMAND

EXHIBIT A
DICTUM of SOUTHERN COMMAND
Wikipedia, LOOTING
Looting, also referred to as sacking, plundering, despoiling, despoliation, and pillaging, is the
indiscriminate taking of goods by force as part of a military or political victory, or during a
catastrophe, such as war,[1] natural disaster,[2] or rioting.[3] The term is also used in a
broader sense to describe egregious instances of theft and embezzlement, such as the
"plundering" of private or public assets by corrupt or greedy authorities.[4] Looting is loosely
distinguished from scavenging in terms of objects taken: scavenging implies taking of
essential items such as food, water, shelter, or other material needed for survival while
looting implies items of luxury or not necessary for survival such as art work, precious
metals or other valuables. The proceeds of all these activities can be described as loot,
plunder, spoils, or pillage
John Bouvier. Published 1856.
LICENSE, contracts. A right given by some competent authority to do an act,
which without such authority would be illegal. The instrument or writing which
secures this right, is also called a license. Vide Ayl. Parerg, 353; 15 Vin. Ab. 92;
Ang. Wat. Co. 61, 85.
2. A license is express or implied. An express license is one which in direct terms
authorizes the performance of a certain act; as a license to keep a tavern given by public
authority.
3. An implied license is one which though not expressly given, may be presumed from the
acts of the party having a right to give it. The following are examples of such licenses: 1.
when a man knocks at another's door, and it is opened, the act of opening the door licenses
the former to enter the house for any lawful purpose. See Hob. 62. A servant is, in
consequence of his employment, licensed to admit to the house, those who come on his
masters business, but only such persons. Selw. N. P. 999; Cro. Eliz. 246. It may, however, be

inferred from circumstances that the servant has authority to invite whom he pleases to the
house, for lawful purposes. See 2 Greenl. Ev. Sec. 427; Entry.
4. A license is either a bare authority, without interest, or it is coupled with an interest. 1.
A bare license must be executed by the party to whom it is given in person, and cannot be
made over or assigned by him to another; and, being without consideration, may be
revoked at pleasure, as long as it remains executory; 39 Hen. VI. M. 12, page 7; but when
carried into effect, either partially or altogether, it can only be rescinded, if in its nature it
will admit of revocation, by placing the other side in the same situation in which he stood
before he entered on its execution. 8 East, R. 308; Palm. 71; S. C. Poph. 151; S. C. 2 Roll.
Rep. 143, 152.
5.-2. When the license is coupled with an interest the authority conferred is not properly a
mere permission, but amounts to a grant, which cannot be revoked, and it may then be
assigned to a third person. 5 Hen. V., M. 1, page 1; 2 Mod. 317; 7 Bing. 693; 8 East, 309; 5
B. & C. 221; 7 D. & R. 783; Crabb on R. P. Sec. 521 to 525; 14 S. & R 267; 4 S. & R. 241; 2
Eq. Cas. Ab. 522. When the license is coupled with an interest, the formalities essential to
confer such interest should be observed. Say. R. 3; 6 East, R. 602; 8 East, R. 310, note. See
14 S. & R. 267; 4 S. & R. 241; 2 Eq. Cas. Ab. 522; 11 Ad. & El. 34, 39; S. C. 39 Eng, C. L. R.
19.
LICENSE, International law. An authority given by one of two belligerent parties,
to the citizens or subjects of the other, to carry on a specified trade.
2. The effects of the license are to suspend or relax the rules of war to the
extent of the authority given. It is the assumption of a state of peace to the
extent of the license. In the country which grants them, licenses to carry on a
pacific commerce are stricti juris, as being exceptions to the general rule; though
they are not to be construed with pedantic accuracy, nor will every small
deviation be held to vitiate the fair effect of them. 4 Rob. Rep. 8; Chitty, Law of
Nat. 1 to 5, and 260; 1 Kent, Com. 164, 85.

Wikipedia
Capitis deminutio or Capitis diminutio (lit. "decrease of head") is a term used in Roman
law, referring to the extinguishing, either in whole or in part, of a person's former legal
capacity.
There were three changes of state or condition attended with different consequences,
maxima, media, and minima. The greatest, capitis deminutio maxima, involved the loss
of liberty, citizenship, and family (e.g. being made a slave or prisoner of war). The next change of
state, capitis deminutio media, consisted of a loss of citizenship and family without any
forfeiture of personal liberty. The least change of state, capitis deminutio minima, consisted
of a person ceasing to belong to a particular family, without loss of liberty or citizenship.[1]
Blacks Law Dictionary provides the following definition:
Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status) In Roman law. A diminishing or
abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of legal
attributes and qualifications.
Capitis Diminutio Minima (meaning a minimum loss of status) - The lowest or least
comprehensive degree of loss of status. This occurred where a man's family relations alone
were changed. It happened upon the arrogation [pride] of a person who had been his own
master, (sui juris,) [of his own right, not under any legal disability] or upon the emancipation
of one who had been under the patria potestas. [Parental authority] It left the rights of
liberty and citizenship unaltered. See Inst. 1, 16, pr.; 1, 2, 3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld. Rom.Law,
144.
Capitis Diminutio Media (meaning a medium loss of status) - A lessor or medium loss of
status. This occurred where a man loses his rights of citizenship, but without losing his
liberty. It carried away also the family rights.

Capitis Diminutio Maxima (meaning a maximum loss of status) - The highest or most
comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man's condition was changed from one
of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of
citizenship and all family rights.
Diminutio. Lat. In civil law. Diminution; a taking away; loss or depravation.[2]
Capite. - Lat. By the head.[3]

Blacks Law 2nd, 4th Edition: CAPITIS DIMINUTIO:

In Roman law, A diminishing or abridgment of personality. Tills was a loss or curtailment of a
mans status or aggregate of legal attributes and qualifications, following upon certain
changes in his civil condition. It was of three kinds, enumerated as follows: Capitis
diminutio maxima. The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when
a mans condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a
slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights. Capitis diminutio
media. A lesser or medium loss of status. This occurred where a man lost his rights of
citizenship, but without losing his liberty. It carried away also the family rights. Capitis
diminutio minima. Tile lowest or least comprehensive degree of loss of status. This
occurred where a mans family relations alone were changed. It happened upon the
arrogation of a person who had been his own master, (sui juris,) or upon the emancipation of
one who had been under the patria potestas. It left the rights of liberty and citizenship
unaltered. See Inst. 1, 1G, pr.; 1, 2, 3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld. Rom. Law.
USLegal,
1.Capitis diminutio minima consisting of the loss of a persons family relations alone. The
right to liberty and citizenship are unaltered here. In Capitis diminutio minima there is only a
minimum loss of status.
2. Capitis diminutio media consisting of the loss of a persons citizenship and family. Here
there is no loss of personal liberty. In capitis diminutio minima there is a medium loss of
status.
3.Capitis diminutio maxima consisting of the loss of liberty, citizenship and family. Here a
persons status is changed from freedom to bondage. In Capitis diminutio maxima there is
the highest loss of status.
Bouviers 1856 Edition HIGHWAY. A passage or road through the country, or some parts
of it, for the use of the people. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 442. The term highway is said to be a generic
name for all kinds of public ways. 6 Mod R, 255.
(2) Highways are universally laid out by public authority and repaired at the public expense,
by direction of law. 4 Burr. Rep. 2511.
(3) The public have an easement over a highway, of which the owner of the land cannot
deprive them; but the soil and freehold still remain in the owner, and he may use the land
above and below consistently with the easement. He may, therefore, work a mine, sink a
drain or water course, under the highway, if the easement remains unimpaired. Vide Road;
Street; Way; and 4 Vin. Ab. 502; Bac. Ab. h. t.; Com. Dig. Chemin; Dane's Ab. Index, h. t.;
Egremont on Highways; Wellbeloved on Highways; Woolrych on Ways; 1 N. H. Rep. 16; 1
Conn. R. 103; 1 Pick. R. 122; 1 M'Cord's R. 67; 2 Mass. R. 127; 1 Pick. R. 122; 3 Rawle, R. 495;
15 John. R. 483; 16 Mass. R.33; 1 Shepl. R. 250; 4 Day, R. 330; 2 Bail. R. 271; 1 Yeates, Rep.
167.

Blacks Law 2nd Edition: HIGHWAY

A free and public road, way, or street; one which every person has the right to use. Abbott v.
Duluth (C. C.) 104 Fed. 837; Shelby County Comrs v. Cas- tetter,7 Ind. App. 309, 33 N. E.
986; State v. Cowan, 29 N. C. 248; In re City of New York,135 N. Y. 253, 31 N. E. 1043, 31 Am.
St. Rep. 825; Parsons v. San Francisco, 23 Cal.464.In all counties of this state, public
highways are roads, streets, alleys, lanes, courts, places, trails, and bridges, laid out or
erected as such by the public, or, if laid out and erected by others, dedicated or abandoned
to the public, or made such in actions for the partition of real property. Pol. Code Cal.
Highway: Blacks Law 4th Edition
A free and public roadway, or street; one which
every person has the right to use. Abbott v. Duluth, C.C.Minn., 104 F. 837. Illinois Cent. R. Co.
v.Bennett, C.C.A.Miss., 296 F. 436, 437. Its prime essentials are the right of common
enjoyment on
the one hand and the duty of public maintenance
on the other. Hildebrand v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., 219 N.C. 402, 14 S.E.2d
252,254, 255.
Bovier's Law Dictionary, 1914 ed., p. 940. "Driver -- One employed in conducting a
coach, carriage, wagon, or other vehicle..."
Black's Law 3rd Edition, Driver - One employed in conducting or operating a coach,
carriage, wagon, or other vehicle, with horses, mules, or other animals, or a bicycle, tricycle,
or motor car, though not a street railroad car. See Davis v. Petrinovich, 112 Ala. 654, 21 So.
344, 36 L.R.A. 615; Isaacs v. Railroad Co., 7 Am. Rep. 418, 47 N.Y. 122. -- Black's Law
Dictionary, Third Edition DRIVER. One employed...
Blacks Law 2nd Edition, DRIVER: One employed in conducting a coach, carriage, wagon, or
other vehicle, with horses, mules, or other animals, or a bicycle, tricycle, or motor ..