Strategic Planning Report
Strategic Planning Report
CEECN
Kunbbony - Hungary
March 5-6, 2008.
2. day
Time Activity Method
9:00 9:20 Wrap up, start of the day
Partnership with other networks Group discussion
9:20 10:15 CEBSD, Baltic Sea NGO Network, Trans-
Atlantic
Possible inclusion of European Community Group discussion
10:15 10:45 Organizing Network (ECON)
10:45 11:00 Break
Structure Small group work,
discussion
11:00 12:00 What is the best structure for the planned strategic
areas and activities
Questions regarding the structure and the mana- Group discussion
gement of the network
12:00 12:30
Membership, growth of the network, sub
regional structure
12:30 14:00 Lunch
14:00 14:30 Exercise
Further management questions Group discussion
Participants in two groups created a picture, a vision of the network. How will CEECN
look in five years time from now on? (see pictures)
3.) Values What are the main values of the members of Group discussion.
the network? Common values List and priorities.
Participants prepared the list of their most important values connected to the
network. Than in pairs they selected the 7 most important common values of their list.
We collected them on the flip-chart. Everyone had three votes to give it to the
preferred values on the list. Maximum of two votes could be given to one value. See
the results below.
Value Votes
Every citizens has the right to participate 2
Interdisciplinarity
Geocultural position 2
Learn from each other good sharing 3
Sustainability
Inclusion of marginalized and unempowered 2
Openness, flexibility 5
Focus on real citizens issues 3
Cooperation, acting together 4
Common faith and experience
Mutual trust 1
A Partners for Democratic Change International tagja 4
H-1027 Budapest, Frankel Le u. 5. Tel.: 438-5260, 438-5270, Fax: 438-5271
web: www.partnershungary.hu e-mail: partners@partnershungary.hu
PARTNERS HUNGARY FOUNDATION
Group 1
Strengths Weaknesses
Geographical coverage/area Communication culture
Existing different expertise but as Lack of standards (implementation of the
perspective /not structured, organized networks activities, membership policy
EU non EU members, different etc.)
perspectives for discussion Geographical coverage/area
Connection with COE and other Networks members dedication to follow
networks up agreed activities
Relatively stable funding of the network Lack of entrepreneurship within the
and developed network structure members
Wide area of expertise and possibilities Not sufficient funds available to the
Positive attitude about facing problems members
(issues) Only one donor, not diverse donors base
Language
Group 2
Strengths Weaknesses
Strong base (low) Level of active engagement in
Broad membership communication and some activities of the
Good reputation network
Citizen Participation week not able to utilize, take advantage of
Creativity of members members talents, skills, experience
Important and clear issue and very large diverse geographic area that is
terminology growing more apart
Core funding support MOTT size and diversity of member
Mature/well established member organization
organizations and individuals expensive
Partnership, friends, contacts conference (expectation, agenda,
Openness and inclusiveness funding)
Experienced as members and also as follow up to activities
network limited and week management
Participatory status at Council of Europe country borders create big complications
week links between member
organizations
change of key people
week links within members
A Partners for Democratic Change International tagja 5
H-1027 Budapest, Frankel Le u. 5. Tel.: 438-5260, 438-5270, Fax: 438-5271
web: www.partnershungary.hu e-mail: partners@partnershungary.hu
PARTNERS HUNGARY FOUNDATION
Activities Looking at the main strategic areas, what will Small group work,
6.) be the main activities of CEECN presentation
In small group work and later on in long group discussion the participants finalized
nine main activities of CEECN and also ranked them by their importance. Each
participant made a ranking order of the activities and it was collected, cumulated and
it gave the final order.
Activity Score Positio
s n
1.) Citizen Participation Week: 25 1
Expand
Find solution about cooperation with COE LDW
More money and activity
National and regional activity
2.) Work with media including internet, E-campaigning, E- 35 4
participation
National and local level
3.) Best practice continue, tie it to media activities 37 5
4.) Analyses of state of Citizen Participation in region curricula 34 2
research, mapping the spaces of CP
5.) Conference 53 9
6.) Utilizing IT, game development 34 2
7.) Participatory budgeting program 49 8
8.) Annual training 47 7
9.) Project in Byelorussia 46 6
A Partners for Democratic Change International tagja 7
H-1027 Budapest, Frankel Le u. 5. Tel.: 438-5260, 438-5270, Fax: 438-5271
web: www.partnershungary.hu e-mail: partners@partnershungary.hu
PARTNERS HUNGARY FOUNDATION
The activity No.7 Participatory budget program was further developed as a project
plan:
1. Establishing task group Creating draft plan
2. Introducing the plan and discuss it with interested NGOs
3. Creating training frame
4. Training delivery + support member NGOs in developing their projects
5. Establish ongoing consultancy support
6. Periodical visits to member countries, NGOs + meetings
7. Evaluation of implemented action and develop next plan
Decision: They remain our strategic partner. Representative of ECON comes to the
April meeting in Prague to introduce the network. After that the CEECN will decide
about the inclusion. (The decision will be made without the participation of the ECON
representative!!!)
Baltic Sea NGO Network: Chuck replies to them underlining the differences in the
missions
CEBSD: we have the European Dialogue Project with them. We participate on the
event on May together with them. They remain our strategic partner.
Trans-Atlantic: We have the fellowship project with them. They remain our strategic
partner.
Capacity building
Building on infrastructure and strengthening skills and knowledge of citizens
Network has analytical, educational, informational and political means for
influencing EU policies
Following an hour discussion about the ranked activities and the list of objectives five
main activities, priorities were named as to be the suggestion for the April meeting of
the representative team. (These are very similar to the result of ranking the different
activities) This is a list and it is not ranked:
Project based operation focusing on the network
Council of Europe
Citizen participation week
Research, analysis best practices
Utilizing IT
The agreement was that the representative team will see all the activities collected
on this meeting in the ranked order.
Some participants stated that the see now better the future activities and the
possibilities of the network. They have a clearer picture about what needs to be done
in order to reach the main goal.
Participants in two groups created a structure of the organization. What is the best
structure to serve the main goals and to provide the main activities in the operation of
the organization? (see pictures)
What do I get from CEECN, what can I give? personal Group discussion
10.)
motivation
In the final round we discussed these questions from personal points of views. What
does it bring to the participants to be member of CEECN and what can they give to
the network.
As a result of the two day planning procedure the future picture of CEECN became
clearer for the participants. The next steps are bringing the results to the
representative meeting in April in Prague and make a decision about the directions
and main activities.