Scribd
Upload
40 views3 pages

Dataset Cancer Experiment

The document compares the performance of different classifiers - ANN, DT, SVM, Naive Bayes, and KNN - on cancer dataset. It reports the accuracy, recall, precision, F-measure and AUC of each classifier on the training, validation and testing sets. On the training set, ANN performed best with an average accuracy of 75.25%. On the validation set, ANN and KNN had similar average accuracies of 73.8% and 73.57% respectively. On the testing set, Naive Bayes performed best with an average accuracy of 68.37%, followed by KNN at 69.23%.

Uploaded by

Farhad Ahmed Chirley
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
40 views3 pages

Dataset Cancer Experiment

The document compares the performance of different classifiers - ANN, DT, SVM, Naive Bayes, and KNN - on cancer dataset. It reports the accuracy, recall, precision, F-measure and AUC of each classifier on the training, validation and testing sets. On the training set, ANN performed best with an average accuracy of 75.25%. On the validation set, ANN and KNN had similar average accuracies of 73.8% and 73.57% respectively. On the testing set, Naive Bayes performed best with an average accuracy of 68.37%, followed by KNN at 69.23%.

Uploaded by

Farhad Ahmed Chirley
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Table-1:- Comparison of different classifiers

for the Cancer Dataset


Training set:-
Classifier Accuracy Recall Precision F-Measure AUC
ANN 75.25 0.75 0.74 0.74 0.74
8.89 0.09 0.11 0.10 0.13
DT 69.98 0.70 0.70 0.69 0.67
10.55 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.14
SVM 71.98 0.72 0.71 0.70 0.63
9.32 0.09 0.11 0.10 0.11
Nave 75.24 0.75 0.73 0.72 0.66
Bayes 8.76 0.09 0.13 0.11 0.16
KNN 73.50 0.73 0.73 0.71 0.63
8.63 0.09 0.12 0.09 0.13

Training set
Mean Standard Deviation
80 75.25 75.24
71.98 73.5
69.98
70

60

50
Accuracy

40

30

20
8.89 10.55 9.32 8.76 8.63
10

0
ANN DT SVM Na ve Bayes KNN

Classifier
Validation Set:-
Classifier Accuracy Recall Precision F-Measure AUC
ANN 73.80 0.74 0.69 0.70 0.77
16.05 0.16 0.22 0.19 0.25
DT 62.53 0.63 0.64 0.61 0.62
19.51 0.20 0.23 0.20 0.30
SVM 65.07 0.65 0.64 0.62 0.58
17.26 0.17 0.21 0.18 0.20
Nave 63.97 0.64 0.59 0.60 0.54
Bayes 18.97 0.19 0.21 0.19 0.29
KNN 73.57 0.74 0.70 0.70 0.64
15.61 0.16 0.21 0.17 0.22

Validation set
Mean Standard Deviation
80
73.8 73.57
70 65.07
62.53 63.97
60
Accuracy

50

40

30
19.51 18.97
20 16.05 17.26 15.61

10

0
ANN DT SVM Na ve Bayes KNN

Classifier
Testing Set:-
Classifier Accuracy Recall Precision F-Measure AUC
ANN 66.03 0.66 0.59 0.61 0.57
15.63 0.16 0.19 0.16 0.30
DT 59.63 0.60 0.59 0.58 0.47
16.30 0.16 0.19 0.16 0.28
SVM 57.70 0.58 0.55 0.54 0.47
15.34 0.15 0.17 0.14 0.17
Nave 68.37 0.68 0.63 0.64 0.67
Bayes 15.55 0.16 0.20 0.17 0.28
KNN 69.23 0.69 0.50 0.58 0.49
10.68 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.08

Testing set
Mean Standard Deviation
80

68.37 69.23
70 66.03
59.63
60 57.7

50
Accuracy

40

30

20 15.63 16.3 15.34 15.55


10.68
10

0
ANN DT SVM Na ve Bayes KNN

Classifier

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy