Scribd
Upload
88 views24 pages

Bhopal Lee

The document discusses a 1984 disaster in Bhopal, India where a leak at a Union Carbide pesticide plant released methyl isocyanate gas, killing thousands. Factors like poor plant design, lack of safety equipment, and untrained workers contributed to the disaster. It had massive health, environmental, and legal consequences and highlighted ethical issues around prioritizing profits over safety.

Uploaded by

JR Deviente
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
88 views24 pages

Bhopal Lee

The document discusses a 1984 disaster in Bhopal, India where a leak at a Union Carbide pesticide plant released methyl isocyanate gas, killing thousands. Factors like poor plant design, lack of safety equipment, and untrained workers contributed to the disaster. It had massive health, environmental, and legal consequences and highlighted ethical issues around prioritizing profits over safety.

Uploaded by

JR Deviente
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

The Bhopal Accident

Gavin Lee

SFWR ENG. 3J03


March 14, 2003.
Presentation Layout
! Background Information
! The Bhopal Disaster
! Technical Details / Factors for Failure / Aftermath
! The Stakeholders
! Consequences of the disaster
! Who were primarily responsible?
! The Ethical Issues
! Implications for Software Engineering
! Q&A
Background Information
! Sunday, December 2nd, 1984.
! One of Union Carbides Pesticide factories was
located in Bhopal, India.
! Union Carbide of India Limited (UCIL) was a
subsidiary of The Union Carbide Corporation (UCC).
! A rapidly growing community of roughly 900,000
people.
! The Factory produced carbamate pesticides. One
component was Methyl Isocyanate (MIC).

(a)(b)
The Bhopal Disaster
! The MIC production unit had been shut down for 2
months for routine maintenance.
! 9:30pm - Several pipelines linked to 3 MIC storage
tanks were being washed.
! 11:00pm - Many workers became aware of an MIC
leak, but werent able to find the source.
! 12:30am - The stinging sensation of MIC got
stronger.

(a)(b)
! MIC tank 610 was checked out. The ground
around the tank was unstable.
! 40 tons of deadly gases suddenly burst out into the
atmosphere. Workers fled in panic.
! Neighbouring communities fled in panic shortly
after.

(a)(b)
The Bhopal Disaster Technical Details

! Many pipelines were interconnected with each


other.
! A jumper line was installed several months prior to
the disaster to ease routine maintenance.
! The jumper line allowed water to flow through.
Along with another leaky pipe, water was able to
pass into tank 610.

(a)(b)
! Production of MIC:
Carbon Monoxide + Chlorine = Phosgene
Phosgene + Monomethylamine = Methyl Isocyanate
Methyl Isocyanate + Alpha Napthol = SEVIN.

! MIC went through a runaway reactions because it


was contaminated with water.

(a)(b)
(bi)
The Bhopal Disaster Factors for Failure

! Instrumentation and control devices were


inadequate and werent extensive enough.

! Plant safety systems were not designed to meet


extreme cases.

! The plant design was severely affected by economic


issues.

(a)(b)
The Bhopal Disaster Aftermath
! The largest industrial disaster in history.
! Approximately 2500 deaths at the time of the
disaster.
! July of 1985, it was estimated that about 50-60,000
people were severely debilitated.
! Other estimates say the total number of deaths up
to 1997 totaled to more than 16,000.

(a)(b)
(bii)
The Stakeholders
! Union Carbide Corporation.
! Interested in making more money in foreign countries.
! Warren Anderson.
! Same interests as above.
! Union Carbide of India Limited.
! Interested in making super profits.
! Also interested in expanding the economy.

(e)
! The West Virginia Engineering Firm.
! Primary concern was for the design of the plant.
! The Government Of India.
! Interested in the expansion of the economy.
! Interested in more jobs and money.
! The Bhopal community.
! Interested in the expansion of the community and economy
as well as available jobs at the plant.

(e)
Consequences Of The Disaster
! 1985 Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster Act
! Allowed Government of India to represent all affected
individuals.
! $2.2 Million grant to Arizona State University for
new vocational-technical training facility for the
citizens of Bhopal.
! Meanwhile, the Institute Plant in West Virginia had
a chemical leak due to several faults and
unsatisfactory software performance.

(e)(f)(g)(h)
! Emergency Planning and Community Right To
Know Act.
! Provides information to local communities and
individuals about hazardous materials in their local areas.
! Responsible Care under the Chemical
Manufacturers Association.
! Creation of the Chemical Safety and Hazard
Investigation Board.

(e)(f)(g)(h)
Who Were Primarily Responsible?
! Union Carbide Corporation (UCC).
! Union Carbide Of India Limited (UCIL).
! Warren Anderson (CEO of UCC).
! Eight Indian Officials (Some were part of UCIL).

(d)
The Ethical Issues
! Hold paramount the safety, health and
welfare of the public.

! Poor quality and lack


of many instruments, safety
equipment and reduced operation of critical
systems
! Flare Tower, VGS, Water Sprays, MIC refrigerator, Tank
610.
! The local community was never given any
information about MIC and other chemicals.

(a)(b)(i)
! Gross negligence by the Government of India
and UC.
! 3 separate safety audits. No actions made.
! Cared more about saving money.
! Coffee breaks were more important.
! First official meeting took place 40 hours after the
disaster.
! Workerswere never informed of the dangers of
MIC as well as other chemicals.
! Gained information the hard way.

(a)(b)(i)
(c)
! Perform services only in areas of their
competence

! Jobs were continually cut to reduce costs.


! Some shifts only had 8 workers.

! Many workers never had the expertise required


for their positions.
! Training went down from 6 months to 15 days.

(a)(b)(i)
! Issue public statements only in an objective
and truthful manner.
! Avoid deceptive acts.

! Workers sometimes went for random medical examinations.


Were never told the truth.
! Chief Medical Officer of UCIL told doctors that MIC was a
non toxic irritant.
! Police officials were told lies.
! Many false claims and accusations in the trial.

(a)(b)(i)
! Why were these Ethical codes broken?

! How can we prevent future disasters of this


type?
Applications & Implications to
Software Engineering
! Problems found in the Bhopal disaster that may be
found in software systems:
! Extreme Case handling.
! Measurement readings and calculations.

! The above examples can pave the way for the


Software Engineering profession.
! Code of Ethics for Classical Engineering apply
directly to Software Engineering.
Bibliography
(a) Everest, Larry. Behind The Poison Cloud, Banner Press; U.S.A. 1986.
(b) Morehouse, Ward & Subramaniam, M. Arun. The Bhopal Tragedy, Council on International and
Public Affairs; U.S.A. 1986.
(bi) Union Carbide Diagram of MIC Storage Tank with Jumper Line Added was taken from pg.
#18.
(bii) How the deadly gas spread over Bhopal picture was taken from pg. #22.

(c) Bhopal Plant picture source from http://www.chemsafety.gov/images/bhopal01.jpg


(d) Bhopal, http://www.ucaqld.com/au/community/bhopal
(e) Bryce, Amy. Bhopal Disaster Spurs U.S. Industry, Legislative Action,
http://www.chemsafety.gov/_lib/bhopal01 July 29, 1999.
(f) Union Carbide Corporation. Chronology, http://www.bhopal.com/chrono.htm 2001-2002.
(g) Union Carbide Corporation. The Settlement, http://www.bhopal.com/sna.htm 2001-2002.
(h) Union Carbide Corporation. Incident Review, http://www.bhopal.com/review.htm 2001-2002.
(i) Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science. National Society of Professional Engineers
(NSPE) Code of Ethics for Engineers, http://www.onlineethics.org/codes/NSPEcode.html
2003.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy