Quashing - Danish Amir vs. Nabiha
Quashing - Danish Amir vs. Nabiha
OF 2012
..Petitioners
Versus
..Respondents
INDEX
S. No
PARTICULARS
PAGES
1.
Notice of Motion
2.
Urgent Application
3.
4.
Memo of Parties
5.
6-15
6.
16-17
7.
Annexure P-1[Colly]
Copy of FIR No.157/2011 with fair typed copy and
English translation.
18-35
8.
Annexure P-2
Copy of settlement dated 24.03.2012 between the parties
before Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts.
36-39
9.
Annexure P-3
Copy of order dated 09.04.2012 passed by Ld. DJ &
ASJ, Delhi.
40
10.
41-46
11.
47-48
12.
3-4
5
49
Mobile: 9811202991
OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF :
DANISH AMEER & ORS.
..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
..RESPONDENTS
NOTICE OF MOTION
To,
The Standing Counsel (Criminal)
State (NCT of Delhi),
Delhi High Court,
New Delhi.
Sir,
Take notice that the matter will be listed on 19.09.2012 at
10.30 O Clock in the forenoon or soon thereafter as may be convenient
to the Court.
New Delhi
Dated: 17.09.2012
OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF :
DANISH AMEER & ORS.
..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
..RESPONDENTS
URGENT APPLICATION
To
The Registrar,
Delhi High Court,
New Delhi.
Sir,
Kindly treat the accompanying Petition for directions as an urgent
one as per rules and orders of this Honble Court.
The grounds of urgency are Necessary directions are sought for.
New Delhi
Dated: 17.09.2012
Centre,
the
petitioners
were
granted
OF 2012
..Petitioners
Versus
..Respondents
MEMO OF PARTIES
1.
Danish Ameer
S/o Shri Ameer Ahmad,
2.
3.
Nasreen Bano
W/o Shri Ameer Ahmad
4.
Ameer Ahmed
S/o Shri Zamir Ahmed
All Resident of:
C-33, Ground Floor,
Nizamuddin East,
New Delhi
5.
PETITIONERS
VERSUS
1.
2.
..RESPONDENTS
Mobile: 9811202991
OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF :
DANISH AMEER & ORS.
..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
..RESPONDENTS
GATE
AND
PROCEEDINGS
ARISING
THEREFROM.
2.
That
the
marriage
between
petitioner
no.1
and
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
That all the jewellery articles have already been returned to the
respondent no. 2 by the petitioners. The petitioner No.1 and
Respondent No.2 are living together as husband and wife at the
matrimonial home and there is no dispute between the parties.
12.
13.
14.
That Respondent No.2 does not wish to pursue the FIR No.
157/2011, and proceedings arising therefrom against the
petitioners, and no useful purpose would be served in proceeding
with the instant FIR. Copy of the identity proof of the petitioners
and respondent No.2 is annexed as Annexure-P-4 (Colly).
15.
That the petitioners have not filed any similar petition before this
Honble Court and before Supreme Court of India.
16.
PETITIONERS
THROUGH
New Delhi
Dated : 17.09.2012
OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF :
DANISH AMEER & ORS.
PETITIONERS
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
AFFIDAVIT
I, Danish Ameer S/o Ameer Ahmed, aged about 33 years, R/o C-33,
Ground Floor, Nizamuddin East, New Delhi, do hereby solemnly affirm
and declare as under:
1. That I am petitioner No.1 in the above mentioned petition and am
fully conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case,
therefore, competent to swear present affidavit.
2. That the accompanying Petition under section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, seeking quashing of FIR No.157/2011
U/s 498A/406 IPC at P.S. Lahori Gate, Delhi and proceedings
arising therefrom, has been drafted on my instruction. I have
understood the same in vernacular and the same are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge.
3. That the Annexure filed by me alongwith the petition are true
copies of their respective originals.
Deponent
VERIFICATION:Verified at New Delhi on this
Deponent
OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF :
DANISH AMEER & ORS.
..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
..RESPONDENTS
AFFIDAVIT
I, Ahmar Ameer @ Ahmer Amir S/o Ameer Ahmed, aged about 34 years,
R/o C-33, Ground Floor, Nizamuddin East, New Delhi, do hereby
solemnly affirm and declare as under:
1.
2.
Deponent
VERIFICATION:Verified at New Delhi on this
Deponent
OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF :
DANISH AMEER & ORS.
..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
..RESPONDENTS
AFFIDAVIT
I, Nasreen Bano W/o Ameer Ahmed, aged about 60 years, R/o C-33,
Ground Floor, Nizamuddin East, New Delhi, do hereby solemnly affirm
and declare as under:
1. That I am petitioner No.3 in the above mentioned petition and am
fully conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case,
therefore, competent to swear present affidavit.
2. That the accompanying Petition under section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, seeking quashing of FIR No.157/2011
U/s 498A/406 IPC at P.S. Lahori Gate, Delhi and proceedings
arising therefrom, has been drafted on my instruction. I have
understood the same in vernacular and the same are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge.
Deponent
VERIFICATION:Verified at New Delhi on this
Deponent
OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF :
DANISH AMEER & ORS.
..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
..RESPONDENTS
AFFIDAVIT
I, Ameer Ahmed S/o Shri Zamir Ahmed aged about 63 years, R/o C-33,
Ground Floor, Nizamuddin East, New Delhi, do hereby solemnly affirm
and declare as under:
1. That I am petitioner No.4 in the above mentioned petition and am
fully conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case,
therefore, competent to swear present affidavit.
2. That the accompanying Petition under section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, seeking quashing of FIR No.157/2011
U/s 498A/406 IPC at P.S. Lahori Gate, Delhi and proceedings
arising therefrom, has been drafted on my instruction. I have
understood the same in vernacular and the same are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge.
Deponent
VERIFICATION:Verified at New Delhi on this
Deponent
OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF :
DANISH AMEER & ORS.
..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
..RESPONDENTS
AFFIDAVIT
I, Aliya Faisal @ Aalia Faisal W/o Mohd Faisal Hussain aged about
35 years R/o 72, Faisal Manzil, Zakir Nagar, Main Road, Okhla, New
Delhi, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:
1. That I am petitioner No.5 in the above mentioned petition and am
fully conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case,
therefore, competent to swear present affidavit.
2. That the accompanying Petition under section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, seeking quashing of FIR No.157/2011
U/s 498A/406 IPC at P.S. Lahori Gate, Delhi and proceedings
arising therefrom, has been drafted on my instruction. I have
understood the same in vernacular and the same are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge.
Deponent
VERIFICATION:Verified at New Delhi on this
Deponent
OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF :
DANISH AMEER & ORS.
..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
..RESPONDENTS
AFFIDAVIT
I, Nabiha Danish @ Nabeeha W/o Shri Danish Ameer aged about
22 years R/o C-33, Ground Floor, Nizamuddin East, New Delhi, also
at 3/1145, Phatak Rang Mahal, Behind Novelty Cinema, Delhi, do
hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:
1.
2.
3.
4.
agreed to live together. All the jewellery articles have been handed
over by the petitioners to the respondent No.2. The terms of the
settlement have been recorded in the settlement proceeding dated
24.03.2012.
5.
That the deponent has amicably resolved and settled all the issues
with the petitioners. Now all the differences and misunderstanding
have been sorted out and no claim of any nature remains between
the parties. Therefore, Respondent No.2 does not wish to pursue the
said FIR and proceedings arising therefrom against the That the
disputes between the petitioners and respondent No.2 was an
unfortunate phase of their respective lives which everybody
including Respondent No.2 wants to forget and now the respondent
No.2 has no grievance against the petitioners.
6.
7.
That the Respondent No.2 does not wish to pursue the said FIR No.
157/2011, and proceedings arising therefrom against the petitioners,
and no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the
instant FIR. The deponent has no objection if the said FIR is
quashed by this Honble Court.
8.
Deponent
PETITIONERS
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
AFFIDAVIT
I, Danish Ameer S/o Ameer Ahmed, aged about 33 years, R/o C-33,
Ground Floor, Nizamuddin East, New Delhi, do hereby solemnly affirm
and declare as under:
1. That I am petitioner No.1 in the above mentioned petition and am
fully conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case,
therefore, competent to swear present affidavit.
2. That the accompanying application under section 482 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure, has been drafted on my instruction. I have
understood the same in vernacular and the same are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge.
Deponent
VERIFICATION:Verified at New Delhi on this
Deponent
PETITIONERS
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
That the petitioners have filed the accompanying petition u/s 482
Cr.P.C. and the contents of the same may also be read as part and
parcel of this application.
2.
That the petitioners have not filed the certified copies of the
orders / annexures alongwith the petition and undertakes to file
the certified copies of the orders/ annexures filed with the present
petition as and when directed by this Honble Court.
PRAYER
It is therefore respectfully prayed that the petitioner may
kindly be exempted from filing certified copies of the orders/
annexures in the interest of justice.
PETITIONERS
Through
New Delhi
Dated: 17.09.2012