Scribd
Upload
1K views1 page

Edited Version Monitoring Tool For Checking TOS TQs

This document is a monitoring tool used to check teachers' quarterly tables of specifications (TOS) and test questions (TQs) for compliance with standard formatting requirements. It contains indicators for the TOS, such as including learning competencies and properly allocating items under cognitive domains. It also contains indicators for the TQs, such as aligning items with competencies, numbering items continuously, and ensuring options are parallel in form. The tool is used to observe compliance during quarterly checks and is signed by the monitor and school head upon completion.

Uploaded by

Christian Opeña Ducusin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views1 page

Edited Version Monitoring Tool For Checking TOS TQs

This document is a monitoring tool used to check teachers' quarterly tables of specifications (TOS) and test questions (TQs) for compliance with standard formatting requirements. It contains indicators for the TOS, such as including learning competencies and properly allocating items under cognitive domains. It also contains indicators for the TQs, such as aligning items with competencies, numbering items continuously, and ensuring options are parallel in form. The tool is used to observe compliance during quarterly checks and is signed by the monitor and school head upon completion.

Uploaded by

Christian Opeña Ducusin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Region I

LA UNION SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE


Catbangen, City of San Fernando, La Union 2500

IMS-F02
MONITORING TOOL FOR CHECKING QUARTERLY TOS & TQs
School: _______________________________ District: ________________________ Date of Checking: __________________
Name of Teacher: _____________________________________ Position: ____________________
Curricular Program: __________________________ Learning Area: ________________________Grade Level: _____________
Quarter: ___ 1st ____ 2nd ____ 3rd ____ 4th School Year: ___________________________

Indicators Observed Not Observed Remarks


TABLE OF SPECIFICATIONS (TOS)
1. The two-way format with the six (6) Cognitive Domains (in verb form)
is followed.
2. Learning Competencies (LCs) for the quarter are listed.
3. LCs that require performance and product assessment are labelled.
4. The recommended total number of items are shown.
Grades 1 - 3 = 30 items
Grades 4 – 6 = 50 items
Grades 7 – 12 = 60 items
5. Allocated items for the LCs are properly placed under the
corresponding domain arranged in accordance with the item
placement in the test paper.
6. Technical considerations:
a. Paper size – Legal (8.5” x 13.0”)
b. Margin - Normal (1” all sides)
c. Orientation - Landscape
d. Font – Arial
e. Font size - 12
TEST QUESTIONS (TQs) / TEST ITEMS
1. Test items are aligned with the learning competency.
2. Test items are arranged according to the level difficulty (determined
by the verb introducing the LC), LOTS to HOTS.
3. Test items are numbered continuously.
4. The recommended total number of items is strictly followed.
Grades 1 - 3 = 30 items
Grades 4 – 6 = 50 items
Grades 7 – 12 = 60 items
A. STEM
1. Directions/instructions are very clear.
2. The stem is written in a question or an incomplete statement.
3. A formulated problem is clearly presented in the stem of the
question.
4. Positively worded. Negative words used are CAPITALIZED,
ITALICIZED, UNDERLINED AND IN BOLD FONT.
5. Words that are repeated in each alternative is included in the stem.
6. Blank space for incomplete statements is found at the end of the
statement.
B. OPTIONS/CHOICES/ALTERNATIVES
1. Three (3) options/ choices (for lower grades -1 to 3) and four (4)
options (grades 4-12) are provided.
2. Options grammatically consistent with the stem and parallel in form.
3. Choices are arranged in a logical or in a numerical order (most to least
and chronological).
4. Letter options are in capital letters. (A B C D)
5. Choices are homogeneous in content and in grammatical structure.
6. Alternatives are approximately equal in length.
C. TEST PAPER (TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS)
a. Paper size – Legal (8.5” x 13.0”)
b. Margin - Normal (1” all sides)
c. Orientation - Portrait
d. Font – Gr 1-2 Century Gothic
Gr 3-12 Arial
e. Font size - 14 (Gr 1-2), 12 (Gr 3-6), 11 (Gr 7-12)
f. Color of graphics (tables, figures, images) - black
g. The name of school and the name of teacher are allowed to be
printed in the test paper. No other unnecessary texts and images
Monitored by: Conforme:
________________________ _________________________
EPS/PSDS School Head

Monitoring Tool: Checking of TOS and TQs

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy