Acting for Animators A Complete Guide to Performance Animation Airateanvcies eran bird iiCaes Ed Hooks % Foreword by Brad Bird lustirati Paul NaasHeinemann A division of Reed Elsevier Inc. 361 Hanover Street Portsmouth, NH 03801-3912 wwwheinemanndrama.com Offices and agents throughout the world © 2003, 2000 by Ed Hooks All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any elec- tronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer, who may quote brief passages in a review. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hooks, Bd Acting for animators : a complete guide to performance animation / Ed Hooks foreword by Brad Bird ; illustrations by Paul Naas. — Rev. ed pcm. ISBN 0-325-00580-X (alk. paper) 1. Animation (Cinematography). 2. Motion picture acting I. Title. TRE97.5.H66 2003 791.43'7—de21 2003007225 Editor: Lisa A. Barnett Production editor: Sonja S. Chapman Electronic product developers: Dan Breslin and Eyeon Interactive (Cover and text illustrations: Paul Naas Cover design: Catherine Hawkes, Cat & Mouse Compestor: Reuben Kantor, QEP Design Manufacturing: Steve Bernier Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 07 06 05 04 ve 23.45Contents Foreword by Brad Bird vi Acknowledgments viii Introduction ix 1 Seven Vi sential Acting Concepts 1 2 The Audience I 8 The Character 18 4 The Scene 29 5 Movement 55 6 Speech 76 7 The Camera 79 Technique 82 The Form 97 10. The Medium 102 ses UL IL Classroom Exer 12 The [ron Giant: An Acting Analysis 6 1B What Is Method Acting? 24 Recommended Reading and Additional Study 26 Works Cited 128 About the CD 130vi Foreword O.. never hears about how many tubes of paint Picasso used to create Guernica, the exact number of notes contained in Gershwin’s "Rhapsody in Blue,” or how many facial expressions Brando deployed in On the Waterfront, Yet when the art of character animation is discussed at all, it is usually in mind. numbingly numeric terms, with statements along the lines of “more than 23 skadrillion drawings were used in the production of Rumpelstiliskin. Ifeach drawing were laid end to end, they would reach to Jupiter and back 6.7 times.” When an art form is so consistently described in such a dreary way it's easy t0 see why animation is often thought to be more technique than art, and its practitioners, little more than technicians with pencils (or clay or pixels or puppets) in the eyes of the public. When an animated character breaks through and becomes part of the cultural land- scape, the voice actor—not the animator—is credited, because people understand what a voice actor does. A friend of mine supervised the animation of a lead character in a major animated feature. In many interviews the well-known actress who voiced the character immod- estly claimed that the animators had simply, in effect, copied her mannerisms and per- formance. In reality the animators had found her acting style generic and boring, and had turned elsewhere for inspiration: to people they had known in their own lives, friends and members of their families, even to studying Julia Louis Dreyfuss in episodes of Seinfeld What is typically lost in discussions about animation is the fact that when you watch an animated film, the perlormance you're seeing is the one the animator is giving to you. Ifan animated character makes you laugh or cry, feel fear, anger, empathy, or a million other emotions, it is largely due to the work of these often unsung artists, who invest a lot of theraselves in the creation of these indelible moments. If the public could watch the faces of the best animators when caught up in the act of drawing an emotional scene, they would see artists as fully invested in the moment as the best live actors. The difference is that an animator stays in that moment, oftenForeword working for wecks to express an emotion his or her character takes only seconds to convey onscreen. The art of character animation, then, is to try to catch lightning in 2 bottle one volt at a time. Countless books have been dedicated to the graphics, the look, the techniques, the proces of character animation, but precious little has been written about performance, which is nothing less than the heart of the matter. As with any art, the vast majority of animation is garbage. It overflows with “characters"—human and not, male, female, characters who possess different fat, thin, tall, short, young, ld, and in-betwe voices, different clothes, head shapes, skin color, hair color, characters that have in fact only one thing in common—they all move exactly alike Ed Hooks knows that in the very best animated films, movement d Lady moves differently than Tramp, Woody moves differently than Buzz, and Wallace moves nothing like Gromit. By looking outside the medium itself, and by intelligently and thoughtfully examining character animation from am actor's perspective, Mr. Hooks has made a valuable contribution toward deepening our understanding of it, Thave no idea how many hours it took Mr. Hooks to write this book, how many gallons of ink was used in its printing, o how far it would stretch if you laid each copy of this edition end to end. And I hope to God it never comes up. jes character: Brad Bird viiviii Acknowledgments hough writing a book may be a singular activity, it is not something one does alone. Many talented and generous people in the world of animation have influenced me since I wrote the first edition of Acting for Animators. Their input has been occasion ally extensive and intense and sometimes amounted to little more than a casual exchange of emails or maybe a passing comment in party conversation. Many have taken the time to dialogue with me in Internet news groups. Each person has been important and influential. 1 am not myself an animator and am therefore dependent on the goodwill, wisdom, and advice of professional animators. The more I understand about the magic that is done with animation, the better able I am to bring to bear what Tunderstand about formal acting theory. The list, though woefully incomplete, includes Doug Aberle, Brad Hird, Mare Vulcano, Michael Barrier, Paul Naas, Sven Pannicke, Brad Blackbourn, John Canemaker, Tien Yang, Jeff Cooperman Keith Lango, Phil Tippett, Rex Grignon, Angie Jones, Mike Caputo, Alberto Meuache, Larry Bafia, Jean Newlove, Leslie Bishko, Matt Brunner, Rachelle Lewis, Peter Plantec, and Siobhan Fenton. On the editorial side, I would be remiss if I didn’t acknowledge the invaluable con tributions of Lisa Barnett, senior editor at Heinemann. Many publishers turned down Acting for Animators before it reached Heinemann. The typical rejection response was, “If there was a need for animators to have a hook ahout acting, there would already be one." The publishers simply dida’t believe meThen, in a leap of calculated faith, Lise endorsement and the financial commit gave this book the green light, Without hi ment of Heinemann, itis likely you would not be reading these words right now. lam proud and honored to be working with this fine company that has since published another of my books, Acting Sategies for the Cyber Age And finally, thanks to my wife, Cally, and our daughter, Dagny. They are now and for ever the twin animated beacons in my life. I am continually inspired and oriented by their light.Introduction Ne enter err eter tater alin Pacific Data Images, Palo Alto, California, Lhad at that point been a professional actor and acting teacher for twenty years, but [ knew nothing about animation, When I intro duced myself to the assembled PDI animators that day, [ had not yet drawn a distinction between the way thet an actors perceive and apply it. erroneously believed that there was only one way to learn mators perccive and apply acting theory and the way that stage acting, and that was to get up on your feet and act. That first day I brought with me a box of scripts from Teil Simon stage comedies, I handed out scripts, assigned scenes, and instructed the an mators on how to rehearse together outside of class. When we gatherea for class for week number two, I discovered that hardly anybody had rehearsed their scenes. If this had happened in one of my stage-acting classed; 1 would have hit the roof and lectured everybody about professionalism. At PDI, how- ever, I realized right away that I was the one out of step, not the students, I was on their turf, and this was my first reality check. [took a deep breath and started trying to fig. ure a way of teaching acting theory to people who did not themselves want to get up and act. Looking back on those early classes from my cucrent perspective, I am aston- ished that the Human Resources people at PDI didn't send me packing. They didn’t, thanks in large part to the endorsement of their visual effects genius Ken Beilenberg (Shrek and Shrek 11), who had bees a student in my regular stage-acting class and who first brought me to the company. “Ken says you're a good acting teacher, so if you're willing to try, then so are we,” they told me at lunch. I will never be able to properly express my gratitude to them or to Ken for the opportunity. I worked with the animators at PDI for some long weeks. We quit trying to do scene work right away, and I began lecturing on acting theory. I started considering more closely the connections between thinking, emotion, and physical action. I brought in clips f-om Charlie Chaplin movies and deconstructed them to display acting principles. Tread The Ilusion of Life (Thomas and Johnston 1981), and I convinced some of the ani- mators to sit down with me to show me what they were doing. I designed some sim- ple and fun improvisations to underline particular acting principles. I probably learned ixIntroduction more than the animators did in this process and, once they went into production for their movie, Antz, the classes ended. I didn’t work on the movie itself but, by then, my education about the animation process was underway and I was loving it, Because I had the good fortune of working with top-rung artists right out of the chute, other com- panies began calling me for acting classes. One workshop ied to another and I contin. ued to learn and tweak the content, With each class, [tried something new.That process has continued up to the present day. I'm still massaging the content, but now I have a firm grasp on the differences between the way that animators perceive and apply act- ing theory versus the way that stage actors perceive and apply it Viva la Difference! A stage actor performs in the present moment, utilizing a process of rehearsed repeti tion, He learns the lines, plays actions, and tries not to anticipate what the upcoming moment holds. A stage actor is taught that indication (showing an audience how you feel) is an acting error. He learns to stay in the moment, playing off the reality of what ever his scene partners are doing, A stage actor's art requires that he be psychologically visible on stage. This is why acting classes for stage actors spend so much time on the challenge of removing emotional blocks. An animator, by contrast, is taught to be an exper’ at indication. An animator’s task is to specifically show an audience how the arimated character feels. There is no way an animated character can play off the reality of his scene partner in the present moment because there is no present moment in animation. There is only an indication of a pre~ sent moment (mocap and rotoscoping excluded). The very word anticipation, which is anathema to a stage actor, means something totally different and positive to the ani an animator mator. For her, anticipation is a necessary part of her art. And, of cours has no need to be psychologically visible, even though it may be a nice quality to have in life T have learned over time that acting training for animators aeeds to include zero exercises for releasing emotional blocks. An animator needs to know a lot about act- ing, but she doesn't need to know everything about it. She doesn't, for example, need to learn how to make herself cry on cue because, if she were to do that, she wouldn't be able to see to animateIntroduction This revised second edition of Acting for Animators brings the reader up-to-date on my approach to acting as it is learned by animators. By the time you finish reading, you should have a working grasp of essential acting principles, some of which go back to Aristotle. This book will not teach you how to draw or manipulate pixels on a screen because [am not an animator. I cannot myself draw a credible image of a waster! I'm presuming that my reader either already knows those skills or is cur- jerpret and filter ation. I have tried rently being instructed by experienced animators. My goal is to i the basic principles of acting so that you can apply them to ai hard to make it brief and easy to digest. Acting isan art like music or ballet, but it ought to be fun A Brief History of Acting The roots of acting are in shamanism, Seven thousand years ago there were nomadic tribes following the herds in Mesopotamia. A tribe would encounter & rough winter gr a thinning herd and would call out its shaman who would paint himself blue, put on a mask, and chant to the animal or weather gods. The point of the exercise was to help the tribe get through another season and to survive. By 50 nc., when the Greek theatre arrived, the tribes still had shamans except that they were organized into choruses. There were regular Dionysus festivals in which the chorus chanted the Dithyramt. The enterprise was still shamanistic, but it had more structure than in ancient days. One day, a member of the chorus—Thespis—donned a mask, pretended to be a god, and spoke back to the chorus. Acting was born. Over the next couple of hundred years, the solo actor was joined by other actors (Aeschylus and Sophocles), and it evolved that the chorus was supporting the actors instead of day Broadway musical still fits this paradigm in the other way around, (The moden fact.) Religious ceremonies morphed into drama as gods were replaced in the stories by demigods, human beings, and heroes. The stories shifted away from being about man’s relationship with the gods and onto man’s relationship with other men. Today, actors are still speaking to the tribe, still talking about how to get through a tough winter. When you or your character act, you are calling the tribe together. The tribe (audience) expects you to lead and to have something to say. That is the essence of the theatrical contract. xiIntroduction Animation Is Born According to Donald Crafton in Before Mickey—The Animated Film 1898-1929 (1982), Emile Cohl’s 1908 “Fantasmagorie” was probably the very first animated cartoon. IF true, then the animation industry today is less than one hundred years old. During this short time, ‘we've gone through rubber hose animation, the birth of Mickey Mouse, Thre Little Pig Snow White, the rise of CGI, Toy Story, and flirtation with photo-real. The technical standard in today’s major studio releases is breathtaking. Time and Newsweek rapturously report on strides being made in the depiction of water, hair, fur, and skin. Animation is poised on the brink of truly astounding advances. Computer graphics has largely overtaken hand-drawn animation in major feature films and on TV, bring- ing with it sky-high audience expectations. Seventy years ago, audiences would fill the seats just to watch animated characters like Gertie the Dinosaur who seemed to move across the screen. Today, audiences are not impressed that a character appears to have the illusion of life or that its gestures appear to be motivated. The standard that used to be almost magical is almost a yawn in the twenty first ¢ ry. Indeed, this is the great challenge and opportunity that is facing the industry. Acting for Animators Versus Acting for Actors Animators are oriented to what stage actors disparagingly call sults From a trained stage actor's petspective, the way animators come at the subject is upsid - down. An animator is concerned with whether a character's eyebrows should be raistd to show curiosity how many blinks occur in an excited moment, whether it is the head or the shoulders that first turns for a sideways glance, how to indicate emotion; actors, by contrast, think about such things rarely if ever because they are taught not to play results, Emotions and facial expressions are results of inner motivation. A stage actor strives to find intention and motivation, which manifest themselves in the actions, and he plays actions in pur suit of objectives. He is taught that whatever emotion and facial/body movement are appropriate to the moment will just naturally happen. If an actor in one of my stage acting classes asked me if she should lift her eyebrows to suggest curiosity, I would beIntroduction dumbfounded. Actors shouldn't be thinking about eyebrows! But animators ask these kinds of questions all the time, as well they should Professional acting training is a relatively recent development in history, dating back only to 1897, when Constantin Stanislavsky established his workshops at Russia's Moscow Art Theatre. It was he, under the influence of Freud and Pavlov, who fathered naturalistic, pyychologically-based acting techniques. Remember Pavlov’s famous exper- iment with the dog, the food, and the bell? Pavlov would ring a bell whenever he fed the dog so, after a while, the dog would salivate when he heard the bell, even if there ‘was no food involved. Stanislavsky observed this behavior and asked himself why actors couldn't do that, too. Would it be possible to train actors to have an emotional reaction to something like a bell ringing? That was the basic idea behind Stanislavsky’s work Before his innovations, actors struck poses and “showed” the audience that they were experiencing emotion. The implied message to the audience was, “I'm not really feel ing anything but, if 1 were, it would look like this.” Stanislavsky said, “Let’s really feel something instead of pretending to do so.” Prior to Stanislavsky, stage acting was learned mainly through a process of informal’ apprenticeship. An aspiring actor would present himself at the theatre door and ask for the opportunity to learn by doing, He would pull curtains, move props, carry spears in soaking up accumu crowd scenes, paint flats, and generally sit at the master's kne lated theatrical wisdom, When formal acting classes later took root in the United States and in England, the teachers were dependent on this same initiative on the part of the student actor. A student actor was one who wanted badly to be on the stage. In my stage-acting classes, I depend on the student to bring a certain in.tiative to the process. The students memorize scenes—mainly from stage plays—reheerse outside of class, and then present the scenes for critique, analysis, and re-work. Since animators do not generally aspire to being on stage themselves, it is nonpro- ductive for an acting teacher to expect them to rehearse and present scenes. Acting training for animators is training with a difference. It is more akin to acting training for writers or puppeteers. Animators need to have a seat-of-the-pants understanding of acting, but they learn it through observation, discussion, and example rather than workshop scene work and appearances in front of audiences. Frankly, I think the acting that animators do is more difficult than what stage actors do, Stage actors work within the fleeting moment, moving from action to action, emotion to viiixiv Induction emotion, never looking back, never focusing on the emotion itself. A good animator must go through similar process of motivating his characters on 2 moment-to- ‘moment basis, but he then must keep re-creating that same moment over and over and over again, sometimes for weeks on end, while he captures it on the cell or computer screen, Actors learn that once a moment is gone, it's gone for good, but animators have ‘o pitch camp at the intersection of movement and emotion. For the stage actor, itis an error to attempt re-creation of the performance he gave yesterday. For the animator, the ability to re-create—and describe—yesterday’s performance is essential When a stage actor rehearses a show, he is not trying to get the performance to a point where it can be frozen and replayed on demand. He is connecting the emotional dots, finding through-lines in intention and objectives. The only thing that remains the same on a performance-to-performance basis is the blocking This is why performances in the theatre are so unique. The audience and the ac.ors get together in the same place at the same time and cocreate the performance. The play your friend saw lest week will never be seen again, When you go see the same show on his recommendation, you'll sce the same story and blocking, but a different performance. True, an actor's perfor mance can be captured on film but even in that process, the acting happens in the pre sent moment when it’s being captured. If an actor does twenty “takes” on a given shot, they are going to be twenty different takes. On 2 moment-to-moment basis, nothing remains the same, The performance that was captured on film this morning is going to be different from the performance that is captured afier Lunch. Animators, compar- atively speaking, operate in a much different kind of environment. This is why the “outtakes” that Pixar included at the conclusion of the Toy story movies are so amusing. The entire idea of outtakes in animation is insane! That is a concept that only works with live action.Seven Essential Acting Concepts 1 a he late Shamus Culhane correctly pointed out in his wonderful book, Animation from Script to Scren (1990) that Disne tive, stylized cartoons.To adhere to realism is to abide by the laws of physics, weight, and volume. That's why, even if you do not aspire to realistic animation, it still is smart of ydu to Jearn what it's all about—and that is why, even though animation takes many differ- arliest paintings style realism is harder to accomplish than more restric ent forms, Lam mainly concerned with realism in this book. Picasso's ‘were very realistic. Examine his Nude Study of Jose Romain (1895) and Science and Charity (1897), and you'll see realism worthy of Michelangelo. He could not have executed Seu Old Man (1970) or TwoWomen of Algiers (1955) without first having learned the basics. His cubist work would have been impossible without a firm foundation in realism, The following concepts are the base on which I build this book. Once we get into it, you'll discover that there is a lot of blending and cross-referencing in acting theory Frequently, there are two ways to look at the same issue. Before we get into deeper the ory and nuance, I'd like for you to keep these basic concepts in mind. 1 Thinking tends to lead to conclusions; emotion tends to lead to action, Everything begins with the brain, Human life itself is literally measured in brain activity. A person is declared dead not by the cessation of his heartbeat, but by the flattening of brain waves, Thinking, anal to all humanity. When you walk down the awareness, and reasoning are fundam street, its your brain that keeps you erect and moving, even if you aren't thinking con sciously about each step. Zap the brain, and the human collapses. Walt Disney had it right when he observed that “the mind is the pilot.” He learned what Aristotle discov ered a couple of thousand years earlier. People don’t just move, they move for a reason.Acting for Animators "We think of things before she body does them,” he explained in a famous memo to the studio's resident art teacher Don Graham (Memo to Don Graham, December 23, Jutionary in. ani 1935), This observation, as self-evident as it may seem now, was re mation and led directly to the legendary success of Walt Disney Studios. Beginning with Mickey Mouse, Walt understood that thinking, even if subliminal (a wrestler is moving. like crazy, but he’s not consciously thinking about moving his arms or legs, right?) leads to movement as well as emotion. Walt gave Mickey a brain! And feelings! He discovered that it is possible to get the audience to care about the characters, not just to laugh at them, if the audience thinks the characters have feelings. Disney's characters would be funny, they would have heart, and they would think Emotion is a result of the thinking you do with your brain. It can be defined as an ‘automatic value esponse and it happens whether you want it to or not. For animators, itis use ful co draw a distinction between thinking and emotion because emotion is what tends to lead to character action. If you want to understand what a character is feeling, itis best to start by asking what the character is thinking and what his value system is, Thinking tends to lead to conclusions; emotion tends to lead to actionSeven Essential Acting Concepts Here's an example: Let’s say you are walking alone on a dark street jate at night, and you hear footsteps behind you. The thought process works like this: First, you have to determine what the noise behind you actually is. Is it an airplane? A car? A human? Is it a male human or a female human? Is the sound that of footsteps in high heels? Boots? So far, there is no emotion going on. You're just trying to decide what is behind you. Your brain is operating faster than the fastest computer, so you're not really aware of what is happening on a thought-by-thought basis, but it is happening nonetheless Ultimately, you determine that the sounds behind you are footsteps of a human and they are getting closer and they sound heavy and insistent. Ac th point, you begin te experience emotion. If you are a person that has ever had trouble with street crime, or ifsomeone you know was mugged, you will likely feel fear. If, on the other hand, you have been raised in a country or region with very little street crime, like Singapore or China or maybe on a farm in America, then you may not feel fear at all. You may be happy for the company. But for the sake of example, let's say you feel fear. The emotion will tend to cause you to do something about it. You might quicken your step, look behind you to see who it is, jump into a doorway, or maybe reach into your pocket for motion is what leads to the action, and the emotion is an auto. your pepper spray. The matic value response based on thinking When your lover caresses you, you experience emotions based on your personal values, your experience with past lovers, the way you were raised, and the context of the moment. And each person or character is unique. I might feel afraid of heights while you are thrilled at the prospe of us have certain traits in common. We all think, and we all experience emotions. Emotions come from hinking Walt had it right. + of parechute jumping We are all different, but all 2.Acting is reacting. Actin, is doing. Bill Tytla (Snow White) correctly observed that “the pose {sa reaction to something” But itis also true that all action is a reaction to something. Your car reacts when you hit the gas; your cat reacts when you step on its tail. You react when your cell phone rings or you get a neck massage. Acting is reacting Acting is also doing. Acting is both doing and reacting. Your character may be react- ing to an internal thought (“I'm thirsty”) or an external event such as a fire alarm going off ("Let's get out of here!") or a tasty burger being served up for dinner ("Yum"). The reaction precedes the doing. The traffic light turns red, so what do you do about it? You stop the car. You feel a headache coming on, so what do you do aboutActing for Animators Acting is reacting it? Take an aspirin, Wile E, Coyote reacts to the fact that Road Runner just foiled hiny again, and he immediately begins formulating a new plan of attack on the elusive bird Captain Hook reacts to the tick-tocking of the crocodile by running away. Runuing away is doing something, Note also that each of the examples I'm giving have another component: emotion, First comes emotion, then comes action. First comes a stimulus, then comes action. If you want to show that a character is cold, you first have him react to the temperature—and then he does something about it, namely tries to keep warm, pethaps by rubbing his hands together and stamping his feet, How many times have you seen an animated character indicate cold with trembling and chattering teeth? That's weak acting. A person who is cold will act to keep warm. The action is in response to the stimulus, Acting is reacting. Acting is doin 3.Your character needs to have an objective. Theatrical movement is purposeful and signifi ny time your character is on cant. Regular ordinary movement lets it all hang out. A stage, you should be able to answer the question, What is he doing? And what he’s doing—his action—should be active, in pursuit of an object've. Your character needs to be doing something 100 percent of the time. This kind of doing does not mean he is scratching his nose or tying his shoes. Theatrical doing is an action in. pursuit of an objective, Aristotle referred to this as unity of actin—small actions that lead to a biggerSeven Essential Acting Concepts action, or objective. This simple ule lies at the base of all acting theory. An action with- ‘out a thought is impossible, and an action without an objective is just a mechanical thing, moving body parts. It isn’t theatrical. If your character swats a gnat or moves her lips while she is reading, that is doing something, but it is not in pursuit of a theatri- cal objective, Movenient may be subsidiary movement, shadows movenient, and there: fore not relevant to her primary objective—or it may be in pursuit of a theatrical objective. When Pluto struggies to get the flypaper off his nose, he is playing an action (get rid of the flypaper) in pursuit of an objective (freedom). In the movie Gold Rush, Charlie Chaplin’s Littke Tramp wants to Impress Georgia, the dance-huall gist, anel her friends by hosting them ior New Year’ Eve dinner And so he shovels snow > make the money to buy food for a nice dinner. Shoveling the snow and buying th» food are actions. These actions are in pursuit of an objective, namely impressing Georgia. Get it? The objective a character pursues informs the action. If you're trying to figure out what kind of action your character should be playing, or how he should be playing it, ask yourself what the character's objective is. Acting is playing an ac.ion in pursuit of an objective while overcoming an obstacleActing for Animators Suppove for example you've created a scenario in which a character pilots an air plane from Los Angeles to Las Vegas. Getting to Las Vegas is his objective, When he climbs into the cockpit, he'll check the fuel gauge, the brakes, and the controls. His actions have a purpose toward his objective of flying to Las Vegas. Everything else is in support of that, His objective informs his actions. His actions speak of his objectives. And if he’s flying to Las Vegas to get married, the way he checks the fuel gauge will be affected. If the weather forecast calls for thunderstorms along the flight route, a bystander watching him in the cockpit might notice that he seems nervous. No one would know he is bound for Las Vegas, but they can tell by his energy whether he is just tidying the cockpit, oF if he is prepping the piane for a trip. If he has an objective, there will be purposefulness in his movement. And his feeling about his upcoming trip will also affect his body movement. When the Evil Qu en is mixing her terrible brew in SnowWhite, her objective is to commit murder. The act on she is playing—stirring the pot—is in pursuit of an objective. Take away the intent to kill, and you have a house hold cook. When the Iron Giant Mies off into the sky to detonate the already-launched atomic bomb, flying is his action, Detonation of the bomb is his objective +4. Your character should play an action until something happens to make him play a diferent action. Your charac should be playing an action 100 percent of the time, even if the scene is purely expository or connective. During one of my Acting for Animators classes in Germany, a student challenged this assertion. “Suppose he's just siting there?” she asked. “E think it posible to just sit around, doing nothing” “if' someone peeked into this room,” I coun, tered, “she could say that you're just siting around, but the fact is that you have a pur pose in being here. You're sitting in a class, learning about acting because it is going to make you a better animator. Maybe one day, you'll run your own animation studio in part duc to what you Fearn here.”Then Easked if anybody in the class could come up with an example from a movie in which a character is doing nothing at all “yy Story! said one fellow with a pretty big grin on his face, “When human char acters enter the room, the toys stop moving around and become lifeless toys again. They're not doing anything during that time.” I grinned back. "Nope. Good try, though. Actuully, the toys are working very hard to pretend they are lifeless. The premise of the movie is that the toys have a secret life They live! But it’s our little secret, so when humans in the story enter the scene, the toys have to put on the old lifeless-toy act.”Seven Essential Acting Concepts Your characters should always be doing something, always moving from action to action. To continue with the Tyy Story example, Woody and Buzz may be squabbling over something, but, when a human enters the room, they pretend to be lifeless. That is a good example of playing an action until something happens :o make you play a different one. Keep in mind that the thing that happens to cause your character to play a different action can be internal as well as external. Yes, a human coming into the room moti- vates a new action for Woody and Buzz. But suppose Woody suddenly remembered where he left his hat? He would move from one action to another, based on an inter- nal stimulus, namely a memory. I's like when you suddenly remember that you left the stove on, just as you're pulling out of the driveway. The thought will cause you to do something about it, namely to repark the car and zeturn to the kitchen to turn off the stove, You play an action until something happens to make you play a different one. To further clarify this concept, think of a bead necklace. One bead is next to another is next to another, and so on. String enough beads together and you have a necklace, and one bead over there with a big spage in right? You can't have two beads over her between. Constantin Stanislavsky used this image when explaining the necessity to play actions. An amusing side note is that, in the United States, he was misunderstood. Acting teachers in the United States thought he was saying “beats,” not "beads." To this Pe Play an action until something happens to make you play a different action‘Acting for Animators very day, you will hear acting teachers speak of “beats” in a scene. (Note: A musical beat is a different matter, not to be confused with an acting beat—or “bead.”) If you want to really understand what that means, think of beads in a necklace. You can’t play an action for a while and then just hang out until another action pops up. Your char acter needs to be playing an action all the time. 5. All action begins with movement. Breathing is movement. A heartbeat is movement. These ‘movements are so small that the observer can’t readily detect them, but they are move- ‘ments nonetheless. Movement may be imperceptible at first, but there is movement in every action. If you sit quietly and multiply 15 x 92, there is movement, if only in the shifting of your eyes as you calculate. thought that is not expressed in action is noth- ing. An impulse remains an impulse until it is acted upon. When it is acted upon, there is movement. Theatrical action (that is, action that is in pursuit of an objective) usually involves more external movement, that’s all. Action without movement is impossible. ‘And remember that movement is a result of thinking 6. Empathy is the magic key. Audiences empathize with emotion. Empathy means “feeling into.” ‘When an audience member empathizes with a character, he relates in a personal way to how the character feels. The importance of empathy in acting is a major theme of All action begins with movementSeven Essential Acting Concepts this book, and I'll spend more time on the subject later. For now, just remember this: The basic theatrical transaction is between the actor and the audience, and the glue that holds it all together is emotion. Humans empathize with emotion, not with thinking nating in the first place. The goal The audience is why actors act and why you are ani of the animator is to expose emotion through the illusion of movement on screen. What the character is doing on a moment-to-moment basis is vitally important, but the points of empathy with the audience involve emotion, how the character feds about what he is doing, Empathy is as essential to dynamic acting as oxygen is to water. 7.A scene is a negotiation. A theatrical scene requires an obstacle unless itis a pure con- nective or expository situation. In the early moments of The Iron Giant, Hogarth is rid. ing his bicycle through town to the diner where his mother works so he can talk to her about squirrel ownership. This is a connective scene, getting from one place to another. It doesn't have much couflict in it and that's okay. It sets up the next scene, exposes ambience, and contributes to exposition. The subsequent scene that takes place in the diner is chock full of negotiations and conflict In theatrical terms, the word obstacle 1s synonymous with conflict. You can simplify the concept by thinking of a scene as a negotiation because negotiations inherently con- tain conflict. A scene is a negotiation10 Se Conflict with oneself equals negotiating with oneself Conflict in a theatrical sense is not necessarily a negative thing, Normally when we hear the word conflict we immediately start looking for ways to ease it. Nobody likes con- Mict. Actors, however, learn that conflict is their friend. There are three kinds of conflict: Your character can have conflict with himself, conflict with the other character in the scene, or conflict with the situation. Put another way, the theatrical moment requires that your character try to overcome an obstacle of some kind. (Television commercials, are a different matter. We'll get to that later) I don't like the word conflict much, how- ever, because it sounds negative, like a fistfight in a bar, and conflict in acting is not nec- cssarily a negative thing, You ean be in confliet about whether to eat the chocolate cake or the apple pic, about whether to vacation in Aruba or Paris, Obstece is alittle better, but it still sounds like something a soldier climbs during basic training. So, instead of those terms, I prefer to take my lead from playwright David Mamet, who refers to scenes as negotiations. A negotiation implies conflict, obstacles, opposing needs—but it suggests a search for a positive resolution. You can negotiate with the car salesman, or you can negotiate with yourself about whether to have a second piece of pie. It is always a good idea to ask yourself what is being negotiated in a scene. If you can’t find a negotiation, you've probably got theatrical trouble.The Audience 2 The Actor-Audience Contract To be an animator, you have to have a sense of the dramatic, a feeling for acting —Mare Davis, animator of Cruella De Vil in 101 Dalmatians Everything on the stage must be significant. Even if we are playing the most naturalistic play, everything must be done significantly: The actor must have inside him the feeling of significance at all times. i —Michael Chekhov, celebrated 1930s actor and acting teacher Ngee oe quotes above, Marc Davis and Michael Chekhov are talking about the same thing. This “feeling for acting” or “feeling of significance” is one of the least under~ stood and most important aspects of the actor's art, resting on the premise that actors and audience members have an unspoken but iron-clad “contract” with one another. The basic terms of the contract call for the actor to assume a leadership, high-status position, to take the audience on a journey, to tell a story. Suspending Disbelief and Animation The audience, for its part of the theatrical cortract, suspends its disbelief in the pre tend circumstances on stage. They know the living room walls are actually made out of canvas, that nobody is actually stabbing Julius Caesar, that the actor playing Romeo doesn't really die every night. In effect, the audience presents itself in the theatre and says to the performers on stage, “Take me where you want to. I'm ready to travel!12 Acting for Animators Classical animation puts an extra spin on this transaction because it boasts of its nonreality. Animation makes no effort at all to get the audience to suspend its disbe- lief. Instead, it asks the audience to play along in a more childlike way. Bugs Bunny and Wile E, Coyote are cartoon characters that defy the laws of physics, and there is never a chance that the viewer will think they are real. Donald Duck wears a suit of clothes. Indeed, that’s part of the fun. The transaction between animator and audience is more similar to that between children when they play dress-up or tea-and-cake. A little girl who is clomping around in Mom's high heels enjoys the experience all the more because she knows these are Mom's shoes. She has a disincentive to pretend otherwise. ‘When Tinker Bell almost dies in Disney’s Peter Pun, the people in the audience do not mutter, “Aw, heck, it's just a bunch of drawings.” Instead, they are likely to start yelling at the screen, “I believe! I believe!” in order to save the fairy. They are \olding up their end of the contract, you see? When your character performs, you are saying to the audience, in effect: “I (the animator) think these things about this character are impor- tant to the telling of this story” The audience's obligation is to suspend its disbelief and play along with you. The audience relates to the characters on screen, but it commu- nicates with you, the animator. In the final analysis, the transaction involves humans communicating witl other humans, not humans communicating with drawn images. This brings us to the special challenges of photo-real animation. With photo-real, we have a whole new set of aesthetic considerations. Take the movie Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within, for example. It was sold to the public as the ne plus ulta of photo-real. The audience was invited to be amazed at how lifelike was Dr. Aki Ross, the female lead. The movie failed artistically and financially mainly due to story problems, so it never reached the point where it might have stimulated worthwhile discussions about the terface between aesthetics and photo-real, Sooner or later, however, there will be another atteinpt, and here is the point: Producers of photo-real animation cannot have it both ways, They cannot say to the audience, “This movie is animation and doesn’t require suspension of disbelief” while also saying, “This is the animation equivalent of live-action and therefore requires suspension of disbelief” The effort will only confuse and disorient the audience. It seems to me that most producers of photo-real animation are climbing the moun- tain just because it is there. Their goal is to create believably lifelike characters that can- not be distinguished from live action. My best guess is that the first producer of aThe Audience Viable and successful photo-real movie will have to sell the story and not the technol- ogy. The more that attention is drawn to the technology, the harder it will be for the viewer to enjoy the story. That was part of what went wrong with Final Fantasy. (That, plus the fact that the movie had zero humor.) In the short term, photo-real animation will be useful in video games, which have a different aesthetic standard altogether, and in the depiction of minor background characters in live-action films. Ridley Scott populated the Roman Coliseum with photo-real extras in the movie Gladiator An animated background character in a film can be made to do stunts that are too dangerous or too expensive for live actors to attempt. Titanic had all those CG extras falling overboard, for instance. They can be rendered just believably enough not to draw attention to the fact that they are animated because the focus is most often on the foreground characters. Stage Actors Versus Animators Redux Actors on stage have the benefit of spontaneous feedback from the audience, and they adjust their performance on a moment-to-moment basis accordingly. The experience of live acting is sort of like riding a wave. The actor is on the surfboard; the audience is the current. That's what makes a theatrical event, But the animator is at a major disadvantage when he enters into this actor-audience contract because he does not receive the imme- diate feedback from his work that an actor on stage does. Insteaa, he works alone, play- ing for the audience in his head, which becomes a surrogate for the intended audience. If you are animating a kid's TV show, you'll make a different kind of performance than you will if you are animating, say, a movie like Anz. You do one kind of performance if you are playing for five- to eight-year-old kids and another if you are playing for adults, right? Audiences are not generic, and the audience in your head will take the form of whoever your intended audience is. Broadway actors learn early on that the gray-haired Wednesday matinee audience is a different animal from the more hip audience that shows up on Friday night. The performance varies with the audience. The audience is the cocreator of the show. The animator, then, is sitting in for the audience that isn’t there, the audience as .e imagine it, and he is guessing at its response, (Playwright Jeflrey Sweet writes eloquently about the actor-audience contract as it applies to theatre in his book The Dramatists Toolkit: The Craft of the Working Playwright [1993].) 4The Audience viable and successful photo-real movie will have to sell the story and not the technol- ogy. The more that attention is drawn to the technology, the harder it will be for the viewer to enjoy the story. That was part of what went wrong with Final Fantasy. (That, plus the fact that the movie had zero humor) In the short term, photo-real animation will be useful in video games, which have a different aesthetic standard altogether, and in the depiction of minor background characters in live-action films. Ridley Scott populated the Roman Coliseum with photo-real extras in the movie Gladiator. An animated background character in a film can be made to do stunts that are too dangerous or too expensive for live actors to attempt. Titanic hacl all those CG extras falling overboard, for instance. They can be rendered just believably enough not to draw attention to the fact that they are animated because the focus is most often on the foreground characters. Stage Actors Versus Animators Redux Actors on stage have the benefit of spontaneous feedback from the audience!’and they adjust their performance on a moment-to-moment basis accordingly. The experience of live acting is sort of like riding a wave. The actor is on the surfboard; the audience is the current. That’s what makes a theatrical event, But the animator is at a major disadvantage when he enters into this actor-audience contract because he does not receive the imme- diate feedback from his work that an actor on stage does, Instead, he works alone, play- ing for the audience in his head, which becomes a surrogate for the intended audience. If you are animating a kid's TV show, you'll make a different kind of performance than you will if you are animating, say, a movie like Anz, You do one kind of performance if you are playing for five- to eight-year-old kids and another if you are playing for adults, right? Audiences are not generic, and the audience in your head will take the form of whoever your intended audience is. Broadway actors learn early on that the gray-haired Wednesday matinee audience is a different animal from the more hip audience that shows up on Friday night. The performance varies with the audience. The audience is the cocreator of the show. The animator, then, is sitting in for the audience that isn’t there, the audience ase imagine it, and he is guessing at its response, (Playwright Jeflrey Sweet writes eloquently about the actor-audience contract as it applies to theatre in his book The ‘Dramatists Toolkit: The Craft of the Working Playwright [1993].)14 ‘Acting for Anirators There is an implied contract between actor and audience Tread a study awhile back in which it was determined that an actor in his first entrance on stage can experience the same blood pressure rise as does a jet aircraft test pilot during takeoff. As an animator, you do not have to personally get up on the stage, ‘but your character does. You get up there vicariously. Because your character acts, and you're the one pulling hus strings so to speak, you will experience that adrenaline rush at the first screening of your work. Your character, through you, needs to be thrilled by that same dimming of dhe house Confidence on stage manifests itself in a feeling of centeednes, certainty. A good actor—or animator—accepts his position in the pulpit, and feels anchored. That's what the “feeling for acting” Marc Davis speaks of is all about. I’s a heightened sense of purpose. The feeling for acting involves knowing that you, through your character, belong on the stage, that you deserve to be there, that you have something worth- while to say to the audience. It is not enough to merely animate a character, to make him move believably, He must be animated with theatrical intention, theatrical pur- pose. A moth flying around a lightbulb is animated, but just because there is a lot of ils that excites acteeal actorsThe Audience wing activity does not make the flight theatrical. Bring in a fly swatter, and you start getting theatre. Theatrical Reality Versus Regular Reality The actor-audience contract also requires a certain kind of communication. Theatrical reality is not the same thing as regular reality. Regular reality is what you get at the cor- ner grocery store, The theatrical moment—whether on stage or screen, live-action oF animated—is interpretative: condensed in time and space, designed for maximum impact on the audience. Animation is not supposed to be “real life.” Itis more than real life. Regular reality is about letting it all hang out; theatrical reality is about letting some of it hang out. Flowers in the garden are lovely, but they aren't art. They become art when Monet or Cézanne paints his impression of them. A pair of old shoes is just a pair of old shoes, but, by the time Van Gogh gets through with his pair of old Shoes, we have art. When Charlie Chaplin buys flowers fom the blind girl at the beginning ‘Theatrical reality versus regular reality 1516 ‘Acting for Animators of City Lights, the moment becomes meaningful beyond the simple reality of the flow- crs, the girl, or the Lite Tramp. Art takes reality to another dimension~-one that springs from the artist's brain. The important thing is what ‘an Gogh thinks about his old shoes, what Monet thinks about a flower garden, how Cha lin makes a metaphor of the girl’ blindness, Holding the Mirror Up to Nature Shakespeare said that actors should “hold the mirror up to nature” (Hamlet's advice to the players, Act II, scene 2). What he meant by that is that acting should be a reflec: tion of reality, not reality itself. In order to reflect reality, however, you first have to be acutely aware of it, Hang a camera around your neck; go for a walk through the city streets, and you'll see photographs everywhere you look. Actors have to be like that, but without the camera. Instead of phorographs, we are continually taking mental pic tures of human behavior. It can be embarrassing for the nonactor companion of an. actor when t y're out in public because actors will lurk and eavesdrop on even the ‘most personal goings-on, That couple pitching woo in the back booth at the coffee shop deserves their privacy, but their body language is the artist's no-cost classroom— and so he tunes in as the lovers lock eyes, as she leans forward slightly, and his gaze shifis to her bosom. We watch as he, under the cover of a quiet laugh, reaches across the fable and places his hand gently on hers. She responds by adjusung her fingers to {grip his. That's reality. The spaghetti-eating scene in Ledy and the Tamp is an artist's reflec- tion of the reality of lovers at a table. An actor can be in the middle of a heated argument with his partner, things are going hot and heavy, and inside a happy little voice is whispering to his brain: “This is good! You can use this!” Absolutely everything in fifi is fair game for the actor. You never know when you can use your memory of, say, the way a particular street person is digging in a trash can, Watch how he retrieves that partially empty raspberry jam jar, checks the label, and evidently decides that he prefers grape or orange marmalade and returns it to the trash. Yep, that’s one I've been carrying around with me for twenty years. The old guy was rummaging in a trash can situated at 72nd and Broadway in New York City, and one day I'll use it.