Scribd
Upload
157 views2 pages

Parts 5 & 6: Rubrics: Case Study Recreational Travel and Tour Management (TOUR 120)

This rubric evaluates case studies on recreational travel and tour management. It assesses recommendations, documentation, writing skills, format, and punctuality. Recommendations are scored based on how well they include an itinerary, activities, and consistency with analyses. Documentation is scored based on inclusion of required documents. Writing, format, and punctuality are also scored on adherence to standards. The rubric is used to evaluate and provide scores to group case study projects.

Uploaded by

Reina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
157 views2 pages

Parts 5 & 6: Rubrics: Case Study Recreational Travel and Tour Management (TOUR 120)

This rubric evaluates case studies on recreational travel and tour management. It assesses recommendations, documentation, writing skills, format, and punctuality. Recommendations are scored based on how well they include an itinerary, activities, and consistency with analyses. Documentation is scored based on inclusion of required documents. Writing, format, and punctuality are also scored on adherence to standards. The rubric is used to evaluate and provide scores to group case study projects.

Uploaded by

Reina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Rubrics: Case Study

Recreational Travel and Tour Management (TOUR 120)

Parts 5 &
6
Recommendation

4
(Poor)

-Failed to include
itinerary which is
needed by the
guests
-Was not able to
include activities
which are beneficial
to the well-being of
an individual and
favorable to the
destination and its
community
-Reminders and
other information
were not
incorporated
-Some areas cited in
the SWOT analysis
were poorly
discussed
-Recommendations
were vague and
inconsistent with
SWOT and
management
analyses

Documentation

-Most of the
documents were not
included

6
(Average)

8
(Proficient)

-Itinerary is
incomplete and
vague
-Failed to include
activities which are
beneficial to the
well-being of an
individual and
favorable to the
destination and its
community

10
(Excellent)

-Provided an itinerary
(technical & descriptive)
related to the type of
recreation (if applicable)

N/A

-Included activities which


are beneficial to the wellbeing of an individual and
favorable to the
destination and its
community
-Reminders and other
information were
incorporated

-Reminders and
other information
were not
incorporated

-All areas cited in the


SWOT analysis were
discussed

-Some areas cited in


the SWOT analysis
were not discussed

-Recommendations were
consistent with SWOT
and management
analyses

-Recommendations
were inconsistent
with SWOT and
management
analyses

-Some documents
were missing

N/A

-Included the following


documents/proof: letter/s,
leaflet, entrance ticket;
photos
(facilities/destination,
group pictures), etc.
-Included the letter sent
to parents, parental
consent, group itinerary,
budget proposal, copy of
rules during site visit and
guidelines

1
(Poor)
Writing lacks
organization with
frequent errors in
punctuation and
spelling; sentences
are often
ungrammatical

1.

Writing Skills

2.

Format

Majority of the
format were not
used

3.

Punctuality

-Submission is
beyond the
prescribed date and
time

2
(Average)
-Writing has some
organization but
there are more
occasional errors in
punctuation and
spelling
- Some concepts
and sentences are
vague
-More than 3 format
were not applied

3
(Proficient)
-Writing is mostly
organized and free
of punctuation and
spelling errors
-Some concepts
and sentences are
vague

4
(Excellent)
-Writing is organized and
totally free of punctuation
and spelling errors
-Sentences are totally
grammatical

-Two of the given


format are not
followed

-Submitted the
following day

-Submitted within
the specified date
but beyond the
given time

-Used short bond paper;


double space;
Calibri; 12 font size; 1.5
left margin; 1 inchtop/bottom, right margin;
justified; with pagination
-Cover page has title of
the case study; name of
members, section, and
companys name is
indicated
-Submitted within the
given date and time

Total Score
Group Leader
Members

:___________________________
:___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________

__________________________
__________________________
__________________________
__________________________

Section:________ Name of Destination:_____________________________________________________________________

Scor
e
32
pts.

Remarks:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy