DDB Memorandum Brief
DDB Memorandum Brief
Page 3 of 88
The success of any National Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Strategy
and/or Program greatly depends on the faithful and rational application of
this provision:
Section 86. Transfer, Absorption, and Integration of All Operating Units
on Illegal Drugs into the PDEA and Transitory Provisions. The
Narcotics Group of the PNP, the Narcotics Division of the NBI and the
Customs Narcotics Interdiction Unit are hereby abolished; however they
shall continue with the performance of their task as detail service with the
PDEA... until such time that ...the Agency is fully operational and the
number of graduates of the PDEA Academy is sufficient to do the task
themselves: ...
(BACKGROUND: THE RATIONALE BEHIND SEC 86 PROVIDING THE
TRANSFER, ABSORPTION AND INTEGRATION OF THE OPERATING UNITS
ON ILLEGAL DRUGS INTO THE PDEA.
Submitted by Undersecretary Grepor Butch Belgica as a comment on the
proposed amendment to Section 86 of RA9165
Decades ago when the problem of Substance Abuse ballooned, and
parallel with it are Delinquency and the increase in drug-related Heinous
Crimes, among the factors that were looked into is the efficiency and
adequacy of the supply reduction policy, programs, and law enforcement
setup and system prevailing during that period.
There were multiple law enforcement agencies with their respective elite
groups and task forces involve in the drug supply reduction efforts during
those times; as there were as much anti-drug enforcement agencies with
some of their operatives protecting illegal drug syndicates. One of the
more prominent of the problems was the involvement of law enforcers to
illegal drug activities, and parallel with it was the increase of criminal drug
traffickers with protection from law enforcers, thus making a mockery of
the Law, and replacing the rule of law with the rule of agencies.
STEPS TO BE TAKEN AS ADDRESSED BY THIS SECTION 86 ARE:
1. The ABOLITION of all these agencies and their replacement with a
super drug enforcement agency (PDEA) with clear and direct
accountability to a multi-departments super-body (DDB).
Page 7 of 88
OPTIONS TO TAKE:
Page 10 of 88
1. The Board or the ExeCom, thru resolutions, may correct and act on
these issues above-presented particularly in the implementation of RA
9165, Articles IX and X, Sections 87 and 88.
2. The Chair may issue a memorandum circular to the effect that the
Unified (Two in One) Board-Agency is to henceforth be presented,
known, called, promoted as DDB-PDEA, as defined by law in
Article IX of RA 9165.
CONCLUSION:
DDB-PDEA with a very broad membership of Department executives and
supported by a very comprehensive law could be a very effective
government institution in curbing the problem of illegal drugs and in
neutralizing, among others:
1. Narco-Politics and their major Players
2. International and National Narcotic Syndicates
3. Criminal Drug Syndicates involving some Law Enforcers
Communications to the President and Congress may be prepared for other
corrective legislations needed.
3. THE YOUTHGUIDE INITIATIVE
A Program on Anti-Delinquency and -Substance Abuse In Response to the
Rise of Drug Related Violence among Youth Gangs and Pseudo
Fraternities
RATIONALE
Proliferation of substance abusing youth gangs is phenomenal, instilling
fear and anxiety to both parents and kids in the community, in and off
campus. This phenomenon is complex and distinct but not much attention
is given.
Youth involvement in substance abuse increased very significantly while
gangs formed are more vicious and secretive. Their proliferation can be
traced to several factors:
First, the moral degeneracy which greatly contributes to the weakening
of the youths resistance to evil (curiosity) and peer pressure.
Second, Neglect or lack of Parental guidance; lack of community
vigilance and restrain.
Page 11 of 88
ADDENDUM
LEGAL EXPLANATION to a Unified DDB-PDEA
Excerpted from the Report of JC Calida and Associates Law Firm
Page 14 of 88
All these factors point to the fact that PDEA cannot exist and operate
independently of the Board. For one, PDEA cannot implement a national
drug control strategy except that formulated by DDB.7
While the PDEA Director General is appointed by the President, there is no
express provision in the RA 9165 placing PDEA directly under the Office
of the President unlike that of the DDB.8 PDEAs role is that of an
Implementing Arm and that arm is attached to the body of DDB.
