Machining Data Handbook
Machining Data Handbook
RN 5, /
A0A09
2695 a
us-A
'DE
Best
Available
Copy
8etAvalilable COPY
QUICK INDEX OF PAGE NUMBERS
MATERIAL GROUPS AND MACHINING OPERATIONS
MACHININGOPERATION 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4
Gear Gear Gear Gear Gear Surface Surface Surface Surface
Hobbing Cutting, Shaping Shaving Grinding, Grinding - Grinding - Grinding - Griding -
Straight Form Horizontal Horizontal Horizontal Vertical
andSpiral Spindle, Spindle, Spindle, Spindle,
Bevel Reciprocating Reciprocating Reciprocating Rotary
Table Table - Table- Table
CBN Wheels Diamond
MATERIAL GROUP Wheels
1. FreeMachmninCarbonSteels Wrought 7.3 7.31 7.47 7.60 7.89 8-3 8-29 - 8-43
2 CarbonSteels,Wrought 7.6 7-32 7.49 7.71 7-89 83 8-29 - 3-43
3. Carbonand Ferritc Alloy Steels(HighTemp. Service) 7-8 7-34 7.51 7-73 - 83 - - 8-43
4. FreeMachining Alley Steels.Wrought 7.9 734 7-51 7.73 7-90 8"4 8-30 - 8-44
5 Alloy Steels,Wrought 7.10 7-35 7-52 7.74 7-90 8-4 8-30 8.39 844
Wrought
6. HighStrength Steels, 7.12 7-36 7-54 7.76 7-91 84 831 - 844
7.Maragrng Steels.
Wrought 7.13 736 7.54 7.76 7-91 8-5 8-31 - 845
8. Tool Steels, Wrought 7-13 7-36 7.54 7.76 7-91 8-5 8-31 8-39 845
9.Nitridiog Steels,Wrought 7.15 7-38 7-56 7.78 - 8-8 8-32 - 8-46
10.Armor Rate. Ship Plate, Aircraft Plate.
Wrought - - - - 8-8 - - 846
11.Structural Steels,Wrought -. ..- - - 8-46
12.FreeMachining Stainless Steels, Wrouglt t 7.15 738 7.56 7.78 - 8- - - 847
13.Stainless Steels.
Wrought 1 7.16 7-38 7.57 7.79 - 8-7 8-33 8.39 8-47
14. Precipitation Hardening StainlessStels Wrought 7-19 7.40 7.59 7-81 - 88 - - 8-48
15.Carbon Steels,Cast 7.19 7-40 7-59 7-81 - 8-8 8-33 - 848
16.Alloy Steels, Cost 7-20 7.40 7-60 7-82 8-8 8-33 - 848
17.Tool Steel Cast - - - - 7-92 89 8-34 - 8-49
18.Stainles Steels, Cast 7-21 7-41 7-61 7-83 - 8-10" - 8-50
19.Precipitation Hardening StainlessSteels,
Cast 7-23 742 7-62 7-84 - 8-11 - 8-51
20. Austenitic Manganese
Steels, Cast . . . ....
21.GrayCastIrons 7.23 7-42 7-62 7-84 - 8-11 8-34 8.39 8-51
22. CompactedGraphite CastIrons - - - 8-11 - - 8-51
23. Ductile CastIrons 7.24 743 7-63 7-85 - 8-11 8-35 - 8-51
24.Malleable Cast'lrons 7-_5 744 7-64 7-86 - 8-12 835 - 8-52
25. White CastIrons (Abrasion Restant) - - 8-12 8-35 - 8-52
2. High Slicon Cast Irons - - - - - 812 - - -
27. Chromium Nickel Alloy Castings - - - 8-12 - - -
28.Aluminum Alloys, Wrought 727 7-44 7.66 7-87 - 8-13 - - 8-52
29.Aluminum Alloys, Cast 7-27 7-45 7-65 7-87 - 8-13 - - 8-53
30. Magnesium Alloys, Wrought - - - - 8-13 - - 8-53
31. Magnsum Alloys, Cast - - - - 814 - - 8-53
32. Titanium Alloys, Wrought - . . . 8-14 - - 8-54
33. Titanium Alloys, Cast - . . . 8-15 - . - -54
34, CopperAlloys, Wrought 7-27 745 7.68 7-87 - 8-15 - - 8-5
35. Copper Alloys, Cast 7-28 746 7.67 7.88 - 8-16 - - 8-56
36. Nickel Alloys, Wrought andCast - . . . 8-17 - - 8-56 -
MACHINING OPERATION 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 8S 8.10 8.11 8.13 8.14
Cylindrical Ciliodrica: Cylindrical internal Internal Internal Ce'iterteus Abrasive Thread
Grinding Grnding - Grinding - Grinding Grinding - Grinding - Grinding Belt Grinding
CBNWheels Diamond CBNWheels Diamnd Grinding
Wheels Wheels
1.FreeMacining Carbon Steels,Wroughit 8601 8-93 - 8.101 8.133 - 8-143 8-177 8.179
2.Carbon Steels.Wrought 8.81 ".31 - 8.101 8.133 - 8-143 8-177 84179
3.Carbonand Frriic loyStels (High Temp.Service) 8061 - - 84101 - - 8-143 84177 8.179
4 FreeMachinin~g Allay Steels,
Wrought 8-2 8&94 - 8.102 '1134 - 8-144 8.177 8-180
5.Alloy Steels, Wrought 8-62 8-4 - 8.102 8.134 - 8-144 8.177 8&180
6 HighStrength Steels. Wrought 8-63 894 - 8103 8 135 - 8145 - 8.181
7.Maragmng Steels,Wrought 8-03 8-9 - 8.103 8.135 - 8145 - 8-181
8.Tool Steels, Wrought 8063 895 - 8.103 8.135 - 8-145 8.177 8-181
9.Nitidig Steels. Wrought 8M6 895 1 - {8-10D5 8.136 - 8-147 - 8-183
Wrough
10.Armor Plate. Ship Plat, Aircralt Plate, t 8-65 - - 8.105 - - -
so. -rciu - - -- -
JRu"e 4 8.132 -- 817 - -
W-
MACHINING
DATA
HANDBOOK
The data contained in this publication have been derived from many sources including
tests conducted under conditions which njav or may not exist where such data are used.
Changes in conditions of processing (machining, fabrication, heat treatment. etc.) and
differences in material properties from those described herein may make some or all of
the data used inappropriate under the circumstances. Users of the enclosed information
are thus cautioned that the information contained herein should be used only as a guide
where the user judges it to be appropriate. Metcut Research Associates Inc.. contractor
to the Unitea States Government. disclaims any and all responsibility for use of the infor-
mation contained herein by readers and users of this publication.
-,-= _
MAIDININO
TA
3rd Edition
VOLUME TWO..
Compiled by the
Technical Staff
of the
Machinability Data Center
A DoD Information Analysis Center
Sponsored by the
Army Materials and Mechanics Research Cent
MDRC
MACHINABLITY DATA CENTERS
Metcut Research Associates Inc.DT
3980 Rosslyn Drive
C_ __I
J ;~ivun;~eJS
~ DHEC 21980 e-J
A"c'-so o
198
;A'
MDC MACHINABILITY DATA CENTER
MDC is a DoD information analysis center sponsored by the Army Materials and Mechancs Research
Center (PMRC). Arsenal Street. Watertown, MA 02172. and operated under Defense Logistics Agency
contract DLA900-77-C-3197 by Metcut Research Associates Inc.
Scope
The Machinability Data Center (MDC) collects. evaluates. stores, and disseminates material removal in-
formation. including specific and detailed machining data. Emphasis is given to engineering evaluation for
the purpose of developing material removal parameters. such as speeds. feeds, depths of cut. tool material
and geometry. cutting fluids and other significant variables. Data are being processed for all types of mate-
rials and for all kinds of material removal operations. such as turning. milling. drilling. tapping, grinding.
electric. -:-.harge machining. electrochemical machining. etc.
MDC has a data file of over thirty-two thousand selected documents pertaining to material removal tech-
nology. This data file is supported by a computer system for retrieval of information based upon the sp,-
cific material (with definite chemical. physical. and mechanical properties) and the specifiG material re-
moval operation being used. Computerized search techniques are employed utilizing a combination of
search parameters to produce source data. Information retrieval can be refined to the extent necessary to
satisfy the requirements of a specific inquiry by controlling the input search paraneters,
For information: Contact the Machinability Data Center. 3980 Rosslyn Drive. Cincinnati. OH 45209.
Telephone: (513) 271-9510. TWX: 810-461-2840.
Typeset in Helvetica and Bookman by Dayton Typographic Service Inc.. Dayton, Ohio
Graphics by Repro Art Service Inc.. Cincinnati, Ohio
Printed and bound by The Johnson &Hardin Co.. Cincinnati, Ohio
I
I
CONTENTS
Volume 2
Section 7. Gear Cutting and Gear Grinding Operations ............................... ....... 7-1
7.1 Gear Hobbing .............................. ................................... ...... ......... 7-3
7.2 Gear Cutting. Straight and Spiral Bevel...................................................... 7-31
7.3 Gear Shaping ....................................................................... ........... 7-47
7.4 Gear Shaving ............................... ............................................... 7-69
7.5 Gear Grinding. Form .......................... ................................................... 7-89
V
CONTENTS
Volume 2
*For the detaild contenits of this section. see the title page of thissectior-.
Vi
CONTENTS
Volume 2
vii
MACHINING
DATA
HANDBOOK
.. -.. .__-_____--..
.. .. . .
I___l
SECTION 7
GEAR CUTTING AND
GEAR GRINDING OPERATIONS
tI
!I
iA
i4
i4
lI
1*1
7-1
NO-----~=i----
pkRECEMWi PAcE BLANK-40 FIL,44D
DIMTRLFEED* PER [
IAMTRAL
DAD UBE REVOLUTION HOB I 9S5TOOL
PITERIA NUMBENDIIOROOF SPEED MATERIAL
HARD- OF WORKPIECE
MATEIAL
ESS ONDIIONCUTS
in fpm AISI
1212 iW2'
1-2 2 .060 230
3-10 1 .060 240
11-19 1 060 265 M2.M7
150 20-48 1 050 275
to Cold 48 & Finer 1 .030 300
200 Drawn 13 W_5
-07O ~ _
Annealed
060 270
11-19 1 060 285 M2 M7
150 20-48 1 050 295
!0Cold 48 & Finer 1 .030 330
200 Drawn r4 WM-
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390 03) or better gears, it may be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts. $Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended thob diameter.
To meet finish requirements it may b-2necessary to try both conven- When using a smaller hob diameter, the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb cutting portionally.
7-3
7.1 Gear Hobbing
FEED* PER
DIAMETRAL REVOLUTION HOB HSS TOOL
PITCH NUMBER OF SPEED MATERIAL
1
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION -7 ;n-5 OF WORKPIECE
MN- g CUTS in fpm AISI
I22 060 170
10 2 .060 180
1. FREE MACHINING CARBON
STEELS, WROUGHT (cont.)
Hot t1-19 1 060 190 M2. M7
Medium Carbon Reaulfurizd
Rolled. 20-48 1 .050 200
1132 1144 175
Normalized. 48 & Finer 1 .030 220
1137 1145 to
i1q 1146 225 Annealed II M -
1140 1151 orCold
1141 Drawn = "
1-2 2 .060 7
3-10 1 .060 20
11-19 1 .060 20 M3,M42
20-48 1 .050 2
325 Quenched 48 & Finer 1 .030 250
o a b gnly
375 Tempered i=
Lo Crbn eaedi
LwCroLodd3-10
to 1-2 2
1
ana .065 23
.065 25
1L8Hot 11-19 1 .060 27 M2. M7 :
111-17 100 Rolled, 20-48 1 .050 29
48 & Finer 1 .0300_:
to Normalized,
Drawn Ar-
1-2 2 .065
3-10 1 .065 22
Hot 11-19 1 .060 20 M2, M7 A
150 Rolled, 20-48 t 1 05027
to Normalized, 48 & Finer 1 .03028
or Cold _
Drawn
1-2 2 .060 14
3--10 1 .05018
10L18_ Hot 11-19 - 1 ~ .050 '20 M2 M7 P-
---
20 Rle.20-48 1 .050 22
Normalized, 48 & Finer 1 .03020
20 Annealed
or Cold
Drawn
For bobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390 03) or better gears. it may !)e See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
recessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts. *Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter. AR
To meet finish requirements it may be necessary to try both convert- When using a smaller hob diameter, the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb cutting. portionally,
7-4
Gear Hobbing 7.1
FEED* PER
DIAMETRAL REVOLUTION HOB HSS TOOL
HARD- PITCH NUMBER OF SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION XOF WORKPIECE
CUTS
Shn
Sin fpm 5
AISI'
_ nM, _ IW Aifi tSIO fi
1-2 2 .065 255
Low Carbon Leaded
12113 3-10 1 .065 265
11-19 1 060 295 M2. M7
12114 Hot
Rolled. 20-48 1 .050 305
12115 100
48 & Finer 1 .030 340
to Normalized.
150 Annealed 3. ' i
or Cold
Drawn
eA ----
1-2 2 .065 210
3-10 1 .065 240
Hot 11-19 1 060 275 M2, M7
Rolled. 20-48 1 .050 285
150
48 & Finer 1 .030 320
to Normalized,
200 Annealed 3r1 "R _m W.
&& .
Drawn ?X 1t;
For hobbIng Class 9 (per AGMA 390.03) or better gears. It may be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by50% and/or take 2 cuts. *Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements it may be necessary to try both conven- When using a smaller hob diameter. the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb cutting. portionally.
7-5
_____________
iP- ---- r---~-----
7.1 Gear Hobbing
1' FEED* PER
1-2 i 2 .060 8
3-10 1 045 9
11-19 1 .045 25 M3,. M42
20-48 1 025 20
325 Quenched 48 & Finer 1 .025 290
to and -
375 Tempered
3-10 1 .070
WROUGHT
Low Carbon Hot 11-19 1 .060 25 M2, M7
1012 1026
1013 1029 1-2 2 070
1015 1513 3-10 1 070
1016 1518 Hot 11-19 1 .060 200 M2, M7
1017 1522 125 Rolled. 20-48 1 .050 210
1018 to Normalized, 48 & Finer 1 .030 220
175 Annealed
Drawn
1-2 2 .07014
3-10 1 .070 170
Hot 11-19 1 .060 190 M2, M7
175 Rolled, 20-48 1 .050 200
to Normalized. 48 & Finer 1 .030 210
225 Annealed -
or Cold
Drawn
1-2 2 .06010
3-10 1 .06016
11-19 1 .060 15 M2, M7
For bobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390.03) or better gears, it may be See section 16 for Cuffing Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% an, /or take 2 cuts. 'Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements it may be necessa : try both conven- When using a smaller hob diameter, the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb cutting portionally.
7-6
_________
-- ~- P*.~~-~~------- - ii
Gear Hobbing 7.1
FEED PER
DIAMETRAL REVOLUTION HOB HSS TOOL
PATERIAL OF OF SPEED MATERIAL
HARD- CONDITION
NESS CUTS
NESS WORKPIECE
hnin fpm AISI
225 Annealed . - -
Drawn
_ ie 4
to or
325 Quenched
and
Tempered
1-2 2 .045 70
3-10 1 .045 80
11-19 1 .025 100 M3,M42
20-48 1 .025 105
325
to Quenched
and 48 & Finer 1 .025 120
375 Tempered
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390,03) or better gears. itmay be See section 16 for Cutting FluidRecommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts. *Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements Itmay be necessary to try both conven- When using a smaller hob diameter, the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb cutting. portionally.
7-7
-:-' -- 3,
7.1 Gear Hobbing
i FEED* PER
1-2 2 .045 85
Hot 3-10 1 .045 100
Rolled. 11-19 1 .045 110 M2. M7
20-48 1 .045 120
275 Normalized.
to Annealed 48 & Finer 1 .030 130
325 or -
Quenched
and
1
Tempered as a. -
1- 2 2 .045 65
2-10 1 045 75
11-19 1 .025 95 M3. M42
20--48 1 .025 100
325 Quenched 48 & Finer 1 .025 115
Tempered
35
~--~ a m 4N.~ __
For hobbing Class 9 (pa, AGMA 390.03) or better gears, it may be See section 16 for
Curing Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts, *Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements it may be necessary to try both conven- When using a smaller hob diameter. the Feed must be reduced pro-
tlonal and climb cutting. portionalty.
7-8
- _ . = - _ - _- -w - -2 _-,
. _ .- '- .V-
IFEED* DIAMETRAL
PER
REVOLUTION HOB HSS TOOL
HARD PITCH NUMBER OF SPEED MATERIAL
NESS OF WORKPIECE
Ih CUTS
1-2 2 .060 145
4. FREE MACHINING ALLOY
3-10 1 .060 155
STEELS, WROUGHT
Hot 11.19 1 .060 165 M2. M7
Medium Carbon Resulfurized
20-48 1 .050 180
4140 150 Rolled.
4140Se to Normalized, 48 & Finer 10320
4142Te 200 Annealed z" ; : MF
4145Seor Cold
4147Te Drawn >
4150 MA
1-2 2 .060 120
3-10 1 .060 130
Hot 11-19 1 .060 140 M2.M7
1-2 2 .045 90
3-10 1 .045 100
11-19 1 .045 110 M2. M7
275 Quenched
2520-48 48 & Finer 1 .045
.030 120
130
to and
325 Tempered
1-2 2 .045 65
3-10 1 .045 75
11-19 1 025 95 M3. M42
325 Quenched
3520--48 48 & Finer 1 .025
.025 100
135
to and
375 Tempered
S1-2 2.0 14
3-10 I.060 15
Hot 11-19 1 .060 170 M2..M7
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390.03) or better gears, it may be See section 16 forCutting Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts. *Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements it may be necessary to try both conven- When using a smaller hob diameter, the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb cutting. portionally.
_ _7-9
"- -,_... __
Z.
7.1 Gear Hobbing
FEED PER
DIAMETRAL REVOLUTION HOB HSS TOOL
HARD- PITCH NUMBER OF SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION - - OF WORKPIECE
CUTS
Iin fpm AISI
B. .n. .... . J ... . ... .
1-2 2 045 70
3-10 1 .045 90
11-19 1 .045 110 M3. M42
20-48 1 045 120
325 Quenched 48 & Finer 1 .030 130
to and ~- 15~-
375 Tempered ~ ~ ~ ~ ;.~
Drawn 5
1-2 2 .045 90
3-10 1 .045 100
11-19 1 .045 ;10 M2. M7
Normalized 20-48 1 .045 120
275
IC or
Quenched 48 & Finer 1 .030 130
325 and ;iWEMER
Tempered- -'yg N
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390.03) or better gears, it may be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts. *Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements it may be necessary to try both conven- When using a smaller hob diameter. the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb cutting portionaltly
7-10
I
- - -- ~t=~.
Gear Hobbing 7.1
Tempered gag.:__
1-2 2 .045 60
3-10 1 .045 65
375 and
Tempered -__
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390.03) or better gears. it may be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid R-commendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts -Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements it may be necessary to try both conven- When using a smaller hob diameter. the Feed must be reduced pro-
lional and climb cutting. portionally.
7-11
r -. -- ~
7.1 Gear Hobbing
FEED* PER
DIAMETRAL REVOLUTION Ho HSS TOOL
HARD- PITCH NUMBER OF SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION OF WORKPIECE
r ~ ~~Bhn i CUTS f in '." fpm * AISI _"
1-2 2 .045 80
3-10 1 045 90
11o19 1 r d045 100 M2. M7
Normalized 20-48 1 .045 105
275 or 48 & Finer 1 .030 115
to Quenched -- ~
325 and
Tempered
# r4z Z 2r
1-2 2 .045 55
3-10 1 045 60
Normalized 11-19
20-48 11 .025
025 70
75 M3. M42
325 or 48 & Finer 1 025 90
10 Quenched -r-t
- -7iv$ ;J -
and si- '-
Tempered cZ!h J7-- -1VOW
-- . -
1-2 2 .045 65
-- 10 1 .045 80
11-19 .045 90 M2, M7
20-48 1 .045 95
to 48 & Finer 1 .030 105
350
1-2 2 .045 60
HP 9-4-20 3-10 1 .045 70
HP P 4-25 11-19 1 .025 80 M3,M42
HP 9-4-30 20-46 1 .025 85
HP 9-4-45 325 48 & Fine. 1 .025 95
to Annealed g~
375
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390.03) or better gears. it may be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts. *Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements it may be necessory to try both conven- When using a smaller hob diame'er the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb cutting. portionally.
7-12
Gear Hobbing 7.1
FEED PER
DIAMETRAL REVOLUTION NOB .SS TOOL
HARD- PITCH NUMBER OF SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION-' OF WORKPIECE
CUTSin fpm AISI
~A
T6
Hoor--2 2 .060 70
SHot Work 3-10 1 .060 75
H10 H23 11-19 1 .060 85 M2.M7
$11 $23 20-48 1 050 90
$H12 24 150 48 & Finer 1 .030 110
H13 H25 1o Annealed Sp,
H14 $26 200 -7
H19 H42
H21 I~__
! 1-2 2 .060 55 -= -
3-10o 1 .060 60
11-19 1 .060 70 M2. M7
;20 -48 1 .050 75
200 48& Finer 1 .030 95
250
_ _ _ __ i -
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390.03) or better gears, it may be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts. *Feeds are based on the largest standard recon'mnended hob amcler.
To meet finish requirements it may be necessary to try both conven. When using a smallor hob diameter,. the Feed must be reduced pro-
II
ional and climb cutting portionally.
7-13
- %
7.1 Gear Hobbing
t AD
|
! DIAMERAFED
PITCH
PIRI iER
NSUMBER IREVOLUTION
OF PAR SPEED
HOG MATRIAL
HSS TOOL
__--- OF O SPED MAERA
MATERIAL HARD- NESSlCONDITION __ WORKPIECE
NES U1S 1 in fpm I AISI
1 2 .045 45
a. TOOL STEELS, WROUGHT 3-10 i .045 50
(conL) 11-19 1 025 60 M3.M42
Hot Work (coaL) 20--48 1 025 65
(materials listed on preceding raye) 325 Quenched 1 48 & Finer 1 1 .025 85
toand ts r14 f
37b Temrpereo"j-'- - - r-I !4YW
I 'Ar tI '!
A7201 .0-07
,5,
022
52
3--0 .060 17
P2 11-19 .060 85 M2.M7
P4 20--46 1 .050 15
P5 100
P3 tc Annealed
S 1-2 2 .060 95
F~or
hobbingj Class 9 (per AGMA 390 03) or better gems. II may tie Sesectlon 16 tot Ct.ng Fluid Recoewnfiriont
nacesa.ary to reduce apdeda and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cu. "Feeda are based on the largest standJard recommen-ded bob, diameter.
To meet finoti requirements it may be nececsalry to try both convert- When usingj a smaller bob (fameter the ForJd m.,st be reduced pro-
tion al and climb cutti ng port.ionaly.
7-14
I -
Gear Hobbing 7.1
12 22 106.0 21
12-2S 1 00 1
WRUH 3-10
1-91G5
1.4 1 o
10 F214
NftralOov *25
Nrlralloy
Nalratu"
.35
!3' Mod.t
200 Anneale ~ 5aFe 1.312
_
10 Ouenched _____
Temred M As ?_EZ
-~~~
_ 12
For hobbng Class 9 (per AGMA 3 O 03) or fl(W gears. it may be See section 16 lot Cutti7g Fluid Recormenidatiorts
necessary 1oreduce speeda and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cutS *Feeds are bjaed on the largest standlard recommvended hob diamseter.
To meet fish requiremefts it may be necessary to try both corrver- When usng a smaller hob, diameter. the Feed tJ be reduced Pro-
ttonal and climb cutting Porbionaly-
7-15
7.1 Gear Hobbing
FEED PER
DIAMETRAL REVOLUTION HOB HSS TOOL
HARD- PITCH NUMBER OF SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION OF WORKPIECE
CUTS
y4'9MODULEV : in fpm AISI
.6 22 125h~w _____
440F Se5 -- .
-
9 _ -*
325 Tempered EX
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390 03) or better gears. it may be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and leeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts. *Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements it may be necessary to try both conven. When using a smaller hob diameter, the Foed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb cutting, portlonally.
7-16
Gear Hobbing 7.1
FEED* PER
DIAMETRAL REVOLUTION HOB HSS TOOL
HARD- PITCH NUMBER OF SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION - OF WRPEC
~MODQLE~
6UEin
CUTS
fpm AISI
___________________ Bhn ________ __ __ ni- >nninIO
Auutenitic 1-2 2 .060 95
21 383-10 1 .060 105
201 308 11-1t9 1 060 120 M2, M7
1-2 2 060 90
3-10 1 .050 100
11-19 1 .050 115 M2. M7
225 20-48 1 050 125
to Cold 48 & Finer 1 .030 135
275 Drawn ~ 1~ ~~i 52-'<
122 .060 70
3-10O 1 .050 80
11-19 1 .050 90 M2. M7
2520-48 1 .050 105
to Cold 48 & Finer 1 .030 120
275 Drawn _4 i
Austenitic 12 2 060 60
Nitronic 3231010070O
Nitronic 3311110580 M.7-a
N~tronic 40 210
Nitronic 50 to Annealed48&Fnr 1.310
Nitronic 60 250
Martentic j Iz.60
t 13
403 111 1 00 45 M2 M
410
420 135
422 to Annealed
501 175
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390.03) or better gears. itmay be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts *Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter
To meet finish requirements it may be necessary to try both convent. When using a smatter hob diameter. the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional an lm utn.portionaily.
L~.. 7-17
7.1 Gear Hobbing
I I FEEO* PER
HARD-
IDIAMETRAL
PITCH NUMBER
REVOLUTION
OF
HOB
SPEED
HSS TOOL
MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION . OF WORKPIECE
AWU CEu
, CUTS in pm AISI
Bhn __ _ __ _ -~~mm - rmr ISO,
13. TILS TES 1-2 2 060 100
WROUGHT (cont.) 11-19 1 060 120 M2M
Martensitic (cont.) 20 48 1 050 145 MM
(materials listed on preceding page) 175 248 ie8 1 030 160
to Annealed 48-1ie 2 1 0010
22525;,1_
1-2 2 045 60
3-10 1 045 80
11-19 1 045 95 M2, M7
20-48 1 045 105
275 Quenched 48 & Finer 1 030 120
to and253 .s2 , 6--
325 Tempered i - 24 -
1-2 2 .045 55
3-10 1 .045 75
11-19 1 .045 90 M2, M7
20-48 1 045 100
275 Quenched 48 & Finer 1 030 115
to and __-3 ~ ~ ~ 9~
325 Tempered ~ M
275 _- --
1-2 2 .045 50
3-10 1 .045 70
11-19 1 045 85 M2, M7
20-48 1 .045 95
275 (',enched 48 & Finer 1 .030 110
to andMD
325 Tempered-
For hobbrng Class 9 (per AGMA 390.03) o~rbetter gears. it may be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendaions.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50%and/or take 2 cuts. *Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements it may be necessary to try both conven- When using a smater hob diameter, the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb culling. portionalty.
7-18
-- * % 9 Mn-ww rr- f' r
S- in fpm i AISI
Shn -. - 'I - I ISO
1-2 2 060 65
14. PRECIPIrATION
3-10 1 060 85
HARDENING STAINLESS
11-19 1 060 100 M2 M7
STEELS, WROUGHT
20-48 050 110
15-5 PH 150
Solution 48 & Finer 1 030 125
16-6 PH to
17-4 PH 200 Treated 150 ?20-
2 - -
17-7t PH 1-51102
17-14 Cu Mo 2-5I1030, S4, S2
AF-71 14
AFC-77 5&Fne 175 _________ ____
-1 -,__
PH 13-8 Mo Z 5f S
150 Normalized
and h;
" S- ti "
Tempered AN S0
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390.03) or better gears, it may be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts. *Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements it may be necessary to try both conven- When using a smaller hob diameter, the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb cutting portionally.
7-19
- .. - - -
4. f
. .. . 30..
16. ALLOY STEELS, CAST 1-2 2 .060 130
Low Carbon 3-10 1 060 150
Annealed. 11-19 1 060 165 M2. M7
ASTM A217 Grade WC9
ASTM A352. Grades LC3. LC4 150 Normalized 20-48 1 .050 175
ASTM A426 Grades CP2. CPS. to or 48 & Finer 1 .030 190
-
200 Normalized Rt:it 2-AO }
CP5b. CP 1. CP 2. CP15. .
and Piz
CP21. CP22
1320 2320 4120 8020 Tempered A;t25-- s- _
Tempered t_ -4r
1-2 2 .045 90
3-10 1 045 100
11-19 1 .045 110 M2, M7
250 Quenched 20-48
48 & Finer 1
1 .045
030 120
130
to and
300 Tempered ~ 2 2 ~ t t
7 t
155
3
120 and
(materials c-tinued Tempered . '
on next I- je) L
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390.03) or better gears, It may be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts, *Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements it may be necessary to try both conven- When using a smaller hob diameter, the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb rutting portionally.
7-20
Gear Hobbing 7.1
FEED PEP T
DIAMETRAL REVOLUT!ON HOB I HSS TOOL
PITCH NUMBER OF SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION OF
NESS OF ~~CUTS WORKPIECE m I As
in fpm AISI
____________ Wi8n ________ I___ -, ____ i IS -_
1-2 2 045 55
3-10 1 .045 60
i1-;9 1 .025 70 M3. M42
20-48 1 .025 75
350 Quenched 48 & Finer 1 .025 85
to and - . -
400 Tempered . .
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390.03) or better gears, it may be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations. Sit
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts. *Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements it may be necessary to try both conven- When using a smaller hob diameter, the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb cutting portionally.
7-21
7.1 Gear Hobbing
FEED* PER
DIAMETRAL REVOLUTION HOB HSS TOOL
HARD- PITCH NUMBER OF SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION -' s OF WORKPIECE
:- CUTS
AA moou . CUTS:n fpm AISI
Bhn _ ~ /lv
1-2 2 .060 90
18. STAINLESS STEELS, CAST
(cont.) 3- 10 1
1
060
.060
100
11-19 115 M2, M7
Austenitic 20--48 1 050 125
ASTM A296 Grades CF-3, 135 Annealed 48 & Finer 1 030 135
CF-B. CF-SC. CF-20 to or 51 S~~~i~
ASTM A351. Grades CF-3. 185 Normalized
CF-3A, CF-S. CF-8A. CF-BC /2 7 -. ,z-
ASTM A451
C PF3A . C PFGrades CPF3.
. C PF8A . : :'2-t5
.--,- S r
1
z
-MA-i Z---
1-2 2 060 80
Auteniic 3-10 1 060 90
ASTM A296: Grades CF-3M. 11-19 1 060 105 M2. M7
CF-8M. CG-8M. CG-12, 20-48 1 050 115
CH 20, CK-20 135 Annealed 48 & Finer 1 .030 125
ASTM A351: Grades CF-3M, to or t-s X j W 7 ' ;_
CF-3MA. CF-8M. CF-1OMC, 185 Normalized 4
CH-6, CH-10, CH-20. CK-20. = - . - ---- t -
ImI
Martensitic 1 2 2 .060 95
ASTM A217: Grade CA-15 11-19 1 .060 125 M2.M7
ASTM A296. Grades CA- 15. 20-48 1 .060 135
CA-iSM. CA-40 135 48 & Fintr 1 .030 145
ASTM A426. Grades CP7. CP9. to Annealed I ,-P
CPCA15 175
ASTM A487: Classes CA15a.
CA- 15M
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390.03) or better gears, it may be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts. 'Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements it may be necessary to try both conven- When using a smaller hob diameter, the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb cuffing. portionally.
7-22
Gear Hobbing 7.1
FEED' PER
DIAMETRAL REVOLUTION HOD HSS TOOL
HARD- PITCH NUMBER OF SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION ,. T'_ OF WORKPIECE
and
Tempered M'rhQs~% - v=
1-2 2 .045 50
3-10 1 .045 70
11-19 1 .045 80 M2. M7
20-48
48 & Finer 1 .045 90
275 Quenched 1 .030 105
to
325
and
Tempered
~A 4 4 P K
=t 4 f Wt'
150
220
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390.03) or better gears, it may be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts *Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements It may be necessary to try both conven- When using a smaller hob diameter, the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb cutting. portionally.
7-23
7.1 Gear Hobbing
FEEDIPER
DIAMETRAL REVOLUTO 0B HSS TOOL
HARD- PITCH NUMBER OF SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NES CONDITION ___a OF 0ORKPIECE
NSS ;& E CUTSinfm AS
Bhn __ infpRAS
21. GRAY CAST IRONS (cont.) 1-2 2 .060 60
Pearlitic, + Free Carbides 3-10 1 .050 65
ASTM A48 Classes 45. 50 11-19 1 .030 75 M2. M7
SAE J431c- Grades G,1500. 220 20-48 1 .020 80
G4000 to
I48
As Cast
&Finer 1 015 90
--
Tempered - V
Fo obig
lss9(prAGA3 0.0orbttr0ar.imyb4 Seseto 16 for Cutn70iecmedtos
0
nv-~~~ - -____-o _
Gear Hobblng 7.1
FEED* PER
DIAMETRAL REVOLUTION HOB HSS TOOL
HARD- PITCH NUMBER OF SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION OF WORKPIECE
CUTS n AS,
Bhn in 01m IS
1-2 1 .060 60
Pearlitic- Martensitic
ASTM A536 Grade 100-70-03 3-10 1 050 65
11-19 1 030 70 M2.M7
SAE J434c Grade 07003 20-48 1 .020 80
240 Normalized 48 & Finer 1 .015 90
to and . .~
300 Tempered
11-2 1 .060 35
Martensitic
ASTM A536 Grade 120-90-02 3-10 1 .050 50
SAE J434c Grade DQ&T 20-48 1 .020 70
270 Quenched 48 & Finer 1 .015 80
to and E R --M'
330 Tempered 07 XN___M1- MNE-M
1-2 1 .035 40
Aumfenitic (NI-RESIST
Dutl)11-19 3-10 11 .030
.020 45
55 M2. M7
ASTM A439: Types D-2B. D-3.
.
-4. -B to
140 Anae
Annealed 48 & Finer 1 .015 70
275 0:1
M5003 Treated
For bobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390 03) or better gears. It may be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts. *Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements It may be necessary to try both conven- When using a smaller bob dfameter. the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb cutting portionally.
7-25
7.1 Gear Hobbing
FEED PER
DIAMETRAL REVOLUTION HOB HSS TOOL
HARD- PITCH NUMBER OF SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION OF WORKPIECE
UI.:CUTS
r .. C. -:in fpm AIst
Shn 112 -S_:00l 2I S~0_
24. MALLEABLE CAST IRONS 1-2 1 CSO 100
(cont.) 3-10 1 050 120
Pearlitic (cont.) V1-19 1 030 140 M2. M7
Malleabized 20-48 1 .u20
u 150
(malenals listed on preceding page) 200
to and 48 & Finer 015 160
Tempered
ASTM Martensite121.009
A220- Grade 60004 3-10 1 050 110
Treated wR KRM
Treated -
Treated I W-1
I
For obbmg Class 9 (per AGMA 393.03) or bel1er gears. itmay be See section Cuting Fluid
16 for Recomrrendetions.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by SC0% and/or take 2 cuts *Feeds are hase on the largest strldard recommended hob diamet.
To meet finish requirements it may be neccssarv to try both conven. When using a smaller hob diameter. the Feed must bereduced po
porbonally.
ionaland climb cutting&
7-26
Gear Hobbing 7.1
F FEED-PER
DIAMETRAL REVOLUTION HOB HSS TOOL
1 1 850
13-0
28. ALUMINUM ALLOYS, 1-2 00
WROUGHT 1 050 900
11-19 1 030 1000 M2.M7
CC 2218 5252 253 30 20-48 1 020 1050
1060 22!9 5254 6262 to Cold 48 & Fine, 1 015 1150
1100 2618 5454 6463 80 Drawn251 -=5O
1145 3003 5456 6951 500kg ~1t> --- IA2 - 27
1175 3004 5457 7001
'-
1235 3005 5652 7004 i w.
- - <4 t5--- ..........
2011 4032 5657 7005 I --. -"- =--io
2014 5005 6053 7039 1 2 1 060 800
2017 5050 6061 7049 3-10 1 050 850
2018 5052 6063 7050 11-19 1 .030 950 M2.M7
2021 5056 6066 7075 75 Solution 20--48 1 .020 1000
2024 5083 6070 7079 to Treated 48 & Finer 1 .015 1100
2025 5086 610' 7175 150 and '-' r-.- 4=jw--
2117 5154 6151 7178 500kg Aged I " - -EO
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390 03) or oetter gears, itmay be See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% end/or take 2 cuts. -Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements itmay be necessary to try both conven- When using a smaller hob diameter, the Feed must be reduced pro-
tional and climb cutting. portionally.
7-27
-I
7.1 Gear Hobbing
i j FEED' PER *
DIAMETRAI. REVOLUTION NOB HSS TOOL
HARD- PjrCH NUMBER OF SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS CON1DITION OF WORKPIECE
: CUTS
ISOCU t z in fpm AISI
1-2 060 250g
1-2 I 060 250
34. COPPER ALLOYS,
3-10 1 050 300
WROUGHT (can) I11-19 1 .030 350 2. M7
190
226
425
435
466
467
667
675 10R
20-48
48&Fner
1
1
j .020
.015
400
450
230 442 613 687 to Anneaied
240 443 618 694 70 R. C 150-. <-- -
For hobbing Class 9 (per AGMA 390 03) or better gears. t may be See section 16 for
Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
necessary to reduce speeds and feeds by 50% and/or take 2 cuts -Feeds are based on the largest standard recommended hob diameter.
To meet finish requirements it may be necessary to try both convea- Whe, using a smaller bob diameter, the Feed must be reduced Pro
tional and climb cutting portionJy.
7-28
Gear Hobbing 7.1
NESSur WORKPIECE I 1m AS
8 8 15 1
80 1- 2 I 1 .060 100
'
[ --
-
1 7--
.
rt~
Fm .;I
j
For hobbing CUas9 (per AGIAA 390 03) or better gears. it ay be See sectioni 16 for Cutun Flud ev nmaons.
necessary to reduce speds and feeds by 50% andl/of take 2 cuts. *Feds are basfed on the larges standad recoaumended hob diarueWe.
To mee finish requireivents it may be necessary to try both coriwn- Whe using a iniusller hob dwwameter,h Feed must be reduced pro-
borst and climb cuttig portionaly.
7-29j
EO~IG PACE BL"ka-NQP FILMh
375 Tempered
Hot
150 Rolled, 130 265 M2.M7
to Normalized,
200 Annmaled
or Cold
B
Drawr,
m . m =1 1 ...
: ... . . ... . ..- , .. ... ..
7.2 Gear Cutting, Straight and Spiral Bevel
CUTTING SPEED HSS TOOL
HARD- CONDITION ROUGHING FINISHING MATERIAL
MATERIAL fpm fpm AISI
NESS
_________________ Bhn __________ Th 1n m r 18soidNz
Hot
150 Roiled, 145 290 M2,M7
to Normalized,
200 Annealed ,V5M
or Cold
Drawn y S41A.4
Hut
200 Rolled, 110 225 M2.M7
Normalized,
to
Annealed
orAMU 02aw -N 10
250
Drawn 101-*
225 Annealed, _-
Hot Rolled.
IU
22 Normalized, 90 175 M2, M7
to Cold Drawn
to ~ Coldrw
. w MCutters
.ling i, o r a
Gear Cutting, Straight and Spiral Bevel 7.2
CUTTING SPEED HSSTOOL
HARD- ROUGHING FINISHING MATERIAL
MATERIAL CONDITION
NESS fpm fpm AISI
B,,, _ _ Mn ... ....
2. CARBON STEELS, WROUGHT (cont.) Hot
Low Carbon (cont.) 175 Rolled 80 165 M2,M7
(materials listed on preceding page) to Normaized.
225 Annealed F, j w- ?
Drawn
orCold M -1 '4 , - -"' - R
-
50 100 M3
to Quenched
375 and
Tempered "
325 Quenched
to and
375 Tempered 21
ASTM A369. Grades FP5. FP7. FP9. FP2 1. Annealed 70 140 M2.M7
FP22 150 or
to Normalized
200 and
Tempered __ ~
4. FREE MACHINING ALLOY STEELS, Hot
WROUGHT 150 Rolled, 85 175 M2. M7
Medium Carbon Resulturized 1o Normalized,
Annealed
4140 4142Te 4147Te 200 or Cold :-4
4140Se 4145Se 4150 Drawn _
Hot
200 Rolled. 75 155 M2, M7
to Normalized.
250 or Cold __
_ _Drawn I_ _ _
325 Quenched 4 5M
to and~--
75Tempered z~
Hot
200 Rolled. 75 155 M2. M7
to Normalized.
250
250
Annealed ~
or Cold
Drawn
325 Tempered
325 Quenched 4 0M
10 and
375 Tempered
Hot
25Rotted. 65 130 M2,M7
to Normalized. _______
25Annealed gp *-
or Cotd
Drawn 1z NNaMMN
No.,malized 60 120 M2 M7
275 or
to Quenched
325 and
Tempered W
35Normalized 50 100 M3
325 or
to Quenched
35and __
Tempered -
Normalized 50 100 M3
325 or
to Quench~ed
35and
Tempered
Normalized.
225 Cold Drawn5010M,7
275 Quenched 5
and
Tempered
Cutting speed recommendations are for use with Alternate-Tooth
Milling Cutters or Gear Generators.
For Planer-Type Generators use the recommended cutting speeds In
section 7 3 Gear Shaping.
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations 7-35
7.2 Gear Cutting, Straight and Spiral Bevel
CUTTING SPEED HSSTOOL
MATERIAL HARD-
NESCONDITION C IOUGHING fmfmAS FINISHING MATERIAL
NESS fpm I pm AISI
Bhn _0WAF 0__ I r
5. ALLOY STEELS, WROUGHT (cont.) Normalized 45 90 M2, M7
High Carbon (cont.) 275 or
(materia!s listed on preceding page) to Quenched
325 and K U
Tempered t _ -
325 Normalizeo 40 80
or M3
to Quenched i r -
375 and_
Tempered t4
300 40 80 M2. M7
to Normalized
350-
HP 9-4-20 40 80 M2. M7
HP 9-4-25 325
HP 9-4-30 to Annealed ,.
HP 9-4-45 375 -
High Speed
IM3-1 M33 M43 T5 225
M3-2 M34 M44 T8 to Annealed
M4 M36 M46 T15 275
M7 M41 M47
M30 M42 T4
I' R
Cutting speed recommendations are for use with Alternate-Tooth
Milling Cutters or Gear Generators
f-
For Planer-Type Generators use the recommended cutting speeds in
section 7.3 Gear Shaping.
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations. 7-36
Gear Cutting, Straight and Spiral Bevel 7.2
65 130 M2. M7
200
to Annealed .
250
325 Quenched 45 95 M3
to and -
375 Tempered WE -P
Cold Work
65 130 M2.M7
A2 A9 D7 200
A3 A10 01 to Annealed
A4 D2 02 250 K_
A6 D3 06 ____
A7 D4 07 __" .__
A8 D5
Mold
P2 100 90 180 M2. M7
P4to Annealed -~=
P5 150 -_r -
P6 1
P21 to Annealed -
200
Special Purpose
L2 150 70 145 M2.M7
L6 o Annealed --
L7 200 1
Special Purpose
200 65 135 M2.M7
F1
F2 to Annealed
250
Water Hardening
W1.W2.W5 150 90 180 M2.M7
SAE J438b. Types W108. W109. W110, to Annealed
Wi 12. W209. W210, W310 200
9. NITRIDING STEELS,'WROUGHT
200 65 130 M2.M7
Nitralloy 125
Nitralloy 135 to Annealed
Nitralloy 135 Mod 250 K
Niraloy 225 - #
Ntralloy 230
Ntralloy EZ Normalized 55 110 M2.M7
Notralloy N 300 of
Nitrex 1 'o Quenched ts -r-' Z .2 _,a
_.
350 and ______ ~
Austenilic
135 60 150 M2.M7
203EZ 303Pb
303 303 Plus X to Annealed
303MA 303Se 185 A- I_107M__&
65 135 M2.M7
225
to Cold
Martensitic
416 420F Se 135 85 175 M2.M7
416 Plus X 440F' 1o Annealed
416Se 440F Se 185
420F
Drawn
240 Cold2 M
275 Quenched
to and
325 Tempered
Austenitic
321 385 135 60 120 M2.M7
201 304
202 304L 347 to Ar.nealed
301 305 348 185
302 308 384
225
to Cold
275 Drawn
1 4
Cutting speed recommendations are foruse with Alternate-Tooth
Milling Cutters or Gear Generators.
For Planer-Type Generators use the recommended cutting spe .s In
section 7 3 Gear Shaping.
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations 7-38
Gear Cutting, Straight and Spiral Bevel 7.2
AusteniticI
302B 310S 317 135 50 100 M2.M7
309 314 330 to Annealed -- RK.U i x
309S 316 185 M -M, -
225 45 90 M2, M7
to Cold
275 Drawn
Austenitic I_______________________________
Martenaitic
403 422 135 75 150 M2. M7
410 501 to Annealed
420 502 175
Martensitic
414 225 60 120 M2.M7
431 to Annealed
Greek Ascoloy 275 MI W- _P-
275 Quenched5510M.7
to and
325 Tempered
Martensitic
44A2555 115 M2. M7
4408 toAnnealed
440C 275 -
325 Tempered X
CUTTING SPEED
MATERIAL HARD- GSE - HSTO
NESS CONDITION ROUGHING FINISHING MATERIAL
Shn fpm fpm AISJ
14. PRECIPITATION HARDEING
STAINLESS STEELS, WROUGHT 50
15-5 PH to Solution
16-6 PH 200 Treated
17-4 PH-
17-7 PH
17-14 Cu Mo
AF.71
AFC-77 Ala 6 A-6)to 275 Solution
Treated 45 95 M2,M7
AlM-r360 -32 325 or --
AM-350
AM -355
n di tad
;.
. .1 ,Yr:r
1L
AM-363
Custom 450
Custom 455
325 Solution 40 85 M3
HNM tO Treated
PH 13-8 Mo 375 or - -
PH 14-8 Mo
Hardened... .
PH 15-7 Mo
Stainless W
Ca rboGrade-
Lo wA426-
ASTM n r f u i n Nr a ed
CP1 0oraie
1o 910S M2. M7
I
ASTM A356 Grade to or
F-ud Rcommndaons7-4
1030
1040 175 Normastzed
and 16 fr Cutin
R -IR-0
10 50 T e mp e red
.
Annealed. 4
225 Normalized
and
Tempered
,
225 Norma~zed
and
Tempered
300 Tempered
C ut t in g s e d r c m e d t o s a re fo r u se w ih A lt r a ? T oh
Milling Cutters or Gear Generators
For Plane-Type Generators use the recommended
cuttng speeds in
section 7 3 Gear Shaping.
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations
7-40
= - 7
Austenitic
ASTM A296: Grades CF-16F. CN-7M. 140 Annealed70152.M
CN-7MS to0o
ASTM A35 1: Grade CN-7M 170 Normalized-
Austionitic: 010M.M
ASTM A296, Grades CF-3, CF-8, CF-8C. 135 Annealed
CF-20 to o
ASTM A351: Grades CF-3. CF-3A. CF-8. 185 Normalized-
CF-8A. CF-8C
ASTM A451i: Graaes CPF3. CPF3A. CPF8.
CPF8A. CPF8C. CPF8C (Ta Max)
ASTM A452: Grades TP 304H. TP 347H
Austenitic
ASTM A297 Grades HD. HE. HF. HH. I. HK, 160 so 100 M2 ?A7
HL. HN. HP, HT. HU to As Cast -
ASTM A608 Grades HD5O. HE35. H-F3O. 210 ~ ~ ~
HH3O. HH33. H135. HK30. HK4O. HL-30. 1.
HL4O. HN4O. HT5O. HU50 ___________________
Mwitensitic
ASTMA2I7 GradeCA-15 135 70 145 M2. M47
ASTM A296. Grades CA- 15. CA- 15M4. CA-40 to Annealed
ASTM A426: Grades CP7. CP9. CPCA15 175 -~~
Annealed
175 Normrazed 65 135 M2. 147
toor____
25Normalized
and
Tempered
~ =-=
~1 srz~
2550 Quenched 105 M2. 147
275
to and ---
325 Tempered - S__
ZZV
Peariti- Feretic
ASTM A48: Class 25 1 75 150 M2. M7
SAE J431c: Grade G2500 to As Cast
200
Ferritic- Pearlitic
ASTLI A536 Grade 80-55-06 190 70 140 M42.M7
SAE J434c. Grade D5506 toAs Cast
225
225 65 130 M7
M42.
to As Cast
260 R M.f P KW
Pearlitic- Martensitic
ASTI A536 Grade 100i-70-03 240 Normalized 60 125 M42. M7
SAE J434c. Grade 07003 to and
300 Tempered
111artensitic:
ASTM A536: Grade 120-90-02 270 Quenched 60 120 M42.1M7
SAE J434c G'2dje 0O&T to and
330 Tempered 1004 Ai _ az-
MATERIAL HR-CONDITION
NES
1 f ROUGHING
CUTTING SPEED
fpni
FINISHING
1pm- 4 "$STOOL
IMATERIAL
- AISI
SA A47SGradesP32510.308t aeahc
240 Heal
Treated __
Tempere Martenst
ASTMA A220 Grade 60004 200 PMateabtzed C5130 f.12. P7
ASIA A602 Grade 1.15503 to and_____
SAE J158- Grade M45503 255 Heal 1
Treated
Tempered Mairtewisite
ASIM A220. Grade 70003 220 Malleablized 60 125 V-2, M7
ASTMA A602 Grade M7002 toand___________
SAE J158* Grade M47002 260 Heal
Treated __-4S2 -
Temaered MAwtensite
ASTM A220. Grade 80002 240 )Aateablized 60 120 1A2MI7
ASTMA602 Grade P48501 to and
SAE J 158. Grade tA8501 280 Heat
Treated- 7 - s2
Tempered Martenithe
ASTM A220 Grade 90001 250 Mateablized 55 110 M 1.4P7
ASTM A602 Gradef.4&8501 and 1
SAE J 158- -rade MM50 320 Heal=~. ~=~-
Treatea TOP4'~
~~~ -. ;QWe~2y
_-1 r
___-,__,
_m___
&N,
4 1-4 .022
P 5-10 .016 90 M2,tA7
1S0 2 11-19 O011
to Cold 2 20-481 0081
200 Drawn 2126-
-- 5 ..
4 1-4 .022
2 5-10 .016 110 M2. M7
150 2 1-9.1
t0 Cold 2 20-48 _ 008
200 Drawn
4 1 -4 .2
150211Oi
to Cold 2 20-48 1 .008
200 Drawn - ~
For cutting gears otClass 9 (AGMVA 390.03) or better, the tI!ntary Feed
should be reduced and the number of cuts should be lncreasea.
See section 16 for Culling Fluid Recommendations
7-47
7.3 Gear Shaping
fDIAMETRAL
-f
ROTARY FEED
N per cutter CUTTER HSS TOOL
MATERIAL HARD-
HARD-IONOF i NUMBER PITCH
x" '.- .' stroke
(4D#P.D. cutter) SPEED MATERIAL
NESS CUTS ( P.D.-cutter)
KM
- in fpm AISI
4 1-4 .012
1. FREE MACHINING CARBON
STEELS, WROUGHT (cont.) 2 5-10 .010 40 M3,M42
2 11-19 008
Medium Carbon Resulfurized 325 Quenched 2 20-48 008
(cont.) to and -; . . -
(materials listed on preceding page) 375 Tempered ' 4. - - ;w . .
4 1-4 022
Low Carbon Leaded
10L18 Hot 2 5-10 .016 110 M2. M7
Rolled. 2 11-19 .011
11117 100
2 20-48 .008
to Normalized.
150 Annealed 4 . .... _ - "
or Cold ~ ~ t ~ :25 ~ ~ ~ tz-4-
Drawn.
4 1-4 .022
Hot 2 5-10 016 100 M2,M7
2 11-19 .011
150 Rolled.
2 20--48 .008
to Normalized,
200 Annealedt, ts 2 - -_
or Cold r X-4-~. .~_
Drawn t
4 1-4 .022
Annealed _ - 85
250
Drawn
or Cold j-_
Drawn -
4 1--4 .022 -
2 5-10 016
Hot .011
2 11-19
150 Rolled,
2 2041.0
to Normalized, 20-48 .008
200 Annealed . -
4 1--4 .022 A
or Cold A
Medium Carbon Leadd 4 1-4 022
10L45 Hot 2 5-10 .016 90 M2.M7
IOL50 125 Rolled.
to Normalized. 20--48 .008
11L37
11L41 175 Annealed :%-If
11L44 or Cold
Drawn
For cutting gears of Class 9 (AGMA 390 03) or better, the Rotary Feed
should be reduced and the number of cuts should be increased
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
7-48
Gear Shaping 7.3
275 or %4~
Quenched -2 4 55.54.82!
and ~ ~ =
Tempered -at
Hot Rolled, 4 1-4 .018
2 20-48 .008
105u03eoNmlied,
1005
60
M 2M42
1119 .008 90
ar o f Classlled2 r ,t a
ForC
10 1016 1025 125 ~ aze,22--8.0
1017 1026 orCl '-- " i - -
1008
See
s o 16 FluidRecommer-nd-ations CCuttnlgd _
1009 18 109Drawn !
l10O lO1 1513 "
1011 1020 1518 4 1-4 018
1522 Hot 2 5-10 .01280M . 7
1012 1021 M,7W
125 Rolled, 2 11-19 .01080
1013 1022
to Normalized, 2 20-48 .008
___ - f
-~~~ -
4 1-4 .016
2 5-10 .1
19 .010 60M2 M
225 Annealed 211-
to or 2 20-48 .008
For cutting gears of Class 9 (AGMA 390 03) or better, the Rotary Feed
should be reduced and the number of cuts should be increased.
See section 16 for Cutting
Fluid Recommendat ions
,
-4
-- 7
ROTARY FEED
DIAMETRAL per cutter CUTTER HSS TOOL
HARD- NUMBER PITCH stroke SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION OF =: :3 (4" PD.incutter)
-- :("PO utr
CUTS AIsI
4 1-4 .016
Hot Rolled.
Normalized. 2 5-10 .012 60 M2 M7
2 11-19 .010
225 Annealed.
to Cold Drawn 2 20-48 .008
V.
275 or
Quenched s"r" -& 3 '= ' - "' 'fl.- '-'
and Ali&~
Tempered . - ZAtr",-
4 1--4 .016
Hot Rolled. 2 5-10 .012
Normalized, 2 11-19 010 50 M2,M7
275 Annealed 2 20-48 .008
. -- --
2 75 or
Quenched p
Tempered t~ _r2-;si L 4 t&
Hot 4
2 I,41-4
5-10 .016
.012
Rolled. 45 M2.M7
2 11-19 .010
275 Normalized,
2 20-48 .008
to Annealed
325 or
Quenched
and
Tempered
For cutting gears of Class 9 (AGMA 390 03) or better, the Rotary Feed
should be reduced and the number ofcuts should be increased
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations
7-50
- . -- ~- - - -- ~--3--r..
Gear Shaping 7.3
jROTARY FEED
DIAMERAL
DAERL per cutter CUTTER HSS TOCI
HARD- NUMBER PITCH stroke SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NES CONDIT;ON
NESCT OF --- (411
P.D. cutter)
MODULE' in fpn AISI
4 1-4 C)12
2. CARBON STEELS, 2m 5-10 01m0 S
WROUGHT (cont.) 2 11-19 008 35 M3,M42
High Carbon (cont.) 325 Quenched 2 20-48 .008
(materials listed on preceding page) to and 4 2 ~ ~ 3
35 Tempered2 -
4 14 .018 s~s-
3. CARBON AND FERRITIC 14 .018
ALLOY STEELS (HIGH 2 11-19 .010 60 M2. M7
TEMPERATURE SERVICE) 150 As2 2C-48 .008
ASTM A369. Grades FPA. FPB. to Asrge
FPi.FP2.FP12 200 Fogd ~2-6 5 I-
2- 5Z 32~18 $
52
4 1-4 .2
2 5-10 .0187222M
Hot M.7
Rolled.211 1Oi75
200
to Normalized. 22 -8.0
250 Annealed ~k__
or Cold __
~
-k.
~
Drawn
2 11-19 .008 3 3 4
325 Quenched
to and 2 204
3~5 Tempered ~
For culling gears of Class 9 (AGMA 390 03) or better, the Rotary Feed
should be reduced and the number 0f cuts should be increased
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations
7-51
7.3 Gear Shaping
DIAMETRAL ROTARY FEED H
4 1-4 018
2 5-10 .012 50 M2 M7
2 11-19 .010
to
275
325
and
Quenched
Tempered
2
- '
20-48 008
4 1-4 .012
2 5-10 .010 3 314
2 11-19 .008
325 Quenched 220-48 .008
sl bTempered
D~awn
4 1---4 .016
Hot 2 5-10 .01250 M,7
2 11-19 .01050 M,7
225 Rolled,
to Normahizod, 2 20-48 008
sectio
fooutnrFudRcmmnain
See01165 Annealed -
275
-- -. _ _ _ L ,-- ---' _
4 1-4 .012
2 5-10 ,010 45 M2. M7
Normalized 2 11-19 008
2 75 or 2 - - 20 - 4 8 .008-
to Quenched - -
325 and
Tempered
Fo,. cutting gears of Class 9 (AGMA 390 03) or belier. the Rotary Feed
should be reduced and the num~er of cuts should be Increased
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations
7-52
Gear Shaping 7.3
ROTARY FEED
DIAMETRAL
per cutter CUTTER HSS TOOL
HARD- NUMBER PITCH stroke SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION OF (4" P.D. cutter)
CUTS in fpm AISI
Bhn r-,n/un S
5. ALLOY STEELS, WROUGHT 4 1-4 012
(cnt.) 2 I 5-10 .010 40 M3M42
(Con Normalized 2 1 19 .008
Low Carbon (cont.) 325 or 2 20--48 008
(materials listed on preceding page) to Quenched_-
375 and .S.-2t 1
Tempered --- > 2 .
4 1-4 .012 -a
325 or 20-4,
to Quenched f -7- - --
375 and - u n-- N_
Tempered
4 1-4 .01C ,
Normalized. 2 5-110 .012
2 11-19 .010
225
to Drawn
Cold Of 20-48 .008
275 Quenched -.-
Tempered
4 1.-.4 .016
2 5--10 .012
Normalized 2 11-19 .010 35 M2,M7
275 or 2 20-48 .008
to Queched
325 and
Tempered
For cutting gears of Class 9 (AGMA 390 03) or better, the Rotary Feed
should be reduced and the number of cuts should be increased
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
7-53
7.3 Gear Shaping
DIMF A- ROTARY FEED
N IMT
E per cutter CUTTER HSS TOOL
NUMBER PITCH stroke SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL HARD CONDITION OF 717*- ' --- (4" P.D. cutter)
NESS CUTS
Ihn
_____-__________:_ in 1pm AISI
4 1-4 .012
5-10 .010 40 M2.M7
300 2 11-19 .008
30 Nomlie 2 20-48 .008
to Normahzed _ Z' --
4 1-4 .012
HP 9-4-20 2 5-10 .010 45 M3.M42
HP 9-4-25 2 11-19 .008
HP 9-4-30 325 2 20-48 .008
HP 9-4-45 to Anneeed - -'-
,I - = - _~
4 1.-- .012
ASTM A538: Grades A B.C 2 5-10 .010
200 Grade 2 1119 .008 35 M2.M7
250 Grade 275 2 20-48 .008
300 Grade to Annealed ~ f. e" ,
For cutting gear, a! Cl-sS 9 (AGMA 390 03) or better, the Rotary reed
should be reduced and the number of cuts should be increased
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations
7-54
Gear Shaping 7.3
I I DAMETAL
DIMTRL
jROTARY FEED
per cutter CUTTER HSS TOOL
HARD- NUMBER PITCH I stroke SPEED MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION OF f (4" R.D. cutter)
Ho~o ~OUL~ in 1pm AS
Bhn ME _ _______ ____
__10ai ___-4i
4 1-4 .012
2 5-10 .010 25 M3,M42
325 Quenched 2 20-48 .006
to and - n-na M:;
375 Tempered -~r
A3 04 200 21-9.1
A4 05 to Annealed 2 2-8.0
A6 07 250
A7 01
A8 02
A9 06
A10 07
02
Shock Reatling
$2 175 2j048.0
$6 225
S7
P2 a
P4 ~~100 21-9.1
P5 to Annealed 22-8.0
P6 150
Mold 414.1
P202 -0.150 M.7
15021 -1 .1
P21
200
For cutting gears of Class 9 (AGMA 390 03) or better, the Rotary Feed
should be reduced and the number of cuts should be increased
See section 16 for Culling Fluid Recommendations.
7-55
7.3 Gear Shaping
DIAMETRAL pe utr "CUTTER HSS TOOL
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION NUMBER
OF PITCH stroke
(4" P. cutter) SPEED MATERIAL
Bhn 359 , -
250
W.
SAE W2. W5 Types W108.
J438b: 2 1-19 .010 M2, M7
150 2 112.-4819 .010
W109, W110, W1 12. W209. to Annealed
W210. W310 200
9. NTTRIDING STEELS,
Narllo
13o Anealed+. -
.01
01 M2--
WOGT2 5-10 .012 4
Nitralloy 125WRO T2 200 2 11-
20-48 .010M2
.00
Tempered
430F 185
430F Se--
4 020
.--
A us e t f 2 1 0.--15 M .M
203EZ 2 11-19 .010 M.M
303 135 2 20-04 .008
303Pb 186
303 Plus X
303Se
4 1-4 .020 2
225 S 2
2 5--0.015
11-1010MM
275 Drawn
For cutting gears of Class 9 (AGMA 390.03) or better. the Rotary Feed
should be reduced and the number of cuts should be increased.
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations-
7-56
Gear Shping 7.3
5 4 1-4 020
S.-- j0 050 M2.M7
!2 2 11-19 ' .010
185 Annealed
to tO2402 or I 20-48 .008
Cold
. Drawn -o
I It' .o Z=2
1-19 .010
.- 25 M2.M7
4 1-4 .020
WROUGHT STEELS,
13. STAINLESS 2 5-10 .015 40 M2.M7
Forfc135 2 11-19 .010
2 20-48 .008
--
405
409 434
436 185
to Annealed -
429 442
430 446
Awtenifti'
2)oberteta0F30
5-10
1-4
.01
.020
M2,M7
202 305 384 35
bi nneaed 2 20-48 .008
301 308 385 to
4 1-4 .020
2 5-10 .01525 M.7
252 11-19 .010
to cold 2 20-48 .008
27-5
4 1-4 .020 0
2 ,5-10 .015
2 11-1q .01020 M M
225
For cutting gears of Class 9 (AGMVA 30-0 03) or better. the Rotary Feed
should be reduced and the number of cuts should2 be increased
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendavon's.
7-57
- -- --
502
25--10 015 I
11 19 .010 135 M2.M7
152
175 Aneaed2 20-48 .008
225
4 1-4 .016
2 5-10 .012
2 11-19 .010
275 Qucnched 2 20-48 .008
Ito and W -- -
325 Tempered PODU__
-- ~"WO c
i s 4 1-4 .018 .
414 2 5--10 .012 30 M2 M7
431 2 1 19 .010
431 225 2 20-48 008
Greek Ascotoy to Annealed
275 ~~z'
4 1-4 .016
2 5-10 ! .012 20 2 M?
275 27 Q unhd2
ed08 11-19 i .010
440A2 5- .012
44B 2 1119
2O-48 .010j22
.008
440B 225I2
275
A 1.--4 .016 .
2 5-10 .012 20 1 2.M
2 11-19 .00
275 Ouenched
7 7 04 08 -
tOand
45 Tempered
I4
For cuttn geas at Class 9 (AGMAA 390 03) a' better. the Ratary Feed
should be reduced and the number at cuts should be increased
See secton 16 forClming Fluid Recomnmendatto.
7-58
- - =
Gear Shaping 7.3
fDIAMETRAL
ROTARY FEED
NUMER PICH per cutter CUTTER HSS TOOL
HARD- NUBR PTHstroke SPEED IMATERIAL
MATERIAL NES CONDITION OF ("PO utr
MOD LE-
-TS in fpm AISI
hr ~ iir/n n -
t4
____________ _________m_______
-~
41-701
1.CARBON STEELS, VAST01
Low Carbon Annealed, 2 6-10 .012
100 Normalized 2 11-19 .010 80 M2, M7
ASTM A426. Grade CP1
1010 to Noraie 2 20-48 nn
1020 ~and S ;
Tempere
____WIN__ 1-0iz~_____ 2-- --
1050 Tempered
14 1-4 018
Annealed. 2 5-10 .012 70 M2, M7
175 Normal-zed 2 11-19 .010
2oo 20--48 .008
225 Normalized~~4
and ~-
4 1-4 .016
25-: ( 012 55 M2,.M7
2 11-19 .010
250 Quenched 2 20-48 008
to and
300 Timo~ered 7
For cutting go&.s .1Class 9 (AGMA 390 03) or better, the Rotary Feod
should be reduced and the number of cuts should be Increased
Iee section 16for Cutting Fluid Recommrendationis.
7-59
7.3 Gear Shaping
D R ROTARY FEED
NUMBR
NUMBER MPTH
PITCH per cutter
stroke CUTTER
SPEED HSS TOOL
MATERIAL
MATERIAL CONDITION OF (4" P.D. cutter)
NES CTS >MDU-Win 1pm AISI
4 1,-4 .012
2 5-10 .010 30 M3 M42
2 11-19 .008
350 Quenched22--8.0
to and [. 2 20-4 .008
400 Tempered
For cuttinggears ofClass 9 (AGMA 390 03) or better, the Rotary Feed
should be reduced and the number ofcuts should be increased.
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations
7-60
Gear Shaping 7.3
4 1-4 .018
Austenitic
ASTM A296. Grades CF-16F. 2 5-10 .012 35 M2. M7
2 11-19 .010
CN-7M. CN-7MS 140 Annealed 2 20--48 .008
ASTMA351: Grade CN-7M to or W-H;
170 Normalized
4 1-4 .018
Austonitle
ASTM A296. Grades GF-3, 2 5-10 .012 30 M2. M7
2 11-19 .010
CF-8, CF-8C. CF-20 135 Anitealed 2 20-48 .008
ASTM A35 j: Grades CF-3, to or :7-
CF-3A, CF-8, CF-8A, CF-SC 185 Normalized
ASTM A451: Grades CPF3,
CPF3A. CPF8, CPF8A, 6 Z
CPF8C, CPF80 (Ta Max)
ASTM A452: Grades TP 304H,
TP 347H
--- - -- R
T -
1-4 .018
Austenific:
ASTM A296: Grades CF-3M, 5-10 .015 30 M2,M7
2 11-19 .010
CF-8M. CG-SM. CG-12. 135 Annealed 2 20-48 .008 A
CH-20, CK-20 to or M
ASTMA351: Grades CF-3M. 185 Normalized
CF-3MA, CF-8M. CF-10MC.
CH-8, CH-10. CH-20. CK-20.
HK-30, HK-40. HT-30
ASTM A451: Grades CPF3M,
CPF8M. CPF10MC, CPH8.
CPH10, CPH20. CPK20
ASTM A452- Grade TP 316H I I
For cutting gears of Class 9 (AGMA 390 03) or better. the Rotary Feed
should be reduced and the numberof cuts should be Increased.
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
7-61
S"'i ~rt Mqrl7'9 ~i Y Y~i2~inSt Y
CA-15M
ACI
CD - M0 G radeize
-.
174P 4 1-4 0
AM25 50 01
-~~~~ -- W- Z.---~
Gear Shaping 7.3
2 5-0 02
260 W, t; 256-4
320 and w 5
Tempered ~~~2 ~SS7
0-:115 Z-
225 @W,~
fff_2-- -- ___
4 1-4 .018
2 5-10 .012
2 11-19 .010 70 M2,M7
225
to A at2 20-48 .008
For cutting gears of Class 9 (AGMA 390,03) or better, the Rotary Feed
should be reducod andithe numt- *of cuts should be increased
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Ri omrmendations
7-63
m
7.3 Gear Shaping
DIAMETRAL ROTARY FEED
NUMBER PTRAH
DUBR
PITCH per cutter
stroke CUTTER
SPEED HSS TOOL
MATERIAL
' ((4""D. cutteI
RD. cutter)
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION
NESCUTS
OF ..... -
in fpm AISI
(cnt)2
(cont.) 2 11-19
5-10 ,010
.j2 6 M2, M7
Pearlitic- Martensitic 240 Normalized 2 20-48 _ 008
ASTM A536: Grade 100-70-03 to and -- : j t t? ''
- r '
a5
330 Tempered ,
Tempered Martenalte
ASTM A220: Grade 60004 2 5-10 .012 65 M2. M7
ASTM A602: Grade M5503 200 Malleablized 2 11--9 .010
SAE J158: Grade M5503 to and 2 20--48 .008
255 Heat
Treated
For cutting gears of Class 9 (AGMA 390 03) or better, the Rotary Feed
should be reduced ano .he number of cuts should be increased
See
section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.4
e f n o
7-64
Gear Shaping 7.3
ROTARY FEED
Olin JS
Tempered Martensite 4 1-4 018
ASTM A220" Grade 70003 2 5-10 012 60 M2,M7
ASTM A602: Grade M7002 220 Malleablized 2 11-19 010
SAE J158: Grade M7002 to and 2 20-48 .008
260 Heatr-
Treated ~h52- 3bc
208.0 A332.0 Ci
1443.0 dRs
713.0 765
213.0 F332.0 514.0 771.0
222.0 333.0 A514.0 850.0 -A -- ,-
224.0 354 0 8514.0 A850.0 I I
242.0 355 0 5200 880.0 2 10 .24
295.0 C355.0 535.0 2--1.04160 M2 M7
B295.0 356.0 705.0 70 Solution 2 11-19 .015
308.0 A356.0 707 0 to Treated 2 2G--48 .008
+
HidumniniumnRR-350 125 and - ' , -
For cutting gears of Class 9 (AGMA 390 03) or better. the Rotary Feed
should be reduced and the number of cuts should be increased
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations. 76
7-65
- -~ a..... 3' - -. . ,
MATE RIAL
1- 1DIAMETRAL
NUMBER PITCH
ROTARY FEED
per cutter
stroke u t r
CUTTER
SPEED
HSS TOOL
MATERIAL
NE SSDH CO NDIT IO N COF
F
USO -(
NESS II-'-,'--'- - .. (4"1P.D..Dcutter)
Bhn -- IS-C1--40
CUT 06 in - 1pm AISI
34. COPPER ALLOYS, 4 108
WROUGHT 2 5-10 012 100 M2.M7
2 11-19 .010 10 M.M
145 332 360 482 10 R 8 2 20-48 .008
147 335 ?35 485 to Annealed J--4
'
10 0 R Drawr42565
4 1-4 016
190 425 466 667 2 5-10 .01P 70 M2M7
226 435 467 675 2 11-19 .010
230 442 613 687 10 R% 2 20-48 008
240 443 618 694 to Annealed I-- ...- - _
100 Re R __
4 1-4 .012
101 125 185 614 2 5-10 .012
102 127 189 619 2 11-19 .010
104 128 192 625 10 Re 2 20-48 .008
105 129 194 674 to Annealed 'E--- - Sr
107 130 195 688 70 Re -1R-
For cutting gears of Class 9 (AGMA 390 03) or better, the Rotary Feed
should be reduced and the number of cuts should be increased
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations
7-66
. . . . -=.. i n=- W=,.- - _. *. -rw= -J. -._ _" -.
4 1-4 .016
817 868 905 947 2 5-10 .012
821 872 915 948 40 2 11-19 .010 60 M2 M7
833 874 922 952 to 2 20-48 .008
853 875 923 955 175 As Cast ___ -
861
862 876
878 925
926 957
958 500kg = --- -
865 903 927 _r A
4 1--4 .012
-i-
For cutting gears of Class 9 (AGMA 390 03) 0' better, the Rotary Feed
should be reduced and the number of cuts should be increased
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
7-67
PfODA9~ BLAWL-1P F1-kZhD
ehn n-4: r m
&-- :E59
1. FREE MACHINING CARBON STEELS, 1-4 .012
WROUGHT 5-10 008 610 M2. M7
Low Carbon Resulfurized 100 Hot 11-19 .005
Rolled 20 & Finer .003 ,
1116 1119 to
1117 1211 150 or
1118 1212 Annealed
1--- .012
5-10 008 M2 M7
11-19 005
150
Cold 20 & Finer .003
to
200 Drawn
1-4 .012
Low Carbon Reaiulfurizod 1235-10 008 60 M2. M7
1213 1 9 .0
1215 100 Hot
to Rolled 20 & Finer .003
150 or MIN,
Annealed -R""""""" -
1---4 .012
5-10 .008 70 MM
150 1
Cold 20 & Finer .003
to Drawn
2GO
1.-4 .012
5--10 .008
.05 20 M2. M7
15011-9
50
Cold 20 & Finer .003
to
200Drw
11411
5-0 .008
5-190 00 350 M2. M7
275 Quenched 20 & Finer .003 2
325 Tempered -I
37 empered -M K101--
1- 012
Hot 5-10 .008 70 M.M
150 Rolled. 11-19 .005 70 M.M
10 Normalized. 20 & F tier .003
200 Annealed
or Cold - = ~
Drawn ~~~__
1-4 .012
Hot 5-10 .008 55 M.M
200 Rolled.119 05
to Normalized.20&Fnr .3
250 Annealed M~
or Cold _
Drawn
Hot -0 .8
150 Rolled.'1 19 .0
10 ormlizd.20 & Finer .003
200 Annealed Owl~
or Cold
Drawn -4 A2
Hot 10 .8
200 Rolled.119 05
to Normalized.2&Fie 03
250 Annealed
or Cold v
Drawn
-~~~ ~ ~ ---- ~ 7;
Gear Shaving 7.4
AMET
AL F EO~tCUTTER
IMTHL Perev. PITCH HSS TOOL
MAEILHARD, PONITCNH o erv LINE MATERIAL
M~ERALNESS CODTO _ogw SPEED
~3UG~t'~ in fpm AISI
1-4 .012
Hot Rolled.5-0 '8
Normalized. 11-10 008 2 M.M
225 Annealed.111 05 42 2M
to Cod Drawn 20 & Finer .003
275 or 0922
Quenched
and 927
1empered
02
Hot Rolled.1-
Normalized. 51 08
.0 35 M.M
275 Annealed. 1-9
to Cold Drawn 20 & Finer .003
325 or
Quenched
Tempered
275r Cold
Drawn
gea shavingier.00
1- .012
2. CARBON STEELS, WROUGHT (cont.)
Medium Carbon Hot -- 10 008 450 M2. M7
1030 1044 1526 125 Roi2ed. 19 003
1045 1527 to Normalized. 20 & Finer 003
1033
175 Annealed 2 ' ,
1035 1046 1536
1037 1049 154 or Cold
1038 1050 1547 Drawn
1039 1053 1548 1 -4 .012
1040 1055 1551 5-W .008
1042 1524 1552 H 11-19 05 400 M2. M7
1043 1525 175 Rolled. 2 & F9 005
to Normalized. 20 & Finer 003
225 Annealed
or Cold _ _
Drawn
1-4 .012
Hot Rolled. 5-10 .008
Normalized. 350 M2, M7
225 Annealed. 20 .003
to Cold Drawn 20 & Finer 003
275 o
Quenched
and
Tempered
Hot Roled. 5-10 .008
Normalized. 11-19 005
275 Annealed 20 & Finer .003
to of
325 Quenched __
and
Tempered
1-4 012
--- 617
11--19 008
005 275 olM3_ =
325 Ouenched
to ando, 20 & Finer .003
375 Tempered
1070
1074
1085
1086
1572
J or Coid
Drwn
1---4 .(0!2
8
I
Hot RClled. 5-
Norm3lized. 5 25 M2. M7
225 Annealed.
20 & Finer 003
to Cotd Drawn
275 of-
Tempered
I ! i~~--4 .1
ReL4ed.--0 .0 300 M2. M7
I-ot1-
325 or
Ouenc."ed
and
t ! Tempeed
See section 16 for Cining Fluid Recommt ",itons.
*Feed r-commendal-ons apply to CONVENTIONAL (axial-lransvrse)
gear shaving.
tFeeds should be ;ncreased 100% for gears shaved by the DIAGONAL
(angular-transverse) method
7-72
-7-
Gear Shaving 7.4
-
ASTM A369: Grades FP~'b. FP1'
Annealed 11-19 .005 0 2 -
150 o 0&Fr7 .0
toNomlzd-
200an
200an
Ttmpered
25 Annealede
511 .08a2nM.dA
325 Temrpered
t~~~esds~~32
100% O h OAOA OuenJ18 20 &nr~e .003rs~ae
(antu~r~tans10e aetod
375 Tempe7
e
See ecton 1 fo CutingFlui Reonowato
*Feed_ _________________applyto__CONVE_____AL __________
go vism"________________i
7.4 Gear Shaving
FEEDt CUTTER
DIAMETRAL
PITCH PITH per rv.
pr rev. LINE
PITCH MATERIAL
HSS TOOL
HARD- CONDITION of gear
MATERIAL NESS SPFED
1- -. 2
5- 10 ,08 350 M2, M7
275 Quenched 2011-19
& Finer 005
.003
325 Tempered
1--4 .012
5-10 .008 25 M
325 Quenched 2011-19
& Finer 005
003
1-4
5. ALLOY STEELS, WROUGHT
Low Carbon Hot 5-10 .008 475 M2, M7
125 Rolled, 1119 005
4012 4615 4817 8617
4820 8620 to Annealed 20 & Finer .003
4023 4617
4024 4620 5015 8622 175 or
4118 4621 5115 8$22 o winn-"
4320 4713 5120 931C Draw,
4419 4720 6118 94B15 .
4422 4815 8115 94B17 1-4 .012
Hot 5_-10 .008 45 MM
175 Rolled, 1-1 005 45 iMM
003
to
t225 Annealed
or =...20 & Finer '
Cold
Drawi,, ,w it
1-4 012
1.,-4 .012
o b5-e10
Normalizd .008
to g 300
275 or 201119
& Finer .005
.0
to Quenched i,
325 and
Tempered
30"
__M in fpm AISI
Shn T --S - _ . . ..
1 4 012
5. ALLOY STEELS, WROUGHT (cont.)
Normaized 10 .008 250 MS
Low Carbon (cont.) 20 & Finer 003 2
325 or
(materials listed on preceding page)
to Quenched 2- 6ZPt - . w -+
35and L t ~ ;
Tempered
1-4 012
Medium Carbon
1330 4145 5132 8640 Hot 5-10 .008 400 M2, M7
1335 4147 5135 8642 175 Rolled, 11-19 .005
to Annealed 20 & Finer 003
134U 4150 5140 8645
1345 4161 51,45 86B45 225 or .
407 4340 5147 8650 Cl
4028 4427 5150 8655 1 Drawn M.% . '*1Q ; a ....
S2=
4032 4626 5155 8660 n&'or2t.
1-4 N 012
4*N ;"' -st
4037 50B40 5160 8740 Annealed, 5-10 .008
4042 50544 51560 8742 Normalized, 11 -9 .005 325 M2, M7
4047 5046 6150 9254 225 Cold Drawn 20 & Finer 003
4130 50B46 81B45 9255 to or00
4135 50B50 8625 9260 275 Quenched aa,-
4137 5060 8627 94530 Querd t' 4r io4~& t
4140 50B60 8630 Tempered - 4 -
1-4 .012
5-10 .008
Normalized 11-19 .005 225 M3
325 or 20 & Finer 003
to Quenched lp V
375 and ON
-
Tempered f7 . ZA
Drawn + ... .. i
1.-4 .012
Normalzed, 5-10 .008 30
1 1-19 .00 5 C i F dM2ug i c e t7
2 25 Co ld D rawn
or 20 & Faer 003
to
275 AL QsodbicadndogashvbthDAN
Tempered
1-4 0;2 !
1 -10 .008 2 M2 'A,
275or Normalzed 20 & Finer .003
to Quenched -
(anguar-trnsvese) mthod
n fpm AISI
1-4 012
5. ALLOY STEELS, WROUGHT (cont.)
High Carbon (cont.) Normalized 11-19 .005 200 M3
(materials listed on preceding page) 325 or 20 & Finer .003
tO Quenched A " _
1-4 .012
5-10 .008 25 M
11-19 .005 25 M
300 20 & Finer .003
to Normalized - 7r
350
1-4 .012
HP 9-4-20 5-10 .008
HP 9-4-25 11-19 .005
HP 9-4-30 325 20 & Finer 003
HP 9-4-45 to Annealed
375
1-4 .012
ASTM A538: Grades A. B, C 5-10 .008
200 Grade 300 M2. M7
250 Grade 275 20 & Finer .003
300 Grade to Annealed
350 Grade 325
HY230
1,-4 .012
High Speed 5-10 .008
*43-1 M34 M46 200 M2,M7
M3-2 M36 M47 225 20 .003
M44 M441 14 to Annealed
M7M42 T5 2754
M30 M443 T ,--xsIM
M433 I
M444 RONS
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
*Feed recommendations apply to CONVENTIONAL (axial-transverse)
gear shtlrg.
tFeeds should be Increased100% for ge a shaved by the DIAGONAL
(angular-transverse) method.
7-76
Gear Shaving 7.4
CUTTER
PITCH HSS TOOL
DIAMETRAL FEEDf
per rev. I NE MATE I L
PITC H
HARD- CONDITION of gear E MATERIAL
MATERIAL NESS O N- f SPEED
4ZZ ....jj(W in fpm AISI
H19 H42
1121 1-4 012
5- 10
1-19 .008
.005 300 M2,M7
2011-19 005
200 20 & Finer 003
to Annealed -: -- 'V _-'-
250 W k-tt -
1-4 012
5-10 .008
11-19 .005 250 M3
325 Quenched 20 & Finer .003
to and
375 1empered MN
.4 - RO
4
~-~-
Cold Work 1-4 012
A2
A3 D3
D430 5- 10
11-19 .005
.008 300 M2, M7
A3 DA 200 20 & Finer .003
A4 D5 to Annealed . - w e
A6 D7 250 W IT - - -
A7 01
A8 02
A9 06
A1O 07
D2
1-4 .012
Shock Resisting
S1 ~5-10 11- 11
.008
005
35
3 5M
MM
,M
S 217
$2 175 20 & Finer 003
$5 to Annealed
$6 225 A.2
$7 W0_
1-4 .012
P6
P5 0to Annealed 2-ir 0
ISO
Mold1-4 .012
5-110 .00-10450 1 M2, M7
P20 11-19 .005
P21 1F 20 & Finer .003
to Annealed
200
Wate
Hadein0 20& inr~ .003
to Annealed ,4
II
Austenitic .1
203EZ 15-19 008 250 M2, M7
303 135 20 & Fine~r .003
303MA to Annealed ____4 -
303Pb 185 gK
303 Plus X
303Se fu -
1-4 .012
5-10 .008 225 M2. M7
2511-19 005
to Cold 20 & Finer .003
275 Drawn
I1-4 012
5-10 .008 27 2M
185 Annealed 11-19 .005 27 M27
to or20 & Finer 003
240 Cold 25m-6 3
Drawn -2
2- 15-- 12 8 -_ 4
1-4 .012
5-10 .008 225 M2, M7
11-19 05
275 Quenched 20 & Finer 003
to and ~ SP
325 Tempered 2S42
12
14 012
5-10 .008 20 M.M
225 11-19 005 20 MM
to Cold 20 & Finer .003
275 Drawn
___
___ ___
___ ___ _ ~ ~ t~1 gI~ -
1-9 .0
225
toCold 20 & Finer .003
275 Drawn___
________________ 7_ ___________________________=
7.4 Gear Shaving
1-4 012
275 Quenched20&Fnr .3
to and
325 Tempered Ws-
Martensitic1-A .2
414 1 -9 .
431 225 11-1ie 10053 2 2M
Greek Ascotoy to Annealed
2750
Martensitic
440A111 .05 25 M.17
440B2220&Fnr .3
440CtoAnae -- I-1
275 --
325 Tempered
7-80~--~
Gear Shaving 7.4
J.
_ ___
___ ______I ___ ___ ~in fpm I AISI
17-7 PH
17-14 Cu Mo
AF-71
J~--- i...- 4S2i-
-Z't~-
'FC-77 -40I
Almar 362 (AM-362) 5_10 I.008 20 M.M
Tempered
Medium Carbon 14 .1
ASTIA A352 Grades LCA. LCR LCC Annealed. 51 08 45 M.M
ASTM A356- Grad-r 1 125 Normalized 1-9 .0
t0 or 20 & ier .0
1030
1040175 Normalized
1050 and 2 3Q9
~
-4O -
A
Tempered
225Nomlzdssc
300 Tempered
gear
sarng20&.inr 00
mto.78
(angulrcmedtosapyt OVNINL(xa-transverse)
gear____ _________________________________
tF~~~~~~~ds~~~ shul
yteDAO inrese
A 10%ltgasSae -e
7.4 Gear Shaving
T DIAMETRAL FEEDt ICUTTER f TO
PH perev PITCH HSSTO
MAERA HARD- CODITOC pear
o LINE MATERIAL
MAERALINESS CODTO 1w SPEED
I MOWAE in fpm AISI
Bhn 4-M
_________ _____Mj /mh,- -ISO
16. ALLOY STEELS. CAST 1-4 012 r
Low Carbon Anneale 5-l0 008 425 M2. M7
ASTMIA217 Grade WC9 10Normalized 11-19 005
ASTM A352 Grades LC3. LC4 15oo 20 & Finer 003
ASTM A426 Grades CP2. CP5. CP5b. OPI 1. 200 i Normalized 2-6 -
and 5 32 > 2
Tempered 15 1_2-
1-4 .012
5_10 I.008 32
.1-19 005 35 M .M4
250 Quenched 20 & Finer .003
to and .-.
300 Tempered __ yN-- -
Medium Carbon 14 .1
ASTM A27 Grades Ni1, N2. U-60-30 60-30. Anae.10 .008 352ZM
65-35. 70-36 70-40 175 Normalized. 11-19 .005 37 2.7
ASTM A148. Grades 80-40. 80-50. 90-60. to or 20 &Finer .003
105-85 120-95. 150-125. 175-145 225 Normalized ~ o--
ASTM A216- Grades WCA. wCB. WCC: and _
400 Tempered
gearsunceavinginr
00
(anula-trnsvrse
metho
35 7..-82
Tmpre .. W
- -:-_wL in
Gear Shaving 7.4
AL EFtECCUTTER
DIAMETR AL PITCH HSS TOOL
MATERIAL HARD- PITCH pejrv LINE MATERIAL
NESCONDITION SPEED
in fpm AISI
______________ hn :~. is~f/ll
h________ S
1- 012' 1
18. STAINLESS STEELS, CAST5-0 08' II
Ferritic f 0 250 M2.0M7
ASTM A217 G.ades Cs. 012 235 1-119 05 20 MM
20 & Filler 003
ASTM A296 Grades C8-30. CC-50. CE-30. j to -neae
6
ASTM A487 Class CA6NM
ASTM A608 Grade HC3 I -
-.
I.0
20 & Fmner .003I
ASTM A351 Grade CN-7M to or
70 ormaized
CF'O135
Austnitc
175 M2.M7
____I_________
Austenitic 14 .1
ASTM A297- Grades HD. HE. HF. HH. HI. HK. 51 08 15 M.M
HL. HN. HP. HT. HU 160 I20 & Finer .003
ASTM A608: Grades H050. HE35. HF3O. t0 As Cast
HH3O. HH33, H135. HK3O. HK4O. HL3O. 210
2-1lt=---1
2
69 8S2.-
_______~~~~~ 12i~~
7-
0_______
325 Tempered
Peartitic- Ferritic 1- 1
ASTM A48* Class251 19 05 30 2M
SAE J43 Ic Grade G25-30 20&Fie0.0
to As Cast -
Pearitic 1-
ASTM A48 0lasses, 30. 35 40 5- 0010 230 W M7
SAE J431c Grade G3000 l10 & ie
20-1 003
to As Cast - ~
220 .
IuDIAMETRAL FEED t
' ;
CUTTER
PITCH i HSSTOOL
MATERIAL
HARD-
NESS
j CONDITION
ODTO gea
LINE
SPEED
MATERIAL
to0 Quenched
30and t~ ~ ~ ~ __
Temperedi--
2 &1Fine
.005
W8
.003
400
4 M2. M7
I 1-4 .012 I
5---10 .008 30 M.M
I t As Cast
pearlifi
ASTM A220 Grades 40010. 450G6. 45008.40
0!2
W.17
500105 1 60Mleabtzed g IOO 40 I M '
ASTM A602. Grade M4504. IA5003 and 20 rifler .003
SAEjt58 Grades M4504. M5003 20re0e I
14 012
5_0 008 M2.1I'?
200 MalleabtrzzedC~ie 003
to and 2C&InI0
240 Heat
I j Treated
22 ?a'ea~ied11-19 .005#
SAE -J158. Grade t,7002 toald '0&me 03 - V= =
TemperedMTreated
Tempered Martnite5
ASTIA A220, Grade 90001 .0 0 2
AS -MA602 Grade M8501 250 Mlebzd1-9 .3
SAE J158: Grade 1.48501 and 20 & Fie .0
ITreated fY R
- 0,-
-
28 A3330 A5430 70
2220 3330 A5140 8500 , - -
2240 354 B514 0 Ad50.0 0 12
3550 520.0 B8500 I i.
2420
250 0C355-0 5350 0 i --
0,o
C05 I iP 42. M7
705 C 70 !1-
8295 0 3560
3080 A356.0 707 0 tO Tea:eoJ 2&-f... 0 i
HIduminium RR-359 125 and
500kc o--d 1
___ ___ ,
r,.
34. COPPER ALLOYS, WROUGHT
145
147
332
335
360
365
482
485 to
1 I
I
I w
2'
-
5 -10
.
1 008I
012
oos i
.003
-2.,7
=
173
187
340
342 366
367 5440
2370 Pe Anrneatedf - i ;-
191 349 368 624-
17 342 367 62340 ~~
314 350 370 638 k i :
316 353 377 642
385 782 I 5-10 012
330 351
35i3-
78,51 0081 127
6A Re I -0D !M t .
6 % 1'- Qt
1o CC' 20 & F-,a'e .003
4 1-4
116 65 to50 75 -
70R11 74raw
116 10
Se1s1to 12 f Cutn7FudReomndtos
2r
1e2d reomedtin a524oCOVNINL altrnvre
gear s 1a2ng.
t122d s 1oul 6ecesd100%frgassae yteDAOA
(5.nguPaR-tAnsveS ethod.4
7-88M.M
Gear Grinding, Form 7.5
DIAMETRAL WHEEL
IDENTIFI- INFEED WHEEL TRAVERSE
AR-PITCH
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION TIF SPEED RATE
NESS CATION
MOULE , ANSI in/pass Ipm 1pm
1OL50 11L41
2. CARBON STEELS,WOGT5 I to
to48 AGOK%
A60KV .0015
.0012 to5003
w Carburized 10 to 16 A80KV .0005 6500
LowCarbon Over and/or 16 & finer A100LV .0005
1005 1012 1019 1026 48R Quenched and N _____Z
1006 1013 1020 1029 Tempered
1008 1015 1021 1513 Tmr _ t. =. 'v-
1009 1016 1022 1518
1010 1017 1023 1522
1011 1018 1025
Medium Carbon
1030 1042 1053 1541
1033 1043 1055 1547
1035 1044 1524 1548 t R A-Ai
1037 1045 1525 1551 I
1038 1046 1526 1552
1039 1049 1527
1040 1050 1536
High Carbon
1060 1074 1085 1566
1064 1075 1086 1572
1065 1078 1090 -32
1069 1080 1095
1070 1084 1561
7-89
7.5 Gear Grinding, Form
T DIAMETRAL
PITCH WHEEL
IDENTIFI- IHEELINFEED WEL TRAVERSE
TAES
HARD- SPEED RATE
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION - - CAT ON
7-90
- ---- n- _____________~'~ -
Gear Grinding, Form 7.5
7
DIAMETRAL *HEEL { WEL TAES
HARD- PITCH IDENTII"I INFEED WHEEL TRAVERSE
79
7-91
. - ........ -...
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
..... -. ~
-- :! ~
_ _
-:- . - -
_
: = -
_ _ I1
...- -.=,
. ,--
7.5 Gear Grinding, Form
DIAMETRAL 1IDNIi
WDEELM
WHEEL TRAVERSE
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION
PITCH
CATION jSPEED
INFEED
RATE
NS ANSI isn/pass fpm fpm
Bhn _____ ~S ' ~ a ~ f ~ 7~~
S. 'TOOL STEELS, WROUGHT
(cn.
I I
58
A8JV
A8K
.00 15
0012
5500
Group. Ove Quenche 1I A100KV .0005 to 20-30
Gru IIOer Qenhd 16 & finer A12OKV 0005
A7 M7 M41 M47 458R and AN-WTiL 502-'--
07 M433 M43 TS Tempered ~~~-
M46 1436 1446 ~t'se~A2Kj t1O~~~~ ~~
GrupI 1 to 4 A8OJV .0015 50
Grop I I5 to B ABOKV .0012 60
M44 10 to 16 A100KV .0005 to 20430
115 Over Quenchied 16 & finer IA120KV 0005 60
48Rfi and c---
Tempered&
7-92
SECTION 8
GRINDING OPERATIONS
8-1
PECED11iO PAGE~ BLANIC-NOr FILLAED
MATERIAL ICONDITION
NESS
HARD-
WHEEL
SPEED
TABLE
SPEED
I1HEL
OOWNFEED
I
CROSSFEED J IDENTIFI-
CATION
Ipm fpm inpassJ n/pass ANSI
Shn __________/-/sasms~4 - 111- iso/p-
5500 50 Rough: .003 050-.500
1. FREE MACHINI!JG CARBON
STEELS, WROUGHT
Lo CronReufnzd
Hot Rolled. Normalized.
50 Rc Annealed. Cold Drawn
eto
6500
to
100
Finih
j001 max,
(Max: 1/4 of
WheelWidth)
i A46JV
lOL50 111_41 -
s- *
__________________ wi E ~
8-3
8.1 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
HARD- WHEEL TABLE WHEEL
MATERIAL CONDITION DOWNFEED CROSSFEED IDENTIFI-
NESS SPEED SPEED CATION
fpm fpm in/pass in/pass ANSI
Bhn MWA7J Ml i - m p 0/
_ _
8-4
HARD WHEELTAL HE
MATERIAL HR- CONDITION WEL TBE DOWNFEED CROSSFE ED jIDENTIFI-
NESS SPEED SPEED CTO
fpmn fpm in/paSS in/pass ANSI
________________Bhn ______ /m m i 1l 6 X
7.MAINSTES MARAINGSTELSto 4000 50o Rough. .003 050-.500
Finish (Max: 114 of 6V
WROUGHT 50 RC Annealed 6000 '00 I.001 max Wheel Width)
ASTM A538, Grades A. B. C max.O I R_ - -_ - -
120 Grade oare 1_';~ 5. ~ ~ 1i~
180 Grade -
200 Grade-.
250 Grade 3000 50 Rough: 002 025-250
300 Grade to to Finish (Max, / 10 of A60HV
350 Grade Over 4000 100 .0005 max. Wheel Width)
HY23050 Rc Maraged ZM1I :OO_"
6500
50
to
100
n
Rough. .003
Finiish
.0005 max.
.050-.500
(Max: 1/5 of
Wheel Width)
A46JV
A H1
L7 P1and Tempered ~.dm-T i
A4 H-19 01 Si
A6 H21 02 S2 - _______ c- ~1i- _____
Group aU 0
02 F2 MIO T4 0R Anae
03 H42 M30 T8 0c Anae 6500 100 .0005 max. Wheel Width)
max. or Quenched
D4 Ml M42 and Tempered
05 M2 Ti 1n-
F1 M3-1 T2 1 _______ _
See2
secio 16 for Cutnd
4 Flud Rcomenains
M6ee Leomenaton arM46 e ridn.FrDR dn-s
Alosescin2..Vndn
a00 so5e grade.00 udln
wheel.5
50 PICuen8.5
toFinsh
t Max:1/1
of 601
to 1and10
f400 MaX. Wheel-Wdth
_ _ _~~0
_ _ _ __ _ __ _ _
8.1 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
0MAlo
125 275 Norlzdawn 10 .4) gil. W e l
With
Nitraloy826
-. 50 Rough: A0 1 .025-.250
to to Finish I(Max: 1/l0ot A46HV
IOver Quenched 650 100 .0005 max. Wheel Width)
275 and i
Tempered _
8-7
81Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
~ WHEELcotrno,
HARD.I TABL
MATERIAL HARSS CODTO SPEELD AL DOWNIFEED ICROSSFEED * IDENTIP-
I I CATION
f pm fo1m *in -pass : in/pass ;S
t
_
PH 14-8 Mo I
PH 15-7 Mo
Stamnless W/~~ _
8-8
Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table 8.1
9. 10
ASTM A389: Grades C23. C24
ASTM A486. Classes 70, 90,
120 T-W l
ASTM A487 Classes iN, 2N.
4N, 6N, 8N, 9N, 10N, DN, 10,
42Q
,
4Q,0A. 60,70, 80,
90. 100
1330 4130 80B30 8640
1340 4140 8040 9526
2325 4330 8430 9530
2330 4340 8440 9535 Fm, , M..
4125 8030 8630
c Tempered .. i
i
t tO- Finismax.
.0005
CD-5 to Annealed -
250 , -
,8-9
Surface Grinding-Horizontal Sp!ndle,. Reciprocating Table
I.HARD W E T E WHEEL*
MATERIAL HARD CONDITION WHEEL TABE DOWNFEED CROSSFEED IDENTIFI-
NESS SPEED SPEED CATION
fpm fpm in/pass in/pass ANSI
Bhn k'Af/ _3Lni/mln -- n _IIZ
L'M j5i
18. STAINLESS STEELS, CAST 5500 50 Rough: .002 .050- 500
F 1o to Finish (Max. 1// of A461V
Ferritic 135 6500 100 .0005 max Wheel Width)
ASTM A217- Grades CS, C12 to Annealed -,
C C -50. C E-30, C A 6N .
, .. - -
,,A-6NM, CO4UCu.
4, =.. . _ ) 't|a/l' },-,
ASTM A487
ASWe A297: Class
Grade CA6NMV
HC w g .r ri -
CF-1O1VC,
CH20 cH-, CH-10,
20
,CN7,
HK-30, HK-40, HT-30
ASTM A451: Grades CPF8A,
' NIN
. f,
CPF3, CPF3A, CPF3M, CPF8.
CPF8C, CPF8C (Ta Max.), .-
CPF8M, CPF1OMC, CPH8,W I
CPH1 0, CPH20, CPK20
ASTMVA452: Grades TP 304H,
See eI'A216 foraeCuting
Fli1Rcmmnatos
, ASTM A608: Grades HDS0,
HE35, HF30. HH30, HH33,
H 135 , H K 3 0 , H K 4 0 , H L3 0 ,,
. .. --
8-10
Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table 8.1
WHEELS
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION WHEEL TABLE DOWNFEED CROSSFEED IDENTIFI-
NESS CSPEED SPEED CATION
Peerlitic
ASTM A48: Classes Carbidec
+ Free 45, 50__MI and Tempered
SAE J431c. Grades G3500. 5500 50 Rough: .002 .025-.250 C46HV
G4000 to to Finish (Max: 1/10 of or
Peirlitic or Acicular + Free 48R c R Flame 6500 100 .0005 max. Wheel Width) A46HV
22 RAHIE5500
CMPCTD 50 Rough: .003 .050-.500 C36JV
CATIOSto to Finish (Max: 1/3 of or
6500 100 .001 max, Wheel Width) A461V
8-11
8.1 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
HARD- ODTO WHEEL TABLE WHDENELD*
MATERIAL NESS CNION SPEED SPEED RSFED CANED
IETIN-
0-58
ASTM A571: Type D-2MM
- 72 4 .
M5003
Temered Martonalt.
ASTM A220: Grades 60004,
70003, 80002, 90001
ASTM A602: Grades M5503,
PA7002, M8501
SA1E J158: Grades M5503,
M7002, M8501
8-12
Surface Grinding-Horizonitai Spindle, Reciprocating Table 8.1
HAD HE AL WHEEL*
MATERIAL HARDS CONDITION SPEEL TABE DOWNFEED LROSSFEED IDENTIFl-
NES PED SPE CATION
fpm fpm in/pass in/pass ANSI
___________ hn AM_____ ~7 ~ ~ .-M-011
Prann
Ml 4000n 50 Rough: .003 .050-.500
Sadan
emaet od 40 As Cast to to Finish (Max: 1/3 of A461V
328.0 333.0 A356.0 to or 500 100 .001 max. Wheel Width)
A3320
35.0 37.0 125 Solution Treated
F332.0 356.0 359.0 500Okg adAe
360.0 A380.0 3900 A413.0 -
8-13
8.1 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
HARD- WHEEL TABLE WHEELO
MATERIAL CONDITION DOWNFEED CROSSFEED IDENTIFI-
NESS SPEED SPEED CATION
fpm fpm in/pass in/pass ANSI
Bhn 9-MR17QU WN5IesAc%6YSOa5
As Cast. 5500 50 Rough: .003 .050-.500 C46KV
31. MAGNESIUM ALLOYS,
CAST# 50 tc to Finish (Max: 1/3 of or
to Annealed 6500 100 .001 max. Wheel Width) A46KV
AM60A AZ91 C ZE41 A 90 or
AMlOOA AZ92A ZE63A 500kg Solution Treated NEW-
AS41A EZ33A ZH62A and Aged - NO4 sik }ta-
AZ63A HK31A ZK51A
AZ81A HZ32A ZK61A
AZ91A KiA
AZ91 B 0E22A --. " - _-
Ti-6AI-6V-2Sn
T,-6AI-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo
Ti-6AI-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-.25Si
See section, 16 for Cutting Fluid Recomandations tise tral (gengi)siio abd
*Wheel recommendations are for wet grinding. For DRY grinding-use #I CAUTION: Potential Fire Hazard Exercise caution in grinding and
a softer grade wheel. Also see section 20.2. Gridng Guidelines disposing of swarf. Do NOT use water or water-miscible cutting
fluids for magnesium alloys
8-14
Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table 8.1
MATERIAL HARD-
NESS CONDITION WHEEL
EE TABLE
E DOWNFEED HE
ICROSSFEED IDENTIFI-
HARDN SPEED SPEED CATION
3506A-i~-Z--
As CaP' -
ASTM 8367: Grades C-5. C-6 ,Ae= 07)
34,7 6 o Anae
226
210
220
230
332
335
342
368
370
385
464
465
467
O
10R
70 RS
5500
to .
60
50
to
100
Roug
Finish
.0005 max.
.050-.500
(Max: 1/3 of
.Wheel Width._._
C361Vt
__
8-15
8.1 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
S e 1 r 6Re6500
t lto to
100 Fnish
.0005 max. (Max: 1i3
Wheel o
Width) C36Vt
100 Re
'WhC m
801 e B1t AtOs f
616ft A825tt 40
to As Cast to to Finish (Max: 1/3 of C361Vt
6500 100 .0005 max. Wheel- Wid
1/3 of
(Max: Width) A46JV
a 4R
s C
to Heat Treated
t6500
to 100
to
Z
Finish
.0005
-
max. Wheel
45 Rc
8-161 2
Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table 8.1
MATERIAL AD.
IR CONDIT.ON WHEEL TABLE OOWNFEED CROSSFEED
WHEEL*
IOENTIFI-
INESS
1 ________
SPEED
ftpm J j
SPEED
pM
_____ICATION
- ~
-5500 50 IRough: .03 .050-.500
962 974 50 to to Finish (Max: 1/31of 0361 Vt
963 976 to 6500 100 .0005 max. Wheel Width)
964 978 100 As Casts- .
966tt
973
993 500kg ~_-~_____ -
NICKei 2 I
Nickel 220
Nickel 230
8-17
8.1 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
HAD.
MATRIA CONITIN HEE TALE DOWNFEED CROSSFEED IDENTIFI-
MAEILNESS CNION SPEED SPEED CATO
tpm fpm in/pass in/pass ANSI
NCKEL
37. INIRYLUUU11111 5000 Rough:.001 .040-.400
tRough:.002 .025-.250
38. HITINOL ALLOYS,
WROUGHT
Nitonr
210
t.0005
to
K5i4TWogt5000
Wrought
40 Finish
max.
(Max: 1/l10of
Wheel Width)
556:S~
C601V
r
Nitinol 56Ni-44Ti 340 Annealed ~' '
Nitir'ol 6ONj-4OTi , 4 .hdIti~
SRough:.002 .025-.250
48 RC 500 4 Finish (Max: 1/10 ot C601V
to Quenched _
~0005 . max. Wheel Width)
52 R0 _
See section 16 for Culling Fluid Recommendations. ttCAUTION, Toxic Material, refer to National Institute for occupational
Wheel recommnendations &tefor wet grinding. For DRY gninding-use Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions.
a softer grade wheel Also &e section 20.2. Grinding Guidelines.
8-18
Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table8.
Refractaloy 26
Udimef 630
Rene 125
SEL
SEL15
TRW VI A
j e ~~Udimet
500W~-~*
Udimet 700
XSTf. AP2,b Grades CW-12M. - ______ __
N-12M. CY-40
ASTM A297: Grades HW. HX
AST M A494: Grades'N- 12M- 1. -
See section 16 f or Cutting Fluid Recommendations. ttCAUTION* Toxic Material, refer to Naticnal Institute for Occupational
*Wheel recommendations are for wet grinJing. For DRY gninding.-use Safelty and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions,
a softer grade whieel. Also see section 20.2. Grinding Guidelines.
8-19
7c =~---~
81 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
HARD-WHEEL TABLEWHEEL'
MATERIAL NAED- CONDITION WHEEL TABE DOWNFEED CROSSFEED IDENTIFI-
NESS PEED PEEDCATION
fpm fpm in/pass in/pass ANSI
8M
hn M~~j m
39. HIGH TEPRTR 3000 50 Rough: 001 020-.200
MAERALHARD)-
MAEILNESS
CNl
CNION
WHEEL
SPEED
ITABLE
SPEED
I DOWNFEED -
CROSSFEED
HIETFI
IDCATIN-
fpm fpm inipass; in/pass I ANSI
___________ Bhn __________ -_a-- 5t
Tantalum"
0
2000 jRough: 001 .020- 200
ASTAR 81 IC 200 10 40 Finish j(Max- 1/12 of A46JV
T- 111 10 Stress 4000 I.0005 max. IWheel Width)
T-222 250 Relieved 'AN
Ta-lOW k - ,
t2(=
~40
Tunle-2Tod
hra lmd ..
1Rough:.COl
rnisf tra;".
.020,.200
:!2 rif C6OJV
260 Prssd 60 .0005 max. Wheel Width)
to andI -
320 Sintered
W-25Re-30Mo ______
40 Rough: .001
40.020-.200
2yromet (Max: 1/ 12 of C6OJV
Mallory 2000 t n
W-1OAg 320 Sintered
W-7Ni-4Cu
~ WOI BhI~4
44 URAIUM, 300 50 Rough: .005 .0520
56,RAIIKWOGKI to to Finish (Max: 1/1001f C46GV
58 RA
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations Due to the brittleness of refrtory alloys, cracking. chipping, flaking
.Wheei recomnmendations are for wet grinding. For DRY grinding-use and breakout tend to occur. partcularly on the edges of the ma-
a softer grade wheel. Also see section 20.2. Grinding Guidelines. chined surfaces
tCAUTION: Toxic Material, refer to National institute for Occupational
Safety anid Health (NIOSH) for Precautions
$.'CAUTION. Potential Fire Hazard. Exercise caution in gninding and
disposing of sv art.
8-211
_0 ..... .......-Z
8.1 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
R E T WHEEL'
MAENA
MATERIAL HEESS ONTON
CONDITION SPEED
WHEEL SPEED
TABLE DOWNFEED CROSSFEED IJ CTO
IDENTIF-
I CATION
o I Ro-gh
P . M, -.00
45. ZIRCONIUM ALLOYS,
WRO040 Rolled. , ish
Fn140 (Max: 1/6 of C46.JV
rOHI.del i 140 ERudled i i .0005 max. Wheel Width)
Zr-0.001%HI (Grade 21) I280 or orgd 5 1 I
Zircaloy 2 (Grade 32) ____I___ O3a. -1/ d._______
Zrcaioy 4 (Grade 34) i
90Cu-10Nt
62Cu- 18Ni- 18Zn-2Sn
8-22
Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table 8.1
65W-3SAg
56W + C-440u
SSW-45Cu
51W-49Ag _
F-0000-P 101 AsSnord 600 100 .0005 max. Wheel Width) A41
FC-028823
8.1 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
WHEEL TABLEWHEEL$
MATERIAL HR- CONDITION WHEEL SA8E DOWNFEED CROSSFEED IDENTIFI-
NESS PEED PEEDCATION
1pm 1pm in/pass in/pass ANSI
Bhn WM____
*222y mc
________M2jMMW-rWC-7
70 Rc Tempered
I0
Magnetic Core Iron (up to 4% Si) 185 650 100 max. WheoWdh
(M00:
to Wrought 60 0
240
8-24
Surf ace Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table 8.1
!v.Q%_"
-ft
Alnico
Alnico
4000c
V-
20 Rough .03 .2- 0
Alnico XI
ColumaxI rfealsescin8
Seeluse co16frCtigFudRcomnain.-7l oonntiewelI
- ~ ALY
2
to
neld40
8ONROL51
or________-p
00 a.
~
WelWdh
~-..
jX
8.1 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
MATERIAL
HARD-
NESS CONDITION
WHEEL
SPEED
TABLE
SPEED DOWNFEED CROSSFEED
I HEEL*
IDENTIFI-
55. GLASSES & CERAMICS 5000 j 50 Rough 002 025- 250 1Rough: C461Vt
(cont.) iver to to Finish (Max 1/l0ot Finish
Ceramics 800 Fired 5500 100 .0005 max. -Wheel Width) C6OIVt
Alumina (Aluminum Oxide) Knoop 1 R~~5
u5. ~ .565 RuhC6V
Alumina-Mullite tor,~1SW a
Aluminum Silicate 03fii E-M _ki)
Beryllia (Beryllium Oxide)ft O mx. Wi Ih)= ... c0 t
Magnesia (Magnesium Oxide)
Mullite ___
Siticon Carbide A
Silicon Nitride*-. - 4
Thoria (Thorium Oxide)tt
Titania (Titanw'n Oxide)
Titanium Diborideti
Zircon (Zirconium Siticale)
Zirconia (Zirconium Oxide) 4
See aection 10 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations. t Diamond wheel ispreferable. see section 8.3
*Wheel recommendations are for wet grinding. For DRY grinding-use Diamond wheel is preferable for flame sprayed carbides and ceram-
a softer grade wheel. Also see sertIon 20.2. Grinding Guidelines. ics, see section 8 3.
ttCAUTION. Toxic Material, reter to National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions
4
8-26
Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table81
HARDWHEL TBLEWHEELV
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION WHEEL TAPE DOWNFEED CROSSFEEO IDENTIFI-
NESSSPEE SPED ICATION
fpm fpm in/pass in/pass ANSI
____________ StiBr, 'yi/i fiAl'7.rm/!i ~ S~
58. FLAME (THERMAL)
SPRAYED MATERIALS
(cont.) s
(materials continued from__________ *- - -------
preceding page)
Magnesium Zirconate
Molybdenum Disilicide -
Mullite N I
Nickel (40%). Alumina Blend
Nickel Oxide 01_____6110 __1__11
Cobalt
Nickel - -.
Molybdenum
Monet
8-27
8.1 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
MATERIAL HARD-
NESS
CONDITION WHEEL
SPEED
ITABLE IDOWNFEED
SPEED ICATION
CROSSFEED IPNII
8-28
Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table 8.2
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels
WHEELWHE
SPEEDWEL
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION DRY WET* TABLE DOWNFEED CROSSFEED IDENTIFI.
NESS SPEED CATION
fpm fpm fpm in/pass in/pass ANSI
Bhn __ __ _ _
1212
1115 andTempered -
1116 1213
1117 1215
Medium Carbon Rosulfurized-
1132 1140 1145
1137 1141 1146
1131 1144 1151
Low Carbon Leaded
10L18 121-13 121-15
1IL17 121-14
Medium Carbon Leaded
I0L45 11L37 11L44
lOL50 111L41
2. CARBON STEELS,500 02 .- 10
WROUGHT400 t tolOTB
1005 101a 119o02 Carburized 8000 125 Finish: (Max: 1/2 of
1006 1013 1020 1029 Over and/or .0005 max. Wheel Width)
1008 1015 1021 1513 50OFc Quenched
1009 1016 1022 1518 and Tempered
1010 1017 1023 1522
1011 1018 1025
Mediumn Carbon
1030 1042 1053 1541
1033 1043 1055 1547 -
8-29
8.2 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels
WHEEL
SPEED WHEEL
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION DRY WET* TABLE DOWNFEED CROSSFEED IDENTIFI-
NESS SPEED CATION
fpm fpm fpm in/pass in/pass ANSI
Bhn tZa' K,
4145Se _.
8-30
Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table 8.2
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels
WHEEL
SPEED WHEEL
MAEILHARD- CNION DR~Y WET TABLE DOWNFEED CROSSFEED IDENTIFI-
CONDTIO SPEED CATION
fpm fpm fpm in/pass in/pass ANSI
_____________Bhn ________ i~~Eii Voi ~ ~ ~
6. HIGH STRENGTH STEELS, Rough: .25-1.00
WROUGHT 5500 50 .001-.002
300M H11 4000 to t0 B100T75B
4330V H13 Quenched 8000 125 Finish: (Max 1/2 of
430 P -420 Over ad.0005 max Wheel Width)
4340Si HP9-4-25 50~ Tempered -.
98BV40 HP 9-43 3- O 6
D6ac HP9-4-45 _ _ ~~ ~ ~UJi
8-31
8.2 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheeis
WHEEL
SPEED WHEEL
0
MATERIAL HARDS CONDITION DRY WET* AL DOWNFEEED CROSSFEED CAETIN-
NESS SPEED CTO
fpmn fpm fpm in/pass in/pass ANSI
Bhn 94!_____ _____
Group IIIRog: 1 .0
A7 M41400 t toBOT5
D7 M43800 15 Fns: (a:12o
M3-2 M44 Quenched005mx Welidh
M6 M46 Over an.00ma. Welidh
M7 M47 50 Rc Tempered
M33 T5
M34 T6
9. NITIRIDING STEELS,Rog: .5 0
WROUGHT
Nitralloy 125800 15 Fns: (a:/2o
Kitratloy 135 60ORc .05mx WelWdh
Nitralloy 135 Mod. j to Nitrided
Nitralloy 225 I 6n
Nitralloy 230
Nitralloy EZ
Nitrattoy N
Nitrex 1
8-32
- -- -- ,~ -_ - ~ ~::-~ AA
Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table 8.2
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels
WHEEL I WHEEL
H SPEED I IWEEL
MATERIAL CONDITION DRY WET* TABLE j DOWNFEED CROSSFEED IDENTIFI-
NESS SPEED CATION
fpm fpm fpm in/pass in/pass . ANSI
___
8-33
8.2 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels
WHEEL
I SPEED IWHEEL
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION DA~Y WET* TLE DOWNFEED CROSSFEED IDEI4TIFI-
NESS SPEED (CATION
1pm 1pm fpm in/pass in/pass ANSI
Bhn __________ ___ ; _
15. ALLOY STEELS, CAST
(cont.)
Medium Carbon (cont.)
(materials continued
from preceding page) __
8-34
Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table 8.2
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels
Ii
ISPEED
WHEEL
WHEEL
MATERIAL jHR. CONDITION DRY WET* TABLE DO1! sCOS)DIEtJTIFI-
NESS SPEED ICATION
hnI fprtA f pm fpm in /pass in pass ANSI
45006.45008.50005 -1 3. (M-i2v
ASTMVA602: Grade M4504. ~- - mt~. ie~dl Ii
M5003 II
SAE J 158: Grades M4504.I
M45003
Tempered MairtensiteI
ASTM A220: Grades 60004.,
70003.80002.90W01 P~-~-'I
A602- Grades M45503.--
ASTMV -
M47002.1M8501 101~
SAE J158 Grades M45503. - -- - -- ~
Rough.
25. Wi4ITE CAST IRONS 550 5 05.00 06-1.00
(ABRASION RESISTANT) to
5000 to 081000758
Cass Type A53. B .DA~s. 2 Finish: (Max. 1/20of
Clas I1.Types A. B.0C. As CaE 800 12 W02 mnax. Wheel Width)
. .C D E
Clas I.Typs Over Annealed ~=-~
Class Ill. T'.pe A 45Rc or Hardened zV W.' 0. - ____
-, WHEEL
HARD
D-j
CON DITION
I SPEED
1,DRY IWET.
iWHEEL
I TABOLE= ONED! RSFE IDENTIFI-
.. A~P.LNESS a ISPEED 'CATION
fPni fpm I tprr ANISns
An/as
_
__ _ _ _ IBhn T-,V INiI - R Pas
39. IGHTEMPRATRE Rough I
39 IHTMEAUESeel 5500 II r- D 25-100
ALLOYS, WROUGHT AND NttIt
CAST
Nickel Base, Wrought SouinTetd8000 .25 Finish (Max, 1/2 of
3010 Soui nTetdIWelWdh
i or 00OOO-nax MetWdh
AF2- IDA tI Solution Treated ';7_MrWM
Aslolo 475
Haynes Alloy 263
and Aged C2CSF
1R. ~ -
or
IN- 102 ------
- -~~-
Nirnonic 75
Ninionic 0
Nimonic 90
Nimonic 95
Rene 41
Rene 63
Rene 77
Rene 95
Udimnel 500
Udimel 700
Udirnet 710
Untrrmp 1753
Waspaloy
8-36
Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table 8.2
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels
WHEEL1
SPEED WHEEL
MAERALHARD- CODTO DR -E TABLE DONED COSED IDENTIFI-
MAEILNESS CODTO R E*SPEED DONED COSED CATION
1pm 1pm fpm in/pass in/pass ANSI
___________Bhn ___ ilwoo*m ~ ~ A4~t
Nickel Base, Cast Rough: 25- 1OO0
B-1900 MAR-M200 See 5500 50 001-.002
GMR-235 MAR-M246 Notef to to(ax0/2o B 00T758
-M235D MAR-M421 200 As Cast 8000 125 Finish (Maxd/2ho
Hasteiloy Alloy B MAR-M432 t0 Or R- 05ma1helWdh
Hastelloy Alloy C Rene 80 425 CatadAed3--
Haslelloy Alloy 0 125 Cene Age X .-- 1r. ; - ~
IN-100 (Rene 100) SEL It~ 8 QZB
t_
IN-738 SEmlS X' n ? .
8-37
8.2 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels
WHEEL
SPEED WHEEL
o
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION DRY WET TABLE DOWNFEED CROSSFEED IDENTIFI-
NESS SPEED CATION
fpm fpm fpm in/pass ri/pass ANSI
8-38
Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table 8.3
Diamond Wheels
WHEEL
8
8-39
_______________________
L
- ---- -
35R
00 5 Finish. (Max- 1/8 of D220-R75-B 1/8
160 secio
Cutting Recommendations-1
8e9 6o (luid
2404
___ _____-
Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table 8.3
Diamond Wheels
WHEEL
SPEED
* TA B L E
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION DRY WET DOWNFEED CROSSFEED WHEEL
NESS SPEED IDENTIFICATION
fpm fpm fpm in/pass in/pass ANSI
50g
*See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations. ttCAUTION. Toxic Material. refer to National Institute forOccupa-
See section 20 for additional information tional Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions.
8-41 -
8.3 Surface Grinding-Horizontal Spindle, Reciprocating Table
Diamond Wheels
WHEEL
SPEED
HARD- CONDITION DRY WET* TABLE DOWNFEED CROSSFEED WHEEL
MATERIAL
NESS SPEED IDENTIFICATION
fpm fpm fpm in/pass in/pass ANSI
Bhn iioi3 a~> t ~~'-
51. COMPOSITES 5 Rough .030 D180-R100-M-1/8
5500 003
Kevlar 49 to -
Graphite Epoxy 6500 Finish (Max 1/8 of
Fiberglass Epoxy 6 .001 max Wheel Width) D220-N100-M-1/8
(E) Glass - - 5?
(S) Glass - iffa075;-3
Boron Epoxy_ - I ThA
I
Columbum (Niobium)Tt
Glass (Kovar sealing)tt
Hexaboron Silicidet T
Magnesia Alumina Spinel - EN 5
Magnesium Zirconate ....
Molybdenum Disilicide
Nickel (40%), Alumina Blend
Nickel Oxide _________
8-42
Surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table 8.4
WHEEL
11L17 12L14
Medium Carbon Leaded
10L45 111-37 111-44 WMF R;W
1OL50 11L41
8-43
8.4 Surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table
WHEEL
WHEEL TABLE* DOWNFEED IDENTIFICATION
HR-SED (WORK) per rev. OPERATION NARROW BROAD
MATERIAL HARDS CONDITION SED SPEED of table WORK WORK
NESSAREA AREA
fpm fpm in ANSI ANSI
___________ ~Bhn _ _ _ _ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o
4. FREE MACHINING ALLOY Hot Rolled. 3500 80 .001 Roughing A301V A30HV
STESoOUH to to
W ROsUTu
STeELSCabo 50 RC Normalized. 6000 200 .005 Finishing A801B A80HB
Medium
Crbon Reulfmax. Annealed. Cold Drawn - .~,.-
4140Se 4145Se 4150 and Tempered '
S. ALLOY STEELS, WROUGHT I Hot Rolled. 3500 80 .001 Roughing A301V A30HV
Low Carbon
401 465
41 67 5Rc
j Annealed.
Normalized,
Cold Drawn
to
6000
to
200 r" .005
to
Finishing A801B A8OHB
402417 4820 8620 mxj or Quenched
4024 4620 5015 8622 and TemperedI IA6
A118 4621 5115 8822
4320 4716 5120 9310 3500 100 .0005 Roughing A46GV A46FV
4419 4720 6118 94815 Carburized to 10 10
4422 4815 8115 94817 Over and/or 4500 250 .001 Finishing A 80131 A80FB
Medium Carbon 50 R.. Quenched and
1330 4145 5132 8640 Tempered_
1335 4147 5135 8642 - ____ ___ _____
4340Si _1 - ik
HP 9-4-30
HP 9-4-45
8-44
Surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table 8.4
1I WHEEL
WHEEL TABLE' DOWNFEED I IDENTIFICATION
SPEED (WORK) per rev. OPERATION NARROW BROAD
HARD-
MATERIAL CONDITION SPEED of table WORK WORK
NESS AREA AREA
fpm fpm in ANSI ANSI
Bhn ________ ZiV R 5,f
7. MARAGING STEELS, 3500 80 .001 Roughing A301V A30HV
WROUGHT to to to
WROUG50 BC Annealed 6000 200 .005 Finishing A801B A80HB
ASTM A538" Grades A. B C max. or -, z 'r . ..
120 Grade Maraged "
180 Grade moo
200 Grade _A
250 Grade 3500 100 .0005 Roughing A46GV A46FV
300 Grade to to to
350 Grade Over 6000 250 .001 Finishing A8CGB A80FB
HY230 50 R Maraged N
A9 H23 07 S6 to to to
S7 and Finishing A100HB A100GB
A10 H24 P2 $7 Over Quenched 4500 250 .001
H10 H25 P4 WI 50 a
Tempered
Hl1 H26 P5 W2 _
H12 L2 P6 W5 -
58 RC Tempered
3500
to to .001
to Roughing A30HV A30GV _
Group Il
A7 M7 M41 M47 50 R Annealed 6000 200 .003 Finishing A80HB A80GB
D7 M33 M43 T5 max0- or Quenched
M3-2 M34 M44 T6 and Tempered
M6 M36 M46
58 B0 1empered
8-45
8.4 Surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table
MATERIAL AR-
NESS
IAD CONDITION
WHEEL
PE
SED
fpm Ifpm
TABLE'
(WORK)
SPEED
DOWNFEED
per rev.
of table
in
OPERATION NARROW
WORK
AREA
ANSI
WHEEL
IDENTIFICATION
BROAD
WORK
AREA
ANSI
HY100 ~~ 6 ~ ~ _ _ _
MIL-S- 16216
HY180
See section 16 for Culling Fluid Recommendations -In this handbook, Structural Steels are designated by yield strength
*See section 20 4 for calculation of Table rpm and Downfeed in ipm in units of 1000 psi. For example. 50 mans a steel with 50.000 psi
yield strength. Similarly. 140 means 140.000 psi yield strength.
Therefore, in order to select lIte appropniate block of machining
data, itlls necessary to know the yield strength or Bhn.
8-46
Surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table 8.4
7HE NESAREA
(WORK)
WAD-SEEL
SPEED
SPEEDLCODIIO
TABLE DOWNFEED
per rev.
of table
OPERATION
I
jNARROW
WORK
WHEEL
IDENTIFICATION
T ROAD
WORK
AREA
Martensitic t ot
403 422 440C 135 6000 350 .003 Finshino A80HB A8OGB-
410 431 501 to Annealed -
8-47
8.4 surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table
I WHEEL
10Normalized. Normalized
Annealed,.50
600
8
200
t
0
005
oghn
Finishing
31
A8018
3H
A80HB
ASTMA A426: Grade CP1I10 and-Tempered.,.s.
1010 300 or Quenched
1020) and Tempereo
Medium Carbon-300 10 .05 Ruhn A4G A4F
00 .05 Ruhn A4G A6V
ASTMA A352. Grades LCA. LCB.350
LCC Carburized to to to
ASTM A356: Grade I Over and/or 6000 250 .001 Finishing A8GGB A8OFB
1030 10501040 SRC Quenched and ~
16 LOAT3500
TES 80 .001 Roughing A301V/ A30HV/
LOW Curbon 150 Norinahized. Norma!Lzed 6000 200 .005 IFihng A801B A80HB
ASTM A217: Grace WC9 FoianiTemired
ASTMAA352: Graces LC3. LC4 400 or~uenched ~
ASTM A426: Grades CP2. CP5. and Tempered - 7-- 1
70-36. 70-40 0
ASTM A148- Grades 80-40.1
80-50. 90-60.,105-85. A
120-95. 150-125. 175-1453_q
ASTM A2' 6: Grades WCA._
WCB. WCC
ASTMA217. Grades WCI,
W04. WC5. WC610
ASTM A352 Grades LIA C2.
LC2-1
(materials continued on next page)
8-48 __
Surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table 8.4
I WHEEL
WHFEL TABLE' DOWNFFED IDENTIFICATION
HARD- T I SPEED (WORK) per rev. OPERATION NARROW j BROAD
MATERIAL CONDITION SPEED of table WORK WORK
NESS I AREA AREA
fpmIfpmfpm i n ANSI I ANSI
58 RC Tempered -
1o Anald
3500 100 .0005 Roughing A46HV A46GV
to to to
48C Quenched 4500 250 .002 Finishig A10HB A100GB
toR an %:q4 -
~ ~ ~
See1Tfemumed~i seRio ~
eomedain
5
568R and4
Tempered _ f jM
0 M.
8-49
_w"W
8.4 Surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table
1 1 WHEEL
SWHEEL TABLE' DOWNFEED I IDENT'FICATION
HARD-i HAW.EED SPEED (WE
(WORK)j ftal
per rev. OPERATION i NPO
A BROAD
MATERIAL NES. CONDITION SPEED of table I WORK I WORK
NESS AREA AREA
pm r pm in ANSI ANSI
{Bhr Sl '--- _ ____ __
50 I 1 00 00; Roughrio i AS01V 1A30HV
19. STAINLESS STEELS, CAST 1 100li 00____ Roghn A1V A3H
Fernitic j135 toj
to 600 350 1 to
a,),; Fin-sh-rT A801B A80H8
ASTM A217 Grades C5. C12 t0ona~ 0-0 30Fnsirc BI BH
ASTM A296: Grades CB-0 1851 8 30 25 * Rubgj
CC-SO. CE-30. CA6N.
CA-6NM. CD4MCu_ _15
I_
ASTM A297 Grade NC
ASTM A487 Class CASNM ,
k++
ASTM A6C8. Grade HC30 i ,
CF-6F.cF-20 .
Aulltenilic
Auelfc3500
ie , I100
30 +_+ .001 RcL~hinQ i
-
A301V
+A+H
A30rHV
ASTM A296 Grades
CF-8, CF-3.
CF-BC. CF-6M. 1.5
to Annealed.
Normalized T0
6000 to
350 to
003 Finishi n A&OIB IA8HB
CF-3M.
CF-16F. CF-20. CG-8M 210 or __5 q02-
V
C1 - .. _ _ ., -
275 andTemperd _
I ______________
8-50
r
MATERIAL HARiD-
I .IWHEEL
__________________ fWHEEL
____________
CONDITION
NESAREA
I
SPEED
.
TABLE'
(WORK)
SPEED
DOWNFEED
per rev.
of table
OPERAT;ON
IDENTIFICATION
NARROW I 8BROAD
WORK jWORK
AREA
SELATto
STEL, AS 25 Souto Tebed
or Solution Treated
I6000 200
-~-
.003 Finishing A801B A80HB
AM-355
21. GRAY CAST IRONS 3500 100 003 Roughing ASOIV A3OHV
Ferritic As Ca: to to0t
ASTM A48. Class 20 5211c Annealed 6000 350 .008 Finishing C801B 00B
SAE J43 1c*Grade G1800 or #42 q RunheN
Pearlitic- Ferritic and Tempered
ASTM A48: Class 25 X4______ VV~
SAE J431c, Grade G2500
Pearlitic
ASTM A48, Classes 30. 35. 40
SAE J431c: Grade G3000
Pearlitic + Free Carbides
ASTM A48 Classes 45. 50=1
SAE J431c Grades G3500.
G4000
Pearlitic or Aclcular - Free
Carbides
ASTM A48: Classes 55, 60
225
8-51
8.4 Surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table
WHEEL
TABLE* DOWNFEED IDENTIFICATION
WHEEL
(WORK) per rev. OPERATION NARROW BROAD
HARD- SPEED
WORK WORK
MATERIAL
N'S';
CONDITION
j SPEED of table
AREA AREA
fpm fpm in ANSI ANSI
I- .
23. DUCTILE CAI" IRO'eS
Bhn
3500 100 001
W-s9-'-Q ~st
Roughing A30HV
i IS
A30GV
(cont.) 120 to to to
to Annealed 6000 350 005 shng A80HB A80G
Austenitic (NI-RESIST
Ductile) 275g
ASTM A439 Types D-2, D-21.
0-20, 0-3, D-3A, D-4, D-5, IS 7
D-5B
ASTM A571 Type D-2M
ROS
24 MLLABECAT ale~hzd 3500 100 .001 Roughing A30HV A30GV
24. MALLEABLE CAST IRONS ~MaI lzdt ot
Ferritic5 ora000.e to to to
ASTM A47, Grades 32510, 52 o 6000 350 .005 Finishing ABOH A80GE
35013 and
ASTM A602. Grade M3210 Heat Treated
SAE J158 Grade M3210
Peariltic
ASTMA220 Grades 40010
45006, 45008, 50005
ASTM A602. Grade M4504.
M5003 R.
SAE .1158 Grade M4504,
M5003
Tempered Martenuite
ASTM A220' Grades 60004.
70003,80002. 90001
ASTM A602: Grades M5503,
M7002, M8501
SAE J158' Grades M5503,
M7002, M850i
8-52
-- _ z_7 - -
29. ALUMINUM ALLOYS, CAST 3500 100 .001 Roughing 0A461B CA46GB
Sand and Permanent Mold 40 As Cast to to to
A0
25. 54. 720 to or 6000 250 .004 Finishing 0A601B CA60GS
2010
2Y38.0
B295.0 A514.0
308.0 B514.0 713.0
D712.0 125 I Solution Treated
IN SadAgdd
Offil" ..
Sad
PrmnntMod
n 40 As Cast to to to
328 0 333.0 A356.0 to or 6000 250 004 Finishing CA601B CA60GB
A332.0 354.0 357 0 125 so~ition Treated
F332 0 356.0 359.0 500kg adAe
DWe Castings g
360.0 A380.0 390.0 A413.0 -1 R1.
A360 0 383.0 392.0
380.0 A384.0 413.0
31. MAGNESIUM ALLOYS, 5sCat 3500 1030 .001 Roughing CA461B CA46GB
CAT4to 6000 250 .004 Finishing CA601B CA60GB
AM60A AZ91A HK31A ZE63A 90 0ouio1ete
AM100A AZ91B HZ32A ZH62A 00g and Aged
AS41 A AZ91C KIA ZK51A
AZ63A AZ92A QE22A ZK61A -
See secion 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations #CAUTION Potential Fire Hazard. Exercise caution in grinding and
'See section 20.4 for calculation of Table rpm and Downfeed in 1pm. disposing of swarf. Do NOT use waler or water-miscible cutting
fluids tor magnesium alloys.
8-53
8.4 Surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table
WHEEL
TABLE* DOWNFEED IDENTIFICATION
WHEEL
(WORK) per rev. OPERATION NARROW BROAD
HARD- SPEED
MATERIAL CONDITION SPEED of table WORK WORK
NESS AREA AREA
fpm fpm in ANSI ANSI
Ti-6AI-4V ELI WL
# - , 4,.
Ti-6AI-6V-2Sn
Tv-6AI-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo
Tj-6AI-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo- 25Si
Beta
TIAUAlloy S, 3500 50 .0005 Roughing C36HV C36GV
CTi-I8V6r4 Z 2750 Aneaed to to to
Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3AIto n ' -
TI-O2Pdand Agnaed
ATM G-2e-adeC-1, C-,
8-54
Surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table 8.4
T WHEEL
-M N_0
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations itCAUTION. Toxic Material, refer to National Institute tor Occupa-
*Seesection 20 4 for calculation of Table rpm and Downfeed In Ipm. tional Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precajtions
8-55
8.4 Surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table
WHEEL
0
WHEEL TABLE DOWNFEED IDENTIFICATION
SPEED (WORK) per rev. OPERATION NARROW BROAD
HARD-
MATERIAL CONDITION SPEED of table WORK WORK
NESS AREA AREA
35. COPPER ALLOYS, CAST 3500 100 .001 Roughing CA461B CA4CGB
88t85t 40 ACatto to to
01
11
963 976
8to AsCast 6000 250 004 Finishing CA601B CA60GB
805 814 821tt 827tf 500kg Heat Treated, _
807 815 822ff 828tt .1
809 817tt 824tt
Se: section 16 for Cutting Fluid RecommeiJations #tCAUTION. Toxic Matrial. refer to National institute !or Occupa-
See section 20.4 for calulaton of Table pm and Downfeed in pm tional Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautons. M
8-56
Surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table 8.4
Berylco 41 C
See
1 fo CutingFlui R
ecton oasn orCUIN oi aeil ee t ainlIsiuefrOcp
8-57
- - . ~ -- 6
8.4 Surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table
WHEEL
WHEEL TABLE' DOWNFEED IDENTIFICATION
Nimonic 80 ' - -
Nimonic 90 To .;1sz&-
Nimonic 95 E_- , - _ -_ _ __'
Rene 41
Rene 63
Rene 77
Rene 95 16 -5 WE~
Udirme 500 -OOM
Refractaloy 26
Udirmet 630
-~ -_ag. - S -Z101_____
8-58
Surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table 8.4
1 WHEEL
TABLE' DOWNFEED i IDENTIFICATION
WHEEL
per rev, OPERATION NARROW BROAD
WHEED (WORK)
MATERIAL HARD CONDITION SPEED of table WORK WORK
NESS AREA AREA
TRW VI A
,
ASTIJ A296 Grades CW-12M, * - o ...
N- 12M. CY-40
ASTM A297 Grades HW. HX
ASTM A494: Grades N-12M-1.-
N-1Z2M-2. CY-40, CW-12M-t.1
~~!
8-59
8.4 Surface Grinding-Vertical Spindle, Rotary Table
WHEEL
WHEEL I TABLE DOWNFEED IDENTIFICATION
HARD- SPEED (WORK) per rev. OPERATION NARROW BROAD
MATERIAL I NESS CONDITION SPEED of table WORK WORK
AREA AREA
fpm fpm in ANSI ANSI
x-45
MAR-M32509 1425 _%
_ _ _
_ _ __ _ _ __ _~_
!
_ _ _ _ W_ _. ,~_
0- _ __
,
- - - - - . -
W-545___ -__-_______ % -.
I _ __9D
-. -A -~
8-60
8-60
Cylindrical Grinding 8.5
TRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK INFEED Wihe WDETL
SPEED SPEED on dia. wit DNII
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION per rev. CATION*
NESS of work
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
___________________ Is-__ k'1SOl
___________________________
150
to2
200
]Normalized
IC
As Fc:ged.
Annealed
ano Tempered
6M
ZIOP-
10 Fns'max._ /
8-61
8.5 Cylindrical Grinding
TRAVERSE
Wheel WHEEL
SPEED SPEED on dia. width IDENTIFI-
HARD- CATION*
MATERIAL CONDITION per rev.
NESS of work
fpm fpm n/pass ANSI
Bhn _m /smlmin :mm/lli- .. ISO_:
4. FREE MACHINING ALLOY STEELS, Rough 112
500 70 002
WROUGHT
to to A60LV
Medium C3rbon Resulfurized
4140 Hot Rolled. Normalized, 6500 100 Finish 1/6
4140Se 50 R c Annealed. Cold Drawn .0005 max.
414emax.
4142Te orQuenched '1-_'] -Rou--
.05_ : 1_/2i-
41456e andTempered 2 21 050
4147Te to tO- A60LVI.
415o i.o-6
Medium and High Carbon Leaded Rou03
41130 41L47 51L32 86140 Roughuu 1/4 I
to to A6KV
41140 41L50 52L100
41145 43140 861-20to oA6K
Carburzed 6500 100 Finish 1/8
Over and/or .0005 max
-
50 Rc Odenched and Rog.
Tempered 28 -2 050
8-62
Cylindrical Grinding 8.5
Rou,
7. MARAGING STEELS, WROUGHT 55ugh 70 02?
ASTM A538. Grades A. B. C Ito to A'60KV
120 Grade 650 10 Finish: I
180 Grade 50 P Annealed 650mx 1/6 1
200 Grade max.C or .05mx
250 Grade Maraged 12JIO
:
300 Grade ~~- _
350 Grade -3- 3 Thih
HY230 O3a
Rough: 114
4000 70 00?2
Rough 112
8. TOOL STEELS, WROUGH4T 60/2 Rough0
Group I to40 to 0
P2 H13 L6 P20 6500 !00 Finish-
A3 H14 L7 P21 50 R Annealed 0005max 1w6
A4 H19 01 SI max.C or Oi-enched7
A6 H21 02 S2 and Tempered I~~--
AB H22 06 S5 ~-=~-
A9 H23 07 SG
A10 H24 P2 S7
Hi0 H25 F14 Wi1
Hi1 H26 P5 W2 Ruh 1
H12 L2 P6 V15400160 .0
SAE j43Ab* Types W108, W109. WilD0. Wi 12.to oA0K
W209. V1210. W310 Over I uenchrA6D 10 Fnih /
c ~Tempered 5R
8-63
65Cylindrical Grinding
[ I TRAVERSel
Wheel 11WHEEL
WHEEL WORK IINFEED 'ONII
1width IETF-
HARD- SPEED1 SPEEDi on dia.
COI:DITION per rev. CTO
MAT~rNESS
NESS~o j Iowork
tp'P fpm I n pass *ANSI
Ij Rogh
t0 to jA 80V
GroupIN aRough-
A7 fM4
Grup1 40 1 0 060 I
D7 M4360001 Finish-
M3-2 M44 RAnnealed
i00
o. e..
MS 1n4 ax or ouenched 7- - 7-
Ro-,gh :A8J
h400 60 Rough-
.001 .14 1 Sk
to IA81
Ove Onced 5500 100 Fiish:
Ov8r and -- ODD3mnax
5CTempeed _ _
8-64
Cylindrical Grinding 8.5
TRAVERSE
Wheel WHEEL
INFEED WIdth IDENTIFI-
WHEEL WORK
SPEED SPEED on dia.
HARD- CATION*
MATERIAL N -SS CONDITION per rev.
NI of work
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
Bhn /tii n/nr nt/n~- $tzS
Gru VRough: 1/2
Group IV 4000 60 001
to to A60JV
T1
100 .0004 max.
Finish: 6
50 maA uneaed
c Queced 5500
ari T)empered tM Al
Rough: 1/
0 60 001
400
to to A8OKV
soa 135 Aunled5500 100 Finish 116
0 totraeno.0003 h ~and ; . max3u
58 RC Tempered -
Rough /
400 60 .001
to to A80HV
"3 100 0003 max.
Finish ,
60Ruenchd
58e Ac 5000
Tempered Z'u! - "gg
_,.
2-.N.,_
Pough
4000 ,90 .001 1/
1 tC A01V
8-65
8.5 Cylindrical Grinding
TRAVERSE
Wheel WHEEL
INFEED Whdth WDEF
WHEEL WORK
SPEED SPEED on dia.
HARD- per rev. CATION*
MATERIAL CONDITION
NESS of work
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
AutntcRough:. 1/ 2
Austenitic 5500 50 .002
203EZ to to C54JV
303 6500 100 Finish,
303MA 135 Annealed 0005 max
303Pb to or .-
303 Plus,' 275 Cold Drawn 5
303Se
Rough 114
5500 50 002
to to A601V
AutrilcRough. 1/
Austentlc5500 50 .002
201 308 317 to to C54JV
202 309 321 6500 1,0 Fnsh
301 309S 330 135 Annealed 0005 max.
302 310 347tor
3028 310S 348 275 Cold Drawn
304 314 384
304L 316 385
305 316L
8-66
Cylindrical Grinding 8.5
TRAVERSE
INFEED Wheel
Width WHEEL
WDEF
WHEEL WORK
SPEED SPEED on dia.
HARD- per rev. CATION*
MATERIAL CONDITION
NESS of work
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
Bhn 'Tii~~/nv1mm/ t tWcj.<> Io
Austenific Rough 1t2
5500 50 002
Nitronic 32 to to C54JV
Nitronic 33 6500 100 Finsh
Nitronic 40 210 .0005 max 1/6
Nitronic 50 to Annealed
Nitronic 60 250 . R.:
Rough 1/4
5500 50 002
to to C541V
Rough. 1/4
5500 50 .002
to to A601V
Ouencned 6500 100 Finish:
Over .0005 max.
275 and
Tempered Z : =
8-67
8.5 Cylindrical Grinding
WHEE
WOK INEED TRAVERSE
WHEL
WRK INFED Wheel WHEEL
HARD- SPEED SPEED on dia. wit DNII
MATERIAL NESCONDITION per rev. CATION*
NESS of work
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
Bhn M mmi pi2 ~ iO
15. CARBON STEELS, CAST 50 70 Rough 1/2
Low Carbon
ASTM A426. Grade P1
1010
Inrmaled,
100
60
50 1
0
00
.0
0 mais-x
1/6t
/
A60LV
Medium Carbon MA
ASTM A27: Grades N1 . N2. U-60-30, 60-30, Rough: 114
65-35. 70-36. 70-40 4000 70 002
ASTM A148. Grades 80-40. 80-50. 90-60. to to A60KV
105-85. 120-95. 150-125.,175-145 Carburized 6000 100 Finish 1/8
ASTM A216 Grades WOA. WOB. WOO Over and/or .0005 max
AM'TMv A217: Grades WC1. WC4, wos. W06 50 Rc Quenched and __
_Z I
ASTM A352, Grajs 101. L02. L02-1 Tempered ft-2
ASTM A356 Grades 2, 5,6. 8. 9, 10 ~~-
ASTM A389: Grades 023. 024
ASTM A486, Classes 70. 90. 120
ASTM A487 Classes 1N. 2N. 4N. 6N. 8N. 9N.
1ON, DN, 10. 20. 40, 40A. 60. 70, 80.
90. 100
1330 4130 80B30 8640
1340 4140 8040 9525
2325 4330 8430 95307
2330 4340 8440 9535
4125 8030 8630
W
See section 16for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
*Wheel recommendation- are for wet grinding of 2- to 4-inch 150toI
100 Mmndiameter work For DRY grinding-use a softer grade wheel.
For LARGER diameter work-use a softer and/or coarser grit wheel.
For SMALLER diameter work-use a harder grade wheel. Wheel rec-
ommendations also apply to plunge grinding applications Also see
section 20 2. Grinding Guidelines
8-68
Cylindrical Grinding 8.5
TRAVERSE
Wheel WHEEL
WHEEL WORK INFEED Width iDE i
on dia.
SPEED SPEED
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION per rev. CATION*
NESS of work
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
Bhn j s;
Rough; 1/3
4000 60 .002
to to A60KV
ASTC-5to
A57:Graes D-, to A60JV
Rough: 1/4
4000 60 .002
564000 60 .002
ZRNMR
R Quenchedmax.
to andle
Rough: 1/43_
4000 60 .002
to to A60KV_
4A5500 100 Finish: 1/8
Ove Quenched .0004 max.
100~~~ ~ afergae~
56 FIc
~
he ra00 ~
Tempered
~ ~ ~ 50
NAI,
FimtrnoisFrDh:rnin-s
Fo AREdaetrwok-ue ote ndo O tver 0003ema
Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
See section 161cor
"Wheel recommendations are Ior wet gnnding ot 2- to 4-inch [50 to
100 SmAmLEdiameter work- R gdn-use a grade wheelelrc
softer
8-69
8.5 Cylindrical Grinding
225 or Normalized
an Tempered Ww;,
A00
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations
-Wheei recommendations are for wet grinding of 2- to 4-inch (50 to
100 min] diameter work For DRY grinding-use a softer grade wheel
For LARGER diameter work-use a softer and/or coarser grit wheel
For SMALLER diameter work-use a harder grade wheel Wheel rec-#
ommendations also apply to plun ,j grinding applications. Also see
section 20 2. Gnnding
Guidelines
8 7
Cylindrical Grinding 8.5
MATERIAL
____________________________
_______
HARD.
CONDITION
SPEED SPEED
-TRAVERSE
Rough: 1/4
5500 70 002
to to C601%/
48R Flame 6500 100 Finish. 1/8
H0 0005 max
to or - -
60 PIC Induction Hardened R" -
_______~ o ~ ~ AI# -
225
8-71
8.5 Cylindrical Grinding
TRAVERSE
Wheel
W idth WHEELF
WDEN
W HELL W ORK INFEED
SPEED SPEED on dia.IDENTIFI-
HARD- per rev. CATION*
MATERIAL CONDITION
NESS of work
52OverPCor
ASTM A602: Grades M5503, M7002. M8501 6500 100 Finish.
Flame 0005 max. 1/8
SAE J158 Grades M5503, M7002. M8501
5Ac Induction Hardened
Rough:
25. WHITE CAST IRONS (ABRASION P0ugh: 1/4
RESISTANT) REISAN)to 50 to0 .0 C601%
ASTM A532:
6500 100 Finish:
Class I. Types A. B, C. 0 60 R, As Cast. .0005max. 1/8
Class II. Types A. 8. C. D. E
Class III.Type A
max Annealed
or Hardened - A
8-72
Cylindrical Grinding 8.5
I 1
TRAVERSE~
WHEEL WORK INFEED Wheel WHEEL
HAD SPEED1 SPEED j on dia. width IOIENTIFI-
MATERIAL HR-CONDITION I jperrev. .CATION'
NESS I Iof wark
fpm fpm In'pass IANSI
Bhn rn)Imrnn On/-
Duiriclor 1t00
to 10 I Fns ,vh
160 101Fii 1/8 Fin-
ASTM A518
52%
R As Cast j _ ---- hf
I 5E0 0
275-I 10i 02 ..
1000F maxj
to Is Cast -- I
376~1 1
to 30 -1 5i4tiV'
-
I_
7050
2021 5056 6066 7075 1
2024 5083 6070 7079
2025 5086 6101 7175
2117 5154 6151 7178
IQ _
8-73
8.5 Cylindrical Grinding
TRAVERSE
F MAEILCONDITION
HWH
WRK
WHEL INFED
SEEL WOEEK InFEED
Wheel
width
Iper rev.
WHEEL
IDENTIFI.
CATION'
NESS of work
Ipm fpm u-/pass ANSI
Bhn -rnJ i:nhtriijinn s _-
See section 16 tor Cutting Fluid Recommendations iuse -riate (g'een grit) silicor. arbidie
*Wheel recommentdations are for wet grinding of 2- to 4-inch 150 t0 11 CAUTION Potential F.re Hazard Exercise cautin in grinding and
100 mi diameter morlr For DRY grinding-use a softer grade wheel disposiiig ot Swarl Do NOT use water or waler i'vscible cutting
For LARGER "maieter work-use a softer and/or coarser grit wheel fluids for magnesium alloys
For SMALLER diameter work-use a harder grade whee: Wheel rc-
ommerdatiOns also apply to plunge grinding applications Also see
sec.ion 20 2. Gninding Guidelines
8-74
Cylindrical Grinding 8.5
MATERIAL HARD-
NESS I
fWHEEL
CONDITION
WORK
SPEED SPEED
INFEED
on dla.
TRAVERSE
Wheel
wit
per rev.
of workc
WEELFI
DNII
CATION*
to Treated
440and Age
See section 16 for Cutting Fiuid Recommendations tUse triabie (green gal) siiicon carbide
*Wheei recommendations are for wet grindirr2 o. 2- rI 4-inch 150 to J$CAUTIOJ Potential Fire Hazard. Exercise caution in grinding and
100 m] diameter work For DRY grinding-use a softer gradt whieal disposing of swart
For LARGER diamneter worl-ise a softer and/or cov-ser gra wheel
For SMALLER diameter work-use a harder gride wheel Wheel rec-
ommnendations also apply to plunge grinding applications Aiso spa
section 20 2. Giding Guidelines
8-75
8.5 Cylindrical Grinding
TRAVERSE
Wheel IWHEEL
INFEED Wdth HIDENTIF-
WORK
WHEEL SPEELU
HARD- ~SPEED on dia. wit DNI-
Rough, 1/3
210 332 368 464 5500 70 002
220 335 370 465 to to C46KV
226 340 377 466 10 R 6500 100 Finish 1/6
230 342 385 467 to .0005 max
240 349 411 482 Annealed -
314
316 365
366 44?
444 6941
9 Rough: 1/3
316 366 44 5500 70 .002
330 367 445 to to C46KV
Rough: 13
505 613 632 5500 70 .002
510 614 638 to to C46KV
511 618 642 6500 100 Finqh:
521 619 651 10 Re .00,_5 max.
524 623 655 to Annealed -
Rough: 13-
5500 70 .002 1/
to to C46KV
60 Re 6500 100 Finish: 4
to Cold Drawn
100 Rb,
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations t t CAUTION Toxic Material, refer toNational InVclute for Cccupational
-Wheel recommendations are for wet grinding of 2- to 4-mc!# [50 to Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions,
100 min diameter work For DRY grinding-use a softer grade wheel.
For LARGER diameter work-use a softer and/or coarser gnt wheel.
For SMALLER diameter work-use a harder grade wheel Wheel rec-
ommendations also apply to plunge gnnding applications Also see
section 20 2. Grnng Guidelines
8-76
_
___ _ _ ____ I-=1
Cylindrical Grinding 8.5
I TRAVERSE
WHEIWORK INFEED Wheel IWHEEL
HR-SEDSPEED onda width IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL HR-CONDITION I t t per rev. CATION*
NESS ot work
1p
pm in/pass ANSI
__ __
_ _ _ _ __ _ _ Bhn __ __ _ __ _ 1*7417S ~J~
100R
5500 -0 .00
34 % 6500 10 Finish:
to Treated
IHeal -.
45RA
8-77a
_____________________
8.5 Cylindrical Grinding
I WhAVEqS E
36o /6V
962555i 7 02
964 s 6500 100 1 F ih 1/6
9661 to I 00I5 ma i
973 100 As Cast w8>f21 --
974 -5-- -i/3-
976 50gA~
978 - - I
993
993 ____ ________ -I-
5500 70
Rough.~
.002 13
k i I * I
j
-L
I 5
JRough-
. 1/
DURANICKEL Alloy 301 5500
MONEL Alloy 5021 to to C60
MONEL Atloy K500 , 6500 100 F inish
NI-SPAN-C All / 902 150 i 0005 max. 1/10
PERMANICKEL Aloy 300 to Soulion Treated ,
320
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations i t CAUTION Toxic Mateial refer to National Inst-ute for Oc.u.at.ojal
*Wheel recommendations are for wet grinding ol 2. to 4.inch .50 to Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precaut.ons
100 mm.n]diameter work For DRY grimdmg-use a softer gra etieel
For LARGER mareler work-use a sontor and or coarser gri wheel
Fa- SMALLER damnele w.k-use a harder grade wheel Whertl rec-
omendations also ap. j ti piune gn ing appacations Also se7a
secwi n 20 2. Gnndirg Gupde-i-es
8-78
Cylindrical Grinding 8.5
TRAVERSE
tW *.,
';-013mii __
Rougn: 1/
5500 50 .002
to to A601V
47 RCHardened 6500 100 Finish 1/10
to or005mx
52RP Aged
500 50 .002
to0 oC61
&.eesection~ Cuttng Fluid Re~commendations tfCAUTION Toxic Material, refer to National Institute for Occupational
-Whe-V recommendtations are Vw,eat ndng of 2- to 4-inch (Oto Safety and Hoalth (NIOSH) lor Precautions
100 rmn dineter 'NOMFo' or y g'ineing-use a softer grade wheel
Foi i.At 3ER diarnater work-tsg a softer and/or Coarser grit wheel
'r 5W.A LER d-ar'eter worX,e a harder grade wheel Wheel rec-
on1i eno,.oinx a-so apply to plunge grinding appticalioi~s Also see
secliI ' 21 ?. Grinding Guidelines.
8-79
8.5 Cylindrical Grinding
I TRAVERSE
Wheel WHEEL
I
ARD-PEED
S D oNFEd width IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL HARD-
NESSI CONDITION SPEED SEED on dIa. perrev.
of work CATION*
Nimonic 75
Nirnonic 80
Nimonic 90
Nimonic 95
Rere 41
Rene 63
L
Rene 77
Pane95
Udimet 500 W
"1 W1
RE
Udimet 700
Udimet 7 10
Un-temp 1753
Waspatoy
8-80
Cylindrical Grinding 8.5
TRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK INFEED Wihe WEEL
HARD- SPEED SPEED on dia. wit DNFI
MATERIAL NESCONDITION per rev. CATION'
NESS af work
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
SEL 15
TRW VI A
Udirnet 500
Udimet 700
ASTLI A296 Grades CW- 12M, N-12M, CY-40
ASTM A297 Grades HW. HX
ASTM A494 Grades N-12,M- I. N-12M-2,
CY-40. CW- 12MV1, CW- 12M-2
ASTM A608 3raaes HW.5O dY"Q
S-816
V-36
3000 50 .0014
See seclior IF or Cutting Eluid Recommendations ttCAUTiON Taxi .ial. refer toNational nstitute f Occuipational
*Wheel recommendations are for wet griiiding of 2- to 4-inch (50) to Safety ard He- *0ICS) for Precautions
100 mmj dlamster work For DRY grinding-use a softer grade wheel
For LARGER diameter work-use a softer aiid/or coarser grit wheel
For SMALLER diametar work-Jse a harder grade wheel Wheei roc-
ommendmtions also apply to piunge grinding applciceions Also see
section 20 2. Grinding Guidelires
8.5 Cylindrical Grindin;
MATERIAL
HARD-
NESCONDITION
NESS
SPEED SPEED
Iper
dia.
jof
width
rev.
workI
IDENTIFI.
CATION*
______ tA
V_______ x
16-25-6 Rough-
19-9DL 3000 50 001
to to A60JV
250 4000 100 Finish: 1/10
to Solution Treated 0002 max.
320 and Aged
Fea section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations Due to the brittleness of relrictoiy atloyq. cracking. chipping, flaking
'Wheei recommondalionib are for wet grinding of 2- to 4-inch [50 to and breakout tend to occur, pa licularly on tlip edges of the ma-
100 hm) diameter work For DRY grinding-use a softer grade whee! chined surfaces
For LARGER diameter work--,,- 3i softer cnd/or coarser grit w#heel t tCAUTION Toxic Maloeirefer to NationatlInstitute for Occupaional
For SMALLER diameter work-use a harder grade wheel Wheel rec- Safety and Heciih (N'iOSH) for Pre~:autions
ormmendations also apply to plunge grinding applications Also see ttCJTION FtAential Fiie Hazard Exorcise caution in grirnding and
section 20 2. Grinding Gudelnes d'3posrrg of Swart
8-82
Cylindrical Grinding 8.5
--r - TRAERSEW
WHEEL WORK INFEED Wihe WEEL
HARD- ISPEED
~SPEED on dla. wit
perrey.
DNII
CATION*
MATERIAL HAEDS CONDITION
Molybdenum" 5 Rough 1/
220 10 Finis
Mo 4000 to A60LV
TZCJ T to Stress 0003 max I 11
ZM 290 Relieved - - Rog:-
N.01-l 1 AnIshr -
z:- - A %ON/.10
Tantalum o Rough - ,
ASTAR 81 1C 4000 50 001A6K
T- 111 to0 Finih.V
T-222 200 00 Fns. 1/10
Ta- ioW to Stress .0003 max
Ta-Hf 250 Relieved - RuIi i j
Tungsten Rough /
85%denty50 001
85% density 2000 to C60KV
96% density 180 Pressed and Sintered. 100 Finish- 1/10
100 desit toForged. .0003 max.
Arc Cast
IRough /
Tungsten -2 Thoria** tT gh
0/5
2000 to C60KV
260 Pressed 100 Finish- 11
.0003 max
320 Sintered J ,_ *
0-,
30Sintered
____________to
I an
: * seci,-ri 16 for Cutting Fluid Recornrendations *Due to the brittieress of refract ry alloys. cracking. chir~ping. flaking
'Wheeel reconmnindatione nre for *at grinding o' 2- to 4,incii (50 to arid breakout tend to occur. *jaflicularly on the edges of the ma-
100. thin diarmeter Yvork
Fc' 011Y .3rnding-use a softer grade wheel ctlined surfa'es
For L.,RGER d~aiteler .3rk-.s'. a softer and/or coarser grit wheel t YCAUTION, Toxic Mater-at. refer loNational inatituo for Occuptional
For SMALLEP diameter work-use a harder vrade wheel Wheel rec- Safety and Health (NIOSrI) for Pre~autions
ornrminoations also apply to i'lunge ;rnrding appicatir. is A so see
section 20 2. Onrnomng Guidelines
8-83
8.5 Cylindrical Grinding
ITRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK INFEED vheeI WHEEL
HARD SE width IDENTIFI
MATERIAL HARD CONDITION SPEED SPEED o perrev. CATION*
SNESSI of work I
tpm fp ~ asJtANSI
~5 g - Rogh
BrsesRough. 1/3
Brasses 5500 70 002
to to C46KV
CZP-0218-T
CZP-02180
mn d
C028-Wz o r an to AsSitee c
6500 100 0005 max.
Finish 16
o0Cu-30Zn to A eN n F a c u i n
68 5Cu-30Zn- I 5b
112
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations "Due to :ne orittlet.m of refractory alloys. cracking, chippfng, flaking
Wheel recommendations are ;'rwet gnndmng of 2. to 4.inch 150 to and breakout tend :o occur. particularly on the edges of the mea- f
100 mini diameter work For DRY grinding-use a softer grade wheel chined surfaces
Fo' LARGER diameter work-use a softer and/or coarser grit wheel ttCAUTION Toxic Material refer to National institute for Occupat, onai
Fol SMALLER diameter work-t se a harder grade wheel Wheel rec- Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Pr, %utons
ornmendations also apply to plunge grnng apphicatlons Alo see t;:.CAUTION Potential Fire Hazar .xercise caution in grnng and
section 20 2. Grnng Guidelines disposing of swarf
Grinding of low-density parts is not recommended be";aus surface
porosity will be reduced or los:
8-84-l
Cylindrical Grinding 8.5
Nickel:~0 0 P hIA6V
4; As Sintered I005-a 0
160001100 maxiih
0W*C-50Aq .j _ _ _-I-9g J 1 O 4
I -13
Rough:
Refractory Metal Base 1I0 00 1
61Mo-39A9 4000 t0 A60LV
SO~oSOI j oo0 Finish
75 RE 0003 max 11
82 RB
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations ~Grinding of low-density parts is not recommended because surface
'Wheel recommendations are for wet grinding of 2- to 4-inch ISO0 orosity will be reduced or lost
100 minI diameter work For DRY grinding-use a softer grade wheei l
For LARGER diameter wvork-use a softer and/or coarser grit wheel
For SMALLER diameter work-use a harder grade wheel Wheei rec-
cmimendations also apply to plunge grinding aoplications Also see
sedc..n 20 2 Grinding Guidelines
8-85
8.5 Cylindrical Grinding
TRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK INFEED Wheel IWHEEL
HAR- SEEDSPEDI n da. width IDENTIFI.
MATERIAL HAED. CONDITION SPE PE 1 o i. per rev. CATION'
NfEwoS
f pm -fpm in pass ANSI
tShn rn/is m/mtih rn/pas -- ISO I
FC-0908-P
FC- 1000-N /
FN-0205-S i O3nx
FN-0205-T
FN-0405-R
FN-0405-S
FN-0405-T
PX- 1005-T
FX-2008-T -___
-t --
I !TRAVERSEI
HARD-WHEEL WORK INFEED I DNF-
1 HR-SPEED! SPEED Ion dia. Idt
MATERIAL NESCONDITION
jANSI
ofrk A~N
68 R, Hardened 00 A0V
to- and I 0003 max
I 70 Temnperedc~h /
to to IA46KV
Mane~cCoe
ro-F (p o toSi Wrought o mw
-- -ikw-~g
240 46;j
Hi Penn 49 Rough: /
HyMu 80 to1 to C54KV
I I6500
85 100 Finish
to Wicught
240
See section 16 'of Cun-rig Fluid Recommendiations Diamond wheel ispreteraDle. see section S 7
' Wheel recommendations are for wet grinding ct 2- to 4-inch f50 to
10OmmJicrmeter worki For DRY grinding-use a sotter grad~e wheel
For LARGER dian'eter work-use a softer and -or coarser grit wheel
For SMALLER diameter work-use a harder grace wheel Wheel rec-
orimendations also apply to plunge grndirng applications Also see
section 20 2 Girinding Guidelines
8-87
8.5 Cylindrical Grinding
T 1 TRAVERSE!
IWheel WHEEL
!EEL, WORK INFEED
iW width IDENTIFI-
HARD- ;SPEED; SPEED: on dia. I
MATERIIAL AR-CONDITION per rev. 'CATION'
NESS Iof work
1pmr fP17, zass ANS'
Columax5 P
1 12 Annale 0005ma
Aloc X1 I6
MACHNIN
CONTOLLE 220 1je ~Roughr
53.
CNRLEW ALLOYS
ASON 550 50 002o-.
~C54KV~
54.
N S
C A R2O 1500 AnneAaleT 1 RoughF/2ish
&_RP11TE
CABN S4
Shore Et ie _ R_
- W= 7M - -
_ _ __ __ __ _ 4r
seto Gunideline62020
8-8
-n5n
0001ua
Cylindrical Grinding 8.5
fT7 TRAVERSE
IWHEEL'
NESS
WORK INFE]ED Wheel JWHEEL
of work
Ifpm fpm in pass I ANSI
GraphiteRog 11 Ruh
1 5s000 50 002 3j
I,16500 75 Fiwsh 16 iFns
axIC360JV
0005
2- Rough
0005
a~ IC6OJVf
lOog 2~-
Roughf
Porcelain Enamel j 55001 70 Do1
1/
1/50K
6500 100 Finish 11
0005 max
See section 16 for Cutting ciuid Recommendations Diamond wheel is Preferable, see section 8 7,
'Wheel recommendations are for- wet grnoing of 2- to 4- ich 1S0 to ft CAUTION Toxic Material, refer to National Inst tute for Occupational
100 mmJ diameter work For DRY grinding-use a softer grade w"eel
For LARGER diamele' work-use a softer and 'or coarser grit wheel
For SMAALLER diameter work-use a h~arder grade wheel Wheel rec-
ommiendationS also apply to Plunge gninding applications Also see
section 20 2. Grind~rng Gr..delines
Safety and Health (NIOSH) tor Precautionsl
i
8-89
8.5 Cylindrical Grinding
MATERIAL
I
HAR~~~
HR-CONDITION
I I
~ ~WHEEL;
WOKIIFE
ITAVERSEI
SPEED SPE'onda
SEI SPE!o
heel
ia per rev.
WHEEL
DENTflFI-
CATION'
NESS itot work
Ip pm urC, : ps ANSI
I I BoCO0 L 0 riis
- Cast
T Rough-
lnaed
58.
SRAYEFAME ThERAL) r -
SprayedaCarbide
Chromiume-Ug
ln Ca0d-obl
Tungsten Carbide
Tungsten Carbide-Coball
Tunasten Caroide (Cobatt)-Nicke Alloy Blend2
See section 16for Cutting Fluid Recommendations Diamond whieel is preferable for flame spraired carbides and cerarn-
*Wheel recommendatins are for wet grinding of 2-,to 4-Inch (50 to ts see section 8 7
100 mm) diameter work For DRY grinding-use a so.ter grade wheel
For LARGER diameter wvork-use a softer and'or coarser grit wheel
Pa' SMALLER diamneter work-use a harder grade wheel Wheel ret- 4
ommendators also apply t0 pluNge grinding applications Also see
section 20 2 Grnding Guidelines
8-90
Cylindrica! Grinding 8.5
Monet
See seciror. 16 fo, Cutting Fluid Recommendations Diamond .tsee! is preferable for flame spayed carbK"- znd ceram-
*Wheel recommrendations are for wet gninding of 2- t0 4-inCh [50 10 ics. see section 8 7
100 mmj~ndiameter work For DRY grinding-use a softer grade wheel t tCAUTION, Toxic Material. refer to National Institute fos(ccupational
For LARGER diameter work-use a softer andior coarser grit wheel Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions
For SMALLER diameter wa-k-use a harder grade wheel Wheel rec-
om'menda:id1ns also apply to plunge grinding applications Also see
section 20 2.Grinding Guidelines
8-91
8.5 Cylindrical Grinding
Sive Plt 50 0 C)
SooI to
Fnish 00
6500 1,1
I-lard -x
100 ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
dimtrioknFrDYirnin-ssasfergae:he o log
For~ ~~~~~~~~~~~_
~~ LAGRdaeeMokueasftradoWore
u he
For~~~ ~ ~
rd welWelrc SMALEdimtrwr-seahre ~ ~~ 50
ontrend..os 110Aloaplyto
pung grndin apliction seto
section~t 20. rndngGidlie
659W nh / a5
- -S0 -- 1 -. max-
Rcuo3
Cylindrical Grinding 8.6
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels
TRAVERSE
Wheel WHEEL
WORK INFEED width IDENTIFI-
WHEEL
SPEED SPEED on dIa.
HARD- per rev. CATION
MATERIAL CONDITION
NESSof work
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
Bhn /t -t r$m
i-!hlssI- 4: Anslzs;
1116 1213 i
.,
1 s * , hrt9:4
r 8,,s
1117 1215 <.
10L50 11L41
Rough 114
2. CARBON STEELS,
WROUGHT 5000 50 001
to to BlOOT100B
Low Carbon
Carburized 7500 100 Finish. 1/8
1005 1012 1019 1026 Over and/or 0002 max.
1006 1013 1020 1029 50 Rc O,,enched " r 5
t i -i
1008 1015 1021 1513 and Tempered
1009 1016 1022 1518 IG~t ~ 4~
1010 1017 1023 1522 -M4 ,3v - -
1011 1018 1025 M-
i--0jmi +
Medium Carbon
1030 1042 1053 1541
1033 1043 1055 1547 A
1035 1044 1524 1548
1037 1045 1525 1551
1038 1046 1526 1552
1R A -02
1039 1049 1527 M
(,"51_+_
1040 1050 1536 -tfE
NN~N
t "
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations
See section 20.1 for additional information.
~8-93
8.6 Cylindrical Grinding
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels
HARD.
IWHEEL
SPEED
WORK
SPEED
INFEED1
on dia.
TRAVERSE
Wheel
width
WHEEL
IDEI4TIFI.
]
8-94
Cylindrical Grinding 8.6
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels
TRAVERSE
j
Wheel WHEEL
WDEN -
WHEEL WORK INFEED Wheeh
SPEED SPEED on dia.IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL NESS
NESS CONDITION perwork
of rev. CATION
03 L2 M46 T4
04 L6 M47 T5
D5 L7 01 T6
07 Ml 02 T8
Ff M2 06 T15~4Z
F2 M3-1 07 Wi RR O
HlO1 M3-2 P2 W2 - ;j7'f ZZ
HiJ M4 P4 W5<4 # 5 ___
H13 M7 P6 - M
SAE J438b. Types W108. W109.
W1 10, W1 12, W209. W210,
W310
9 . NI R D I G T E L ,R ough 1/ 4
9. NITRIDING
WROUGHT STEELS, 5000 50 Rough50
.001 1/4
125 Nirato to BlOTlOOB
Nitralfoy 125 Ntralloy 230 7500 100 Finish
Nitraloy 135 Nitralloy EZ 60 Rc .0002 max. 1/8
Nitratloy 135 Mod Nitratloy N to r'rnded
Nitralloy 225 Nitrex 1 65 c
8-95
8.6 Cylindrical Grinding
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels
--" TRAVERSE i
]
Low Carbon 5000 50 001
AST. A217, Grade WC9 to to 100T10
ASTM A352 Grades LC3 LC4 Carburized 7500 100 Finish 1
and/or 0002 max
ASTM A426 Grades CP2. CP5, ,,er
5
cP5biCP 1.CP12,CP 15. oC Quenched
CP21.CP22and Tempered
1320 4110 8020 r -t ;1. ......
2315 4120 8620 - -
2320 4320 2 '- 0O5 -t.ez.w - -4-z .
Medium Carbon
ASTM A27- Grades NI. N2.
U-60-30. 60-30. 65-35.
70-36. 70-40
ASTM A145 Grades 80-40.
80-50. 90-60. 105-85. ..S -
120-95.50125 175-45
ASTMA A216 Grades WCA,PEN
WCB. WCC 6
ASTMA217 GradesWC1. -
IE:
90. 100
1330 4130 80B30 8640
1340 4140 8040 9525
2325 4330 8430 9530
2330 4340 8440 9535
4125 8030 8630W -;- -
Tempered
8-96
Cylindrical Grinding 8.7
Diamond Wheels
TRAVERSE
WHEOK NED Wheel WHEEL
WHD-SEEE WOR D diE width IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL HR- CONDITION SED PED oda. per rev. CATION
NESS of work
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
Bhn t ..-
48. MACHINABLE CARBIDES Rog: 1/5
!-erro-Tic 5500 40 .001
Ito to D100-L-100-6-1/8
68Rc Hardened 6500 50 Finish: 1/10
to and 0002 max.
72 Rc Tempered - r
94 RA
Ns_
See ~
20.1~fomditoaax'frto t Wrouion
240
Alnio I ough 1/6 D120N75--if
5500
.00 0
Alnio 11to t
Ainic 1116500 so Fnish
Alnio IV45 R1/12 D220N78-97/
_ _ .000 max
________Vto__AsCast
Ainico~~ V--8
8.7 Cylindrical Grinding
Diamond Wheels
TRAVERSE
SEDIwidth IDENTIFI-
WHEEL
HARD-SPEED WHEEL WORK
SPEED INFEED
on dia. Wheel
wit DNFI
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION per rev. CATION
NESS ofwork
--W 7
-. s __ __--
Knoop ~1 6 0 1
Silicon Nitride --
Thoria (Thorium Oxide)tt -meu - --
Titania (Titanium Oxide)
Titanium Diborideft
Zircon (Zirconium Silicate)
Zircoma (Zirconium Oxide)
. -_
57 OPITE Rough: 1/8 D 100-N 100- B- 1/8
,--v
57. COMPOSITES75 .001
Kevar 49 to to
6500 150 Finish: 11 60NG--/
.0005 max.
see section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations t I CAUTION Toxic Material. refer to National Institute for Occupational
See section 20 1 to, addltonal information Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions
8-98
Cylindrical Grinding 8.7
Diamond Wheels
STRAVERSE
I Wheel WHEEL
WHEEL WORK INFEED width IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL HARD-
NESS CONDITION SPEED SPEED on dia. per rev. CATION
I ofwork
-;Xjst
k-ogn A~23-f I~
to to
6500 1 60 Finish- 1/12 D320-N100-B-1/8
0005 max.
~OEM
"A_ 2 - 27~~
8-99
. 7.
8.7 Cylindrica! Grinding
Diamond Wheelqs
TRAVERSE i
WHEEL WORK INFEED ".Wheel I WHEEL
SPEED SPEED on dia. width IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION per rev. CATION
NESS of work
fpri fpm m/pass ANSI
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations t r CAUTION: Toxic Matenal. refer to National Insiute for Occupational
See section 20 1 for additional information. Safety ano Health (NIOSH) for Precautions
8-100
-yN
Internal Grinding 8.8
rA LWHEELI W INFEED Wheel HEE
1110
ills 1215
1212 tZo jA5M
1215
Medium Carbon Resulfurized
-- L
Rog. 1/3
1132 1140 1145 5000 75 0005 A
1137 '141 1146 to to A60K
1139 1144 1151 Carburzed 6500 200 Finish.
Low Carbon Leaded Over and/or .0002max 116
10L18 12113 1215 50 Rc Quenched ano
11L17 12114 Tempered r.21'' 2 13
.
Meodiumn Carbon Leaded
20145 11137 '.11-44 ~-O~
10L50 11141 O3xl - Z91
2. CARBON STEELS,WROUGHT Rough: 1/3
Low Carbon 5000 75 .0005
Low Ca 12 to to A54MV
1005 1012 1019 1026 Hot Rolled. Normalized. 6500 200 Finish: 16
1006 1013 1020 1029 50 RL Annealed,Cold Drawn .0002max.
1008 1015 1021 1513 max. or Quenched _.
1009 1016 1022 1518 and Tempered -
1010 1,317 1023 1522 - -
1011 1018 1025
Medium CarbonI
C__rE
1030 1042 1053 1541 Rough
1033 1043 1055 1547 5000 75 10005
/3
1035 1044 1524 1548 to to A60KV
1037 1045 1525 1551 Carburzed 6500 200 Finish. 1/6
1038 ;04 152_6 1552 OC'e iad/o 1/62ma.
Over and/or .0002 max.
1039 1C49 1527 50 QunheRn an
1040 1050 1536 Quenced
Tempered *;1 1"I"3"
-
1060
Iligh Carbon
1074 1085 1566
1064 1075 1086 1572
1065 1078 1090
1069 1080 1095
1070 1084 1561
8-101
88 Internal Grinding
ITRAVERSE
HR-CONDITION
I WHEEL WORK
SPE PE
INFEED
Wheel
w
ni.Iperrev.
I WHEEL
It
IENTIFI-
CATION'
MATERIAL
NESS jof workc
fpm Pin in'pass ANSI
Bhn mls mfinm mm/pass - -
4147Te I3 ; -
4150
Medium and High Carbon Leaded
.0.a
Rough___ 1/3________
41130 411-47 511-32 86140 50ug0 75/30
41L40 41150 521-100500 to 7
to .05 IA60KV
411-45 43140 86120 Cabrzd6500 200 Finish
Over and/or .0002 max,
50 PC Quenched and - --'R~:~1) ---
Tempered 25 3 01U - --.-
Medium Carbon
Ruh
1330 4145 5132 8640 4000 Rough00 1/3
1335 4147 5135 8642 10 10 A6OKV
1340 4150 5140 8645 Cruzd6 0 iih 1
1345 4161 5145 868345 Cv;abnid/o 600.000 Fmnsh1.
4027 4340 5147 8650Ovrado002m
4028 4427 5150 8655 5~ unhdad~ iog
4032 4626 5155 8660 Tmee =0'_2 O3
4037 50840 5160 8740 ___
8-102
Internal Grinding 8.8
E A TRAVERSE
INFEED Wdth IDENIFI-
WHEEL WOR.
C Terr'ered - 3z
Rough /3
75 0005
4000
to to A80IV
5500 200 Finish:
.0002 max.
Over
50 Rc Maraged - s- . .__.._
GroupRough:
8. TOOL STEELS, WROUGHT 1 5000 75 o.00 1/3
to to A60MV
A2 H13 L6 P20 6500 200 Finish:
A3 H14 L7 P20 R Annealed /6
A4 H-19 01 S1 SOc or Oluenched .0002 mna.. -
SO R ~ and -
8-103
"
- , =--- -- ' --- - _'F- -: -: - - -
8.8 lntei nal Grinding
8PCTempered -I
Rogh 1/34
uenceW-
Q6M6o frJL.!
-
58 % enpered
M1
T5
f3 T6
IA3 a
See~ ecrnena~ ~
16Nut.gFi aecnd
sec0o
see~~~50 Gidlie Finishdi-
810e U.02mk
_ _ _ R,
TRAVERSE
Wheel WHEE
WEF
WHEEL WORK INFEED Wh
SPEED SPEED on dla.
HARD. per rev. CATION
MATERIAL CONDITION
NESS of work
fpm fpm i/pass ANSI
Rough: 1/3
GroupIV 400( 7 .0005
M4 to to A60JV
TI5 6000 20 F:ush: 1/
50 R0 Annealed 0002 m 1/6
m or Quenched ,0-a
and Tempered .. ..
Rough: 11/3
4000 7 0005
Rough: 1/3
4000 7 .0005
Rough: 1/
9. NITRIDING STEELS, WROUGHT 5000 75 .0005
Nitralloy 125o t A60K
Nitralloy 135 6 is.;
Nitralloy 135 Mod 200 Annealed, 6500 200 Finish. 1/6
Nitralloy 225 to Normalized 0002 max.
350 or Quenched
Nitrailoy 230
Nitralloy EZ
Nitralloy N a
Nitrex !
Rough: 11
75 .0005 /
4000
toto A81
8-105
8.8 Internal Grinding
TRAVERSE1
Austenitic 500Rough 1/
5000 75 0005
203E2 to to C60KV
303 6500 200 Finish-
to3M Annealed or .0002 max.
303Pb
303 Plus X
303Se
Martensitic Ruh /
4168o t 6K
416 Pius X 60 0 iih
416Se151/
420FtoAnaeor.02mx
420F Se 20Cl rw
440F
440F Se
1u1n6~dReomndtos
Sea~ve
tonsh ~ sectio
~ ridn 160
WheeIarmaxe o5 ~
~ 8t -ic ~ 2 re0men0ton unce
mini~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 diaete
hoeTFrLAGRmoesueehrsmeodofe
1TRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK INFEED Wihe WDETLI
SPEED SPEED on dia. wit Il
HARD-
MATERIAL CONDITION per rev. CATION*
NESS of work
tpm fpm in/pa ss ANSI
Rough: 1/3
5000 50 .0005
to to C60JV
325 6500 150 Finish: 116
to .0002 max
toCold Drawn scu 5 ' A7t
Martensitic Ruh /
403 440Ato tA6K
410 440B 60 0 iih
414 4400 135 6500 Finish:
2
420 501 to Annealed Z10 M
422 502 275 ~
431 Greek Ascotoy
8-107
8.8 Internal Grinding
TRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK INFEED Wheel WHEEL
SPEED SPEED on dla. width IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION perwork
rev. CATION*
NESS of
Over
PCCuenched
50R and/orand } Z
Temrpered
7.rA ME
8-108
_ _NIN S
Internal Grinding 8.8
TRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK jINFEED JWheel
width
WHEEL
IDENTIFI-
HARD- SPEED SPEED on dla.
MATERIAL CONDITION Iper rev. CATION*
NESS ofwr
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
Bhn ________ j7 _
to toA80KV1
50 Rc Quenched600 20 Fns 1/
Group:
ASTM400 A75 Grde00020C- 1/3
48r 0 Quenched1/
56 and --
RC Tempered
to Annealed- -~
8.8 Internal Grinding
TRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK INFEED Wihe WDEETL
HARD- SPEED SPEED on dla. wit DNFI
MATERIAL CONDITION per rev. CATION*
NESS of work
fpm fpm ,in/pass ANSI
Bhn :ms.rn 1 m/as __ ISO_-
18. STAINLESS STEELS, CAST 500Rough: 1/3
Ferritic 50 7 .0005
ASTM A217- Grades CS. C12 to to A60KV
ASTM A296 Grades CB-30. CC-SO. CE-30. 135 6500 200 Finish 1/6
CA6N. CA-6NM, CD4MCui to Annealed Roughmax 3
ASTM A297 Grade HC 185
ASTM a.487 Class CA6NM -2 2 .013
ASTM A608- Grade HC30 o t 6K
- 005ma
C_____
Austenitic Ruh /
ASTM A296 Grades CF-3, CF-3M. CF-8, 5000 75 .0005C6V
CF-8C. CF-8M, CF. 16F. CF-20. CG-8M. to toIC6K
CG-l 2. CH-20. CK-20. CN-7M. CN-7MS 135 Annealed. j6t)00 200 I 1/6
ASTM A297- Grades HD. HE. HF. HH. HI. HK. to Normal17Pi 0002 mnax,
I HN. HP. HT. HU pin or . -Pih
ASTM A351- Grades CF-3, UI-3A. CF-3M. A at ~ ~ ~ 1
CF-3MA, CF-8, CF-8A. CF-8C. CF-8M. 6OV
CF-1 OMC. CH-8, CH-1 0, CH-20. CK-20, 3
~ ijgh-:, P;
CN-7M. HK-30, HK-40. HT-30 0iax _ _
Martensitic Rough
.00 1/3
ASTM A217: Grade CA-i 5007500
AST A-iM.CA40to
A96 Gade C-1. to A6OKV
ASTM A26: Grades CAP7.C9.5M CCA54 13 6500 200 Finish- 1/
ASM42C7rae
C9 CC1515 Annealed. Normalized .0002 max 1/
ASTM A487: Classes CAl5a. CA-15M to o
25 Normalized and Tempered *10c-
~3
Over Wuenched
~~
See Oe 1600
sectiond mrClinalix.cmenain
8-110
Internal Grinding 8.8
TRAVERSE
ORK
1WHEL INFED Wheel WHEEL
HR-SPEED SPEED on dia. width IDENTIFI.
MATERIAL HADCONDITION per rev. CATION*
NWEEORSNFE of work
fpm 1pm in/pass ANSI
_ii- vi Infivimm/pasis- ___
1
21. GRAY CAST IRONS Rough- 1/3
75 C46JV
Ferti48Clas2
Ferlc5000
to to Ior.002
SAS J431c. Grade G1800 As Cast. 6500 200 Finish, 1/6 A46KV
Pearl itic- Ferritic 4 IAneld0002m max.
ASTM A46Ciass
brax. or Quenched /
SAE J431c. Grade G2500 and TemperedN
ASTM A48 Classes 30. 35. 40 ~'
SAE J431ic Grade GZ~u_____ _________
Rough: 113
5000 75 .001 C601V
to to or
4F CFae6500 200 Finish- 1/6 A601V
to or .02mx
60 Rc Induction Hardened - i3
8-111
8.8 Internal Grinding
I I TRAVERSE~
WHEEL WORK INFEED Wheel WHEEL
MATERIAL
I HARD-
ICONDITION
SPEED SPEED ondla. width
per rev,
IDENTIFI-
CATION*
I NESS of work
pm
fp in/pass ANSI
Martensitic Ruh /
ASTM A536: Grade 120-90-02 50 5 .0 61
SA9.J434c: Grade DQ&T 1 oo
53 PCFlame 60 0 iih / 61
to or .02mx
V 'c Induction Hardened -
8-112
Internal Grinding 8.8
TRAVERSE
-o-- --
27.
ALLYHROMUM-ICKE
CSTINS 500 5 Rough:- /
A2T. AHIGHGradesN
CrASONi. 500rO~ 75 .00 1/3
8-11A
1100 toColdDraw545
2618 646 or0002max
8.8 Internal Grinding
TRAVERSE
INFEED Wheel WHEEL
WHEEL WORK
SPEED SPEED on da. width IDENTIFI-
HARD- per rev. CATION*
MATERIAL CONDITIOE
NESS of work
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
Die Castings
C443 0 5180
Rough: 1/3
31. MAGNESIUM ALLOYS, CAST 5000 75 .003
AM60A AZ91C ZE41A to to C46JV
AM100A AZ92A ZE63A 50 As Cast. 6500 200 Finish,
AS41A EZ33A ZH62A to Annealed
AZ63A HK31A ZK51A 90 or Solution
AZ81A HZ32A ZK61A 500kg Treated and Aged ;
AZ91A KiA
AZ918 0E22A
Maxirmum hole length is 2.5 times hole diameter. 11CAUTION Potential Fire Hazard Exercise caution in grinding and
Maximum wheel width is 1.5 times wheel diameter disposing of swarl. Do NOT use water or wate.-miscible cutting
See section 16 for Cuttirq Fluid Recommendations fluids for magnesium alloys
*Wheel recommendations are for wet g.fndrng 0 8- to 2-inch (20 to 50
mm] diameter holes. For LARGER holes-use the same or softer
grade wheel For SMALLER holes-use a harder grade wheel. Also
see section 20 2.Gnnding Guidelines
8-114
Internal Grinding 8.8
TRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK iINFEED Wheel WHEEL
SWORKI nFEED width IDENTIFI-
[Rough
r
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION SPEEDISPEED on di pe rev. CATION'
NESSof wrork
1pm fm in/pass ANSI
NES of/3o
Bhn mL mimAmpsisO
32. T'TANIUM ALLOYS, WROUGHT 400 50 0005 1/3
C mmerciglly Pure to to C60JV!
99.5 5000 150 Finish
992 110 .0002max 1/6
99.0 to Annonw,
989 275 t - 4 -h ___
Ti-O 2Pd Z
TzCODE-12 -- Z '_ =-t
SesAlosRough. 1/3
Beta Alloys 40 0 00
T:-3AI-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr 4o 50 0005
Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3AI to to F10sh:
T- 11 5Mo-6Zr-4 5Sn 275 Annealed 000 mns 1/6
Ti-OV-2Fe-3A1 to or
Ti-13V-1 lCr-3A 350 Solution Treated -
Rough.
4000 50 .0005 13
to to C60JVt:
3503
350 5000 150 Finish: 1!6
Maximum hole length is 2 5 times hole diameter. tUse friable (green gnt) silicon carbide
Maximum wheel width is1.5times wheel diameter. #*CAUTION Potential Fire Hazard Exercise caution in grinding and
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations disposing of swart
'Wheel recommendations are for wet grinding 0.8- to 2-Inch [20 to 50
mmJ diameter holes For LARGER holes-use the same or softer
grade wheel For SMALLER holes-use a harder grade wheel Also
see section 20.2. Grinding Guidelines
8-115
8.8 Internal Grinding
(tRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK INFEED Wheel WHEEL
SPEED S on dIa. width IDENTIFI-
510 6
Rough: 1/3
210 332 368 464 5000 .002
220 335 370 465 toC,16J3V
226
230 340
342 377
385 466
467 0R 6 500 200 .0002 max.
Finish: 6
to Cold DrawngdweFSAEhesaaegehlA
100 R B _-
J Rough, 1/3 X
i
505 613 632 5000 75 .002
,51 6438to to C46JV
511
521 618
619 642
651 10R 6500 200 FinEsh:
.0002 max.
524 623 655 to AnneaWds
544 624 674 70 Re
Maximum hole length is2.5 times hole diameter. t Use friable silicon carbide.
(green grit)
Maximum wheel width is 1.5 times 'wheel diameter. ft CAUTION: Toxic Material. refer to National Institute for Occupaticnal
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations. Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions.
*Wheel recommendations are for wet grinding 0.8- to 2-inch 120 to 50 #:CAUTION: Potential Fire Hazard. Exercise caution in grnng and
mm) diameter holes For LARGER holes-use the same or softer disposing of swaf.
grade wheel. For SMALLER holes-use a harder grade wheel. Also
see section 20.2. Grinding Guidelines.
8-116
Internal Grinding 8.8
TTRAVERSE
Wheel WHEEL
WHEELI WORK INFEED I width IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION Dper re. CATION
~I
1!3
706 752 500 75 002
710 754 to to C 4L.11
7,5 75? I 6500 200 I F.ins 116
745 782 ;otoRe I ,.nealed . e-
R ou h:- 1/3
5000 75 GC
to to -;46JV
60 A 9 6500 200 Finish:
to Cold rawn
100 R
t a
8-117
7
8.8 Internal Grinding
TRAVERSe WHEEL
WHEELj WORK INFEED wih IENTIFI-
HARD- SPEED SPEED on ela. w IN
MATERIAL HERD CONDITION per rev. CATION
NESS of work i
'hnpci , ANS
966ff to 0002 ma U.
m 974
973 10As Cast -
Rough. 1/3
500O 75 .002
to 10 A54KV
Over As Cast WRO.
A000S6IK0 116
N10e or
Maxrium hole length s 2.5 times hole diameter. t tCAUTION Toxic Mateal. refer to Natonal Instdtue for Occupational
Maximum, wheel width is 1.5 tus wheel diameter. Safey and Health (NIOSH) forPrecautions
See section 16 forCutting Fluid Recommendations
*Whel recoumendations are for wet grinding 0 8- to 2-inch (20 to 50
mm) dkirmeter holes. For LARGER holes-use the same or softer
grade wheel. For SMALLEF. holes-use a harder grade wheel. Also
see section 20 2.Grinding Gudelines
, 8-118
I
---- - -m - II - - I - - -I - - - _
Internal Grinding 8.8
1 RAVERSE
IWheel whdL%
WHEEL -
WDEN
WHEEL WORK INFEED
SPEED SPEED on dla.
HARD- per rev. CATION'
MATERIAL H CONDITION
NESS 'o.work
fpm fpm In/pass ANSI
Rough /3Bhn
DURANICKEL Alloy 301 6000 50 Ruh5
5000 so 0006
MONEL Alloy 502 to to C60JV
MONEL Alloy K500 6000 ISO Fiish-
NI-SPAN-C Alloy 902 150 .0002 max. 1/6
PERMANICKEL Alloy 300 to Solution Treated V
.0002 max.,
5000 50 .0005
to to C60JV
toto0 to A60JV
253tHardened00 0 FiAesh- 1
452R Aged
47o16N-2
0 Hardd .0002 max.
340 ---A-KI5! -- -
;Ieae g
to or
TRAVERSE
Wheel WHEEL
INFEED width IDENTIFI-
WHEEL WORK
HARD- SPEED SPEED on dl3 i dt DNII
MATERIAL
MATERIALNESS CONDITION per rev. CATION*
fpm fpm m/pass of wor
ANSI
n %ar ogh
38, NITINOL ALLOYS, WROUGHT (cont.) 50 5 1 /3
(materials hlsted on preceding page) 5000 to C60JV
Rene
Udimet95500 Cutting Fluid.Recommendatons --------
(Idimet 700
Udimet 7 10...... ". . - -
Urilemp 1753
Waspaloy
8-120
- ~--. -
_.=- -- --
internal Grinding 8.8
F TRAVERSE
WHEEL
WHEIOK IFC Wheel
SPEED SPEED ondia. wit DNil
HARD- per rev CATION*
MATERIAL CONDITION
NESS of work
fhl
pm 1pm in/pass ANSI
Hastelloy Alloy X ~
Incoloy Alloy 82504______ IA _
SEL 15
TRW VI A
Udimet 500
Udimet 700
ASTM A296, Grades CW-12M. N-12M. CY-40
ASTM A297: Grades HW. HX
ASTM A494: Grades N-12M-1. N-12M-2.
8-121
8.8 Internal Grinding
-T TRAVFRSEi
Wheel WHEEL
WHEEL WORK iNFEED
WHEELWORK
NFEE width IDENTIFI.
SPEED SPEED on ddia. width IDCATION=
HARD-
MATER'AL NESS CONDITION per rev. CATION
of work I
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
Ehn iM_____________
i rc~~~~ 'S~
39. HIGH TEMPERATURE ALLOYS, Rough. 113
WROUGHT AND CAST (cont.) 3000 50 0005
to to A60JV
Cobalt Base, Wrought
AiResist 213 180 4000 150 Finish i1/6
laynes Alloy 25 (L605) to Solution Treated m. -
Haynes Alloy 188 230 I t&
J-1570 7'.
tAAR-M905
MAR-M918 I __ti~n
x
8-122
Internal Grinding 8.8
TRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK INFEED W'he WDETFL
HARD- SPEED SPEED on dla. wit DNII
MATERI L CONDITOON perrev. CATION*
NSSS of work
fpm fpm rn/pass ANSI
Bhn ~i/2~/nn fa~____ tO
40. REFRACTORY ALLOYS, WROUGHT, Rough 1/3
CAS, PM~50 001
CASTlrn
P/ M f 4000 to A60JV
0103 170 ' Fiih 1/6
C129Y to IStress 0005 mnax
Cb- lZr 225 Relieved -- Zj,- _-glr
Cb-752 a-2
FS-85 y_2 F_ =
FS-291 -
Tantalum" og /
ASTAR 8110C5 J
T-111400 tA6J
T-222 20015 Fish 1/
Ta-IOW to Stress 00 a
Ta-Hf 250 Relieved
Ta633
Tungsten" ogh /
85% density 20 toC60H-V
93% density 10 Pressed and Sintered, 150 Finish: 1/
100% density to Forged. .02mx
320 or
Arc Cast
Maximum hcte length is 2 5 times hole diameter. *Due to the brittleness of refractory alfcys. cracking. chipping. flaking
Maximum wheel width Is 15 limes wheel diameter and breakout tend to occur, particularly on tie edges of the ma-
See section 16 foi Cutting Fluid Recommendations chined surfaces
*Wheel recommendalloi.s are for wet grinding 0 8- to 2-inch (20 to 50 ttICAUTION Toxic Matenial. refer to National Institute for Occupational
mm) diameter holes For LARGER holes-use the same or softer Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions
grade wheel For SMALLER holes-use a harder grade wheel. Also t CAJTION: Potential Fire Hazard Exercise caution in gninding and
see section 20 2. Grinding Guidelines disposing of swarf
8-123
16 8.8 internal Grinding
TRAVERSE
WHELWOK INFEED Wheel WHEEL
HARD- SPEED SPEED on dla. width IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL CONDITION per rev. CATION*
N E Sfpm fpm in/pass o w rk ANSI
Tungsten Alloys"'Rug /
Gyromet50 05
Mallory 2000200 tC6H
W-1OAg29Prse002mx
W-7Ni-4Cu t n
320 Sinte~ed
Maximum hole length is2.b times hole diameter. *Due to the Lrdlieneas of refractory alloys. cracking, chipping, flaking
Maximum wheel w~dth isI.5 times wheel d-ameter. and breakout tend to occur, particularly on the edges of the ma-
8-124
L/
WOK
WHEE INEED ITRAVERSE
Wheel JWHEEL
WORKD
WHD-SEEL onFEdi width IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL HD.CONDiTION SED PED oda. per rev. jCATION*
NE S pm fpm in p ass o w rk ANSI
Bronzes Rough 1/
CT-0010-N 5000 75 002
CT-0010-R to to C46JV
CT-0010-S 308RI 6500 200 Finish 1/6
95CL-5A1 to As Sintered 00O02max
OR5 2 50
Ou am~ ; '. - -z
-J5
Maximum hole length IS2 5 limes hole diameter. Grinding of low-density parts is not recommended because surface
Maximum wheel width Is 1.5 times wheel diameter. porosit will be reduced or lost
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations
-Wheel recommendations are for wet grinding 0.8- to 2-inch 120to 50-E
mm] diameter holes For LARGER holes-use the same or softer 9i
grade wheel. For SMALLER holes-use a harder grade wheel. Also _!
see section 20 2. Grinding Guidelines w
8-125
8.8 Internal Grinding
TRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK INFEED Whdth WDEELIF
HARD- SPEED SPEED on dia. it DNII
MATERIAL CONDITION per rev. CATION*
NESS of work
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
Bhn rn/s rn/mmj mm/pass ISO,
FN-0205-S____ ________ C ~ m x
FN-0205-T
FN-0405-R
FN-0405-S
FN-0405-T
PX- 1005-T
FX-2008-T .- -
Maximum hole length is 2 5 timres hole diameter. Grinding of low-density pans is not recommended because surface
Maximum wheel width is 1.5 limes wheel diameter. porosity wilt be reduced or lost
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendatiurs
*Wheel recommendations are for wet grinding 0.8- to 2-inrh [20 to 50
mini diameter holes. For LARGER holes-use the 9sme or softer
grade wheel. For SMALLER holes-use a hA.,d1z;.ade wheel. Also
see section 20 2. Grinding Guidetiries.
8-126
Internal Grinding 8.8
TRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK Wihe
INFEED W
IHEEL
MAEILHARD- SPEED SPEED wit
on dia. DNII
MAESSA CONDITION per rev. 1 CATION*
NESSof work
fpnm fpm in/pass ANSI
Bhn mi/s rn/mi ;miriipas]' fSOJ-
48. MACHINABLE CARBIDES Rough 1/3
Fer-Tc4000 50 0005
teor to A60JV
4 040 6000 150 Finish 1/6
Rc 0002 max.
to AnnealedRoh
511318
t
68 R, Hardened
to and
70OR, Tempered -- ~-
94 RA A3- -
240 ~-
240 Wrought
Maximum hole length is 2.5 times hate diameter. tUse diamond wheel. see section 8.10.
Maximum wheel width is1.5 times wheel diameter. tOiamond wheel is preferable. see section 8.10
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
*Wheel recommendations are for wet grinding 0 8- to 2-inch 120 to 50
mini diameter holes For LARGER holes-use the same or softer
grade wheel. For SMALLER holes--use a harder grade wheel Also
see section 20.2. Grinding Guidelines
8-127
8.8 Internal Grinding
I TRAVERSE
WORK
WHEEL INFEED -
w
ofee
width HErk
IDENTfl'-
HARD- ISPEED SPEED on dia.
MATERIAL CONDITION per rev. CATION'
NESSof work
1pm fpm in/pass ANSi
Bhn Lz 113-Iiipss
st r
51. MAGNETIC ALLOYS (cont.) 5000 50 Ruh5
5000 50 0005
Hi Perm 49 to to C60KV
HyMu 80 6000 150 Finish
185 0002 max 6
to Wrought --
240
Rough. 1/3
Alnco I 5000 50 .0005
Alnico :! to to A60JV
Atmco III 6000 150 Finish:
Almco IV 45 C .0002 max. 1/6
Ainico V to As Cast -
Atnico V-7 58 RC ~~_ ~ A
Alnico XII
Columax-5
Hyflux Alnico V-7 , .
X-11: 11
53. CONTROLLED EXPANSION ALLOYS 5000 50 .0005
Invar to to C60KV
Kovar
125 Annealed F
000 as.
to or .02mx
250 Cold Drawn -
Rough- a1
Brush Grade Carbon 5000 .0005
to to C36KV
8 6500 Finish
to Molded .00 a, 1/6
90 or4
Shore Extruded
8-128
Internal Grinding 8.8
TRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK INFEED Whe IDETFI
SPEED SPEED on dla. wit DNI-
HARD- per rev. CATION1
MATERIAL CONDITION
NESS of work
fpm fpm in/pass ___ANSI
Bhn ~ WAi$
*ms
Graphite Rough og
5000 0005 31
Selicon 20rid2.GKdnPGieie
gria whlor SMALeR oe-seahre gaewel lo 8
8.8 internal Grinding
TRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK INFEED Whdth I WEELFI
on dia. wdh DNII
MATERIAL II HARD-
ESCONDITION
NESS
SPEED SPEED
per rev.
of work
CATION*
Rough: 1/3
5000 50 001
10 t0 C46KV
6500 150 Finish. 1/6
0005 max.
Rough. 1/
5000 50 .001
t0 to C36LV
6500 150 Finish: /
.0005 max.
Laminated .-
58.FLAE ~Rough*
ThEMAL 1/3
58 LM TERIALS SPRYE 5500 50 .0005
Sd5
MATRALy~ to t0 C80HV
Chromium Carbide 650000 2 max. 1/6
Chromium Carbide-Cobalt Blend-- __ .02mx
Columbium Carbide ~---
Tantalum Carbide ~_.1'
Titanium Carbide --
Tungsten Carbide
Tungsten Carbide-Cobalt ____ ________
Tungsten Carbide
(Cobatt)-Nickel Alloy Blend
Maximum hole leigth is2.5 limes hole diameter. Diamond wheel is preferable for flamne
sprayed carbides and cc 510-
Maximum wheel width is1.5 times wheel diameter. ics. see section 8.10.
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations.
'Wheel recommendations are for wet grinding 0 8- to 2-Inch 120 to 50
mm] diameter holc.- For LARGER holes-use the same or softer
grade wheel. For SMALLER holes-use a harder grade wheel. Nlso
see section 20.2. Grinding Guidelines.
8-130
Internal Grinding 8.8
TRAVERSEf
WHEEL WOFK INFEED Wheel WHEEL
SPEED SPEED ondla. i dth CATION
MArERIAL HARD-
NESCONDITION prrv AIN
NESS of work
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
Bhn n/ -rn/in /mmi
Rough
_
1/ _ S.i.
Inorganic Coating Materiais 5500 50 0005
Alumina (Pure)
tO to C601Vl
Alumina (Grey) containing Titania
Alumina. Nickel-Aluminide Blends 6500 100 Finish 1/6
Barium Titanate .0002max 1/
Borontt oih-
Calcium Tilanate
Calcium Zirconate
Chromium Disilicidetiai1~~
Chromium Oxideft
Cobalt 140%). Zircont Blend
Columbium (Niobium)c
Glass (Kovar sealing)Tt
Hexaboron Silicidef
Magnesia Alumina Spinet
Magnesium Zirconate .
Molybdenum Disilicide
Mull1o -=
Maximum hole length is 2-5 irmeshole diameter. Diamond whael is preferable for flame sprayed carbides and ceram-
Maximum wheel width is 1 times wheel diameter. ics: see section 8.10.
See section 16 for Cutting Fuid Recommendations t CAUTION, Toxic Material. refer to National Institute for Occupational
20 to50
*Wheel recommendations are for wet grinding 0 8- to 2-ri 1cU Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions.
mm) diameter holes For LARGER holes-use the $'.e or softer
grade wheel. For SMALLER holes-use a harder gi. cf. wheel. Also
see section 202. Grinding Guidelines.
8-131
8.8 Internal Grinding
TRAVERSE
OR
WHEL
WHEELWORK
I NFEED Wheel WHEEL
idthIDENTIFI-
MAEILHARD- CNION SPEED SPEED on dia. ervCAIN
NESS Jof work
fpm inpassANSI
frn
Bhn - i 'lkttmlpma.
59. PLATED MATERIALS 30D 50 u~ 3
1D5
Ctiromium Plate:30 00I
10 to A80HV
4000 150 Finish.
-~~~ 0002mrax 16
5000 so 000 3
,NickelPlate to to A60KV
Silver Plate
5 o rih 16
-0005 m-fuc o
61.RUBERRoug't 113
500050 001
to to C3OIV
6500 15,0 Finish: 11
.0005 ax
-Whe~aecorifiadstos
foCe gidn 08 oJ-n (2 o5 toe
mm)~~
AGE~ ~ oa-us ~h ari rs 1iaete 116o
grad whet.
a arde
Fr grae
SALLE hols-us 0.Als
werc setin_0.____gGudeins
8-13-
Internal Grinding 8.9
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels
TRAVERSE
WORK INFEED Wheel WHEEL
WHEEL
SPEED SPEED on dia. width IDENTIFI-
HARD.
MATERIAL CONDITION per rev. CATION
NESS of work
I pm fpm in/pass ANSI
1040 1050
High Carbon 1536 to , to >ff
1060 1074 1085 1566
1064 1075 1086 1572 - R
1065 1078 1090
1069 1080 1095
1070 1084 1561
107 14 55 15
3 18-133
1 1 12 1548
8.9 Internal Grinding
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels
TRAVERS
WHEEL WORK INFEED Wheel WHEEL
HARD- SPEED SPEED on dia. width I IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL CONDITION per rev. CATION
NESS of work
fpm tpm in/PCIss ANSI
Bhn r/mi
mms- mm/*pas- - - - ANSI
4. FREE MACHINING ALLOY 5.000 80/00 812T
STEELS, WROUGHT500 80 05
Medium Carbon Resulturized to to
4140 Carb~urized 10,000 1! Finish 1/8 B180TV
41OeOver and/or .0002 max.
4140Se50 Rc Quenched - ~- is T2O
414Teand Tempered ; -: -4- a --.
z Oi3
414S5e
4147Te to- to . -
4150 46A--ilh::
Medium and High Carbon - _______ .00IflMax. - 81 8T
Leaded
A1L30 41147 51132 861.40
41140 41L50 521100
411-45 43140 86L20
OW - w__
8-134
Internal Grinding 8.9
Cubic Boron Nitridie Whteels
TRAVERSE WEE
WHECL WORK INFEED D4iI Iit
MATERIAL HARD. CONDITION SPEED SPEED on dia. I per rev. CATION
NESS pn fp n/pas of work AS
Shn ~r/i- i/i
6. HIGH STRENGTH STEELS, Rough 1/6120TB
WROUGHT 5.'000 80 0005
to to
300M Hit 10,000 150 Finish
4330V H13 Over Quenched .0002 max. 1/8iS1OTV
4340 HP 9-4-20 50 Rc and Tempered ~oi~i& 1OB-
4340Si HP 9-4-25 -' 2 z2
98BV40 HP 9-4-30 '7o
M~ac HP 9-4-45 4 Fnlh> --
HY2?n ,-
A 10 H26 M43 Ti
'), H42 M44 T2 _
D3 L2 M46 T4
D4 L6 N147 T5
05 L7 01 T6____________
rl M2 06 T15 -
Fl2 M3-1 07 Wi ME ~
HIO M3-2 vz W2
Hil M4 P4 W5I
H12 AB P5 '
H13 M7 P6- R
431 _
Greek Ascoloy
Rough 13B2T
15. CARBON STEELS,CAST 5,000 80 .0005
Low Carbon t
ASTM A426 Grade CP1 Carbunzed 10.000 150 Finish
8-136
Internal Grinding 8.9
Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels
TRAVERSE
WHEEL WORK INFEED I WheWHE
HARD- SPEED SPEED on dla. width
per rev.
I IDENTIFI-
CATION
MATERIAL NES CONDITION
NESS of work
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
8-13720
- PEC=i t PAGE BLANK-NOT FILfLW
IRough3 10R53
49. CARBIDES 5000R D150-R75-
Titanium Carbide
Tungsten Carbide:TugtnCrie6000 to to
100 Finish
89 RA 60002 max 6 D220-R75-B
to .00-a
AlnicoRough 3 D -N75-M
Atco5000 30 .003
Alnico II to to
Almico
Alnico 1][
IV 45 R c 6000 40 Finish
001 max 6 D220-N75-M
Atnico VtoACatL
Atnico V-7 58 Rc
1W 91Mi
49 ~ ~ _
Alni~zo XII
Columax-5 P 1D
Alnico V-7WM- .y-lux
boog
Knoop Cas
S seto
ee 0 1Rough: PYROERA 400 50 .001 3 Dat0-N100-M
to to
Se1eto010ogulngFudRcomnain Mea-oae i 0 nn
704500 100 Finish," 20NO-
700o .0002 max. 6 D2.N 0 -
8-139
- - n- -__________
8.10 Internal Grinding
Diamond Wheels
TRAVERSE
Wheel WHEEL
WORK INFEED Wheel WDET-
WHEEL wit DNI-
HARD- SPE:-D SPEED on dia.
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION per rev. CATION
NESSI of work
fpm fpm in/pass ANSI
Bhn rr" V:pR
55. GLASSES & CERAMICS Rough- 3 DiOO-R50-M
4000 50 .001
(cont.)
480 to to
Glass
4500 100 Finish- 6 D220-R50-M
530 - .0002 max.
Knoop Ink 51 -7 r
-oo qt$i 3 M%
6000 15 FYh
AunuSdaeOvr4500 100
e Irt-
Finish:6D20ROM
-
.0005 max. 6D0-N0-
Seesecin 16 utingidecto to T
6
.a -=
D10NO-
-
I-
Zirconia (Zircorium Oxide)
Sehscon 20itrditinlinomtinSfeyadHelh(NOH-frPecuin
See section 16 for Cutting Flied Recommendation's ttCAUTION* Toxic Material. refer to National Institute for Occupational
See section 20 1 for additional information Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions
8-140-,
Internal Grinding 8.10
Diamond Wheels
TRAVERSE
Wheel WHEEL
WHEEL WORK INFEED width IDENTIFI-
SPEED SPEED on dta.
MATERIALHARD-
NESS CONDITIONper rev.
of work CATION
Lime Stabilized)
Zirconium Silicate
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations tt CAUTION- -oxic Material. refer to National Institute for Occupational
See section 20 1 for additional information Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions
8-141
pjC1~iiG PAcE BLAC-NOT FLUXED
1108 11na
111
i 50 R~c
Hot Rolled. Nor malized
Annealed, Cold Drawn
6500
-
150 IFinish
10015 max
1109
1110 1211 mxor Quenched Ruh
1115 1212 and Tempered 428; 113-
8-143
8.11 Centerless Grinding
WHEEL
WHEEL THRUFEED I INFEED
SPEED OFWORK* ondla. ICENTIFI-
HARD-
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION CATrONt
RN fpm in/mn in/pass ANSI
Rough:
4. FREE MACHINING ALLOY STEELS,
WROUGHT
to to A60MV
tedium Carbon Resulfurized Hot Normalized.
Rolled. Cold 6500 153 Finish
4140 50 Rc Annealed. Drawn 0015 max.
4140Se max or Quenched -
4142Te
4145Se and Tempered
4147Te
4150
Medium and High Carbon Leaded
4'L30 41L47 31L32 86L40 5500 50
41L40 41L50 52L100 to to A80LV
41L45 43L40 86L20 Carburized 6500 100 Finish
Over and/or 0015 max.
50RC Quenched and
Tempered
Rouh.
5. ALLOY STEELS, WROUGHT
to 50 A00M
Low Carbon
4012 4615 4817 8617 Hot Rolled. Normalized. 6500 150 Finish
4023 4617 4820 8620 50 RC Annealed, Cold Drawn .0015max.
4024 4620 5015 8622 max. or Quenched- - - - -
Rd
8-144
Centerless Grinding 8.11
INFEED WEL
WHEELITHRUFEED
MATERIAL HARD SOFIDNTIFI-
CONDITION SPEED 1 on dla. CATIONt
f mi/m in/pass ANSI
Bhn M
6. HIGH STRENGTH STEELS, WROUGHT Rough
300M 550 50 005 1
to A60MV
4330V
4340 Annealed. 6500 150 Finish
4340Si 50 13
C
Normalized
98BV40 max or Quenched
D6ac and Tempered
H1l
H13
M aw
HP 9-4-20
HP 9-4-25
HP 9-4-30 50
HP 9-4-45 to A80KV
600 150 Fiih
Over Quenched .
Tempered . -. -
50
S. TOOL STEELS, WROUGHT
Group Ito A60MV
H13 L6 P20 1
A2
A3 H14 L7 P21 50 R Annealed
AA H19 01 Si 50 Annea5ledx
A6 H21 02max or Quenched
02 2 and Tempered
A8 H22 06 $5
A9 H23 07 $6
A10 H2A P2 $7
H10 H25 P4 W1
H26 P5 W2
H11
P6 .:5 50
H12 L2
to A60LV
SAE J438b: Types W108. W109, W1 10. W1 12.
6000 150ncheis15
W209. W210. W310
Over Quenched 01 a
50Fad-- Tempered
8-145
= . . = . .
8.11 Centerless Grinding
WHEEL THRUFEED INFEED WHEEL
CONDITION SPEED OFWORKI on dia. CATIONF
MATERIAL HARD-
NESS
fpm in/mm in/pass ANSI
n
Bhn __ __ _ _ iS Ii hi* I
57nI - ISO
Rough:
4000 50 .004
to to A60LV
6000 150 Finish.
50 Rc Quenchec .001 max.
58RPC Tempered T9
5NY
Rough:
4000 50 .003
to to A8OKV
6000 150 Finish:
Over Quenched .001 max.
58 RIC and
TemperedI .'
Rough:
Group III
5500 50 .005
A7 M41
to to A60LV
07 M43 D7M36500 150 Finish:
50 R Annealed .015 max.
M3-2 M44
M6 M46 mxCor Quenched -- .0 1 mx
M7 M47 and Tempered i" ;
M33 T5
M34
M36 T6 --
Rough:
4000 5z0 .004
to to A80KV
5R Qunhd6000 1,50 Finish:
50 Rc Quenchedmax.
to and
58 Rc Tempered
to to A80JV
Over Quenched
58 Rc andd
Tempered
8-146
Centerless Grinding 81
NES pm~iii
fh 2 n/pass ANSI'
M4 j 40001
10
50
to
.004
A60KV
T1
T 6000 I 150 Finish-
50 R ~ Annealed 001 max,
maxCor Quenched -
and Tempered
Pough:
4000 50 003
to *10 A:1JV
50P Qechd5500 150 F;nish-
50 aCunchd .001 max
5Rc Tempered
Rough:
4000 5.' .002
to to A8OIV
5500 150 Finish:
Over Quenched .001 max
58 R,. and
CTempered __
Nitrex 1 I--. -- ~-
I Rough:
Z000 50 .003
Ito to A8OJ'/
60ORc b000 150 Finish:
to max.
.irdd001
65 Rc ~~=~~.~~
8-147
8.11 Centerless Grinding
1 1WHEEL
WHEELI TIIUFEED INFEED IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION SPEED OFVIORK* n ias CATION-.
MartenaificRog
416 Plus X 5 10 Fish
416Se 135 I Annealed.01ma
420F to or
42OF~e 240 Cold Drawn . __
440F
440F Se
405 tot3A4L
409 43613 015mx
429 442 to Annealed
430 446 185
Austeriic 50 0 -0
201 308 317to o 0L
202 309 321 6W 10 Fnh
301 309S 3.30 135 Annealed 01mx
302 310 34.7 to or
302B 310S 34E1 275 Cold Drawn
304 314 384
304L 316 3815
305 316L ~-
Ruh _
Austernic
Nitronic 32
Nitronc. 33 60 5 iih
Nitionic 40 210A
NitrOnoc 50 to Annealed
Nitronic 603 250
WHEEL
WHEEL THRUFEED
SP INFEED
I IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITIONSPEED OF WORK* on dln. CATIONT
NESSCODTN ANSI
fpm in/mi n/pass
Bhn __ _ _ _ _ _ __ ~ Q
Vjj~
Rough:
13. STAINLESS STEELS, WROUGHT (cont.)
Austenitic (cont.) 5500 50 005
60 100 Finis
(materials listed on preceding page)
325 0 0
Martenaitic 5ogF
5to .00L
403 440A
to t
410 440B
135 6500 150 Finish:
414 440C
420501 to Annealed
422 502 275
431
Greek Ascoloy
Quenched
Over
275 and
Rough:
14. PRECIPITATION HARDENING
STAINLESS STEELS, WROUGHT to
50 -
8-149
8.1 Centerless Grinding
I H~no
CONDITION
WHEEL 1 THRUFF.ED
SPED OWORK
SEDO-OK"
INIFFED
on ~a.
WHEEL
IDENTIFI-
CATIONt
MATVRI-
MAEIL Sfprn Jrn/min in/pass ANSI
_________________________ hn ________~ r~i ~ Ii~~
15. CARBON STEELS, CAST IRough
Low Carbon 5500 50 005
AiM 46Grd P1to to A60MV
AS OIAnnealed.
A26Gad Normalized, 6500 150 Finish
1010 100 Normalized and 0015 max
1020 to Tempered. W4q;a Z'
Medium Carbon 300 or Quenched :3_
ASTM A352: Grades LOA, LCB. ICC and Tempered RV~
ASTM A356: Grade 1 A
1030 1040 1050 ~ ~ 10______3
Rough
5500 50 005
8-150
Centeriess Grinding 8.11
Rough:
4000 50 .003
to to A60KV
6000 150 Finish:
Over Quenched .001 max
58 R and
Tempereo E7_
2005 ax
to Annealed
250
48 Ri Quenched600 10 Fns
56 RG Temipered
4000 50 .003
6000 150 Finish:
Over Quenched.01mx
56 Tempered
8-151
8.11 Centerless Grinding
1 WHEEL
IDENTIFI-
WHEEL THRUFEED INFEED
*
SPEED OFWORK on dla. CATIOIt
MATERIAL HARD-
NESS CON'.:'TION CATIONt
fpm in/mm in/pass ANSI
Martensitic Rough0
ASTM A217: Grade CA-155
ASTM A296. Grades CA-15. CA-15M. CA-40 Annealed, to to A60LV
ASTM A426' Grades CP7, CP9. CPCA15 Normalized 6500 150 Finish:
135 or.0015 max.
ASTM A487: Classes CA15a. CA-15M or
to Normalized -
225 an
Tempered
Rough"
5500 50 .005
to to A60KV
6500 150 Finish:
Over OverQuenched
Qenche.0015 max.
275 and .
Tempered - -
8-152
Centerless Grinding81
48 Rc FlameFish
250
255
8-153
8.11 Centerless Grinding
Cls Hardened
InduTyecAmao 9p- z 2t
See secio
mmnain 16 for CuMnalldR
aoreuatn
AST And 2 whelsee 2 t 0 p
8-154
Centerless Grinding 8.11
INFEED WHEEL
WHEEL THRUFEED
I I IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION SPEED OFWORK ondla. CATIONt
NESS
fpm in/Mm in/pass ANSI
. _hn
___ ___ ___ Bh __ ___~~___i1n
55 Rough
26. HItH SILICON CAST IRONS
Durron to to C60JV
Duriclor 6500 150 Finish.
ASTM A58
52 Rc As Cast ~ti- 001
0 maxa
Rough
27. CHROMIUM-NICKEL ALLOY CASTINGS
5500 50 005
ASTM A560 Grades 50Cr-50Ni. 60Cr-40Ni to to C60KV
6500 150 Finish
275
max
As0015
375
Rough
28. ALUMINUM ALLOYS, WROUGHT
EC 2218 5252 6253 to to C54JV
1060 2219 5254 6262 30 Cold Drawn 6500 150 Finish,
1100 2618 5454 6463 I to or 0015 max
1145 3003 5456 6951 I 150 Solution Treated XWSI V 7fg-=.
1175 3004 5457 7001 500kg and Aged
1235 3005 5652 7004
2011 4032 5657 7005
2014 5005 6053 7039
2017 5050 6061 7049
2018 5052 6063 7050
2021 5056 6066 7075
2024 5083 6070 7079
2025 5086 6101 7175
2117 5154 6151 7178
Rough
29. ALUMINUM ALLOYS, CAST 5500 50 005
Sand and Permanent Mold to to C54JV
A140 2950 5140 A7,12 0 40 As Cast 6500 150 Finish
2010 82950 A514 0 D712 0 to or .0015 max.
2080 3080 B5140 7130 125 SolutionTreated -
2130 3190 5200 7710 and Aged Sa- -k
2220 355.0 535.0 8500
224 0 C355 0 705.0 A850.0
2420 84430 7070 B850.0 - -
Hiduminium RR-350
Die Castings
C443 0 5180
8-155
8.11 Centerless Grinding
WHEEL THRUIFEED INFEED WEELIF
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION SPEED OF WORK* on dla. CATIONt
NESS fpm in/min in/pass ANSI
Bhn
P_111W WII-
29. ALUMINUM ALLOYS, CAST (cont.) .
Sand and Permanent Mold 50 0 .0
328 0 3560 40 As Cast 6500 150 Finish
A332.0 A356.0 to or .05mx
F332 0 357.0 125 Solution Treated
333.0 359.0 500kg and Aged - -
354.0
Die Castings
360.0 A380.0 3900 A413.0
A360.0 383.0 3920
3800 A384 0 4130
and Aged
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations t Use friable (green grit) silicon carbide.
*See section 8 12for Work Traverse Rates As recommended starting #CAUTION: Potential Fire Hazard. Exercise caution in grinding and
conditions-use a regulating wheel angle with a positive inclination of disposing of swart. Do NOT use waler or water-mis. ble cutting
31 and a regulating wheel speed of 25 to 40 rpm. fluids for magnesium allc/s.
tWheel recommendations are for wet grinding 0.8- to 2-inch [20 to 50
mmi diameter work. For LARGER diameter work-use a softer grade
andior coarser grit wheel For SMALLER dMameter work-use a
harder grade wheel. Also see section 20 2. Grinding Guidelines.
8-156
Centerless Grinding 8.11
MATERIAL
HARD
NEA RD. ISPEED
CONDITION
fpm
J I T
WHEEL THRUF5ED
0F WORK.
_
in/min
_
1
INFEED
on dla.
i n/pass
_
WEELFI
CAIt
_
ANSI
8 n~___ _ _ _ __ _ _ ~i/0718!O~
Alpha and Alpha-Beta Alloys
Ti-8Mn
tRough
I4000 50 .001
Ti- 1AI-8V-5Fe iIto Ftos C6OKVi
Ti-2AI-1I lSn-5Zr- IMo 300 5500 150 Fns
Ti-3lAi-2 5V !Aneld.00 ,05 max
See section 16 tor Cutting Fluid Recommendations 4Use triable (green grit) silicon carbide
'See seLtion 8,12 for Work Traverse Rates As recommended starling #CAUTION Potential Fire Hazard. Exercise caution in grinding and
conditions-use a regulating wheel angle with a positive inclination ot disposing of Swart
30 and a regulating wheel speed of 251to40 rpm.
tWheel recommendations are for wet gninding 0 8.to 2-inch (2^~ to 50
mm] diameter work For LARGER diameter work-use a sofner grade
and/or coarser grit wheel For SMALLER diameter work-use a
harder grade wheel Also see section 20 2. Grinding Guidelines
I
8-157
8.11 Centerless Grinding
5hnI Rough
34. COPPER ALLOYS, WROUGHT
OR5500 50 005
101 116 143 162 to to C54KV
102 119 145 184 6500 150 Fmnsh-
104 120 147 185 10 R e 0015 nax
.05 121 150 187 to Annealed .
107 122 155 189 70 R
R
109 125 162 190- - __ ___
Rough
210 332 368 464 5500 50 005
220 335 370 465 to to C54KV
226 340 377 466 6500 150 Finish.
230 342 385 467 10 Re 0015 max.
240 349 411 482 to Annealed - --
260 350 413 485 -- T79
268 353 425 667-
270 356 435 687
280 360 442 688 .
314 365 443 694 Rough
316 366 444 5500 50 005
330 367 445 to to C54KV
Rough:
505 613 632 5500 50 005
510 61 - 638 to to C54KV
511 618 642 6500 150 Finish:
521 619 651 10 R e .0015max
524 623 655 to Annealed
544 624 674 70 R8
608 625 675
610 630
Rough:
5500 50 .05
to to C54KV
F ish
t00o Cold Drawn 6500 r,'
.00 15 max.
100 R
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations ttCAUTION Toxic Material. refer to National Institute for Occupational
.See section 8 12 for Woik Traverse Rates As recommended starting Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions
conditions-use a regulating wheel angle with a positive inclination of
3. ai.d a regulating wheel speed of 25 to40 rpm
Iheel recommendatons are for wet gnnding 0 8- to 2-inch [20 to 50
mmj diameter work For LARGER diameter work-use a softer grade
and/or coarser grit wheel For SMALLER diameter work-usa a
harder grade wheel Also see section 20 2.Grinding Guidelines
8-158
Centeriess Grinding 8.11
WHEEL
IDENTIFI-
WHEEL THRUFEED INFEED
MATERIAL HARD-
NESS CONDITION SPEED OFWORK ondla. CATIONt
fpm in/m I Inpass ANSI
Rough 0
5500 50 005
706 752
710 754 to to C54KV
715 757 6500 150 Finish
725 770 10 Ra 0015 max
745 782 to
70%R-
Annealed
j kkm
Rough
5500 50 005
to to C54KV
60 6500 150 Finish-
0015 max
to Cold Drawn W
100 R
goug
5500 50 Rough
35. COPPER ALLOYS, CAST
5500 50 005
801 814 824ft to to C54KV
803 815 825ff 40 6500 150 Finish.
805 817ff 826ff to As Cast .01 a
807 818ff -'2t 200 or
809 820ff 828ff 500kg Heat Treated AZ
811 821ff
813 822ff
Rugh:
P 1
5500 50 .005
to to J A60LV
Rough.
833 854 867 5500 so .005
834 855 868 to to C-54KV
836 857 872 35 6500 150 Finish:
838 858 874 to
842 861 875 200 As Cast
844 86250k
848863 878
852 864 879
853 865
Rough:
902 916 934 948 5500 50 .005
903 917 935 952 to to C54KV
905 922 937 953 40 6500 150 Finish:
907 923 938 954 to .0015 max.
909 925 939 955 100 As Cast
910 926 943 956 500kg
911 927 944 957
913 928 945 958
915 932 947
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations tfCAUTION Toxic Material. refer to National Institute for Occupational
*See section 8 12 for Work Traverse Rates As recommended starting Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions.
conditions-use a regulating wheel angle with a positive inclination of
3- and a regulating wheel speed of 25 to 40 rpm
tWheel recommendations are for wet griding 0 8- to 2-inch [20 to 50
mm] diameter work For LARGER diameter work-use a softer grade
and/or coarser grit wheel For SMALLER diameter work-use a
harder grade wheel Also see section 20 2. Grinding Guidelines
8-159
8.1 Centeriess Grinding
WHEEL THRUFEED INFEED WDEELFI
MAERALHARD- ODIINSPEED 1 OFWORKO ondla. CAETIFIt
MATERIAL NESS CNIINCTO'
f pm L n min in'pass ANSI
Bhn I um j-in ffrn/p~
35. COPPER ALLOYS, CAST (cont.) 550 50 o005
(materials listed on preceding page) to t A60LV
6500 150 Finish
Over As Cast 0015 max
100 or
500kg Heat Treated ~Rui
962 550 50 3~
005
963 to to C54KV
964 50 6500 150 Finish:
9661t to 0015 max
973 100 As Cast ~ ~ ~ ~
974 500kg -t3 -
976
978 .
..i~
993 _ _
Rough:
5500 50 .005
to to A60LV
Over ACat6500 150 Finish:
100 osfas .00 15 max.
500kg Heal Treated ~-
Cast ia
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations t tCAUTION Toxic Matenial. refer to Nation~al institute lar Occupational
*See section 8 12 for WobrkTraverse Rates As recommended starting Safety and Heat.%(NIOSH) for Precautions
conditions-use a regulating wheel angle with a positive inclination of
3? and a regulating wheel speed of 2510o40 rpm
tWheel recommendations are for wet grinding 0 8- to 2-inch (20 to 50
r.m) diameter work For LARGER diameter work-use a softer grade
and/or coarser grit wheel, For SMALLER diameter work-use a
harder grade wheel Also see section 20.2. Grinding Guidelines
8-160
Centerless Grinding 8.11
INFEED WHEEL
IWHEELf THRUFEED
0
MATERIAL HARD-SS CONDITION SPEEOj OF WORK ondla. CATIONt
N fpm nmin inpass ANSI
Rough
37. BERYLLIUM NICKEL ALLOYS,
5500 50 005
WROUGHT AND CASTtf to to A60LV
Berylco 440 6500 150 Finish
Berylco 4 lC 200 As Cast 0015 max.
Berylco 420 to or
Berylco 43C 250 Solution Treated
Brush Alloy 2000
Brush Alloy 220C
Brush Alloy 260C Roug_
Rough-
5500 50 .003
to to AGOKV
6500 150 Finish
283 Hardened 001 r.'ax.
425 AgedA fl- - tz
Rough-
5500 50 002 I
to to A6OJV
6500 150 Finish:
47 R C Hardened .001 max
to or
52 RA
0 ge
Rough:
38. NITINOL ALLOYS, WROUGHT 4000 50 003 C60KV
Nitinol 55Ni-45Ti to to or
Nitinol 56'Ji-44Ti
Nitino6Ni-40T
Ndino1 60Ni40Ti 26000
210 Wrought 150 Finish-
M01max. CA60PB
to o
340 Anae
Rough:
4000 so .001 C60XIV
to to or
4R 6000 150 Finish- CA60PB
to Ounched.0005 max.1
to Qece
52 Ac0
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations ttCAUTION Toxic Material. refer to National Institute for Occupational
*See section 8.12 for Work Traverse Rates As recommendd starting Safety and Hea'th (NIOSH) for Precautions
conditions-use a regulating wheel angle with a positive inclination of
3- and a regulating wheel speed of 25 to 40 rpm
tWheel recommendations are for wet gnnding 0 8- to 2-inch (20 to 50
mm] diameter work For LARGER diameter work-use a softer grade
and/or coarser grit wheel For SMALLER diameter work-use a
harder grade wheel. Also see section 20 2. Grinding Guidelines
8-161
8.11 Centerless Grinding
iWHEEL' THRUFEEDI INFEED WHEEL
HAD-SEE Ie O WR o IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL NESS- CONDITION SPE FWR* o ~. CATION-.
fpm jin min IfnIpass ANSI
Bhn &sI~ums mia ?l~
39. HIGH TEMPERATURE ALLOYS., Rough.
WROUGHT AND CAST A60O5000
Nickel Salli,Wrought I to InA6K
AF2-1DA 1 200 4001IO Fns
Anricalec
Astroloy
I I
to I Sou0nrae
t
0
PIa
Unitemp 1753
Waspa'oy
8-162
Centeriess Grinding 8.11
WHEEL THRUFEED INFEED WETL
HARD SP~r)OF WRK* on ie. IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL HARD-
NESS CONDITION SPEE' OFWORK ondia. CATIONt
fpm inmin in/pass ANSI
__
_ __
__ _ __ _ __ _ Bhn _____ %i: ~iMhW'~b7~~~ Z1i
t5ough:
Nickel Bass, Wrought
5500 50 .005
TP-Nickelff
to to A60KV
TD-Ni-Crtt
8 6500 150 Finish.
As Rolled 0015 max.
10
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations ttCAUTION, Toxic Material. ref( -to National Institute fur Occupational
*See soction 8 12 for Work Traverse Rates As recommended starting Safety and Health (NIOSH) fin Precautions
conditions-use a regulating wheel angle with a positive Inclination of
3 a. . a regilaling wheel speed of 25 to40 rpm
tWhbel recommendations are forwet grinding 0.8- to2-inch (20 to 50
min]diameter work For LA.:,t-R diameter work-use a softer grade
and/or coarser grit wheel For SMALLER diameter work-use a
harder grade nheel Afr-' see section 20 2. Grinding Guldelinv.
8-163
-- . . ..."'
P. - . .. . . - = i
V-57
W-545
16-25-6
1g-9DL 3000 50 .003
to to A60KV
Rough:
40. REFRACTORY ALLOYS, WROUGHT,
CAST, PM' 50 .001
00 to A60LV
Columblum t. 4000
C 103 170 ISO Finish:
to Stress .0005 max.
C129Y
Cb-lZr 225 Relieved -
Cb-752
FS-85
FS-291
WC-3015 ..
in VA
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendatiors ** Due to the brittleness of refractory alloys, cracking, chipping, flaking
*See section 8.12afor Work Traverse Rates As recommended starting and breakout tend to occur, particularly on the edges of the ma-
conditions-use regulating wheel angle with a positive inclination of chined surfaces 2
3* and a regulating wheel speed of 25 to 40 rpm ttCAUTION- Toxi- Material, refer to National Institute for Occupational
tWheel recommendations are for wet grinding 0 8- to 2-inch (20 to 50 Safety and Heaith (NIOSH) for Precautions
m1 diameter work For LARGER diameter work-use a softer gr-de ::CAUTION* Potential Fire Hazard. Exercise caution in gnnding and
and/or coarser grit wheel For SMALLER diameter work-use a disposingofswarf
harder grade wheel Also see section 20 2. Grinding Guidelines.
8-164
Centerless Grinding 8.11
Tantalum" Rough
ASTAR 1110 2000 50 .001
T-111 to to A60KV
T-222 o 4000 150 Finish
Ta-lOW to Stress .0006 max.
Ta-Hf 2510 Relieved
Ta63
Tungsten** Ruh
85% densityso 01
93% densiity200 tC7V
96% densily Pressed and Sintered.
100% density to -orgeo..03ma
320 o
Arc Cast ~ -
Tungsen Aloys8-1ug5
* . - n- - - * ,-rw u,.Jin..O -
U Rough
44. URANIUM, WROUGHTtf
4000 75 005 C46JB
to to or
56 RA 6000 125 Finish C46KV
002 max
to Annealed
58 RA
Rough,
47. POWDER METAL ALLOY Rough
5500 50 005
Copper
to to 5K
50 PR- 6500 150 Finish"
50 Rr0015 max.
to As Sintered Wpm r ,M ,
Brasses Rough-
5500 50 005
CZP-0218-T
CZP-0218-U to to
35 RH 6500 150 Finish
CZP-0218-W .0015 max
90Cu-1OZn to As Sintered
Rough-
Bronzes Rough
5500 50 005
CT-0010-N
CT-0010-R to to C54KV
CT-0010-S 30 RF 6500 F.h max
95Cu-5AI to As Sintered - ___ 0
77Cu-l5Pb-7Sn-1Fe-1C 75 RFAs-intered -
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations *Due to the brittleness of re'ractory al!oys, cracking, chipping, flaking
*See section 8 12 for Work Traverse Rates As recommended starting and breakout tend to occur, particularly on the edges of the ma-
conditions-use a regulating wheel angle with a positive inc;inaton of chined surfaces
30 and a regulating wheel speed cf 25 to 40 rpm ttCAUTION Toxic Material, refer to Natior.al Institute for Occupational
tWheel recommendations are for wet gnnding 0 8- to 2-inch [20 to 50 Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions
mm diameter work For LARGER diameter work-use a softer grade ttCAUTION Potential Fi e Hazard Exercise caution in gnnding and
and/or coarser gnit wheel For SMALLER diameter work-use a disposing of swarf
harder grade wheel Also see section 20 2. Grinding Guidelines Grinding of tow-density parts is not recommended because surface
porosity wilt be reduced or lost
8-166
Centerless Grinding 8.11
As Sintered.0005 max.
to
82 R
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations Grinding of :ow-density parts is not recommended because surface
*See section 8 12 for Work Traverse Rates As recommended starling porosity will be reduced or lost
conditions-use a regulating wheel angle with a positive inclination of
30 and a regulating wheel specd of 25 to 40 rpm
tWheel recommendations are for wet grinding 0 8- to 2-inch [20 to 50
mmj diameter work For LARGER diameter work-use a softer grade
and/or coarser grit wheel For SMALLER diameter work-use a
harder grade wheel Also see section 20 2. Grinding Guidehne
8-167
8.11 Centeriess Grinding
WHEEL
WDEF
WHEEL THRUFEED INFEED
I' E*L I IDENTIFI-
MATERIAL HARD- CONDITION SPEED OFWORK* on dIe. CATIONt
NESS
1pm in/mm in/pass ANSI
Bhn * Mr7*'
'h 1 . .
SteelsRough.
5500 50 005
FSteels
F-08S6500 to to
150 Finish A60NV
F-0008-S
F-0005-S 101 As Sintered 001 max
FC-0205-Stor
FC-0208-P 426 Heat Treated
FC-0208-S
FC-0508-P
FC- 1000-N
FN-0205-S
FN-0205-T
FN-0405-R
FN-0405-S
FN-0405-T
FX-1005-T
FX-2008-T
Ruh
49. CARBIDES
I itanium Carbide550 001
w i c t 10 C60KV0o
Tungsten Carbde 6500 60 Finish: _,
89 R A.0003 max.
to _
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations, Grnng of low-densily parts is not recommended because surface
*See section 8 12 for Work Traverse Rates As recommended starting porosity will be reduced or lost /
conditins-Jise a regulating wheel angle with a posite inclination of -
3 . and a regulating wheel speed of 25 to 40 rpm
tWheel recommendations are for wet grnng 0 8- to 2-inch 120 to 50
mini diameter work For LARGER diameter work-use a softer grade
and/or coarser grit wheel. For SMALLER diameter work-use a
harder grade wheel Also see section 20.2, Grinding Guidelines
8-168
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- - - --- - -- - -l--- ------- __ _ _ __ _
Centerless Grinding 8.11
240
0015 max
Hi Perm 49Rough
HyMu88600V to to
Alnico I 56 .003
Atnico II
Alnico IV151R 6500 150 Finish-
Alnico IV 4
Alnico V-7 b8OR
Atnico XII
Columax-5 7:
Hyltux Alnico V-7
- -- -- - - -.- 8-169 r -- -
8.11 Centerless Grinding
INFEED IDENTIFI-
WHEEL THRUFEED
SPEED OFWORK onda. CATIONF
MATERIAL HARD-
MAERA NESS COND:TIONCAIN
fpm
fS inm/m in/pass ANSI
':7insh
to Molded Oct max
900 or
GraeRough:
GaSe CA5000
h .005
to 50 C36NV
8 6500 Finish
90
to
or
Molded 001 max
Shore- Extruded - -
GrpieRough Rough-
Grphte5000 005 C36JV
to 50
6500 Finish: Finish,
001 max- C60JV
Knoop
to to C0LV
.001 "max.
8-170
__________________ _______
Centerless Grinding 8.11
I WHEEL
WDENF
WHEEL THRUFEED INFEED
Silicon Carbide .
Silicon Nitride RO
t
Thoria (Thorium Oxide)tt -S
Titania (Titanium Oxide)
Titanium Diborideff
Zircon (Zirconium Silicate)
Zirconia (Zirconium Oxide)
Rough:
5500 5 .005,020
to to C46MV
6500 30 Finish:
Rough:
5500 5 .005-.020
to to C36NV
6500 30 Finish:
.003 max.
-- Laminated
See section 16 fur Cutting Fluid Recommendations tt CAUTION. Toxic Material. refer to National Institute for Occupational
*See section 8 12 for Work Traverse Rates As recommended starting Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions
conditions-use a regulating wheel angle with a posive inclination of
3 and a regulating wheel speed of 25 to 40 rpm
tWheel recommendations are for wet grinding 0.8- to 2-inch 120 to 50
mm] diameter work For LARGER diameter work-use a softer grade
ane/or coarser grit wheel. For SMALLER diameter work-use a
harder grade wheel Also see section 20 2. Grinding Guidelines
8-171
8.11 Centerless Grinding
T WHEEl.
THRUFEED INFEED WET-
WHEEL
SPED OWORK on ia. IDENTIFI-
HARD
MATERIAL I SHARD
NESS CONDITION SPEED OFWORK ondla. CATIONt
fpm in/mm in/pass ANSI
_________________Bhn 29t_____________ -T
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations t tCAUTION Toxic Material. refer to National Institute for Occupational
*See section 8 12 forWork Traverse Rates As recommended starting Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Precautions
conditions-use a regulating wheel angle with a positive inchratirn of
3* and a regulating wheel speed of 25 to40 rpm
$Wheel recommendations are for wet gnnding 0 8- to 2-inch (20 to 50
mm)diameter work For LARGER diameter work-use a softer grade
and/or coarser grit wheel For SMALLER diameter work-use a
harder grade wheel. Also see section 20 2. Grinding Guideliies
8-172
Centerless Grinding 8.11
WHEEL THRUFEED INFEED WEETLF
to o173K
- PfRECEDi' PjACZ BLANK-NYT FILLMD
10 15 20 25 30 40 50 70 90 125 160
inces* rpm rpm rpm rpm rpm rpm rpm rpm rpm rpm rpm
80 4.4 6.6 8.8 11.0 13.2 17.5 I 21.9 30.7 39.5 548 702
85 4.7 7.0 9.3 11-6 140 186 233 32.6 41 9 58.2 74.6
9.0 49 7.4 99 123 148 19.7 24.7 34.5 44.4 61 7 78.9
95 52 78 10.4 13.0 15.6 20.8 260 365 46.9 65.1 83.3
10.0 5.5 82 11.0 13.7 16.4 21 9 274 38.4 49.3 68.5 87.7
10.5 5.8 1 8.6 11 5 14.4 17.3 230 28.8 40.3 51.8 72.0 92.1
1 j 11.0 60 90 12.1 15.1 18.1 24.1 30.2 422 54.3 75.4 965
11.5 6.3 95 126 15.8 189 252 31.5 44.1 56.7 788 100.9
12.0 66 99 13.2 164 19.7 263 32.9 46.0 59.2 82.2 1053
125 6.9 10.3 13.7 17.1 20.5 274 34.2 47.9 61.6 85.6 1097
13.0 7.1 10.7 14.3 17.8 213 28.5 35.6 49.8 64.1 890 114.1
13.5 7.4 11.1 14.8 185 22.1 29.6 36.9 51.7 66.5 924 118.5
.114-0 76 11.5 154 19.2 22.9 30.7 38.3 53.6 69.0 95.8 122.9
80 8.8 13.2 17.5 21.9 263 35.1 43.9 61.4 78.9 109.6 140.3
85 9.3 14.0 18.6 233 28.0 37.3 46.6 652 83.9 116.5 149.1
9.0 99 14.8 19.7 24.7 29.6 39.5 493 69.1 88.8 1233 157.9
9.5 10.4 15.6 20.8 26.0 31.2 41.7 52.1 72.9 937 130.2 166.7
10.0 11.0 164 21.9 27.4 32.9 i 439 54.8 76.7 98.7 137.1 1754
10.5 i 11.5 17.3 230 288 34.5 460 57.6 806 1036 143.9 184.2
20 11 0 12.1 181 24.1 302 1 36.2 48.2 603 84.4 108.5 150.8 193.0
11 5 112.6 189 25.2 31.5 37.8 50.4 63.0 883 1135 157.6 2017
12.0 13.2 19.7 26.3 32.9 395 52.6 65.8 92.1 118.4 164.5 210.5
12.5 13.7 20.5 127.4 I332 j41.1 548 68.5 96.0 123.4 1713 219.2
130 14.3 21.3 28.5 33.6 42.8 57.0 71.3 99.8 128.3 174.2 228.5
13.5 14.8 22.1 29.6 33.9 44.4 59.2 74.0 103.7 133.3 177.0 236.7
14.0 I 15.4 22.9 30.7 34.3 46.1 61.4 76.8 107.5 138.2 183.9 245.5
I
8.0 1 13.2 19.7 26.3 329 39.5 52,6 658 92.1 118.4 164.4 210.5
8.5 14.0 21.0 28.0 34.9 41.9 55.9 69.9 97.8 125.8 174.7 223.6
9.0 14.8 22.2 29.6 37.0 44.4 592 74.0 103.6 133.2 185.0 236.8
9-5 156 23.4 31.2 39.1 46.9 62.5 78.1 109.3 140.6 195.3 249.9
10.0 16.4 24.7 32.9 41.1 493 65.8 82.2 115.1 148.0 205.5 263.1
10.5 17.3 25.9 34.5 43.2 51 8 69.1 863 120.9 155.4 2158 276.2
30 110 18.1 27.1 362 45.2 54.3 72.3 904 1266 162.8 226.1 289.4
11.5 18.9 28.4 37.8 47.3 56 7 75.6 94 5 132.4 170.2 236.4 302.6
120 19.7 29.6 39.5 49.3 59.2 78.9 987 138.1 177.6 2466 315.7
125 20.5 309 41.1 51.4 61.6 82.2 1028 143.9 185.0 256.9 3288
13.0 21.3 32.1 42.8 53.4 64.1 855 106.9 149.6 1924 267.2 341.9
13.5 22.1 33.4 44.4 55.5 665 88.8 111 0 155.4 199.8 277.5 355.0
14.0 229 34.6 46.1 57.5 69.0 92.1 115.1 161.1 207.2 287.8 368.1
8.0 175 26.3 1 35.1 ,.38 52 6 70.1 87.7 122.7 157.8 219.2 280.5
8.5 18.6 27.9 37.3 16.G - 74.5 93.1 130.4 167.7 232.9 298.1
9.0 19.7 29.6 39.4 493 59.2 789 98.6 1 138.1 177.5 246.6 315.6
9.5 208 31.2 41.6 52.1 62.5 83.3 104.1 145.7 187.4 260.3 333.1
10.0 21.9 32.9 43.8 54.8 65.7 87.7 109.6 153.4 197.2 273.9 350.7
10.5 23.0 34.5 46.0 57.5 69.0 920 115.1 161.1 207.1 287.6 368.2
40 11.0 24.1 36.2 48.2 603 723 964 120.5 168.8 217.0 301.3 385.7
11.5 252 37.8 50.4 63.0 75.6 100.8 1260 176.4 226.8 315.0 403.3
12.0 26.3 394 52.6 65.7 178.9 1052 131.5 184.1 236.7 328.7 420.8
12.5 27.4 41.0 54.8 68.5 82.2 1096 136.9 191.7 246.5 342.4 438.4
130 28.5 426 57.0 71.3 85.5 114.0 142.4 199.4 256.4 356 1 456.0
135 29.6 44.2 592 74.1 88.8 118.4 147.8 207.0 266.2 369.8 473.6
14.0 30.7 45.8 61.4 769 92.1 122.8 153.3 214.7 276.1 383.5 1 491.2
*To convert inches per minute to millimeters per minute multiply by 25 4
'To convert inches to Millimeters multiply by 25.4.
8-175
8.0 26.3 394 52.5 657 78.8 105.1 1314 I 1839 236.4 328.4 4203
8.5 27.9 41.9 558 69.8 83.7 111.7 139.6 195.4 251.2 348.9 4466
90 296 443 591 739 88.7 118.2 147.8 206.9 2660 369.4 4729
S 9.5 312 46.8 624 780 93.6 124.8 156.0 218.4 280.8 393.0 499.2
100 32.8 49j3 65.7 02-1 98.5 131.4 1642 229.9 295.6 4105 525.4
105 34.5 51.7 69.0 86.2 I 103.4 137.9 172.4 241.4 1 310.3 431 0 551 7
60 11 0 36.1 54.2 72.2 90.3 108.4 144.5 180.6 252.9 3251 4515 5780
11.5 37.8 56.6 75.5 94.4 113.3 151.1 188.8 264.4 339.9 4721 604.2
12.0 39.4 59.1 78.8 98.5 118.2 157.6 197.0 275.8 354.7 492.6 i 630.5
12.5 41 0 616 82.1 102.6 123.1 164.3 205.2 2874 369.5 5131 656.8
13.0 I 42 6 64.1 85.4 106.7 128.0 170.9 213.4 298.9 384.3 533.6 683.1
I 13-5 44.2 66.6 88.7 110.8 132.9 177.5 221.6 310.4 399.1 554.1 709.4
140 458 1 69.1 92.0 114.9 137.8 184.1 229.8 321.9 413.9 574.6 735.7
I 45.97.6 t 73.
8.0 30.6 45.9 61.3 76.6 91.9 122.5 153 1 214.4 275.7 382.9 490.1
8.5 325 1 48.8 65.1 81.4 97.6 1302 162.7 227.8 292.9 406.8 520.7
go 34.5 1 511 68.9 86.1 103.4 137.8 172.3 241 2 310.1 4307 551.3
95 36.4 54.6 72.7 90.9 109.1 145.5 181.9 254.6 327.4 454.7 582.0
10.0 383 57.4 76.6 95.7 1149 153.1 191.4 268.0 344.6 478,6 612.6
10.5 402 603 80.4 100.5 1206 160.8 201 0 281.4 361.8 502.5 643.2
70 11.0 421 632 84.2 105.3 1263 168.5 210.6 294.8 379.0 526.4 673.8
11.5
120
44.0
159
660
68.9
88.1
91.9
110.1
114.9
132.1
137.8
176.1
183.8
220.1
229.7
308.2
321.6
396.3
413.5
5504
574.3
j 704.5
735.1
125 47.8 71.8 1 95.7 119.7 143.5 191.5 239.3 335.0 430.7 598.2 765.7
13.0 49.7 74.7 1 99.5 124.5 149.2 199.2 248.9 348.4 447.9 622.1 796.3
13.5 51.6 77.6 103.3 1293 154.9 206.9 258.5 361.8 465.1 6460 826.6
14.0 535 80.5 107.1 134.1 160.6 214.6 268.1 i 375.2 482.3 - 669.9 857.5
8.0 1 35.0 525
52.5 j770.0 8744j04.559.6
104.9 139.9 174.9 2448 3148 437.2 5
8.5 37.2 55.7 743 92.9 111.5 148.7 185.8 2601 3345 464.5 594.6
90 39.3 59.0 78.7 98.4 118.0 157.4 196.7 275.4 354.1 491.9 629.6
9.5 41.5 62.3 83.1 103.8 124.6 166.1 207.7 290.7 373.8 519.2 664.6
100 437 65.6 874 1093 131.2 174.9 218.6 306.1 393.5 546.5 699.5
10.5 45.9 68.9 91.8 114.8 137.7 183.6 229.5 321.4 413.2 573.8 I 734.5
80 1110 48.1 72.1 96.2 120.2 144.3 192.4 240.f 3367 432.8 601.2 i 769.5
11.5 50.3 75.4 1006 125.7 150.8 201.1 251.4 352,0 4525 628.5 804.5
12.0 52.5 78.7 104.9 131.2 157.4 209.9 262.3 3673 472.2 1655.8 j 8395
125 54.7 820 1093 136.7 164.0 218.6 273.2 3826 491.9 6531i 874.5
130 569 85.3 1136 142.2 170.6 227.4 284.1 397.9 511.6 710.4 909.5
135 59.1 88.6 118.0 147.7 177.2 236.1 295.0 413.2 -31 3 737.7 944 5
91
14.0 61.3 .9 122.3 153.2 183' q 244.9 305.9 428.5 551.0 7650 979.5
*TO convert inches per minute to millimeters per minute multiply by 25.4
'Toconvert inches to millimeters multiply by 25 4.
8-176
Abrasive Belt Grinding 8.13
I i i i __
CONTACT WHEEL
__
Z.-d Tempered
L z4W 4 - -SR___ 2040
~
A~O~- ________ ____ ___ 20S
- - AO1
20 I I
I Roughing AI203 ZrO, 40-80 i 2500-4500 1 SR 70-95
45 R, Quenced Polishing A1203 1 100-320 3000-4500 SR. SFR I 20-60
to Quand ,- ____'t -
56R I Tempered - -- A 4
_
_J
STAINLESS STEELS, A1201
WROUGHT i Roughing AIO-ZrO- 36-60 2000-4000 SR 7C-95
AND Anne . I I
CAST
GRYCSR SI 135 or Polishing AI2O 3 ' _
8u-1 0 _ __ -4o
300-5500 SR. SFR 20-60
0to cluenched - -- I -_J- -!
56 Rc
FI ad I 3 .1000- SR SR 7-5
Tempered - ~ .--
I 400 Treate
MAGNESIUM ALLOYS' 30
AsDl
or Polishing
i Al O-r i
AlOSC i 100-240
I
24-80
I
500"500
5000-2300 SR.SFR
SR
'
I
7
70-95
20-60
WROUGHTANDCAST to Solution N _ . _
IS0 Treated - - - -- - -_
1500kg and IRUdl
ai.Al ~4 25-33 zSII-SFR ~7095
_
I Aged
TITANIUM ALLOYS.": I
AND
Aneld
jAnSolio I Ruhn
I~Sic. AJ 0 - 2 3 ~ I1
CAST 1 10 Tieatd 'I Polishing SIC 100-240 12M02500 SR. SFR 20-60
to o
40 Solution k~g A
,4= 1 0 ~--- ~~
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations =IRHD (International Rubber Hardness degrees) is aplxoxenatey equal to
Use lower values of BELT SPEED when good surface integrity is the duro'meler 'eadcrig
required_ -CAUTION Potential Fire Hazard Exercise caution in gr'ndiigz and da
SR-Serrated Rubber. SFR-Smooth Face Rubber. B-Buff Type posing .fswar Do NOT use water or water-mzscibe -ut?.i-g fliisds for
Serrations are usu~lly at 45" angle. aitrough some heav, stock removal magnesiu'm aigoys
operations use 60- Widths of lands and grooves vary fro.,n narrow lands
and wice grooves for fast aggressive cuts to wide lands and narrow
groo- es for intermediate and fi' ishing operations dependingn upon wori.
piece shape and opeating conditions
-~0 05~-~
S-ill
8.13 Abrasive Belt Grinding
CONTACT WHEEL
_____________
_____ :~ls~n I~ SC 10 20 20-30- $ F B - 20.60__:
HIGH TEMPERATURE IA1 203
ALLOYS, WROUGHT Roughing A1203 -ZrO 2 40-80 20910-4500 SR 70-95
AND CAST 1
140 Polishing A1201 100-24C 3000-5500 SRSFR 20-60
Nickel, Cobalt to All fir -
and Iron Base 475 A,6~thI~ 4-0 1-3,
ZINC ALLOYS,I
CAST Roughing Al203 SIC 150-220 5000-10,000 SR B 40-95
8Polisning Ai203 SIC 220-320 5000-10,000 SR,6 20-60
to As Cast Aw- ' Q ~
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recommendations *IRHO (lrternational Rubi~er Hardness degrees) is approximately equal to
"Use lower al~es of BELT SPEED Wh~en good su'face integ'ity is the durometer reading
required "CAUTION Beryllium-copper alloys are Toxic Materials, refer to National
'SR-Serrated Ruober, SFR-Smcrotl, Fape Rubber, B-Buff Type Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) for Pracao-oor- --
Serrationq , !_5ufl 2!'~i~ ' nn'gf, 3n~ieavy MtOCKremov.:
some.g section 6 itifor specific beryllium-copper alloys indicated by"
operations use 60' Widths of lands and groov.s vary from narrow lands
and wide grooveb for fast aggressive cuts to wide lands and narrow
grooves for Intermediate and finishing operations, depending upor Work-
piece shaoe and operaiing conditions
8-178
Thread Grinding 8.14
High Carbon
1060 1074 1085 16
1064 1075 1086 1572I
1065 108 1090
1069 1080 109E
1070 1084 156' j '
8-179
8.14 Thread Grinding
THREADS
THREADS IDENTIFI- WHEEL WORK
HARD- PER INCH SPEED SPEED
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION CATION
PITCH (P) ANSI fpm fpm
Elm 2VEN4 toii12 1A3-
A9ORBi i8500w !- A
4 to 12 A90RB 800
4. FREE MACHINING ALLOY STEELS,
WROUGHT 13 to 27 A120SB 9000 4.0
Hot Rolled. Normalized. 28 to 63 Ai80TB 9500
Medium Carbon Reaulfurized 50 Rc Annealed, Cold Drawn 64 to 80 A220UB 10000
4140 4145Se max or Quenched
41403e 4147Te
4142Te 4150 and Tempered q k$ .ssr -
4 to 2 A90SB 900
5. ALLOY STEELS, WROUGHT
Low Carbon 40
Hot Rolled, Normalized, 28 to 65 A180TB 9500
4012 4615 4817 8617 50OR 0 Annealed. Colo Drawn 64 to 80 A220U3 10000
4023 4617 4820 8620 max or Quenched
4024 4620 5015 8622
4118 4621 5115 8822 and Tempered
4320 4718 5120 9310
4419 4720 6118 94815 . --
8115 94817 4 to 12 A100KV 700
4422 4815
Medium Carbon to 63
13 to
28 27 A220MV
A150JV 8500
7500 6.0
13 415
53 860Carburized
1330 4145 5132 8640 Over and/or 64 to 80 A240PV 9000
1335 4147 5135 8642 50 Quenched and
1340 4150 5140 8645
1345 4161 5145 86B45 Tempered .. -
I I
B
8-180
Thread Grinding 8.14
8-181
8.14 Thread Grinding
THREADS WHEEL WHEEL NORK
4 to 12 A100KV 7000
13 to27 A150JV 7500 I
28 to63 A240MV 8500 60
Over
58 Ro
Quenched
and
Tempered
V 64 to80
-- -
A280PV
-I
_
--- - -
9000
-
to
1412 A90RB 85(
Group III 13 to27 A120SB S,5C0
A7 M33 M44 28 to 63 A18OTB 9500
D7 M34 M46 50 R c Annealed 64 to80 A220UB 10000
M3-2 M36 M47 max or Quenched - ..
M6 M41 T5 and Tempered N -
M7 M43 T6Ioa
4 to 12 A!00KV i000 40
13 to27 A150JV 75G0 40
26 toS3 tk24GMV 8500 6.0
58 RC
Over and
Quenched
Tempered
64 to30 A230PV 9000 60
4 to 2 AIODKV 7000 40
13to2 7I A150JV 7500 40
28 to 63 A220Mv" 8500 60
0 c Quenched 64 to80 A240PV/ 9000 60
to and
58 RC rernpered -
8-182
Thread Grinding 8.14
WHEL WHE WR
THREADS IDN I WEEWR
HARD- PER INCH INTF- SPEED ISPEED
MAERALNESS I CONDITION CATION
203EZiti
tutnii 4to 12
13 o 27
A90RB
A12SB
850 1
9000 4
I 3 nnae 28 to 63 A180TS 9500 4
303Z
303MAAneae 64 to 80 A220U8 10000
303MA t
275b Cold or
Drawn
303 Pius x
303Se .~ T;W
_ -8
Martens itic
416 42OF Se
1J4t 2
13 to 27
AOB
A12OSB
80
90
416PS X
41Se
440F
440F Se
135
to
I Annealed
or64
to6
I8
to80
A8T
A220L8
35 0
000
4
- OMIU
4 to 12 A100K' 7000
13 t o27 A150KV 7500
to 63 A220Mv 8500 60
OeQunhd28
27er Quenchd 64 to 80 A240PV 900
Sce27 sscndo
e~nmna,
16frCtigFud
8-183
8.14 Thread Grinding
HREADS WEL WHEEL WORK
MATERILCONITIO CATION
HARD-
NESS C PE INCH IID NTF SPEED SPEEDI
PITCH (P) ANSI fpm 1pm
______________________ Shn I_______%i?
, 41012' 1 A90RB '--500
13. STAINLESS STEELS, WROUGHT 1127 A90R8 8000
Ferritic 131o27 A120KV 9000 4.0
405 434 135 28 to 63 A180TB 9500
4 to 12 A90RB 8500
201 t34 30 3013 to 27 A12CSB 9000
201 304L 305 330 28 to 63 A180TB 9500
202 305 314 347 135 Annealed 64 to 80 A220UB 10000
301 308 316 348 o or -
302 309 316L 384 275 Cold Drawn - ## -
3022 309S 317 385
304 310 321
to 12 A0RB 8500
Austeniic4
Nitronicit 13 to 27 A120SB 9000
N~r mc3 2 064 281o63
to 80 A18OTB
A220UB i 9500
10000
Nitronic 33 210
Nilronic 40
Nitronic 50
Nitronic 60
to
250
Annealed
W - . q -4;?:
to
C o ld D ra w n
r
--.
Mrnitc13 12
to27 A90B 8500
Martensitic4 to A120SB 9000 4.
403 440A 28 to 63 A80TB 500
410 z- "g 135 64 to80 A220UB 10000
414 4400 to Annealed
420 501 275 r- 2
,
422 502
431 P
Greek Asoloy 41o12 A100KV 7000
13 to27 A150KV 7500 -3
28 to63 A220MV 8500 4
Over Quenched 64 to 80 A240PV 9000
Tempered
X
-t
See section
16 forCutting
FluidRecommendations
20 for
See section additional
information
21
8-184
Thread Grinding 8.14
4.
8-185
8-8
8.14 Thread Grinding
I ~THRED _.NTF-
READS WHEEL WHEEL WORK
HARD- PER INCH 1TE I SPEED SPEED
MATERIAL CONDITION CATION
NESS PITCH (P) ANSI fpm I pm
S hn ~-m~~rma
16. ALLOY STEELS, CAST (cont.)
Medium Carbon (cont.)
(materials continued from preceding page) 1 I
ASTM A487 Casses IN. 2N. 4N. 6N. 8N. 9N
ION )N. 10. 2. 40. 40A, 60. 70.,80 - 0 M
90. 100 -XV iS
1330 4130 80830 8640 ' , ?
1340 4140 8040 9525
2325 4330 8430 9530
2330 4340 8440 9535
4125 8030 8630
4 to 12 A9088 8500
17. TOOL STEELS, CAST
Group! 13 to 27 P120SB 9000 40
28 to 63 A18OTB 9500
ASTM A597 Grades CA-2. CH-12. 5-13.
0 Rc Annealed 64 to 80 A220U6 10000
CO-ma or Quenched M 4
and Tempered-
4 to A100KV 7000
13 27 A150JV 7500
28 to 63 A220MV 8500 60
50 c Quenched 64 to 80 A240PV 9000
to and
58 Rc Tempered OEMA%
,4iV!SI-
4 to 12 A100KV 7000
13 to 27 A150JV 7500J 6.0
28 to 63 A240MV 8500
Over Quenched 64 to 80 A,280PM 9000
5 CTempered
8-186
Thread Grinding 8.14
MATERIAL
HR.PERCONDITION 4
INCH ID....IFI
CAT,.. ION
SPEED SPEED
MAERALHES PITCH (P) 1 ANS I fp' ! fpm
Shn . . . .- - . . . - .. ..
17. TOOL STEELS, CAST (cont.) !4 to 12 A100KV i7000
Grou II cont) i13 to 27 A150JV 75G0
Gru I cot)28to 63 A240MV 8500 i 60
(materials isted on preceding page) Over ] Ouence- 64 to 80] A280PV 9000
8-187
8.14 Thread Grinding
THRED WETLI WHEEL IWORK
HARD. IPERINCHI ID
CATION
I SPEED ISPEED
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION
IPITCH (P) ANI!m p
p
-- .- : IA S p
Shn
8-188
Thread Grinding 8.14
tWHEEL WEL WR
THREADS IWEL WR
E INCHISPE IDENTIFI. PE PE
HARD- PER SED
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION CATION
PITCH (P) ANSI Ipm !_pm
Bhn
23. DUCTILE CAST IRONS 4.12 1 A90RB i 8500
Ftnitic AneldA a*, '3 to 27 Ai.20SB 9000 4
ASTM A536. Grades 60.40.18. 65.45-12 AnaeAsCs. 28 ic 63 A 180-F3 9500 j4
SAE J434c. Grades E4018. D4512 s2RNrazdao 64 to 80 A22oUB ooI
Fealitic- Peerlitic max' Tempoered
ASTVM A536: Grade 80-55-06 and Tuerncee
SAE J434c: Grade D5506
Psaritic- Martensitic 5__________
ASTM A536. Grade 100-70-03
SAE J434c, Grade 07003
Martensitic
ASTIV A536: Grade 120-90-02
SAE J434c: Grade 00&T
A62 80T
R Annea32led5
o 64 to 80 A220UB 100
P~cM8501a
SEsetiJ18 Grae M55t03. M70id
See ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' SetoA01radtonl'joraf
12(
36. WOUGT AN CAS
CKELALLOS, 4,o28O1895
____
_____
8.14 Thread Grinding
" THREADS j E IWHEEL I WORK
HARD. PER INCH DPEED SPEED
MATERIAL CONDITION CAI IN
I PITCH (P) ANSI , i
j Bhn
! t ~i ,41I 2 AgoP-
______
,.O
36. NICKEL ALLOYS, WROUGHT AND CAST I1 :o 27 A120SB "9C0.
(coo.) 28to63 AI80TB z
DURANICKEL Alloy 301 1 64 to 80 220UB , 4w
MONEL Alloy 502 to0 Solution Treated
MON EL Alloy K500 i 2 I40
NI-SPAN-C Alloy 902 I 29
PERMANICKEL Alloy 300LS o2R5 -
Berylco 43C
Brush Alloy 2000-
Brush Alloy 220C 4 01 90B 80
Brush Ailoy 2600
3t 7 A2S 00 4
283 Hardened 64 to 80 A22OUB 10000
t425 Aged- *r- --
See section 16 for Cutting Flu:d Recommendations CAUTION Toxic Material, refer to National Institute for Occupational
See section 20 for codtonal information Safety and Heath (NIOSH) for Precautions
8-190
Thread Grinding 8.14
THREADS WHEEEELP
IDE'JTIFI WEL WP
THARD- PER INCH SPEED SPEED
MATERIAL NESS CONDITION CATION
A, -, 4100zto12 A9,uS8
inccWoy Alloy 825 1 131to27 (A1OOTB I
-ionl lly
01240idDa 28 63 Ao, 40
I nase Ada 0-6 o A8T
Fleffacialoy 26 I 310 1 A'- '--=
Udelnet 6301
See sectbon 161for CLIbzng Fluta Reconrnetdalmm I l CAL.TO' Tox .aenal reft to Natonv .url4je for 0--curat'orli
See sect~on 20 'or adr11ona; .nfomzonr Safety anc H4ea~n (%NOSHI
for Pecautsons
8-191
8.14 Thread Grinding
V-36 4 to 12
13 to 27 A10B 9000 to
270 28 to 63 A18OTB
to Solution Treated 64 to 80 A28OTB
320 and Aged
8-192
Thread Grinding 8.14
4 to 12 0SB 8500
47. POWDER METAL ALLOYS
Irons 13tto 637
28 A2S 00 4.0
F-0000-N 50 A18OTB 9500
F-0000-P to 64 to 80 A220UB 10000
67 As Sintered -
F-0000-R
F-00u0-S 500kg
F-0000-T
4 to 12 A90B 80
50
Stel
F-00e8- 13 to 27 A120S8 9000 4.0
F-0008-P 28 to 63 A18OTB 9500
F0008- 101 As Sintered 64 to 80 A220UB 10000
F-0005-S to or
FC-0205-S 426 Heat Treated
FC-3208-P
FC-0208-S
FC-0508-P
FC- 1000-N
FN-0205-S
FN-0205-T
FN-0405-R
FN-0405-S
FN-0405-T
FX-1005-T
FX-2008-T
See section 16 for Cutting Fluid Recc' omendations.
See section 20 for additional information.
8-193
8.14 Thread Grinding
8-194
SECTION 9
INTRODUCTION TO
NONTRADITIONAL MACHINING
9-1
FPRECIMIZG PAGE BLANK-NOT FIL1I)
9-3
=
9INTRODUCTION TO NONTRADITIONAL MACHINING
0
0 c
cv~ toi
2 c U
Lio 0 c__
0,
-~ ~
0)
L)
- - - - - - - - - - - Z5Li0
CL Cl)
tv 0
0)o
0) - E
00 o > ca c
C =CA a) (D
0)0
o~~ (>0
0 0 0 0 - .5
-n :cE 'o
-i, 0
LL0 0 aj W- E S C cl
-W U) 0o-c
c0
o 0)C
2 2Z 0
0
0 0) o0 -2> o 0
01
02~~~~~ m2222w
~ -
a 2 oomZ LZc
ui~~~~~~ ~ ~ -XM
~ ~ 0 LLU (n U
ax-oI 1 a1
2 i D w w w wWCw w j 0 i . w o or
0 a
.C C)
Q9-4
C cu EN O- E~~~~~ 0 Cc .2
INTRODUCTION TO NONTRADITIONAL MACHINING 9
TABLE 9-2 Comparison of Material Removal Rates and Dimensional Tolerances for Conventional and Nontraditional
Machining Processes
MAXIMUM'
I I I ACCURACY=
- AT MAXIMUM
I RATE OF TYPICAL PENETRATION IMATERIAL TYPICAL
1 MATERIAL POWER CUTTING RATE PER REMOVAL MACHINE
PROCESS IREMOVAL CONSUMPTION. SPEED MINUTE ATTAINABLE RATE INPUT
OHM
_____
I
1490
820
30
-
- I 3.46-3
-
-0.001
0O.02
- 0.0025--
0.0005
0.013
-
-0.05
0.003-
0.075
20
ECG
I 2 2 0.25 I
I
-0.0002 0.0025
-- = . 4
9-5
SECTION 10
MECHANICAL NONTRADITIONAL
MACHINING OPERATIONS
10-11
PRECEING PACE BLAIe-NOT FILLhD
Operating Parameters
L
Lower" Flow
:media pressure: 100 to 3000 psi [700 to 20.000 kPa]
chamber volume: 3 to 100 fluid ounces (100 to 3000 mlJ
rate. 2 to 60 gal/min [7 to 225 Limin)
Principles
Abrasive flow machining (AFM) is the removal of material
by a viscous, abrasive media flowing-. under pressure. Material Removal Rates and Tolerances
through or across z- workpiece. Figure 10.1-1 contains a The greatest material removal action will occur at the
schematic presentation of the AFM process. The grit- point(s) of maximum flow restriction. AFM processing
loaded media of polymeric-base material is selected for its times frequently range from one to five minutes. Stock
viscosity and type and proportion of grit. in order to suit removal can be uniform within 10 percent of the stock re-
the part shape and the intended action-deburring. polish- moved and uniform within each passageway. but out-of-
ing. radiusing. Generally. the putty-like media is extruded roundness will not be corrected. Production rates of 1000
through or over the workpiece with motion usually in both pieces per hour for multiple-fixtured small parts have been
directions using from one to one hundred flow rev-rsals per achieved. Usually only a few thousandths inch of material
fixture load. Aluminum oxide, silicon carbide. boron car- are removed by AFM. as demonstrated in tables 10.1-5
bide or diamond abrasives are used. The velocity of the ex- and 10.1-6. Where passageways of dissimilar size are adja-
truded media is dependent upon the principal parameters cent. stock removal will also be dissimilar, but fixture de-
of viscosity. pressure. passage size and length. sign can sometimes provide compensation.
10-3
10.1 Abrasive Flow Machining-AFM
10-4
-~ . i- -- --. --- ~ -- ~ -
Abrasive Flow Machining-AFM 10.1
SELECTED DATA
TABLE 10.1-2 Abrasive Flow Media Designations TABLE 10.1-3 Grit Sizes Used in AFM
10-5
10.1 Abrasive Flow Machining-AFM
TABLE 10.1-5 AFM Cutting Test Results for Cold Rolled Steel Discs-10 Full-Reverse Cycles
Conditions:
hole length .......................................................... ............................................... 0-25 inch [6.25 m m ]
hole diameter ................................................... 0-125 inch (3.18 mril] lon.inal-initially
SOURCE- W B. Perry. Fropere and capabiles of low pressure abrasive flow mediae. Technical paper MR75-831. Society of Manufur Engineers.
1975.
10-6
Abrasive Flow Machining-AFM 10.1
TABLE 10.1-6 AFM Cutting Test Results for Cold Rolled Steel Discs-30 Full-Reverse Cycles
Conditions
hole lenqth .................. ........................ 0.25 inch [6.35 mm]
hole diameter ................................................ 0.125 inch (3.18 mm] nominal-initially
number of full reverse cycles ............. ................. 30
equipment .... ..................................... Dynetics HL15
initial media temperature .................................... 25C (77F)
media pressure ....... ........ .... .....I.................
450 psi [3100 k Pa]
Modia
base polymer ..............................................64.5%
60-grit size, black silicon carbide (S)... ... ................. 21.3%
..............
700-grit size, 'lack silicon carbide (S) ......................... 14.2%
base poiyrier ............. 100, 200, 300 (see table 10.1-2 for viscosities)
................................... .......
or
base r,-'-,mer ...... .....................................56.5%
36-grit size, black silicon carbide (S) ........................... 37.8%
700-grit size, black silicon carbide (S) .........................5.7%
base polymer .. ......... .................... 100, 050 (see table 10.1-2 for viscosit!es)
.........................................
MEDIA
TOTAL
TIME
INITIAL
DIAMETER
1 FINAL
DIAMETER RADIUS
min inch inch inch
Stock Removal and Flow Rates1 1. Stock removal per unit time increases substantially with
increasing extrusion pressure (figures 10.1-2 to 10.2-4).
One of the attractive features of AFM is the wide variety of 2. Media flow rate increases with increasing extrusion
available and easily adjustable process parameters. The ef- pressure. Note: Flow rate increases proportionally with
fects of changing some of these parameters for specific extrusion pressure, or logarithmically, as indicated in
niedia compositions are illustrated in figures 10 1-2 to figure 10.1-5.
10.1-7. These data come from simple laboratory tests on
cold-rolled-steel samples and are intended only to provide 3. Flow rat-, inci eases as media temperature increases (ig-
"'guidelines" for use in actual production situations. The m- ure 10.1-6). Note: In the tests conducted in preparing
terrelationships of various parameters depend greatly on this graph, stock removal per unit volume of flow did
the characteristics of a given media composition. A few not change with changes in flow velocity over the range
widely different media compositions were examined in or- covered by the graph.
der to formulate general rules that can be applied to AFM.
Parameter relationships are also affected by the size and 4. Increasing hole length reduces both flow rate and diam-
length of the flow passages. The data in figures 10.1-2 to eter change per unit flow (figure 10.1-7).
10.1-7 are limited to the examination of round holes ma-
chined normal to the test piece surfaces. The general rules These general rules apply for each of the medias examined,
which emerged are as follows: but the degree of application varies. These variances re-
flect differences in the content of base materials, lubricants
and/or plasticizers as well as differences in the size and
'Based on text ann figures from L J Rhoc..des. Extrude hone-edge and percentage of grit. The relative size and length of the flow
surface finishing-capabilities and costs. Technical paper MR77-366. passage also is likely to have an effect on these relation-
Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn. Ml, 1977 ships.
10
10.1 Abrasi aw Machining-AFM
0 007
0.00
S 0.004
E
Ca
3 0003
0,001
0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540
Time. sec
Figure 10.1-2 Stock removal rates for AFM of cold-rolled-steol samples using media 70 (633) at three
extrusion pressures. (From L. J. Rhoades, Extrude hone-edge and surface finishing-capabilities and costs,
Technical paper MR77-366, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI, 1977. p. 14)
0.009
0.007 ____
1200 psi 900 pi'
0.006 _____(6200 kPa) -
1200 psi
0.0
2 0,004
E 600 psi
0002 .......
Figure 10.1-3 Stock removal rates for AFM of cold-rolled-steel samples using media 36 (564) at four
extrusion presstires. (L. J. Rhoades, p. 14)
10-8
Abrasive Flow Machining-AFM 10.1
0009
600 psi /
0008 (02 mm] - 600psi
(4100 kPa]
0007 A-,
C I500 psi,00
!~00 0005
Z -/M0
_'0 ! ,
S0003
E 400 psi
0)
0023 1000oF--[8 c
Figure 10.1-4 Stock removal rates for AFM of cold-rolled-steel samples using media 100 (356) at three
extrusion pressures. (L J Rhoades, p 15)
55
4,0
E 3.5 -
; 30
.2 2.5
2.0
15
1.0 -
05
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
[7] [14] [21] [28] [35] [42] [49]
2
Extrusion pressure, psi [kg/cm ]
Figure 10.1-6 Media flow rate versus extrusion pressure. Test conditions same as figure 10.1-4 (L. J.
Rhoades, p. 16)
10-9 j
10.1 Abrasive Flow Macnining-AFM
1250
Hoie dia 0 250 in (6.35 mm)
1200 Hole length 0,250 in (6.35 mm]
Pressure 900 psi
1150
0 1100
S 1050
S 1000
950 ""000,00
Figure 10.1-6 MAedia flow rate versus temperature for AFM of cold-rolled-steel samples using media 70
(633). (L. J. Rhoades, p.-16)
0009 1 1 1
U08
2 1,11Hole
0 dia. 0.040 in [1 mm]
Media 100(356)
0007 - - Media temp. 900 F [320 C]
Media pressure 400 psi
E- 0.006 --
CU
S 0,005 - - ---- __ -
C)
S 0.003
10i
Abrasive Flow Machining-AFM 10.1
Hole Enlargement
600
(20 oz)
400
E
cc)
: 200
200
4 l
Operating Conditions
Figure 10.1-8 Hole diameter increase as a function of media volume. Data from enlarging 0.015-inch
diameter laser drilled holes in a nickel alloy. (Courtesy of General Electric Company)
10-11
10.1 Abrasive Flow Machining-AFM
Workpiece
configuration
Deburr 12 drilled hole Radius & remove recast Draw die poIshing
intersections layer from extrusion die
Media
type Dynetics D080-20S(50)- Extrude Hone MV70S Extrude Hone HV30pD
36S(50)-700S(40)
Number strokes
(one way) 6 20 30
Material removed
(Dimension
changed) 0.001 inch per surface 0.00075 inch per surface 0.001 to 0.002 inch
Surface roughness
change, pin R.- 63 to 16 75 to7 25-35 to 6-8
10-12
Abrasive Flow Machining-AFM 10.1
TABLE 10.1-7-Continued
Work material. Cast Stellite High Strength Steel AISI Type 02 Tool Steel
00
V/orkpiece
configuration:
Media
type. Dynetics D060-20B(35)- Extrude Hone MV70S Extrude Hone MV24S
36B(35)-700(45)
Number strokes
(one way): 6 4 14
Material removed.A
(Dimension 3
changed): Polished 0.0002 inch per surface 0.002 inch per surface
Surface roughness
change,pin R.: 63 to 12 40to8 100 to 10
10-13
10.1 Abrasive Flow Machining-AFM
TABLE 10.1-7-Continued
Workpiece
configuration,
1- 1-o 015 in
0.032 in dia
(section)
Remove recast from Removal of recast &
small holes add radii to hole
Media
type. Dynetics D250-220S(50) Extrude Hone VLV320S
Material removed
(Dimension
changed). 0.004 inch on diameter 0.005 inch on diameter
Surface roughness
change, pin R.: 50 to 16
10-14
Abrasive Jet Machining-AJM 10.2
PROCESS SUMMARY
regulatorExas
~Hood
10-15
- -- - -' .- a- - -
10.2 Abrasive Jet Machining-AJM
Operating Parameters Figure 10 2-4 illustrates the factors that can influence ma-
terial removal. These data were taken on plate glass of 450
to 510 Knoop hardness using a 0 018-inch 10 46 mini diamn-
eter nozzle, air as the gas at 75 psi 1517 kPal. and 1/'32-
inch [0.79 mini nozzle tip distance (ntd) from the workpiece
(unless otherwise expressed) Silicon carbide abrasive
TABLE 102-1 Typical Values for AJM Operating would cut at approximately the same values
Parameters
Because of the small amount of abrasive flowing through
Abrasive the nozzle, it is possible to be very selective in material re-
types AIUmMum oxide for aluminum and brass moval The radius on holes, slots, grooves, and threads
Silicon carbide for stainless steel that are deburred abrasively will vary from sharp to 0 010
and ceramic ich 10.25 min depending on abrasive used and blast t-me.
Bicarbonate of soda for nylon, Teflon', I
Delrin' and light cleaning It is common for micro-abrasive blasting to be a secondary
Glass beads for polishing deburring operation after rechasing threads. reaming
holes, or using a wheel to remove the heaviest burrs. A
size- 10 to 150pm, well classified and clean practical minimum cut width is 0.005 inch 10.13 mini. Tol-
quantity i to 5 g/min for fine work erances are typically =OC05 l0.13 mini with =0.002
5 to 10 g/min for usual cuts inch I z0.05 mm possible with good fixturing and motion
10 to 20 g/min for heavier cuts control. Taper is present in deep cuts.
Carrier gas
types, Dry air, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, nitrous
oxide, helium (Do not use oxygen) Surface Technology
quantity- Up to 1 0 fttlmin [28 L/min) Surfaces generated by AJM have a random "grainness'"or
pressure 30 to 190 psi [207 to 1,310 kPa] matte texture. Surface roughness ranges from 6 to 63 mi-
croinches R. [0.15 to 1.6 taml depending on grit size. as
velocity. 500 to 1,100 ft/s [152 to 335 m/s] demonstrated in tables 10.2-2 and 10.2-3.
Nozzle The AJM process is cool cutting; heat sensitive alloys are
material. Tungsten cabide or sapphire not affected. Constant motion of the nozzle is necessary to
tip distar~r prevent unwanted grooves on the surface. Cleaning of the
(ntd) to wo,. 0, inches [2.54 to 76 mm] (see surfaces of softer materials may be necessary to remove
-s 10 2-2 and 10 2-3 any imbedded particles of grit. Cleaning is also required to
opening- .... r 0.005 toO0 046 inch [0 13 to 1.2 remove
wrpeegrit from crevices or internal passageways in the
mm] workpiece.
Rectangular size 0.003 x 0.020 to
0.026 x 0 026 inch [0.075 x 0.50 to
0 65 x 0.65 mm]
operating Equipment and Tooling
angle: Vertical to 600 off vertical The equipment consists of four parts: (1) an apparatus
which stores. mixes and propels the abrasive: (2) a work
chamber: (3) a dust collector: and (4) a dry gas supply. A
complete system is available for a modest investment.
Single- or dual-tank. bench-top apparatus is available. The
work station should provide sufficient illumination for the
operator. The dust collector should be a commercial unit of
at least 3/4 horsepower with a cloth-bag filter that can 4
handle fine powder particles as small as 40 microinches
Material Removal Rates and Tolerances 11 pnl. The gas supply of at least 100 to 125 pounds per
AJM is -ot a mass material removal process: it is a finish- square inch 1690 to 862 kPal must be dried to a moisture
ing pr "s The typical removal rate for plate glass is content of less than 50 parts per million. It is possible to
0.001 inch per minute 116.4 mm 3/min!. The speed of use bottled carbon dioxide or nitrogen as a dry gas supply.
drilling ,.. ,.ass is impressive: however, higher hardness ce-
ramics cut at approximately 50 percent higher rates and The nozzle tips are normally made of tungsten carbide.
metals cut at lesser rates, as low as 10 to 25 percent that of Their life will vary depending on the type of abrasive and
glass depending on the metal properties. Tumbling, vibra- the operating pressure used. Tip life of 8 to 15 hours with
tory or larger recirculating blast cabinets may be more silicon carbide and 20 to 35 hours with aluminum oxide is
practical for large parts. The rate of material removal is af- reasonable.
fected by several factors. including abrasive type and par-
ticle size, nozzle opening, nozzle-to-work-surface distance, Abrasive powder must be clean, dry, and very well classi-
nozzle angle. and particle velocity. Generally, the larger fled. It is not practical to reuse abrasive powder because
the particle and the higher the velocity, the faster the mate- contamination and worn grit will cause a decline in cutting i
rial removal, rates.
10-16
_ _ __ -- Vag
Abrasive Jet Machining-AJM 10.2
Machining Chacteristics
The powders used in AJM are nontoxic. but adequate dust
control is needed Silica dust produced during AJM may be
a health hazard Commercial grades of abrasive powdlers
are not suitable for AIM because they are not classified
closely enough to assure proper flow and they may contain
some silica dust. Ordinary shop air should not be used with-
out adequate filtration to remove moisture and oil. Oxygen
should never be used as the propelling gas because it may
produce a violent chemica! reaction when combined with
the workpiece rhips or the abrasive.
SELECTED DATA
TABLE 10.2-2 Surface Roughness for Glass Processed TABLE 10.2-3 Sim'Mu.Ze iiougniac:s for 316 Stainless
with AJM Steel (A#%r; aied) Processed with AJM
GRIT SIZE SURFACE ROUGHNESS :,ial surface was ground to 18.5 pin R. [0.47 pm])
ABRSIV
TYEI- GRIT SIZE SURFACE ROUGHNESS
_________On
R.____________ ABRASIVE TYPE ;npnR
xd 11mnm
00 25 1to2 8 O~o5 Almnmoid0!0 8t
Almnu1'xd 00 64to28lmiu oxide 400 8to 20~~~
2000 0 38 to 55 G4to1iO1000 10 21
lto 25C_ J
2000 is to38 ~.Bo09
Silicon carbide 800 - 2~ 12 to 20 b0tO5
2000 ~5717 to34 ~3oJ
Glass bead 2000 ts 12 to38 9 I
SOURCE: Comco Incorporated.
10-17
10.2 Abrasive Jet Machin ing-AJ M
C-~
In
CoJ OD jCC
-l (7)'SCI
~r LXf. c
E -~ k.)
'a oo
z O ) CU)Cl
E Cl
2f E CUi 0~ CIOc
cc E )I~c ~ ~
(0 0
w Co T, Ci
C~ o oC) F
C
CU co
-1 0 C ~ 0 ~
N C;
00
Cw r -
0)
o0 0N0(0 0o
00 '
1,,: x 0xx
10-1
~----
.- - -- ~- ~ j
Abrasive Jet MachiningAJM 10.2
0
6 cE cE cE cE
EOo 0 6F: -
T(0 TD
C C/
'NN
I II
I NII
II I !0
I -
E
SI !I E
I --
o oj II
i -D
I, I
0
C))
00 00
I Im
CL
10-19
10.2 Abrasive Jet Machining-AJM
24 ------ ,
20
oxide 2asM
8I -
Malerial Paegss20
.aea;oagis
4 I
Ivq :1- 30 s
0
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
~~~10 l ~ l ~ l j
283693
132' 132 22
Abrasive flow 9 min f zm 1 Nozzle distance -i :20 'ni
A Abrasive flow effects on cutting speed
8 (u!*larg rate as I unio, of rlozz-ie
thDcisidflce ir'td,
10-20
Hydrodynamic Machining--HDM 10.3
PROCESS SUMMARY
Controts
Miyer (
Pump Sapphire
and
.,._ dtor [ nozzle
Hydraulc Un t
Jet
Workpiece i:i
Standoff
distance
Drain
10-21
10.3 Hydrodynamic Machining-HDM
General Observations Surface Technology
" Increasing nozzle diameter improves performance and Edge quality depends upon how easily the workpiece frac-
increases horsepower requirements (figure 10 3-12) tures Soft materials cut smoothly and crushable materials
can be sit with high quality edges Test cuts are recom-
" Increasing pressure increases penetration, quality of cut mended before selecting the final operating parameters
and horsepower requirements. The high energy density of the jet stream causes a slight
rise in temperature which may melt some types of plastics
" Lower pressure reduces edge quality and delamination at low traverse rates, but the temperature is not high
effects enough to be a concern for paper-type materials Tendency
to delaminate layers of composite materials during cutting
" Traverse rates are directly it lated to cost and rates of can be elimmated by reducing the cutting rate
production.
" Increased standoff distance decreases oenetration and in- Equipment and Tools
creases noise (figures 10 3-16 and 10.3-17). Machine and hydraulic components are available for
HDM; however, a general-purpose machine tool is not
" Additives can increase cutting performance and reduce regularly available Each application is engineered to meet
cut width (figures 10.3-16 and 10.3-17) the requirements as found by sample test cuts made to de-
termine !he exact values for the key operating parameters.
* Smaller nozzles produce finer cuts. Equipment generating pressures up to 60,000 pounds per
square inch 1415 MPaI is commercially available with con-
" Larger nozzles are needed for slicing thicker materials. trols, filters and hydraulic seals of reasonable durability. A
drain and sump need to be provided close to the workpiece.
" Lower traverse rates improve the quality of cut. The jet stream does not dull and nozzle life is respectable,
provided there is good filtration of the fluid Filtration
" Cutting performance can improve with positive rake down to 0.5 micrometer (20 yin) followed by deminerahza-
angles. tion and deionization is recommended to reduce erosion of
the nozzle. There is little frictional drag in the cut and vir-
tually no forces at right angles to the jet; therefore, holding-
fixture requirements are minimal Multiple jets have been
arrarged for multiple cuts
10-22
- . - - - f
Hydrodynamic Machining-HDM 10.3
SELECTED DATA TABLE 10.3-2 Steps To Select HDM Operating
Parameters
There are several valid techniques for selecting operating -3,10 3-4 and
parameters for HDM The steps in table 10 3-2 are recom- 1 Can workpiece materal be Tables 10 3
mended as one logical sequence Supporting data come machined by HDM? 10.3-5
from the other figures and tables in accordance with the 2 Cutting rates User's process or production
terms as explained in figure 10.3-3 required requirements
3 Nozzle size and pressure Test cuts or table 10 3-4,
figures 10.3-7,
10 3-8,
Positive /10.3-13
Pressure is usually less than
rake 65 ksi [450 MPa].
Nozzle size is approximately
0 001 inch [0 025 mm]
/less than cut width.
4 Cutting rates Table 10.3-4 and
'I figures 10.3-7,
/ oz 10.3-9,
103-10.
Nozzle Nozzle 10.3-11
motion 4/: Rate is approximately
,./it inversely proportional to
thickness being cut
5 Flow rate Figure 10.3-5
ey %X Traverse
feed
Standoff
Nozzle distance
diameter / .
Rake Jet
/angle velocitytfi
.",,,\\\V"Lb,\ \,
\ Penetration
\Workpiece depth
10-23
I --
Glass-polyimide
Glass fiber reinforced polyester
Graphite
Graphite-epoxy composite-to 0.625-inch [15.9 mm] thickness
Gypsum boards
Insulating materials
Kevlar and epoxy-to 0.5-inch [12.5 mm] thickness
Laminated plastics
Lead
Leathers
Lucite plate-to 0.5 inch-[12.5 mm] thickness
Maple
Micarta-to 0.37 inch [9.5 mm] thickness
Mild steel
Mineral fibers (acoustic tile)
Neoprene rubber, 50 Shore hardness-to 2-inch [50 mm]
thickness
Nomex honeycomb-to 3-inch [75 mm] thickness
Nylon (brushes, carpets)
Oak
PVC
Paper-corrugated board, liltars, impregn-:ed, coated, laminated
newsprint
Plastics
Plexiglass
10-24
L/
10-25
10.3 Hydrodynamic Machining-HDM
These feed rates can be extrapolated inversely on a nearly linear basis as the material thickness is reduced. That is,if a 0.25 inch
[0.6 cm] thickness can be cut at 200 in/min [5 m/min], a 0.125 inch [0.3 cm] thickness can be cut at 400 in/min [10 m/rin].
SOURCE. E.J.Buck and D L Zeulow, New techniques in water let cutting, Technical paper MR79-376, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI,
1979, p.5
NOTE- The above materials were cut at awater pressure of 55,000 psi 13800 kg/crn'.
10-26
Hydrodynamic Machining-HDM 10.3
::oo 900m/s] 3 F( 11 4
L/min
2500
o
1500
(D
W
.2 0 015 in1
1000 ~ 0 0 lin
500K
0 005 in
I 0
0
3 10 20 30 40 50 60 [420 MPa) 0 1000 2000 3000 '900 m/s]
Jet velocity, ft/s
Nozzle pressure, ksi
Nozzle
diameter
100 [75 kW] 002 i
[0.5 mm]
80
40 - f177N]
60 015 in
40 Nozzle diameter
0 02 in
30 [05mm]
0 010 in
S20
3,
0 2
44
0 005 in
10 000in-
2 11 0 , 0 01i
0005 in
1 0f
1000 2000 3000 [900 m/s) 0 1000 2000 3000 [900 m/s
Figure 10.3-4 Operating parameter relationships in HDM. (From K. F. Neusen, High velocity fluid jet cut-
ting and slotting, Technical paper MR76-691, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI, 1976, pp.
8-10)
10-27
il
10.3 Hydrodynamic Machining-HDM
f37.8 L/min] 10
6
6 COJ
N--
4
3
, 3 -
o 2.5
01.
Q)
E
G 9 N4
E 8
,J7
0C
6 " .00.1
2.5
1.51
0.1
10,000 1.5 2 2.5 3 4 5 6 7 8 9100.000
[689 MPaj
Pressure, psi
Figure 10.3-5 Pressure versus flow rate with various nozzle sizes. Knowledge of two variables enables
determination of two other variac,,.as. For example: (Note heavy lines) if a cutting pressure to 60,000 psi
is required, it can be obtained using a flow rate of approximately 1.5 gal/min with a 0.014-inch diameter
stream. (Courtesy of Flow Equipment Company)
10-28
Hydrodynamic Machining-HDM 10.3
100,000 N 1X % 1
[689 MPa]
50,000 1
ai 10,000
:3
N Flow,,gal/mI
0001 0 . .105.n1 0 0
1.0 /mn
0.400 -1 0.8
0080-
0.060-
0.040 r-0.6
v 0.020- 300 fts[90M/]
0Lea 2J~0.4 25
0.010 -a
0.008 -2-00
0006 - - - -0.2
0.004 --
5052
l Aluminum 0
0.002- 0 1 2 3
Traverse veiocity in/s 7 m /s
0.001
Figure 10.3-7 Slot depth for various materials (fixed nozzle 0.0094-inch diameter of 17-4 stainless
steel. 60,000 psi pressure, plexol-201 fluid). (From K. F. Neusen, pp. 10-11)
10-29
10.3 Hydrodynamic Machining-HDM
00 60.0 (000365 in
40010 - 0*
40.0
lOOI(3.9,n)
/ #/ I-
200 ,
4.2000
10 (3.94 in) 4 i
60 2 4 100 2
E 40
E 4 Z- ."F-,, q, E 60.
E
+ 0 Ma]
4Z d e
20 - qC .
A4'Q) 0
10 F 0- E
0un o oat) 2
4 /At1.0 P
2 C?0.6 V C
e -8
Exi Dm0.4
pesur, kbr
0 xt rssre
r.ba Ian
1103
0.4
L-J--L---LJLLJL/0.1
0.2 I d
1 2 4 6 10 1 2 4 5 10
[1 0 MPal [1 0MPal
Exit pressure, kbar Exit pressure, kbar
Figure 10.3-8 Depth of cut and material removal rate at different HDM pressures. (From 0. Imanaka et
al, Machining with continuous liqu!d jets at pressures up to 10 kbars, Proceedings of the international confer-
ence on production engneering, 1974 (Part 1). p.28. Japan Society of Precision Engineering, 1974)
10-30
Hydrodynamic Machining-HDM 10.3
0.7
0.7 PoplarI
1
Pressure. 50,000 psi [345 MPaj
06 Nozzle diameter: 0.006 in [0.15 mm]
06
C
-15 mm]
0
CL
0) 0.5"
0.4
M =25% (moiture)
05 1
Poplar
Pressure: 35,000 psi [240 MPa]
04 Nozzle diameter: 0.005 in [0.13 mm]
[10 mm]
o
0.3
M = 25% (moisture)
0 .2 .---
O M 12 %/
0_ I II
Figure 10.3-9 Feed rate and depth of cut for poplar at two levels of moisture content and two levels of
HDM pressure (cut perpendicular to grain, 2 mm standoff distance, nozzle at 900, fluid = H20). (M. P.
dePlessis and M. Hashish, High energy water jet cutting equations for wood, Concordia. Univ., Montreal.
Quebec. 1976)
10-31
10.3 Hydrodynamic Machining-HDM
0 75 ,l 25 4 mm I.J Delrin 075 Potycarbonate
3A0in) Direc127om Nozzle diameter (0 3 in) Nozzle diameter
Of CL 0 076 in007m
E (0 003 inj 000 n
\ 60 ksi __25_4_mmE_60___
-050 05
00
o 02541 a0235B
B276 30
0
0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40
(16 ir)(1 6 in)
Feed rate cm/s Feed r -in/S
30 6 --207
0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40
(1 6 in) (1 6 in)
Feed rate cm/S Feed rate. cm/s
fDelrifl
20
F Nozzle diameter
0178 mmn6
20
(0 8 in)
Potycaroonate
Nozzle diameter
018m
15 60ksi (0 007in) ( 0 n
E (0 6 in) E
0 5
10 10
0 040
05345
0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30A
(16 in) (16 in)
Feed rate. Cm/S Feed rate. Cm/S
Figure 10.3-10 Depth of cut versus feed rate at various pressures. Deirin-Polycarbonate; saphire
nozzle, 0.38 mm above surfac3; fuid = H20. (U. H. Mohaupt and D. J. Burns, Machining unreinforced
polymers with high-velocity water jets, Experimental Mechanics 14 (April 1974): pp. 154-155)
10-32
Hydrodynamic Machining-HDM 10.3
10 Plexiglas 20 Plexiglas
4 mmj-.
*~25 Nozzle diameter (068 in) Nozzle diameter
Y -A -
06 T
mm0
n) (
1
003
7 m 0
4(0
127 mm
005 in?
075 ?"#1 5
(0 3 in) m
050
0 05
50.5
CD
45-05
3027 "' 130--, 276
---- 007
0 1-
20
0 05 10 15 20 0 05 10 i5 20
(0OCin) (0 6 in)
Feed rate. Cm/s Feed rate, cm/s
Figure 10.3-11 Depth of cut versus feed rate at various pressures. Plexiglas. (U H. Mohaupt and D.J
Burns, p. 155 )
C I V
S0.1
C
a-
0 20 40 60 80
[550 MPa]
Pressure. ks;
Figure 10.3-12 Effect of nozzle oriface diameter on workpiece penetration. (Courtesy of Grumman
Aerospace Corporation)
10-33
10.3 Hydrodynamic Machining-HDM
50
Work material. Polystyrene
Traverse rate. 4 in/s [100 mm/s]
0 215 mm] 40
Workpiece thickness (polyst 0.187 in
T 30
PI
0.1 in f2.54 mm
,Q
(-
75
Q,
Nozzle orifice diameter: (D
0.4 mm (0.016 in)\
",
N 50
0
Z
0.
0 20 40 60 80 -
[550 MPa] C
Pressure. ksi I
5
Figure 10.3-13 Effect of jet pressure on work- .0
piece panetration. (Courtesy of Grumman Aerospace 0 50 100 150 200 250
Corporation) Standoff/Nozzle orifice diameter ratio
10-34
Hydrodynamic Machining-HDM 10.3
0.12
00
0.08
e)e
*~ 0.06
i 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
[100 mm)
Standoff distance, in
Figure 10.3-16 Width of cut versus standoff distance for aluminum. *PEO Polyethylene oxide.
(Courtesy of Grumman Aerospace Corporatior)
ca
0 02 /
(D 0.02'
0.01
0.
0 1 2 4 3 5 6
[100 mm]
Standoff distance, in
Figure 10.3-17 Penetrcion depth versus standoff distance for aluminum. *PEO = Polyethylene ox-
ide. (Courtesy of Grumman Aerospace Corporation)
10-35
- - , - r ~- - -....-. '- - -- !
10.3 Hydrodynamic Machining-HDM
0.060
90 ksi [620 MWa]
0.050
CL
0 5 10 15 20
Jet angle, degrees
Figure 10.3-18 Effect of jet angle on penetration depth for steel cut under water. (Courtesy of Grum-
man Aerospace Corporation)
10-36
Low Stress Grinding-LSG 10.4
PROCESS SUMMARY careful consideration of the total process.ng sequence and
the proper placement of LSG within it
To maintain an acceptable level of productivity. LSG pa-
rameters should be applied only to the removal of the last
INFEED few thousandths inch of material from the workpiece (see
table 10.4-2) LSG should not be applied "all over" the
workpiece. It should be considered for use only on critical
areas, and then only if it is the final process affecting the
"as shipped" surface. Note that heat treatment, shot peen-
Abrasive ing or other post-grinding processing may affect the ground
wheel surface or may make LSG unnecessary
Operating Parameters
10-37
10.4 Low Stress Grinding-LSG
Material Removal Rates End Tolerances Equipment at,, .---
Material removal rates are low, but good productivity can Conventional gri: ". ,quipment can be used to produce
be attainedby successively reducing conventional material LSG results. ' I . necessary to modify the equipment
removal rates to LSG levels as the finished dimensions are to obtain the, - , I lower wheel speeds and higher table
approached Typical tolerances that can be obtained are in speeds The lov ,nfeed rates usually are attainable on a
the 0 0002 inch 1 0.005 mml range. well maintainec macnine If it is not practical to modify
some mach;' condition to secure the desired operating pa-
rameter, it still possible to attain LSG results. In this
Surface Technology case all of the other parameters should be at their best lev-
Surface roughness values are typical of those attainable by els to compensate for a deficiency in one of them.
fine grinding and range from 16 to 32 microinches Rt tO. 4
to 0 8 pml. Plastically deformed debris, distortion and re-
sidual strebs are minimal or absent The low residual-stress
levels frequently are compressive, which further enhances Machining Characteristics
the high-cycle-fatigue strength The absence of micro- Results from LSG are typical of those attained by any fine
cracks also contributes to high surface integrity A test gentle grinding operation Cleanliness of the lubricant,
specimen or check of the results from LSG is desirable. Ei- workpiece and machine are important, and it is most desir-
ther the distortion produced in a ground, thin test strip or a able to assure that a continuous, full stream of lubricant
simple metallographic examiration of the surface taken reaches the interface between the wheel and the work-
parallel to the lay can be a useful quality assurance test. piece. A closely fitted nozzle box is helpful.
SELECTED DATA
TABLE 10.4-2 Typical Infeed Schedule for Producing Surfaces by Low Stress Grinding
... INFEED RATE
STEP WORKPIECE STOCK REMOVAL*
inch/pass
Rough Grinding From raw material dimension to up to 0.002
within 0.010 inch [0.25 mm] of
desired final dimension--
Dress wheel
Semi-finish Grinding From 0.010 inch [0.25 mm] to 0 0003 to -
.. 0.001 inch [0 025 mm] of fina
size final 0 00066
NOTE For additional data and description of low stress grinding, see abrasive machining discussion in section 18 3, Surface
Integrity
*Data apply to the radius for cylindrical grinding and to the depth for surface g-Inding.
'This roughing rate should be such that roughness, tears, cracks, or microcracks in the surface are of lesser magnitude than
the material remaining to be removed by the finishing and semi-finishing cuts.
10-38
Thermally Assisted Machining-TAM 10.5
PROCESS SUMMARY TABLE 10.5-1 Energy Density of Heat Sources
DENSITY
HEAT SOURCE
Practical Applications
Softned one-WorkieceHard-to-machine and high -temperature alloys are all candi-
dates for "hot machining" or TAM Work materials with
hardness ranges of 40 to 70 Rc should be considered for
TAM. Poor thermal conductivity in the material can re-
duce the heat loss between the time of heat application and
Plasma torch % the time of cutting. Aluminum. coppcr, and titanium with
connection thru their relatively high heat conductivities are not good candi-
brush rii date materials for TAM Most of the applications have
been for turning, however, experimental work has involved
milling and slotting. Cuts of long duration have the greatest
Figure 10.5-1 TAM schematic. potential for economic benefit from the addition of TAM.
Operatln6 Parameters
The heat source (plasma torch) parameters are added to
the conventional turning parameters. The standoff dis-
tance, angular position and shieldings for the torch are usu-
ally fixed by adapters to the machine tool. A careful bal-
ance between heat input, cutting depth and speed are
needed to be sure that adequate, but not excessive, temper-
atures are achieved at the necessary depth in the work-
Principles piece surface at the instant of the cut.
Thermally assisted machining (TAM) is the addition of sig-
nificant amounts of heat to the workpiece immediately
prior to single-point cutting so that the material is softened,
but the strength of the tool bit is umimpaired (see figure
10.5-1). A steep temperature gradient is necessary, so the Material Removal Rates and Tolerances
heat transfer properties of the work material are impor- Conventional turning tolerances apply equally to thermally
tant High energy density in the heating source is a prime assisted machining but material removal rates increase be-
necessity Table 10.5-1
erlheat sources Whilelists the energy
resistive densities
heating for sev-
and induction asete
cause themach i iss softened.
worltpiece softened. r Theear
shear res
forces re re-
are re-
eral betsucsWierssiehaigadidcin duced, however, the depth of the softening zone governs
heating offer possibilities, the plasma arc offers the most the maximum depth of cut at which improved rates can be
practical and effective method for external heating at the attained. Table 10.5-2 lists improved rates of cutting
required rates The plasma arc has a core temperature of attained.
14500F l8000CI and a surface temperature of 6500OF
13600*Cl The torch can produce 2000'F I1100Cl in the
workpiece in approximately one quarter revolution of the
wurkpiece between the point of application of the torch
and the cutting tool This temperature will soften many
high temperature alloys. The depth of heat penetration Surface Technology
must be sufficient to secure material softening to the depth When the heat input and cutting rates are properly bal-
expected to be used by the cutting tool. Warm surfaces are anced, the work material below the cut is usually not
not helpful-the temperature must reach the softening re- heated enough to alter the metallurgical structure. The sur-
gion for the work material. The residual temperature in the face roughness, plastic deformation, residual stresses, etc.,
workpiece usually is only 100' to 200F 1350 to 100 0 CI associated with conventional turning apply equally to
Temperatures in thin wall sections may be higher. TAM.
10-39
10.5 Thermally Assisted Machining-TAM
CONVENTIONAL
MATERIAL TURNING TAM
j 10-40j
. . . - I i I l l I-
Ram force
Worktable I
3600 Orbiting cam
Grit size- ~ (#180
100toprovides
--20 a good balance between
cutting rate and reasonable finish.)
10-41
10.6 Total Form Machining-TFM
Equipment anr Tooling to secure the mirror image needed. Several other tech-
Equipment is regu..riy available in several sizes, with table niques for preparing the cutting master are available from
sizes up to three feet (900 mini square and up to 18 inches the equipment builder.'
1460 min of ram travel. Orbiting offsets up to 0.50 inch
112.5 minI are available Filtered fluid systems accompany
the machine or are built into the base. Machining Characteristics
The preparation of the abrasive cutting master, with ap- The fluid flow in TFM eliminates the dust associated with
propriate overcut allowances, can start from a full-scale conventional profile milling of graphite or other friable
model and use a double-reverse, plastic-molding technique materials
IC Krauter, 1976. EDM and TFM, The ideal marriage in a production die
sinking center. Technical paper MR76-702. Society of Manufacturing Egi-
neers. Dearborn, MI.
10-42
Ultrasonic Machining-USM 10.7
and R-tary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
Operating Parameters
Feed or
spndle thrust TABLE 10.7-1 Typical Values for USM Operating
* Parameters
10-43
10.7 Ultrasonic Machining-USM
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
Material Removal Rates and Tolerances Equipment and Tools
Respectable machining rates combined with accuracy and USM equipment for cavity sinking or piercing is available
good finishes can be achieved for very hard work materials, in a power range from 200 to 2400 watts arid. with special
Vibration amplitude and frequency. area of cut, and static engineering order, up to 4000 watts. The most common
load are principal considerations: however, abrasive size frequency is 20 kHz which can be adjusted about plus or
and type. work material brittleness, and depth of cut are minus 10 percent to attain better tuning for specific tooling
also important. The rate of penetrstion is inversely propor- Special attachments or equipment adaptations provide ul-
tional to the area of the cut and j- )ortional to the grit size trasonic assist for conventional drilling, grinding, forming
and the square of the amplitude of vibration. Trepanning of and drawing. Tool material and grit are matched to the ap-
cavities or holes is preferable to the use of solid tools. Cut- plication. and for the best productivity, great care should
ting rates increase with the hardness of the abrasive grit. It be exercised in selecting and maintaining the amplitude of
is essential to maintain a good flow of fresh. sharp grit at vibration. The tool should be designed to resonate at the
the cutting interface and to flush this face free from ch~ps desired frequency for best results, and it must be strong
and accumulations of debris. Excess static load can com- enough to resist fatigue failure. Tool materials are selected
pact the grit and slow the penetration rate. on the basis of ductility and toughness rather than hard-
ness. The overcut between the tool form and workpiece
The delicate touch of USM. while slower in volume re- shape is approximately equal to twice the size of the abra-
moval rate. can be especially valuable for reducing manu- sive grit. Tool storage needs attention in order to reduce
facturing losses of fragile workpieces. Breakout and chip- nicks and scratches that can cause early fatigue failure.
ping of exits of cuts can be a problem. Thin parts often are Most forces are low. so workpiece clamping can be min-
cemented to a sacrifice plate. imal. Fixturing should be positive so as to eliminate vibra-
tion of the workpiece. The slurry recirculation system
Accuracy is typically --0.001 inch 140.025 mini and can should have cooling capability.
achieve -0.0002 inch I=0.005 mml with special care.
Typical operating conditions are listed in table 10.7-3. The RUM equipment is available in a range of sizes and acces-
rate of removal and other specific operating conditions are sories as well as in portable units. Practical limit to tool
dependent upon the work material characteristics, as dem- weight is 1.4 oz 140 gl. The rotary heads provide capability
onstrated in table 10.7-20. for threading.
Surface Technology
Surface roughness decreases and finish improves with
smaller size grit and smaller vibration amplitudes or higher Machining Characteristics
frequencies (see figures 10.7-3 to 10.7-5). USM typically There are no unusual safety considerations in USM. and
achieves roughness values of 20 to 30 microinches Ra 10.51 the simplicity of the operation reduces the training or skill
to 0 76/pml. Side walls of deep cavities can be rougher than requirements. A good flow of slurry is desirable in order to
the bottom face. There ;s no heat-affected zone, and there maintain the cutting rate. Replenishment of the grit is
are no chemical or electrical alterations in the surfaces pro- needed at regular intervals. With water-based slurries, a
duced. The multitude of small impacts imparts a shallow, rust-preventive treatment is desirable following the wash-
compressive residual stress to the surface This residual out of the slurry. The proper choice of tool material and
stress promotes an increase in the high cycle fatigue abrasive grit will result in satisfactory wear ratios between
strength of the work material after USM (see section 13.3. the workpiece and the tool. Taper in deep cuts can be re-
table 18.3-7). Side-wall channels can occur from the action lieved by the use of roughing and finishing tools. Because ,A
of cavitation but will only be approximately the size of the tool wear occurs mostly on the bottom face of the tool, pro-
abrasive grit. file precision is maintained.
IN
10-44 0
Ultrasonic Machining-USM 10.7
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
SELECTED DATA
There are several valid techniques for selecting operating
parameters for USM. The steps in table 10.7-2 are recom-
mended as one logical sequence Supporting data come
from the other figures and tables in accordance with the
terms ai explained in figure 10 7-2
Average
grit size
0
OO_- " feed Vibration From
0-O o- so IIIpump slurry
/
Overcut -0 0 Slurr
" '
C "J Working
gap
', -
22.Vibration 0, O000l Workpiece
am
ltd
.w Taper
0
Chips
K4
Tool H
face area
3
I! #
I
I
10-45 1i
I
-' - ~---- -- --
10.7 Ultrasonic Machining-USM
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
TABLE 10.7-2 Steps to Select USM Operating TABLE 10.7-3 Typical USM Operating Conditions
Parameters
SEMI.
ITEM DATA PARAMETER ROUGHING FINISHING FINISHING
10-46
Ultrasonic Machining-USM 10.7
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
TABLE 10.7-4 Materials That Have Been Successfully Machined Ultrasonically
TABLE 10.7-5 Abrasives Used in USM TABLE 10.7-7 USM Cutting Speed Index for Brittle
Work Materials
KNOOP RELATIVE (Soda glass, using 100 mesh B4C abrasive = 100)
ABRASIVE HARDNESS CUTTING POWER
ABRASIVE
Diamond 6500-7000 1.0 Boron Carbide Silicon
Cubic boron nitride (CBN) 4700 0.95 WORK MATERIAL - Carbide
Boron carbide (BC) 2800 0.50-0.60 100 200 400 100
Silicon carbide (SiC) 2480-2500 0,25-0.45 mesh mesh mesh mesh
Aluminum oxide (AI20 3) 2000-2100 0.14-0.16 Soda glass 100 90 77 85
Hysil 73 66 54
B9 borosilicate glass 86
Ferroxcube IIIC 37 34
Ferroxdure (demagnetized) (32)
Quartz crystal (57)
Fused alumina 19
Synthetic sapphire 19
Synthetic ruby 18
Flint stone (72)
Barium-titanate ceramic 110 109
TABLE 10.7-6 Selection of Abrasive Ceramic 507 (38) 35
ABRASIVE WORK MATERIAL Garnet (58)
Feldspar (40)
Boron carbide Tungsten carbide, metals, high density Spinel (48)
ceramics, minerals, semi and precious Slate 67
stones. Mycalex (240) (200)
Silicon carbide Low density ceramics, glass silicon, germa- -
nium. mineral stones. SOURCE: E. A Neppiras and R.0. Fosketi. Ultrasonic machining. Philips
Technical Review 18 (1956-57). p 372.
Aluminum oxide Glass. low density, sintered or hard powder NOTES: Tool used was mild steel H-form. 1/2-inch 112 7 mm) square,
compounds, limbs 1/16-inch (1.59 mml thick. see figure 10.7-9.
Numbers in parentheses are estimates, interpolated from measurements
SOURCE. G E Littleford. Machining by ultrasonics, 1971. under somewhat ddferent conditions.
10-47
10.7 Ultrasonic Machining-USM
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
TABLE 10.7-8 USM Cutting Speed Index for Metais
(Soda glass, using 100 mesh BAC abrash e =100)
1 ABRASIVE
WORK MATERIAL j.
I Boron Carbide
T
fsilicon
Carbide Alumina
IDiamond
j Sand Powder
100
mesh
220
mesh
00o
mesh
100
mesh
220
mesh
(grit size
0.012 In)
I(grit size
0.001 In)
odlas100 90 77 85 65479
Bas(omon yellow) j 6.6 5.6
TABLE 10.7-9 USM Cutting Speed Index for Ceramic Work Materials
(Soda glass. using 100 mesh 84C abrasive =100)
[ _____________________ABRASIVE_____
10-48
Ultrasonic Machining-USM 10.7
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
TABLE 10.7-10 Grit Sizes Used in USM
PARTICLE SIZE
GRIT SIZE
Roughing__
120 0.0056 -_ M.
140 0.0048
170 0.0034
200 0.0026
230 0.00248 X
270 0.00175
325 0.00128
400 0.00090
Finishing
500 0.00073
600 0.00057
800 0.00044
900 0.00038
1000 0.00032 .
1200 0.00022
25 400
'EN Sides (glass)
. -- 20 3007.6 gm) _ __
,300
i 1,0
1' 200
(40/.gin) al
"''b Bottoms (glass)
~~~ (41~tn
0 0 Igo
'b0-0I
. F,0 (tungsten carbide)
SidesBoto
140 ;-40 320 420 600 800 1000 0_o Boto (tnse arbide
size
0rit 0 0.002 0004 0.006 0 008 [02mmI
10-49
10.7 Ultrasonic Machining-USM
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
1000 --
008ToISet
n
0F
002 4~_
0 8
[576m
25crato~/:>
3000 0005 20
Copper -Circular,
.2 CO CO B -,
C ~ L CJ( COt CD C
0o
0
00 00 0r
U)C0
C. S) I E 6 , Lt i Ci'D NC
0I f(-O ~ ~ CO (0 toCD
- CO':O
0 m (0 CO
0 (0 -
C':
0 0
C 00CO 0)0 0 (nl
CO
3 toL
0(U)4 - - C':
?L U-)
(00) -N C W
D 00
0 -0 --
on 0 ') .1 to
S
- \
0O
0
"
C
~O~C\- 0- CO0
0
00
coo C;0
) CO ,
C6C
a C C
CCE- Ecn
EE E E~
S'C''EN .E .r C7? *
C ;NZ )
-Z C C C C 0
-- ~ ~
oNCJ N'
,-- ~ ~ c
0* 0'~.
Cu
Cda C
000
6 00 0 X 0 W wT
ui In1
S0 _C E o1
0 5 - C
:1 z) 10 >
_j 'U3C 0 < C
0
0 OL 5E(O~
~~v>~0 <~0
10-51
10.7 Ultrasonic Machining-USM
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
TABLE 10.7-13 Material Removal Rates for Various TABLE 10.7-14 USM Material Removal Rate Index
Work Materials (Cutting soda glass at 0.060 in/min [1.52 mm/man] = 100)
TABLE 10.7-15 iotary Ultrasonic Machining (RUM) with Rotating Diamond Impregnated Tool
WORKDRLDETMAHNG
MATERIAL DIAMETER OFCTTIME CONDITIONS
Brn0.250 040
700
SOURCE W R Tyrrell, A new method for machining hard and brittle materials, SAMPE Quarterly 1 (January 1970), 55-59
10-52
Ultrasonic Machining-USM 10.7
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
[051mm] b
004 lm]()0020
STool section
S003
-, 000163
--- c0015-
To I section
0
E 16 35 mm)
C) _ ___ ____ C)
0 02 0 0010
~~~Tool Section 112i
001
0 xi
00002 1- Too000
0 1 2 3 4 5 0 2 4 6 8 10
[1 82 KgJ [3 64 Kg]
Static load. lb Static toad 110
Figure 10.7-7 Penetration rate as a function of static load for (a) various amplitudes ( ) and (b)various
tool areas. (E.A.Neppiras and R. D. Foskett, p.369)
0 046
E 1mm) _ __
002
0 C
;E
0
001
C)S
0 1
0 5 10 15 20 10 051 mml
Frequency kHz Amplitude in
Figure 10.7-8 Penetration rates in glass as a function of (a) frequency, for a peak to peak amplitude of
0.001 25 inch [0.038 mm] and constant static load; and (b) amplitude, for four operating frequencies and
constant static load. (E.A Neppiras and R D Foskett, p.369)
10-53
10.7 Ultrasonic Machining-USM
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
0020 1051mm) 100n esh Tool Section
400 mesh
H ,r
127m
7mm)
1
0015 4'2sn'" [l 59mm)
If [12 7mmj
5 '=500 mesh
0 0010
! I ==.3-- 600 mesh
0 005
0 _j
0 25 50 75 100 125
Time seconds
Figure 10.7-9 Penetration rate as a function of time for varioIs grit sizes. Grit sizes given in British
Standard Sieves (American Mesh sizes are essentially the same.) (E.A Neppiras and R D.Foskett,
p. 370)
o 7
x . Material Limestone
a, Tool width 3/4 in 19 1mm)
Cut depth 1/2 in [12 7mmj
6Voltage 1100
3200 W 3200W
2500 W3000W
W 250 3000 W 4 Angle
Power of to
1500 attack
2000 W
No3 No6 No7 tO0 toa
t '-J A 2000
1 25 n "- 125 in 4
1 in
-," c- NO 7
2 *" 5 cmtrn,n -
cm/s
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0 2 4 6 8 10 I
0 0.5 10 1s 20 2 5 in/S
Time seconds Cutting speed
Figure 10.7-10 Drilling and layer removal rates for medium Indiana limestone processed with IJSM.
Left, depth of drilling versus time for three types of tools operated at 10 kHz; right, specific energy at
various cutting speeds and angles of attack at 10 kHz. (From K. F Graff, Application of sonic power to
rock cutting. Ultrasonics international 1973 conference proceedings. pp. 31. 33)
10-54
Ultrasonic Machining-USM 10.7
and Rotary Ultrasonic Ma'shining-RUM
0 120
S 0 080 [2mm]
0
*60040
0.003
S 0 002
0)
0 0100 020030
[2 54mm]
Diameter of tool. in
Figure 10.7-11 Cutting rates for stainless steel tools into ceramic work material. b'p. determining
rates for various size tools; bottom, rates as a function of jol diameter. (J Krawczyk, Ultrasonic grinding
techniques in microminiaturization, Report No TR-958, D:amond Ordnance Fuze Labora'ories, Washington,
DC. 1961)
10-55
10.7 Ultrasonic Machining-USM
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
0
000 400 mesh
800 meSh
0
00
0 01 02 03 04 CE 0 0 3 0
Figure 10.7-12 Overcut values for tungsten carbide and soda glass work materials cut with B4C abra-
sive at various depths. (E. A. Neppiras and R, 0. Foskelt, p. 374)
ICold
Brass
Annealed low C steel
rolled steel
Stainless steel
Tungsten carbide
40-50
100
100
150
1000
10
35
40
0.7
1.1
39
28
0.9
40
100
75
75
_
10-56
Ultrasonic Machining-usm 10.7
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
TABLE 10.7-17 Representative USM Penetrating and Tool Wear
Rates at 700 Watts Input
MAXIMUM
RATIO PRACTICAL AVERAGE
MATERIAL STOCK REMOVED MACHINING PENETRATING
TO TOOL WEAR AREA RATE*
in- cOe in/min m~i
SOURCE. Data from Raytheon Company, Impact grinders for ultrasonic machining. 19'61
NOTE. Toot material was cold rotted steel in all cases, 320 mesh Boron Carb'de was
used in all cases
*1/2-inch (12 7mm) diameter tool. 1/2.'nch (12 7 mm) deep
TABLE 10.7-18 Representative USM Penetrating and Tool Wear Rates at 100 Watts Input______
Glass
Aluminum oxide
Tungsten carbide
j 0.25
0.25
025
~83~' 1
5
1
~ O4~
L_45t0,
0.075
0010
0.002
L 5
A9
C
>
'
' 14101
1.41
1.41
13:1
1:1
Silicon
Quartz
j 0.25
0.25
1
3
tW.-6g 0.110
0.070
Z?-
ILI
1.4 1
1 4:1154:1
100:1
Glass j0.125 1 ~---A' 0.125 41
11. 100:1
SOURCE: Data from Raytheon Company. Impact grinders 1w, ultrasonic machining. 1961.
NOTE: Tool material was cold roiled steel in all Cases: =.320 mesh Boron Carbide was used in alt cases
10-57
10.7 Ultrasonic Machining-USM
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
llI* I I"
300 1 T T 1 1
200 - - -4 S--- 4-
8 Ferriteu
02 O__Z
05
Figure 10.7-13 Tool wear versus machining rate. Relative wear rate of stcaI tool in various work mate-
rials. 100% is 5 mm/min (0.20 in/min) in glass. (M. Aoithan and V. C. V-nkatesh. Tool wear phenomenon
in ultrasonic drilling. Proceedings of 5th all India machine tool design and research conference, University of
Roorkee. 1972, p. 625)
10-58
Ultrasonic Machining-USM 10.7
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
18 VVV7
16
1 ~ 4
142
E (0040mn)
Work material Glass
e. Work material
-08
0 j thickness 6 5mm (0 26 i
I Tool material Mild steel
06 Tool size
I
outer diameter 5mmn (0 20 in)
04 - 1nner diameter 4mm (0 16 in)
Abrasive
02- typ SIC
~grit size 280
0 - [FrequenecyY20kHz
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220
Metal removal rate mm/min
Figure 10.7-14 Tool wear versus machining rate and cutting time. (M. Adtthan and V C Venkatesh.
p 627)
11
7
10
Without ultrasonics
C Scatter band --
00
5O2 04 70600
44
105
10.7 Ultrasonic Machining-USM
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
Abrasive
Type BeC 84C BC B4 C sic B4C B4C A12O,
Size 320 500 320 180 240 320 240 180
Percent concentratiorn 20 60 20 40 I 50 40 50 20
Carrier fluid H20 light oil H20 H20 H20 HO H20 H20
Power
Frequency. kHz 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 10
Watts 700 100 40C 200 500 300 500 1000
Amplitude.
in 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0 0005 0.0015 0.0005 0 004
[mm] [0.051] [0,0251 [0.051] [00251 [00131 (0.0381 [0.013] [0.102]
Spindle thrust. lb 5 2 2 1 4 2 4 10
[kg] [2.27] (091] [091.45 [182] j [091] [1.82] [4.54]
Material removal j
Rate, I
n/min 0030 0.015 0.004 0005 00002 0.016 0.0003 0.15
[mm/min] [491) [246) [65.5] 181 9] [32.7] I [262) [4.9) [2458
Penetration.
in/mi 0 150 0.075 0.020 0.025 0001 0.080 0.0015 0.150
[mm/min] [381] [1.90] [0 51] [0 64] [0 025] i i2.0] [0.038] [3.81]
Relative percent* 100 50 15 20 6 50 4 500
Depth of cut. in 0.5 0.5 0.1 01 0.25 0.1 01 10
[mm] [12.7] [12.7] [2.5] [2 5] [6 4] [2 5] [2.5] [25.4]
10-60
Ultrasonic Machining-USM 10.7
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
SPECIFIC APPLICATIONS DATA
Workpiece
configuration:
Q.in 0.020 in j 4 in
0 . 0.40 in 3in
Draw die i
Abrasive
type: B4C BC A120 3 SiC
percent
concentration: 50
Power supply
frequency, kHz: 20 20 20 20
power, W: 600
Surface roughness,
pin R0: 22 15 16
Remarks, Roughing cut, Finishing cut, Bottom hole. Very delicate part.
trepanned, 0.4992-inch
%6-inch OD tool size.
ID. Through hole.
Through hole.
if
10-61
ca
10.7 Ultrasonic Machining-USM
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
TABLE 10.7-21-Continued
Work material Silicon Nitrite Glass-Graphite Epoxy Glass
Composite
Workpiece
configuration 0 1nOD Oa
109 inOD %0 ,at2f,
Q 9 in ID Qi21
Abrasive
type. SIC B.C Ei-C
percent I
concentratiop 50 140 35
Power SUDply
frequency kHz
I 20 1 20 25
Surface roughness
pir R. i 15 60 (est)
Remarks: i Hardest ceramic No ourrs o,. ttrough slots Low carbon steel too! for
_ __ engraving
10-62
Ultrasonic Machining-USM 10.7
and Rotary Ultrasonic Machining-RUM
Workpiece
configuration.
00 8i
08 0i4n2 i
00-o 0 01
10 holes. 0.016 in dia. TSpline trepanninq
ALrasiveB0 C
percent
concentration,
Poker supply
frequency, kHz- 20 I20
power, W.
Tolerance, in-
Surface roughness,
pin R :
10-63
PRECEDLNG PA(z BL NK.-NOT FILED
PROCESS SUMMARY
lMultiple nozzle 71
10-65
10.8 Water Jet Machining-WJM
Material Removal Rates and Tolerances Shake-out or cleaning of crevices in the workpiece is nec-
Low pressure WJM is -jot a mass material removal process. essary when grit loaded fluids are us,-d.
it is a finishing, cleaninj and del'urring process. The higher
pressure uses in civil engineering applications are outside
the scope of a machinability handbook. Equipment and Tooling
Production equipment is avadiable which offers adjustable
nozzles in a splash chamber, pumps. filters and associated
Surface Technology items in a single package. Portable equipment with flexible
A polished, scoured clean surface is typical. When abra- nozzles and lances also is commercially aviilable.
sives are used. a light peening texture may occur. Motion
in the workpiece o. the nozzle is desirable because dwelling
on one spot can result in grooving Oiling of iron bearing al- Machining Characteristics
loys is necessary to reduce rust formation after cleaning Suitable for cleaning large areas
10-66
SECTION 11
ELECTRICAL NONTRADITIONAL
MACHINING OPERATIONS
11-1
PRECEMDNG PAGE BLAAN-NOT FILVXD
Fixture Pump
Insulation'
Heat - Electrolyte
protection h - supply
11-3
11.1 Electrochemical Deburring-ECD
inch I 0.018 to 0 050 mniml The larger tolerances are as- hydroxides in the used electrolyte need to be filtered out be.
sociated with lower current densities and large operating fore the electrolyte is reused This action minimizes metal
gaps: however, the principal factor controlling accuracy is hydroxide deposition on the workpiece or tools and pro-
the "on" time. Automatic controls are needed to hold the motes more uniform material removal rates. Disposal of
best values. sludge from the used electrolyte should be carried out in an
environmentally sound manner.
Surface Technology
The highly focused electrolytic action produces smooth SELECTED DATA
radii and surface roughness in the range of 8 to 16 micro-
in'hes R, 10.2 to 0.4 pmal. With high current densities. sur-
f- , ess can be 2 microinches Ra 10.05 trol. Stray 0 020 in
.Nil; occur at some considerable distance from the [0 508 mini Average
- ng deburred. Shallow striations (less than
00oi irch 10.0025 mml) can occur where turbulent flow.
-ubbles or insulation discontinuities are present. Some
-. 0 015 in
ajiGs with large. distinct grains can exhibit selective etch- .0 (0381 I
0010 mm! Expected variation~l -
ing on a microscale. particularly in low current density "xpin vartie
ing0 in removal time
areas adjacent to the principal focal point of the electrode.
ECD is not stress-inducing ancd can remove some pre- 0010 in
viously strained surface layers. Alloys with nonconductive "10.254 mm
grains, for example, silicon grains in aluminums alloys, can
exhibit a pock-marked surface where these grains have o
fallen out.
a) 0 005,in ,.;o
< [0 127 mi_
Equipment and Tools
ECD equipment is smaller and less complex than that for
ECM because feed motion is not required. Plastic tables or
shallow tanks are arranged to accept the fixtures and to al-
low quick connections for electricity and electrolytes. 0 10 20 30 40
Stainless steel fixtures and fittings are used to resist the Deburring cycle time, seconds
corrosiveness of the electrolytes. Tooling and electrodes
are tailored to conform to the configuration of the work- Figure 11.1-2 Burr removal rates for aluminum al-
piece and the edLas to be deburred By properly insulating loys. Thickness of burr is measured at root of burr.
the cathode, effects on other exposed areas of the work- (D W Sickels, Electrochemical deburnng-some ca-
piece are reduced to negligible amounts. Power supplies pabilities and limitations, Technical paper MR76-133,
range from 100 to 500 amperes, with multiples available if Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, Ml,
several parts are to be run concurrently Automatic con- 1976, p 10)
trols are desirable to secure repeatable results. particularly
with the very short machining cycles. Multiple workpiece
fixtures and automation of the ECD cycle are frequent. 0.020 in
The cycle begins witi, closure of the lid or splash guard and mm] 10.508
placement of the electrode in correct relation to the work-
piece. The cycle continues automatically from electrolyte-
on, to current-on. through the cutting time to current-off,
flushing. and opening of the lid. Hand-held tools for ECD
also are available (see discussion of ECS. section 11.7). .0381
o n
mmni
I
-
A,
r-..
Electrolyte supplies, pumps and filters are sized to handle 0 :
the flow rates. Flow rate depends on component size and Expected
fixtures, but usually ranges up to only a few hundred gal- = 0-010 in variation in. 1015-1
Ions because cycle times are so short. - [(0 254 mm] removal -
time
ECD equipment for the 20-second operation on automotive
pistons cited under "Practical Applications" was integrated > 0 005 in _._,. ___
into a transfer line that included cleaning, rinsing and < [0.127 mm! / --
oiling.
11-4
Electrochemical Discharge Grinding-ECDG 11.2
PROCESS SUMMARY
Insulatedl /l Graphite~dl~tve
LgContct
power jSite of
random discharge
Principles and the wheel and to prevent boiling and possible severe
Electrochemical discharge grinding (ECDG) combines the arcing. Sometimes the process is called ECDM. electro-
teatures of both electrochemical and electrical discharge chemical discharge machining.
methods of material removal (see figure 11.2-1) ECDG
has the arrangement and electrolytes of electrochemical
grinding (ECG). but uses a graphite wheel without abras~ve Practical Applications
grains. The random spark discharge is generated through The workpiece must be an electrically conductive mate-
the insulating oxide film on the workpiece by the power ial. As with ECM. the hardness of the workpiece does not
generated in an alternating-currentsource or by a pulsating affect the material removal rates, e'nd almost any con-
direct-currcnt source The principal material removal ductive material can be cut Single-point carbide dis-
comes fron, the electrolytic action of the low levei direct- posable-insert grinding or resharpening is done by ECDG.
current vortages. The spark discharges erode the anodic Plunge, face and surface grinding are all performed. Thin
films to allow the electrolytic acton to continue. At in. or delicate profiles can be form ground. The electrolytic ac-
creased operating levels, electrical discnarge contributes to tion produces a burr-free surface. Circular forms that need
the material removal, as demonstrated i figure 11 2-2 to be stress free are g.od applcations, as is the machining
There is no mechanical contact between the wheel and the cf honeycomb materials. The low cost wheel and the ease
workpiec : however, there are separating forces developed with which it can be formed for intricate profile grinding
by the compression of the electrolyte in the space between are distinct advantages. Careful economic comptrisons be-
the wheel and the workpiece.
diec-cric:
Careful
ricialmaeia
ouceTh
electrolyte control
rmoal
,s tween
dctvemaera
ECG and ECG
cn
should
e- u
beSnl-nmade beforecabdeds
completing
required to assure its placement between th workpiec an applhcation study.
11-5
11.2 Electrochemical Discharge Grinding-ECDG
Operating Parameters
Power supply
type. Pulsating dc ac
frequency: 120 Hz 60 Hz
vchage" 4 to 12 V (8 optimum) 8 to 12 V
current: 200 to 1000 A 200 to 500 A
Electrol :e
type. NaCl, l,,aNO 3 proprietary neutral salts
concentration: 1/i to 2 lb/gal (180 to 240 g/L;
temperature (inlet): 800 to 100 F (270 to 380C]
Wheel
type: Graphite, typically 300 mesh
speed: 4(O0 to 6000 fpm [1200 to 1800 m/mm]
(Lower speeds do not promote good
electrolyte flow and permit gas bubbles
to become too large, thus inhibiting
maximum current densities-see figure
11.2-3.)
Feed rates*
plunge grinding, carbide: 0.020 in/m [0 5 mm/mini]
plunge grinding, steel: 0.060 in/min [15 mm/mini
surface grinding, carbide. 0.15 in/mm [3.8 mm/min]
surface grinding, steel: 0.50 in/min [12.7 mm/mmin
'Fo, 575 A/in 2 [0.9 A/mm 2] on an 8-inch [200 mm] diameter wfleel
Surface grindng at 0 10 inch (2 5 mm] iepth of cut.
11-6
___ .
Electrochemical Discharge Grinding-ECDG 11.2
Maierial Removal Rates and Tolerances The surfaces are sometimes pitted with miiiue craters
ECDG will remove about one cubic inch 110 cmil of tool from the electrical discharge if tie v ages used are too
stecl per hour-about 5 times faster than EDG while using high (Too-high voltage aiso deteriorates the wear ratioi
10 to 15 times as much current. Dimensional accuracy is Tie electrolytic dissolution promotes stress-free material
Dimesionl is removal action and burr-free edges
less than that from EDG and is typically =0.0005 inch
[::0.013 miml with close control and =0.001 inch 1 =0.025
mml for routine production. While a typical depth of cut is Equipment and Tools
one-half inch 112 5 mmI when machining at 200 amperes.
1
10
the1 cm
cubic'minl for carbide
inches workpieces
per minute and 0.015
metal enoval 10.25
rate cm-A/
is 0.006 peres is available
Comercial onlspecial
equipment in the engineering order
range from 20 Tooling
to 1000 am-
mini for steel workp'eces. Single-point carbide disposable involves the electrolyte flow control so as to obtain a
iniorset have een
been roundtoaSingepoith
inserts ground to a depth ofcfr0.010icpos0.2
0.010 inch 10.25 uniformly thick
Conforming film between
graphite thefilm
or plaotic workpiece
scrapersand
arethe wheel.
essential
minI at the rate of one insert per minute. Carbide thread Cnomiggaht rpai imsrpr r seta
chasers have been ground with a mean thread height deva- to tolerance and repeatability control. A sufficient flood of
tion of h0.0003 inch 1:0.008 mini and pitch deviatiov of filtered electrolte is essential to l-gh material removal
S0.00015 inch 0h mini
.004 The accuracy is primarily a rates and to the prevention of excessive temperatures. gas
function of the degree to which the electrolyte filmiS unr bubbles or :oiling in the working gap Fixtures should be
funcionof
egre t whch
he te eectolye flm.is nt- made of stainless steel. plastic. or materials compatible
form. Special scrapers are needed to control the electrolyte with the corrosiveness of the electrolyte
flow and to prevent air films.
Machining Characteristics
Surface Technology Wheel-to-workpiece wear ratios are dependent upon !he
Surface roughness values of 5 to 15 microinches R,,10.13 to type of power supply. the voltage, the grade of graphite and
0.38 .ml for carbide workpieces and 15 to 30 microinches the uniformity of electrolyte film. Figure 11.2-5 demon-
R. 10.38 to 0 76 pinl for steel workpieces can be expected. strates the relationship between wheel wear and voltage
SELECTED DATA
0.4
02 --
o0 CC"I
__ 0 __ _ _ _ __i..
0 200 400 600 800 0 1000 2000 3000
(5000A/mn') Z
Current density. A/cm2 Wheel speed, rpm
Figure 11.2-2 Feed rate versus current density in Figure 11.2 -3 ;-ielationship beiween current aen- -_
drillirg steel plate with ECDM. (M. Kubota. Metal re- s.tv and wheel speed. (W.G. Voorhees, Electro-
n.ovai in ECDM, ISEM-5 roceevings, International cn3inical discharge machining. Technical paper
Symposturr,tor Etectromachining.Zurich. Switzer iand, MR67-165. Socit!y r, Manuf"ctunng Engineers, Dear-
1977. p. 218) born, M, 9bl p.7)
11-7
11.2 Electrochemical Discharge Grinding-ECOG
~~ 12Vo
C 000010
C Vlt
0.00005-
0.
aMech.. jGa-
-~_wear ;parking
< L
0 4 8 12 16
Voltaoe. V
11-8
Electrochemical Grinding-ECG 11.3
PROCESS SUMMARY
Conductive bonding
~Abrasive wheel
Insulating protruding
abrasive grains Abrasi - Shp ring
Workpece the g g w
rc nductive,-
i - Worktable
Constant11.35)
feed
DC
Power supply +!
11-9
11.3 Electrochemical Grinding-ECG
Material Removal Rates and Tolerances glas or equivalent dielectric material (see table 11.3-4).
The material removal rate is proportional to the current Workpiece fixtures should be made of copper. copper-base
density The cui rent density is limited by the anodic dis- alloys or 300-series stainless steel and should be con-
solution rate for a particular alloy-electrolyte system and structed such that all cathodic components remain elec-
the boiling point of the electrolyte A convenient value for trically insulated from anodic components during the ECG
most common materials is 0.010 cubic inch per minute operation. The wheels must have the correct abrasive qual-
10 16 cm , mini per 100 amperes of current A plunge grind- ities of the insulating grit (silicon carbide and some forms
ing feed rate of 0.050 inch per minute 11.27 mm/mini is at- of Borazon cannot be used because they are electrically
2
tained at 500 amperes per square inch 177.5 A/cm l. while conductive.)
.3urface grinding operates at 1.0 inch per minute 125.4 mm/
mini with a 0.010 incn 10.25 mml depth of cut at 1000 am-
peres per square inch 155 A/cmil Size control is typically Machining Characteristics and Precautions
=0.001 inch I = 0.025 mini and is attainable in a one-pass It is necessary to "condition" any ECG wheel to remove the
cut. Accuracies to =0.0002 inch 1=0.005 mini can be metal matrix and to allow the nonconductive abrasive par-
achieved with the final pass without electrolytic action. ticles to protrude (see table 11.3-4). To accommodate the
Outside corners usually have a radius about 0.001 inch usually longer runs between wheel dressings. truing of the
10 025 mini. Inside corners have a limit of 0.010- to 0.015- wheel should be more precise than that for conventional
inch 10 25 to 0 38 mini radius. Removal rates are 5 to 10 grinding-0.0002 to 0.0005 inch TIR 10.005 to 0.013 mml.
times those for conventional grinding on hard materials
(Rockwell C45 and up). Handling and storage of the electrolytes should be done
with care and strict attention to the cautions pertaining to
the particular chemicals (see table 11.5-6. ECM). A mod-
Surface Technology erate fire hazard exists when dry NaNO 3 is mixed with or-
Surface finishes improve with increasing current densities ganic materials. With their heavy metal and salt content.
and big. -r feed rates Roughness values of 8 to 32 micro- the disposal of the used electrolytes needs careful. envi-
inches R::0.2 to 0.8 pml are common. with 1 to 4 micro- ronmentally sound planning.
inches R. 10,025 to 0.1 ptml attainable. The surface texture
is similar to that obtained with a metallographic polish. Areas adjacent to the current gap are exposed to the con-
Workpiece hardness is not a factor: howvcver. the material ductive spray and may be slightly eroded or pitted by the
type can affect the range of roughness values. The surface low current densities present there. Appropriate insulation
is free from process-induced residual stress and there is no in the tooling is required to avoid bimetal electrolytic cor-
heat-affected zone Both of these effects contribute to the rosion. NaCI electrolytes are rarely used in ECG because
production of workpieces with high surface integrity, they have strong corrosive effects on machine components.
Citrates. tartrates or proprietary chemicals frequently are
added to the electrolytes and can aid machining while re-
Equipment and Tools ducing corrosiveness. A thorough washdown of the equip-
Grinding machine construction must be rigid enough to ment and tools at the end of each day or each period of use
maintain precision under the deflecting forces which can is a good preventive maintenance practice. Workpieces
reach 150 psi I1 MPal between the workpiece and the should also be well rinsed after ECG, and some materials
wheel. The spindle must be insulated and capable of con- should be checked for possible adverse metallurgical reac-
ducting the low-voltage, high-current d-c power to the tion to the electrolytes.
%%heel. Associated equipment is required to store. pressur-
ize. filter and withstand the corrosive electrolytes. Con- Spindle current for the a-c drive motor is a good indication
trols. fixtures and mechanicai and electrical systems must
be made of suitable material or coated so as to be capable
of the amount of mechanical grinding during ECG. An in-
crease in current to 125 percent of the no-load value for
4
of operating in the salt mist environment. Conversion kits roughing ECG or t- 1.5 -.- , .. nt of the no-load value for
to convert mechanical grinders are available. Wheels must finishing ECG is a :easonaaie ,.pper limit for the amount of
be conductive and must use an insulating grain. Electrolyte grinding The d-c operating current should be selected such
nozzles should be close fitting and should be made of Plexi- that resistive overheating does not occur in the workpiece.
11-10
Electrochemical Grinding-ECG 11.3
SELECTED DATA
There are several valid techniques for selecting operating
parameters for ECG. The steps in table 11 3-2 are recom.
mended as one logical sequence Supporting data come
from the other figures and tables in accordance with the
terms as explained in figure 11 3-2.
I Feed
_I
d
SURFACE ECG
_ Fee
WN
11-11
. -
11.3 Electrochemical Grinding-ECG
TABLE 11.3-2 Steps To Select ECG
Operating Parameters
11-12
Electrochemical Grinding-ECG 11.3
TABLE 11.3-3 Recommended Parameters for ECG of Various Materials
Base
Chemical lb/gal H20 g/L H20 A/in2 A/cm-
Straigfh'tI. rt
ca. Diamond KNO 3 1.5-1.7 180-200 500 78
Tantalun, ..
carbic, bedoes Diamond KN03 1 5-1.7 180-200 500 78
High speed steel Diamond NaNO 3 1.0-1.5 120-180 500 78
Tungsten Diamond KOH or NaOH 1.0-15 120-1 80, 500 78
Low carbon steel Aluminum oxide KNO3 (90%) + INO2 (10%1) 05-1.0 601-120 1000 155
High carbon steel IAluminum oxide NaNO 3 1 0-15 120-180 1000 15.,-
Stainless steel Aluminum oxide NaNO3 1 5-1 7 180 200 500 78
Silicon iron Aluminum oxide NaCI 1.0-1 5 120-180 500 78
ICopper '~loys Aluminum oxide NaNO 3 or KNO, r .7 180-ad0 1500 233
IAluminum alloys Aluminum oxide NaNOI 1 0-1.2 120-140 1500 233
Titanium alloys Aluminum oxide NaNO 3 1 0-1.2 120-140- 1000 155
A-286 Aluminum oxide NaNO 3 10-1.2 126-140 1 750 116
Hastelloy alloy X Aluminum oxide NaNO 3 1.0-1.2 120-140. 750 116
M252 Aluminum oxide NaNO 3 1 0-1.2 [~12a44f0 750 116
Udimet 500, 700 Aluminum oxide NaNO~ or NaCl" 0 9-1 0 110- 750 116
Waspaloy Aluminum oxide NaNO3 1 0-1 2 120-140.. 750 116
Inconel Aluminum oxide NaNO 3 1 0-12 1120-140, - 750 116
Rene 41 Aluminum oxide NaNO3 ',8-2.0 1 81133 500 78-
Rene 80 Aluminum oxide NaNO 3 1.5-1 9 12 1d;44'0 500 78
Nick~el alloys Aluminum oxide NaNO 3 1.0-1.2 120-140 750 116,
Cobalt alloys Aluminum oxide NaNO3 10-1.2 6080 500 78-
HS-31 (X40) i /Aiuminum oxide NaN4O 3 + NaCl* 0 5-0.7 60- 80- 500 78--
Zirconium alioys .Jumninuin oxide NaNO 3 1.0-1.5 120-180 750 16-
Stellite i Aluminum oxide NaNO 3 1 8-2.0 -210-240 50(0 ~ 787
*Thero are many prcprietary mnixtures~or additives to the base chemicals that nave deeirabte eftects on specific allovs and restrain the corrosion of equip.
me-nt These are recor imended for iniiial iOals. Note that NaCi isespecially corrosive
'0ensty may te limited by possibility of overheating workpiece
11--13
---- -- . . . .- ----- -
11.3 Electrochemical Grinding-ECG
TABLE 11.3-4 Recommended Procedures for Conditioning the Wheel, Maintaining the
Electrolyte, and Fitting the Nozzle in ECG Operations
EGG wheels require 'conditioning'" after dressing to remove copper binder and allow nonconductive part:cles
of aluminum oxide or diamond to protrude Attention to electrolyte co dition and flow nozzle on a regular basis
is also recommended
Wheel mounting procedure recommendations
1 After iemoving worn-out wheel, clean flanges and spindle with warm, clean water and dry thoroughly
Check for any burrs on bearinq surfaces of flanges
2 Clean bear;ng surfaces and holes of flanges w.,ri an abrasive fabric, then blow clean with air to remove
any abrasive oarticles This is important for proper electrical conductivity between flanges and
v. eel
3 Mount wheel At this point, only hand-tighten flange nut
4. Indicate wheel face to within 0 001 inch [0 025 mm] TIR (total indicated runout), this is accomplished by
trial and error Use piece of wood to tap wheel into position Tighten fianges w,h wrench and re-
check TIR. 'f wheel has moved repeat procedure
Conditioning cutting face of wheel
1 Set source voltage at 4 to 5 volts.
2 Set spark suppress at maximum setting (if such control exists on powei supply)
3 Start wheel rotation and full electrolyte flow
4 Plunge grind into a piece of scrap steel. Plunge into steel slowly until ampere eter stabilizes
5. Increase voltage and feed until sparking occurs
6 Continue until cutting face and wheel has a dul! gray or charcoal appearance
7 Wheel is now ready to use
8 Return spark control to normal setting
Electrolyte checks:
If machine is rot equ.pped with a coolant filter, electroly'e should be changel onre a week, or when
mounting a new whee' Check electrolyte nozzles to ens.ire proper flow on all areas )f wheel
For cutofi wheels, electrolyte should flow evenly under 1 l ava:lable pressure on each side of wheel
and on whel periphery
Nozzle fitting:
The fitting of the nozzle is very important since it will helo to confine and direct the electrolyte into the
working gap between the wheel and workpiece contact area A properly selected and fitted nozzle will
also help to reUce "stray machining" caused by a combination of excessive electrolyte spray and un-
controlled current flow
The point at which the wheel enters into the nozzle must L'e tghtly fitted against the O.D surface of the
wl-eel, This will break up the air curtain around the periphery of the "spinning" wheel. The air cuitain
would seriously restrict the current flow between the anode and cathode in the wCrking gap. The
wheel will pick up the electrolyte by traveling tnrojgh the supply line. it is a!srN good practice to relieve
the inside of the nozzle chamber to eliminate any possible wiping acti-n between wheel and nozzle
11-14
Electrochemical Grinding-ECG 11.3
TABLE 11.3-5 Comparison of ECG to Precision Conventional Milling and Grinding
Machinery steel - + = - +
Tool steel, soft = - + + - +
Tool steel, hard + + - + + +
Cast iron -- + = -
Copper - + + + +
Brass -4- -+ = =
Aluminum -- + - -
Tungsten - + + - + +
Tungsten carbide + + + + + + -
Beryllium -.... +
300 stainless - + + = + + + +
400 stainless - + + + + + +
Titanium - - - + + = +
A-236 - + + = + + -+
Waspaloy + + + = + + + +
Inconel 718 + + + = + + + +
Inconel X + + + = + + + +
Rene 41 + + + = + + + +
HS-21 + + + + + + = -
Hastelloy alloy X + + + = + + = +
PWA 1004 + + + + + +
PWA 689 + + + = + + = +
AMS 5668 - + + + + +
Udimet 500 + + = + + + +
Udlm3tO00 + + + = + + + +
Greek Ascoloy - = + = + + = +
PWA. SO + + + = + + + +
SOURCE R R Bra -di, Basics of electrochemical grinding, American Machinist 118 (April 24, 1974), p 48
NOTE In gereral, ECG superiority ncr- ases with hardness or toughness of material
AI
11-165
11.3 Electrochemical Grinding-ECG
O 00 000 0 0 0 00 (D fl (0'TC.
0 )O C(~( C\j0 000 0 C
- o
r7~
Iu 0c.' -
0O 0
cn 0 -
I- C
4 0
oO (D0
-0 E
0- (
0 0
2 0 C
0~6)
0 ,000 ) - 0C D O7C 0
Cl 0 0 0 00C O 00 0 0 00
Ii I Iejo U)q~u-
11-16
Electrochemical Grinding-ECG 11.3
0 080 (2m/i]1000
1155 A/cm2]
<
S0075 e900
Ce
CUC
.10)
000800
L) E
0 06570
30 50 70 90 110
(758 kPa]
Work to wheel pressure, psi
Figure 11.3-4 Effects of work~ to wheel pressure in face ECG on M2 tool steel with aluminum oxide
wheel (J R Thompson, Operating parameters in eiectrochemical grinding with aluminum oxide wheels.
New Developments in Grinding, Pittsburgh. PA Carnegie Press, 1972. p 793-812)
0 080
!2mm/minII1
0070 1000
(155 A/cm2]
C
0060<
E .,o~&800
(D a)
0.000
600
:3 0.040E
0.030 400
0.020 ______
6 7 6 9 10 11
Voltage. V
Figure 1!~.3-5 E'ffects of voltage in face EGG on M2 tool cteel with aluminum oxide wheel. (J. R
Thompson. p.811)
11-17
11.3 Electrochemical Grinding-ECG
2.8
6
450 1 Constants
10 volts
Note Voltages are 0 5 10-inch diameter (254 mml
2.4 volt below level for 1/2-inch thick 1127 mml
2.2 initiation of sparking 400 A M-2 steel
20 .
1.6 - 35- i
E
14 11 VoltsQ
C 12- 10OVolts 0.El (
10 (25 4 mm/minI- 9 Volts- 0
08 8Volts
0.6
0 020 0.030 0040 0050 250
Doned n[1.27 mm] 0.6 10 1.4 1.8 22 2.F
Cutting rate. in/mmn (66 mm/mini
Radi. is R
Wheel thickness T
Downfeed =F
Flguro ',1.3-6 CalC~daVOi Of co'itact area of wlcel and workpiece for surface ECG of slots (i R.
Thomoson. p 810)
Electrochemical Grinding-ECG 11.3
24
225 4 mm)
2
0
0 0.010 0.020 0.030 0 040 0 050 0.060 0.070
[1 8 mml
Tube wall thi,.kness, inch
Figure 11.3-9 ECG cutoff operation for type 304 stainless steel tubing. Maximum cutting rates for vari-
ous tube diameters and wall thicknesses. (Courtesy of Evente Machine Products Company)
00O8
KNO3
006_NaN_3_
_____ KNO3 Potassium nitrate
ENaNO 3Sodium nitrate
KNO KNO 2 Potassium nitrite
o NaNO 2 Sodium nitrite
E KOH Potassium hydroxide
.KOH K, CO, Potassium carbonate
NHF Ammonium Fluoride
UKCO- Na2 CO3 Sodium carbonate
0 Na.CO_
O 0.02
Figure 11.3-10 Conductivity versus concentration for ECG electrolytes (Courtesy of Anocut Engineer-
ing Company)
11-19
11.3 Electrochemical Grinding-ECG
0 030 IWheel 0 97-inch [25 mm) wide!
I 13 42-inch (341 mi dial
Aluminum oxide
~~ Consta-it spindle load
Voltage. 6 5 Vdc
002
- ~Electrolyte. Anocut 90
_ j ( Hardened steel
\.x 'L~Rockwoll'64
0 10 20 30 40 50
f1016 mm/mm]in
Table teed, 'n/mmn
Figure 11.3-11 Effect of wheel 3peed in ECG of two work materials. Note: Wheel speeds are some-
what higher than the typical 4000 to 7000 fom. (L A W-Illiams. 1ll. Electrochemica! grind-ng Technical pa-
per MR67-649 Society of Manufacturing Engineeis. Dearborn. Mi. 1967. p 17)
Figure 11.3-12 Effect of wheel speed in EGG of T15 tc.ol steel. Note: Wheel speeds are somewhat
higher thpn the typical 4000 to 7000 fpm (L H Williams, ;11P 17)
11-20
Electrochemical Grinding-ECG 11.3
Work materal Fully Annealed Low Carbon Tungsten Carbide Stellite Repair Weld on Waspaloy
Steel and Medium Carbon Steel
Hardened to 60 R,
WorKpiece
confiq.2ration
40blades
diameter, in. 14 8
Electrolyte
type IS.Cl KNOI NaNO3
cooventration,
lb/gal: 05 10 20
Voltage, V: 8 to 9 8
Tolerance, finish. Three parts per load Eliminated rough grinding. Tolerance was 0.0005
t2nef-ts and 17-second cutting r.ycle One wheel per year in place
remarks: 50 wheei oscillations per of several per week.
minute. No ,eat cnecks-33- more
parts pet wheel dtp-ss;ng
Accuracy was m0.00025 incn
30 wheel oscillations per
_ minute
11-21
-- -~~~~~
. -- ---.-
11.3 Electrochemical Grindng-ECG
TBLE 11. 3-6--Continued
Work material Inconel Alloy X High-Nickel Magnetic Stainless
orpeeLamination
WorkpieceI
configuration
0 020 i
Wheel
type. AIO2
A12 03
A120 3
diameter, in 5 8 10
speed. fpm: 1.900 6.000
Electrolyte
type: NaNOI NaNO3 NaNO3 + NaNO,
concentration,
ib,
ydI; 2.0 2.0 1.7
Type of cut- Surface I Contvur Surface cutoff
Depth cut. in: 10.25 0.0092
Feed rate, in,
min- 20 3.0 30
Voltage. v/ 4 6 8
CL:rent. A: 25 120 25
11-22
Electrochemical Honing-ECH 11.4
PROCESS SUMMARY
Mechanical
exchanger
(noriconductive)
PracicalAppicatonsElectrolyte
PracicalAppicatonstypes and
The advantages of ECH are most prowounced when honing concentrations: NaNOi. 2 lb/gal [240 g/L]
hard metals. The workpiece must 'Le conductive The ab- NaCI. 1 lb/gal [120 g/L]
sence of heavy mechanical action keeps the workpiece cool ternperaur. 100 0 Ff38-C]
and free from heat distortion The electrolytii action in- pressure: 75 to 150 psi [500 to 1000 kPaj
troduces no stresses ard deburrs automiatically Blind holes flow: Up to 25 gal/min [95 L/min]
in cr'st tool Ntee[ components and pinion gears of 62 Rr gap- 0.003 to 0.010 inch [0.076 to 0.25 mm]
high alloy steels have been honed using ECH
11-2.3
11.4 Electrochemical Honing-ECH
Material Removal Rates and Tolerances
Material is removed 3 to 5 times faster by
the combined matermal --nova) modes, Automatic sizi- gag-
ECH tha- by ing is sometimes w'Vc...rrated -rcs og for
conventional honing and 4 times faster thian cnizrol of the
1bv internal elec ivt l.ow Path aird for POjsit. ninig
griningRemval
f 0008inch10.0 mnI o stck rom shouid be labri-
the bore of 8620 steel in 30 seconds cated from stainless steels or plastics tnat
has bieen reported To)- are resisi.nt to
eranck-s up to =0 0001 inch I the,(coromie.
38-cos t hes1.(
=0 0025 mi are possible 15or~v
in if qipmiet
Product-on tolerances achieve =:0 with fower 3acksch to 600incheres.
0005 inch I =0 013 mm. ihpwr ak pt 30 mee jmiti dae
on, the diameter and 0 0002 inch
ness. 10 005 minI an straight-
Machinina Characteristics
Surface Technology The electrolyte se!ection arid control
ECM because of td:e cleaning action is not as critical as in?
of the stonies
Surface roughness of 8 to 32 microinches
is routine, arid roughness of 2 microinchesR, 10.2 to 0 8 arml
attainable For a controlled surface R,, 10.05 ,aml is
sometimes arc allowed to cut for a roughness, the stones H-one-Forming
few
curient has been turned off This sequenceseconds after the A reversed-polarity veiesion of EC-Il
cocnbines honing with
also will leave a plating. This "hone-form~ing" process
light, compressive residual stress uses plating solutions5
in the surface, For a in place of deplating electroltes and
stress-free surface, the last few seconds can achieve rapid. ac-
of action should be curate metal deposition,. This highly
pure electrolytic material removal, This focused plating has
practice is helpful achieved aeposition rates of 0.00
foi controlling surface integrity, ich per !rnn-ite
f0.0025 mm'rninl for copper. 0.0005
inch per minute o0i 3
mm, mini for nickel and 0.0001 inch
per
Equipment and Tooling mm/minI for chromium. The mechanical minute 10.0025
action prepares a clean surfa-~e for (abrasive) honing
Commercial ECH equzpment is made the plating and sizes the
to special engineer- bores to close tolerances The equipment
ing order only for internal cylindrical
suitable pumps. tanks, filt-..rs. power
honing. It comes with ECl- equipment, and sometimes the is quite smilar to
packs and controls for acronym ECF is
applied.
11-24
Electrochemical Machining-ECM 11.5
PROCESS SUMMARY
Fan
Eleetrolytepo xusrant H
Pnie!s-de e mel osar roe
Peat excnanger inslation c
Ecr eic(Mi t Too older Is pnrtetto
2to3
IIP p;' r - d _l " Fixture
F.lter Sl~ 2 j DC
Prinriples des. While metal ions are removed frm the workpiece sur-
the reinoval of elec-
El,.;ctrocheniica! machining (ECM) I-s face. hydrogen is generated at the electrode_ Adequate pro-
trically conductive material by anodic dissolution in a rap- vision is required to safel vent this hydrogen.
idly flow~ng electrolyte which separates the workptece
from a shaped electrode (see figuare 11.5-1). The filtered
erectro;yte is pumped ujider pressure and at controlled tern
perature to bring a controlle d-conductivity fluid into the Practical Applications
narrow gap of the cutting area. The shape imposed on le ECM is best suited for repetitive production of complex
workpiece is nearly a mrirror or conjugate image of the shapes in high st-ength. hard. or difficult-to-machine mate-
shape or the cathodic electrode. The electrode is advanced rials where high surface quality is needed. The work mate-
into the workpiece at a constant feed rate that exactly rial must be electricaliy conductive. Sma.l. odd shaped. dif-
matches the rate of dissolution of the work material The ficult or deep holes as small as I 8-inch 13.2 mini across
current density is the chief factor in setting feed rates and can be 'di.!ed" individually or in multiples. ELfrtrodes di,
in attaining sniocthness Higher curreiit densities and feed not wear: consequently. long tool life is possible. The
rates create better finishes and higher materiai removal stress-free material ,'er.nval eliminates dist.rtizo, from the
rates The hydraulic pressures and toolworkpiece separa- ECM operation (but not necessarily from prior stress-
ring forces increase with smaller gaps and can affect work- inducing operations)- Ccnc ntr.,tion of current density at
piece tolerances Fixtures i'ith epoxies or other sccurely the edges on the workpiece provide., automatic rounding
fastened olastics for insulation locate and control the elec- and the absence of burrs. Anodic dissolution general.v prt,-
trol-e flow so that it iscontinuous and uniformly tu. aulent ceeds independently of material hardness. so finish cuts in
M,.terials and design must accommodate the hieh currents the heat-treated state are practical.
without distortion or overheating. Fixtures must be com-
patible with the organic salts or acids that are used as elec- The characteristics of an application thai inake It a p;.-e
trolytes Metal dissolved by .r"electrolytes forms a sludge candidate for ECM are as follrws:
of considerable volume. and excess sludge must be re-
moved by filtratnon centrifuge or settling. Canductivity a Material is hard or toigh.
control of the electrolyte is maintaned by temperature con-
trol. usually cooling. and by Iperodit: Lhecks on chemical 9 Difficuh con-ours are ;nvolvie
composition. Both inlet and outet pressure cortro:.r pro-
vide flow control. The electrode design must ;-.,udr. coM- Machining without coid working is needed.
pensation or corrt-ction for the variable current density that
comes with variations in the shape of the work:,:ece and * Repetitive production is invo!ved (more than 30 pieces)
the metal content of the electro;yte. Exact control of all
critical parameters is needed to ensure the best results * Distort:uless. burr-free parts are req uired.
Catting action occurs on all exposed faces simultaneouslv.
and there is no mechanical contact or wear of the el -ctro- * High surface quality is requirxi.
11-25
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
Operating Parametert,
Power suopiy
type- Direst current
voltage 5 to 30 V
current: 50 to 40.000 A
Current density: 50 to 3.000 A in2* [8 to 465 A cm2]
Electrolyte
tyoe and concentration:
mrost used NaCl at 1/t2 to 2 lb 'gal (60 to 240 g L]
frequently used: NaNO; at i to 4 lb gal [120 to 480 g L)
less frequently used: Proprietary mixtures
.ernperature. 90' to 125'F 1126' to 460C]
flow rate- 0 25 gal mnin., 100 A f0.95 L men 100 A]
velocity: 5.000 to 10 000 fpm [1.500 to 3.000 m 'me-.]
inlet pressure. 20 to 300 psi j-,37 to 2.060 kPal
outlet pressure: 0 to 45 psi [0 to 310 kPa)
IToleranca
2-dimensional shapes: -0.001 it'dl: 0.025 mm]
3-dimensional shapef;: 0.002 inch f~z .051 mrm)
Surface roughness. R..
sa'.. 8 o 63 microinches [0 2 to 1.6 urn)
Material Removal Rates and Tolerances 0.8 tan.1 is normal Roughness values dect ease with the in-
Material removal rate is independent of material hardness crease ;n cutting rates that accomnpannies higher curr ~nt
and for most common metals is approxmaielv 0 10 cubic densities The :aster the cutting. the bctter the Finish. Mir-
inch per !timlte 11.64 cmnmirl per 1000 amp-cres The cu- ro3r finishes (8 microhliches R. i0.2 uii! or better) are easily
tisoccu7s sismnutarteously on all exposed surfaces. and th: obta;ned in frontal cuts or stainless steels or nickel allo>s
aids productivity. Accur.acy up to =oJ.004 inch' 1=0.1 ii Th, side-gap areas generally are much rougher because
is usual for contoured cavities, and accuracy up to cur.rent densiy is lower in these areas. incorrect electro-
-0 0010 inch I = 0.025 niril is conimon for frontal cuts or lvte. different work material heat treatment, low current
cuts made with refined tools ,These tul.-ice-s can be c'it density. or stray current can produce selective etching PUtS
in half with well-devcioped tools and experienced oper- or interCranular a-. at the grain boundaries. Th-e ab-
ators.i Deep cavities will h~ave a taper of up to 0.001 inch sence ef residual stiess (in contrast with the presence of
per inch 10 (01 mm.'mn 1 with 0 00- 'nch 10-13 min! overcut cornpicssive stresses from many mechanical process!es)
ga nless a spf-c-al tool design :s used internal radii of produces a reduced high cycle fatigute strength (by com
0 rj07 inch 10 18 mini and external radi: of 0.062 inch parison). but thtse values more nearly represent the true ar
10-051 minI are attainable T olerance capabilities are de- unaffzctled material values. Any physical blemish ie the tooli Z
pendent upon part geometry tool d&sign and narticular will I- ireprodtticed on the workpiece. and poor flow condi x
shop practices and renmii'e careful checking wit cxe tio-is can produce- striations in the surface. Hydrogen ewp
rienced people for patc-a plctosbrittlement is not a problem, because the hydrogen is ir
pplc'ionsated
par~c~ar at the elsckrode. (as a gas) and is catried away by the
Suflac Techologyflowing electrolye aus
shown in figuzre 11.5-2.
Stirlees roughness o: iv to 32 ricroin':hes R. 0O.4 -.0
11-26 -
Electrochemical Machining-ECM 11.5
_ Electroite; _
4
Electrons
H2 0- EIElectrons 1
0 Fe - Fe" + 2e
2H + 2e HFe(OH)
Gas
4 000
00
2 Fe++ + 20H-- Fe(OH) 2
Precipitate
O0 0
IN ~~ 000 i~~ I
00
00
Equipment and Tooling electrolyte to the 7.5-micrometer level or better is most de-
The available equipment ranges from small S0-ampere sirable. Placement of the filter immediately ahead of the
bench models to 40,000-ampere models with a five-foot- electrode is good practice. With salt solutions, the volume
cube working space. Power sources providing from 4 to 30 of metal hydroxide or metal hydrate can be 100 to 500
volts direct current are available with special, fast-acting, times the volume of.the metal removed, as noted in table
short-circuit protective devices. Ancillary equipment, such 11.5-13. Settling or filtration for removal of these "chips" is
as pumps, tanks, plastic piping, mixing vats and sludge- necessary, and disposal requires environmentally satisfac-
disposal devices, should be engineered as a complete sys- tory planning.
tem. Equipment and tools should be rigid enough to with-
stand the forces from the high hydraulic pressures. The
fixtures. the insulation and the tool material must be chem-
ically compatible with the electrolyte. Electrode materials Machining Charact: 3tlcs
are high-conductivity coppers, brasses or bronzes (see table Process contro! and the sequence of operating steps must
11.5-10). be exact and precisey repetitive for good productionm The
workpiece should be thoroughly cleaned and/or oiled after
Tooling trials and start-up costs should be carefully as- ECM to prevent corrosion. Periodic washdown of the
sessed and included in development plans. The electrode equipment can reduce maintenance expenses. Special
design- and correction during tryout may require several safety precautions should be instituted when the electrolyte
"cut and try" cycles for complex shapes. Filtration of the used is a chlorate or a nitrite (see table 11.5-).
11-27
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
SELECTED DATA
There are several valid techniques for selecting operating
parameters for ECM. The steps in table 11.5-2 are recom-
mended as one logical sequence. Supporting data come
from the other figures and tables in accordance with the
terms as explained in figure 11.5-3.
- I Electrode !-Feed, vi
Workplece
o 0 Se
- a)
- -Gap, Sc= Se sec 0 = ---
Overcut, S _ 4 W /a/,/ --. sina
11 approx.
Tip or lip -- "- Tip
-ientatior lip II 14
*_.' 0for - "'oo 0< 400
Cno. Orientation .
11-28
Electrochemical Machining-ECM 11.5
TABLE 11.5-2 Steps To Select ECM Operating Parameters
ITEM DATA
1. Workpiece material From engineering drawings obtain material type, composition, and metallurgical state. Must be
electrically conductive material.
2. Material removal rate, A. For planning or rough estimating, good approximation can be had from the following values which
MRR, (at 100% 3fficiency) apply to most common conductive materials and alloys:
0.1 in33/min/1,000 A [1.64 cm 3/min/1,000 A]
1.0 in /min/10,000 A [16.4 cm 3/min/10,000 A]
B. For pure metals, removal rate depends on valence and the relationships established in Faraday's
second law:
specific removal rate = atomic weight 1 1
valence density 96.,494
where 96,494 is Faraday's constant representing the number of coulombs (or ampere-seconds) of
electricity required to remove one gram equivalent weight of material. Gram equivalent weight is
atomic weight divided by valence. Values in table 11.5-3 represent theoretical metal removal rates
assuming 100% current efficiency (all current goes to dissolving metal and none goes to gas
generation at the anode).
C. For alloys, rates of material removal can be calculated from alloy chemical composition using
Faraday's law (table 11.5-4).
3. Assume efficiency, h, of With complex tools, long electrolytic path, higher voltage or current density, valence variation or
electrochemical action chemical activity, and appreciable stray current or spray, the efficiency can decline to 80 to 90%. For
most estimatinr prior to a pilot run, 90% is a fair assumption.
7. Electrolyte Selection Table 11.5-5 and 11.5-6. Many applications try simple NaCI first, then try more complex electrolytes
Composition only if necessary. Keep concentrations as low as compatible with productivity so as to reduce
Concentration accumulations of salt deposits on equipment and tooling.
Temperature Selection should be based upon compatibility with particular metallurgical state of alloy being
machined, feed rate, surface roughness (both frontal and side) and surface integrity.*
Temperature control should be within 1OF [ 1.80C] to attain consistent electrolyte conductivity at
the inlet to the electrode, see table 11.5-i, figures 11.5-14 and 11.5-15.
8. Electrolyte Testing
Select a measure for
electrolyte condition or
control
Specific Gravity Nomographs, figures 11.5-10 to 11.5-12.
Salim ter Table 11.5-8, figure 11.5-13.
Conductivity Figures 11.5-14 and 11.5-15.
Titration Standard analytic chemical test.
*For detail on Interrelationships, see J. A.Cross, ECM machinability data, Technical paper MR73-228. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI.
1973, or J. A.Cross and A.U.Jollis, Electrochemical machining (ECM), Technical report AFML-TR-72-188. General Electric Company. 1972.
~-.-----
---- -r~- --- 1-1-29
~7~-- . ~~ --- - -
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
TABLE 11.5-2-Continued
ITEM DATA
9. Voltage A minimum voltage, AE, is required to initiato full electrochemical action, see figure 11.5-17 and table
11.5-9. The usual operating range is between 5 and 30 volts. The value is set to attain the desired
current density that matches the feed rate. Typical setting ranges are:
Steel alloys 5 to 10 volts dc
High strength alloys 10 to 20
Titanium alloys 15 to 25
Superalloys 10 to 25
10. Tool design, cutting gaps The equilibrium frontal gap is a compromise depending on tool design and prior parameter
and corrections selections, see figures 11.5-16 and 11.5-17. It is not independently adjustable. Electrode shape
Frontal gap, S. should he adjusted depending on orientation angle, see figure 11.5-18.
Side gap. S,
Orientation, A gap
11. Current Cannot be set independently-it is a result of equilibrium among prior parameters to just balanc3 feed
rate and MRR. Adjusted by setting feed rate. Note that current increases as starting gap reaches
operating or equilibrium gap during full engagement when selected current density (item 6) is
attained.
12. Electrolyte Pressures The tool design and operating gaps will determine pressures required to get rapid turbulent flow. Inlet
pressures range from 20 to 300 psi. Outlet pressures range from 0 to 45 psi (and sometimes to 75).
Adequate provision to contain the considerable hydraulic forces is needed in the plumbing, fixtures,
electrodes and machine if good accuracy is to be attained (figure 11.5-19).
13. Starting Gap and Depth These parameters can be set independently and are a function of the shape to be generated and the
of Feed shape of the raw material stock. Adequate cutting stock is required to permit penetration of electrode
to point of electrochemical equilibrium.
14. Thol Construction The insulation and tool materials must be compatible with the electrolyte being used. Typical
materials are listed on tables 11.5-10 to 11.5-12.
15. Sludge The "chips" from ECM are In the form of a sludge in the electrolyte composed of metal hydroxides or
hydrates. The volume of sludge is considerable with salt electrolytes, see table 11.5-13.
16. Trial cut The extensive interrelations among the ECM parameters make a trial cut highly desirable. If it is
performed on a sample of the workpiece in the metallurgical state equal to the production item, a
simple me' allographic section of the ECM surface can reveal possible surface integrity Imperfections.
13
Io .. 11-30
nermediate shapes
I~
Di ficull shapes
*%b
00
C np
ECM
11-31
11 .5 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
U) UO
00
0
'N C
0
LUC) 0 C
C
00
C- 0 E
0
0 0
CE
10 U')
'0
cc
C.
C7
0~
L .0
u -k -- a:
a) 0 0
0 ID
0 0 2 0 C
2E t; E E
(D C 0 W
o 0
CD
0o -D Ca a
.C)
0 CL0
_~L 0 i
0&
I ii
TPA
to- 0
Cw V
N U,6C ci
113
cc~_
_ _ _ _
Electrochemical Machining-ECM 11.5
TABLE 11.5-3 Material Removal Rates for ECM of Pure Metals Assuming 100 Percent
Current Efficiency
5 1.23 010 A. o;
Beryllium 9.012 2 0.067 0.37 0.092 2 14
Bismuth 20o.98 3 0.354 t 5.73 0.27 - '4-,
5 __ 3.44 0.16 Q
Cadmium 112.40 2 0.313 k 8,- 4.62 0.25 _ZI.t
.,i3+
Chromium 51.896 2 0.260 2.14 0.137
3 1.43 0.092 1ItIV
6 0.71 0.046 !
Cobalt 58.93 2 0.322 _ 2.42 0 125 r1
3 1.62 0.084
Columbium 92.906 3 0.310 2.55 0.132 A
(Niobium) 4 1.92 0.103 j -
5 1.53 0.08 ;-157-
Copper 63.546 1 0.324 5.22 0.265 I
2 2.61 0.134 17 2.'
Germanium 72.59 4 0.192 1.49 0.13 I
Gold 196.967 1 0.698 4 1622 0.39 Y.22, i
3~ ~ ~ 5.40 0.3 6*
Hafnium 178.49 4 0.473 , 3.68 0.13- -
4 4.26 0.17
Magnesium 24.312 2 0.063 ' 1.00 0.27
Manganese 54.938 2 0.270 2.26 0.14
5.2 01
3i z4
11-33
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
TABLE 11.5-3-Continued
ATOMIC REMOVAL RATES
METAL WEIGHT VALENCE DENSITY AT 1000 AMP1ERES
NOTE: Rates listed wers calculated using Farada law and valences a
foows:
Aluminum 3 Copper 2 Splkon 0
Carbon 0 Iron 2 TOtN=u 4
Coluimbium 3 Mangans 3 Tungsten 6
Cobalt 2 Molybdenumt 4 Vanadium 5 --
Chromium 3 Nickel 2
11-34
----------- ~- -- -
Electrochemical Machinirag-ECM 11.5
1-
Feed rate II- Usual machining range
in/min Complex Symmetrical
shes sshaes
0.800
0.700 - - - - -----
- - - - ~ -- metals*
o.600
.50[12.7 mm/mm])
CY
20.400
a)
0.300
0.200 I_0000
* 0.100 2000 00 40 00 00 70
FIgure 11.5-7 Feed rates versus current density for ECM of various materials. (Courtesy of Cincinnati
Milacron)
Z4 Tor
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
Machining area
2
in
200-
Feed
in/min
100- 1.0
80 0.8
60 0.6
40Z 0.4
Current
A
20- 5- -0.2
-2,000
4- 0.04
1.000
2- 400 -0.02
-- 200
4.0
9.2- 4.0 -0.002
-- 20
Figure 11.5-8 Nomogram for appro.ximating ECM feed rates and currents. (Courtesy of Anocut Inc.)
773
Electrochemical Machining-ECM 11.5
0.10 1
Slope of graph is metal removal constant. k
k= 9.4 x 10-lin'/A-min 0
0.08
Theoretical
rate from
table 11.5-4
CD
0.
0.04
0.02 0!
Material: Rene 41
Electrolyte: 2.15 ib/gal NaC!
Temperature: 85OF
Ul-3
0
0..0
~Current density. A/in 2
= Figure11.5--9 Typical material removal rate data for a specific alloy-electrolyte combination with data
~points from ECM machinability data test ig. (G. Bellows, ECM machinability data and ratings, Technical
paper MR67-71 0, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI, 1967)
1
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
.2
7iga -615g
4C U Ca C r-
*
CL= 0 --
0 b.C0
C - L ;w
-52 0
.2 a C.8
(__ 13- -- - ;
0
*~~ -
Cg d .
' -ff
* -- -
00~~'0 00v, 0 C~
-~3-0
-~ 00
Anl An LO4 ) '
0 L 0 0
0) 400 0) 0 00 0)a 0 )m
-'0 00C
.0~~~~~~ .- a% 0 r
00r0 l -
'03
OZO
00 Z 000 to Z. 02 000 N 00 ZM 0F m Oft
U- U
CJ
C.J- 0- C
-,66 +0(5 (5 6
10 5C
0
Cb E
C00 0, 0
I- <.j -< go
3 2 3 3
U -j wO 0 0 Ca HP0
11-382
-~C. ,~ C- b- E~___
Electrochemical Machining-ECMV 11.5
C
W 0
.2 -0
U) NS OR
OR , S 0 4) a
2 0 :2
) a
.0
0~
0
CL C
0 'I-& wIff- ) 00 0 CO 4,
-5 2
0~ 0
0 , '@ 0)UCO
z1 z~ C- 0 w S-0.
00 (DLuc3
r-1. .2
IS C0 C) -2!0 5 C
0 -D . 5 ccz
I w - k 0
00
0M-0
11-39
- N -O Ln Iwo------- r
43 -LQ--- -
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECMV
CO -0.
z 50 00 .C onoC
0) -O N 0 M
0 a.
cO w a0 cfQ
E, Z ' 0 U' E
(D -00020 ' a) 0)
0c4Ma) 2 t0(IT
U)
)
a CDOS
f 7- w
-S~ ~~~ ~N
-,,Ak~t
ft~~~IZ ____"- r
au -Ca
160 '-
R0
6
LO2
0!
- 0~ 0 - I
00 0
-6'v
AA - ,n-0- 0E
'AQW
-r 6
-
0
0
0D 0 .. f 0'
-0
F'O
06, ]1
=1 0 0 0 2
0 c
LO-
N ItN S C
iM -O 0 0 CC J to
0 +
11-40 '
Electrochemical Machining-ECMV 11.5
Co -
Co
(0
C1.
EC
=OEC
Co CL0
0 0 17
0-R0
~ C~oEECM
~~ 0~
1 C
0,0
LL~ 0 Co
aN0 0 Co !?
- '0 0C 4
_ 4 eg - 4
4 ___ e C CL
40C Co
w~fo -z. a
- -r 80
r- C
S..
. O0 0' L COj
0 ;a
CM, CL CL
~<
_C..
qit-x
C0I
Ca
0 0
0C 4 C
4n 0
0U 0-1I0
02 o( 0.0 ID0
i-as!
0 O ,0
11-41
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
in Hg in Hg OF
psi psi
0 14.7 212.0
35.3 50 281.0
85.3 100 J27.8
135.3 150 358.4
185.3 200
11-42 36.1.8
Electrochemical Machining-ECM 11.5
Specific gravity
-- 1.20
1.19
-- 1.18
Temperature 1.15
OF
.130 -- 1.13
-120 -- 1.12
.110 1.11
1.5
-- 100 -- 1.10
-- a- -1.09
80 1.0 -- 1.08
[119.8 g/1-]
70 [21C] '--1.07
-- 1.06
-- 1.05
0.5
-- 1.04
- 1.03
Figure 11.5-10 Nomogram to determine the specific gravity of sodium chloride solutions. Specific
gravity measured by 60 0 F/600 F hydrometer. (Courtesy of Anocut Engineering Company)
11-43
1135 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
Specific gravity
-1.40
-1.38
Temperature
Salt concentration 1.36
OF
lb/gal
140 [60-C]
5- -1.34
130
-1.32
- 120
-1.30
- 1 04
- 1.28
100
-1.26
90--1.24
- 80
3-1.22
70 f21 0C]
1.20
-1.18
- 1.164
1.12j
[119.8 gL
501.200 -- 55-
60-
2.500- -1.180
65-
2.000--7 -
-1.140
80-
1.750-
-1.120 85
1[4900
f 119.81-45
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECMV
TABLE 11.5-8 Sodium Chloride (NaCI) Electrolyte Concentration Conversion Chart
HYDROMETER READING CONCENTRATION/TEMPERATURE
Specific 100OF 110OFC1201105F @ 13011F
0
'Baume* Gravity Salimeter* lb/gal 9' lb/gal lb/gal gd lb/gal
ow,
8 1.06 30 0.7 ~ ~ 0.6 z 0.6 .06079 01pzl
9 1.07 34 0.8 95J 0.7 0.7 0.7
10 1.07 38 0.9 'r iD~q 0.8 . 0.8 ',Atj~08 95~
11 1.08 42 1.0 0.9
09W 0.9 VIM~.8 0.9 ~O
12 1.09 46 1.1 g13IZ 10 1. 1.0 0iiazs
13 1.10 50 12 143M 1.2 1.1 ~i~* 1.1 ~S
14 1.11 54 1.3 1.3 1.3 ~ 1
15 1.11 58 1.5 % 7 1.4 ~6 ~~~1.4 1.3 i7
16 1.12 63 1.6 ~1f~ 1.5 ~j ~~ 1.5 gzq 15 ~1
17 1.13 67 1.7 1.7 Wj 1.6~b & 1.6 ~
18 1.14 71 1.9 ~2T~ 1.8 I.:; 1.8 ~25'
19 11 76 2.0 ~ 0 1.9# 1
20 1.16 80 2.1 ~2L - 2.1 NMI~6 2.0 !L 20 22.0
211.17 842.3 2.2 22 1 .25*
22 1.18 88 2.5 24
2___ 2.4 2.3 ,.IVW7
23 1.19 93 2.6 1L 2.6-~1i 2.5 2. Arkes
24 1.0 I 97 2.8 hI~ 28 2.7 - 2.6
25 1.20 I 100 3.0 ~W ; 2.9 2.9 2.8 ~
SOURCE: Cincinnati Milacron. of salt by weight. A reading on the Salimeter scale represents the percent-
*Generally.a reading on the 8aume scale is approximately the percentage age of saturation in a sodium chloride solution.
lla-46
Electrochemical Machining-ECM 11.5
Specific DegreesDers
gravity aierers
Dam
1.210 25 100er
1.200 2
1.190 -23 9
1.18090
1.18022
1.170 -21 85 -
1.160 -20 80
1.150 19575
1.140 -18 70 3
-174
1.13065;
1.120160
6
-15
1.110
-14 55
1.100 -13 50
1.090 1245
1.080 40
1.070 -03
-9
- -. 8 -30 -
1.050 25
-1.040 20
1.030 -4 15
1.020 -310
-2
1.010 1 5
1.000 0 0
Figure 11.5-13 Nomogram for salt concentration. Hydrometer scale comparison at 68 0F. (Courtesy of
International Salt Company)
11-47
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
ElectrolyteTeprte
Conductivity TepeFtr
concentration mohm-cm
lb/gal
2.000 0.340-13
0.320-12
1.750 0.300-12
120
0. 280W
1.500--,
0,260 115
0,240
1.250-
0.220
105
0.2001
0.181 (380-C]
(119.8 g/1_1:
- - - -100-
1.000
0.160- 95
90
0.140
0.750-
85--
0.120-
0.1001
75-
mb- 70-
0.500
(J. A. Cross
Figure 11.5-14 Nomogram to determine (ECM), the conductivity of sodium chloride electrolytes.
Vol. General
11, Elec-
Technical report AFML-TR-72-1 88,
and A. U. Jollis, Electrochenmical machining
tric Company, 1972. p. 83)
11-48
Electrochemical Machining-ECM 1.
Electrolyte
concentration Conductivity Temperature
lb/gal mohm-cm OF
0260- 125
3.500-
3.250- 0.240 120-
3.000-
2.750 -
2.500- 0.220115 1 r
2.250- Ile-
0.180= [38-0]
1.750- 100 -M.
0.160
95-
15 0 -0.1401
90 -
85-
1.250--0.120-
80-
0.100-7-7
Figure 11.5-15 Nomogram to determine the conductivity of sodium nitrate electrolytes. (J. A. Cross
and A. U. Jollis, p. 84)
115Electrochemical Machining-ECM
2 30
Current~ denSitY. A/in 0050
50 30
1500 20
100
6.00
27 .5
30.440
.0701 0D 0.40
000
11-50
Electrochemical Machining-ECMV 11.5
4011
Material: Rene 41
Electrolyte: 2.15 lb/gal f258 g/LJ NaCl
Temperature: 850 F [29.40 C]
30 ______ ______
0.020-inch Gap
02
0.0
100
0-1 I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Figure 11.5-17 Specific gap selection data for specific alloy-electrolyte combination. (Note that figure
11.5-9 and 11.5-17 are the same data set.) (G.Bellows, ECM machinability data and ratings, Technical pa-
per MR67-71 0. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, Ml, 1967)
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
0.015
0.010
0.005
00 10 20 30 40 5 07
Orientation angle. 0 degrees
" An Approximation:
AGap Se (sec 0 - cos 0
Figure 11.5-18 Design of contour cutting electrodes in frontal ECM cutting under steady-state (equi-
librium) process conditions.
11-52
Electrochemical Machining-ECM 11.5
in3/A-min
az/gal x 10-S
SOURCE J. A Cross and A U. Jallis, Electroc hemical machining (ECM), Technical report AFML-TR-72-188, General Electric Com-
pany. 1972
*Used for estimating current required In formula
k
I- current, amperes 2 2
A. - area being machined, in [cm l
vf = feed rate, an/mm[cm/mini
k -metal removal constant, an3/A-man [cmS/A-mln]
See also tagure 11.5-7 and table 115-3.
'Can also be cut satisfactorily with 16 az/gal NaCI.
11 -54
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
270
300 galmin
[1136 L/minj
24C
200 gal/min
1757 L/min]
210
180
a:T
150
2~10(827 kPa]
a. 100 gal/min
1379 L/min]
90
50 gal/min
[189 L/min]
60
30 __1
Figure 11.5-19 Theoretical pressure drop for an idealized cathode as a function of flow rate and gap
size. (Courtesy of Anocut Inc.)
* - 11 "54
agg
(1 0o 03 c
00 (1) r-
CLa)
E
cu~ E
~ E.N.2
cu E 0
0
z - g ajc6 a xi ic
2~~ 2 0 ~ Cf U) 2)090
0 0 .~ 550
Na =5 IDS.- 0 * a2 f.l W
.0 f E
'Co a)0) (D
0 4)0 -5 -T ( E 0 0S
~ 0 00 L
a.- 0 *-
00 0 0
04 0 0 00
LW0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
20
0)
zi-
0
0
aL aL aL aC > ) CL
LIL 0 0 In U) 0 0 (0 NM 0
e CMr CO CO N~
CDN0) (7 r-oN1 C
0" 06 0l 0 0 0-CO C
C
00
o 'ajp E -
A.
25
U)u01-t)
CU) UK ui CD (6
-
I CD 0)
%
IQr
L.INS -- -
raZWI
EE0 .0
: 0
1 ,
0
- N
c-S c-
o
ow C)
S 0 0
aO (R cRa0
.0 4300 0 (
ZW -E0 0~
us
M a. O a?010
.
a. .W
2
E.
,r
Co
Ca -
0 -a)-
0) z0 E*a
M.
o~ z o 2!ii
_ O W 0_ 0 -0 -- -
11-55
7;t
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
TABLE 11.5-11 Insulating Materials for ECM
CHEMICAL RESISTANCE
Dilute RESISTANCE
COATING Hydrochloric Brine Dilute TO REMARKS
and Sulphuric Solution Alkalis ABRASION
Acids
Polyvinyl S S S Good
chloride
(PVC)
Polythene S S S Good Preferred to the low
(high density) density material or
electrical applications
Polythene S S S Fair
(low density) I
Nylon Limited S Limited Very good Very low water
absorption. Electrical
insulation excellent
SOURCE: A. E. De Barr and D. A. Oliver, Electrochemical machining (New York: American -Elsevier, 1967),
p. 181.
NOTE: S - Satisfactory
11-56
Electrochemical Machining-ECM 11.5
14_
1157.
= =
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
SPECIFIC APPLICATIONS DATA
Workpiece rnd0
0
configuration:
F0i00-oh c032a 3312-inch dia
020000 in1.42
Vav82 in---,Broach
in
Valve S:ots 0 20-inch thick tool
0 250 O0010 in
0 090 -0010 in
Electrolyte
type: NaCI NaCI NaCl
concentration,
lb/gal: 1.25 1.7 1.0
Voltage, dc volts: 20 13 13
Current, A
start: 650 1.500 200
Surface roughness,
pin R=: burr free 25 to 50 30
Electrode material, Brass electrode. 10 /m (micron) Brass electrode. 50 pm (micron) Two pieces cut simultaneously.
filtration, benefits filters. 5-second dwell time. filters. Piercing cut.
and remarks: 72 groves spaced at 50 Intervals for All8 kidney slots machined
3600 both sides. Groove width simultaneously.
0.040 inch; thickness 0.0693
inch 0.0035 inch. One side
machined at a time.
-4
11-58
Electrochemical Machining-ECM 11.5
TABLE 11.5-14-Continued
Work material: A286, 25 R, Waspaloy Udimet 700, forged
Workpiece
configuration: Turbine blade Turbine blade T e engine bade
073-in
radius 0073-in radius111
0164
in4
30-
'~iF
0164
in
6in
IE
lI 2 7
0.700 in3 0.700 in
in 020-ch dia in
0 020-inch dia
blend blend
Electrolyte
type: NaNO3 NaCI HS0 4
concentration,
lb/gal: 2.2 1.7 10% solution
inlet pressure, psi: 130 to 200 130 to 200 15
outlet pressure, psi: 0 0 0
flow rate, gal/min: 2 2.5 0.6
temperature, OF: 110 90 95
Voltage, dc volts: 11 12 9 with periodic reversal
Current. A M
start: 100 100 3
end: 150 150 10
Feed rate, in/min: 0.300 0.325 0.050 4
Depth of cut, in: 7.0 7.0 3.0
Tolerance, in: 0.004 0.004 0.002
Surface roughness,
Ain R.: 15 to 25 10to20 63 to 120
Electrode meterial, Copper-tungsten electrode. 50 m Copper-tungsten electrodes.
filtration, benefits 50junr Insulated titanium tubes as
(micron) filters. (micron) filters.
and remarks: Constant section turbine blade. electrodes. 10 Am (micron)
Constant section turbine blade. filters.
6 holes of slightly different
"_
sizes machined simultaneously.
_ _ _ See also STEM process.
11-59
t---
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
TABLE 11.5-14-Continued
Work material: Inconel Alloy 718, STA Tungsten Uranium, 53-57 RA
Workpiece
configuration:
0 002 in
-- 0 54W2
T , 1 in
approx Tube 2 in
1n0 739x i
50 pO 025-inch fad
( j 0 070 0 005 in
Turbine disk pockets
0675.n-F-T
Electrolyte
type: NaCI NaCI NaOH NaCI
concentration,
lb/gal: 1.0 0.1 1.0 1.5 1.0
inlet pressure, psi: 225 to 275 100, start; 160, 50 150
end
Current, A
start: 130 (est.) 2,800 to 3,500 450 400 (est.)
Surface roughness,
pin R.: 30 to 40, front; 70 to 90 10
75 to 150, side
Electrode material, Copper electrodes. Brass electrodes Copper electrodes. 50 pan Copper tubing electrode.
filtration, benefits 75 pm (an assembly (micron) filter. Trepannede -inch hole through -
and remarks: (micron) of 54 separate Bore enlargement from 0.535 21-inch ingot. (Ingot turned
filter. replaceable to 0.542 inch. end for end after penetration
Single pocket per units). Similar to ECP. of the tool had reached one
stroke. All 54 pockets per half the length of ingot.)
stroke. Nine-
minute ma-
chining cycle.
11-60
- . " - --- --- - |
Electrochemical Machining-ECM 11.5
TABLE 11.5-14-Continued
Work material: TI-6AI-4V HC250 Alloy Steel, 54 R.316 Stainless Steel
Workpiece
configuration.
Brickette 0#.400/in
roll 177 x 186
x 0555 in 4* -Nozzle
095in
j2i in
-3/8
0060-inch tad
00000 28 in Q)
2in-m 0 10in 0040J
1 27/32ii
0 075 in squaie L i
2 7 2 /32 Inc
Electrolyte
type: NaCI NaCI NaCl
concentration,
lb/gal. 1.0 1.0 1.0
inlet pressure, psi: 190 10 210 80
outlet pressure, psi: 10 (est.) reverse flow 150 0
flow rate, gal/min: 50 (est.)
2
temperature, *F: 115 to 125 100 80
Voltage, dc volts: 13~ 15 17
Current, A
start: 2.000 (est.) 3,000 20
end: 2.400 9,000 310
Feed rate, in/min: 0.050 0.060 0.230
Depth of cut, in: 0.925 0.555 1.74
Tolerance, in: ; 0.002
-- 0.015 40 taper
Surface roughness.
Ain R.: 22 to 28, bottom; 120 to 240, side 70 5 to 10
Electrode material. Copper-tungsten electrodes (side 7 pockets cut simultaneously.
filtration, benefits Copper electrode, so Lm (micron)
insulation). 630 pockets in 45 rows of 4
and remarks: 0.008-inch front gap. 0.030-inch side filters.
each. One indexing vertically
gap (overcut). 0.060-inch corner per row.
radii.
11-61
11.5 Electrochemical Machining-ECM
TABLE 11. 5 -1 4 -Continued
Work material: 18% Ni Maraging Steel Inconel AlloyX750 4340 Steel
Workpiece
configuration:
A 14 holes
17 -442
0022 0-_l
00081 0.750 in-.
nj ban
Roller
3 495-inch dia A
cage
Electrolyte
type: NaCI NaCi + NaNO 3 NaCI NaCI
concentration,
lb/gal: 1.25 1.33 + 0.67 1.0 1.0
inlet pressure, psi: 60 to 100 80 (est.) 200 200
outlet pressure, ps: 0
20 (est.) 125 so
flow rate, gal/min: 17 10 (est.)
temperature, IF: 110 100 (est.) 100 100
Voltage, dc volts: 6.5 17 15 10.5
Current,
start:A 1,000 400 5,000 1,000
end: 2,600 1400 6,000 1,200
Feed rate, in/min: 0.076 0.080 0.195 0.400
Depth of cut, in: 0.090 1.250 0.50 0.50
Tolerance, in: *0.0003 on thickness 0.003 (est.) Trepanning Finish cut *0.002
roughing cut
Surface roughness,
tin R : 4 to 10 35 to 50
30 max.
Electrode material, Copper electrode. 100 Im (micron) Copper-tungsten
filtration, benefits filter. electrode. Five Parts cut simultaneously.
Through-hole slot. Trepanning roughing cut followed by
and remarks: Workpiece rotated at 125 rpm
(or ECT). One side machined fnsigct
finishing cut. 300mnt
minute
at a time. floor-to-floor time per part.
Waffle grid of pockets.
1142-
Electrochemical Polishing-ECP 11.6
PROCESS SUMMARY
Insulation
Uninsulated E
Ilctrolyte
SWorkpiec /Workpiece -
Cutting Polishing
11-63
RiECED1DJ FAh BLAN(-ZNOT PI1hZD
Operating Parameters
For ECS. only 10 amperes or less are required for the
small electrodes and fractional gallon-per-minute flow
rates. The voltage range is similar to that for ECM. 8 to 18
volts.
11-65
9EC9014 PAGE BLAU -NOr FIIMD
Operating Parameters
The operating parameters and typical values are similar to
these for electrochemical machining, section 11.5.
11-67
14iECED1iO4 PJI Ba"1..NQ] FIU"
Electro-streamn'-ES 11.9
PROCESS SUMMARY
19-" EExhaust
Feee
P cwt re fan
creoo io of tControls
Acidfrhaieco.
supi wl
igre11e9u1 ES schematic.
11-69
- -7
11.9 Electro-stream -ES
Operating Parameters electrolytic dissolution follows Faraday's laws (see section
11.5), and current density is limited by the boiling of the
electrolyte in the nozzle from the resistive heating. Diame-
TABLE 11.9-2 Typical Values for ES Operating ter tolerance is typically 0.001 inch 10.025 mm] or plus
Parameters or minus 5 percent for sizes above 0.020 inch 10.5 mini.
Straightness is 0.0005 inch per inch [0.0005 mm/minI.
Power supply
type' Direct current
voltage: 150 to 850 V Surface Technology
current: 20 to 200 milliamperes/hole Surface roughness in the holes ranges from 16 to 63 micro-
(not independently adjustable) inches R. [0.4 to 1.6 piml. There are no metallurgical
changes when the electrolyte and operating parameters are
Electrolyte compatib.- with the metallurgical state of the workpiece,
type (s): H2S04,HCI, or proprietary mixtures nor are there process-induced residuL' stresses in the sur-
concentration: 5 to 15% faces. Thermal damage is nonexistent. Surface imperfec-
temperature: 80- to 120F [270 to 490C] tions frequently are a reflection of material inhomogeneity
pressure: 20 to 100 psi [138 to 689 kPa] rtn roe s varalty.
contamination: 6 g/L max rather than process variability,
Feed rate: 0.030 to 0.180 in/min [0.76 to 4.6 mm/mini Equipment and Tools
Hole diameter: 0 008 to 0.040 inch [0.2 to 1 mm] ES equipment is available from the General Electric Com-
Hole depth: Up to 0.75 inch [19 mm]
Depth-to-diameter pany, Cincinnati, Ohio 45216. Equipment can be provided
ratio: Up to 50:1 with all the ancillary devices needed to operate the system.
Holes per stroke: Up to 100 Fixturing requires the careful selection of materials suit-
Drilling angle- 100 to 1700 able for the process environment. The nozzles are drawn
from special glasses and are designed for penetration either
Diameter tolerance: 0.001 inch [0.025 mm] or 5%of hole in the feed mode or in the stationary, "dwell" mode.
diameter
Surface roughness: 16 to 63 pin R (0.4 to 1.6 m] Machining Characteristics
The highly corrosive environment can shorten the life of
the equipment unless exceptionally good maintenance is
Material Removal Rates and Tolerances endered. Adjacent equipment must also be protected. Dis-
I
Penetration rates of 1 to 2 thousandths inch per second posal of the metal-ion-contaminated electrolyte, must be
10.025 to 0.050 mm/sl are typical for the superalloys. The carried out in an environmentally satisfactory manner.
!
I
i
417
11-70 _
Shaped Tube Electrolytic Machining-STEMTM 11.10
PROCESS SUMMARY
Pricpes
tiaeteroConstant uieedpf -
\Ie Flowmeter I ;:
IIplate
Filter Supply ddsto
=.j .,.., -- (anode) :
-g Workpiece,'
Heater ,, T ni
Fixture ?
11-71
Wpm.
11.10 Shaped Tube Electrolytic Machining-STEM
Operating Parameters per second 10.018 to 0.064 mm/sI. Several dozen holes
have been drilled simultaneously. with tooling or setup
costs being the practical limit Runout is typically 0.0015
inch per inch 10.0015 mm/mml: however, 0.001 inch per
TABLE 11.10-2 Typical Values for STEMTM Operating inch 10.001 mm/mml can be achieved. Diameter tolerance
Parametem is typically 0.0015 inch 10 038 mml for hole diameters
under 0.10 inch 12.5 mml and plus or minus 10 percent for
Power supply larger diameters. The material removal rates are governed
type: Direct current by Faraday's laws (see section 11.5) and are limited by the
voltage: 5 to 15 V
forward on time: 3to 20 s current-carrying capacity of the tube and the boiling point
reverse time: 0.2 to 0.4 s of the electrolyte.
Electrolyte
type: H 2SO 4 Surface Technology
concentration: 6 to 15% volume Surface roughness in the holes ranges from 32 to 125 mi-
temperature: 900 to 110OF [320 to 430C] croinches R. 10.8 to 3.2 pIml. There is no stress introduced
pressure- 10 to 45 psi [69 to 310 kPa] into the surface. The electrolyte must be compatible with
metal content* 8 oz/gal max. [6 g/L max I the netallurgical state of the workpiece to prevent inter-
flow rate: 1 2 to 9.1 in3/min (20 to 15C cm 3/min] granular attack or selective-etch pitting. The natural radi-
using action of electrolytic machining eliminates all burrs.
Feed rate: 0.030 to 0.080 in/mm [0.76 to 2.0 mm/mini Close control of the electrolyte flow and degree of metal-ion
Hole diameter: 0.02 to 0.25 inch [0.50 to 6.4 mm] contamination is required for quality assurance. Mon-
Bare electrode, OD. See figures 11.10-2 to 11.10-4 itoring the current during operation can provide an early
warning of size deviation.
Amperes per hole: 1 to 40 A
Holes per stroke: 1 to 100
Hole length: Up to 24 inches rup to 610 mm] Equipment and Tools
!1-72,
1--
+~
mwI
SELECTED DATA
cc
cc.
0
CTO
.1a
cmJ
CD
Q0
oC
Co CL
60
C5
oQ 0)
0*
0 C o,
43U,~~~~0 '()J4wlC10.:
11-Co
11.10 Shaped Tube Electrolytic Machining-STEM TM
0.160T
0.10
- ___Tube O.D.
Tube I.D.
E 0.080 - ---
0.06
Applies to:
F- 0 nikel asealloys at
0.040 - -- 0.056 in/mmn
(1.42 mm/mini feed.
Current density in tube
0.020 - 2 -- - wall = 1750 A/in'
0-10 [271 A/cm2]
0 HII I I II
0 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100 0.120 0.140 0.160 0.180 0.200
[4 mm]
Hole diameter. inch
FIgure 11.10-3 Tube diameter versus hole diameter for STEMTm drilling nickel base alloys. (C. Jackson
and R. 0. Olson. Shaped tube electrolytic machining, Technical paper MR69-1 09, Society of Manufacturing
Engineers, Dearborn, Mi. 1969. p. 10)
0.0100 - - - -- -
0.0080 -- -__
0.00W0 - ___ -
0.0040 - - -__
0.0020- - - ___
cc 0.0010 -
cc 0.0008
0.0004Applies to:
nickel base allays at
0.056 In/min
0.0002 - 1.42 mm/mm]) feed.
Current density in tube
wall =1750 A/in'
0.0001 -1 271 A/cm']
0.001 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.010 0.020 0.040
[0.065 cm']
Figure 11.10-4 Tube wall area verreus hole area for STEMTMI drilling nickel base alloys. (C. Jackson and
R. 0. Olson, p. 10)
11-74
Shaped Tube Electrolytic Machining-STEM TM 11.1l0
WORK MATERIAL
Electrolyte
type H2S0
4 H2S04 H2S0 4 H2S04 H2S04 HCI H2SO4
concentration, % vol. 10 10 8 9-10 10 5.0 0.5 10
temperature, OF 90 100 2 95 100 2 100 100 =5 100
pressure, psi 10 40 10 est. 25 22 45 10
metal content, g/L 2 2 3.0-6.5 4 none
flow rate, cm3/min 100 60 115 5 330 20
Hole diameter, in 0.02 0.050 0.120 0.05 0.124 0.060 0.025 0.003
Bare electrode, OD, in 0.015 0.035 0.090 0.035 0.107 0.045 0.017
Amperes per hole, A 1 1 8 2 max. 7.5 4.3 0.5
Holes per stroke 1 16 8 6 1 3 30 41
11-75 __________
-RCEDIIOG PA(Z BLAC-NOT FILMD
SECTION 12
THERMAL NONTRADITIONAL
MACHINING OPERATIONS
1-
12-1
- RECMAG PAGE BLANK-NOT FILMD
12-3
12.1 Electron Beam Machining-EBM
Material Removal Rates and Tolerances tural integrity of highly stressed components, and for such
The thermal properties of the work material and the power components, this material should be removed or modified.
level of the EBM unit dictate the material removal rates.
Tungsten can be machined at a rate of 0.92 x 10-4 cubic Equipment and Tools
inch per second 115 x 10-4 cm 3/sl with one kilowatt of
power, while aluminum can be machined at a rate of 0.24 x Machines for EBM are produced with capacities ranging
3 3 3
10- cubic inch per second 13.9 x 10- cm /sl with the same from a few hundred watts to 60,000 watts with vacuum
power level, as shown in figure 12.1-5. Typical tolerances chambers of nominal or special volume-up to 20-by-27-
are about 10 percent of the slot width or hole diameter, as foot 16 by 9 ml capacity. Special equipment can include
shown in figure 12.1-6. The taper present in slots and holes room-size chambers with electron beam guns traveling
limits the depth-to-width ratio. With computer control of over NC positioning tables. Optical scans and controls with
the pulsed beam and integrated workpiece motion, hole as much as 40:1 magnification are available to utilize the
drilling rates up to 5.000 holes per second can be attained precision capability of the small spot size, high beam power
in thin materials. including ceramics. densities
beam andandthelow beam inertia.
work motion is Simultaneous
common. Proper control of the
program-
ming of the deflection beam, "flying spot" scanners and
pulse controls can produce intricate geometric cuts in the
workpiece.
Surface Technology
Estimates of surface roughness for the small holes and cuts
are in the neighborhood of 40 microinches R. 11 pml. The Machining Characteristics
short bursts of the beam limit the extent of the heat- The "chips" from EBM are small dust particles or small
affected zone; however, there is always a thin layer of beads formed from the solidified, expulsed molten material.
recast or heat-affected material on the cut surface. Heat- Cleanliness efforts should be continuous. Cathode life de-
affected material up to 0.01 0-inch 10.25 mini thick has been clines at the higher power densities. Shielding of the sec-
observed. This material can be detrimental to the struc- ondary radiation is necessary for safety.
.4
12-4
I
SELECTED DATA
Li..1
10"0
109
10I Metals
5 1 Hardening
E 43 2 Fusion-transformation
Joining
44 Perforation
0106' (6.5 x 101 Wlin2) -5 Drilling/Milling
CL 6 Engraving
lu 105 - 2 377Sublimation
1 Plastics
10' 8 Polymerization
F T10 9 Electro-resist
10- I9I 10 Plastic-perforation
0
103 -'
102 F
10'-
Figure 12.1-2 Application range of electron beams. Power density and time of impact are typical for
the various techniques. (J. Drew, Electron beam drilling, Influence of metallurgy on hole making operations,
Metals Park, OH: American Society for Metals, 1978, p. 115)
2.0
1.0
0.5
V04
E
E
Capability of EB perforation
E 0.1
0
0.05
Flgure 12.1-3 Range of EB perforation for steel and nickel alloys. (J. Drew, p. 118)
12-5
12.1 Electron Beam Machining-EBM
50.000 - 40
-0 2.5
C 1.000- _ -
______ 0.1 (0.004 in)
p0.15
I~~ ~ 2.0 - -~o~
Qi O 0.2
100 1 1.5
50
100.4
'~0.6
1o 008--.o 0.5
0.01 0.05 0.1 0.5 1.0 5.0 10
(0 040 in)
Material thickness. mm 0 0.001 0.002 0.003
0.005 0.006 0.004
(0.0004 in'/s)
Figure 12.1-4 EB perforation rate for steel and Metal removal rate. cm/s (
nickel alloys. (J. Drew, p. 119) Figure 12,1-5 Metal removal rates versus power,
assuming 15 percent cutting efficiency. (R. K.
Springborn, ed., Non-traditional machining processes,
Dearborn, MI: American Society of Tool and Manufac-
turing Engineers, 1967, p. 141)
2.00
Material thickness. mm
(C040 in)
0.5-
E 1 -
04.0 (0.157 in)
E 0.5
.! V 0.1 0.
0.3 I1
- 0.05
0,011 ... 1 1 fl
111l
12-6 -
Electron Beam Machining-EBM 12.1
TABLE 12.1-2 Physical Thermal Properties of Various Materials
PROPERTY MATERIAL
AVERAGE
WORK WORKPIECE HOLE DRILLING ACCELERATING BEAM PULSE PULSE
MATERIAL THICKNESS DIAMETER SPEED VOLTAGE CURRENT WIDTH FREQUENCY
in P-w in s kV ILA 11s Hz
400 Series
stainless
Alumina A1203steel 0.010
0.030 0.0005
0.012 <1
30 130
125 60
60 4
80 3,000
so
Tungsten 0.010 0.001 <1 140 50 20 so
90-10 Tantalum-
tungsten 0.040 0.005 <1 140 100 80 50
90-10 Tantalum-
tungsten 0.080 0.005 10 140 100 80 50
90-10 Tantalum-
tungsten 0.100 0.005 10 140 100 80 50
Stainless steel 0.040 0.005 <1 140 100 80 50
Stainless steel 0.080 0.005 10 140 100 80 50
Stainless steel 0.100 0.005 10 140 100 80 50
Aluminum 0.100 0.005 10 140 100 80 50
Tungsten 0.016 0.003 <1 130 100 80 50
Ouartz 0.125 0.001 <1 140 10 12 50
SOU.CE: Adapted from R.K.Sprinjbom, ad.. p.143.
NOTE: The main control parameters for shaping the hole are the pulse width for the depth of the hole, the beam current for the diameter of the hole and the
power ditriution within the beam as we as the position of the focus with respect to the workpiece.-J. Drew. Farrel Company.
12-7
12.1 Electron Beam Machining-EBM
TABLE 12.1-4 Slots Cut by EBM In Various Materials ____________ ___ ___
ACCEL- PULSE
WORK WORKPIECE SLOT DESCRIPTION TIME OF CUT ERATING AVERAGE PULSE FRE-
MATERIAL THICKNESS AND/OR DIMENSIONS OR RATE VOLTAGE BEAM WIDTH QUENCY
in n
ij~ A~_MkV pA s Hz
0008 by
1a 0.072
Stainless steel 0.007 WO1Sl 0.004 wd2inmn130 50 80 9
Brass 0.010 OOwide
0.00 WO~M 2 in/min 130 50 to 50
Stainless steel 0.002 tOUOW 0.002wide 4 in/min 130 20 1 4 s0
Alumina A1203 0.30@ 2 0.004 wide - 24 in/min 15020 8 200
12-8
Myar tape
0.0015-inch thick Cut a 4.615 in/mmn 110 600 - Continuous
Ouart crystal
0.125-inch thick 0.001-inch exit dia. <is 140 10 12 50____
Sapphire crystal
0.026-inch thick 0.0025-inch dir, hole <:30 s 1020 950
0.026-inch thick 0.0015-inch dia. hole. hole <30 s 110 j 20 9 so
______________taper dpprox. 2*_______
Silicon wafers
0.01 0-inch thick Scribed to 0.002-inch depth 5 in/mmn 130 70 4 3.000
gold deposited ____________ ____ ______
Aluminum
0.100-inch thick 0.005-inch dia. hole los 140 100 80 50
1/16-inch and Slotting Manual 130 15 S00 300
1/8-inch thick _____________ ________
Copper (OFHC)
0.002-inch thick cut Approx. 130 50 2.5 25.00
tubveligd v _ 1_________
min__ (cner)j
tubaveligwvd msa
Brass
0.01 0-inch thick 0.004-inch wide slot 2 in/mmn 130 50 80 50
i
Brass, foil grid
0.004-inch thick Cut by fly.,ng spot scanner Approx- 120 50 4 3.000
____________________3 min_______ ___
thick
0250-inh 0.03 0-inch enitra width 50 j ___ 7.000____3.
7.0o100t.
12-9
12.1 Electron Beam Machining-EBM
TABLE 12.1-5-Continued
I CUTTING AVERAGE
CONFIGURATION SPEED ACCELERATING BEAM PULSE PULSE
MATERIAL PRODUCED OR TIME VOLTAGE CURRENT WIDTH FREQUENCY
kV AA ps Hz
Steel, stainless
0 250-inch thick 0.020- to 0.040-inch 3 mm 145 4,000 2,100 12.5
dia. holes
0.040-inch thick 0.005-inch dia. hole <1 s 140 100 80 50
0.080-inch thick 0.005-inch dia. hole lOs 140 100 80 50
0.100-inch thick 0.005-inch dia. hole 10s 140 100 80 50
0.062-inch thick Rectangle-9.008 by 0.250 inch 5 min 140 120 80 50
0.00025 inch
0.007-inch thick 0.004-inch wide slot 2 in/min 130 50 80 50
0.002-inch thick 0 002-inch wide slot 4 in/min 130 20 4 50
Hastelloy 0.200-inch dia. hole in - 130 5,000 5,300 100
0.200-inch thick material
0.100-inch dia. hole hi 70s 130 5,000 5,300 100
0.450-inch thick material
Molybdenum, shim
0 010-inch thick Less than 0.002-inch dia. <1 s 140 20 20 50
_______ alloy holes on 0.003-inch centers
Tantalum alloy
(90Ta-10W)
0.040-inch thick 0.005-inch dia. hole <1 s 140 100 80 50
0 080-inch thick 0.005-inch dia. hole lOs 140 100 80 50
0.100-inch t" .k 0.005-inch dia. hole 10s 140 100 80 .50
Tantalum, 100A
thin film resistor Manual cut -- _100 20 9 1,000
Tungsten
0.010-inch thick 0.001 -inch dia. hole <1 s 140 50 20 50
0.016-inch thick 0.003-inch dia. hole <1s "30 100 80 50
0.002-inch thick 0.001-inch wice slot 7 in/min 150 30 80 50
I"
12-10
Electrical Discharge Grinding-EDG 12.2
PROCESS SUMMARY
Rota ting
Insulated conductive
spride wheel
~supply A
FilterZ
servo
ismltEWeeteor afeed
sero c
gapFtuisontrol e T
pt ci iWorktable u
iI
12-11
12.2 Electrical Discharge Grinding-EDG
(0.013 to 0.13 mm. Tolerances to 0 0002 inch [10.005 Equipment
mm are normal, witt 0 000050 inch 10.0013 mini Equipment for EDG is available in a range of sizes. Sys-
achievable. terns are equipped with variable speed drive, insulated
wheel spindles and a servomechanism to control the table
Surface Technology speed.
Surface roughness values decrease with an increase in
spark frequency and are typically 16 to 125 microinches Ra
10.4 to 3.2 ml. The melting, vape g and resolidification
of the surface of the workpiece I :, a heat-affected zone Machining Characteristics
that can be from a few tei, sandths- to a few
thousandths-itich deep Hardness .erations occur which Grinding action is nonexistent. Wheel wear occurs from the
also affect the material properties. Components intended spark discharge. The wear ratio ranges from 100:1 to 0.1:1
for high-stress applications should have these heat-affected with an average of 3:1
layers removed or modified to ensure the best surface
integrity.
volumetric volume of work removed
TABLE 12.2-2 EDG Material Removal Rates versus wear ratio volume of wheel consumed
Surface Roughness
MATERIAL REMOVAL RATE SURFACE ROUGHNESS, R, It is necessary to redress the wheel frequently if sharp radii
in3/hr j- n are desired. Sharp radii also contribute t, -nore rapid
0.05 :125 wheel wear than do round or flat shapes. Abj.,t one-half of
0.05 125 the wear ratio can be attributed to redressing. The dielec-
0.03 63 tric fluid must be inserted between the wheel and the work-
0002 16 piece; consequently, the contact area is usually submerged
in dielectric.
12-12
Electrical Discharge Grinding-EDG 12.2
SPECIFIC APPLICATIONS DATA
J,! ) g
0 0
0 0 0 Uf)
~
C0
UD)
~ E~.E
C; 0 0
U) Cc C
(1)= E 1)
Laio 0 0 0
0. 0 C (0
r- o0
.0~ 00C
0 0 0 0 0
4)
.0
-5
0
'ro-
r4 cm CjV
-0.c.
.
V)
~ v CwC
o C
-~ 0 ~~~a o
.9 0 0; m Co C
Z U aI
9C
U > .V.
IM
. Q
00
0 0
00
) 00)
LJ o ;F3 E -- -- -
00
0C.0N
0l o 0) ..
__
0 0
-C Cm Cv @(-C
0 a
_ _ _ _ 1213c
MRE PAG
WING BLAM-N=T FIIMD
41 Dielectric
EElectroe Failte
Spark Tank
dscharge ts l a oeist.t
generator
12-15 1
12.3 Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM
Corner radii are controlled by the spark length, while taper Surface Technology
is controlled by the amount of cutting debris in the arc gap The surface texture is a series of overlapping, small craters
or fluid. that increase in size with increasing spark energy and/or
lower spark frequency. Recast and heat-affected layers oc-
cur on all materials and range from 0.0001- to 0.005-inch
10.002 to 0.13 mini deep. These layers should be removed
or modified on critical or fatigue-sensitive surfaces. Surface
TABLE 12.3-1 Typical Values for EDM Operating roughness is typically in the 63- to 125-microinch Ra 11.6 to
Parameters 3.2 piml range. Surface roughness from rough cuts can
INDEPENDENTLY CONTROLLABLE PARAMETERS range up to 500 microinches Ra 112.5 pml, and more costly,
deluxe methods can attain 2 to 4 microinches Ra 10.05 to
0.1 iml. Surface residual stress is shallow (under 0.001
Open circuit voltage: 50 to 300 V inch 10.025 mml) but may be a high percent of tensile
Frequency. 50 Hz to 500 kHz or equivalent duty- strength. The fatigue strength of EDM surfaces without
cycle setting of on and off times post-treatment usually is severely reduced.
per pulse
Dielectric type: Hydrocarbon (petroleum) oils,
deionized water, kerosene, gas Equipment
(dry) (see table 12.3-10) EDM equipment is available in a wide range of sizes from a
Dielectric flow pressure. 28-inch 1711 mm] vacuum to 70 psi bench model with a few amperes capacity to 13-by-18-foot
[482 kPa] pressure 14 by 5.5 ml die sinkers with 5.000-ampere capacity (made
Electrode materials: Graphite,
steel, copper, brass, zinc-tin,
copper-tungsten, copper- up
u from multiple 500-ampere
rmmlil power packs). Automatic or
0-meepwrpcs.Atmtco
graphite, silver-tungsten, NC controls are common. Automatic feed, interchangeable
te tungsten electrode holders and rotary-turret electrode holders are
Servo drive gap sensitivity Gaps: 0.0005 to 0.005 inch 10.013 to available to aid electrode changing and automation of the
control: 0.13 mm] EDM process. Multiple electrodes and multi-lead power
Capacitance: (on some style machines) from trial supplies enhance the productivity of many equipment
cuts types. Integrated systems are the usual order: thus. EDM
Polarity: "Standard" is positive on machines can be placed almost anywhere in the normal
workpiece, negative on shop. Fume vents are recommended, and tooling should
electrode (see table 12.3-8) provide a means for venting the liberated gases. The pulse
power supply usually contains full control of "on and off'
times for each discharge, as well as full control of the dis-
DEPENDENT VARIABLES AND RESULTS charge energy.
Average current: 0.1 to 500 A (A few large machines The "grinding" mode of EDM is covered in section 12.2 on
use multiple 500 A power EDG. Section 12.5 on EDWC covers the wire cutting
packs, with separate leads.) EDM operations. Orbital or planetary erosion is a recent
Spark gap: 0.0005 to 0.005 inch [0.013 to 0.13 addition to EDM capabilities. This method makes possible
mm] the almost constant enlargement of a die cavity of geomet-
Overcut: 0.0002 to 0.020 inch/side [0.005 to rically difficult contour with simple electrodes. Electrode
0.50 mm] motions range from simple orbital movement to complex
Material removal rate: 0.003 to3 1.5 in3/hr [0.05 to 24.6 combinations of vertical, eccentric and orbital motions, as
cm /hr] shown in figure 12.3-2.
Wear ratio (ratio of
workpiece erosion to
electrode erosion): 0.5:1 to 100:1 (see table 12.3-12) Machining Characteristics
Surface roughness: 8 to 250 microinches Fl (0.2 to 6.3 High quality output depends upon rigid machine tools and
UmJ
Depth of recast plus 0.0001 to 0.005 inch [0.0025 to 0.13 fixturing for close gap control via the servomechanism
heat-affected zone: mm] which controls the electrode movement.
Corner radius: 0.001overcut
inch [0.025 mm] or equal to Good safety practice makes it desirable to operate with the
Taper 0.0005 to 0.005 inch/inch/side spark fully submerged in the dielectric. Gas and fumes gen-
[0.0005 to 0.005 mm/mim/ erated should be carefully vented. Good hygiene, thorough
side]. With proper tooling, washing by the machine operator and the use of a moistur-
taper can be eliminated. izing cream can eliminate skin irritations caused by the die-
lectric oils.
12-16
Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM 12.3
0/
C '20
0
EmL 0
0 C)
0;
M0
x C/)
CL..~
U .c i ...
......
AC 0
a) 0
NL-0
0t
CL
UNu
00
0.
ii-1
12.3 Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM
I
SELECTED DATA frequently are measured under "standard" conditions. In
practical application, deviations from "standard" might re-
There are many combinations of EDM operating parame- suit from the use of different materials, dielectric fluids, or
ters that will remove material from conductive workpieces. product forms or from different levels of operator expe-
Experience with particular equipment and/or systems plus rience.
a limited number of test points on particular electrode-
material/workpiece-material combinations will provide the The steps in table 12.3-2 are recommended as one logical
operator with reference points for improved estimating and sequence for selecting EDM operating parameters. Sup-
operating efficiency. Most equipment manufacturers are porting data come from the other figures and tables in ac-
supplying approved data for their installations These data cordance with the terms as explained in figure 12.3-3.
12-18
Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM 12.3
Generalized Cavity Cut
Electrode Dielectric
0 Curen Tracesl
Electrodea
discarg
channelge I-okic
Sparlw
(Plasma) IN*
I *+j cycle
Vaor
I
:-
[o0+ b-i. I
/ I/Chips
/.~.-
~On
I time'
Off
time
t
Peak
Average
LiqidCrater --
E Arc
Recast energy_
Heat-affected zone
Wokiece
Time
Figure 12.3-3 EDM parameter terminology. (Drawing at top courtesy of Agietron Corporation)
12-19
12.3 Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM
TABLE 12.3-2 Steps to Select EDM Operating Parameters
ITEM DATA
12-20
Electrical Discharge Machining-EDm 123
(/2
0-
00
o .Co
ED
0
U)
CLC'
Co
o o w
0)0
CC
0) C
00
r-r
U'T ~t
12.3 Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM
TABLE 12.3-3 Relationship of Metal Removal Rate In EDM to Surface Roughness and Expected Recast W4
iterlal
EPCE EATMTRA
PROCESSING
LEVEL SURFACE ROUGHNESS, Ro METAL R~EMO VAL RATE Predominant Maximum
Gentle <63 h : Ijjl <0 003 ~ < 0.00022 o< 0.00054- j5414-g
__ ~~ 0.00060 f#5
Finishing 63-1 25 003008ffifPMW 0.00022- ~E- 0.001-
-2 a S - ~ 0.00028 0.03-A
Normal 125-250 0.018-0.42 0.00028- rO1 0.0022- ~.6
0.00043 0.0033 FO06
TABL
omePhy~calProGrtishoiED
12~-5 ElectrodeMatetal Elctod
5030 cm C5DC
1 NU-1.
Sublimes
oribonlsmbeforesmeltinghathatmosrh apclpressure.
I CODC CON- -n -
Electrical Discharge Machining-EDMV 12.3
40
20 _
100
6 A t
4
x
C
10
C
> .
0
E 0.8 _
0.
0.4 - 0 Workpiece-- - - - - -
- A Tool material -- _ _ - - - -
0.12-
Melting point. OC
Figure 12.3-S Average metal removal rate versus melting point. (L. J. Quackenbush and W. N. Law-
rence, Electrical discharge machining for the 70's, Ann Arbor, Ml: University of Michigan. 1971, p. 19)
12-23
12.3 Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM
TABLE 12.3-6 Selection of EDM Electrode Material
Copper-graphite 3 blocks.
rods 2:1 4:1 medium fine general purpose I
I
Brass 4 same as 0.7:1 1:1 low good holes and high accuracy
copper cavity sinking
Zinc P.'loys 5 cast, die 0.7:1 2:1 low good forging die holes
casting cavities
Steel 6 all forms 1:1 2:1 low excellent through hols carbides
Copper-tungsten 7 bar, fiats. 3:1 8:1 medium fair slots. carbides large areas
shim stock.
rod, wire.
tube
Silver-tungsten 8 sintered 8:1 12:1 high fair small slots, large areas
I holes and
intricate
details
Tungsten 9 wire. rod. 5:1 10:1 high poor small hWles irregular
ribbon holes
I
I
12-24
Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM 12.3
TABLE 12.3-7 Trade-off Conditions Among EDM
Parameters
SITUATION A SITUATION B
12-25
12.3 Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM
10 1 eoa
1_ihmta
0.40
0 eMetal removal
E
0.10 (1 64 cm3/hr]
008
006- --
004-- -- -
0 -, - - - 200
0.0110
ow electrode wear 80 a
40)
0
204~
100~
- 0 Z0
8 "
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750
(6 3 im] Surface roughness, pin rms
Figure 12.3-6 Interrelations of EOM process varlak:--a. (Courtesy of Poco Graphite, Inc.)
12-26
Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM 12,3
1000 - I 1ii I
800 j - Example.
-- . - '-Convert 20 kHz at 75% duty cycle into pulse and pause times -
600 . -- , expressed in microseconds.
_ _Reading from the horizontal scale at the intersect point of 20
kHz (vertical scale), the total cycle time is shown to be 50 micro-
400 seconds at 75% duty cycle, pulse time = 50 x 75% = 37.5 micro- -
seconds, pause time 50 x 25% (the remainder) = 12 5 micro-
seconds.
200 '- I
100 --
80 - ----
N 60 ,-
o 40 i
U-
10 -
8 - ----- --- -
6 -
8\ -- - -"~--- - -
1~~ i__
2 4 6 8 10 20 40 60 80 100 200 400 600 8001000
12-27
- -i-- - -- -- .- - -~ ~ - -
12.3 Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM
Electrode Polarity: NEGATIVE Ip = Peak current
Electrode size. 1 in x 1 in x 4 in rms = Root mean square, /j in
Flushing- Thru elec., 1/4 inch Ohole -/- Pulse/pause time.p)s
1.5
10
3
16 4 cm /hrj- --
_ur1 rr
25/6
100/25 200,/50
080 12/6 - Power (p 25 A)
060 - -- -2 5/6o 0-
-414- 100/25- Power (Ip 12.5 A)
0.40 33 -/
3/2- 4/2 50/12
o-006 4/2 1
00 2/2 1
002 -- - -- - -- - -- - -
0.01 100
80
8
60
. .- - --- - .0)
- 40
. - 20
3:c
C0
-10 x
}:z End wear 8
,-- 25 A-- 6
312.5 A- 0
" " 3" 2 A
3 1' 4 C.
-9 625 A
6 125A-2A
1. 3.12 A- 1 2
- Comer wear
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750
[6 3pj ml
Surface roughness, p in rms
Figure 12.3-8 Data for Poco EDM-1 electrode (negative polarity) cutting tool steel. (Courtesy of Poco
Graphite, Inc.)
12-28
---,.~-w------- - ----
Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM 12.3
Electrode Polarity: POSITIVE IP= Peak current
Electrode size- 1 in x 1 in x 4 in rms =Root mean square, min
15 Flushing: Thru elec, 1/4 inch Ohole I-Pulse/pause time. us
1.07
S 0.0 Power
- ( 0p623A
0.622-I/
-6
50 10 61020 25 0050 50 50 5060 5 0 5
122-2
700 -
600 -
U1)
fc 400
000
a) 300
U) 200 1
100
50
25
1 2 3 45 10 50 100 500 1000
Arc duration, IIs
Figure 12.3-10 Surface roughness versus arc duration at various currents for EDM of steel with
graphite electrodes. (Courtesy of Hansvedt Engineering, Inc.)
201
18
< 16 Full (20 A) 00
5D 14
W 12 ______
0)
10
>, 10/2 __
E 8_ _
44
2 .,.......1 /20 _
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
On-time, %
Figure 12.3-11 Maximum average current versus percent age of on-time for EDM of steel with graph-
ite electrodes. (Courtesy of Hansvedt Engineering, Inc.)
12-30
Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM 12.3
Graphite electrode 100V
MM nu NAL. j Steel workpiece +
012- 8 4
7
0 126 8 j0l3 -- -
01 -
016 - I
2-2- 3CurAen2
J
u6ac
-0b - 0-
10 20 so 100
330
tp(s mple uato. wtc p
V~ Rte o ersion rnm/"J
v~20 Vouerc6er
RmaxMaxPeakto-ally
Roghnss high. 6
GAP Spark gap.m
Undrsze m
M~~~
131
--
41 4q--:1 2
2.0,
M A
Graphite electrode +
M 2GAP AGIE Riex0100
mm mnm jMSelwrpee
NORiMAL XF
=*~~
=.=* mSelwrklc
U. l
08- 500__
2 i
1 05-05QS
90 50L -9
g - 6
Q2-020 1 8
01 - 7 20-
01 1
008 , 006
7
6
6
5 2 -
iM r200 2
.e-O-~~2j Curren
500
iz 24- zz
S200ace
R.U
roughness t i
1
JT Current amplitude. Switch JT. JP- JR: 20 -
12-32
Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM 12.3
~0 - O3 - - 10
- -9 10 10- 188 12 8 6
0 --02- 02 - 10
8 - -
9 50
3,_
5 10 20- 50 10 0 00 0
tp ;is
~~~~T~V
amltue Si0hJ. Currentn 04
GAP7
Sprkgp.m
200 _i0 5 10 20 50 00
4 4
.U12-33
12.3 Eiectrical Discharge Machining-EDM
- 0 12 6
02- 01- 0
4
01 -
N--- Curren 20 -- 1
21%
30 33A
RateU ersin
K~ 2f 2m/mP
M Underize.mm
res cndtinsacordngtolSo355
F~gue 123-15Paraete'
:..ectin fo EOM (Cortes of gieton orortin
6m.
Current-34
Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM 12.3
TABLE 12.3-9 Pulse/Pause Times versus Duty-Cycles: TABLE 12.3-10 EDM Dielectrics
Conversion Chart
Principal functions of the dielectric in EDM
UsTP s Insulate until required conditions are achieved.
Flush particles out of spark gap.
x 200
E
cc 100
E
: 50
C 20
10
o 52
O 2_4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
=1 recommended
unfavorable
Viscosity. centistoke at 20 C
12-35
12.3 Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM
120> 040
072 -
048 -
01
0240.
0010 20 30 40 5 60
Current.A
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Current. A
End Wear Ratio vs Amps at 2.000 Hz
End Wear Ratio vs; Amps at 130.000 Hz
7 7
6
6
5
2 5-
3
4 - -4
0
1
W 3
0
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Curn.ACurrent.
Corner Wear Ratio vs Amps at 2.000 Hz AIat 130.000) Hz
Corner Wear Ratio vs Amps
35 - - - -3.5
30
30
25 - -~25
2
0 2
20 - -
.
1.0.5 3
Dielectric
01- 1 - 1
No 1l-- 100% Silicone oils 0
0 0 20 30 40 So No 2 -Dow Corning 1025-
Curn.AEDItfuid
Curent
ANo 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
3-Conventional 6DM Current. A
coo!anisI
Figure 12.3-17 Effect of dielectric on operating parameters. (Courtesy
of Dow Corning Co.)
12-36
Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM 12.3
Very good
Factor 1
Good
Factor 2
Fair
Factor 3
Poor
Factor 4
Very poor
Factor 5
S Extremely poor
H more than 10 x D
12-37
-_ :~~= Z1------
12.3 Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM
TABLE 12.3-11 Flushing Techniques Used In EDM
Original
lengtht
-Cdre ear
Volumetric
Roughing cut
Depth of cut
Workpie ce
Figure 12.3-19 Types of electrode wear in EDn.4. (Modified from H.W. Yankee, Manu-
facturing processes, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 1979. p.311)
12-38
WIN
PART 2
ELECTRODE MATERIAL WORKPIECE MATERIAL POLARITY ON ELECTRODE ELECTRODE CORNER WEARII
percentage
SOURCE: Pat 1, Hansvedt Engineering, Inc., Urbana, IL; Part 2, Elox Divi- *Low- ,ear (pulse mode).
Colt Industries, Dav!dson, NC 'Wear ratios are for 90 corner. Less than 1%electrode wear is achieve,
electrodo length 1wo0.decs enngth between 450on-time
croseconds -nd 50 wit
microseconds on-time vary
graphite. Settings with with
ropper, and 250
electrode to 35 ni-
material
inthis total wear ratio so figure provides length of electrode required for a
finished lengin (depth) of workpiece
12-39
- 5-
22 - ___
20 ' '00
> 18
16 -
14
12
E 10
0 000
8 -10
0 11) 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
On-time. %
Figure 12.3-20 Voltage setting for FDM. 'Courtesy of Hansvedt Engineering, Inc.)
" Conventional machining from solid block; mill, drill, turn, etc.
" Cut oft from bar stock, rounds, squares, shapes, extrusions !
" Tracer milling from plaster master
" Punching
* Total form machining (TFM, see section 10.6)
Electroforming
o Casting (die, investment, plaster)
* Rotating discs
" Molding (cold, powder metal)
" Pressing, forging, coining
" Extruding
" Electrical discharge wire cutting (EDWC, see section 12.5)
12-40
r...
Band saw 0.06 to 0 19 15 350 to 600 8 tO5 0.5 inch [12 7 mm] 5,000 J.525 Feed by hand
blade width-
_7,.c 4 teeth/inch [6 3
mm/pitch]
36-grit 003 toO006 125- Thickness 7,000 2130 Feed by hand
silicon w gtlj -Aw 0.06in [1.5 mm]
wheel [1.5-mm]
Pressure
psi _
TABLE 12.3-15 Optimum Machining Perameters Used To Compare Mini-Rod* Electrodes with Metallic
Electrodes
ELECTRODE ELECTPLDE PEAK PULSE/PAUSE1 GAP
12-41
- - r ----- --
------- '' ~ ~ -~ -
12.3 Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM
8
6__ _
4
00
2
*0
08
04
02
Figure 12.3-21 Depth of recast versus process intensity (material removal rate) for EDM of a variety of
materials. (Modified from G Bellows, p. 19)
CU 0.5
C 10 Copper 0
-0
C) I 0.3
05 - 0.2 O
0.4 - Tungsten
%Copper
03 -tungsten j0.1
0,2
Figure 12.3-22 EDM drilling performance data for varicjs electrode materials. (Courtesy of Poco,
Graphite, Inc.)a
12-42
Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM 12.3
SPECIFIC APPLICATIONS DATA
Workpiece
cofgrtin n 4 625 i-..58 airfoil slots with
5n,~ 2188-inch cord lengthK
through 0 090-inch watt
4t0 ~
8i
/
0250 in
117 in'
0060 in 150 in
Power supply: Elox HPR104 Elox HPR104 Ingersoll Special Hansvedt SM-150B Hansvecdi SM-150OB
Electrode material: copper copper copper punching (used once) graphite rotating graphite rotating
(rotating (rotating disc disc
wheel) wheel)
Dielectric
type- Texaco 499 Texaco 499 Eloxal 13 oil spray flushing spray flushing
Hansvedt Hansvedt -
Average current, A: 14 to 5 1 25 to 30 14 2 ;I
Polarity on electrode- negative negative negative positive negative
Material removal rate,
in3/hr:
I
Su'rface rouighness.
pi R.: 1205 s0 no burrs 32
Tolerance, inch: -0.001 0.001 0O.002
12-43 1
12.3 Electrical Discharge Machining-EDMV
TABLE l 2 .3-l6-Continuei
Work materna1 420 Stainless Steel (1ToStel
WorkpieceI
C~nigraio configrati0 563-
25-inh 05ic in dia
thick ~ 312 in
~II~it 0
563-inh dia: -.
-05 in
Through hole
i Ze l
HatO mold fortfitting
12-44
Electrical Discharge Machining-EDM 12.3
TABLE 12.3-16-Continued
Power supply. Raycon solid state 40-ampere split Elox PS50 Elox PS50 Elox PS50 Elox PS50
lead with refeed control
Electrode material: copper-graphite and Poco EDMC-3 graphite graphite graphite graphite
I (Gentrode (Gentrode (Gentrode (Gentrode
1 10) 10) 10) 10)
Dielectric
type. Texaco 499 petroleum oil petroleum oil petroleum o;I petroleum oil
pressure, psi: surface flow 5 5 5 5
Operation type.
Current, A- 3 38 38 15 5
Surface roughness,
pin R.- 150 (approx. 0.001-inch recast)
Notes: Fully automatic multiple drilling -inch diameter -inch diameter -inch diameter -inch diameter
with 3-axis NC control and predrilled pI'edrilled predrilled precirilled
multiple slides for electrode hole for hole for hole for hole for
refeed cartridges, flushing. flushing. flushing. flushing.
11 holes average per pass.
12-45
12.3 Electrical Discharge Machining-EDMV
TABLE 12.3-16-Continued
Workpiece
configuration. II0 062 in
5 sl~s dia 8 holes
00069-inch dia
-4- 0045 in x 0 75 in 0Ooo i n
005
0in045-inch wall
0 125-inch thick
I Fuel injector nozzle
Operation type:
Current, A: 2 o).2
Surface roughness., -
pin R,, 50 J16 to 18, no burrs
Tolerance, inch: I 0 001 0.001
12-46
II
Disc
"r thickness Feed
Workpece
Workpiece
Figure 12.4-1 EDS schematic. Left, band saw: right, disc saw.
12-47
12.4 Electrical Discharge Sawing-EDS
TABLE 12.4-1 Typical Values for EDS Operating Parameters-Steel
Workpieces
Power supply
type: Direct current Direct current
voltage- 16 to 24 V 18 to 35 V
current (varies
with thickness): 400 to 1,500 A 1,000 to 15,000 A
Fluids
frequently i Water Water
sometimes: Air Air
rarely: Water glass (sodium I Water glass (sodium
silicate) silicate)
Fluid flow: 5 to 13 gal/min Submerged
[20 to 50 L/min]
Wear ratio,
workpiece-to-band or
workpiece-to-disc: Approx. 3:1 Approx. 10:1
Cutting rates: 5 to 20 in2/min 20 to 300 in2/min
[32 to 129 cm 2/min] [129 to 1,935 cm 2/min]
Surface roughness, R.
.oarse, high-ampere 400 to 500 Itin 400 to 500 !dn
cutting: 110 t.125 pm] , [10 to 12.5.urnj
fine, low-ampere 250 to 400 pin j250 to 400 pin
cutting: [6.3 to 10 apm] [6.3 to 10 pm]
TABLE 12.4-2 Circular Arc Saw Cutting Rates recast and heat-affected zone on the surface that is 0.001-to
0.005-inch 10.025 to 0.13 mini deep.
WORK MATERIAL CUTTING RATE
in2/min Equipment and Tools
Tooling consists of simple holding devices because only
Aluminum 775 low forces are involved. Good electrical contact is needed.
Tool steel 280 Z i Band arrangements are available with throats up to 48-
Stainless steel 263 1 inches 11.2 ml deep. Discs with 18- to 60-inch 10.5 to 1.5 ml
Nickel alloys 280 --- blades are typical. with blades up to 72-inches 11.8 ml di-
Cobalt alloys 280 ameter available on special order. Current capacities up to
15.000 amperes have been used.
12-48
Electrical Discharge Wire Cutting-EDWC 12.5
PROCESS SUMMARY
supplyuppl reel tr t
Dielecri
supply!damete-
_.lotKerf)
Wire
12-49
12.5 Electrical Discharge Wire Cutting-EDWC
Material Removal Rates and Tolerances Die relief angle generators and offset controls are available
Cutting of 0.001- to 6-inch 10,25 to 150 mini thick materials on most machines along with kerf-width control via the gap
can be done at a rate of approximately I square inch per setting and wire-diameter selection. Equipment is also
hour 16 5 cm 2 /hri. which on thin parts can yield cutting at available with cam or other mechanical programming for
40 inches per minute 11 m/min (sce tables 12.5-2 and the wire motion as well as with standard EDM servo con-
12.5-3). Positioning accuracy up to =0.0001 inch trol for straight cutting.
I =0.0025 mml is normal in all metals. Workpiece accuracy
usually is =0.0005 inch I= 0 013 mini. with special in- Some machines have CNC or optically guided motion di-
stances of = 0.0002 inch I = 0.005 mml and = 0.0001 inch rect from an enlarged drawing. Table motions as much as
I =0.0025 mml in unique applications. 2 by 3 feet 10 6 by 1 ml have been made. with 1 by 1 foot
10.3 by 0.3 ml being more common. Workpiece thickness 3
to 6 inches 175 to 150 mini can be accommodated-
Surface Technology
Surface roughness is typically in the 30- to 50-microinch R. Forces are low, so simple holding fixtures are practical. A
10 8 to 1.3 aml range. and the surface has a matte or velvet- 5-pound 12.25 kgl reel of 0.008-inch 10.2 min diameter cop-
like texture. Special care and slower cutting can produce a p-r wire can provide 36 hours of cutting.
surface roughness of 15 microinches Ra 10.4 pml. The re-
cast and the heat-affected zor.e are very small and uniform
with the low spark energy levels that are typically used.
These layers should be removed or modified on critical or
fatigue-sensitive surfaces. Machining Characteristics
The machine motions are similar to those for a band or a
wire saw. Use of cutter offset control permits several sizes
Equipment to be cut from the same NC tape. The cutting accuracy is
Several manufacturers regularly build EDWC equipment high because the spark erosion emanates from a fresh, con-
with NC. tracer controls and all programming accessories. stant-size section of wire,
AN
-1-
12-50
Electrical Discharge Wire Cutting-EDWC 12.5
SELECTED DATA
TABLE 12.5-2 Average Performance Data For EDWC with Brass Wire Electrode
Steel carb~on
chrome
Copperx
__ __
12-51
______ 5
12.5 Electrical Discharge Wire Cutting-EDWC
TABLE 12.5-2 - Continued
0 004
0 j 0 08 :o0 .8
"2 000
n 7-S 6 :o9
:3 - :o 244; 035
Camlece ;1%
cofla,
I
0010 0 C8 to ,6 0011 39 14 " 24- 00186
255 22-c-4C, "0 '351. -03 !o 06- -0120,!
Alumnum 0i 5
12-52
Electrical Discharge Wire Cutting-EDWC 12.5
TABLE 12.5-3 Average Performance Data for EDWC with Molybdenum Wire ,iectrode
/ ST A
T
Steel. carbon
chrome 0004 0 08 to 0.4 00049 18 to 23 00109
[Oil [2 to 101 [125] [0.47 to 0 591 [007)
Carbide. 15%
cobalt 0004 0.08 to 0 5 0 0153 5 to 9 0.0093
[Oi [2 to 12 71 [135) [0 118 to 0 231 [006]
0N
12-53
POMCIDING PAM BLAW(-NOT FILAMD
Total
reflecting ~ --- - ~ - .
mirror ---
- "e -
?Xsngi Material~o~- artial
-~-
Protective
ro
_ , 'n Le n s , t a pe
01 Power N cN
position control table
Principles Cutting, welding, scribing and heat treating can all be done
Laser beam machining (LBM) removes material by melt- with the same laser by varying the energy density and by
ing, ablating, and vaporizing the wcrkpiece at the point of appropriately adjusting the focus (spot size) and the pulse
impingement of a highly focused beam of coherent mon- duration Sharp, short, Gaussian-mode repetitive pulses
ochromatic light (see figure 12.6-1). Laser is an acronym are best for cutting because they have high energy den-
for "Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radt- sities. Welding requires longer duration pulses and a broad
ation." The electromagnetic radiation operates at wave- spot. Welding energy densities are 105 to 107 watts per
lengths from the visible to the infrared (see table 12.6-3). square inch 11.55 x 104 to 1.55 x 106 W/cm 2 . Heat treating
The principal lasers used for material removal are the neo- operates at under 106 watts per square inch [1.55 x 105
dymium-glass, the Nd-YAG (neodymium-yttrium aluminum W/cm 2 l, and scribing requires very short cutting pulses (see
garnet), the ruby and the carbon dioxide (CO2 ). The last is figures 12.6-3 to 12.6-7). Heat treating and welding are
a gas laser (most frequently used as a torch with an assist- not covered in this process summary.
ing gas-see LBT, laser beam torch), while the others are
solid state lasing materials. During laser beam machining, the expulsed material forms
metal gases and vapors, which subsequently solidify to dust-4
For pulsed operation, the power supply produces short, or minute beads. In addition to protection for the lens from
intense bursts of electricity into the flash lamps, which con- molten particles or splatter, a "chip" removal system-fre-
centrate their light flux on the lasing material. The result- quently a vacuum cleaner type-is desirable to keep the op-
ing energy from the excited atoms is released at a charac- crating area clean and free from dust.
teristic, constant frequency. The monochromatic light is
amplified during successive reflections from the mirrors. Practical Applications'
The thoroughly collimated light exits through the partially
reflecting mirror to the lens, which focuses it on or just be-
low the surface of the workpiece. The small beam diver- LBM is not a mass material removal process-it is a fast,
gence, high peak power and single frequeucy provide excel- easily controlled process with a non-contact, non-wearing
lent, small-diameter spots of light with energy densities up tool that imparts minimal heat and thermal distortion with
to 3 x 10 l watts per square inch 14.6 x 109 W/cml which minimal demands upon fixturing. The high energy density
can sublime almost any material. Cutting requires energy in a well-focused beam will melt and vaporize any material.
densities of 101 to2 109 watts per square inch 11.55 x 106 to Contour cuts and slitting of thin steels, aluminum, titanium
1.55 x 10 W/cm 1, at which rate the thermal capacity of alloys, and other metals are done at rapid rates with nar-
most materials cannot conduct energy into the oody of the row kerfs; continuous-wave (CW) modes or high pulse rates
w;orkpieee fast enough to prevent melting and vapor- are used. Texturing and etching are performed at lower
ization. The initial or leading edge of the power spike is energy levels. Small hole drilling can be done at shallow
most important in CO 2 lasers to initiate vaporization in angles (15 degrees) to the surface. Multiple pulses permit
nonmetal drilling, which then promotes better absorption
of the energy. Workpiece surface reflectivity, absorption
coefficient, thermal conductivity, specific heat and heat of 'Laser technology isadvancinarso rapidly that current limitations frequently
vaporization are all important when considering a laser are removed by more recent developments. A check with active laser-
application, equipment buiders is recommended for
new applicat;'.q.
12-55
12.6 Laser Beam Machining-LBM
hole dri;ling to 40:1 depth-to-diameter ratios on 0.005-inch of the laser's speed and precision. Viable applications for
10.13 mm diameter holes, while larger holes, 0.050-inch LBM range from diamond wire draw dies to catheter drill-
11.27 mm diameter, can be drilled in 0.50-inch 112.7 mm ing to food sieves. The ability to direct and focus the laser
thick material. Trepanning is done for still larger holes us- beam into inaccessible locations permits unusual appli-
ing NC or a circle-generator attachment. Plastics, rubber, cations, such as balancing rotors dynamically while they
cloth and similar organic-base materials cut more easily are rotating.
than the metals. Ceramics, glasses and composites of many
types are drilled, scribed and diced. Microcircuit com- For additional applications, see Laser Beam Torch. sec-
ponents. resistor trimming or circuit "deburring" make use tion 12.7-particularly for slitting and for contour cutting
Operating Parameters
TABLE 12.6-1 Typical Values for LBM Operating Parameters and Process Capabilities
OPERATING PARAMETERS
PROCESS CAPABILITIES,
12-56
I
Laser Beam Machining-LBM 12.6
Material Removal Rates and Tolerances concern. Removal or modification of such lasered surfaces
Material removal rates are slow. approximately 4 x 10
4
is recomr ended (see section 18.3).
3 3
cubic inches per hour 16.5 x 10- cm /hrl. Nevertheless. a
laser can drill or slot thin materials faster than a workpmece
can be repositioned by numerical control. Even if multiple Equipment and Tooling
laser pulses are necessary. each pulse typically takes only The principal equipment emphasis is the control of the po-
one-thousandth second. The removal rates are inversely sition of the workpiece under the focal point of the beam.
proportional to the material thickness. Even deeper holes Multiple-axis control is needed to allow the beam to follow
can be drilled rapidly. for example. 1 to 3 seconds for a undulations in: the workpiece. Computer or numerical con-
0.020-inch 10.50 mm diametri hole in 0.10-inch 12.5 mm trol makes use of the easy integration of the laser parame-
thick nickel alloy. Because flash lamps have a long life. ters-intensity. focus, pulse rate-with motion control or
costs :an be reduced to a few cents per slot. and for mul- automation. Beam deflecting, beam splitting for multiple
tiple arrays of holes, to tenths-of-a-cent per hole. Holes and machining sites, circle generators for trepanning. special
slots will have irregular surfaces or roundness and will con- lenses (toric, axicon). rotating mirrors, and time sharing
tain taper. yet location accuracies up to 0.001 inch are all employed in special laser systems. The absence of
10.025 mml are commonplace and limited primarily by mechanical contact, the low-inertia beam and the nearly
the accuracies available in the positioning devices for the forceless characteristics of the laser simplify the fixturing.
workpiece. Conventional. axicon or toric lenses are used to
attain better productivity in unusual applications.
Machining Characteristics
Surface Technology The ease with which the laser beam can be manipulated
Laser machined surfaces are usually rough and have a re- enhaaces its versatility. Adequate eye protection is needed
cast texture. The rapidity of the application of energy re- for bath direct and reflected laser light. The United States
duces the heat-affected zone and recast to less than that Bumeau of Radiological Health has issued requirements
from other thermal processes. The usual recast is about that laser manufacturers should follow to assure personnel
0.001 - to 0.002-inch 10.025 to 0.050 minI thick, with some safety. The CO:! laser wavelength is opaque to plastic, so
as much as 0.010 inch 10.25 mm, with a heat-affected zone shielding or enclosure is simplified. Dust control is neces-
below the recast. as shown in figure 12.6-13. In many ma- sary. and vacuum systems are the prevalent method for
terials, a hardness alteration will also occur below the sur- removing'the -chips." The gases released by some mate-
face. These surface effects can be detrimental to product rials during LBM should be checked with OSHA for safety
integrity if the surface is highly stressed or if fatigue life is a effects.
12-57
12.6 Laser Beam Machining-LBM
SELECTED DATA
There are several valid techniques for selecting operating
parameters for LBM. The steps in table 12.6-2 are recom-
mended as one logical sequence. Supporting data come
from the other figures and tables in accordance with the
terms as explained in figure 12.6-2.
Parameters
ITEM DATA
*See also D.Sliney, Health hazards from laser material processing. Tech-
nical paper MR75-581, Society of Manufacturing Engineers. Dearborn, Mi.
1975. A
M
I
12-58
Laser Beam Machining-LBM 12.6
Flash lamps
Workpiece
okic
Divergence angle
' Lens spot s--
...:---
.. --
.-=..
: ..size
. . ... .,
Vaporization
dH
*Distance within which the spot size (s) is no more than 40% larger than at focus. Depth of focus'
A.lM W pps
SOURCE: Modified from J. F.Ready. Selecting a laser for material working. Laser Focus (March 1970). p.40.
*Neodymium-yttrium aluminum garnet. I
* COl plus He plus N,mixture.
12-59
12.6 Laser Beam Machining-LBM
Drilling Welding
intensity >1 O"W/cm' intensity <1 05W/cm'
Vapor -i - - ------
~u-suf -Surfade
-t rmeraiur eriraire-
*0~~ur- miraeSbsiae-
cciii ~ dmfa.~gr%.
Melt- ice s -
yt wd
0._::- I emea
F- cc -srto/
Room
Time
Figure 12.6-3 Difference in energy and absorption between laser drilling and laser welding. (S. R.
Bolin, Pulsed-laser metalworking, American Machinist 120 (October 1976) p. 124)
Gaussian Mode (or TEM~c)' Ideally suited for Mixed Mode (approximately 50% each of
high quality cutting. Power densities up to 109 TEMQ0 and TEMo,). Flat topped distributionI
watts/inch2 [1.55 x 101 W/cm?]. Mode quality is makes this model ideal for welding and heat
maintained throughout the pov -r range. treating.
Figure 12.6-4 Laser excitation modes for cuffing versus welding. (Courtesy of GTE-Sylvania)
12-60
Laser Beam Machining-LBM 12.6
0
0 02 04 06 08 1.0 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Pulse length. ms Pulse length. ms
Figure 12.6-5 Pulse configurations for C02 lasers. Left, short pulse length (less than 100 ps to peak);
right, long pulse length. (Courtesy of Coherent, Inc.)
20
15
7)
CL
a; 10
C. Maximum pulse rate
0)
0 20 40 60 80 100
Pulse rate. pps
Figure 12.6-6 Operating range of a flash-lamp pulsed Nd-YAG laser. (Courtesy of Coherent, Inc.)
12-61
12.6 Laser Beam Machining-LBM
500 ________ 1_______1___ 250 TABLE 12.6-5 Selecting a Laser Type for Machining
% Continuous wave power. W
%APPLICATION LASER TYPE
400 ---- 4-200
% % NLarge holes (to 0.060-inch
Average [1.52 mm] diameter) Ruby, Nd glass. Nd-YAG
_____power 150 3: Larger holes (trepan ned) Nd-YAG, C02
~300 %1
o Small holes (>0.010-inch
[0.25 mm] diameter) Ruby, Nd glass. Nd-YAG
~ 20 0 ___0_ Drilling (punching or percussion) Nd-YAG, Ruby
20 -i- 100
% Thick cutting 002 + gas assist*
%< Thin slitting metals Nd-YAG
100 ---- 50 Thin slitting plastics C02
Peak%
power -=---Plastics C02
Aluminum 1.0
Titanium 1.5
Iron 1.8 0
Molybdenum 2.2Ri
Tungsten 2.9
12-62
Laser Beam Machining-LBM 12.6
5 4 -50
10,2_
-2
1 10's 300 20
5
3
8 10
-3 400 1
1- -10.7
(L 6 2 500_
5-2
< 5- 5 -050
2 -------4-
5
5 05 03
-1.5 800 1
-02
0.2
3 1 "10' 1000 5---72-
."0.1
7-
-- -8 --- - - .1
0.9 -0.05 -
-0.03
.02
-0.01
0.005
Figure 12.6-8 Energy nomograph. (Courtesy of Photonetics Associates; reprinted from 1979 Laser Focus
Buyers' Guide)
12-63
12.6 Laser Beam Machining-IBM
This nomograph relates the energy and power of a laser beam to its temporal
Average characteristics. In the example. the right side of the nomograph shows that a Peak
power 50 nanosecond
kilowatts. the leftpulse
side containing
shows that,20formillijoules
the 20 mJhas a peak
pulse, power
a pulse of 400
repetition power
Pulse
energy
10 PW 100 J l0w
1mW1 Pulse 1 kW
duration
Pulse
repetition 100p
frequency
10 RIW0.Hz10mlol10k
100 mW 10k
10 kHz 1 100 ps
low100kHZ 10 nsJ
10W10MkHz 105*Js
100 MHz
1kW
I 1 GHz 1 1GW
lO~nJ 10GW
Figure 12.6-9 Pulse energy and power nomograph. (Courtesy of Photonetics Associates; reprinted from
1979 Laser Focus Buyers' Guide)
12-64
Laser Beamr Machining-LBM 12.6
0/0
cC
0.
1.0
0.5
Figure 12.6-11 Typical depth and diameter values for pulsed-laser drilling in ferrous alloys. (Adapted
from S. R.Bolin. p. 126.)
12-65
12.6 Laser Bpqm Machining-LBM
60
50
c40
20
10 [254 mm/si
[0.76 mm]
0
0 0.015 0.020 0.025 0 030 0.035
Cloth thickness, in
Figure 12.6-12 C02-laser cloth cutting (250 watts TEM~o). (Courtesy of Coherent, Inc.)
0.010
[0.25 mm]
C:
0
N
E 0.005 Ha
Z0 Predominate afetdon
12-66
Laser Beam Machining-LBM 12.6
TABLE 12.6-6 C0 2-Laser Drilling of Plastics____
HOLE DIAMETER
PULSE POWER
MATERIAL THICKNESS Top Bottom LENGTH LEVEL
inin w'IW& in ms
S
0.016
.2 0.012
_CD
0.008
0.004
024 6810 12
Figure 12.6-14 Ceramic scribing chart-penetration depth versus speed using 185-watt continuous-
wave 002 laser. Shaded area reflects operating domain expected In production environment with a 1.5-
t ~Inch focal length lens. (Courtesy of Coherent, Inc.)
12-67
12.6 Laser Beam Machining-LBM
Work material: ABS Plastic Strip Cloth, Single Ply Brass Caps
Workpiece
configuration:
Laser equipment
type: C02 CO2 Nd-glass Ruby
Operating conditions
power level: 50W 40J
Remarks: Drilled while strip moving. Computer controlled nesting Vibratory bowl feed for
Laser deflection used to and cutting. workpieces.
reduce relative motion. Seals edge so no fraying.
12-68
Laser Beam Machining-LBM 12.6
TABLE 12.6-7-Continued
Workpiece
corigur"on. 0 0,3-i:ct, dia
"
0 110 in 15
f-U~~~~~~~ *
Lm-'
~ .. inIlIul 10i
Laser equipment
type, Ruby COl Ruby
Operating conditions
power level" 3J 250 W 14.5 J
Tolerance, in
12-69
S~ -- - -
12.6 Laser Beam Machining-LBM
TABLE 12.6-7-Continued
Workpiece
configuration:
Laser equipment
type: C02 Ruby Ruby
wavelength. jf : 10.6 0.6 0.69
oe~wer, W: 250 50 J 50 J
Operating conditions
power Ievel: 4W 27 J 25 J
1
4
12-70 _
Laser Beam Torch-LBT 12.7
PROCESS SUMMARY
_________________Plane mrirror
Focused beam f
12-71
12.7 Laser Beam Torch-LBT
TABLE 12.7-1 Typical Values for LBT Operating Parameters
Gas
types: Oxygen, nitrogen, argon, air, helium
pressure: 20 to 120 psi [140 to 825 kPa]
nozzle diameter: 0.020 to 0.040 inch [0.5 to 1 mm]
nozzle gap: 0,020 .+.0.010 inch [0.5 0.25 mm]
Focus
spot size: 0.002 inch [0.05 mm] smallest diameter
0.003 to 0.010 inch [0.07 to 0.25 mm] usual
depth of focus*: 0.030 to 0.33 inch [0.76 to 8.4 mm]
focal length: 1.5 to 5 inches [40 to 130 mm]
foca! pcint: Surface vi biii1y 6310w
*Distance between which spot size is no more than 40 percent largerthan at focus.
Sura., Technology been built. Laser cutting forces are almost nonexistent so
A heat-affected zone (HAZ) is present in all laser cuts but fixturing is less complicated. Rotating mechanisms for the
the rapidity of the metal removal can leave less HAZ than lens (or mirrors) are employed when trepanning larger-size
competing processes (see table 12.7-7 and LBM section, holes.
figure 12.6-13). Surface roughness is high-125 to 250 mi-
croinches R, 13.2 to 6.3 pai being typical. The amount of
stock removal needed to clean up the roughness or HAZ is
minimal and ranges from one-fourth to three times the Machining Characteristics
stock thickness. Dross attached to the underside of the cut It is essential to keep the laser beam focused accurately on
usually is zasy to remove, the workpiece. Optical and mechanical contour followers
are availabl, to adjust the torch focus when workiS on
sheets with undulations. Adequate fume and sight pro-
Equipment and Tools tection are needed for LBT.
LBT equipment is --iailable in 1/4- to 16-kW sizes in
worktable sizes up to 4 by 6 feet 11.3 by 2 mi. NC, optically The noncontacting tool in LBT increases tool life almost
or mechanically guided torches or workpieces are available indefinitely. The choice of gas used can be influenced by
to cut straight or intricate contours. Multiple torch com- the need for protection of the workpiece material (see table
binations and LBT combined with punch presses have 12.7-6).
12-72
Laser Beam Torch-LBT 12.7
SELECTED DATA 1o -.
a- jos
~aCr,atio; .1
10' I , I I
Focal 10-.' 10"6 10"5 10-' 10
3
10"2 10-'
Gas Cutdance
material thickness
ri Figure 12.7-3 Laser material
processing appli-
Gap/ ,.../
/ ( cations in terms of power density and interaction
zv&piece; time. (A. Schachrai and M. Castellani-Longo, Appli-
cation of high power lasers in manufacturing, Annals
Heat-affected zone of the CIRP. Vol. 28/2, 1979, p. 466)
Kerr
TABLE 12.7-2 Steps to Select LBT Operating TABLE 12.7-3 Penetration of CO2 Laser In Perspex
Parameters (Boxboard) with Various Gases
ITEM DATA GAS PENETRATION
1. Workpiece material _
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
in
I.
characteristics Engineering drawing and Helium 0.93 -
table 12.7-5 Nitrogen 0.94
2.Applicability of LBT Comparison of saw, nibble, Oxygen 0.89 i
plasma- arc, oxyacetylene, Air 0.96
etc., with laser, table 12.7-4 Argon 1.00
and figures 12.7-3 and 12.7-4 Carbon dioxide 0.87
3. Select assisting gas Tables 12.7-3 and 12.7-6 and Argon/hydrogen, 75/25 0.91
figure 12.7-19
4. Material thickness SOURCE: F.W. Lunau, Boc-Murex Welding Research and Development
(cut depth) Engineering drawing Laboratories, London.
5. Select power level
and cutting rate Figures 12.7-5 to 12.7-25
Table 12.7-7
6. Estimate kerf and
heat-affected zone (HAZ) Table 12.7-7 and figures
12.7-20 to 12.7-25
7. Template design with trim
allowance Figure 12.7-20 and item 6
8. Cutting gap setting Trial cut to verify parameters
and edge finish
12-73
12.7 Laser Beam Torch-LBT
200
A Laser-oxygen jet
9 Plasma-arc
160 160 Oxygen-fuel gas
c120 z
80
40
(1.020 m/mini II -t
40
1I
12-74
Laser Beam Torch-LBT 12.7
TABLE 12.7-4 Comparison of Cutting Rates Among Competing Processes ______
TYPE WORK
II PRESS BAND OXYACETYLENE PLASMA-ARC
LASER TORCH
250 W plus
MATERIAL OF CUT THICKNESS NIBBLER SAW TORCH TOCH2 gas assist
Cutting Speed
____ in ,ii~ in/min __-W in/min __ in/mm in in/min IiN~ in/mm i ii
Titanium alloy Contour 0.020 8.5 0 22: - 200 N
Ct~ntour 0.062 5_ 160
Cnor0.125 ri~ 20 0S 44 'O 6 60 120
Straight 0.250 ~j ~23 ~O 100 ~24~ 167 ~A2~ 200 ~
Contour 0.250 30 075 50 --t.25tg 60 5
Contour 0.50 2 120 35 ~ 40
Contour 1 25 ~ 5 ~ 4 0 2i~ i~~
Contour 2 10~ ~16 0 22 0S' 5 01
Steel Contour 0.020 6j5 8 w8
Contour -q-~5. 40
Contour 10125 34.4 20 j _A5jQ
4130 Alloy steel Contour 0.100 30
3025! 20 Y 30 30 05 65 7
4340 Alloy steel Contour 0.375 8i2 14 J6 80 Z: n 88 2~ 35
Contour 0.75 ~1 ~ ~10 $2 50 .3 60 15-
Stainless steel Contour 0.050 i~~30 ~7~ 25 10 i~2~ 10 jO2518 0
16 kw lasert
TABLE 12.7-5 Properties of Metals and Alloys Important for Oxygen-Laser Cutting ______
12-75
12.7 Laser Beam Torch-LBT
U.
C-
-! OW -,04-2 -
A R.
M 0a
00
0*
Go - C~
C)I- Q
(CID
rlV D qc0
CM-r 01j 0
C -J0 t
v )1
~
( A
M0IT0 ~ aOC 00(
( ' IDQa00)
Di)C -04
of (0D 00 .U)
VI 0
.000f)
C C Q)i~ 0 g -
- CO -II
99) IT M @#_:t C-=
0 C
MN0 01 x 1- 3:
01
CL 0) 0oc)
____
___;__ ___ 127N_ _ _ _ _
- - - - -)
Laser Beam Torch-LBT 12.7
-
z 0z
- CI
o 0 I 0
I LIr -
IL I ~~-~-- - ~'-
1 ~ 1', 16550-O
0 3:
w 00
t 00M0 0 0 0) 0Y 000 00 0- 0. 0l 00 0 0 0 00 00 000n
000 7 0 0q 0 0f 000 00 0 0 ' uc. O ) ) -000 00
C0 OIM O (D wU
u)
0N'j
C\
OV
0' 0EU n ~ Y
IlDf 00
N~
W U )
102
100 N UC( )0D u(u ~CJ
o c
I I.
1w -RE:J
0N ) CMJ 0D 0 M0 00Vit L 'C) V) C) C- O rito c0)
a) 0 00 .- 0- 00
~~oE' S 10(t
.-.- ~ )~ C N (1)1 0 V9.-
N N
N-
N C) U)C (0 0( I ) ,~O 9 (00
R
?
Cv
C ~~ 0 ~
0 ~ ~ N ( . 00~
O C
- 10 - - - -0 t; '
0 . 0 00
L IC 2O 000 10
foO r
P 0 CO
12-77
12.7 Laser Beam Torch-LBT
IllwI
E Coo C~C-co Fj
_5
-. oMV O0
00 000 000 6_ 00 __ _5 _i __ II
a0 000 000 0 0 o0
00 -0 000
aa
000 0w 0C
'A 000
coo 000 0 0 0 0 00 W0 W U0 000 0 0 0 0 Ct) C D
OqUct qq qqq0 qDI~
C!W R~C o~D 0 0 f0
0-.- 0 (0 O D 9-C~ U) C UJ
ME C4
Ct ('CiC0
0C C.CJ tCU) Ifl flt0 0WO D U) ) U) 90 0 CD -:U0 c0
0
CD C
CI - - - -
10r f 0 C~ t
4D 0
12-=7t
---- ~ -- :
Laser Beam Torch-LBT 12.7
.oz -
I'0
C) Nt 4
00 0
0 0
0 0 0~~~~-
,0 0 0 0 000 -
ito)COL
) CD
"'
C5o e. c i *
0
0 0c
S ;
0>
00 0 00 01!q
C5 6 ;C 0 C S 0 00
, 000 0 c 0 00 000 0a 0
CO co 00 c 00 000 0 00
23 n 0) 0 P -3to c a C COC. CO I O 0 U - CJ
q 0------------ 0 to to in t&Dmo
00
0io 0~c 6666 00 Co 0o0 0 00 000 600 doo 0
0 0
lu E
M C.
12-79
12.7 Laser Beam Torch-LBT
I ~~ & -- -;A
~Eli
(M
(D ta (1o CocoD co C
0 0
C)i, o
0 0
C
0
C'0 .- ) 0 08
Sd 6oo 0 0000 000 000
00 0l
V) 00 0 C~l r( 0 00
4M~ ~ to \ _oa
IK I. r iN , --- -- Nt N
M M.
o~ (D L ) L o 0 Cj Vc ~ O LL ci,JW
V, M
LC Lf 0 0 U,
.C) C1 o l O l l )( ot
c. ><
00 6 -~ ;C;6 0 0
*~ C', C'-
0 E ~ 40a
L U 0 0 CD.
.j F Czi C;
12-80
--- 91 MAi
,z--A
- H -'4rs -
UCY M'
to C"jCM0 0) 0O2
l( 0 0~
0 C0
0)o 000006
-~ S'4
00 00 0RqP
.5000 000 0 00
U)
a E
tu w 0 C 00000 LO~
0 Oc'iof)0 0 00 020 0 C0 02 0 0U0C -- 0
=
c q C)toC
R (00(
L)JO
P
)0
Ci 0
CY
-u)
N
C)Lou) coU)
~ 1(0(0 \l'JLO.JU)
L)
14
O02
U)
0
'2
0U)
0
00
c) v
U)
W)
M 0
CM. w)
0 00
0'2
cm c
00
-2t
6
66S 00 o 0 0 00ow000 0 0OD0 0)0 06660000000V)MC
E OL DVr T t oc\ -t l DL
CyM ~
0U
E E~
-0 2o 0 : is (
Lu a)r
12-81
12.7 Laser Beam Torch-LBT
40_0
Cl 000 0 0
0f 00f ( 4 I
cv cm'
m
0 900
MU6
D
(0c c
r sit.
NO f, NM 00 No N, M
N N
m - 0)0 N 0r Wa 0) co) -mVcu-0
c; a~ 0 00
0 N N) 1C - N Cv, N O 0 0v 0 N 0i C ) 0 0 0 N0 N-0 )0S
*R .- 0 9 O--..,C N 9 9 9 ' 9 '
I E)
C FL
a 4)
V 2 )M(
'
-U
i 0 co nm (D
rm 0. C _Z5 .2 E 00
V.zx47
-)z_ rC DI I
CO cd Z: MET
t- to 0 4) 5 *-_ -a -d
Laser Beam Torch-LBT 12.7
- ~Zo M~-i
c-, e
U.
c
01-L_ -
0 At Lnco0
I- 0 t ql
a 000.
O_ Lf Lf ~ n \
cm C~ l f C~ l
W 0 0 00 C,0
0 0 00 coo C.)C,
a'
00000 0 0 0 0 0 000 coOZ 000
Z :
l
u
co C CDM DCC cDi SJ M l CV D~
T MCD% MC ~ CDj C~iL)l
M (DO(- CMCM CC D
l
aam
a )0C ) U o ( )0 o N CWc ;0
CDDL
.lCD)C C) CO 4: CO) it CM CV~i
o !F
CS 00010 0 o'000
6' C;C5c C o 0 0 it) 0 ( o
Z)~0 00- 00 0 0.C
00
0t' 00C4
I Wu C C 0 ( 0 (a0C w = 0
Nf.: 0
000
a.*
00 CL w0I j;a 0 .0 01. ..'
W,0
:3 CL
vai~
Zo
0 '
0 0U a o
w
H aE
CL
o
0~ 00
12-83
12.7 Laser Beam Torch-LBT
LU -1
Uww
XLL N
U.
Fi i
2 _M3
o ~h*3M
II it
rD 00 N
0 C 00 0 0 0 0 3
0-. i - c6 4 -- -z
I-('.~ C')..
,-C~C~ 0 0 0 0 0 OU)C'J 0O)0 c0 i -t 'CJ
I:
c%1a0~~~(A ccJq U 00a0' 0 cci 0 It ccOU
!:icr&0
M0 00 '-0Ir 00000 0 L)00 >0 00 0
-0 000
CM C0
*.l) N~ _) (D ?!
0-
co 03JI
>. ,"l o)ISi
I-
z4
-- -w- Q -CO~
Laser Beam Torch-LBT 12.7
500 Hz_____ __
10
00 0 .80 0.
C',0
:2 0 .8 .
o go
C1C
- 0.4 0 0.2
0 00.20. 0.C08.
2ength
Hzso Puls
~lgue 127-5
ulsepowe capbiliies f 0 watcniuu-wv O)02lse.(oreyo
Coernt Inc.)
VN
120
12.7 Laser Beam Torch-LBT
240
Machinability Rating
160
.S
C
"" 140
COm 120 2
-- T
100
80
-[2.54 m/min]
60
40 80
Plain carbon and Titanium and alloys
20low alloy steels O
Material thickness, in
Figure 12.7-6 Cutting rates for 325 waft C02 laser with 02 assist in slainless steel, carbon and low al-
loy steel, and titanium alloys. (Courtesy of Coherent, Inc.)
-
, : lo alo steelsl
12-86
Laser Beam Torch-LBT 12.7
800 ('-- -600
c 400 -
600-
9 300 -
200
S
40-- -- --
400100
- 6250W Power=1000W
Poer =1250 watts0
E
__
Z:5O 5W
:E0 005 010 015 020 025
E
20 - - (6.4 mm]
200 Thickness, in
0.240-
2 0,200 - -- __
U,
0,16
0,12
0.080 -
Figure 12.7-8 Maximum material removal rate versus thickness for CW Nd-YAG laser cutting carbon
steel with 02 assist. (Courtesy of Holobeamn Laser Inc.)
12-87_______ ___
12.7 Laser Beam Torch-LBT
150
1600
125 3 2 m/mm E
lO a, 1200
100
E
25 -
0
80080
[20 rn/mmn) Thic ness in2
[20 in/mm] hc n ss 61 rm
600
E 600
S
2 400
D)
c400
E20
Power 1000W
200 E 200
0ower fir M
00
0 004 008 0.12 0.16 0.20 0 0.02 004
CO asrwiharo
gsasit.(. aso n
0.06 0.08 0.10
Thcnssn[5.08 mm)
thicknes i [2.54 mm]
Figure12.7-11 C02 laser cutting rate for 1018
low Figure 12.7-13 C02 laser cutting rate for 6061
carbon steel. TEM 0 mode cutting at 1000 watts
with no assisting gas. (Courtesy of GTE-Sylvania) Aluminum alloy. TEMo mode cutting with 02 assist.
(Courtesy of GTE-Sylvania)
12-88
Laser Beam Torch-LBT 12.7
500 12 '
500 watts CW
02 1
0 0.025 0.050 0.075 0,100
12.54 mm
Thickness. in 0
0 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400
(10 mmJ
Figure 12.7-14 C02 laser cutting rate for Hastel- Thickness. in
Ioy alloy X. TEMoo mode cutting with 02 assist.
(Courtesy of GTE-Sylvania) Figure 12.7-16 Acrylic cutting rates with C02
laser with air assist. (R. J. Saunders and M. Pasturel,
C02 laser beam machining of plastic and glass, Tech-
nical paper MR74-958, Society of Manufacturing Engi-
neers, Dearborn, MI 1974, p. 8)
V/
4 (13.1 fpm)--
,
1.3 mm (0.051 in)
700W
Air r_,.-T
-- 4
5.0 \
0 3 3.0-
.) 2
AISI 1045
.- I- 6.2 mm (.24 in) 2.0 -rapel
1
_
I? -1 10
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 35
[304 kPaJ 0 _
Figure 12.7-15 Cutting speed asa function of gas Figure 12.7-17 LBT cutting of plywood and lum-
pressure in cutting Inconel alloy 718, Ti-6AI-4V al- ber with 250 watt CO 2 laser with 50 psi N2 gas as-
loy and AISI 1045 steel. (A. Schachrai and sist. (C. C. Peters and H. L. Marshall, Cutting wood
M. Castellani-Longo, p. 466) materials by laser, FPL report 250, Forest Products
Laboratory, 1975)
12-89
12.7 Laser Beam Torch-LBT
0 044 30
f1 mm; 0W 1t
I E 20
0 036S
( 10 (0 39 in)
20 waItts
0028
04 328
0024 1___0
Figure 12.7-18 LIST cutting of parallel-sided slots Figure 12.7-19 Penetration Of 002 laser in box-
in 3/4-inch thick plywood for steel rule die manu- board (Perspex) at 200 mm (7.87 in) focal length
facture with C02 laser using inert gas assist. (Cour- and 130 mm/mmni (5.1 in/mmn) cutting speed, (Cour-
tesy of Coherent, Inc.) tesy of F.W. Lunau, BOC-Murex Welding Research
and Development Laboratories, London)
TABLE 12.7-8 TsIe Requirements for Drilling 0.004- to 0.005-Inch [0.1 to 0.13 mm] Diameter Holes with Nd-YAG Laser 7
I WORK
ILAMP
DRILL TIME REQUIREMENT CURRENT
AVERAGE LASER
POWER OF 1.O6sm
MAXIMUM
THICKNESS
WORK
MATERIAL THICKNESS min USED WAVELENGTH DRILLIED
Oxygen Argon
in ass Ist Air assist A W in -
AZ 31 Magnesium
alloy 0.123 -. 1~ very 12.50 0.36' 35 42 0.123
Slong
12-90 A
Laser Beam Torch-LBT 12.7
30-60 Taper-..-.\
3' Tper--= nc
R =0.030
/
F-'a"1 inch
[0.76 rmm]
Start of cut
OXYGEN CUTTING PLASMA - ARC
Width of cut
(Kerf)
Max HAZ
Extent of HAZ - -
EMA~x
in 0.050 0.375 0 200
-
Figure
Inc.)
12.7-20 Comparison of kerfs produced by torch cutting techniques. (Courtesy of Coherent.
12-91
12.7 Laser Beam Torch-LBT
E (5mml
12
:9 t.5 -- + E 0075
14
12-92
Laser Beam Torch-LBT 12.7
00 E
0 o c
c-
a LL
I\ c~0
00
CC
-,a Z
0
E C?
ICx -, CD
~.c .5
(*)0 E
C:
o. cE E
E E
oo
0 0 c 0 0
0 00 0 L 0Lo 0o 0
o 0 o 0;
U! ~
WnWT~ & C~ o U! V f Wx
czV
029
12.7 Laser Beam Torch-LBT
Workpiece
configuration: - [0 020-inch dia
0 180 inch
-5 panel--
0.004-inch pa e
diameter holes -
Hole spacing on
Laser equipment
gas. 02
Operating conditions
power level: 250 W
beam mode: CW CW CW
Tolerance, in:
Remarks: Drill during extrusion using 5 to 15 holes. Good saving by nesting parts.
optical tracking. NC controlled
Extrusion up to 300 fpm.
No deburring.
No
Wallresidue.
thicknesses range from
0.010 to 0.040 inch. Pulse
length depends on hole in
outer wall; some holes
through both walls.
12-.94
Laser Beam Torch-LBT 12.7 I
TABLE 12.7-9-Continied
Work material: Aluminum Honeycomb Fired Ceramic Alumina Stainless Steel
Heat Exchanger Component
Workpiece
configuration:
36 in
0.25 in
14in 24 in
12 in 0.025-inch thick
0.062-inch thick
Laser equipment
type: CO2 C02 CO
wavelength, jpm: 10.6 10.6 10.6
powei: 1,000 W 50W 2,500 W
gas: Oi N2 02
gas pressure, psi: 40
Operating conditions
power level: 1,000 W 50W 1,000 W
beam mode: CW Pulsed CW
pulse length, ms:
0.5
cycle time:
feed rate, in/mm: 90 2 to 4 in/s 450
Tolerance, in:
No HAZ
Remarks: In contour cuts, no burrs or Scribing with closely spaced LBT substitute for large
bent combs, holes, 0.003-inch dia. by blanking dies.
0.008-inch deep. Vacuum-chuck worktable
with NC motion.
12-95
A
&
J~ iI i ~ Z_ II
-
Workpiece
configuraion'
Z 0.118 in 1 070
0035 in
0 055 in-- h
I-*-J
Laser equipment
type. YAG YAG YAG
wavelength, sin: 1.06 1.06 1.06
power. 70 J 200 W 600 W
gas: 02 yes 02
Operating conditions
power level- 55 J 200 W 600 W
'eam mode. Pulsed multi CW multi Multi
pulse length, ms: 1
cycle time: 10 shots at 1 pps
feed rate, in, min
50 50
Tole! ance, in.
Remarks:
Slitting Slitting
-4
12-96
Plasma Beam Machining-PBM 12.8
l SConstrcted
I arc Operating Parameters
I Plasma
Standoff TABLE 12.8-1 Typical Values for PBM Operating
%- Shield gas
(secondary)r
supply
Workpiece type: Direct current
wattage: Up to 200 kW
current: 50 to 1,000 A
Kerf --
Plasma let Primary gas
(Molten metal removed) type: Argon-nitrogen (80%-20%), hydrogen
flow: 15 to 20( ft3/hr [0.42 to 5 66 m3/hr]
Figure 12.8-1 PBM schematic Shielding gas
type: Nitrogen, oxygen, water, compressed air, C02
flow: Up to 400 ft3/hr [11.3 m3/hr]
Principles Water(inshield
place flow
of
Plasma beam machining (PBM) removes materi-r' by utiliz- shielding
ing a superheated stream of electrically ionized gas (see fig- gas): Up to 15 gal/hr [56.8 L/hr]
ure 12.8-1). The 20,000' to 50,000F 111,000* to 28,,t'0 C
plasma is created inside a water-cooled nozzle by elec- Plasma
trically ionizing a suitable gas such as nitrogen, hydrogen, temperature: 20,0000 to 50,000F [11,100' to 27,800C]
argon, or mixtures of these gases. Since the process does Cutting speed: 2 to 240 in/min [50 to 6,100 mm/min]
not rely on the heat of combustion between the gas and the Standoff distance: 0.25 to 3 inches [6.4 to 9.5 mm]
workpiece material, it can be used on almost any con- Nozzle orifice size: 0 062- to 0.25-inch [1.59 to 6.35 mm]
ductive metal. Generally, the arc is transferred to the diameter (figure 12.8-2)
workpiece which is made electrically positive. The
plasma-a mixture of free electrons, positively-charged ions Kerr width: 0.060- o 0.090-inch [1.52 to 2.29 mm] thin
and neutral atoms-is initiated in a confined, gas-filled plate
chamber by a high-frequency spark. The high-voltage di- 0.188 inch [4.76] for 1-inch [25.4 mm]
rect-current power sustains the arc, which exits from the plate
nozzle at near sonic velocity. The high-velocity gases blow 0.75 inch [19 mm] for 6-inch [152 mm]
plate
away the molten metal "chips." Dual-flow torches use a sec-
ondary gas or water shield to assist in blowing the molten ral
normal: 20 to 70
metal out of the kerf, giving a cleaner cut. Water shield or
arc,
special: 1 to 20
special:_1_*_to_20
injection is sometimes used to assist in confining the
blasting away the scale and reducing smoke. Greater
nozzle life and faster cutting speeds accompany use of wa- Accuracy: -0.031 inch [0.81 mm] on 0.25- to 1.375-
ter-injection-type torches. Control of nozzle standoff from inch[32 mm] on 6-to 8-inch [152
the workpiece is important. One electrode size can be used to 203 mm] plate
to machine a wide range of materials and thicknesses by Corner radii: 0.156 inch [3.9 mm] minimum (increases
suitable adjustments to the power level, gas type, gas flow with increasing cutting speeds to 1.50
late, traverse speed and flame angle. PBM is sometimes inches [38 mm] at 240 in/min (6,100
called plasma arc machining (PAM) or plasma arc cutting mm/min]
(PAC).
12-97
12.8 Plasma Beam Machining-PBM
Material Removal Rates and Tolerances for the functional purpose; however, an allowance of 1/16
Profile cutting can be done at 30 inches per minute 1760 inch I1 6 mml for finishing is typical for PBM.
mm/mini on 1-inch 125.4 mini thick aluminum plate, while
1/4-inch 16.4 mini thick carbon steel can be cut at 160 Equipment and Tools
inches per minute 14,060 mm/mini The use of water in- Hand-held plasma torches and small portable equipment
jection can increase the carbon steel cutting rates to 240 are available, as are NC or CNC programmable motion-
inches per minute 16,100 mm/min for 3/16-inch 14.76 mml controlled, multiple-torch arrangements. Optical followers
thick plate. Tables 12.8-2 and 12.8-5 through 12.8-7 show and table sizes up to 44 by 82 feet 113.4 by 25 ml are used,
the range of cutting speeds for PBM of various materials with cutting speeds controllable from 2 to 240 inches per
and thicknesses. Table 12.8-9 and figure 12.8-4 contain minute 150 to 6,100 mm/mini. Advanced systems with wa-
feed and speed data for plasma arc turning, ter injection, water shielding or water beds to catch the
dross are available. In addition to flat contour cutting, at-
The taper on the sides of the cut raxiges from 2 to 7 degrees tachments for lathe turning, grooving or gouging are made
with the straight side determined by the direction of the (see TAM).
cut. With special selection and controls, the taper can be
held to 1 to 2 degrees. The kerf width usually is 3/32 to Some advanced plasma cutting systems are designed for
3/16 inch 12.38 to 4.76 mm) for metals less than 1-inch mounting on large NC shape-cutting machines and are
125.4 mini thick and 3/8 to 3/4 inch 19.5 to 19 mml for met- equipped with torch standoff controls that automatically
als up to 6-inches 1150 mini thick. Corner radius is a min- find and maintain the correct torch standoff from the plate.
imum of 5/32 inch [3.97 mml on thinner plates. Tolerances
for slots and holes ordinarily range from 1/32 inch Tooling is simple because there is little load reaction from
10.81 minI on 1/4-to 1-3/8-inch 16.4 to 35 mini thick the torch.
plates to 1/8 inch 13.18 mini on 6-inch [152 mml thick
plates.
12-98
Plasma Beam Machining-PBM 12.8
SELECTED DATA
6I
;E 4
61 iCA2
Figure 12.8-2 Material removal rates for PBM with various gases and nozzle orifice sizes. (R. K.
Springborn, ed., Non-traditional machining processes, Dearborn, Ml: American Society of Tool and Manufac-
turing Engineers, 1967, p. 163) Zi
TABLE 12.8-2 Plasma Cutting Guide for Common Steel, Stainless Steel and Aluminum
POWER SELECTION
THICKNESS SPEED Amperage, A
in OE inm (steel Stainless steel Aluminum
70150 105
100 200140
10210 135
430 550
0.50 0 170135
40__ .190 120
70 260 25 180_
135 50027
15 1,00040
210100
280 1,000
SOURCE: J.A Bagley, Plasma arc cutting. Technical paper MR69-578. Society of Manufacturing Engineers. Dearborn,
Ml, 1969. p.23.
12-99
12.8 Plasma Beam Machining-PBM
TAB3LE 12.8-2-Continued
POWER SELECTION
WORKPIECE CUTTING
THICKNESS SPEED Amperage, A
40 3302235530
70 9004227
800 87562040
1 10 Mm-4 i! 201515
11 M 701004
400 75035
125 105 1 58
30410 235
20 4-$$ 20 47
10
10 6590 65 385
20 .0 1800 585
350 50
1,1479 320
10 59 400 20
40__ 2 87
00
70~ 1 100055
100 750
Plasma Beam Machining-PBM 12.8
TABLE 12.8-3 Nozzle Size and Gas Flow Selection
A in tV/hr
fU~ __ ft'/hr WIN=r~ A
TABLE 12.8-4 Plasma Arc Gouging Power and Speed In 5086 Aluminum Alloy
(Constant 1/8-inch [3.2 mm) standoff, torch angle of1450, and nitrogen gas)
- 3.10 -
80 0.442- 013.1
12.8 Plasma Beam Machining-PBM
TAB3LE 12.8-5 Cuffing Speeds for Plasma Beam Machining
CUTTING SPEED
MACHINING MATERIAL ____ _ in/min
CONDITIONS THICKNESS _A_ _ _
Secondary gas
at 210 cfh10
002 witis 4 ~~QK
40 psi
30 psi 1.5 NR NR 12 16 18 24
40 psi W-5 0~
-6 t AxI
400 amperes'i054 57 2 011
1.0 30 40 40 55 50 7
Primary gas: N2 1.203258350
at 50 cfh2.142178285
20 psi2.101121160
Secondary gas: 002, -
at 210 cfh
40 psi
12-102
Plasma Beam Machining-PIBM 12.8
TABLE 12.8-6 Cutting Speeds with Water-injection PBM
CUTTING SPEED
MACHINING MATERIAL in/min
CONDITIONS THICKNESS S V
Carbon Steel Stainless Steel Aluminum
in
______ ~Best Max. Best Max. Best Max.
MACHINING MATERIAL
CONDITIONS THCNS idSelStainless Steel
0.375 50 S- ~ 55 ~ -
45 to 50 psi -
in~ degreesinn
0.188 10 t-i00
0.250 22 .100
0.312 2 .0 00
0.375 40000
4
0.437 4 0.02 0.1
12-103
12.8 Plasma Beam Mlachining-PBM
TABLE 12.8-9 Plasma Arc Turning Parameters
steels__
Rotating workpiece
Metal removal
0 0.125 0.250 0.375 0.500 0.625 0.750 0.875 1.00 f25.4 mm]
0.062 0.188
Stock thickness, in
Figure 12.8-3 Cost and time versus thickness in cuffing mild steel with plasma arc. Icost includes gas.
perishable parts and electricity, at prevailing rates in 1978, but does not include labor cost for time in-
dicated. (Courtesy of W. A. Whitney Company)
12-104
Plasma Beam Machining-PBM 12.8
Feed per revolution, in
400 tS o 012
210
001
zg 3.18
CL
105 a~ 20~
52 10
0 10 20 30 40 50f127m'min)
Carriage speed. in/mi
Figure 12.8-4 Interrelationship among some of the factors involved in plasma arc turning. (R. K.
Springborn, p. 165)
Workpiece thickness. in
001 1/8 114 4 24
Oxy-fuel-
Mild steel 7
Medium alloy sleel
Plasma arc-
Mild steel
Medium alloy seel
Stainless steel___
Aluminum - -
Laser
Mild steel
Medium alloy steel
Stainless steel
Figure 12.8-5 Comparison of plasma arc, oxy-fuel and laser processe-i in cutting metals.
12-105
-77 7=-___
SECTION 13
CHEMICAL NONTRADITIONAL
MACHINING OPERATIONS
IS
13.-1
IECEM14 PAGE ULAD-NOT FILD'--Z
, " : _ 7 ... '- ' "Cooling tion or, chemical machining of thin or smali parts.
Operating Parameters
Figure 13.1-1 CHM schematic.
Etchant
Principles Cheicl
"M types:
concentration: Aikalines. 13.1-3 proprietary mixtures
See table acids,
Chemical machining (CHM) is the controlled dissolution of oeratin
operating
a workpiece matei -a] ky contact with a strong chemical temperature: 70D to200'F [21 to 93*C]
ieagent (see figure 13.1-1). The thoroughly cleaned work- te eat ue R b r PVC. polet neprn
piece is covered with a strippahle. chemically resistant Maskana: Rubbers. PVC, polyethylene, neoprene
mask. Areas where chemical action is desired are outlined and similar plastics or elastomers
on the workpiece with the use of a teempiate and then (tables13.1-6 and131-7)
stripped of the mask. The werkpiece is then submerged in
the chemical reagent to remove material simultaneously Etching rate: 0.0002 to 0.0025 in/min [0.005 to 0.064
from all exposed surfaccs. The solution shoulu be stirred or mm/mi,) typical. 0.001 in/min
the workpiece should be agitated for more tffective and 10.025 mmimin]
more uniform action. Increasing the temperatures will also Etch factor. 1:1 usual: up to 1:3 (table 13.1-3)
expedite the action. The machined workpiece is then (ratio of undercut to depth of cut)
washed and rinsed, and the .emaining mask is removed. Metal ion content: A little is desirable but too much can
Multiple parts can be machined simultaneously ii' the same stop etching. Uncontrolled etching
tank. begins at about 75 grams per liter
f o oz/gall.
Contour machining is accomplished by successively strip-
ping masks and resubmerging the workpiece ;n the chem- Tolerance: Approximately =10% of cut depth
ical bath. Etching of the workpiece proceeds radially from (iables 13.1-8 and 13.1-9. figures
the openings i'i the masK. Thi- results in an undercut as 13.1-7 to 13.1-13)
well as a depth of cut. The ratio of distance etched beneath
the mask to the distance etched into the workpiece (the
etching factor) is typically 1:1 (figure 13.1-6). A controlled
rate of immerqion r withdrawal from the bath v' ll preduce
tapered sections. It is preferred that the workpiece be ori- Material RemToval Rates and Tolerances
ented such that the grain is in the direction of the longest The material removal rate is deteimined by the solution
cut. type. concentration and temperature. all of which are se-
lected to be compatible with the particular metallurgical
statt. of the work material (tables 13.1-3. 13.1-4. and
Practical Applications 13.1-5). While the removal rate is low. about 0.001 inch
Nearly all materials car 'e chemicallv machined: however, per minute 10.025 mm/mini. cutting occurs simultaneously
the depth of cu" has a practical limit of 0.25 to 0.5 inch 16.4 on all exposed surfaces. The depth of cut is .-antrolled by
to 12.7 mini. Large. shallow areas are especially suitable the time of immersion.
for CHM since removal is uniform and simultane( ;. No
burrs are produ( J d,,d ro workpiece surface stresses are Uniform;ty of removal rates depends upnn the chemical
ge,erated by CHM. Short-run. quick-change. low-cost tool- and metallurgical uniformity af the workpiece and the uni-
ing offers process flexibility. Thin sheets. formed sheets formity of the solution temperatwte. concentration and
and delicate cuts are particularly suitable for CHM. Sharp metal ion content (figures 13.1-2 to 13.1-51. Solution or
radii canr-t be produced in the cutting direction. workpiece agitation aids application of the etchant to the
13-3
Or
--
NO
13-4
Chemical Machining-CHM 13.1
SELECTED DATA
There are several valid techniques for selecting operating
parameters for CHM. The steps in table 13.1-2 are recom-
mended as one logical sequ,-'iu.e. Supporting data come
from the other figures and tables.
ITEM DATA
effluents
15
13-5
13.1 Chemical Machining-CHM
TABLE 13.1-3 Etchant Characterlstivs and General Applications____________ ______
METAL THAT
ETCHANT
[ CTCHANT
ETCHANT
CONCENTRATION
1
I
OPERATING
TEMPERATURE
ETCH RATE WITH
FRESH SOLUTION FACTOR*
ETCH
WILL ATTACK Fi/mwlrn
Molybdenum H2S04 :HNOj H20 1:1:1 to 5 130 -54.~ 0.001 at 13O F .0021*5
-~~_ varies With temp.v~Utn~
HN0 3:HCI.H 20 1:11lto2-
Nickel FeCI 3 420 Be' 120 .0005O toO0.00 1:1 to 3:1
Nickel-iron alloys, FeCI3 420 Be' 120 CjO49
'ti 0.0005 to 0.001 1OOM10l l5 1:1 to 3:11
Phospor-brnze
Crarni acid commercially available cold (90) 2 ~ 005 ~ ~ ~ ~ K 2
(N 4) 2S208
____________ 2.2 lb/gal [263g/L] H0 cold (0 00 0~
Silicon HNO3 :HF:H20 various 100 to 120 :j" PA, slow
Silicon steel Fed13 420 Be' 130 0001 O 2 ' 1.5 to 2:1
Silver HN0 3:H2O 50 to 90% (vol.) 100 to 120 005t 001
.il~8
FeNOI 360 Be' 120 0.00080
Stainless steel FeCI 3 420 Be' 130 I E-0.0008 1.5 to 2:1
13-6
Chemical Machining-CHM 13.1
TABLE 13.1-4 Comparison of Data and Characteristics of Systems for Chemical Milling Titanium, Steel, Aluminum, and
Nickel- and Cobalt-Base Alloys
nifilf mmmmmfin-i_
. in mIT OF ! , piin
Steels Hydrochloric acid- 0.0006 toO0 0012 0.15t60:031] 0.125 _32j 145 5 L~3*27 30Oto 120 8o3
nircacid 7-
Nickel- and Niric acid- 0.0004 to 0.0015 '0.U014o .03d- 0.125 ~32'140 45 .8 2740 to 15010to38
cobalt- hydrochloric acid- -''
alloys .+
35 300
I Unsatisfactory results.
+ metal may not
30 __ +even etch
E v
13u 200
Co _ r
0)
2-5 - 100
2.0 0 1-
02045 50 1002030
Figure 13.1-2 Suitable working ranges for the Figure 13.1-3 Relationship between metal and
free acid and nitrate concentrations of an aqua- chloride content for an aqua-regia-type etchant
regia-type etchant for 18/8 stainless steels. (W. T. (W. T. Harris, p. 238)
Harris, Chemical milling, Oxford. Clarendon Press,
1976,p 239)
13-7
13.1 Chemical Machining-CHM
2.5 2.0
2.0 15
E E
10 05
0.5 , 0 _
2 3 4 5 6 0 10 15 20 25 30
Nitric acid, percentage by volume Sulfuric acid, percentage by volume
Figure 13.1-4 The effect on etch rate of increas- Figure 13.1-5 The effect on etch rate of increas-
ing the nitric acid concentration in an etchant con- ing the sulfuric acid concentration in an etchant
0 0 0
taining 25 percent sulfuric acid at 700C (158 F). containing 5 percent nitric acid at 70 C (158 F).
(W T Harris, p. 234) (W. T. Harris, p. 234)
Mild steel 2.0 to 3.5 0.2 to 4.1 1.5 to 3.0 100 to 250
Stainless steel 2.0 to 3.5 0.2 to 4.1 1.5 to 3.0 100 to 250
Nickel alloys 2.0 to 3 5 0.2 to 4.1 1.5 to 3.0 100 to 250
Cobalt alloys 2.0 to 5.5 0.2 to 2.0 0 to 3.0 0.5 to 1.0 125 to 250
13-8
Chemical Machining-CHM 13.1
TABLE 13.1-6 Typical Maskants for Various Metals
MASKANT MATERIAL
Exposure to Oxidizing Acids -
PROPERTY r-Exposure to Acids or Alkalis s-
Ease of application:
dipping Good to fair Poor to fair Good Good Good
flow coating Good to fair Poor to fair Good Good Good
air spraying Good Good Poor Poor Fair
Type of cure Air or heat Heat Heat Air or heat Air or heat
Tensile strength, MN/m2
air-dried (24 hr) - - - 7 max. 14 max.
heat cured 7 to 17.5 6 to 11 6 to 11 11 to 17.5 11 to 21
Resistance to etchant:
deterioration Good to Very good Very good Very good Very good
excellent
permeability Fair to good Very good Excellent Very good Very good
Heat llriit OF* 160 140 300 250 200
13-9
13.1 Chemical Machining-CHM
12 f
Position of template edge for B'. mm 1
first step ---- (04 in) 1 32
second step 10
third step4
/5
EE
838
A A;,.mm
Harris
p 26-9
TABL 131-8Typcal
urfce imesionl Tlernce
0.02
.05 .00 .00 .00 2iI ~4S 8--U 10 12
Harri, p 28-69
TABL 131-8Typcal
urfce imesionl Tle-nce
_ kRZO
Chemical Machining-CHM 13.4
TABLE 13.1-9 Tolerance on Depth of Cut
TOLERANCE, in
10 0.5m]TitaniUm alloys
9 100.25 mm] _ _
G 10
U --
0Aluminum alloys
2 -2
L) * v Best gidin
0L
0~ ~ ~ 00.0.03
a0010 03 0.4 0.5 1 m
DethofCu,
n [12.7 min) Depth of cut, in
Figure 13.1-7 CHM depth-of-cut tolerance for Figure 13.1-8 Depth-of-cut tolerance capability of
sheet materials. CHM.
______________ ~13-11__________1-
13.1 Chemical Machining-CHM
0.6115 mm]
[1.5 mm] E 03 0/
: E/
.2
0.2
Figure 13.1-9 Nominal lateral tolerance.
0.1
0
0 0.1 02 0.3
(7.6 mm]
Depth of cut. n
0.18- 0.18
-- -200 mm x 250 mm
012 0.12 - (8 in x 10 in)
E E
(0,004 i) _ E / - - 50 mmx 50 mm
(2 inx2in)
010 in),, -. 0.10
o Iof
o
Io
00
004
003 -/ /
/
-
I-/
0/..oo
6,
0'3"o
0.06 - "
/
-
004 004 1 --
02 r0 Oo I
0 02 G4 06 0.8 10 0 02 04 06 0.8 1.0
Thickness. mm (0 040 in) Thickness. mm (0.040 in)
(a) (b)
Figure 13.1-11 Practical tolerances on etched dimensions, for a range of flat sheet sizes and material
thickness. (a) For prototype and short runs; (b) for production runs. (W. T. Harris, p. 192)
13-12
Chemical Machining-CHM 13.1
0.14 - Y 1 - -
E Steel anidE
(0.004in) __magnetic afloys-
00e -
"Copper alloys Materials Maximumn Transition Zone
I IAluminum al)z4xdpho u
0T0 - ,agre-.um adtoys 6 x depth of cut
Ferrouss alloys 10 x depth of cut
0 vNui(ol and Cobalt alloys 10 x depth of cut
o~o -- ~ ~ .Tiniurn alloys 10 x deph 0f cut 0. ...5 inch 112 7 mm)
/ Nicel ato~'(whi,-he ,er isgreater)
3.0 (2pn
w A
13-13
13.1 Chemical Machining-CHM
TABLE 13.1-10 Surface Roughness Achieved by Chemical Milling
T
MATERAL
MATERAL
OR
FRM
SURFACE ROUGHNESS
(.0AFToR 0.15 in) REMOVEm
(.0AFtER 0.215 Ino0.40Vmm
jiqi~o
-pin R,
TABLE 13.1-11 Summary of Health Risk Arising from the Commonly Used Etchants
MAEIA iN ETCHANT(S
AuiuSoimSplashes
ETCHANT RISK(S)
on to
FUME RISK(S) j
alloys hydroxide J skin, mouth, or
Fume rnot dangerous
but hydrogen gas is
eyes explosiee
Magnesium Sulphuric ISplashes on to skin. Corrosive acidic fume.
alloys acid mouth, or eyes. Hydrogen gas is
Additicris may explosive
cause spatteringj
Steel/nickel Hydrochloric. Highly corrosive Corrosive and
alloys nitric, splashes on to suffocating turri is
sulphuric and skin, mouth, or also toxic
phosphoric acids eyes
Titanium Hydroluoric Highly corrosive Corrosive and
aloys acid with splashes on to skin, suffocating fume is
nitric or mouth. or eyes. also toxic
chromic acid Hydrotluoric acid is
particularly dangerous
Copper Ferric ICorrosive Wpashles Corrosive and
alloys chlrid&e on to skin, mouth, suffocating fume
13-14
Chemical Machining-CHM 13.1
LU0
a:
_0 7 1 -1 -1IA
00 0- 00Das0
00E- k-0
C.J jc c I
00u 00 00) 01 M
00
5 C; II II C5 -1 d
I 0 I
f- 0 0 I
1 C
(LZ
zI LaILM( C
,:E iWT 0 w*UM D
0 00i E
I-- E UC Ur
0w 0t- lo 0 CU. 0- 00 - - 0
o) Co 4 CIO L,-,~j~
I x
CL *1
Z
I-
0~
> ~ --
- w0M 10 o -
00 CUOC
-
0M .90
;v
00 N1
1~z.F00
-- Z0 Co) CDM CM tor rnn -
X. -) X__ - z_ z z
-M -.- -,; -; 0 .
0O E 00 0n .
0i 0.
C -c .CO zZff z -
Z
Z ~ j 6 o0 .z~
o E.
us cE = 0 0 aC
30 0
0
0 0M ~~~I~ou E
0. U 0 O JO
13-15
13.1 Chemical Machining-CHM
ju w
0
dr-*- y __t=
- 00
000
0ii 00~ 0 OI I
0 0. '0 0D 0
so 03 0
x4 00 t
C I
* .502 .5 L2 .0 j
r -&4 -:z=
zz
xr
00 0 0 0 0 Nr* NN
uflO
I ___________________________________
_________________ f ________________
_________________ _________________
W I 0 0
tI M1 qo .) c) C.) C) rC iI 1 cCY l
OD -o - . r-
C a m y0 I
r J5 (5 M 0
Wg! C5
13o; X: 0
B Z. z
5
.8
1 : :
I 2
x5 0 3 0 4rzC
z~~ If (a
IL 2 *x 0 )o z za z
x__x : ~ x2 xP2_IX
IUD2 C ~ j
13-16
- 7-7777 7 e
Electropollshing-ELP 13.2
Operating Parameters
e Stirrer
Hanger TABLE 13.2-1 Typical Values for ELP Operating
i~ ~ ~----
-~ ~ ank parameters
polished. The cutting action takes place, o.er the entire ex- ilsraeadtetm f meso.Tetpclruh
posed surface, thstreivire. a good flow of heated. fresh chcm- xezs values range from 4 to 32 microinches R. 10.1 to 0.3
eede in
icaiheisvuingareato scureunifrm fn- ~ with i to 2 microinches R~. 10.025 to 0.05 pail aichiev-
icss Theed cting ation wdill crao cre foro n-s able. WZen noniconductirg masks are used, an additional M
finsdshes corners.g action cocnrto
i sw lal thast usedurrth depth of cutting is experienced adjacent to the mask. ELP
fisan prevent ctng Mi unw- a trcat usd it prudcce.- a sazrface that is free from residual stress and es-
*b.ireofca ~letri~t
enanc tse thrwin poer sentially unblemished. The uniformity of surface conditions35
haeo"an flcr pwr also is enhanced.
of the. direct current to ralish re-cesses and speed the ctit- 7:
ting ac,eur. Almost any eleciricali- conductivec material
can be polished by this process.
Equipment andl Toolsle
Pacica Applications Commercial plating 3r chemical machining equipment ca~n
Electropolishirgs geitle removal action produces a work- be readily adapted f(-. ELP ts-,.
piece surface of high quafit,- and introduces no stresses. ItZi
is trctiuently used as a finishing process for appearance or
smoothne-s3, or t~or applications where the absence of proc- _
13-17
13.2 Electropolishing-ELP
SELECTED DATA
IRene
Tungsten
41
Molybdenum
Sodium Hydroxide
Phosphoric-Sulfuric acid
Ortho Phosphoric acid-Sulfuric acid-
30 to 1;0
400
3.to516
_U,TU 68
70
13-18
Photochemical Machining-PCM 13.3
PROCESS SUMMARY
M Clean workpiece
Photo resist coat
Start Negatives
Developed
Et
ched
Depth of cut
Material Removal Rates and Tolerances
Cutting rates range from 0.0004 to 0.0020 inch per minute
10.01 to 0.05 mm/minl, depending on the material and its
Depth of cut B metallurgical stat. (see tables in section 13.1). Tolerance
Etch factor Undercut =AB increases with material
13.3-2 to 13.3-6 and figurethickness,
13.3-3. Onassurface
shown in tables
dimensions,
the typical tolerance is 15 percent of the material thick-
Figure 13.3-2 Etch factor in photochemical ma- ,,tss; however, any one dimension can be held to 10 per-
chining. (Note: Inverse of that used in chemical cent when other dimensions are allowed to vary by 25
machining.) percent of the material thickness.
13-19
- - - - --
-_- _ -_
13.3 Photochemical Machining-PCM
TABLE 13.3-1 Materials that Can Be Photochemically 0 08
Machined
METALS
Aluminum N'icoseal 3 06 .
Aluminum anodized Therlo E- W7_ .
Brass Sealmet 29-17 E
Cold rolled steel Therlo 2
Coldhrolled steel ASTM F-30 Alloy
Chromium Gls eln 2o0) 0
Copper,
Copper, oxygen
rolled free Glass Seal
142 Alloy ng 42 0 0.0d .- , g -
& n MY; -
Copper, rol Glass Sealing 46 44
Copper, electrolyt!ic14Alo
Copper, beryllium lAso
Sealing 4_ OWoI
Copper (OFHC)
Elinvar Extra Glass
4750 Seang 49 0.02 . .
Einvary Extra Glass Sealing 52 _
PH 17-7 Steel ELECTRICAL SILICON installations include an electrical assist to the light, low-
Custom 455 IRONS concentration chemicals in order to obtain a straighter cut.
Spring steel Direct-current power, with low current density, is required.
Tungsten Orthosil Photoreducing and photoreproducing equipment are read-
Udimet CONTROLLED EXPANSION ily available and can be integrated into continuous blank-
Vanadium ALLOYS ing lines.
Zinc
Zirconium Invar 36
90-10 Copper nickel OTHERS Machining Characteristics
GLASS TO METAL Plastics Safety considerations in handling the corrosive chemicals
AND Polyesters and fumes are similar to those for CHM.
CERIUM TO METAL Polymides
ASTM F-1 5 Alloy Epoxy resins
GlassThethfco The etch factor fcr photochemical machining and the cir
,rpoohmclmcingadhei- W
Kovar Ceramics cuit board industry, figure 13.3-2, has been defined as the
Rodar inverse of the ratio used in the chemical machining in-
dustry. The tool designer must exercise care to be sure
SOURCE Photo Chemical Machining Institute, Evanston, IL which is applicable in his case.
13-20
Photochemical Machining-PCM 13.3
SELECTED DATA
TOLERANCE, inch
Plastics
(Mylart, Kapton') 0.001 0.0015 0.0025 0.005
Molybdenum, titanium
and exotics 0.0005 0 001 0.002 -
WORKPIECE MATERIAL WE
Nickel-silver a WOW
Magnetic Ni-Fe alloys vp 5.. .. .
(Hy[Au 80*) ~ wfl__9-- ;jflh.-.
Steel i R 4W
Nickel and ANE N5
stainless steel , 4 # f
Aluminum and magnesium '_U& FS
(lasticsrl,
Kapton)
W
Molybdenum, titanium
and exotics 9
_ _ _
13-21
_ _ __ _FlH i
13.3 Photochemical Machining-PCM
TABLE 13.3-3 Practical Tolerances Attainable for Prototype and Short PCM Runs
APPROXIMATE TOLERANCE, inch
FLAT SIZE
Thickness, inch
NOW=
13-22
Photochemical Machining-PCM 13.3
TABLE 13.3-5 Practical Tolerances for Center-to-Center
Dimensions in PCM
CENTER TO CENTER
DIMENSIONS TOLERANCES
in 2 n
i~T lft
METAL THICKNESS
ZakSMALLEST HOLE DIAMETER
13-23
! -~~
PAOT BiG
pj~iBpA(Z FIUED
Oxygen D
Igniter Charging
Vent cylinder
Mixing
Workpece
.. .. .. .
. xplosio n
Practical Applications
TCM will remove burrs or fins from a wide range of mate- Material Removal Rates and Tolerances
rials. but it is particularly effective with materials of low Burrs are removed in a few milliseconds and the total cycle
thermal conductivity. It will deburr thermosetting plas- time is typically 15 to 50 seconds. Handling time is the
tics-but not thermoplastic materials. Any modest size principal manufacturing rate determinant. Rifle bolts that
workpiece requiring manual deburring or flash removal formerly took 5 minutes each to deburr by hand are being
should be considered a candidate for thermal deburring. processed with more consistent results at the rate of 2
Die castings, gears, valves, rifle bolts and similar small pieces in 8 seconds in a batch processing setup. The bulk of
parts are deburred readily. including blind, internal and in- the workpiece is generally not affected in TCM. With the
tersecting holes in inaccessible locations. Carburetor parts application of extra energy, radii can be formed. Radiusing
are processed in automated equipment. Thin sections of is limited by the conductivity of the workpiece material, for
fragile parts or those made from highly oxidation-resistant example:
materials may be difficult for TCM. As a rule of thumb, the radii in steel 0.002 to 0.030 inch
maximum burr thickness should be less than one-fifteenth 10.05 to 0.76 mini
of the thinnest feature on the workpiece. Uniformity of re- radii in aluminum
suits and greater quality assurance over hand deburring is and brass 0.001 to 0.005 inch
a special advantage of TCM. 10.025 to 0.13 mml
13-25
13.4 Thermochemical Machining-TCM
or Thermal Energy Method-TEM
Surface Technology processing chamber. Delicate parts may require holding"
Other than the deburring or radiusing action, there is little fixtures to withstand buffeting during the thermal shock
effect of TCM on the surface of the workpiece. Thermal wave Bulk loading baskets are used for handling small
distortion is no- a problem unless extremely close toler- parts in lots up to hundreds per load
ances are involved. There can be a thin recast layer below
thick burrs or fins. A thin oxide film is deposited on most Machining Characteristics
parts. These films are easily removed with commercial sol-
vents or washes. Surface stains may result if the workpiece is not clean, dry
and free of oil before TCM. The equipment has a stout
chamber to contain the detonation. Preplanned handling of
Equipment and Tools the pressurized gases is needed. Noise can range from a
Automatic equipment is commercially available with cham- gentle "ping- to the sharp report like a 22-caliber rifle
bers up to 11 inches 1280 minI diameter and 9 inches 1229 when the higher pressure settings are used. Even at full
mml high. A cycle time of 15 seconds is possible with this load. the average sound emission level generally remains
equiment. Fixturing is primarily oriented toward sim- below 85 decibels. Cleaning of the operating chamber is re-
plifying the movement of workpieces into and out of the quired at regular intervals.
SELECTED DATA
Thermplastic 9 to 1 10 to 25
Zinc 4.5 to 1 30 to 70 . -O1 -U
Cast iron 4.5 to 1 50 to 175 104[S.4J6
Aluminum 4.5 to 1 50 to 125 S
Brass 4.5 to 1 200 to 240 E .
Steel 4.5 to 1 100 to 220 4 I
Stainless steel 4.5 to 1 175 to 370 1 W
SOURCE: SURF/TRAN Company. Madison Heights, Mi.
NOTE: The pressure or amount of energy required for deburring increases with the heat conductnty of the ma-
terial to be deburred.
13-26
SECTION 14
TOOL MATERIALS
14.1 General Guidelines for Selection of Tool Materials ................ .................. ... . ... 14-3
14.2 High Speed Steels ........................... ...........--............................. ......... 14-4
14.3 CastAlloys .......... . ............ ............................. . ....................... ........ 14-6
14.4 Carbides ................................................... ..... ....... ......................... .14-7
14.5 Microgramn Carbides .......................... e ................................
. .. ................ 14-15
14.6 Coated Carbides ............................................. ................... .... ........ .... 14-16
14.7 Oeramic Tool Materials ............................ ...................................... ...... <.14-17
14.8 Diamond Tools ................................................. ................. ........... 14-18
14-1
B14 M -N T iTi l ll
. . . . . .G . ...
TOOL MATERIALS 14
1.4,1 General Guidelines for 2 Cast alloy cuttiag tool materials are selected as an inter-
meaiate between high speed steel and carbide tool ma-
Selection of Tool Materials terials. The high cobalt high speed steels also serve as
intermed;ates, and there appears to be a trend for them
Selecting the optimum tool material is a major factor in to supersede the cast alloy tools.
realizing the full potential of a particular machine tool.
While only one type of tool material is specified for some
materials and operations in sections 1 through 7. there are
a number of cases for which two or three material types are I Carbide tools are generally applicable when one or
recommended. The following supplemental guidelines are more of the following conditions exist:
offered as an approach for the logical selection of the best
tool materials for machining a specific work material. * Rigidity of the machine tool. tooling, and workpiece
is acceptable.
1. High speed steel tools are generall, used for the
following: * Machine tool power is adequate for higher metal re-
moval rates,
" High volume, low cutting speed operations (for ex-
ample. in screw machines) e Workpiece configuration and machining operation
* Complex tool forms such as form tools, drills, cutoff permit higher cutting speeds.
tools, etc. * High production rates are required.
" Certain machining operations on problem materials. 4. Ceramic tools, high strength carbides. diamond tools.
such as nickel base high temperature alloys and the cast alloy tools referred to previously have
rather specific application in contrast with the wide us-
" High positive rake requirements age of high speed steel and carbide tools.
14-3
14 TOOL MATERIALS
As a general rule. the tungsten grades such as T1. T2. etc..
14.2 High Speed Steels are not quite as tough as the molybdenum grades but are
much simpler to heat treat The molybdenum high speed
The high speed steels can be classified into three genera; steels such as Mi. M2. M3. M7 and MIO are much more
types as follows: widely used than the tungsten grades. Both the tungsten
and the molybdenum high speed steels can be hardened to
1. Tungsten high speed steels 64 to 66 Re and are recommended for the machining of
2. Molybdenum high speed steels easy-to-machine materials. These include steels having a
3. High speed steels contari1g cobalt hardness up to 350 Bhn. While high speed steel types 1 and
2 can be used in machining steels having a higher hardness.
The chemical compositions of the AISI and the ISO high the type 3 high speed steels containing cobalt are recom-
speed steels are listed in tables 14-1 and 14-2. respec- mended. It should be noted that several of the high speed
tively. Note that the type numbers and designations listed steels such as M3 and M4 contain more vanadium, thus
in table 14-2 are tentative, having been taken from the pro- providing increased wear resistance. but at the same time
posed draft international standard ISO/DIS 4957. making the grinding of the tools more difficult,
TABLE 14-1 Compositions and Applications of AISI-Type High Speed Tool Steels
C W Mo Cr V Co
1. Tungsten High Speed Steels
14-4
- - -- r __- -
TOOL MATERIALS 14
The high speed steels with cobait. type 3. contain 5 to 12 High speed steel cutters are widely used for the following
percent cobalt. The addition of cobalt provides greater hot machining operations:
hardness and wear resistance but results in a somewhat
lower toughness. In general. it has been found that these Operations using form tools
grades are not particularly advantageous in tie machining Screw machine operations
of the readily machinable materials. Tttev are. however. End milling
most beneficial for machining steels having a hardness Drilling
level above 350 Bhn and for the more difficult-to-machine Reaming (carbide-tipped reamers are also widely used)
metals. such as titanium and nickel base high temperature Topping (nitrided taps are often used for difficult-to-
alloys. The TIS grade also has a higher percentage of machine alloys)
vanadium: consequently. it is more difficult and more costly Broaching
to grind than the other high speed steels containing cobalt. Gear cutting
In general. the high speed steels containing cobalt can be A recent development in high speed steels is the .avail-
heat treated to a hardness level of 65 to 67 Re. While the ability of indexable inserts made by the powder metal proc-
M40 series can be hardened to a level of 70 R-.the hard- ess. The sizes and shapes of the inserts correspond to those
ness range usually recommended is 66 to 68 Re.Above 68 of some of the more popular carbide inserts. The current
R-. high speed steel tools tend to be too brittle for most grade selection is limited, but in the future. selection is
applications. likely to expand.
TABLE 14-2 Identification and Type Classification of High Speed Tool Steels
ISO AISI
Group No.* No., DesignationOt C Co= Cr Mo0 V W
Si T 'II I
S1 TI HS18-0-1 0.73 to 0.83 - 3.50 to4.50 I - 0.90to1.20 17.2 to 18.7
Basictypes S2 M7 HS2-9-2 0.95 to 1.05 - 350 to 4.50 8 20 to 9.20 1.70 to 2.20 1.50 to 2.10
S3 M HS 1-8-1 0,77 to 0.87 - 3.50 to 4.50 18.00 to 9.00 0.90 to 1.40 1.40 to 2.00
S4 M2 HS 6-5-2 0.82 to 0.92 - 3.50to4.50 14.60to 5.30 1.70 to 2.20 5.70 to 6.70
Increased I
5 M3 HS6-5-3 1.15to 1.30 3350!a4.50 4.60to 5.30 2.70 to 3.20 5.70 to 6.70
C + V-content
S6 use T5 HS 18-0-1-10 0.75to0.85 9.50to 10.5 3.50 to 4.50 - t.30to 1.80 17.2 to 1.7
With Co-content S7 use T4 HS 18-1-1-5 0.75 to 085 4.70 to 5.20 3.50 to 4.50 0.70 to 1.00 1.10 to 1.60 17.2 to 18.7
S8 M35 HS 6-5-2-5 0.85 to 0.95 4.70 tu 5.20 3.50 to 4.50 4.60 to 5.30 1.70 to 2.20 5.70 to 6.70
Increased C + V
content + Co
S9 T15
S10 - HS 10-4-3-10 1.20 to 1.35 9.50 to 10.5 13.50
HS 12-1-5-5 1.45 to 1.60 4.70 to 5.20 3.50 to 4.50 0.70 to 1.00 14.75 to 5.55 11.5 to 13.0
to 4.50 3.20 to 3.9013.00to3.50 -.00to10.0
Increased C-content S11 M42 HS 2-9-1-8 1.05 to 1.20 7.50 to 8.50 3.50 to 4.50 9.00 to 10.0 0.90 to 1.40 1.30 to 1.90
+ Co S12 M41 HS 7-4-2-5 1.05 to 1.20 4.70 to 5.20 3.50 to 4.50 3.50to 4.2011.70to2.20 6.40 to 7.40
I_1________ ____I I ____
*The type numbers and designations are tentative and will be subject to alteration when the reevan international Standards have been established.
'Approximate AISI egurvalent-See table 14-1.
'Successively W-Mo-V-Co.
'For all steels,
Silicon < 0.50%. Manganese < 0 40%. Phosphorus < 0.030%. and Sulphur < 0.030%.
'A dash in these columns indicates that these alloying elements 3hould no! De intentionally added to the heat and. that in the case of cobat, the content of
the cast should not exceed 1.00% and. in the case of moybede' um. it should not exceed 0.70%.
14-5
14 TOOL MATERIALS
14.3 Cast Alloys Cast alloy materials are not widely used. However. they
find limited use as a compromise since they perform wc;l at
higher surface speeds than conve:nticnal high speed steel.
Cast alloys have been available for many years. These ma- and are more resistint to chipping than standard carbide
terials are generally cobalt-chrome-tungsten ailoys with grades. A number of cast alloy tool materials and their
carbon and other alloy additions. They are not heat treat- compositions are shown in table 14-3.
able. and the maximum hardness (55 to 65 Re)occurs near
the cast surface. As a result, cast alloy tools must be tsed
as-cast with as little grinding as possible.
NOMINAL COMPOSITION
TRADE NAME percentage HARDNESS, R. MANUFACTURER
Co Cr W C OTHERS
Blackalloy 525 440 24.0 20.0 2.0 61 to 63 Blackalloy Company of America, Inc.
Paterson, NJ
Blackalloy T.X. 90 42.0 24.0 22.0 2.0 63 to 65
Haynes Stellite R 98M2 alloy 38.0 30.0 185 2.0 1 2%boron, 63 Co-Bo Cast Tool Co. Inc.
4%V. 4% nickel Kokomo. IN
Haynes Stellite R Star J metal 43.0 32.5 17.5 2.5 61
Haynes Stellite R alloy No. 3 50.0 31.0 12.5 2.4 59
Haynes Stellite R alloy No. 19 53.0 31.0 10.5 1.8 55
NOTES: The procedure used for making cast alloy tools is to met the particular analysis in an electric furnace and then cast the tools to shape with small
stock allowance for finish grinding. The tools are at maximum hardness when removed from the molds and cannot be hot or cold worked and do not respond
to heat treatment
"'HaynesStellte" is a registered trademark of Cabot Corporation.
This chart isnot to be considered an endorsement of any manufacturer's product or an approved list of any manufacturer's products.
ZE
______I.
-~ -
14-6
TOOL MATERIALS 14
i4.4 Carbides Char.)14-4 Carbide Manulacturers (Carbide Grade
TABLE
Each tool manufacturer listed in table 14-4 has a wide va- CARBIDE MANUFACTURER
riety of carbide grades, so that a specific grade can be se- -
lected for a given material and operation. Although most 'if
the carbide grades are listed under the industry code (C-i. Adamas ADAMAS CARBIDE CORPORATION.
C-2. etc.) in table 14-5. this does not necessarily imply that Kenilworth. NJ
the various manufacturers' grades under a specific code are Atrax ATRAX RESEAIRCH &DEVELOPMENT
equivalent. CENTER. Wallace-Murray
Corporation. Tuscaloosa. AL
The C-1 through C-4 grades are straight tungsten carbide Carboloy CARBOLOY SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT.
bonded with cobalt and vary chiefly in cobalt content and General Electric Company. Detroit.
MI
grain size. They are widely "sedfor machining cast irons.
high temperature alloys, work hardening stainless steels. CmT o A Memb&
abrasive nonmetallic materials and nonferrous metals Industries. Madison Heights. MI
including titanium. Toughness decreases and hardness in- DoAll DOALL COMPANY. Des Plaines. IL
creases proceeding from C-1 to C-4. The C-2 grades pro- Duramet DURAMET CORPORATION. Warren. MI
vide a good compromise in properties and may be cate- Ex-CeIIO EXCELL-O CORPORATION. Detroit MI
gorized as "general purpose" for the aforementioned Ex-nea- X
materials. Greenleaf GREENLEAF CORPORATION.
Saegertown. PA
The C-5 through C-8 grades include those which contain GTE (Walmet) GTE SYLVANIA INCORPORATED.
various combinations of tungsten carbide, tantalum car- Walmet Division. Royal Oak, PA
bide and titanium carbide bonded with cobalt. The C-8 cat- Iscar ISCAR METALS. INC.. Edison, NJ
egory now also includes tools of straight titanium carb:de Kennametal KENNAMETAL INC.. Latrobe. PA
bonded with molybdenum (or molybdenum carbide) and Newbide NEWCOMER PRODUCTS. INC..
nickel. Other straight titanium carbide grades with proper- Latrobe. PA
ties in the C-5 through C-7 range are also availal-e. Grades Sandvik (Coromant) SANDfVIK, INC.. Fair Lawn. NJ
C-5 through C-8 are generally recommended for machining Seco SECO TOOLS INC.. Northbrook. IL
steels because they provide better crater resistance than Talide METAL CARBIDES CORPORA7ION.
the C-I to C-4 grades. Toughness decreases and the hard- Youngstown. OH
ness increases in going from C-S to C-8 The C-6 grades are Teledyne (Firthite) TELEDYNE FIRTH STERLING,
for general-purpose use. Pittsburgh. PA
TRW Wendt-Sonis WENDT-SONIS DIVISION. TRW Inc..
For work materials such as highly alloyed cast irons, alloy Rogers. AR
steels over 50 Re. ferritic or martensitic stainless steels and Tungsten Alloy TUNGSTEN ALLOY MANUFACTURING
some high temperature alloys, the preferred carbide grades CO.. INC.. Harrison. NJ
may come from either the C-1 to C-4 or the C-S to C-8 Ultra-Met ULTRA-MET MANUFACTURING
group. COMPANY. Farmington. MI
Valenite THE VALERON CORPORATION. Oak
Table 14-6 has been used in classifying carbides according Park. MI
to use as specified by the International Organization for VR/Wesson FANSTEEL. VR/Wesson Division.
Standardization (ISO). Recommended grades produced by Waukegan, IL
various manufacturers are listed according to ISO classifi-
cations in table 14-7.
14-7
- - - - -- t--
14 TOOL MATERIALS
TABLE 14-3 Carbide Grade Chart, C Grade
TRADE
NAME C1C-2 C-3
INDUSTRY CODE
C-4 C-5 C-6 C-7 ] C-8
Adamnas B A PWX 1GU-2 499 ACT-51 548 490
AM ACT-21 434 AG-5' ACT-71 ACT-71
ACT-21 ACT-51 495 Fitan 80* Titan 80*
IAG-5* Titan 60* Titan 1001
474
_______ _______I ________ _________ Titan 50* __________
DoAII DO-i
_______
CA-84431
CA-9443
DO-2
R-03*
______
rO-3
___
E:04
CA-9740a
CA-9721
DO-15 DO-16
t 00-1 7 00-18
D0-30 DO-20 IDO-80 DO-35 D0-36 DO-34 00-80
00D-46' I______ 00-44' 00-401 D0-421 _____
Kennametal K1
KC02501
_______
____
_______
K(6
1K68
K(8735
KC210'
F K68
______
1C210ti0
KC0910'
--
________
(1 1
KC9O
K(420
I 0850"
IC 757
t K420
K21
28
1(88
IC 757
K4H
K45
C11
K810
KC8501I
1K7H
______
1 K,65*
C1O
14-8
TOOL MATERIALS 14
Table 14-5-Continiued
Sandv!k
(Coromarit)
420
HML
GC15l
G0315+
G0015v*
GC31 51
GCol5**
H05
S6
SM30
IG01025'
IGC015**
GC10251
GC015**
GC015**
SIP
GC10250 GC10251 HIP G01351 GC1351 SIP IF02-
HiP I P Hi0 S6/S4 S4 S2 G01025'
H20 H10 GC310** GC10251 SM SMI GC120'
HM FIM S35 SM30 SM30
HML GC30* S35 G0135*
GC310** GC320** GC120 GC120V
GC320** GC135'
IRB _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I__ _ _ _ __ _ _ _
Talide
Teledyne
(Firthite)
0-89
IHi7
1-1
K1IATOi" ,
H
-93
0-1
0~-936_
0-95
HN +
S-880
T-04
T4
__
S-901
HN+*
TC"
S 92
HN+ t
T-25
_
-94
IT--1
N+"
H-6 HA KN +"1 HF HN + 4'1 TXH ITC+ 11 SD-3*
IHN+ 1 TO + SD-3* To + 4", T-22 'SD-3*
~T " SD-30 HN + 11
TRW iTW-167$ tTRW-027t TRW-237$ NTA37
Y-2 TR- $ TW74t TW71
22
CQdtSnjG-221V CO-23T, CQ-23T' CY-16* U225' U2271 CY-31T'
C0-22
C0-12
00-2
CQ0-23
CQ-23
O-3
00-4
G-0-23
CY-1i71
U225
CY-16
JTi8*
ICY-14 CY-31
Ti8*
I TRW-7156'
CY-1 2 ____
6B_______________
Ultra-Met Z-1
Z-1 0
Z-2
IZ-20
1Z-20
Z-3
Z-4 Z-5
Z-52
1
Z-50
Z-6
Z-7
Z-70
Z-8
Z-80'
Valenite
Z-25_Z_51___60
Z-29___
V-iN"1 V-01** V-0~
4___
V-01**
Z-50
V-88, V-0~
___
Z-7
Z-8_
Vfi V-01*0
_ _
V/mn2A3
I2A68
2A5
VR-82
IVR-82
630'
2A7
630'
1650
660'
650'
660'
660'
670'
VR-651
VR-71
VR-54 630' 2A7 VR-65* VR-77 VR-75 VR-73 670'
_______Ramet-1 Ramet-1 j_____________1_____ VR-77 ______ _____
14-9
14 TOOL MATERIALS
0 0
- 0 T 9 0
(D OC 0) 1 C
0) - C 00 C
U) 0)
C.-
0 3 ~
0 U) m
'a C CD E) : -0 = o0w
o~' U)C
a) P
a. o
.D
;c
~ g 0)
~: EEQ
w 204)c
cc~-
0
-d
0)~
0)w Im V) ~- 0 U) ) ( 0z Cc a2 o) CU
ZC C 0 ) U0, a) a) 03
0 Q,( 2U 4)' 10a a)_0
0) .0 C-D :3 -0 C CL 0
0) E Z E- 0 00D 0
a.-oo ~~0C
CDE~
-5
g~CL)aC
0) 4)) E
1 S~~(U)0 ) 0)~
0 0 0. 0~ CEQ. E( (DU Cb 60
-a 0 L'-sEC
vE ) E
u..i- 6-2 E
0i 0 0
(I) C (D C C - 0 C
- . Q, E D CL ca ZU a) c
0 S :EU = a ic 02
U)E
U) o U)> U) ca 0. E E 0
0) )C C E~ m ) 0E ) CF 'A0
0) CL (
mC
0) )20 C)~4
0) U)cz~
42~~~. 0 00Ur C* > ~ U
- U) 420 *)0W
0_-
0 .2-
:s C mC a '
*( C a E ca c C ~
0
U) .00) LD-. C o)
C.) 0) 0) 0 )C zI. E0 2 Cm
E E2 S > c
u. cc) 0) W0 c
0 '
)..)
(D0 D c,
14-1
TOOL MATERIALS 14
Woo o 0r
5
00
C
0
C C
,C.- o o i
0 o 00 c.a
4C C CC CDU
0
o~~~t ~ C* C)C
c
>~-
0 t xC
C- -a 0
0 o
uIE I
0 0
7E ca0i 0-a ( :
cu
,K Ax - --- c
t- x
cci
I L--___.__ __
UU C., 3 1
cc~co -tic
<- 0
00
.
2i __ [Iccr.cc.
- -, c_ c
C D
cc~~ cooc
I K. ._- '--__
- _ - - ..= _
IcL t
14-12
TOOL MATERIALS 14
r ICYt
ZUt
CL a,
0_ _Ch_ _ _ F -
21!~ L:g
~ ~ 2 t"'
-- /
~Rn
a.3i
a.H
Hil I
02
I -
14-13
14 TOOL MATERIALS
A I~oo
TT I
' _ _ _ _ _ i " I1
m =++ . ?
t I
. -
+- ~ I
i;Ic.
:E
ICD~a
-
=
,..-',,, = -a ,
_
>>>
__
_>>>__
_ _
1
I u
++
a.4 M
I L =~--
14-1
u, =0 04
co
US_
j z? ?
Li >
14-14
p
TOOL MATERIALS 14
mal strength levels would chip or break. The major use of
14.5 Microgran Carbides micrograin carbides at present is in cutoff and form tools.
replacing high speed steel in low-surface-speed, high-pro
A relatively new group of high strength carbides intended duction operations on screw machines and similar equip-
for machining applications is now available. These tung- ment. Some application is also being found for micrograin
sten carbide-cobalt base materials are characterized by carbide tools in the machining of problem materials such as
strength levels previously found onl) in impact and rock bit the high temperature alloys and for making punch and die
grades. coupled with much higher levels of hardness. as sets intended for extended use.
shown in figure 14-1. Their properties are achieved by var-
ious proprietary processes and depend in part on achieving The high edge-strength of micrograin carbides allows the
and maintaining a very fine carbide grain size. use of high speed steel tool geometry and. when necessary.
speeds as low as those used with high speed steels. Con-
Manufacturers recommend these materials for improving versely. operation at normal carbide speeds may not be
metal removal rates and tool life over those possible with practical because the high cobalt binder level in these ma-
high speed steels fc- conditions where carbides with nor- terials significantly reduces their resistance to cratering.
C- ad
-6 200 -300 90.0 - 92.5-- GOOD
Carbide
Diamond
Figure 14-1 Comparative properties of tool materials derived from published data for available grades.
Crater resistance refers to ferrous metals.
I1
14-15J
14 TOOL MATERIALS
1I
|I
Ia
i
j
14-16
TOOL MATERIALS 14
ling and for machining materials of very high hardness (60
14.7 Ceramic Tool Materials to 68 Re).
There are two main types of ceramic cutting tools, the pure
alumina tools and the alloyed cermets (see table 14-8)_ The Presently. the main uses for ceramic tool materials are in
cermets are also aluminum-oxide-base materials containing finish and semifinish turning. Typical applications are bor-
various amounts of titanium carbide or other alloying in- ing and facing of cast irons for the automotive industry.
gredients The alumina tools are white in appearance. Al- turning of steels for ordnance applications, and finish turn-
though these tools may be either hot pressed or cold ing and facing of chilled iron and of hardened steel rolls.
pressed. ;.hey are usually cold pressed. The alumina inserts Where high rigidity has been designed into the machine
are norrrally applied in lighter-duty cuts. such as noninter- tool and the tooling, roughing of cast iron and steel may be
rupted turning and boring, performed with ceramic materials.
NOTE Listings do not necessarily imply equivalency of various manufac- Even with the improved technology of adding K-lands and
turers graotz: This chart is not to be considered an endorsement of o. an using thicker inserts, more care must be exercised in apply-
approved list of any 'nufactiirPr'nodicts. ing ceramic tools than is : mally used in applying high
SCermet speed steel or carbide inserts. In particular, it is necessary
to avoid mechanical shock where possible and thermal
shock at all times. Ceramic tools are rarely, if ever, used
The cermet tools are hot pressed. These tools are much with cutting fluids. Their application in turning, boring or
tougher than the alumina inserts and are therefore appli- milling is always dry. Negative rake inserts are used al-
cable for roughing, for interrupted cuts. for some face mil- most exclusively.
14-17
14 TOOL MATERIALS
14.8 Diamond Tools Tools
TABLE 14-9 Producers of Polycrystalline Diamond
Diamond tools are most generally used for machining non- Carboloy Division of General Electric Company
ferrous alloys and abrasive materials, such as presintered Detroit, MI
carbides and ceramics. graphite. fiberglass. rubber and Kennametal Inc.
high-silicon aluminum alloys. Man-madc polycrystalline di- Latrobe. PA
amonds that are sintered under very high temperatures and
pressures are now available as cutting tool inserts of vari- Megadiamond industries
ous sizes and shapes. Manufacturers of these tools are Chicago. IL
listed in table 14-9. Polycrystalline diamond tools have
proved to I e. in most cases, greatly superior to natural
mined diamonds in normal machining operations on the
work materials listed above. However. even though the In general, diamond tools should be treated with the same
polycrystalline diamonds are much tougher and able to care as would be used with any very hard. brittle tool mate-
withstand a great deal more abuse than natural mined dia- rial. However. even light interrupted cuts are possible with
monds. it is still good practice to observe as much care in the stronger polycrystalline diamonds. Diamond tools are
handling the tools as possible. If natural mined diamonds generally used with positive-rake tool geometry in order to
are desired for use as the cutting tool material, then the fol- reduce the forces on the tool. but th. re are other appli-
lowing guidelines should be observed: cations of negative-rake geometries that have proved suc-
cessful. The new strei.gth and reduced cost of poly-
Diamond tools are purchased from suppliers who are crystalline diamond have opened up many new fields of
expert in the art of cutting and orienting diamonds and machining, and new applications continue to be found.
should be returned to them for resharpening. In-house
grinding or reshaping should not be attempted. The di- The use of a cutting fluid will usually ncrease the tool life
amond tool should be resharpened as soon as it be- of the diamond, but where this is not practical. a stream of
comcs dull to minimize breakage. thereby increasing air can be used to cool the tool and keep the cutting edge
the number of possible resharpenings. free from chips.
Mi
___ _ _ __ _ _ _
1j
- -- ~-~-
14-18
SECTION 15
TOOL GEOMETRY
SECTION CONTENTS
15.1 Turning and Boring Tools, Single Point .............................................................................. 15-2
15.2 Threading Tools, Single Point ............................... ............................................................ 15-4
15.3 Die Threading Tools, Thread Chasers .........................................................-........................ 15-6
15.4 Face M ills ..............................................................-............................. .................................. 15-8
15.5 Side and Slot Mills-Arbor Mounted ...................................................................................... 15-10
15.6 End Mills-Peripheral and Slotting, High Speed Steel ........................................................... 15-12
15.7 Drills, High Speed Steel Twist ...................-.........-................................................................. 15-14
15.8 Oil-Hole or Pressurized-Coolant Drills, High Speed Steel ...................................................... 15-16
15.9 Spade Drills, High Speed Steel ......................................................... .................................... 15-16 3
15.10 G un Drills. Carbide . ..................................... ........................................................................ 15-18
15.11 Ream ers, High Sp. d Steel .............. ............ ...................................................... .................. 15-19
15.12 Ream ers, Carbide ............. .-.............. 1....................................................................
15-20
15.13 Boring Tools, Carbide ............................................................................................................ 15-21
15.14 Taps, High Speed Steel ................................... ...................................................................... 15-23
15-1
15.1 Turiing ard Boring Tooth, Single Point
TOOL GEOMETRY
Side rake
angle
Side fA/
relie End cutting edge angle*
angle / 1/eg
7 IG SPEED SEEEL
1__ I CAPBIDE
a BRAZED I "DEXALE
_
hn degrees degrees Ideee deg rees degrees degrees degrees degreeses 6egrees
Free Machining Carbon Steels- - 5-25 10 12 5 5 0 6 .7 5 5
Wrought 1225-325 8 1101 1 5 6 7 0 5
Carbon Steels-Wrought and - ]
Cast
Free Machining Alloy Steels-
Wrought
1
I
325-52R
52R, 58R
0
-
j
io ~5 6 7
5
.5
5
5_
I
Alnoy Steelis-Wrought and
cast
High Strength Stel-
Wrought eels-I
Maraging Steeis-Wrouqht
I
1 i
Tool SteelsWrought
Nitiding Steels-Wrought
Armcr Plate-Wrought
Structural Steels-Wrought _-_ o
Free Machin"ngStane-t 135-275. 5 a. 1545 10 6 7 -5 5 5
SteelsWrought 1 275-425 0 5~ 5 0 6 7- -5 __
StainlessSleels.Ferritic- 135-185 5 8 5 5 0 6 7I 0 5
StainlessSkeelsMadensic- 1'35-325 i( 10 5 1 0 6 7 1 I s
Wrought and Cast 325-425 5 j
48,5R 0 5 5 0 6 1 7-55
-i
15-2
- - . - - r- -.. -rF
Turning and Boring Tools, Single Point 15.1
TOOL GEOMETRY
BRAZED [ INDEXABLE
Back I Side End Side Back S Back Sie
Rake IRake Rc'ief i Relief Rake Rakt- Relief IRake Rake ReiW
MATERIALHAMESS
IAngle Angle Ang. Angle A -gte 1Angle Angles Angle Angle Angles
oha1 degfees jdegres degrees j deg ses degret. d-grees 1 degrees degrees degrees degree
; - - ____ ___ ___
Precipitation Hardening
Stainless Steels-Wrought 5 0 ;
and Cast 150-50" 0 10 5 5 0 6 7 -5 -5
Titanium Aiiois-Wrough
and Cast
I I V-"05
0
5
.- 0 6 7J-5
t 5 -
Wr and Cast
,,t I 14075 10 5 5 65 0
_ _ _.__ _ _ _ _-
_,._._ !-
ClmlmA170-2-!to0 20 5 5 0 20
oys-lirought,
Coumlum I 5O
cast ,PM
Molybdenum
Cast, P/ U Alloys-Wrought, I
Tantalum Alloys-Wrought. i a a
Cast. P/M "
Tungsten Alnoys-Wrougat, 8 I
ZiCAlloys-Cast 8-100 10 1 12 - i 5 5 a
11 i ; I .a L
tk.aium Ai-Wrooot 19-210 I - , -5 7
_ _I I . _
Machinable Glass Cera _ic 50 ___oop
o : ,I s 5 5 1 o , 7 o o 5
,3!;
15-3
_ _
15.2 Threading Tools, Single Point
TOOL GEOMETRY
00 Rake / 00 Rake
30K
15i
15-4
Threading Tools, Single Point 15.2
TOOL GEOMETRY
275-425 0 to 5 10 to 15 5 to 10
Stainless Steels, Ferritic-Wrought and Cast 135-185 5 to 10 5 to 8 5 to 10
40-200
Group2 500 kg 3 to 7 5 to 10 5 to 10
40-200
Group 3
500 kg 7 to 15 5 to 10 5 to 10
15-5
15,3 Die Threading Tools, Die Chasers
TOOL GEOMETRY
Chamfer or throat
angle Rake
Hook angle angle
aneFiace
angle
Milged
CIRCULAR
Milled
Chamfer or throat
angle Hook aF7
a Chamfer or throat
angle
Rake
angle
Hobbed or Tapped
RADIAL
TANGENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
f+
15--6
~ -
Die Threading Tools, Thread Chasers 15.3
TOOL GEOMETRY
Group 2 40-200
500 kg 10 to 20 110o2 2010o25 010o10 10o10 0Oto 5
15-7
- -+
. -- - S "
- ,+ += -4 -. . .. . . _ _+ _ a *- + _= - -. . - . , _...
15.4 Face Mills
TOOL GEOMETRY
Free Machining Carbon 85-270 10 tol1510to 15 5 to7 -5to-14 0Oto -7 0 to -7 30 5 tol 10 5to 7 3 to 7
Steels and Carbon Steels- - - - ___ ______
Wrought and Cast 270-325 10 tol1510to 15 -4 to -8 -3 to -11 0 to -7 0 to -7 30 5to 10 5 to7 3 to 7
Free Machining Alloy
Steels and Aloy Steels- 325-425 10 to12 10 to12 -4 to -8 -3 to -11 0 to -10 0to -10 30 5 tol10 5 to7 3 to 7
Wrought and Cast
Maraging Steels-Wrought 43R,-50R, 5 to 105tol10 -4 to-8 -3 to -11 -5 to -15 -5 to-15 45 4 to 7 5to7 31o7
Tool Steels- Wrought - - - ___ __
Structural Steels- 50Re-56R, -4 to-8 -3 to -11 -5 to -15 -5 to-15 45 4 to 7 8 8
Wrought I___ I______________
High Strength Steels- 225-425 5 tob10 tolO -4 to -8 -3 to -11 -5 to -15 -5 to -15 45 4 to 7 5 to 7 3 to 7
Wrought- - ______ ______
15-8
Face Mills 15.4
TOOL GEOMETRY
Stainless Steels,
Martenstic-Wrought 135-425 5 to 10 5 to 10 5 to 11 -5 to -11 0 0 to -5 45 5 8 to 10 8 to 10
and Cast
Precipitation Hardening
StainlessSteels-Wrought 150-450 5to10 5to10 5to7 0to5 0 0 45 5 8to10 8to10
and Cast
210-340
Ntinol Alloys-Wrought 48R-60R - - 5 to 7 0 to 5 0 0 45 10 12 12 2
High Temperature Alloys- 200475 slo 51010 0105 0to-5 0105 0to-5 45 5 7tolO 7t010
Wrought and Cast
Molybdenum Alloys-
Wrought, Cast, P/M 220-290 0 20 5to7 0to5 0 0 45 5 to 10 10 10
Tantalum Alloys-
Wrought, Cast, P/M 200-250 0 20 5 to 7 0 to 5 0 0 45 5 to 10 10 10
15-9
15.5 Side and Slot Mills-Arbor Mounted
TOOL GEOMETRY
Radial relief
angle Radial clearance
angle
Axial
rake t x ial relief angle
angle
15-10
Side and Slot Mills-Arbor Mounted 15.5
TOOL GEOMETRY
High Strength Steels, Maraging Steels and 100-52Rc 10to 12 5to 12 21o4 3to 7 -5to-10 0to-10 2to4 5to8
Tool Steels-Wrought
Free Machining Stainless Steels-Wrought 135-425 101o 12 51o12 3to5 4to8 0to5 -5to5 2to4 5to8
High Temperature AlIoys-Wrought and 140-300 10to15 10to15 1 to5 5to10 -5to-10 0to-10 3to5 51o8
Cast
300475 101o12 5to12 1105 4to8 -5to-10 0to-10 3to5 5108
ZincAlloys-Cast 80-100 10to20 10to20 51o7 8to11 101o15 101015 71o10 7to10
15-11
t
15.6 End Mills-Peripheral and Slotting, High Speed Steel
TOOL GEOMETRY
Helix angle
rY Axial relief
angle
15-12
o= =~~-
End Mills-Peripheral and Slotting, High Speed Steel 15.6
TOOL GEOMETRY
NOMINAL I
Radial
Primary Primary
j Radial
Secondary
Radial
Primary Primary
Radial
Secondary
CUTTER I Relief Land Clearance Relief Land Clearance
DIAMETER Angle Width Angle Angle Width Angle
in degrees in degrees degree. in degrees
0* o2-- -c-
IMb -5 ----- O- -- 22
"A A. _62
_m o -ao- -- 7- e
ffl-4114-~
Ex
3,S~ I
d :Mzj-I
_M_
Uv_ -1M-1V_'
15.7 Drills, High Speed Steel Twist
TOOL GEOMETRY
Lip relief
V Web thickness
angle q
"
DRILL UP RELI
MATERIAL HARDNESS TYPE POINTANGLEO ANGLESI HEUX ANGLE POINT GRIND
Shn degrees degres
Fre._ Machining Carbon Steels-Wrought General
Carbon Steels-Wrought, Cast and P/U 85-225 Purpose 118 A Standard Standard
Free Machining Alloy Steels-Wrought
Alloy Steels-Wrought, Cost and P/N General
Maraging Steels-Wrought an .225-325 Purpose 118 A Standard Standard
Niftriding Stees-roughtGera
Armor PlaGeneralh
Structural Steels-Wrought 325-425 Purpose 118 to 135 B Standard Crankshft
Heavy 1t15Cakhf
325-25 Heavy
Wrougot 8; Hadn.gStlesStes
P7cptto 0 ast 48Rc-52Rc Web 118 to 135 B Standard Crankshaft
15-14
Drills, High Speed Steel Twist 15.7
TOOL GEOMETRY
70 to118
i
' C
C
I HighSadr
High
~Sadr
IStandard
jPurpose_
___
118
I B
_ __
Standard
J
!Crankshaft
ttnol Alloys-Wrought 210-360 General
48Rc-52Fl. Purpose 118 j B Standard Crankshaft
High Temperature Allys-Wrought HeavyL
enldCat 140-475 Web li8to 135 a Standard Crankshaft
n 170-2u90lyxlnun
General 11BStnadtnar
Tantalum Alloys-Wrought. Cast, P 10-9 Purpose 18aStnrdtnad
Tungsten Alloys (Anvil"o)' General
29"-20 Purpose 118 8 Standard Standard
Zinc Alloys-Cast General
80-100 Purpose 118 C Standard Standard
Uranim Alloys-Wroughti Special 1-5* Land on
190-210 Carbide 118 5-8 20-- DrilliLip
Zirconium Alloys-Wrought General
140-280 Purpose 118 A Standard Crankshaft
Thermoplastics and Thermosettig Speia
All Plishe 60 to 90 C Low Standard
Magnetic Core Iron General
185-240 Purpose loo to 118 A High Standard
Controlled Eipalon AlloysGera
125-250 Purpose 118 A Standard Crankshaft
Magnetic Alloys (HI Perm 49, HyMu 80) GeneralI
185-240 Purpose 118 A Standard Crankshaft
Carbon and Graphite 8-100 General
Shore Purpose 90 to 118 C Standard Crankshaft
Machinable Carbide (Ferro-Tic) General
40Rc-51 Rc Purpose 118 8 Standard Crankshaft
Lip Relief
Angles al
JDrill Size
Periphery =8t==--0o4 =4tIo 406 t%*o icu
A j 24- 21- Is# W 141 12- 10. a.
8 K) 18!1 16- 14 1210 t* 8. 7
C 1 26- 24- 22* 2 18. 18' 14# 12*
15-15
15.8 Oil-Hole or Pres.murized-Coolant Drills, High Speed Steel
TOOL GEOMETRY
Drill geometry as shown in section 15.7 (HIGH SPEED
STEEL TWIST DRILLS) may be used for Oil-Hole or DRILL DIAMETER
Pressurized-Coolant Drilling. . inches WEB
op- - Upto 1/4
1 12%
Drills used for Oil-Hole or Pressurized-Coolant Drilling
erations, however, have heavy or semi-heavy webs which Over 1/4 to 1/2 10%
require thinning of the point. Instructions for thinning are Over 1/2 to 3/4 8%
shown below. Over 3/4 to 1 8%
Over 1 to 1-1 /4 7%
Over 1-1/4 to 1-1/2 7%
0
Web, shown as %
of drill diameter
140
-Chip breaker 70 to 80
Primary "B"
grooves relief Rad.
angleI
C
Point 0"A" WebRadius
angle 0 offset
00
1300 00A
20 to 30
70 to 100 "D"
Circular
land
15-16
EN 00-R.M-
Spade Drills, High Speed Steel 15.9
TOOL GEOMETRY
MATERIAL*
D
M STE-LS, STEELS,
E Wrought Wrought ALUMINUM
N and Cast and Cast STEELS, and
S and CAST and CAST Wrought STAINLESS MAGNESIUM TITANIUM COPPER
DRILL I IRONS IRONS and Cast STEELS, ALLOYS, ALLOYS, ALLOYS,
SIZE I 100 to 175to 330 Bhn Wrought Wrought Wrought Wrought
RANGE S 175 Bhn 330 Bhn to 52R, and Cast and Cast and Cast and Cast
inches inch inch inch inch inch inch inch
!-1/32 to1-1/4 B 3/16 1/4 1/4 3/16 3/16 1/64 and 100 Rake 5/32
____,___
1-9/32 to 1-1/2- B 7/32 9/32 1/4 7/32 1/4 1/64 and 100 Rake 5/32
B 9/32 __ 11/32 3/8 9/32 3/8 1/64 and 100 Rake 7/32
2-1/16 to 2-1/2 -..... ____
B 9/32 3/8, 3/8 5/16 1/2 1/64 and 101 Rake 1/4
2-9/16to 3 - _
C 0to 1/32 0 to 1/32 0 to 1/32 5/64 9/32 1/8 7/64
3-1/16 to 3-1/2 B
-_____
5/16 3/8 3/8 11/32 - - 9/32
_____
I
B 3/8 1/2 1/2 7/16 --
B 112 7/..
4-1/16 to 5
C 0to 1/32 0to 1/32 . to 1/32 1/8 -
15-17
15.10 Gun Drills, Carbide
TOOL GEOMETRY
Shoulder
Cattagefluid
Inner angle (200)
Wear pads
Stack Grind
15-18
Reamers, High Speed Steel 15.11
TOOL GEOMETRY
Chamfer angle
Radial rake angle
1
I- Chamfer length
,.
g -Margin width
" 1 \ Land width
Chamfer relief Ld t
angle
Helix angle
Secondary- Primary
relief angle relief angle
PRIMARY
RADIAL CHAMFER
REUEF CHAMFER RELIEF
DIAMETER MARGIN WIDTH ANGLE ANGLE ANGLE
inches inch degrees degrees degrees
Under 1/8 0.004-0.006 20 to 25 45 7 to 12
1-1/2 to 2 0.016-0.022 5 to 8 45 7 to 12
Over2 0.018-0.025 5 to 8 45 7 to 12
For general purpose use. - Freer cutting. * Reduces chatter on nonrigid setups.
0
* Improves finish. * Use 3 0 0 to 45 helix for splines and
keyways.
- Reduces chatter.
* Requires rigid setups with no backlash. * Requires more thrust.
15-19
7- -- 2[.$4
15.12 Reamers, Carbide
TOOL GEOMETRY
Secondary
clearance angle
Heli" angle
1 0.012-0.015 8 to 10 18 to 20 0.050-0.060 7 to 9 14 to 18
15-20
-- - ~ i
Boring Tools, Carbide 15.13
TOOL GEOMETRY
Side relief
Mounting
angle
Note: All rake and relief
angles are measured
in normal direction.
15-21
15.13 Boring Tools, Carbide
TOOL GEOMETRY
350-500 0 to -6 -3 to -8 5 to 10 2 to 3
Free Machining Stainless Steels-Wrought 135-425 3 to 10 0 to 15 5 to 10 2 to 3
15-22
Taps, High Speed Steel 15.14
TOOL GEOMETRY
Land Chamfer
Ch-mfer angle relief Rake Hook
I
angle Rake Tangential
Heel
Flute I
L Chordal hook
angle
HOOK OR CHAMFER
RAKE RELIEF TYPEOFTAP
MATERIAL HARDNESS ANGLE ANGLE
Bhn degrees degrees Thru Hole Blind Hole
Modified
300-375 0 6 4 Flute Hand Tap
Modified
375-425 -3 to -6 6 4 Flute Hand Tap
Modified
48R,-52R, -5 to -10 4 to 6 4 Flute Hand Tap,
Modified
325-425 0 6 to 8 4 Flute Hand Tap
15-23
K- _
15.14 Taps, High Speed Steel
TOOL GEOMETRY
15-24
Planing Tools 15.15
TOOL GEOMETRY
Side rake
angle
Side
relief
angle End cutting edge angle
Nose radius /
LSide cutting edge angle
1 5-25
15.15 Planing Tools
TOOL GEOMETRY
{
MATERIAL HARDNESS Angie Angie Angie Angle Angie Angie Angle Angie Angie Angie
Bhn degrees degrees degrees degrees degrees degrees degrees degrees degrees degrees
Free Machining Carbon 85 - - - _
Steels-Wrought to 5 to10 61to10 101015 6to10 5tolS 0Oto -5 15to-15 3t05 3105 4 tol15
Carbon Steels-Wrought 375
andCast
Free Machining Alloy
Steels-Wrought
Alloy Steels-Wrought and
Cast
High Strength Steels-
Wrought
Maraging Steels-Wrought
Tooi Steels-Wrought
Nitriding Steels-Wrought
Armor Plate-Wrought
Struciuiz: Ste-is-Wrought
Free Mahining Stainles 135
StelsWrougZ to I51010 610o10 101015 61010 5Stol 010Ot-5 5to-15) 41o6 4 to 6 41to15
Sies Steels, Ferritic-
Wrought and Cast32
Stainless Steels, Austenitic-
Wrought and Cast
Stainless Steels,
Martensitic-Wrought and
cast
Precipitation Hardening
Stainless Steels-Wrought
and Cast _______
Aluminum Alloys-Wrought 30
and Cast to 1t2 0oO 8o5 8o5 7o
150 112 000 805 805 70
500 kg__________
Magnesium Alloys-Wrought 401
and Cast to
101o20 301040 t1o15 810o15 710
to 9
90
500 kg ___ ______ __
____________ 320[j
NOTE: For all materials and for both high speed steel tools and carbide tools, use a 0*-30' side cutting edge angle. For best chip flow when planing mild and
medium hard steels. try a 230 side culling edge angle.
1&-26
nk
Broaches, High Speed Steel 15.16
TOOL GEOMETRY
Face or
hook angle Pitch Land
Backoff or
clearance angle
Tooth depth
Root radius
Group 2 40-200
500 kg 0 tol 0102
Group 3 40-200
500 kg 10 to15 2 to 3
Nickel Alloys-Wrought and Cast 80 to 360 12 to 18 112 to 2
15-27
15.17 Tool and Cutter Angles-Approximate Equivalents
TOOL GEOMETRY
r
LATHE AND PLANER MILLING CUTTER DRILL BROACH
Back Rake Angle '.xial Rake Angle Helix Angle Hook Angle
Side Rake Angle Radial Rake Angle Radial Rake Angle Sid: Rake Angle
Side Cutting Edge Angle Corner Angle 1/2 Point Angle -
End Cutting Edge Angle End Cutting Edge Concavity Angle -
Side Relief Angle Radial Relief Angle - Clearance Angle
End Relief Angle Axial Relief Angle Lip Relief Angle Clearance Angle
I
I
1I
I
15-28
SECTION 16
CUTTING FLUIDS
16-1
- - -; _m-7-
16-3
-K
16.1 Cutting Fluid Selection and Use
metal. Such additives have been refined to minimize pre- When both chloiine and sulfur are added to cutting oils.
vious objections to the formation of disagreeable odors and anti-weld or EP characteristics are efferfivp over a wider
the tendency to gum. temperature range. Sulfo-chlorinated mineral oil and sulfo-
chlorinated fatty oils are examples of such oils which are
Fatty-mineral oils are combinations of one or more fatty suitable for a wide range of applications.
oils blended in straight mineral oil. Lard oil is frcqueitiy
used for this purpose Fatty oils may comprise up to 40 per- Phosphorus performs as a mild EP lubricant or anti-fric-
cent of the blend depending on the application and are tion additive when added to a cutting oil. The phosphide
quite effective for many operations. The advantages are film breaks down at lower temperatures than do sulfide or
not great and are confined primarily to improvement of fin- chloride films and, therefore, is not as effective an anti-weld
ish in the mac-iining of mild steel, brass, copper and alumi- agent. Phosphorus is most effective in reducing friction and
num Such blends are particularly suitable for machining wear. These oils are nonstaining to most ferrous and non-
the harder types of brass and copper, where straight min- ferrous alloys.
eral oil may not give the finish required and where the use
of more active oils would cause staining. These oils are These basic types of cutting oils can have various additive
widely used in automatic screw machines where the oper- levels and may be used singly or in combination and at var-
ations are not exceptionally severe. ious viscosities to suit various applications. Some recent
developments include oils in which the production of fume
Extreme pressure (EP) additives are added to fluids used and oil-mist have been significantly reduced.
for machining operations where cutting forces are partic-
ularly high, such as tapping and broaching, or for oper- Applications of all compounded cutting oils (both active
ations performed with heavy feeds. Chemical or EP addi- and inactive) are generally limited to machining operations
tives provide a tougher, more stable form of lubrication at on difficult-to-machine metals or form grinding from the
the chip-tool interface. These additives include sulfur, chlo- solid. The high cost, the possible danger from smoke and
rine or phosphorus compounds that react at high temper- fire, and the operator health problems often restrict the use
atures in the cutting zones to form metallic sulfides, chlo- of these oils to operations where other fluids do not provide
rides and phosphides In addition to providing extreme satisfactory performance.
pressure lubrication, these additives provide a film on the
tool surface with anti-weld properties that minimize the
built-up edge. Sulfurized fatty-mineral oi! blends have sul-
fur added in a strongly bonded, inactive form which may be Water-Miscib', (Water-Soluble) Fluids
totally nonstaining. The water-miscible (water-soluble) cutting fluids are pri-
marily used for high speed machining operations because
Active Cutting Oils they have better cooling capabilities. These fluids are also
Active cutting oils (compounded with chemically active ad- best for cooling machined parts to minimize thermal dis-
ditives) include sulfurized or phosphorized mineral oils, tortion.
sulfo-chlorinated mineral oils, and sulfo-chlorinated fatty-
mineral oil blends. These fluids have good anti-weld and Water-miscible cutting fluids are mixed with water at dif-
extreme pressure lubrication qualities which improve tool ferent ratios depending on the machining operation. For
life in high-temperature and high-pressure applications, high-speed chip-making operations, they are normally
They may, however, cause discoloration or staining of cer- mixed 1 part concentrate to 20 to 30 parts water. For
tain metals. many grinding operations where it is desirable to have a
lighter fluid with more cooling action, the ratio is 1:40 or
Sulfur can be added to a cutting oil in the form of sulfu- 1:50. Water-miscible fluids form mixtures ranging from
rized mineral oil or sulfurized fat. The sulfurized mineral emulsions to solutions when mixed with water. Because
oil is more active at lower temperatures and tends to se- water has a high specific heat, high thermal conductivity
verely stain aluminum, copper, brass, bronze and magne- and high heat of vaporization, it is one of the most effective
sium alloys. In comparison, the sulfurized fatty oil (which is cooling media known. Blended with water, the water-
sulfurized at a higher temperature) will not release sulfur as miscible fluids provide the combined cooling and moderate
readily and. therefore, has less tendency to stain nonferrous lubrication required by metal removal operations con-
metals or steel. Oils containing sulfur will form metallic ducted at high speeds and lower pressures.
sulfide films which will act as solid lubricants at temper-
atures up to about 1300F [700C. The water-miscible fluids can be classified as emulsifiable
oils (soluble oils), chemical (synthetic) fluids or semi-
Chlorine reacts and functions in essentially the same man- chemical (semisynthetic) fluids. Fluids within these classes
ner as sulfur. Inhibiting ingredients are added to prevent are available for light-, medium-, and heavy-duty perform-
corrosion of ferrous surfaces, since chlorine is more reac- ance.
tive than sulfur. Chemical reaction is thus restricted to the
chip-tool interface, where the temperatures are high. Emulsifiable Oils
Chlorinated oils form an iron chloride film when reacting Emulsifiable oils are commonly called soluble oils, emul-
with ferrous workpiece materials or high speed steel tools. sions, or emulsifiable cutting fluids. An emulsion is a sus-
This film has a low shear strength and provides low friction pension of oil droplets in water made by blending the oil
up to about 750 0 F 14000C1, beyond which it decomposes. with emulsifying agents and other materials. These emulsi-
Chlorinated oils usually will not stain nonferrous alloys. fiers (soap or soap-like materials) break the cil into minute
16-4
Cutting Fluid Selection and Use 16.1
particles and keep the particles dispersed in water for long Fatty soluble oils have animal or vegetable fats or oils or
periods of time. Bactericides-usually nonphenolic organic other esters added to the mineral oil content to provide a
compounds specifically approved by the Environmental range of fluids with enhanced lubricating properties.
Protection Agency (EPA)-are added to control the growth
of microorganisms such as bacteria, algae and fungi. If dis- EP soluble oils contain sulfur, chlorine or phosphorus ad-
posal is of no concern, phenolics may be used. The soaps, ditives to improve load-carrying performance Since the
wetting agents, and couplers used as emulsifiers in water- EP concentrate is diluted 5 to 20 times when the emulsion
miscible fluids reduce surface tension signficantly. As a is prepared, the lubricating capability is reduced. Where
result, the liquid has a greater tendency to foam when sub- the lubricating capabilities of soluble-oil emulsions and the
jected to shear and turbulence. For this reason, water- cooling properties of cutting oils are inadequate, EP so-
miscible fluids sometimes cause foaming problems in luble oils can satisfy both requirements in many cases.
operations such as gundrilling or flat-bed and double-disk These fluids, commonly known as heavy-duty soluble oils,
grinding. With the use of special wetting agents and foam have in some cases replaced cutting oils for broaching,
depressants, however, water-miscible fluids can be ren- gear hobbing, gear shaping, and gear shaving.
dered sufficiently nonfoaming to be effective in almost all
operations. Chemical Fluids
Emulsifiable oils combine the lubricating and rust-pre- Chemical (synthetic) fluids are chemical solutions con-
vention properties of oil with water's excellent cooling sisting of inorganic and/or other materials dissolved in wa-
properties. Emulsions, with their cooling-lubricating prop- ter and containing no mineral oil. All of these fluids are
erties, are most effectively used for metalcutting operations coolants; some are also lubricants. Chemical agents that go
with high cutting speeds and low cutting pressures accom- into these fluids include: amines and nitrites1 for corrosion
panied by considerable heat generation. inhibitors; nitrates, for nitrite stabilization; phosphates and
borates, for water softening; soaps and wetting agents, for
Advantages of emulsifiable oils over straight or com- lubrication and reduction of surface tension; phosphorus,
pounded cutting oils include greater reduction of heat, chlorine and sulfur compounds, for chemical lubrication;
cleaner working conditions, economy resulting from dilu- glycols, as blending agents and humectants; and germi-
tion with water, better operator acceptance and improved cides, to control the growth of bacteria.
health and safety benefits. They can be used for practically
all light- and moderate-duty cutting operations, as well as In general, the advantages of chemical fluids include econ-
for most heavy-duty applications except those involving ex- omy, rapid heat dissipation, good size control, detergent
tremely difficult-to-machine materials. Emulsifiable oils properties which help keep the machine surfaces and the
can be used for practically all grinding operations with the coolant systems clean, excellent workpiece visibility, easy
exception of severe grinding operations, such as form, mixing with little agitation, and high resistance to rancidity
thread and plunge grinding where wheel form is a critical and rust. The increased cost of oils, plus OSHA and EPA
factor. Extreme-pressure, compounded emulsifiable oils do requirements, may result in increased use of these and
not suffer from this limitation, other water-miscible fluids.
Cutting fluid manufacturers supply emulsifiable oils as con- A possible disadvantage of chemical fluids that may be en-
centrates that the user prepares by mixing with water. countered in some severe operations is insufficient lubri-
Mixtures range from 1 part oil in 100 parts water to a 1:5 city, which may cause sticking and/or wear of moving ma-
oil-water ratio. The leaner emulsions are used for grinding chine tool parts. The dry, powdery residue or film left by
or light-duty machining operations where cooling is the es- chemical fluids is easy to remove. This residue can inter-
sential requirement. Lubricating prt -erties and rust pre- fere with component movements if allowed to remain on
vention increase with higher concentrtions of oil. The four the machine surfaces. Most of the stickiness is caused by
types of emulsifiable oils are summarized in table 16.1-1. the minerals in the water used. The mineral content in wa-
ter can quadruple in six weeks as water is added to replace
k- that lost by evaporation. Deionized water should be used to
General-purpose soluble oils are milky fluids with min- avoid this problem. Improved lubricating or EP properties,
eral oil droplets 0.2
of Tey
0.0002-inch
inidiaete. to 0.008-inch
re ommoly 10.005
sedat mm of
iluion to however, can be provided. Other limitations may include
0.2 minI diameter. They are commonly used at dilutions of foaming problems in high agitation applications, and high
1:10 to 1:40 for general purpose machining, detergency and alkalinity characteristics which may irri-
tate sensitive hands when the concentration of the mix is
Clear-type (or translucent) soluble oils contain less oil not controlled.
(with higher proportions of corrosion inhibitors) and con-
siderably more emulsifier than do milky emulsions. The Chemical fluids are usually classified into two general
clear type, therefore, consists of oil dispersions with groups: true solutions and surface-active types (see table
smaller oil droplets which are more widely distributed. 16.1-1).
Since there is less dispersion of transmitted light, the fluid
is less opaque, and the result is a translucent liquid. The
translucency is not permanent, though, because often times
the tiny oil droplets tend to coalesce and form larger drop-
lets. These oils are generally used for grinding or for light-
'CAUTION: The use of fluids containing nitrites may present a hazard and
is
andpresently under review by the National Institute of Occupational Safety
Health (NIOSH). Nitrites can react with amines to form nitrosamines
which are carcinogenic. NIOSH may ban or control the use of nitrites incut-
I
duty machining. ting fluids after completion of their review.
16-5
Emulsifiable (1) General-Purpose Used at dilutions between 1:10 and 1.40 to give a milky emulsion. Used for general
Oils Soluble Oils purpose machining
(2)Clear-Type Used at dilutions between 1:50 and 1:100. Their high emulsifier content results in
Soluble Oils emulsions which vary from translucent to clear. Used for grinding or light-duty
machining.
(3) Fatty Soluble Used at similar concentrations to (1) and of similar appearance. Their fat content makes
Oils them particularly good for general machining operations on nonferrous metals
(4)EP Soluble Oils Generally contain sulfurized or chlorinated EP additives. Used at dilutions between 1:5
and 1:20 where a higher performance than that given by (1), (2) or (3) is required.
Chemical (1)True Solutions Essentially solutions of chemical rust inhibitors in water Used at dilutions between 1:50
(Synthetic) and 1:1010 for grinding operations on iron and steel.
Fluids
(2)Surface-Active Contain mainly water-soluble rust inhibitors and surface-active load-carrying additives
Chemical Fluids Used at dilutions between 1:10 and 1:40 for cutting and at higher dilutions for
grinding. Most are suitable for both ferrous and nonferrous metals.
(3) EP Surface-Active Similar in characteristics to (2) but containing EP additives to give higher machining
Chemical Fluids performance when used with ferrous metals. Used at dilutions between 1:5 and 1:30.
Semichemical - Essentially a combination of a chemical fluid and a smal! amount of emulsifiable oil in
(Semisynthetic) water forming a translucent, stable emulsion of small droplet size. EP additives are
Fluids usually included permitting their use for moderate- and heavy-duty machining and
grinding applications.
True-solution fluids (without wetting agents), also called Surface-active chemical fluids are extremely fine colloidal
chemical solutions or chemical grinding fluids, primarily solutions composed of inorganic and organic materials dis-
contain rust inhibitors (inorganic and organic nitrites2 ), se- solved in water with the addition of wetting agents (surface
questering agents, amines, phosphates, borates, glycols or active agents). The wetting agents improve the wetting ac-
ethylene or propylene oxide condensates. Some of these tion of the water and provide greater uniformity of both
fluids contain highly developed corrosion inhibitors such as heat dissipation and anti-rust action. This type of fluid may
sodium nitrite 2 (for cast iron), triethanolamine (for both include anti-foaming agents, humectants, mild lubricants
cast iron and steel) and sodium mercaptobenzothiazole (for (organic or inorganic) and water softeners. The lubricating
reducing corrosion on brass, zinc and aluminum). True so- (anti-wear) properties may be provided by a viscous poly-
lutions, used at 1:50 or 1:100 ratios, are clear in appear- glycol compound. Corrosion protection may be provided by
ance but are often colored with dyes to indicate their pres- a mixture of triethanolamine and caprvlic acid, and the for-
ence in water. These fluids are restricted to grinding mulation may include a deactivator for copper alloys.
operations where they prevent rust and permit rapid heat
removal. True solutions have high surface tension (about The surface-active type of chemical fluid has fair lubricity,
equivalent to water). They have a tendency to leave a resi- low surface tension, and good rust-inhibiting properties and
due of hard or crystalline deposits formed by water evapo- usually leaves a dry, hard or powdery residue that is easily
rating. These chemicals can also be added to emulsifiable removed. The slight tendency of these fluids to foam is usu-
oils or to other chemical fluids to enhance their corrosion- ally not a serious problem in most operations. They are
inhibiting properties. usually used at dilutions of 1 part concentrate in 10 to 40
parts water.
16-6
Cutting Fluid Selection and Use 16.1
Semichemical Fluids SELECTION OF A CUTTING FLUID
Semichemical fluids or semisynthetic fluids are essentially
a combination of chemical fluids and emulsifiable oils in The proper choice of a cutting fluid depends on many comn-
water. These fluids are actually preformed chemical emul- plex interrelated factors. Of primary concern are machin-
sions that contain only a small amount of emulsified min- ability (or grindability) of the material, compatibility (met-
eral oil. about 5 to 30 percent of the base fluid, which has allurgical. chemical and human) and acceptability (fluid
been added to form a translucent, stable emulsion of small properties, reliability and stability).
droplet size. Since the usual EP additives can be in-
corporated (often more readily in the oil content than in the Machinability
synthetic base), tloe lubricating performance can be varied
to permit using such fluids for moderate- and heavy-duty The selection of the type of cutting fluid for use should be
machining and grinding applications based on:
Semichemical fluids combine some of the best qualities of & Type of machining operation
chemical fluids and emulsifiable oils. The advantages and
limitations are similar to those described for chemical * Material beingmachned
fluids, except that semichemical fluids have better lubri-
cating properties than do chemical fluids. They are also Tool material
cleaner, with better rust and rancidity control than emulsi- * Machining conditions-cutting speed, feed, and depth of
fiable oils.
cut
16-7
16.1 Cutting Fluid Selection and Use
3. Mineral oil with chlorinated additives ing the heat generated. They permit heavier cuts to be
4. Mineral oil with sulfurized fatty additives taken, produce smoother finishes, reduce wheel brtak-
5. Mineral oil with free sulfur and sulfurized or chlori- down, and, hence, allow better form control. Oils suffer
nated compounds from the disadvantages of allowing heat buildup in the
workpiece, tending to hold chips in suspension, and smok-
Slow speed operations require the lubricating properties of ing or burning. The messiness of oil vapors is also a
cutting oils As a general rule, cutting oils should be used at nuisance.
cutting speeds below 100 feet per minute 130 m/mini. Cut-
ting oils with EP lubricants are effective in a wide variety In summary, from a machinability viewpoint, cutting and
of machining operations on many materials up to speeds of grinding fluids should be selected to provide the following:
200 feet per minute 160 m/mini. At speeds of about 200 feet
per minute 160 m/minI, chemical action is much less effec- Greater Lubrication
tive than at the lower speeds. Chemical action diminishes
quickly and becomes virtually nil as the cutting speed is in- 0 at relatively low speeds
creased to 400 feet per minute 1120 m/mini.
* on the more diffficult-to-machine materials
Both tapping and threading involve many small cutting
edges in continuous contact with the work throughout the * for more difficult operations
cut. The design of the tools and the nature of these oper-
ations shield the edges of the tools from the flow and the o for better surface finish
cooling effect of the cutting fluid, particularly in tapping Greater Cooling
There are some operations for whigh oils are specially for-
mulated. For example, honing requires the use of a thinner, Other Considerations
paraffinic-base oil. A number of other important factors must be considered
when selecting cutting and grinding fluids. These include
For many high speed operations, such as grinding and turn- compatibility of the fluid with the material being machined,
ing or milling with carbides, the most important benefit is the quality of the water in which it is mixed, tramp oil con-
provided by the superior cooling characteristics of the wa- tamination and the mach-ne tool. The acceptability of the
ter-miscible fluids. In such instances, lubrication and anti- fluid, in terms of its properties, reliability and stability, is
weld properties are less important. At high speeds, time for also important. Other factors to be considered include the
reaction between fluid additives and the workpiece is re- quantity of fluid used and the method of application, facil-
duced to a minimum. Further, the higher relative velocities ities for storing, handling, cleaning or recycling the fluid,
of the work and the tool virtually preclude the fluid's reach- the quality of water used in the aqueous emulsions or solu-
ing the work zone. Consequently, gross cooling is required tions, and the rust and rancidity control necessary. Eco-
to prevent catastrophic tool failure from crater wear, to nomic considerations include any waste treatment facilities
prevent distortion in the workpiece from heat buildup and that may be required prior to disposal. The cutting fluid's
to control workpiece size. effect on the total machining cost per piece must be consid-
ered, since the more expensive fluids may sometimes be
Some emulsifiable oils and chemical fluids are formulated more economical in the long run.
specifically for grinding operations and are used in concen-
trations of 1 part concentrate in 25 to 60 parts water. An Compatibility with Workpiece Material
increase in the richness of emulsifiable oil mixtures from The cutting fluid selected for use must tie compatible with
2.5 percent to 10 percent can improve the grindir- ratio the material being machined. The fluid should not cause _
and the workpiece finish and reduce horsepower require- staining or corrosion of the workpiece. It should prevent
ments. Note that the grinding ratio is a measure of the vol- corrosion of the workpiece during machining, while as
ume of material removed per unit volume of wheel wear. work-in-progress waiting for transfer, and possibly while in
storage for a reasonable time. Care should be taken when
Severe grinding operations, such as form, thread, and selecting coolants from a corrosion standpoint, especially
plunge grinding where wheel form is a critical factor, re- for nonferrous work materials.
quire the use of cutting oils or EP-compounded emulsi-
fiable oils. It shoul, be noted that for the low stress grind- Some copper alloys cannot be machined with highly sulfu-
ing technique, the use of an oil-base fluid results in less rized cutting oils since the active sulfur will stain the ma-
surface distortion. Grinding oils reduce friction, thus reduc- chined surface. Sulphur is often tised in a form in which it
16-8
Cutting Fluid Selection and Use 16.1
is chemically combined with fatty oils, although for severe residual stresses. Occasionally. data will show little
machining operations it is often used at low concentrations difference between water-miscible fluids and oils: however.
in its natural form as free sulfur. In this latter or active most of these tests involve higher infeed rates or higher
form, however, it is very reactive toward copper. For this wheel speeds. The effect of infeed is more pronounced and
reason, cutting fluids containing free sulfur should never be tends to overwhelm the effects of the fluids. Grinding oils
used in t!ie machining of copper or its alloys, become increasingly effective at wheel speeds below 4,000
feet per minute 120 m/sl. It is apparent that grinding oils
Metals such as aluminum, magnesium and zinc (also galva- are superior for high integrity grinding.
nized steel) are attacked by acids or alkalies, thus causing
corrosion. Selection of a cutting fluid for aluminum de- Compatibility with Water
pends on the alloy. Active sulfur or chlorine additives may Water-miscible fluids must be compatible with the water in
cause staining of some aluminum alloys. There are some which they are mixed. Water quality is perhaps the most
fluids, however, with patented additives that improve fin- important s'ingle factor affecting fluid life. The chemistry
ishes and help prevent staining. The use of highly alkaline and biology of the water have a strong impact on the cool-
grinding fluids on aluminum would probably produce badly ing effectiveness and the life of the coolant. The best cool-
corroded parts. Magnesium and its alloys, for example. ing action can be obtained from very fine emulsions, but
should never be machined or ground with water-miscible such emulsions cannot be made with water that is high in
fluids because the metal has an incendiary effect in water. either hardness or dissolved solids. Many things are af-
Zinc and galvnized steel should not be machined with fected by the hardness level or pH of the water, such as
nitrite-containing fluids; oil-rich emulsions with a pH of ap- rate of biological growth, rust protection, evaporative ef-
proximately 8.0 have been found effective for machining fect, emulsion stability, and foaming. A high chloride or
these metals. Special fluids available for machining copper, sulfate content can negate the rust protection that has been
aluminum and magnesium are listed in section 16.3. built into a coolant formulation. Hard water (over 200
ppm) can break some emulsions, resulting in scum forma-
Ferrous metals dissolve when attacked by acids and rust tion that leads to many performance problems. Soft water
will form. Alkalies form a protective layer on most ferrous (under 100 ppm) often produces excessive foam, especially
metals to prevent corrosion. Cutting fluids for ferrous met- under conditions of high agitation. A
als are therefore kept on the alkaline side-to inhibit rust-
ing of machines and machined parts. Compatibility with the Machine Tool
The cutting fluid must also be compatible with the machine
Fluid concentration should be maintained; otherwise, the tool in which it is being used. The use of water-mistible
rust-inhibiting properties will be reduced. Some rust inhib- fluids with most machines causes few problems. Usually,
itors are attacked by oxygen and acids in the air and in the the drive mechanisms and the feed mechanisms are some
water; eventually, the inhibitors will be used up. distance from the cutting zone, completely enclosed with
their own lubrication system and adequately sealed against
The rust-inhibiting effect of soluble oils is rapidly lost when the ingress of water-containing cutting fluids. With some of
machining cast iron. Therefore, it is advisable to add some the more complex machine tools, however, like automatic
soluble oil concentrate regularly in order to maintain the and semi-automatic lathes and gear cutting and broaching
proper concentration. To prevent corrosion, soluble oils machines. water-miscible fluids cannot be used. Because
must be 2 to 3 times more concentrated when machining many of these machines rely on a cutting fluid to lubricate
cast iron than when machining steel. moving parts near the cutting zone, the use of oils is man-
datory. In other cases, problems have been experie-.ced in
Particular care should be exercised in selecting cutting preventing a water-miscible fluid from reaching drive
fluids used for machining components which are highly mechanisms and, therefore, oils must also be used.
stressed in service and which are exposed to unusual envi-
ronments. For such parts, cutting fluids should be used Acceptability
which will not make the part vulnerable to stress corrosion Another important consideration in selecting cutting fluids
attack in the event that surface films are retained on the is acceptability to the operator. Fluids designed with the
workpiece. At present, the only way of selecting such cut- operator in mind will be clean to use, pleasant and safe to
ting fluids is to choose them on the basis of extensive labo- breathe, nontoxic and free from ingredients harsh to hu-
ratory tests and/or service experience. An alternative is to man skin. Bacterial growth in the coolant should be con-
provide unusual care in washing the cutting fluid away af- trollable before and during use. Fluid clarity makes it eas-
ter machining with due consideration given to the diffi- ier for the operator to see the work while it is being
culties of washing complex finished assemblies, machined. A pleasant-smelling, generally clean, "non- ;9
sticky" fluid helps to make an operator's job more pleasant
Cutting fluid selection can have a dramatic impact on the and productive.
distortion and the residual stresses generated by grinding.
Grinding is commonly done with water-miscible fluids, with
oils or even dry. The differences among them relate to ther- APPLICATION OF CUTTING FLUIDS -
mal cooling action, .ibricity and possibly some chemical
action, Water-miscible fluids have greater cooling capabil- The way in which a cutting fluid is applied has a consid-
uiy and less lubricity than the oils; however, they also im- erable influence on tool life and on the machining operation
pose a greater heat shock on the workpiece. Dry grinding in general. Although there are many extremely effective de-
conditions are not usually compatible with low stress grind- vices and systems for supplying fluids to the cutting area,
ing or high surface integrity. Lubrication is the most impor- special equipment is not generally necessary for good
tant function of the grinding fluid relative to control of results.
16-9 1
16.1 Cutting Fluid Selection and Use
Even the best fluid, however, cannot perform its function fluid to the cutting zone, a copious flow provides cooling ac-
unless it is effectively delivered to the cutting zone. Thus. a tion that prevents undue temperature rise. Proper cutting
fluid -hosen for its lubricating qualities must be directed so fluid application should not be neglected because of in-
that it can form a film at the sliding surfaces. Likewise, a adequate splash guards. Typical coolant flow requirements
fluid used for cooling must gain reasonable access to the are given in table 16.1-2.
cutting edge of the tool. These conditions usually require
that the fluid be forced into the cutting zone so that the heat The geometry of flood application directly influences the ef-
can be removed as it is generated. Continuous application fectiveness of cutting fluids. Nozzles should direct fluid flow
of the cutting fluid is preferable to intermittent application, so that fluid is not thrown off the workpiece or tool by cen-
Sporatic fluid application causes thermal cycling, which trifugal force. Two or more nozzles should be used-one for
leads to the formation and propogation of microcracks in directing fluid into the cutting zone and the other for aux-
hard and brittle tool materials, such as carbides. Besides iliary cooling and flushing away chips.
shortened tool life, intermittent fluid application'can lead to
irregular surface finishes. Turning and Boring
Turning and boring operations require the cutting fluid to
A secondary advantage of proper fluid application is the ef- be directed to the cutting zone where the chips form. This
ficient removal of chips. This also aids in prolonging tool provides good cooling action by enveloping the cutting tool
life, since properly placed fluid nozzles can prevent block- edge and the workpiece. An empirical rule is that the cool-
age or packing of the chips in the flutes of milling cutters ant nozzle should have an inside diameter of at least three-
and drill bits. quarters the width of lathe-type cutting tools.
For heavy-duty turning and boring operations, a second
Manual Application nozzle supplying fluid from below and along the flank of the
Paste and solid lubricants are applied manually by brush or tool is desirable. The flow from the lower nozzle is not hin-
oilcan to the tool and to the workpiece. mainly in tapping. dered by the chip and can be forced between the work and
More recent developments include pressurized aerosol dis- tool to help in providing lubrication at lower speeds.
persants and foams which cling to the tool and workpiece. Dilling and Reaming
Manual application is an effective method where a small For horizontal drilling and reaming, fluid application
number of holes are to be drilled or tapped on a machine through hollow tools is preferable to external application
that is not equipped with a coolant system. When two dif- because it provides adequate flow at the cutting edges and
ferent operations are performed on the same machine, flushes chips out of the hole. Even in vertical drilling, very
manual application may be used in conjunction with the little fluid gets down to the cutting zone because the spiral
flood cooling system of the machine. The flood cooling may flutes (which are designed to pump out the chips) pump out
be used for a drilling operation with a moderately active the fluid. The use of oil-hole drills will solve this problem.
fluid, whereas a highly active cutting oil can be applied
manually for a tapping operation that follows. Milling
Milling operations require the use of two nozzles directing
a copious supply of fluid to both the incoming and the out-
Flood Application going sides of the cutter. The fluid from one nozzle is
The most common method of applying fluids is to flood the pumped through the cutting zone by the cutter teeth, while
tool and workpiece. A low-pressure pump delivers the cut- fluid from the other nozzle washes away the chips as they I
ting fluid through piping and valves to nozzles situated near emerge from the cutter. Standard round nozzles are suf-
the cutting zone. After flooding the cutting area, the fluid ficient for narrow cutters. Wide cutters require using fan-
drains doA n over various parts of the machine into the chip shaped nozzles at least three-quarters the width of the mill-
pan whete it flows to the sump of the coolant pump. The ing cutter to provide good coverage.
volume of the tank must be sufficient to allow time for cool-
ing and for the settling of fine swarf and may require from For face milling, use of a ring-type distributor consisting of |
five to fifty gallons or more depending on the type of a tube with many small holes can be beneficial. This directs j
machine. A course strainer on top of the collecting pan pre- the fluid at all cutting edges and keeps the cutter corn-
vents larger chips from entering the tank and the fine pletely bathed in fluid to provide even cooling. When a par-
strainer at the pump section. Important exceptions are ticular size face mill is used often, the ring-type distributor
grinding, honing. lapping and deep-hole boring machines can be supplemented with a special fan nozzle with a
where high-quality work depends upon removing the finer curved opening to match the cutter radius.
swarf and abrasive particles. Occasions arise when the in-
clusion of filtration equipment on other types of machines Grinding
can avoid the gross co;,tamination and overloading of the A copious flow of cutting fluid at low pressures will gener-
coolant with the metall., particles and help keep the fluid ally provide good results for grinding operations. Where ap-
clean, thus prolonging its useful life. plication of a large volume of fluid results in undue splash-
ing, it is better to install splash guards on the machine than
Flood application of cutting fluids permits a continuous to reduce the coolant flow.
flow of fluid to the cutting zone and is efficient in flushing
away chips. A copious stream of fluid should be applied so The normal methods of applying fluids to grinding oper-
that the cutting tool cdg . and the work are completely en- ations remove little heat before it has dissipated into the
veloped. In addition to supplying an adequate amount of mass of the workpiece. Because high surface speeds are in-
16-10
Cutting Fluid Selection and Use 16.1
TABLE 16.1-2 Typical Coolant Flow Requirements
Screw Machining
1 inch [25 mm] dia 35 gal/min [132 L/min]
2 inch [50 mm] dia 45 gal/min [170 L/min]
3 inch [75 mm] dia. 60 gal/min [227 L/mini
Milling
Small cutters 5 gal/min [19 L/min]/tool
Large cutters Up to 60 gal/min [227 L/min]/
tool
Drilling, Reaming
1 inch [25 mm] dia. 2-3 gal/min [7.6-11 L/min]
Drilling, Large 2-3 gal/min x dia., inch
[0.3-0.43 L/min x dia., mm]
Gundrilling
External chip removal type
0.18-0.37 inch [4.6-9.4 mm] dia. 2-6 gal/min [7.6-23 L/min] Fine filtration required.
0.37-0.75 inch [9.4-19 mm] dia. 5-17 gal/min [19-64 L/min]
0.75-1.25 inch [19-32 mm] dia. 10-40 gal/min [38-151 L/min]
1.25-1.50 inch [32-38 mm] dia. 17-50 gal/min [64-189 L/min] Use higher flow rates for
Internal chip removal type deeper holes and the larg-
0.31-0.37 inch [7.9-9.4 mm] dia. 5-8 gal/min [19-30 L/minj est diameters in each
0.37-0.75 inch [9.4-19 mm] dia 8-26 gal/min [30-98 L/min] range.
0.75-1.18 inch [19-30 mm] dia. 26-66 gal/min [98-250 L/min]
1.18-2.38 inch [30-60 mm] dia. 66-130 gal/min [250-492 L/min]
Trepanning
External chip removal heads
2-3.5 inch [51-89 mm] dia. 8-48 gal/min [30-182 L/min] Fine filtration required.
3.5-6 inch [89-152 mm] dia. 16-80 gal/min [61-303 L/min]
6-8 inch [152-203 mm] dia. 32-104 gal/min [121-394 L/min] Use higher flow rates for
Internal chip removal heads deeper holes and the larg-
2.37-6 inch [60-152 mm] dia. 110-215 gal/min [416-814 L/min] est diameters in each
6-12 inch [152-305 mm] dia. 215-340 gal/min [814-1,287 L/min] range. If an emulsion is
12-18 inch [305-457 mm] dia. 340-460 gal/min [1,287-1,741 L/min] used instead of oil,
18-24 inch [457-610 mm] dia. 460-570 gal/min [1,741-2,158 L/min] increase the flow rate.
Honing
Small 3 gal/min [11 L/min]/hole Very fine filtration required.
Large 5 gal/min [19 L/min]/hole
Broaching
Small 10 gal [38 L]/stroke
Large 3 gal/stroke x length of cut, inch
[0.45 L/stroke x length of cut, mm]
Centerless grinding
Small 20 gal/min [76 L/min] Fine filtration required.
Large 40 gal/min [151 L/min]
Other grinding 5 gal/min/inch of wheel width
[0.75 L/min/mm of wheel width]
16-11 1
__ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ L!
16.1 Cutting Fluid Selection and Use
volved, an entrained film of air usually encloses the grind- hoses that are required for flood cooling. In addition, only
ing-wheel surface, and this prevents penetration of the fluid small amounts of fluids are used. and these generally dry on
into the cutting zone. Special nozzles can be designed the part or can be easily wiped away.
which will force the fluid through the air film and onto the
wheel. These nozzles must be placed as close as possible to Mist systems are often advantageous because they:
the workpiece to prevent complete loss of the fluid by the
centrifugal forces of the wheel. Another method of over- 0 Provide better tool life than cutting dry
coming the air film enclosing the grinding wheel is to use a
close-fitting baffle that interrupts the air flow. creating a 9 Provide coolant when a flood system is not available or
vacuum that sucks the grinding fluid into the wheel-work practical
interface.
* Apply fluids to otherwise inaccessible areas
High-Pressure Application e Provide higher fluid velocities at tool-workpiece inter-
For some operations, such as gundrilling and trepanning, face than possible by flood cooling
high-pressure fluid systems are normally used with fluids
being applied at pressures ranging from 100 to 2,000 psi 0 Reduce costs in some cases
1690 to 13.790 kPal. A gundrilling tool is essentially a
single-point end cutter similar to a boring tool. except that 0 Give better visibility of the workpiece in cut
it has an internal passage for fluid. Trepanning is a hole-
making opera-ion that cuts a cylindrical path into the Disadvantages of mist systems include limited cooling ca-
metal, leaving a solid core. "Ihis core passes through the pability and the need for venting.
hollow cylindrical cutting head as a tool feeds into the
metal. The cutting fluid is pumped around the outside of Two types of mist generators are normally used-the as-
the tool under pressure, forcing chips back through the pirator type and the direct-pressure type. For the aspirator,
center. Cutting fluids for trepanning must have good EP a stream of air is blown over the open end of a tube which
and anti-w-ld properties, must be low enough in viscosity is immersed in the fluid. A partial vacuum is created and
to flow freely around the tool, and must have good oiliness, the fluid is drawn up the tube where it becomes entrained
in the air stream. In the pressurized mist generator, either
Deep-hole drilling presents the problem of maintaining a pressurized gas bottles or shop air may be used to force the
sufficient flow of cutting fluid to the cutting edges. One so- fluid into the air stream.
lution is the use of oil-groove, oil-hole, or oil-tube drills,
which utilize drill-flute space for cutting fluid passages. The
fluid, under 50 to 100 psi 1345 to 690 kPal pressure, is Special Application Methods
transfered to the drill by a rotating gland and is forced Chilled cutting fluids and highly pressurized gases have
directly into the cutting zone. The fluid flowing from the been shown effective in increasing tool life. These methods
hole assists in chip removal. Oil-hole drills have become are more exotic than the conventional application methods.
very popular in recent years. particularly for deep holes. In special cases they may be economically justifiable. They
Their use represents a significant improvement over flood- may prove worthwhile to try in cases where nothing else
ing as the method of getting the cutting fluid to the drill works.
lip.,. Significant increases in tool life and productivity can
also be achieved (that is, oil-hole cooling gives better tool
life at higher speeds than flood cooling does). MAINTENANCE OF CUTTING FLUIDS
High-pressure systems are sometimes used for other oper- Cutting fluids, like any other fluids that are used over and
ations. The high pressure facilitates the fluid's reaching the over again, must be cared for properly. There are several
chip tool interface. In grinding, a high-pressure jet also precautions that should be observed.
serves to clean the wheel.
Cutting Oils
Mist Systems Oil-type fluids perform satisfactorily if applied at full flow
Cutting fluids may also be applied in the form of an air-car- to the tools and the work and if sufficient volume is main-
ried mist. Small jet equipment is used to disperse soluble tained in the system to hold the oil temperature around 700
oil or synthetic water-miscible cutting fluids as very fine to 75F 121 0 to 240 C].
droplets in a carrier such as air. at 10 to 80 psi 169 to 552
kPal, or occasionally as an aerosol. Water-miscible fluids Cutting and grinding oils become contaminated rapidly f
are preferred over oil because oil presents possible health during use. Extraneous materials, chips, dirt, etc., should
hazards and tends to clog. Mist application is best suited to be removed continously or at periodic intervals by filters.
operations where the cutting speed is high and the areas of strainers, centrifuges, or settling tanks. The mechanical
cut are low, as in end milling. Cutting fluids normally edge-type filter, incorporating metal strips or disks as the
chosen primarily for their cooling ability are used for mist filter element, acts principally as a strainer. The absorbent-
application. The very small droplets come into contact type filter uses paper disks, cotton waste, or cloth bags as
with the hot tool, workpiece, or chip and evaporate and the filtering element. Magnetic filters are suitable for sepa-
rapidly remove heat by vaporization. Mist cooling does not ration of ferrous particles. Centrifuging is used for remov-
require the splash guards, the chip pans and the return ing heavy contaminants and particles from oil. Centrifug-
16-12
Cutting Fluid Selection and Use 16.1
ing, together with a heating unit and settling tanks, is often off a bad odor. is usually caused by bacterial growth. The
used for extracting oil from chips. rotten-egg stench emanating from the sump of a machine
that has been shut down over a weekend is caused by bac-
All cutting oil systems should be drained at intervals, man- teria that attack inorganic sulfates found in all natural wa-
ually cleaned, flushed and replenished with filtered or new ters. A quality cutting fluid and regular use of biocides
cutting oil. Frequency of cleaning depends upon individual where needed are the best insurance against rancidity.
conditions.
Emulsion concentration is not always given the attention it
deserves. In heavy-duty cutting operations. heat at the tool
Emulsifiable Oils causes water to evaporate at a rate faster than the carryoff
Emulsions generally require more maintenance and care of oil on the machined parts. This results in an increased
than do cutting oils. When preparing emulsions, always add oil-to-water ratio, which if carried too far can cause an in-
the oil to at least two or three times as much water. This vert emulsion. The opposite applies to grinding operations
initial mix should be agitated thoroughly while the oil is where oil carryoff is higher and the emulsion becomes in-
being added: otherwise, soap forms which combines with creasingly dilute with use. This may cause rusting unless
the water causing the mineral oil to separate out. If not the concentration is frequently checked and controlled.
enough water is used. or if the water is added to the oil, an
invert emulsion will result (water particles are dispersed in The amount of time that an emulsion is kept in service var-
the oil phase) which is undesirable for metalcutting. Pre- ies widely-anywhere from one week to six months. Cool-
mixed fluids, instead of plain water, should be used for pre- ing an emulsion by mechanical circulation or refrigeration
paring or for alterating the mix concentration. is useful in extending its service life and in producing better
finish. Aeration. although an effective means of cooling an
Water used in preparing emulsions is very important. Hard emulsion, will usually increase microorganism growth
water containing various minerals and salts often hinders which results in reduced emulsion life. In use, emulsions
or impedes emulsification. It is not uncommon for emul- should be held at a temperature between 550 and 70*F 1130
sions made with hard water to "'break-readi.ly that is. to and 210 C.
separate into a stratified condition with a layer of oil or
creamy emulsion floating on the surface. Such separation is Before putting an emulsion into use, wash and flush the
detrimental. On the other hand, water that is too soft will coolant system thoroughly. Deposits of all kinds must be
cause foaming. Use of a specially formulated hard-water removed. Emulsions are extremely susceptible to con-
soluble oil with soft water may lead to the formation of a tamination If there is any reason to suspect that bacteria
bluish-black stain on freshly ground ferrous parts. are present in the system, flush it with a germicidal iolution
before putting in the new emulsion.
Water used for making cutting fluid mixtures should be as
pure as possible for the most economical and trouble-free
use. Boiler water condensate (when available) or deionized Occupational Dermatitis
water (mineral free) should be used. The deionizer removes Dermatitis is not an affliction that must be tolerated. It can
all minerals by chemical absorption so that the effluent is be closely controlled, or eliminateo, by observing simple
equivalent to distilled water Consequently. no residues are principles of cleanliness that the average person observes
left by evaporation of the water, and corrosion effects from at home.
minerals are eliminated.
Dermatitis is frequently. though mistakenly, associated
Pretreatment of hard water is sometimes necessary. Water with the handling of petroleum products, particularly in the
conditioning agents consisting usually of poiyphosphate machine shop where the operator's hands or forearms are
combinations are readily available, as is tri-sodium phos- in prolonged contact with soluble oils and cutting oils.
phate. The general rule for using these materials is to add Combined with dirt, these fluids form grimy compounds
about 1.5 ouncts per 100 gallons 10.11 grams per literl of that may become embedded in the skin, often blocking the
water per grain of hardness. Chemical tteatment of ex- pores and hair follicles. In many cases, these areas become
tremely hard water is far more economical than the pur- infected and dermatitis sets in. This condition may occur
chase of a specially formulated soluble oil. Excessive use of with almost any material that is allowed to remain on the
polyphosphate water conditioners. however, will tend to skin for a long period of time; it is not limited to petroleum
increase bacteria, mold and fungi growth. Where water products. A contributing factor may sometimes be the sol-
makeup rates are high, the use of deionized water is vent action ott .- cutting fluid. Left on the skin. the fluid
preferred. can dissolve tLL; natural skin oils, inflaming the skin and
causing it to crack.
Microorganisms in the water shorten the service life of a
soluble-oil emulsion. Microorganisms of three types-bac- The bactericides used in most cutting fluids generally have
teria, algae, and fungii-are often encountered in soluble no affect on the incidence of dermatitis; however, formal-
oils, and all three have detrimental effects on emulsion sta- dehyde-releasing bactericides may sensitize the skin of
bility. Many soluble oils are compounded with a bacteri- some people. People with thin skin are more susceptible to
cide. but the amount that can be added is limited by its dermatitis. Fair. biond-complexioned people are usually
solubility in the oil. When the emulsion is made, the bac- more susceptible than are dark, oilier-skinned people. For
tericide is further diluted, reducing its effectiveness, hypersensitive workers, the only answer is a switch to an-
other job-one in which they will not be exposed to cutting
Rancidity, the term applied whenever a cutting fluid gives fluids.
16-13
16.1 Cutting Fluid Selection and Use
Maintaining personal cleanliness, keeping the fluid clean. In order to meet federal, state, and local water-pollution-
using commercially available hand creams, barrier creams control laws, all water-miscible cutting fluids should un-
or protective clothing, and installing splash guards on the dergo some sort of treatment before disposal into a lake.
machines-all can help to control dermatitis in the shop. stream. or municipal sewer system. The chemicals consid-
ered as pollutants in water-miscible products are oil.
nitrites, phenols, phosphates, PCB, and heavy metals. The
Machine Cleaning Practice oil content can be broken out of emulsion by an acid or
For mineral-oil-base fluids, machine cleaning can generally aluminum sulfate treatment. The nitrite content of the ef-
be accomplished by periodic removal of chips, metal fines fluent can then be destroyed by treatment with sulfamic
and sludge. followed by flushing with clean cutting oil. acid.
No matter how effective a coolant clarifying system is on In some states effluent containing more than 2 parts per bil-
water-miscible fluids, machine cleaning must be performed lion of phenol or phenolic derivatives is prohibited. Where
eventually. Proper machine cleaning can extend coolant regulations are less st-ingent, phenols can be removed by
life 4 to 6 times. compared to simply removing the old cool- the use of a carbon filter or slurry.
ant and replacing it with fresh coolant.
For machines not in operation, the proper cleaning pro- Recycling Cutting i
cedure is as follows: Recycling of cutting fluids can solve waste-disposal prob-
lems, reduce costs and ease pollution problems. A closed-
1. Pump out old coolant. loop system for cutting fluid recycling will have some loss,
but 90 percent recovery is not unusual. Even lower rates of
2. Clean out chips and oil residue. recovery can justify the experse of a closed-loop system.
3. Add cleaner mixed with water at a ratio of 1:50 to ma- One basic part of a recycling system is some kind of filter to
chine tool (fill reservoir), remove metal chips and grinding swarf. Other elements are
needed to remove tramp oils, to provide makeup fluid, and,
4. Circulate cleaner for at least three hours until machine unless the recycling system is pa-t of a central fluid system,
is clean and apply cleaning solution directly to all ma- to haul, store, and pump fluid in and out of machine sumps.
chine surfaces that are not in contact with circulating
system. A recycling system can be used for separate machines or
used in a central fluid system as described in the following
5. When the mach;ne is clean, pump out cleaner and re- discussion.
move all accumulated sediment from the sump.
6. Fill with enough plain water to circulate through all CENTRAL FLUID SYSTEM
coolant lines and circulate for at least 15 minutes while
rinsing surfaces previously cleaned in step 4. Wherever possible, consideration should be given to the
possible use of central systems for handling of recycled
7. Drain and refill with plain water, circulate, rinse and fluids from groups of machines. This is only practical if the
drain again. machines are using the same cutting fluid throughout. A
group of grinding machines may be linked together to
8. Add new cutting fluid immediately to cover all exposed handle the swarf by means of an integrated conveying sys-
metal surfaces to prevent rusting. tern; however, all the machines must be grinding similar
materials since mixed metals lose their scrap value. The
By thoroughly cleaning a machine each time the coolant central collection of swarf wetted by cutting fluids also re-
needs changing, all bacteria are removed and, con- duces physical handling and improves working conditions.
sequently, are not present to immediately begin degrading g
the fresh coolant. Although a thorough cleaning takes con- Centralized coolant systems enable a plant to better main- 5
siderably more time compared to pumping out and recharg- tain cutting fluids by providing a convenient checkpoint
ing, the coolant will last considerably longer: consequently, with ancillary equipment to better maintain fluid concen- g
machines can be cleaned on a predetermined schedule in- tration. A central system also means that more controls or j
stead of on a "catch-as-catch-can" program. The result is checks can be brought into the evaluation by minimizing J
controllable machine downtime, which is always less ex- the number of samples that need to be checked. Besides
pensive than emergency downtime. providing better control, a central system minimizes
maintenance with a fluid recycling system. Centralized -;ys-
tems usually cost less than a number of individual machire
Disposal of Cutting Fluids units.
Disposal problems with straight oil products are minimized
with proper batch-type recovery equipment. Straight oil One major advantage of the central system is its efficient
fluids can be sterilized and water contaminants removed by removal of metal fines from the cutting fluid with the feasi-
heat. Settling and addition of base concentrates usually re- bility of removing tramp oil by centrifuge or by other
store adequate quality for continued use. When necessary, means. Centrifuging has an additional benefit for the fluid
oil-base fluids should be disposed of by burning (possibly as user. By centrifuging the coolant, both the tramp oil and
a fuel), the metallic fines are removed. With removal of these con-
16-14
Cutting Fluid Selection and Use 16.1
taminants, about half of the bacteria in the coolant is also ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
removed. since bacteria tend to grow at the interfaces of
the coolant solution and the tramp oil droplets and metallic The cost per piece produced is more important than the ini-
fines. The continuous removal of these contaminants. pe- tial price of a cutting fluid because in many cases more ex-
riodic quality control tests, and the systematic use of addi- pensive fluids may actually be more economical to use. Be-
tives or product concentrates based on these tests-are all cause the cutting fluid is part of a manufacturing system,
major factors which make the central system an effective an economic analysis of cutting fluids must take into co-i-
nieans of realizing extended cutting fluid life. Increased sideration both the costs associated with the fluid itself and
fluid life reduces the disposal problems inherent in the use the costs affected by the fluid. These two cost divisions can
of water-miscible fluids. be further subdivided into direct and indirect costs. In
those cases where the influence of specific costs is great. it
Extending cutting- or grinding-fluid life in central-system is possible to make a rough estimate of th.- savings without
applications requires greater attention to fluid quality con- a complete cost analysis. In any event, the economic justifi-
trol. The large number of machine tools and the productiv- cation of cutting and grinding fluids should include not oniy
ity involved justify greater levels of laboratory effort-not the cost of the fluid but also its effcct on the cost of tools,
only to determine concentration but also to determine ran- wheels, downtime, etc.
cidity-control performance. corrosion protection. volume of
recirculating chips (dirt load) and degree of unwanted con- The selection of cutting fluids varies with the work mate-
taminants. The use of system log records (water. product rial, the operations performed, etc. The benefits, such as
input, concentration, charge dates) and fluid test records reduced machining costs, increased production, decreased
(concentration. pH. bacteria count, dirt load. tramp oil, surface roughness, and greater accuracy, must be balanced
corrosion protection) are vital to monitoring the condition against the costs of having too many different fluids. These
of the cutting fluid and can be useful for identifying correc- include the cost of maintaining a large fluid inventory, fluid
tive action. changing costs, fluid price differentials, and increased
maintenance and disposal costs. Recycling of fluids can re-
duce the increasingly higher costs of fluid disposal.
16-15
.--.
- -~---- -w- - i- -
FEC3)i4i PAGL BJ.W4OT FI1JZD
JIM
ig
I
zl
:1
16-171
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recomnmenciations
1.4 Turning, Cutoff and HSS 2,5.7 3, 5,6,7 2,5,7 3,5,7 3, 5,7_
Form Tools Carbide 0,4.6 0,4, 5,7 0.4.6 1 0.4,6 5.7
1.5 Threading, Single Point HSS 2,5 36J 2.5 t 3,6 3
_____________ Carbide 1,4,6 1,4,6 1 , 4, J 1,4,6 1,4,6 1,4,6
1.6 Threading, Die HSS 2,5 3.6 3 2,5 3.6 a
__________ Carbide 1,4.6 1,4.6 1,4,6 1.4,6 1,.6 1,4,6
1.7 Hollow Milling HSS 1,4,6 2,5,7 3 1.4,6 2,5,7 3
__________ Carbide 0.4,6 0,4,6 2.5,7 0.4.6 0,4.6 2.5.7
2.1 Face Milling Liss 1,4,6 2,5,7 3 1.4,6 2,5,7 3
______________ uarbide 0.1,4 0,1,4 0,2 0,1.4 0,1,4 0,2
2. aeMligDiamond - - - - - -
16-18
50 V F
6.5 Circular Sawing Carbide 0,1,4 0,1,4 2.3 1.4,6 2,5,7 2,3
8.13 Abrasive Belt Grinding -0,1,4 0,1.4 1,4,6 0,1,4 0,1,4 1,4,6
16-19
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
TOOL 3. Carbon and Ferritic Alloy Steels (High 4. Free Machining Alloy Steels, Wrought
OPERATION MATERIAL Temperature Service)
1.4 Turning, Cutoff and HSS _____ 2,5,.7 2.5,7 2.,5,7 2,5,.7
Form Tools Carbide ______ 0.4,6 0,4,6 5.,7 5,7
1.5 Threading, Single Point HSS ______ 2,5 2,5 2,5 3
________________ Carbide _____ 1,4,6 1,4,6 1,4,6 1.4,6
1.6 Threading, Die HSS ______ 2,5 2, 5 2, 5 3
Carbide 1,4,6 s,.4,6 1,4,6 1.4.,6
1.7 Hollow Milling HSS 1.4,6 -,,5,7 2.,7 3
2. Tred
lliigHSS 2,5.7 2. 5, 7 3,5, 7 3
Ho~g80 80 80 90
J2.5,7
3.15 Burnishing 157 1,5,7 2,5,7 -
16-20
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
TOOL 3. CarLmn and Ferritic Alloy ^t 41., 4. Free Machining Alloy Steels, Wrought
OPERATION MATERIAL Temperature Service)
OR __________
16-21
16.2 Cuffing Fluid Recommendations
1.4 Turning, Cutoff and HSS 2,5,7 2,5.7 2,5,7 2.5.7 2,5,7 2,5.7
Form Tools Carbide 0,4.6 5,7 5,7 0.4,6 5,7 5,7
1.5 Threading, Single Point HSS 2.,5 2, 5 3 2,5 2,5 3
Carbide 1,4,6 1.4,6 1,4,6 1,4.6 1.,6 1,4,6
1.6 Threading, Die HSS 2,5 2.5 3 2.5 2,5 3
Carbide 1,4.6 1A46 1,.6 1,4,6 1.4.6 1,4.6
1.7 Hollow Milling HSS 1,5.7 2.5,7 3 1,5,7 2,5.7 3
Carbide 0.4,6 1.4.6 2.5.7 0,4.6 1,4.6 2,5.7
2.1 Face Mlling HSS 1,5,7 2,5,7 3 1,5,7 2.5,7 3
____________ Carbide 0,4,6 0,4.6 0,2 0,4,6 0.4.6 0,2
2.2 Face Milling Diamond - - - - - -
16-22
Cuffing Fluid Recommendations 16.2
OP~TONTOOL
ABRASIVE 125 to
S.Alloy Steels, Wrought
275 to 45 to
f 225 to
6. High Strength Steels, Wrought
275 to Over
275 Bhn 425 Shn 65 RC 275 Bhii 425 Bhn 45 Rc
6.5 Circular Sawing Carbide 1.4.6 2,5.7 2.3 1.4,6 2,5.7 2.3
16-23
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
1.4 Turning, Cutoff and HSS 2,5,7 2,5,7 2,5.7 2,5,7 2.5,7 3
Form Tools Carbide 5,7 5,7 2.5.7 5,7 5,7 5.6.7
1.5 Threading, Single Point HSS 2.5 3 3 3 3 3
Carbide 1.4,6 1,4,6- 2.5,7 2.5.7 1,4,6 1,4,6
1.6 Threading, Die HSS 2. 5 3 3 3 3 3
______________ Carbide 1,4.6 1.4,6 2,5,7 2.,7 1.,6 1.6
1.7 Hollow Milling HSS 2, 5 3 3 3 -3 3
Carbide 1.4,6 2,5,7 2,5,7 2,5.7 2,5,7 2,5,7
2.1 Face Milling HSS 2.5,7_ 3 2,5.7 2,5.7 3 3
Carbide 0,4.6 0,2 0.4,6 0.,6 0,5,7 0.5,7
2.2 Face Milling Diamond - - - - - -
3.15 Burnishing-257-22--
4.1 Tapping 15 .,
16-24
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
8. Tool Steels, Wrought
I
2.5.7 2.5.7
8.1 Surface Grlnding-Horiz.- 2,4.6 3 5.7 5.7 5
Spdl., Recip. Table -- _2_4.6_3 5.7 _._75.75._
5.4 - - - 5.4
8.9 Internal Grinding CBN -
8.13 Abrasive Belt Grnding -- 1.4.6 2,5.7 1,5.7 1.5.7 1.5.7 1.5.7
16-25
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
TOOL 9.~ Nitriding Steels, Wrought 10. Armor Plate, Ship Plate &, 11. Structural Steels, Wrought
OPERATION MATERIAL Aircraft Plate, Wrought
OR _____
1.4 Turning, Cutoff and HSS 2.5.7 - 2.5.7 2.5,7 2,5,7 2.5,7
Form Tools Carbide 4.6 5,7 5.7 5.7 0.4.6 5.7
1.5 Threading, Single Point HSS 3 - 3 3 2.5 2.5
Carbide 1,4,6 1.,6 1,4,6 1,4,6 1,4,6 1,4,6
1.6 Threading. Die HSS 3 _______ 3 3 2,5 2.5
Carbide 1.4.6 1.4.6 0.4,6 1.4,6 0.4.6 0.4.6
1.7 Hollow Milling I-ss 3 - 3 3 2.5 2,5
Carbide 2.5,7 2.5.7 0.4,6 2.5,7 0,4.6 0,4.6
2.1 Face Milling HSS 1.4,6 - 3,5.7 3 1.5.7 2,5.7
Carbide 0,4,6 0,2 0,4,6 0.2 0.4.6 0.4,6
2.2 Face Milling Diamond - - - - - -
16-26
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
TOOL 9. Nitriding Steels, Wrought 10. Armor Plate, Ship Plate& 11. Structural Steels, Wrought
OPERATION MATERIAL Aicraft Plate, Wrought
OR______ _____
6.2 Power Band Sawing HSS 1.4.3 3 2.5.7 3.5,7 1.4,6 2,5,7
6.5 Circular Sawing Carbide 1.4.6 2.3 1,4.6 1.4.6 1.4,6 2,5.7
8.DItenamrodigdB - 5. - - - -
16-27
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
OPERATION
TOOL
MATERIAL
12. Free Machinng Stanless Steels,
Wrought
f 13. Stainless Steels, Wrought
iorniuc and Austenitic
OR ________________
2.1 Face Milling HSS 1,4,6 1.4.6 ______ 2.5.7 2.5,7 ____
2.5 Side and SlotMilling- HSS 1,4.6 1,4.6 ______ 2,.7 2,5.7 ____
3.4Hn~g-90 90 90 90
3.15Burnishing 222
4.1 TappingHS233 [ 3
16-28
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
13. Stainless Steels, Wrought
Steels,
TOOL 12. Free Machining Stainless
OPERATION MATERIAL Wrought Fenic and Austenitic
OR
ABRASIVE 135 to Over 135 to 275 to
275 8hn 275 Bhn 275 Bhn 375 Bhn
5.1 Planing HSS 1.4.6 1.4.6 2.5.7 2.5.7
Carbide 1,4.6 1.4.6 1.4.6 1.4.6
5.2 Broaching HSS 2.5.7 3 2.5,7 3
Carbide 1,4.6 2,3 1,4.6 2.3
6.1 Power Hack Sawing HSS 1.5.7 3.5.7 1 5.7 3.5.7
16-29
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
1 ~13. Stainless Steels, Wrought!
TOOL 13._StainlessSteels,_Wrought _ 14. Precipitation Hardening Stainless Steels,
OPERATION MATERIAL Martensitic Wrought
3.14 Honing 90 90 90 90
3.15 Burnishing 2 2 2 2
4.1 Tapping H 3 2
HSS 3 2 3
16-30
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
13. Stainless Steels. Wrought I
1
TOOL 1S Se14. Precipitation Hardening Stainless Stee,
OPERATION MATERIAL nt rxj.t
OR
ABRASIVE 135 to 275 to 48 to 150 to
275 Shn 425 Shn 56 Rc 440 Bhn
5.1 Planing HSS 2.5.7 2.5.7 "3 "_2.5.7
Carbide 1,4.6 04,6 3.5.7 0.4.6
5.2 Broaching HSS 2.5.7 3 3 3
Carbide 1,4.6 2.3 3 2.3
6.1 Power Hack Sawing HSS 1.5.7 3.5.7 3 3.5.7
8.1 Surface
8.1 Griniding-Hodf,
Stadl..dTe -o - 5.7 1.4.6 5.7 1.4.6
Spdl,. Recip. Table ____ ____
8.9
s~ ztma
Internal Grinding
CBN -- -54
5,4 -
16-31
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
1.4 Turning, Cutoff and HSS 2,5,7 3,5,7 ______ 2.,7 2,5,7 2,5.7
Form Tools Carbide 0.4,6 0.4,6 ______ 0.4.6 5,7 5,7
1.5 Threading, Single Point HSS 1 2.5 3.6 ______ 2,5 2,5 3
Carbide 1,4,6 1.4,6 1.4.6 1,4,6 1,4.6
1.6 Threading, Die HSS 2,5 3,6 2,5 2,5 3
Carbide 1,4,6 1.4,6 1,4.6 1.4,6 1,4,6
1.7 Hollow Milling HSS 1,4,6 2.5,7 1,5,7 2,5,7 3
Carbide 0,4.6 0.4,6 ____ 0.4,6 1.4,6 2.5,7
2.1 Face Milling HSS 1,4,6 2,5,7 1,5,7 2,5.7 3
Carbide 0.1,4 0.1.4 0.4.6 0,4,6 0,2
2.2 Face Milling Diamond - - - -
16-32
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
16-33
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
18. Stainless Steels, Cast
TOOL 17. Tool Steels, Cast
OPERATION PMIWERIAL Austenitic and FerrItlc
on ________________
Carbide 2,, ,, ..
1.7 Hollow Milling HSS 3 3 3 13
Carbide .5. 2. 2.5.7 2.5,7__
2.1 Face Milling HSS 2,5.7 3 3 2.5,.7 __
____
1,4,6 1
3.4Hn~g-90 90 90 90
3.15 Burishing-22-2
16-34
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
TOOL
1
17. Tool Steels, Cast
18. Stainless Steels, Cast
OPERATION MATERIAL Austenitic and Ferrfitlc
OR ________________
ABRASIVE 150 to 325 to 48 to 135 to
250 Bhn 375 Bhn 65 Rc 210OBhn
5.1 Planing HSS 2,5,7 2,5,7 3 2,5,7
Carbide 1,4,6 1,5,7 3,5,7 1,4,6
5.2 Broaching HSS 2, 5, 7 3 3 2,5. 7
Caroide 1,4,6 3 3 1,4,6
6.1 Power Hack Sawing HSS 1,5,7 3 3 1.5.7
16-35
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
TOOL 18.___
Stainless____Steels,___Cast _ 19. Precipitation Hardening Stainlesa Steels,
OPERATION MATERIAL Martenslu~c Cast
ON ____ ____ ____ ____
31Hoig90 90 90
3.15 Burnishing 2 2 2
16-36
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
16-371
N _
OPEATONTOOL 20. Austenitic Manganese Steels, Cast j21. Gray Cast Irons
Carbide ______0,4,6 -
2.5 Side and Slot Milling- HSS ___ ___ ______ ______ 4.6 -
16-38
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
TOOL 20. Austenitic Manganese Steels, Cast 21. Gray Cast irons
OPERATION MATERIAL
6.5Cirulr Crbde
Swig ,50.4,6 -
7.2Gea Cttig,
HS trigh -4.6 -
and4. Sprlee
16-39
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
TOOL 22. Compacted Graphite Cast Irons 23. Ductile Cast Irons
OPERATION MATERIAL
OR
ABRASIVE 185 to 120 to 53 to
255 Bhn 400 Bhn 60 Rc
3.14 Honing - 80 80 -
1
16-40
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
OP~TONTOOL
ABRASIVE
1 22. Compacted Graphite Cast Irons
185 to 120 to
23. Ductile Cast Irons
53 to
________________ 255 Bhn 400 Shn 60 Rc
5.1 Planing HSS _____ 4.6 __ 4,6 -
16-41
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
TOOL 24. Malleable Cast Irons 25. White Cast Irons (Abrasion Resistant)
OPERATION MATERIAL
OR
ABRASIVE 110'o
o Over 450 to
260 Bhn 52 R - 600 Bhn
1.1 Turning, Single Point HSS 4.6 - 4.6
and Box Tools Carbide 0.4.6 - 0.4.6
1.3 Turning Diamond -- -
3.15 Burnishing 57 -
16-42
Cuffing Fluid Recommendations 16.2
TOOL 24. Malleable Cast Irons 25. White Cast Irons (Abrasion Resistant)
OPERAIION MATERIAL
OR
ABRASIVE 110 to Over 450 to
260 8hn 52 Rc 600 Shn
5.1 Planing H3S 4.6 - --
Carbide 0.4.6 --
5.2 Broaching HSS 5.7 --
Carbide 0.4.6 --
6.1 Power Hack Sawing HSS 4.6
8.6
8.7
Cylindrical Grinding
Cylindrlcal Grinding
-
CBN
Diamond
j 4.6
-
5.7
5.4
-
5.7
16-43
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
OPERATION
TOOL
MATERIAL
26. High Silicon Cast Irons J -
27. Chromium-Nickel Alloy
Castings
ABRASIVE - 2 ~ -275 to 375 Bhn
3.3
3.4
O1l-Hole or Pressurized-
Coolant Drilling
Spade Drilling
I
IHSS
HSS
Carbide
_ ____ _ _ _
______
_____
_ _ __ 3.5.7
5.7
3.5,7
____
j
_____j
3.14 Honing g
3.15 BurnIshing
16-44 A
_ ___ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ I
- - - - ~-~- _7
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
13
Carbide
5.2 Broaching HSS ______ ___________
Carbide _______
8. yicrclG~g5.7 2.3
6.9 l~~nding5.mo2.
5.7 2U
16-45U
16.2 Cuffing Fluid Recommendations
TOOL 28. Aluminum Alloys, Wrought 29. Aluminum Alloys, Cast 30. Magnesium Alloys,
OPERATION MATERIAL Wrought
OR
ABRASIVE 3G to 150 Bhn 40 to 1258nn50 to 90 Bhn
(500 kg) (500 kg) (500 kg)
1.1 Turning, Single Point HSS 4, 6, 82 _ 4,6, 82 1,88
and Box Tools Carbide 0, 4, 6 0.4,6 1,88
1.3 Turning Diamond 0, 4 6 0,4,6 1.88
3.9 Boring
Carbide
HSS
Carbide
0,1,82
40.4,
6,82
6
' 1,82
4,6,82
0, 4, 6
___ ___ j 1,88
"1,1,88
88 j
3.11 Boring Diamond 0 4,6 0,4,6 1,88
16-46
K
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
TOOL 28. Aluminum Alloys, Wrought 29. Aluminum Alloys, Cast 30. Magnesium Alloys,
OPERATION MATERIAL Wrought
OR
ABRASIVE 30 to 150 Bhn 40 to 125 Bhn 50 to 90 Bhn
(500 kg) - (500 kg) - (500 kg)
5.1 Planing HSS 4,6,82 1 4,6,82 1.88
Carbide 0.4,6 0,4,6 1,88
5.2 Broaching HSS 4,6,82 4,6, 82 0,1,88
Carbide 0,4,6 0.4,6 0,1,88
6.1 Power Hack Sawing HSS 0, 1,82 0, 1,82 0,1,88
16 7 _
16-47
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
TOOL 31. Magnesium Alloys, Cast 32. Titanium Alloys, Wrought 33. Titanium Alloys, Cast
OPERATION MATERIAL
OR __________
_________________ Carbide 1, 88 83 83
2.8 End MIllIng-Slotting HSS 1, 88 83,91 83.9111
Carbide 1, 8v 83 83
2.9 Thread Milling HSS 1. 88 83.91 83,91
T
________________ Carbide 1 1,88 83 83 ____
3.14 Honing - 80 90 90
3.15 Bumlsh~ng ]
4.1 Tapping
_ _ _ _ _ _
HSS
_ L
1.88
_ _ _
1,83
_ _ _ _ _ _I
1.83
16-48
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
OPRTINMTEOOL 31. Magnesium Alloys, Cast 32. Titanium Alloys, Wrought 33. Titanium Alloys, Cast
16-49f
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
TOOL 34. Copper Alloys, Wrought 35. Copper Alloys, Cast 36. Nickel Alloys, Wrought
16-50
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
TOOL 34. Copper Alloys, Wrought 35. Copper Alloys, Cast 36. Nickel Alloys, Wrought
OPERATION MATERIAL and Cast
OR
ABRASIVE 10 to 40 to 80 to
100 RA 425 Bhn 360 Bhn
5.1 Planing HSS 4,6, 87 4.6,87 5, 7.3
Carbide 4,6 4.6 0.5,7
5.2 Broaching HSS 4.6,87 4,6,87 5, 7,3
Carbide 4,6.87 4,6,87 5. 7,3
F 1 Power Hack Sawing HSS 1,87 1.87 5.7,3
16-51
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
TOOL 37. Beryllium Nickel Alloys, 38. Nltlnol Alloys, Wrought 39. High Temperature Alloys,
OPERATION MATERIAL Wrought and Cast Wrought and Cast
OR
ABRASIVE 200 to 47 to 210 to 140 to
425 Brin 52 Rc 515 Bhln - 475 Bhn
3.15 Burnishing
16-52
-.. . . ..- - .
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
TOOL 37. Beryllium Nickel Alloys. 38. NItl.nol Alloys, Wrought 39. High Temperature Alloys,
OPERATION MATERIAL Wrought and Cast Wrought and Cast
on
ABRASIVE 200 to 47 to 210to 140 to
425 Bhn 52 Rc 515 Bhn 475 Bhn
5.1 Planing HSS - -- - -
Carbide - .
16-53
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
TOOL 40. Refractory Metals, Wrought. 141. Znc All" , 42. Lead 43. TIn Alloys, 44. Uranium,
OPERATION MATERIAL Cast and P/M Cast Alloys, Cast Cast Wrought
OR[
A8I1ASIVE 170to 80 to 10 to 20 Bhn 15 to 30 Bhn 56 to
3.15 Burnishing
16-54
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
TOOL 40 Rercory Meas ruh,14l. Zinc Alloys.4.Led13 Tin Alloys, 44. Uranium,
OPERATION MATERIAL Cast and P/M Cast jAlloys, Cast Cast jWrought
ABRASIVE 1701to 0 o 10 to 20Bhn 15 to 3OBhn 56 t
320 Bhn 100 Bhn (500 kg) (500 kg) 58 RA
5.1 Planing HSS - - - f - -
Carbide -- - t - -
- 183 - -4.
16-55
16.2 Cuffing Fluid Recommendations
TOOL 45 Zicnu Alloys, Wrought 47 owe 48. Machinable Carbides 49. Carbides
OPERATION MATERIAL Metal Alloys
OR__ _ _ _ _____ __ _ _ _
3.15 Burnishing
4.1 Tappln"15
-use the samre cutting fluid as for cast alloys unless prohibited by partis
requirements for cleanliness; and Porosity.
16-56
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
OPERATION
J TOOL
jMATERIAL
45. Z3rconium Alloys, Wrought 47 Powe
Metal Alloys
48. Machinable Carbides 49. Carbides
OR _ _ _ _ ____
8.1
Grldlng..-orlz.
Surace -2.81 0.6 046046
3.8Ginin
ten - 2.8 0.. ..- ..
-U~sethe same cutting fluid astfor zast alloys unless prohibited by part
requirements for cleanlinelss and porosity.
16-57
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
TOOL So. Free Machining Magnetic 51. Magnetc Alloys I 52. Free Machining Controlled
OPERATION MATERIAL Alloys Expansion Alloys
OR I
ABRASIVE 185 to 185 to 1 45 to 125 to1
240 Bhn 240 Bhn 58 RC 260 Bhn -
Carbide - -
3.11 Boring
IDiamond
D aroid
-
...
____ - 11___ ____
3.15 Burnishing -
16-58
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
OPERATION
TOOL
MATERIAL
JO. Free Machining Magnetic
Alloys
31. Magnetic Alloys 52. Free Machining Controlled
Expansion Alloys
OR
ABRASIVE 185 to 185 to 45 to 125 to
240 Bhn - 240 Bhn I 58 Rc 250SBhn
5.1 Planing HSS -...
C a rb id e - ...
5.2 Brc.aching H s 5.7.3 5.7.3 - 5 7.3
Carbide 5.7.3 5.7.- 5. 7.3
6.1 Power Hack Sawing HSS 5.7. 3 5.7.3 - 5.7.3
6.2 Power Band Sawing HSS 5.7. 5.7.3 - 5.7.3
16-5
16-59
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
[_
1.5 Threading, Single Point
_ __ _ _
HSS
Carbide
HSS
-
---- 4.93
4.93
-
-
3.iS Burnishing
16-60
_ _ _.I
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
__________________ Carbide
5.2 Broaching HSS 5,7,3 _____ 0'*
Carbide 5,.7,3 01 -
3 I 0 4.93 4, 3
8.14 Thread Grinding
-2.3
I .
0* 4,93 . 93
16-61 Z
16.2 Cutting Fluid Recommendations
TOOL 56. Plastics 58. Flame (Thermal) Sprayed Materials 60. Precious 61. Rubber
OPERATION MATERIAL Metals
OR
ABRASIVE I
Spotfaclng
Diamond
HSS
Carbide
0, 4,6
0,4.6
0.4.6
_ -
-
.-
_
-
--
- -
3.15 Burnishing
16-62
Cutting Fluid Recommendations 16.2
60. Precious
TOOL 56. Plastics i 58. Flame (Thermal) Sprayed Materials eals 61. Rubber
OPERATION MATERIAL Silve,
OR _
ABRASIVE
16-63
PECMING PA(Z BLAN[-NOr FIL2D
0 DRY
16-65 M
__________
16.3 Cutting Fluid Key
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME
MANUFACTURER
1 OILS-LIGHT DUTY (GENERAL PURPOSE)
(Continued)
Straight Fatty Oil (Continued)
LARD OIL Oil 1948
W&B Lard
EWS LARD OIL (CODE 626) Tower Oil & Technology Co
The White & Bagley Co.
Arthur C. W:throw
Co.
Mineral Oil + Fatty Oil
Lafayette SCF-20
American Oil &Supply Co.
AMOCUT Oil No. 144-F
ARCO ML OilsAooOiC. Amoco Oil Co.
Bezora 22
Bzau 22 Atlantic Richfield Co.
Sparkut NF BP Oil. Inc.
Cook-Cut 25. Cook-Cut 30. Cook-Cut 1711 Bruce Products Corp.
FANOX N 33 Cooks Industrial Lubricants, Inc
B-650 CUTTING OIL Exxon Co., U.S.A.
Franklin Oil Corp (Ohio)
Gulfcut I IA
Habcoo1344 Gulf Oil Corp.
H & B Petroleum Co.
Cut-Max 110. Cut-Max 135
I.C. U152, I.C. #880 E. F. Houghton ? Co.
IRMCO 240, IRMCO 242 International Chemical Co
MINERAL LARD OIL International Refining & Mfg. Co.
LPSI LP2.LPS3 Keystone Div., Pennwalt Corp.
DO-A L-12 . LPS Research Laboratories. Inc.
Magnus Div., Economics Lab Inc.
Mobilmet 33. Mobilmet 34. Mobilmet 35
Kleer Kut Dual Work Mobil Oil Corp.
Triple C 5500 Pillsbury Chemical & Oil, Inc.
Non-Ferrous Aid Pro-Cheni Inc.
Petrolard 116, Petrolard 112 Process Research Products
NEAR-A-LARD OIL. SPECIAL NEAR-A-LARD OIL Reilly-Whiteman, Inc.
G. Whitfield Richards Co.
CUTZOL F 0.506. CUTZOL F 0. 509
SYN-KUT 115. SYN-KUT 135 Rust-Lick, Inc.
Space Age Blending Oil-Plus Henry E. Sanson & Sons. Inc.
Toolife 250, Toolife 251, Toolife 256 Space Age Chemlube
Factokut L-2 Specialty Products Co.
Starcut-3950 Standard Oil Co. (Ohio)
Star Oil Company
SUNICUT 150
Sun Petroleum Products Co.
Extra Cutting Oil
TOWER E- 3u Texaco Inc.
Tower Oil & Technology Co.
W&B Minolard Cutting Oil
Magnacut 40 The White & Bagley Co.
''ITHROKUT 104 CUTTING OIL Witco Chemical Corp.
LARDOLEUM 5 Arthur C. Withrow Co.
0 F Zurn Co.
Mineral Oil + Additives
Lafayette B-I 6
American Oil & Supply Co.
AMOCUT Tn-Purpose Cutting Oil
Promax 1110 Amoco Oil Co
Ashland Oil Inc.
Clairo Oils
Sevora 37. Lumaro 25. Lumaro 36 Atlantic Richfield Co.
Belco 1727 Cutting Oil B? Oil. Inc.
Be-Ray Co., Inc.
Brukut 177-X Bruce Products Corp.
16-66
Cutting Fluid Key 16.3
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-67
____
- -5---- - ----- - - -~-- - -
16.3 Cutting Fluid Key
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
2 OILS-MEDIUM DUTY
Sulfurized Mineral Oil
Lafayette B-1 6 American Oil & Supply Co.
AMOCUT Cil No. 1195. AMOCUT Oil No. 159S Amoco Oil Co.
Promax 1004 Ashland Oil. Inc.
Cutting Oil 70. Cutting Oil 100. Cutting Oil 160 Atlantic Richfield Co.
Lumaro 24A BP Oil. Inc.
Brukut 4 Bruce Products Corp.
PETROCHEM 709 Champions Choice. Inc.
Cook-Cut 10. Cook-Cut 4985-Clear Cook's Industrial Lubricants. Inc.
DAUBERT GARIA S Daubert Chemical Co.
PEERLESS CUTTING OIL 3307 Franklin Oil Corp. (Ohio)
IRMCO 269 International Refining & Mfg. Co.
C-5. C-41. C-42. C-47 Lubrication Co. of America
Fine Kut 41 Pillsburv Chemical & Oil. Inc.
FRIGIDOL CUTTING OIL G. Whitfield Richards Co.
CUTZOL S.O 5ul Rust-Lick. Inc.
SYN-KUT 845 Henry E. Sanson & Sons Inc.
Toolife 100 Specialty Products Co.
Starcut-3719 Star Oil Company
SUZICUT 300 Sun Petroleum Products Co.
W&B Sulfurized Mineral Oil 3197 The White & Babley Co.
16-68
Cuffing Fluid Key 16.3
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-69
71- 7n
16.3 Cuffing Fluid Key
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-70
Cutting Fluid Key 16.3
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-71
16.3 Cutting Fluid Key
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
3 OILS-HEAVY DUTY
Sulfurized Mineral Oil
AMOCUT Oil No. 159S Amoco Oil Co.
PETROCHEM 709 Champions Choice, Inc.
CITGO Cutting Oil 110 Cities Service Co.
Cook-Cut 4985-Clear Cook's Industrial Lubricants, Inc.
PEERLESS 3307 Franklin Oil Corp. (Ohio)
Smooth Cut 111. 112,113,114 Lubrication Co. of America
16-72
Cutting Fluid Key 16.3
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16 -73
- - ---- - ~ ~ ~ -zEPA
16.3 Cuffing Fluid Key
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-74
Cutting Fluid Key 16.3
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-75
-I
16.3 Cutting Fluid Key
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-76
Cutting Fluid Key 16.3
COUE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-77
~
.--- l m..- - - o - . . , . _- . _ -- - . : _ .. .
16.3 Cutting Fluid Key
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-78
Cutting Fluid Key 16.3
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
Semlsynthetic
Brukool 82-C. Brukool 121 Bruce Products Corp.
12 D 192 Chrysler Corp.
Cook-Coolex 40, Cook-Cool 1300, Cook-Cool 4893 Cook's Industrial Lubricants. Inc.
COOL SPEED 363 Daubert Chemical Co.
TOOL COOL 1369 Franklin Oil Corp. (Ohio)
I.C. #343-S International Chemical Co.
J-Cool. Trampol-X, Coldstream S. C. Johnson & Son. Inc.
CLEAR-CUT C Larson Chemical Specialties
Heavy Duty 302 Carbo-Flo, Florosol Lubrication Co. of America
Hamikleer Harry Miller Corp.
CHOICE-CUT Monroe Chemical Co. Inc.
Hy Kut 105 Pillsbury Chemical & Oil, Inc.
Triple C 2670 Pro-Chem Inc.
Sintolin OP2,HD Process Research Products
LUBE-WELL "CD- COMPOUND G. Whitfield Richards Co.
CUTZOL WS-15. CUTZOL WS-30 Rust-Lick, Inc.
SYZ-KUT H Henry E. Sanson & Sons, Inc.
Toolife 316 Specialty Products Co.
SUNICOOL 6 Sun Petroleum Products Co.
ME II Super Concentrate (Recirculating) Tapmatic Corp.
Ami-Lube X-20 Tron-X Research Corp.
VSCC 537. VSCC 545-E Van Straaten Chemical Co.
W&B Concentrate 3100 The White &Bagley Co.
Macco Syncrocut 980-W-1, Macco Syncrocut 980-MM-2 Witco Chemical Corp.
16-79
16.3 Cutting Fluid Key
CODE
NO. TYPE AN[ TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-80
- - =~.=- --
Cuffing Fluid Key 16.3
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-81
16.3 Cuffing Fluid Key
r.-.DE
Semichemical
AMOCOOL SS Fluid Amoco Oil Co.
BrukooI 129 Bruce Products Corp.
CIMPERIAL 15 Cincinnati Milacron. Products Div.
COOL SPEED 515 Daubert Chemical Co.
Libricoolant 930 Sol. Oil (Mineral with natural sulfur) DuBois Chemicals
I.C. 41667 International Chemical Co.
IRMCO 302 International Refining & Mfg. Co.
TRIM EP Master Chemical Corp.
Hamikleer Harry Miller Corp.
CHOICE-CUT Monroe Chemical Co.. Inc.
Hy Kut 9737 Pillsbury Chemical & Oil. Inc.
POLAR SOL 510 Polar Chip. Inc.
Triple C 3010 Pro-Chem Inc.
LUBE-A-TUBE "XAM' COMPOUND G. Whitfield Richards Co.
CUTZOL WS-5100 Rust-Lick. Inc.
SYN-SOL Henry E. Sanson & Sons. Inc.
Space Age "Will-Cut'" Space Age Chemlube
Ami-Lube SX-15 Tron-X Research Corp.
VSCC 707 Van Straaten Chemical Co.
W&B EP Concentrate 2828 The White & Bagley Co.
Syncrocut 167-DM-9. Macco 158-C Witco Chemical Corp.
ZURNSOL 253 0 F Zurn Co.
Semisynthetic
Brukool 66. Brukool 128 Bruce Products Corp.
Cook-Coolex 40 Cook's Industrial Lubricants. Inc.
COOL SPEED 363 Daubert Chemical Co.
Fremont-7030. Fremont-7031. Fremont-7032. Fremont-7033.
Fremont-7035. Fremont-7036 Fremont Industries, Inc.
I.C. 321K International Chemical Co.
IRMCO 303 International Refining & Mfg. Co.
Slipstream 54. Coldstream S. C. Johnson & Son. Inc.
Hon-E-Cool Lubrication Co. of America
Hamikleer Harry Miller Corp.
CHOICE-CUT Monroe Chemical Co., Inc.
Oakite Formula B-S0 Oakite Products, Inc.
Hy Kut 9734 Pillsbury Chen,.ical & Oil. Inc.
Triple C 2511 Pro-Chem Inc.
GWR COMPOUND G. Whitfield Richards Co.
CUTZOL WS-15. CUTZOL WS-30 Rust-Lick. Inc.
SYN-SOL DURO 55,P.O. CUTTING LIQUID Henry E. Sanson & Sons Inc.
Space Age "Will-Cut- Space Age Chemlube
Toolife 316 Specialty Products Co.
16-82
Cutting Fluid Key 16.3
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
Solutions
CAMPBELLENE. CAMPBELLENE NO-NITRITE Allison Campbell Div./Acco
Industries
Lafayette Soluble #91 American Oil & Supply Co.
AMOCOOL Transparent Coolant Amoco Oil Co.
Adcool I Ashland Oil. Inc.
Brukoo1130. Brukool 77. Brukool 78 Bruce Products Corp.
PETROCHEM CHEMICAL COOLANT Champions Choice. Inc.
L 1549.12 D 192 Chrysler Corp.
CIMFREE 104. CIMFREE 106. CIMFREE 108 Cincinnati Milacron. Products Div.
Cook-Cool 1975 (Grinding). Cook-Cool 4988 (Grinding) Cooks Industrial Lubricants. Inc.
COOL SPEED 77-45. COOL SPEED 36 Daub-:rt Chemical Co.
Kleen-Kool DoALL Co.
Lubricoolant 925. Lubricoolant 926 DuBois Chemicals
Fremont-5018 Fremont Industries. Inc.
Houghto-Grind 60 E. F. Houghton & Co.
I.C. 124 International Chemical Co.
IRMCO 120. IRMCO 110 International Refining & Mfg. Co.
50 Cool. TL-131. Millstream S. C. Johnson & Sen. Inc.
KEYCUT 106 Keystone Division/Pennwalt Corp.
KOOLMIST FORMULA #78 COOLANT Kool Mist Corp.
LPS 1. LPS 2. LPS 3 LPS Research Laboratories. Inc.
BLUE COOLANT NF Magnus Div./Economics Lab Inc.
TRIM 9106. TRIM 9106CS. TRIM REGULAR. TRIM
7030. TRIM 5050. TRIM 2575, TRIM MIST. TRIM 9106WA Master Chemical Corp.
Metgrind #432. Metgrind #468 Metalloid Corp.
Hamikleer Harry Miller Corp.
MC"tROE RI Monroe Chemical Co.. Inc.
WHEELMATE 464. WHEELMATE 467 Norton Co.
Oakite Formula A. Oakite Formula C. Oakite Formula G Oakite Products. Inc.
Hone-Rite 306 Pillsburv Chemical & Oil, Inc.
Polar Chip 347 Polar Chip. Inc.
Sintolin R30. Aqualap 15C Process Research Products
Rycosol 66 Reilly-Whiteman. Inc.
GWR #110 G. Whitfield Richards Co.
RUST-LICK G-25-j. RUST-LICK G-25-AH, VVTRO.NT Rust-Lick, Inc.
MIRROR-KOOL M-1. MIRROR-KOOL M-15 Henry E. Sanson & Sons. Inc.
Kool-Aide I Space Age Chemlube
16-83
__ __ _____i -
16.3 Cuffing Fluid Key
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
Solutions (Continued)
Toolife 305 Specialty Products Co.
Molecular Edge (Squirt on). ME 11Super Concentrate (Recirculating) Tapmatic Corp.
TOWERKEM W-21 10 Tower Oil & Technology Co.
Ami-Lube Clear Tron-X Research Corp.
VSCC 990 Van Straaten Chemical Co.
Bio-Cool 500 Westmont Industrial Products
W&B Grinding Concentrate 1500 The White & Bagley Co.
Syncrocut 980-CE-3. Syncrocut 850-A-3 Witco Chemical Corp.
WITHROKOOL 334 CHEMICAL COOLANT Arthur C. Withrow Co.
ZURN KOOLKUT 0 F Zurn Co.
Synthetic Emulsions
Q-77 Coolant Concentrate Associate Technical Sales Co.
L 1542 Chrysler Corp.
CIMCOOL S2 Cincinnati Milacron. Products Div.
COOL SPEED 363 Daubert Chemical Co.
KUTWELL 82 Exxon Co., U.S.A.
Hocut 711 E. F. Houghton & Co. 4i
I.C. #922 International Chemical Co.
Specialube 994 Lubrication Technology, Inc.
Hamikleer Harry Miller Corp.
MONROENN Monroe Chemical Co.. Inc.
WHEELMATE 405, WHEELMATE 414. WHEELMATE 419.
WHEELMATE 613 Norton Co.
Hy Kut 105 Pillsbury Chemical & Oil. Inc.
Polar Cut 400 Polar Chip, Inc. 24
Triple C 2010 Pro-Chem Inc.
Rycosol 77, Rycosol 87 NF Reilly-Whiteman, Inc.
LUBE-WELL D-171 SOLUBLE OIL G. Whitfield Richards Co.
CUTZOL WS-15 Rust-Lick, Inc.
MIRROR-KOOL G-70 Henry E. Sanson & Sons, Inc.
Kool-Aide XII Space Age Chem!ube
Toolife 316 Specialty Products Co.
SUNICOOL 6 Sun Petroleum Products Co.
Ami-Lube Syn-12 Series Tron-X Research Corp.
W&B Lubricant 1888 The White & Bagley Co.
Solutions
CAMPBELLENE, CAMPBELLENE NO-NITRITE Allison Campbell Div./Acco
Industries
Lafayette Synthetic #102 American Oil & Supply Co.
Adcool 2 Ashland Oil, Inc.
Brukool 106 Bruce Products Corp.
PETROCHEM 130Z Champions Choice, Inc.
12 U 176,12 U 182 B Chrysler Corp.
16-84
Cutting Fluid Key 16.3
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
Solutions (Continued)
CIMFREE 234, CIMFREE 238. CIMFREE 305. CIMFREE 307 Cincinnati Milacron. Products Div.
Cook-Cool 1975 (Grinding). Cook-Cool 4988 (Grinding) Cook's Industrial Lubricants. Inc.
POWER-CUT HD-600 DoALL Co.
TOOL COOL 268 Franklin Oil Corp. (Ohio) -
Fremont-701 0. Fremont-701 1 Fremont Industries. Inc.
Gulfcut Soluble CB-2 Gulf Oil Co. p.
Hocut 702. Hocut 4206. Hydra-Cut 496 E. F. Houghton & Co.
I.C. 2614 International Chemical Co.
IRMCO 111 International Refining & Mfg. Co.
KOOLMIST FORMULA #77 COOLANT Kool Mist Corp.
CLEAR-CUT 44 Larson Chemical Snecialists
Empactosol Lubrication Co. of America
Specialube 67D. Specialube 75 Lubrication Techn,og%". Inc.
TRIM HD. TRIM EP Master Chemical Corp.
Metchem f-429. Metchem #474 Metalloid Corp.
Hamikleer Harry Miller Corp.
WHEELMATE 658. WHEELMATE 689 Nortoa Co.
Kool Kut X350 Pillsbury Chemical & Oil. Inc.
POLAR CHIP 347L Polar Chip. Inc.
Sintolin ROD Process Research Products
GWR COMPOUND G. Whitfield Richards Co.
VYTRON. RUST-LICK G-52 Rust-Lick. Inc.
E-COOL. MIRROR-KUT G-7 Henry E. Sanson & Sons Inc.
Kool-Aide III Space Age Chemlube
Toolife 311 Specialty Products Co.
Molecular Edge (Squirt on). ME IISuper Concentrate (Recirculating) Tapmatic Corp.
TOWERKEM W-2110 Tower Oil & Technology Co.
A.i-Lube 1OX-C!ar Tron-X Research Corp.
VSCC 951. VSCC 936 Van Straaten Chemical Co.
Bio-Cool 700 Westmont Industrial Products
W&B Concentrate 3100 The White & Bagley Co.
S)ncrocut 105. Syncrocut 172 Witco Chemical Corp.
WITHROKOOL 340 CHEMICAL COOLANT Arthur C. Withrow Co.
ZURN ALL MET 6 O F Zurn Co.
Synthetic Emulsions
Adcool 3 Ashland Oil. Inc.
Brukoo1132 Bruce Products Corp.
12 U 41 Chrysler Corp.
CIMCOOL FIVE STAR 40. CIMCOOL S4. CIMCOOL S8 Cincinnati Milacron. Products Div.
COOL SPEED 363. COOL SPEED 515 Daubert Chemical Co.
I.C. #922 International Chemical Co.
Specialube 997A. Specialube 998 Lubrication Technology, Inc.
Hamikleer Harry Miller Corp.
MONROE NN Monroe Chemical Co., Inc.
WHEELMATE 603. WHEELMATE 613. WHEELMATE 674 Norton Co.
Hy Kut 9734 Pillsbury Chemical & Oil, Inc.
POLAR EZE 444 Polar Chip, Inc.
Triple C 2510 Pro-Chem Inc.
16-85
16.3 Cutting Fluid Key
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME
MANUFACTURER
7 CHEMICAL AND SYNTHETICS-HEAVY DUTY
(Continued)
Synthetic Emulsions (Continued)
Rycosol 99Rel-himn.I.
LUBE-WELL _X_ COMPOUND G. lWhite nIcs.
CJJTZOL WS-15GIhtildRcad o
KoING K31L Henry E. Sanson & Sons. Inc.
SToolife31 Specialty Products Co.
Ami-Lube Syn-12X Series trOilX ResacnCrp
VSCC 950. VSCC 938 rnXRsacCop
W&B ubriant 300Van Straaten Chemical Co.
WITHROKOOL 339 CHEMICAL COOLANT The White & Bagley Co.
2520 OOLKU OOLKU
ZURN
ZURN 252Arthur C. Withrow Co.
F Zurn Co.
8 SPECIALS-LIGHT DUTY
80 Honing Oil-Light Duty
Lafayette KM-16AmicnOl&SplCo
AMOCUT Oil No. 62FC Amorca Oil o. p~vCo
Econ S. Promax 1074 Ashlan oil. C.
HeonolOil Atlantic Richfield Co.
Bezora 3BP Oil. Inc.
Bruko D-666 (non-ferrous). Bruko D-667 (ferrous)
PETROCHEM HONING OIl Bruce Products Corp.
CIM FREE 104. CIMPREE 200. CIMFREE 23-4. Champions Choice. Inc.
CIMPREE 238 Cincinnati Milacron. Products Div.
Cook 250Comp undCook-s
Industrial Lubricants. Inc.
DAUBE
HDaubert T GA IA Chemical Co.
MICR
5: 9 .10Ex
C O OL IC- Cell.O Tool& A brasive
MENTOR28Products
MENfcTO .G
28 lfu Exxon Co.. U.S.A.
GR ulf
I DGut h . G u fc ut ulf O il C orp .
I.C 2785.
M C29 International Chemical Co.
IRMC.OLP 2 . IRMCO 22 International Refining a Mfg. Co.
L PS 1. L 2 LPS LPS Research Laboratories. Inc.
ELU3RHinOl H13 Larson Chemical Specialties
Lco H1ngOl2 Lubrication Co. of America
L-12 Magnus Div.JEconotics Lab Inc.
TRIM REGULAR. TRIM 7030. TRIM SOL LC
Master Chemical Corp.
TF 382Metalloid Corp.
HamiubeHarry Miller Carp.
Alumicut
Msi ea oe.Ic
VacmuJ 3A Msi ea oe.Ic
Hone~te711Mobil Oil Corp.
GRA Honing Oil Hone~ie 711Pillsbury Chemical & Oil. Inc.
Process Research Products
Petros n 102Reilly-W hiteman. Inc-
GWR HONING OIL
G. Whitfield Richards Co.
HONZOL 11-B
Rust-Lick. Inc.
SYN--IOE M-LVHenry E. Sanson &Sons Inc.
16-86
Cutting Fluid Key 16.3
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME
MANuFACTrURER
8 SPECIALS-LIGHT DUTY (Continued)
80 Honing Oil-Light Duty (Continued)
Toolife Honing Oil
Factokut H Specialty Products Co.
SUNICtIT 102 Standard Oil Co. (Ohio)
MAN-845. CK-50 (for cast iron and a!uminuin only) Sun Petroleum Products Co.
Almag Sunnen Products Co.
TOWER D-204 Texaco Inc.
VSCC 5551 -A Tower Oil & Technology Co.
Bio-Hone 252 Van Straaten Chemical Co.
W&B Honing Oil 2088 Westmont Industrial Products
Macco Honing Oil The White & Bagley Co.
WITHROKUT 104 CUT TING OIL Witco Chemical Corp.
Arthur C. Withrow Co.
81 Chemical Grinding Fluids: Amine Nitrite Solution, Sodium
itrite Solution, etc.
(NOTE: Products with * are Nitrite Fr'~e. See Chemical Fluids
in section 15. 1.)
Bet-Ray Coolant 12X
Brukool 77, Brukool 106 Bel-Ray Co., Inc.
Cook-Cool 1975*, Cook.Ct-ol 4988* Bruce Products Corp.
COOL SPEED 77-45, COOL SPEED 363*. COOL SPEED Cook's Industi ial Lubricants, Inc.
36* Daubert Chemical Co.
DuBois 910 Synthetic (sodium nitride solution), DuBois
915 DuBois Cheni-cals
TOOL COOL 1392
Coolant R se 100 Franklin Oil Corp. (Ohio)
I.C. 445, I.C. 124* E. F. Houghton &Co.
Electrisol 308 International Chemical Co.
Lubrication Co. of America
TRIM 91 06*, TRIM REGULAR. TRIM 7030. TRIM
TRIM 2575*. TRIM HD, TRIM EP, TRIM 9106WA*, 5050,
TRIM HM, T-RIM TI GRIND TRIM CLEAR,
Metgrind 4468* Master Chemical Corp.
Immunui, Hamikleer Metailuid Corp.
MONROE NN*, MONROE RI* Harry Miller Corp.
WHEELMATE 203, WHEELMATE 205 Monroe Cherrical Co., Inc.
flone Rite 3795 Norton Co.
Pola- Chip 34 7*, GRINDEX I IB Pillsbury Chemical 8s Oil, Inc.
XSS-30A Polar Chip, Irc.
VYT,7ON. RUST-LICK B, RUST-LICK G-25-j, RUST-LICK Reilly-Whiteman, Inc.
G-25.AH*,
RUST-LICK G-1 066D0utLcIc I -
16-87
_ _ _ _
16.3 Cutting Fluid Key
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-88
Cutting Fluid Key 16.3
CODE A
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-89
16.3 Cutting Fluid Key
CODE
16-90
Cutting Fluid Key 16.3
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-91
16.3 Cutting Fluid Key
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-92
5-- --
Cutting Fluid Key 16.3
CODE
16-93
16.3 Cutting Fluid Key
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
9 SPECIALS-HEAVY DUTY
90 Honing OIl-Heavy Duty
AMOCUT Gundrill Oil Amoco Oil Co.
Promax 1130 Ashland Oil. Inc.
Honol Oils Atlantic Richfield Co.
Bezora 3 BP Oil. Inc.
Bruko D-666 (non-ferrous). Bruko D-667 (ferrous) Bruce Products Corp.
PETROCHEM 708 Champions Choice. Inc.
Cook's Honing Oil 1995 Cook's Industrial Lubricants, Inc.
DAUBERT GARIA T Daubert Chemical Co.
MICROCOOL IC-9 HONING OIL (Concentrate). MICROCOOL IC-9S: 80-20 Ex-Cell-O Tool &Abrasive
Products
I.C. #155 International Chemical Co.
IRMCO 229 International Refining & Mfg. Co.
LPS 1. LPS 2. LPS 3 LPS Research Laboratories, Inc.
Threadmate Honing Oil 228 Lubrication Co. of America
TRIM SOL S. TRIM EP, TRIM HD Master Chemical Corp.
Metcool 222, Metcool 999 Metalloid Corp.
Vacmul 3D, Vacmul 21C Mobil Oil Corp.
United Base Pillsbury Chemical & Oil. Inc.
PRP 9112 Honing Additive Process Research Products
Petrosan EP43 Reilly-Whiteman, Inc.
FRIGIDOL HONING OIL G. Whitfield Richards Co.
HONZOL 411-B Rust-Lick, Inc.
SYN-HONE MM Henry E. Sanson & Sons, Inc.
Factokut H Standard Oil Co. (Ohio)
Star-3701 Star Oil Company
MAN-852 (Sulfur Free), MB-30 Sunnen Products Co.
Transultex A Texaco Inc.
TOWER D-204 Tower Oil & Technology Co.
VSCC 5299-A Van Straaten Chemical Co.
W&B Honing Oil 2088 The White & Bagley Co.
Biu-Hone 253 Westmont Industrial Products
Macco Honing Oil Witco Chemical Corp. _4
16-94
- T A- ---
Cutting Fluid Key 16.3
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-95
16.3 Cutting Fluid Key
CODE
NO. TYPE AND TRADE NAME MANUFACTURER
16-96
v- _ _ - _ _ -
SECTION 17
POWER AND FORCE
REQUIREMENTS
IN MACHINING
17-11
EME1O PAS BL~aM-NOT FILM~
Vc Transient surface
Feed per revolution
Thrust
force
Ft
63,030 x lips TS 9
549 x cW 5
TS rpm p
17-3
17.1 Determining Forces in Machining
Dynamometer X-
protected by cover
Dynamometer fastened to
subplate and bolted to -Strain gages at each corner
tableM
Three-force dyamometer designed
especially
machining forces during milling (end milling for measuring= i
shown).
Qo ea P =Ui oe.klm1i
eoa ae li
Ts = Torque at spindle, in-lb 0 -Metal removal rate, cm3 /min f,. W
Tr = Torque art spindle, N-m0
Vc-Cutting speed., fPmn
T 6_3.030 x bps Vc
Fc = Cutting force, lb = Cutting speed, mlmin
3 rp =
29 x kWs
Cutting force. N T
w = Width of cut, in rpmFm
-...
W =Wdho um
17-4
Determining Forces in Machining 17.1
/J
Strain
gagesj
jTest piece
Strain
Base
%-
17-5
PRECEDING PA( ALAW-NOT FILVD
The power required in machining can be determined by vided in figures 17.2-3 through 17.2-10 for deternining the
several different methods as follows: power required for turning, milling, drilling and broaching.
Calculation of power from published values of unit Figures 17.2-7 and 17.2-8 - Alignment Chart for
power requirements. An adequate estimate of power in Determining Motor Power in Drilling
machining can be made from the unit power requirements
given in table 17.2-3 and figure 17.2-1 or table 17.2-4 and Figures 17.2-9 and 17.2-10 - Alignment Chart for
figure 17.2-2. The power is determined by multiplying the Determining Metal Removal Rate and Motor Power in
unit power requirements (hp/"n3 /min or kW/cm3/min) by Surface Broaching
the rate.of metal removal (in3/min or cm 3/min). The equa-
tions for performing these operations are given in tables Figure 17.2-11 - Alignment Chart for Estimating
17.2-1 and 17.2-2. In addition, alignment charts are pro- Spindle Drive Efficiency
17-7
17.2 Determining Power Requirements in Machining
TABLE 17.2-1 Shop Formulas for Turning, Milling, Drilling and Broaching-English Units
Cutting speed, fpm V, .262 x Dt x rpm V .262 x D., x rpm Vc .262 x Dd x rpm V,
Revolutions per minute rpm - 3.82 x rpm = :3.82 x rpm 3382x-
DD, Dd _______
fmt
Feed ~er tooth, In - = n x rpm __________
LL L
Cutting time, min = L t =2L
m
Toqea
pnl .=63030 ftp,1 , 63030 hp, T 63030 hp,
Toqu a sinleT, rpm rpm = rpm ________
7 '4
Determining Power Requirements in Machining
17.2
TABLE 17.2-2 Shop Formulas for Turning,
Milling, Drilling and rroachlngMetric Units
PARAMETER TURNING MILLING DRILLING BROACHING
Cutting speed, m /m n V:-,
-,
r
Cuttng time, m en t N t t
millimetrs-per-revolutio
r-Feed,
SYMBOLS. D, = Diameter of workplce inturning, millimeterst'. Cutin t...me minutes-
_-'
:
kW, = Power atspindle, kW
D= -- Diameter of
Dd of drill,
millingmillimeters
cutter,mlimeters nL - Number
Length ofofcut, millimeters
teeth in cutter
ndtp = Total
Depthdepth
; cut,per
millimeters
stroke in broaching. millimeters QP = Rate
= Unit power,
of metalkanowatts
removed,percubic
cubiccentimeters
centimeter per
per minute
minute
E Efficiency of spindle drive
rpm =Revolutions per minute of work or cutter
f, -.Feed rate, millimeters per minute
T. - Torque at spindle, newton-meters
f, = Feed, millimeters per revolution
t = Cutting time, minutes
f, - Feed, millimeters per tooth
V Cutting apeed, meters per minute
IkW = Power at motor, kW
*Unit power data are given in table 17.2-4 for turning, w -Width of cut, millimeters
milling and drilling, and in figure 17 2-2 for broaching.
t
==
17-9
-- = I
- II
= _ -|
17.2 Determining Power Requirements in Machining
TABLE 17.2-3 Average Unit Power Requirements for Turning, Drilling and Milling-English Units
UNIT POWER*
hp/in3/min
TURNING P, MILLING P.,,
HSS AND DRILLING Pd HSS AND
MATERIAL HARDNESS CARBIDE TOOLS HSS DRILLS CARBIDE TOOLS
(feed .005-020 ipr) (feed .002-.008 ipr) (feed .005-.012 ipt)
Sharp Dull Sharp 1 Dull Sharp Dull
Bhn Tool Tool Tool Tool Tool Tool
STAINLESS STEELS, WROUGHT AND CAST 135-275 1.3 1.6 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.7
Ferritic, Austenitic and Martensitic 30-45 R, 1.4 1.7 1.2 15 1.5 1.9
*Power requirements at spindle drive motor, corrected tot 80% spindle drive efficiency.
Carbide
17-10
Determining Power Requirements in Machining
17.2
TABLE 17.2-4 Average Unit Power Requirements
for Turning, Drilling and Milling-Metric
Units
UNIT POWER*
kW/ctro/min,
TURNING P,
MILLING P,
MATERIAL HARDNESS HSS AND DRILLING P,
CARBIDE TOOLS HSS DRILLS HSS AND
I CARBIDE TOOLS
(feed .12-.50 mm/r) (feed .05-.20 mm/r) (feed .12-.30 mm/r)
Bhn Tool
Sap Dull
Tool
Sharp
Tool
Dull
Tool
fSharp
Dull
Tool Tool
STEELS. WROUGHT AND CAST 85-200 "00 M 06" 06 005 05 0064-
Plain Carbon354R,
Alloy Steels350R06 _6Jg_ =x nS i& z
Tool Steels 40-50 R~ 07 04 07 08
08 08 677 09 08 06
10
50-55sR, 09 14 96 11tj8 V096 2H18_
55-58 Rc -15- -- 9---
CAST IRONS
~ 46U 3x411
4 2
110-190 0632 04MU46
Gray, Ductile and Malleable 05 02M3
190-320 04~ 6=-7715 09 050 16
STAINLESS STEELS, WROUGHT AND CAST
Ferritic, Austenitic and Martensitic
135-275 .0 .073~ 064-
VSii -06-4 .077
30-45 R, 064-~ 077 .055- -068. 068 08W
PRECIPITATION HARDENING
STAINLESS STEELS 150-450 &064 .0177 -. 055 068~ .068 - 088-
TITANIUM
250-375 .055~ 08 050
HIGH TEMPERATURE ALLOYS .064- 050D 964
Nickel and Cobalt Base 20036 .114 141_ .01_11_
2030 -1 ~1t .1
01 -1 9 1
Iron Base
180-320 -__07.3- 091 .055 '068 _073 .091-
REFRACTORY ALLOYS__
Tungsten 321 ___
- 127M 159h' .i118~ 1st
.- -13= 164-
Molybdenum 229 -.01- =114 .073= D91= 073D
Columbium 091w
217 07__ 9 064-
Tantalum 077 06"~ =086Z
210 127 159 09-6
NICKEL ALLOYS 1:l18 01 WE1 IA
80-360 091 MF-14 082 400j 7 10
ALUMINUM ALLOYS
301 50 01- Gtf
500 kg 07 009 MaI- 1
___ _
MAGNESIUM ALLOYS
40900____7_
500 kg OQ 09 00739 EM
COPPER 7009
z gb
80 R8 6 __ _0_5__=_4
COPPER ALLOYS
10-80 R, 029 .06 iW22-
80-100 Re _027- 029 - 03
7055
E948- Q"04-=
*Power requirements at spindle drive motor,
corrected for 80% spindle drive efficiency.I
Carbide
17-11
17.2 Determining Power Requirements in Machining
-C
CLC
a)l
0. -C
C 0.
C CO U
CC
C)
--
C.) 0
00
0
(a
CDC
0 0
(D
f
E._
0 ~0
0 D ~ ')(D
00 C.
0 0
17-12
I--
CO)
CO
C CL
CaC
'2a)
n a)
(0 0
'2V)
~0
00
CDC
o
0
0)
C
'C
E, CP
CC U
ulw/coO/M
17-13
17.2 Determining Power Requirements in Machining
0 >
00
320~~~ 0 . 0
-0
I
C
0,~ W
Ln 0 00 0 000
0' f _
E0 0 - CJ 1 V n' ' -O
. u 111i~efill ETL
-0i.
00
U)
~~. 0
12- CL
000 0z /L r
00
C - 00
/ a,
00 0 L
/ x
0000a
WE t~C E.
4 C1 C=
C00
I - C,0)
a~a 0 cMC.
C~ x
0. 0 0
*= 0>
0 0
11 0) C1 -0 aCO to
0 to
0 IT
0
C
0
Ci
0CC", .Z
0 0 3
0E; 0 6 O
ILOU x 0
17-14
Determining Power Requirements in Machining 17.2
>
.1.1.1 1 C
0200
I@
CLC
(p
0p 0 00 30 0 00 00
CDD
CD - .- " C- ~CDC ) - - CJ M~ V to Co ' CL
Eo2 ,* . 1 I I Iii ,I . 1. 1.1. 00
X2 CLu
e.~
co~ 0
,0 E
/ 0 C
/C 2
00 o0 0 U
0~ 00
- CCD
- C) /N -0 000D
00 ~ t2C ct-: ~
LI~l 1,11tI I. I E ~
1/0
00~
IE C, IM
0~~
0 C 0 0 ~
.. DoC)- ~~~~~~~I (s- C
E LL
.2
17-15
17.2 Determining Power Requirements in Machining
Ov .2 0) Of D V
E
C 0 0 00 0 v 0 mC
>) 'jja-Ips
Ui i 6 C'iC; %0 0 C >
W
0 E S=
E f x 0D
0C 0 C.d
q, 0L 0 0v 00
E 0
Oul 0
- c'u
l 00
00i
Ca
0 S 0
CC
oY 0 0)
0 0L 0 S
Oall a)p
00 /
o0 0 C) 1)
. . .0 0 0
CLO )A 0O 00 0D LO
I N a C
2-2
.0 IC
Ct DCO ) 0 U)
0W A
0~~ 00
6 6 o 6
o
17 16
Determining Power Requirements in Machining 17.2
E/
00 0 0 0 CO COm v M, N 0
EU~ C?
Ur -l0 000 >
0
;- -UaIpds %O98+1 0 0 133
660 000 0 0
.SL
E tfll fll 03
xE
0' 0 00 0 0 00 0 ,0' 0 C
'T 11 100
:.sc O ,- 0. , C) .
C14
K .- 0
EE
C> Oa0 0
0..00
0~~~~-
) 00 00 ,01
0 000 00 0000 Cl
I n O liii ' -
E0 > 0a
00
EoX
V C IE fi lI I I I I II o
f >Oc
E
E #~ I :* -
U,~~C
.C0 N
00 Cl
- us C
E. I 0
7 -17
17.2 Determining Power Requirements in Machining
CO (D In c.
(-
0 (2 0 0 00 0
C'
00
CL 0
0 U
0 _
~ c j0 0
LC S .
0 e-I 0
5
0 ~~~~ 000
0 0
~~0
CwDO 0I Xa =- a,
o aC 0
C0 5 - 0 -
v3 =
COC"
0. 000 x Cca g
00 S..-
tro -C 4)~~-
0 CD
EE
0C
CL A
17-18
Determining Power Requirements in Machining 17.2
(D CE~~ ) )
-- 0 0~l0 0 0 0
C O5
0.0
i s0
000 N0 O
j n , Ca I, W0C
00
0 0
0 0
Ix IL -0
E 3)
0 E
00 0),
uLn E Eac
WOc~
IL 0 C C
j
0 -R
I ~S a
0.0
a- 0
0 40
C
C-
E v
.. 0 ,0 0 0 0 ~
0, ED)C OS n a C0)L=
CL-4
171
17.2 Determining Power Requirements in Machining
Q
Vc Metal
Broach .mremovalt
speed x rate hp at
fpm -t inVmin motor
100 dt
Total stock T 30 5
80 removed P -66
per stroke hp/in/min -
0in :-%20 0.3 -8
-- 0.30 I \ 0.4 10
-020 / 15 , 0.5
40 t 06
0,8
Width of -0.10 10 1.0 ,15
I30 cut 1 N'
0. 8 20
0.0S -2.0
20N t 0.04
6 3.0
0o
5 4.0
-0.02
02 -4 40
10 3N 0.01 -3 50
-s0
-8 4 -60
-5
-6 280
-5 - =10 b
1 -100
4
Examiple:
Mhterial: Cast iron - HSS tools Q 12 Vc x w x dtin/min
Chipload 0.005 in/tooth l xP QxP
V, 30 fPor w - 1.5 in E 0.7
dt = 0.040 in 0 = 22 in'/min
3
P = 0.7 hplin /min hpm = 22hp
*See figre 17.2-1 for Unit power values Ithpm at motor for 70% drive efficiencv
Figure 17.2-9 Alignment chart for determining metal removal rate and motor horsepower in surface
broaching with high speed steel broaching tools-English units.
17-20
Determining Power Requirements In Machining 17.2i
kWmt
Motor
power
VC kW
Broach
Speed
m/min
T~4050 CJ
Toa
Meta
rea
removal
dt cm3/min
-30 soc
removed
per stroke P 0.01
mm 400 kWV/cm 3/min
_10
Width of/ 306
15 cut
mm
/0.02
5
5 200 ;003
10 0.4 10
3 -0.05
102 -0.06k
/008 15
20 10. 10
20 100 2
-4 \-30 -0.5 -80 -0.20
S40 / -0.4 -030 3
500
20
Example:
Material: Cast iron -HSS tools
0-Vxxtmli
Chipload 0.13 mm/tooth
QxP QxP
Vc~ = ~nm
38mm E 0.7
dt = 1 mm = 380cm3/min
P - 0.03 kW/cml/min Pm -16.3 kW e
Lf
*See figure 17.2fo Uit o ervl s t kWrn at motor for 70% Drive Efficiency
Figure 17.2-10 Alignment chart for determining metal removal rate and motorpoeinsrae_
broachinrg with high speed broaching tools-Metric units.
_
17-211
17.2 Determining Power Requirements in Machining
Number of units
Index operating in sequence
points in transmission drive Efficiency
Antifriction 075
bearings
o 80
C
-10
- 9 -085
N8
7
6
5
4 -090
Spur gears 8
underload 3 0 91
(pairs)
0.92
0 93
V-belt 0 94
drives A
Example: 1
0.95
096
8 Bearings
UL
3 Pairs of gears
0.97
II
17-22
Estimating Forces in Turning 17.3
The turning forces listed in tables 17.3-1 to 17.3-3 are The forces listed are as follows:
based upon a systematic analysis of empirical data; never-
theless, these values are to be applied only as starting Tangential or cutting force, Ft
points. Most of the data were derived from the following Radial force, Fr
sources: Feed force, Ff
TABLE 17.3-1 Turning Force Data for a Unit Depth of Cut of t 1 Inch
(Data based on turning with carbide tool at 80 to 200 feet per minute)
1
SCEA: 0 SCEA: 150 SCEA: 300 SCE.4 450
MATERIAL TOOL FEED
AND RAKE PER
HARDNESS ANGLE REV. F,* F,' Fit Ft F, Ff F Fr F F, F, F
degrees in lb lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.
Cast iron .005 2.061 598 1.383 2.078 602 1,407 2,133 614 1,487 2,238 638 1,647
260-320 Bhn 010 3,498 1.050 1,947 3,527 1,057 1,980 3,619 1,078 2,094 3,798 1,120 2,320
.015 4,766 1,460 2,378 4,806 1,470 2,420 4,932 1,500 2,558 5,175 1,558 2,835
to .020 5,936 1,844 2,742 5,985 1,856 2,790 6,142 1,895 2.950 6,445 1,968 3,268
I1.025 7038 2,211 3.062 7,096 2,225 3,116 7,282 2,272 3,293 7,640 2,360 3,648
+ .030 8:088 2,564 3,350 8,155 2,580 3,410 8,370 2,634 3,603 8,780 2.736 3,992
040
.0 0
10,074
11,944
3,240
3,883
3.862
4,312
10,157
12,043
3,260
3,908
3,930
4,388
10,424
12,358
3.328
3,990
4,153
4,637
10,937
12,966
3,457
4,144
4,602
5,138
.005 2,680 1,016 2.418 2,702 1,023 2,461 2,773 1.044 2,600 2,910 1,084 2,882
.010 4.548 1.785 3,407 4,585 1.796 3,467 4,706 1,833 3,664 4.937 1,904 4,060
015 6,197 2.480 4,162 6,248 2,497 4,236 6,412 2,548 4,476 6,727 2,648 4,960
to .020 7,718 3.135 4,798 7,780 3,155 4,882 7,985 3.220 5,160 8,378 3,345 5,717
tO .025 9,150 3.758 5,357 9,226 3,783 5,450 9,467 3,860 5,760 9,933 4,010 6,383
-10 .030 10.516 4.358 5.862 10.603 4,387 5.965 10,880 4.478 6,30-. 11,416 4.650 6.985
.040 13,097 5,507 6,757 13,205 5,543 6,876 13,550 5,657 7,267 14,218 5,876 8,052
.050 15,528 6,602 7,544 15,656 6,645 7,677 16,066 6,782 8,113 16,857 7,044 8,990
17-23
[I
17.3 Estimating Forces in Turning
TABLE 17.3-2 Turning Force Data for a Unit Depth of*- !. 1 Inch
(Oata based on turning witt. carbide too' at 200 to 600 feet per .et
Cast iron .005 1.195 340 100 1.204 343 813 1.232 350 857 1.288 362 946
160-200 Bhn .010 2,056 608 1,140 2.070 610 1,160 2,120 623 1.224 2,216 644 1,350
+5 015 2,824 852 1.405 2.845 857 1,430 2,913 873 1,507 3.044 903 1.663
.020 3.538 1,082 1.629 3.564 1,088 1.657 3,650 1.108 1,747 3,814 1,147 1,928
to .025 4,213 1,303 1.827 4.245 1,310 1,858 4,347 1,335 1.960 4,542 1,380 2,162
+10 .030 4,860 1.517 2.006 4,897 1.525 2,040 5,014 1,554 2.152 5.240 1,607 2,375
.040 6,088 1,927 2,326 6.134 1.938 2,365 6,280 1,974 2.494 6.563 2,012 2,753
.050 7,250 2.320 2.608 7,305 2,334 2,653 7,480 2.377 2,797 7,816 2.458 3,087
.005 1.555 590 1,400 1.566 593 1,424 1,604 604 1.502 1.676 625 1,658
.010 2,675 1,050 2,000 2,695 1,056 2,034 2,760 1,075 2,145 2,884 1,112 2,367
015 3,675 1,470 2,463 3,703 1,480 2,505 3,790 1,507 2.640 3.962 1,558 2,915 27
-5 .020 4,603 1.868 2,855 4.638 1,880 2,903 4,750 1,914 3,062 4.963 1,980 3.378
to .025 5,482 2,250 3.202 5,523 2.263 3.256 5.656 2.304 3,434 5,910 2,385 3,790
-10 .030 6.323 2,618 3,516 6,371 2,634 3,576 6,524 2,683 3.770 6,817 2,775 4,160
.040 7,920 3,327 4.076 7,980 3,346 4,145 8.172 3,408 4,370 8,540 3,526 4,824
.050 9,433 4,006 4.570 9,504 4,030 4,648 1 9,732 4.104 4,902 10,170 4,246 5,410
Cast iron .005 1,636 474 1,097 1,649 477 1,116 1 1,692 486 1.180 1,775 505 1,306
200-260 Bhn .010 2,780 833 1,546 2,804 838 1,573 2,876 856 1,662 3,016 888 1,840
.015 3,793 1,160 1,890 3,824 1,167 1,924 3,923 1.190 2.032 4,114 1,236 2,250
.020 4,727 1,466 2,180 4,765 1,476 2,218 4.890 1,506 2,344 5,127 1,563 2,596
to .025 5,607 1,758 2.435 5.653 1,770 2,478 5,800 1.806 2,618 6,082 1,875 2,900
I +10 .030 6,447 2,040 2,665 6.500 2,054 2,712 6,668 2.096 2,866 6,993 2,176 3,174
.040 8,034 2,580 3.073 8,100 2,597 3,128 8,310 2,650 3,305 8,715 2,750 3,660
.050 9,530 3,095 3,433 9,608 3,115 3.493 9,858 3.178 3,690 10,338 3,300 4,088
.005 2,126 806 1.918 2.143 811 1,952 2,200 828 2,062 2,306 860 2.284
.010 3,614 1,418 2.704 3,644 1,427 2,752 3,738 1,457 2,908 3,920 1,512 3.220
.015 4,930 1.974 3,306 4,970 1,987 3,364 5,098 2,027 3.555 5,347 2,104 3.938
to .020 6,144 2.495 3,813 6,194 2,511 3,880 6,355 2,563 4.100 6,664 2,660 4,540
to .025 7,288 2,993 4,258 7,348 3,012 4,334 7.538 3,074 4,578 7.905 3,190 5,072
-10 .030 8,380 3.473 4.660 8.448 3,495 4,743 8,668 3.566 5,012 9,090 3,703 5.552
.040 10,444 4,390 5,375 10,530 4,418 5,470 10,803 4,508 5,780 11,328 4,680 6.402
.050 12,390 5.2-,o 6,004 12,490 5,300 6,110 12,815 5,408 6,456 13,438 5,615 7.150
NOTE,To calculate force in pounds. multiply values given by depth of cut
in inches To convert tonewtons, multiply force in pounds by 4.48222.
=F,- Tang ilial or Cutting force
IF, - Radial force
F, - Feed force
34
17-24
a-
Estimating Forces in Turning 17.3
TABLE 17.3-3 Turning Force Data for a Unit Depth of Cut of 1 Inch
(Data based on turning with carbide tool at 300 to 600 feet per minute)
Steels 005 1,853 541 1,116 1,870 552 1,146 1,928 588 1,244 2,038 662 1,449
135-200 Bhn 010 3,062 725 1,324 3,092 740 1,360 3,186 788 1,476 3,369 886 1,719
.015 4,108 860 1,463 4,148 877 1,502 4,274 934 1,630 4.520 1.050 1,900
to 020
025 5,060
5.950 970
1,066 1,570
1,660 5,110
6,006 990 1,612 5,265 1,055 1,750 5.567 1,186 2,039
+ 10 030 6,790 1 150 1,736 6,855 1,088
1.174 1,703
1,782 6.190
7,064 1,158
1,250 1,850 6,545 1,303 2,155
1,934 7,469 1,407 2,254
.040 8,365 1,300 1,863 8,444 1,326 1,912 8,702 1,412 2,076 9.200 1,588 2,420
.050 9,832 1,427 1,968 9,927 1,456 2.020 10,230 1,550 2,194 10,816 1.744 2,556
.005 2,136 860 1,646 2,155 873 1,682 2,215 914 1,804 2,333 996 2,054
.010 3,582 1,285 2,112 3,614 1.304 2,160 3,715 1,365 2,316 3,911 1,488 2.037
.015 4,846 1,624 2,444 4,890 1.648 2,500 5.027 1,726 2,680 5,293 1,880 3,050
.020 6,006 1,918 2,711 6.060 1,946 2,772 6,230 2,038 2,973 6.560 2,220 3,384
to .025 7.093 2,182 2,938 7,156 2,215 3.004 7,358 2,318 3,222 7,747 2,526 3,668
-10 .030 8,127 2,425 3,138 8,198 2,460 3,208 8,430 2,577 3,440 8,875 2,807 3,917
.040 10,070 2,864 3,480 10,160 2,906 3,558 10,446 3.043 3.816 11.000 3,315 4.344
.050 11,895 3.258 3,772 12,000 3,306 3.856 12,338 3,462 4,135 12,990 3,771 4,708
Steels .005 1,942 497 1,183 1,960 504 1,213 2.015 529 1,313 2,121 577 1,522
200-325 Bhn 010 3,256 738 1,429 3,285 748 1,466 3,378 785 1.587 3.556 856 1.838
015 4,405 929 1,596 4,444 943 1,638 4.570 988 1,773 4.812 1,078 2,054
020 5,460 1,095 1.727 5,508 1,111 1,772 5,662 1,165 1,918 5.963 1,270 2,222
to10 025 6,447 1,243 1,836 6,504 1,262 1,882 6,688 1,323 2.038 7,042 1,443 2.362
.030 7,386 1,380 1,930 7.452 1,400 1,980 7,662 1,467 2,142 8,067 1.600 2,483
.040 9.153 1,62b 2,088 9,234 1,650 2,140 9.494 1,728 2,318 9,997 1,886 2,686
050 10,810 1,845 2,218 10,905 1.872 2,275 11,212 1,963 2.463 11.806 2.142 2,854
.005 2,192 1,040 1,842 2,214 1,058 1,888 2,285 1,117 2,038 2,422 1,235 2,350
010 3,592 1,478 2.262 3,628 1,504 2,318 3,743 1,587 2,503 3.968 1,754 2,886
-5 015 4,795 1,815 2,551 4,842 1,846 2,614 4.997 1.948 2.823 5,297 2,154 3,256
.020 5.885 2,100 2,779 5,945 2,136 2,848 6,134 2,254 3,075 6.502 2,491 3,546 _
to .025 6,900 2,350 2,969 6,969 2,390 3,042 7.191 2,523 3.285 7,623 2,790 3,788
-10 .030 7,857 2,578 3,134 7,936 2,622 3,212 8.189 2,767 3,468 8,680 3,058 4.000
.040 9,644 2,982 3,414 9.740 3,033 3,498 10,052 3,200 3,777 10.655 3.538 4,356
050 10,306 3,338 3,647 11,420 3,395 3,737 11,784 3,584 4,036 12,490 3.962 4,654
I /
17-25
17-25
PRECEDING PAG BLANK-NOT FINED
TABLE 17.4-1 Torque and Thrust Values for Drilling with Standard Point Drills
Steels 0005 2 . - - - 62 - - - - - - -
400Bhn .001 3.512 - - - 92 185 - - - - - -
.002 6.221 73 . . . - 144 274 542 - - - - -
.003 8.529 101 . . . - 192 355 678 - - - - -
004 11 37 127 259 - - - 236 431 805 1.179 - - - -
006 15 51 176 358 586 874 ,.213 2,026 318 571 1.041 1.499 1.940 2.390 2.876 3.961
.008 - 64 222 451 739 1.100 1.527 2,550 - 702 1.262 1.797 2,307 2.829 3,383 4.598
.010 - 76 265 539 883 1.314 1.825 3.048 - 827 1.472 2.081 2.659 3.247 3,864 5.204
012 - - 306 624 1.022 1.521 2.112 3.527 - - 1,674 2.354 2,996 3.648 4,327 5.787
015 - - 366 746 1,221 1.818 2.524 4.216 - - 1.965 2,747 3.482 4.227 4.993 6.625
.020 - - 461 939 1.537 2.289 3.178 5,307 - - 2.425 3.368 4.251 5.142 6.047 7.953
.025 - 1.838 2.736 3.799 6.345 - - - - 4.982 6.012 7.050 9,215
030 -- --- - - - - 7.341 - - - - - - - 10,430
17-27
17.4 Estimating Torque and Thrust in Drilling
TABLE 17.4-1-Continued
MATERIAL FEED TORQUE, inch-pounds THRUST, pounds
AND PER
HARDNESS REV. Drill Diameter, in Drill Diameter, in
in 1 12 3/ 1 1 1 '2 2 1A IA , 3/. 1 1, 1A Y 2
Leaded .0005 0. - - - - - - - 13 - - - - - - -
Brass .001 0.7 2,5 - - - - - - 19 38 - - - - - -
.002 1.3 4.3 15 - - - - - 30 56 111 - - - - -
003 1.8 6 21 - - - - - 39 73 139 - - - - -
.004 2.2 7.6 26 53 - - - - 49 89 166 243 - - - -
006 3.1 10 36 74 121 180 250 417 66 118 21 4 308 399 A92 592 815
.008 - 13 46 93 152 226 314 525 - 145 259 370 475 583 696 947
010 - 16 55 111 182 271 376 628 - 170 303 428 547 669 796 1,072
012 - - 63 128 210 313 435 726 - - 344 485 616 751 891 1,191
015 - - 75 154 252 374 520 868 - - 404 566 717 870 1.028 1.364
.020 - - 95 193 317 471 654 1,093 - - 499 694 875 1,059 1,245 1.637
.025 378 563 782 1.306 - 1,026 1,238 1.451 1,897
.0301 . . . . . . . 1,511 .. - - - 2,147
17-28
Estimating Torque and Thrust in Drilling 17.4
TABLE 17.4-2 Torque and Thrust Values for Drilling with Split or Crankshaft Point Drills
Steels 0.0005 1 3 - - - . . 23 - - - - - -
200 Bhn 001 1 23 79 - - 40 71 - - - - - -
002 39 14 48 - 70 122 216 - - - - -
003 54 19 66 - 96 169 297 - - - - -
004 6.9 24 83 173 - - - - 1121 212 372 519 - - - -
006 9-5 33 115 239 401 599 831 1.395 167 292 512 714 905 1.091 1.273 1.630 -
-008 - 42 145 300 504 754 1.046 1.756 - 368 643 895 1.133 1.364 1.588 2.028
.010 - 50 173 359 603 901 1.251 2.099 - 439 768 1.067 1.350 1623 1.888 2405
012 - - 200 416 698 1,042 1.447 2.429 - - 3;7 1.233 -. 553Z 1.372 2.171 2.768
.015 - 239 497 834 i 246 i.730 2.904 - - 1,060 1,471 1.858 2,230 2.591 3.290
- - 30G 525 r.50 i.56 2.178 3.655 - 1.332 1.848 2333 2.798 3.248 4.116
.025 z . 1.255 1.875 2.603 4.369 . - - 2.784 3.337 3.872 4.902
3
.0 0 - - - 5.055 . . . . . . . 5,657
Steels 0005 18 - . . .. .j 33 - - - - - - -
400Bhn 001 32 11 . . . . . . 57 100 - - - - - -
002 5.6 19 68 - - - - 99 173 306 - - - - -
.003 7.7 27 94 - - - - -. 136 239 420 - - - - -
,004 9.7 34 118 244 - - - 172 300 527 736 - - - -
006 13 47 163 338 568 848 1.178 1.976 1237 414 726 1.011 1.283 1,546 1,803 2.310
008 - 59 205 426 714 1,068 1,482 2.488 - 521 911 1.268 1.606 1.932 2.250 2.873
.010 - 70 245 509 854 1.276 1.772 2.974 - 622 1.088 1.512 1.913 2.299 2.675 3.407
.12 - - 284 589 988 1, 477 2.050 3,441j - 1,257 1,746 2.208 2.652 3,083 3.921
015 - - 339 704 1.181 1,765 2.451 4.113 1 - 1.501 2.084 2.633 3.160 3.671 4.661
020 - 427 886 1.487 2.222 3.085 5.178 -- 1.887 2,618 3.305 3.964 4.601 5.832
.025 - - 1.778 2.656 3.688 6.190 . - - 3.945 4.728 5.486 6.945
.030 -. . . . . . . 7.162 . . . . . . . 8.014
17-29
Uh
17.4 Estimating Torque and Thrust in Drilling
TABLE 17.4-2-Continued
MATERIAL j FEED TORQUE, inch-pounds T
AND iPER
HARDNESS! REV. Drill Diameter, in Drill Diameter, :n
I , / 1/, 3/i 1 11, 11 2 V2 3/1 1 1'/ 1'12 2
-73
i 4
17-30
Estimating Torque and Thrust in Drilling 17.4
TABLE 17.4-3 Torque and Thrust Values for Drilling with Metric Standard Point Drills
mm 3 6 12 18 25 30 35 50 3 6 12 18 25 30 35 50
17-31
17.4 -Estimating Torque and Thrust in Drilling
TABLE 17.4-3-Continued
mm 3 6 12 18 25 30 35 50 3 6 12 18 25 30 35 50
17-32
Estimating Torque and Thrust in Drilling 17.4
TABLE 17.4-4 Torquo and Thrust Values for Drilling with Motric Split or Crankshaft Point Drills
mm 3 0 12 18 25 30 35 5 3 8 12 18 25 30 35 .0
013 0.15
'","1 - - - - - - - 102 - - - - - - -
100 ho .50 0 0. -. . . . . 178 318 . . . . . .
.013
.,,*- 0.19 - - - - - - - 133 - - - - - - -
lOO IS?,ff .025 0,33 1.13 - - - - - - 231 405 - - - - - -
050 0,58 203 7 - - - - - 400 703 1.241 - - - - -
075 0.79 2.71 9.8 - - - - 552 970 1,704 - - - - -
.102 1.01 3.50 12.1 252 - - - 694 1,214 2,136 2.965 - - - -
.15 1.38 4.8 16.8 34.6 .A 87.3 121 204 961 1,801 2,945 4,100 5,200 6,268 7,313 9.388
20 - 8.10 21.1 43.8 73.8 110 153 256 - 2,113 3.69 5,142 0.512 7.83 9.128 11,650
25 - 7,23 25.3 524 86 132 182 306 - 2,522 4,413 8,130 7.758 9,323 10.649 13,820
38 - - 29.2 606 102 152 211 354 - - 5,O8 7,062 8.954 10.758 12,504 15,902
40 - - 34.9 72,5 122 162 2W 424 - - 6,000 8.452 10.676 12,815 14.888 18,900
so - - 44 91.3 153 229 315 533 - - 7,60 10,018 13,407 18,076 18,60 23,651
'65 - - - 183 274 380 83 - - - - 16,000 19.176 22.250 28,166
.75 - - . . 73 - - - - - - - 32503
17-33
C7.4, Estimating Torque and Thrust in lri ing
T'A0L|.
t 1 .4-4 -Colell#nu~d
MI n t2 18 20 30 3D 50
';Iu,,
, 131 0023 . .... ..... 1l, .. . . . . . .
All 0 tS 0045 0141 - .- . . '"-t 53,4 - - - -
v) (0 0/ 024)0 003 . .. 331 118 160 - - -
9 tt) 0102 0302 124 -.. 11. 128 216 - - -
102 0124O.452 1.58 328 . 89 100 276 387 - - - -
IS 0.141 0421 2,10 575 1 11
42 1,)6 we2 120 218 378 629 672 WO09 43 1,210
20 - 01110 2,71 065 94(C 142 1, 33,1 271 476 03 641 1,010 1,179 1,003
5 - 0038 3.28 68 113 M. 216 3.i - 328 509 792 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,784
'10 - - 3,73 7,80 13, 191 21,2 45.1 - - 656 912 1,157 1,386 1,015 2,060
40 - - 42 038 1&. 23,0 3.', 1 45 - - 787 I,090 1,379 1,055 1,922 2,430
- - s) 11 4 1u 29.5 41 0e8 4 - - 968 1,370 1,730 2,073 2,406 3,001
,.. 23 C 353 4') ;3' - - - - 2,064 2,471 2,890 3,034
W 0 OA 02 - - -. -. -..
W
032124 4,41 - - - - 436 770 - -
102 0451 1 58 5.4 114 - 310 547 90 1,340 - -
10 0021 2.15 7157 107 2 4 39.4 646$ 9,0 436 701 1.33 1,W 2,349 2,634
3,300 4,230
" - 2.71 049 198 392 49.7 .6,9 110 - 902 1.223 2,321 2,940 3,541'
4,124 5,202
M - 328 114 736 30 M 093 62,5 131 - 1,139 1.995 2,707 3,500 4,902 0,240
4,212
14 - - 13.2 2173 41 60,1 9A4 160 - - 2,304 3,196 4,043 6,649 7,160
4,662
40 - - )8 328 04,9 62,1 114 191 - - 2,149 3W817 4,A44 6,720 6,530
5,7 7
- - 19,9 41 2 0",1 103 143 241 - - 3,46 4,765 6,054 7,250 0,429 10,60
5 . . . 621 124 172 268 - - - - 7,224 6,0 10,049 12,722
15 - .- - - 333 - - - - - - - 14,670
17-34
SECTION 18
SURFACE TECHNOLOGY
18-1
18 SURFACE TECHNOLOGY
Specific Guidelines ..................................................... 18-59
Specific Guidelines and Data for Mechanical Material Removal Processes ....... 18-59
Specific Guidelines and Data for Abrasive Material Removal Processes .-............... - 18-74
Specific Guidelines and Data for Electrical Material Removal Processes ................ 18-91
Specific Guidelines and Data for Thermal Material Removal Processes .................. 18-98
Specific Guidelines and Data for Chemical Material Removal Processes ....... 18-111
Specific Guidelines and Data for Post-Treatment Processes to Aid Surface
Integ rity ............................................................................. .......... ... ..... .. .... 18- 116
Surface Integrity by Materials-High Cycle Fatigue Results ........... ........ 18-123
Quality Assurance for Surface Integrity .................................. 18-127
Specific Guidelines and Special Comments on Quality Assurance for Surface
Integrity ............................................... 18-.332.
Economics and Applications of Surface Integrity .......................... 18-133
Selected Sources of Surface Integrity Data .................................................................... 18-134
References ............. ............................................ ............. ............................ 18-134
Biblio g ra phy .......................................................................................................... 18- 135
18-2
Introduction to Surface Technology 18.1
One of the principal design considerations for highly While most alterations occur in the first 0.015 inch 10.38
stressed components should be the surface condition pro- mini below the surface, this distance can be a significant
duced during manufacturing. This consideration must in- part of the total thickness of the thinner parts being de-
clude a thorough review of the surface alterations resuiting signed. In addition, it should be noted that many com-
from specific machining opta dons. Surface technology is ponent failures have originated within the first few
the activity that describes, details, and evaluates the condi- thousandths inch below the geometrical surface. These
tion of both the surface and the surface layers of manufac- facts alone support the need for design, manufacturing, and
tured components. The historical emphasis on surface tex- quality assurance engineers to exhibit interest in and un-
ture (rough-.ess, waviness, and lay) has been extended to derstanding of both aspects of surface technology-surface
include the assessment of effects just below the surface, texture and surface integrity-in order to produce safe, re-
that is, surface integrity, thereby including the influence of liable and long life cL Dnponents.
the outermost boundary of a component as well as those
outermost layers which differ measurably from the base The influence of manufactured surfaces on component
material. properties h.- been investigated most extensively for th~e
material removal processes. Figure 18.1-1 shows the sur-
face technlogy effects studied to date. During machining,
TRENDS AND CONCERNS process energies blend with work material properties to
produce a wide variety of these surface effects. Surface ef-
In recent years, the demand for increased safety, reliability, fects produced during the machining process affect the
and service life has caused considerable attention to be di- properties of the work material and in turn of the com-
rected to the pronounced influence of the types of surface ponent reliability, as shown in figure 18.1-2. Studies have
conditions produced by various manufacturing methods on demonstrated that each material remova! process has its
the resulting properties and performance of components own effect on each work material. It has also been shown
once in service. New and unusual service requirements and that for each process the intensity or energy level may have
conservation of energy and/ - materials have brought a distinctive effect on the specific metallurgical state of the
..bout the use of thinner sections of improved (and more dif- work material.
jicult to fabricate) materials and the introduction of design A
criteria that employ these materials much closer to their
full potential. While part drawings continue to call out con- ECONOMICS
figuration, dimensions, tolerances and material properties,
surface quality specifications must be added to complete The cost of producing a machined component increases as
the component definition. All the design elements noted surface specifit ations increase. Sophisticated and exten-
above are intimately interrelated and directly affect com- sive surface texture or surface integrity requirements are
ponent cost and producibility. justifie" only if they are necessary for the component part
to fulfill its function. Many parts require only a roughing
The manufacturer, recognizing the above dasign trends operation to attain their desired shape and tolerance. Fin-
and characteristics, also must be concerned with the at- ishing operations may improve quality but they add cost,
tainment of accuracy in thinner parts where distortion from and while emphasis on surface integrity considerations in-
processing stresses is a frequent result. Some of the newer creases component reliability, cost also may increase. To
and higher performance alloys used in the thinner and eliminate unnecessary costs it is important to apply texture
lighter parts also are like!y to be altered or more sensitive and integrity specifications selectively to only those areas
to thermal gradients or the heat generated by some proc- of a part where they are needed, rather than to impose
esses. The emphasis on quality assurance and product reli- these requirements across the entire surface of the part.
ability increases a importance of recognizing the impact The relationship between surface texture and machining
that manufacturi g processes may have on material prop- costs is discussed further in section 21.
erties. As always, in addition to these concerns and trends
the fabrication of a product or component must be accom- The application of surface integrity principles and guide-
plished within the constraints of both economics and envi- lines can increase the number of good parts nroduced or,
ronmental effects. conversely, reduce manufacturing losses. Surtace integrity
evaluations should consider the entire part processing se-
quence and emphasize the achievement of high quality in
RELATIONSHIP OF SURFACE TEXTURE the "as shipped" surface produced. The price for in-
AND SURFACE INTEGRITY attention to surface integrity can be premature component
failure or loss of reliability.
Traditionally, surface texture (roughness, waviness and
lay) has been accepted as the criterion which controls the
quality of a surface. Direct relationships are widely as- QUALITY ASSURANCE
sumed to exist between surface roughness and fatigue
strength as well as other properties. Ample data have now Surface technol,-gy ranks with dimensional configuration
been accumulated to indicate that surface texture is only and tolerance as visual evidence of quality. Deterioration
part of the consideration. Metallurgical and other altera- of surface quality with time or with number of parts pro-
tions below the surface also have a major influence on ma- duced is a handy clue to deteriorating tooL; or proces' set-
terial performance. This becomes particularly important tings. A 10-percent rule of thumb has been found to be a
where high stresses or severe environments are encoun- practical limit within which normal manufacturing oper-
tered by the workpiece. ations can be conducted without jeopardizing surface qual-
M
18-3
18.1 Introduction to Surface Technology
ity. This rule states that if surface roughness increases by questions should be raised as to the control status of the
10 percent (in microinches Ra or rms) or if any one of the process. If two o," more parameters are "adjusted" by 10
operating parameters has been reset or "adjusted" by plus percent or more, the process is no longer controlled and
or minus 10 percent from the planned values, immediate should be shut down until corrective action is effective.
i maBase material
Simulated
section
I
I
I
Process Material
Energies Properties
Mechanical Tensile
Electrical Surface Effects Ductility
Thermal Roughness Hardness
Chemical Residual Stresses
Cracks
Phase Changes
Mechanical Properties
High Cycle Fatigue Low Cycle Fatigue
Stress Rupture Stress Corrosion
Component Reliability
18-4
-7.. . . ."'/
18-5
18.2 Surface Texture
Definitions for the four elements of surface texture are as table 18.2-1). The difference is usually much less than the
follows: point-to-point variations on any given machined surface.
Roughness consists of the finer irregularities which Max. waviness height Max. waviness
generally result from the inherent action of the produc- MaxaXR width
tion process. These include transverse feed marks and Max. Ra-- 63 0.002-2
other irregularities within the limits of the sampling 3
Mm. Ra ------i:2/7U003 - Cutoff
length. _ J 0.015 . Lay
Waviness includes all irregularities whose spacing is "\\ -Max. roughness
greater than the roughness sampling length and less spacing
than the waviness sampling length. Waviness may re-
sult from machine or work deflections, chatter, vibra-
tion, heat treatment or cutting tool runout. Roughness \/Surface may be produced by any method
may be considered superimposed on a "wavy" surface. 7/Material removal by machining is required
Lay is the direction of the predominant surface pat- matorial must be provided for that purpose
tern, ordinarily determined by the production method 0.o01 IV Material removal allowance in inches
used. (or millimeters)
Flaws are unintentional irregularities which occur at 9 Material removal prohibited
one place or at relatively infrequent or widely varying
intervals on the surface. Flaws include cracks, blow
holes, inclusions, checks, ridges, scratches, etc. Unless Figure 18.2-3 Surface texture symbols used for
otherwise specified, the effect of flaws shall not be in- drawings or specifications. In this example, all val-
cluded in the roughness average measurements. Where ues are in inches except R, values, which are in mi-
flaws are to be restricted or controlled, a special note croinches (millionths of an inch). Metric values (mil-
as to the method of inspection should be included on limeters and micrometers, respectively) are used on
the drawing or in the specifications. metric drawings. (Based on ANSI Y1 4.36-1978)
18-6
Surface Texture 18.2
Ra Rq Rt Rmax Rtm
Ra is the universally recognized parameter of
roughness. It is the arithmetic mean of the depar- Ft is the maximum peak-to-valley height within the
tures y of the profile from the mean line. It is nor- assessment length. Rmax is the maximum peak-to-
mally determined as the mean results of several valley height within a sampling length L. But be-
consecutive sampling lengths L cause the value can be greatly affected by a spurious
scratch or particle of dirt on the surface, it is more
Rq is the corresponding rms parameter. usual to use the average (Rtm) of five consecutive
sampling lengths.
I '! I I max
1 a
mr~ ma Rma RMaX 4 I
I I I
L-w=--L- L---1- L--',.=- 1-- ;;I I -- 1 -- L---JO--LJ.- L 21
/. Assessment length -- 4
Ra=- I yJ1,d.R tn Rmax, + Rmax, + Rmax 3 + Rmax
4 + Rmax_
L o
Rtm /5 Rmax i
Rq " 'J (x)dx
L oI
Rp Rpm
Rp is the maximum profile height from the mean line
within the sampling length. Rpm is the mean value
of Rp determined over 5 sampling lengths.
P2 R IR a I
P I PS I P4
Figure 18.2-4 Pome commonly used surface texture symbols and their definitions. (Based on ANSI
B46. 1-1978)
18-7
18.2 Surface Texture
the chlck mark. This symbol indicates the direction of the describe surfaces produced by some of the nontraditional
lay relative to the nominal surface. Figure 18.2-5 explains machining operations. The surface texture symbol also can
the various symbols used to designate lay. The pitted non- designate the extent of material removal desired-from
directional or protuberant designation of lay. P. is useful to none to any amount, as shown in figure 18.2-3.
MLay multidirectional.
Figure 18.2-5 Lay symbols for surface texture designation. (Based on ANSI Y14.36-1978)
18-8
Surface Texture 18.2
Figure 18.2-7 Microtopographic map of Blanchard-ground surface of stainless steel. 200X in X-Y
plane, 2000X in Z direction (Courtesy of Gould Inc.)
18-9
18.2 Surface Texture
21X X - P00bOMOXi
Figure 18.2-8 Scanning electron microscope (SEM) views taken at a 550 angle of a typical surface of
17-4 PH stainless steel produced by electrochemical machining (ECM). Arithmetic average roughness
(R..) was 29 microinches [0.74 jan], and maximum peak-to-valley roughness height (Rt) was 152 micro-
inches [3.86 Lim].
18-10__
Surface Texture 18.2
SURFACE TEXTURE PRODUCED BY THE processing operation to produce a specific surface rough-
MACHINING PROCESS ness depends on many factors. In turning, for example, the
surface roughness is geometrically related to the nose
To a large degree the surface texture produced by a mate- radius of the tool and the feed per revolution. For surface
rial removal process is characteristic for that particular grinding, the final surface depends on the type of grinding
process. The range of roughnesses typically obtained for a wheel, the method of wheel dressing. the wheel speed, the
variety of manufacturing processes is shown in figure table speed. cross feed and down feed. and the grinding
18.2-9. This chart also indicates that it is possible to ex- fluid. For electrical discharge machining (EDM), the
ceed the usual range under unusual or specially controlled roughness level is related directly to the individual spark
conditions. discharge energy level. A change in any of the process op-
erating parameters may have a significant effect on the fi.
The selection of surface texture values involves more than nal surface produced.
merely designating a particular process. The ability of a
Drilling "//! //
Chemical millng vli //.
Electropolisn"'i,,/// i/l,/ll'
The ranges shown above are typical of the processes listed. I Average application
Higher or lower values may be obtained under special conditions. Less frequent application
Figure 18.2-9 Surface roughness produced by common production methods. (From ANSI
B46.1-1978).
18-11
18.2 Surface Texture
MACHINING COST AND SURFACE Each application must be evaluated on its own merit.
TEXTURE Table 18.2-2, if used with discretion. may serve as a guide
to the surface roughness values that may be necessary
The cost of producing a machined surface increases with where machine work must be held to close tolerance for
increasing requirements for finer finishes. Certain machin- other reasons than merely surface texture. It must be fur-
ing operations. such as rough turning and milling, are nec- ther realized that the practical control of tolerance is also
essary to shape a component to its required dimensions. influenced by the size of the part, the overall size of the sur-
Additional operations to refine the surface are needed only face being cut. and the material removal operations in-
to permit the surface to perform functions which it could volved. A chart showing how attainable dimensional tolei-
not otherwise perform. A surface roughness of 63 micro- ances tend to vary as a function of part size is shown in
inches 11.6 Lml or coarser can be obtained at a reasonable figure 18.2-11.
cost by general roughing and semi-finishing operations.
The relationship of surface texture to the cost of machining
is discussed further in section 21.
surfaces the total profile height is approximately four times Below 0,0002 Below 8 A29
the measured (arithmetic a,", age) roughness. When meas- 0.0002 to 0.0005 A 6 to 16
urements are made on a diameter of a part. this value 0.0005to0.0010 t 18to32
would be doubled. It follows that the roughness value on a 0.0010 to 0.0020 5 32 to 63 0Zo4
diameter should not exceed one-eighth the dimensional tol- 0.0020 to 0100 A 5 63 to 250 A
erance on the diameter if useful dimensional controls are to
be maintained.
Average
Roughness roughness Profile
centerline height height
18-12
Surface Texture 18.2
10-' _ _
8 -izzz
1000
S 4
00
U 2 _____
000
10-3 1
10--1
D~iameter or length. in
Figure 18.2-11 General effect of part size on manufacturing tolerances. (Adapted from Manufacturing
planning and estimating handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963, p. 20-23)
18-13
18.2 Surface Texture
PREFERRED ROUGHNESS VALUES practical to place undue emphasis on achieving a specific
roughness number. To minimize the variety of drawing
With all the factors that can influence the generation of a callouts. the American National Standards Institute in the
surface roughness value, with the dearth of data linking a standard, ANSI Y14.36-1978, promotes the use of pre-
specific roughness value to the function performed by a spe- ferred values for average roughess (Rj). roughness cutoff
cific surface. and with the variability introduced by the length and maximum waviness height. These values are
minute sample used in most measuring techniques, it is im- listed in table 18.2-3.
TABLE 18.2-3 Preferred Values for Arithmetic Average Roughness (R), Cutoff
Length, and Maximum Waviness Height
ARITHMETIC AVERAGE STANDARD ROUGHNESS MAXIMUM WAVINESS I
ROUGHNESS (Ro) SAMPLING LENGTH "EIGHTI
ltin in in-
400
600*
800
1000 =
18-14
Surface Texture 18.2
THEORETICAL ROUGHNESS PRODUCED roughness is a function of the tool radius and the feed per
BY MILLING CUTTERS AND BY LATHE revolution. The similarity between the roughness determi-
nations for the Type-B and Type-C configurations for both
TOOLS the turning tools and the milling cutters results in identical
It is possible to calculate the theoretical surface roughness sets of theoretical roughness values for each tool type in
produced by face milling cutters in a milling operation and each operation Hence. the table of theoretical values of R.
by lathe tools in turning. The theoretical surface roughness and R, values for the Type-B tooth in milling (table 18.2-9)
is important because it represents the best finish that can1 applies equally to the Type-B tool in turning. Similarly, the
be obtained with a sharp tool. The actual surface rough- values in tables 18.2-10 through 18.2-19 for the Type-C
ness usually will be poorer than this because built-up edge tooth in milling apply equally to the Type-C tool 'n turning.
is present. A series of graphs depicts the arithmetic average surface
For face milling, the cutter tooth can be classified2 accord- roughness for the various tool configurations as follows:
ig to one of the following common configurations: Type A: Zero-radius face milling cutter: figure
Type A: Zero nose radius 181-14
Type B: Round Type B: Round tool; figure 18.2-15
Type C: Nose radius, end cutting edge angle and side Type C: Tool containing a nose radius plus end cut-
cutting edge angle ting edge angle; figures 18.2-16. 18.2-17. and
18.2-18
These configurations are shown in figure 18.2-12. For-
mulas have been developed which determine the arithmetic As previously mentioned. the actual surface roughness gen-
average roughness. R,, and the peak-to-valley roughness erally will be poorer than that calculated from geometric
height. Rt. for these configurations. 3 considerations such as shown in tables 18.2-4 through
18.2-19. (The theoretical calculations all assume that the
The theoretical surface roughn.ss produced by a Type-A cutting conditions are such that the tool profile is dupli-
tooth in face milling is a function of the side cutting edge cated exactly in the workpiece surface.) During the process
angle (SCEA). the end cutting edge angle (ECEA) and the of chip formation, a built-up edge or plastically deformed
feed per tooth. Calculated values of R. and R, for this tooth material may be produced at the cutting edge. Most of this
configuration are contained in tables 18.2-4 through buift-up edge breaks off and flows away with the chip.
18.2-8. However. part of this built-up edge can remain welded to
the finished workpiece surface and adds to the surface
The theoretical roughness produced by the round Type-B roughness. as shown in figure 18.2-19. The presence of a
tooth in milling is a function of the tooth radius and the built-up edge can increase the surface roughness by a fac-
feed per tooth. Table 18.2-9 contains calculated values of tor of 1.2 to 2.5. The added roughness. or the amount of
R. and Rt for this configuration. built-up edge. is a function of the cutting tool material and
the work material. The amount of built-up edge present on
The Type-C tooth produces theoretical roughness values the surface can be minimized by using higher cutting
which are a function of the nose radius, the ECEA and the speeds and by using chemically active cutting fluids. Addi-
feed per tooth. Values R. and Rt that were calculated for tional factors which can add to the surface roughness in-
this configuration are given in tables 18.2-10 through clude chatter, vibration and tool wear.
18.2-19.
Special tool shapes can create finer- or micro-finishes. A
For turning operations. lathe tools can be characterized as -wiper- blade, figure 18.2-20. is one such tool shape used.
either Type B or Type C (see figure 18.2-13). For common Its broad. convex face reduces feed marks. Normally only
Type-C tools, the theoretical surface roughness is deter- one wiper blade is required in multiblade stiling cutters-
mined by the nose radius, the ECEA and the feed per revo- Higher cutting speeds do not appear to reduce the effi-
lution. When a round Type-B tool is used. theoretical ciency of wiper blades.
18-15
18.2 Surface Texture
B)
R Tool radius F-
Feed per
revolution
~Feed per
Feed per tooth revolution
Feed per
tooth
18-16
Surface Texture 18.2
TABLE 18.2-4 THEORETICAL Values for Arithmetic-Average Roughness (Ra) and Maximum Peak-to-Valley Rough-
ness Height (Rt) for Milling-Tool Type A
inmicroinches
0001 17 70 35 140 52 210 70 280 87 350 105 420 123 491 I 1.11 562
005 22 87 4.1 175 66 262 8/ 350 109 437 131 526 153 6I 176 7(3
r
0W6 2f; 10 52 210 79 314 105 420 131 525 158. 631 1841 73/ 211 843
0007 31 12? 61 244 92 367 122 489 153 612 184 736 215 859 246 984
0008 35 1.10. 70 279 105 419 140 559 175 700 210 841 246 982 231 11241
o000 39 157 79 314 118 472 157 629 197 787. 236 946. 276 1105 316 1265
)10 4,1 175 87 349 131 524 175 699 219 875 263 1051 307 1228, 351 1405
o012 52 209 105 419 157 629 210 839 262 1050 315 1261 368 1473 422 1686
001.1 61 214 122 489. 183 734 245 979 306 1225 368 1471 430 1719 492 1968
0 16 10 279 140 559 210 839 2N0 1119 350 1400 420 1582 491 1965 562. 2240
1018 79 314 157 629 236 943 315 1259 394 1575 473 1892 553 2210 632 2530
0J020 87 349 175 698 262 1048 350 1399 437 1750 526 2102 614 2456 703 2811
0 025 109 436 218 873 328 1310 437 1748 547 2187, 657 2628 767 307O 878 3514
0 030 131 524 262 1048 393 1572 524 2098 656 2625 788 3153 921 368.1 105. 1216
0035 153 611 306 1222 459 1834 612 2447 766 3062 920 3679 1074 4297 1230 4919
0 4( 175 698 349 1397 524 2096 699 2797 875 3500 1051 4204 1228 4911 1405 5622
04 , 196 785 393 1571 590 2358 787 3147 984 3937 1182 4730 1381 55-15 1581 6324
0050 218 873. 437 1746. 655 2620 874 3496 1094 4374 1314 5255 1535 6139 1757. 7027
mm micrometers
0.020 0.09 0.35 0.17 0.70 0.26 1.0 0.35 1.4 0.44 1.7 0.53 2.1 0.61 2.5 0.70 2.8
0.040 0.17 0,70 0.35 1.4 0.52 21 0.70 2.8 0.87 3.5 1.1 4.2 1,2 4.9 1.4 5.6
0.060 1.0 0026
052 2.1 0.79 &1 1.0 4.2 1.3 5.2 1.6 6.3 1.8 7.4 2.1 8.4
0.080 0 . ,0.70-. 2.8 1.0 42 1:4 . 5.8 1.7 7.0 2.1 8.4 2.5 9.8 2.8 11.
0.100
0,12 ,:",
: "1t.3
;'.11 -
5.2
63,
1.7
2, 11
7.0.4 2.2
2.11
8.7
10,
2.6
3.2
11.
13.
3.1
3.7
12,
Is.
3.5
4.2
14.
17.
0.140 0"' 14 1.24. 1.8 73' 2.4 9.8 3.1 12. 3.7 15. 4.3 17. 4.9 20.
0.100 07,,0 2.1 8.4 2.8 11. 3.5 14. 4.2 17. 4.9 20. 5.6 22.
03180 rt.. "1"3 24 9.4 3.1 13. 3.9. 16. 4.7 19." 55 22. 6.3 25.
0.2002' 1 0. 3.5 14. 4.4 17. 5.3' 21, 6.1 25. 7.0 28.
O. r ,..",t" .2 4 33 1,L 4.4 17. 5.5 22. 46.8 26., 7.7 31. 8.8 35.
.3I.: U2
6. "5.2 21. 6.6 26. 7.1, ;''.32. 92 37. 11. 42.
0360 :4 1:" i , ,0,'
4' st 1s, 6.1 " 4. 7.7 31. 9.2 37. 11. 43. 12. 49.
0.400 1. 7,7. 3. 1 5.2' 21. 7.0 X6. 07 35. 11. 42. 12. 49. 14. 56.
0450. to 7 l,"Is' W S111., 24. 7.9 31. 98 39. 12. 47. 14. 55. 16. 63.
00 22 8S In, 21 8 2 3
6. 11. 44. . 13. 53. 15. 61. 18. 70.
0.U - .. 2i.. 7 31. 10. '4. 13... 52. 16. 63. 18. 74 21. 84.
S- 9.1 '24 ' 37.'12. 15. 81, 18. .74- 21. 86. 25. 98.
FEED 10 20 30 40 5 6 1 70 80
PER ECEA ECEA ECEA ECEA ECEA ECEA ECEA ECEA
rmcroinchus
0.1
,3)0 I ' 3 5? 1/ 9 8 2 10? 30 119 34.
88 21:5
'
ti / 3, I/ 63 26 103 jI 1 '31'
, 1/1 51 20.1 ,59 2;8
)00, 0 122 61 ?42 96 362 i128I 480 150. 598 179 716 208 832 237, 918
)(08 '0, 139 69 277 103 413 137 548 71 68, 204 Q18, 238 951, 271. 1084
!001) 3,1 156 /8 311 116 465 5 6'S 192 769 230 920 267 1070 305 1219
'0) 4i
3 17, 86 346 129 51/ i2l 686 214 055 256. 1022 297. 1188 339 1354.
,,1 '? A3.8 103 415 155 620 206 824 256 1026. 307 122i 357. 1425 406. 1625
,101.1 h1 2-13 121 484 181 724 "40 961 299 1197 358 1431 416 1664. 474 1883
0 69 278 138 554 2271 827 2/" 1098 342 1368 409 1636 475 1902. 542 2167.
'018 /8 313 156 623 233 9130 :.38 1236 385 1539 460 1840 535 2140. 609 2.138
' 02' 81 34/ 1/3 892 258 1034 343 '3/3 421 1710 511 2045 594 2j77 677 2/09
0:2" 10 13.1 210 86- 323 1292 13"3 171, 534 2137. 639 2,53,6 /43 2972 841 3386
. 11,3 521 ?,' 1')38 3,84"' 1550 515 2059 641. 2565 767 3067 8Y2 3Z6 1016 4063
16:
111:35 b08 303 21!1 452 1409 f31 2402 748 2992 894 3578 1040 4161 1185. 4740
f):) 174 695 3-16 1314 517 267 6r. 2746 855 3419 1022 4089 1189 4755 1354 518.
03.15 195 782 389 1557 581 2326 ,,2 3089 962 3847 1150 4600 133/ 5349 1524 6095
03)3,0 217 869 432 1730 646 2584 858 3432 1069 4274 1278 5111 1486 5944 1693 6772.
mm : micrometers . . .
0.020 0.35
0.09 0.17 0.89 026 , ID 0.34, A 0.43 0.51 io,'0.59 .4.72A 0 2.7
0.040 .'60
7 10 41: 12 4A 1A 5.4
0.060 0.26 1.0 0.52 2.1 0.8 31 10 4I 13 1 1,5 ' '.i7~' '2.0' &1
0.080~~~0.147
0.35 0.61 1.4 0.69
1, i.
.4M -+4l+ +63I0 j t,:" 0.1417 :'- + &
" '2b 9, 2.7: 11.
0.100 0.43 1.7 0.86 3.5.' .1. 5.2 1.7 &9 2.1 ,'8 2A~ 3.4.: _14.
0.120 0.52 2.1' 1.0 ' 4.2 :1 4.2'.) .2,; 2. 3.V
M I ',4.1 16,
2 ,.0
.5 '241,,2 1 S 1. ' .'
040 0.61 ,2.4 .1.2 J3. A' .72" 2A'"9 3. W1,j, _ 1
0.200
0.180 0.87
0.78 3.5
3.1 1.71 &13 ~.S
AA v.
.,5-18
-1.2 *'4 1 *52 2 68' 27.
24.
02 011 43 2.2 8.6 1. 4.3~ -I M
e.~ '5 A
7,, 1Mr 8. 34.
0.50 1.7 8. 2.5 14. '. ,1:~
040 2.0 528 3.9 10. r" W af8> ~ ~ Y'5S i.
'10 1:
42~6
0001 13 i 86 34 13 99 20 11 3 .
0' (002
1110
8;G ' 1 63 7 ~ ' 1 3 . 16, I 67c 03a 2?7:7
I~)t' ',? 71'/ 1111 3- , . 32 K 2:0 7,4. 237" 3. 34-1 i17 3i,
004 s . J t, 2'J
W?'7 5' .:3 99 3IJ6 1t6 14 I 13V.
000. ;' 6, .[3 171 .1
" 33 416;
J10 496 :40 7," I61A
0001, 2 10 4 3
'1 5 "1 4"' ' 3 1 .. 46 14 !. 32 1' 7,0
?
(J()1
0 4J I/ 817 1-. ": 5,. IhO
: 8 6 2'8 8,11 46 991 .7 1 47
001? 5?" 20/ 103 411 13 .'. i 837 24 39Y9 21' 11 j 344 1376 9,
0014 60 4 11 4,, 178 "2 735 -J,1 291 166 34, 13B74115",6 455 '1
1026 '8 4j. 214 '-,' 319 '772 I4: "6-U 621 .'082 t19 2477 71" .'>6 8'? .,'>
1030 i1.1
! '' 257
5 .', 382 ' ',4 2u': 625
.' 24115 141 2973 860 3440 .
0035 161 '
6,1 00 1i.98 445 1 :,0 - 2352 /.9 :916 l;" 3458 ! 4,13
,3 1
0040 1i3 b91 342 13t.9 6,' -. '> 26 8 33 331 991 3964 1147 456 1300 00
0.0680 0.35 1.4 0.68 2.7 1.0 4.1 1.3 5.4 1.7 6.7 2.0 7.9 2.3 9.2 2.6 10.
0.100 0.43 1.7 0.86 3.4 1.3 5.1 1.7 6.7 2.1 1.3 2.5 9.9 2.9 11. 3.2 13.
0.120 0.52 2.1 1.0. 4.1 1.5 61 2.0 6.1.- 2.5 10.0 30 12. 3.4 14. 3.9 16.
0.140 ,0j,0 2.4 12 4.8 1.8 7.1 24 94 2.9 12. 3.5 14. 4.0 16. 4.5 16.
O10.6 2.8 1.4'' S.5 20 II 2.7 11. 3.3 13. 4.0 14. 4.' 1& 5.2. 21.
0.180 0.78 3.1 1.5 6 23 #2 3.0 12 3.7 15. 4.5 U. $2 ,21. 5.8 23
0.200 0.86 . 1.7 &6.' 25 M10. 4 13. 42 17 .0 "20. 5.7 23. 5.5 26.
0.250 1.1 4.3 '.1 1,6 342 4.- 17. &2 21. 6.2 25. .7.2 29. . 32.
0= 13 5.2 2.6 -10. $51&6 . SJ 2. 6.2 ' 2 7As 0.1 34. 9.7 39
0350, 1.5 8.-0 U 12t 45 1. 10, . 73 2. 47. 3S. 10- 40. J1. 45.
0.400 1.7 .9 34 1. 5.1 2-. &.7 27. 8-3 .1 . t". 40 11. 46,. 13. 5z
1.9 .3.9 15. 5.7 t3. 7. 30. t9.4 .37. ji. 45. 13. 52. 15. 58.
0.500 2.2 &.8 4.3 17.*i\, &4'r ~ 8.4 34. 110. '~411 1?- 50 1%4. W57 16 6.'
o.600 2. 1. 5.1 21. . 40. .12. 15 " 69. 1. 78.-.
30812.
I000 . 4.-.-" L9-3&% 2. . .. 15. ,5.- 17. 69., 20. . 26&.. -91..
0.100 3.5 14 U68 27 t 41. a1 54. 1"'67. 20. 79. 23. 92. 26. .104.
18-19
18.2 Surface Texture
TABLE 18.2-7 THEORETICAL Values for Arithmetic-Average Roughness (Ra) and Maximum Peak-to-Valley Rough-
ness Height (Rt) for Milling-Tool Type A
FEED 10 20 30 40 50 6 70 80
PER ECEA ECEA ECEA E ECEA CEA
TO O TH _I_ _ il_, , Ht R, A,_R, lAo [I,
in microinches
0004 17 69 34 135. 50 199. 65 261. 80 322. 95. 380. 109. 437. 123, 493.
0.005 21 86 42. 169. 62. 249 82. 327 101. 402. 119. 476. 137. 547. 154. 616.
(006 26 103 51. 202. 75 299 98 392. 121. 483. 143. 571. 164. 656. 185. 739.
0007 30 120 59 236. 87 349 114. 457. 141, 563. 166. 666. 191. 766. 216. 863.
0 008 34 137 67 270. 100. 398. 131. 523. 161. 644. 190. 761. 219. 875. 24,6. 986.
0009 39 154 76. 304. 112. 448 147. 588. 181. 724. 214. 856. 246. 984. 277. 1109.
0010 43 172 84 337. 124 498 163, 654. 201. 805. 238 951. 273. 1094. 308. 1232.
0012 51 206. 101 405. 149 598 196. 784 241. 965. 285. 1141. 328. 1312. 370. 1479.
C014 60 240. 118 472 174. 637. 229. 915. 282. 1126 333. 1332. 383. 1531. 431. 1725.
0 016 69 274. 135 540. 199 797 261. 1046. 322. 1287. 380. 1522. 437. 1750. 493. 1972.
0018 77 309 152 607 224. 896. 294. 1176. 362. 1448. 428. 1712. 492. 1968. 555. 2218.
0020 86 343. 169. 679 249 996. 327. 1307 402. 1609. 476. 1902. 547. 2187, 616 2464.
0025 107 429 211 844 311. 1245. 408 1b34. 503. 2011. 594. 2378 683. 2734. 770. 3081.
0030 129 515 253 1012 373 1494 490 1961. 603 2414 713. 2853. 820 3281 924. 3697.
)035 150 600 295 1181 436. 1743 572 2287. 704. 2816. 832 3329. 957. 3828. 1078. 4313.
0 040 172 686. 337. 1350 498. 1992 654. 2614. 805. 3218 951. 3804. 1094. 4374. 1232. 4929.
r 045 193 772 380. 1518 560 2241 735. 2941 905. 3620 1070. 4280. 1230. 4921. 1386. 5545.
C(150 214 858. 422 1687. 622 2490 817. 3268. 1006. 4023. 1189. 4755. 1367. 5468. 1540. 6161.
mm micrometers
0.020 0.09 034 0.17 067 025 1.00 0.33 1.3 0.40 1.6 0.48 1.9 0.55 2.2 0.62 , 2.5
0.040 0.17 0.69 0.34 1.3 0.50 2.0 0.65 2.6 0.80 3.2 0.95 3.8. 1.1 4.4 1.2 4.9
0.060 0,26 1.0 0.51 2.0 0.75 3.0 0.98 3.9 1.2 4.8 1.4 5.7 1.6 - 6.6 1.8 7.4
0.080 0.34 1.4 0.67 2.7 1.00 4.0 1.3 5.2 1.6 6.4 1.9 '7.6 2.2 8.7 2.5 . 9.9
0.100 0.43 1.7 0.84 3.4 1.2 5.0 1.6 6.5 2.0 8.0 2.4 , 9.5 2.7 11. '3.1 12..
0.120 0.51 2.1 1.0 4.0 1.5 6.0 2.0 7.8. 2.4 9.7 2.9 -, 11. .3.3 '13. '3.7 15
0.140 0.60 2.4 1.2 4.7 1.7 7.0 2.3 9.1 2.5 11. 3.3 13. 3.8 .. 15. '4.3 17.
0.160 0.69 2.7 1.3 5.4 2.0 8.0 2.6 16.' 3.2 13. 3.8 . 15. 4.4 , 17, 4.9 . 20.
0.180 0.77 3.1 1.5 6.1 2.2 9.0 2.9 12. 3,6 14. 4.3 17. '3 :4.9 20 5.5 22.
0.200 0.86 3.4 1.7 6.7 2.5, 10.0 3.3 , 13. -4.0 16. 4.8 .19. 5.5 .22., 6.2
0.250 1.1 4.3 2.1 8.4 3.1 12. 4.1 . 16. 5.0 20. 5.9, ' 24., 6.8 27. 77 31.
0.300 1.3 5.1 2.5 10. 3.7 15. 4.9 20. 6.0 24. 7.1 . 8.2 ':"33. 9.2 '37.,
0.350 1.5 6.0 3.0 12. 4.4 17. 5.7 23. 7.0 28. 8.3 ,33. 9.6 38.. 11.. 43.
0.400 1.7 6.9 3.4 13. 5.0 20. 6.5 26. 8.0 32. 9.5' 38. , 11.' 44" 12. .49,
0.450 1.9 7,7 3.8 15. 5.6 22. 7.4 29. 9.1 38. 11. 43. 12. " 49. 14 . , ,55.
0o 2.1 8.6 4.2 17. 6.2 25. 8.2 33. 10. 40. 12. 48. 14 55". 15 '
'
0.600 2.6 10. 5.1 20. 7.5 30. 9.8 39. 12.- 48., 14:. 57. 16. '66. 18.'-:,74.
0.700 3.0- 12. . 5.9 24. 8.7 35. 11. .4V , 14. '58." 17 87, 19. 77. -22.'. l'8
0800 3.4 14. . 6.7 27. 10.0 40. 13.. ,..2 16. 64. 19." r6 22 . 57 25 9-.4.
:g
1.000 4.3, 17. 8.4 34.,' 12.. 50. 16. 65.., 20:. 80. 24., " 95. 27, 109. 31. ,
1.200 5.1 21. 10. 40. 15. 60. 20. 7. 24. 97 29 14 31 37
18-20
Surface Texture 18.2
TABLE 18.2-8 THEORETICAL Values for Arithmetic-Average Roughness (R,) and Maximum Peak-to-Valley Rough-
ness Height (Rt) for Milling-Tool Type A
(100.1 17 68 33 132. 48, 192 62 249 76 304 89. 356 101 405 113 452
0005 21 85 41 165 60 240 78 312 95 380 111. 445 127 506 141 565
00016 25 102 49 198 72 288 94 374. 114 456 133 534 152 608 170 678
( 007 30 119 58 231, 84 336 109 437. 133. 532 156. 622 177 709 198 791
0008 34 136 66 263. 96. 384 125 499 152. 608 178. 711 203 810 226 904
0009 38. 152. 74 296. 108. 432. 140 561 171 684 200 800 228 911. 254 1017
(010 42. 169 82. 329 120 480 156 624. 190 760 222. 889 253 1013. 283 1130
0012 51 203 99 395 144 577 181 748 228 912. 267. 1067 304 1215. 339 1356.
0014 59. 237 115 461 168 673 218 873 266 1064 311 1245. 354. 1418 396 1582.
0016 68. 271. 132 527 192 769 249 998 304 1216. 356. 1423 405 1620. 452. 1808.
0018 76 305. 148 593. 216. 865 281 1123. 342. 1368 400 1601 456 1823 509 2034
0020 85. 339. 165 659. 240. 961 312 1247 380. 1520 445. 1778. 506 2025 565 2261.
0025 106. 424. 206 823 300 1201 390 1559. 475 1899 556 2223 633 2531 706 2826
0030 127 508. 247. 988 360 1441 468 1871. 570 2279 667 2668. 759 3038 848 3391
0035 148 593. 288. 1153 420 1682 546 2183 665. 2659 778 3112. 886 3544 989 3956
0040 169 678. 329. 1317. 480. 1922. 624 2495 760 3039. 889. 3557. 1013 4050. 1130 4521
0.045 191. 762. 370. 1482. 541 2162. 702 2807 855 3419. 1000. 4001. 1139 4556. 1272 5086
0.050 212. 847. 412. 1646. 601. 2402 780 3119. 950. 379S. 1111 4446. 1266 5063. 1413. 5651
mm micrometers
0.020 0.08 0.34 0.16 0.66 0.24 0.96 0.31 1.2 0.38 1.5 0.44 1.8 0.51 2.0 0.57 2.3
0.040 0.17 0.68 0.33 1.3. 0.48 1.9 0.62 2.5 0.76 3.0 0.89 3.6 1.0 4.1 1.1 4,5
0.060 0.25 1.0 0,49 2.0 0.72 2.9 0.9A 3.7 1.1 4.6 1.3 5.3 1.5 6.1 1.7 6.8
0,080 0.34 11.4 0.66 2.6 '0.96 3.8 1.2 5.0 1.5 6.1 1.8 7.1 2.0 8.1 2.3 9.0
0.100 0.42 1.7 0.82 3. 1.2 4.8 1.6 6.2 1.9 7.6 2.2 8.9 2.5 10. 2.8 11.
0.120 0.51, 2.0 0.99 4.0 1.4 5.8 1.9 7.5 2.3 9.1 2.7. 11. 3.0 12. 3.4 14.
0.140 0.59 2.4 1.2 4.6 1.7 67 2.2 8.7 2.7 11. 3.1 12. 3.5 .14. 4.0 16.
0.160 0.68,, 27 1.3 5.3 1.9 7.7 2.5 10.0, 3.0 12. 3.6 14. 4.1 16. 4.5 18.
0.180 0.76 3.0 1.5, 5.9 2.2 8.6 2.8 11. 3.4 14. 4.0 16. 4.6 18. 5.1 20.
0.200 0,85 3.4 1.6 6.6 2.4 9.6 3.1 12. 3.8 15. 4.4. 18. 5.1 20. 5.7 23.
0.250 1.1 4.2 2,1 -8.2 3.0 12. 3.9 . 16. 4.7 19. 5.6 22. "6.3 25. 7.1 28.
0.300 1.3 5.1 2.5 0.9 , 3.6 14. 4.7 19. 5.7 23. 6.7 . 27. 7.6 30. 8.5 34.
0.350. 15 6.9 2.9 12.', . 4.2 17. 5.. 22. 6.6 27. 7.3 31. 89 35. 9.9 40..
0.400 ,.1.7. 68 3.3 13. 4h' 6.2 , 25. 7.6 30. 8.9 36. 10. 41. 11. 45.
0.450 1.9 76 . 7 1 5.4 !22. -7.0 . .28. 8.5 34. -10. 40. 11. 46. 13. 51.
0.500 .1. 8.5 4' 16., 81 24.,-11 '.8
:31,. .5 38. 1,,.44. 13. 51.- 14. 57.
.937. '1,... 5
I
0600 2.51,0i 49 ;2 -',7.2 29.' 9.4 ' 37. :11. 46. 13. 53 15. .'61. 17.: 68.
0.700 3.1 12, 58
&a ; 34. 11. 44. .,1& 53. 16. 62. 1. 71.,, 20. 79.
0.800 34 , 14.: 6.6 2& '9.6,38. 12. 50. 15. 61., 18. 71.,. 20. 81, 23. 90.
1.000 17
42 iio . I ,4
'4 16. 62.' 19. 76. 22. 89.' 25. 101. 28.- 113.-
1.200 5.1 209 l). 14. 58. 19. 75.' 23., 91. 27. 107... 30. 122. 34. '136.,
18-21
18.2 Surface Texture
TABLE 18.2-9 THEORETICAL Values for Arithmetic-Average Roughness (R,) and Maximum Pcak-to-Valley
Roughness Height (Rt) for Turning or Milling-Tool Type B
FEED/REV.
ITurning! DIAMETER
Or
[Millig)
FFEW/TOOTH 0.25 in 0.375 In 1,0.50 In j0.625 In 10.75 in 1.0 in j1.25 in 1.5 in
__ mm 10 mm 12mm j 16mm [ 20 mm 25mm 32mmin 40 mm
~R,
R fl 1, ~ R, JR. 18, 18,,fR: R 1, R.- R, I8 RI 18 1,
i In microinches
0 00 i 031 10 0 16 061 0 12 0 1 0 '0 040 1008 033 1008 025 J005 020 005 0 17
i)Ju. 10 40 U075 27 S;, 2J 040 6 1 032 13 02 10 0 20 080 OIC0 067
0003 23 90 16 66 12 4 090J 36 0,90 301 060 23 0 4: 18 040 1
()0i1"i3 49 84 33 63 25 5J '10 4 1X 3? 2 26 98 25 82
660LI 16 64 11 43 82 32 6 55S 21 42 16 35 13 30 11
0009 1 8 1 4~ 41 83 32 70 27 S52 2IN 4? 16 37 14
0 025 161 627 107 417 80 313_ 64 250 53 208 40. 156 32 125 27. 104.
0030 232 903 154 601 116 456- 1 92 360 77 300 58 225 46 180. 39. 150.
0 035 316 1241 210 81d 157- E13 126 490 105 409 79 306 63 245 52. 204
0043 413 1613 274 1070 206 K0 164 641 137 534 103 400 82 320 68 267
0045 523 2042 347 1355 260 15 2G8 811 173 676 130 507 104 405 87. 338.
00U50 647 2526 429 1674 321 1253 257 1002 214 834 160 625 128 5W0. 107. 417.
0060 935 3653 619 2416 463 18&07 370 1443. 308 1202. 231 901 185 720 154 600
0070 1278 500 844 3296 631 2462 5-04 1966 420 1637 315 1227 252 981 210 817.
008,0 1677 6573 1105 4316 825 3221 659 2571 549 2139, 411 1603 329. 1281 274 1067.
0090 21h~ 8381 1402 5480 1046 408,3 835 3257 695. 2710. 520 2029. 416. 1622 347. 1351.
0 100 2654 10436 1736 6790 1293 5051 11032 4026, 1858 3348 1643 2506 1514 2003, 1428, 1669.
mm
orno~~~~~0.1
0.610om u~ M u ts s 00
0.04 . _O01. 0.015 Mtm 'Im0 -44 oilU~?4
0.060 00
28~11~2~ 117i
0100sD 5. JA %o1
18.. 1~ 1.
Best5Avilbl CoptyO
Surface Texture 18.2
TABLE 18.2-10 THEORETICAL Values for Arithmetic-Average Roughness (R,,) and Maximum Peak-to-Valley Rough-
ness Height (Rt) for Turning or Milling-Tool Type C
(10 1 2 1 s0 2 80 2 1 80 21 80 ,1 80 2 1 80 21 ,( 1 80
002 2 1) 2 2Q 82 3 8? 32 82 32 82 32 82 32 82 32
0 003 1 63 19 , 19 ,2 13 '2 19 72 19 72 19 72 V)
1 .' 87 .,.U i0I 366 102 398 102 398 102 398 102 3M18
t S01'8 3, 1i, V,2 1017 390 i: 488 133 522 133 522 133 5211 133 5,T
i '93 1ii 41) '2.7 4613 15) '94 169 1,9 169 663 169 663 169 663
o ji '10UH I3 !11 460 14," 38 191 I05 209 804 210 823 210 823 210 823
0 012 112 ..
4
i 1t,6 1 I 19 692 255 937 295 1114 305 1200 305 1200 305 1200
3,Y14 3 ,0 : 2 748 231 831 322 1179 388 1444 421 1659 421 1659 421 1659
)16 133 39)94 239 H," dO 1014 391) 1430 485 1i92 557 2206 557 2207 557 2207
0118 181 ('63 ."16 10.1 319 1180 4601 1689 585 2154 716 2817 718 2858 718 2858
[)0
010 204 173 :114 11;1 33 1349 531 I'53 688 2528 891 3470 904 3627 904 3627
(0 S2 !fX1t 409 1')37 477 1181 114 263? 955 3508 1389 5271 1492 5937 1509 613T
U.
10 1 3 ' 1 911 592 )214 4033 3347 1233 4540 1945 7286 2224 8678 2314 9277
mm micrometers
0DZ, 0.06 025 0.06 0.25 0Z.0 0.25' 0.06 ,02' 0.06 0.25 0.06. 0.25 0.06 0.25 0.06 0.25
0"040 0.23 0356 0.26 ON' 0.26 10 0.26 1,0V 1026 1.0 '026-- 1.0 0.25 1.0 0,26 1.0
o. .. 0.43 1.6 0.54:' 2.0 17 2.1 0.58 13 0.58 '2.3 0.58 , 2.3 0.58 2.3 0.58 2.3
tp
* _0.63 23 0.6 31 0.1 34 10 10 , 4.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 40
.1.106 0,85: 3.1 1.2 4.4 1. 4.6 16.
14 D S .4 164 8,4
11. 1i 65.4 1.6 6.4
391 2.4 9.' 2.4 9.2 2.4 9.2
0'140 1.3 41 19 6J."' 2-1""'
i t g- 10.7 3.2 It 3,2 '13 3.2 13. 3.2 13.
00 5.6 2.2 , 83 2i 1.4 3.5 - 1'" 4..2 17. 4.2 17, 4.2 1.
1 26 . i 4.1 . &D 19.' 54 2 5.4. 21,. 54-. 21.
4 :.4: ~..0'
3 is.! 4J3i8 6.6 .fiY!A
'7 .11 27.
6.8 6.8 27.;
j25 9.6" 'l9'iA 4 17 66 -24. I31;
8.5%' '1"'4. 44. 11. .44.
"41 ... 5A" . 4..V'4j' d .66. 16 66, '17. 67.
'44.304.-37 ~'"'22 ~ 8. . 4 S~ -21. 71 23. 92. 24. 96.
18-23
18.2 Surface Texture
TABLE 16.2-11 THEORETICAL Values for Arithmetic-Average Roughness (R.) and Maximum Peak-to-Valley Rough-
! '. M.
ness Hc h! I%,) ,r , n
,.... ..
in microinches
001 10 4.0 1.0 40 1.0 4.0 10 40 10 40 1.0 40 1.0 4,0 10 40
() 00 41 16 41 16 4.1 15 41 16 41 16. 4.1 16. 4.1 16. 1.1 16
(1003 03 36 93 36 93 36 93 36 93 36 93 36 93 36 9.3 36
0001 43 15C, 50 191. 50. 196 51 197 51. 197 51. 197. 51. 197. 51. 197.
0008 53. 194 64 242 66 253. 66 257. 66. 257 66 257 66. 257. 66 257
0009 63 230 79 294 82. 312 84 326 84 326. 84. 326 84. 326. 84. 326
0010 73 268 94 349. 100. 373 103 403. 103 403. 103 403 103 403. 103. 403.
0012 94 344 126. 462 136. 503. 149 579 149 582. 149. 582 149. 582. 149 582
0014 115. 423 159. 581 174. 639 202 771. 204. 795 204. 795 204. 795 204. 795.
0 016 136 503 192 704 213 7_1. 259. 975. 267. 1043. 267. 1043 267. 1043 267 1043.
0)018 158 585 226 830 253 927 319. 1189 329. 1318 339 1326 339. 1326. 339 1326.
0020 180. 669 2Cl 959. 294 1076. 381. 1410. 417 1609 420. 1646, 420 1646. 420 1646.
0025 236 881. 350. 1291. 398. 1463 543. 1992. 636 2389. 665. 2613. 665. 2613. 665. 2613
003 293 1099 441 1634. 506 1865 711. 2607 873 3232 972. 3842 972 3842 972. 3842.
0035 351 1321. 534. 1985 615 2277 885. 3247 1120. 4124 1348. 5320. 1350 5370 1350 5370.
0040 409 1545. 628. 2343. 726 2b98 1063. 3906 1377. 5055. 1783. 6940 1808. 7253 1808. 7253.
0045 468. 1772 723. 2706 839 3127. 1244. 4583. 1640. 6020. 2263. 8684, 2355. 9456 2360. 9581.
0050 527. 2001. 819. 3074 953. 3562. 1429. 5274 1910. 7015. 2778. 10542, 2983. 11874. 3018. 12273.
0060 646. 2465 1013 3821 1185 4447 1805 6693 2466. 9080. 3889. 14572, 4447. 17356. 4629. 18554.
mm micrometers
0.020 0.0, 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.03 0,13 0.03 0.13 0.0 0.13 0.03. 0.13
0,040 0.13 0.50 0.13 0.50 0.13 0.50 0.13,_- 0.50 0.13 0.50 0.A3 .. 0.50 "0.13 0.50 ''1.13 0.50
0.060 0.28 1.1 0.29 1.1 0.29 1.1 0.29 '1.i :'0.29, 1.1 :0.29."1: '.1': '1 29
"0.29 :' 11'
0.080 0.46 1.7 0.51 2.0 "0.51 2.0 0.5' .2.0 '0.51 512.0
5011 " '0.5 2.0.
0.100 0.65 2.4 0.79 3.0 0.80 3.1 .80... 3.1 .0.6,, 31 ' 0, ,' 3.1 o ' "0.80-
0.120 0.85 3.1 1.1 4.0 1.1 4.3 1.2 -- 1.. -12.-,,
4.5 . 1,2 A4..5 1.2 .5 . l'
0.140 1.1 3.9 1.4 5.1 1.5 5.5' .1.6 , 6.2 '1.6 .52 16." &2- " .6J. 23 1
0.160 1.3 4.6 1.7 6.3 1.9 6.9 2.1. 8.0 2.1 '8 .1 ' .. 1-. 2. . " 8A' 2.18.1
1
0.180 1.5 5.4 2.0 7.5 2.2 8.2 2.6 9.9 2.6 10. 2.6 0. 2.6 10. 2.6 10.
0.200 1.7 6.2 2.4 8.7 2.6 9.6 3.2 12.. 3.2 13. 3.2:,, 3. " . ' ,13. 3.2:' 13.
0.25C 2.2 8.3 3.2 12. 3.6 13. 4.7 17. 5.1 20. 5. 20. 5 20.'.' &.1. 20.
0300 2.8 10. 4.1 15. 4.7 17. 6.3 23. 7.2 27 ,.4 29A'-,
." 7 14 29.
0.35..4..5.0 19. 5.7 21. 7915-
0.400 3.9 15. 5.9 22. .8 25." 9.6 :3& 12. .44 14. .. 54. 14, " , 14- ,4
0.450 4.5 17. 6.9 26. 7.9 29. 11. .4. 1.. 5 7 ~6.2
69 (74
0.500 5.1 19. 7.8 29. 9.0 34.. 13. ii
17;. 6:2' 22. 85_ 2M 8S- 2,-
0.600 8.3 24. 9.7 36. 11. 22... 82 31.' :120. 3 r
.. .... ffi13...,*
0700 7.5 28. 1 4.4. 14. 51. 21. 78. 2.. 102
215 42e. 46 _4"l.,
18-24
Surface Texture 18.2
TABLE 18.2-12 THEORETICAL Values for Arithmetic-Average Roughness (Ra) and Maximum Peak-to-Valley Rough-
ness Height (Rt) for Turning or Milling-Tool Type C
0001 069 27 069 27 069 27 069 2.3 069 27 069 27 069 27 069 27
0002 27 11 27 11 27 11 27 11 27 11. 27 11 27 11 11 27 11
0003 62 24 62 24 62 24 62 24 62 24 62 24 62 24 62 24.
0004 11 43 11 43 11 43 11 43 11 43 11. 43 11 43 11 43
0005 17 67 17 67 17 67 17 67 17 67. 17 67 17 67 17 67
0006 25 94 25 96 215 96. 25 96 25 96 25 96 25 96 25 96
0018 141 516 189 694 204 754 1224 869. 2214 874 224 874. 224 874 224 874
0020 162 594 222 812 242 590 275 1059 277 1081 277 1081 277 1981 277 1081
0 025 215 796 305 1119 339 1243 418 1568 135 169)9 435 1700 435 1700 435 1700
0030 270 1003 392 ,439 441 1614 572 2115 626 2413 630 2469. 630 2469 630 2469
0035 326 1215 480 1768 545 1999 732 2691 840 3182 864 3395 864 3395 864 3395
0 N0 382 1430 570 2i26 651 2393 898 3291 1070 3996 1140 4489 1140 4489 1140. 4469
0045 439 1649 662 2451 758 2797 1067 3911 1309 4848 1459 5764, 1459 5764 1459 5764
0050 497 1870. 754 2801 867 3208 1240 4546 1555 5733. 1824 7214 1824 7237 1824 7237.
0060 613 2318 942 3514 1 90 4&47 1594 5860 2065 7583 2674 10410 2712 10880 2712. 10880
00,10 731 2773 1132 4242 1316 4907 1958 7218 2594 9523 3647 13937 3834 15357 3852 15670
0080 850 3233 1325 4982. 1545 '7&W 2330 8613 3140 11540 4707 17759 5163 20406 5270 21344
0090 969 3697 1520 5732 1777 6.671 2708 10040 3699 13621 5834 21858 6671 26034 6943 27831
0.020 .0Z 0.06 0.02 -ONS v.02' -,am 7 :O.an -on cm8 *a,
0 0.04.2 6~ 0.02 ~0.08
00000. 0.10111 t@.337_LiIMh 11140.._13 0.33 040S amJ 0.3
tU 0.0.033
0.060 Oil. '0.75A 0.19 '0375 31. 1Sm 0.19,0" on 0.19 on7 0.1 @75 6.3M.5 19 07
PJ408 0_ '13T .3 13 O - .3, ON 43034, 1.3
0.100 0Sz'.1.t -0.5 am'.L 0.4 1.3 -US .L3 6.61t
0.61 OM7 .19t 3ti)7 D' I.7
0.120 - 0609 2 6! 0.37 -'jr W7 117 34' 0.7'.7 3 7 3.0
-q
0.160 .&, 1. 13.1 14. 1k-~ 1.1, 4., 4
0.10 '..' -,4.0 ,3i< 4_2 1.4 14' 4.4 t4 .1. SIA ., 1A ,~5A, I ' 5.4
0.18 7 1.3 1A ivi L4 1- 41 1.7> G65 1' 'U <1.71- 61
0200M~ 5. S; 1ay, 22 2~ '$M
A OSA_~ 12 $A 22 &
2-0,, 7. 21 Wl, IV 4l ,t 3A ',4.
-. 4 3A4.. 13.
0.3WSS 4.3 -4.9 4.9
4.48-5.
18.2 $urface Texture
TABLE 18.2-13 THEORETICAL Values for Arithmetic-Average Roughness (Ra) and Maximum Peak-to-Valley Rough-
ness Height (R1) for Turning or Milling-Tool Type C
Imling
FE/OrT _CE ECEA I CE ECEA IECEA ECEA I ECEA jEE
IEEDIfill
Mifing H, P, k H R, K, , H H 0 H, H, H
microinches
[
p
j8> 3O 24 9 i>' 96 25 98 25 98 98
9825 98
IA 120 I 2 50'
1 33 128 33 128 33 128 33 128 33 128
4
41 1; 0 2 16? 4? 1652 42 1Q2 42 162 42 162 42 162
5. ~0~ ~
0 ~191 -f 1K 20 200
01 51 202 1 0
A12I 0j 7 287 74 09 74 283 74 289 74 289 74 289 74 289
4 t:7 3' Y
130 382 11 391, 101 393 101 39j3 101 3393 101 393 101 393
) " !:j' 33 16 28 .8,3 10j1 5,r,4 132 514 132 514 132 514 132 514 132 514
16 126 461 158 588 CA- E23 17 651 167 651 167 651 16-1 651 167 651
00 146 531 188 69 7 199 746. 6 805 206 805 206 WS5 206 805 206 805
193 "2 a 93
9b8 191 107,2 023 1251 323 1263 323 1263 323 1263 323 1263
zK
"1 92" I 05" 1-263 a 87 1418 459 174.2 467 1827 467 1827 467 1827 467 1821,
Y0
305 i31 3 1 596 4M6 17 '996 2266 639 2492 639 25(9 639 2500 639 2500
',4 360u 133i52 1917 St87 2151 "t i 28 17 833 3213 839 3286 839 326,6 839 3286
4
1 i'54? b10 2246 691 2534 921 j390 1045 397/6 1058 4190 10D68 4190 1068 4190
O 5 47 17F,2 730 2581 796 292"5 I1,35 3'82 1270 4774 132? 5218 1327 5218 1327 5218
1f
066 2193 8 62 3214t6 111 3727' 142? 5210 1743 6458 1941 7671 1941 7671 11941 7671,
3070 M0 2641 1067 3958 1230 4552 1769 5489 2239 8240 2692 1D622 2696 10719 2696 10719
AO4, 817 3090J 1255 4E684 1452 5314 2125 7308 2751 1010? 3560 13860 3609 14477 3609 14477
0090 935 3544 1445 5410 1678 6251 2487 9161 3278 12032 4519 17345 4 700 18876 4710 19119
0 100 1053 4002 11637 6146 1906 7121 12856 10543 13818 14021 15549 21056 15954. 23705 6C23 24495
mm ,nm~~;.
*:6fiS f.66
#ls 0.02- ,',0.0
0000 0.U038 MZ4 -S 4 1 'o
0,00 oz -10 02i s< 02 .
0.w0 0.30 1.5,0A t&- I0'M ;'. 1.6' 0*.- : 1
0.1600.93.
.& '4
0.140<
62i
.0116-2.
0.74 2 t 3.
Best0
Av4.ilbl
. X-Copy"A. 1. 5,
I
0)Y)/ 3 4 ,' 13 , 4I
49 1.A 44 I] 49 13 49 13 49 13 49
0 M96 6 .,4 1o 44 F 64 T6 64 16 64 16 64 16 (i. 16 6.
00j) 21 81 21 8 21 81 21 81 21 81 21 81 24 81
1)010 .'. 1(14) r, . *. l t.. '4 100 26 100 26 1042 26 100 26 100
0 012 ," 144 4 144 .,' 144 37 144 37 144 37 144 37 14 37 14.1
0014 ' ;141; F' 196 50 1io 50 196 50 196 50 196 50 196 50 196.
0016 W) 252 tk 256 66 256 66 256 66 256 66 256 6) 256 66 256
{>4018 341
W; d3 324 83 324 8 3324 83 324 83 324 83 324 83 32.
0020 99 3};? 1423 401 103 431 103 401 103 401 103 401 103 401 103 401
0025 145 534 160 621 161 627 161 627 161 627 161 627 161 627 161 627
U 430 192 l)b 228 864 231 895 232 903 232 903 232 903 232 903 232 903
0035 242 885 301 1122 311 1185 316 1231 316 1231 316 1231 316 1231 316 1231
0040 2,' 1070 377 1394 398 1492 413 1610 413 1610 413 1610 411 1610 413 1610
0)045 'I4 1259 45 1675 488 1812 523 2040 52:3 2042 523 2042 523 2042 5213 20.1)
041St) 3' 1453 36 1965 581 2144 645 2501 641 2526 647 2526 64! 2526 61/ 2526
0 060 502 1850 /01 2567 7;3 2835 912 3484 935 3653 935 3653 935 3653 935 3653
0070 610 '258 871 3191 971 3557 1213 4533 1277 4984 1278 5(WO 12/8 5000 1218 5000
0080 720 2673 1044 3834 1174 4.303 1523 5635 1667 6426 1677 6573 1677 6573 1677 6513
0090 831 3096 1221 4491 1381 5068 1843 6781 2091 7951 2135 8381 2135 8381 2135 8381.
0 100 944 3525 1399 5161 1592 5850 2170 7963 2539 9547 2654 10436 2654 10436 2654 10136
mm micrometem
0.2 1 0.01 04 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01, 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.04 0,01 0.04
0.o40 0.04 0.17 0.4 0.17 0.04 0.17 0.04' 0.17 0.04 0.17 0.04.i 0.17 004 0.17 .0,04 0.17
01060 0.1 0.36 0.10 *. 0.10 o36 0. 0.36 0.10 o.1 0.10 0.6 0.10"" 0.38 0.10 0.38
0.0w, 0.17 0.8 0.17 0.6 W.17 0. 017 0.67 0.17' 0.87 0.17 . 0.67, 0.17 .0.67 0.17. 0.67
0.A00. , .271027 1 7 1.0 02 1. 0271, .2,. 1A.0 0.27 '10
'Or 027 '1.0 0.27 '.
0.120o- . 0 .5 o0.'
IO Is 0.31 1. 036 1.5 o5 1.5., 3A,1017
03111,0U0
1.5 .39 0.87,
.9: 3A
1.5
0.140, 0.52, 2.0:, 0.52 2.0 0.52 2.0 0.52 ' .2 2.0 0152 2.0 052 2.0 0.52' 2.0
0.10, 0.66 2. 061' 2.7 21:'.6 0M ' " 2.7 0.66 2.71 0.6 2.7 0.661 2.7.
0.180 0.85 3.' 0.8 34 7 ' 3A 037 ' .
0 0)'
87 3 1 0.67 :3.4' 0.67 . 3I4
0. 1.0 3.6 11 2 .; 1.1
4 14.2 1.1
12 42~ 11 14 ll 4
02 . . . 64- 17 6 2' 11' 4.2- 1.1 '4. 1,1 6,521.
2 7Y% :2A U"' 23- 9.3 ':.A . 9.429k
'.42.4 24:9. 9A'
4 04806~
, 1. '& 4.7. 17-. 5~ '19. 5.4 '21 5.5,"1 -21,. ':.
:i <5,5,>.1 55. 1
0. " 4.00 Is 7.
5 32. .73 -21. .5 4:r68 k 17 .7,-6 '71 36."
k
0" 7.1z' 2.L T3. '29. '4 7i?~5/ .7 2
%1
microinches
'f ('' 04 006 067 00b 067 044b 0467 03 067 006 067 00f 0 (7
00
41l
' r
/ ' HI 02
1 2 012 :7 414,2 2/ 062 21 162 217 042 2/
4 ., 11 :1i 21 11 21 11, 27 41 21 1 2/ 11
, I0, ' / 11 ,t 17 43 1 43 1. .13 1/ 4:4 17 43 It
00)444, f4.' 2 4 24 62 2,4 62 2.4 462 24 62 24 62 2,4 62 24.
1''4014
0 )
4),' (it I4 6I
G U. I // 07 11 6/ II Of./ 61
'4440
1 ') ' '11 96 241 44 25 446 25 96 25 341 25 91 25, 96
( 14 .34 '3 1 34 131 34 131 34 131. 34, 131 34 131 34 131 34, 131.
(116 , '/' 44 171 ,44 171 44 111 4,4 171 4,4 171 44 171 44 1/1
0448 4, '4 '1 , 216 55 21 55 216 55. 216. 55 216 55 21 55 216.
''4410 'I f;' fil. 2b/ 68 267. 68 267. 68 267. 68 267 68 2b7 66 267.
H41?' it, lo, 114' 41/ 10/ 417 41 417 107 417 107 417 107 417 107 .1417
1410 1111 'Y,.l . 601 154 601 154 601 154 601 154 604 4414 601 154 601
IO.I4 1 . 4
41 :11 817 210 818 240 BIB 210 818 20 818 210 BIB, 210. 4IB.
.0,10 .4' 13H, )., 1050 214 1069 214 1070 274 1070. 2/4 1070 274 1070 274, 1070
045 '}4' 405 41 1296 347 1343 341 1355. 347 1355. 347. 1355 347. 1355. 347. 1355.
)440
o1 4.l4l 14:3', 11.4 4552 426 1630 429 1674. 429 1674 429 1674 429 1674. 429. 1674.
1060 44)) ,01 5,', 2090 596 2238. 619 2416 619 2416. 619 2416. 619 2416 619. 2416.
(14/0 ',11 444' 7031 2656 778 288? 8.41 3287. 844. 3296 844 3296 844 3296 844 3296.
344)o 41, 217, 46 3244 966 3556 1099 4230. 1105 4316 105 4316 105 4316 1405, 4316
H54444 / 2 1/ 1444'),
0)', :380 444) 4253 13/1 52243 1402 5480. 1402 5480 140?. 5480 1442 5480
40100 'i 3181 1 44/2
12,? 1357 4970 1669 6265, 1736 0786 1/36 6790. 1736 6790. 1/36 6790
mm micrometers
0.020 001 003 0.01 0.030.01 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.1 0.03
0,040 0.03 0.13 0.03 0.130.03 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.W 0.13
0.060 0.07 0,28 0.07 0.280,07 0,28 0.07 0,28 0.07 0.28 0.07 0.28' 0,07 0.26 0.07 0.28
0.060 0.13 0.50 0.13 0.500.13 0.50 0.13 0.50 0.13 0.50 0.13 0.50 0.13 0.50 0.13 0.50
0.100 0.20 0.78 0.20 0.780.20 0.78 0.20 0.78 0.20 0.78 0.20 0.78 0.20 0,78 0.20 0.78
0,12C 0.29 1.1 0.29 1.1 0.2
"3 1.1 0.2 1,1 029 1.1. 0.29 1.1 0.29 1, 0.29 ,1.1
0,"0 0.39 1.5 0.39 1.5 0.39 1.5. 039 ,1i 0.39 1.5 0.39 15 ,0.39, .5 0.39 ..1.5
0,160 0.51 2,0 01 2.0 01 2.0: 0.51 2.0 0.51 2.0 01 2.0 011 2.0. 0.51 2.0'
0.180 0.05 2.5 0.65 2.5' A5 2.5' 0.85 .23 0.5 2.5' 0.05" 2.5 0.65, '2." 0.85 2.5'
0.200 0.80 3.1 0.80 3.1 0.80 3.1- 0.80 3.1 0.80 3.1. 0.80 3.1 0.80 3.1 0.80 3.1
3
0,250 12 4.8 1.3 4.9 1.3 4.9' 13 49 11 49 1.3'. 4.9 '1.3. 4,.9 13 4.0
0.300 1.7 6.2 1.8 7.0 18 7.0 1.8 70 1.8 7.0 1.8 "":7.0 1. .7.0 1.8 70
0.350 2.1 7.9 2.4 o.4 2.5 9.6 2. 9. 2.5 9.6 2.5 9.6 2.5 9. 2. 9.6
0.400 2.6 9.6 3.1 12. 3.2 12.. 3.2 13. 3.2 13. 3.2 13 3.2 ' 13.- 3.2 ,. 13.
0.450 ..1 11. 3.9 14, '15;4.0 '4.1 16.' 4.1' 16. 4.1 1:' -4.1 i,1.' 4.1 _:16.
'.
0.500
0.600 3.6
4.5 13.
17. 4.6 1' 4. :18.
6.2 '23.,2.: .67 '2.';.. 73,
20..
5.0., -'.2
7.3 ,2" 0
5.0, 20.
7.3 28.9
5.0
o ,..28, .,' U
7.3 7.3
, , 20. % 5.0
''
228,'; 3 .'202.,
77.3 1'-
Y.'
0,700 5.7 21. 7.8 ,29.- 8. 32.. 9.8 384, 99 9.9.30,- 9-0.9,9 -3.
080.8 25. 9.5 ' 6 : 11. '39."" .' 13, 8 13. 51, 13. 51 13 "' 81 ! 13.'1' '514
1.000 8.9 33. 13. 48. ,, 53. 19, i9. 20.. 79. . ,80. 20., .'*' 20.
1.200 42. 16. : . 19. 89 25
'21.
. 92.1, 29. 109 30. 117. L30. 117.- ." :, 117.
18-28
- Surface Texture 18.2
TABLE 18.2-16 THEORETICAL Values for Arithmetic -Average Roughness (R,,) and Maximum Peak-to-Valley
Roughness Height (RI) lor Turning or Milling-Tool Typo c
rr.[O/HEV. 11urnftg)
or
30S
ECEA ECEA __
6
ECEA __
J 100
ECEAi,
300
.. iECEA ,,__ hECEA
15 1
(E EA
400 J 450
CE
FI ________1 I ___ ___ ji _ _ _ _ I, ii, iI,, if
01 mlcrolnches
000 1 0,13 0.50 0,13 0.50 013 0,50 0.13 0,50 0.13 0.L0 0A1 0,50 0.13 050 0.13 0i.50
00011 0.51 20 051 20 051 2.0 051 2.0 0.51 2.0 0.51 20 0.51 M. 0.51 2,0
0003 12 45 12 45 1.2 4.5 1.2 4.5 1.2 4,5 112 4.5 t? 4.5 1.2 4.5
0,004 2.A 80 ?.1 110 2.1 8.0 2.1 8.0 2.1 80 2.A 8.0 2.1 8.0 2,1 11.0
000 32 13 3.2 13. 3.2 13. 3.2 13. 32 13 3.2 13. 32 13. 3.? 13
0 00N 4.63 III 406 18 4.63 18. 4.613 8, 4.0 1$, 4.8 18. '113 18 4.6 in.
0)001 633 25 13:i , 6'1.3 25 133 25, 1.3 25. 0.3 25. 13 25. 13.3 25.
0081 II 32. 82 311 8.2 32 8.2 32. 8.2 32, 82 32. 8.2 32. 8.2 32.
00019 10 41. 10. 41, 10 41. 10. 41. 10. 41, 10. 41. 10 41. I0. 41,
0010 111 so, 13 50 13 50. 13. 50. 13. 50. 13. 50. 13. 50. 13. 50.
0 012 18. 7?. 18 72. 18 72. 18. 72. 18. 72. 18. 72. 18. 72, 18. 72.
0014 25 98, 25 98. 25 981. 25. 08. 25. 08. 25. 98. 25, 98. 25. 9)3.
010 it 33 128 33, 128 33r 128 33, 128. 33. 128. 33. 128. 33. 128. 33. 128.
1)1)18 42. 1032 42. 162 42 1132 42. 18?. 42, 1032. 42. 162 42. 1132. 42. 1132.
011110) 51. M11. 51 200. 5I. 200. 51 200. 51I 200
5. 200.
51, . 200.
5 01
0025 80. 113. 80 313. 80 313. 80. 313. 80. 31. 80. 313. 80. 313. 80. 313.
01331 115. 4463, 116G 450. 1113 450. 116. 450. 110. 450. 116, 450. 1113. 450. 1113. 450.
0OX)' (55 59). 15/. 013. 1 013 W,7 1313 157. 11. 151. 613. 157. 013. 157. 013.
0040 198 744. 12013 801. 206. 801 206 801. 2013. 801. 206. 801.r 2013. 801. 2013. 80).
004." N43 903 260 1014 20. 10 15 20 0. 15,S 200 1015. 20,130. OI 20, 0 15,I 2130. 1015.
(000 289 10138. 321. 1242 321. 125:4, 321 1253 321. 1253. 321. 1253 32t 1253. 321. 1253.
0001)O 385. 1411. 455. 1728. 462. 1790. 403. 1807. 403, 1807. 403. 1807, 403 1807. 463. 1807,
00/0 483 1169. 001, 2245 622. 2370 031. 2402. 031. 2462. 631. 2402. 631. 2462. 631. 2402.
01.030 584. 2130. 754. 2187 79(5r2984. 825. 3221 825. 3221. 825. 3221. 825. 3221. 825. 3221.
0.000 081. 2519. 911, 3350. 97/6 3624. 1046 4081. 1040. 4083. 1040. 4083. 1040. 4083. 1040, 4083.
0)100 /91, 2900. 1072, 3931. 116?. 4288. 1201. 5002. 1293. 5051. 1203. 5051, 1293, 5051. 11203. 5051.
mm micrometers
0.020 0.01 0,02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 . 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 . 0,02
0,0.40 0.02 0,08 0.02 0.08 0.02. 0.08 0.02 0.06 .0.02 0.08 0.02 'O006 0.02, 0.08 0.02 0,08
0,060 0obb 0.10 0,05 0.19 0.05 Up19 0,0o. 0.19 - 0.05 0.19 0,051 "0.19 0.5 0.19. 0.05 0.19
0.080 0.09 OW~ 0.09 0.33 0.090 .3 0.0
CAP 0.33 0.9X 0.33 0.09 '0.33 0.9 0.33 0.09' 0,33
0.100 0,13 0.52 0.13 0.52 0.13 0.52 '0.13 ' 0.52 0.13 0.52 0.13 0.52 06 0.13,3 052
0.120 0.19 0.75 .0.19 0.15 0.19 0.75 0,19 0.75 0,119. 0.75 0.19 0.75 0.194 0.75 0.19 0,75
0,140 0.26 1.0 0.26 1.0 0.26 1.0 0.26 1.0 0,2 1.0, 02 0.20.2
At 1.0 .26 , 11.0
0.160 0.34 1.3 0.34 1.3 0.34 1.3 0.34 ~1.3 .0,34 1.3 0,34,, ".13 ,~0.3 1.3 0.34. 1.3
0.180 0A3 1.7 0A3 1.1' 0A3, '1.7 0OA3 .,O A3 .7' 0,43~1,7, 0.43' 1.7',' A3 . 1,7
0.200 0.53 .2.1 0.53 '2.1 0.53 ' 2.1' 0.53 $2.1, OM3 ~ 2.1 0.53... 2.1 0.53. 2.1 0.53., 2.1.
0.250 , 0.84 3.3 0.84 3. O.84'. 3.3 3 ,4 3 4 '.4 3.3 '084 3.3, 0.84- 3.3
0.30 240 1.2.7
1 47 12 :4 '.7' ' 47*., :1.2 '47 12 47 ' 4.7'
2
0.3501.5 61 1.6 6.4 .~.GA. t.0 , J.GA f \ 64 .116 'i64 1.6 6A4 1.K .
0.400 . 2.0 7.6 .2.1 2 8.3 12.1, 11; 241' , 3 ~ 3 . '21' 8. 2.1 8.3 2.1 8.3
0.450 2.5 .3 2.7 1, 2.7. ill z7? 1, . 7 . 217 11, 2.% 'r,11. 2.7, . 1.
0.500 .0 I11.'. 3.3 13. 3.3 ,13.., 33i." N13.', 3. '13, 3.3 13, 313t 13. 3.3.: j','At"
0.600 3.9 14. 4.7 18, ,, '4.8 19, 48~.3 , 19., .8 1 8 19 48 - 9
0.700 4.9' 18, 8.24. 23. GA. .24:1 G'.0 I 20, 6. 26. 6.6 ' 26. '6 M 6' - 26.
2.000 1.
21.200 W
25.
2i.
.
3?i;
93. 1
t,~
436
44;I
1
1
,k ':13* 53.
,'
13,
5*
531
5jj'26. 5,
283 63 59120.31 89' 35
18-29
18.2 -Surface Texture
TABLE 18.2-17 THEORETICAL Values for Arithmetic-Average Roughness (Ra) and Maximum Peak-to-Valley
Roughness Height (R) for Turning or Milling-Tool Type C
FErD
FV. ITurning 38 50 60 100 150 300 400 450
Or ECEA ECEA ECEA ECEA ECEA ECEA ECEA ECEA
FEEDT00TH fl R,
RMilling, R . R. R, R R, R R, R, H, R. R,
mm micrometers
0.020 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 .0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02
0.040 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.07
0060 0.04 0.15 0.04 0.15 0.04 0.15 0.04 0.15 0.04 0.15 0.04 0.15 0.04 0.15 0.04 0.15
0.080 0.07 027 0.07 027 0.07 027 0.07 0.27 0.07 027 0.07 0.27 0.07 0.27 0.07 0.27
0.100 0.11 0.42 0.11 0.42 0.11 0.42 0.11 042 0.11 0.42 0.11 0.42 0.11 0.42 0.11 0.42
0.120 0.15 0.60 0.15 0.60 0.15 0.60 0.15 0.60 0.15 0.60 0.15 0.60 0.15 0.60 0.15 0.60
0.140 0.21 0.82 0.21 0.82 021 0.2 0.21 0.82 0.21 0.82 0.21 0.82 0.21 0.82 0.21 0.82
0.160 0.27 1.1 027 1.1 027 1.1 027 1.1 027 1.1 0.27 1.1 . 0.27 1.1 0.27 .1.1
0.180 0.35 1.4 0.35 1.4 0.35 1.4 0.35 1.4 0.35 1.4 0.35 1.4 0.35 1.4 0.35 1.4
0.200 0.43 1.7 0.43 1.7 0.43 1.7 0.43 1.7 0.43 1.7 0.43 1.7 0.43 1.7 0.43 1.7
0.250 0.67 2.6 0.67 2.6 0.67 2.6 0.67 . 2.6 0.67 2.6 0.67 2.6 0.67 2.6 0.67 2.6
0.300 0.96 3.8 0.96 3.8 0.6 3.5 0. a3.8 0.96 3.8 0.96 3.8 0.96 3.8 0.96 3.8
0350 1.3 5.1 1.3 5.1 1.3 5.1 1.3 5.1 1.3 5.1 1.3 51 1.3 5.1 1.3 5.1
0.400 1.7 6.5 1.7 6.7 1.7 6.7 1.7 6.7 1.7 6.7 1.7 6.7 1.7 6.7 1.7 6.7
0.450 ?.1 8.0 2.2 6.4 2.2 8.4 2.2 .4 2.2 8.4 2.2 8A 2.2 8.4 2.2 8.4
0.500 2.6 9.6 27 10. 2.7 10. 2.7 10. 2.7 10. 2.7 10. 2.7 10. 2.7 10.
0.600 3.5 13. 3.9 15. 33 .15. 3.9 15. 3.9 15. 3.9 15. 3.9 15. 3.9 15.
0700 4.4 16. 5.2 20. 5.2 20. 5.3 20. 5.3 20. 5-3 20, 53" 20. 5.3 20.
"
0.800 5.4 20. 6.6 25. 6.1 26. 6.9 27. 6.9 27. 6.9 27. 6.9 27. 6.9 27.
1.000 7.4 27. 9.7 36. 10. 36. 11. 42. 11. *42. 11. 42. 11. 42. 11. 42..
1.200 9.5 35. 13. 47. 14. 51. 15. go. 16. 61. 16. 61. 16. 61. 16. 61.
1.500 13. 47. 18. 65. 20. 72. 24. 90. 24. 95. 24. 95. 24. 95. 24. 95.
2.000 18. 68. 26. 97. 30. 109. 39. 144. 43. 136. 44. i72. 44. 172. 44. 172.
2.500 24. 69. 35. 131, 40.. 148. 55. 20. 66. 246., 69,.., 273. . _69.: . 273.. 69.,. 273.
18-30
= Surface Texture 18.2
TABLE 18.2-18 THEORETICAL Values for Arithmetic-Average Roughness (Ra) and Maximum Peak-to-Valley
Roughness Height (Rt) for Turning or Milling-Tool Type C
0.020 0,01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
00.40 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.04
0.060 0.02 0.09 0.02 0.9 0.02 O.9 0.02 0.09 0.02 0.09 0.02 0.09 0.02 0.09 (.02 0.09
0,080 004 0.16 0.04 0.16 0.04 0.16 0.04 0.16 0.04 0.16 0.04 0.16 0.04 0.16 0.01 0.16
0.100 0.06 0.25 0.06 0.25 0.CS 0.25 0.06 0.25 0.06 0.25 0.06 025 0.06 0.25 0.06 0.25
0.120 0.09 0.36 0.09 0.36 0.09 0.36 0.09 036 0.09 0.36 0.09 036 0.09 0.36 0.09 0.36
0.140 0.13 0.49 0.13 0.49 0.13 0.49 0.13 0.49 0.13 0.49 0.13 0.49 0.13 0.49 0.13 0.49
0.160 0.16 0.64 0.16 0.64 0.16 0.64 0.16 0.64 0.16 0.64 0.16 0.64 0.16 0.64 0.15 0.64
0.180 0.21 0.81 0.21 0.8 021 0.81 0.21 0.81 0.21 0.81 0.21 0.81 0.21 0.81 0.21 0.81
0.200 0.26 1.0 0.26 1.0 026 1.0 026 1.0 026 1.0 0.26 1.0 0.26 1.0 0.26 1.0
0.250 1.40 1.6 0.40 1.6 0.40 1.6 0.40 1.6 0.40 1.6 0.40 1.6 0.40 1.6 0.40 1.6
0300 0.58 2.3 0.58 2.3 056 2.3 0.58 2.3 0.58 23 0.58 2.3 0.58 2.3 0.58 2.3
0350 0.79 3.1 0.79 3.1 0.79 3.1 0.79 3.1 0.79 3.1 0.79 3.1 0.79. 3.1 0.79 3.1
0.400 10 4.0 1.0 40 1.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 4.0
0.450 1.3 5.1 1.3 5.1 13 5.1 1.3 5.1 1.3 5.1 1.3 5.1 1.3 5.1 1.3 5.1
0.500 1.6 6.3 1.6 6.3 16 63 1.6 6.3 1.6 63 1.6 6.3 1.6 6.3 1.6 6.3
0.600 2.3 8.9 2.3 9.0 2.3 9.0 2.3 9.0 2.3 9.0 -.
3 9.0 2.3 9.0 21 9.0
0700 3.1 12. 3.1 12. 3.1 12. 3.1 12. 3.1 12. 3.1 12. 3.1 12. 3.1 i2.
0.800 4.0 15. 4.1 1& 4.1 16. 4.1 16. 4.1 16. 4.1 16 4.1 16. 4.1 16.
1.000 5.8 21, 6.4 25. 6.4 25. 6.4 25. 6.4 25. 6.4 25. 6.4 25. 6.4 25.
1,200 7.7 28. 9.1 35. 92 36 9.3 36. 9.3 36. 9.3 36. 9.3 36. 9.3 36.
1.500 11. 39. 14. 50. 14. 53. 14. 57. 14. 57.. 14. 57. 14. 57. 14. 57.
2.000 16. 58. 21. 79. 23 86. 26. 100. 26. 101. 26. 101. 26. 101. 26. 101.
2.50 21. 78. 30. 109 33. 121 40. 150. 41. 159. 41. 159. 41. 159. 41. 119.
18-31
18.2 Sutf ace Texture
TABLE 18.2-19 THEORETICAL Values for Arithmetic-Average Roughness (Ra) and Maximum Peak-to-Valley
Roughness Height (R) for Turning or Milling-Tool Type C
mm micrometers
0.020 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 001 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01
0.040 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 . 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02
0.060 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.05
0.080 0.03 0.08 0.03 0.08 0.03 0.08 0.03 0.08 0.03 0.08 0.03 0.08 0.03 0.08 0.03 0.08
0.100 0.03 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.03 0.13
0.120 0.05 0.18 0.05 0.18 0.05 0.18 0.05 0.18 0.05 0.18 0.05 0.18 0.05 0.18 0.05 0.18
0.140 0.07 0.25 0.07 0.25 0.07 025 0.07 025 0.07 0.25 0.07 0.25 0.07 0.25 0.07 0.25
0.160 0.08 0.32 0.08 0.32 0.06 0.32 0.06 0.32 0.08 0.32 0.08 0.32 0.08 0.32 0.08 "0.32
0.180 0.11 0.41 0.11 0.41 0.11 0.41 0.11 0.41 0.11 0.41 0.11 0.41 011 0.41 0.11 0.41
0.200 0.13 0.50 0.13 0.50 0.13 0.50 0.13 0.50 0.13 0.50 0.13 0.50 0.13 0.50 0.13 0.50
0.250 0.20 0.78 0.20 0.78 0.20 0.78 0.20 0.78 0.20 0.78 0.20 0.78 0.20 0.78 i 0.20 0.78
0.300 0.29 1.1 0.29 1.1 0.29 1.1 0.29 1.1 0.29 1.1 0.29 1.1 0.29 1.1 0.29 1.1
0.350 0.39 15 .0.39 1.5 0.39 1.5 0.39 1.5 0.39 1.5 0.39 1.5 0.39 1.5 0.39 1.5
0.400 0.51 2.0 0.51 2.0 0.51 2.0 0.51 2.0 0.51 2.0 0.51 2.0 0.51 2.0 0.51 2.0
0.450 0.65 2.5 0.65 2.5 0.65 2.5 0.65 2.5 0.65 2.5 0.65 2.5 0.65 . 2.5 . 0.65 2.5
0.500 0.80 3.1 0.80 3.1 0.80 3.1 0.80 3.1 0.80 3.1 0.80 3.1 0.80 3.1 0.80 3.1
0.600 1.2 4.5 1.2 4.5 1.2 4.5 1.2 4.5 12 4.5 1.2 4.5 12 4.5 1.2 4.5-
0.700 1.6 6.1 1.6 6.1 1.6 6.1 1.6 6.1 1.6 6.J 1.6 6.1 1.6 6.1 1.6 6.1
0.800 2.1 8.0 2.1 8.0 2.1 8.0 2.1 8.0 2.1 8.0 2.1 8.0 2.1 8.0 2.1 8.0
1.000 3.2 13. 3.2 13. 3.2 13. 3.2 13. 3.2 13. 3.2 13. 3.2 13. 3.2 13.
1.200 4.6 18. 4.6 18. 4.6 18. 4.6 18. 4.8 18. 4.6 18. 4.6 18. 4.6 18.
1.500 7.1 27. 7.2 28. 7.2 28. 7.2 28. 7.2 28. 7.2 28. 7.2 28. 7.2 '28.
2.000 12. 43. 13. 50. 13. 50. 13. 50. 13. 50. 13. 50.. 13. 50. 13. 50.
2.500 16. 60. 20. 74. 20. 77. 20. 78. 20. 78. 20. 78. 20. 78. 1'20. 78.
18-32
Surface Texture 18.2
1000 --7- 7-1000 125pum)
508020m
600
40
10
000
404
328(833
- -a. -
18z2 Surface Texture
1000
1000 (125 pm
400--
125 (3 2 pm]
100
so
Q1 16 10UM
48 3 4__
Surface Texture 18.2
1000 125 )uml
1000 _____
8000
400 -
200/
125 132pm]
100
80
C))
a) 32 1O89mI
Ii)L
*~20
16 104mi
0
CD 10
8 -09M
4 EE
SCEAX-
2 fOO05Mj
Figure 18.2-16 Theoretical surface roughness for turning or face milling tools with a radius of 0.0156
inch [0.39 mm] and various ECEA.
18-35
-7 - ~ ~- -
18.2 Surface Texture
60
-- 0 500 [125pmm]
400 5
30 ECEA
250 163pm]
200
125 [3 2 Jm]
80
cc 60 i-/6
1 t m
Cr
C,
o
,.
20
16 0 4 Lim)
0
~c 10 I - . T oo l t y p e C
8 8 [029m]
4 F 4 f~ilpmJ
SCEA\*"
2 , 2 1005pm) i
0001 0005 00
0,254 mm) 1254mm)
18-36
Surface Texture 18.2
I I 250 163pumJ
125 132pum]
80,
40
C)a
z 32 108pm]
10
R0pm 16
C.)E
SC)
2 2 10 05pmr]
18-37
18.2 Surface Texture
Chip
. .Tool
N Workpiece surface
Tt,11"
Figure 18.2-19 Built-up edge retained on workpiece sur'ace as detrimental to good surface texture.
(Photo from A. J. Pekelharng, Annals of the CIRP 23(2): 207)
SFeed "
j Adjustable
! cam pin
Cutting X I blade
bladesb
Wiped surface
Wiperacineg.
Figure 18.2-20 Wiper blada or micro-finish blade for smoothing feed marks from face milling.
I 8-o8
Surface Integrity 18.3
While all manufacturing processes may have significant ef- * distortion and loss of dimensional quality, particularly in-
fects on the workpiece material and its properties. he bulk thin components
of cui of
,:, uj.z:t~ydviialedata
,viiable d rrelates
s to conventional
o n anddo
non- residualstreses lowering fatigue endurance strength
traditional materirl removal processes.
residual stresses combined with severe environments
leading w early stress corrosion failures
Benefits from the Application of Surface Integrity
Practices * reduction in fatigue strength from metallurgically altered
The disciplined use of surface integrity rractice3 for the surfaces: fbr example. untempered or overtempered mar-
manufacture of surfaces which are highly stressed and/or tensite. recast or resolidifed areas from thermal
critically loaded can yield significant benefits as follows: processes
" Enhanced component integrity with resultant increase in 0 metallurgicalor mechanical alterationsproduced as a re-
safety and service life and decrease in maintenance costs sult of excessvely high removal rates or process energy
Better understanding of the effects of manufacturing a thin sectiors of co:.ponents operating at high stress
process parameters as they relate to reliability ol levels
components
* applications where life or safety reliabilityconcerns are
" Decreased costs achieved by limiting surface integrity particularly stringent
processing only to highly stressed surfaces and simulta-
neously relaxing costly specification requirements for * holes with high depth-to-diameterratioswhere maintain-
generating the other sarfaces of a conponent !, drill sharpness may be difficult
18-39
18.3 Surface Integrity
* high temperatures and high temperature gradients
MECHANICAL:
" Plastic deformations (as result of hot or cold working)
" Tears and laps and crevice-like defects (associated with -built-
up edge" produced in machining)
" Hardness alterations
* Cracks (macroscopic and microscopic)
" Residual stress distribution in surface layer
" Processing inclusions introduced
* Plastically deformed debris as a result of grinding
" Voids, pits, burrs or foreign material inclusions in surface
Figure 18.3-1 Failure in grinding of a carburized
BC2 rr n-r 2,n2bse., of...
tep .... su3..ace= froteg
-
e;............. a...METALLURGICAL:
rity from leading edge dullness on plunge gear e Transformation of phases
grinding. Ultraviolet light photograph of fluorescent 9 Grain -'ize and distribution
penetrant indications found during inspection after * Precipitate size and distribution
3
grinding. (G. Bellows ) o Foreign inclusions in material
* Twinning
* Recrystallization
e Untempered martensite (UTM) or overtempered martensite
(OTM)
* Resolutioning or austenite reverson
A practical balance must be found between over-con-
trolling the manufacturing process with its attendant costs CHEMICAL:
and unneeded benefits and under-controlling with its pos- Interranularattack(IGA)
sible decrease in quality, increase in scrapped components. 0 Intergranular corrosion (IGC)
or loss of reliability. Good application of surface integrity a Intergranular oxidation (IGO)
practices can result in cost improvement and quality en- * Preferential dissolution of microconstituents
hancement by insisting on greater surface quality only on * Contamination
surface areas where needed and relaxing specifications for * Embrittlement-by chemical absorption of elements such as
ti-e bulk of the component surfaces. hydrogen, chlorine. etc.
* Pits or selective etch
# Corrosion
ALTERED MATERIAL ZONES (AMZ) * Stress corrosion
Surface integrity is concerned primarily with the host of ef- THERMAL:
fLcts a manufacturing process produces below the visible * Heat-affected zone (HAZ)
surface. The -;ubsurface characteristics occur in various Recast or redeposited materiall
layers or zones. The subsurface altered material zones o Resolidified material
(AMZ) can be as simple as a stress condition different from 9 Splattered partic;es or remelted metal deposited on surfari-
that in the bcdy of the material or as complex as a micro-
structure change interlaced with intergranular attack ELECTRICAL:
(IGA). Chanoes can be caused by chemical. thermal. elec- e Conductivity change
trical. or mcchanical energy and may affect both the phys- e Magnetic change
ical and tht; metallurgical properties of the material. The e Resistive heating or overheating
principal causes of alterations to a surface during material
removal operations are as follows: SOURCE: G. Beflows and 0. N. Ttshier.
18-40
Surface Integrity 18.3
TABLE 18.3-2 Summary of Possible Surface Alterations Resulting From Various Metal Removal Processes
Steels-____ __
__________
I PD PCK.
C
R___ I SE.
IGA 1
Srz.
IGA
Hardenable A. R, R. R. l A
4340 PD, PD, MCK' SE. ISE.
D6ac L&T MCK' AC. IGA IGA
MCK' . U7'M.I
uTM. OTM OTIAI
Staialess (n'artensitic) R. R. A. R. RA
410 1PD. PD. MCK. SE. S5E.
L&T PACK. RC.J IGA JIGA
IIUTM.
PCK. UTM,
OTM *OTW
UTM.I
Stainless (austenitic)
302
R.
PD.
RR.
PD PACK.
R.
SE,
1R. SE.
L&T IRC IGA IGA
Precipitation hardeniiq R. . R, A.. IR.
17-4 PH 1D.
I PD, PACK SE. SE,
L &T. OA RC. IGA IGA
___ ___ __OA __ _ OA ___I
Maraging (18% Ni) R. R. A. Ij R R.
20GaeP.PD. AC SE, E
L5~af
PD. RS G G
RS. OA OA
.S
I
_________OA .
Nickel and Cobalt Base Alloyb:
Aene 41 jPD. PD. MCK, SE.SE
HS 31 L & T. MCK RC IGA IIGA
lIJ-1 00 MCI'_____ ______ _____
ritanium Alloy:
Ti-6A1-4V
IPD.
R, R.
PD.
A.
MCI'E
R. . S
TZM R. R...R.A
L .MCK MCI' SE. ISA
18-41
18.3 Surface integrity
AMZ DefintijUns Low stmss surface is ore containing a resid-
ual stress less than 20 ksi 1138 MPal or 10
Cracks are narrow ruptures or separations percent of tensile strength. whichever IS
that aiter the continuity of a surface- They greater, at depths below the surface greatr
are usually tight and characerized by sharp than 0.001 inch 10.025 mm. Sometii. _
edges or sharp changes in direction with called a stress-fret surface.
depth-to-width ratio of 4:1 or greater and
discernible with the unaided eye or with Metallurgical transformationsare those " -
lox or less magnification. "
crostructural changes resulting
from exter-
Micrecracks are those cracks requiring nal influences. They include rec*,stz:,iza-
gr rsateth ose10 racksion
foreqirng tion. all, depletion. chemical reactions.
greater than IlOX niagnification for discernl- a"o eatllay-
nent. as sho-vn in figures 18.3-2 and and re.--mdified or redeposited or recast
183-4 ers. Figure 18.3-7 shows an example oi
metallurgical transformation
i8-42
Surface Integrity 18.3
Rem elted or resolidified n. ,erialis that por--______________________
tion of the surface which during the metal
removal process become molten. but if not
removed from the surface prior to resolidifi- -70001 in
ON o
0 -
F ;ure 18.3-2 Example )t micror-ack froi. grind- Figure 18.3-5 Example of intel-granular attack,
ing of Lidimet 700C. 250X. (Surface Inte~grity En- ECM of Waspaloy (aged. 40 R-). iOOOX. (W. P. Kos-
cyclopedia') ter et als)
- C
Figure 18.3-3 Example of craters. EDM of ffnc-nel Figure 18.3-4 Example of l3p, fold and tears. Drill-
Alloy 718 (solution treated and aged). SEM at 40 ing of 4340 steel (quenched and tempered. 50 Rc),
and 215X. (Sujrface integrity Encyclopedia') IODOX perpendicular to lay.
18-43
18.3 Surface Integrity
0.001
in
0.0002 in
Pit
0.001 0.
in
Figure 18.3-8 Example of pit from grinding of Figure18.3-10 Example of recrystallization. Re-
Rene 80 (solution treated). Top, surface view at crystallized layer from age heat treatment following
40X; bottom, section at 1000X. (Surface Integrity En- grinding of Rene 80, 1000X. (Surface Integrity En-
cyclopedia)) cyclopedia')
18-44
w
-_- -'- - - -_ -- - - -- - - - -- - -- - - =-- - _
Surface Integrity 18.3
The standarddata set provides more in-depth data for more
IL critical applications. It includes the results from the min-
imum data set along with residual stress (or distortion) pro-
files and high cycle fatigue screening tests. as outlined in
table 18.3-4. Generally. the standard data set has informa-
o- tion at two or more diverse levels of process intensity to
o represent finishing and roughing (or abusive) machining
conditions. Figure 18.3-13 is an example of the standard
data set produced in grinding of 4340 steel, quenched and
tempered to 50 Re.
1. Surface texture
* roughness measurement (per ANSI B46.1-1978) or
microtopographic map (figure 18.2-7, section :8.2)
* lay designation or photo
2. Macrostructure (lOX or less)
- macrocracks or surface imperfections (pits, laps. etc.)
* occasionally includes scanning electron microscope
(SEM) series of photos at increasing magnifications
(recommended series 20, 200, 1000, and 2000X)
(figure 18.2-8. section 18.2)
-_ macroetch indications (e.g., fluorescent penetrant or
magnetic flux or similar)
3. Microstructure (cross section examination at 1000X preferred)
* microcracks
* plastic deformation (section parallel to lay suggested)
Figure 18.3-12 Example of selective etching. * phasetransformations
Chemical machining of Inconel Alloy 718C (solution * intergranular attack
treated
ete a and aged, 40 Rc), 1000X. (W. P. Koster * micro defects (laps, inclusions, etc.)
n built-up edge or deposits of debris
et a18) recast layers
* selective etching
* metallurgical transformations
4. Microhardness alterations
* heat-affected zones
EVALUATION TECHNIQUES
TABLE 18.3-4 Standard Surface Integrity Data Set
Experimental procedures have been developed to provide
three increasingly deeper levels of surface integrity eval- 1. Minimum data set
uation. The minimum data set is the least expensive ap- 2. Residual stress profile-or ;.Miurtlon measurements
proach and should be considered only as a screening test 3. Fatigue tests (screening only-recommend using full-reverse
for the analysis of surface effects. It is essentially metal- bending at room temperature using tapered area flat spec-
lographic information supplemented with microhardness imens with results to 10' cycles)
and surface texture measui ements. Table 18.3-3 describes
the components of the minimum data set. SOURCE: G.Bellows and D.N.Tishler.
18-45
18.3 Surface integrity
-0001
odi
E
X.-0.0
0,002- 0.002
LOW STRESS CONDITIONS - No visible surface ABUSIVE CONDITIONS - A total heat affected zone
alterations in microstructure were detected, of 0013 inch was produced The white layer shown
above is 65 RC and appioximately 0.001-0002 inch
deep but in some sections was up toO0 005 inch deep.
MICROHARONESS 10 RESIDUAL STRESS FATIGUE
ar I
70 110 F~e F 1-110-\IF-I-
G 80
- -,_-....-Low stress
-- ~Low
stress I AuivE 12 0
~~~-Abusive
600 i li:l z r : 0
0 j140j~jj 10 0 0
00 000 008 0d
Depth
surfacein
bennl
18-46
Surface Integrity 18.3
Process Intensities and Surface Integrity
Processes are usually operated over a range of intensities.
The roughing and finishing modes are one reflection of
these differing intensities or energy densities. From a sur-
face integrity and quality assurance standpoint, it is neces-
sary to consider the change in surface effects over the full
range of energy levels expected to be used. These data can
then be used to establish reasonable quality control limits.
This range of process intensity 'evels is often implied in the
machining terminology that indicates increasingly intense
processing, such as the following-
" low stress surface
" finish machining (or "gentle")
I
edge retention technique of plating can alter some of the * areas of untempered or overtempered martensite
surface effects that might
be present.
Various types of microscopy are available for the eval-
uation of surface metallurgy including optical microscopy, * cchemical
softening
softeningsotie
(sometimesasnite
associated with chemical
scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission machining or electrochemical machining)
electron microscopy (TEM). Optical microscopy is the
least expensive and the most widely applicable method. It a heat-affected zones
is advisable to examine metallurgical mounts first in the
unetched condition, thereby accentuating the profile, mi- 9 plastic deformation or work hardened zones
crocracks, inclusions, voids, and crevice-like defects. After
etching, specimens are reexamined for microstructural Figure 18.3-15 illustrates some of the types of hardness al-
identification and grain boundary conditions. terations observed.
18-47
18.3 Surface Integrity
TABLE 18.3-6 Mounting Technique and Metallographic Preparation for Edge Retention
1. Samples are sectioned from the workpiece in a manner which leads to the least oossible distortion or burring.
Bandsawing or hacksawing is preferred. A minimum oi 0.030 inch [0.76 mm] is then removed from the cut
surface using a 120-grit silicon carbide paper on a low-speed polisher.
2. Copper molds (or tubes), 1'Ainches [31.8 mm] inside diameter by 2 inches (70 mml high, are placed on a
pallet approximately 5 inches (125 mm] in diameter. The inner surface of the molds and surface of the pallet
are previously sprayed with a silicone releasing agent.
3. Afte, placing a metallurgical specimen in a mold, a mixture of epoxy resin, hardener, and pelletized aluminum
oxide, sufficient to produce a layer of '%to % inch [6.4 to 9.5 mm] in depth, is poured over the specimen. The
ratio of resin to hardener is 4 to 1.The amount of pellets added is in the range of 10 to 15 grams. The hard-
ness or abrasive level of the pelletized material used (low, medium, or high fired) is strictly a function of the
alloy to be prepared and its hardness cheracteristics.
4. The pallet containing the molds is placed in a vacuum chamber (at a vacuum of 1 x 10-1 to 1 x 10-' torr) in
order to degas the mixture. thereby improving the adherence of the epoxy and pellets to the surface of the
specimn. When v;gorous bubbling of the mixture decreases after vacuum impregnation, sufficient resin and
hardener (4to 1 ratio) is added to produce a mount approximately 1inch [25 mm] high.
5. The mounts are cured at a temperatur - not greaier than 70F [21(C] for approximately 10 hours. Casting of
the mounts is accomplished during the latter portion of the laboratory workday so that curing occurs over-
6. After curing, they are placed in an oven at a temperature of 150OF [660C] for a period of one hour after which
they are removed from the molds.
7. Approximately 0.020 inch [0.50 mm] of stock is then removed from the as-mounted metal surface on a posi-
tive positioning automatic polishing unit, using the side of a 1-by-13-inch [25 x 330 mm] aluminum oxide 320-
grit grinding wheel as the grinding medium. Water is used as a coolant.
8. Subsequent rough grinding is performed wet on silicon carbide papers or equivalent ranging from 240 to 600
9. For steels and nickel- and cobalt-base superalloys. the intermediate polish is performed on an automatic pol-
isher using a polishing cloth with a soft nap texture and 6-micrometer diamond paste. The final polish is
achieved using deep nap or pile cloth similar to billiard cloth with a suspension of 0.1 micrometer or finer
aluminum oxide inwater.
Titanium and refractory alloys require an etch-polish cycle (using a slurry of hydrogen peroxide, water, and
0.1 micrometer or finer aluminum oxide) which is accomplished between a diamond polish and a final polish
procedure. The final polish for titanium and refractory alloys is accomplished oo, a vibratory polisher using a
deep pile cloth with a suspension of 0.1 micrometer or finer aluminum oxide in water.
10. Samples are etched by swabbing. Examples of some typical etchants used are given below:
Mate:.nl Etchant
Steels 2%HNO3 and 98% Denatured Anhydrous Alcohol
Nickel Base Alloys 100 ml HCI, 5 g CuCI 2,2H20, and
100 ml Denatured Anhydrous Alcohol
Titanium Alloys 2%HF and 98% H2O or
2%HF. 3% HNO3. and 95% H20
SOURCE: L.R.Gatto and T.D.DLullo.a
50 j " 1
Recast layer
S45
/ material hardneSS'f
SBase mtra
/D
M 40 - -When determining the microhardness using a Knoop in-
[1oftened denter, a 100-gram load is generally employed. W'th this
Softened zone load and carefully performed readings, accurate hardness
readings can be made to within 0.001 inch 10.025 mi of
3,5 ' the surface without producing edge yielding. Surface hard-
0 oo02 0,004 0006 0.008 ( 020 ness readings to within 0.0005 inch 10.0127 mml of th- sur-
Depth beneath surface, in face may be made using 25- to 50-gram loads, but extreme
care must be taken even with these light loads. It is recom-
Figure 18.3-15 Microhardness traverses on mended that if the light load is used, hardness readings also
Inconel Alloy 718 (solution treated and aged) from a be taken at a considerable distance from the edge and com-
variety of machining processes. Key: A, roughing pared with 100- and 500-gram load Knoop readings.
EDM and shot p3ening; B, gentle ECM and glass Knoop readings are generally converted to Rockwell C
bead peen; C, gentle grinding; D,ECM; E,EDM.(G. readings for a ready appreciation of the hardness relation-
Bellows and D. N. Tishler)4) ships which exist near and below the affected surface layer.
18-48
7777
Surface Integrity 18.3
Residual Stress Determination
The use of X-ray diffraction for measuring residual stress
Distortion may occur in the manufacture of components
as has by and large superseded the deflection test strip
a result of heat treating or material removal processes
which can leave substantial residual stresses in the method. Much smaller areas can be measured with greater
surface accuracy. Accuracy of plus or minus 5 percent can be
layers. There are several ways of determining the
residual obtained.
stress profile. The two most common are X-ra, diffraction
and layer removal-deflection techniques. Most of
the ma-
chining-induced residual stress occurs in the first 0.0005
to
0.010 inch 10.0127 to 0.254 mini below the surface.
Some
of the descriptors used in residual stress discussions
shown in figure 18.3-16. Figures 18.3-17 and 18.3-18are
il-
lustrate results of residual stress profiles determined
from
two materials and are typical of the range of effects
ob-
served. It should be noted that single surface residual
measurements can be quite misleading, stress
and a profile for the 100
first few thousandths of an inch below the surface --
is essen-
tial. The peak value and its depth below the surface
lated to the high cycle fatigue strength are re-
and magnitude of . 80 F
distortion. For example, note in figure 18.3-18 that the sur- ,
face residual stress is zero, yet substantial stress is ")
present Conventional grinding
less than 0.001 inch 10.025 mml below
the surface. -60
401 -
-40 ,.
- Compressive
-120
-140 - - - - -
18-49
18.3 Surface Integrity
120 I 0,0001 inch indicator
S-20
cle Electropolish -
grind 1(00030)
r -40 (0.0040)1t -
I Abusive
C-60 I grind + shot peen
E (0.0352)
I
-
0.1
0
0)0.001 inch/pass M
C downfeed
- Amount of stock 000.010--
- removed in test cut
18-50
Surface Integrity 18.3
Fatigue Strength Testing temperatures. For the simple screening tests that are part
It is well established that variations in material removal of the standard data set, however, it is sufficient to collate
operations can produce great differences in the mechanical or compare results from room temperature, full-reverse
performance of the workpiece material. Fatigue strength is cantilever bending high cycle fatigue tests. the setup for
perhaps the most sensitive property. The extensive range which is shown in figure 18.3-23. A test specimen that pro-
of precess influence on high cycle fatigue strength is shown duces repeatable results and exposes an ample test surface
in table 18.3-7 for Ti-5A1-2.5Sn alloy and in table 18.3-8 to the test stress level is shown in figure 18.3-24. The re-
for Inconel Alloy 718. High cycle and low cycle fatigue sults are frequently displayed on an S-N (stress versus num-
strengths are dynamic properties that are surface depend- ber of cycles to failure) curve. figure 18.3-25. or in a bar
ent and are linked on a simple continuum for AF 95 (Rene graph using the stress level at 107 cycles as representative
95) in figure 18.3-22. Similar effects are found at elevated of the endurace strength.
TABLE 18.3-7 Comparative High Cycle Fatigue Strengths and Surface Roughnesses of
TI-SAi-2.SSn Alloy (formerly A110 Alloy) from Several Processes
PROCESS FATIGUE STRENGTH* SURFACE ROUGHNESS
ksi 14n R.
anneal (CHM) 77 30 to 40
Shot peened (CPE)l 76 __
As rolled 61
Chemical machining (CHM) 59 30 to 40
Conventional traverse grinding (CGS) 53 16 to 18
Conventional longitudinal grinding (CGS) 52 31 16 to 18
Electrical discharge machining (EDM) 22 30 to 40
18-51
18.3 Surface Integrity
300---
2830 - ---
00
ci)I
U160' 0 0 O 0
Cycles
failur t
Fiu1. 2 Eapeo ihccead o yl aiu teghcntnu nts aafo lc
trEa dicag8ahnn0fA 5 Rn 5 t10~.(.Belw n .P otr
:3_
20-5
Surface Integrity 18.3
Section AA
0246 -25
Note 8 0iin
187e rneiahe
~~~~3 hoAlowsresgrn
2. AbsvArnadrtme
40 050-
.
(40 11
1121
5 0005to495-n)
Noe
diesin ininche untrpre
A Lowstres grin
1406 a o tesgidadrtme
o Absivegrid
retmpe an
120 Esimate
~~=Lo-t.---r gridq enuac limit-~--~----
-~~~1- s-i--
18.3 Surface Integrity
Surface Roughness and Fatigue Strength the endurance strength of particular material and process
In the testing of several alloys, it has been observed that combinations. Caution must be exercised before drawing
surface roughness is not the critical factor that it has tradi- general conclusions from the limited data available at this
tionally been assumed to be. It appears that the effects of time concerning surface roughness and surface integrity
roughness can be overshadowed by the effects of residual interrelationships.
stresises. the presence of metallurgically changed phases.
plastically deformed surfaces or other effects. As indicated Stress Corrosion Cracking
in figure 18.3-26. the gently ground surfaces on 4340 steel The two surface integrity effects having the most direct
produced the best high cycle fatigue strengths. Notice. bearing on design and application considerations are fa-
however, that inothetheatwor
case wee
fator of abusively ground surfaces big ong and andstress
applcation ccracking
rain propensity.
refa-
other factors were at work wihinthe ang ofsurace
within the range of surface tigue strength
The former lends itself to corrosion
a fairly simple comparison as
roughnesses tried. and all roughnesses developed the same he frer len itelf To atfai mple comparison, as
65 ksi 1448
milling MPal fatigue strength.
of Ti-6AI-6V-2Sn and in theObserve also that
face turning in the
of Inconel has already
simple been noted
evaluation The latter
procedure is more that
has evolved complex
yieldsand no
corm-
Alloy 718. the fatigue strength did not vary with surface parable data. The number of possible combinations of ma-
rougi8ess. terials. processes. metallurgical states. energy levels. serv-
roughess.ice stresses, environmental fluids or gases is beyond
Further studies of the effects of surface roughness on fa- counting. Therefore. each application should be analyzed
tigue strength have been made in which the data represent for its own situation and evaluated by carefully structured
conditions where residual stresses from the machining testing.
process were essentially zero. Figure 18.3-27 shows the
differences among three materials that range from prac- Combined Effects
tically no effect from surface roughness (Inconel Alloy 718) It is rare that the dynamic properties results can be attri-
to a substantial effect (the two titanium alloys). For alloys buted to a single surface integrity effect. such as residual
where surface roughness has little or no effect on fatigue stress. finish, hardness. etc. One of the more pronounced
strength. a considerable potential for cost reduction exists. relationships which has been observed exists between the
peak residual stress value and the fatigue endurance
In analyzing surface roughness. it is not implied that the ef- strength. as demonstrated in figure 18.3-28. The tri-axis
fect of scratches, tool marks. sharp corners and other geo- graph. figure 18.3-29, illustrates the relationships among
metric considerations can be overlooked. The effect of fatigue endurance strength. residual stress and surface
these factors as producers of stress concentrations leading roughness for Inconel Alloy 718. These results are for spe-
to premature fatigue failure is well established. cific materials and process combinations, and other com-
binations may demonstrate different relationships. Caution
In summary. an important point to consider is to test and should be taken not to draw general conclusions from the
evaluate the influence of finish and other factors affecting limited data available.
ISurface roughnessl
pinRa a
4340 (Q& T. 50 R) 8 - _ 117
longitudinal
surface grinding 127 ioc
4340 (0 & T. 50 Rc) 111
transverse 58
surface grinding 128 185 S
Figure 18.3-26 Summary of high cycle fatigue strengths-surface roughness study. Fatigue strength
in fu.i-reverse bending at 107 cycles at room temperature. (W. P.Ko.tCer et at) 4
1 5
185
Surface Integrity 18.3
60 1401-
50
130-
- Ii---
40 - -- -. Inconel 718
S ~~120-*
30 .
_______ _ _____ ~,j110 - - - -
u-20Ti-A-2Sn-4Zr-2Moa
0__ to100
1 10 100 10000
60 -- - - ~
__ _ _
lowssiua
_ _
arresd W.P.Kote
_
-10-- 118_ 20
_ _ _ _ _ _
6 -0+00-2
_ _ _io
14
18.3 Surface Integrity
The guidelines are intended primarily for processes used in evaluated carefully to assess the impact of the full se
quence of processes that generate the "as-shipped"
producing the final or finished surface of a workpiece. It is face. The control of the sequence of processes is as sur-
ir
important to know the depth of surface alterations pro-
duced during the roughing or prior operations so that ade- portant to surface integrity as is the selection and
quate provision can be made for removing any damaged maintenance of the process operating parameters.
layers. In maintaining surface integrity, the sequence of op- 4. Control of the material metallurgical state is as impor-
erations is as important as the specific processing level. tant as control of the process parameters.
Ample recognition .mustbe given to the necessity for relent- 5. Material inhomogeneities or anomalies (sometimes
less process control once the desired surface integrity proc-
essing parameters have been selected. Equal consideration even those within specification limits) caa have com-
for control of the metallurgical state and condition of the ponent integrity effects as serious as the surface integ-
material being presented for processing is essential. rity effects from different process intensities.
" Cracking in processing or in service. 8. Thefsurface integrity effects from conventional ma-
chining are of the same magnjtude as those from non-
" Short service life. traditional machining.
* Requirements for manufacturing parts using sensitive al- 9. Metallographic sections at high magnification, taken
loys, such as high strength steels, nickel and cobalt base parallel and perpendicular to the lay pattern, provide
high temperature alloys, titanium alloys, beryllium, and an effective early alert to potential surface integrity
refractory alloys. problems.
18-56
Surface Integrity 18.3
10. Post-processing treatments, such as heat treatment, ing of holes. Other plants give short courses on how to in-
shot peenling, roller burnishing, low stress grinding, spect for rehardened and overteniPered inartensite in the
etc., may offset some, but not necessarily all. of the manufacture of high strength steel components.
otherwise detrimental surface integrity effects. Specifying Surface Integrity Qnality
11. Hand-controlled operations have a tendency to pro- Overspecification or too extensive use of surface integrity
duce variability in surface effects and should be consid- quality specifications can significantly increase manufac-
ered suspect. turing costs. Component part drawings should call for the
surfa'e integrity controls only on the areas or zones that
12. Low piocess en.ergy intensities and low material re- are highly stressed or critical in preference to notes calling
moval rates are characteristic of most, but not all, ma- out "apply all over". Good value engineering and coordina-
terial removal processes which provide acceptable sur- tion with manufacturing personnel will produce design de-
face integrity, tails with the best component integrity.
13. Rigid, high quality machine tools and fixtures are Manufacturing Engineering
desirable. Carefully integrated machine, operation and inspection
planning will improve the surface integrity results and con-
14. Cutting fluids should be fresh or well controlled and tain the manufacturing costs. Simple metallographic exam-
carefully, completely and quickly removed from the ination of test pieces can provide a preview of the surface
workpiece when the operation is completed. integrity results to be expected during production. These
checks can prevent expensive and time consuming sur-
15. Deburring of all machined edges is desirable. prises during initial production.
16. Parts stored for extended periods should be covered Maintaining Operating Parameters
with a protective coating to prevent corrosion. Particular attention should be given to the necessity for
maintaining specified operating paraineters. Machine oper-
ators should be thoroughly trained to follow the proper
Comparison of Altered Material Zones from procedures outlined by manufacturing engineering. All pa-
Material Removal Processes rameters for material removal should be specified by nianu-
Examination of several thousand section photomicro- facturing engineering. For chip renloval operations, these
graphs of surfaces generated by a wide variety of material include tool material, tool geometry, cutting speed, feed,
removal processes has provided data for table 18.3-9, a cutting fluid, and tool life (maximum nurber of parts per
summary of the depth of surface integrity effects. These tool grind). Similarly, appropriate parameters must be set
data sh'w the maximum depth of alterations observed to up for operations such as grinding, ]2DM and ECM. Ma-
date for two particular operating levels of each listed proc- chinists should be informed as to the reason and necessity
ess. The two process intensity levels displayed represent (a) for maintaining good surface integrity and surface quality
finishing, "gentle" or low stress conditions or (b) roughing, and should be made aware that it is not currently possible
"off-standard" or "abusive" conditions. The former repre- to guarantee maintenance of surface integrity by final part
sent what might be expected from well controlled, good inspection. Management needs to be ever alert to the de-
surface integrity operations, while the latter represents sire on the part of operators to try 'just one more notch" on
high intensity or even accidental conditions, such as a de- the control. Without requalification, this relaxation of
layed application of coolants. The data cover the full range standards may result in loss of surface integrity.
of material types.
Quality Audits
Since no instrument can measure the surface integrity pro-
Implementing Surface Integrity Programs duced, reliance is frequently placed on process control.
The following cteps are. -,commended for instituting an in- Good quality control practice includes randomly spaced,
house surface integrity program: periodic audits of the operating conditions actually being
used as compared to the preplanned values. Some Corn-
Education and Training panies use the manufacturing engineer most knowl-
Manufacturing and product engineering personnel are gen- edgeable in a process to conduct the audit.
erally not sufficiently acquainted with the many types of
surface alterations which can be produced during material Guidelines and Specifications
removal operations. Product or design engineers generally The guideline concept has been used by some organizations
do not realize that high temperatures prevail in conven- to assist in the implementation of surface integrity process-
tional machining at the workpiece-tool interface, while ing. Booklets can be designed to fit the specific needs of a
manufacturing people often do not realize the extent to company, division, or department. Guidelines are partic-
which metallurgical changes occur and how seriously they ularly useful prior to the development of practical and
lower mechanical properties. This situation points out the meaningful specifications.
advisability of educational efforts to help increase general
cognizance of the importance of surface integrity control. Preparation of processing specifications is highly recom-
In addition to general educational programs, sp. cific train- mended for critical parts. In fact, some of the aerospace
ing is required for machine operators and quality control producers have written detailed manufacturing specifica-
personnel. Some companies, for example, require qual- tions incorporating machining parameters and procedures
ification of personnel in order to perform drilling and ream- in an effort to maintain surface integrity. These specifica-
18-57
18.3 Surface Integrity
TABLE 18.3-9 Comparison of Depth of Surface Integrity Effects Observed in Material Removal Processes
PROPERTY
AND
II MAXIMUM OBSERVED DEPTH OF EFFECT*
inch
TYPE OF EFFECT CONDITIONE
.. m....
I
Turning Electro- Electro- Electrical Laser
or Chemical chemical chemical Discharge Beam
Milling Drilling Grinding Machining Machining Grinding Machining Machining
MECHANICAL ALTERED MATERIAL ZONES
Hardness alteration' finishing 0.0005 0.0010 0.0015 0.0010 0.0014 0.0007 0.0010 -
roughing 0.0050 0.0200 0.0100 0.0031 0.0020 0.0015 0.0080
Residual stress* finishing 0.0060 - 0.0005 0.0010 0.0000 0.0000 0.0020 0.0002
roughing 0.0140 - 0.0125 0.0010 0.0000 0.0000 0.0030 -
24o* - -W - I 71 Th- _=
________________fsa M~___M W=~hbg
13rw ~U2i
METALLURGICAL ALTERED MATERIAL ZONES
Rectystallization finishing - - 0.005 1 -'
roughing - - -
Selective etch, pits, finishing 0.0004 - 0.0002 0.0006 0.0004 0.0001 0.0005
protuberances roughing 0.0010 0.3000 0.0004 0.0015 0.0025 0.0005 0.0016
Metallurgical
transformations
_ _ _ _ _
finishing
roughing
0!=
0.0004
0.0030
-
0.0015 0.0005
0.0200=_ EPP MI
0.0060 -
MI0.0000
"0.0002
00001
0.0003
0.0006
0.0050 _
0.0006
0.0015
SOURCE: G,Bellows and W.P.Koster.' $Depth to point where residual stress becomes and remains less than 20
NOTE: Adash (-) in the table indicates no or insufficient data. ksl [138 MPa] or 10%of tensile strength, whichever is greator.
A triple asterisk (***) in the table indicates no occurrences or not 'Finishing, "gentle" or low stress conditions.
expected. t Roughing, "off-stapdard" or abusive conditions
*Normal to the surface.
'Depth to point where hardness becomes less than 2 points R,(or equiv-
alent) of bulk material hardness (hardness converted from Knoop micro-
hardness measurements).
18-58
Surface Integrity 18.3
tions, even though widely used in subcontract work, are These data emphasize the importance of the machining
generally considered proprietary and under the control of process; however, equal consideration should be2 given to
the prime contractor. It is suggested that the manufac- the metallurgical state of the workpiece material.
turing or engineering departments of the large producers
be contacted directly concerning the availability of their
speciicatons.Specific Guidelines and Data for MECHANICAL
specifications. Material Removal Processes
Testing Specific Applications Conventional mechanical machining surface integrity
Thorough component or product testing is one of the best guidelines have been developed principally from data get'-
assurances for checking of 3urface integrity. Tests should erated by single- or multiple-point tools operated in the
be conducted on surfaces of parts that have completed the turning, milling (end, peripheral or face) or drilling mode.
full sequence of processing steps. While metallographic ex- Table 18 3-10 combines and summarizes the surface integ-
amination and some nondestructive tests can be helpful rity data observed from all of these. Figures 18.3-30
and can reveal clues to the surface integrity, the most criti- through 18.3-44 illustrate both good and poor surface con-
cal applications should preferably be supported by specific ditions as seen in cross section, high magnification photo*
specialized testing where the test conditions reflect the ex- micrographs. Figures 18.3-45 and 18.3-46 show residual
pected operating environment, stress profiles found from the surface inward a few
thousandths of an inch perpendicular to the surface. Fig-
ures 18.3-47 and 18.3-48 compare the high cycle fatigue
strengths of a variety of materials. These strengths are the
SPECIFIC GUIDELINES values at 107 cycles of failure from full-reverse bending
cantilever tests run on tapered section specimens at room
While several thousand bits of data have been used to de- temperature. The reference base or "handbook" value in
velop specific surface integrity guidelines, only the sum- most cases was data generated from low-stress-ground
mary tabulations or statements are included in this hand- specimens or hand-polished specimens. Other mechanical
b-Dk.1 These summaries are accompanied by a material removal illustrations are figures 18.3-6, 18.3-7,
representative selection of specific data to illustrate the 18.3-9 and 18.3-26.
types of effects observed.
Conventional machining processes
have been used so long
The guidelines aic organized and presented according to that it is easy to forget that they are characterized by me-
the process groups that follow: chanical plastic deformation, regular lay patterns and
somtimc zubstantial heat affects from too forceful a pas-
* Mechanical Processes, including milling, turning and sage of the cutter point over the surface. The degree of
drilling dullness of the tool is a major factor in determining the sur-
face effects. With the approach of the end of the tool life,
* Abrasive Processes, including grinding, sanding and low extensive roughness, tears, laps, or deposited built-up edge
stress grinding can result in abused surfaces. (See section 18.2, figure
18.2-19.)
" Electrical Processes, including electrochemical machin-
ing and electrochemical grinding Surface integrity data for the mechanical nontraditional
processes are not extensive and should be investigated in
Thermal Processes, including electrical discharge critical applications using techniques suggested previously.
machining, laser beam machining and electron beam Generally the low energy levels and gentle material re-
machining moval rates result in a minimum of altered material zones.
* Comments by major material groups 4. Form cutters tend to produce surface damage more
readily than do finishing tools which generate a form.
9 Comments on special situations
5. The heat from the passage of a cutting tool, especially
o List of guidelines a dull one, can produce metallurgical transformations.
L4
18-59 1
7=-
18.3 Surface Integrity
6. Evidence of burning on the surface should initiate a as to do everything pcssible to provide a low rate of tool
check of the depth, which can extend to 0.010 inch wear. All tools should be inspected after grinding to insure
10.254 mini. that previous wear. chipping, galling. etc., have been cor-
rected to meet tool specifications. After grinding, the cut-
7. Residual stresses from dull cutting tools are frequently ting edges of all tools should be protected to prevent acci-
compressive, below the surface. dental damage from transit or handling. Tools should be
double checked by the machine tool operator for obvious
8. Sharp drills should be used to help avoid serious sur- defects.
face layer alterations.
Sharp tools help establish surface integrity in turning
9. Dwelling during drilling should be avoided; galling, and milling. For chip removal operations, as for grinding
torn or discolored su:faces should be cause for rejec- operations, it is important to produce a surface which has a
tion or correction. minimum or preferably an absence of surface alterations;
that is, the surface layers should be similar to the base ma-
10, Drill fixturing rigidity is desirable. terial below the surface.
11. Deburring is imperative on both the entr nce and the For turning and milling, there are two very important steps
exit of holes. which will improve surface integrity. First, select machin-
12. Drilled and reamed holes should be chamfered on both ing conditions which will give long tool life and produce
good surface finish. Second. machinc with sharp touls.
the exit and the entrance. Sharp tools minimize distortion and generally lead to better
13. Reaming stock allowances should be contioiied, control or
turning during
ilgmachining. The
iie maximum
ghudb flank wear when
o prxmtl .0
tunnrmilling should be limited to approximately 0.005
to 0.008 inch 10.127 to 0.203 mm. A good rule of thumb is
14. A maximum number of holes per reamer should be to remove the tool when the wearland becomes visible to
specified and maintained despite the visual appearance the naked eye since the aforementioned wearland is just
of reamer. barely visible to the naked eye. Dull tools develop high
compressive stresses which cause distortion, and very often
15. Hand feeding of straight reamed holes should be they produce tears, laps and metallurgical alterations of
avoided. the surface, including untempered and overtempered mar-
tensite in steels. For turning most alloys, carbide tools tend
16. Alignment, tool geometry and tool condition are impor- to have the lowest wear rate and at the same time make it
tant controls in hand reaming. possible to meet reasonable production rates. Indexable
carbide tools, in particular, should be used whenever pos-
17. Finish boring operations should maintain roughness sible. This expedites the changing of cutting edges when
limits and avoid laps and tears. Only very small wear- ever tool wear reaches its specified limit.
lands can be tolerated with about 0.005 inch (0.127
mini as a limit. One finish pass per cutting edge is a fre- In order to determine machining conditions which will pro-
vide long tool life. it is necessary to refer to tool life data for
specific materials and material removal operations. Refer-
18. Honing is an excellent finishing operation for devel- ences
eci 33trthrough 66lsupply
data
data forretol
tool maeratol geom
materials, tool geom-
oping surface integrity. etry, feeds, depth of cut, cutting fluids, etc., for the purpose
of achieving long tool life. If tool life data are not available,
checked. Old fluids should be checked because old the material closest in characteristics to the actual work
w.uokpieces mre aiedyematerial can be used for initial consideration of the machin-
fluids often corrode workpieces more rapidly. ing parameters. In addition, it is recommended that tool life
20. Finish roughness values should not ser 'e as the only data between
ship be studiedmachining
carefully parameters
in order to and
develop
tool the
life.relation-
In this
criteria for development of fatigue strength. si ewe ahnn aaeesadto ie nti
way, one can get an idea of the effects of changes in speeds,
feeds, tool materials, etc., on tool life and be in a better po-
Special Comments Concerning Surface Integrity sition to decide on departures from the recommended ma-
Practices for Chip Cutting Processes chining parameters.
Rigid, high quality machine tools are essential. They Any evidence of burning as a result of a tool or cutter
must be designed with the ranges of speeds and feeds nec- breakdown should be reported to supervision. Care must
essary to meet surface integrity requirements. See com- be taken to remove sufficient stock after tool breakdown to
ments below on the need for selecting speeds and feeds completely remove the effects of the burning which may ex-
which give long tool life. tend as much as 0.005 to 0.010 inch 10.127 to 0.254 mini
below the machined surface.
Cutting tools should be inspected carefully prior to
use. Cutting tools must be carefully ground, and the most There is a tendency for more surface damage to occur
rigid tool design should be employed. For example, stub when a long cutting edge produces the final surface. This
length drills should be used instead of a jobber's length -situation usually occurs when turning to a shoulder or
wherever possible. Cobalt or premium grade high speed when milling a radius into a component. The use of espe-
steel should be used wherever carbide is not applicable so cially sharp cutters for finishing is desirable in order to min-
1f
18-60
Surface Integrity 18.3
imize the alterations. For turning, whenever possible a In addition, it may be advisable to provide for alignment of
shoulder or large radius should be generated by the finish- the reamer to insure accuracy during the hand reaming
ing tool rather than being formed by the long cutting edge operation.
of a forming tool.
Double ream all straight holes 5/16 inch 17.9 mini or larger
Sharp drills should be used to avoid serious surface al- with a minimum metal removal of 3/64 inch 11.2 mml on
terations. Holes in highly stressed components should be the diameter. On smaller holes, the minimum metal re-
free of tears, laps, and untempered or overtempered mar- moval should be 1/64 inch 10.40 mini on the diameter. The
tensite. To minimize defects, the wearland on drills should operator should visually check the reamer for sharpness af-
be limited to 0.005 to 0.008 inch (0.127 to 0.203 mini. ter each operation. At the first sign of chipping, localized
Wherever possible, all hand feeding during drilling should wear or average flank wear beyond specification, the
be avoided. When drilling assemblies, a rigid machine tool reamer should be replaced, and the hole should be in-
or gantry type drill should be employed in preference to spected. Also, regardless of the hole and reamer condition,
portable drilling equipment. Dwelling should also be a maximum number of holes should be specified for reamer
avoided because it produces damage and may even friction replacement. Each reamed hole should be carefully in-
weld the drill to the workpiece. The operator should vis- spected for surface roughness, galling, smearing, scratches,
ually check the hole and drill after each operation. If aver- etc. The entrance and exit of all holes should be carefully
age or localized wear exceeds specifications, the drill deburred and chamfered.
should be replaced. If abnormal conditions develop in the
hole, it should be marked and inspected thoroughly before Deburring and chamfering should be used to remove
assembly. Galling, torn surfaces, or discoloration from all sharp edges. Drilled and reamed holes should be
overheating are causes for rejection. When a drill wears ex- countersunk or chamfered at the entrance and exit to re-
cessively or actually breaks during the drilling of sensitive move the entire burr because sharp edges and burrs are
alloys, the operator should notify appropriate personnel so common sources of component failure. To countersink, use
that remedial steps can be taken. Accidents of this type in- power feed units if possible and use a countersink which
dicate that machining conditions have not been selected completely avoids chattering. Generally, low spindle
and/or used properly. Coolant-fed drills may help minimize speeds are desirable and chamfering tools should be kept
surface damage, but no supporting data are available, sharp. The operator should visually inspect the tool after
each cut, and it should be replaced if there is any visual evi-
Proper drill fixturing assists in minimizing damage dence of wear.
or
during drilling. When drilling holes 1/4 inch 16.4 minI ac- The breaking of edges or radiusing may be done by abra
myedneyar-
larger, a drill fixture or bushing should be used. Where Thbraigoedsoraiun
largeriaydrillitfixtureor bshing should be usedWhe ac- sive deburring using a low speed, po'ver hand drill. When
cessibility permits. a drill backup should be used to min- cafrn
chamfering a part, iiu
at a minimum off000ic 024mn
0.010 inch 10.254 mini
imize burring, chamfer is advisable. The break edges and chamfers
should be carefully examined for compliance with surface
Finishing of drilled holes is imperative. The entrance roughness requirements. This is especially important on
and exit of all holes should be carefully deburred and chain- the entrance and exit of holes where fatigue failures have a
fered. All holes should be finish reamed after drilling when- tendency to originate. The chamfers should be carefully
ever possible to insure better surface finish and surface in- blended into the adjacent surfaces.
tegrity. (See comments that follow.)
Honing is an excellent fizishing operation for devel-
Bushing clearance is needed on deep holes. For holes oping surface integrity. Honing is usually used only when
with depths 3 times the diameter, or more, ample clearance finish requirements or tolerances are too close for practical
should be provided between the drill bushing and the work- use of other finishing operations such as reaming, grinding,
piece for the chips to flow. etc. A multi-stone head is preferred; heads with steel shoes
and/or steel wipers are not recommended. Honing pro-
Special precautions should be taken when reaming duces less surface deformation and fewer surface integrity
holes in sensitive alloys. Since reaming often serves as a effects than any other conventional mechanical hole-finish-
final hole finishing operation, all machining parameters ing process.
must be controlled. Stock allowances must also be con-
trolled. Power feeding of power driven machines should be Boring may be used as a finish machining operation If
employed for reaming of straight holes. When using power roughness is within the manufacturing engineering
driven machines for tapered holes, hand feeding is per- limits. When boring, extra precautions should be taken in
missible, but power feeding is preferred. Hand reaming of the preparation of the cutting edge to provide extremely
tapered holes using a tap wrench may be permissible after low surface roughness values. The tool wearland in finish
power reaming. If hand reaming is performed, special at- boring should be limited to 0.005 inch 10.127 mini, but of.
tention should be given to the selection of tool material, the ten it should be far less than this in order to achieve the de-
reamer geometry, and the accuracy in grinding the reamer. sired accuracy and surface roughness.
18-61
18.3 Surface Integrity
Figure 18.3-30 Built-up edge from face milling 4340 steel (quenched and tempered, 50 Rc). Machin-
ing operations such as turning, drl'i 'g, e....tc.,
ecpeciay under Door machin'-g conditions, are
likely to produce surfaces with a built-up edge. This photomicrograph shows that portion of the built-up
edge which was left on the workpiece. Fracture analyses of failed parts have shown that cracks associ-
ated with the built-up edge have served as origins of the fracture.
0.001 in
18-62
Surface Integrity 18.3
30 -
3- White surface layer
20 1-
0 0010 0020 0030
Ucpth iieatn surface. in
Figure 18.3-32 Surface characteristics of Ti-6AI-4V (aged, 33 Rc) produced by face milling. (Surface
Integrity Encyclopedia )
IN
Figure 18.3-33 Surfaces produced by carbide face milling 4340 steel (quenched and tempered, 40
Rc). (M. Field. W. P. Koster and J. B. KohlsIs)
18-63
18.3 Surface integrity
ABUSIVE CONDITIONS -Photoniicrographs at 1000X (left) and 250X (right) showing white rehardened patches of martensite. The interval
the patches corresponds to the feed of the cutting tool. Thin zones of
70 - - -of
IL - Gentle
Abusive
overtempered rfartensite 0 001-inch deep with hardness as low as 46 RC
are found beneath each patch.
cc..... 60
;ehardened patches
4 00 0020 0030
Figure 18.3-34 Surface rharacteristics of 4340 steel (quenched and tempered, 52 Rc) produced by
face milling. (M.Field, W. P. Koster and J. 3. Kohls' 5 )
- ~~~~~~~~
in ~~~0001
_____________________
0.001 in
Figure 18.3-35 Surfaces produced by carbide face milling M~ac (quenched and tempered. 48 Rc). (M.
Field, W. P. Koster and J. B. Kohls's)
18-64
I
28.5X 1450X
0.00025 in
2850X 7100X
Figure 18.3-36 Turning Inconel Alloy 718 (solution treated and aged) with sharp tungsten carbide
showing anomaly areas of smeared metal, material pull-outs and microchatter. Views at successively
greater magnification from scanning electron microscope taken at 150 from perpendicular. Plastically
leformed surfaces as seen in figure 18.3-37. (G. Bellows' 7 )
CMi
_19
4
- x-
' Z4-
Worst spot with sharp tungsten carbide. Note Worst plastic deformation, 0.0012 inch, plus
built-up edge and lap. torn metal, with dull tool.
Figure 18.3-37 Surfaces produced by turning Inconel Alloy 718 (solution treated and aged) with sharp
and dull tungsten carbide tools. Sharp tool had 0.005-inch wearland and dull tool had 0.013 inch. Sur-
face roughness was 63 microinches R. in both cases. (G.Bellows')
18-65
m '
it
" - I
18.3 Surface Integrity
Clean surfaces - no laps or tears 50 MICROHARDNESS
S48
.44 inB N =
0.001 i
-40f ,
-t ~ ~ 2 1.5 4 8 1 6
0.O~hn
(Depth - beneath surface. thousandths inch
N..RATIUA STREGT
.~~ 100--~~ ag dl
s6o
60 WC - -
_ ~ix
.~-40
with~Dpt
specimens
lowstessgrun thousBellowsin)
0.0.00 in
, r7- M~ ~ 100 -A , u1
C 60 WC6
. -, sharp
7o). T
40 orCB
-*4 uoi i
Hole1wall
Surface Integrity 18.3
Figure 18.3-40 Surfaces produced by drilling 4340 steel. Top two photos represent carbide drilling
4340 (quenched and tempered, 54 Rc); remaining photos represent high speed steel drilling 4340
(quenched and tempered, 48 Rc). (M. Field. W. P. Koster and J. B.Kohls's)
18-67
18.3 Surface Integrity
WW.-
Gentle conditions - very thin trace of Abusive conditions - an overaged or resolutioned layer
cold work may be seen on the surface. 0.001-inch deep at 37 Rc is found on the surface. Total
50OX affected deoth is approximately 0.002 inch. 50oX
.. l ..L_ _ _L
U) 50 Gentle
01T--
' ' e s Ol u t iOn e
d - - busive
- i
30 layer _ If] j
U "-.u1U U.uLO 0.030
Depth beneath surface, in
Figure 18.3-41 Surface chatacteristics of 18% nickel maraging steel Grade 250 (aged, 52 Rc) pro-
duced by driiling. (M. Field, W. P. Koster and J. B. KohlslS)
0001 in
Figure 18.3-42 Surfaces produced by high speed steel power taper reaming 4340 steel (quenched
and tempered, 40 Rc). (M. Field. W. P. Koster and J. B. Kohls's)
18-68
- - _____
Surface Integrity 18.3
C
C 0C
R 01
0
T0
JExit
Exit
Burr condition produced 75OX Burr condition produced 75OX
by sharp reamer.
by dull reamer.
Figure 18.3-43 Surfaces produced by high speed Steel power
taper reaming 4340 steel (quenched
and tempered, 48 Rc). (M.Field. W. P. Koster and J. B. Kohis
Is)
18-69
18,3 Surface Integrity
I V 0.010 in
0
a:
ci)
0 _
30 - 4
-25-
0.5 0.75 1 1.5 2 4 8 16
Depth beneath surface, thoutandths inch
Figure 18.3-44 Broaching of Inconel Alloy 718 (solution treated and aged) with T15 high speed steel
tools. Wearland increased to 0.006 to 0.007 inch during 254 cuts for a total of 158 inches of cut. Micro-
hardness traverse taken after 254 passes. (Surface Integrity Encyclopedia)M
18-70
Surface Integrity 18.3
0
n- o 6.008 inwearland
100
0.016 in wearland
,i..
0
-150
0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009
Depth below surface, in
Figure 18.3-45 Effect of tool wear on residual stress in milled surface, face milling of 4340 steel (52
Rc). Note that the amount of residual compressive stress produced in this specimen is related to the
tool sharpness. The worn tool produced a deeper compressive layer. (W. P. Koster and J. B. Kohisls)
. .0 ABUSIVE CONDITIONS
U, 40 Cutting speed: 150 tpm
a - Tool wear 0.015 to 0 020 in
Cutting fluid: dry
-GENTLE CONDITION -
20
Cutting speed 100004fpm
in
Tool wear 0 to 0
!,l
T -20
E Orientation: longitudinal mill. Stress profiles
o L-40 , I parallel to lay. i
9
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010
Figure 18.3-46 Residual surface stress profiles of Ti-6AI-6V-2Sn (solution treated and aged, 42 Rc)
produced by peripheral end milling. (W. P. Koster and J. B. Kohlsl8)
18-71
18.3 Surface Integrity
Peripheral
Cutting I
Ti-6AI-4V 66 Gentle
Beta rolled 32Rc 62 Abusive
Ti-6A1-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo 82
STA, 36 Rc 47 68
End Cutting T 6
82 @ 13 p in roughness
Ti-6AI-6V-2Sn 82 @ 55 pin roughness
STA, 42 Rc i 82 @ 125 j in roughness
Ti-1A1-4V 64
Beta rolled 32 Rc 77
Ti-6A 1-4V 73
Anneal, 32-34 Rc 64
AISI 4340 - 85 102
0 & T. 50 Rc| 1
Rene 41 4775
STA, 40 Rc
17-4 PH 7V98
43 Rc 4
42
Mar-M509
as cast, 29 R c 4
1 9 H4 il
424
Alum 7075-T7351
77 R 8 9
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Fatigue strength at 10' cycles, ksi
(toom temperature, full-reverse bending)
18-72
- ~
Surface Integrity 18.3
60O
Inconel 718, 60 @ 25 pin roughness
STA, 44 Rc 60 @ 58 p in roughness
60 @ 118 p in roughness
i60 @ 76 pin roughness
Ti-6A i-4V, 66
Annealed, 32-34 R c 71
Almiu, 7Gentle
7075-T7351, 7I
77 RB
775-731 14 V 24 AbIusive
Low stress grinding
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
18-73
18.3 Surface Integrity
TABLE 18.3-10 Surface Integrity Effects Observed in Mechanical Material Removal Processes
FINISHING, ROUGHING,
PROPERTY "GENTLE" OR "OFF-STANDARD"
AND LOW STRESS OR ABUSIVE
TYPE OF EFFECT CONDITIONS CONDITIONS
Recrystallization
lntergranular attack (IGA)
Selective etch, pits, protuberances 0.0004 0.0010
Metallurgical transformations 0.0015 0.0200
Heat-affected zone (HAZ) or Recast layer 0.0001 0.0030
Specific Guidelines and Data for ABRASIVE and alloys studied to date. Titanium alloys are the most
Material Removal Processes drastically affected by grinding variables, although some
The heat in the workpiece surface resulting from the use of cast nickel base materials are close behind. The ferrous
any of the varieties of abrasive machining is the principal materials, except the high strength varieties, are less sensi-
ingredient affecting surface integrity. The amount of heat is tive to grinding variables than these other alloys groups,
proportional to the intensity with which the process is ap- although very significant losses in fatigue strength are asso-
plied. The degree of surface effects is a function of the ther- ciated with both conventional and rough grinding levels of
mal properties of the workpiece material and its metallur- intensity. Even shallow, isolated spots of untempered or
gical response to the heating k1",,. Residual stress and the overtempered martensite can be detrimental to fatigue en-
attendant distortion can be .oblems, as can smeared durance strength. Hand sanding or deburring operations
metal or the debris from plastic deformation. need strict control to reduce the human variables that can
influence surface reliability. Abrasive cutoff operations are 1
particularly susceptible to surface damage. Table 18.3-11
Grinding produces the greatest ange of fatigue endurance summarizes the surface integrity effects observed during
sensitivity among the several material removal processes the examination of several thousand pieces of data.
a2
18-74
I
Surface Integrity 18.3
The charts and guidelines that follow have baselines the 11. Hand grinding of sensitive alloys should be dis-
same as those for the mechanical material removal proc- couraged, unless done under very careful control.
esses. Figures 18.3-49 through 18.3-54 illustrate good and
poor surface effects from grinding. Figure 18.3-55 shows 12. Stict instructions and controls over power hand sand-
typical microhardness alterations, and figures 18.3-56 to ers should be maintained.
18.3-61 show variations of the residual stress or distortion
patterns. High cycle fatigue responses are charted in fig. 13. Abrasive cutoff frequently has a harsh and deep sur-
ares 18.3-62 and 18.3-63. Other grinding illustrations are face effect, and these altered layers should be removed
figures 18.3-1, 18.3-2. 18.3-8, 18.3-10, 18.3-13, 18.3-15, by more gentle processes.
18.3-17, 18.3-18. 18.3-21. 18.3-25, 18.3-26. and 18.3-28.
14. Surface X-ray residual stress measurements can be
Abrasive Process Guidelines that Promote Good misleading. A full profile is best, or enough checks
Surface Integrity Results should be made below the surface to correct for pene- Ai
1. Low stress grinding techniques can reduce distortion tration of the X-rays and the slope of the profile.
and surface damage. Frequent coarse dressings of 15 Good dressing action on the grinding wheel is pro-
softer grade wheels, lower infeeds and reduced grind- moted by cleanliness and sharpness of the dressing
ing wheel speeds with lubricating-type cutting fluids tool. Pauses or dwells in the dressing tool action can
are the principal elements of low stress grinding. A dull the wheel surface, particularly with the roll form,
shallow depth of low value tensile or compressive re- crush roll or form block dressing tools.
sidual stress can be attained.
2. Highar work material speeds can aid both product. ity Special Comments Concerning Surface Integrity
and surface integrity. Lower wheel surface speeds aid Practices for Abrasive Machining Processes
su;face integrity without sacrificing productivity. Reduce grinding distortion and surface damage by us-
ing 'low stress" conditions during finish grinding.
3. Frequent coarse dressing of grinding wheels can re-
duce surface damage by keeping the wheels open and Conventional finish grinding practices should be replaced
sharp, thus helping to reduce temperatures at the by low stress grinding procedures in order to minimize
wheel-workpiece interface, grinding distortion and to reduce the possibility of produc-
ing extensive surface metallurgical alterations and crack-
4. Modifications to established low stress grinding pro- ing. Low stress grinding procedures are described in table
cedures should not be attempted unless testing con- 18.3-12. Some of the metallurgical alterations caused by
firms that they can be tolerated, abusive grinding do not produce cracking immediately, but
they develop conditions leading to delayed cracking, which
5. If low stress grinding is specified for finishing oper- may occur later "on the shelf' or prematurely in service,
ations, then conventional grinding can be used to thereby seriously complicating inspection practices. Low
within 0.010 inch 10.254 mml of the finished size, pro- stress grinding in comparison with conventional practices
vided that the work materials are not sensitive to employs softer grade grinding wheels, reduced grinding
cracking. wheel speeds, reduced infeed rates, and chemically active
cutting fluids. Low stress conditions should be used for re-
6. Lubricating-type fluids and coolants should have a co- moving the last 0.010 inch 0.254 min. See tables 18.3-13
pious and positively directed flow and should be to18.3-17.
checked for their chemical action on the specific mate-
rial being ground. Modification of low stress grinding procedures should
not be attemped unless service experience or testing
7. Conventional grinding conditions should not be used programs in the shop and/or laboratory confirm that
for finish grinding of highly sensitive alloys such as compromises can be tolerated. For certain type parts
high strength steels, high temperature nickel and co- made of sensitive alloys, no compromises should be permit-
bait base alloys, and titanium or molybdenum alloys, ted in the specification of low stress grinding parameters.
Experience has shown that it is sometimes possible to relax
8. The heat-affected zones from rough grinding can be low shuess procedures in order to accommodate equipment
much deeper than the surface discolorations might in- limitations or to increase production rates. Table 18.3-17
dicate. Microhardness traverses can generally detect is an example of a set of grinding conditions, case A, which
the depth of surface alterations. produced scrap as a result of grinding cracks in the fir-tree
section of IN-100 turbine blades. Substitution conditions,
9. High stress grinding of martensitic steels can create case B, are essentially low stress except for the infeed. Ex-
untempered mqrtensitic zones with overtempered mar- perience had indicated that in this instance an infeed as
tensitic zones below them, both of which will limit fa- high as 0.002 inch 10.050 m]l could be tolerated.
tigue strength.
An almost identical cracking problem was encountered in
10. Crack detection tests should be made when rough the production of Inconel Alloy 713C turbine blades. This
grinding materials. Existing surface cracks can propa- problem was also solved by implementation of the recom-
gate ahead of the grinding when finishing some ther- mendations shown for case B of table 18.3-17. Parts made
mally sensitive materials. Low stress grinding should of cast HS-31 and cast WI-52 have also cracked in conven-
be used to remove more than the altered material tional grinding. Because of these experiences and tha lack
zones from any prior conventional grinding operation. of other data, it is suggested that all cast nickel and cast
18-75
18.3 Surface Integrity
cobalt base high temperature alloys be processed using low quenched and tempered steels, OTM is frequently pro-
stress grinding conditions for the highly stressed or criti- duced under the UTM. Even if the UTM is removed by
cally loaded surfaces. gentle grinding, the fatigue strength is still reduced 25 to
30 percent. This indicates that overtempered martensite
If low stree grix~dfng is required for finish grinding, may be as important as untempered martensite in in-
then conventional grinding can be used to within 0.010 fluencing fatigue strength.
inch 10.254 mini of finish size if the materials being
ground are not sensitive to cracking. During conven- Conventional grinding conditions should not be em-
tional grinding, metallurgical alterations, including ployed for either roughing or finishing alloys wh.ch
stresses. are usually confined to within approximately are ultra-sensitive to the grinding process. From expe-
0.005 inch 10.127 mini of the surface or less, This makes it rience, certain alloys have been found to crack easily dur-
possible to remove most of the stock by conventional prac- ing conventional grinding. For such alloys, it is likely that
tices and then finish grind using low stress methois. How- the cracks created will not be eliminated by finish grinding.
ever crack detection tests should be made to see that con- The high temperature nickel and cobalt bas,- cast alloys
ventional grinding of the material in question does not (such as IN-100, Inconel Alloy 713C. M.R-M509. HS-31,
create cracks of greater depth. Stock allowances of the or- WI-52, Udimet 500, Udimet 700. inconel Alloy 738, etc.),
der of 0.010 inch 10.254 mml or greater. if necessary, are in contrast with the wrought nickel and cobalt base high
sugge;ted to compensate for location inaccuracies in hold- temperature alloys, are examples of alloys which should
ing fixtures. never be ground conventionally. See table 18.3-17 for a
specific case history involving cracking of a cast nickel
Finish grinding of critical and/or highly stressed sur- base high temperature alloy. Metals and alloys which are
faces of sensitive alloys exposed to high service brittle, such as beryllium and tungsten, tend to respond
stresses should be performed using low stress grinding similarly.
instead of conventional grinding. Some high perform- Frequent dressing of grinding wheels can reduce sur-
ance, high strength alloys are also sensitive to the thermal face damage by keeping the wheels open and sharp,
shocks accompanying grinding. A partial list of these alloys thus helping to reduce temperatures at the wheel-
is as follows: workpiece interface. Automatic dressing and wheel com-
High Strength Steels, Wrought pensation contribute to the ecenomic feasibility of frequent
4340 or 4340 Mod. at 40-54 Re dressing. Crush dressing and diamond roll dressing can
300M or D6ac at 48-56 Re also be used to minimize the cost of frequent dressing.
Maraging
HP94-45 Steels Cutting fluids, properly applied, help promote surface
integrity. In order to get fluid to the wheel-workpiece in-
High Temperature Nickel and Cobalt Base Alloys, terface, position the fluid nozzle as close to the wheel as
Wrought possib!e. A general rule of thumb, regarding the quantity of
Rene 41 fluid needed, is to use at least two gallons of fluid per horse-
Rene 80 power per minute.
Udimet 700
AF 95 (Rene 95) Hand grinding of sensitive alloys should be dis-
Waspaloy couraged. The inherent lack of control has been respon-
AF2-1DA sible for creating many surface defects.
Inconel Alloy 718
Rene 125 Abrasive cutoff requires special surface integrity con-
Titanium Alloys, Wrought siderations. Abrasive cutoff operatio-: generally cause
Ti-6A1-4V deeper surface alterations than grinding, sometimes as
Ti-hAI-2.5Sn much as 0.050 inch 11.27 mini, and capability for min-
Ti-6A1-25Sn-4Zr-2Mo imizing damage from cutoff operations varies from plant to
Ti-6AI-6V-2M plant. It is recommended, therefor!!. that when abrasive
cutoff is used that steps be taken to determine the extent of
Table 18.3-18 and figure 18.3-62 provide high cycle, room disturbed layers
the subsequent andbyproper stock allowances be made
for cleanup suitable machining. Also, the en-
temperature fatigue data showing the adverse effects of for su t ceanup b e an ina ls the en
abusive and of conventional grinding compared with gentle tresutnsrace sube exie e the tmr
or low stress grinding for several classes of aerospace te gt e
materials.
Fatigue str- igth reduction of martensitic steels as a result Controls for hand power sanders should be main-
of abusive grinding has been determined to be approx- tained. Test data reported in figure 18.3-63 show that
imately equal, regardless of the quantity of untempered good fatigue results can be obtained for such alloys as 4340
martensite (UTM) or overtempered martensite (OTM) pre- at 50 Re and Ti-6AI-4V provided that controlled conditions
sent. Traces of UTM or OTM as well as 0.004-inch 10.10 are maintained. The conditions are as follows:
mini deep layers were associated with the same fatigue
strength reduction, figure 18.3-25. Reduction of the fatigue Use a low belt speed (2000 feet per minute 110 m/sl
strength was found to be about 30 to 35 percent. For maximum, for example).
18-76
Surface Integrity 18.3
Use a flexible (rubber) support for sanding disks or Adjustment of the grinding conditions can sub-
belts. stantially alter the surface conditions. When it is not
possible or practical to control one of the operating param-
Use an abrasive grit generally no coarser than 80. and eters to low stress values, alteration of all of the other pa-
use coolant if feasible. rameters to the best values can frequently achieve the de-
sired surface quality, as shown in figure 18.3-64.
At present, the relatively new high speed grinding
processes should not be used for finishing of highly
stressed structural parts unless an extended data set is
developed. Presently, insufficient mechanical property
data are available to justify the recommendation of high
speed grinding for critical parts even though increased pro-
duction rates are attainable. High speed grinding increases
the difficulty of the effective application of the grinding
fluid, especially on complex parts, thereby making it more
difficult to avoid surface damage from overheating.
g f4 0 ( .. -
17 I
18-77 m
18.3 Surface integrity
Coo
:
* C o
0 (.
a)'-
0
C)w
(00 0 0 -%
C: 0 CY
E Co
000-0
-~ C
Cm :60 0
CLSo a) 00
C>
4)0 C
C C C .. C ")
oo < ) o
cr0 00.C C
.C .C
.T .- 0(wG 'D a .
- 0. 00 C
OCD U) > 4) -
0 0 0 CIL
o 0 V- 0
z 0 C Eo~.
CD
0) 0 6 o
C
-;
0) 0
0 0
ID 0
0 -V0
0 CC 0
S
C COO 0
05
0w, 2s-
8 0 HCCO 0 _H-
-0 20
-0C
L
:3 0
CL.
Ln - .
Cm
>
M -U
18-7M
Surface Integrity 18.3
0 0 C
A ~A
Q)0
CD
cc0 t
CLC
oC
00
0,,x
.0.C)0 ::3
U0)
CcV~
CL 0
42 coo0
0
C)
'F t-S
C.D
=0 )
-D0~- 0) CL
an -_
A87
____________________________________
18.3 Surface Integrity
-~ ~ -U---0.001 in
V!V2I
7 '~
-7
41
V
Ln. _
1-2
-
1
100__
18-80
Surface Integrity 18.3
V0
. 0 0
0
-
C
0
CC)
CL
ww - -i7E E
0
C
00
C)0
40
~ ~ ~ ' n o .I
2~@
- ' -o
~C
r 0 .
0
0 0 0
CL
0CC
0
0 '00
> 4
C.2
41 -o
MRES a
0C~.
cc- 00
.00
-0 00
0 40
00
18081
18.3 Surface integrity
60 1 1120
Un empered zone I I I
Low tres gridingWheel
j Wheel grade. A46KBV
speed 6000 fpm
Cr Table spetd 60 fpm
'6I Crossfeed 0040 n~.hpaso
stress grinding 80 - Depthi ol grind. 00.0 inch
0High
.g ~ IGrinding llu'dl soluble oil (140)
M 0 1Specimen size u ,j60 x 314 x 4-114 in
M4 60-
400
Ivremee
zoe
4C 000 inch/pass
zones_
Ovremee 00 inh/s
Wheel grade:A46K8SV
wheel speed: wee below
100 Downfeed: 0.002 inch/pass
Table speed: GGfpm
Crossfeed: 0.040 inch/pas
60 So Deth of grind:O.010 in
.2 Grnding fluid: soluble oil (1.40)
uin Ra Ispecimensize: 0.060 x314 x4-1/4 in
S40 -p 5
65 in Ra--.-
127 luin Ra .....
- - ~ 40 -
I I I
ca C 0
18-82
Surface Integrity 18.3
Figure 18.3-59 Effect of downfeed on change in Figure 18.3-61 Effect of grinding fluid on change
deflection versus wheel speed when surface grind- in deflection versus wheel speed when surface
ing 4340 steel (52 R@). Note the low distortion pro- grinding 4340 Steel (52 Rc). Distortion is minimized
ducedi by low wheel speed and low stress down- by use of low wheel speeds and also by using sulfu-
feed. A typical low stress downfeed calls for carefulrienl.M.ildW.PKstradJ .ohs)
control in removal of the last 0.010 inch in finishing.
The first 0.008 inch is taken at 0.0005 inch/pass
and the last 0.002 inch at 0.0002 inch/pass. Resid-
ual stress values for these tests are shown on fig-
ures 18.3-57 and 18.3-58. (M. Field, W. P. Koster
and J. B. KohisIs)
- 0.040
;-.t I I/ -
0-010 0
18-83
13.3 Surface Integrity
AISI 4340
0 & T, 50 R c -117@8uin roughness
1 10@ 65 pin roughness
(longitudinal grind) l0 127pMin roughness
AISI 4340 120@ 1. pn roughness
T, 50 Rc 185 100@ 58 in roughness
AISI 4340 9 pin roughness
o & T,,50 Rc 65@ 64 m roughness
(longitudinal grind) 65 @9 7p in roughness
AISI 4340
Q & T, 50 R
c
4340 Mod . 1122
o & T, 53 Rc
Grade 300 105
maraging steel
STA, 54 R c 85
17-4 PH steel 42 198
4
3 Rc 8
Ti-6A1-4V 54
beta rolled, 32 Rc 14
Ti-6A I-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo 68
STA, 36 Rc
Ti-6A[-6V-2Sn - .=-=-
..--'30
30. 65
STA, 42 Rc
Inconel 718 60
STA, 44 Rc 24
Rene 41 152
STA, 40 Rc
Rene 80 42
STA, 40 R C ,
ST plus grind plus age 32-36
AF95 (Rene 95) 24
STA, 50 Rc 26
Low stress
AF2-1DA 170 or gentle
STA, 46 Rc 20
MAR-M509 42 Conventional
as cast, 29 Rc 24
7075 Aluminum 24 High stress
9 or rough
T7351, 77 RB
18-84
____
-
____
_ ___
- ~~ ~ _
-~-~--
__
-= - -------
___ ____ S
r
!SurfaceIntegrity 18.3
I I I I }
AISI 4340 Q&T, 50 Re
I I I I ,
4340 Mod O&T, 53 R, , 105
Ti-6AI-6V-2Sn STA, 42 Rc 67
I I
17- Gentle
Abusive
Low stress
grinding
SURFACE SECTION
1/4 in 0.0005 in
lO00X icoox
HIGH STRESST
Fine dress, dry,, 6000 fpm
I
CONVENTIONAL
Fine dress, oil, 4800 fpm
_CONVENTIONAL
Coarse dress, oil, 4800 fpm
LOW STRESS
Coarse dress, oil, 2000 fpm
Figure 18.3-64 Effect of different grinding intensities. Left, ultraviolet photographs of fluorescent pen-
etrant inspections of the four surfaces of a bar of cast nickel base alloy ground under four different con-
ditions of surface grinding. Right, corresponding section photomicrographs at 1000X. These photos re-
veal the presence of cracks and pull-out. The low-stress-ground surface is free of microcracks. (Surface
Integrity Encyclopedia')
18-85
M
18.3 Surface Integrity
TABLE 18.3-11 Surface Integrity Effects Observed In Abrasive Material Removal Processes
FINISHING, ROUGHING,
PROPERTY "GENTLE" OR "OFF-STANDARD"
AND LOW STRESS OR ABUSIVE
TYPE OF EFFECT CONDITIONS CONDITIONS
Recrystallization 000
lntergranular attack (IGA)
Selective etch, pits, protuberances 0.0002 0.0004
Metallurgical transformations0.05.06
Heat-affected zone (HAZ) or Recast layer 0.0007 000
18-86
Surface Integrity 18.3
TABLE 18.3-12 Low Stress Grinding Procedures
English L Englsh
WheelA4HC6V
Wheel speed 2500 to 3000 fpm* - - 2000 to 3000 fpm*
Do%-wnfeed per 0.0002 to 0.0005 -- 0.0002 to 0 0005
pass inch'tinch'
Table speed 40 to 100 fpml - 40 to 100 fpml
,;rossfeed per 0 040 to 0 050 - 0.040 to 0.050
pass inch inch
Grinding fluid Highly sulfurized See section 16.3.
NOTE, For a wide variety of metals (including high strength steels, high 'Downfeeds or infeeds in the range of 0 0002 to 0.0005 inch per pass
temperature alloys, titanium and refractory alloys), low stress grinding [0 005 to 0.013 mm/pass] have been found satisfactory for steels, nickel
practices develop very low residual tensile stresses. In some materials the base high temperature alloys, and titanium alloys. A typical feed schedule
residual stress produced near the suface is actually in compression in- calls for removing the last 0.010 inch [0.254 mm] of stock as follows. re-
stead of tension. move 0.008 inch [0 2 mm at 0.0005 inch per prss [0 013 mm/pass] and
*Low stress grinding requires wheel speeds lower than the conventional remove the last 0.002 Inch [0 05 mm] at 0 0002 inch per pass [0.005 mm!
6000 feet per minute [30 meters per second]. In order to apply low stress pass].
grinding, It would be preferable to have a variable speed grinder. Since :Increased work speeds even above those indicated are considered to be
most grinding machines do not have wheel speed control, it is necessary advantageous toward improving surface integrity.
to add a variable speed drive or make pulley modifications
2 I
18-87
18.3 Surface Integrity
TABLE 18.3-13 Process Parameter Guidelines for Low
Stress Grinding Results
SOURCE: G. Bellows.,$
NOTE- Process parameter guidelines are listed in descending order of sig-
nificance to low residual stress generation in the workpiece surface. A ma-
chine and setup with good rigidity, freedom from vibration or chatter and
well maintained with fine cleanliness are also an aid to grinding perform-
ance
*Cylindrical grinding frequently requires use of harder wheels (with J
grade prevalent): however, the other parameters must be selected to com-
pensate for this extra hardness.
TABLE 18.3-14 Typical Infeed Schedule for Attaining Low Stress Surfaces by Grinding
I INFEED RATE
SOURCE: G.Bellows.'"
*Data applies to the radius for cylindrical grinding and to the depth for surface grinding.
'This roughing rate should be such that roughness, tears, cracks, or microcracks In the surface are of lesser magnitude than
the material remaining to be removed by the finishing and semi-finishing cuts.
18-88
Surface Integrity 18.3
TABLE 18.3-15 Influence of LSG Parameters on Production Rates
RANKING DIRECT INFLUENCE MINOR INFLUENCE NO INFLUE!.CE
IN INFLUENCE ON MATERIAL ON PRODUCTIVITY ON PRODUCTION
ON RESIDUAL REMOVAL RATE AND RATE
STRESS PRODUCTION TIME
1 (most) Dressing
2 Wheel speed*
3 Infeed rate
4 Lubricant
5 Wheel grade
6 Table speed
7 Machine type and quality
8 Rigidity of setup
9 (least) Coolant nozzle design
SOURCE: G Bellows."
NOTE: It is possible to achieve the "best of both worlds"--high surface integrity and good productivity-it a
careful selection among the LSG parameters ismade.
*At very low sheel speeds, a wheel acts like asofter wheel and needs more frequent dressing and thereby has a
minor influence or production rates.
SOURCE G. Bellows"
4i
18-89
77-
18.3 Surface Integrity
TABLE 18.3-18 Fatigue Strength Variation from Different Grinding Conditions
Titanium Alloys:
Ti-6A1-4V (Beta rolled. 32 Rj 62 713 9
Ti-6A[k6V-2Sn (STA, 42 Rj 5 .4 0)0 0 18
Ti-6A1-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo (STA, 36 Rj 68 40 17 11 10 6
TABLE 18.3-19 Low Cycle Fatigue Test Data From Surface-Ground Materials
18-90
Surface Integrity 18.3
Spn-cific Guidelines and Data for ELECTRICAL 7. Contact between the electrolyte and workpiece with-
Matarial Removal Processes out current flow should be minimized.
The nolecule by molecule dissolution of the electrically
conductive workpiece in electrochemical machining 8. Localized overheating of the workpiece as a result of
(ECM) is a forceless material removal that introduces no poor connections or short circuits should be carefully
residual stresses into the workpiece. The surface texture is examined for the extent of any damage. Removal of
smooth, has no lay pattern, and can approach a metal- the surface discoloration is insufficient, as demon-
lograph-polish caliber even to revealing individual grain strated in figure 18.3-75.
patterns. The absence of beneficial residual stress and/or
cold working in the surface frequently results in high cycle 9. Careful and complete rinsing of the electrolyte from
fatigue strengths less than that produced with conven- the workniece is essential. Ultrasonic agitation of the
tionally prepared surfaces. If nceded. the addition of a post- cleaning bath is helpful.
ECM process such as shot peening or rolling can add a
beneficial compressive residual stress. Some slight soft- 10. Selective etching, excessive roughness, intergranular
ening of the surface has been observed in some alloy- attack or pitting are evidences of less than optimum
electrolyte combinations. The key to good ECM surfaces is operating conditions or tooling practices. These condi-
a careful match of the electrolyte composition with the tions can occur on surfaces subjected to low current
metallurgical state of the workpiece material plus careful density in the presence of the electrolyte or in areas ad-
control of the operating parameters, especially the current jacent to the main electrode cutting face.
density. Selective etching, intergranular attack (IGA) or
pitting may occur in the low current density areas adjacent 11. Room temperature fatigue endurance strength is gen-
to the main electrode high current density areas. Static ma- erally lower as compared to that of low stress conven-
terial properties have not been found to be affected bytionally ground specimens and represents the unblem-
ECM. Hydrogen embrittlement has also not been attri- ished or unaffected material properties state. The lack
buted to ECM (the hydrogen ions form at the cathode and of any residual stress in electrochemically machined
are in the molecular state before reaching the anodic work- surfaces can account for the differences observed in fa-
piece surface). tigue strength.
The charts and guidelines that follow have baselines the 12. The use of a post-ECM shot peening or rolling treat-
same as those for the mechanical material removal proc- ment may be desirable to enhance component fatigue
esses. Figures 18.3-65 to 18.3-73 illustrate good or poor
surface effects from the electrochemical processes. Micro- 1c
hardness examples are shown in figures 18.3-67. 18.3-71
and 18.3-72. and residual stress patterns are shown in fig- in material composition can influence the surface qual-
ures 18.3-66 and 18.3-72. High cycle fatigue strength sum-
mary data are shown
summry
srfaein ffigure
te 18.3-74. Table 18.3-20
itegityeffctsobsrve is a
duing 114. Some surface softening will occur in many, but not all.
the examination of several thousand pieces of data. Other
18.-1.illustrations
electrical machining are figures 18.3-5.
nd183-7.15. . An increase in roughness of the ECM surface can be a
18.3-15. and 18.3-1 7. significant alert to the departure from optimum or pre- i
planned operating conditions.
Electrical Process Guidelines that Promote Good 16. Hydrogen embrittlement is not attributable to CM.
Surface Integrity Results Special Comments Concerning Surface Integrity
1. Surface roughness standards should be -e .d Practices for Electrical Machining Processes
when applying ECM because ECM produces unusual
surface textures with no ly pattern. High current densities produce improved finishes and
high material removal rates. In sharp contrast to conven-
2. Well controlled ECM does not induce any stresses into tional machining, ECM finishes improve with the higher
the surface. material removal rates that accompany high current den-
sities in the main electrode working gap. Rates of electrode
3. High current densities are desirable in the cutting gap advance of 0.001 to 0.005 inch per second 10.025 to 0.127
for good finishes and rapid metal removal. mm/sl and current densities of 500 to 1500 amperes per
square inch 178 to 232 A/cm2Jlare frequent. The upper limit
4., The current density in the workpiece should be care- for current densities is usually the internal, resistive heat-
fully planned to prevent overheating in the material. ing in the workpiece. Inaccuracies or distorting forces can
accompany this internal heating. Poor electrical con-
5. Relentless process controls should be supplemented nections or clamps can produce highly localized hot spots
with periodic metallographic checks from representa- that can involve temperatures to the point that micro-
tive surfaces. structural alteration occurs, as shown in figure 18.3-75.
6. The work material heat treat state should be precisely Surface roughness can be a quality control guideline.
known and controlled to assure the best repeatability The usual fine ECM finish, if tracked or plotted, sequen-
of ECM surfaces. cially and frequently can be a good quality control tech-
18-91
18.3 Surface Integrity
nique. A gradually changing roughness usually accom- Accidental short circuits should be carefully examined
panies a slow change in ECM operating parameters; for for subsurface damage. Modern short circuit protection
example rising sludge content, electrolyte temperature de- devices have rapid enough action to protect surfaces from
cline, etc. A sudden change in roughness frequently can be severe damage (and in some cases show only barely detect-
traced to a change in the metallurgical state of the work- able pin pricks). Older, slower devices have been known to
piece material: for example, a new lot of stock. produce microcracking as deep as 0.10 inch 12.54 mml.
Careful examination, removal of damaged areas or rework-
Areas of low current density should be suspects for in- ing can protect the workpiece surface integrity. Occasion-
tergranular attack or selective etching. At increasing ally, overheated areas will show only as a light surface dis-
distances from the principal electrode cutting face, the volt- coloration. While the appearance is easily restored, cases
age, current and current density all decline and with them have been recorded of nuggets of metallurgically altered
the cutting rates. At specific low values, pitting, inter- material of considerable extent. Figure 18.3-75 illustrates
granular attack. selective etching or anodic films can oc- one such nugget that occurred from overheating a Ti-6AI-
cur. Insulation of the sides of the electrode can concentrate 4V alloy by concentrating the current flow under a con-
the electrolytic action. Masks on the workpiece surface are nector as a result of a loose adjacent connector.
only partially effective in reducing these undesirable effects
because a groove of removed material will frequently ap-
pear at the edge of such masks. These stray etching areas
usually have so little material removal activity that dimen- ECM produces unblemished surfaces. With the lack of
sional problems are nonexistent and the cosmetic appear- mechanical contact with the workpiece, the gentle mole-
apce effects can be confined to the anodic film or "blush" cule-by-molecule dissolution of the material, and the min-
that is readily removed. ute surface chemistry effects, ECM produces a nearly un-
blemished surface. From the standpoint of assessment of
Random pitting in workpiece surfaces adjacent to the pure, uncontaminated or unaffected material proper-
ECM'd areas can result from material anomalies. Occa- ties. specimens prepared by well controlled ECM are unex-
sionally groups or single pits will afoear on the workpiece celled. Even polishing with worn crocus cloth can have
in areas adjacent to the ECM'd area. The pitted areas have measurable impact on high cycle fatigue values.
been exposed to low current density from free flowing elec-
trolyte or electrified mists. The electrolytic action concen-
trates in the anomalies in the work material, thus gener-
ating a pit or ring- shaped depression (around a less Mechanical material removal action in electro-
conductive inhomogeneity in the material). Some use has chemical grinding (ECG) should be controlled to min-
been made of this selective cutting tendency as an in- imum values. The abrasive action of the electrically con-
spection aid to assess the surface uniformity of material ductive wheel used in ECG is intended for removal of the
stock, anodic films formed on workpiece surfaces. It is not used
for significant material removal. The principal material re-
Control of the metallurgical state of the work material moval action is still electrolytic, Too heavy abrasive action
is needed. The proper selection of electrolyte, current den- can result in short circuits, abrasive burns or too much re-
sity and the other operating parameters must include con- sidual stress, as in conventional grinding. Less than 5 per-
sideration of the heat treat or metallurgical state of the ma- cent, and frequently as little as 1 percent. of the material
terial. While electrolytic machining will continue at almost removed comes from the mechanical action. One rule of
the same rate regardless of the material hardness, the pres- thumb states that no more than two light scratches from
ence or absence of IGA can depend on the heat treat state. abrasive action should be seen in each square inch of sur-
Many alloys will be free of IGA when ECM'd in the hard- face. The primary purpose of the abrasive action is to pro-
ened state: some, however, must be ECMd in the annealed vide a clean nascent surface so that the electrolytic action
state to be free of IGA. A simple metallographic section of can proceed at the most rapid pace consistent with over-
a test piece or coupon is good quality assurance. For ex- heating the workpiece. wheel or electrolyte. With good
ample, the massive IGA shown in figure 18.3-68 dis- electrolyte flow control and good operating parameters.
appeared completely when the M252 alloy was electro- ECG will result in stress free and unexcelled surface integ-
chemically machined in the annealed state. rity, as is demonstrated in figure 18.3-73.
18-92
Surface integrity 18.3
08
2 4
-a20-- ~
-40
0 0.002 0.004 0.03 0.008 0.010
Depth beneath surface, in
0 38**
C)
0 34*-
- 32
Figure 18.3-65 Typical surface characteristics 0.5 075 11.5 2 4 8
of 16
17-4 PH producad by electrochemical machining.
Top. SEM of surface at 45' and 1000X; bottom, Depth beneath surface, thousandths inch
section at 1000X. Surface roughness is 29 micro-
inches R.; Rt = 152 microinches. (Surface Integrity
Encyclopedia]) Figure 18.3-67 Typical microhardness traverse
from ECMV showing surface softening or Rebinder
effect (17-4 PH). (G.Bellows and J. B. Kohls2O)
18-93
18.3 Surface Integrity
STANDARD
OFF STANDARD
Minimal IGA
0.0003 in
Udimet 500
_0
_1 ORR 0
"-:i , , _Pits or
selective etch
U0.0015 in
Udimet 500
Massive IGA
._ 0.002 in
CY Aged M252
ZI33Rc
__
0
Co----___
18-94
- -- -- ~ - ---- ---- --
Surface integrity 18.3
II Surface
Ol1in
Section
15
10
0A~
7~
M - -
5 -w
Getl rnonedmcr-Abusive
oniios-
scopic roughening and tendency toward conditions - pronounced surface roughening
intergranular attack plus slight surface plus moderate surface hardness loss. -
r-rGent-le
18-95
18.3 Surface Integrity
- - so lCROHARDNESS
S45a
35 -
Depth2 beneath
-~- 0 4 surface.
6 thousandths
8 10
inch 12
S10
a.ypical processing paa eessufc og i
s2
43 gjin Ra Minor subsurface softening plus a fyp-
ical surface etching.'
__,
000 2f 4_ 6 8 1 1
STGU STENT
___Da
Ci C
18-39
Surface Integrity 18.3
MATERIAL 3j
321 stainless steel
________________________________
403 stainless steel1 7
54_______68____
1 198- 122
300M. 0 & T, 52 Rc I 7
___64_ 105
Grade 250 maraging steel 1_____
38! 60 671
Ti-6AI-4V. STA. 36 Rc max--
'47 72
Ti-6A I-6V-2Sn. STA. 42 RcI
Inconel alloy 718. STA. 44 Rc
41145 52
Rene 41. STA. 40 Rc72 8
17-4 PH. STA. 43 Rc
1 35 145i
Mar M509
1 1 44 J57 75
Rene 95. STA.50~R283 42
Rene 80. STA, 40 Rc VVntec &ereo
1 55 6365 -handbook- values by
AF2-1DA. STA. 46 Rc low stress grinding
I I I ~ Range observed to date
0 20 40 60 80 100
Fatigue strength at 10- cycles. ksi
(room temperature. full reverse bending)
Figure 18.3-74 Summary of high cycle fatigue strengths from electrochemical machining. Note: In the
observed ranges. the lower values most generally represent the "off-standard" operating conditions,
while the upper values are representative of "standard" or preplanned conditions.
F. -2
~ ~~A~~-3!e -M.056 in
Figure 18.3-75 Metallurgical alteration below the ECM surface of Ti-6A1-4V caused by current con-
centration under an electrical connection adjacent to a poor (or high resistance) electrical connection.
40X. (G.Bellows2 l)
18-97
18.3 Surface Integrity
TABLE 18.3-20 Surface Integrity Effects Observed In Electrical Material Removal Processes
FiNISHING, ROUGHING,
PROPERTY "GENTLE" OR "OFF-STANDARD"
AND LOW STRESS OR ABUSIVE
TYPE OF EFFECT CONDITIONS CONDITIONS
Specific Guidelines and Data for THERMAL The shallow thermal impact of these processes is accom-
Material Removal Processes panied by the very rapid quench rate from the heat sink of P
The therial material removal processes utilize a variety of the bulk of the material. These transient thermal waves
heat sources to melt, vaporize or sublime the workpiece produce a recast and/or resolidified layer(s) on the surface
surface. The rate of material removal is a function of the with a heat-affected zone (HAZ) below the recast layer(s).
energy density which can vary from 100 watts per square Lightly attached splatter and globules appear at higher
inch 115 5 w/cm2l with plasma arc or electrical discharge energy levels. Figure 18.3-78 illustrates most of the effects
machining 2(EDM) to 3 x 1010 watts per square inch 10.47 x found. The thickness of the recast layers increases with an
1010 w/cm for laser machining. The surface texture re- increase in the material removal rate, as shown in figure
flects the impingement of the heat source and the molten 18.3-79. When EDM is well controlled only a few ten
state that occurred, as is shown in figures 18.3-3 ane thousandths inch of recast is found, as shown in figure
18.3-76. Surface roughness measurements of reasonable 18.3-80. The recast layer has a heat-affected zone immedi-
accuracy can be made on these surfaces if stylus traces are ately beneath it and of a thickness approximately the same
averaged over several readings taken in different direc- as the maximum recast. Figure 18.3-81 shows typical mi-
tions. Roughness increases with increase in process energy crohardness traverses with the much harder recast and the
level vh;,;h is directly proportional to the material removal usually softened zone below.
rate, as shown in figure 18.3-77.
18-98
Surface Integrity 18.3
Since most of the thermal machining data has been gener- 11. Microholes (those less than one millimeter in diameter)
ated using EDM, the temptation to extend these data to produced by thermal processes may not be detrimental
other thermal processes should be resisted The signifi- to fatigue endurance strength A check by facture me-
cantly different energy rates of laser, for ex,,nple, produce chanics of the critical hole size for a specific material is
significantly different effects, as demonstrated in figure desirable.
18.3-4. The charts and guidelines that follow have base-
lines the same as those for the mechanical material re- 12. Ou; thin components, high current densities may over-
moval processes. Figure, 18.3-76 to 15.3-92 illustrate heat the workpiece.
good or poor surface effects from thermal material removal
processes. Microhardness example- are shown in figures 13. Thorough cleaning to remove lielectric fluids, beads
18.3-81, 18 3-82, 18 3-84, 18.3-86, 18 3-87, and 18.3-89 and vapor residue is desirable.
and typical residual stress patterns in figures 18.3-88 and
18.3-89. A summary of high cycle fatigue strengths from 14. The microcracks per inch of cross section can be a
EDM is contained in figure 18.3-94 and table 18 3-22 valuable clue to the relative thermal sensitivity of ma-
Table 18 3-21 is a summary of the surface integrity effects terials. table 18.3-23.
observed during the examination of several thousand
pieces of data. Other thermal material removal illustra- Special Comments Concerning Surface Integrity
tions are figures 18.3-3, 18 3-4, 18.3-11, and 18.3-15. Practices for Thermal Machining Processes
Whenever EDM is used in the manufacture of highly
stressed structural parts, the heat affected layer which
Thermal Process Guidelines that Promote Good is produced should be removed or given a remedial
Surface Integrity Results post treatment. The altered surface layer(s) which is pro-
duced during EDM lowers fatigue strength of alloys signifi-
1. The surface texture is composed of a random array of cantly. The altered layer consists of a recast layer with or
overlapping craters or cusps, sometimes with macro- without microcracks. some of which may extend into the
cracks at the roughing level of processing, as shown in base metal, plus metallurgical alterations such as rehard
figures 18.3-3 and 18.3-76. ened and tempered layers. heat-affected zones, intel-
granular precipitates, etc. Concern over the lowered fa-
2. Surface roughness standards should be reassessed tigue strength is in reference to highly stressed structures.
when using these processes because they produce un- For many tool and die applications, the altered layer has
usual surface textures with no lay patterns and require not caused problems. and the. e have been reports of im-
different methods of checking. proved die life in speial applications. Generally. during 0
4. Careful monitoring of the preselected operating param- The detrimental high cycle fatigue effects of the surface al-
eters is necessary. Some older types of equipment do terations caused by EDM are shown in comparison with
not maintain their initial settings throughout a long low stress grinding in table 18.3-22 and figure 18.3-94.
day or run.
Post treatment to restore fatigue strength is recom-
5. The depth of thf heat-affected zone (HAZ) or recast mended to follow EDM of critical or highly stressed
structure on the surface is aporoximately proportional surfaces. Since all alloys examined to date show a signifi-
to the magnitude of the energy impinging on that sur- cant decline in fatigue strength when their surfaces are pro-
face It is always present to some degree. duced by EDM, it is necessary to apply a modifying post-
EDM process in order to restore the surface integrity.
6. The HAZ can induce hardness variations and a sub- There are seve-al effective processes to accomplish resto-
stantial tensile residual stress in the surface layers. ration or even enhancement. It is recommended that a spe-
cial surface integrity evaluation be made for critically
7. The depth of the H AZ below the recast layers is ap- loaded surfaces. The evaluation should be made on test
proximately equal to the depth of the maximum recast. workpieces or coupons to which the full sequence of oper-
The recast layer in EDM can be controlled precisely ations generating the "as-shipped" surface has been ap-
and is usually only a few ten-thousandths inch thick. plied. Among the frequently used post-treatment processes
are the following:
8. Fati,ue strength is frequently severely reduced by the
HA-,(s). 9 removal of layers by low stress grinding
9. Highly stressed or critical surfaces should have the * removal of layers by chemical imachining
HAZ produced by thermal material removal processes
removed or modified by a post-processing treatment. 0 addition of a metallurgical type coating
The degree of microcracking can be a valuable comparison only in the recast layer. It is wrong to assume that the
technique to assess the relative thermal sensitivity of sharp metallurgical structural change at the interface be-
alloys, tween the recast and the base metal will act as a barrier for
the propagation of microcracks. The single metallographic
Laser beam machining (LBM) develops surfaces show- section is too small a sample to assure that no microcrack
ing the effects of melting and vaporization. Applica- extends deeper than the recast, and no data are available
tions for LBM are not yet common. Recently, however, on such microcrack propagation characteristics.
LBM with oxygen assi.t has been investigated for cutting
instead of shearing various alloys including titanium. Also, Very minor fatigue strength differences exist between
LBM has been used for the production of small holes. finishing and roughing EDM. Finishing and roughing
Wherever LBM is used in manufacturing highly stressed EDM are characterized by a wide difference in surface
structural members, it should be remembered that in the roughness levels (50 to 200 microinches Ra 11.25 to 5.0 Am
application of this method the surface is subjected to melt- RaJ) and wide differences in recast layer thicknesses
ing and vaporization. Indications are that such surfaces (0.0002 to 0.005 inch 10.005 to 0.127 i..ml). High cycle fa-
should be removed or modified. It becomes difficult, how- tigue strength, however, is nearly the same for finishing as
ever, to apply secondary processing to parts containing for roughing EDM, as shown in figures 18.3-93 and
very small diameter holes or narrow slots. As a first step, it 18.3-94. The roughness values are not as significant as it
is suggested that critical parts made by electron beam ma- has classically been assumed to be. Not only the recast
chining and laser beam machining be tested to see if sur- layer but also the underlying heat affected zone can be det-
face alterations lower the critical mechanical properties. rimental. For critically loaded surfaces, it is desirable to re-
move the HAZ or to modify the surface preparation or to
The concern for EDM recast should be confined only to conduct extensive testing to Assess the reliability of the sur-
critically loaded surfaces. Too frequently the reaction to face generated for particular applications.
18-100
Surface Integrity 18.3
-7-- -T-
0 050 in 0 010 in
0.005 in 0.002 in
1000
500
Ca
50
25..
0.005 0.01 0.02 0 05 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.0
[16.4 cm3/hrJ
Material removal rate, in'/hr
Figure 18.3-77 Approximate relation of surface roughness to material rei oval rate for electrical dis-
charge machining. (G. Bellows and J. B Kohls2o)
18-101
18.3 Surface integrity
Figure 18.3-78 Recast surface with types of alterations and their descriptors (Hastelloy Alloy X at
300X). (G.Bellows and J B Kohls2O)
50
Cu
0.0
cc
a)
005010.02 0 0 %. . . .
:5;~8- 1--21a
0.2_ - --
Surface Integrity 18.3
c Recast StructureAbsv
I 5)C 40
0.001 in
Finishing conditions -a thin discon-
tinuous recast ayer 00~1to002inch Roughing conditions.-.a band of cracked recast
metat
and underlying layers of untempered and
deep was produced on the surface overtem-
pered martensite were formed The total heat-affected
10DOX depth was approximatu.y 0 005 inch
1000X
70 -Recast structure
o--Untempered martensite
SC
0 I
C
Overtempered martensite
'2 50
Finishing
40 / Roughing
0 0010 0020 03
Depth beneath surface, in
Figure 18.3-82 Surface characteristics of type
D2 tool steel (quenched and tempered, 61
duced by EDM. Ac) pro-
18-i103
18.3 Surface Integrity
x
Figure 18.3-83 Surface characteristics of tung-
sten carbide (883) produced by EDM. (Surface In-
tegrity Encyclopedia')
0001 in
so
40
0 001C 0020 0030
Depth beneath surface. in
Figure 18.3-84 Surface characteristics of 4340 steel (quenched and tempered, 50 Rc) produced by
electrical discharge machining.
11
18-104 i
Surface Integrity 18.3
0 002 in _
150 000, in
Figure 18.3-85 Typical surface characteristics of rolled Hastelloy Alloy X from "normal" EDM. (Sur-
face Integrity Encyclopedia')
W ffected
a n
40
Figure 18.3-86 Surface characteristics of Waspaloy (aged, 40 Rc) produced by EDM. (W. P. Koster
8
et a1)
18-105
18.3 Surface !ntegrity
_ __ _ 140 1
0 00 n 2 FINISHING ROUGHING
~7 O~in12 ~ Frequency. kc 260 16
~ ~ ~Amperes 1 4-5
-4'~ Capacitance. mifd 0 2
If100 jVoltage 70 80
A oil- 1
.4fU)
00 i
40--
Q 20
MC
I ~j~ Figure 18.3-88 Residual surface stress profiles in
AF 95 (Rene 95) (solution tree 4ed and aged, 50 RC)
uiFinishing produced by EDM. See also f-gure 18.3-93. (W. P.
- - -Koster and J. B. Kohls' 8)
4 -
.Rouhing
0.5 1 2 51 0 20
Depth beneath surface, thousandths inch
18-106
Surface integrity 18.3
~- 001in -F 4~
~-0001 in
_V
T
0 .00045 h07
18.3 Surface Integrity
- 4 .
-. 3
,k..
0.016 in
18-108
Surface Integrity 18.3
140 -- FATIGUE SURFACE
- - -CONDITION STRENGTH ROUGHNESS
80 Gentle grind 75 13
ca
<~ 60
40 Fiih80 0s
I -t Rough EDM 35 200+
105 108
Cycles to failure
Figure 18.3-93 High cycle fatigue characteristics of AF 95 (Rerne 95) (solution treated and aged, 50
Rc) produced by EDM. Mode: cantilever bending, zero mean stress, temperature 75 0F. See also figure
18.3-88. Note that finish EDM has about the same reduction in fatigue strength as rough EDM as com-
pared to gentle low stress grinding. Note also the recovery and enhancement of fatigue strength With a
post-EDM shot peen treatment. (W. P. Koster and J. B. Kohisl")
MATERIAL i F ] Ii
410 stainless steel. 0 &T. 32 Rc 1__40 62
Ti-5AI-2.S Sn 21I
Ti-6A1-4V, STA. 32-34 Rc 24V4
FRgure 18.3-94 Summary of high cycle fatigue strength from electrical discharge machining.
18-109
18.3 Surface Integrity
TABLE 18.3-21 Surface Integrity Effects Observed In Thermal Material Removal Processes
S FINISHING, ROUGHING,
18-110
Surface Integrity 18.3
Specific Guidelines and Data for CHEMICAL 4. Surface roughness variations during processing can be
Material Removal Processes a good indicator of changes in the processing condi-
The chemical family of material removal processes is char- tions. or a change in the metallurgical state of the
acterized by an absence of stress introduced into the work- work material.
piece as a result of the process. The gentle chemical action
of dissolution. molecule-by-molecule or grain-face by grain- 5. Careful rinsing of the solutions from the finished work-
face, is typically smooth: however, very smooth surfaces piece is essential.
(32 microinches Ra or less [0.8 pn R. or lessil are slightly
roughened, while rough surfaces (125 microinches R, or 6. The control of the metallurgical and heat treat state of
more 13.2 pn R. or morel) are usually smoothed. The uni- the work material is as essential as the control of the
formity and fineness of the grain structure in the original process parameters.
workpiece is a principal factor in the final roughness. A 7 Selective etching, intergranular attack and pitting can
slight softening of the surface sometimes attributed to the rslt f rooffistana tsch as hig et-
Rebinder effect* is frequently. but not always. found, as result from off-standard conditions such as high et-
demonstrated in figure 18.3-100. Surface discontinuities, chant temperatures, incomplete stirring. depleted or
such as a weld joint, frequently result in different surface unbalanced solutions or contaminated solutions, and
texture and cutting rates. variations in the metallurgical state of the work
material.
Achieving good surface integrity from the chemical mate-
rial removal processes begins with a careful matching of 8. Weld areas tsually show a different rate of cutting than
the reagents to the metallurgical state and composition of the base material and an increase in surface rough-
the work material. Proper process control, particularly the hess.
chemical bath freshness. -isessential. 9. Steel, titanium and nickel base alloys which are sus-
Selective etching, pitting or IGA can occur with improper ceptible to hydrogen embrittlement should have a post
reagents or overly contaminated or stagnant chemicals. heat treatment of a few hours at a temperature of
Hydrogen absorption and possible embrittlement can occur about 3750 to 4009F 1191 0 to 204'C). Treatment should
with some alloys of steel. titanium or nickel. Post-process- be applied immediately after chemical processing.
ing bakes are recommended for this condition. 10. Room-temperature, high cycle fatigue strength gener-
Static mechanical properties have not been found to be ef- ally is lower when compared to conventionally pre-
fected by chemica; machining (CHM). The absence of ben- pared, low-stress-ground specimens. This is probably
eficial compressive residual stress from chemical machin- caused by the absence of residual surface stresses.
ing has the effect of reducing the high cycle fatigue strength
when com pared to conventionally prepared test specimens. 11. The use of post treatments to add a compressively
stressed surface layer may be desirable for enhancing a
The charts and guidelines that follow have baselines the component's fatigue strength.
same as those for the mechanical material removal proc-
esses. Figures 18.3-12 and 18.3-95 through 18.3-100 ills- 12. A test coupon for metallurgical evaluation should be
trate some of the good and poor surface effects from chem- made at least at 90- to 180-day inte als, or whenever
ical material removal processes. A summary of the high
cycle fatigue strengths from chemical machining and elec-
tropolishing (ELP) is shown in figure 18.3-101. Table 13. For quality assurance, a deviation of one operating pa-
18.3-24 is a summary of the surface integrity effects oh- rameter by more than 10 percent from the preplanned
served during the examination of several hundred pieces of value should be cause for alarm and checking. If more
data. than one parameter has deviated by more than 10 per-
cent, the operation should be shut down until correc-
Chemical Process Guidelines that Promote Good tions have returned the process to a controlled state.
Surface Integrity Results
1. Chemical machining does not induce any significant
stress in the machined surfaces. Special Comments Concerning Surface Integrity
Practices for Chemical Machinig Processes
2. Surface roughness standards should be reassessed
when applying CHM because CHM produces surfaces Special cognizance should be taken of the surface soft-
with unusual textures and no lay pattern. ening that occurs in CHM and ECM of aerospace mate-
rials. Microhardness studies on aerospace alloys have
3. The chemical reagents must be matched to the ex- shown that chemical machining and electrochemical ma-
pected metallurgical state of Ohe work material. chining8 produce a soft layer in a majority of the aerospace
alloys. Hardness reductions for chemical machining and
electrochemical machining range from 3 to 6 Rockwell C
points to a depth of 0.001 inch 10.025 ram for hemical
machining and 0.002 inch 10.050 mini for elec-ochemical
machining. Shot peening or other suitable post processing
The Rebinder effect is the modest softeniag of su:Uce z of an objec should be used on such surfaces to enhance mechanical
upon applicauon of secteid chemical sO'uio-.s that vy with ti material properties. This surface soft.ning is sometimes labeled the
of the object.' Rebinder effect.
18-111 i
18.3 Surface Integrity
Surface integrity evaluations should be made when for example, is very sensitive to the heat treat state of the
chemical (CHM) and electrochemical (ECM) processes material. Material removal is -t the rate of 0.0005 inch per
are used for finishing critical parts. The fatigue strength minute 10.0127 mm/minI, and :he surface roughens slightly
of surfaces produced by controlled chemical and electro- when in the full solution-treated state. When aged, how-
chemical processes has often been found to be low,-r than ever. massive IGA appears. Figure 18.3-99 illustrates the
that produced by some of the more commonly ':sed mate- differences. These differences occur with ider.*ical process-
ria! removal processes. This is generally attributed to the ing parameters. The material quenching rate is the princi-
unworked, stress-free surface produced by processes such pal variable. The best chemical machining of Rene 4 oc-
as electrochemical machining (ECM). electropolishing curs when the material is in a fine-grained structure with
(ELP), and chemical machining (CHA.). There is evidence the best uniformity. The quick quench in hot rolling, plus
that processes such as milling and polishing may some- the well-worked structure of thin (under 0.100 inch 12.54
times provide beneficial fatigue resistance as a result of mml) zheet stock yields the best material condition for
cold working or compressive residual stresses; therefore chemical machining. Increased thickness and slower
when substituting CHM for other machining processes, it quench rates tend to produce increased roughness and
may be necessary to add post-processing operations such slower material removal rates. The aged condition usually
as steel shot or glass bead peening or mechanical polishing, produces a surface that is rough (150 to 400 microinches
Some companies require neening of all chemically or elec- Ra 13.75 to 10 /n Ral) and filled with IGA. In the worst
trochemically machined surfac-s of highly stressed struc- case, a film forms on the surface exposed to the chemicals,
tural parts. inhibiting the action. This film must be mechanically re-
moved before chemical machining can be continue4
Heat treat state is a principal factor in good chemical
machining results. The chemical machining of Rene 41,
--
18-112
Surface Integrity 18.3
20 X 100 X 200 X
0001 in
1000 X 2000 X
Fiy,.re 18.3-96 Surface texture of chemically machined Rene 41. SEM photos at 20, 100, 200, 1000,
and 2000X taken at 840 to surface. Surface roughness 500 microinches R, from off-standard condi-
22
tions. (G. Bellows )
0001 in
Gentlc conditions. No visible surface effects Abusive conditions Slight surface roughening plus indicated
othr than shallow hardness loss. hardness loss less than 0 002-inch deep.
Surface roughness 35 min Ra Surface roughness 120,uin R a
., wG entle
35I.,- --. Abusive
30f
25 j i
0 0004 0008 0012 0020
Depth beneath surface, in
Figure 18.3-97 Surface characteristics of 4340 steel (annealed, 31-36 Rc) produced by CHM.
18-113
18.3 Surface integrity
40 Gnl
S35
30 LL1.LL
Abusive
Figure 18.3-98 Surface characteristics of 17-4 PH stainless steel produced by OHM. (W. P Koster
et a18)
(A) (B)
Typical surface roughness 50 to 60 Pin Ra. Off-standard surface roughness, 100 to130)jinlRa. Note, both inter-
granular attack and selective etch.
Figure 18.3-99 Comparison of surfaces of Rene 41 (45 Rc) when chemically machined in (A) solution
23
treated state and (B)solution treated and aged state. (G.Bellows )
18-114
SR
Surface Integrity 18.3
50- ____ _ _ __ _ _
45 -
C)
C1
30 7 1 1.5 2 4816
Figure 18.3-100 Rebinder (softening) effect on chemically machined Rene 41 (solution treated and
aged), surface roughness 190 to 290 microinches R,.(G.Bellows2 3 )
MATERIAL
CHM
AZ9lC mnagnesium alloy 1r 15 r3 Range observed to date
X2020 aiununurr 31;32/2
L71 li~inu-coperally 1 23Reference baseline or "handbook" values
L7 lmu-opraly1 V 23by love stress grinding or milling
DTO 687 aluminum-zinc alloy 12 14 1-~
70754T7351 aluminum alloy. 77 Ra 18 V 4
Al 1 AT titanium alloy (T.-5AI-2 5 Sni,59 6
Ti-6A1-4 V-bela rolled 31-33 Ac 45 51 62
To-6A!-4V, annealed 32-34 Re 4212 54
S97 steel 14 V7
.RS130, 1%CrMo ferrous alloy ---- T--- 3-t :4
RS140 3% crMoV ferrous ailoy 57 4 )Z 6 170
H50. 5%crMov ferrous alloy X/4 172
17-4 PH. STA, 43 Ac 60 98
Rene 41. STA. 40 Ac 33 36 52
ELF
305 stainless steel. hot rolled 25M 22733
AISI 4340. 0 & T. 50 RIc 90 102
Inconel 718 alloy, STA. 44 RC 142 eo I
F1
Inconel 718 alloy, ST. 98 Re. age after
machiningI
28
....1.....J-1.... 7
-t-
0 20 40 80 80 100
Figure 18.3-101 Summary of high cycle fatigue strength from chemical machining (CH-M) and electro-
polishing (ELP). (G.Bellows 23)
18-115
18.3 Surface Integrity
TABLE 18.3-24 Surface Integrity Effects Observed in Chemical Material Removal Processes
FINISHING, ROUGHING,
PROPERTY "GENTLE" OR "OFF-STANDARC"
AND LOW STRESS OR ABUSIVE
TYPE OF EFFECT CONDITIONS CONDITIONS
18-116
Surface Integrity 18.3
Veiy gentle. low energy intensity conventional turning. 5. Peening with steel shot or sand or glass beads can be
milling or reaming can be quite effective as finishing oper- useful to add substantial beneficial ccmpressive resid-
ations: however, on stress-critical areas these processes ual stress. improve surface cleanliness and enhance fa-
should be carefully evaluated as previously detailed. Proc- tigue strength
ess and/or quality control must be rigorous and continuous
with much insistence on the use of sharp tools Chemical 6. Mechanically gentle processing can be effective with
and electrochemical processes with their absences of resid- specific evaluation of each situation
ual stress need special evaluation if it is desirable to add re-
sidual stress or cold working. 7. The benefits of shot peening can be nullified or se-
verely decreased by exposure to high local stresses or
Figure 18.3-102 shows the shot peened surface of 18% temperatures or by vibration which allows the surface
-.ckel maraging steel Grade 250. Figure 18.3-103 illus- stress to relax by plastic deformation either from creep
trtes the surface section of olution treated and aged or yielding during "post-peen" processing or during
'nconel Alloy 718 after shot peening, with off-standard operation.
ECM as the primary material removal method. Figure
18.3-103 depicts two levels of peening: level 1, using Si 10 8. The possibility that peening. burnishing, lapping and
shot of 50 to 55 Rc hardness with 300 percent coverage to similar processes can cover up. but not overcome, the
Almen strip intensity of 0.006 to 0.008 A: and level 2. existing microcracks should be assessed.
which was the same peening as level 1 except coverage
was 125 percent 9. Human variability means that hand finishing should be
avoided if possible or controlled rigorously.
Figure 18.3-104 charts the residual stress pattern induced
in solution treated and aged Inconel Alloy 718. The low- 10 It is possible to overpeen surfaces and create excessive
stress-ground specimens, 0.076 inch by 0.75 inch by 4 core stresses. microcracks, untempered martensite.
inches [approx. 2 mm by 20 mm by 100 mml, were shot laps or similar abuses.
peened with SI 10 steel shot to Almen intensity level 0.006
to 0.008 A. The residual stress profiles were prepared on 11. The junction between peened and unpeened surfaces
specimens after exposure to the indicated temperatures for should be "feathered" to avoid stress concentrations.
100 hours in a vacuum. The shot peening pattern is essen-
tially retained through 1300F 1704C1 for Inconel Alloy Special Comments Concerning Surface Integrity
718. This results in a 6 to 16 percent improvement in high Practices for Post-Treating Processes
cycle fatigue strength at 1000F 15380C. On such speci-
mens, an overpeened (that is. damaged) condition can oc- Cracks, heat-affected and other detrimental layers cre-
cur when a 0.012- to 0.014-A intensity level is used on thin ated during material removal processes should be re-
specim ns such as these. moved (or altered) from critically stressed areas of
component parts. Microstructural examination and mi-
Figure 18.3-105 summarizes the high cycle fatigue crohardness testing can frequently establish the depth of
strengths found for various materials subsequent to shot adversely altered layers and other defects. Certain critical
peening. These data are comparable to those illustrated for situations may require mechanical testing to be certain that
the material removal processes. Most of the tests were run no alterations have been produced which cannot be de-
on specimens peened to 0.006 to 0.008 A2 or 0.004 to tected by microexamination. Removal of these defective
0.006 A2 ,on the Almen strip scale with 125 to 300 percent layers by gentle processes should be accomrt hed. Some
coverage. post-treatment processes can satisfactorily alter these lay-
ers or even enhance the fatigue strength results.
Figure 18.3-106 summarizes the high cycle fatigue
strength found with several types of post-processing treat- Steel shot and glass bead peening as well as burn-
ment
Iconl Aloy 18.ishing
ononeallo. can be used to improve surface integrity. A con-
Post-Treatment Guidelines that Promote Good Surface siderable number of studies have confirmed that the fatigue
Integrity Results life determined in laboratory tests and verified by field per-
Interit Resltsformance is measurably enhanced by peening. 8 Laboratory
1. Careful washing should be employed to remove all tests have shown that shot peening is effective in sub-
traces of fluids used during machining that could con- stantially increasing high cycle and low cycle fatigue
tribute to stress corrosion. strength at both room and elevated temperatures for typi-
cal titanium alloys, high temperature alloys, and high
2. Low temperature heat treatment will remove any hy- strength steels, regardless of the type of prior material re-
drogen picked up during processing. moval processing. For example. electrical discharge ma-
chining and abusive grinding are two processes which are
3 Heat treatments following material removal are of lim- among the most detrimental to these alloy groups. But
ited usefulress. when added as a post-processing treatment, shot peening
has been shown capable of fully restoring the room and ele-
4. Abrasive tumbling can be effective for improving sur- vated temperature low cycle and high cycle fatigue
face texture and for adding a modest compressive re- strengths for these alloy groups. Since the above comments
sidual stress to aid fatigue strength. are based upon laboratory tests of specimens. component
evaluations are recommended. Peening. which puts the
surface layer into compression and cold works the surface,
18-117
; ._ .o
-- --- J-.-='. -- - - - -_ ~~
18.3 Surface Integrity
must be performed under controlled conditions Specifica- shot peening Low temperature heat treatments are helpful
tions for controlled peening should include consideration of in eliminating embrittlement for operations where hydro-
factors such as the cleanliness and surface roughness of the geii may be picked up during processing. such as in plating.
part being machined: the type. the chemistry. the geometry Elimination of hydrogen is time- and temperature-depend-
and the hardness of the shot and its fluid carrier: and peen- ent and also depends upon the alloy being treated. Steels.
ing time, intensity and coverage. Reports also indicate that for example. are often treated at about 3750 to 400F 11910
peening improves resistance to corrosion and reduction in to 204'CI ror periods of 8 hours or more.
stress corrosion susceptibility. There are indications that
cold working ot drilled holes by burnishing is also benefi- Abrasive tumbling is an effective process for improv-
cial as is roller burnishing. Some reports contain pre- ing surface properties including fatigue. This process is
cautions against overpeening in order to avoid fatigue dam- less applicable than shot peening for many of the very large
age and to reduce the possibility of masking flaws such as parts required for aerospace applications Both abrasive
fine cracks. tumbling and shot peening usually require an added polish-
ing operation when very high finish requirements must be
Evaluate the use of controlled shot peening practices satisfied. Care must be taken not to remove the thin favor-
to restore fatigue life of components processed by elec- able surface layer established by peening or tumbling.
trical, chemical, and thermal removal processes. Shot Abrasive tumbling can be used to reverse unfavorable ten-
peening has been shown to be extremely effective in im- sile stresses by inducing a compression stressed surface
proving the fatigue life of specimens processed by electro- layer.
chemical machining (ECM). electrical discharge machining
(EDM). and electropolishing (ELP).9 Component tests are
recommended to confirm the favorable trends shown in Washing procedures should be employed for critical
tests on laboratory specimens. Examples of shot peening parts and assemblies to remove all traces of cutting
improvement in the fatigue strength of specimens are fluids which may cause corrosion. Typical suspect com-
shown in table 18 3-25. pounds are sulfur compounds on aluminum and nickel base
alloys and chlorine compounds on titanium alloys-" Cur-
Post heat treatments following material removal are of rently, some companies do not allow any chlorine-contain-
limited usefulness. Stress relief treatments, used to soften ing cutting fluids to be used in processing titanium parts
hardened layers produced during grinding of steels, do not which are to be used at room or elevated temperatures.
restore the hardness of overtempered layers which are pre- Other companies use this precaution only for parts which
sent immediately below the damaged surface layers. Also, are subjected to temperatures over 500F 1260T]C. For ap-
0
heat treatment does not heal any cracks produced during plications at less than 500'F 1260 C, carefully controlled
material removal. Some companies have advised the use of washing procedures are often used to remove the chlori-
tempering operations to relieve stresses after electrical dis- nated and sulfurized cutting oils. These fluids are partic-
charge machining (EDM) of steels. Stresses may be re- ularly effective for chip removal operations such as drilling.
lieved but fatigue properties are not improved sufficiently. tapping and broaching. Since complete agreement does not
Evidence has also been presented to show that annealing exist among manufacturers regarding cutting fluid prac-
treatments following EDM on nickel base alloys, such as tices. subcontractors are obliged to follow the policies and
Rene 41. Inconel Alloy 625. Inconel Alloy 718 and Monel procedures established by the prime contractor.
Alloy K-500. seriously lower tensile strength and ductility
as a result of carbon diffusion) 0 Experience has shown that Protection of parts. Parts should not be stored for ex-
heat treatments in some cases have improved surface integ- tended periods without being carefully washed and then
rity of damaged surfaces but not nearly as effectively as covered with a coating of oil for corrosion prevention.
18-118
Surface Integrity 18.3
UO
0
Figure 18.3-102 Typical surface characteristics of shot-peened Grade 250 Maraging steel. Surface
machined with ECM, then 300% coverage shot peened with S110 shot of 45 to 50 Rc hardness to Almen
level 0.004 to 0.006 A2. View by SEM at 450 at increasing magnifications of 20, 200 and 2000X. Note im-
pression bf single shot in highest magnification view. Surface roughness of 38 microinches R,. (Surface
Integrity Encyclopedia')
0.001 in
125% peen- surface roughness - 119 juin Ra 300% peen: surface roughness - 9C gin Ra
tr 5-
45 ---- ECM - 125% peen
ECMA + 300%, peen
8 40
-
Figure 18.3-103 Surface characteristics of Inconel Alloy 718 (solution treated and aged, 44 Rc) pro-
duced by ECM plus shot peening. Note roughness similar to ECM but with additional tears and cracks,
perhaps from peening. Subsurface strain lines from peening also visible. (A. P. Kosler et ale)
18-119
- ____ ~
18.3 Surface Integrity
40
d oj:- 4Ce
0
13000 F
-201
(02 00 0 Ff
-40
0)
10000
OL -60__ _
E
0
-8 11000F
No exposure
-1001 %&
-120 - - -- I
Figure 18.3-104 Residual stress patterns in Inconel Alloy 718 (solution treated and aged) produced by
low stress grinding plus peening (0.006- to 0.008-A
24
intensity) after 100-hour exposure to various ele-
vated temperatures. (G.Bellows and R.M.Niem1 )
18-120J
Surface Integrity 18.3
MATERIAL AND BASIC PROCESS
SI I I 1 1 610 75
17-4 PH. STA, 29 Rc CTR A J'j83
Figure 18.3-105 Summary of high cycle fatigue strength of materials shot peened subsequent to basic
matertal removal process.
18-121
_7a
18.3 Surface integrity
Figure 18.3-106 Summary of high cycle fatigue strength of Inconel Alloy 718 (solution treated and
aged) with several types of post-processing treatments. Baseline reference, or "handbook" value, from
low stress grinding (LSG).
KIsi ksii
AF 95 4STA.SR
15 105
ECM 5710
EDM 4 1
Low stress or Gentle grindiri_ 115-
Ti-6AI-6V-?Sn (STA, 42 R, f
ECM
Low stress or Gentle guinding 5
K
*Ro~ohtemperature. 10'cycles furorerz* bending.
18-122
Surface Integrity 18.3
SURFACE INTEGRITY BY MATERIALS- selection. Tables 18.3-7. 18.3-8, and 18.3-26 to 18.3-30
HIGH CYCLE FATIGUE RESULTS provide such data for a number of alloys. Caution and re-
straint should be exercised before transferring these data
It is helpful in selecting the processes to be used in fabri- to similar alloys. It has been found that each intensity level
cating a component part to compare the relative fatigue of a process will have a unique surface integrity response
stiengths from a variety of processes. Value engineering for each metallurgical state of the work material. The data
can be strengthened by use of surface integrity data to as- presented are the room temperature high cycle fatigue
sure a more complete and disciplined approach to process strength at 10- cycles taken from full-reverse bending tests.
Milling: _-_
Chemical NTM:
Electropolishing (ELP) 1-0 15
ELP plus shot peen 96 45
18-123
18.3 Surface Integrity
TABLE 18.3-27 Comparative Fatigue Strengths and' Surface Roughnesses of
Ti-6A1-4V from Several Processes
MATERIAL CONDITION IFATIGUE STRENGTH*I SURFACE ROUGHNESS
AND PROCESS _
ksi rn R.
pi-~
BETA ROLLED 32 R,
Grinding: _ i
Low stress surface grinding 62 _i__27__ 35 0.90_;;
Conventional surface grinding 12 83 I 45 R -
Abusive surface grinding j 13 906516
Gentle hand sanding j 57 -338 0
Abusive hand sanding 1 027 1 802.
Milling: I
End milling-sharp cutter 64 41 67 170~
End milling-dull cutter 77 __5184 j2.10
Peripheral milling-sharp cutter 70 4830.17
Peripheral milling-dull cutter 32 21 J 50 -3
Chemical NTM:
Standard OHM 51 352 20 D0750
Off-standard OHM 45 20165 -- 4.20
ANNEALED 32-34 Rc
Grinding:_____
Low stress surface grinding 54 73k24 06
Conventional surface grinding 12 8___ 30
Abusive surface grinding 14 197M 48 2_____
Turning:.-____
Gentle turning 66 22 M __
18-124
Surface Integrity 18.3
ksi gi-R
Grinding:
Low stress surface grinding (LSG) I68 4939 OV
Conventional sujrface grinding I17 117V 41 --
Abusive surface grinding 1 10 69
132
Hand grinding
LSC-plus age
Conventional surface grinding pu
50
21120
345 V
shot peen 6
Hand grinding plus stress relief j44 30
Hand grinding plus shot peen 74 f--i--
Milling:
Gentle milling-peripheral cut
Rough milling-peripheral cut {47 82
0324f
6536
j 77 1
Electrica! NTM:
Standard ECM1403-2
Off-standard ECM 25 -1225-50 SO-2O
STEM 35~
Standard ECM rplus st-=c peen '55 ___
18-125
M-
Grinding:
Low stress surface grinding (LSG) 60 414 15
Conventional surface grinding 24 1 26 05
Abusive surface grinding 22 70
Hand grinding 40 iis 64
LSG plus resolution and age 58 io 15
LSG plus superfinish and age 49 _3M <5
LSG plus vacuum age 74 5I 17
LSG plus shot peen 65-70
LSG plus shot peen 70
Conventional surface qrinding
plus resolution i-id age 50 .___5 26
Conventional surface grinding
plus stress relief 58
Hand grinding plus stress teliet 40 12"75 32
Turning:
Gentle face turning 60 -4 25
Gentle face turning I60 5 4
Gentle face turning j 60 _-14 188
Abusive face urning 60 4 76
Conventional turning-Borazon' CBN
tool 858BW6 39
Conventional turning-Carbide 55 _7 65 !
Electrical NTM:
Standard ECM 39-40 43
Off-standard ECM 3940 74-500 a
STEM 39 125 KA,
Standard ECM plus vacuum age 42 19
Off-standard ECM plus vacuum age 69
5
Standard ECM plus glass bead peen 78 69
Standard ECM plus shot peen 65-78 74
Off-standard ECM plus shot peen 67-75 90- 119 2
Thermal NFM
Finish EDM 22 60
Rough EDM 22 170
Finish EDM plus vacuum age 29 65 ,
Rough EDM plus vacuum age 29 165 .
Rough EDM plus resolution and age 26-38 62 175 4.40.
Rough EDM plus stress relief 25 221
Finish EDM plus glass bead peen 66 43
Rough EDM plus shot peen 75 125
-h-n ical NTM-
r,.M 40 16
ELP 40-42 76-Z90 15
ELP plus shot peen78 43
ELP plus vacuun; age 28 15
18-126
C
- -- -~ ~ -7
i
Grinding. A
Low stress grinding (LSG) 42-13 2902w-= 16 0
Conventional grinding 18 124
Abusive grinding 16 .110
Low stress grinding-finishing _
plus age heat treat 33-40 M-_7W
Low stress grinding-finishing
plus full heat treat' 35 241
Low stress grinding-finishing
plus full heat treat and shot
peen' 53-57 i365
Conventional grinding-roughing
plus age heat treat 32-35 M-241
Conventional grinding-roughing
plus full
Conventional heat treat
grinding-roughing 52
33-36 4
plus full
peen' heat treat and shot 54 - 72= -
Ultra-high speed grinding plus
fl3v
Standard ECM conditions b"dn28
Off-standard ECM conditions 28 g o c 4
Finish ECG 30
Rough ECG 30 A
SFull heat treatment Includes aging plu,,. equivalent of brazing and coating cycles
QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR SURFACE It is advisable to become acquainted with the possible
INTEGRITY types of surface alterations which result from the com-
bination of a metal removal process with a specific mate
Quaiity control practices should be reviewed and amplified rial. Information of this type is provided in tables !8 3-2
in order to satisfy high surface quality requirements. No in- and 18.3-32. Nondestructive testing is the most desiralie
strument exists that will measure surface integrity. Proper- approach to evaluating surface integrity effects. The princi-
ties which may require investigation -n order to establish pal iondestructive testing methods for evaluating surface
surface integrity include surface texture, surface metal- integrity and subsurface characteristics are listed ir.tables
lurgy, mechanical properties, surface chemistry and other 18.3-33 and 18.3-34. Destructive ,ecnniques are also
engineering properties. Table 18.3-31 is a summary of shown in table 18.3-34 for compariso,
standard and specialized techniques generally employed for
these measurements.
18-127
-- - -X O
18.3 Surface Integrity
TABLE 18.3-31 Techniques for Surface Integrity Measurement
I I
PROPERTY , STANDARD TECHNIQUES 1 SPECIALIZED TECHNIQUES
Surface Metallurgy
Microstructure Metallurgical sectioning-Opticai
I Transmission electron microscopy
microscopy
Mic;ohardness Microhardness testing-Knoop or Vickers
indenter
Microcracks and Crevice-like Metallurgical sectioning-Optical Scanning electron microscopy
defects microscopy Nondestructive-Eddy Current
Nondestructive-Macroetching Ultrasonic
Penetrant inspection I etc.
etc.
Fracture toughness
and stress
j Fracture toughness testing
18-128
- - - !
Surface Integrity 18.3
TABLE 18.3-32 Surface Hardness Changes That May Result from Various Metal Removal Processes
CONVENTIONAL PROCESSES NONTRADITIONAL PROCESSES
Milling, Drilling,
MATERIAL Turning, or Grinding j EDM ECM or CHM
Surface Hardness Surface I Hardness Surface Hardness
Alteration Change j Alteration Chance Alteration Change
18-129
18.3 Surface integrity
TABLE 18.3-33 Nondestructive Techniques for Detecting Surface Inhomogeneities In Metals
18-130
__ _ _
Surface Integrity 18.3
TABLE 18.3-34 Testing Techniques Used To Detect and Locate Surface Inhomogeneities in Metals
Macrocracks Visual inspection Ultrasonic pulse echo Acoustic impact Optical matallography
Binocular inspection I
Magnetic particle Automatic optical I
Penetrant scanning i
Eddy current
Acid macroetch I
Microcracks Binocular inspection Ultrasonic pulse echo. Radioactive gas penetrant Optical metallography
High sensitivity fluorescent surface waves and High frequency ultrasonic Scanning electron microscopy
penetrant lamb waves Acoustic impact Transmission electron
Magnetic oarticle i Surface electrical resistance microscopy
Tears, laps & pits Visual Nithparticle
Magni.tic etch , Automatic optical
scanning Radioactive gas penetrant Optical metallography
Scanning electron microscopy
Eddy current
Penetrant
Surface hardness
changes
Superficial hardness testing
Ultrasonic hardness testing
Eddy current
X-Ray diffraction
Beta backscatter IMtcrohardness
I
traverse
Gamma radiography
Neutron radiography
j.Ultrasonic
Beta backscatter
Radioactive gas penetrant
velocity
Radioactive gas penetrant
Optical metallography
Microharaness traverse
_.
Optical metallography
-
18-131
18.3 Surface Integrity
After exhausting the nondestructive testing methods. re- Specific Guidelines and Special Comments on
liance is then placed on destruct*ve testing of extra work- Quality Assurance for Surface Integrity
pieces or coupons by simulazing the process factors In
some situations. it is necessary to resort to detailed process 1. Detection of Untempered and Overtempered
parameter planning followea up by operator education and Martensite
periodic audits for compliance to the preplanned condi- Parts manufactured from martensitic high strength steel
tions Few quality assurance engineers are fully satisfied can be visually inspected after an acid etch for evidence of
with a process control approach: however, it can be effec- untempered or overtempered martensite (frequently found
tive-if production supervision exercises a relentless insist- from grinding and some forms of mechanical cutting,,. Typi-
ence ipon performaneeaccording to standards cally. untempered martensite appears white -nd over-
tempered areas appear darker than the background mate-
It is vital to surface integrity that as much attention be rial A specific etching technique for detecting grinding
placed on the quality of the material presented for process- damage in hardened steel is given in table 18.3-35
ing as is placed upon process parameter control. The met-
allurgical state will affect the final "as-shipped*"surface 2. Conventional Versus Nontraditional Processes
quality as much as the intensity level at which the process
is operated. Similarly the full sequence of operations The original surface integrity investigations concentrated
applied to a surfacc must be evaluated, and the evaluation heavily on grinding and the nontraditional material re-
must be made with the exact sequence used during moval processes like electrical discharge machining and
production. electrochemical machining. More recently. the older, con-
ventional. generally mechanical material removal proc-
The best quality assurance is the evaluation of surfaces of esses have beer, shown to have an equal range of surface in-
specific parts when exposed to the full environmental ef- tegrity effects It is vitally important that the application of
fects expected: namely, heat. chemicals. stress. vibration, surface integrity practices include an assessment of every
etc The minimum data set can provide a better evaluation, process that effects the final, as-shipped" surface.
but the extended data set is recommended for the most crit-
ically loaded or exposed surfaces. This controlled, system- 3. Suggested Experimental Programs
atic testing technique is recommended for safety critical Systematic metallurgical and mechanical testing programs
areas of component parts. for establishing and controlling surface integrity are essen-
TABLE 18.3-35 Etching Technique for Detecting Grinding Damage in Hardened Steel
OPERATION i SOLUTION USED DESCRIPTION, TIME, OR FUNCTION
Double Etch Method
(1) Etch No. 1
(2) Rinse
4 to 5%Nitric acid in water
Warm water
I
I Until black. 5 to 10 seconds.
Do not over etch.
I To remove acid
(3) R'nse Methanol (or acetone*) I To remove water
(4) Etch No. 2 5 to 10% Hydrochloric acid in I Until black smut is removed.
methanol (or acetone*) 5 to 10 seconds
(5) Rinse Running warm water i To remove acid
(6) Neutralize 2%Sodium carbonate + ITo neutralize any remaining acid
phenolpthalien indicator in
water
(7) Rinse Methanol To remove water
(8) Dry Warm air blast
(9) Oil dip Low viscocity mineral oil with rust Enhance contrast, prevent corrosion
inhibitor
18-132
Surface Integrity 18.3
tial for highly critical parts and have been detailed pre- and application of rust inhibitors, as outlined in table
viously. Functional testing of the final product of field test- 18 3-35
ing under actual service conditions is a desirable step for
the most critical applications c Magnetic particle inspection. penetrant inspection. ul-
trasonic testing. and eddy current techniques are recom-
4. Comparative Photomicrographs mended for detecting macrocracks. Most of the in-
Comparison of current results during production with sets spection techniques currently being used should be
of photomicrographs that display both the "standard" and fur ther refined by using more care in their application.
"off-standard" conditions to be expected are helpful. The Direct visual examination shoula be supplemented by
growing data accumulations in surface integrity encyclo- macroscopic examination at low and medium magnifi-
pedias also are useful. The Machinability Data Center has cations (5 to 20X). Some of these methods require low
the most extensive collection of this information. These levels of surface roughness on the surface being exam-
data also are useful in appraising or establishing quality mned in order to reduce background "noise- to the in-
control limits or process parameter limits strument.
- r - ~----
18.3 Surface Integrity
stress or severe working environment The balance of the 5. Field. M.: Mehl. C L "and Kahles. J F. 1906. Machin-
surfaces are lightly loaded and a relaxation of specifica- ing data for numericalcontrol. AFMDC 66-1 Cincin-
tiorts can be justifled without compromising the product nati. OH: Air Force Machinability Data Center
integrity
6 Field. M.: Meh!. C. L : and
Kahles.J. F 1968 Supple-
By eliminating "ail-over"-type specifications and concentra- ment to machining data for numerical control.AFMDC
ting on specific critical areas. substantial cost reductions 68-2. Cincinnati. OH: Air Force Machinability Data
have been made Indeed. some of the "all-over" specifica- Center.
tions have been found to be carry-over from previous gener-
ations of designers with little or no data to support the spe- 7 Glaeser. W. A. 1969- Surface effects in metal deforma-
cific required levels One set of gas turbine discs of Inconel tion Technical Paper MF69-1 01. American Society of
Alloy 718 had for years been specified to have a 63-micro- Tool and Manufacturing Engineers. Dearborn. MI
inch R_ l 6 umi roughness all over. When both high cycle
and low cycle fatigue tests showed that the particular alloy 8 Koster. W. P. et al. 1970. Surface integrity of ma-
was not sensitive to roughness level (see table 18.3-29 and chined structural components. U. S. Air Force Techni-
figure 18.3-48). the roughness level was changed to 125 cal Report AFML-TR-70-1 1. Metcut Research Asso-
microinches Ra 13.1 pml on all but one critical radii which ciates Inc.. Cincinnati. OH.
was changed to 32 microinches R. 10.8 ,ml. A 7 to 12 per-
cent reduction in machining time was effected on the six 9. Koster. W. P et al. 1972. Manufacturing methods for
discs while increasing the quality assurance. The savings surface integrity of machined structura_ components.
was several hundred thousand dollars per year at the then U. S. Air Force Technical Report AFML-TR-71-258.
current level of production. Metcut Research Associates Inc.. Cincinnati. OH
18-13,
Surface Integrity 18.3
abrasive machining processes. Annals of the CIRP -. 1972 Application of surface integrity to production of
23(1): 191-192. jet engines Metals Engineeringguarterly 12(4): 55-58.
20 Bellows. G. and Kohls. J B. 1976. Surface inte'-rity of _. 1972. Advanced material removal processes Techni-
nontraditicnal material removal processes. T, hnical cal Paper MRR72-02. Society of Manufacturing Engi-
Paper MRR76-12. Society of Manufacturing Engi- neers. Dearborn. MI.
neers. Dearborn. MI.
-. 1969. Surface integrity of electrochemical machining.
21- Bellows. G. 1970. Surface integrity of electrochemical Report R69AEG172. General Electric Company. Cincin-
machining. Technical Paper 70-GT-1 11. American nati. OH.
Society of Mechanical Engineers. New York. NY.
S. 1968. Impact of nonconventional material
removal
.2. Bellows. G. 1973 Surface integrity of nontraditional processes on the surface integrity of materials. Technica,
machining processes. Technical Paper IQ73-633. Paper MR68-518. American Society of Tool and Manufac-
Society of Manufacturing Engineers. Dearborn. MI. turing Engienering. Dearborn. MI.
23. Bellows. G. 1977. Chemical machining: Production _. 1968. Surface integrity guidelines. Report
with cheinistry. MDC 77-102. Cincinnati. OH: Ma- R68AEG192. General Electric Company. Cincinnati. OH.
chinability Data Center. Metcut Research Associates
Inc. Bellows. G. and Tishler. D. N. 1970. Manufacturing proc-
ess effects on surface integrity. Report TM70-976. General
24. Bellows. G. and Niemri. R. M. 1971. Surface integrity Electric Company. Cincinnati. OH.
of machined Inconel 718 alloy. Technical Paper IQ71-
239. Society of Manufacturing Engineers. Dearborn. - 1970. Surface integrity processing guidelines. Report
MI. TM 70-977. General Electric Company. Cincinnati. OH.
25. Bellows. G. --- I Tishler. D. N. 1970. Introduction to Christenson. A. L. 1961. The measurement of stress by
surface integrity. R:;port TM70-974. General Electric x-ray Information Report TR 182. Society of Automotive
Company. Cincinnati. OH. Eng.neers. New York. NY.
26. Gatto. L. R. and DiLullo. T. D. 1971. Metallographic Clorite. P. A. and Reed. E. C. 1958. Influence of various
techniques for determining surface alterations in ma- giindiz:g conditions upon resiauai stresses in titanium.
chining. Technical Paper IQ71-225. Society of Mianu- Transactionsof the ASME 80 Series B (1): 297-301. 4
facturing Engineers. Dearborn. Ml Cross. J. R. 1972. Electrochemical machin.'g. U. S. Air
21- Rooney. R. J. 1957. The effects of various machining Force Technical Report AFML-TR-72-188. Cross Techni-
processes on the reversed-bending fatigue strength of cal Sales. Cincinnati. OH.
A-11
cal OAT titanium
Report alloy sheet. U. S.
WADC-TR-57-310. Air Force
Wright Air Techni-
Devel- D7
Decneut. A. and Peters. J. 1973. Continuous measurement
opment Center. Wight-Patterson Air Force Base. OH. of residual stress in thin cylindrica; pieces using deflection-
etching techniques. In Proceedingsof the internationalcon-
28. &eiiz. .f 072. Surface integrity from electrical dis- ference on surface technolog'. pp. 262-281. Dearborn. MI:
charge machining Juer~l:,L' Report R72AEG236 Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
(not fully releas d at this time). General Electric Coin- Donachie. Jr.. M. J. and Sprague. R. A. 1968. Mechanical
pary. Cincinnati. OH. properties. residual stress and surfaces. Technical Paper
EM68-519. American Society of Tool and Manufacaturing
Engineers. Dearborn. MI. ___
18-135
18.3 Surface Integrity
Fleming. C. M. and Arzt. P. R. 1971. Integrity control pro- INiemi. R_ M. 1971. Surface integrity prediction- Technical
cedures for machining 300M steel and titanium aircraft Paper IQ71-226. Society of Manufaturing Engineers. Dear-
structures. Technical Paper IQ71 -238. Society of Manufac- born. MI.
turing Engineers. Dearborn. MI.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 1967
Gurklis. J. A. 1965. Metal removal by electrochemical Nondestructive testing: trends and techniques. NASA
methods and its effects on mechanical properties of metals SP-5082 Washington. DC.
DMIC Report 213. Defense Metals Information Center.
Columbus. OH Paxton. H. W. and Proctor. R. P M. 1968. The effects of
machining and grinding on the stress-corrosion cracking
Kalles. J. F.: Bellows G.: and Fied. M. 1969. Surface in- susceptibility of metals and alloys. Technical Paper EM68-
tegrity guidelines for machining. Technical Paper MR69- 520. American Society of Tool and Manufacturing Engi-
730. American Society of Tool and Manufacturing Engi- neers. Dearborn. MI.
neers. Dearborn. Mi.
Phillips. J. L_ 1967. Effect of machining on the service life
Kahles. J_ F and Field. M. 1973. Impact of surface integ- of high-strength low-alloy steels. In C,nference on machin-
rity on product manufacturing and performance. In Pro- ability pp. 93-101. ISI Special Report 94. London. Eng-
ceedings of the international conference on surface tech land: The Iron and Steel Institute.
nology. pp. 652-668. Dearborn. MI: Society of
Manufacturig Engineers. Prevey. P. S. and Koster. W. P. 1972. Effect of surface in-
tegrity on fatigue of structural alloys at elevated temper-
-. 1968. Surface integrity-A new requirement for sur- atures. Metcut Research Associates Inc.. Cincinnati. OH
faces generated by material removal methods. In Proper- (Presented at the University of Connecticut. June 18-22.
ties and metrology of surfaces. Proceedings 1967-1968. Vol. 1972).
182. Part 3K. pp. 31-45. London. England: The Institution
of Mechanical Engineers. Society of Manufacturing Engineers. 1973. Proceedings of
internationalconference on surface technology- Dearborn.
Koster. W. P. 1976. Surface integrity: An emerging crite- MI.
rion for quality assurance. Technical Paper IQ76-926.
Society of Manufacturing Engineers. Dearborn. MI. Schroeer. R. 1968. Research on exploratory development
of nondestructive methods for crack detection. U. S. Air
Koster. W. i.4zd Fj itz. L.j. 1970. Surface integrity in Force Technical Report AFML-TR-67-167 (Part 11). A-vin
conventional machining. Technical Paper 70-GT-100. Systems Inc... Dayton. OH.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers. New York.
NY. Slack. R. B. !967. Thc cffcr; of srvria variabies on fa-
tigue of a nickel-base alloy. Master of Science Dissertation.
Koster. W. P.: Fritz. L. J.: and Kohls. J. B. 1971. Surface Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Hartford Graduate Cen-
integrity in machining of 4340 steel and Ti-6AI-4V. Techni- ter. Troy. NY.
cal Paper IQ71-237. Society tf Manufacturing Engineers.
Dearborn. MI. Society of Automotive Engineers. 1971. Residual stress
measurement by x-ray diffraction. SAE J784a. New York.
Kroll. R.J.,: Westermann. F. E.: and Cuddeback. J.K. NY.
1970. Expansion of derivation of Stablein's equation for
calculating residual stress in a machined surface. Metcut Tarasov. L. P. 1946. Detection causes and prevention of
Research Associates Inc.. Cincinm.ti. OH. injury in ground surfaces. Transactions of American
Society for Metals 36: 389-439.
Littman. W. E. 1967. Control of residual stress in metal
surfaces. In International conference on manufacturing Tarasov. L. P.: Hyler. W. S.: and Letner. H. R. 1958. Ef-
technology. Proceed:n.gs. pp. 1303-1317 Dearborn. MI: fects of grinding direction and abrasive tumblingon the en-
American Society of Tool and Manufacturing Engineers. durance limit of hardened steel. American So, iety for Test-
ing Ma tcrials Proceedings58: 528-539.
-- 1967. The infl.jence of grinding on workpiece tech-
nology. Technical Paper MR67-593. American Society of Westermann. F. E. 1971. Determining the distortion and
Tool and Manufacturing Engineers. Dearborn. Mi. residual stresses produced by metal removal operations.
Technical Paper IQ71-224. Society of Manufacturing En-
Mattson. P L. 1956. Fatigue. residual stresses and surface gineers. Dearborn. MI.
cold working. In Internationalconference on fatigue of met-
als. Session 7. Paper 5. pp. 6-12. London. England: The Whitehouse. D.J. 1972. Modern methods of assessing the
Institution of Mechanical Engineers. quality and function of surface texture. Technical Paper
IQ72-206. Society of Manufacturing. Dearborn, MI.
McAdams. H. T. and Reese. P. A. 1970. Surface topogra-
phy and metal fatigue (Project STOP). CAL Report No. Wi!iiamson. 3. B. P. 1968. Physical aspects of a surface.
KB-2952-D-1. Final report. Cornell Aeronautical Labora- Technical Paper EM68-513. American Society of Tool and
tory. Inc.. Buffalo. NY. Manufacturing Engineers. Dearborn. MI.
18-136
SECTION 19
MACHINING GUIDELINES
19.3 Tool Life . ......................................... ............. ...... ....... ............... , ........................ ................. 4.9-11
19-1
I
1. 'Good machining practice requires a rigid setup in addi- 6 When dimensional accuracy and surface integrity are
tion to the selection of proper cutting speed. feed. tool not critical, high speed steel tools should be removed
material, tool geometry and cutting fluid. Rigidity in it- when the wearland on the flank of the tool reaches ap-
self does not ensure a successful machining operation: proximate;y 0.060 inch 11.5 mini width. In the Lase of
however, without it. tools are subject to p-emature carbide tools, the maximum width should not be al-
failure. lowed to exceed 0.030 inch t0 75 miml. ott'erv'- ,om-
plete tool failure may occur. On componer-.s wh-re d:-
2. The machine tool must be capable of providing the ri- mensional accuracy and surface integiity are critical.
gidity required for the machining conditions used. If the tool wear must be carefully limited, see section
the Size of the machne tool is not adequate or if loosen- 18.3.
ess exists in the moving parts. such as spindle bearings
or gibs. ciitter will occur and poor tool life will result. 7. Wearland measurement is not always oossible on the
When a rigIJ setup cannot be made. the feed and, or tool: however, it is practical to instruct the operator to
depth of cut must be reduced accordingly. change tools after a predetermined number of pieces
have been machined. The number of parts to be ma-
3. Excessive tool overhang is a source of trouble in a ma- chined per tool should be set conservatively so that the
chining operation. When this condition exists, poor cutter will not fail. Occasionally by this procedure. a
tool life and surface finish result. and dimensional ac- cutter may be removed before it is dull: therefore. the
curacy is difficult to maintain. Stub-length drills should resharpening time will be short. but catastrophic fad-
be used inscead of jobbers-It ngth drills where the depth ure will have been avoided.
of hole permits. Milling cutters should be mounted as
close to the spindle as the iob will allow. The length of 8. The cutting fluid system should provide a copious flow
end mills should be kepi at a m;nmum. Climb milling of cutting fluid to the area where the chip is being
usually gives better tool life and surface finish than formed- In the case of machining operations where cut-
does conventional milling if the machine tool and setup ting fluids are used with carbide tools. a continuous
have sufficient rigidity and the feed mechanism is free flow of the cutting fluid is irrperai.tc. Interrupted or
from backlash. intermittent flow can cause thermal shock and break-
4. Misalignment
problems. such andastool runout arid
oversize cause other machining
bellmouthed holes age of the carbide tool.
problems.reasuch as oersi and butheds es - 9- The concept of good machining practice involves con-
ping and die threadiugh sideratio- of all factors associated with the machining
operati' n. Each detail-workpiece. fixturing. speed.
5. Maintenance of cutting tools must be given careful feed. tool material, tool geometry. cutting fluid. and
consideration in the development of good machining the machine tool itself-must be ,iven e~refi atten'o-
p1 actict.. One common problem is the failure to change to ensure success for the machining operation under
tools at the proper time. Tool costs become exorbitant consideration.
on those jobs where tool failure is the criterion for tool
change. Usually this approach results in excessive 10. The machinability of a wc.k material must be deter-
regrinding time or. in the case of a milling cutter. the mined in order to select the proper machining cor.di-
replacement of broken teeth with new ones. Tooth re- tions. The machinability oi a material can be defined
placemert requires considerable time in addi,:on to in terms of three major factors: surface integrity. tc-ol
regrinding time. iife. and power or force requirements.
19-3
Guidelines for Drilling 19.2
INTRODUCTION A standard twist drill has two cutting edges. two helical
flutes, and a straight or tapered shank.
Drills are among the most wideiv used tools in the shop.
but their selection, grinding, and usage often receive the Straight shank drills have cylindrical shanks which may be
least care. A drilled hole i3 usually either a clearance hole of the same or of a different diameter than the body uf the
for a fastener or a starting point for tapping. reaming. or drill.
boring. Drilling usually can be done satisfactorily with
standard off-the-shelf twist drills. Where large quantities of Tapershank drills are preferable to the straight shank type
precision holes must be produced. certain refinements in for drilling medium and large diameter holes. The taper on
practice are necessary as follows, the shank conforms to one of the tapers in the ANSI Stand-
ard Series. Taper shank drills generally have a driving
* The drills should be machine ground in order to develop tang and are directly fitted into tapered holes in drilling
accurate geometry of the noint. machine spindles or into driving sockets.
* Point angle. web thickness. and lip clearance shoula be Double margin drills have a second pair of margins at the
suitable for the material being drilled, rear of the lands which act as steadying elements. Double
margin drills may produce more accurate holes. Their size
* The work should be properly supported and clamped range is from 1/8 to 2 inches 13.2 to 50 mml.
and the drill should be guided in a drill bushing of suit-
able fit and length. Chip breakerdrills have features built into the drill design
to preverit long. stringy chips. They have a diameter range
* Adequately powered and rigid machine tcols should be from 3/8 to 2 inches 19.5 to 50 mm).
utilized.
Atemate Drills
TYPES OF DRILLS When applications arise that cannot be inet by using a twist
drill, one of the following alternate drills can be considered:
Step Drills. figure 19.2-2
Twist Drills Subland Drills. figure 19.2-3
A tw;st drill is an end cutting tool having one or more cut- Flat Drills. figure 19.2-4
ting edges and having helical and sometimes straight flutes Spade Drills. figure 19.2-5
for the passage of chips and the admission of a cutting Core Drills. figure 19.2-6
fluid. See figure 19.2-1 and table 19.2-1 for the description Oil-Hole or Pressurized-Coolant Drills. Figure 19.2-7
and application of twist drils. Gun Drills, figure 19.2-8
Sse tables 19.2-1 through 19.2-3 for the descriptions and
applications of alternate drills.
() Chip Breaker )
I
19-5
19.2 Guidelines for Drilling
Description Twist drills are the most common. Step drills have two or more diame- Subland drills are combination tools
Most of these drills are made ters produced by grinding vari- having separate lands or margins
with two helical flutes which al- ous steps on the diameter of the which extend the full length of
low the removal of chips and the drill. The steps or different diam- the flutes for each of the two or
admission of a cutting fluid to the eters are ground on the same more diameters. See figure
tip of the drill. See figure 19.2-1. land. See figure 19.2-2. 19.2-3.
Application Twist drills are used to produce the Step drills produce two or more diam- Two or more diameters can be drilled
majority of clearance holes for eters in one pass of the drill, and simultaneously. The different
fasteners and pilot holes for sub- also serve as combined drills and lands can be ground to permit
sequent reaming or tapping. countersinks, combined drills drilling and countersinking for
and counterbores, and combined fiathead screws or drilling and
drills and reamers. counterboring for socket head
screws. Two or more diameters
can be maintained constant
throughout the life of the drill
even after resharpening.
"ool High speed steel, solid carbide, or High speed steel High speed steel
Material carbide-tipped for special appli-
cations. -
Size range Standard range: 1/8 to 1-1/2 inches Standard range: 1/4 to 2 inches Standard range: 5/32 to 3/4 inch
[3 to 35 mm] [6 to 50 mm] [4 to 18mm]
Micro range: 0.0059 to 1/8 inch
[.15 to 3 mm] For special sizes, the largest diame-
Large range: 1-1/2 to 6 inches ter should be no greater than
[38 to 150 mm] twice the smallest diameter be-
cause of the variation in cutting
speeds.
----------------------------------
(a) 3 Flute -
(b) 4 Flute
19;-6
Guidelines for Drilling 19.2
TABLE 19.2-2 Characteristics of Flat, Spade and Core Drills
I
2068 kPa] are employed.
Tool High speed steel or carbide-tipped steel for special The tip is usually carbide, and the shank is alloy steel
Material applications, tubing.
Size Range Standard range: 6/32 to 1-1/2 Inches Standard range: 1/8 to 2 inches
14 tom38 mm] [3 to50 mm]
19-7
19.2 Guidelines for Drilling
DRILL GEOMETRY Straight Flute
Straight flute drills (zero helix) are especially adapted for
drilling brass and other soft or very hard metals. See figure
Drill Point 19.2-1 (d).
Point Angle
Standard drills have point angles of 118 degrees. The point Lip Clearance
angle may be increased up to 150 degrees for very hard or For most drilling, the lip clearance varies from 7 to 25 de-
tough materials. For softer materials such as aluminum or grees depending on the drill size. Smaller drills require
copper alloys, the point angle may be 90 to 100 degrees. more clearance, while larger drills require less. In general.
for harder materials, the clearance should be as small as
Double Point Angle possible to allow maximum strength to the cutting edge.
When drilling very hard or abrasive materials, double an-
gles are sometimes ground on the point to reduce chipping
of the corners of the lips. This is done by first grinding the HOLE SIZES
larger included angle (118 to 140 degrees) and then regr-
inding the smaller included angle (60 to 90 degrees) on the Micro Drilling
corners, giving the effect of a chamfer at the corner. For holes from 0.001- to 0.020-inch 10.025 to 0.5 mini di-
Thinned Web ameter, flat drills are used over this entire size range.
The central web of the drill increases in thickness toward Twist drills are used for hole sizes over 0.006 inch 10.15
point must be thinned as the drill is mml. Speeds must be much lower and feed rates higher
the shank.
ground back so as the
Hence, to prevent excessive end pressure. This than are used for larger drills so as not to produce a pow-
is usually required when the web thickness exceeds one- der that will pack in the flutes.
fifth of the drill diameter. Techniques used to reduce the Normal Drilling
web thickness include the undercut thinned point, the For holes from 0.014- to 3-inch 10.35 to 75 mini diameter,
notched point, and the crankshaft point, standard twist drills are generally used.
19-8
-I
Guidelines for Drilling 19,2
TABLE 19.2-5 Reduction of Feed for Deep-Hole Drilling Hole Location
wi!h Oil-Hole Drills The machine tool and the setup affect the accuracy of the
location of the hole. Approximate placement capabilities
REDUCE for three general categories of machining with respect to
DEPTH BY true location are as follows:
drill Jig borer 0.0002 inch
diameters 10.005 mml
NC drill 0.0025 inch
5to 7 10% 10.064 mml
8 to 10 20% Drill press (with bushings in drill jig) 0.002 inch
over10 30% 10.05mm
I Drill press wtithout bushing 0.015 inch
1 0.08 mm)
ACCURACY OF DRILLED HOLES Several common grades such as MI. M7 and M10 IS2 and
S31 are used in the majority of drilling operations. See sec-
Accuracy of Holes Drilled with Twist Drills tion 14.2 for :omplete listing of HSS compositions.
There are two elements of hole accuracy-location and
oversize. Table 19.2-6 indicates the accuracy of holes Cobalt High Speed Steel
drilled with twist drills vith and without center-drilled Grades containing combinations of high cobalt with high
holes and drill bushings. Holes drilled without center- vanadium or high carbon such as TIS, M33. and M41
drilled holes and drill bushings tend to be bellmouthed. through M47 IS9. S11 and S121 are very useful in drilling
hard steels, titanium alloys and nickel-base alloys. The co-
balt grades usually give higher tool life or faster production
Effect of Drill Point than regular high speed steel. The cobalt grades are more
The point angle affects hole location and size. Point angles expensive and in some cases are more difficult to grind
which are -nore acute than standard point angles (smaller than the common high speed steels.
included angle) have more of a self-centering effect on the
drill. The blunter the point angle, the greater the care and
skill which must be exercised to control hole location and Surface Treated HSS Drills
size. Special point grinds, such as spiral points, also im- Various surface treatments such as cyaniding and nitriding
prove the centering effect of the drill, can be applied to high speed steel drills to increase the
hardness of the outer layer of materials. Cyanided and ni-
trided HSS drills are considered when drilling hard and
Point Grinding Faults abrasive materials which allow very short tool life of un-
Cutting lips of nonuniform length or angles will produce treated HSS drills. Flash chrome plating is used on occa-
oversize holes and excessive margin wear. Insufficient sion when drilling small-diameter holes in printed circuit
clearance will result in excessive drill thrust and will pro- boards, carbon and graphite, and some nonferrous metals.
duce excessive heating and burning of the work material Other treatments such as special polishing and black oxid-
and drill point. A too large lip clearance, leaving in- ing are used to minimize friction between the drill and the
sufficient support behind the cutting edges, results in chip- workpiece, galling of chips in the flutes, and excessive
ping and crumbling of the cutting edges. work material buildup on the drill lips.
DIAMETER
No center drlled hole-no bushing 0.003 0.007 0.006 0.008 0.008 O.O09
Center drilled hole-no bushing 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.005
Drill bushing 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.004 10.003
19-9
19.2 Guidelines for Drilling
" Carbide-tipped drills are usually preferred because they Very large assemblies of sheet material, usually aluminum.
are less expensive than solid carbide drills. Standard titanium or steel alloys, are frequently drilled in the aircraft
carbide-tipped drill diameter range is usually from 3/32 industry. The larger assembly size usually dictates the use
to 1-1/2 inches 12.4 to 38 mml. of portable drilling equipment. This equipment may be
electric- or pneumatic-powered. The drills may be hand-fed
" Solid carbide drill diameter range is from 1/16 to 1/2 when drilling aluminum alloys, but are power-fed when
inch 11.6 to 13 mmlI (or No. 80 to No. 13). drilling titanium alloys or steel.
19-10
Tool Life 19.3
Tool life is one of the most important factors in the eval- speed are presented in figures 19.3-2 and 19.3-3. Figure
uation of machinability. Specifically. the manufacturing en- 19.3-2 shows that for tests on 8640 steel using a carbide
gineer needs to know the relation of too! life to speeds. tool. the longest tool life was obtained at 300 feet per min-
feeds and the other pertinent machining parameters. For ute 190 m/minI with a feed per revolution of 0.010 inch
production operations, tool life is usually expressed as the 10.25 mini. Figure 19.3-3 shows the tool life in cubic inches
number of pieces machined per tool grind. In m~rhinability of metal removed for the same test conditions. In this case.
testing, tool life is generally defined as the cutting time in the greatest tool life was obtained at 300 feet per minute
minutes to produce a given wearland for a set of machining 190 m/minI with a feed per revolution of 0.020 inch 10.5
conditions. This cutting time can be converted to cubic mml even though the tool life in minutes was less than that
inches of metal removed for a given depth of cut. obtained when using a feed per revolution of 0.010 inch
10.25 mml.
Turning tests usually are used for evaluating the machin-
ability of a material in terms of tool life. This operation is Once the tool life curves have been established showing the
used because of the simplicity of the cutting tool. In addi- effect of cutting speed. other tests can be run to develop the
tion. all of the machining conditions, such as speed. feed. relationships between tool life and other machining varia-
tool geometry. tool material, and cutting fluid. can be read- bles. Tool life curves on the effect of feed for a constant
ily controlled. y varying one of the machining conditions cutting speed are shown in figures 19.3-4 and 19.3-5. Tool
and keeping the others constant, it is possible to determine life versus feed is given for three different cutting speeds.
the effect of such a change on tool life. The relationships The curves in figure 19.3-4 show tool life in minutes. The
among the various machining variables are obtained in this longest tool life was obtained using a feed per revolution of
manner. 0.010 inch 10.25 mini with a cutting speed of 300 feet per
minute 190 m/minl. Figure 19.3-5 shows tool life in cubic
In a machining test such as turning, the tool is removed af- inches of metal removed. At a cutting speed of 300 feet per
ter a given amount of wear is produced on the flank of the minute 190 m/minI. tool life was greatest when using a feed
tool. The wearland is usually 0.015 or 0.030 inch 10.38 or per revolution of 0.020 inch 10.5 mini. For complete results.
0.75 mini for carbide and 0.060 inch 11.5 mini for high a three-dimensional graph of speed and feed versus tool life
speed steel. It is general practice in these tests to stop the is necessary.
machining at frequent interva!s and examine the wearland
on the tool. The time to produce the wearland is then re-
corded. A typical data sheet for turning tests is shown in Other tool life tests can be performed to evaluate the effect
figure 19.3-1. This procedure is continued until the wear- of the other machining variables, such as carbide grade.
land reaches a predetermined width, which in these tests tool geometry. and cutting fluid. Figure 19.3-6 shows a set
was 0.015 inch 10.38 minI. It should be noted that inter- of tool life curves comparing the effect of a carbide grade
mittently measured tool wear rates may not fully indicate on tool life. Tool life curves for various materials can be
rates of continuous cutting wear. Hence, wear tests should grouped on the same chart to compare the relative machin-
be run both ways. ability of each of the materials when machined under sim-
ilar conditions. A group of tool life curves for turning vari-
Initially. a tool life curve is obtained with several different ous materials is shown in figure 19.3-7.
speeds. keeping the other variables constant, thus obtain-
ing a relationship between cutting speed and tool life. The This presentation on tool life curves has dealt mainly with
recommended cutting speed for a high speed steel tool is turning tests. While turning tests are most widely used, it is
generally the one which produces a 60-minute tool life. preferable whenever possible to test using the particular
With carbide, the tool life can be much shorter. particularly machining operation in question. such as turning, milling,
if a throwaway-type tool blank is used. In this case. a 30- drilling, reaming. tapping, etc. The tool life curve is a valu-
minute tool life may be satisfactory. When a tool life curve able source of machining information: from it the tool engi-
is available for a range of cutting speeds, the tool engineer neer. designer. or planner can obtain machining conditions
can select "he cutting speed which will give him the best which will produce maximum production at a minimum
compromise between tool life and production rate. Tool life cost for the machining operation. A further discussion of
curves for various feeds which show the effect of cutting cost is presented in section 21.
aI-
19-11
7
--- --- - _ _
19.3 Tool Life
44 H+ - -- - --4
--- -- -
fil -f Ef
S0 ('EN '-.
.Wj
O.S
LLu
w ca U;
Z-I _ _ 2z_ _ 1
0 19-12
Tool Life 19.3
10 _ _-__ _ _. __o_ [ 61 . .. .
100020 ,pr .,zo._ ,
,
0 Feed I "- ' - -
300 400 500 600 700 800 300 400 500 600 700 800
Cutting speed. fpm Cutting Speed. fpm
Figure 19.3-2 Effect of cutting speed on tool life Figure 19.3-3 Effect of cutting speed on tool life
for turning 8640 steel, 190 Bhn. for turning 8640 steel, 190 Bhn. See figure 19.3-2
for test conditions.
4410j. 1 3 27
_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _E 200_
"30 -t I * - - -,.."
0 " - 300fpm Cutting speed
-6 20 pm 10j0 speed
Cutting I
0 17 jsOwp~tigpe
f.
1- -- 0pm Cutting
100 speed r 50
1 --
10 z0 45 30 pm Cutin
f___
utn see
pe
10 - 800 1pm Cutting speed 0 - _
0 1 011-& - I -'
Figure 19.3-4 Effect of feed on tool life for turning Figure 19.3-5 Effect of feed on tool life for turning
8640 steel, 190 Bhn. See figure 19.3-2 for test 8640 steel, 190 Bhn. See figure 19.3-2 for test
conditions, conditions.
19-13
I
SCEA- 0 NR 0 040 in
6 60
-- -eFeed
Depth, of cut 0 100 in
0 0 10 ipr
Cuiting fluid Dry Wear 0015 in
SI 0
200 0 1~ j -
*-
Figure 19.3-6 Effect of carbide grade on tool life for turning 8640 steel, 190 Bhn. Best tool life was ob-
tained at 300 fpm using C-7 grade carbide. For a 40-minute tool life, AISI 8640 steel can be turned at
415 fpm using C-7 grade carbide, compared to 320 fpm with C-6 grade carbide.
003
' I 1%= ./ 1020 Steel
o - Se ! / 115Bhn
20 /l 0 NN
'" I
430OSteeI 0
0 T 400 Shn~ fi
250 4 00
0 200 320 1 740
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Figure 19.3-7 Effect of cutting speed on tool life for turning various materials. For a 40-minute tool life
turn the above steels at: 740 fpm for 1020 steel, 115 Bhn; 320 fpm for 8640 steel, 190 Bhn;, 250 fpm for
8640 steel, quenched and tempered to 300 Bhn; and 200 fpm for 4340 steel, quenched and tempered to
400 Bhn.
4
19-14
Types of Machinability Data 19.4
There are various degrees of sophistication of machin- these situations, it is possible to calculate the machining
ability data available for use by industry. A general dis- conditions which provide minimum cost or maximum pro-
cussion of the types of data will be given. duction rate or maximum profit. Whenever such calcu-
lations are made, it is wise to verify the calculation by shop
trial.
Tables of Recommended Machining Conditions
This Machining Data Handbook contains the practical Machinability Ratings
starting conditions for most of the significant work mate-
rials and machining operations. It supplies the recom- There appears to be an endless desire to provide macnin-
mended feed, speed, tool material, tool geometry. and cut- ability ratings for materials. The original machinability rat-
ting fluid as well as data for determining horsepower ing index was based upon turning BI 112 steel at 180 feet
requirements for various machining operations. It also con- per minute 155 m/minI with a high speed steel tool for an
tains the most practical and readily accessible data for gen- index of 100 percent. This index was developed years ago
eral shop application, under strong influence from the Independent Research
Committee on Cutting Fluids.
Wide Range Machining Data Since inthat
bides time, high speed steels have lost ground to car-
turning. It is tempting to try to use a single numer-
Detailed machining data covering the tool life obtained un- ical value to designate the degree of difficulty (or ease) with
der a wide range of machining parameters such as speed. which a particular material can be machined. Unfortu-
feed. tool material, tool geometry. and cutting fluids are of- nately. it has been found that this machinability rating of a
ten useful in selecting a set of conditions for machining at given work material changes with the type of operation in-
lower costs or higher production rates. The detailed ma- volved and with the tool material selected. The inconsist-
chining parameters can be obtained from laboratory stud- encies and futility of applying machinability ratings can be
ies or from shop studies by varying the pertinent parame- seen in table 19.4-1.
ters and observing their effect on tool life. Data formats for
presentation of wide range machining data are shown in Machinability ratings are given for four work materials
section 21. and three operations-turning, milling and drilling. In addi-
tion. the rating is given for both high speed steel and car-
bides for the turning and milling. In machining 4340 steel.
Cost and Production Rate Determination and the rating is seen to vary from 25 to 88 depending upon the
Analysis operation and tool material.
It is possible and desirable to calculate the total cost and
production rate on any machining operation. Section 21
supplies the necessary procedures for making these calcu-
lations based on the relation of tool life to the machining TABLE 19.4-1 Mahlnablit Index Inconsistencies
parameters.
WORK MATERIAL
Mathematical Correlation of Machining Parameters 250
with Tool Ufe and Subsequent Optimization of OPERATION 4340 T-3k- 17-7 PH Maraglng
Cost and Production Rates Steel 13V-llCr Steel Stee
Attempts have been and are being made to correlate tool 3i9
4 215 8hn 170 DIm 330
life with the other pertinent machining parameters. The
usual approach is to obtain empirical data relating tool life Tamining
to speed, feed, and depth and width of cut. In some cases. HSS 25 - 32 54
these data can be put into the fairly simplified equation: Carbide 31 16 18 59
Milling
vTfadb%- = K HSS 25 16 37 74
Carbide 88 20 53 83
where: v = cutting speed Drilling
T = tool life HSS 42 17 42 92
f = feed _. -
d = depth
w = width
and n, a. b, c, and K are constants.
The application of the machinability index should be re-
Unfortunately. it has been found that most work materials stricted to very special situations where the ratings have
when machined by thevarious operations do not follow this meaningful and consistent values. Another application of
simple relationship except for restricted regions of cutting the machinability rating system involves the use o, relative
speeds and feeds. Despite this, certain combinations of machining time, an example of which is given. A more pre-
work materials and operations that obey this simple law :ise and logical approach to the selection of machining
permit one to obtain this mathematical relationship be- data is to use the data contained in the Machining Data
tween tool life and the various machining parameters. For Handbook.
19-15
SECTION 20
GRINDING AND
ABRASIVE MACHINING
20-1
I
Tables 20-1-2 and 20.1-3 list the codes that are used by while high numbers indicate an.open structure.
the various grinding wheel manufacturers for alminum Wheels having an open structurt are recommended for sur-
oxide wheels and silicon carbide wheels. respectively. face grinding, while wheels having a dense structure are
Grain Size
Grain size influences surface roughness. stock removal Truing and Dressing
rate. chip size and corner holding ability. Surface rough-
ness depends on a number of factors. such as wheel hard- Before truing a grinding wheel, the spindle should be run
ness. structure and dressing methods. but finer-grain abra- until it is up to operating temperature Then the diamond
sives tend to produce surfaces with lower roughness truing tool should be placed at the center of the wheel and
values. fed out to the wheel edge. and then from edge to edge. A
copious flow of coolant should be directed at the wheel-tool
interface.
Wheel Grade
The grade or hardness of a wheel is a measure of the The face of the wheel must be prepared for the job it is ex-
strength of the bond holding the grains in the wheel. The pected to do by dressing. When dressing wheels for finish-
niajor factor affecting bond strength is the amount of bond ing operations. the diamond tool is fed slowly across the
holding an individual grain. Wheel grades range from A to face: when dressing wheels for roughing operations. the di-
Z in order of increasing bond content. amond tool is fed more rapidly.
20-3 ___
20.1 Grinding Wheel'
Cr).
Cc 0
ca 0 30 c
'0' 0
>- . ~ u
-
'Fa '55S1Z 2M..R' 0)
%fo* aa c a 0 aQ cc .
. cCo5P:;
UL. ).
00LL
I Cb
a.
4) 0)C 4 o q c j
0,
00
CL
LU E
ITW
.
V nN
I 0 0 0 0D
mg
all coC4
_ _ _ _ U- ~ f) 1r U D Uc
0i CD 0 00c
<'
c
Ii. cc0
I ; II N
m_-_-_-_
z04
---- cs
Grinding Wheels 20.1
TABLE 20.1-2 Comparative Aluminum Oxide Wheel Marking Symbols
(Includes both manufacturers' prefixes and abrasive symbols)
HEAVY DUTYI
MIXTURE OF MIXTURE OF
MANUFACTURER Aluminum IREGULAR SEMI- FRIABLE ALMNM Al. Ox. &
Bancroft NA
-8XT
ZA VA
-RA
A
- I -
--
1A 2A
-CIA
-C2A
5A 7A
Bay State 1A A 3A 9A 8A CA
-27A 25A 1 /A -GA
-33A - -iA- 16
Bendix RA -KA I A, PA I WA GA I CA
- -6A -BA -EA-
- I 31A JA -- - DA C
2A 22A A 35 48 15 CA
1-88A I -29 - 18
--- A I -- FBA AC
- - - -- FWA-
- I - - - BWA-
Buckeye A ZA SA A PA WA MA CA
Bullard 3A -A PA WA 6A 6TA CA
Carborundum A VA WA A BA AA DA CA
-XA -- GA -BGA-
-- - -PA FA-
-- - - SA---
-_ 26A 1OTA
de Sanno A I XA -A 7A 9A 97A CA
-YA -AT 7AT 10A JA DA
-ZA -- 8A RA 7RA PA
- - - -12A 4A-
- -- KA GA
- -- -KTA HA
- -- - - -SA-
- s -- - -PTA-
Edmar HA ZA SA A PA WA MA CA
Ferro (FMR TA ZT EA A FA 13A 2A BA
Electia) YA BZT XA -JA 36A 15A CA
-CZT - TFA WA HA DA
_ _ - - - - -LA-
Fisher M ZR -- A B AS AC
SOURCE, Grinding Wheel Institute.
20-5
20.1 Grinding Wheels
TABLE 20.1-2-Continued
- -- -- -91A -
Hanson TA I -
ZA
-- MA -BA
FA
RA
WA
HA
W2A
CA
AC
ITT Abrasive HA XA MA A KA WA ZA JA
- - - -PA -EA-
National JA 14A 6A A PA SA MA CA
- ZA - - BA WA - KA
- 24A - - HA - -
- 34A - -- ---
- ZMA - - LA ---
- - - - BKA --
Ney Abrasives - -- RW A WA HA CA
Norton - 66A -A 57 32 16 AC
- 68A 76A -- 38. 19
- ZF -- - 23 - A
- ZS --- -53-
-NZ-- -
Osborn 3A - 7A 2A 1A -AC
Red Hill TA ZA -A FA WA HA AC
NA XA--- --
Universal -- 4A - A FA WA WAA CA
-QB - SA WRA FCA
-40D - RA (Ruby) EM -
- - - - EA (Em- RFA-
Raid) ______
20-6
Grinding Wheels 20.1
TABLE 20.1-3 Comparative Silicon Carbide Wheel Marking Symbols
(includes both manufacturers' prefixes and abrasive symbols)
SILICON
MANUFACTURER HEAVY REGULAR SEMI- FRIABLE CARBIDE
DUTY FRIABLE MIXTURE
Acme -GO-
Bancroft C C GOC
Bay State 70 C 10
Bendix SC C GC MC
-C GO HO
Blanchard -C 90
Brightbay sic---
- S
Buckeye HO C GO CA
Carborundum TO C SO GO ROC
WO BC-
Chicago 490 - 49CG 470
-480C
Hanson HOC GC 4C
ITT Abrasive 0 C GO SO
Jowitt & Rodgers -X GOC
MWA C 30 70 30
National -C GO RC -
7 Westfield -C GOC
Bullard 0 FO GO 60C
207
20.1 Grinding Wheels
CUBIC BORON NITRIDE (CBN) GRINDING When grinding the superalloys, a heavy-duty, active grind-
WHEELS ing fluid, that is, sulfo-chlorinated oil or sulfo-chlorinted
soluble oil, is a must These heavy-duty grinding fluids will
also improve grinding ratios when grinding hardened steels
Applications with CBN wheels
CBN grinding wheels are recommended for alloys that are
difficult to grind with conventional abrasives: that is. steels
and cast irons with hardnesses above 50 Re and nickel Truing and Dressing
and cobalt high temperature alloys with hardnesses It is of utmost importance that a CBN wheel be properly
above 35 Re. conditioned before attempting to grind with it. Both resi-
noid-bond and vitrified-bond wheels can be trued using a
Wheel Identification rotary diamond dresser, a brake-controlled truing device or
Table 20.1-4 shows the standard marking system for dia- a metal-bonded, 100 to 180 mesh size diamond truing tool.
mond and cubic boron nitride abrasives (per ANSI B74.13- A single-point or cluster diamond should not be used. The
1977). Table 20.1-5 lists the codes that are used jy the wheel should be flooded with a copious supply of coolant
while truing.
various wheel manufacturers for these abrasives.
Metal-Lond, electroplated wheels contain a single layer of wheel is properly dressed. Vitrified-bond CBN wheels usu-
CBN grains and cannot be trued or dressed. Therefore, it is ally do not need to be dressed or conditioned. They can be
imperative that the spindle be running true and that all used immediately after truing.
mounting surfaces be clean and free of burrs. When these
wheels are mounted, the runout should not exceed 0.0005
inch 10.013 mm TIR in either the radial or the lateral Machine Requirements
directions. To realize maximum benefits from using CBN wheels, tie
Grit Size machine must have sufficient rigidity, horsepower and
spindle speed. Machine vibrations that can be tolerated
Because of the sharpness of CBN, it is necessary to use with conventional abrasives because of their more rapid
finer grain sizes than are used with conventional abrasives wheel breakdown will cause CBN wheels to chatter.
to obtain the same surface roughness level. Extremely fine
finishes are difficult to obtain with CBN abrasives because
there is little or no burnishing of the surface since CBN
abrasives wear so little. Surface Integrity
Because CBN wheels remain sharp longer, they produce
Grinding Fluids less heat and deformation in the workpiece, thus less resid-
Hardened steels and cast irons can be ground dry with ual stress. This permits the use of conventional speeds and
CBN wheels; however, using a grinding fluid will improve feeds on critical parts that would otherwise require "low
both the surface roughness and the wheel life. A light-duty stress- grinding procedures if conventional abrasives were
soluble oil will suffice for these materials, used.
I
20-8
Grinding Wheels 20.1
z0 f
.0 LL LW
V m U)c a) Dco-
0 .2 a) E .
0 C
4,, o
-2 '0. >, 3: x
0
ir Q rcoP
00
o 0 0.5
o0 r- m
a o I-
LU C) X,
I.a E~ 0
a.z
C0 0 aU oc
z = 0CM C
tu 20-z
C.0 E____________________
I
20.1 Grinding Wheels
TABLE 20.1-5 Comparative Diamond and Cubic Boron Nitride Wheel Marking Symbols
20 10
I-
DIAMOND GRINDING Wet grinding with diamond wheels eliminates some of the
common problems associated with dry grinding. Since
Diamond grinding technology has developed considerably workpiece temperatures are kept at a low level, the poten-
during the past 30 years with respect to both grinding tial for surface cracks or possible catastrophic cracking of
wheels with natural grit and. more recently. grinding the workpiece is greatly reduced. Dust problems also are
wheels with synthetic grit. Today. diamond wheels are eliminated. The flushing action of a copious supply of cool-
available in a large variety of mesh sizes. diamond concen- ant helps to keep the diamond wheel cutting free, thus pre-
trations, and bond types. Table 20.1-4 lists the standard venting loading of the wheel.
markings used for diamond wheels. The designations for
abrasive types used by various wheel manufacturers are
listed in table 20.1-5.
Grain types have been developed for specific grinding oper- Dry Grinding
ations and materials. More recent developments have If dry grinding is absolutely necessary, wheel speed must be
opened up new applications for diamond wheels, especially kept below 4.500 feet per minute 123 m/sl. with 3500 to
in the field of steel and carbide grinding utilizing metal- 4.000 feet per minute 118 to 20 m/sl preferable. With care
clad, diamond-grain wheels. and practice. an experienced operator can become pro-
ficient at dry grinding of hard materials such as carbide and
Diamond wheels are available in several bonds: metal, vit- ceramics. One problem associated with dry grinding is
rifled and resinoid. Each bond type provides different re- dust: therefore, adequate dust-collecting systems need to be
suits, depending on the type of grinding operation and the employed. Wheel wear will be greater than with wet grind-
material being ground. ing because softer wheels must be used to help keep the
grinding temperatures as low as possible. Although resi-
Metal-bond wheels are extremely strong, long-life wheels noid-bond wheels are recommended for dry diamond grind-
having diamonds securely held in a metal matrix. Chief ing of hard. brittle materials such as carbide, glass and ce-
uses are cutoff operations with thin wheels, offhand grind- ramics, high grinding temperatures can burn or crack the
ing. chip-breaker grinding and electrolytically assisted grinding wheel. Metal- and vitrified-bond diamond wheels.
grinding. Metal-bond wheels should always be used with a on the other hand, if run dry on hard, brittle materials may
coolant, cause cracking of the wnrkpiecc miaieriai.
20-11
pR IG PA BL -NOT FI/LZD
These recommendations should handle most grinding situ- * To generate form-use a finer grain wheel with a more
ations. In a job shop. it is often necessary to avoid wheel dense structure. (See table 20.3-3.)
changes: a few general-purpose wheels usually are used to
grind almost every type of material, even if at less than * To grind large areas-use a softer grade and coarser
optimum efficiency. Where large production quantities are grain wheel.
involved, testing and modifications may be necessary to ob-
tain optimum results. To grind small areas-use a harder grade and a finer
grain wheel.
Despite the use of standard grinding wheel markings (table
20.1-1). wheels with identical markings made by various * To grind soft metals-use a harder grade and a coarser
manufacturers may vary in actual performance. Individual grain wheels.
wheel makers have their own modifications of both abra-
sive and bond which cannot be included in the data tables. * To grind hard metals-use a softer grade and a finer
Likewise. the structure number is omitted from the wheel grain wheel.
identification because its significance differs among various
makes of wheels. The structure provides chip clearance * To improve workpiece finish-dress the wheel to a fine
and is also a result of grain size and proportion of bond. finish.
The best or standard structure is usually derived for most
grain size and grade combinations as a result of experience * To minimize heat. warpage and surface damage in the
and tP-ting. The manufacturers of grinding wheels publish workpiece-maintain wheel sharpness (see section 18.3,
thti tables of wheel recommendations which include Surface Integrity).
grat, -iifications as well as structure numbers.
* If the grinding wheel breaks down "o fast-use ;i wheel
Recommi . in section 8 are predicated on average with a less friable abrasive, a harder grade and a denser
shop conditions. Deviations from such basic conditions will structure.
generally affect the manner in which grinding wheels per-
form. Some of the variables discussed later have opposing 0 If the grinding wheel glazes and burns-use a wheel with
effects and may balance each other when present con- a more friable abrasive, a softer grade and a more open
currently. Other variables can have similar effects which structure.
can be expected to work additively. An understanding of
the directions in which process variables interact with
grinding wheel performance permits modification of the
controllable variables
tion to or improve overall operating condi-
conoics.Guidelines for Surface Grinding
tions or economics.
" To minimize heat and warpage in the workpiece-use
fast tabh speeds, light downfeeds, and dress the wheel
before final size.
MODIFYING WHEEL
RECOMMENDATIONS * To improve workpiece finish-dress the wheel to a fine
The following list of guidelines are providf.d for use in mod- finish.
ying the grinding wheel recommendations provided in sec-
-n 8 to improve production or to meet the specific require- te-usingradeesofter bon.
ats of an application. No application, however, should ter-use one grade softer bond.
be so finely tuned that normal variations would affect the
output rate or the quality. The best approach is to accom-
modate any variations likely to occur. The best wheel for
any application is the one that compromises the ability to Guidelines for Surface Grinding, Vertical Spindle,
cut rapidly with the ability to hold form, maintain surface Rotary Table
roughness requirements and last longer. e To produce smoother workpiece finish and closer toler-
ances-use faster table speed, lighter downfeed and
Wheels recommended in section 8 are suitable for proper sparkout.
both rough and finish grinding in one setup. Where
two setups are used, use a wheel one grade harder for 0 To increase material removal rate-increase table speed
roughing and a wheel )ne grade softer for finishing, and downfeed rate.
20-13
20.2 Grinding Guidelines
Guidelines for Cylindrical Grinding Guidelines for Internal Grinding
" When using wheels larger than 14-inch 1356 mml diame- 0 For long bores-use softer grade wheels and wider
ter-use one grade softer bond. wheels, if possible.
" For heavier stock removal-use a faster traverse speed e For low powered machines-use softer grade wheels.
and a slowr work speed and/or increase the depth of
cut. * For light spindle machines-use softer grade wheels.
20-14
Grinding Guidelines 20.2
PRECAUTIONS direct the fluid so that is reaches the cutting zone. See sec-
tion 16. Cutting Fluids.
Safety
Follow all requirements for safe wheel use. Do not exceed
the maximum speed marked on the wheel or shown in
ANSI B7.1-1978, Safety Requirements for the Use, Care, Surface Integrity
andProtectionofAbrasive Wheels. See tab!e 20.2-2. To avoid damage to the ground surface in the form of
grinding burn. heat checks (grinding cracks). warpage. re-
sidual stress or other surface alterations, see section 10.4.
Cutting Fluids Low Stress Grinding. for proper grinding procedures. Also
Use the proper cutting fluid. use the proper flow rates. and see section 18.3. Surface Integrity.
20-154
20.2 Grinding Guidelines
TABLE 20.2-2 Standard Maximumn Wheel Speeds_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
3(For Fixed Base Machines) 4.500 5000 6.000 6.000 7.500 8.500
Type 6-Straight S' e Cups
jType 1-Flaring Cups____ ___ _________I
8" dia. upto 2" thick and up to 2" hole 5.5W0 6.325 7.550 6.500 8.000 9.500
Diamond and Cubic Boron Nitride Wheels NA NA 6.500 NA NA 9.500
8 Exceptions- 1. Metal Bond NA NA 12.000 NA NA NA
2. Steel Centered Cutting-off Wheels NA NA 16.000 NA NA 16.000
9 Cutting-off Wheels Type 1 and 27A N A N .0 2O 42
-Larger tVan 16" dia.. Including Reinforced Organic N A N .0 200 1.9
Cufting-off Wheels Type 1 and 27A
10 16" dia.. and Smaller-including Reinforced NA NA NA 9.500 12.000 16.00
______ OrganicII
11 Threal aind Flute Grinding Wheels 8,000 10.000 12.000 8.000 1000 12.000
12 Crankshaft and Camshaft Grinding Wheels 5.500 8.000 8.500' 6.0 8.000 9.500
Type 1 Snagging Wheels 16" diamneter and
J
13larger. Organic bond including reinforced: NA NA NA NA NA 12.500
Used on swing frame grinders, designed
for this speed ______ __ I___
I
Used on semi-automatic snagging grinders. NA NA NA I NA NA 16.500
deefgned for this speed
20-16
Surface Roughness and Tolerances 20.3
SURFACE ROUGHNESS is limited by the maximum allowable raijius at the botton
of the thread. This radius is usually given in terms of rcot
The grain size of a grinding wheel will determine the ap- width, which is the distance between the points of tangency
proximate surface roughness that can be obtained on the of the arc and the sides of the teeth. The root width varies
workpiece. as given in table 20.3-1. The structure of the inversely with the number of threads per inch for metric
wheel and the dressing procedure will also affect the sur- pitch): the greater the number of threads per inch. the
face roughness to some degree. A finer-grain-size wheel will smaller the maximum allowable root width.
usually produce surfaces with lower roughness values at
some sacrifice of stock removal capability. To alter the wheel recommendations in section 8.14. table
20.3-4 may bz used as a guide for selecting the coarsest al-
Obtaining surf, -e roughness values of less th in 10 to 15 lowable grain size for a thread grinding wheel. If a particu-
microinches R. 10.25 :o 0.38 pml requires special attention lar standard calls for a narrower root width, the grain size
to work speeds and crossfeed or traverse rates. Very must be chosen for the maximum allowable root width. An-
smooth surfaces require abrasive grain sizes of 220 and other factor to be considered is the quality of the finish.
finer. Where a very low surface roughness value is required on
threads of relatively coarse pitch. it is advisab!e to use a
finer grain wheel than would be necessary to hold the
TOLERANCES proper root width.
The tolerances achievable with various grinding oper-
ations are given in table 20.3-2. The production tolerances
can be held without difficulty: however, larger tolerances TABLE 20.3-1 Grinding Wheel Grain Sizes for
where acceptable will be more economical. The precision Producing Various Surface Roughnesss
tolerances can be held with care but will be more costly.
GRAIN SURFACE R NESS
SIZE
Form Requirements
Grinding of forms and fillets usually requires the use of 80 pin
grain size and finer wheels, as indicated in table 20.3-3.
46 32
54 20 to 32
Thread Grinding Requirements 60 15to2o
In conventional grinding, the standard practice is to use the 80 10 to 15
coarsest practical grain size for fastest stock removal. In 120 a to 10
thread grinding, however, the coarsest practical grain size _
I 20-17 -
V -+ _ __
20.3 Surface Roughness and Tolerances
TABLE 20.3-2 Production and Precision Grinding Tolerances
TOLERANCES (Plus or Minus)
GRINDING
OPERATION inch .n-h M
Production Precision e
CYLINDRICAL GRINDING =
Diameters 000025 0.00001 0064k
Shoulders
Shoulder to Shoulder 0.00025 0.0005 O.0064 00
Traverse Grinding to a Shoulder 0.002 0.001 0 0
Corners and Radii
External Corners Sharp Sharp
Internal Corner Radii 0.005 0.0025 0 03
Spherical Sections (oscillating grinders)
Diameters 0.00015
Location of Centers 0.001 .....
CENTERLESS GRINDING
Diameters and Parallelism 0.0001 0.000025
Roundness 0000012 fe' w
Concentricity of Stepped Diameters 0.00025 0.0001 " *40
THREAD GRINDING
Lead Error (inch per inch) 0.00025 0.00001 '6
Pitch Diameter 0.0005 0.0002 0 00
Roundness 0.00025 004
Concentricity (thread form with OD) 0.0005
Grooves (width) 0.001
SURFACE GRINDING
Reciprocating Table Grinder
Flatness 0.0002 0,00015
Thickness 0.0003 0.00015
Rotary Table Grinder _
I
TABLE 20.3-3 Grinding Wheel Grain Sizes for the
Radius of Forms or Fillets
80 0.010
120 0.007 C
180 0.007
220 0.004
280
320
500
0.003
0.0020-5
0.001
0.7
i
20-18
Surface Roughness and Tolerances 20.3
TABLE 20.3-4 Coarsest Allowable Grain Sizes for Thread Grinding Wheels
AMERICAN STANDARD COARSEST ALLOWABLE -jFI500TRIAL METRICT &
UNIFIED THREADS GRAIN SIZE - T HREAD
9 0.0139 90 80
(0.01 48) 90 800.7M
6 0.0156 80 80 ,
- (0.0172) 80 80 0,438
7 0.0178 80 80 _ .
- (0.0197) 80 80 t 0 W A
6 0.0208 80 80
- (0.0221) 80 80 0
- (0.0246) 80 70 0. 25
5 0.0250 80 70
- (0.0271) 80 70 0.6
4.5 0.0278 80 70
- (0.0295) 80 70 .0.7M
4 0.0312 70 70
SOURCE: Adapted from Thread Grinding, 18th Edition, 1963, published by Norton Company.
NOTES: Pitch = 1 + number of threads per inch.
Root width - 0.125 x Pitch.
*Also ,pplies to British Standard ISO Metric Threads.
20-19
PRECEDING PAM BLANK-NOT FILLE
Shop equations and data for determining pertinent infor- Figure 20 4-4 Alignment chart for determining
ination on various types of grinding operations are given in metal removal rate and horsepower
tables 20.4-1 through 20.4-4 and figures 20.4-1 through required at motor: traverse grinding
20 4-7 as follows: (reciprocating table) for horizontal
and vertical spindle surface grinding.
Table 20.4-1 Definitions of symbols used in grind-
ing formulas and sketches, English
units. Figure20.4-5 Alignment chart for determining
metal removal rate and horsepower
Table 20.4-2 Definitions of symbols used in grind- required at motor: plunge grinding
ing formulas, Metric units. (reciprocating table) for horizontal
and vertical spindle surface grinding.
Figure 20.4-1 Sketches of various grinding oper-
ations Figure 20.4-6 Alignment chart for determining
metal removal rate and horsepower
Table 20.4-3 Grinding formulas, English units. required at motor: traverse grinding
for centertype cylindrical, centerless
Table 20.4-4 Grinding formulas, Metric units. and internal grinding.
Figure 20.4-2 Unit power for surface traverse
grinding: horizontal spindle-recipro- Figure 20.4-7 Alignment chart for determining
cating table. metal removal rate and horsepower
required at motor: plunge grinding
Figure 20 4-3 Unic power for centertype cylindrical for centertype cylindrical, centerless
plunge grinding, and internal grinding.
20-21
20.4 Grinding Formulas and Charts
TABLE 20.4-1 Definitions of Symbois Used in Grinding TABLE 20.4-2 Definitions of Symbols Used in Grinding
Formulas and Sketches, English Units Formulas and Sketches, Metric Units
a = Depti of grind, inches per pass a = Depth of grind, millimeters per pass
at = Total depth of grind, inches at = Total depth of grind, millimeters
b = Width of cut in plunge grinding, inches b = Width of cut in plunge grind;ng, millimeters
b Crossfeed, inches per pass b = Crossfeed, millimeters per pass
b -- Original width of grinding wheel, inches b, = Original width of grinding wheel, millimeters
b. = Width of workpiece, inches b. = Width of workpiece, millimeters
do = OD of grinding whec', inches (velical spindle surface d. = OD of grinding wheel, millimeters(vertical spindle
grinder) surface grinder)
IDof grinding wheel. inches (vertical spndle urface d, I.) of grinding wheel, millimeters (vertical spindle surface
grinder) grinder)
dr = Regulating wheel diameter, inches (for centerless d, = Regulating wheel dtameter, millimeters (for centerless
grinding) grinding)
do = Initial grinding wheel diameter, inches grinding
d Initial grinding wheel diameter, millimeters
d,2 = Final grir ding wheel dqmeter, inches J,2 Final grinding wheel diameter, millimeters
d, Average diameter of workpiece path on rotary table, dt Average diameter of workpieca path or. rotary table,
inches (vertical spindle surface grinder) millimeters (vertical spindle surface grinder)
d.t = Original work diameter, inches d, = Original work diameter, millimeters
d 2 = Final work diame:z-J, inches
E = Efficiency of grinding wheel drive d,2 = Final work diameter, millimeters
ft = Table traverse feed rate or throughfeed of work in E = Efficiency of grinding wheel drive
centerless grinding, inches per minute ft Table traverse feed rate or throughfeed of work in
f, = Plunge infeed rate, inches per minute .enterless grinding, millimeters per m;nute
G = Grinding ratio = Volume metal removed,3 in
3 ip = Plunge infeed rate, millimeters per minute
3
Volume wheel wear, in G = Grinding ratio - Volume metal removed, mm 3
L Length of workpiece ground, inches Volume wheel wear, mm
hpq = Horsepower required at motor. hp Lw Length of workpiece ground, millimeters
n, = Regulating wheel rpm kWg = Power required at motor, kilowatts
n, = Grinding wheel rpm n, Regulating wheel rpm
n, = Rotary table rpm (vertical spindle surface grind3r) n, Grinding whpe rpm
n,. =Work rpm nt = Rotary table rpm (vertical spindle surface grinder)
P, - Uitit horsepower, horsepower per cubic inch per minute n, = Work rpm
s = Feed per revolution of work, inche P = Unit powe,*, kilowa Its per cubic centimeter per minute
t =Axial wear from face of grinding wheel (vertical spindle s = Feed per revolution of work, millimeters
surface grinder) t = Axial we3r from fa:;e of grinding wheel, millimeters
v,= Peripheral speed of grinding wheel, feet per minute (vertical spindfe surface grinder)
v.= Peripheral speeu of work, feet per minute v, = Peripheral speed of grinding wheel, meters per second
w == Maximum contact width of grinding wheel on work v. = Peripheral spee of work, meters per minute
(vertical spinole surface grinder) w,. = Maximum contact width of grinding wheel on work,
Z Metal removal rate, cubic inches per minute millimeters (vertical spindle surface grinder)
(centerless Z = Metal removal cubic centimeters
rate,inclination per minute
grinder) wheel inclination angle, degrees
= Regulating = Regulating wheel angle, degrees (centrless
grinder)
20-22
Grinding Formulas and Charts 20.4
IC
13,
~C
00
00
~Mq~jcm
.0 CM
0. Z- 0
'E
4, - 4 o
\ / .! c;
0~
- - 4, a
C))
:k0j 0
> 0)
0. V)
IM, 0
0 3. 0
0 i 0 - 0
4) 0 c
cc Tc
0.
an CL
X4!4 > Ii
II20-20
20.4 Grinding Formulas and Charts
>.3 x
Z 3 OD CM x
)c 3
WO
-0 cm c,.0
cm Iii II
CF N0 N
CC 3
x~
t ot C
l XW
0 IRx
Z xx
N U O
oU Ci cc.~
NN 0
a. 4 :d O xiV
0 N Aj
X VV0'"
a. Ii x
clIi c)ii x '
z N N. 0\
x NC
NN 0
C',I
-c
xa'
2m CR N Lq
E x .0
Ii C4C
- )
N 01
N '-
z0
x
1!-
(0>0 X B
TU
I
C C M
- CF-
MI N
C~~~ ;72
co C.)
d ~
-qII
*,
i
a0 x ' .. x
z C4
20-24c
Grinding Formulas and Charts 20.4
jj c
Co x C
-I,: V ~ xl
Z ~ cl w
NO CDj No CDxC
ir CM~ .
IN
w-w 00S0
U Z 0 c cl)1.5
N D N C
x -C
IwR 1C
O
-, .- ,X
-j a:1 - -Dc
V, t
>NN N
z z ci
CC U*_ cI co axtu
LJa0 CJ1 c)
U C.) Je
> >t
0
c,1 N4 -
c)
a Nj O
x
.2.
a~ -j '0-
N uZ
b C
-r
-a
x
-f
- 0
0L 0 M
Illi
a a
> 10
ojo
C 0Ox
C
c n 0 U)
0cD
D U)) 0
0 S)
Z ::-, 2 2
o 2. - 0 S -
oc U))
CL -
E.a
-~
.0
o 0)
oC,
___v I ___
*0
C5
c)
U)
II
cm) C
-~~5 - -
00. I ( f r . ___
CC
q- t c Q Cd(
- - - - - - a
- - 0w/m
jamo ow d __
20_-26 _
Grinding Formulas and Charts 20.4
EI
0~
q o
C5
CD
0o
_00
66 C
20-2)
__0
-=~--O
-- S
20.4 Grinding Formulas and Charts
bc or bw
Crossfeed
in/pass a Z
It or Depth ot Metal Pg *hpg
Table Work width grind removal rate Unit hp hp at
feed rate in in/pass m&/mn hplnlmin motor
-100
-80
C- 0.5
- E 002 S
6.00-
g0.03 50
004 - 08
005 4.0
0.06 10
0.08 3.0
.1 =0-006
-2000
150 -0.005 1.5
1500 .- 0.2
1500-0004 0 2.0
1.0 2.0
100 - 03 1.5
- 0.4 -0.003
80--1000 - 0.5
- 0.6 -0.002 2.0 30
-800 - 0.8 1.0- 3.0
60- _ 10
6000.001 0.8 4.0 4.0
50- 6008 % , 50 5
. 60 5.0
40- 50 ,200006 -6 Z 8.0 6.
- 400
400 3.0
3o , - 0.0005
-00004 - 0.5 100
30-4, 304.0 0.0003 . . 8.0
S300 60 -0.0002 . -100
150 02
-20.0
10 0.15
100
130.0
Example: Vertical spindle - Traverse grinding Traverse grinding* Z ftx bc x a (Horiz. spindle)
Gray Iron, 180 Bhn Z ft x bN x a (Vert. spindle)
Given: ft = 665 in/min (56 ft/min) bw 2 in Pg X Z
a = 0.0006in/pass Pg =15hp/in3/min hpg E
Then; Z - 0.8in3 /min hpg =15hp
*hpg = Horsepower at spindle motor
Figure 20.4-4 Alignment chad for determining metal removal rate and horsepower required at motor:
traverse grinding (reciprocating table) for horizontal and vertical spindle surface grinding.
20-28
Grinding Formulas and Charts 20.4
b or bw
ft Width of cut a
Table or Z hpg
Depth of Metal Pg
feed rate Work width hpa
grind remora. rate
remova!~h Unit raeUtth
hp mtor
inch in/pass in,/min hp/in3!min
-10.0
80
. S 0.02
EE 60
0.- 0.03 0.5
-S
.S 0 350 -0.6 -
004
0 50
-. 05 - 4.000.8
- 0 06 -- 0Z
0.08 - o
0.1 3.0 1.0
-2000
150
1500 0.2 0.006 2.0 1.5
100 -0 005
0.3
"0.4 -0.004
- 0 041,5 .02.0 2.0
80 '1000 -0.5 0.003
_ - 0.6 0.002
800 2.0
0.8
60 -_ 1.0 3.0 3.0
50- 600 0 fnn - 0.8 4.0
- 0.0008 5.0 4.
40 500 __ 2.0 Q~t -6.0
*N . - 0.0006 0.6 8 -5.0
- 400 3.0 0.6
0
30- 4.0 --0.25 - -- 0.6
5.0 -0.0003
300 - 0.4
206.0 -0.0002 -20.0 0.8
20 - 8 .0 .-
200oooi40 210.0 -0.3 30.0 -10.0
15 -0.0001 B -40.0
15- 50.0
150 -0.2
10 15.0
0.15
-20.0
100
3
-. 0
Example: Vertical spindle - Plunge grinding
Plunge grnding Z = ft x b x a fHoriz. spindle)
1020 steel, 120 Bhn Z = ft x bw x a (Vert. spindle)
Given: ft = 40 ft/min bw = 2 in a = 0.0005 in/pass hpg A Z
Pg = 10.5 hplin'/min
Then: E
Z = 0.48 in'/min
iipg = 6.4 hp
*hpg =Horsepower at spnil
motor for 80% spindle
drive efficiency
20-29
20.4 Grinding Formulas and Charts
dvi a
ft Oa.
Table feed of Depth Z
of Metal Pg
rate work hpg
grind removal rate Unit hp
in/min in hp at motor
in/pass in3/min hp/in 3/min
-5.0
-4.0
.
3.0
x
J1.0
2.0 0.5
- 0.6
-300 0.1 Z0.8
1.0
"0.010 2.0
:200 0.2 0.008 1.0 2.0
0.3 0.006
-0.005 -. C 3.0 3.0
0.4 -0.004
0.5 4.0
0.003 0.6 5.0
06 4.0
- 6.0
100 0.8 0.002 0.5 " 8.0, 5.0
80 " 0"0.0i
F "
.0
n :0.0008
-- 10.0
- 20.0 8.0
-#0 ~~ -.3.0
- 0.0006 0.
0005 -30.0
50 4.0 0.0
-00004 - 40.0
40 5.0 20.0
500.0003 5
6.0 - 50.0
8.0 -0.0002
30 =10.0
-0.0001 20.0
20 0.1
30.0
-40.0
10
9 50.0
-8
88 -6O.O
7 .
Example: Centertype cylincirical - Traverse
grinding Traverse grinding: Z = x a x ft x dwl
8620 steel, 170 Bhn
Given: ft = 50 in/min
Pg 15hp/;n3 /minEdwl 2 in a - 0.0006 in/pass h E
12 _-
Then: Z = 0.88in'/min hpg , 3.5hp "hpg Horsepower
for at spindle motor
80% spindle drive efficiency
20-30
_ _
4
Grinding Formulas and Charts 20.4
nw
S Work Tp z
Feed or work rpm Inteed Metal Pgh tp
Work dia., Width cut.zj Mv-il rate th
in/rev in/min in Unit hpmor
in in 3/min hp/in3/minmto
-0-002 10 -002
0.2
F20 4 0.03
/~-
-100
80.
.1 ' 0.3
/
50o~ 00 0.4 %~5
-0.0008 -0.05 -0.2/ -0.5
4
10 .6 10.0 0.;3 0.6 -50.0
r 200:; 02000
-010
5.00
5.
4.0
0.5 -0.8 -30.0 3
.0003
'7403.0
0.0 4 00
50 .5
1.0
1. 120.0
20
20
50 0.1 10.
2.0 1.5
1
-0.0002 -1000 0.20 1.0 3. 0.25.
14.0 4.0\ 10
-2000 0.0 0.5, .
3.0 .
2.08
0.010.40
0 . o o i4
0.3 /10.06 =
.0 1.0
500 -. 0 0.2 -5.0
4
080 I 8.0
1.00
10.02
_
P9x
Given: S -O.00025 in/rev nw = 100 rpm hPgZ
dw, 3m
in~
b =1 in P8 11.6 hpfin 3 /min
Then: fp = 0.026 in/min *See figure 20.4-3 for unit power values
Z =0.25 in3 /min hpg 3.6 hp for centertype cylindrical grinding__
20-31
I "
Abrasive Machining 20.5
Grinding has traditionally been used to provide final work- This reduces floor space and capital investment require-
piece finish and din' 9sional accuracy. About 1962. the nients. Further economnies may result from the use of worn.
term -abrasive mach " appeared in the literature to coa-se-grain belts for finishing passe-s
cover those grinding perations used for stock removal as
well as for the production of the final finish and accuracy
The Abrasive Belt Machine
There are various tves of abrasive grind'-g operations: Machines used for belt grinding have two common fea-
the prominent ones are descr:bed below tures: all are very rigid and al! utilize high horsepower.
Rigidity is at least as important as horsepower in obtaining
good abrasive economies. The common types of machines
VERTICAL SPINDLE, ROTARY TABLE in belt machining are centerless bel: grinder, surface belt
SURFACE GRINDING grinder, cylindrical belt grinder, and roll belt grinder.
Vertical spindle surface grinding hzs been employed The Abrasive Belt
many years as a stock removal operat-fn on many coniTion
commercial alloys. It has been used in the automotive in- Grinding belts used for abrasive machining are resin bond
dustry for grinding cast iron and steel components in lieu of coated with either aluminum oxide, silicon carbide. or dia-
milling. The normal stock removal of 0.125 to 0.250 inch Mord grains. The grain is electrostatically coated to the
13.2 to 6.4 mini on cas, ags and forgings has been accom- belt in order to control orientation, dispersal and thickness.
plished on parts whicl have essentially flat. unencumbered There is up to three times more chip clearance in a coarse
surfaces. In recent years. there has been an extension of the grird-ng belt than in a comparable grinding wheel. This
application of vertical spindle surface grinding to many permits high metal removal rates at low pressures. Most
larger parts. including machine tool beds and tables. cylin- failures of belts are caused by loading, glazing and strip-
der heads, gear housings, motor cases. etc- Machines are ping (shedding) which are discussed as follows:
being built with table sizes up to 14-foot 14 ml diameter and
up to 300 horsepower 1225 kWI. It may be advantageous to 9 Loading is the filling of areas between abrasive grains.
redesign parts to take advantage of the benefits of this The use of lubricants and a weaker bond can retard
operation. loading
The recommended grinding conditions for this operation * Glazing is the dulling of the abrasive grains resulting
are contained in section 8.4. where it may be noted that from the usc of strong bonds. It can be eliminated by
wheel speeds in most common use vary between 3.400 and changing to a weaker bond and using a more -aggres-
5.000 feet per minute 117 and 25 mi/sl. sive- contact wheel.
20-33
20.5 Abrasive Machining
comparison, the new wide-wheel centerless grinders re- Machine Design Considerations
move only 0.6 to 0.75 cubic inch per inch 10 39 to 0.48 Grinding machines designed for high-efficiency grinding re-
cm 3/mml width on large bars and require 8.3 horsepower quire special considerations which prohibit the conversion
per inch 16.2 kWl width of wheel compared to 7.5 horse- of existing grinders into high-efficiency grinders. The de-
power per inch 15.6 kWl width for a belt sign requirements for high-efficiency grinders include the
There are six types of belts as follows: following:
" Paper-backed with two glue coatings. * High spindle speeds to provide grinding wheel speeds of
12,000 to 18,000 feet per minute 160 to 90 m/sl.
" Paper-backed with a glue making-coat and a heat-resist- 0 Hig' work speeds, at least double that of normal
ant resin sizing-coat. grinders.
* Cloth-backed with a glue making-coat and a heat-resist- * High horsepower to accommodate the high rates of
ant resin sizing-coat. metal removal.
" Cloth-backed with two resin coats. * High rigidity and freedom from vibration.
" Cloth-backed, specially waterproofed with two resin a Automatic wheel balancing on the spindle to minimize
coats. grinding wheel vibration
" Belts containing dry lubricants. * Provision for the safety of the operator, the passerby and
the machine tool, including use of special guard systems
Abrasive Belt Machining Conditions to contain the wheel in case of wheel breakage.
Abrasive belt speeds range from 600 feet per minute * Special coolant application systems to ensure that the
13 m/sl on certain ceramics to 14,000 feet per minute 170
m/sl on nonferrous snag grinding. Most abrasive machin- grinding fluid reaches the grinding zone at the high
ing is done between 2,500 and 5,500 feet per minute 113 wheel speeds.
and 28 m/s, with the most commonly used speed being * Filtration systems to remove
em. the large quantities of swarf
4,500 feet per minute 123 m/si. Feee.- vary from one inch Fration syst
per minute 125.4 mm/min for heav slabbing cuts to 240 from the coolant system.
feet per minute 173 m/mini for precision centerless belt * Cooli .g systems to r.event overheating of the grinding
grinding applications. fluid.
HIGH-EFFICIENCY OR HIGH-SPEED The use of live centers rather than dead centers for cylin-
HGIY Odrical
GRINDING speed. grinders to accommodate the increased work
Cylindrical Plunge Grinders - There are many of these cam Grinding Wheel Dressing
machines out in the field for grinding of pinion gears,
shafts, steering knuckles and other components as will be Diamond roll wheel dressing is being used to reduce the
described below, time for dressing the wheel.
20-34
Abrasive Machining 20.5
Applications stock by plunge grinding both straight and formed parts.
Most of the high-efficiency cylindrical grinding applications The grinding wheels are crush dressed. The width of the
are plunge grinding operations. Cylindrical plunge grinding wheel or the length of the ground workpiece can be as
may economically replace turning under the following con- much as 12 inches 1305 min. A necessary requrement for
ditions where: this grinding system includes a high pressure coolant jet
spray which is traversed back and forth across the grinding _4
* The product of the diameter times the length of the grind wheel This jet spray blasts metal and ,warf loose from the
is greater than 4. grinding wheel and maintains a clean wheel. This method
of grinding is being used on steels and 1'-ih temperature al-
* The ground length does not usually exceed 7 inches 1178 loys. It is being applied to the grindi. jet engine com-
'Y
mml. ponents and mechanical test specimens instead of turning
and finish grinding.
* The stock removal is limited to about 0 25 inch 16.4 mml
on the diameter.
* The tolerance is less than 0.003 inch 1 0 075 mm). CREEP FEED GRINDING
Special problems (for example. interrupted cuts) which Creep feed grinding is a process whereby the grinding
might be more restrictive on turning than on grinding, wheel takes the full depth of cut in a single pass at an ex-
tremely slow feed rate. This process was developed in Eu-
* The surface roughness is 30 microinches Ra 10.76 pml or rope some twenty years ago but did not gain wide accept-
greater. ance until recently when specially designed grinding
machines with high stability, increased power and in'-
* The workpieces are mass produced, are manufactured in proved drive systems became available. With such ma-
large batches, or are similar parts produced in short chines it is possible to remove as much as 1 inch 125 mml of
runs. metal from flat or cylindrical surfaces in a single pass,
which rivals the capacity of milling machines.
Table 20.5-1 illustrates some workpieces which were suc-
cessfully high-efficiency machined and compares them with Metal removal rates as high as 1 cubic inch per second
the above list of economic guidelines. 116.4 cm 3/sl with wheel speeds of 20,000 feet per minute
1102 m/sl have been reported.
CYLINDRICAL CRUSH DRESS GRINDING With the present state of the art, it i,, imperative that the
process parameters be evaluated for each new application.
A recent addition to abrasive machining has been the de- This is especially true if the surface integrity of the part is a
sign of cylindrical grinders for removing large amounts of consideration.
SOURCE: C.B Matson, High effiency centertype grinding, Technical papei MR71-147. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, Mi, 1971.
20-35
PiMCED114 PAZ BLANK-NOT W114LED
SECTION 21
ECONOMICS IN
MACHINING AND GRINDING
Introduction ...............................................................
........................................ . ..........
21-3
Effect of Engineering Design on Cost .............................................................21-3
Effect of Surface Roughness and Dimensional Tolerance on Cost ............... 21-3
.........
Machining Cost and Production Rata ................................................................... 21-3
Procedure for Calculating Cost and Production Rate ................................... 21-4
...............................
Determ ining Optim um Cutting Conditions ............................................................... 21-5
Shop Procedures for Optimization of Machining Conditions ........................................ 21-6
e ..................
21-6
iechnique for Calculating Cost and Production Rate .......................................................
21-1
PiRECM.NG PAM B1,ANK-.I.OT FI PED
21-3
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
Although the previous discussion has centered on the rela- Examples
tionship of cost to cutting speed, it should be pointed out
that cost also is a function of other machining parameters. 1. Example of a Cost and Production Rate
such as feed. depth of cut, width of cut, tool material, cut- Determination in Turning on a Conventional Engine
ting fluid. etc Lathe
Table 21-13 contains the time study and cost data for turn-
PROCEDURE FOR CALCULATING COST ing a shaft 3.5 inches in diameter by 19 inches long on a
AND PRODUCTION RATE conventional engine lathe. The material was 4340 steel,
quenched and tempered to 300 Bhn. Three types of tools
The following steps describe a method for calculating ma- (that is,brazed carbide, throwaway carbide, and high
chining cost and production rate. speed steel) were used for the cost investigation. The tool
life data are given in table 21-14. The tool life versus cut-
dMachining Parameters ting speed data sets are denoted by the circled numbers 1,
1. Machining Data and Ma2, 3, and 4 for th- C-7 carbide tool material, and 5,6. 7,
Data relating the tool lifc to machining parameters must be and 8 for the high speed steel tool material.
obtained for those work materials that ate to be machined.
Data can be obtained from handbooks and may also be ob-
tained from historical shop experiences. It is important to The lathe tool setup for turning using the brazed carbide.
have a well-defined format for recording and storing signifi- the throwaway carbide and the solid high speed steel tools
cant data. Typical data formats for turning, milling, drill- was the same as that illustrated in figure 21-5.
ing. reaming and tapping are shown in tables 21-3 through
21-5. Using the above data and the equations for turning from
tables 21-6 and 21-8, the machining cost and production
2. Cost and Production Rate Equations rate were determined. The calculations were performed on
2 C nost and p an IBM 1130 computer, and a I .intout of the results is
Equations
duction for for
rates determining costs, operating
various machining times,
operations are and pro-
listed in shown in figure 21-6. It should be noted that there are
trestsocaulinsonfobaedabdeolson
tables 21-6 and 21-8 for English units and tables 21-7 and three sets of calculations: one for brazed carbide tools, one
for
steelthrowaway carbide
tools. Using tools,
the tool and one
life data for C-7
for the solidcarbide
high speed
tool
21-9 for metric units. The first bracket of terms in the cost
equations determines the time and cost for the machine material and the time study data for brazed carbide tools
materal an ee s dy ata cho ofbfour caride tools.
tool. and the second bracket of terms determines the cost
for the cutter and its reconditioning. In tables 21-6 ad cost caklations were made at each of four cutting speeds.
21-7, the cost equations are given for turning, milling, drill-
ing or reaming. tapping. and center drilling or chamfering. Notice that the printout contains not only the total cost per
These equations apply to both conventional and numerical piece and the production rate in pieces per hour but also all
control machine tools. It should be noted that a separate the cost factors that make up the total cost. In the case of
equation is provided foi calculating the handling and setup the brazed carbide tool, there were ten cost factors; for the
costs. In the case of conventional machining, the two terms throwaway carbide tools, seven; and for the solid hig
inthis equation should be added into the appropriate oper- speed steel, eight. A quick glance at the cost factors in fig-
ation equation in order to calculate the handling and setup ure 21-6 indicates which are significant and which are in-
costs of a specific operation such as turning or milling, etc. significant. For example, with the brazed carbide tool.
In the case of NC machining, the individual equations are when cutting at 470 feet per minute. the total cost was
used for each machining operation in sequence, while the $5.33 per piece. Of this, the feeding cost was $1.50, the
handling and setup equation is used separately. as will be load and unload cost $0.92, the setup cost $0.42, the tool
illustrated in an example to follow. The equations for deter- change cost $0.49. and the tool sharpening cost $1.48. The
mining the operating time and the production rate for each less significant factors were as follows: rapid traverse cost
operation are given in tables 21-8 and 21-9. It is desirable $0.11, tool depreciation cost $0.13, rebrazing cost $0.16.
to program all of the cost and production rate equationc on tip cost $0.10, and the grinding wheel cost $0.02.
a computer for ease of calculations.
For the throwaway carbide tools. figure 21-6. it can be
3. Supporting Data Required to Complete seen that all the tool costs were virtually n:l. On the other
Calculations hand, when turning with solid high speed steel, the tool
In addition to tool life data, time study data and tool cost cost was an appreciable portion of the total cost. Thus,
data are required for a cost and production rate determina- when turning with high speed steel at 45 feet per minute
tion. Tables 21-10 and 21-11 list and define the variable the total cost was $21.29 per piece, the tool change cost
factors that appear in the cost and production rate equa- was $1.29, and the tool sharpening cost $2.58.
tions. Figure 21-5 illustrates the setup factors for various
n.achining operations. Note that "R" equals the total rapid The cost and production rates for turning 4340 steel at 300
traverse distance for a tool or cutter in one operation. Bhn were plotted against cutting speed. Figure 21-7 con-
whereas "e"equals the extra travel in feed. tains these plots for brazed carbide, throwaway carbide W
and high speed steel tools. The data show that the cost per
The derivation of the terms in the cost equations for turn- piece decreased as the cutting speed increased when using
ing and milling are given in table 21-12. throwaway carbide tools. The cost per piece was at a min-
imum at approximately 360 feet per minute for the brazed
The procedure described above has been applied in several carbide, and the cost per piece was at a minimum at ap-
situations to generate the examples that follow. proximately 60 feet per minute for the high speed steel.
21-4
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING 21
The minimum costs for turning within the range of expert- in number of holes drilled, by the hole length to get the drill
mental data were about $3.09 with the throwaway carbide. life in inches of travel required -, dull the drill. Using data
$4 44 with the brazed carbide and $18.62 with the high set 1. the drill life was 30 holes. The lengtt, of each hole
speed steel. The maximum production rate. also within the was 0 5 inch. Therefore. the drill life was T. = 15 inches
range of experimental data, was 8 picces per hour for the (30 x 0.5 inch).
throwaway carbide tools. 7 pieces per hour with the brazed
carbide tools. and 1.8 pieces per hour with the high speed Figure 21-10 is the computer printout of the results from
steel tools. using the drilling equation from table 21-6 to calculate the
cost per piece and the drilling equation from table 21-8 to
For those who would like to calculate the cost manually. determine the production rate.
the cost calculations for the example just described are
given in table 21-15 for turning with the brazed carbide Figure 21-11 shows the cost and production rate curves for
tool. this drilling operation. The data show that the 0.005 ipch
. Eper revolution feed can achieve higher production rates
2. Example of a Cost and Production Rate and lower costs than the 0.002 inch per revolution feed.
Determination in Face Milling on a Conventional provided that proper cutting speeds are used.
Milling Machine
Table 21-16 contains the time study and cost data for face 4. Example of Machining a Part on an NC Machining
milling a block 2 inches wide by 8 inches long. The work Center
material was 4340 steel, quenched and tempered to 341 An example of a 4340 steel forging machined on an NC ma-
Bhn. A two-inch wide cut was taken on the eight-inch long chining center is shown in figure 21-12. The operations
workpiece with 4-inch diameter milling cutters. A solid were to face mill the top surface, peripheral end mill the
high speed steel cutter and two types of carbide cutters (in- sides and ends, mill two slots and drill two holes. The time
serted tooth and throwaway insert) were used. The setup study and tool cost data are given in table 21-20. and the
used for this example was the same as that for milling illus- pertinent machining parameter and tool life data for the
trated in figure 21-5. various operations are given in table 21-21. The cost and
production rates for the individual operations were calcu-
The tool life data for the alloy are given in table 21-17. In lated on the computer and a printout is given in figure
this table, the sets of data relating tool life in inches per 21-13. Again. the computer prints not only the total cost
tooth to cutting speed in feet per minute for the alloy are but also the individual cost factors. It should be noted that
identified by the circled numbers 1 through 6. calculations were made for each of the individual oper-
ations, and for each operation a line of data shows the cost
The IBM 1130 computer was used to calculate the cost per corresponding to the feed. speed and tool life combination.
piece using the milling equation from table 21-6 and the The minimum cost for each of the opertions in the print-
production rate using the milling equation from table 21-8. out of figure 21-13 is circled, and a summary of the best
The compur printout of the results is shown in figure machining conditions is given in figure 21-14.
21-8.
The geometric setup used was the same as that illustrated where:
,for drilling in figure 21-5. v = cutting speed
T and Tt = tool life
The tool life data is listed in table 21-19. The sets of data S and St = reference cutting speed
giving the drill life in number of holes are identified by the n = tool life exponent
circled numbers I through 8. The cost and production
equations required that the drill life (TJ be expressed in (See table 21-10 or 21-11 for detailed definition of
inches. Therefore. it was necessary to multiply the drill lfe. variables.)
21-5
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
With these Taylor equations, the cost for the various ma- overall machining cost and production rate as a function of
chining operations can be minimized. This has been done the machining parameters using the iocedure outlined
by substituting the appropriate Taylor equation into the previously.
cost equation, differentiating the cost with respect to cut-
ting speed, and setting the derivative equal to zero. The
cutting speed calculations for minimum cost (v,,, cost) and TECHNIQUE FOR CALCULATING COST
for maximum production (vm5 . p!)for the conventional as
well as the NC machining operations are given in the equa- AND PRODUCTION RATE
tions in tables 21-22 and 21-23. The corresponding tool Although the equations used for the cost and production
life equations for minimum cost and maximum production rate calculations involve only simple mathematics, the de-
are given in table 21-24. The values of Vmincost and tailed analysis of a given machining setup will become very
vm. dj in the denominators must be calculated using the time consuming because many factors mLst be included.
appropriate equation(s) from table 21-22 or 21-23. With this in mind, techniques have been developed that al-
low the rapid analysis of a machining operation through the
The validity of the optimized determination depends, in use of computers and programmable calculators.
turn, on the validity of the constants n and S or St in the
Taylor equation. The most accurate values of these con- The cost and production rate equations given in tables
stants can be determined by actual experimentation (that 21-6 and 21-8 have been programmed in FORTRAN IV
is, by actual cutting tests). In so doing, it is also possible to for use on a computer with as little as 8K memory, such as
determine the range of cutting conditions over which the an IBM 1130. This program, called NCECO, is available
Taylor equation applies. The least reliable procedure is to through the Machinability Data Center and issupplied in
pick an average value for the Taylor constant from a hand- card-deck form and includes full documentation. With mi-
book. It is suggested that if one assumes the Taylor rela- nor n"ldifications for input-output, this program will oper-
tionship and proceeds to determine optimum cutting condi- ate on any digital computer supporting the FORTRAN IV
tions, these conditions should be verified by actual shop language. The program will accept any combination of ma-
tests. chining operations required for a part setup including: turn-
ing, face andend
milling, milling, drilling, reaming, tapping,
The relationship of cutting conditions to tool life as deter- center drilling chamfering. Capability exists to deter-
mined by actual cutting tests may be too complex to be rep- cented afe ringa pability eist toter
the sipl
th
resented byresnte b
simple Taloreqatin.Techniques
Taylor equation. Tspeed are mine the effects using allortypes
ofcarbide, of tools, that is, high
steel, brazed throwaway carbide. To run
now available to mathematically model the more complex this program. data such as that in table 21-13 is compiled
relationship of tool life to cutting speed, feed, and depth of
cut. The mathematical model can, in turn, be used to deter- or cardshchainputato
on which are input to The mter The
the computer. the computer
puter -
mine cost and production rate over the wide range of then prints out a detailed cost breakdown such as that
machining conditions with subsequent determination of shown in figure 21-13.
minimum cost. minimum cutting time and maximum pro-
duction rates. These techniques are too complex for in- With the advent of programmable calculators, it is now
clusion in this handbook, possible to perform these calculations quickly without uti-
lizing a large computer. A calculator generally uses semi-
SHOP PROCEDURES FOR OPTIMIZATION conductor electronics that allow the solving of a mathe-
OF MACHINING CONDITIONS matical problem using a series of keystrokes on the
machine. A programmable calculator has the ability to
When it is felt necessary to decrease cost or increase pro- store and automatically execute the series of keystrokes
ductivity of a machining operation, it is possible to experi- necessary to solve a particular problem. Using this feature.
meat on the shop floor by changing machining conditions. a programmable calculator can be instructed to perform all
It is necessary to keep careful records of the changes in cut- the calculations necessary for cost and production rate
ting conditions and the effect of these changes on tool life analysis with the user supplying only the data necessary for
as well as on production rates. the calculations. Two such programmable calculators are
the Hewlett-Packard HP-67 and the Texas Instrument
The first step is usually to increase the feed. The feed may TI-59.
be increased until either the specified surface roughness is
no longer obtained or the tool life starts to decrease. With The Hewlett-Packard HP-67 is a pocket-sized program-
the best feed, the next step is to increase and then decrease mable calculator powered by alternating current or re-
the cutting speed and observe the change in tool life. By chargeable batteries. All output is by digital display. The
this manner, the combination of feed and speed can be se- programs are stored on small magnetic strips and are read
lected to achieve maximum productivity. Additional fac- by the machine simply by inserting a strip in a slot on the
tors which may be investigated for their effect on tool life side of the machine. The small memory size of this machine
include cutting tool material, tool geometry, and cutting makes it necessary to use a separate memory strip for each
fluid. type of machining operation. The magnetic strips are
stored in a 3-by-5-inch card which gives all the necessary
Although the feed rate as a result of shop trials can be read- instructions for running a complete analysis. Since this cal-
ily observed, it is not possible to directly observe the effect culator is pocket-sized, it is well suited for doing these cal-
of these trials on the overall machining cost since the ma- culations right on the shop floor. An enlarged version of the
chining cost involves not only machine tool time but also instructions and sample inputs and outputs are shown in
the cutter cost. It is necessary, therefore, to calculate the figure 21-15.
21-6
21.-i
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
U)
00
U).)
c o 0
0
3-- E
0 o co
-00
Et U)
0~ C=D
I-- 0 oa
000
0~0
=0 0
L
00
0
0.0
0 c
co<
E )
c >.= a
0 ~ ~ 0
co ccC3 .0 0
co c oo
cv 00
cm CL E
Wc cc C E ~v 20 2
'ac EC
cvo M
M ja = - c < - I,
,.Q 0 M2
.2 U)
. .0 E 0 x _ <
07U) rU)U.0 0
0) U) oo >) .0 E
m
s E E E~ ED(D0
; ~- , o0
,T 5< c C 0 -
7io M 0
'Ur~~I- Z' EZ1 5 ZE
21-8
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING 21
TABLE 21-2 Relative Machining Time of Various Alloys Compared to 4340 Steel, 300 Bhn
MATERIAL GROUP
1CONDI- HARD 1 I El
MATERIAL TIOND NESS HSS arbide HSS Carbide HSS Carbide HSS HSS
_____
____ ____
____ ____ ____ I ___ ____ Wi
Bhn i __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Ann
-1 320
220 0.8
i13 10
0.8
T 1.7
0.6
1.7
0.7
1.0
0.5
1.0
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.0
1.0
steels Q&T 5601 - 14.0 - 100 - 25.0 1.1" -
Ann 2001 0.8 09 0.5 0.5 0.9 1.0 0.8 1.3
H11 Q&T 3501 1 .7 2.0 1.7 20 3.3 5.0 1.4 1.7
Q&T 5201 -I 50 25.0 10.0 - 10.0 10.0 10.0
Maraging steels 200,250. Ann 320 1.7 0.8 1.0 1.4 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.3
.. 1 300 Grades Mar 500 33 2.5 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 50
Stainless steels, 302,304 Ann 180 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.8 1.0
austenitic 317.321 -
martensitic Q&T 300 1.7 1.3 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.3 0.8 1.3
420 Q&T 400 25 3.3 5.0 5.0 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.5
Stainless steels, 17-4 PH Ann 170 1.0 0.9 1.1 0.9 1.1 0.8 1.0 1.0
precipitation 17-7 PH
hardening
AM-350 Ann 300 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.0 1.4 1.3
17-4 PH
17-7 PH Q&T 400 25 20 3.3 3.3 2.5 5.0 2.5 2.5
AM-350
Titanium alloys Ti-100A - 175 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.4 0.4 0.8 0.5 0.8
Ti-5AI-2.5Sn Ann 300 1.4 1.4 1.4 25 0.5 1.3 0.7 1.0
Ti-6AI-4V Ann 310 1.7 20 2.0 33 1.0 2.0 1.2 1.3
STA 365 20 2.5 2.0 3.3 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.7
Ti-7AI-4Mo
Ti-6AI-6V-2Sn Ann 320 2.0 2.0 2.5 2.0 1.1 1.7 0.9 1.4
Ti-8AI-1Mo-1V
Ti-6AI-6V-2Sn STA 420 2.5 3.3 2.5 5.0 1.4 2.5 1.4 2.5
Ti-7AI-4Mo
Ti-13V-llCr-3AI ST 310 2.5 5.0 3.3 3.3 2.0 3.3 3.3 2.5
STA 400 2.5 5.0 3.3 10.0 3.3 4.0 10.0 3.3
High temperature Rete 41 ST 280 5.0 5.0 10.0 16.7 5.0 5.0 3.3 2.5
alloys Inconel700 STA 365 10.0 5.0 10.0 16.7 10.0 12.5 10.0 5.0
U-500 _
Nickel base Incone1718 ST 270 5.0 5.0 3.3 10.0 3.3 10.0 3.3 2.5
STA 370 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 12.5 12.5 5.0 5.0
Cobalt base HS25 ST 200 3.3 50 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 33 2.5
S-816 STA 300 5.0 10.0 10.0 12.5 10.0 10.0 5.0 3.3
Iron base A-286 ST 200 1.7 2.5 1.4 3.3 2.0 3.3 1.7 1.7
19-9DL STA 300 2.0 3.3 3.3 5.0 3.3 12.5 3.3 2.5
Aluminum 7075-T6 STA 75 0.12 0.3 0.06 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.5
alloys to
1 150'
Source R. L Vaughn and N.Zlatm. "Producibility Aspects of Aerospace Products with Regard to Machinability," ASTME PaperW
WE S7-29.1967.
*Condition: Ann-Annealed 0 &T-Quenched and Tempered *Brinell Hardness for 500 kg load
Norm-Normalized ST-Solution Treated 'Carbide Drill
Mar-Maraged STA-Solution Treated and Aged
21-9
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
400
Material: Steel
350
Approximate
______ _____ machining costs
300___
06 250
05
o 00
50
Semi-
finish FinishI
Rough turn turn turn Grind j
Semi-
finish Finish
Rough turn tunGrind Hone
Figure 21-2 Relative machining costs and surface roughness for steel parts. (Courtesy of Gel'eral
Electric Company)
21 -10
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING 21
Turning Face Milling Cylindrical Grinding
900 300
800 Tolerance
0002 and under
700 250
70-
25 rms Surface
600 0 200 - -%'.A roughness
- 60-
0e
Q
1500o
5
400 C 40'
Zi 30 100 - Tolerance
ToveOO 30 0 rms Surface
C 0 roughness
200 20
50
10 C
01 10
0
25 63 125 250 400 0*j
45 63 125 0.0001 0.00025 0.0005 0,001
Surface roughness value. rms Surface roughness value. rms
Dimensional tolerance. in
40
160
3535
140__
0,
Infeed
U a
Througheed %
10 to -40
0
0.010v1 0.0005 0.001 0.002 01
0.0005 0.001 0.002 0.0001 0.0003 0.001
Dimensional tolerance, in Dimensional tolerance, in Dimensional tolerance. in
Figure 21-3 Effect of tolerance and surface
roughness on machining costs for several operations.
(L. J. Bayer, Analysis of manufacturing costs relative
to product design. Paper No. 56-A-9, American Society
- - of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY. 1956)
21-11
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
'j))
0
C.)
C-L
CLC
W Toa0ahiigcs
0
*0
Feed or
cutting cs
Figure 21-4 Machining cost and production rate versus cutting speed.
21-12
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING 21
- C) 0 toT o o N 0 ol 0T
m u QD1,' 11
Lii IC
c.5
cm vi1
" c"
q' acu
--
%D
01 o 00
o
ImcD
C
00(
.
c .I
010
0
0 WD 001
cDo lo
__ __jD ' i
cot
co C!
C, .
C> 0
Lo (D Doo 10
CD 6 6
0
6,
0 t t0
6 I 6
0 -
o
6I 6
ti 0 0 cm 0
c3 c 2 a
to r D Id 0
p~
ELZ-- <100
_tn 0 in, P CL a C-i M
C0 0 c 0o t 0o
co co c
Z5, c oC co oV
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
..........
0 0
0, 00
u, OLOo wt
0 0o
It m 0mf- 0-0
6o
0 Lo0
to
9T - n0)
00
s
te 13
_ _ _to
_ _ _
= L. 0
m~
* ~ -l
00
. Lo . o
0 W. c02 a c
0
==.2.
a. == i0 0m0
___9_ =. -6-.E2,
A 0
MU Lo tn W. c
C, _
-~ 'c
U) .)
(
-M -- ---
-6 _ _
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING 21
0UC 'I'0L
FE
Lo~C 00t
m0 ) 0
cv ) )
U) U,
0 0)
N o
0 0D
a. Ia
C.U
CV
-FU C.2
Um
- 5to,
c" tot)C
a--
to-
-~ .- 0 -U
cx (6 A
caz cm P.:_
c;0 a- PrE
0,
ca' CcoE3i
+_
__ co_ .
__
- R
-)
_ __ rC
-11
_ ~ C a) E.U
3-C.7
00
I=U) Ow 0 0V
~ ~ & N
~2 -1 B-
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
a,
+ + + + + O.
_o
0
+ + +o
*0
N C
cc
+ + +
0 C
I-,
0 +
+ + + ++ ca
f r
0 ++ + + +
+ + + + +
o ++ + +
LU cm N
. -
0 0
+ + +
. E ++
- 1-
CC
-1
.!7ccn 1---16
acc
C 2 E,
+ + + + E +
0 4) -1i> a
o L
+IN E +~ 0
.JiR C 0
(I-~~ 0a 00 0 0 c
21-16
" ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING 21
Q))
J++ -21 + 4)-
+ ++- + + +
+
0m
+ +
0 0CD 0
CC0
+ +
+ +>
0)~
to tO _ .)
C
+ +.4 4
00
Su-
.. 7E
cu: E
0) ++ + + +
0
C++
0L
-
+ +
) +
,) 0.j
21-17
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
TABLE 21-8 Equations for Calculating Operating Time TABLE 21-9 Equations for Calculating Operating Time
Per Piece and Production Rate When Using English Per Piece and Production Rate When Using Metric Units
Units
EQUATIONS FOR OPERATING TIME PER PIECE
EQUATIONS FOR OPERATING TIME PER PIECE
Turning
Turning D(L+ e) R ti DLtd
D(L+e) R t + DLt, t, - 318fr +- 318frvT
3.82fv r 3.82fvT Milling
-' + tL + )
21-18
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING 21
TABLE 21-10 Cost and Production Rate Equation Variables
(Definitions and applications for variables in English units)
APPLIES TO OPERATION
21-19
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
APPLIES TO OPERATION
VARIABLE DEFINITION I Drl lnDrill-Center
T
I Ream'
C Cost for machining one workpiece; $/workpiece , V V V "
C Cost of each insert or inserted blade; S/blade V V No No No
C' Purchase cost of tool or cutter; S/cutter V V V V V
(;,. Cost of grinding wheel for resharpening tool or cutter; S/cutter V V" No No No
d Depth of cut; mm V V No No No
D Dia. of work in turning, of tool in milling, drillinyj, reaming, tapping; mm V V V V V
e Extra travel at feedrate (f,or f,) including approach, overtravel, and all
positioning moves; mm V . V V V
f, Feed per revolution; mm V No V No V
21-20
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING 21
Le R
Turning
R -. L e
t Workp~ece
Milling
. ,i i I
Fl
Drilling Reaming Tapping
21-21
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
TABLE 21-12 Derivation of Terms in Cost Equations for Turning and Milling
N, = No. pieces between sharpenings Tool life. min 3.82 f,v T Tool life (Total length cut, in) ZT
R R
R R
Rapid traverse time
r r
Set m Time to set up I.
No. pieces in lot N, NL
Tool
resharp. Time to 1 1xG
cost N resharpen cutter NxGto N'- t
21-22 FEW
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING 21
TABLE 21-13 Time Study and Cost Data for Turning 4340 Steel Shaft
R Total rapid traverse distance for a tool on one part, in 27.2 27.2 27.2
C, Cost of each carbide tip or insert, $ 5.00 3.15 -
Cp Purchase cost of tool, S 6.70 28.30 18 30
C. Cost of grinding wheel for resharpening tool, $ 0.07 - 0 02
d Depth of cut, in 0.1 0.1 0.1
D Diameter of work in turning, in 3.5 35 35
I, Feed per revolution, in a
*These values are taken from Tool Lde Data. tpble 21-14.
2
21-23
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
-qr
C oI M
0 V L
F; -e IV
=0 0 l
C- co
B_ 0
-ED
U) c
ME-
cm
C -D
S z P 0
5 0 0
0-.
-6
0
0 (
CLo-
E- ID,
03 CD2 E a)
21-24
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
21
I
i
21-25
I
I
I
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
8 ~Throwaw~ay carbide11
_______ I _______
_______ _______ Brazed carbide
a. 2 _ _
0 L_____
__
20.00HS_____
CL
60 10.00
Brazed carbide
5.00
Figure 21-7 Cutting speed versus cost and production rate for turning 4340 steel (quenched and tem-
pered, 300 Bhn) with three tool materials.
21-26 __
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING 21
TABLE 21-15 Manual Cost Calculations for Turning 4340 Steel Shaft With Brazed Carbide Tool
21-27
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
TABLE 21-16 Time Study and Cost Data for Face Milling, 2 Inches Wide by 8 inches Long
(Material: 4340 steel, quenched and tempered, 341 Bhn)
!NSERTED
TOOTH SOLID
CARBIDE THROWAWAY He,
VARIABLE DEFINITION TIP INSERT CUTTER
a Approach of cutter to work, in 90 9.0 90
C, Cost of each nserted tooth, throwaway insert, or I
carbide tip, $ 250 2.35 -
C, Purchase cost of cutter, $ 137 00 248.00 310.00
C. Cost of grinding wheel for resharpaning cutter,
$/cutte, 0.30 -0 35
d Depth of cut, in *
D Diameter of milling cutter, in 4.0 4.0 4.0
e Overtravel of mil!ing cutter past workpiece, in. 5.0 5.0 5.0
f, Feed per tooth, in 0 0
G Labor and overhead cost on cutter grinder,
$/min 040 - 0.40
ki No of times cutter is resharpened before being
discarded 9000 9000 20
kz No of
(ortimes cutter
blades) areisreset
resharpened before inserts
(o; rebrazed) 4- ,
k3 No of times blades (or inserts) are resharpened (or
indexed) before blades (or inserts) are disco-rded 12 8 -
L Length of workpiece, in 8.0 80 8.0
M Labor and overhead cost on r ,Pmg machine. $/min 0.40 0 40 0 40
N No. of workpieces in lot 100 100 100
r Rapid traverse rate, in/aim 150 150 150
tb Time to reset blades or to rebraze cutter teeth,
min 30 --
*These values are taken from Tool Life Data, table 21-17
21-28
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
21
EE E
= o (o c
oc
0l , t) L
6, 6'
-C2
0
0.
a =s
0 C
I-
0z Co
0z 0
Cf C
I-0
-I-
W
_o
zel
= C2
L3
0 -- ~E - I-
0, -
1-
21-29
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
DATA'* WORK
:IARD'TOOL 'CUT *FEED/'TOOL * :FEEDORAPD:LOAD*SET-'CUTR:BODYTCUTR*BLAD*BLADGRND* "*TOTAL"*PROD:
SET' 'NESS'*ATL* 'SPD 'TOOTHLIFE * 'COST*TRAV*UNLO UP *CHNG*DEPR'SHPN*RSET'COST*'HL.* "COST "RATE'
NO.' MATERIAL * * *FIN * IN 'IN/TN' ' S ' S ' S * S ' S S ' S * S ' S ' S ' "S/PC."PC/HR
6 AISI 4340 341 C-6 680 0.005 20.0 0.2? 0.08 1.20 0.24 0.2? 0.00 2.13 0.20 0.08 0.02 4.41 11.7
S AISI 4340 341 C-6 550 0.005 50.0 0.33 0.08 1.20 0.24 0.11 0.00 0.85 0.08 0.03 0.01 2.93 12.2
6 AIS! 4340 341 C-6 340 0.005 80.0 0.53 0.08 1.20 0.24 0.07 0.00 0.53 0.05 0.02 0.00 2.73 11.3
THROWAWAY INSERT
4 AISI 4340 341 C-6 680 0.005 20.0 0.27 0.08 1.20 0.24 0.16 0.00 0.12 2.07 12.3
5 AISI 4340 341 C-6 550 0.005 50.0 0.33 0.08 1.20 0.24 0.06 0.00 0.05 1.96 12.5
6 AISI 4340 341 C-6 340 0.005 80.0 0.53 0.08 1.20 0.24 0.04 0.00 0.03 2.13 11.4
I AISI 4340 341 TIS 93 0.010 17.0 0.42 0.08 1.20 0.24 0.13 0.50 1.08 0.01 3.66 11.6
2 AISI 4340 341 TIS 76 0.010 22.0 0.51 0.08 1.20 0.24 0.10 0.38 0.83 0.01 3.36 11.2
3 AISI 4340 341 i1S 62 0.010 32.0 0.63 0.08 1.20 0.24 0.0? 0.26 0.57 0.01 3.06 10.P
Figure 21-8 Printout of cost and production rate results for face milling 4340 steel with three cutter materials.
21-30
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING 21
120
0 2 carbide
C,
10.
5.0
4.
CL Solid HSS
0
21.0
tempered,~~nsete
treto mtras carid tipwt
213
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
TABLE 21-18 Time Study and Cost Data for Drilling Five Holes, 0.25-Inch Diameter by 0.5-Inch Deep
(Material- 4340 steel, annealed, 212 Bhn)
I
2
21-32
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
21
~ z 0V Pn
W- 0
'A .cN 0
0;
Oga No N..4
fu f N N t.y N
00
r
a
(Vi Lfl
0 0
0 C
- a,
4.
.4 , '
_j0ILN 0 '
0
.. . . .... . . .. . . . . .
'coo 0~~_ a: 0j 0 - 0
4.xw 0 40
QQ.,,. . . . . . . . . .
.4 ' j - w, 0 0
00
.43
7 o 0
z- .4 04
5',0o
0)
lot~f
Sn.c. ;
o 2 ! 0) 00
0 K,
0 G0
05
N
0
0a 0 0 0 0
P S Wn
frE '~ o n 0 a
CV 0
0 ~~~~~0
,N
-l N 'A
N
-
N A
n
' 0
of50 0'
0
U 0 0 0 0 003
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
30_____
0
0 25
1.8
1.6
2 2
2.00
1.80
0.0052
ipr
~, 1.60
1.0
0.8
Figure 21-11 Cutting speed versus cost and production rate for drilling holes in 4340 steel (annealed __
21-341
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
21
0to
00
CO~ C
CD
CL0 -
to
CD
ca,
0)
E
tr. Z _
JU-1~ t woCCUt
to a)
to UU
CD"
000
I N-
21-35
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
TABLE 21-20 Time Study and Cost Data for Machining 4340 Steel Forging on an NC Machining Center
OPER. I Part No.
NO. OPERATION 456987-003
N 010 Face mill top surface PartI Name 45698-Si3
Bracket-Slider
N 020 Peripheral end mill sides and ends Material AISI 4340 Steel Forg.
td Time to replace dull cutter in tool changer storage unit; min 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
t. Time to index from one type cutter to another between operations (automatic
o: manual); min 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
t; Time to load and unload workpiece; min 20 2.0 2.0 2.0
to Time to setup machine tool for operation; min 60 60 60 60
tp Time to preset tools away from machine (in toolroom); min 20 15 15 12
t, Time to resharpen lathe tool. milling cutter, drill, reamer or tap; min/tool - 15 15 5
T, Tool life measured in inches travel of work or tool to dull a drill, reamer, tap or
one milling cutter tooth; in I
v Cutting speed; fpm
w Width of cut; in 3.50 0.75 0.75 -
Z No. of teeth in milling cutter or no. of flutes in a tap 6 4 4 1
*These values taken from Tool Life Data, tab:e 21-21.
21-36
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING 21
TABL.E 21-21 Tool Life Data for Machining 4340 Steel ont an NC Machining Center
FACE MILLING*
I TOOL
MATL TOOL
GEOMETRY
____I I i
ON
utp ' CUT- TOOL TOOL
UFEITOOTH
cogriaIO kims- IDaWn ill.' TOIGOEP 1MOTHFEED richres
work travel
I
MATERIAL AN jHARD- Trig try ANL- j -J FUID OF OF P E NDOi
MIISTRUCTIE NESS bw. Grig. 06 AA~lt CAl TR* l ECEP . OD CUT CUT ITOOTHI POWtT CUUSPEWD.fpm
m
PEIPHEIA EN MILING
COWTN
11111113- RO. WIDTHFEED LIFE
TUG DEPTH Inches
work travel
Normalized -
1
M HSI 1
Aiua
331 SS
HS
uiie0750
Sen J01 4 2 Down 30 10 0.6
in8
1 1.2 200700001 5108
155010 70
MIATRI [-1
MIL
~TOOL
N - HAR- Trade try CUTTER KO FlITTE MEIIL-"six
1K
END MILL SLOTTING
TOOL
GEMETY
Chow- FLUID OF OF IS 11 i
MICICUE MWS rd
136 TYPE Olk ToUl118TH 06 Anb IA.- r
IEMA E CUT CUT TOOH OU CIITTUG6siEEO
lwn
DRILLING
OW
OSIIA IMILLIMZ DRILEUBY {
____L ' OIILI
Bni I ir i _i
10 50 100 150
4
Sigle tooth cutter except as noted74
*Cuffing Fluid Code
00 Dry
I i Soluble Oil
21-37
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
SET NO.'
0 OPER. :RATL' S :LIFE *COST'TRAV'UNLD' UP *IkDX'REPL":DEPRSHPNRSET:COSTNHL 'PRST: : COST ::TIME
NO. * *$ SN S* S ' S* S
S % S S S
$ * I *. HIl.
30001 N010 FR-TA C-6 670. 0.005 47. 0.65 0.24 0.08 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.28 e 1.27
30002 NO1 FM-TA C-6 540. 0.005 70. 0.80 0.24 0.08 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.19 1.44 1.43
30003 NO1O FM-TA C-6 445. 0.005 83. 0.98 0.24 0.08 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.16 1.56 1.62
30004 WO1O FM-TA C-6 345. 0.005 95. 1.26 0.24 0.08 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.14 1.81 1.96
30005 NO20 EM-HSS R2 155. 0.004 50. 2.78 0.15 0.08 0.33 0.25 0.79 0.01 0.79 4.03
413)
30006 N020 EM-HSS M2 100. 0.004 100. 4.31 0.15 0.08 0.16 0.12 0.39 0.01 0.39 5.63 5.67
3000? N020 EM-HSS NQ 80. 0.004 140. 5.39 0.15 0.08 0.12 0.09 0.28 0.00 0.28 6.40 6.92
30008 N020 EM-HSS M? 70. 0.004 220. 6.16 0.15 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.18 0.00 0.18 6.88 7.79
30009 N030 EN-HSS M2 65. 0.002 50. 3.34 0.26 0.08 0.10 0.OS 0.25 0.00 0.25 Q-3) 4.56
30010 N030 EM-HSS M2 54. 0.002 110. 4.02 0.26 0.08 0.05 0.02 0.11 0.00 0.11 4.66 5.31
30011 N030 EM-HSS M2 43. 0.002 190. 5.05 0.26 0.08 0.03 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.07 5.56 6.52
30012 N040 DRILL MI 90. 0.002 10. 0.45 0.23 0.08 0.25 0.01 0.20 0.48 1.70 1.22
30013 N040 DRILL Mi 74. 0.002 25. 0.35 0.23 0.08 0.10 0.00 0.08 0.19 1.23 1.16
30014 N040 DRILL R1 60. 0.002 50. 0.68 0.23 0.08 0.05 0.00 0.04 0.10 1.18 1.25
30015 N040 DRILL MI 50. 0.002 80. 0.81 0.23 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.06 1.24 1.39
30016 N040 DRILL "1 74. 0.005 5. 0.22 0.23 0.08 0.50 0.01 0.40 0.96 2.40 1.24
30017 N040 DRILL MI 45. 0.005 25. 0.36 0.23 0.08 0.10 0.00 0.08 0.19 1.05 0.93
30018 N040 DRILL R1 36. 0.005 50. 0.45 0.23 0.08 0.05 0.00 0.04 0.10 0.98 z
30019 N040 DRILL MI 30. 0.005 90. 0.54 0.23 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.96 1.06
LOAD. UNLOAD AND SETUP TIME AND COST 1.66 2.49 4.15 5.00
NOTE - FEED UNITS ARE IPR FOR TURNING, DRILLINGREAMING, AND CENTERDRILLING OR CHAPFE ING
FEED UNITS ARE IPT FOR MILLING
TOOL LIFE UNITS ARE IN, FOR MILLING, DRILLING, REANINGAND TAPPING
TOOL LIFE UNITS ARE MIN. FOR TURNING
TOOL LIFE UNITS ARE NO. OF HOLES FOR CENTERDRILLING OR CHAMFERING
Figure 21-13 Printout of cost and production rate results for machining 4340 steel forging on an NC machining center.
21-38
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING 21
30001 NO10 FM-TA C-6 670. 0.005 47. 0.65 0.24 0.08 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.28 1.43 1.27
30005 N0Z0 EN-HSS M? 155. 0.004 50. 2.78 0.15 0.08 0.33 0.25 0.79 0.01 0.79 5.18 4.03
30009 N030 EM-HSS M2 65. 0.002 50. 3.34 0.26 0.08 0.10 0.05 0.25 0.00 0.25 4.34 4.56
30018 N040 DRILL *I 36. 0.005 50. 0.45 0.23 0.08 0.05 0.00 0.04 0.10 0.95 0.98
LOAD, UNLOAD AND SETUP TINE AND COST 1.66 2.49 4.1s S.00
7.22 .88 1.66 2.49 .32 .57 .30 1.08 .09 .01 1.42 16.05 .84
NOTE - FEED UNITS ARE IPA FOR TURNING, DRILLING.REANING AND CENTERKILLINS OR CHARFERING
FEED UNITS ARE IPT FOR MILLING
TOOL LIFE UNITS ARE IN, FOR MILLING,. DRILLING, REARING.AND TAPPING
TOOL LIFE UNITS ARE NIN. FOR TuRNING
TOOL LIFE UNITS ARE NO. CF HOLES FOR CENTERDRILLING OR CHAMFERING
Figure 21-14 Best conditions for machining 4340 steel forging on an NC machining center.
21-39
21 ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING
TABLE 21-22 Optimized Cutting Speed Equations for Use with English Units
For Turning
+ +
+ t 1 k2 C + Gt,
S +ej n
n(L+e)
V FnLn)LtdJ
e)[o(-
For Milling
n
n ,+
n
+ 1 nMD(L+e)
v , (S,) L
LGtd++
3.2f t + b + - + C, + Gt-
82LMt + k, + 1 + Gtk
n
n + l
1 ( nD(L+e) I
o () n
[3.82f Lt J
()n+1
-- nD(L+e)
For Tapping
1 r
=5 (
)fl 1 .91L (t, + knnD+) t G)
W-71mnD(~e) +
V - P~_ (St
21-40
" ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING 21
WA I.LL1-23 Oplhnlzoud C1ltliti Spood Eclunillos for Uso wilh Moiric,lilll
For Turnling
....
,
For Milling
v~ nn+I
101, L ML, +1 C( +] O
rr1 + + + +
+ e)
ji ; r k~~t Ii,
v~~~~~~
,,., .....
- ( 1, [p.D(L
~~~318,L,
- (',)" 1 ' M
td + nn Gs, + a
n .. . . . . .. - ,,,, ,
For Topping
n
1 '
..... r1 L n) I-c
+ _ -- + )mj
n
( 8 )1 + 1 n +pLt
v......, -
N1 - 1
w-U
For Turning
1
1
Tmm. p . [
Tt moxpro
[
II
WZ
I
N.
A
21-42 --
ECONOMICS IN MACHINING AND GRINDING 21
00
Q)' - - a . V
0-C4N V
0Lc ,0ci4 ;6u uC - ) =
CC)
T. 0. 0)
co 0U C)
0 -j 0
10 o- 'o
0.~~F ~ 0 ' (]1
*61) V)0N to 2 O
o c' o ei ' C -- nC
C)
-WW CC U) W )LJWc, C)
- -- F- R, t- < 0 0 N--UU
cc f 0 0
LLu
k- F- JAM
o(, - E
C., - av " ..
az 4r(.
0)
2-E > C a
rcrc E ~I c -r Zc !; C]-
-
ZC)ca C CL
_ _ _, 4) ! 0 ' -
a)- CD 04
ii~~ 0
.0 r) u) - ) -
.0 --
- EI 4 )
0 0
11E -,J 0, Ll ( C 0
*vD -~~
-21: 43
9 PRESET COT
0: T 9. Preset cost. dollars
0.
10 R TRAVERS I 1 10. Rapid traverse distance inches
C: OST
,-., Constant cost, dollars
15122
6 S F FD- - Feeding cost. dollars
,4, .9 .:.
0 TL Tool cost. dollars
6.3
6 3.,:, 16 Z- TOT -- Total cost, dollars
Figure 21-16 Example of the cost and production program as run on the .9 calculator.
21-44
NOTE: The material in this section was adapted in large part from a home-study course and reference marnal entitled "How to
Troubleshoot Machine Chatter and Vibration" with permission of Manufacturing Education Copyright 1978 by Manufacturing Educa-
tior, P 0. Box 36050. Cincinnati. Ohio 45236
22-1
MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION 22
INTRODUCTION structures. Cast iron is more resistant to deflection than
aluminum, steel is even better. and tungsten carbide is su-
Problems arising from machine tool-workpiece vibration perior Since cast iron is an easily obtainable material and
are among the major obstacles to greater productivity in less expensive to machine than steel, it is often used in ma-
metal cutting The vibratory motion between a cutting tool chine tool structures in spite of its lower modulus of elastic-
and a workpiece is recorded on the workpiece surface and. ity Tungsten carbide is very expensive and costly to ma-
depending upon the severity of the oscillatory motion and chine, hence. it is used where performance is more
the surface finish specifications. may result in parts with important than cost
unsatisfactory surface quality Excessive vibration or chat-
ter may also seriously decrease tool life. In addition, chat- For a given material, the deflection of a structure is a func-
ter affects the life of bearings and other machine com- tion of the applied load and the geometry Equation 22-1
ponents. although this is not well understood.' 4 can be used to predict the deflection of the cantilever beam
with a round cross section. illustrated in figure 22-1.
Higher production rates and more severe cutting condi-
tions encountered in modern shops reveal another vibra- 64PL 3
tion problem-excessive noise This problem usually stems d = - (Eq. 22-1)
known as
from the high frequency vibrational condition
chatter, and while it may have only a slight physical effect where:
on surface finish, recent government regulations have fo- d = beam deflection. inches
cused sharply upon the noise environment of the machine P = force on the end of the beam, pounds
tool operator. L = length of the beam. inches
22-3
22 MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION
diameter ratio of greater than four or five to one is consid- Forcing of Structures
ered impractical A given percentage increase in diameter The important terminology of vibration a- -sis is tlus-
(D) has an even greater effect on reducing deflection than trated in figure 22-3 and is used extensivel: i the follow-
length had on increasing deflection: hence, it is important ing discussion Included are:
to have the diameter of overhanging members as large as
possible Amplitude. A. is the maximum displacement from the
equilibrium position It is one-half of the peak-to-valley
Structural Stiffness distance and is not the total displacement from the top-
The stiffness of a structure can be interpreted as the most peak to the lowest valley
amount of force required to produce an inch of deflection Period T. is the time required to complete one full
Equation 22-2 can be used to calculate the stiffness of a cycle of vibration.
structure in pounds per inch.
p Frequency. f. is the number of cycles which are com-
K = dd (Eq 22-2) pleted in a given amount of time. usually one second.
where:
K = stiffness. pounds per inch
P = force. pounds
d = deflection. inches o I-----
For example. if a machine deflects 0.001 inch under a load - '
of 800 pounds. the stiffness is: A
800>
K 800.000 lb/in
0.001 C
o
If the stiffness of a structure is known. its deflection under "
load can be calculated from a modified form of equation CL - Equilibrium position
22-2: f T-
P
K Figure 22-3 Periodic motion of a vibrating struc-
ture.
The term "directional stiffness- is used to describe the stiff-
ness of a structure when loaded in different directions. This
is an important concept because many machines. tools, and
workpieces have both stiff and weak directions. If a ma- Equation 22-3 is an important relationship between fre
chinig setup is made so that cutting forces are aimed to- quency and period:
ward the weak direction. excessive deflection and possible
chatter will occur. If the setup is changed so that the forces
are in the stiff direction. the problem will be minimized or f(cycles per second) (Eq. 22-3)
eliminated. As an example, consider figure 22-2: if this T (sec) (
beam is loaded in the Z or the X directions, it will be very
rigid. Loaoing the beam in the Y direction produces the Another name for -cycles per second- is Hertz. For ex-
greatest deformation and. therefore. the lowest directional ample. 20 cycles per second is the same as 20 Hertz. While
stiffness. the term Hertz is the officir! standard for frequency in the
p U. S. A.. many prefer to use the more descriptive term cy-
Y cles oer second, or cps. The term cps will be used in this
discussion.
j
2
22--4
MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION 22
The occurrence of forced vibrations in a milling operation cast iron has much higher internal damping This figure
can be expected for three major reasons First. the number might lead to the conclusion that cast iron machine struc-
of teeth in contact with the workpiece is changing con- tures have a much better vibration resistance than those
stantly Second, the angular orientation of the force built from steel
changes as the tooth rotates. Third. the chip thickness
changes as the tooth moves through the arc of contact. Fig-
ure 22-4 is an illustration of an actual recording of milling
forces II Forced vibration is obviously present in all three
cutting force components. F. F. and F.
0 22(rev)
I FZ -50
-- 0
I I I * I I "
22-5
22 MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION
B
Bed 0.045
Only .
C-
Bed + ,., I
Carriage 7 aA Z0.015.. .
Bed +
ed + ~e0 100 200 300
Headstock r-ULa-Pl Load -- P, ib
ior under steady loads The basic principle is that at very stiffness. Kg,. is the ratio of the force amplitude. F. to the
low frequencies the structure responds to dynamic loads v. lion amplitude. A. at a certain vibration frequency.
the same as it does to static loads To emphasize this. con- Kd = K; that is. the dyiamic and static stiffnesses are the
sider figure 22-7 which shows the deflection versus static same.
load behavior of a cantilever beam. The concept of dynamic stiffness. K,. can be understood
from the curve of figure 22-7 showing load versus deflec-
This graph could be computed from the deflection equation tion. For the example illustrated in figure 22-7. where a
for a specific be-am at various loads. At 100 pounds, the de- peak-to-valley force of 200 pounds (F = 100 pounds) gave
flectio, is 0.015 inch, at 200 pounds. it is 0.030 inch. etc.
a peak-o-valley displacement of 0.045 - 0.015 0.030
The static stiffness. K. is the value of steady force acting on
the structure divided by the deflection it produces. The
static stiffness of the beam producing the data of figure
22-7 is 6.670 pounds per inch as shown by the following Kd = 6670 b/in
calculation: 0.015
22-6
MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION 22
where: Further suppose the hand is moved up and down. very
F forcc amplitude (the maximum increase in slowly at first. then at higher and higher frequencies. Let us
the oscillatory force from its average value, examine what happens to the heavy object. It would be ob-
that is one half of its peak-to-valley value) served first that the heavy object always moves at the same
frequency as the hand. This is elementary. but important. It
A = vibration amplitude, suggests that when there is a suspected forced vibration
problem the cause of the problem can be tracked down by
Note that this is exactly the same as the value of K. illus- knowing its frequency.
trating the fact that as long as the force and displacement
data fall on the same curve, their ratios remain the same At very low frequencies the heavy object moves exactly the
and the dynamic stiffness is the same as the static stiffness. same distance as the hand. Thus. the amplitude of the hand
and object are the same and there is no additional stretch
Figure 22-8 shows the force pattern acting on a structure in the spring. This behavior is typical of all structures. As
at a low frequency and the resulting motion of the struc- the frequency increases, the spring begins to stretch and
ture. This illustrates a very basic point of vibration trouble- the amplitude of the object becomes larger than that of the
shooting: namely. the structure almost always vibrates at hand. Eventually a frequency is reached where a given
the same frequency as the periodic force that is causing it to hand movement results in a very large object amplitude
vibrate.In figure 22-8 there is a "phase difference- between This condition is called resonance. The frequency where
the two waves: that is. the peaks of the displacement trace resonance occurs is called the natural frequency. f.,. which
occur slightly later than those of the force trace. In spite of is also the frequency at which the dynamic stiffness is the
this. the period. T. is the same for both waves and con- lowest. As the frequency is increased beyond the natural
sequently the frequency must be the same. frequency. the amplitude of the object continually de-
creases until finally the hand can shake very rapidly while
the object appears to remain motionless-
where:
f,- = natural frequency, cycles per second
0.001- K = spring stiffness. pounds per inch
A 0.001"
o / '"
02 0.2i 0 .' \Time.
0p W = object weight. pounds
When troubleshooting vibration problems, equation 22-4 is
1 T 0.2 -seldom
--- used to estimate the natural frequency: however, it
o is useful for estimating the effects of changes in stiffness
and we;ght.
Figure 22-8 Representative force and dis-
placement patterns of a structure vibrating at a low
frequency. Behavior of Complex Structures
Figures 22-9 and 22-10 show respectively a motor on its
mounting bracket and its frequency response. The system
There are a few rare cases of unusual structures and un- has a static stiffness of 8.330 pounds per inch and a natural
usual forme wave shapes where the above relationship be- frequency of 20 cycles per second. In frequency analysis, it
tween displacement and force is not true. but these cases is common to plot the compliance, which is the reciprocal
require an expert to analyze. For purposes of investigating of the static stiffness. Figure 22-11 represents the fre-
common vibration problems, always proceed as though this quency response of a machine column having a stiffness of
rule (italicized above) werc true. because it will lead to the 50,000 pounds per inch and a natural frequency of 50. If
best approach to the problem: namely, measure the vibra- the bracket of figure 22-9 is attached to this column, the
tion frequency and look for possible sources of forcing at frequency response of the bracket mounted on the column
that same frequency. will contain the natural frequency of both the bracket and
the column. A composite frequency response can be con-
structed using simple logic. At low frequencies the motion
Behavior of Simple Structures of #he weak bracket is much greater than that of the stiff
Suppose a heavy object is suspended from a weak spring column. Therefore, up to the lowest natural frequency. only
and the upper end of the spring is held in someone's hand. bracket deflection occurs and the composite response
22-7
22 MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION
a 0.0006
0 -
S0.00012
X
0 O - f I
0 10 20 30 40
Frequency - t, cps
_ 0.0006
6 0.0004,
o1
0
E
o 0.00002
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Frequency - f, cps
Figure 22-11 Frequency response of a machine column.
curve will be identical to the bracket response curve. At there are two natural frequencies. namely, at 20 and at 50
the resonance of the bracket, both the motor and bracket cycles per second.
will be vibrating and forcing the column. However. since
the motion of the column is still very low at this frequency. Most real machine structures are much more complicated
the combined frequency response will still be the same as than the above example: for instance. figure 22-13. taken
the bracket response through its resonance The frequency from reference 15. shows the frequency response of a drill
response of the bracket-column will continue to be equal to press. Logarithmic scales are used as graph axes in figure
the frequency response of the bracket alone, until the forc- 22-13 to compress it to a reasonable size. The peaks in this
ing frequency is close to the column resonance- At this fre- figure represent resonances of the structure at 23. 33. 38.
quency. and at h;gher frequencies. the column response is 70. 100. 110. 170. 230. 300. 380 and 500 cycles per sec-
much greater than the bracket motion: therefore, the com- ond. Each peak is associated with a different vibration pat-
posite response is equal to the column response. tern of the various components that make up the drill
press. Although the frequency response of most machine
The composite frequency response for this system is illus- tools is more like figure 22-13 than the system response de-
trated in figure 22-12. This is the response curve that scribed by figure 22-12. vibraticn problems are generally
would be observed if the motor and brack( t were tested not this complex because they often involve only one fre-
while mounted on this column. Under these conditions quency. Consequently. the other resonances can be ignored
22-8
MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION 22
00008
*0.0006-
00
00.0004
0.0002 -
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Frequency - f. cps
0.00001
._0
S
&0.000001
E
0
0.0000001
10 100 1000
Frequency - f,cps
and the real machine considered as a complex system with bration amplitu,'- at r--scaance divided by the vibration
only one natural frequency. amplitude at low frequencies for equal force amplitudes.
The r, ,,onance amplifcation is also the ratio of the static
stiffness, K. to the dynamic stiffness. Kd. at resonance. In
Influence of Damping figure 22-15 the static compliance is 0.00001 inches per
It was noted that damping has a strong influence on the pound while the maximum compliance at resonance is
amplitude of free vibration when a system is started vibra- 0.00005 inches per pound. Therefore. the resonance ampli-
ting and allowed to die out. Damping also has a very strong fication is (0.00005 + 0.00001 =) 5.
influence on the amplitude of forced vibration, particularly
at resonance. The family of curves in figure 22-14 shows For a lightly damped system the resonance amplification
the frequency response of a simple vibrating system with might be ten to thirty. while for heavy damping it might be
varying amounts of damping. In this figure the amplitude of one-and-one-half to four. These ranges point out the impor-
the force is F. the vibration amplitude is A. and the fre- tance of damping in machinery. It is sometimes fairly easy
quency is!. to reduce the vibration amplitude by adding damping to a
lightly damped structure vibrating near resonance. Almost
The degree to which a vibrating system is damped can be any dampirg added to a lightly damped structure improves
measured by its -resonance amplification- which is the vi- dynamic stiffness by a factor of two or three which, in turn.
22-9
22 MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION
-=o
C
LZ0. Response curve for
light damping
Increasing
o damping I
C I
C- 0.3,1 I
,,-Response curva for
0Eo heavy damping
1.0.
___-2.0,
Frequency - f. cps
Figure 22-14 Influence of damping on the frequency response of a vibrating system.
0.00006
0Dynamic compliance
0.00005
ZZ Resonance frequency
-: 0.00004 -
D 0.00003
C
E 0.00002
0
0.00001
Static compliance
Frequency - f. cps
22-10
MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION 22
0 and 25 cycles per second. seven between 25 and 50 cycles Low natural frequencies are typical of the vibration of
per second, eight between 50 and 75 cycles per second: etc- heavy components. such as a whole machine rocking on its
The data of figure 22-16 show that natural frequencies of- mounts. The 100 to 300 cycles per second range corre-
ten occur in the range of 0 to 100 cycles per second. that a sponds to vibrations of good. stiff, lower weight corn-
fair number are widely spread over the ragge of 100 to 300 ponents. for example. a lathe bed. In practice. vibration
cycles per second. and that there were no important natu- problems occasionally occur at natural fvCqvCeiCs Wl"
ral frequencies over 300 cycles per second for this particu- above 300 cycles per second but. in most cates. these are
lar group of machine tools associated with tool. not machine, vibration. Equation
22-4 demonstrates the characteristics necessary to obtain
high natural frequency values. If a component has a stiff-
ness of 5 00.000 pounds per inch. then its effective weight
can be only about 19.5 pounds to give a natural frequency
as high as 500 cycles per second, since:
0-25 98 500.000
fN, . d 500 cps
19.5
25-50
z 175-200
8- A
200-225 _ _
D 7-
225-250 6
5-
250-275 4
275-300 "6 2
I i I I I I I 4 S
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 _
22-11
22 MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION
The final value needed from the testing of real machines is chatter and can ahvays be solved by resharpening the tool.
the dynamic stiffness at resonance Listed in table 22-2 are It is described here only to keep it from being confused
values obtained from nime machine tools of all sizes and with other types of machine tool vibration.
shapes.
Regenerative Chatter
TABLE 22-2 Dynamic Stiffness as Resonance The important type of self-excited chat:er is regenerative
chatter. Regenerative chatter is di.,incut to troubleshoot
MACHINE DYNAMICIinFFNESS. since it is almost impossible to predict why the machine is
chattering. Nearly every machining variable affects it
sometimes. but only a fev affect it all the time This is the
A 15.40O source of much of the shop lore about chatter. some of
B 27.500 which is usually true and some of which is seldom true
C 33.300
D 33.500 In regenerative chatter. a small disturbance. as a result of
E 58.900 small forced vibrations. cutting force fluctuations. etc..
F 71.500 eauses the tool to vibrate relative to the workpiece. Small
G 122.000 bumps are left on the machined surface. Since most turning
H 410.000 cuts normalh overlap the previous cut to some degree.
I 478.000 these bumps make the cut a little deeper when they show
up on the next revolution and have the same effect as a vi-
Source Data corrp-led from Long,' Koer.sberger. Gan~issart.- Tob:as.* bratory force. This causes the tool to vibrate even though
, the or:ginal disturbance has disappeared. For a well-
behave, cut. the bumps left by the forced vibration on the
second revolution will be a little smaller than the original
A dynamic stiffmss of 15.000 pounds p-r inch represents a bumps. and after a number of revolutions, they will totally
light duty machine ool. nA. meant for heav" stock re- disappear.
moval. Stiffness values of 400.000 and up represent ma-
ch'nes that are capable of very heavy stvck removal. Pro- in a situation leading to chatter- the bumps will become
ductivity of heavier duty machine tools will often be limited greater each revolution and eventually become so great
by the rigidity of the tooling. workpiece. or fixtures put on that visible. audi-le chatter occurs. The mathematical
them. study of whether threse bumps will grow or die out is called
stabihty theor_ This study is described in several different
ways in some excellent technical publications. - The most
SELF-EXC 1TED CHATTER important practical vndmngs of stabilit% theory are as
follows:
The vibrations discussed to this oint were caused by
forces resultmng from factors including unbalance. eccen- 1. In some ranges -f machine speed. the tendency to chat-
trici-y. and misalignments. There is. however. a totally dii- ter increases or decreases as the speed is changed
ferent t-,vne of vibration known as self-excited chatter. s'ightly_ This is because severe chatter can only occur
When there is no external forcing. the structure itself deter- when the wave that is feeding back from the previous
mines whether there will be self-excited chatter. based on revolution is in a certain relationship to the present mo-
its rigidity and the cutting conditions. There are two types tion of the tool- For example. if the bump in the work-
of self-excited chatter. high freuency chatter and regener- piecc surface is increasing the force. and at ti-e same
at-e chatter time the tool -s moving out of the work decreasing the
force. the net result might be zero force variation, and
no tendency to chatter. This phenomenon relates to the
High Frequency Chatter cutting speed and the natural frequency of the machine.
High frequency chatter Is the result of high frequency viha- As speed is changed. the machine might go from heavy
tion that sometimes occurs when tools become very dull. chatter to no chatter and back again to heav.y chater.
The tool vibrates in the direction of the cutting speed and
results in high-pitchd noise and - workpiece surface that 2. The chatter frequency is very close to that machine nat-
is rot deeply scalloped. This type of chatter is caused by ural frequency having the highest resonance peak flow-
the desrease in the rubbing force on the tool flank as the est dynamic stiffness).
cutting sneed increases. During cutting. a hard spot in the
work. or a small vibration from a vre small unbalanced 3. Chatter never occurs until the severity of the cut
force. may result in a very slight increase in cutting force. reaches a certain level. dependent on the minimum
This. in turn. causes a very slight increase in the defection dynamic stiffness of the machine ciructure at resonance.
of the cutting tool in the direction of the cutting spe-d, Above a certain !evel of cut severity, chatter always oc-
While the tool is deflectina in this direction, the sped is de- curs. The threshold level depends on many different cut-
creased slightly, causing a slight increase in cutting force. ting and structural p,-rameters and is very difficult to
which causes more deflection. etc. This cycle continues un- predict accurately.
til the cuttiug force has buit up so high that the tool snaps
back to its original position. overshoots, and the cycle re- 1. The maximum severity of cut which can be taken with-
peats itself. This is not an important type of self-excited out chatter is clozicly related to the value of the min-
22-12
MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION 22
imum dynamic stiffness at the highest resonance peak. Chatter occurs when the cutting severity is equal to or
The frequency response that is most important is not greater than the structural vibration resistance. Mathe-
the response of the machine but the response to the forc- matically. chatter occurs if:
ing between the tool and the workpiece, which includes
the tool, tool holder, machine, fixturing, and workpiece. QL, L CKd,1 , (Eq. 22-5)
Doubling the least dynamic stiffness permits taking a
cut that is approximately twice as heavy, where:
Q = workpiece material tendency to chatter
5. The tendency to chatter increases in proportion to the L, = total length of cutting edge engaged
total length cutting edge engaged in the cut. The total C = factor depending on cutting speed and
cutting force and power are not important. How large a resonant frequency
chip is being produced is not important. Kil = minimum dynamic stiffness at the high-
est resonance peak of the machine tool-
6. The tendency of various workpiece materials to chatter workpiece system
is in proportion to the cutting forces they produce. Ma-
terials which produce high cutting forces are capable of Table 22-3 contains a compilation of Q values for a wide
only light chatter-free cuts. Materials producing low range of workpiece materials and hardness ranges.
machining f-rces are capable of heavy cuts without
chatter.
22-13
22 MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION
TABLE 22-3-Continued
CHATTER
MATERIAL GROUP HARDNESS TENDENCY
Bhr --' Q
22-14 -- - -
MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION 22
TABLE 22-3-Continued
CHATTER
MATERIAL GROUP HARDNESS TENDENCY
Bhn or R, 0
22-i15 i
22 MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION
Machining Tests * Chatter
A number of researchers have made cutting tests to study d 0.8F 0 Borderline chatter
self-excited chatter. Figure 22-18 shows what happens . o\ * No chatter
during the turning of a bar if the depth of cut is gradually o*
0\[ *Ae
increased. The vibration amplitude is measured and "5 o G .... /
plotted as a function of the depth of cut. The low vibration .0.4- 0 \0 *0o0 0 a A
level at light cuts represents the background vibration level " o00 &'k at10 00 * * (V' o\ *
of the machine resulting from unbalance and irregularities r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '-a.C -0 0 0 -.
in the drive train. The sharp increase in vibration at a cer- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
tain -critical width of cut" is characteristic of regenerative 0
chatter. The actual amplitude during chatter is likely to 0 500 1000 1500
vary greatly. Not much is known about how the amplitude Workpiece speed, rom
is determined, but once chatter occurs, the amplitude is al- Figure 22-19 Experimental results of a study on
most always too great. The solution is to eliminate chatter regenerative chatter. Lobed line denotes borderline
rather than to determine why the machine vibrates at a cer- of chatter.
tain level.
- Region of chatter The reason for the "lobes" in the figure where certain
speeds enable increased chatter-free widths of cut is the in-
0 terrelationship between cutting speed and regenerative
chatter. The lack of chatter at very low cutting speeds is
a called "low-speed stability." This phenomenon is not com-
pletely understood, but it is likely the result of small areas
Iof tool-workpiece contact just behind the cutting edge.
Experiments have been performed to show that dull tools
c Critical width or depth of cut and low tool flank clearance angles increase low-speed
-_ stability.
so
8 r While chatter theory is very good at explaining experimen-
.- ,, -1- - Background vibration level - - tal results (other than the enhanced stability at low cutting
speeds), it is difficult to use in solving chatter problems.
Chatter theory is not good at predicting just when a ma-
, ,. , chine will start to chatter. More theory development is nec-
Depth or width of cut essary before this can be done.
Figure 22-18 Experimental procedure to de- Factors lntluencing Chatter
termine the critical width of cut for regenerative It seems logical that the more power consumed in a cut,
chatter.
and the higher the cutting forces, the greater the likelihood
of chatter. This is wrong. Chatter theory says that the se-
verity of the cut is the chatter tendency of the material mul-
tiplied by the length of tool edge in the cut. This relation-
Repeating this experiment at various cutting speeds dem- ship was given as equation 22-5. More power may or may
onstrates how this "critical width" is affected. Tests were not mean greater tendency to chatter. The chatter tend-
run at the speeds and widths of cut denoted by the circles in ency of a workpiece material is closely related to the cut-
figure 22-19. The solid circles represent chatter, the open ting forces and power that occur. The theoretical chatter
circles represent chatter-free cutting, and the half-solid cir- tendency of a variety of workpiece materials is listed in
cles represent borderline chatter (more than background table 22-3. The tendency to chatter is generally propor-
vibration but less than violent chatter). The dashed line is tional to the expected cutting power. Low values are asso-
an attempt to sketch the borderline of chatter. Useful con- ciated with aluminum, intermediate values with ordinary
cepts to be learned from this figure include the following: cast irons and steels. and high values with the difficult-to-
machine alloys often found in aerospace applications. The
1. Below a certain width of cut. there is no chatter at any chatter tendency numbers in the table show that. all other
speed. factors being equal, a cut three times as heavy can be taken
with a 175 Bhn free machining carbon steel as with a 350
2. At slightly greater widths of cut. it is possible to get into Bhn cast precipitation hardening stainless steel.
or out of chatter by changing workpiece speed.
Another major factor influencing cutting severity is the
3. Chatter occurs at large widths of cut except at very low length of the cutting edge. In rough turning, the length of
speeds. the cutting edge in the workpiece is approximately equal to
the radial depth of cut. Thus, if one-half inch is being taken
4. Very large chatter-free widths of cut can be taken only if off the diameter of a bar, the cut is twice as severe as if one-
the cutting speed is low enough. quarter inch were being removed. Note the lack of impor-
2 4
22-16
i 22-17 i
~ _
22 MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION
Feel vibration of structure
near spindle during cutting*
Stop machine
Or,
cycle Yes Fo d vibration
vibrates samevirto
as cit'ing from inside machine
cycle
NN c
Increase t, n
vibration Y Frequency
due to
cutting changes
f in Reduce feed to 1/2. 1/4. 1/8
proporion t and feel structure
I~o Forced
samcut Ys vibration
has due to
Sef- e c e
process
22-18
MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION 22
,,
"1oilm
$11: m m
,'' "
S! S
, 1
3
5 WL
4
42
7
V7
WL4
6
3g
4F
Figure 22-24 shows a similar situation for face milling. Once the chatter wave length or spacing is measured, the
Again. no importance should be given to the spiral pat- frequency of vibration may be calculated as follows:
terns, marks 1-2-3, or marks 4-5-6. By following the feed
lines, the marks were found to be made in the following se-
quedce: V
Tooth 1: Mark 4; off the workpiece f (Eq. 22-6)
Tooth 2: Mark 5: mark 1; off theworkpiece. 5 (WL)
Tooth 3: :,;idk 6; mark 2; off the workpiece. where:
f = vibration frequency in cycles per second
The chatter wave length is again measured by moving V cutting speed in feet per minute
along, not across, feed lines. WL = length (or chatter mark spacing) in inches
5 = constant introduced because of the units
In practice, the chatter wave length should be measured used
several times. Unequal measurements are usually caused
by continuing vibration during the disengagmeat of the tool For example, if the chatter wave length spacing in the pre-
from the work. These extra vibration marks overlay the vious milling example is 0.1 inch, and if the cutting speed is
true pattern and make the spacing of marks meaningless. 20ftp minute. n the c ucy s
This problem can be minimized or avoided by disengaging
the feed as quickly as possible or by rapid traversing away
from the workpiece in the direction perpendicular to the f= = 400 cps
chatter-marked surface. 5(0.1)
22-19
22 MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION
Turning
slotted
workpiece
LZ7 + -+El
Change
top
rake
Face
_-_ Change
Lrake
_____ radial t
Slab
___ Change
helix
angle
Figure 22-25 Suggested methods for reducing the magnitude of forced vibrations.
Whether the vibration problem is the result of interrupted speed. The fundamental principle here is that self-excited
cutting can be determined quickly by increasing or decreas- chatter occurs at a frequency near the natural frequency,
ing the cutting speed by 50 percent. After each cut at a dif- regardless of the spindle speed, but forced vibrations al-
ferent speed. measure the chatter marks and recalculate ways occur at the forcing frequency. A 50-percent change
the frequency. The chatter is the result of interrupted cut- in cutting speed will make very liftle.change in the fre-
ting if the frequency changes in proportion to the cutting quency of self-excited chatter. The same change in speed
i
22-20--
MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION 22
should change the frequency of forced vibration by 50 per- ful method of reducing self-excited chatter. Self-excited
cent. chatter occurs less frequently for a heavier chip load of
0.010 inch or greater than for a light chip load of 0.005
Another sure way to identify self-excited chatter is to re- inch or less. The heavier feed rate increases the cutting
duce the severity of the cut. As the length of cutting edge force but not the length of cutting edge engaged in the
engaged is decreased, a point is reached where a small de- workpiece and. hence, slightly reduces the tendency of the
crease in cutting edge length causes a dramatic decrease in material to chatter.
vibration. The decrease may be associated with "width of
cut" or "depth of cut" depending on the particular cutting If the cutting speed is low (less than 200 feet per minute) or
operation: however, it is never associated with the feed if the chatter frequency is high (1.000 cycles per second or
rate. more). a reduction in the cutting speed tends to reduce
chatter. Almost any size cut can be takern without chatter if
the cutting speed is lowered sufficiently. This added stabil-
Elimination of Forced Vibration ity at low speeds is associated with springback of the
If the problem is identified as being forced vibration, try machined surface just behind the cutting edge. A small con-
either to reduce the magnitude of the forcing vibration or to tact force is created that tends to push the tool out of the
increase the stiffness of the machine tool system. One way work and resist chatter. The effect is much more pro-
to reduce the magnitude of the forced vibration is to change nounced for tools with low clearance angles. Tool wear
tool angles so that the cutting load is picked up gradually. stabilizes the cut since the worn edge acts like a low clear-
Figure 22-25 illustrates how bad situations can be changed ance angle generating a force which opposes tool pene-
into better ones. Another possible way to reduce the forced tration into the work. If the clearance angle and the speed
vibration is to reduce the feed rate. The vibration ampli- can be reduced. chances of solving the problem are
tude should change in proportion to the feed rate: there- improved.
fore. if only a slight reduction is needed, decreasing the
feed rate is an appropriate solution. One final technique which applies to both self-excited and
forced vibration is redirecting the cutting force toward a
A change in the cutting speed often has dramatic effects on stiffer direction of the structure. For example. the turning
reducing forced vibration. Either an increase or a decrease tool with a 45-degree lead angle on the top in figure 22-26
in cutting speed. depending on which side of the resonance will chatter much sooner than the one shown on the bottom
peak the machine is operating. may reduce the vibration with a zero lead angle. Because the cutting force is per-
enough to solve the problem. If the machine tool is being pendicular to the cutting edge. a major portion of the force
forced at a frequency just below the natural frequency. a is aimed in the weak bending direction of the bar in the
small increase in speed will increase vibration amplitude, first case (a). However. in the second case (b) the force is
and further increases in speed will reduce vibration ampli- aimed along the very rigid axis of the bar. There is no
tude. On the other hand. a reduction in speed will immedi- simple rule for aiming the force in a more rigid direction
ately reduce amplitude. The opposite response is true if the except in the simplest of cases. A combination of analysis
forced vibration started out above the natural frequency. and judgment is required.
Since there is no way to tell in advance which situation
applies, try either an increase or a decrease in cutting
speed of at least 20 percent. whichever is easiest. If the re-
sults are not positive, try changing the speed in the other
direction. 07
A technique that sometimes works in milling is to change
the direction of the cutting force away from a weak direc- 0.7F
tion of the structure toward a strong direction. This cannot (a)
a)
always be done scientifically because force direction or ma-
-
such
chine directional rigidity may not be known. Changes
as feeding a face mill in the Y-direction rather than in the a 45*
X-direction or changing the table feed direction in slab
milling have been known to work.
22-21
-b
22 MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION
REGENERATIVE CHATTER CHECKLIST e Try an axial stepped milling cutter design.
* Try changing from climb to up milling (or vice versa) to change
By applying the principles outlined above, many difficult vi- the force direction.
bration and chatter problems can be solved. Others require
experts who have powerful instruments to give them data GRINDING
not available from a simple approach. Often the measure- * Redu e the width of grind.
ments lead to the conclusion that the machine has a weak- * Reduce the stock removal rate.
ness that can be corrected. Further analysis leads to sug-
gestions for stiffening the machine, or adding a vibration a Dress the grinding wheel more frequently.
damper. Even if it is eventually necessary to go to an ex- Use a sharper dress (more lead, greater depth, sharper
pert for a solution to a particular vibration problem, the diamond) if possible.
suggestions contained in table 22-4 should always be tried * Use a softer grinding wheel.
first. There is a good chance that one of these simple tech- * Reduce excessively high work speeds.
niques will yield a solution. * Use a backrest on slender workpieces.
TURNING
" Lower the stock removal per pass.
" Try a heavier feed if presently feeding below 0.010 inch per rev.
* Reduce the width of cut of the form tool.
" Use a steadyrest on slender bars.
" Chuck slender bars at their center and turn end-for-end.
" Use a smaller nose radius on the tool to keep the cuiting forces
away from the radial direction.
* Modify the cutting edge angle to be more radial keeping the
forces away from the radal direction.
" Consider using the Kennametal Roller Devibratorl-(or
equivalent) on slender bars.
" Minimize the tool overhang.
BORING
" Use the largest possible boring bar diameter.
" Reduce the borino bar length to as short as possble.
" Make the tool nose radius as small as possible to minimize the
radial force.
" Use a side cutting edge angle as radial as possible to reauce
the radial force.
" Reduce the stock removal in roughing.
" Consider a damped boring bar for LID's greater than 6.
" Consider solid carbide boring bars for L/D's over 4.
" Consider reaming after semi-finish boring for finish borin
problems.
" Consider multi-tooth boring bars for roughing operat:s.
MILLING
" Reduce the stock removal per pass.
" Reduce the width of cut.
" Try heavier feeds if presently feeding below 0.01 ( inch per
tooth.
" Try reducing the RPM when using high speed steei cuttcrs.
" Try dulling the cutting angles of high speed steel culters.
" Avoid high wrap-around angles in end mill cutting.
" Generate an interior radius rather than plunging the cutter.
" Try using serrated edge end mills.
" Use a cutter with half as many teeth.
" Remove half of the inserts in a face milling cutter.
" Try a face miii with a random tooth space design.
" In face milling, use more of a comer angle to get cutting edge
mo.e toward the finished surface and reduce x z., y horizontal
force components.
* In face milling, try feeding at 90 to the present feed direction.
22-22
MACHINE CHATTER AND VIBRATION 22
REFERENCES
1. Ostwald. P. F. and Shambli,. J. E. 1968. Effects of 8. Gandissart. Ph. and Van Herck. P. 1964. Influence des
dynamic chip breaking upon surface microgeometry vibrations sur le fini de surface et lerreur de forme
and free chip dimension. Transactionsof the ASMdE 90 dans les passes de finition. CRIF Report. University of
(Series B): 71-78. Louvain. Louvain. Belgium.
2. Kristoffy. I. et al. 1965. Influence of vibrational energy 9. Tobias. S. A. 1961. Schwingungen an Werkzeug-
on metalworking processes, U. S. Air Force Technical maschinen.Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag.
Report AFML-TR-65-2 11. Wright-Patterson Air
Force Base. OH. 10. Tlusty. J. et al. 1962. Selbsterregte Schwingungen an
Werkzeugmaschinen. Berlin: VEB Verlag Technik.
3. Langenecker. B. et al. 1964. Effect of ultrasound on
deformation characteristics of structural metals. U S. 11. Hahn. R. 1954. On the theory of regenerative chatter
Navy NAVWEPS Report 8482. NOTS TP 3447. in precision grinding operations. Transactionsof the
U. S. Naval Ordnance Test Station. China Lake. CA. ASME 76 (May): 593-597.
4. Andrew. C. 1965. Chatter in horizontal milling. Pro- 12. Merritt. H. 1965- Theory of seli-excited machine tool
ceedings of the Institutionof Mechanical Engineers 179 chatter. Transactions of the ASME 87 (Series B):
(Part 1. No. 28): 877-898. 447-454.
5. Peters. J. 1965. Survey of methods for increasing the 13. Kegg. R. L. and Sisson. T. R. 1968. Trouble shooting
damping of machine tools. Report tc the General As- chatter by improving cutting conditions. Technical Pa-
sembly of CIRP. per MR68-615. Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
Dearborn. MI.
6. Long. G. W. et al. 1968. The effect and control of chat-
ter vibrations in machine tool processes. U. S. Air 14. Hosoi. T. and Hoshi. T. 1977. Cutting action of ball
Force Technical Report AFML-TR-68-35. Wright- end mill with a spiral edge. Annals of the CIRP26(1):
Patterson Air Force Base. OH. 49-53.
7. Koenigsberger. F. and Tlusty. J. 1969. Machine tool 15. How to troubleshoot machine chatter and vibration.
structures.Volume 1. London: Pergamon Press. 1978. Manufacturing Education. P. 0. Box 36050.
Cincinnati, OH 45236.
1U J
22-23
C FACG
Sd BLAW-W' FIhIQD
SECTION 23
NUMERICAL CONTROL
MACHINING
zI
23-1
PIEG IMP PAM &LANK-NOr FIL-ED
oo.0
DoQ~~ .000 il
000 E ___
Feedback loop
23-3
a
23.1 NC Machining Guidelines
tion of parts to be assigned to NC has a significant effect on In general. if a part surface can be defined mathemati-
its payoff. The following guidelines which may be used for cally, it can be machined by NC.
parts -election describe tho:e parts for which NC may be
applicable: 8. Parts which require REPEATABILITY from part
to part and lot to lot
TOOLING
1. Parts which require SUBSTANTIAL
COSTS in relation to the total manufacturing costs Data stored on tape or other input media will not per-
by conventional methods mit an operation to be forgotten or skipped.
For example, NC should be used where expensive drill 9. VERY EXPENSIVE parts where human error
jigs, templates. or models are otherwise required. Drill would be very costly and increasingly so as the
bushings are not needed for NC: consequently, the ii- woul er cotln
tial or replacement costs associated with drill jigs in
conventional drilling do not apply to NC. Even prior to machining, the cost of the forging or cas-
2. Parts which require LENGTHY SETUP TIMES ting required may be high or the material itself may be
compared to the machine run time in conventional expensive.
machining 10. HIGH PRIORITY parts where lead time and flow
time are serious considerations
Rapid setup of NC jobs is common because part fix-
turing is simple. This makes NC economical for jobs Usually, the flow time from blueprint to the finish-ma-
where the machine run time is short. chined part is considerably less With NC machining,
provided that the programming can be expedited
3. Parts which are machined in SMALL OR VARI- through any backlog. Special tooling, if required, is
ABLE LOTS usually simpler for NC than for conventional machin-
Usually, the savings in setup time and handling using ing and can be designed and built faster.
NC machine tools outweighs the higher operating 11. Parts with ANTICIPATED DESIGN CHANGES
costs of NC compared to conventional equipment.
4. A WIDE DIVERSITY OF PARTS requiring fre- Changes can be made on the tape or other data input
quent changes of the machine setup and a large media with relative ease compared to changes in hard
tooling inventory if conventionally machined tooling.
This is a common situation in the aerospace, the ma- 12. Parts which involve a LARGE NUMBER OF OP-
chine tool, and the job shop industries. The quantities ERATIONS or MACHINE SETUPS
are not large enough to justify transfer machines as
used in the automotive industry. The part dimensions Part operations may be complicated, tedious, and diffi-
and configurations may cover such a broad range that cult to follow. NC machining allows data on the tape
adequate inventory may be prohibitively large. NC to be utilized repeatedly once it is satisfactorily pro-
may be used to provide spare part capability without grammed. This is a considerable advantage over con-
storing the parts or bulky fixtures and tooling after the ventional machining where the complexity of following
product is no longer marketed the instructions continues for each part. NC can also
utilize a variety of successive, interchangeable tools
5. Parts which are PRODUCED AT INTER- without time losses for machine stoppage, setups, and
MITTENT TIMES because demand for them is transfers. For example, parts requiring straight-cut
cl "Iic milling combined with many drilling, reaming, and tap-
ping operations are excellent choices for the less so-
This occurs where part requirements are seasonal or phisticated machining centers.
subject to production scheduling for assembly.
Whereas conventional machining requires the costly 13. Parts where NONUNIFORM CUTTING CONDI-
storage of templates, tools and fixtures, NC requires TIONS are required
only tape Storage.
The cutting speed, feed, or depth
of cut may need to be
6. Parts which have COMPLEX CONFIGURATIONS varied because of the part configuration. Such varia-
requiring close tolerances and machined relation- tions may be incorporated into the NC program.
ships
14. Parts which require 100 percent INSPECTION or I
NC with ii.ultiaxis capability makes simultaneous ma- require measuring many checkpoints resulting in
chining motions possible, and parts can be produced high inspection costs
which previously were impossible to produce by con-
ventional methods. With the inherent dimensional repeatability of NC, it is
often necessary to inspect only the first and last pieces
7. Parts which have MATHEMATICALLY DE- completely and to spot check the critical dimensions
FINED COMPLEX CONTOURS on the other pieces.
23-4
NC Machining Guidelines 23.1
15. FAMILY OF PARTS and analyzed to determine the most economic operating
conditions. Computer and calculator programs are avail-
These are parts that are in the same general class with able to carry out the simple, but long and tedious. calcu-
respect to configuration or manufacturing sequence lations. 1.2 Machining data relating tool life with cutting
but vary in dimensions. This situation is particularly speed and other parameters are required for these calcu-
common in the machine tool industry. Common setups lations. Such data are contained in this and in other MDC
may be used for these parts, and programming time publications. Section 21 of this handbook and reference 3
may be reduced by using the same basic format or at the end of this section outline and demonstrate this
macro's for all the parts in the family. approach.
Although it is best if parts can be machined completely Machinability data in various degrees of sophistication are
on NC machine tools, allied conventional machining available for use by industry for NC machining. These data
operations often are required. An exception is the man- include (1) recommended starting conditions and (2) wide
ufacturing cell or work center concept common to range machining data.
group technology. In this situation, the operator of an
NC machine may also do part deburring, drilling or This Machining Data Handbook contains recommended
tapping of holes on peripheral equipment manually starting conditions for most of the significant work mate-
while waiting for the NC machine to finish its cycle. By rials and machining operations. It supplies the recom-
balancing operations timewise between the NC ma- mended feed, speed, tool material, tool geometry, and
chine and manual equipment, a reduction in the over- cutting fluid, as well as data for determining the horse-
all processing time can be achieved. Usually, however, power requirements for various machining operations.
if only the most time-consuming, conventional oper- These recommended starting conditions are currently the
ations are replaced by NC, many of the benefits of NC most practical and readily accessible data'for genera! shop
will be minimized or eliminated, application.
Cost studies should be performed for parts that are selected Detailed machining data covering the tool life obtained un-
when one or more of the above guidelines apply. Some- der a wide range of machining parameters, such as speed,
times even simple configuration parts will show savings by feed, tool material, tool geometry, and cutting fluids, are
NC production, so cost studies are advised for these parts very useful in selecting a set of conditions for machining at
as well. Various cutting conditions should be investigated lower costs or higher production rates. Detailed machining
23-5
~ -
23.1 NC Machining Guidelines
parameters can be obtained from laboratory studies or percent of their total available time actually cutting, while
from shop studies by varying the pertinent parameters and for NC machines, cutting time may be on the order of 70
observing their effect on tool life. percent. A major contributing factor in this reduction of
nonproductive time has been the development of quick-
Machinability data that are accurate, reliable and appro- change and preset tooling. Because there is high initial in-
priate are essential to the success of NC machining. The vestment in the capital equipment used, it is essential that
philosophy of NC manufacturing, involving its high level of every avenue be followed that increases the percentage of
automation, demands the use of the best available data. machining time. The primary objective of tooling for NC is
The high cost and productive capacity of NC are frequently to assure that there is complete compatibility between it
such ritical factors that every effort must be made to find and all the engineering and economic criteria by which nu-
the best set of operating conditions. merically controlled machines are justified.
Since data for conventional machining are often conserva- Tooling systems for NC must incorporate the principles of
tive, they are not particularly suitable for NC machining eliminating operator error and maximizing productivity.
operations. Further, such data are often too simple or These goals can be achieved using the strategies that
based on information that is too generalized. NC machining follow:
conditions selected from these data may result in signifi-
cant machine underutilization and reduced profits. 1. Automatic tool chauging for sequential operations
For NC machining, the feeds and speeds are most often 2. Off-machine presetting of tools
computed quantities rather than being dependent solely on
operator judgment. The effect of this is m.oi e consistent re- 3. Speeding up the manual replacement and changeover of
suits because the operator-indvccU variables are minimized tools
or eliminated. Another approach sometimes employed with
NC feed and spetd selection is to program the cutting con- 4. Reducing machine adjustments caused by tool deflec-
ditions or the high side and then use override controls to tion and wear
suit actual conditions.
5. Using the NC program to facilitate tool selection and
Specialized machinability data systems are being devel- changing
oped for NC because simple data systems are inadequate.
Reasons for this inadequacy are as follows: For NC applications, it is typical that less hard tooling is
required than for comparable operations on conventional
* The higher cost of NC machine tools and machining time machines. Numerical control, with its relatively in-
expensive tooling, eliminates the need for expensive jigs,
" Programming costs fixtures, cams, master parts, form tools, etc. Lower tooling
costs enhance the justifiability of parts for production with
* Variations in NC machine tools and NC production NC equipment. The inherent accuracy and repeatability of
req