0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views10 pages

output nova

The document presents a frequency table and crosstab analysis of respondents' demographics, including age, education, knowledge, employment, family support, and their unmet needs. It highlights that 73.5% of respondents reported unmet needs, with significant correlations found between education and unmet needs, as well as knowledge and unmet needs. Chi-square tests indicate statistically significant relationships, particularly between lower education levels and higher unmet needs.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views10 pages

output nova

The document presents a frequency table and crosstab analysis of respondents' demographics, including age, education, knowledge, employment, family support, and their unmet needs. It highlights that 73.5% of respondents reported unmet needs, with significant correlations found between education and unmet needs, as well as knowledge and unmet needs. Chi-square tests indicate statistically significant relationships, particularly between lower education levels and higher unmet needs.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

Frequency Table

umur responden
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 41-45 9 26.5 26.5 26.5
36-40 25 73.5 73.5 100.0
Total 34 100.0 100.0

pendidikan responden
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Rendah 15 44.1 44.1 44.1
Tinggi 19 55.9 55.9 100.0
Total 34 100.0 100.0

pengetahuan
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Rendah 21 61.8 61.8 61.8
Tinggi 13 38.2 38.2 100.0
Total 34 100.0 100.0

pekerjaan
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Bekerja 12 35.3 35.3 35.3
Tidak bekerja 22 64.7 64.7 100.0
Total 34 100.0 100.0

dukungan keluarga
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Rendah 14 41.2 41.2 41.2
Tinggi 20 58.8 58.8 100.0
Total 34 100.0 100.0
kejadian unmet need
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Ya 25 73.5 73.5 73.5
Tidak 9 26.5 26.5 100.0
Total 34 100.0 100.0

Pie Chart
Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
pendidikan responden *
34 100.0% 0 .0% 34 100.0%
kejadian unmet need
pengetahuan * kejadian unmet
34 100.0% 0 .0% 34 100.0%
need
pekerjaan * kejadian unmet
34 100.0% 0 .0% 34 100.0%
need
dukungan keluarga * kejadian
34 100.0% 0 .0% 34 100.0%
unmet need

pendidikan responden * kejadian unmet need Crosstabulation

kejadian unmet need

Ya Tidak Total
pendidikan responden Rendah Count 14 1 15
Expected Count 11.0 4.0 15.0
% within pendidikan
93.3% 6.7% 100.0%
responden
Tinggi Count 11 8 19
Expected Count 14.0 5.0 19.0
% within pendidikan
57.9% 42.1% 100.0%
responden
Total Count 25 9 34
Expected Count 25.0 9.0 34.0
% within pendidikan
73.5% 26.5% 100.0%
responden

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.409a 1 .020
b
Continuity Correction 3.741 1 .053
Likelihood Ratio 6.087 1 .014
Fisher's Exact Test .047 .023
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.250 1 .022
b
N of Valid Cases 34
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.97.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper


Odds Ratio for pendidikan
10.182 1.102 94.104
responden (Rendah / Tinggi)
For cohort kejadian unmet
1.612 1.074 2.421
need = Ya
For cohort kejadian unmet
.158 .022 1.130
need = Tidak
N of Valid Cases 34
pengetahuan * kejadian unmet need

Crosstab

kejadian unmet need

Ya Tidak Total
pengetahuan Rendah Count 19 2 21
Expected Count 15.4 5.6 21.0
% within pengetahuan 90.5% 9.5% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 6 7 13
Expected Count 9.6 3.4 13.0
% within pengetahuan 46.2% 53.8% 100.0%
Total Count 25 9 34
Expected Count 25.0 9.0 34.0
% within pengetahuan 73.5% 26.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig.
Value df sided) sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.104a 1 .004
Continuity Correctionb 5.987 1 .014
Likelihood Ratio 8.145 1 .004
Fisher's Exact Test .013 .007
Linear-by-Linear Association 7.866 1 .005
b
N of Valid Cases 34
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.44.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper


Odds Ratio for pengetahuan
11.083 1.796 68.396
(Rendah / Tinggi)
For cohort kejadian unmet need
1.960 1.072 3.584
= Ya
For cohort kejadian unmet need
.177 .043 .725
= Tidak
N of Valid Cases 34
pekerjaan * kejadian unmet need

Crosstab

kejadian unmet need

Ya Tidak Total
pekerjaan Bekerja Count 6 6 12
Expected Count 8.8 3.2 12.0
% within pekerjaan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Tidak bekerja Count 19 3 22
Expected Count 16.2 5.8 22.0
% within pekerjaan 86.4% 13.6% 100.0%
Total Count 25 9 34
Expected Count 25.0 9.0 34.0
% within pekerjaan 73.5% 26.5% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig.
Value df sided) sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.275a 1 .022
b
Continuity Correction 3.572 1 .059
Likelihood Ratio 5.138 1 .023
Fisher's Exact Test .060 .031
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.120 1 .024
b
N of Valid Cases 34
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.18.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper


Odds Ratio for pekerjaan
.158 .030 .832
(Bekerja / Tidak bekerja)
For cohort kejadian unmet need
.579 .321 1.044
= Ya
For cohort kejadian unmet need
3.667 1.111 12.103
= Tidak
N of Valid Cases 34
dukungan keluarga * kejadian unmet need

Crosstab

kejadian unmet need

Ya Tidak Total
dukungan Rendah Count 11 3 14
keluarga
Expected Count 10.3 3.7 14.0
% within dukungan keluarga 78.6% 21.4% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 14 6 20
Expected Count 14.7 5.3 20.0
% within dukungan keluarga 70.0% 30.0% 100.0%
Total Count 25 9 34
Expected Count 25.0 9.0 34.0
% within dukungan keluarga 73.5% 26.5% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig.
Value df sided) sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .311a 1 .577
b
Continuity Correction .026 1 .871
Likelihood Ratio .316 1 .574
Fisher's Exact Test .704 .440
Linear-by-Linear Association .302 1 .583
b
N of Valid Cases 34
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.71.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper


Odds Ratio for dukungan
1.571 .319 7.745
keluarga (Rendah / Tinggi)
For cohort kejadian unmet need
1.122 .755 1.669
= Ya
For cohort kejadian unmet need
.714 .214 2.386
= Tidak
N of Valid Cases 34

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy