Sample Report
Sample Report
Botom
CML ID
(mm) (mm) (mm/yr)
North
South
Piping Element Original Date of Last
West
Thickness Radius
East
(mm)
Top
Pipeline Number I/V Size (in)
Description Reading Dates Inspection
1 2 3 4 5
8" 75 FG110 53B V ELBOW 001 8" 1-Apr-1993 20-Sep-2017 6.35 7.63 7.04 6.45 6.46 6.52 0.0000 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Thickness Measurement (mm)
Line Information CML Description Dates
Current Thickness Readings
Minimum
Original Minimum Corrosion Required Remaining Next Inspection
Design Thickness Reading Rate Remarks
Elbow Outer Radius Elbow Inner Thickness Life (years) Date
Botom
CML ID
(mm) (mm) (mm/yr)
North
South
Piping Element Original Date of Last
West
Thickness Radius
East
(mm)
Top
Pipeline Number I/V Size (in)
Description Reading Dates Inspection
1 2 3 4 5
Note 1 : Corrosion rate was found 0.00 mm, the corrosion rate was taken to be as similar elements in the same line / service.
Note 2: Temperature correction factor was considered and all actual thickness readings was reduced by 7%.
Inspected By: Prepared By: Reviewed By:
Ultrasonic Testing Thickness Survey Report (Short Term Corrosion Rate)
Corrosion Rates
Line Information CML Description Dates Thickness Readings (mm)
(mm/year)
Minimum
Required Remaining Next Inspection
Thickness Life (years) Date Remarks
Pipeline Number I/V Piping Element CML ID Size (in) Date of Previous Date of Last Design Previous Current (mm)
Description Inspection Inspection Thickness Thickness Thickness
8" 75 FG110 53B V ELBOW 001 N 8" 1-Aug-2012 20-Sep-2017 6.35 7.62 7.63
Corrosion Rates
Line Information CML Description Dates Thickness Readings (mm)
(mm/year)
Minimum
Required Remaining Next Inspection Remarks
Thickness Life (years) Date
Pipeline Number I/V Piping Element CML ID Size (in) Date of Previous Date of Last Design Previous Current (mm)
Description Inspection Inspection Thickness Thickness Thickness
Corrosion Rates
Line Information CML Description Dates Thickness Readings (mm)
(mm/year)
Minimum
Required Remaining Next Inspection Remarks
Thickness Life (years) Date
Pipeline Number I/V Piping Element CML ID Size (in) Date of Previous Date of Last Design Previous Current (mm)
Description Inspection Inspection Thickness Thickness Thickness
Corrosion Rates
Line Information CML Description Dates Thickness Readings (mm)
(mm/year)
Minimum
Required Remaining Next Inspection Remarks
Thickness Life (years) Date
Pipeline Number I/V Piping Element CML ID Size (in) Date of Previous Date of Last Design Previous Current (mm)
Description Inspection Inspection Thickness Thickness Thickness
Note 1 : Corrosion rate was found 0.00 mm, the corrosion rate was taken to be as similar elements in the same line / service.
Note 2: Temperature correction factor was considered and all actual thickness readings was reduced by 7%.
Inspected By: Prepared By: Reviewed By:
NOTES:
Note 1 : The actual thickness was found more than original thickness,higher corrosion rate was taken as similar with
Note 2 : The actual thickness was found more than original thickness, so the highest pipe schedule were used as new
Note 2 : The actual thickness was found more than original thickness,so the original thickness are 12.5% increase.
Note 2 : The actual thickness was found more than original thickness,so the original thickness are 12.5% decrease.
Note : Due to 0.00 mm corrosion allowance, as a result remaining life become negative value. The next inspection d
Note : Due to 0.00 mm corrosion allowance, the minimum required thickness were deducted by 12.5% from it's des
Note 2: Temperature correction factor was considered and all actual thickness readings was reduced by 7%.
:
te was taken as similar with the same line and the same calculated in short term.
e schedule were used as new original thickness
kness are 12.5% increase.
kness are 12.5% decrease.
value. The next inspection date were consider as 10 years interval as per API 570.
ucted by 12.5% from it's design thickness.
was reduced by 7%.