Project-Clinical Legal
Project-Clinical Legal
PHILOSOPHY OF CLINICS
INDEX
TOPIC
PAGE NO.
INTRODUCTION
5-9
HISTORY
10-13
PURPOSE
14-18
IMPLEMENTATION
19-22
BENEFITS
23-26
CHALLENGES
27-30
CONCLUSION
31-32
BIBLIOGRAPHY
33
with a vast doctrinal base of knowledge sealed within a context that is not
translatable into practice."1
The term, "clinical legal education" was first used by Jerome Frank, in 1933 in
United States in his article, "Why not a Clinical Lawyer School"2 and has since
then been the focus of attention for improvement of legal education and for
creating a synthesis between the law schools and the legal profession. The legal
clinic concept was first discussed at the turn of the twentieth century by two
professors as a variant of the medical clinic model. Russian professor Alexander I.
Lyublinsky in 1901, quoting an article in a German journal, and American
professor William Rowe, in a 1917 article, each wrote about the concept of a
legal clinic. Both professors associated it with the medical professions tradition
of requiring medical students to train in functioning clinics ministering to real
patients under the supervision of experienced physicians.
Clinical legal education is essential to preparing law students to practice law
effectively.
Clinical Legal Education has been a significant part of legal education since 1960.
The first clinic started in U. K. in 1970 and in Australia in 1990s. The concept is
fast expanding across the globe also.
The clinical method allows students to confront the uncertainties and challenges
of problem solving for clients, to say that the process of learning law in such a
textured manner should be relegated to a certain course or set of courses ignores
what educational theorists have been saying for years: that the best learning takes
place when the broad range of abilities we possess is engaged.
1 John B. Mitchell, Betsy R. Hollingsworth,
Patricia Clark & Raven Lidman, And Then
Suddenly Seattle University Was on its Way
to a Parallel, Integrative Curriculum, 2 Clin.
L. Rev. 1, 21 (1995).
like a lawyer. Instead of being just a craftsman manipulating advocacy skill, the
present society needs the lawyer to be equipped for policy planning and advisory
roles.
As a philosophy clinical legal education aims to change and restructure
institutionalized legal education, producing a philosophy about the role of lawyers
in society: "To create visible models of justice in action to demonstrate a deep
commitment to achieving justice and to challenge injustice, teaching law students
that the privileged class of lawyers possess the responsibility to facilitate a just
society."
The Bar Council of India, constituted under the Indian Advocates Act, 1961, is
endowed with the responsibility by the Parliament to prescribe and maintain the
standards of legal education in consultation with State Bar Councils and
Universities teaching law. The Rules which the Council brought into force from
June 1982 distinguish professional education from other forms of legal education.
Recognizing the importance of dissemination of legal knowledge for promotion of
democracy and constitutional government, the Council exhorted Universities to
devise ways and means appropriate to their situations for liberal legal education.
The Council insists on strict standards in professional legal education, and in this
regard, it has laid down a required curriculum with some possible adjustments in
details for accommodating local needs and requirements.
The goal of professional legal education is to equip students to perform the
various roles which lawyers are expected to play in our society. The modern
emphasis on humanistic and policy oriented goals in legal education can be
gauged from the inclusion of instruction in law related social science subjects and
humanities in the law courses.
The clinical component of legal education, which has been the most neglected
aspect so far, requires some priority attention if a fair balance is to be achieved
between the doctrinal and empirical goals of the new curriculum. Clinical
education offers unique opportunities for students professional and intellectual
development. Clinical programmes can be conceived much more broadly and
5