Scribd
Upload
288 views2 pages

In Re Request For Clarification of RA 10154

The Supreme Court of the Philippines ruled that the requirement under Republic Act No. 10154 for retiring government employees to obtain clearance of pending administrative cases from the Civil Service Commission does not apply to retiring employees of the Judiciary. As the Constitution gives the Supreme Court exclusive power over administrative supervision of court personnel, requiring clearance from an external agency like the CSC would disregard the Court's constitutional authority. However, clearances for pending criminal cases may still be required from the Office of the Ombudsman, which is not within the Judiciary's administrative powers.

Uploaded by

Paolo Ortiz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
288 views2 pages

In Re Request For Clarification of RA 10154

The Supreme Court of the Philippines ruled that the requirement under Republic Act No. 10154 for retiring government employees to obtain clearance of pending administrative cases from the Civil Service Commission does not apply to retiring employees of the Judiciary. As the Constitution gives the Supreme Court exclusive power over administrative supervision of court personnel, requiring clearance from an external agency like the CSC would disregard the Court's constitutional authority. However, clearances for pending criminal cases may still be required from the Office of the Ombudsman, which is not within the Judiciary's administrative powers.

Uploaded by

Paolo Ortiz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

1/7/2017

A.M.No.130908SC

TodayisSaturday,January07,2017

RepublicofthePhilippines
SUPREMECOURT
Manila
ENBANC
A.M.No.130908SCOctober1,2013
RE: REQUEST FOR GUIDANCE/CLARIFICATION ON SECTION 7, RULE III OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10154
REQUIRING RETIRING GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES TO SECURE A CLEARANCE OF PENDENCY/NON
PENDENCYOFCASE/SFROMTHECIVILSERVICECOMMISSION.
RESOLUTION
PERLASBERNABE,J.:
Before the Court is a Memorandum dated September 18, 2013 from Atty. Eden T. Candelaria, Deputy Clerk of
Court and Chief Administrative Officer, Office of Administrative Services of the Supreme Court, requesting
guidance/clarification on the applicability to the Judiciary of Section 7, Rule III of the Implementing Rules and
RegulationsofRepublicActNo.(RA)101541whichstates:
Section7.NoticeofPendencyofCase.TheretiringemployeeshallseekClearanceofPendency/NonPendency
ofAdministrativeCasefromhis/heremployeragency,CivilServiceCommission(CSC),OfficeoftheOmbudsman,
orincaseofpresidentialappointees,fromtheOfficeofthePresident.
Section 6,2 Article VIII of the 1987 Philippine Constitution (Constitution) exclusively vests in the Court
administrative supervision over all courts and court personnel.3 As such, it oversees the court personnels
compliancewithalllawsandtakestheproperadministrativeactionagainstthemforanyviolationthereof.4Asan
adjunctthereto,itkeepsinitscustodyrecordspertainingtotheadministrativecasesofretiringcourtpersonnel.
1 w p h i1

In view of the foregoing, the Court rules that the subject provision which requires retiring government
employeestosecureapriorclearanceofpendency/nonpendencyofadministrativecase/sfrom,amongothers,
theCSCshouldnotbemadetoapplytoemployeesoftheJudiciary. Todeemitotherwisewoulddisregardthe
Courts constitutionallyenshrined power of administrative supervision over its personnel. Besides, retiring court
personnel are already required to secure a prior clearance of the pendency/nonpendency of administrative
case/sfromtheCourtwhichmakestheCSCclearanceasuperfluousandnonexpeditiousrequirementcontrary
tothedeclaredstatepolicyofRA10154.5
1 w p h i1

To further clarify the matter, the same principles dictate that a prior clearance of pendency/nonpendency of
administrative case/s from the Office of the President (albeit some court personnel are presidential appointees,
e.g., Supreme Court Justices) or the Office of the Ombudsman should not equally apply to retiring court
personnel. Verily, the administrative supervision of court personnel and all affairs related thereto fall within the
exclusiveprovinceoftheJudiciary.
Itmust,however,benotedthatsincetheConstitutiononlyaccordstheJudiciaryadministrativesupervisionover
itspersonnel,adifferenttreatmentoftheclearancerequirementobtainswithrespecttocriminalcases.Assuch,a
clearancerequirementwhichpertainstocriminalcasesmaybeimposedbytheappropriategovernmentagency,
i.e., the Office of the Ombudsman,6 on retiring court personnel as it is a matter beyond the ambit of the
Judiciaryspowerofadministrativesupervision.
WHEREFORE,therequirementofseekingaClearanceofPendency/NonPendencyofAdministrativeCasefrom
the Civil Service Commission embodied in Section 7, Rule III of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of
RepublicActNo.10154isdeclaredINAPPLICABLEtoretiringemployeesoftheJudiciary.
SOORDERED.
ESTELAM.PERLASBERNABE
AssociateJustice
WECONCUR:
MARIALOURDESP.A.SERENO
ChiefJustice
ANTONIOT.CARPIO
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2013/oct2013/am_130908sc_2013.html

PRESBITEROJ.VELASCO,JR.
1/2

1/7/2017

A.M.No.130908SC

AssociateJustice

AssociateJustice

TERESITAJ.LEONARDODECASTRO
AssociateJustice

ARTUROD.BRION
AssociateJustice

DIOSDADOM.PERALTA
AssociateJustice

OnLeave
LUCASP.BERSAMIN
AssociateJustice

MARIANOC.DELCASTILLO
AssociateJustice

ROBERTOA.ABAD
AssociateJustice

OnLeave
MARTINS.VILLARAMA,JR.
AssociateJustice

JOSEPORTUGALPEREZ
AssociateJustice

OnLeave
JOSECATRALMENDOZA
AssociateJustice

BIENVENIDOL.REYES
AssociateJustice

MARVICMARIOVICTORF.LEONEN
AssociateJustice

Footnotes
1 "AN ACT REQUIRING ALL CONCERNED GOVERNMENT AGENCIES TO ENSURE THE EARLY

RELEASE OF THE RETIREMENT PAY, PENSIONS, GRATUITIES AND OTHER BENEFITS OF RETIRING
GOVERNMENTEMPLOYEES."
2 Section 6. The Supreme Court shall have administrative supervision over all courts and the personnel

thereof.
3Macedav.Vasquez,G.R.No.102781,April22,1993,221SCRA464,466467,citedinAmpongv.Civil

ServiceCommission,CSCRegionalOfficeNo.11,G.R.No.167916,August26,2008,563SCRA293,302
303.
4Id.
5Section1.DeclarationofStatePolicy.ItisherebydeclaredthatitisthepolicyoftheStatetoensurethe

timely and expeditious release of the retirement pay, pensions, gratuities and other benefits of all retiring
employeesofthegovernment.Publicofficersandemployeeswhohavespentthebestyearsoftheirlives
serving the government and the public should not be made to wait to receive benefits which are due to
themunderthelaw.Accordingly,itisherebymandatedthathighestpriorityshallbegiventothepayment
and/or settlement of the pensions, gratuities and/or other retirement benefits of retiring government
employees.
6"TheauthorityoftheOmbudsmantoinvestigateandprosecuteoffensescommittedbypublicofficersand

employeesisfoundedinSection15andSection11ofRA6770.Section15veststheOmbudsmanwiththe
powertoinvestigateandprosecuteanyactoromissionofanypublicofficeroremployee,officeoragency,
whensuchactoromissionappearstobeillegal,unjust,improperorinefficient,xxx.
xxxx
The power to investigate and to prosecute granted by law to the Ombudsman is plenary and
unqualified. It pertains to any act or omission of any public officer or employee when such act or
omissionappearstobeillegal,unjust,improperorinefficient.xxx."(Uyv.Sandiganbayan,407Phil.
154,1631642001.)
TheLawphilProjectArellanoLawFoundation

http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2013/oct2013/am_130908sc_2013.html

2/2

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy