Spwla 1965 F
Spwla 1965 F
D. R. Peacock
WORTH WELL SURVEYS, INC.
Abstract
The use of new, highly-sensitive and stable temperature logging systems has produced data which correlates with earlier theoretical predictions and has stimulated the application of temperature logging into areas
other than the conventional cement top location.
Innovations lie chiefly in the concepts of combining gradient with
differential logs to get different views of a given temperature anomaly.
Also, the techniques of changing well conditions during a series of logs
are effective in creating temperature anomalies which can reveal considerable information about downhole conditions.
These techniques are particularly effective in producing injectivity
profiles in secondary recovery programs and in evaluating fracturing operations.
Field examples are supplied to illustrate the various procedures.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Introduction
Types of Temperature Logs
1. Solid Line Types
(a). Mercury Thermometer
(b). Mechanical Recording Thermometer
2. Conductor Line Types
(a). Resistance Wire
(b). Semi-Conductor
(c). Differential
Applications
1. Gradient
2. Differential
3. "Delta T" Concept
Temperature Log, After Cementing
1. Locating Cement Tops
2. Locating Squeezed Cement
3. Correlation With Open Hole Caliper Log
Temperature Log in Producing Well
1. Locating Gas-Producing Zone
2. Locating Oil-Producing Zone
3. Locating Gas-Oil Contact
4. Locating Channelling Behind Casing
5. Locating Leaks in Casing
Temperature Log in Open Hole. Locating
Loss of Circulation
-l-
G.
H.
I.
J.
A.
B.
Types of Temperature Logs. In general the temperature measuring systems used in bore hole applications can be grouped in two categories,
(1). those which are operated on solid lines and do not communicate
data to the surface during operation, and (2). those which operate on
conductor cables in order to produce surface recording of continuous
downhole temperature measurements.
1. Solid Line Types.
(4.
-2-
-3-
operation. Field examples of this type of log and a detailed discussion of the typical problems are presented later in this paper.
Large gas or fluid movements either in open hole or through tubing
or casing leaks have been successfully analyzed by means of the
gradient types of survey. The gradient type of temperature log is
actuated by the single temperature sensing element downhole, e ither resistance wire or semi-conductor, and surface recording of
One special
the temperature encountered in degrees Fahrenheit.
type of fluid movement problem which has frequently been successfully diagnosed by the gradient temperature log is that of loss of
circulation in drilling.
2.
3.
"Delta T" Concept. A new concept in the application of temperature logs has produced significant new data, and is based more on
the new usage of existing gradient and differential temperature
logging systems in combinations rather than the development of new
apparatus or circuitry. The new concept may be summarized in the
It is based
attitude of "if you don't find a delta t, make one".
that
a
single
temperature
log may be
on the practical observation
difficult to interpret, but in combination with a series of logs
run under planned and varied conditions on the same well, the
The situation is analogous to the
downhole picture comes alive.
single still photograph compared with the lapsed time series of
photographs or the motion picture. A typical series of logs would
involve a minimum of three conditions, selected to generate "delThe first log would be run
ta t" at areas of interest in a well.
the
well
having
been shut in for a conunder static conditions,
siderable period of time and with downhole conditions in near normal equilibrium. The second log would run several hours after the
well has been set into a flow condition and the new downhole thermal gradients resulting from the flow have approached equilibrium.
The third log would be run a short time after the well is shut in
and the downhole gradients in the process of returning to the original state of equilibrium.
It is often found that these three curves will reveal areas
of particular interest, and it is common practice to detail those
local areas with the differential temperature log to amplify the
anomalies.
D.
The need
-4-
cementing operation in filling the annulus around casing to a desired level has brought about the widespread usage of the temperature log for this purpose. The exothermic chemical reaction present in the setting cement generates considerable heat over a period of six to twelve hours after the initial mixing, and it is the
temperature rise of the cement behind casing which is readily detected by the temperature log.
In Fig. 1, the sharp break in the
temperature gradient curve at 1880 ft. clearly indicates the top
of the setting cement.
2. Locating Squeezed Cement.
The quantities of cement which are frequently small and the high pressures in squeezing operations very
often do not develop sufficient heat rise in the casing detected
by a gradient temperature log.
It then becomes advisable to use
the differential method.
In Fig. 2, an example is shown where the differential temperature log was used to advantage in squeeze cement problem.
The
perforated interval from 3498' to 3966' was producing an excessive
amount of water.
Approximately 170 sacks of cement were squeezed
into the perforations, and 60 hours later a differential temperature log run showed that the squeeze cement had penetrated a
water sand zone immediately below the oil-producing zone and shut
out the water.
3.
Correlation With Open Hole Caliper Log. In Fig. 1 the curve above
the cement top is straight and records the normal geothermal gradient of temperature increase with depth of about l/2" per lOO_ft.
Below the cement top, the curve shows considerable variation in
temperature because of the non-uniform diameter of the borehole
and the varying cement mass.
A temperature log in casing surrounded by setting cement should correlate closely with an open
hole caliper log of the same section. Failure to correlate may
indicate an unsuccessful cementing job, with channelling or unfilled cavities.
In certain areas where radiation logs cannot be successfully
used, the temperature log made in casing after cementing is used
for depth control in perforating operations.
E.
-5-
been flowing for several hours. With the temperature tool traveling downward, the log indicated the bottom of the producing zone
to be at 3459' but did not indicate the top of the zone. The well
was then shut down with no flow for one hour and the second run
was made, showing the top of the producing zone to be at 3442'.
This is a typical example of using the "delta t method" of problem
solution by the deliberate creation of temperature changes in a
well by altering well conditions between successive runs. As shown
on Run No. 1, the oil and gas being produced had cooled the bore
hole several hundred feet above the point of entry. Run No. 2 records the increase in temperature above the production zone and
shows clearly the temperature anomaly created with the zone in
production. This method is very successful when the produced fluids or gas moving up the tubing or casing diffuse the temperature
anomaly of the fluids moving horizontally into the borehole.
3. Locating Gas-Oil Contact. The curves shown in Fig. 5 illustrate
the location of gas-oil contact in an open hole section after the
gas-oil contact had been lowered as a result of production. Run
No. 1 with the gradient temperature log indicated the probable location of contact at 5186' and two runs with the differential log
under identical well conditions confirmed this contact point. The
differential logs showed a minor gas-producing zone at 5220' which
was not detected by the gradient run.
4. Locating Channelling Behind Casing. In Fig. 6 the gradient temperature log shows gas moving from the top of a channel behind the
casing at 2320' and migrating downward to the top of the perforations at 2380', creating an excessive gas-oil ratio. A squeeze
cement operation above the perforations successfully sealed the
channel.
5. Locating Leaks in Casing. The detection of a casing leak, shown
in Fig. 7, was accomplished by making all logging runs with the
well shut in. First came the gradient log, which indicated a leak
at 3420'. Two differential logs at different sensitivity settings
confirmed the leak at the same depth.
F.
G.
-6-
a. a base log "before frac" temperature log; b. that the fracturing fluid temperature is sufficiently higher or lower than the
zone to be fractured; c. that a proper selection of time delay after fracturing is completed, to run the "after frac" log; d. that
proper pressure control equipment is used while running log if
well has surface pressures.
(a). Base Log.
A temperature log should be run just prior to fracturing and used
as a base log, providing no previous logs have been run in the
same fie.ldor area, or providing cementing operations have recently been made on well.
(b). Fracturing Fluid Temperature.
During fracturing operations there is a considerable amount of
heat transfer between the fluid being injected and the formations
surrounding the borehole, and formations which break down and accept fluid experience a greater temperature change than the adjacent formations which do not break down.
Field experience has
shown that best results are obtained when there is a temperature
differential of 35F between the injection fluid and the surface
temperature of the well.
This temperature may be higher or lower
than the formation.
Computation of the anomaly amplitude can be
made from the rate of injection, type of fluid, volume of fluid,
depth of injection and temperature of fluid and formation. These
computations will not be discussed in this paper.
(c). Time Delay for Logging After Fracturing.
For the proper evaluation of a fracture operation, the time for
running a temperature log is at the point when the temperature
gradient above the fractured zone has approached near-thermal equilibrium and the temperature at the fracture has remained abnormal. This time occurs between 3 to 8 hours after fracturing operations are completed. An early time should be selected if no previous logs have been recorded.
(d). Fluid Control While Logging.
Fluid disturbance due to fluid loss at the lubricator pack-off
should be avoided. Movement of the fluid inside the borehole can
result in an incorrect evaluation of the fracturing operation.
2. Examples.
(a). Ambient Temperature Fluid Fracture.
Figure 9 is a typical "after frac" temperature log across a Devonian formation in Midland County, Texas. The top of fracture is
indicated by the sharp decrease in temperature at 11868'. The bottom of the fracture is shown on the log at 12027'. Largest percentage of the fluid has entered the zone at 12000'. Notice should
be taken of the fact that the entire perforated interval was not
fractured. Temperature of the fracturing fluids at the surface was
approximately 90"F, while the formation temperature was approximately 190F.
-7-
-8-
1400 barrels.
2. Locating Gas Injection Zones With Temperature Logs.
Fig. 12 shows a temperature gradient (Run No. 1) and a differential temperature log (Run No. 2) across the Devonian formation.
Both logs were run while injecting 2.1 million CFPD of natural
gas.
The temperature logs clearly show the zones creating large
temperature anomalies with the differential temperature log amplifying the smaller anomalies. These logs can be effectively applied to any injection well where a relative quantitative analysis
is adequate.
I.
Pressure Equipment.
The correct use and proper selection of pressure control equipment
is of prime importance in running temperature logs in wells having
any surface pressure. In addition to the safety factor, which should
be considered, is the importance of being able to completely "shut
off" or prevent any blow-by of gas or fluids past the cable pack-off
This is especially important while the temperature log is
system.
being run where static thermal equilibrium is desired.
The most effective method for pressure control is the hydraulic controlled packoff in which grease is used to hold back well fluids and gas.
Gas
wells with well head pressure up to 5000 PSI have been successfully
controlled with this system.
J.
-9-
76*
a 5
e 0.
90=
9 5.
Ior
105.
I 10*
II 5*
12 o
125.
Izoo
135.
I
MO*
145*
Is O*
Is 5
16o
It 69
I 500
\
l-em
1 ,Ut
PER
I NCH
5.-
LUb
1600
1700
1;ALI PER
9
,,,
LOG
Iz
,,
I 5,
1200
\
TOP
C EMENT
\
L \
1200
I
w
o
1
2CQ0
2100
~
i
<1
I
1-1
FIG.
CEMENT
TOP LOG
woo
I
97.
I
93 .
96*
9 8*
9 9
Ic
7900
II
I*
40
PER
207.
II
. TEMPERATuRE
1.
206-
20
TEMPERATURE
2 IS
PER
ECe.
20s.
z 0.
211.
Zlz@
213
214*
LOG
>
INCH
DIFFERENTIAL
TEMPERATURE
LOG
[)
L06
INCH
8CG13
( !
60
80
8100
OIFP ERENTIA L TEMPER ATURE
3800
20
L06
82 w
40
60
(
\
S300
00
\
3900
8400
29
\
40
PERF2.
TOP OF SQ CEMENT
83 m
60
I
1
GAS
ZONE
)
so
L
WATER
BOTTOM
ZONE
<
8EC0
OF SO. C EMENJ
\
2Q
8700
40
\
-
so
*
8803
so
4mo
FIG. 2
\.
FIG
40
107*
I 08=
I 09.
110.
II 1.
<
3100
so
5
90
9 I*
9 2*
9 3*
9 4.
% .
%.
OIFF ERENTIA L T2MPE RATuRE
20
\ TEMPERATURE
1-
40
PER
\ WELL
TEMPERATURE
LOG
I - PER
INCH
1- PER
LOG
INCH
LOG
INCH
<
sow
WELL
FLOWING
TEMPERATURE
LoGs
80
CLD3ED-IN
I HOUR
so
20
so
40
320Q
S4
20
so
\
40
!3100
S-vzcs
so
20
40
3300
q
/
so
.!
20
GAS -OIL
i=
CON TACT
40
5200
so
20
\
L
40
so
\ ,
J
\
so
3400
.20
so
/
PERFS.
>
E
40
5W30
(
Q
PRODUCTION
n
[-
60
,<
ZONE
],
FIG. 4
LOCAIING
-1
20
<
FIG. 5
LOCATING GAS-OIL
CONTACT
2800
85*
40
76-
77.
7e*
--
66.
7.
22.
j.
;.
64
7\.~
8
TE, tPERATURE
I*
60
u )6
DIFFERENTIAL
~ER INCH
( ,4
TEMPERATURE
LOGS
\,
2900
TEMPERATuRE
00
,.
DFR
LOG
DIFFE RENTft3L
TEMPER ATURE LC G
1NCH
2200
3000
20
\
40
3100
w
(
80
32~
COLLAR
LOG
23CC
\
20
OP Cf
CH AN NEL
3300
40
/
/
60
/
3400
1
A
(
~
<
60
CASING
LEAK
/
>
2400
/
_asoo
20
40
3600
\
60
Sa
..
PERFS
~
Y
3700
1
2500
\
\
20
I
32@J
FIG. 6
FIG. 7
E
0
FIG. 8
LOCATING
LOSS
OF
CIRCULATION
- 14-
ZONES
60
\
TEMPERATURE
I-
1700
PER
LOG
INCH
4 HRS. AFTER
FRAC
20
PERFS.
==a
40
60
==s
\
80
--
11800
-
i_
20
40
\
60
TOP OF FRAC
70
/
80
PERFORATED
20
c/
40
60
Ii
/
12000
\
20
_.PERFS._
-,
AFTER
FRAC
LOG
- 15-
BASE
LOG
BEFORE
GO
TEMPERATURE
Ia PER
FRAC
AFTER
I
FRAC
lNCH
LOG
8 HOURS
SO
I
3100
\
20
I
40
SO
3200
COLLAR
LOG
20
40
60
80
1
I
-
TOP
OF FRAC
, 3300
PO
--MTCK
-c-
40
60
,/
BOTTOM
OF FRAC
SO
3400
--
(
20
FIG.
IO
- 16-
LOGS
40
1
390
I
870
I
36
I
35
RUN
GO
NO.1
BEFORE
1
HEATED
I
99
I
FLU++kSGW%
I
9oa
1920
91
3te
RUN
HRS.
AFTER
1
360
I
35
3b*
NO.3
I
CLOSING-IN
I
97
98
RUN
I-1
ALL
,*
I
TEMPERATURE
PER
_OGS
INCH
2700
PO
60
40
80
2800
,
20
i
(
1
40
60
\
I
30
BOTTOM
CF
TBG.
I.,
2900
pEzFs.
i
20
40
GO
3000
20
IT
\\
LOCATING HtATED
-17-
INJECTED FLUIDS
I
ID,
NO.2
,NJECT,NG
80
I
loo*
HEATED
I
102
FLUID
60
8900
-..
FIG. 12
LOCATING
GAS INJECTION
-18-
_A.._^
LONtY