Scribd
Upload
458 views2 pages

Abando, Ann Margarette G. Legal Research LLB Tsu 1A

This document is an Answer filed in response to a civil case regarding a petition for legal separation. It admits some allegations from the petition, denies others, and provides further context regarding the state of the marriage. Specifically, it admits the parties were married and had four children, but denies allegations of infidelity. It claims the marriage was miserable and the respondent left due to the petitioner's disrespectful behavior. The answer also denies allegations about property, asserting one property was exclusively the respondent's prior to separation and another was purchased solely by a third party.

Uploaded by

miss independent
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
458 views2 pages

Abando, Ann Margarette G. Legal Research LLB Tsu 1A

This document is an Answer filed in response to a civil case regarding a petition for legal separation. It admits some allegations from the petition, denies others, and provides further context regarding the state of the marriage. Specifically, it admits the parties were married and had four children, but denies allegations of infidelity. It claims the marriage was miserable and the respondent left due to the petitioner's disrespectful behavior. The answer also denies allegations about property, asserting one property was exclusively the respondent's prior to separation and another was purchased solely by a third party.

Uploaded by

miss independent
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Abando, Ann Margarette G.

LEGAL RESEARCH
LLB TSU 1A
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
3rd Judicial Region
Branch 63
Tarlac City

Nica Bryne, Petitioner,

Civil Case No. 188-218-18


For:

- versus
Nicky Bryne, Respondent,
x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
ANSWER
COMES NOW Respondent, through undersigned counsel, without necessarily
submitting to the jurisdiction of the Honorable Court, most respectfully alleges:
1. That the allegations contained in paragraph 1 are admitted.
2. That the allegations contained in paragraph 2 are admitted.
3. That the some of the allegations contained in paragraph 3 are
specifically denied and some are admitted. It is in fact admitted that the
Petitioner is blessed with four children with Respondent however, the
truth of the matter is that, the marriage of the petitioner and the
respondent was only for convenience and it was a miserable relationship.
4. That the allegations contained in paragraph 4 are admitted.
5. That the allegations contained in paragraph 5 are admitted.
6. That the allegations contained in paragraph 6 are specifically denied.
Respondent did not engaged in any sexual affair to a woman named Mish
Tress then, and that respondent had not abandoned his family for the
mentioned woman but was forced to leave the family home because
respondent can no longer bear Petitioners acts of going home late at
night and sarcastic remarks every time her attention was called to what

she had been doing. The truth of the matter is that their marriage has
gone through several misunderstandings and numerous disagreements.
7. That the allegations contained in paragraph 7 are specifically denied. The
lot belongs exclusively to the respondent because they were already separated in
fact. Further, assuming arguendo that the lot is conjugal, the transaction should not
be declared entirely void as Respondent had one-half share over the property.
8. That the allegations contained in paragraph 8 are specifically denied. The
said property was issued solely to Mish Tress. A Deed of Absolute Sale dated was
declared in favor of Mish Tress and Transfer Certificate of Title No. S-90293
covering. The property in question was purchased by Mish Tress with her
own exclusive funds and it was only for convenience that the respondent
facilitated the mortgage. That, although the respondent paid the monthly
amortization of the mortgage as attorney-in-fact of Mish Tress, the money came
exclusively from her.

WHEREFORE, premises considered it is most respectfully prayed of this


Honorable Court that this Answer be admitted.
Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise prayed for.
Tarlac City, Philippines, this 4h day of November 2016.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy