0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views12 pages

Analisis Univariat (Deskriptif) : Frequencies

The document analyzes univariate data from a dataset on computer ownership. It provides frequency tables for several variables, including development patterns, parenting styles, knowledge levels, information sources, socioeconomic status, attitudes, and family support. It also performs chi-square tests to analyze the relationship between parenting style and development patterns, and between knowledge level and development patterns. The results of the chi-square tests show significant associations between the variables.

Uploaded by

uswatun
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views12 pages

Analisis Univariat (Deskriptif) : Frequencies

The document analyzes univariate data from a dataset on computer ownership. It provides frequency tables for several variables, including development patterns, parenting styles, knowledge levels, information sources, socioeconomic status, attitudes, and family support. It also performs chi-square tests to analyze the relationship between parenting style and development patterns, and between knowledge level and development patterns. The results of the chi-square tests show significant associations between the variables.

Uploaded by

uswatun
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

ANALISIS UNIVARIAT (DESKRIPTIF)

Frequencies

[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\UTS PUNYA KOMPUTER.sav


Statistics
perkembangan
Valid 50
N
Missing 0

perkembangan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
tidak sesuai 27 54.0 54.0 54.0
Valid sesuai 23 46.0 46.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=polaasuh
/BARCHART FREQ
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies

[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\UTS PUNYA KOMPUTER.sav


Statistics
pola asuh
Valid 50
N
Missing 0

pola asuh
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
tidak baik 29 58.0 58.0 58.0
Valid baik 21 42.0 42.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=pengetahuan
/BARCHART FREQ
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.
Frequencies
[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\UTS PUNYA KOMPUTER.sav
Statistics
pengetahuan
Valid 50
N
Missing 0

pengetahuan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
rendah 32 64.0 64.0 64.0
Valid tinggi 18 36.0 36.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=sumberinformasi
/BARCHART FREQ
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.
Frequencies
[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\UTS PUNYA KOMPUTER.save
Statistics
sumber informasi
Valid 50
N
Missing 0

sumber informasi
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
tidak ada 27 54.0 54.0 54.0
Valid ada 23 46.0 46.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=sosialekonomi
/BARCHART FREQ
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.
Frequencies

[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\UTS PUNYA KOMPUTER.sav


Statistics
sosial ekonomi
Valid 50
N
Missing 0

sosial ekonomi
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
tidak baik 32 64.0 64.0 64.0
Valid baik 18 36.0 36.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=sikap
/BARCHART FREQ
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.
Frequencies
[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\UTS PUNYA KOMPUTER.sav

Statistics
sikap
Valid 50
N
Missing 0

sikap
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
tidak baik 29 58.0 58.0 58.0
Valid baik 21 42.0 42.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=dukungankeluarga
/BARCHART FREQ
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies
[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\UTS PUNYA KOMPUTER.sav
Statistics
dukungan keluarga
Valid 50
N
Missing 0

dukungan keluarga
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
tidak mendukung 27 54.0 54.0 54.0
Valid mendukung 23 46.0 46.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Analisis Bivariat (Chi-Square)


Crosstabs
[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\UTS PUNYA KOMPUTER.save
Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
pola asuh * perkembangan 50 100.0% 0 0.0% 50 100.0%

pola asuh * perkembangan Crosstabulation


perkembangan Total
tidak sesuai sesuai
Count 23 6 29
tidak baik Expected Count 15.7 13.3 29.0
% within pola asuh 79.3% 20.7% 100.0%
pola asuh
Count 4 17 21
baik Expected Count 11.3 9.7 21.0
% within pola asuh 19.0% 81.0% 100.0%
Count 27 23 50
Total Expected Count 27.0 23.0 50.0
% within pola asuh 54.0% 46.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 17.807a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 15.464 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 18.975 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear
17.451 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 50

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.66.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for pola asuh
16.292 3.970 66.860
(tidak baik / baik)
For cohort perkembangan =
4.164 1.691 10.253
tidak sesuai
For cohort perkembangan =
.256 .122 .537
sesuai
N of Valid Cases 50
Crosstabs
[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\UTS PUNYA KOMPUTER.sav

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
pengetahuan *
50 100.0% 0 0.0% 50 100.0%
perkembangan

pengetahuan * perkembangan Crosstabulation


perkembangan Total
tidak sesuai sesuai
Count 25 7 32
rendah Expected Count 17.3 14.7 32.0
% within pengetahuan 78.1% 21.9% 100.0%
pengetahuan
Count 2 16 18
tinggi Expected Count 9.7 8.3 18.0
% within pengetahuan 11.1% 88.9% 100.0%
Count 27 23 50
Total Expected Count 27.0 23.0 50.0
% within pengetahuan 54.0% 46.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 20.827a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 18.217 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 22.816 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear
20.411 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 50

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.28.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 tab

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for pengetahuan
28.571 5.261 155.170
(rendah / tinggi)
For cohort perkembangan =
7.031 1.879 26.306
tidak sesuai
For cohort perkembangan =
.246 .125 .483
sesuai
N of Valid Cases 50
Crosstabs
[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\UTS PUNYA KOMPUTER.sav
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
sumber informasi *
50 100.0% 0 0.0% 50 100.0%
perkembangan

sumber informasi * perkembangan Crosstabulation


perkembangan Total
tidak sesuai sesuai
Count 27 0 27
tidak ada Expected Count 14.6 12.4 27.0
% within sumber informasi 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
sumber informasi
Count 0 23 23
ada Expected Count 12.4 10.6 23.0
% within sumber informasi 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Count 27 23 50
Total Expected Count 27.0 23.0 50.0
% within sumber informasi 54.0% 46.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 50.000a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 46.055 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 68.994 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear
49.000 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 50

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.58.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio for sumber
informasi (tidak ada / ada)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be


computed. They are only computed for a
2*2 table without empty cells.
Crosstabs
[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\UTS PUNYA KOMPUTER.sav
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
sosial ekonomi *
50 100.0% 0 0.0% 50 100.0%
perkembangan

sosial ekonomi * perkembangan Crosstabulation


perkembangan Total
tidak sesuai sesuai
Count 25 7 32
tidak baik Expected Count 17.3 14.7 32.0
% within sosial ekonomi 78.1% 21.9% 100.0%
sosial ekonomi
Count 2 16 18
baik Expected Count 9.7 8.3 18.0
% within sosial ekonomi 11.1% 88.9% 100.0%
Count 27 23 50
Total Expected Count 27.0 23.0 50.0
% within sosial ekonomi 54.0% 46.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 20.827a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 18.217 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 22.816 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear
20.411 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 50

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.28.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for sosial
28.571 5.261 155.170
ekonomi (tidak baik / baik)
For cohort perkembangan =
7.031 1.879 26.306
tidak sesuai
For cohort perkembangan =
.246 .125 .483
sesuai
N of Valid Cases 50

Crosstabs
[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\UTS PUNYA KOMPUTER.sav
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
sikap * perkembangan 50 100.0% 0 0.0% 50 100.0%
sikap * perkembangan Crosstabulation
perkembangan Total
tidak sesuai sesuai
Count 22 7 29
tidak baik Expected Count 15.7 13.3 29.0
% within sikap 75.9% 24.1% 100.0%
sikap
Count 5 16 21
baik Expected Count 11.3 9.7 21.0
% within sikap 23.8% 76.2% 100.0%
Count 27 23 50
Total Expected Count 27.0 23.0 50.0
% within sikap 54.0% 46.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 13.286a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 11.273 1 .001
Likelihood Ratio 13.887 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear
13.020 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 50

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.66.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for sikap (tidak
10.057 2.697 37.497
baik / baik)
For cohort perkembangan =
3.186 1.443 7.036
tidak sesuai
For cohort perkembangan =
.317 .159 .630
sesuai
N of Valid Cases 50

Crosstabs
[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\UTS PUNYA KOMPUTER.sav
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
dukungan keluarga *
50 100.0% 0 0.0% 50 100.0%
perkembangan

dukungan keluarga * perkembangan Crosstabulation


perkembangan Total
tidak sesuai sesuai
Count 27 0 27
tidak mendukung Expected Count 14.6 12.4 27.0
% within dukungan keluarga 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
dukungan keluarga
Count 0 23 23
mendukung Expected Count 12.4 10.6 23.0
% within dukungan keluarga 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Count 27 23 50
Total
Expected Count 27.0 23.0 50.0
% within dukungan keluarga 54.0% 46.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 50.000a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 46.055 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 68.994 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear
49.000 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 50

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.58.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio for dukungan
keluarga (tidak mendukung /
mendukung)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be


computed. They are only computed for a
2*2 table without empty cells.

RELIABELITAS DAN VALIDITAS


Reliability
[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\BAHAN UJU VALID DAN RELIABEL UTS.sav
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N %
Valid 18 100.0
Cases Excluded a
0 .0
Total 18 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's N of Items
Alpha
.825 15

Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
S1 1.61 .502 18
S2 1.44 .511 18
S3 1.61 .502 18
S4 1.78 .428 18
S5 1.83 .383 18
P1 1.61 .502 18
P2 1.61 .502 18
P3 1.44 .511 18
P4 1.61 .502 18
P5 1.50 .514 18
D1 1.61 .502 18
D2 1.44 .511 18
D3 1.61 .502 18
D4 1.50 .514 18
D5 1.83 .383 18

Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Scale Variance if Corrected Item- Cronbach's
Item Deleted Item Deleted Total Alpha if Item
Correlation Deleted
S1 22.44 12.732 .694 .798
S2 22.61 13.781 .375 .820
S3 22.44 13.320 .518 .810
S4 22.28 14.565 .220 .828
S5 22.22 13.948 .479 .814
P1 22.44 14.850 .095 .838
P2 22.44 12.732 .694 .798
P3 22.61 13.781 .375 .820
P4 22.44 13.320 .518 .810
P5 22.56 13.908 .337 .822
D1 22.44 12.732 .694 .798
D2 22.61 13.781 .375 .820
D3 22.44 13.320 .518 .810
D4 22.56 13.908 .337 .822
D5 22.22 13.948 .479 .814

Scale Statistics
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
24.06 15.467 3.933 15

Reliability
[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\BAHAN UJU VALID DAN RELIABEL UTS.sav
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N %
Valid 18 100.0
Cases Excluded a
0 .0
Total 18 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the


procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
.873 8

Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
S1 1.61 .502 18
S3 1.61 .502 18
S5 1.83 .383 18
P2 1.61 .502 18
P4 1.61 .502 18
D1 1.61 .502 18
D3 1.61 .502 18
D5 1.83 .383 18

Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Scale Variance if Corrected Item- Cronbach's
Item Deleted Item Deleted Total Alpha if Item
Correlation Deleted
S1 11.72 5.742 .688 .851
S3 11.72 5.742 .688 .851
S5 11.50 6.618 .447 .875
P2 11.72 5.742 .688 .851
P4 11.72 5.742 .688 .851
D1 11.72 5.742 .688 .851
D3 11.72 5.742 .688 .851
D5 11.50 6.618 .447 .875

Scale Statistics
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
13.33 7.647 2.765 8
Reliability
[DataSet1] C:\Users\USER\Documents\BAHAN UJU VALID DAN RELIABEL UTS.sav

Scale: ALL VARIABLES


Case Processing Summary
N %
Valid 18 100.0
Cases Excludeda 0 .0
Total 18 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the


procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's N of Items
Alpha
.892 6

Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
S1 1.61 .502 18
S3 1.61 .502 18
P2 1.61 .502 18
P4 1.61 .502 18
D1 1.61 .502 18
D3 1.61 .502 18

Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Scale Variance if Corrected Item- Cronbach's
Item Deleted Item Deleted Total Alpha if Item
Correlation Deleted
S1 8.06 4.173 .711 .873
S3 8.06 4.173 .711 .873
P2 8.06 4.173 .711 .873
P4 8.06 4.173 .711 .873
D1 8.06 4.173 .711 .873
D3 8.06 4.173 .711 .873

Scale Statistics
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
9.67 5.882 2.425 6

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy