Which?

works for you

Which? Car review

Toyota Auris (2007-)

Feb 2007 Class: Medium cars
New price: 12,845 - 23,010 Used price: From 5,750
On sale:

Performance:

Ride comfort:

handling:

Boot & Storage:

Safety:

Reliability:

Total score:

63%

Good access and a roomy interior.

Comfortable drive.
Good safety features.
Visibility could be better.
Inflexible boot space.
High starting price and a bland image.

Recommended models
in the range

Which? Car Top Choice Model

1.6 V-Matic TR 5dr [6]
New price: Used price: 8,325

Fastest Model
2.2 D-4D SR180 5dr
New price: Used price: 9,275

8.1 secs

0-62mph:

Most Efficient Model

1.8 VVTi Hybrid T4 5dr CVT Auto [89g/km]
[Nav]
New price: 21,185
Used price: Combined fuel economy:

74.3 mpg

Cheapest Model to buy new

1.33 Dual VVTi Edition 5dr
New price:

12,845

Overview
Like the Corolla which preceded it, the Auris is well-built and competent, but uninspiring.
All three diesel versions weve tried seem to deliver good performance, but the 1.4 D-4D is
the economy king.
The Auris range was revised for 2010, with a minor restyle and re-jig of equipment levels;
continuing engine options are 1.3- and 1.6-litre petrols, and the 1.4 D-4D. The Auris HSD (hybrid
petrol-electric model) joined the range in summer 2010.
The Auris takes up where the long-running Corolla left off and has much in its favour: its
easy to step in and out of, and the driving position gives good forward visibility, for instance.
However, the rear view isnt so clear, and parking sensors are part of an expensive options
pack. The boot holds 315 litres, and grows to 670 litres when you fold the seats.
The Auris rides and handles well, and weve tested three diesel versions. The 1.4 returned
an impressive 53.3mpg (claimed 56.5), providing reasonable power if you rev it hard. The
2.0 diesel was slightly hesitant from a standing start and returned 47.9mpg (claimed 52.3).
The 177bhp 2.2-litre diesel has ample grunt for confident overtaking, as well as cruising. We
matched Toyotas claimed economy, returning 45.6mpg.
Theres a hybrid version, the HSD, which is very economical and could make a good
alternative to a Prius if you dont want quite such an in your face design. Unfortunately its boot
is smaller than the regular Auris because of the hybrids battery pack. That might not matter
when you consider the outstanding 64.2mpg test average it achieved.
According to our latest Which? Car survey, the Auris scores well for reliability, but owners
dont rate it very highly (71% customer satisfaction score).

Cheapest Model to buy used

1.4 VVTi T2 3dr
Used price:

5,750

Cheapest Model to Run (new)

1.33 Dual VVTi Edition 5dr
New price: 12,845
Running costs: 12,069
(3 years/36,000 miles)

Owners View
A very reliable, comfortable
and spacious car. Braking
and stability are excellent.
All round a practical and
affordable family car.

Which? Car review

Toyota Auris (2007-)

Medium cars

On the road

How we test

The Auris isnt quite as refined as, say, a Golf, nor is it as sharp on-road as some of its rivals,
but for the most part, it succeeds in being everything it needs to be. It corners confidently and
overtakes easily while retaining a comfortable ride. Only at lower speeds do the diesel engines
raise the noise levels.

Performance

The 2.0-litre diesel engine we drove (now discontinued) was the pick of the range at the time. It
pulls strongly and produces bags of torque, so overtaking manoeuvres are completed in next
to no time. The precise steering requires little effort to pull off tight manoeuvres and parking.
Toyota has fitted a capable six-speed gearbox, which has an engagingly direct action. And,
unlike some other six-speed transmissions weve tried, it manages to avoid the trap of placing
the middle (third, fourth and fifth) gears too close together within the rev range.
At first, the 1.4 diesel only came with a five-speed gearbox; its narrow rev range is better
exploited with the six-speed now fitted. Ultimate performance is reasonable, and its quieter
than the 2.0 diesel, but its small capacity means it cant deliver relaxed overtaking.
The HSDhybrid version uses a CVT(Continuously Variable Transmission)gearbox. This
makes it easy and smooth to drive, but it can be noisy under full acceleration as the engine
revs rise dramatically.
Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

Ride comfort

Acceleration (37-62mph)
8.8 secs
8.1 secs
6.3 secs
6.2 secs
5.0 secs
7.0 secs

Rating

The suspension is rather stiff, but well balanced. Long and short bumps are absorbed well, and
jolts caused by manhole covers are not usually felt by passengers. Road-holding is good, too,
and body roll in corners is minimized, producing a comfortable ride.
Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

Performance

Rating

We use the sophisticated electronic timing

equipment to record standing-start and
in-gear acceleration, and repeat each test
several times.
Ride comfort

Ride comfort is assessed by our laboratory experts who have driven hundreds of
thousands of miles in a myriad of different
models.

Which? Car review

Toyota Auris (2007-)

Medium cars

On the road continued...

How we test
Handling

Handling

Electronic stability control (optional in lower-spec models) kicks in when swerving sharply to
help the driver keep the car on track. The traction control also activates when accelerating
quickly on slippery surfaces.
In corners, the Auris is nimble, but it has a tendency to develop slight oversteer at the
limit. If this happens, you can expect the stability control (where fitted) to step in and prevent
unwanted sliding.
Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

Rating

Brakes

The brakes are very effective and can be applied in small increments to produce very
controlled braking. Stopping distances are short, even when slowing from motorway speeds,
although the back end is a little twitchy under heavy braking at such speeds.
Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

Braking distance (62-0mph)

37.0m
34.6m
37.0m
37.0m
38.5m
38.5m

The 2.0 diesel engine we tried was very composed; even at high revs, few vibrations disturb
the cabin. Only with the engine idling do the cabin fittings and the steering wheel vibrate
slightly (not such a problem with the 1.4 D-4D diesel). At motorway speeds, noise levels are
pleasantly low, and its possible to hold a conversation without raised voices.
Both inside and out, the build quality is good. Panel gaps are uniform, tight and well
finished. However, the bodywork lacks side protection and the painted bumpers will scratch
easily. Inside the car, the plastic sections of the dash are well finished and leave a lasting
impression of quality.
Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

Cruising noise
69dB
69dB
68dB
68dB
68dB
69dB

Brakes

The Which? Car braking test measures

stopping distance from 62-0mph and is
repeated ten times in quick succession to
highlight any brake fade issues.
Refinement and noise

Rating

Refinement and noise

On-the-limit handling is explored well

away from public roads to ensure a fair
test. Our obstacle avoidance test is one of
the harshest tests in the industry..

Rating

The Which? Car experts use a decibel

meter to record interior sound levels
at common UK motorway speeds, and
combine this with subjective assessments
to arrive at an overall score.

Which? Car review

Toyota Auris (2007-)

Medium cars

On the road continued...

How we test
Cabin and controls

Cabin and controls

The Auris is more comprehensively equipped than the Corolla ever was. The controls can be a
little fiddly, but once you get used to it, the cabin is fairly easy to use.
The steering wheel is height- and reach-adjustable, as you would expect. Both light and
wiper functions are integrated into the two steering-column levers. The wipers are sensorcontrolled and can adjust automatically to the local weather conditions. The headlights also
come on automatically in low light. The raised position of the gear stick means it falls easily to
hand, and the pedals are easily located.
Perhaps the most striking feature is the handbrake lever, mounted at a steep angle below
the gear stick. With the handbrake on, the lever sits too far back which means you have to
work unnecessarily hard to take it off. Other drawbacks are few and far between, but some
might find some instrument lettering and the built-in satnav (optional) difficult to see in direct
sunlight.
Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

Visibility and parking

Rating

Visibility and parking

We like the raised driving position, which is a little higher than in most medium cars. It means
a driver can enjoy good forward views without having to resort to a mini-MPV or compact
off-roader. The auto-dimming rear-view mirror ensures the driver wont be dazzled by the
headlights of a following car. However, the high window line of the windscreen and slope of
the bonnet limit the ability to judge exactly where the front end is. Rear visibility is marginally
better, although with the wide pillars and a small back window, wed strongly recommend
investing in the options pack which includes parking sensors.
Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

We penalise cars with difficult controls,

and we look for things like backlit light
switches and easy-to-use heating and
ventilation adjustments.

