Cause of Action For Conversion of Property
Cause of Action For Conversion of Property
of Property
The common law cause of action for conversion of property.
Developing this legal protection of property rights to combat
oppressive conduct.
Conversion of Property
Under Texas law, stock is personal property. Minority shareholder rights are based
ultimately on fundamental rights of property ownership.
Elements
To establish a claim for conversion of property, a plaintiff must prove that (1) the plaintiff
owned or had possession of the property or entitlement to possession; (2) the defendant
unlawfully and without authorization assumed and exercised dominion or control over
the property to the exclusion of, or inconsistent with, the plaintiff's rights as an owner;
(3) the plaintiff demanded return of the property; (4) the defendant refused to return the
property; and (5) the plaintiff was injured by the conversion. The demand and refusal
elements are established as a matter of law and are not submitted to the jury if the
property was initially taken wrongfully without the owner’s consent, or when the actions
of the defendant amount to a clear repudiation of the plaintiff’s rights such that demand
would be useless.
Ownership or Possession
The plaintiff must prove either ownership, legal possession, or the right to immediate
possession of the property at the time of conversion. The plaintiff may introduce
testimony or other evidence that the property was acquired by purchase or otherwise.
Dominion or Control
The defendant must exercise dominion or control over the property in a manner
inconsistent with the plaintiff’s ownership rights. Any act that interferes with the owner’s
right to the property and deprives the owner of its free use and enjoyment constitutes
dominion and control. There is no requirement of a physical taking, and the
interference may be temporary, but the act of control or dominion must be positive and
affirmative, mere non-feasance is insufficient.
If the property was initially taken lawfully, then conversion of the property occurs when
the plaintiff demands its return, and the defendant refuses, but demand and refusal are
unnecessary if the circumstances indicate that the defendant has clearly repudiated the
plaintiff’s right or that a demand would be futile. Demand and refusal are also not
necessary if the defendant took possession without the plaintiff’s consent.