Teacher(s) : Daniel Dandurand, Alex Subject:: Direct Instruction
Teacher(s) : Daniel Dandurand, Alex Subject:: Direct Instruction
Standard(s): Common Core, Arizona Career and College Ready Standards, ISTE Standards
apply to this lesson
AZ Content Standards
Strand 2. Concept 1 PO 5. Describe the difference between a primary source document and
a secondary source document and the relationships between them.
Strand 2. Concept 1 PO 6. Determine the credibility and bias of primary and secondary
sources
Strand 2. Concept 1 PO 8. Analyze two points of view on the same historical event.
Strand 3. Concept 4 PO 2. Discuss the character traits (e.g., respect, responsibility, fairness,
involvement) that are important to the preservation and improvement of constitutional
democracy in the United States
AZ Anchor Standards
68.RH.1. Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary
sources.
68.RH.6. Identify aspects of a text that reveal an authors point of view or purpose (e.g.,
loaded language, inclusion or avoidance of particular facts).
68.RH.8. Distinguish among fact, opinion, and reasoned judgment in a text.
ISTE Standards
1. Empowered Learner.
C. Use technology to seek feedback that informs and improves their practice and to
demonstrate their learning in a variety of ways.
3. Knowledge Constructor.
B. Evaluate the accuracy, perspective, credibility and relevance of information,
media, data or other resources.
C. Curate information from digital sources using a variety of tools and methods to
create collections of artifacts that demonstrate meaningful connections or
conclusions.
Objectives (Explicit): Use Blooms verbiage and formula
Students will be able to analyze, describe, and determine the differences between fake news
and real news when presented with documents for evaluation using presented criteria to
determine bias of the author or entity toward the subject in question.
Using presented criteria students will be able to spot fake news with 75% accuracy
Opening (state objectives, connect to previous learning, and make RELEVANT to real life)
ENGAGE/ hook the students
Is it fake or is it real, you decide. All too often we are inured with false information. Many
times we see some blurb off to the side of our Facebook page that says so and so will be
missed implying that the person has died. But, if you dig a bit deeper into reputable
sources you find that the person in question is just fine! The purpose of this bit of fake news
is to simply peak our curiosity enough to click on the link in question that inevitably leads us
to some advertisement we would not have clicked on if advertised at face value.
Instructional Teacher Will: Be specific Student Will: Be specific
Input
Provide students with two Listen and follow along with a
examples of legitimate and/or presentation that provides instructions
fake news and criteria on how on spotting fake news articles and how
to spot the differences between to tell if an article is real.
them.
Students will be able to use the help of a shoulder partner if needed and
teacher will confirm understanding of new concepts and ask for questions
at each new idea or concept presented.
Stop the presentation and get a thumbs up and ask if there are any
questions at this time before moving to independent practice.
Links:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/lessons_plans/lesson-plan-how-to-teach-your-students-
about-fake-news/
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/daily_videos/why-is-it-important-for-news-sources-to-be-
trustworthy/
https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-
facebook?utm_term=.qdMBRR71L#.twG700p2W
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/remedy-spread-fake-news-history-teachers-
180961310/
http://www.npr.org/2016/11/22/503052574/stanford-study-finds-most-students-vulnerable-to-
fake-news
http://edwired.org/2008/12/18/you-were-warned/\
Presentation Method:
Peardeck
Assessment Methods: