A Case Study Ikea in Brazil Marketing Essay
A Case Study Ikea in Brazil Marketing Essay
However, there is much more to IKEA than just its cheap stylish furniture. As Eberhard-Harribey (2006) states, regardless of its
openly aggressive focus on cutting costs, IKEA is a leading company when it comes to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
matters. IKEA has managed to combine a cost focus with CSR issues, as opposed to companies such as Starbucks and The
Body Shop, which is considered to be high CSR-oriented but that charges a premium-price for its sustainable products. IKEA
has respectable policies on child labour and has strong partnerships with UNICEF, and the WHO which for instance set a
standard for all other business around the world.
IKEA has a transnational strategy as they try to maximise its global strategy of product standardisation whilst responding to,
consumer local needs. Globalisation, factors like economic growth, deregulation, more disposable income and rising housing
market have created many opportunities for growth in which IKEA have continuously taken advantage of in many countries. In
spite of its global presence, it is worthy to point out two facts. First fact is that Europe accounts for 82% of IKEA's total revenues
and North America accounts for 15% (Datamonitor, 2009). Second fact us that in both Europe and North America regions, as a
result of the economic downturn, the furniture retail industry is under a lot of competition and pricing pressure; as well as ever
growing customer demand environmental awareness.
In order to reduce the political-economical and social-demographical risks inherent with such regions, IKEA needs to
concentrate on diversifying its operations into other markets promptly and efficiently. Moreover, by expanding into other
markets, IKEA can also take advantages of opportunities that these new markets offer that current markets no longer do. For
example, in the past when China opened-up its policy to FDI, it eventually led to the Chinese economic improvement, the rise in
the housing market and subsequently the demand for home furnishings in China. These events have unambiguous allowed
IKEA to successfully enter this market.
The current strategy mode that IKEA undertakes when entering a new market is International Franchising whereby products,
limited rights, operating systems and the use of IKEA's brand name are sold to the foreign franchisee for a sum fee and share
in the profits.
It seems sensible therefore that IKEA continue on expanding into new markets. Nevertheless, before IKEA chooses another
market to enter, several analyses (example?) need to be undergone in order to choose the most appropriate market that not
only match the Furniture Industry but ultimately complement IKEA as a company.
In this work IKEA's plan will be to further its global expansion into the South American Market, having Brazil as a target. South
American has kept strong growth in value, a trend that according to Marketline, 2009 is meant to carry on rising. Brazil is the
largest country in South America and according to Datamonitor (2009), it is characterises the most attractive country for the
Furnishing Industry. The following analyses have as an aim to critically investigate whether or not IKEA can successfully enter
the Brazilian Market and how it should best endeavour it.
The UK housing market has slowed dramatically and with house prices and the number of transactions forecast to fall, furniture
retailers are facing exceptional amount of competition from outside of the specialist market from the likes of Asda, Argos, not to
mention M&S and Next.
Market Segmentation
"Living room furniture sales has proved the most lucrative for the South American furniture & floor coverings market in 2008,
generating total revenues of $7,420.1 million, equivalent to 37.5% of the market's overall value. Brazil" (Marketline, 2009)
however, Brazil leads the South American furniture and floor coverings market, accounting for 63.3% of the market's value.
The Brazilian economy was not affected by the global financial crisis as the country's economy is tightly regulated with orthodox
macroeconomic policies. The country's growth rate increased in 2008 to reach 5.9%. Moreover, Brazil is the founder member of
Mercosul regional integration which for instance, are responsible for 75% of South America's GDP and it is the world's fourthbiggest integrated market. The economic reforms, liberalized foreign investment to most sectors have been considered to be
responsible for the current economic.
However, despite its high profile, Brazil still suffers from corruption. According to Transparency International's Corruption
Perceptions Index for 2008, "Brazil is ranked in the 80th place out of 179 countries". Because corruption is perceived to be very
strong in Brazil, the majority of businesses are expected to encounter corruption when proposing contracts to governments.
Moreover, deforestation caused by multi-nationals is making serious harms to the Brazilian rainforests. As the demand for
environmentally friendly companies in Brazil and around the world continues to rise, companies such as IKEA can certainly
expect to have its CSR scrutinised before receiving any license for operation.
Economical environment:
With emerging markets capturing investors' attention, many are turning their focus towards South American markets. Strong
exports, high commodity prices and increased investments have been contributing factors to growth within many of the Latin
American markets (Fleming, 2007).
Amongst its neighbours, Brazil is the country that provides its population the highest average purchasing power (IMF, 2006)
Thus, Brazil seem a very attractive market for IKEA, especially since the its furniture imports have experienced a growth of
16.27% during the third quarter of 2006. The imports of furniture in Brazil are controlled by the United States with 39% of the
share, followed by Germany with 36% and Italy with 10% (ABIMOVEL, 2008)
An economical risk related to the imports of furniture originates from the Brazilian high government debt remaining at 51% of
the GDP, in spite of a relative decline in 2004. This debt can increase import taxes and or worsen the value of Brazilian's
currency. This could certainly mean bad news for IKEA as its low costs strategy is based on high volume sales. On the other
hand, IKEA could work with partnership with one of the 13,500 Brazilian furniture manufacturers (source?). The issues however
can arise sue to the size o such manufacturers. Brazilian furniture manufactures are small-family businesses that are very
unlikely to meet IKEA's extensive demand.
Social environment:
Although Brazilian has a growing population of 186 million people and it experiences 86% literacy levels, just as in most of the
LDCs, the inequality gap is still a substantial issue in Brazil. There are huge income gaps between the rich people and the poor
people. "The 10% richest people earn 50% of the totally income and the 10% poorest people only get less than 1% (source?)."
Therefore social status is very meaningful, especial for the middle-classes. As IKEA has been very proficient in selling lifestyles
to its customers (KeyNote, 2008) the status importance amongst Brazilians could turn out to be advantageous for IKEA.
However, credit option is extremely limited among most consumers in Brazil, and consumers expect to pay for their goods in
instalments. Sometimes consumers opt for a certain product not because if its quality, but because of the payment facilities.
Consumers can pay for a TV of the equivalent of 300 in 10 instalments and without any added interest. IKEA should certainly
be aware of consumer's buying behaviour as to not have any problems regarding to its liquidity ratios.
Technological environment:
As the telecommunication penetration rate in Brazil remains low, IKEA would not be able to rely in online sales in Brazil in the
middle future and its online advertising should be very efficient
Legal Environment
.
Environmental factors:
Brazil shelters dense forests in northern regions including Amazon Basin that can be use for wooden furniture: half of the
country is covered by forests. However, over the past couple of years, the government has been very cautious about global
warming caused by MNC's deforestation. So IKEA would need to ensure the Brazilian government that its practices are very
sustainable.
IKEA in Brazil
From the analysed above, it can be deducted that there are several attractive aspects for IKEA to invest in the area of furniture
industry in Brazilian market. First of all, the furniture market in Brazil is attractively due to a big value of imported furniture and it
is continues growing more and more. (Reference?). Additionally, the labour cost is cheaper compared to Europe and America.
Market analysts also estimated that the import of furniture especially institutional furniture such as furniture used in hospitals
and hotel will increase significantly (reference?).
Moreover, the most of Brazilian furniture manufacturers are small and family-owned companies which merely specify a
population in southern Brazil as a target market. For above reasons, it might be assumed that there still have large market
share for foreign investors to invest in Brazilian furniture manufacturing. Some more reason is the trade liberalization started in
1990, it could be apparent that the Brazilian trade system changed to be more open and competitive. The last reason that
supported IKEA to expand into Brazil is the million hectares of planted forests. As IKEA's mission statement was stated that to
be a cost leadership and to assemble "a quality product with components derived from all over the world utilizing multilevel
competitive advantages, low cost logistics and large simple retail outlets in suburban areas" (IKEA Annual Report, 2002). So,
IKEA should consider Brazil to be a partner because Brazil has abundance of wood supply with low cost for producing and
distributing reliably. Another reason is the import tax for furniture in Brazil is low around 5-15 per cent, encouraging IKEA to
integrate operations into Brazil. Due to the major end-users of furniture prefer to purchase from renowned and reliable suppliers
therefore, this relation might be a hypothesized that IKEA, which is the world's largest and famous furniture retailer can be
recognized by Brazilian furniture lover and extend enormously its business.
From the centralized strategic direction through franchising, it causes certain difficulties such as the complexity of logistics
system, the difficulty to respond national needs and cultural sensitivity issues, the uncontrollable franchisees, and the emerging
demographic trends. So, the internationalization of IKEA strategy needs to be balanced between country level autonomy and
centralized system. Since, all entry modes have both advantages and drawbacks; the trade offs between each mode is
significant.
Mode of Entry
On deeper analysis, the best market entry mode for IKEA to re-establish its furniture industry in Brazil is strategic alliances,
referred to "cooperative agreements between potential or actual competitors" (Lee and Carter, 2005). This method run the
range from the joint venture which means "an arrangement where a firm is required to share equity and control of a venture
with a partner from the host country" (Lee and Carter, 2005). Establishing strategic alliance with Brazilian company has many
advantages. For one thing,
IKEA benefits from the potentially Brazilian furniture competitors, interior decorators and architectures' knowledge about
competitive conditions, and culture and demographic differences since they are people who recommend styles to customers.
In other words, this entry mode helps increase the level of involvement of partner. The first point, the Scandinavian headquarter
can improve technology know-how, skills and assets, the state of the art equipment, the quality standard of furniture to local
company, satisfied customer demand and differentiated products. A second point that the foreign alliance who know clearly
about its business condition, helps smooth the progress of entry in to Brazil market. This outcome can be seen obviously from
the example of Warner Brother. In order to solve the complexity of approval process and distribution in China, Warner Brother
goes into Chinese market by participating with the two Chinese partners. Then, the joint venture in China allowed Warner
Brother to enter Chinese market easily, distribute film and even produce films for Chinese TV (Chang, 2004). Moreover, both
foreign firm and local partner can share the fixed cost of developing new products and reduce the level of risk including the
conflict with nationalization or government interference.
However, strategic alliances also have some disadvantages such as transfer technology know-how to the partner which results
in the risk of unmanageable and uncontrollable of technology, and the battles between partners which bring to the bargaining
power of venture collaborators (Hill, 2007). Last but not least, so as to gain the good alliance, IKEA needs to concern other
three factors which is partner selection, alliance structure and the management style of the partner.
Conclusion
The conclusion to be drawn is that the centralized control by headquarter through franchising in Brazil brings to the failure of
IKEA. Therefore, IKEA needs to adapt a policy and process to entry the Brazilian market by being aware of cultural and
demographic difference. Also, choosing alternatively the entry mode as strategic alliances for expanding IKEA furniture industry
worldwide will convey numerously good results.
Moreover, Brazil market can be new sourcing area for IKEA to progress the furniture business. However, IKEA is required to
survey market directions of furniture industry in Brazil in order to achieve business goals. In the same time, IKEA is able to
adjust other marketing entry methods, such as licensing, franchising, and exporting to suit situations in Brazil. The company
needs to realise that no one strategy is the best in reality.