Sections 77-84
Paragraph 2, Section 78
3 Section 88, RA 9165
4 Section 81, RA 9165
5 Section 80, RA 9165
6 Section 82, RA 9165
7 Section 84 (a), RA 9165
8 Section 77, RA 9165
1
2
10
Stated differently, under Section 88, PDEA was not conferee the authority
to manage any fund under RA 9165. Applying the rule of Expressio Unius
Est Exclussio Alterius to determine legislative intent, the express mention
of the Board (DDB) means the exclusion of others not expressly
mentioned. While it is true that under Section 89, the Commission on Audit
(COA) shall audit all accounts and expenses of the Board and PDEA, this
Page 17 of 88
section does not grant PDEA any authority to manage its funds. Managing
of funds and auditing thereof are two distinct and separate concepts.
This brings us to Section 88 of the IRR. For ease of reference, we quote the
pertinent portions thereof:
Management of Funds Under the Act: Annual Report by the Board and
the PDEA.
(a) Fund Management The Board and the PDEA shall manage their
respective funds, whether appropriated by Congress or coming from other
sources, as each may deem proper for the attainment of the objectives of
the Act, and respectively account for the same, subject to the observance of
the terms and conditions set in the annual general appropriations act and
pertinent budgeting, accounting and auditing rules and regulations.
(underscoring supplied )
Evidently, Section 88 of the IRR expanded the number of the entity
authorized by Section 88 of RA 9165 to manage the funds by adding
PDEA, contrary to express and plain legislative intent to repose the
authority only to DDB.
It is a fundamental rule that regulation cannot enlarge the law. If a conflict
or discrepancy occurs between the basic law and an implementing rule or
regulation, the former prevails.
In Boie-Takeda Chemicals, Inc. v. De La Serna, 18 Supreme Court ruled
that Implementing Rules cannot add to or detract from the provisions of
the law it is designed to implement. Administrative regulations adopted
under legislative authority by a particular department must be in harmony
with the provisions of the law they are intended to carry into effect. They
cannot widen its scope. An administrative agency cannot amend an act of
Congress.
To cite a particular case, an IRR changed the phrase in the law from the
disjunctive and/or to the conjunctive and. The Supreme Court nullified
the regulation, stating that if the law intended that the employee should
have both a superior provident plan and a housing plan in order to qualify
for exemption, it would have use the words and , instead of and/or.19
Applying the rationale of the said case law, if Congress intended DDB and
PDEA to manage their respective funds separately, then it would have so
stated in Section 88 of RA 9165.
Page 18 of 88
19
Page 19 of 88
PART II
ADAC TOOL KIT
BACKGROUND
As mandated by the Constitution, the government shall promote the quality
of life of the people. The Local Government Code of 1991 provides that
local government units shall pursue undertakings to improve public morals
and maintain peace and order, among other equally significant concerns.
Thus, the increasing use of illegal drugs has significantly contributed to the
incidence of heinous crimes.
Page 20 of 88
The creation of Anti-Drug Abuse Council can be traced back in 1998 when
it was first created under DILG issuance, Memorandum Circular No. 98227, dated December 2, 1998, designating the Governor/Mayor/Punong
Barangay as its chairman.
Supplementing the said circular, the DILG issued Memorandum Circular
99-106 to include provincial Vice-Governor/City Vice-Mayors and
Municipal Vice Mayors as members of the Provincial, City and Municipal
Anti-drug Abuse Councils respectively.
The Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) issued
Memorandum Circular No. 2009-09, dated January 29, 2009, and
emphasized that provincial governors shall ensure that the mandated tasks
and responsibilities cited under Section 51-53 of RA 9165 are
implemented. Under Section 52 (1) of RA 9165, an Administrative Board
may be created, to hear complaints regarding the nuisances.
Article VII of RA 9165, Section 51 mandated the participation of Local
Government Units in addressing the drug problem in their locality, giving
priority to preventive or educational programs and the treatment and
rehabilitation of drug dependents.
In the same Article, Section 52 states that any place or premises which has
been used on two (2) or more occasions as the site of unlawful sale or
delivery of dangerous drugs may be declared to be a public nuisance, and
such nuisance may be abated, pursuant to the following procedures:
1. Any city or municipality may, by an ordinance create an administrative
board to hear complaints regarding the nuisances.
2. Any employee, officer or resident of the city or municipality may bring
a complain before the Board after giving not less than three (3) days
written notice of such complain to the owner of the place or premises
at his/her last known address; and
3. After hearing in which the Board may consider any evidence, including
evidence of the general reputation of the place or premises, and which
the owner of the premises shall have an opportunity to present
evidence in his/her defense, the Board may declare the place or
premises to be public nuisance.
Page 21 of 88
Article VII , Section 52 of the RA 9165 states that any place or premises
which have been used on two (2) or more occasions as the site of the
unlawful sale or delivery of dangerous drugs maybe declared to be a public
nuisance, and such nuisance may be abated, pursuant to the following
procedures:
a) Any city or municipality may, by an ordinance create an
administrative board to hear complaints regarding the nuisances.
b) Any employee, officer or resident of the city or municipality may
bring a complain before the Board after giving not less than three
(3) days written notice of such complain to the owner of the place
or premises at his/her last known address; and
c) After hearing in which the Board may consider any evidence,
including evidence of the general reputation of the place or
premises, and which the owner of the premises shall have an
opportunity to present evidence in his/her defense, the Board may
declare the place or premises to be public nuisance.
If the Board declares a place or premises to be a public nuisance, it may
declare an order immediately prohibiting the conduct, operation, or
maintenance of any business or activity on the premises which is
conducive to such nuisance. An order entered under this section shall
expire after one (1) year or at such earlier time as stated in the order. The
Board may bring a complaint seeking a permanent injunction against any
nuisance described under this Section.
This article does not restrict the right of any person to proceed under the
Civil Code against any public nuisance.
EXPLANATION TO THE CREATION OF AN ADMINISTATIVE
BOARD HEADED BY THE LGU CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND ITS
PREFERRED COMPOSITION
Whereas Section 52 of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of RA
9165 states that a City or Municipality may by ordinance create an
Administrative Board (AB) to be composed of: 1) The City or Municipal
Health Officer as Chairperson; 2) the City /Municipal Legal Officer or, in
the absence of which, the Municipal Administrator and, 3) the Local Chief
of Police as members;
Page 23 of 88
Socio Civic
Religious
Group
Provincial/ City
Municipal Legal
Officer
Provincial/ City
Municipal
Health Officer
DDB-PDEA
Designated
Ex-Officio
Member
Page 26 of 88
DepED Division
Superintendent/District Supervisor
Provincial/City/Municipal
Social Worker Officer
Provincial/City/Municipal
Health Officer
Provincial/City/Municipal
Information Officer
NGO-Socio-Civic Group /
Representative
Religious Group
Page 28 of 88
Barangay Kagawad as
Vice -Chairperson
Parents/Teacher Assn. (PTA) or
(Representative ) as
Member
SK Chairman as
Member
School Principal (Public) or
(Representative) as
Member
Ex-O Tanod as
Member
Religious Organization
Rep. as
Member
NGO/Socio-Civic Rep. as
Member
The DILG through the National Barangay Operations Office (NBOO) shall
monitor compliance of the BADAC while the National Drug Law
Enforcement and Prevention Coordinating Center (NDLEPCC) of the PNP
shall provide technical assistance in anti-drug abuse activities at all levels.
The DILG Regional Directors shall disseminate the said existence and
function of BADAC to all Barangays within their respective jurisdiction.
Page 29 of 88
COMMUNITY
BOARD
Page 33 of 88
DOH accredited
Physician
Yes
BOARD
No
Immediate
Confinement
BOARD
Petition for
Confinement
Private Rehab
Center
**
Government
Rehab Center
Page 39 of 88
Rehabilitation Or Reformation?
The principles involved in the rehabilitation or reformation of either a
delinquent or a substance abuser are almost similar. The only difference is
that the reformation of substance abuser includes a meticulous
consideration of the physical-medical aspect, which is Detoxification:
the process which an abuser undergo to relieve him from his addiction
which severely impairs his/her normal responses and physical condition.
Thus, this area needs careful attention by a physician while a program is
laid out for her/his rehabilitation and reformation.
The physical aspect is therefore more in the realm of rehabilitation
while the behavioral aspect is more in the realm of reformation.
ii.
Basically, there are two approaches used today in the treatment and
rehabilitation of a substance abuser: The drug-substitute approach; and the
Drug-free or Drug-less approach.
As their names suggest, the former approach makes use of substitute
drugs to cushion supposedly the effects of withdrawal from the substance
abused; while the latter approach simply allow the natural or normal
course of withdrawal to transpire.
The former approach allegedly aims to help ease the pain and
sufferings of the addict; the latter deliberately aims to allow the substance
abuser to experience the pains of withdrawal as part of the
reformation strategy. Of course, the professional-clinical eye of a
physician is sought for any eventualities. This is vital, thus a general
physical examination is done to the subject at the start of the program.
It is also believed by most drug-free approach advocates that this is the
most effective approach to rehabilitation. With the support of natural
techniques such as cold shower, water therapy, sweat shop exercise
etc., the ability of the body chemistry to normalize is believed to be
hastened. Believers of the drug-free approach usually disallow even the
use of nicotine or tobacco-cigarette smoking in the center.
REFORMATION PROGRAM: A THREE DIMENSIONAL
APPROACH
iii.
and pneuma (spirit). And this goes on to Phase II and III, where the
emphasis and focus shifts to the corresponding dimension, but WITHOUT
(and this is important!) relaxing or depleting what has been accomplished
previously.
In short, the program intensifies as it proceeds. The previous gains add
on to the current, as the process goes on to mold and remold the man;
develop a benevolent pattern for living; impressed a bright; godly outlook
in life; build and strengthen a positive response mechanism in the inner
man to face and handle stresses, challenges and trials in life.
THE PROCESS OF REHAB/REFORM PROGRAM
iv.
Act.
Otherwise, if the quantity involved is less than the foregoing quantities, the
penalties shall be graduated as follows:
1) Life imprisonment and a fine ranging from Four hundred thousand
pesos (P400,000.00) to Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00), if
the quantity of methamphetamine hydrochloride or shabu is ten (10)
grams or more but less than fifty (50) grams;
2) Imprisonment of twenty (20) years and one (1) day to life
imprisonment and a fine ranging from Four hundred thousand pesos
(P400,000.00) to Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00), if the
quantities of dangerous drugs are five (5) grams or more but less than
ten (10) grams of opium, morphine, heroin, cocaine or cocaine
hydrochloride, marijuana resin or marijuana resin oil,
methamphetamine hydrochloride or shabu, or other dangerous
drugs such as, but not limited to, methylenedioxymethamphetamine
(MDMA) or ecstasy, paramethoxyamphetamine (PMA),
trimethoxyamphetamine (TMA), lysergic acid diethylamine (LSD),
gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB), and those similarly designed or
newly introduced drugs and their derivatives, without having any
therapeutic value or if the quantity possessed is far beyond therapeutic
requirements; or three hundred (300) grams or more but less than five
hundred (500) grams of marijuana;
3) Imprisonment of twelve (12) years and one (1) day to twenty (20)
years and a fine ranging from Three hundred thousand pesos
(P300,000.00) to Four hundred thousand pesos (P400,000.00), if the
quantities of dangerous drugs are less than five (5) grams of opium,
morphine, heroin, cocaine or cocaine hydrochloride, marijuana resin
or marijuana resin oil, methamphetamine hydrochloride or shabu, or
other dangerous drugs such as, but not limited to,
methylenedioxymethamphetamine
(MDMA)
or
ecstasy,
paramethoxyamphetamine (PMA), trimethoxyamphetamine (TMA),
lysergic acid diethylamine (LSD), gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB),
and those similarly designed or newly introduced drugs and their
derivatives, without having any therapeutic value or if the quantity
possessed is far beyond therapeutic requirements; or less than three
hundred (300) grams of marijuana.
Page 48 of 88
Page 51 of 88
Page 52 of 88
Any elective local or national official found to have benefited from the
proceeds of the trafficking of dangerous drugs as prescribed in this Act, or
have received any financial or material contributions or donations from
natural or juridical persons found guilty of trafficking dangerous drugs as
prescribed in this Act, shall be removed from office and perpetually
disqualified from holding any elective or appointive positions in the
government, its divisions, subdivisions, and intermediaries, including
government-owned or controlled corporations.
SEC. 28. Criminal Liability of Government Officials and Employees. The
maximum penalties of the unlawful acts provided for in this Act shall be
imposed, in addition to absolute perpetual disqualification from any public
office, if those found guilty of such unlawful acts are government officials
and employees.
SEC. 29. Criminal Liability for Planting of Evidence. Any person who is
found guilty of planting any dangerous drug and/or controlled precursor
and essential chemical, regardless of quantity and purity, shall suffer the
penalty of death.
SEC. 30. Criminal Liability of Officers of Partnerships, Corporations,
Associations or Other Juridical Entities. In case any violation of this Act
is committed by a partnership, corporation, association or any juridical
entity, the partner, president, director, manager, trustee, estate
administrator, or officer who consents to or knowingly tolerates such
violation shall be held criminally liable as a co-principal.
The penalty provided for the offense under this Act shall be imposed upon
the partner, president, director, manager, trustee, estate administrator, or
officer who knowingly authorizes, tolerates or consents to the use of a
vehicle, vessel, aircraft, equipment or other facility, as an instrument in the
importation, sale, trading, administration, dispensation, delivery,
distribution, transportation or manufacture of dangerous drugs, or chemical
diversion, if such vehicle, vessel, aircraft, equipment or other instrument is
owned by or under the control or supervision of the partnership,
corporation, association or juridical entity to which they are affiliated.
SEC. 31. Additional Penalty if Offender is an Alien. In addition to the
penalties prescribed in the unlawful act committed, any alien who violates
such provisions of this Act shall, after service of sentence, be deported
immediately without further proceedings, unless the penalty is death.
Page 53 of 88
During the pendency of the case in the Regional Trial Court, no property,
or income derived therefrom, which may be confiscated and forfeited, shall
be disposed, alienated or transferred and the same shall be in custodia legis
and no bond shall be admitted for the release of the same.
The proceeds of any sale or disposition of any property confiscated or
forfeited under this Section shall be used to pay all proper expenses
incurred in the proceedings for the confiscation, forfeiture, custody and
maintenance of the property pending disposition, as well as expenses for
publication and court costs. The proceeds in excess of the above expenses
shall accrue to the Board to be used in its campaign against illegal drugs.
SEC. 21. Custody and Disposition of Confiscated, Seized, and/or
Surrendered Dangerous Drugs, Plant Sources of Dangerous Drugs,
Controlled
Precursors
and
Essential
Chemicals,
Instruments/Paraphernalia and/or Laboratory Equipment. The PDEA
shall take charge and have custody of all dangerous drugs, plant sources of
dangerous drugs, controlled precursors and essential chemicals, as well as
instruments/paraphernalia and/or laboratory equipment so confiscated,
seized and/or surrendered, for proper disposition in the following manner:
1.
2.
3.
After the filing of the criminal case, the Court shall, within
seventy-two (72) hours, conduct an ocular inspection of the
confiscated, seized and/or surrendered dangerous drugs, plant
sources of dangerous drugs, and controlled precursors and essential
chemicals, including the instruments/paraphernalia and/or
laboratory equipment, and through the PDEA shall within twentyfour (24) hours thereafter proceed with the destruction or burning
of the same, in the presence of the accused or the person/s from
whom such items were confiscated and/or seized, or his/her
representative or counsel, a representative from the media and the
Department of Justice, civil society groups and any elected public
official. The Board shall draw up the guidelines on the manner of
proper disposition and destruction of such item/s which shall be
borne by the offender: Provided, That those item/s of lawful
commerce, as determined by the Board, shall be donated, used or
recycled for legitimate purposes: Provided, further, That a
representative sample, duly weighed and recorded is retained.
5.
6.
8.
ANNEXES
Page 57 of 88
(Annex-A)
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
A. Francisco Gold Condominium II, EDSA Cor, Mapagmahal St.,
Diliman, Quezon City
MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR
No. 98 - 227
FOR
December 2, 1998
SUBJECT:
CREATION OF PROVINCIAL, CITY, MUNICIPAL,
AND BARANGAY ANTI-DRUG ABUSE COUNCILS
The Constitution mandates that the government shall promote
of life of the people. Towards this end, Section 16 of
Government Code of 1991 provides that local government
pursue undertakings to improve public morals and maintain
order, among other equally significant concerns.
