RESERVOIR FLUID STUDY

SEG1_C1
 RESERVOIR FLUID STUDY

WELL: SEG1_C11

Reported by

Laboratory Services

Reviewed by

Approved by

……………………………..

Manager, Laboratory Services Department

Any information, data, reports, documents, findings, conclusion, and/or advice offered or given to client by or on
behalf of XXXXX is to be construed as a statement of opinion only and not as representation of any kind as to the
effects of following the said information, data, reports, documents, findings, conclusions and/or advice

June 1, 2002
2
SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION

This report contains the results of the routine PVT analysis study for SEG1-C1. The studies
involved the following tests:

 Preliminary quality checks on the bottom-hole samples:

o Checking the bubble point of the bottom-hole samples at reservoir temperature.
 Compositional analyses of reservoir fluid up to C20+ including inerts (N2 and CO2).
 Constant composition expansion test at reservoir temperature.
 Differential vaporization test at reservoir temperature.
 Viscosity test at reservoir temperature.
 A single stage separator tests to determine the effects of separator pressure on the
solution gas oil ratio, formation volume factor, separator volume factor and stock tank oil
gravity.

QUALITY CHECK

Two (2) bottom-hole samples (cylinder no: 1152-AC & 1153-AC) were subjected to preliminary
validation check. The bubble point pressure of the cylinders were determined at reservoir
temperature of 199 ˚F. A portion of the reservoir fluid from the cylinder was charged into high
pressure visual PVT cell and subjected to bubble point pressure determination at reservoir
temperature of 199 ˚F. The results of the quality check are tabulated in Table 1.

COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS

Based on the recommendation from XXXX, sample from cylinder no: 1154-AC was selected for
further analysis. The composition of the reservoir fluid was analysed by a spike flash technique.
The sample was flashed from reservoir condition to atmospheric conditions to obtain oil and gas
at equilibrium conditions. The evolved gas phase was circulated for sufficient period of time for
the oil and gas to achieve equilibrium. The gas oil ratio (GOR) was then measured.

The composition of the equilibrium gas (from C1 to C11+ including N2 and CO2) was analysed
using the the Natural Gas Analyser (NGA)
The equilibrium oil was analysed using the High Temperature Gas Chromatography (HGTC)
which gives detailed hydrocarbon compositions from C3 to C40. However, from the
chromatogram produced, no n-alkane peaks (straight-chains paraffins) were observed. We
believe that the sample has been severely biodegraded hence practically almost all straight chain
alkanes been removed by the bacteria.

The composition of the reservoir fluid to C20+ was obtained from the mathematical
recombination of the compositions of the equilibrium gas and oil based on the flashed GOR of
52.45 scc/cc. The compositions of stock tank oil, stock tank gas and reservoir fluid are tabulated
in Table 2.

CONSTANT COMPOSITION EXPANSION TEST

A known volume of the reservoir fluid was charged isobarically into the high pressure visual
PVT cell. The sample was then heated to the reservoir temperature of 199 ˚F, and the pressure
was monitored to ensure the fluid is in single phase (5000 psig). After thermal equilibrium was
established, the sample was subjected to a series of pressure drops. At each pressure reading, the
volume of the sample was measured using the Camcorder Detection Measurement System. The
bubble point pressure of the sample was determined to be 2320 psia at 199 ˚F. The results of the
CCE test are given in Table 3 and graphically presented in Figure 1.

DIFFERENTIAL VAPORISATION TEST

The sample was equilibrated at the bubble point pressure of 2320 psia and reservoir temperature
of 199 ˚F. The reservoir fluid was subjected to a series of flash processes below bubble point
pressure. At each pressure stage, the volumes of oil and gas were measured using the Camcorder
Detection Measurement System. The liberated gas was then removed from the PVT cell, and its
volume measured using the gasometer. The gas composition was analysed using the NGA. The
gas deviation factor and specific gas gravity were calculated using the gas compositional analysis
results.

At each stage of pressure drop the gas weight removed from PVT cell was calculated based on
the volume and gas specific gravity. Then the oil density was calculated based on the measured
oil volume and oil weight in the PVT cell. The Differential Vaporisation Test data are listed in
Table 4 and graphically presented in Figure 2 to 6
VISCOSITY TEST

A viscosity measurement were performed on the reservoir fluid at the reservoir temperature 199
˚F using the Capillary Viscometer.