‘The Audience Someone may have observed it earlier, but Aristotle was the first person I know of who pointed out that we humans learn by imitating what we see. Stick your tongue out, at a baby, and she'll stick hers out at you. Boys learn how to shave by watching Dad; we all learn the alphabet and arithmetic through a process of imitation, Next time you see 4 person who is involved in a conversation fold his arms across his chest, notice whether the person he is talking to also does that. Most times, he or she will. We imitate one another a lot. It’s part of our human nature. A drawing or an image on celluloid is a rep- nce pleasure in the very act of identifying it resentation ! real life. We humans expe as such, Whe: the drawing or image on screen noves and talks, seemingly expressing emotion, we delight in the recognition of our own feelings. Theatrical reality is a copy of reality, which has beea highlighted and emphasized in whatever ways the artist deems appropriate in order to communicate his perspective to the audience18 The Character 3 Personality Animation The movements and attitudes of a figure should display the state of mind of him who makes them, and in such a way that they cannot mean anything else : —Leonardo da Vinci "Waren is more important: character (personality) or action? Can you have one without the other? Walt Disney was obsessive about personality. Shamus Culhane contends in his books that it is personality first, personality second, and personality third when ‘t comes to animation. Many legendary animators, in fact, refer to the necessity for characters to have colorful personalities—as if personality is something that exists in limbo. Chuck Jones (1989) makes the surprising assertion in Chuck ‘Amuck that personality is more important than story. He says, “Personality. That is the key, the drum, the fife. Forget the plot. Can yon remember, or care to remember, the plot of any great comedy? Chaplin? Woody Allen? The Marx Brothers?” Well, yes as a matter of fact, I remember the stories of all the great comedies, especially those of Chaplin and Woody Allen, How about what is arguably the best comedy of all time, ‘Some Like it Hot? It has a marvelous story. | admire Chuck Jones and appreciate what he's getting at, but I think he may be pushing new animators down a dead-end road with this advice about serving a character's personality and pot the story. Personality may be the key to something, but what is personality? Is it personality if you create a character with a paunch on his belly and one squinty eye? Is character design enough? How does one create personality in a character? Can it be divorced from story? We all understand that Mickey Mouse has a frisky and delightful personality, but what does that mean precisely?The Charac'-r Personality and action are not mutually exclusive. They are not an “elther-or" choice. Action defines a character. Donald Duck is a cute character, but if he doesn’t do some- thing, then he has no personality. Emotions are automatic value responses, and the way a particular character responds emotionally creates the impression of personality Could you have a dead character with personality? No, of course not. Roy Rogers’ horse, Trigger, had a marvelous personality when he was galloping around in those old Republic westerns, but today he stands stuffed in a museum. No personality there except in the memory of people who recall him from the movies. A thought by itself is just a thought. It's not even a smile. A tendency to blush is a personality trait, but it’s not relevant unless the character moves. When you animate a character, you are expressing its thoughts and emotions through the illusion of move- ment and theatrical action. The movement can be as slight as the tightening of a gaze (Clint Eastwood has made a career of this, in fact) or a Mona Lisa sinile, but there must be movement if the character's thoughts are to mean anything to an audience. And the way the character's thoughts are expressed amount to its personality. Miss Pigg’, my all- time favorite character on The Muppet Show, has a strong personality because shé’ is so Action defines character‘The Charuc sr Personality and action are not mutually exclusive. They are not an “either-or" choice. Action defines a character. Donald Duck is a cute character, but if he doesn't do some- thing, then he has no personality. Emotions are automatic value responses, and the way a particular character responds emotionally creates the impression of personality. Could you have a dead character with personality? No, of course not. Roy Rogers horse, Trigger, had a marvelous personality when he was galloping around in those old Republic westerns, but today he stands stuffed in a museum. No personality there except in the memory of people who recall him from the movies. A thought by itself is just a thought. I's not even a smile. A tendency to blush is a personality trait, but it not relevant unless the character moves. When you animate a character, you are expressing its thoughts and emotions through the illusion of move- ‘ment and theatrical action. The movement can be as slight as the tightening of a gaze (Clint Eastwood has made a career of this, in fact) or a Mona Lisa sinile, but there must be movement if the character's thoughts are to mean anything to an audience. And the way the character's thoughts are expressed amount to its personality. Miss Pigg’, my all- time favorite character on The Muppet Show, has a strong personality because shé' is so Action defines character20 Acting for Animators self-centered, but her character description won't matter unless she does things in a superior manner when she acts. She’s the star of her own show in life, and she casts everybody else in the world as supporting players. Aristotle wrote in the Poetics that actions are performed by persons who must have qualities of character and mind. Character and thought, said he, are the two natural ‘causes of action. It is through action that men succeed or fail. We act to live, and we live to act. Walt Disney had the right idea, but Aristotle better understood the process. If you really want to understand acting, study the dynamics of actions first, then the connections between thinking, emotion, and physical action, Personality in animation began with Disney's Thre Little Pigs and really came into its, own with the seven dwarfs in Snow White. True, Winscr McCay's Gertie the Dinosaur had a personality of sorts, but it was primitive compared to the three little pigs. Friz Freleng explains that, in the earliest days of animation, it was enough just to make the charac- ters move—"make ‘em walk, make ‘em run, make 'em turn around, make 'em talk to each other, in pantomime, of course. But you didn’t distinguish one from another; they all did it the same. But when Walt got into distinguishing one from another by per- sonalities, then it changed the whole thing” (Merritt and Kaufman 2000, 81), Character Analysis Fred Moore's character and personality analysis of Mickey Mouse, as pres IMusion of Life: Disney Animation (Thomas and Johnston 1981) goes like this: rated in The Mickey seems to be the average young boy of no pa ticular age; living in a small town, clean living, fun loving, bashful arnnnd girs, polite and as clever as he must he for the particular story. In some pictures he hys a touch of Fred Astaire; in others of Charlie Chaplin, and some of Douglas Fairbanks, but in all of these there should be some of the young boy: (551) That's all, folks. That's the total character analysis of Mickey Mouse. Fred Moore was, of course, one of the giants of animation, a certified pioneer, and his analysis of Mickey was sufficient for his day. Indeed, he was one of the first to point out that cartoon characters could be made to think. I am not about to criticize FredThe Character Moore, but the complicated 3-D characters that are being created by animators today cannot get by with such a simple character analysis. Note how almost every reference in Moore's analysis of Mickey is a generality: "no particular age,” “average young boy.” ‘a small town,” “as clever ay he must be for the particular story.” Which small town? East or west? Probably midwest, similar to Walt’s origins, but it wasn’t spelled out. What the heck is an “average young boy” anyway? Audience expectations are higher than they used to be when it comes to a and an in-depth character analysis is essential whether you are animating a preexisting mation, character or creating a character of your own. Compare Glen Keane's extensive analy- sis of Ariel (The Little Mermaid), to Fred Moore's brief description of Mickey if you want to see firsthand what is happening to animation. Keane, who surely is one of our finest contemporary animators, goes into great depth when describing Ariel. He explains that she is the quirkiest of seven daughters, is sixteen years old, is naive, innocent, and is, able to be hurt deeply. He gets into her relationship with her father as well as her rela- tionship with Ursula. In other words, Glen Keane’s analysis of Ariel is to Fred Moore's analysis of Mickey what a 747 is to a bi-plane. You can't just sav a character is cute and cuddly and has a great personality, espe- cially if you expect it to carry a lead role in a feature film or television series. Indeed, sa difference if the you can’t get away with it even in video games anymore. It mak character you're animating is from San Francisco or the Bronx, if he's thirteen instead of sixteen years old, if he likes to play basketball more than he likes to play chess, if he’s shy around girls, or if he is deaf in one ear. And you'll be surprised how character elements that may never be mentioned or used. in your animation can still provide strong motivation. For example, the storyline of your script may indlude no reference to romance, may in fact include no romantic scenes at all, but it is still a good idea for you to know: precisely how the characters procreate (here I'm presuming nonhuman characters). If evolutionary theory is correct, and if a species acts to propagate itself, then all character activity—even if it is not explicitly about mak- ing the beast with wo backs—will serve that ultimate objective. In other words, even though you may lay out a very complex and complete character analysis and description, that does not mean you have to make all of those character traits visible. Let's create a couple of characters together—one human and one nonhuman. Think of a character analysis as a biography. In many animation studios, a “character bible” 21‘Acting fr Animators is maintained for each character in the story. This bible includes a biographical break- down, similar to the following ‘Human Character Analysis Male or female? Age? Physical health? Appearance? Hygiene? Intelligence? Diet? Culture? History? Religion? Income? Occupation? : Education? Sexual orientation? Sense of humor? Family? Friends? Inner rhythin? Psychology (introvert, extrovert, etc.)? Goals and dreams? Name? Our human character will be a female, seventeen years old, whose name is Jasmine Franco, She isa second-year student at the university in Siena, Ialy, and is in excellent physical health, except for occasional stiffness in her left leg, a esult ofa motor scooter 2The Character accident four years ago. She is the first child of Gianna and Sergio, and she has a | younger brother, Osvaldo, who still lives at home. Jasmine is extremely bright and | wants to do everything in life. Sometimes she aspires to be an attorney, other times she wants to be an economist, but, when she is allowing her dreams to take over, what she really, in her heart wants, is to be an archaeologist. Her hobby is history, and she enjoys nothing more than volunteering on historical excavations. Most recently, she partici- pated in a dig in Sicily. Her boyfriend, Paulo, transferred from the university in Siena to one in London at the end of the last school year, which has resulted in very high telephone charges for her parents, who live in Rome, a four-hour drive south of Siena. Jasmine is as graceful as a gazelle, even regal; 5°9” tall, has alert gray blue eyes, thick straw-colored hair, and is extremely popular with her friends. She is multilingual, speaking Italian, French, and English. She projects an outward air of calm and humor, which disguises inner restlessness and a melancholy, poetic streak. Physical Healt An in-depth character analysis is useful 2324 ‘Acting for Animators, Now for our nonhuman creature, Creature Character Analysis Physical attributes? (Keep in mind evolutionary necessity) Defense mechanisms/ strategies? Locomotion? (Normal humans walk, snakes slink, Superman flies) Age? Life span? Diev? Physical health? Physical handicaps? Lost a leg? Hard of hearing? How does he procreate? Relatives? Sense of humor? Fears? Goals? Culture? Intelligence? Education? Relationship to other characters in story? Source of income? Livelihood? Industry? Name? Ferd-Ferd is roughly two hundred human years old but is just a youngster in Sklar time. He's two-and-a-half feet tall when he stands straight up, but of course that is an unnatural posture for him, angling forward as he does. Anyway, when he stands straight up, it causes his receptor eye to dangle uncomfortably. He is bald as are all Sklartons and his soft outer shell is still an adolescent, healthy (and dangerously visi- ble) translucent green. Sklartons don’t go to school, but are educated in the irradiating bin while they're in the larval stage. This encodes them with knowledge enough for‘The Character their early life survival, provides them with a job description, and will successfully sus- tain most of them when they endure the Predylactus Feast, It’s definizely not an easy life being a primary food source for the Predylactus, but Berd-Ferd nonetheless must ‘make his adult migration to the Elucian Caves in order to mate. Already he is worrying about the upcoming journey, but there is no turning back. Until the dreadful day of departure, Ferd-Ferd will spend his time culating life-sustaining Sklar mold back in the rear chamber of the enclave. I's pretty much all work and no play for Sklar young- sters, but Ferd: Ferd and his buddies are always getting, into trouble with their pranks, ‘What the audience sees on stage is just the tip of the iceberg. Eighty percent of what is happening to a character is under the surface, tied up:in context, character back- ground, and given circumstances. For example, a man walks into an office, having been summoned by his boss. He brings with him the circumstances of his life, right? Maybe his wife told him just this morning that she is pregnant, or maybe he has been leaving work early for months and is fearful that the boss has finally found out about it Maybe: he has a bunion on his foot, or a headache. All of these things affect what goes on as he enters the office. Peter Brook, the famous Shakespearean director, gives an important lesson about char- acter and performance animation when he advises that “no matter how much you feel, your character [eels more. No matter how much you love, your character loves more. Primal Analysis Bugs is simply, and only, trying to remain alive in a world of predators. —Chnick Jones in Chuck Amuck The theme of life is conflict and pain, Instinctively, all my clowning was based on this, —Charlie Chaplin A primal analysis will help you tap in to a commonly shared stream of human values, leading you toward empathic acting choices. It seems self-evident to me that'one way or another we humans must get the next generation into being or we will die out as 2526 ‘Acting for Animators a species. Therefore, when I'm holding that mirror up to nature, I tend to view human behavior as a humongous mating dance, one that is not always graceful. It can be very empowering when an actor finds a strong primal stream for his character. It can some- times open up a scene or story in unforeseen ways, and it will often explain a charac- ter's baffling behavior. At minimum, it can put you in touch with what the character needs rather than what he wants. A need carries more theatrical voltage and is a more common currency than a want For example, in the Tennessee Williams play A Stretcar Named Desire, Blanche is in pri- ‘mal competition with her younger, pregnant sister Stella. She struggles throughout the play to appear and behave younger than she is, relying frequently on special effects, the soft flattering light cast by paper lanterns. She tries unsuecessfully—and with increas- ing desperation—to get local bachelor Mitch to propose to her, but her sexual energy is directed toward Stanley, her sister's husband. Stanley is coarse and simple, a graceful apelike boy/man who possesses extraordinary magnetism. Blanche is high-strung, nervous, painfully aware that her biological clock is ticking, and her old-South, plan {ation values are in conflict with the modern world. In the end, when Blanche can no longer hide her real age, her dark past or agenda, when she is forced into the harsh light of day she literally implodes, experiencing a nervous breakdown and institution- alization, Before she is escorted to the hospital, however, Blanche and Stanley finally have their sexual day of reckoning ‘What draws Blanche to Stenley? We're not talking about teenage passion here, kids tumbling around in the backseat of the Chevy, but something considerably deeper and more complex. Blanche, increasingly unanchored as the story progresses, longs for Stanley's strength, his certainty. It’s primal. The world of animation is full of good examples of primal motivation. Think of Tramp’s courtship of Lady in Lady and the Tramp, Popeye's love for Olive Oyl, Tarzan’s courtship of Jane. The first time we meet the Iron Giant he is trying to find some metal to eat. In classical drama, Anthony literally went to war because of his lust for Cleopatra (Anthony and Cleopatra), and Romeo ultimately gave his life for love in Romeo and Julie. When Medea (Melea by Euripides), bent on revenge against her husband, Jason, mur- ders her own children as an act of revenge, her crime is almost a dictionary definition of primal motivation. Though she never says it out loud, the Medea principle is that, if you killa man, you kill him once. But if you kill his children, you kill him repeatedly —The Character again and again and again, genetically. Medea's man abandoned her, and so she struck back by killing his children. It is no mystery why this story of a woman scorned con- tinues to shock audiences two thousand years after Euripides wrote it. ‘Two more examples from the world of animation: The Queen in Snow White is not merely a vain woman with an “envious heart.” She is of a certain age and has an evo- lutionary interest in being the fairest one in the land. When her magic mirror informs her that she is not the fairest in the land, she obsesses on the demise of lovely, fertile Snow White. I's never made clear who the Queen and Snow White are competing for, panwise—neither in the Grimm's fairy tale nor the Disney movic—but the possibili- ties are intriguing and perhaps disturbing, given that the Queen is Snow White's step- mother. The most important point, in my view, is that their competition is primal. The Queen is not just choosing so destroy Snow White, she’s driven to do so. She's not a serial Killer. The object of her fury is very specific, a young, lovely, child-bearing-age woman. Again, it's primal Cruella De Vil has a similar problem with her vanity. Wny does she lust for a puppy- skin coat? Surely, it must be because she believes that weazing one will make her more attractive. Even though she is married, a puppy-skin coat will perhaps bring her more attention. One of a kind and all that, Marriage does not stop men and women from wanting to appear attractive to the opposite sex, and this is really the only explanation that makes any sense about Cruella’s obsession. The actor's job is to make sense of the character. I's not enough to write off Cruella as an oddball. Oddballs don’t think they are oddballs. There must be a reason for a character's behavior, something that drives him, and the more specific the better. In the cases of Cruella and the evil Queen, a pri- ‘mal analysis fits. They are both being pushed along in life, fighting against age, danc- ing the mating dance, almost like salmon swimming upstream. Neither of them can help themselves. The justificatio 1 for a primal analysis is closely related to the mechanisms of empa- thy: It is not an oj tional matter that we propagate onrselves. We're wired that way by nature. It is a driving, motivating force behind virtually all human behavior. And, since it is true that humans will respond emotionally to the emotions of other humans, you as an animator are digging in a very rich vein when you find the primal motivation. Most of us don’t relate much to the emotions of a sociopath or serial killer because the psychology of such a person is abnormal, But we all do the mating dance, one way or 27roo 28 Acting for Animators the other, for better or worse, dignified or awkward, and so we all recognize the emo- tions that the dance brings out in characters on screen. Tex Avery, for one, got a lot of mileage out of this fact of life with his insanely lusting pop-eyed, leering characters, Evolutionary psychology teaches that “emotions are nature's executioners” (Wright 1994, 88). What that means is that we are hard-wired to feel good about things that are good for propagating ous species, like sex. We like sex because it is good for us. And we are hard-wired not to like things that are bad for us, like infanticide and incest Observe that the idea of infanticide—a parent killing his or her own child—causes you to feel more disgusted than the idea of a serial killer. Remember the Susan Smith, child- drowning incident in North Carolina in the early 1990s? She strapped her two young sons into their carseats and pushed the car into a lake. The case created a firestorm of press coverage. I always saw Susan Smith as a Medea figure even though she was por- trayed in the press in a different light. The public wanted to string her up for having killed her two children. Internet chat rooms and letters to the editor sections of news- papers were buzzing with calls for her slow torture, preferably by water. Now, compare the public's reaction to another highly publicized criminal, Jeffrey Dahmer. Here was a serial killer that liked to dismember his victims and eat them, Dahmer was the topic of jokes on late-night talk shows, but you never heard a single joke about Susan Smith. Why? Because infanticide is an evolutionary no-no. It's bad for our species. Mothers are not supposed to kill their own children, and the public simply does not find it funny. Nature wires mothers to nurture and care for their children, and, when this goes awry, it is extremely disturbing to most of us. But Dahmer was just a garden variety, sociopathic murderer in the vein of Hannibal Lecter in Silence of the Lambs. All humans act to survive. The first thing we do when we are born is try to live, and the last thing we do before we die is try to live, And we have to propagate ourselves if wwe are going to continue living for another generation. It is this shared survival mech- anism that is at the heart of the empathic response. And remember, as artists we are in pursuit of empathy, not sympathy: When you feel sympathy for someone, you simply feel sorry for him and may or may not empathize. When you feel empathy, you iden- tify with him, A primal analysis leads directly to the empathic response.The Scene 4 Negotiation Stanislavsky defined acting as “playing an action in pursuit of an objective, while over- coming an obstacle.” The word obstacle is a synonym for conflict. In theatrical terms, this ind of conflict does not have to be negative. A person can be in conflict about whether to eat the blueberry pie or the chocolate cheesecake. This kind of conflict is more like a negotiation, In fact, we can safely say that a scene is a negotiation, Unless a scene is pure exposition, the kind of thing I call a connective scene,'then at least one kind © “conflict must be present at all times. (Hogarth’s first scene in The Iron Giant is exposi ‘on. He is riding his bike to the diner where his mom works.) Conflict is essential to drama as well as comedy. In acting, there are only three possible kinds of conflict 1. The character can have conflict with another character. “Your money or your life,” threatens the thief, 2. The character can have conflict with himself, “I need money, but if I rob this ‘guy, I'm likely to wind up in jail.” says the potential thief to himself 3. The character can have conflict with his situation, “Here is neither bush nor shrub to bear off any weather at all, and another storm is brewing!” cries ‘Trinculo in Shakespeare's The Tempest, when he finds himself on a tropical island. The Fairy Godmother negotiates with Cinderella when she places a midnight curfew on Cinderella's party plans. When Peter Pan saves Tinker Bell’s life after she drinks the poison, it is with a negotiation. He asks children everywhere to clap their hands if they believe in fairies. Presumably, if the claps were not forthcoming, it would be curtains for30 ‘Acting fer Animators Your character can have conflict with his situation Ms, Bell. In Ty Story, when Woody agrees to rescue Buzz Lightyear, who has fallen out of the window, the decision involves a negotiation with himself and with the other toys, all of whom are accusing Woody of killing Buzz. When Pluto is struggling to get the fly- paper off his nose, he is in conflict with the situation, When a scene is giving you trouble, when it fecls too shallow, too clownish, when the characters seem to be just making funny faces, stop and look for the negotiation, This can be a marvelously effective litmus test for what is wrong (or right) in a scene. Status Negotiations We negotiate status with one another continually, all day long, in all kinds of relation- ships and interactions. When you go into a restaurant and order a meal, the waiter accords you high status because you are the customer, and he is serving you. There is nothing demeaning about it. This is simply the way the status transaction is playing outThe Scene ‘We negotiate status all day long at that moment. When you are having a simple conversation with a friend, you accord her high status when you allow her to speak; she returns the favor when she listens to you speak. And there are the more blatant kinds of siatus transactions between parents and their children, husbands and wives, jailers and inmates, between bosses and sec- retaries. You are reading this book, and, by doing so, you are according me high sta- tus, at least for the moment. When a teacher lectures a class, the students are granting her high status. When actors are on stage, the audience is granting them high status. In order to use this notion of status transactions, you should remove any judgments about it, Status transactions do not usually discriminate, although they could be used that way; they are mainly a way of negotiating interpersonal relationships. Anthony Hopkins used status transactions overtly when he played the butler in the movie Remains «f the Doy. The trick, he said in an interview, was to keep in mind that, from the butler's perspective, all of the space in the room belongs to the master. Whenever Hopkins ‘entered the room, he did so with tacit permission from his snaster. Observe how a but- ler helps his master get dressed. He will step into his master's space, presumably by invitation, help him on with his coat—and then step back out! There is a continual acknowledgment on the part of both parties that the master owns the space, and the 3132 Acting for Animators butler is there to serve. No insults intended. It’s a status transaction. Charlie Chaplin used status transactions frequently. When a lower-status character, like the Little Tramp, behaves in a high-status way, maybe putting his feet up on the desk and puffing on a cigar, itis funny. I have achi nothing more than a simple status adjustment. You can do it, too, in your animation Give one of your characters higher status than the other, and see what happens. The playground bully, for example, is always trying to stake out high status in his dealings with other characters. Kent Manseley, the government agent in The Iron Giant, is an adult bully and a coward. This idea of status transactions is straight out of Keith Johnstone's book titled Impro, and I recommend it to you highly. I had been acting for twenty years before I discov- ered Johnstone. The book is a must-read for all actors and animators. sed remarkable success in workshop scenes by making Scenes Begin in the Middle Playwrights and screenwriters learn to enter scenes as late as possible. Audiences are smart and can fill in the missing blanks. Indeed, the action will be more fun for the audience if it is allowed to cocreate the scene this way. For example, you don't need to show a character entering the building and then walking up the stairs before he knocks at the apartment door—unless, of course, you want to make a specific point about the climbing of the stairs. Instead, you can begin the scene wit the person in the apart- ment answering the door. Or, you could have the person alre «dy in the apartment, and you could pick up the dialogue mid-corversation, maybe wit. the characters sitting on the sofa in the living room Actors operate on a similar principle, namely that a scene does not be lights come up on stage. It begins offstage, where the “moment before” is created. And the scene will not end when the lights fade to black. When an actor is standing in the n when the ‘wings, waiting for his cue to enter, he is connecting ywith where he (his character) has been, how he came to be standing just outside the entrance to the stage set, and what his intention is when he enters. For example, in the Neil Simon play Barefoot in the Park, the newlyweds live on the upper floor of a walk-up brownstone. Whenever the hus- band enters, he is out of breath from having climbed all those stairs. That is a "moment before.” And even more: He may have climbed the stairs wearily or in a head-over-heelsThe Scene hurry, depending on the circumstance, which will also affect the way he enters the scene. Another example: The lights come up on a living room set. A telephone rings. A fellow with a towel around his waist and an annoyed demeanor comes into the living room and answers the telephone. We presume—by filling in the blanks—that he came from the bathroom. If his hair is dripping wet, we presume he got out of the shower to answer the phone. And after he completes his telephone call, exiting in the direc tion he first entered from, we presume he is returning to the shower. If he exits in another direction, we might presume he is going to the kitchen or something, if we have already been made aware of the apartment floor plan. Remember: Your character enters a scene with intention, comes from somewhere else, presumably a previous scene and will be continuing on to some other scene after he leaves this one, This ties in with the lesson about playing an action until something hap- pens to make you play a different one. A character should always be doing something Here’s an another example, this from one of my scene study workshops forrstage actors. I was watching two actors present a scene from The Days of Wine and Roses by J. P Miller. The story deals with the ravages of alcoholism, and we were watching the final scene in the play. The husband, now sober, has been in AA for a year. It is midnight and his daughter is asleep in the other room. There is a knock on the door. Iuis his wife who he has not seen for several months. She enters and explains that she has not had a drink for three days and wants to get back together with him. He refuses because she is still in denial and won't admit that she is an alcoholic. She exits, and that is the end of the play. After we watched the scene once, i¢ was clear that the actors were hitting all the bases, but, still, the scene was just lying there. It wasn't working I began to talk: to the actors about how scenes begin in the middle “What were you doing before your wife knocked on the door?” I asked “Well, it’s midnight and I'm hanging out.” “Acting theory requires that you be doing something 100 percent of the time, What are you doing? What is your objective He didn’t have an answer and so we talked about various things he might do. Finally he decided to balance his check book. I said that was fine, but he needed an obstacle. suggested that he does not have sufficient funds to pay all the household bills “fry to make four dollars turn into six,” I instructed. ——— — eeses=—Sse 3334 ‘Acting for Animators Then I turned to the actress. ‘What is your purpose for entering the scene?” “want my husband to take me back.” “What if he has another woman in the apartment with him? Did you think about that?” No, she had not thought of that. ‘How long has it been since you had a drink?” I continued. ‘Three days.” ‘Don't you figure the stress of this meeting would make you really crave a drink? Don't you think that maybe you could use a drink new more than just about anything?” “Yeah, you're right. I hadn't thought of that.” ‘One more thing. How long did you stand outside the door before you knocked?” “Thirty seconds or so.” “Make it five minutes. Try to get your courage up. Try to put on the best face. Try to get yourself ready to make a good impression on him. Then knock.” ied the scene 4 second time. Now he was balancing his check book The actors pres and was not saiting for any knocks on the door. The actress was offstage, trying to find ‘courage. She knocked. He looked up and crossed to the door. He opened the door and she walked hesitantly inside, glancing around to ser if anybody else was here. She spied one of her daughter's dolls on the sofa and began to weep. The two actors stood there, trying to figure out what to say to one another. Then the scene continued, and it was pure magic. The adjustment in this case had not to do with the scene itself. It was not about fix- ing what the audience was seeing. It was about fixing what went on before the scene began. What we did was yive the actors actions to play that preceded the scene, When e door, the audience was actually watching something now that the knock came on U was already mid-scene. The Rehearsal Afier an actor is cast in a role, he goes into rehearsal. After an animator is cast on a film or television show, he goes into preproduction. For the devel: pment of a character and preparation for performance, I think actors have the advantay ¢, Rehearsal is invaluableThe Scene because the actor usually has the opportunity to work all day long with the director and other actors in the cast, experimenting with various approaches to his role. This process can go on for weeks or even months in the case of a big budget Broadway show. During rehearsal, the castis trying to find the beats, rhythm, and tone of the play, the ebb and fiow of tension within scenes. An actor may have an idea about how his character should be played, but that can fly right out the window if it doesn’t work ‘when put against the reality of what the other actors in the cast are doing. Preparing a show for opening night in the theatre is an intense process, the very definition of group collaboration, Everybody kiows when opening night is, and reheagsal consists of working things out against the imag:ned response of the probable opening night audience, This is the rough equivalent of the animator working for that audience in his, own head. A talented director understands that an audience must be touched emotionally if a play is to succeed, so a lot of the rehearsal process is actually devoted to finding those emotional triggers or, as I like to call them, points of empathy. Good animation is also dependent on finding points of empathy, and, even though animators do not enjoy the same sort of free-flowing rehearsal process, I have decided to place a discussion of empathy under the general heading of The Rehearsal. The ani mator/actor really ought to know this stuff before he can give a solid performance. Emotion and Empathy (Those) animators will have to be able to put across a certain sensation or emotion . .. for that is all we are trying to do in animation —Bill Tytla, Disney animator. speaking to one of Don Graham’s Action Analysis classes Our goal is to make the audience feel the emotions of the characters, rather than appreciate them intellectually. We want our viewers not merely to enjoy the situation with 2 murmured, “Isn't he cu-ute?" but really to feel something of vshat Une character is feeling. we suceeed inthis, the audience will new eae Jedneton, The laion of Lali: racy Anucantion 3536 Acting for Animators When we speak of creating the illsion of life in animation, it boils down not to manner- isms and naturalistic movement, but to emotion. The audience empathizes with emo- tion. Actors are athletes of the heart. If Phito gets a sheet of flypaper stuck on his nose (Playful Pluto, 1934), the audience laughs because of how Pluto feels about it, his frus- tration as he tries to get it off. Flypaper on a nose is nothing more than an interesting fact if you remove emotion, right? When Pluto only succeeds in shifting the flypaper from one body part to another, he becomes increasingly frustrated: the more excited he gets, the harder he tries to free himself from the flypaper, and the funnier the scene becomes. Emotion builds, laughter builds. Sociologists and medical and psychiatric experts agree that humans universally express six basic emotions: happiness, surprise, fear, anger, disgust, and sadness. The expression of contempt comes in a close seventh. There is disagreement, however, about whether facial expression is primarily a reflection of inner emotional states or whether it is a social “display.” It seems to me that it can be either, depending on the situation, Thinking that is not expressed as emotion or movement is basically a big zero, a none, essential element of acting, the point of empathy with the audience. When Wile E. Coyote is chasing Road Runner for the umpteenth time, he is driven by emotion. If he en, mete potential energy Theatrically speaking, emotion is the goal—that is the _ stopped to think about it, he'd probably give up the chase because it surely must be lear by now that he is not ever going to catch that bird. We in the audience empathize swith his campaign, however, because we have all, at one time or another, been obsessed with something or someone Specific—as opposed to universal—situations and emotions are what create a response, a sense of empathy, in your audience. For example, the general fact that all humans die does not produce a fecling of grief in most of us. But the fact that your best friend, Romeo, King Kong, or Bam wright or a screenwriter wants to make a statement about the folly of always living for tomorrow, he will create a character that lives that way. When the character faces death and realizes she has missed the sweetness of life by not living fully in the moment, the andience feels her loss and regret. The circuit begins with a general principle, or theme, and works backward to the specific—and the specific moment is the point of contact with the audience. (Whew! And you thought this book was just going to explain why ‘Woody Woodpecker is crazy!) The drama (and comedy) is unique this way, functioning ’s mother has died dees produce grief So, if a play-‘The Scene Empathy is fundamental to human existence backward from the way, say, most painters work. A painter will paint an image of some thing specific—a single sunflower, a setting sun, a Mona Lisa—and the viewer forms his ‘own opinion about whatever universal principle may be suggested. Empathy is not just something we talk about in acting. It is fundamental to human existence. It is evolutionary. Mothers empathize with their babies, which is how they know to pick them up when they cry. If you're standing in the kitchen with your hus- band when he is cooking dinner, and he slices his finger with a paring knife, you wince along with him because you identify with—empathize with—his emotional reaction to the injury. A psychologically healthy person is an empathic person. A sociopath is notably lacking in the empathy department. If he were empathic, he wouldn't be able to slit someone's throat and then go out for a burger. President Bill Clinton made a political virtue out of being empathic when he told the voters, “I feel your pain.” When King Kong sadly realizes that he can't get out of the cage, the audience empathizes with his feelings of fear and sadness; when the dwarfs cry around Snow White's death bed, we empathize with their grief; when38 Acting for Animators someone wins an Academy Award, the TV-watching audience empathizes with the inner’s gleeful feelings. The audience empathizes with emotion, and finding points of empathy is the animator's key to theatrical success Paul Ekman and the Expression of Emotion Since we are talking about organic versus masked emotion, this is a good time to intro- duce Dr. Paul Ekman, He is a psychologist-researcher-scientist who works out of the University of California, San Francisco, and his field of study is the expression of emo- tion in the human face. If photo-real animation is an animator’s goal, you can be cer~ tain that Paul Ekman’s well-thumbed books will be lying around the studio. He and his associates have mapped and numbered the muscles (forty-six of them) in the human face and determined that we are capable of making more than 5,000 different and sig- nificant facial expressions (1983). Professor Ekman has identified nineteen different versions of the smile, for example, Lovers exchange one kind of smile, and the smile exchanged between customers at the bank is another kind. Also, cultural influences can alter the way that emotions are expressed. European Americans tend to express public emotion differently than Asians, and a child who has been raised in a dysfunctional household will frequently send confusing emotional signals. Ekman is not an integral part of the animation world at all even though he has lec tured at Pixar and DreamWorks, but he’s high on the guestlist for any photo-real din- ner parties. Animators would probably love it if they had a comprehensive encyclopedia e might of facial expressions they covld copy from. “My character is brave but afraid,” we 346 of the facial encyclopedia to find the appropriate specify, while turning te ps expression, This is pie-in-the-sky stuff because the face is simply too complex and poetic for finite codefying, but Paul Ekman is for sure making a dent in the effort. His latest book, Emotions kevalel (2003), includes more than one hundred illustrations of the sub- deties of facial expression. Since the 1960s, Ekman has become a pioneer in the study of facial expressions. He has authored or coauthored a foot-high stack of scholarly papers and books on his sub- ject and lately has begun to attract the attention of the general public. The New Yorker ‘magazine ran an extensive article on his work (Gladwell 2002), and Psychology TodayThe Scene closely referenced him (Blum 1999), Lawrence Weschler cited Paul Ekman’ research in “Coming Face to Face with the Uncanny Valley—Paradoxes of Digital Animation of the Face” in the March 2002 issue of Wired magazine. Not :o be too grandiose about it, we can safely predict that the study of expression and micro expression of emotion will be increasingly relevant as we humans become more global and anonymous. The ‘expression of emotion in the human face is a tribal thing after all, not a cyber thing. It is important to the way we perceive one another up close in person; the more distant swe become from one another, the more essential will be this skill Animators have to cherry pick what they can use frou Bkinan's research because the larger subject of human expression is bewilderingly complex. He and his associate Wallace Friesen invented the Facial Action Coding System, or FACS, that they are teach- ing to police departments and terrorism units around the country, What FACS boils down to is a grad course in how to read faces. The police like to use FACS because to understand the minutia of the muscles in the face isto be able to more effectively sep- arate truth from lies when guns are drawn and lives are at stake. Animators would prob- ably like to use FACS, too, except that mastering it involves its own branch of specific ‘We humans communicate subtlety via our facial expressions SeteActing for Animators and extensive study. For starters, a person who wants to master FACS has to learn the names for all the muscles in the face. I realize that most animators study physiology and musculature, but Ekman takes this to a whole other second-language level. If you want to lower a character's brow, for example, that involves three separate muscles: the depressor glabellac, depressor supercilli, and the corrugator. If you want to project the emotion of happiness, you must contract the orbicularis oculi and the pars orbitalis in ination with the zygomatic major. Most animators understandably would prefer to com! animate than to try and master this kind of terminology, Learning curve aside, animators that work on photo-real animation will have to become increasingly expert at creating the illusion of micro expression because the audience will demand it, The reason is that our human sense of sight is many more times powerful than our sense of hearing, We humans are wired through evolution to communicate subtlety via our facial expressions, Though the average person on the street may not be able to enunciate this reality, it is nonetheless how he will function 2 photo-real animation on the sereen, in his interpersonal eclationships. Ifyou show L he either will or will no: respond organically. Animators who are working on the next generation of photo-real will, therefore, necessarily have to come to terms with pre cisely the kinds of things Ekman is talking about. Charlie Chaplin and Empathy ‘Walt was really influenced by Chaplin. He thought of Mickey Mouse actually asa little Chaplin, Walt kept the feeling of this droll, kind of pathetic little char- acter who was always being picked! on but cleverly coming out on top anyway. —Dick Huemer, Disney storyman I thought of the Tramp as a sort of Pierrot. With this conception I was freer to express and embellish the comedy with touches of sentiment. —Charlie Chaplin admired Chaplin very much because you could see him think, and plan, and you cared for him. —Chuck JonesThe Seene fyen funnier than the man who has been made ridiculous is the man who, having had something funny happen to him, refuses to admit that anything ‘out of the way has happened, and attempts to maintain his dignity. —Charlie Chaplin All great cartoon characters are based on human behavior we recogu ourselves, ein —Chuck Jones in Chuck Amuck es and animation is huge. Cartoonist Pat Sullivan, for example, borrowed from when he was drawing the Saminy Johnsin comic strip back in 1917, And later yan and Otto Messmer produced a Little Tramp comic strip that was wildly popu- hen Messmer moved from comic strips to animated films, many people consid- d his Felix the Cat character to be a knock-off of Charlie Chaplin. it was Walt Disney who got the most mileage out of Chaplin. He and Disney's art teacher Don Graham made sure that the Disney animators at the old ham and the animators would do “action analysis” on them, studying the dynam- of Chaplin’s movement and watching how he set up his gags. To be sure, they also who was the most influential by a good distance. made this little man so popular and important? Some folks argue that it was his ‘walk, the big shoes, the cane he twirled, his mustache. Yes, all of those things are and they may have contributed to Chaplin as an endearing personality, but it was ity to inspire empathy that was his true genius. Chaplin understood how to play he heart, how to evoke laughter one moment and tears the next. Since he was target- international audience in a time before the talkies, he continually searched for the that all humans have in common, the things that make us laugh and cry. Chaplin ood that audiences empathize with feelings, not thoughts or gags, and he looked sto allow the feelings of the Little Tramp to be visible. The important thing was what happened to the Tramp, but how he felt about what had happened to him.” 412 ‘Acting for Animators Empatiy and sympathy are not interchangeable nouns. Psychologist Edward Tichener coined the word empathy in the early 1920s, It is derived from a German word, Einfihlung, which literally means “feeling into.” The German word had been brought into use around 1907 by art critic Theodore Lipps because he was searching for a way to describe a mode of aesthetic perception. 4 person could “feel into” a painting, for instance. Sympathy, which means “feeling for,” oes not capture the same meaning as empathy: IF you feel pity or concern for another person, that’s sympathy. Empathy means, that you identify with, and share in, the other person's feelings. If an audience merely feels sorry for the character, the scene will fall flat. When a viewer empathizes with the character on screen, he is seeing in himself the potential to behave like that character is behaving. In a word, he identifies with the character. Empathy is based on the fact that we all act to survive, to li-e. Doesn't matter which. start breathing at birth, and we keep tying to breathe until the culture or country, w Jast moment of our lives. Sounds simplistic, but itis actually ¢ very profound truth for animators to recognize. In order for acting 10 rise to the level of art, it must inspire empathy. (Bertholt Brecht’s theories respectfully excepted because they are not relevant to animation.) This was the difference between Sennett’s Keystone Cops and Chaplin's work as the Little Tramp in The Gold Rush, In the Keystone Kops series, there was no script, no plot to speak of, and the gags involved chase scenes and prat falls. Pure slap- stick comedy. A Kop would get his foot caught in a bucket and try to shake it off, kick- ing around wildly. That was the kind of comedy that was popular when Charlie Chaplin arrived in America. When the Lite Tramp got his foot caught in the same bucket, he too tied to shake it off—but he would look around to see if anybody noticed his predicament. He was embarrassed by it, Immediately, the audience would empathize because we have all gotten our foot caught in the figurative bucket atone time or another, When the Keystone Kops did it, the audience laughed at the Kop; when Charlie did it, they Iaughed with him. Til wager that you have had many Chaplinesque moments in your life and didn’t even realize it. I'll tell you about a couple of mine, When I first moved 10 sunny Los Angeles from chilly New York in 1976, I decided to go to the beach. Parking being a big problem in Santa Monica, I drove north along the Coast Highway until I found a grocery store with a large parking lot on the east side of the Coast Highway. Leaving my car in the lot, Imade my way in a westerly direction, climbing through the brokenThe Scene "chain link fence. I walked alor 2 a winding out-of-the-way foot path that doubled me back under the highway and deposited me onto a small and lovely beach not too far north of the ultra-rich Malibu Colony. After laying out my blanket on the sand, setting "the portable radio dial to the golden-oldies station, an¢ lathering on the suntan lotion, _ Tglanced around at the people on the beach, pleased with myself for having settled in "like a local. That was when I noticed the two of them, a handsome young man and ‘woman, just emerging from the ocean, stark naked. Focusing more closely, I shifted my "view slightly to my right to see if anybody else noticed Venus and Adonis. Several more _ bare bottoms shone in the sunshine. 1 looked to my left, same thing Then it dawned ‘on me that some of the folks were starting to look at me with annoyed expressions on "their faces! I casually checked my watch, considered for a moment the nonexistent "appointment I had forgotten about, gathered my blanket and accouterments and, as if "passed this way every Sunday, walked slowly back to the path that had led me to what ‘was obviously a clothing-optional beach. On the way back to the car, I imagined the " scene I had just been part of as it might have been played in a comedy movie.The actor playing my part would have gawked at the nudity, his jaw dropping with incredulity. But that would have been cheap movie-making. In real life, I had personified a Chaplin ‘moment, My first impulse was not to gawk (though I surely was gawking inside), but _ to look around to see if anybody else realized there were naked people on the beach. Inother words, {didn't play the moment for laughs, but for the humanity, which made -itreally funny. Charlie Chaplin’s Little Tramp character was just that, a tramp, a drifter. Chuck Jones __says he knows of no lasting comedian who was not a loser, and he cites Chaplin as an example. | understand his point because the Tramp rarely had more than a few coins in his pocket, and he was never very far from starving, but I disagree about the loser part. | There is a major difference between being a victim and being victimized. The Lite ‘Tramp was no victim. He was a survivor who was frequently victimized. No matter how ‘dismal the circumstances of his life were, no matter how hungry or cold he was, he never gave up, and he never lost his self-respect. There was pathos to the Little Tramp, yethe did not want to be pitied. If he had given up, if he indeed were a loser, the unspo- ‘ken audience reaction would be, in effect, “That Little Tramp sure is a sad character. 1 hope he can get his act together. I, on the other hand, would never give up.” In other ‘words, the audience would sympathize with the Little Tramp, but if he gave up the good 43 ak‘Acting for Animators fight, they would not empathiz. This is, in my opinicn, one of the major differences between the comedy of Buster Keaton and that of Charlie Chaplin. Keaton frequently drew sympathy with his expressionless reactions and hangdog demeanor. In a BBC tele- vision documentary about his life and achievements, Keaton said that he never tried to make audiences feel sorry for him, but “if they did, that was okay.” | am convinced that this is the reason Keaton occupies a slightly lesser seat in cinematic history than Chaplin does, He was a brilliant clown and mime, but he was uneducated and unsophisticated about the actor/audience contract and empathy. Walt Disney had an innate understand- ing of empathy, which was why I think he identified with Chaplin so much. Charlie Chaplin never used the actual word empathy, but he had a solid grasp of the empathic process. He just knew. He was brilliant. In The Adventurer, for example, he included a gag in which he spilled an ice cream cone down the dress of this upper- class matron. Explaining the psychology behind the gag some years later, he said, There were two real points of human nature involved in it, One was the delight the average person takes in seeing wealth and lusury in trouble. (It would not have been funny for the ice cream to have fallen on a poor woman.) The other was the ten- dency of the human being to experience within himself the emotions he sees on the | __ Stage or screen, (Robinson 1985, 202) That's empathy. One of my personal favorite on-screen examples of Chaplin’s sense of empathy is in Gold Rush. When it becomes clear that Georgia the dance-hall ; irl is standing up the Little Tramp, that she will not come to dinner in the cabin, he i. crestfallen. As strains of “Auld Lang Syne” wafi from the bar downtown to the cabin, the LittleTramp knows that Georgia is not coming. In that moment, when Charlie is standing in the open door of that cabin listening to the distant music, he is the saddest man in the world. And this ‘moment happens in a comedy! We in the audience empathize with that. We feel his sadness; we all know what it feels like to be stood up. This is Chaplin’s genius, and it isa great acting lesson for all actors and animators. Go for the empathy as much as the gag Remember the heart. Don't just try to be funny. Evoke tears as well as laughter. All of acting rests on the search for the positive motivation, the survival mechanism, in the characters. As Walter Kerr once observed, “The secret of Chaplin, as a character,The Scene is that he can be anyone” (1990 [1975], cover). No matter what the awful circum- stance, Chaplin's character always hung on to a basic respect for the human race. He was serious and funny, both at the same time. “All of my pictures are built around the idea of getting me into trouble and so giving me the chance to be desperately serious {in my attempt to appear as a normal little gentleman,” he wrote early in his Hollywood career, adding: “That is why, no matter how desperate the predicament is, I am always very much in earnest about clutching my cane, straightening my derby hat, and fixing iy te, even though I have just landed on my head Now, apply the empathy litmus test to your favorite cartoon characters like, say, Bugs Bunny or Sylvester the Cat and see if they are not cock-eyed optimists, too. Chuck Jones acknowledges that Bugs’ optimism is a key element in the rabbit's character, and I'm surprised he didn’t recognize Bugs’ roots in Charlie Chaplin’s work. As the old saying goes, “Everybody loves a winner.” It started with Chaplin. Pop some corn, put your feet up, and study him hard. Acting Is a Process of Exposing. Not Hiding This is another of those tricky distinctions between actors and animators: When creat- ing a character, an actor tends to work from the inside out; animators, by contrast, tend to work from the outside in. Actors think of exposing themselves through the charac- ter, When acting is right, it feels mildly embarrassing, like you are taking off your clothes in front of strangers. The animator doesn’t work like that because he doesn’t work in the fleeting moment. But this is important: The fact that actors expose them- selves is what makes each actor's perspective unique. While it is true that the audience sees a finished and well-developed character on stage when the curtain goes up, the actor who created the character does not experi- ence the process of acting as hiding, or becoming another person. To him, it feels like truth telling. From an actor's perspective, the goal is to merge his own honest impulses with those of the character he is playing. I'm not suggesting that the actor tries to make each of his characters behave like the actor does in real life. No, the challenge for the actor is to identify what the character is doing in the scene, and then to find in him- self the impulse that will lead to that action. 45he Acting for Animators Acting is a process of exposing Actors do not become the characters they play. You can’, in reality, be anybody other than yourself, right? You can’t be me, and I can't be you, and neither one of us can be Hamlet. But we both understand vengeance in our own ways, and therein lies the secret of how you and I can both play Hamlet. Our performances would be similar in that we both say Shakespeare's lines, but what you think makes Hamlet tick is differ- ent from what I think makes Hamlet tick. We each look at life in our own unique way. The fun in acting is to play characters that are different from yourself because, when you do, you are telling an audience what it is that you understand about this character. This is how acting riscs above the Mickey Rooncy, “Hey, kids, let's put on a show!" level and becomes art. At its artistic best, all actirg is character acting. But we don’t so much the character as we “release” the character. Michelangelo spoke of exposing the ‘create™ hidden figure within the marble rather than creating a figu their characters. ‘We have the potential to be anything in life. If you had been born into less money or more money, or if you had lost a foot in a motorcycle accident when you were six- teen, your life would be quite different today. If your mother had died in childbirth, So it is with actors andThe Scene you'll never know how her influence on you might have affected your ultimate matu- rity. Given your genetic parameters, circumstances in your life are what mold you. It is possible that, given different circumstances in your life, you might have turned out to be an US. Senator, a doctor, or a clown at Ringling Brothers. You could be in jail or in a monastery or on the moon, given different circumstances in your life. In life, we emphasize the character traits that get us the most mileage, the most suc- cess. One person's demeanor may be that of the jokester, another takes the quiet, stu dious approach. Yet another is a born politician. There is a good chance that the quiet studious person got that way partly because nobody ever laughed at her jokes much anyway. The jokester, by contrast, gets plenty of positive feedback for his gregarious ways. When you are acting, you find the parts in yourself that would be like the char- acter you are playing, and you hoist those up the flagpole, allowing them to be more powerful than your regular street personality. When an actor is cast in a role, he does not spend a single moment denying that he could himself turn out to be like the character. If he were going to play a murderer, he would not deny in himself the potential for murder. Instead, he would study the play, learn about the character, and try to find points of empathy, conjunction between him- self and that character. If he were cast to play Stanley Kowalski in Stretéar Namal Desire, for example, he would try to find the part of himself that expresses himself phy scaly. Stanley is not a man who is good with words. In a momen: of frustration, he is more likely to wipe the dishes off the table, sending them flying into the wall, than he is to talk things out in the family counselor's office. Adrenaline Moments Definition: An adrenaline moment is a moment that the character will remember when he or she turns eighty-five and looks back on his life. It is, in short, a mornent of sig- nificance. Have you ever noticed that you tend to remember particular moments in your life more than others? You will always remember the first time you made love, for example, but you will have trouble remembering what you had for breakfast the day before yesterday. You will remember everthing about what you were doing on 9/11. You will remember the day you met your spouse. You will remember the day your first child was born. 4748 Acting for Animators Scientists have discovered that when something important (i.¢., important to our survival as humans) happens to a person, her brain literally becomes bathed with adrenaline. Nature marks this moment and instructs that she remember it-The moment may be happy or sad, full of excitement or very quiet. None of that matters, All that ‘matters is that the moment be important. The time you saw your friend get eaten by a saber-tooth tiger, your brain was bathed with adrenaline and marked. That way, you would respond with fear the next time you saw one of those animals approaching. It isa survival mechanism. Ihave extended this physiological concept into storytelling and acting, I am con- vinced that effective storytelling necessar‘ly includes at least one adrenaline moment, and it may include many. The Iron Giant is chock full of these moments, for instance. Darn near every scene is so important that the characters involved will remember it when they turn eighty-five. Hogarth will always remember the day he first met the Giant, Dean will always remember the day that Hogarth's squirrel ran up his pant leg An adrenaline moment!MAD IGM mer ewes. The Scene COPY in the diner, Everybody on earth will semember she day the Giant chose to fly into "space to intercept the bomb. ‘An adrenaline moment doesn’t have to be a oig earth-shaking deal. In the famous __ Disney animation of Pluto getting the flypaper stuck on his nose, that is an adrenaline ‘moment for Pluto. It works theatrically because it is important to the dog and because the scene involves actions, obstacles, and objectives, The world will not change because ‘of the flypaper. The moment is comparatively insignificant when compared with world wars and such, but it is important to the dog, and that is all that matters. Pluto will never forget his encounter with the flypaper. saw an advertisement the other day for a bird-feeding contraption that will liter- fling hungry squirrels off into the bushes. It is battery operated and is hysterically "fanny to look at. Squirrel climbs up to get some food and the whole thing starts spin- _ ning, with the squirrel hanging on for dear life. Well, we have the makings there of an saline moment for the squirrel, if anybody decides to make an animation out of For sure, the hapless squirrel will not forget the day he encountered the squirrel- bird feeder. “winning short animation “Father and Daughter." The story is about a young girl spend- “ing her life coming to terms with her father's death. The single adrenaline moment in. piece is the day the father dies. The movie has no other such moment, but that sin- ‘moment powers the whole thing ow to Use the Adrenaline Moment Concept can super-charge a scene if you make it into an adrenaline moment. Clearly, you “don't want to do this for every single scene in a story. Ifa character is threading a nee~ for instance, that may very well not be an adrenaline moment. It would become one ‘say, the needle got embedded in the person's finger and he had to go to the doctor 49Acting for Animators to get it taken out, You would not want to arbitrarily make an adrenaline moment out of an average scene. But if you have a story that seems not to have any adrenaline ss the significance of your story. Why are you telling the story in the first place? What is important about it? Why does it matter? moments in it, you may well want to reas If you are making your own animation, ask yourself if the story you are telling is worth calling the tribe together. Actors are shamans, and so are animators. When you tell a story, there needs to be some point to it. If you call the tribe to assemble, be sure that you have something worthwhile to say. If you are assigned a scene to animate on the job, ask yourself if it is possible that this is an adrenaline moment for one of the characters. Check with the director. In my stage-acting classes, I will sometimes suggest to actors that they play an energyless scene a second time, making it into an adrenaline moment, What this means is that they should make the scene important enough that the characters will remember it when they turn eighty-five. Most often, this is a very constructive adjustment. Heroes and Villains ‘The queen in SnowWhite had to be cold, ruthless, mean, and dramatic. Nothing E would be gained by developing her personality any further or by letting the audience discover her weaknesses, Like a Shakespearean mnonareh, she had to be regal and beyond the reach of common people. —Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston in The Hllusion of Life: Disney Animation Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston speak at length about the making of Disney villains in their book named, appropriately enough, The Disney Villain (1993). They are explicit in their insistence that the villain must be bigger than life and have no regrets. It seems to me that this might be a workable formula for a classic fairy tale, which is what their masterpiece Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs is, but animation today’is sailing past the fairy- tale stage, taking its place in the mainstream of adult entertainment. Fairy tales don’t traffic in subtleties. They require an archetype hero and villain, a moral conclusion, and that’s enough. When it comes to the heroes and villains of the twenty-first century, however, we need to create more nuanced characters 50The Scene Avoid one-dimensional villains Consider for a moment the Disney animated version of The Hunchback of Notre Dame. It appears to me that the story's villain, Claude Frollo, was created in the mode of the queen in Snow White—a one-dimensional baddie—and I'm guessing this is a formula that can be traced back to the reasoning of the Nine Old Men. Frollo is, in my opin- ion, dastardly from irst entrance to final exit, the kind of character that would kick babies down the stair. Following the logic from the 1920s and 1940s, I can see where the creators figured this would be frightening—but Victor Hugo's The Hunchback of Notre Dame is decidedly not a fairy talc. It would not have taken much to flesh out Claude Frollo’s character a bit, and I contend it would have made for a better movie. I'll get back to this scenario and iny rationale in a moment, but first let's try to come up with workable definitions of hero and villain, To me, a hero is an ordinary person who has to rise to extraordinary heights to fight an extra-extraordinary villain or situation. Alfred Hitchcock made a hero out of Cary SI52 Acting for Animators Grant in North by Northwest. Gary Cooper was certainly a hero in High Noon, a workaday sheriff who has to defend an entire town single-handedly. Jimmy Stewart was a hero in Mr Smith Goes toWashington, fighting political corruption, the biggest and ugliest enemy of all. A passerby who pulls victims out of a burning car wreck is a hero. A parent who jumps in front of a car to protect his own child is not. A naturally talented athlete is not a hero, even if he climbs Mount Everest, but an athlete who overcomes a diagno- sis of terminal cancer to win the Tour de France, as Lance Armstrong did in 1999. is a hero in my book. Those few who smuggled Jews out of Germany during WWII were heroes, but an Army general is not a hero just because he is a general. And, yes, Quasimodo—hunchback, bad eye, and all—would fit my definition of a hero, Despite his unusual abode in the cathedral, and the cruel circumstances of his upbringing, he is basically an ordinary kind of person who longs to be just one of the gang. A villain, by contrast, is an ordinary person who has a fatal flaw, a blind spot in his psychology, something that torments him and causes obsession. Captain Nemo in 20,000 Leagues Under the Seu is a great villain. Adolph Hitler was a villain. Captain Ahab in Moby Dick is a great villain. One of my favorite cinematic villains is Cruella De Vil in 101 Dalmations. She's a regular enough lady, but she has this flaw that causes her to obsess about owning a puppy-skin coat. Hannibal Lecter in Silence ofthe Lambs and its sequel is the very definition of an excellent movie villain—a medical doctor run amuck, mor- phed into a serial killer who—gasp!—cannibalizes his victims! You don’t get much more awful than that, now do you? ‘Okay, now that we know what heroes and villains are, let's talk about what to do ‘with them acting-wise. The key once again, still and always, is empathy. An actor's job is to create in the audience a sense of empathy, and this is true whether the character is a hero or a villain. IPL were cast to portray Hitler, I would wry to find in myself the potential to do what he did. Hitler didn’t think he was evil or a villain. He figured the world had a Jewish problem and needed what Germany had to offer as a solution. As ugly as that may be, I~as an actor—must justify such behavior, It does me no good at all to deny that I have the potential to earry out mass exceutions If, after my performance as Hitler, members of the audience say to themselves, “My God, I understand tie man! I can see how this terrible thing happened and might could happen again!” then I am a success. If they say on the way out, “Yep, that Hitler ‘was an evil fellow okay. Good thing he’s dead, God and the US.A. prevailed, and we; ST oe EST IS The Scene don’t have to worry about people like him any more,"then I have failed. The point of artis to say something about life, about living. I's not about preaching to the choir. Whenever I hear an actor in one of my classes say that she cannot relate to the character she is playing, I stop the class cold. It is virtually impossible to give a com- pelling performance if you cannot relate to your character, if you do not in fact like your character, When Anthony Hopkins portrayed Hannibal Lector, he had people in the audience act lly rooting fer the cannibal. You know why? Go back and watch the movie again and you'll see that Ho skins allowed in these litte slivers of humanity. In the scene where Jodi Foster stands outs. 4e his cage and tells him about how her father met his violent death, you can see in Hopkins's nonverbal reactions that he is (1) stimulated by her description of death and (2) empathizing with her feelings of loss. It’s the second part that makes Hopkins's work so wonderful. He makes us identify with the man. We all can identify with the emotions of a person who has lost a loved one. Brilliant acting. ® Now let's return to Frollo’s character development. There is a lot to admire about Disney's version of The Hurchback of Notre Dame, not least of which are the gorgeous Paris backgrounds and the catchy show tunes. And it was to be expected that Disney would convert pathetic, stone-deaf, silently furious Quasimodo into a sort of good-natured chipmunk of a fellow with a back problem and one cute eye. But a fundamental error was made in the adaptation of the villain, Claude Frollo from novel to animation screen. This factor, more than any other, robs the movie of the greatness it might have otherwise achieved. In this movie, we just don’t get to feel the humanity in Frollo. We never even hear about how he cared for his younger brother after their parents died, or why he was moved to protect and raise Quasimodo in the first place. Indeed, in the movie, his first reaction to the idea of adopting the child is to protest. “What?! I'm to be saddled with this misshapen From beginning to end, the animated Frollo is unempathic. There is no way for an audience to identify with him—and he therefore loses some of his power to frighten. The thing that is scariest is the recognition of the villain in each of us It would not have taken much to do for Frollo what Hopkins did for Hannibal Lecter. A single scene in which he could experience amusement, a touch of human kindness, would have done the trick. Those figurines that Quasimodo carved in his liv- ing quarters presented an opportunity. It appears that the only reason for them to bedon't have to worry about people like him any more,"then I have failed. The point of art is to say something about life, about living. It's not about preaching to the choir. Whenever I hear an actor in one of my classes say that she cannot relate to the character she is playing, I stop the class cold. It is virtually impossible to give a com- pelling performance if you cannot relate to your character, if you do not in fact like your character, When Anthony Hopkins portrayed Hannibal Lector, he had people in the audience actually rooting fer the cannibal. You know why? Go back and watch the movie again and you'll see that Ho skins allowed in these little slivers of humanity In the scene where Jodi Foster stands outs. Je his cage and tells him about how her father met his violent death, you can see in Hopkins’s nonverbal reactions that he is (1) stimulated by her description of death and (2) empathizing with her feelings of loss. I's the second part that makes Hopkins’s work so wonderful. He makes us identify with the man. We all can identify with the emotions of a person who has lost a loved one. Brilliant acting - Now let's return to Frollo’s character development. There is a lot to admire about Disney's version of The Hunchback of Notte Dame, not least of which are the gorgeous Paris backgrounds and the catchy show tunes. And it was to be expected that Disney would convert pathetic, stone-deaf, silently furious Quasimodo into a sort of good-natured chipmunk of a fellow with a back problem and one cute eye. But a fundamental error was made in the adaptation of the villain, Claude Frollo from novel to animation screen. This factor, more than any other, robs the movie of the greatness it might have otherwise achieved. In this movie, we just don’t get to feel the humanity in Frollo. We never even hear about how he cared for his younger brother after their parents died, or why he was moved to protect and raise Quasimodo in the first place. Indeed, in the movie, his first reaction to the idea of adopting the child is to protest. “What?! I'm to be saddled with this misshapen ...” From beginning to end, the animated Frollo is unempathic. There is no way for an audience to identify with him—and he therefore loses some of his power to frighten. The thing that is scariest is the recognition of the villain in each of us. It would not have taken much to do for Frollo what Hopkins did for Hannibal Lecter. A single scene in which he could experience amusement, a touch of human kindness, would have done the trick. Those figurines that Quasimodo carved in his liv- ing quarters presented an opportunity. It appears that the only reason for them to be54 ‘Acting for Animators in the movie was to set up the commercial tie-ins. But suppose Quasimodo was carv- ing the delicate figures to please Frollo? Suppose Frollo was truly charmed by them? A moment of gentleness perhaps? Suppose Frollo were charmed and then, as a reaction against his own weakness, he swept the figurines off onto the floor! That would have created a point of empathy. A warm connection between Frollo and Quasimodo, how- ever fleeting, would have made the later terror in the movie much more frightening Heck, it would have been nice if Frollo had even liked his horse! When he tumbles from the cathedral at the end of the movie, we are supposed to be happy that there are no more Claude Frollos among us.The one who existed has bitten the dust.To me, that is not getting the most mileage for the villainous buck It is true that, in order to have a strong hero, you have to have an even stronger vil- lain. The stakes have to be huge in order to make the fight worthwhile in cinematic and theatrical terms—and to carry a theme. If Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs were farce, I would agree \ ith Thomas and Johnston when they say that there would have been no gain in deepening the character of the queen. Maybe they're right, and we'll never know for sure, but in general I contend that you cannot go wrong by making your villains empathic. True, it is frightening to have a big train boring down on you, but it is more frightening to know that a sociopath is at the controls,Movement 5 BEN tion of atoren bak shearers anlesGat Wisi person in the audience sees creates a much stronger impression than what he hears. In fact, if you want to pri- oritize the senses, they would rank this way 1, Sight: We see something before we can hear it. Hearing: We hear something before we can smell it 2. 3. Smell: We smell something before we can touch it 4, Touch: We touch something before we can taste it 5. Taste: Taste is intimate, as close as we can get A character's body language is going to transmit a more powerfull message than his dialogue. Politicians and Madison Avenue ad execs understand this better than anybody, which explains all those flag-waving, sappy campaign ads that saturate the airwaves every couple of years. It doesn't really matter what sort of awful lies they are telling, just as long as they're kissing babies and standing in front of a flag. Anthropologist Edward T. Hall says in his book The Hidden Dimension, “itis probable that the eyes may be as much as a thousand times as effective as the ears in sweeping up information” (1969, 42). The evolutionary reason for this is that when we were still running around on the savannas, hiding from saber-toothed tigers, we had to be able to detect preda- tors before they were close enough to cat us. If we had to wait until we could hear or smell them, we'd be lunch. For proof of the power of visuals, consider how long it takes for you to form an impression about the people that you see on the street. Iam writing this paragraph while sitting in the window of my favorite Italian coffee shop in downtown Palo Alto, 5556 ‘Acting for Animators Visuals lead to conclusions about your character California, on a sunny October afternoon. A steady stream of cars and pedestrians is pass- ing by on University Avenue outside, but street noise i: isolated from me. All | can hear is the music on the store music system and the happy «hatter of a few patrons. The fact ng conclusions that I can’t hear outside noises, however, doesn’t stop me from forn about what Tam seeing There is a man sitting dircetly across the street from me, for example. He is under a tree in front of the bank; he has freshly barbered blonde hair, is beardless and is in a wheelchair; he just finished drinking what appears to be a milkshake ‘or soda from a large Dixie cup. He is lighting his cigarette with a lighter, not a match; he ting burgundy Tshirt and black slacks; his left foot is propped up is wearing a loose- on the frame of the well-traveled chair, causing his left knee to jut higher above his lap than his right. That suggests to me that he is not paralyzed from the waist down. He may be thirty years old and appears to be in good general health except for not being able to walk. He looks brighter than the average bear, probably has at least a high school educa-Movement tion and, this being mid-afiernoon on a weekday, is probably unemployed. The fact that he lit his cigarette with a lighter says to me that he is a regular smoker and may have an obstinate attitude. Everybody knows smoking is a health hazard, so why would a person who is already in a wheelchair be smoking? I figure he probably is the sort who will not let anybody tell him what to do. Smoking is a signal of his independence. Now the truth is that I have no basis on which to conclude these things about that man. I don’t know why he is in that wheelchair or, in fact, anything at all about him. ns, yet I do it. You, too, form continual Icis unfair for me to be forming any conclusi and immediate impressions based on what you sce—and more relevant to the topic under discussion, so does every member of every theatre and movie audience in the world. The visual impression created on stage or screen is more important than the spoken word. This is why I am firmly convinced that strong animation can save a weak voice-actor performance, but the strongest voice performance cannot save weak ani mation, (I'm frequently annoyed by reviews of animated features because too many reviewers credit the voice-actors with the success of the final film, treating the animg- tion almost as an incidental element!) Of course, I'm not suggesting that visuals and sound are an either/or proposition. Both music and sound effects accompany movies. The music frequently creates a mood that vastly enhances the visuals. The Gary Cooper movie High Noon is a good example. In it’s pre- release edited form, the haunting theme song, “Do Not Forsake Me, Oh My Darlin’ was not included. Studio execs decided the movie didn't work and insisted that the track be added. I defy you to imagine that movie without the song. It makes the movie! This fact of life about vision versus hearing is an appropriete introduction to the general topic of movement. Movement does not exist in a vacuum. Your arms, and the dog's legs, don’t just flail around senselessly. Movement is usually a result of thinking and emotion. An animator really should have a profound understanding of the con- nections between thoughts and movement, emotion and movement, how movement impacts the audience, and how it impacts other actors in the scene. Animating Force Versus Form Recently, I was rereading a transcript of a Don Graham class at the old Disney Studio. His subject was the importance of animating force rather than animating mere forms. 57RSS ‘Acting for Animators, He rightly pointed out that if you draw the form of a leg and then another bunch of forms of legs, it might all flow together as a moving image, but it will not stimulate the audience emotionally. To have that effect on an audience, he explained, you must, animate force, And force is most often something that originates in the character's thinking and emotion The bookends of human life are brain waves, that is, thinking. Medical science can keep hearts and bodies alive mechanically now, but when the brain stops, that’s the end of the party. This is more than a simple observation. It is a profound connection between all humans, something that we all have in common. It doesn’t matter if we are talking about Mother Teresa, Osame Bin Laden, or Tom Cruise, we all come into the world the same way, and we exit the same way. We are all part of the same family. While we may disagree with one another about the best ways to spend our time between entrances and exits, we are hard-wired by nature to recognize in one another the very ‘attempt to spend the time. And that attempt manifests itself as the force that Graham was talking about. To paraphrase Gertrude Stein, a body is just a body is just a body, even if it is an inert one. The thing that causes us to pay attention to one another as humans is force—the way we go about living and spending the time. Acting is doing! Though all of ns humans have thinking brains—making us all part of the same fam- ‘ily—the kind of thinking we do varies from person to person. Because each of us is an individual product of our genes and environment (nature vs. nurture) the key to suc- cess character animation is understanding the character's particular sense of life and personal style. Pluto and Mickey Mouse were both humanized animals, with human: type brains. But Pluto’s brain and style were more doglike than human. Mickey was a normal human boy in every way except his mouse ears and a disappearing tail. Pluto lerstoodl this, they were good to go. If Mickey the wav that Pluto did. he would have: was always slog, Once the animators Mowe bal 58Movement makes a character appear happy, anxious, sad, and angry. I've taken those suggestions and included a miniguide to generalized movement, but I do it with some reservations because good performance animation cannot be codified that way. Acting is not like a Chinese menu, where you take this facial expression from column A and that leg move- ment from column B. There are as many different body movements and facial expres- sions as there are characters. Each character is unique and has his own identity. Suppose the character you are animating has a cold and you have to make her sneeze. How would you specify the action involved in a sneeze? Look under $ in a book of facial expressions? You'd discover a garden-variety “Achoo!” But | know a woman who, when she sneezes, holds her nose andl squeaks, evidently running the risk that she'll blow out her eardrums. By contrast, when I sneeze, it’s so loud my wife says that Iscare the dog. My point is that there is not a generic sneeze, nor a generic nose blow, any more than there is a generic way to scratch a mosquito bite. While it is true that these sorts of details will help bring a character to life, itis also true that nuance—and real illusion of life—resides in the way the details are drawn. And the way details are drawn have everything to do with the artist's perceptions of and attitudes about the world around him, coupled with his understanding of his character's value structure, physical attributes, and situational context Well-trained actors spend at least some of their time in dance studios. Having been an actor myself for thirty years, I have studied dance, mime, and Laban Movement Theory (discussed later in this chapter). But, 28 an actor, I can tell you that we do not think about movement the way animators do, Did you ever hear of a book entitled The Inner Game of Tenis (1974) by W. Timothy Gallwey? It’s good stuff, and I recommend it. The main theme is that, if you want to play championship tennis, you need to stop thinking about your movement, your serve, and start thinking about where you want the ball to be. Yes, by all means, train well. But then, to move on to the next step, trust the training and focus on your goals and intention. That’s the way actors consider movement. It's something you need to be able to do well, but it's not something you think about a lot. You see? The mechanics of movement, important as it may be to animators, are second nature to actors. Actors learn to allow physical expression, not to ese it. It is actually an internal thing, not external. Internal impulses (thinking) are expressed externally, always through the body, sometimes through words.Try acting in a scene in which you 5960 Acting for Animators, move nothing but your face and sce how far you get. Movement precedes words, but it is also true that, from an actor's perspective, if you are thinking about how you are moving, you will not be pursuing your objectives in the scene; you won't fully be play- ing your action. I's like when you ride a bike, you don’t think about your fect push: ing the pedals. Thave come to the conclusion that many animators have a misconception about how actors deal with movement. Preston Blair, for example, contends in How to Animate Film Cartoons that “the actor learns the craft—how to always walk or move with a meaning— to never pause unless you have a reason for it—when you pause, pause as long as you can, Hold a gesture as long as possible to let it register and sink-in” (1990, 14). With due respect to Mr. Blair, I know of nothing in the actor's lexicon about pausing for as long as you can. There is a rule of acting that says you ought not to move without a reason, without motivation, but that’s it. The purpose of movement is destination There's nothing in ther: about pausing as long as you can, but I understand that pauses take on physical properties for the animator. As my animator friend Doug Aberle ‘observes, “Watch sometimes how long Daffy Duck may stare at the camera afier being shot, before his face falls off." BIG pause! In general, however, sometimes you pause, and sometimes you don’t. Depends on the moment and your objectives, and, most ‘often, an actor is as surprised as everybody else when he pauses on stage. Hayao Miyazaki, the Japanese animation master, talks about ma, the space that falls, between the sound of claps when you clap your hands. He points out that ma is not an absence of something It is very much something He contends that American anima- tors tend to be afraid of ma. They're afraid if they don't constantly have the sound of clapping going on, the audience will get bored. But Miyazaki pays close attention to ‘ma, He fills it with emotion. He correctly observes that the audience will not leave you if the time is full. It does not have to always be full of sound. When Wile E, Coyote runs ofa cliff and is suspended in thin air, he just hangs there for a long time before falling That is mo, and it is wonderful. We empathize with his emotion Walt Disney discovered back in the 1930s that character expression is best when. it involves the whole body, not just the face. Movement begins in the area of your navel and radiates outward into your limbs. Ask ten people what the most expressive part of their body is, and nine of them will tell you it’s the face. The truth is that our hands and arms are the most expressive parts of our bodies. When you think of your‘Movement body as a form, a block that is filling space, you see that only the head and face occupy a tiny part of the form. This lesson is hard for many new actors to grasp, com- ing as they do from the world of cinema where they are raised on the extreme facial close-up. “It’s all in the eyes” is the maxim you hear all the time when you first learn about movie acting. It all comes to close-ups, and close-ups are about eyes. But that’s no place to hang your hat if you are trying to understand hnuman psychology and expression. This is why animators who rely too heavily on that mirror on the desk to work out facial expressions are doing only haif the work. It is true that actors and animators must be masters of portraying emotion, but you do yourcell a disservice if you believe that emotion is mainly expressed by the face, There was a famous review of Geraldine Paye’s Broadway performance in a Tennessee Williams play (Summer and Smoke, I think), in which the reviewer observed that “Miss Page does more acting with her back than most actors do with their fronts.” So did Charlie Chaplin. And so it is—or should be—with animation. Get the body first, and then worry about the face! When I was seventeen years old, I saw my first performance of The Dark ofthe Moontat Arena Stage in Washington, DC. Renee Auberjonois played the witch boy who falls in love with Barbara Allen, the human girl. He makes a deal with the head wich who allows him to become human on a trial basis. Now, the way most productions of this play deal with the transition from witch to human is with wild costumes. When the witch boy is a witch, he may have twigs growing out of his back for instance. And when he becomes human, the twigs are removed. Well, Renee Auberjonois did some- thing in that show that made a dramatic impression on me as an actor and testifies to the power of visuals in human movement. He chose to move close to the ground when he was a witch, slinking around like a weasel, on all fours. After he made the deal with the head witch, he played subs:quent scenes in increasingly erect postures. I recall that, at one point, he was tilted from the waist at about a 45-degree angle. Then, when he made his first entrance as a full human being, he walked out onto the stage standing fully erect, proud and tall. I get chills just thinking about it even now, almost forty years later! It was as if the lights in the theatre had gotten brighter. The actor had mimicked the evolution of man, from muck to full power. The words of the play were the same as I have now learned they are in every production. It was winat that marvelous actor did with the physical movement that made the impression. 616 Acting for Animators ‘A person's physical movement is a compensation for, or reaction to, whatever is going on with him physically or psychically. Here's an example: I had an acting stu- dent in my San Francisco class who suffered from slipped discs in her spine. Invariably she arrived at class late, walking slowly, and when she entered, she brought with her a pillow to sit on, Another student was a dancer, and { don’t recail him ever sitting on a chair or sofa in the erect. Or, if he sat on a sofa, he would manage to position himself in a stretching pose. Mind you, none of this was done for effect. I's just the way he handled his body. Renee Auberjonois, in that play, decided that the power of the human was in the spine and in egular way. He preferred to sit cross-legged on the floor, back our evolutionary struggle to defy gravity With this proviso—that there really is not an ironclad, one-of-a-kind, check-off guide to physical movement—I offer the following generalities of body language for you to consider: + Arms folded across the chest indicate that the person is “closed,” intractable. Hands clasped behind one’s back or folded across one’s crotch indicate low- status, literally signaling that “I won't defend myself.” + Confidence manifests itself as relaxation, and relaxation manifests itself in a feel ing of weight, not lightness. A confident character has weight, centeredness. + Accerebral person will tend to lead with his forchead. A fun-loving person will tend to keep his chin up, exposing more throat. Children lead with their heads up a lot. Adults become more cerebral + Aman with a beer gut has a lot of pressure on his lower back. When he sits in a chair, he will tend to use his arms and hands to ease the descent, per- haps bracing himself on the arms of the chair. + When a person in conversation is interrupted, he may first turn his shoul- ers in the direction of the interruption before he turns his head, so he can complete whatever he is saying. + Embarrassment is a low-status emotion, a way of defuusing a tense moment. When you are embarrassed, you tend to shrink in space. You cast your gaze downward, your hands tend to rise to at least partly cover your face. Usually. when a person is embarrassed, he is acknowledging a truth of some kind. A kidMovernent tosses a ball through the living room window, and he's embarrassed. He did a bad thing You discover that your fly is unzipped in front of the church group, and you are embarrassed. The top of your bathing suit comes off when you dive in the pool, and the resulting applause from onlookers embarrasses you. + Anxiety is a heady energy, concentrated above the chest Line and into the head. Woody Allen, to cite a popular example, typically displays a high power center, with arms and hands gesticulating wildly. This is a result of his phi- losophy of life. Woody operates on the premise that death is probably going to come sooner rather than later, and it makes him nervous. Mehatma Gandhi, on the other hand, presumably also knew that we all die, but he was comfortable with the idea, and so displayed a lower power center and grace- fulness of movement + When body movements extend above the waist, above the shoulders, they light” in nature; body movements below the waist are more associated with “weight” or “heaviness.” Gravity is pulling harder. + Asa person gets older, his spine settles, and the character begins to move in reaction to discomfort. When you see old people walking down the street with little mincing steps, itis because it would hurt them to take bigger steps. And note how very old people tend to keep their mouths open as they walk, pethap: to allow in more oxygen. When an elderly person turns to looks slightly behind him, he will tum his entire upper body, not just his neck. That's because of stiffivess in the upper spine. I still remember my granddaddy, trying to back out of the driveway at his house in Atlanta. He shouldn't have been driving at all at his age, but they didn’t use to make as big a deal about this as they do today. In order to drive in reverse, he didn’t even attempt to turn his body around to look directly out the back window. That hurt his neck too much. So he watched the reverse-image in the rearview mirror as he accelerated carefully backward. That's not how they want you do to it at the DMV. As I wrote the last sentence, a man in his thirties walked slowly by on the sidewalk outside my window. He wore one of those black elastic-and-Velcro girdlelike braces 63 be eesActing for Animators that you get at the chiropractor’s office. He was angled forward from the waist, shift- ing his power center out in front of him until it tilted hi a forward and he had to catch up with himself. His arms did not have as much swing to them as they would typically. His neck was jutting out a bit, and his chin was angled up, parallel with the sidewalk Allin all, the movement seemed very uncomfortable, and it was all because of his reac~ tion to whatever was going on with his back. Power Centers The notion of shifting power centers is a particularly useful tool for animators, The basic idea is that, when we stand and walk with ease, our power center is in our chest leading us forward. Try it, Just get up and walk around the room in a relaxed fashion or, as I prefer to say, “with ease.” Can you feel the power generating from your chest? Now, let the power center move into your stomach, dropping from your chest. A pregnant woman walks this way. Try moving the poy er center to your feet. Let it pull you along, shuffling. Suddenly, you feel like a street bum, a wino. Put the power cen ter behind your neck and let it push you instead of pull you. Feel the energy acceler- Aly Every character has a power centerMovement ate? Put the power center six inches over your head and dangle from it, let it make you dance. In 1996, Michael Keaton starred in an underrated movie entitled Multiplicity, in which he played a main who clones himself in order to make life easier. “Two of me is better than one of me” is the logic. The thing is that the clones, all played by Keaton, have very different personalities. One is a macho kind of guy, another is politically correct and accommodating, and another is ultraweird and unpredictable, e plished, keeping in mind this business about power centers. The politically correct clone has a high power center, in his upper chest; the macho clone has a low power ‘n zany. | recommend that you rent this movie and study what Keaton has accom- center, in his groin An anxious pers n has a power center in his head. Think of Woody Allen or the comedienne Joan R. sers. Did you ever see Woody Allen's movie, Play It Again, Som? In it, Humphrey Bogart—a la Cesallanca—appears in the Allen character's fantasy, instructing him on how to be a “real man,” how to “get a dame.” Allen's a nervous wreck, a man with a very heady energy, a high power center; Bogart, a man’s man, has a very low power center, is unflappable. Next time you're at a loss with a character you're animating, try shifting the power center. The Psychological Gesture Gestures do not always have to be illustrations of the spoken word. A gesture can express an inner emotional state. This isa particular trap for animators because the ani- mation so often comes after the dialogue is recorded. The temptation is to listen to the prerecorded words and then have the gestures illustrate them. This is actually closer to mime than gesturing, and it is not an accurate mirror of what we humans do. Yes, we do sometimes gesture to illustrate, but we just as often gesture in a way that contrasts with the spoken word. Our gestures, in other words, can expose the truth within, Iam convinced that the next generation of animation excellence will hinge on paying atten- tion to just this kind of nuanced behavior. Michael Chekhov is the person that first coined the acting term psychological gstue, (See On the Technique of Acting 1991). He contended that every character has a defiring psychological 65 | } Micsamensh66 Acting for Animators A psychological gesture can be a powerful acting tool gesture, Have you ever noticed someone who wrings his hands a lot while he’s talking? er That's That's a psychological gesture. A bully punches someone ir the chest with his fin a psychological gesture. It is 2 useful concept for an animator. For example, the word broken in the sentence "My heart is broken” can be expressed by miming the breaking of a stick. Try this experiment: With your hands down by your side, say that line out lond. Did you do it? Well, go ahead and do it. This lesson won't mean much unless you do the work. Say, right out loud, “My heart is broken.” pe gesture of breaking that stick of wood Nobody's watching. Good. Now, make Good. Now say the line again and da the gesture at the same time, breaking the wood precisely when you say the word broken. See how much stronger the line sounds, how much stronger it feels? Now, put your hands in your pocket or down by your side, say the line out loud and imagine breaking that stick. Make the stick -breaking gesture men tally. The line still sounds stronger, just as if you were actually, physically making the gesture with your hands out front. Amazing, huh? Now let's take the notion of the psychological gesture a step further, incorporat- ing Chekhov's concept of “atmosphere.” Imagine a car wreck on a highway. PoliceMovement cars are in attendanc«, lights flashing in the drizzly early evening air. There is a yel- low tarp covering wl wt must be a body in one of the wrecked cars. A man is sitting on the curb, sobbing. Got the picture? Okay, now imagine that you arrive on the scene, on foot, Can you feel the “atmosphere” of the place? It's quite different from the atmosphere in the coffee shop down the street or the atmosphere at a play- ground. Notice how your body reacts to the very idea of atmosphere at that car wreck scene? Notice how you tense up? There is a valuable acting lesson there. There is an inherent atmosphere in every scene, every setting. Rather than simply entering a scene as if you (or your character) are all that exists in the world, let the aumo- sphere of the scene inform you emotionally. React to it, factor it into your actions. Let it color the intentions you bring into the scene. This principle is what makes haunted house scenarios so scary, by the way. The atmosphere is designed to scare the pants off you Take a look at some d-awings by Daumier, a man who obviously understood the principle, too. For every mood there is a gesture. Effect of Alcohol and Drugs on Movement Alcohol and marijuana relax the muscles, causing the character to yield to the pull of ‘gravity. A drunk character is heavy, and his movement is slower, the arcs more fluid. Cocaine will wire the character, causing him to doubly resist the pull of gravity, and his movement will be swifier, the arcs quicker. Acting-wise, you can lump all external substances, whether they stimulate or depress, together under this maxim: Allow the substance to do whatever that particu- lar substance does to the body—and then act to control it, to hide it. If it relaxes you and slows you down, strive for alertness and muscle tension; if it wires you, like cocaine, strive to relax, to moderate your behavior. A drunken person—unless he is trying to be drunk, like at a frat party or with a bunch of drunken sailors—will act against the loss’of control. The person who drinks too much at office parties, or on a date, circumstances where it is a liability to appear too out-of-control, are worth studying Even as a person is getting mentally and phys- ically slower, he strives to appear alert, even erudite. Itis a hallmark of the amateur actor 6768 ‘Acting for Animators that, when he plays a drunk, he stumbles and mumbles across the stage, really layering it on. For an accurate, dramatic live-action depiction of drunken behavior, watch the Jack Lemmon movie The Days of Wine end Rose. For a comedic live-action depiction, watch Dudley Moore's performance in Arthur Pantomime Pantomime is one of those words that can lead to confusion because there is “English Pantomime,” which involves fairy tales and cross-dressing, and there is the kind of pantomime for which Marcel Marceau is famous. The origins of both are unclear, but they evidently are rooted in Commedia dell “Arte in sixteenth century Italy. The Harlequin character got into the act somewhere along the way, donning whiteface, to emphasize facial expression. Today, an informal man-on-the-street poll will surely show that most civilians consider pantomime to be a kind of wordless acting—some thing very distinct from the acting you see in movies, Consider this: An actor expresses A mime generally does not speak at all‘Movement love with words, sighs, and accompanying gestures. A mime generally does not speak at all, so he expresses love with poses, attitudes—maybe he will cross his hands across his heart and put a funny expression on his face. The way the word pantomime is used in the world of animation is probably a holdover from the days of the silent cartoons. Back then, the characters did use pantomime! But that’s because they had no voices, no other way to communicate. All that changed when talkies came in! Today, it is common for the animator—particularly in feature animation—to listen to a prerecorded voice track, making his animation fit the voices And when you do that, you're really not pantomiming You're looking for the mnotiva- tion underneath the words. Remember that words express thoughts. If the animator is trying to pantomime the words he is hearing, he is going to wind up trying to phys- ically convey the words in a wordless way. Words, movement, and emotion do not fit together like that, even in animation. Stage actors don’t pantomime and, in fact, itis considered to be bad acting if they do. It is too external, too much of an “indication” of emotion rather than a straight- forward expression of it. The movement in pantomime is very—for lack of a better word—artful, and the audience relates to it differently than they do to the general movement of actors. There is an added mental step in pantomime, Part of the appreci- ation is in the “considered” nature of the movement Charlie Chaplin considered himself to be a pantomime, which he defined as a per- former who would use mute gestures and facial expressions to convey emotion. That's because he worked in silent pictures but, frankly, I think he underestimated himself. He was far more than a mime. Chaplin always was a powerful actor, attuned to gener- ating a sense of empathy in his international audience. Taking his self-assessment at face value, however, may explain why his stardom diminished with the advent of sound in motion pictures. To be sure, sound is what killed certain animared, pantomimed char- acters, like Felix the Cat. And other silent stars like Harry Langdon and Buster Keaton did not make the transition because they mainly practiced pantomime. In Chaplin's autobiography, he bemoans the arrival of sound pictures, and he delayed his partici- pation in it for as long as he could. [As we have already discussed, acting has very little to do with words anyway. I's all about intention, motivation, actions—emotion. But if character movement takes the form of pantomime, you've crossed over into another distinct art form. 6970 Acting for Animators Laban Movement Theory Rudolf Laban (1879-1958) was a major pioneer in the Central European Expressionist Art modern dance movement. He developed a new and influential approach to the study of dance, focusing on the systematic analysis of movement in relation to the dynamic use of the body in space. He also created a widely used form of notation (now evolved into Labanotation) to describe movement. Laban’s work was revolutionary in its day and has subsequently been applied to a wide variety of disciplines, from psychotherapy to ethnology, from movement therapy to voice training, acting, and dance and, during the ppast several years, to computer animation. Although there is no school or teacher offer- ing specific Laban movement training for animators at this time, animator and Certified Laban Movement Analyst Leslie Bishko, Director of the Computer Animation Program at ‘Vancouver Institute of Media Arts in Canada, has written several papers on the applica- tion of Laban Movement Analysis (LMA) to computer animation methods. She includes analogies between Laban’s Effort theory and the twelve Animation Principles. 1 am indebted to Ms, Bishko and to Jean Newlove of the Jean Newlove Centre for Laban Studies in London for their assistance in preparing the following primer. Before getting into Laban theory itself, a brief historical preface is helpful because Rudolf Laban’s original ideas have been interpreted, reinterpreted, and synthesized in different ways in different parts of the world at different times by different folks. Jean Newlove studied personally with Rudolf Laban in the 1940s, worked as his assistant and is famitiar with what the man himself had to say. She is the author of an excellent book on the subject, entitled Laban for Actors and Dancers (1993). Her school offers a diploma course in which students study Laban in depth, using it as a base for most theatre skills Simultancous with Newlove’s career inthe UK and Europe, however, Laban's theories found their way to the United States dirough other disciples. lmgard Barteniell in par- ticular mixed her perspectives with Laban's and created Laban Movement Analysis (LMA), a theoretical framework for movement observation and description for which fone can receive certification through the Laban/Bartenieff Institute of Movement Studies in New York. Graduates from this schoo! have fanned out across the United States and Canada and have, in turn, trained others. Animator Leslie Bishko studied the LMA branch of Laban, not Laban theory as espoused by Ms, Newlove. While there are differ‘Movement ences in terminology and focus between the North American and British versions of Laban theory, their roots are very similar. That's enough history. Let's roll up our sleeves and get to work. I can't possibly do justice to this very rich resource in these few pages, but I want to give you the basic ideas behind Laban theory, plus a list of resources for further study. It is difficult to talk about movement because it is constantly changing. Imagine the challenge you would face if you had to write a paper describing in detail how a child's body is moving as he pedals his tricycle up and down the driveway. He's pedaling like crazy, then he slows down, and then he topples over as hee tries to make a U-turn, At every point, the nature of his movement changes. The genius of Rudolf Laban is that he defined a set of movement categories, with parameters within each category. These parameters provide a frame of reference for the observation and description of move- ment. In this chapter, I introduce two categories: space (i.¢., where the movement is happening), and effor (i.e., how intention and will affect movement). ‘The CD-ROM that accompanies this book contains a picture of a twenty-sided objegt called an iewsahedron, Along with the tetrahedron and three others, the icosahedron is one of Plato's solids, and it is at the base of Rudolf Laban’s theories. Space Imagine that you have created an animated character that looks like a regular-sized brick with arms and legs, and it is standing in the icosahedron. In Laban terminol- ogy, the personal space around your character is called ts kinesphere—the distance it can extend its arms and its free leg if it is balancing on one leg. Your character can move to any of the points of the icosahedron, Actually, your character can move in infinite ways but, for the purposes of this chapter—and for simplicity’s sake—I will reduce this to the most basic six movements: (1) forward, (2) backward, (3) up, (4) down, (5) sideways/left, (6) sideways/right. Forward/backward movement occurs con the sagittal axis; up/down movement occurs on the vertical axis; left/right move ment occurs on the horizontal axis. As Leslie Bishko observes, “the axis are directly analogous to the Cartesian coordinate system's X, Y, and Z axis, used in computer animation.” 71n ‘Acting for Animators Effort Effort refers to how the character moves through space. He can move in different ways, depending on how you vary his inner attitude toward space, time, and weight. Each character you create is unique and moves in his or her own way, right? He can move on aTime scale measured from very fast urgency to very lingering slowness; he mobi- lizes his Weight with forceful strength or delicate lightness, and his atention toward Space car be direct, like an arrow, oF indirect, like a mangled figure-eight. Plus there is the variable of Flow, a factor that pertains to the “feeling” of movement and can be measured on a scale that ranges from Bound to Free, When a baseball pitcher winds up for a pitch, for example, his movement has a Bound quality, It has resistance, a pause, and then the ball is hurled across home plate with Free Flow, as if he is trying to throw the ball straight through the catcher’s mitt Let's look a little closer at the Time factor, break it down a little further. This offers a way to differentiate between the qualities of time (sudden, urgent or sustained, linger- ing), and quantitative time (fast, slow, accelerating, decelerating). If the brick character you created walks down a city street, his movement may be sudden (urgent) or sus tained (lingering), accelerating or decelerating depending on circumstance. If he steps around a pothole, he may slow down; or he may speed up to make a traffic light. This, being the case, both Leslie Bishko and Jean Newlove prefer to refer to the Time con- ‘timaum as one ranging from suddenness to sustainment, with the presumption that the character may, while moving suddenly or sustained, vary between fast and slow. Itis useful to think of Effort as the character's “inner attitude” toward the movement factors of Space, Weight, Time, and Flow. I's not the mass of the thing or character that makes the difference, but the character's attitude toward how it moves, For example, when considering Weight, the character can have an Active or Passive auitude toward mobilization of his body weight. Imgard Bartenieff (LMA) is the one who originally came up with the distinctions between Active and Passive. As she put it, “Lightness in Passive Weight becomes Limp; Strong Passive Weight becomes Heaviness, giving in, The British version of Laban does not use these terms, preferring Rudolf’s original resisting or indulging. But regardless of the precise terminology, you get the idea. The char- acter can be active or passive, give in to or resist movement. Does your character move with quick, flicking motions or with slow, purposeful movement? There are eight possible combinations of Space, Time, Weight, and Flow,Movement all of which are demonstrated by an actor who appears in the CD-ROM that accom- panies this book. If we remove Flow from the equation, which has to do with the emotional or “feeling” aspects of movement, we wind up with the following basic types of movement: Press (direct, sustained, strong) Wring (indirect, sustained, strong) Glide (direct, sustained, light) Float (indirect, sustained, light) Thrust (direct, sudden, strong) Slash (indirect, sudden, strong) Dab (direct, sudden, light) . Flick (indirect, sudden, light) The best and easiest way to really grasp how this works is to get up on your feet and move around the room. Reading about Laban is like reading about bicycle riding It’ all well and good to know how the chain goes ‘round and ‘round, but, at some point, you need to get up on the bike to really grasp what it means to ride the thing I know it looks silly to dance around the room, but forget about that. You're an artist, and artists are already thought to be a bit odd. Anyway, if somebody walked in and found an animator doing her facial expression thing in front of a mirror, all bets would be off First, just relax and walk with ease from one side of the room to the other, like your regular self. Don't try to be a character or to otherwise change yourself. Be aware of your body as you move through the space. Now let's transfer your weight and keep walking. When we talk about varying the sts between gravity and weight” of a character, we're referring to a tension that « upward movement. Relaxation equates to weight. Totally relax, and you'll fall down on the ground. A drunken person is relaxed, pulled down by gravity. When you are having an energetic day, your energy will lift you up, pushing away from gravity, Exuberance pushes you away from g -avity.74 Acting for Animators Press (direct, sustained, and strong) Let's work on Pressing Think of it like pushing a friend's stalled car off to the side of the road. Direct, sustained, strong, See? Do it. You'd push a car differently than you would a shopping cart, which would be closer to Gliding. Now try Wringing. Suppose you are a soaking towel. If you wring yourself out, you do so in an indirect, sustained, and strong manner. Floating is what it sounds like it is. Balloons float. Remember boxer Muhammed Ali in his prime? “I float like a butterfly, sting like a bee!” he used to shout in the ring In Laban terms, Muhammed would be Floating (indirect + sustained + light), and then thrusting (direct + sudden + strong), maybe interspersed with Flicking (indirect + sudden + light) If you were a cotton ball being dabbed onto somebody's face, how would you ‘move? What is Dabbing? Direct, sudden, and light. Got it? From the animator's perspective, movement is the visible outer result of the charac- ter’s inner impulses. If you animate that brick character you created earlier, causing him to walk in a jaunty, brisk, and determined fashion, light on his feet, chest out, the person viewing the animation would presume this is a happy character. This movement could be described as Dabbing. Are you starting to see how Laban can be used?‘Movement Phrosing, which is a term much used by Leslie Bishko, refers to the rhythmic changes of movement in an animated character. Changes of Effort over time can be phrased in the following ways: Fven continuous, unchanging Increasing __ from lesser to greater intensity, accelerating Decreasing _ from greater to lesser intensity, decelerating Accented series of accents, Vibratory series of sudden, repetitive movements Resilient series of rebounding, resilient movements (Maletic 1984) Applying this quality to the animated brick walking down the street, we could say his phrasing is even, perhaps increasing if you want to show a growing sense of urgency. In a conversation I had with Leslie Bishko when preparing this chapter, she said, “My teaching is infused with LMA-esque scrutiny of animated movement. The LMA themes that come up over and over again are Initiation/Sequencing and Phrasing. In particular, the phrase Anticipation-Squash/Stretch-Follow-through-Overlapping is a practical example of LMA’s phrasing principle of Preparation/Action/Recuperation. I also discuss the elasticity of Squash and Stretch in relationship to Breath and Shape changes in the torso to help students understand how they can phrase their use of Squash and Stretch to convey emotion” (Bishko 1999). Laban theory is a big, important, and largely unexplored subject for both animators and actors. It is my fervent | ope that the publication of this book will spur more research and further applicat on. Jean Newlove's orientation is with motivation for actors and dancers, artists who get up on their feet and actually move through space. The actor in me responds powerfully to this perspective. Leslie Bishko’s LMA orienta~ tion is with computer animators, artists who manipulate characters on a screen, Her goal is to create an industry-standard computer animation interface based on LMA—a way for animators to better describe and analyze movement. The work of both, how- ever, is about how the mind/body expressive processes manifest themselves in move- ment and, with both acting and animation, that is Ground Zero. £ 7576 Speech 6 Aecs has very little to do with words. Words express a thought, the same as a hug or a kiss. What we are really searching for in acting is intention, objectives, moti- vation, and emotion. In other words, acting is more about what is underneath the words, Remember the metaphor of the iceberg: Only 15 percent of it shows above the water ‘line; 85 percent is under the water. But in order for it to be an iceberg, you still have to have the unseen 85 percent. Animators who work in feature films have 2 tough job because the character voices are typically recorded belure the anituation ¥ crested. In the real world, snesemnent precedes words, When a thought occurs, itis not the words that emerge first, itis head and eye movement, shoulder and neck movement. Therefore, when animating to pre- recorded dialogue, the animator is forced to sort of work backward from the way actual actors work, finding the inner impulse—the thought—that would be expressed by the recorded words. In the instant before a character speaks, he moves, expressing the impulse. Watch the way ventriloquists make their dummies move around, looking this way and that, generally a beat ahead of the mouth movement. Here's a trick I use all the time in my regular acting classes, one that may help you W for the most awkward Or most find the key to animating, « prerecorded voice. List dificult or most anual word or phrase ina scene: holite iCand say iC out loud your Soll TYG to inal at gounsell che tmgputse, which would allow you to express this wav: If you cau justly, that, you cau probably hang die rest of the character om it: Let's say you're listening to a voice track in which a male character says, at one point, “Oh, ‘goody, goody, goody!” Now, you probably don't walk around in your daily life saying that. It wouldn't be cool. But uy it on for size. Get up from your chair and walk around the room, saying out loud, “Oh, goody, goody, goody!” You'll discover that the impulse comes from a high place in the body, for starters, and you'll probably want to purseSpeech your lips when you say it. The character is a lip purser who carries his energy up in the shoulder and neck area. Also, keep in mind when you are animating a prerecorded jent and emotion are a two-way street. Emotion makes you dialogue track that move move a certain way, and the way you move will make you feel a certain way. Since the audience expects to hear dialogue once the impulse to speak is evident, there is comedy to be found in putting a delay between the impulse and the actual audible sound. Find the impulse to speak, but then don’t speak. Hold the impulse, ride iLike a pony: The audience will hang on the moment with great expectancy. Ifyou have a prerecorded track, it's difficult to use this one because the timing is already built in, but maybe one day you'il get the chance. I recall years ago seeing a production of William Sayoran’s The Time of your Life. One of the characters had a philosophical and rather nonsensical sh rt speech to give: "What? What not? No foundation, all the way down the line,” he w:s supposed to say: The actor playing the role stretched that one sequence into maybe a minute and a half of hysterically funny shifting inner impulses He would find the impulse to say something, go slightly into the predictor-movement, then decide not to say that, changing the impulse to another thought and predictor- movement, then deciding Hot to say that, And of course, by the time he finally finished, what he said hadn't made mach sense anyway. It was fall-down-on-the-floor funny. Try it yourself You can hold an audience on the tip of your fingers for a very long time this way. If they feel you are about to say something, they'll hang in there with you. T've never seen an animator use the lesson, but there is no reason why it would not work there, 100. Active Listening Imagine a scene set in Washington Square Park in New York, on a sunny summer morn- ing The characters are two middle-aged women who are sitting next to one another on a bench, talking about their kids who are playing in the fountain. They take turns talking, sometimes interrupting one another. The trick to making this kind of transac- tion come alive is active listening. When Woman #1 talks, Woman #2 does more than just sit there, absorbing Woman #2 is listening, projecting ahead, filling in blanks that are left unsaid, framing responses, deciding not to interrupt, and keeping an eye on her kid. In other words, listening, when it is right, is extremely active.78 Acting for Animators Active listening Actor Nicol Williamson tells a story about when he was a young actor, playing his first large role. In the play, his character first entered a party scene at the top of the play, but he didn’t speak any lines for two pages. After a run-through, the director was giv- ing notes to the assembled cast. “Nicol, what are you doing during your first entrance, afier you enter the party?" “You mean before I speak? I'm not doing anything really, just listening” “Wrong,” said the director. “You're listening, coming up with responses to what is being said—and then deciding not to say them.” The point is that, even for those two pages of non-speaking, it was essential for the actor to be doing something Ifa tornado had blown through the evil Quecn’s palace while she was stirring her bub. bling, festering pot of poison, she would have had to stop doing what she was doing and deal with the storm, close windows and such, She would then be playing another action, this one not in pursuit of being the fairest one of all, but of staying alive. Once secure, she would return to her poisons and her evil objectives. When one character listens to another, he should still be doing something. In fact your character should be doing something 100 percent of the time when he is on stage. Doing means playing an action, pursuing an objective. Scratching an ear or cross- ing a leg is also doing something, but that’s not what I mean. To do something, the- atrically speaking, is to play an action, to have intention, to pursue an objective.The Camera 7 Acting for Camera In live-action movies, the reaction shot carries 90 percent of the baggage. It is so important, in fact, that many live-action actors view the master shot as little more than a rehearsal for the close-ups. When editing a movie, the editor usually cuts to reaction shots. In close-up coverage of a shot, in fact, they learn to “listen, react, speak"—being careful not to overlap lines. This is so the editors can get a clean edit on the sound track and will have reaction shots to cut to. The basic set up for a filmed live-action scene is a “master shot,” which includes the action of the entire scene, plus “coverage” —close-ups this way and close-ups that way. Its all put together in the editing room. An animated movie, of course, doesn't shoot the same way: I's not necessary to make an animated master shot for an entire scene, plus entire-scene close-ups. You lay all that out on the story board in the first place, essentially editing beforehand. But, to the extent that an animated feature film follows live-action film editing technique, itis useful to talk for a minute about the way actors in live-action approach the process, The performance they give in 2 master shot is dif- ferent from what they do in a close-up. A master shot is usually photographed from some distance, anywhere from a few feet to the length of a football field. The further away the shot is, the more physical the actor can—and must—be. It is okay to gesture a lot, for example, if she master shot is staged across the distance of a department store parking lot. At that distance, the actor th do on the Broadway stage. The closer the camera gets to the actor, the more still the performance needs to be. In an extreme close-up, when you have a full screen of the actor's face, everything is in as delivering a performance that is almost as large as what he might the eyes, so you don’t want to have the character's head shaking around too much. The 7980 Acting for Animators ‘camera sees thoughts, The audience and other characters will likely look first at the eyes for clues about emotional state, One caveat: In your effort to make the character hold still, be careful that you don’t lower the emotional stakes! This is a common error made by new actors when they first start acting for camera. Thi Jong shot, the stakes remain high, but the foeus of the performance is different. The point is this: When you are animating a sequence that includes long shots and close-ups, remember that the actor behaves differently depending on the shot. You don't simply take the action from the long shot and blow it up because, if you do, the physical action would be too frenetic in close-up. Make the performance the right size for the frame of the shot Hlia Kazan, the director of such classic movies as A Streetcar Named Desire, On the jention is the same as in the Waterfront, and East of Eden, says that the camera doesn’t just look at the actor, it looks inside him (1988, 256). What he means by this is that the camera sees the tapestry of thoughts and emotions iaside the character. One of my favorite contemporary movie actors is Kevin Spacey (The Usual Suspects, Americon Beoaty). The thing that makes him so good on camera is the way he performs in close-up. When the camera cuts to him for a reaction, it typically sees the reaction, and then his reaction evolves into yet another thought. Its mental and emotional movement, caught on film. This mental fluidity makes him appear more interesting than the line of the script might suggest. The Actor Generally Leads the Camera The came master shot is usually that of an audience ment edd by the actor’ ave oe shill ofattention, For esample, consider the following Master Shot: A woman sits alone at a table in a restaurant alone waiting for someone, She glances at her watch. Move in for medium-clse shot so we pick up her facial expres. sion. Whoever she is waiting for is late. Off camera, we hear a female voice: “Sorry I'm. late..." The woman at the table reacts to the voice and looks toward the door, Cut to: Woman's POV of friend approaching table. Or, the camera might pan toward the door, off the woman's glance, picking up her friend as she enters the scene.‘The Camera Now suppose the scene had been shot this way: Same master shot. Same medium- close up. But instead of hearing the friend's greeting from off-camera while the on- screen shot captures the seated woman's reaction, we quick-cut to the woman at the door, entering. She sees her friend at the table and, off her recognition, she calls out, “Sorry I'm late. . .."Then we cut to the woman at the table, reacting to the arrival of her friend ‘We could do it either way and the scene would work, but we'd have to put in the reaction shots somewhere Imagine a scene in a haunted house, late afternoon, Our hero climbs the creaking wooden steps, pushes thick cobwebs aside, and steps into the main entrance hall. Silence and gloom. Slow pan around the room from our hero's POY, sunlight casting odd-shaped shadows through the dust. Cut back to the hero, taking in the room, smelling the mustiness. Suddenly, a large bat comes to life in the rafters, his flapping ‘wings in turn disturbing some nesting birds that fly into action, squawking. Cut to our alarmed hero, reacting to the noise, looking around anxiously. Cut back to the room, Birds fly out a broken window, the bat settles back into the rafters. Cut back to the hero. His face, now touched with a glaze of perspiration, relaxes. He chuckles at his own skittishness and continues cautiously into the house. 8132 Technique 8 a is a potpourri category of acting dos and don'ts. An actor learns, for example, that if a scene is going south, if he’s starting to hear people in the audience coughing and shuffling around, the worst thing to do is to “chase” them, that is, to increase the intensity of the performance. It will only make things worse. It is prefer- able to stop, reconnect with your intention, and scene partner—and the audience will return, In shorthand: “Don’t chase your audience!” Animators, of course, don't have this sort of problem to solve because animation isn’t presented to an audience in real- time, but there are many snippets of acting wisdom that I think you will be able to use in animation. If you read entertainment industry trade publications, you'll see advertisements for acting teachers who teach Meisner Technique or Adler Technique or even Stanislavsky Technique. Lee Strasberg’s Method Acting could be called a technique. None of this means much except that each teacher advocates his own approach to acting and has slapped his name on it in order to sell more seats in their classes. There is in reality no single, correct technique. Technique is whatever works Simplify Your Actions The more direct, simple, and specific your acting choices are, the better. Trying to play, for example, “I want to be loved," is neither active nor specific enough. A stronger choice would be “I want you to go on a date with me” or “I want you to marry me It might be true that your character desires love and affection, which gives voltage to the way he tries

You might also like

• GRUMPY MONKEY Final PDF

  

  100% (1)

  GRUMPY MONKEY Final PDF

  18 pages
• Acting and Character Animation - The Art of Animated Films, Acting and Visualizing PDF

  

  100% (3)

  Acting and Character Animation - The Art of Animated Films, Acting and Visualizing PDF

  409 pages
• AnimeJapan 2024 Slate Overview English

  

  No ratings yet

  AnimeJapan 2024 Slate Overview English

  12 pages
• 2D Animation Bible

  

  75% (8)

  2D Animation Bible

  113 pages
• Acting An Animation

  

  No ratings yet

  Acting An Animation

  4 pages
• Acting For Animators PDF

  

  No ratings yet

  Acting For Animators PDF

  145 pages
• Acting For Animators

  

  100% (17)

  Acting For Animators

  145 pages
• Cartoon Animation - Preston Blair

  

  No ratings yet

  Cartoon Animation - Preston Blair

  223 pages
• Wind Rises.

  

  No ratings yet

  Wind Rises.

  2 pages
• Mahoraga and Sukuna's Fight - Google Search

  

  No ratings yet

  Mahoraga and Sukuna's Fight - Google Search

  1 page
• Nation: Otaku

  

  No ratings yet

  Nation: Otaku

  7 pages
• UI Elements Framework: Background Concept

  

  No ratings yet

  UI Elements Framework: Background Concept

  4 pages
• Movie Review - Art App. Act 3

  

  No ratings yet

  Movie Review - Art App. Act 3

  4 pages
• Read Tokyo Ghoulre - Vol.6 Chapter 53 Dream MangaBuddy 4

  

  No ratings yet

  Read Tokyo Ghoulre - Vol.6 Chapter 53 Dream MangaBuddy 4

  1 page
• Shaman King - Google Search

  

  No ratings yet

  Shaman King - Google Search

  1 page
• EDMM 1420 Lecture 3

  

  No ratings yet

  EDMM 1420 Lecture 3

  31 pages
• Acting and Performance For Animation

  

  100% (1)

  Acting and Performance For Animation

  218 pages
• Instructions: Circle 5 Terms That You Associate With Each Disney Character

  

  No ratings yet

  Instructions: Circle 5 Terms That You Associate With Each Disney Character

  5 pages
• Twin Flames

  

  No ratings yet

  Twin Flames

  11 pages
• IFE ZazoAguiar Comics PDF

  

  No ratings yet

  IFE ZazoAguiar Comics PDF

  18 pages
• The Illusion of Life Disney Animation - Ollie Johnston, Frank Thomas

  

  No ratings yet

  The Illusion of Life Disney Animation - Ollie Johnston, Frank Thomas

  548 pages
• 3D Modeling in Silo - The Official Guide

  

  100% (2)

  3D Modeling in Silo - The Official Guide

  323 pages
• "Slumber Party Slaughter" Storyboard

  

  100% (5)

  "Slumber Party Slaughter" Storyboard

  260 pages
• Wa0002.

  

  No ratings yet

  Wa0002.

  2 pages
• The Animators Eye (Animation - Ir)

  

  100% (1)

  The Animators Eye (Animation - Ir)

  305 pages
• Acting For Animators - 3 Edição - Ed Hooks

  

  No ratings yet

  Acting For Animators - 3 Edição - Ed Hooks

  196 pages
• 25 - Computer Applications

  

  No ratings yet

  25 - Computer Applications

  15 pages
• Michael Hampton - Figure Drawing - Design and Invention

  

  97% (234)

  Michael Hampton - Figure Drawing - Design and Invention

  241 pages
• Chapter 6.4-5 Modeling Shapes With Polygonal Meshes

  

  No ratings yet

  Chapter 6.4-5 Modeling Shapes With Polygonal Meshes

  40 pages
• Miyazaki Overview

  

  No ratings yet

  Miyazaki Overview

  9 pages
• Character Animation Crash

  

  100% (9)

  Character Animation Crash

  241 pages
• TK 2 D Manual

  

  No ratings yet

  TK 2 D Manual

  13 pages
• What Are Cartoons

  

  No ratings yet

  What Are Cartoons

  3 pages
• The Illusion of Life! Disney Animation

  

  No ratings yet

  The Illusion of Life! Disney Animation

  548 pages
• Muy Bueno !!!!!!! The Art of Special Effects Animation

  

  100% (4)

  Muy Bueno !!!!!!! The Art of Special Effects Animation

  329 pages
• Animation Insiders Ebook PDF

  

  100% (2)

  Animation Insiders Ebook PDF

  114 pages
• Preston Blair - Cartoon Animation - Text

  

  100% (1)

  Preston Blair - Cartoon Animation - Text

  223 pages
• Slam Dunk Anime - Google Search

  

  No ratings yet

  Slam Dunk Anime - Google Search

  1 page
• Computer Graphics: Animation Introduction

  

  No ratings yet

  Computer Graphics: Animation Introduction

  28 pages
• Art of Storyboarding

  

  100% (2)

  Art of Storyboarding

  116 pages
• BCIS 1405 Powerpoint Session 11

  

  No ratings yet

  BCIS 1405 Powerpoint Session 11

  39 pages
• Acting For Animators

  

  No ratings yet

  Acting For Animators

  126 pages
• Naviworks Guide PDF

  

  No ratings yet

  Naviworks Guide PDF

  13 pages
• 3 Banking Products and Services

  

  No ratings yet

  3 Banking Products and Services

  1 page
• Icy 074

  

  No ratings yet

  Icy 074

  4 pages
• The Illusion of Life PDF

  

  100% (1)

  The Illusion of Life PDF

  548 pages
• Eapp PT1

  

  No ratings yet

  Eapp PT1

  3 pages
• The Illusion of Life Disney Animation

  

  97% (33)

  The Illusion of Life Disney Animation

  548 pages
• Making An Animated Short

  

  100% (1)

  Making An Animated Short

  34 pages
• Animation: The Twelve Principles of Animation

  

  No ratings yet

  Animation: The Twelve Principles of Animation

  15 pages
• Animation - The Art of Layout and Storyboarding

  

  100% (47)

  Animation - The Art of Layout and Storyboarding

  193 pages
• Top Questions About Character Animation - Animation Mentor

  

  No ratings yet

  Top Questions About Character Animation - Animation Mentor

  2 pages
• Gundam Anime Chonology

  

  No ratings yet

  Gundam Anime Chonology

  8 pages
• Acting in Animation A Look at 12 Films

  

  No ratings yet

  Acting in Animation A Look at 12 Films

  185 pages
• How To Fake Great Animation

  

  100% (1)

  How To Fake Great Animation

  138 pages
• Animation

  

  100% (1)

  Animation

  208 pages
• Animating Short Stories - Cheryl Briggs

  

  No ratings yet

  Animating Short Stories - Cheryl Briggs

  62 pages
• 3A-Design of Steel Structures Objective Questions

  

  No ratings yet

  3A-Design of Steel Structures Objective Questions

  8 pages
• Story Animation Master Class 2012

  

  No ratings yet

  Story Animation Master Class 2012

  89 pages
• Body Language and Facial Expressions

  

  No ratings yet

  Body Language and Facial Expressions

  39 pages
• Acting For Animators PDF PDF Free

  

  No ratings yet

  Acting For Animators PDF PDF Free

  145 pages
• The Illusion of Life Disney Animation

  

  93% (126)

  The Illusion of Life Disney Animation

  548 pages
• The Animator 39 S Workbook Step-By-Step Techniques PDF

  

  100% (1)

  The Animator 39 S Workbook Step-By-Step Techniques PDF

  156 pages
• Toon Boom Animation - Animation Glossary

  

  No ratings yet

  Toon Boom Animation - Animation Glossary

  12 pages
• Animation Merit Badge: Troop 344 and 9344 Pemberville, OH

  

  No ratings yet

  Animation Merit Badge: Troop 344 and 9344 Pemberville, OH

  37 pages
• Action Analysis For Animators by Chris Webster

  

  100% (8)

  Action Analysis For Animators by Chris Webster

  409 pages
• Bakuman v12

  

  No ratings yet

  Bakuman v12

  209 pages
• Strata 3D CX User Guide

  

  100% (1)

  Strata 3D CX User Guide

  322 pages
• GUI Dev Guide

  

  No ratings yet

  GUI Dev Guide

  284 pages
• How2make Animated Films - 1

  

  80% (5)

  How2make Animated Films - 1

  71 pages
• Disney S The Illusion of Life

  

  No ratings yet

  Disney S The Illusion of Life

  548 pages
• Storyboard Notes 3

  

  100% (1)

  Storyboard Notes 3

  81 pages
• The Creation Process of 2D Animated Movies

  

  100% (5)

  The Creation Process of 2D Animated Movies

  68 pages
• Acting Animation Chapter5

  

  No ratings yet

  Acting Animation Chapter5

  25 pages
• Powerpoint Test

  

  100% (1)

  Powerpoint Test

  5 pages
• Character Design

  

  100% (3)

  Character Design

  256 pages
• Prepare To Board - Thesis

  

  No ratings yet

  Prepare To Board - Thesis

  45 pages
• Glen Keane Animation PDF

  

  No ratings yet

  Glen Keane Animation PDF

  11 pages
• Interviewing Eric Goldberg, Animation Reporter

  

  100% (1)

  Interviewing Eric Goldberg, Animation Reporter

  3 pages
• Sample

  

  100% (2)

  Sample

  39 pages
• Understanding Timing in Animation

  

  100% (1)

  Understanding Timing in Animation

  14 pages
• Glen Keane Notes

  

  100% (2)

  Glen Keane Notes

  22 pages
• Animation Processes

  

  No ratings yet

  Animation Processes

  101 pages
• 12 Principles of Animation 2015

  

  No ratings yet

  12 Principles of Animation 2015

  62 pages
• The 12 Principles of Animation

  

  No ratings yet

  The 12 Principles of Animation

  42 pages
• Animated Performance Sample Chapter 'Design For Living'

  

  100% (1)

  Animated Performance Sample Chapter 'Design For Living'

  28 pages
• Goofy Ahh Script Collefction Gui - Fun Scripts

  

  No ratings yet

  Goofy Ahh Script Collefction Gui - Fun Scripts

  3 pages
• Animation Mentor

  

  50% (2)

  Animation Mentor

  31 pages
• The Illusion of Life

  

  96% (25)

  The Illusion of Life

  548 pages
• Maya Cheat Sheet - Admin

  

  No ratings yet

  Maya Cheat Sheet - Admin

  2 pages
• Animation Insiders Ebook

  

  No ratings yet

  Animation Insiders Ebook

  113 pages
• Simplified Drawing For Planning Animation PDF

  

  95% (22)

  Simplified Drawing For Planning Animation PDF

  41 pages
• Animate: Your Career

  

  No ratings yet

  Animate: Your Career

  9 pages
• Notes From A Lecture by Ollie Johnston: PDF by Jon Hooper 1999

  

  No ratings yet

  Notes From A Lecture by Ollie Johnston: PDF by Jon Hooper 1999

  4 pages