Turning circle
11.1m
11.0m
11.1m
11.1m
11.1m
11.1m

Rating

Visibility is a major issue for motorists

today, so each car gets a 360-degree
swivel view test to reproduce the drivers
eye view and any obscured areas.

Which? Car review

Toyota Auris (2007-)

Medium cars

Comfort and practicality

How we test

Whether youre in the back or in the front, the Auris is spacious. Theres plenty of room in the
back for three; all models have air conditioning to regulate interior temperature, while top
models have dual-zone climate control.
Standard equipment levels are high, with even entry-level versions getting air conditioning,
nine airbags, an MP3-compatible CD player, electric front windows and remote central
locking. Sporty versions are badged SR, and come with large alloy wheels, tinted glass, tinted
headlamp covers, a spoiler and unique interior trim.

Getting in and out

Setting the wheelarches further back on the body of the Auris than on the Corolla has paid off.
Wide doors and good seat height make it simple to slip in and out, and on slopes the doors
stay open rather than closing on you as you climb out. However, the smart key remoteopening system only works on the drivers door, which is a little irritating.
Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

Seat space and comfort

We take measurements all around the

driver and passengers door apertures
and note the height of the seat, door sills
and step down onto the car floor. The
best cars dont require too much bending
or stretching to get in and out.
Seat space and comfort

Rating

Interior space is a major plus-point for the Auris. The front easily accommodates tall adults
(1.9m or more) and the generous cabin width gives a roomy feel. The rear doesnt disappoint
either, with passengers of all sizes also treated to good knee- and elbowroom. However, the
benchs contouring might be a little uncomfortable on a long journey.
The well-padded seats give the driver a relaxed ride in most cases, although some might
find they do not hug the body tightly enough in faster corners. Unlike the drivers seat, the front
passenger seat isnt height-adjustable, which is a shame.
Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

Getting in and out

Rating

We assess seat comfort subjectively,

using our road testers expert knowledge
and experience from thousands of different cars. And we measure the head-, legand elbowroom on offer in every seat, to
see how well the car caters for people of
all shapes and sizes.

Which? Car review

Toyota Auris (2007-)

Medium cars

Comfort and practicality continued...

How we test
Boot and storage

Boot and storage

Its easy enough to lift the boot lid, but closing it is a bit tricky because of the handle design
and location. The boot lip is also quite high, so you have to lift luggage up over it.
Boot capacity at 315 litres is about what youd expect for this class, and the wide opening
is good for loading and unloading items. The wheel arches do protrude inwards making it
difficult to squeeze in long or awkwardly shaped items (such as a set of golf clubs). In these
circumstances, it might be easier to drop the rear seats down to increase luggage space to up
to 617 litres (measured up to the window line). A one-touch system quickly allows the rear seat
to be split 60/ 40.
Surprisingly for a family-oriented car, there are precious few cubbyholes for stashing toys
and other small items in the back.
Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

Heating and ventilation

Boot space (seats up/down)

315 litres / 670 litres
315 litres / 670 litres
315 litres / 670 litres
315 litres / 670 litres
315 litres / 670 litres
315 litres / 670 litres

Rating

The heating is pretty slow to warm up the cabin, with passengers in the back suffering the
most. If youre sensitive to pollen, a filter is available as a cost option.
Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

Rating

Carmakers give official stats for boot

space, but our tests are more realistic. We
load the boot up with measuring blocks
only as far as the rear window line, so
that luggage is well secured and wont
obscure rear visibility. We repeat the test
with the rear seats up, and folded down
(where possible).
Heating and ventilation

Feel sorry for the tester who has to warm

each car up from a frosty -10 degrees in
our climate chamber. Starting with a cold
engine, we measure how long it takes to
warm up the front and rear of the cabin.
Diesel cars usually take longer. We also
check the effectiveness of air conditioning, where fitted.

Which? Car review

Toyota Auris (2007-)

Medium cars

Running costs and depreciation

How we test

Although it is relatively expensive to buy for a car in this class, the Auris does come fitted with
a lot of goodies you might find as extra-cost options in its major rivals. Its also cheap to run,
and holds on to its value well.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption
Toyota claims the petrol models are pretty frugal, the early 1.4 or 1.6 engine returning around
40mpg and the latest 1.33-litre giving 48.8mpg and the 1.6 43.5mpg.
However, as you might expect, the diesel models are the most economical. The 2.0-litre
diesel (now discontinued) we drove achieved 47.9mpg in our tests versus the official 52.3
figure; the 1.4-litre diesel achieved 53.3mpg, compared to the published figure of 56.5mpg.
This engine, in the latest versions, is now claimed to give over 60mpg.

Petrol (combined mpg, claimed)

39.8 mpg - 48.7 mpg

Diesel (combined mpg, claimed)

45.6 mpg - 60.1 mpg

Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

Urban (claimed/tested)
47.0 mpg/48.7 mpg
49.6 mpg/48.7 mpg
40.4 mpg/38.7 mpg
40.4 mpg/38.7 mpg
35.8 mpg/39.2 mpg
31.4 mpg/30.7 mpg

Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

Extra urban (claimed/tested)

62.8 mpg/61.4 mpg
65.7 mpg/62.8 mpg
61.4 mpg/57.6 mpg
61.4 mpg/57.6 mpg
54.3 mpg/54.3 mpg
47.9 mpg/49.6 mpg

Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

Motorway (measured)
46.3 mpg
45.6 mpg
44.1 mpg
44.1 mpg
40.4 mpg
34.0 mpg

Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

Combined (claimed/tested)
56.5 mpg/53.3 mpg
58.9 mpg/52.3 mpg
52.3 mpg/47.9 mpg
52.3 mpg/47.9 mpg
45.6 mpg/45.6 mpg
39.8 mpg/38.2 mpg

We test fuel economy under strict lab

conditions using realistic test cycles to
reveal the facts behind the figures. Our
figures rarely match manufacturer claims
as, unlike the official mpg test, we measure economy with both a hot and cold
engine, and on the motorway.

Which? Car review

Toyota Auris (2007-)

Medium cars

Running costs and depreciation continued...

How we test
Emissions

Emissions
Carbon dioxide emissions for the Auris are low, between 124g/km and 166g/km, meaning
company car tax and VED are both relatively cheap in most cases. The lowest-emissions
model is, unsurprisingly, the 1.4 D-4Ddiesel (tax band Dor E, depending on version), but the
1.33 petrol version makes it into Band E too with its 135g/km output.

Petrol (CO2, claimed)

135g per km - 166g per km

Diesel (CO2, claimed)

124g per km - 164g per km

Model tested
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 1.4D-4D (90bhp) manual 5-door (2010)
diesel 2.0D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
diesel 2.0 D-4D (126bhp) manual 5-door (2008)
diesel 2.2D-4D (177bhp) manual 5-door (2007)
petrol 1.6 (124bhp) manual 5-door (2007)

Emissions (claimed/tested)
132g per km/139g per km
127g per km/142g per km
144g per km/156g per km
151g per km/156g per km
164g per km/164g per km
166g per km/171g per km

Safety and security

Here are the videos of the 2007 Toyota Auris hatchback Euro NCAPfrontal, side and pole
crash tests.

Euro NCAP score

Adult occupant
Child protection
Pedestrian protection

Which? safety rating

Active (crash avoidance)

Passive (crash safety)
Child
Pedestrian

56%
100%
80%
75%

Security
Theft of car:

Theft from car:

While testing fuel economy, we also

collect exhaust gases to enable us to
measure the amount of carbon dioxide
(CO2) emitted. We also check whether
particulate filters are effective at removing
sooty emissions from diesel engines.
Safety

We rate cars for safety using Euro NCAP

crash test scores (where available),
alongside our own comprehensive safety
checklist. Uniquely, we also feed in results
from our accident avoidance test after
all, its far better to steer around a crash
than rely on the airbags...
Security

Security scores come from the security

experts at Thatcham, who break into
hundreds of cars each year. Most modern
cars are very difficult to drive away, but
are still too easy to steal from.