At each pressure drop below the bubble point pressure, the liberated gas was removed from the
viscometer and its composition was analysed using the Gas Analyser. The gas composition was
then used to calculate the gas viscosity. The results of the viscosity measurements are tabulated
on Table 5 and graphically presented in Figure 7.

SINGLE STAGE SEPARATOR

Due to insufficient volume of sample, one single stage separator test was conducted. The test
was conducted at separator conditions as specified by XXXX to determine the effect of separator
pressure and temperature on separator volume factor, gas oil ratio, oil and gas density and stock
tank oil gravity. The liberated gas was expanded to room conditions and the volume measured
using the gasometer. The gas evolved at each pressure stage of separation was collected and
analysed to C11+ including N2 and CO2 using the Natural Gas Analyser. The single stage
Separator Test results are presented on Table 6 to Table 11.
TABLE 1

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

QUALITY CHECKS OF BOTTOMHOLE SAMPLES

TABLE 2

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS OF STOCK TANK OIL, STOCK TANK GAS AND

CALCULATED WELLSTREAM COMPOSITION

MOLE%
COMPONENT
STOCKTANK GAS STOCKTANK OIL WELL STREAM
N2 2.49 0 1.49
CO2 1.95 0 1.17
C1 52.85 0 31.74
C2 14.37 0 8.63
C3 12.32 0 7.40
IC4 10.27 0 6.17
NC4 0.55 0 0.33
IC5 2.52 8.56 4.93
NC5 2.68 8.01 4.81
C6 0 11.49 4.59
C7 0 11.07 4.42
C8 0 10.22 4.08
C9 0 9.36 3.74
C10 0 2.73 1.09
C11 0 4.35 1.74
C12 0 4.43 1.77
C13 0 3.38 1.35
C14 0 3.04 1.21
C15 0 2.90 1.16
C16 0 2.05 0.82
C17 0 1.81 0.72
C18 0 1.74 0.69
C19 0 1.53 0.61
C20+ 0 13.33 5.33

Properties of C11+ (Reservoir Fluid): Mole % = 15.4; MW (g/mole) = 254;

Properties of C20+ (Reservoir Fluid): Mole % = 5.3; MW (g/mole) = 371;

TABLE 3

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

CONSTANT COMPOSITION EXPANSION TEST AT 199 ˚F

Single-Phase
Pressure Relative Volume Liquid Volume
Compressibility Y Function
Psig V/Vsat Percent
V/V/Psi
3200 0.988 8.386E-06
2900 0.990 1.402E-05
2700 0.993 1.656E-05
2500 0.996 2.160E-05
2320 1 100.00
2100 1.054 1.955 92.67
1900 1.123 1.798 84.88
1700 1.214 1.707 76.68
1500 1.334 1.635 68.10
1100 1.731 1.518 50.09
800 2.338 1.420 35.95
500 3.722 1.337 21.89
TABLE 4

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

DIFFERENTIAL VAPORISATION TEST AT 199 ˚F

Solution
Pressure Oil Density Oil FVF Gas FVF Gas Z
Gas Oil Ratio
Psig g/cc RB/STB RB/MSCF Gravity Factor
SCF/STB
3200 0.850 1.35 713 0.94 0.9145
2900 0.847 1.35 713 1.03 0.9065
2700 0.845 1.36 713 1.11 0.9032
2500 0.842 1.36 713 1.19 0.9012
2320 0.839 1.37 713 1.28 0.9006
2100 1.34 639 1.42 0.9019
1900 1.30 566 1.57 0.905
1700 1.27 494 1.77 0.90945
1500 1.24 425 2.02 0.9153
1100 1.19 291 2.80 0.931
800 1.15 190 3.91 0.947
500 1.12 90 6.38 0.965
TABLE 5

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

OIL AND GAS VISCOSITY AT 199 ˚F

Pressure Viscosity (cP) Oil/Gas

Psig Oil Gas Viscosity Ratio
3200 0.30 0.02063 14.426
2900 0.29 0.01956 14.876
2700 0.28 0.01893 15.048
2500 0.28 0.01831 15.241
2320 0.27 0.01780 15.383
2100 0.29 0.01716 16.659
1900 0.30 0.01660 18.032
1700 0.31 0.01610 19.545
1500 0.33 0.01558 21.336
1100 0.38 0.01472 25.672
800 0.42 0.01414 29.703
500 0.47 0.01370 34.307

TABLE 6
COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

SINGLE-STAGE SEPARATOR TEST

Pressure Separator Gas Oil Ratio Separator Formation Stock Tank

Temperature MSCF/STB Volume Factor Volume Factor Gravity

Psia ˚F scf/bbl (2) bbl/stb (2) bbl/stb (3) ˚API

900 110 167

14.7 60 713 1.02 45

1. Cubic feet of gas at 14.73 psia, 60 ˚F per barrel of oil at indicated pressure and temperature.

2. Barrel of oil at indicated temperature and pressure per barrel of stock tank oil at 60 ˚F.

3. Barrels of saturated oil at 2320 psig and 199 ˚F per barrel of stock tank oil at 60 ˚F
TABLE 7

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

SINGLE-STAGE SEPARATOR TEST

Gas Properties
MWt 17.91
Sg 0.664
TABLE 8

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

SINGLE-STAGE SEPARATOR TEST

Pressure Separator Gas Oil Ratio Separator Formation Stock Tank

Temperature MSCF/STB Volume Factor Volume Factor Gravity

Psia ˚F scf/bbl (2) bbl/stb (2) bbl/stb (3) ˚API

300 110 374

14.7 60 1.02 45

1. Cubic feet of gas at 14.73 psia, 60 ˚F per barrel of oil at indicated pressure and temperature.

2. Barrel of oil at indicated temperature and pressure per barrel of stock tank oil at 60 ˚F.

3. Barrels of saturated oil at 2320 psig and 199 ˚F per barrel of stock tank oil at 60 ˚F
TABLE 9

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

SINGLE-STAGE SEPARATOR TEST

COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS OF LIBERATED GAS PHASE
TABLE 10

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

SINGLE-STAGE SEPARATOR TEST

Pressure Separator Gas Oil Ratio Separator Formation Stock Tank

Temperature MSCF/STB Volume Factor Volume Factor Gravity

Psia ˚F scf/bbl (2) bbl/stb (2) bbl/stb (3) ˚API

50 110 648

14.7 60 1.02 45

1. Cubic feet of gas at 14.73 psia, 60 ˚F per barrel of oil at indicated pressure and temperature.

2. Barrel of oil at indicated temperature and pressure per barrel of stock tank oil at 60 ˚F.

3. Barrels of saturated oil at 2320 psig and 199 ˚F per barrel of stock tank oil at 60 ˚F
TABLE 11

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

SINGLE-STAGE SEPARATOR TEST

COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS OF LIBERATED GAS PHASE
TABLE 12

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

WELL INFORMATION

Formation Characteristics
Formation name :
Reservoir Pressure, psi :
Reservoir Temperature, ˚F :

Well Characteristics
Total Depth, m MD :
Producing Interval, m RKB :
Tubing size, in. :
Well Type :

Sampling Condition
Sample Type :
Sampling Date :
Oil Sample Cylinder No :
Sampling Method :
FIGURE 1

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

RELATIVE VOLUME AND Y-FUNCTION AT 199 ˚F

2 2.5

2
Relative Volume, V/Vsat

1.5

Y Function
1

0.5

Oil Relative
Volume
Y Function
0 0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Pressure, Psig
FIGURE 2

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

OIL DENSITY AT 199 ˚F

FIGURE 3

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

OIL FORMATION VOLUME FACTOR AT 199 ˚F

FIGURE 4

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

SOLUTION GAS-OIL RATIO AT 199 ˚F

FIGURE 5

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

GAS GRAVITY AT 199 ˚F

FIGURE 6

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

GAS DEVIATION FACTOR AT 199 ˚F

1.05
Z Factor

0.95
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Pressure, Psig
FIGURE 7

COMPANY: XXXX
WELL: SEG1_C1
REPORT NO: PUTP-SG-00-03

OIL AND GAS VISCOSITY AT 199 ˚F

0.5 0.03

0.4 0.02

Gas Viscosity, CP
Oil Viscosity, CP

0.3 0.02

0.2 0.01

Oil
viscosity
0.1 0.01
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Pressure, Psig