Page 58 of 88
the quality
the Local
units shall
peace and
(Annex C)
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Francisco Gold Condominium II, EDSA Cor, Mapagmahal St.,
Diliman, Quezon City
January 23, 2004
MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR No. 2004-07
FOR : ALL POVINCIAL GOVERNORS, CITY/MUNICIPAL
MAYORS,
PUNONG
BARANGAYS,
DILG
REGIONAL/
PROVINCIAL/CITY DIRECTORS AND FIELD OFFICERS
SUBJECT:
EXPANSION OF THE BARANGAY ANTI-DRUG
ABUSE COMMITTEE (BADAC) THROUGH ORGANIZATION OF
BADAC AUXILLARY TEAM AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES
RATIONALE:
The surge of drugs has assumed alarming proportions in the country over
the past three decades. Drugs are threat to health and a serious threat to the
well-being and security of the residents due to drug related crimes.
Moreover, the proliferation and use of illegal drugs hamper efforts aimed at
Page 62 of 88
Page 65 of 88
(Annex D)
MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR
No. 2009-09
TO: ALL PROVINCIAL GOVERNORS, CITY/MUNICIPAL MAYORS,
PUNONG BARANGAYS, SANGGUNIANS AT ALL LEVELS,
DILG REGIONAL DIRECTORS AND OTHER CONCERNED.
SUBJECT : UNIFIED ACTIONS AGAINST ILLEGAL DRUGS AND
OTHER SUBSTANCES
I.
II.
III. RESPONSIBILITIES
COMMON
TO
ALL
LOCAL
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AT ALL LEVELS.
1. As required under Section 51 to 53 of RA 9165, otherwise known
as the Comprehensive dangerous Drugs Act of 2002, Local Chief
Executives and Sangguniang Members must ensure the mandatory
Page 66 of 88
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
IV.
V.
SANCTIONS:
All concerned local authorities are hereby advised that:
1. The mandate under section 51 of RA 9165 for Local government
Units to appropriate a substantial portion of their respective
Annual Budgets to assist in or enhance the enforcement of RA
9165 is considered as a mandatory requirement in all budget
preparations in addition to those already mandatorily required
under section 324 of the Local government Code. Accordingly,
every Local government Unit shall be a ground to disapprove the
said Annual Budget on review, Further, failure to include such
appropriation in the said Annual Budget can subject the local
officials concerned to a possible administrative charge of
dereliction of duty.
2. In case of adverse reports from PDEA and/or PNP that illegal
drugs sale delivery and use is rampant within local government
Unit concerned or that the PDEA , PNP and other law enforcement
agencies have uncovered Shabu and other illegal drug laboratories
and marijuana plantation within the area of their jurisdiction, and
the local officials therein, after having been made aware thereof,
failed to take appropriate measures to enforce the pertinent
provisions of RA 965, including abatement of nuisance under
Section 52 thereof, may be charged administratively for gross
Page 68 of 88
27 OCTOBER 2003
PREFARATORY STATEMENT
In her State of the Nation Address (SONA) delivered last July 28, 2003,
Her Excellency, President GLORIA MACAPAGAL ARROYO renewed
her commitment to sustain the intensified campaign against illegal drugs
when she declared, Dadaldhin Ko Ang Labang Ito Sa Bawat Lalawigan
At Lingsod Hangang Umabot Sa Mga Barangay.
Page 69 of 88
i.
j.
However, should the DOH find that during the initial after-care
and follow-up program of eighteen (18) months, the drug
dependent requires further treatment and rehabilitation in the
Center, he/she shall be recommitted to the Center for confinement.
Thereafter, he/she may again be certified for temporary release and
Page 78 of 88
Page 80 of 88
14.1.
The Quezon City Anti-Drug Abuse Board (QCADAB) shall
exercise the following functions:
14.1.1. Act as the policy making body and strategy formulating body in the
planning and formulation of policies and programs on drug prevention,
control, treatment and rehabilitation. It shall develop a comprehensive,
integrated, unified and balanced drug abuse prevention program and
control strategy.
14.1.2. Ensure full compliance, participation and support to the provision
of the RA 9165 and see to it that the decision of the Council are faithfully
carried out and implemented.
14.1.3. Received in trust, legacies, gifts and donations of real and personal
properties of all kinds, to administer and dispose the same when necessary
for the benefit of the Quezon City Drug Treatment and Rehabilitation
Center, subject to the limitations provided for by such donation: Provided,
further , that not more than twenty five percent (25%) of such donation
shall be allocated for administrative purpose: Provided, finally, the
deductibility of such donation shall be subjected to the provision of RA
8424as amended.
xxx
End of Excerpts
given the political and police powers of the barangay to administer the
affairs of the community;
WHEREAS, there are shortcomings in the implementation of the barangay
drug-clearing operations due to the dynamics of the drug problem,
confused roles and responsibilities of the agencies involved, inadequate
resources, and lack of management commitment;
WHEREAS, in order to make the clearing of drug-affected barangays
more effective, there is need to craft a more practical set of guidelines,
considering the number of agencies involved and the complexity of said
operations;
WHEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, as it is hereby RESOLVED, to
prescribe the following Revised Guidelines in the Conduct of Barangay
Drug-Clearing Operations:
SECTION 1. Conduct of Barangay Drug-Clearing Operations The
clearing of drug-affected barangays shall be conducted in three (3) phases,
namely: (a) Pre-Operation Phase; (b) Operation Phase; and (c) PostOperation Phase. [See attached Activities and Flow Chart on Barangay
Drug-Clearing Operations, Annex A.]
A. Pre-Operation Phase The activities to be undertaken under this stage
shall commence with laying the groundwork and bases for effective and
sustainable clearing operations against drug-affected barangays:
i. Activation of BADACs, BADAC Auxiliary Teams and SK in each
barangay and definition and allocation of responsibilities for barangay
drug-clearing activities. [OPR: CLGOO/MLGOO supported by Local PNP
Unit]
ii. Capability enhancement of all stakeholders in barangay clearing
operations through the conduct of basic drug prevention and control
seminars, giving emphasis to collection and analysis of drug-related
information and prevention education. [OPR: Local PNP Unit supported by
Local Government Health Officer, Local Government Social Welfare
Officer, DECS Representative, & SK Chairman]
Bd. Reg. providing for revised guidelines in the conduct of barangay drugclearing operations 1 Bd. Reg. providing for revised guidelines in the
conduct of barangay drug-clearing operations 2
iii. Organization of house clusters with designated cluster leader in each
barangay. The cluster leader shall directly report to the BADAC Chairman
Page 83 of 88
all essential facts of any illegal drug activities within his/her cluster, such
as name(s) of pushers/users, marijuana cultivation activities, clandestine
laboratory operations and other drug-related data. [See attached format of
Confidential Report to BADAC Chairman and Guide in Identifying the
Organization of Local Drug Syndicates, Annexes B & C.] [OPR: Local
PNP Unit supported by Local Government Social Welfare Officer, Local
Government Health Officer & BADAC]
iv. Submission by the BADAC Chairman of consolidated information
report to CADAC/MADAC and local police unit concerned for the
formulation and validation of watchlist of drug personalities in every
barangay. [OPR: BADAC Chairman supported by Local PNP Unit]
v. Determination of priority drug-affected barangays, taking into
consideration the number of drug users/pushers and the gravity of the drug
problem in the area, for the conduct of police operations and
advocacy/preventive education seminar. [OPR: Local PNP Unit supported
by Local Government Health Officer, Local Government Social Welfare
Officer, DECS Representative & SK Chairman]
vi. Enactment of city or municipal ordinances creating Administrative
Boards to hear and act on complaints regarding public nuisances pursuant
to Section 52, Article VII of Republic Act 9165. [OPR: Local
Sanggunians]
vii. Establishment of Rehabilitation Referral Desk in every barangay to
endorse drug dependents to the duly authorized representative of the
Dangerous Drugs Board pursuant to Article VIII of RA 9165 and pertinent
issuances of the Board. [OPR: Local Government Health Officer and Local
Government Social Welfare Officer in coordination with the Treatment and
Rehabilitation Center (TRC) Administrator]
B. Operation Phase The objective of the operation phase is the actual
implementation drug supply and demand reduction strategies in priority
drug-affected barangays.
i. Arrest of identified drug users/pushers through citizens arrest, buybust operation, and service of Search Warrants and Warrants of Arrest.
[OPR: PDEA, Local PNP & City/Mun. Prosecutor]
Page 84 of 88
Page 88 of 88