Which? Car review

Toyota Auris (2007-)

Medium cars

Which? Car Survey 2012 results

About our survey

The Which? Car Survey is the UKs biggest and best reliability and owner satisfaction survey.
In 2012, drivers told us about 47,716 cars, covering more than 450 million miles in the previous
12 months (thats equivalent to driving 18,188 times around the world). This unique feedback
allows us to rate satisfaction and reliability for hundreds of new and used cars.
Note Star ratings below are from 1-5 (1 is very poor and 5 is very good). Percentages shown
under Most common faults indicate the proportion of owners reporting each problem in the
past 12 months.

Brand

Sample size: 4,013 people

Toyota ratings
Overall owner satisfaction for this brand
Brand reliability
Dealer Servicing & repair

Model: Toyota Auris (2007-)Sample size:

246 people

Ownership ratings
Overall owner satisfaction for this range

Ease of driving
Comfort
Dash layout and controls
In-car technology
Styling
Build quality
Practicality
Value for money

Everyone who takes part in the Which?

Car survey tells us about their car and
the dealers who sell and service it. We
analyse this feedback across all cars to
give top-level satisfaction ratings for each
brand, including the brands reliability
record over the last eight years. All star
ratings are out of five.
Model ownership ratings

Dealer Sales Service

Driving enjoyment

84%

Brand ratings

These show how owners score this car

in 12 different areas, from performance to
heating. Owners ratings are subjective
so may differ from Which? Car test scores
but they give a good idea of what the
car is like to live with. Where relevant, cars
are scored against other cars in the same
class (e.g. for space).

70%

Owners View
Generally reliable and
comfortable but an
intermittent clutch-slip
has frustrated my ability
to enjoy the car. The main
dealer couldnt identify
the cause of the problem.
I am now replacing the car
with an 18 month old Ford
Owners View
Steady & reliable but
sluggish acceleration in
higher gears.

Which? Car review

Toyota Auris (2007-)

Medium cars

Which? Car Survey 2012 results continued...

About our survey

Reliability ratings

Reliability ratings
Overall Reliability

Petrol cars

Reliability

Breakdowns
Average annual repair cost
Diesel cars

Reliability

Breakdowns
Average annual repair cost
All cars

Reliability

Breakdowns
Average annual repair cost

Up to 3 years old

3-8 years old

-
-
-
-
-
-

3%
27

1%
89

4%
56
-

We split reliability into breakdowns (including failure to start), faults (where parts
need replacing) and problems (minor issues e.g. squeaks and loose trim). Where
the car has been on sale for some time,
and we have numerous survey responses
from owners, we also split scores by the
age of car and fuel type. Star ratings are
out of five the more stars, the more reliable the car.
Most common faults

Breakdowns: Percentage of cars suffering a breakdown in last 12 months

Average annual repair cost: Average annual cost of repairs (not servicing), in past 12
months

Most common faults



Up to 3 years old

Auto transmission
Interior - Other
Other minor problems
Transmission - Other
Engine electrics - Other


Exhaust system (D) 
Mechanical braking
Steering
Cooling system (P) 
Fuel system (D) 

Failure rate: The proportion of owners reporting this problem in the last year

5%
4%
3%
2%
2%
3-8 years old

9%
5%
4%
4%
4%

Want to know whats most likely to go

wrong as the car gets older? These are
the five most common faults reported by
owners, grouped by age into new, recent
and older cars. A score of 40% means
four out of 10 owners reported problems
with that part of the car over the previous
12 months. Engine electrics and non-engine electrics (e.g. windows, stereo) cause
more headaches than mechanical parts in
most modern cars.