Scribd
Upload
56 views3 pages

Example #12-Simulated Solution Gas Drive 1 (Example12.csv) : Using The Numerical Model

This document describes a simulated reservoir model with the following parameters: a high permeability oil reservoir under constant pressure production initially in an under saturated state. It provides reservoir and PVT data and asks questions about boundary dominated flow, type curve matching, determining original oil in place, and comparing results between analytical and numerical modeling approaches.

Uploaded by

wizerth apk
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
56 views3 pages

Example #12-Simulated Solution Gas Drive 1 (Example12.csv) : Using The Numerical Model

This document describes a simulated reservoir model with the following parameters: a high permeability oil reservoir under constant pressure production initially in an under saturated state. It provides reservoir and PVT data and asks questions about boundary dominated flow, type curve matching, determining original oil in place, and comparing results between analytical and numerical modeling approaches.

Uploaded by

wizerth apk
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Example #12- Simulated Solution Gas Drive 1 (example12.

csv)

Description:

- High permeability oil reservoir


- Constant pressure production
- Initially under saturated conditions

Reservoir / Wellbore Parameters:

Pi = 5,000 psia (bottomhole)


T = 200 deg F
G = 0.65
CO2, N2 = 0, 0

API = 40 deg
Rsi = 533 scf/bbl
Pbp = 2,500 psia

h = 10 ft
Porosity = 10 %
Swc = 25 %

PVT data included in “pvt.csv”


Relative permeability data included in “relperm.csv”
This data should be imported using the advanced properties page.

Questions:

- Does the well exhibit boundary dominated flow?


- You will notice that the data match is not optimal on the type curves.
- Is the transition through the bubble point clear on the type curve match?
- Do the type curves yield any additional useful information (ie, is it possible
to determine OOIP with any reliability?)

Using the Numerical Model

- Import the PVT data using the import utility on the advanced properties page
- Import the relative permeability data (as above). Use the input data to
calibrate the default relative permeability correlation (Generalized Corey).
- Attempt to history match on oil production, using the Numerical Model. Use
the gas rates as an additional matching constraint. What is the OOIP,
permeability and skin?
Comparison between Analytical and Numerical Results

- Are the interpreted OOIPs consistent? Why or why not? (Hint: remember that
the well flowing pressure is well below bubble point through the entire
producing life)
- Are the interpreted permeabilities and skins consistent? Why or why not?
(Hint: relative permeabilities come into play here)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy