Sour Maize 13666
Sour Maize 13666
FOOD
MICROBIOLOGY
Food Microbiology 25 (2008) 616625
www.elsevier.com/locate/fm
Department of Microbiology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Agriculture, P.M.B. 2240, Abeokuta, Nigeria
b
Department of Botany and Microbiology, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Received 13 March 2007; received in revised form 17 December 2007; accepted 30 December 2007
Available online 29 January 2008
Abstract
This paper focuses on the functional properties of maize sour-dough microora selected and tested for their use as starter cultures for
sour maize bread. Lactic acid bacteria and yeasts isolated from spontaneously fermented maize dough were selected based on dominance
during fermentation and presence at the end of fermentation. Functional properties examined included acidication, leavening and
production of some antimicrobial compounds in the fermenting matrix. The organisms previously identied as Lactobacillus plantarum,
Lb. brevis, Lb. fermentum, Lb. acidophilus, Pediococcus acidilactici, Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Leuconostoc dextranicum and
Saccharomyces cerevisiae were used singly and as mixed cultures in the fermentation (fermentation time: 12 h at 2872 1C) of maize meal
(particle size 40.2 mm). The pH fell from an initial value of 5.623.05 in maize meals fermented with Lb. plantarum; 4.37 in
L. dextranicum+S. cerevisiae compared with the value for the control (no starter) of 4.54. Signicant differences (Pp0.05) were observed
in values obtained for the functional properties tested when starters were inoculated compared with the control (no starter) except for
leavening. Bivariate correlations at 0.01 levels (two-tailed) showed that signicant correlations existed among pH and production of
antimicrobial compounds in the fermenting meals, the highest correlation being between production of diacetyl and acid (0.694), a
positive correlation indicating that production of both antimicrobial compounds increase together with time. Antimicrobial activities of
the fermented maize dough were conrmed by their abilities to inhibit the growth of Salmonella typhi, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus
aureus and Aspergillus flavus from an initial inoculum concentration of 7 log cfu ml1) for test bacteria and zone of inhibition of up to
1.33 cm for aatoxigenic A. flavus. The ndings of this study form a database for further studies on the development of starter cultures
for sour maize bread production as an alternative bread specialty.
r 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Starter culture; Lactic acid bacteria; Yeasts; Fermentation; Maize meal
1. Introduction
Many foods are fermented before consumption and
lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are widely used as starter
organisms in these food fermentations because they
convert sugars into organic acids thus improving the
organoleptic and rheological properties of the products
(Konings et al., 2000; Vogel et al., 2002). Lactic and acetic
acid concentrations found in many fermented foods could
also be sufcient to impart the observed shelf stability.
Martinez-Anaya et al. (1994) reported that the efciency of
sourdough as a possible preservative agent of microbial
Corresponding author. Tel.: +234 8037119671.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
M.O. Edema, A.I. Sanni / Food Microbiology 25 (2008) 616625
617
ARTICLE IN PRESS
618
ARTICLE IN PRESS
M.O. Edema, A.I. Sanni / Food Microbiology 25 (2008) 616625
9
8
Log of counts (cfu/g)
619
LAB
7
6
Yeasts
5
4
PCA
counts
3
2
1
0
12
24
36
48
Time (h)
Fig. 1. Plate counts of LAB and yeasts during spontaneous fermentation
of maize meal.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
620
Table 1
Functional properties of sour maize meals started with single and mixed cultures of LAB and yeasts
Starter
pH
Acid equivalent
(ml)
Diacetyl
(mg)
Hydrogen
peroxide (mM)
Leavening
(cm)
L. plantarum
L. brevis
L. fermentum
L. acidophilus
P. acidilactici
Leu. mesenteroides
Leu. dextranicum
S. cerevisiae
L. plantarum and L. brevis
L. plantarum and L. fermentum
L. plantarum and L. acidophilus
L. plantarum and P. acidilactici
L. plantarum and Leu. mesenteroides
L. plantarum and Leu. dextranicum
L. plantarum and S. cerevisiae
L. brevis and L. fermentum
L. brevis and L. acidophilus
L. brevis and P. acidilactici
L. brevis and Leu. mesenteroides
L. brevis and Leu. dexranicum
L. brevis and S. cerevisiae
L. fermentum and L. acidophilus
L. fermentum and P. acidilactici
L. fermentum and Leu. mesenteroides
L. fermentum and Leu. dextranicum
L. fermentum and S. cerevisiae
L. acidophilus and P. acidilactici
L. acidophilus and Leu. mesenteroides
L. acidophilus and Leu. dextranicum
L. acidophilus and S. cerevisiae
P. acidilactici and Leu. mesenteroides
P. acidilactici and Leu. dextranicum
P. acidilactici and S. cerevisiae
Leu. mesenteroides and Leu. dextranicum
Leu. mesenteroides and S. cerevisiae
Leu. dextranicum and S. cerevisiae
Control (no starter added)
3.05a
3.16ab
3.26ab
3.09a
3.36abc
3.37abc
3.36abc
3.65abc
3.20ab
3.12ab
3.03a
3.04a
3.15ab
3.40abc
3.35abc
3.41abc
3.48abc
3.46abc
3.39abc
3.92abc
3.55abc
3.91abc
3.88abc
3.85abc
3.85abc
3.95abc
3.71abc
4.19abc
4.08abc
4.12abc
3.93abc
3.78abc
4.08abc
3.75abc
4.04abc
4.37bc
4.54c
3.20ijkl
2.90ghij
2.80ghi
3.00hijk
2.60efgh
2.50cdefg
2.50cdefg
1.33b
3.28jkl
3.36kl
3.49l
2.80ghi
3.46l
2.92ghij
3.50l
2.15cde
2.71gh
2.63fgh
2.16cde
2.16cde
2.70gh
2.10c
2.59defgh
2.15cde
2.16cde
2.53cdefgh
2.83ghi
2.15cde
2.12cd
2.69gh
2.17cdef
2.48cdefg
2.50cdefg
2.17cdef
2.88ghij
2.50cdefg
0.80a
163.55q
180.77u
172.16s
154.94o
154.94o
129.12j
111.90d
94.69b
176.46t
172.20s
172.30s
173.07s
172.77s
185.07v
154.94o
155.07o
156.77p
154.40o
134.70m
167.88r
124.81i
122.17h
121.20gh
120.33fg
121.00gh
130.37k
119.67ef
120.13fg
120.03fg
151.40n
118.70e
118.80e
122.13h
100.27c
120.17fg
133.42l
84.47a
4.25ef
4.22def
4.25ef
4.08bcdef
4.25ef
4.29ef
4.20def
4.08bcdef
4.42f
3.17abcd
3.07ab
3.17abcd
3.35abcde
3.31abcde
4.25ef
3.11abc
3.17abcd
4.02bcdef
3.56abcdef
4.08bcdef
4.17def
4.01bcdef
4.05bcdef
3.99bcdef
3.99bcdef
4.06bcdef
3.94bcdef
3.96bcdef
3.98bcdef
4.06bcdef
4.11bcdef
4.07bcdef
4.16cdef
4.44f
4.22def
4.18def
2.89a
1.33bcd
1.33bcd
1.37cde
1.30abc
1.20a
1.43def
1.37cde
1.50efgh
1.57fghij
1.63hij
1.63hij
1.57fghij
1.67ij
1.53fghi
1.80k
1.62hij
1.59ghij
1.58ghij
1.58ghij
1.70jk
1.80k
1.57fghij
1.60ghij
1.60ghij
1.50efgh
1.63hij
1.47defg
1.50efgh
1.53fghi
1.67ij
1.47defg
1.43def
1.63hij
1.57fghij
1.67ij
1.70jk
1.23ab
Values are means of three replicates. Mean values followed by different letters within columns are signicantly different by Duncans multiple range tests
(Pp0.05).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
M.O. Edema, A.I. Sanni / Food Microbiology 25 (2008) 616625
Table 2
Correlations among functional properties of starter-generated sour maize
meals
pH
pH
Pearson correlation 1
Sig. (two-tailed)
N
111
Acid
.132
.167
111
Acid
Pearson correlation .288 1
Sig. (two-tailed)
.002
N
111
111
.694
.000
111
.025
.797
111
.256
.007
111
Diacetyl
Pearson correlation .426 .694
Sig. (two-tailed)
.000
.000
N
111
111
111
.158
.099
111
.097
.310
111
Peroxide
Pearson correlation .384
Sig. (two-tailed)
.000
N
111
.025
.797
111
.158
.099
111
111
.071
.462
111
Leavening
Pearson correlation .132
Sig. (two-tailed)
.167
N
111
.256
.007
111
.097
.310
111
.071
.462
111
111
and to transplant an organism from one natural environment to another is not a good formula for success,
particularly in sourdough fermentations. The species of
LAB and yeasts isolated from fermenting maize meal and
tested for their functional properties in this work were the
dominant micro-organisms at the end of 48 h spontaneous
fermentation of maize meal (Edema and Sanni, 2006).
Previous studies on the natural micro-biological ora of
sourdough made from different cereals report similar
organisms (Spicher, 1987; Gobbetti et al., 1995; Meroth
et al., 2004; De Vuyst and Neysens, 2005; Ehrmann and
Vogel, 2005).
Micro-organisms necessary in food fermentations may
be added as pure single or mixed cultures. Although in
some instances, no cultures may be added if the desired
micro-organisms are known to be present in sufcient
numbers in the original raw material (Lonner et al., 1986;
Randazzo et al., 2005). In the case of sour maize meal, the
presence of the desired organisms, that is LAB and yeasts,
in the raw material whether sufcient or not, is not
adequate since all the meals fermented with starter cultures
were better in acidication and other properties than the
spontaneously fermented meal used as control. This could
be because there are usually other numerous and undesirable competing micro-organisms as earlier observed
(Edema and Sanni, 2006). Although given favorable
environmental conditions, the desired organisms will
eventually act in proper succession (Wiese et al., 1996;
Gatto and Torriani, 2004), it is advantageous to use
controlled starter cultures as these will drastically reduce
621
L.
pl
an
L. L. taru
f
L. er bre m
ac me v i
Le
u. P. ido n tu s
m a p m
L. L.
Le es ci d hil u
i
p
p
u
L. l a l a
. d en t l act s
pl nt nta
ex ero i ci
L.
a
a
pl L. nt ru rum S. tra id
a p a m
c n es
L. nta l ant rum an an ere i cu
pl rum ar a d d L vi m
s
u n L
an
t a m d . f . b i ae
L. aru n d an L. a erm rev
pl m Le d P c i en i s
an an u. . do tu
L. tar d L me ac id ph i m
u
l
L. bre m a eu. sen i lac u s
br v is n de te tic
L.
br L. ev an d S xtr roi d i
ev br is d . c an e
L. is ev is and L. ere ic u s
br an a L fe r vi m
e d n . a m si
L. L v is Leu d P cid e n ae
f
L.
e . b an . . a o tum
fe L. rm rev d L mes ci d phil
rm fe en is eu e il a us
L. en rm tu an . d nte cti
fe tu en m d ex ro ci
rm m tu an S. ra id
e a m d c n es
L
. n tu nd an L . ere i cu
L.
ac L. ferm m L e d P aci v is m
a u . d ia
i a
L. do p c id en t nd . m ac oph e
ac hi o p um L e es idi i lu
id l us hil a u. en lac s
o a u n d te ti
P.
L
a c . phil nd s a n d S ex t roi c i
i d ac us L d . c ra n d e
P. il a id a eu P e ic s
Le
a c cti o p nd . m . ac rev um
u.
i d ci hil L e id is
m P il ac and us eu. sen i la iae
es . ti L a n d te c ti
Le e a c ci e d e x r c i
u. n te i d an u. S tra oi d
m r il d m . c n e
Le es o id acti Le es er i cu s
u. en es ci u. e n evi m
de te an and de ter si a
xt ro i d L S xtr oid e
ra de e . a e
n s u c n s
C i cu an . d ere i cum
on m d ex vi
tro an S tra si a
l ( d . ce n i e
no S. re cu
st c e v is m
ar re ia
te vi e
r a si
dd ae
ed
)
L.
pl
an
L. L. taru
f
L. er bre m
ac me v i
Le
u. P. ido n tu s
m a c ph m
Le es i d il u
L. L.
u. en il ac s
L. pl a pl a
de ter ti c
n
n
p
ta
L.
t
o i
l
a
a
pl L. nt ru rum S. xtra ide
an pl ar m
c n s
L. ta ant um an an ere i cu
pl rum ar a d d L vi s m
u n L . i
an
ta a m d . fe b ae
L. ru n d an d L. a rm revi
m
L
c e s
pl
an an eu. P. ido ntu
a
L. taru d L me c id ph il m
L. bre m eu. sen i lac u s
br vis an de te tic
L.
br L. evi an d S xtr roi d i
ev br s a d . c an es
L. is ev is nd L. ere ic u
br an a L. fe r vi m
e d n a m si
L. L v is Leu d P cid e n ae
f
L. L er . br and . m . ac ophtum
fe . f me ev L es i d il u
rm e n is e e il a s
L. en rme tum an u . d nte cti
fe tu n a d ex ro ci
rm m tu n S. ra id
m d
n e
L. en t and an L . cer i cu s
L.
e
u
ac L. ferm m L e d P aci d v is m
an u. . o i a
id a
L. o p c ido en t d L me ac i ph e
ac hil ph um e s e di la i lus
id us il u a u. nt ct
o a s n d e ic
P.
a c L. phil nd a n d S extr roid i
i d ac us Le d . c a n es
P. il a ido a u P. e r ic
Le
a c cti c ph nd . m ac ev um
u.
i d i il L e id is
m P il a and us eu. sen i lac iae
es . cti L a n d te ti
Le en a c ci e d e x ro c i
u. te i d an u. S. tra i d
m r il a d m c n es
Le es o ide cti Le es ere i cu
u. en s ci a u. e n vi m
de te an nd de ter si a
xt ro i d L S xtr oid e
ra de e . a e
n s u c n s
C i cu an . deere i cum
on m d x vi
tro an S tra si a
l ( d . ce n i e
no S. re cu
st c e v is m
ar re ia
te vi e
r a si
dd ae
ed
)
Log cfu/g
ARTICLE IN PRESS
622
M.O. Edema, A.I. Sanni / Food Microbiology 25 (2008) 616625
4
S. typhi
3
E. coli
S. aureus
Starter
Fig. 2. Inhibition of three pathogenic bacteria by sour maize meals started with single and mixed cultures of LAB and yeasts (initial inoculum
concentration 7 log cfu ml1, incubation 15 1C for 24 h).
1.4
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
Starter
Fig. 3. Inhibition of Aspergillus flavus by sour maize meals started with single and mixed cultures of LAB and yeasts.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
M.O. Edema, A.I. Sanni / Food Microbiology 25 (2008) 616625
623
peroxidation of membrane lipids thereby increasing membrane permeability. Hydrogen peroxide may also be as a
precursor for the production of bactericidal free radicals
such as superoxide and hydroxyl radicals which can
damage DNA (Yang et al., 1997). It has been reported
that the production of H2O2 by Lactobacillus and
Lactococcus strains inhibited S. aureus, Pseudomonas sp.
and various psychotropic micro-organisms in foods (Cords
and Dychdala, 1993).
Inhibition of A. flavus by sour maize meal started on a
mixed culture of Lb. plantarum and Lb. brevis revealed a
central pattern which could be as a result of production of
bacteriocin-like substance (Corsetti et al., 1998b, 2004;
Vanne et al., 2001) that moved in the direction of observed
inhibition. The inhibition is not likely to have been entirely
a result of acid production by the starters, since it has
previously been shown that Aspergillus parasiticus NRRL
2999 grew in a medium containing up to 0.75% lactic acid
at pH 3.5 (El-Gazzar et al., 1987). It can be observed
however that there is some yeast growth on the plate most
likely from endogenous culture of the maize meal. That
however did not prevent the inhibitory action of the starter,
as the starter culture was in a large quantity enough to start
off the fermentation and the action before the growth of
the endogenous organisms.
Studies on sourdough have been carried out especially in
Germany, France and Sweden where the sourdough
fermentation process has been used traditionally for rye,
rye-mixes and other ours which are difcult to bake
without souring. (Lonner et al., 1986; De Vuyst et al., 2002;
Catzeddu et al., 2006; Valcheva et al., 2006). Also, in the
United States, the San Francisco sourdough bread process
has been carried out in the San Francisco bay area for over
130 years (Sugihara et al., 1970). The use of this technique
is relatively new to Nigeria but is desirable as a way of
utilizing local substrates such as maize and cassava for
development of new food varieties. LAB are able to
produce a wide variety of compounds which give fermented
foods such as sourdough their characteristic avor and also
impart improved safety and rheology to the foods (Arendt
et al., 2007). However, the properties of the sourdough
system depend on many different concurrent factors as well
as external process conditions all of which inuence the
properties of the products. Some of these factors inuence
the properties of the system directly, while others have an
indirect inuence by affecting the activity and the
metabolism of the micro-organisms (Lacaze et al., 2007).
Consistent quality, safety and acceptability of a new
product such as the sour maize bread will be signicantly
improved by the use of well-dened starter cultures selected
on the basis of multifunctional considerations. It is
therefore imperative to properly study and regulate the
fermentation process in order to obtain a desirable
product, as in the focus on ongoing research by the
authors. Further studies are focused on the development of
fast starters with emphasis on rate of leavening, ultimate
levels of acidity produced and avor. Molecular studies,
ARTICLE IN PRESS
624
ARTICLE IN PRESS
M.O. Edema, A.I. Sanni / Food Microbiology 25 (2008) 616625
Lonner, C., Preve-Akesson, K., 1988. Acidication properties of lactic
acid bacteria in rye sour doughs. Food Microbiol. 5, 4358.
Lonner, C., Welander, T., Molin, N., Dostalek, M., 1986. The micro-ora
in a sour dough started spontaneously on typical Swedish rye meal.
Food Microbiol. 3, 312.
Martinez-Anaya, M.A., Llin, M.L., Pila, M.M., Collar, C., 1994.
Regulation of amino acid production by homo and hetero-fermentative lactobacilli in whole wheat sour-doughs. Z. Lebensm. Unters.
Forsch. 199 (3), 186190.
Meroth, C.B., Hammes, W.P., Hertel, C., 2004. Characterisation of the
microbiota of rice sourdoughs and description of Lactobacillus spicheri
sp. nov. system. Appl. Microbiol. 27, 151159.
Mukherjee, S.K., Albury, M.N., Pederson, C.S., Van Veen, A.G.,
Steinkraus, K.H., 1965. Role of Leuconostoc mesenteroides in
leavening the batter of idli, a fermented food of India. Appl.
Microbiol. 13, 227231.
Muller, M.R.A., Wolfrum, G., Stolz, P., Ehrmann, M.A., Vogel, R.F.,
2001. Monitoring the growth of Lactobacillus species during a rye our
fermentation. Food Microbiol. 18, 217227.
Niku-Paavola, M.L., Laitila, A., Mattila-Sandholm, T., Haikara, A.,
1999. New types of antimicrobial compounds produced by Lactobacillus plantarum. J. Appl. Microbiol. 86, 2935.
Odunfa, S.A., Adeyele, S., 1985. Microbiological changes during the
traditional production of ogi-baba, a West African fermented sorghum
gruel. J. Cereal Sci. 3, 173180.
Okoruwa, E.A., 1995. Utilization and processing of maize. IITA Res.
Guide 35, 29.
Olasupo, N.A., Olukoya, D.K., Odunfa, S.A., 1997. Assessment of a
bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus strain in the control of spoilage of
a cereal based African fermented food. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 42 (1),
3134.
Onilude, A.A., Fagade, O.E., Bello, M.M., Fadahunsi, I.F., 2005.
Inhibition of Aatoxin-producing Aspergilli by lactic acid bacteria
isolates from indigenously fermented cereal gruels. African J.
Biotechnol. 4 (12), 14041408.
Oyewole, O.B., 1990. Optimization of cassava fermentation for fufu
production: effects of single starter cultures. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 68, 4954.
Pepe, O., Villani, F., Oliviero, D., Greco, T., Coppola, S., 2003a. Effect of
proteolytic starter cultures as leavening agents of pizza dough. Int. J.
Food. Microbiol. 84 (3), 319326.
Pepe, O., Blaiotta, G., Moschetti, G., Greco, T., Villani, F., 2003b. Ropeproducing strains of Bacillus species from wheat bread and strategy for
their control by lactic acid bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69 (4),
23212329.
Piddock, L.J., 1990. Techniques used for the determination of antimicrobial resistance and sensitivity in bacteria. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 68,
307318.
Randazzo, C.L., Heilig, H., Restuccia, C., Giudici, P., Caggia, C., 2005.
Bacterial population in traditional sourdough evaluated by molecular
methods. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99, 251258.
Richards, R.M.E., Xing, D.K.L., King, T.P., 1995. Activity of
p-aminobenzoic acid compared with other organic acids against
selected bacteria. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 78, 209215.
625
Rusol, G., Chun, C.K., Radu, S., 1997. Survival and growth of Vibrio
cholerae 0139 in selected Malaysian street foods. J. Food Prot. 60 (6),
644648.
Sanni, A.I., Lonner, C., 1993. Identication of yeasts isolated
from Nigerian traditional alcoholic beverages. Food Microbiol. 10,
517523.
Sanni, A.I., Fapounda, E.M., Onilude, A.A., 1995. Characteristic
properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the rumen of Maradi
goats. Chem. Microbiol. Technol. Lebensm. 17 (314), 99104.
Sanni, A.I., Onilude, A.A., Fatungase, M.O., 1998. Production of sour
maize bread using starter cultures. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 14
(1), 101106.
Sanni, A.I., Onilude, A.A., Ogunbanwo, S.T., Smith, S.I., 1999.
Antagonistic activity of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus species
from ogi, an indigenous fermented food. J. Basic. Microbiol. 39 (3),
189195.
Sanni, A.I., Morlon-Guyot, J., Guyot, J.P., 2002. New efcient amylase
producing strains of L. plantarum and L. fermentum isolated from
different Nigerian traditional fermented foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol.
72 (1/2), 5362.
Spicher, G., 1987. The micro-ora of sourdough XXI. Communication:
the Lactobacillus species of wheat sour dough. Z. Lebensm. Unters.
Forsh. 184, 300303.
Sugihara, T.F., Kline, L., McCready, L.B., 1970. Nature of the San
Francisco sourdough French bread process. I. Microbiological aspects.
Bakers Dig. 44, 5052.
Svanberg, U., Sjogren, E., Lorri, W., Svennerholm, A.M.,
Kaijser, B., 1992. Inhibited growth of common entero-pathogenic
bacteria in lactic-fermented cereal gruel. World J. Microbiol. 8,
601606.
Valcheva, R., Ferchichi, M., Korakli, M., Ivanova, I., Ganzle, M.G.,
Vogel, R.F., Prevost, H., Onno, B., Dousset, X., 2006. Lactobacillus
nantensis sp. nov., isolated from French wheat sourdough. Int. J. Syst.
Evol. Microbiol. 56, 587591.
Vanne, L., Kleemola, T., Haikara, A., 2001. Screening of the antifungal
effect of lactic acid bacteria against toxigenic Penicillium and
Aspergillus strains. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium
of Bioactive Fungal MetabolitesImpact and Exploitation. University
of Wales, Swansea, 2227 April 2001. British Mycological Society
(2001), p. 100.
Vogel, R.F., Ehrmann, M.A., Ganzle, M.G., 2002. Development
and potential of starter lactobacilli resulting from exploration
of the sourdough ecosystem. Antonie van Leewenhoek 81,
631638.
Wiese, B.G., Strohmar, W., Rainey, F.A., Diekmann, H., 1996.
Lactobacillus panis sp. nov., from sourdough with a long fermentation
period. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46, 449453.
Wong, H.C., Chen, Y.L., 1988. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and organic
acids on growth and germination of Bacillus cereus. Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 54, 21792184.
Yang, Z., Suomalainen, T., Mayra-Makinen, A., Huttunen, E., 1997.
Antimicrobial activity of 2-pyrrolidone-5-carboxylic acid produced by
lactic acid bacteria. J. Food Prot. 60, 786790.