Scribd
Upload
37 views3 pages

IT Expert Instrument (1) v.lagmAY

The document provides an evaluation form for an expert named Vincent Lagmay to rate various aspects of a computer system for quarterly assessments on a scale of 1 to 5. Some key aspects that were rated include the planning, design, format, content, approach and methodology of the computer system. Overall, the expert found the system to be well designed and logical in its process, which helps teachers by eliminating manual recording and preparation of tests. One recommendation provided was to add security features to prevent cheating during exams.

Uploaded by

Jes Ramos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
37 views3 pages

IT Expert Instrument (1) v.lagmAY

The document provides an evaluation form for an expert named Vincent Lagmay to rate various aspects of a computer system for quarterly assessments on a scale of 1 to 5. Some key aspects that were rated include the planning, design, format, content, approach and methodology of the computer system. Overall, the expert found the system to be well designed and logical in its process, which helps teachers by eliminating manual recording and preparation of tests. One recommendation provided was to add security features to prevent cheating during exams.

Uploaded by

Jes Ramos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

EXPERT EVALUATION OF THE COMPUTER SYSTEM

Expert:_VINCENT LAGMAY
Instruction: Encircle the number that corresponds to your own evaluation with the following
descriptions:
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Good
3 - Good
2 - Fair
1 - Poor

A. Planning Design and Format


Rate the following characteristics of the Computer System for Quarterly Assessments on a scale
of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent).
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent

1. Development of objectives

a. Measurable 1 2 3 4 5

b. Realistic 1 2 3 4 5

2. Inclusion of important components

a. Title 1 2 3 4 5

b. Introduction & Instructions 1 2 3 4 5

c. Prerequisites and resources


available on the topics 1 2 3 4 5

d. Performance objectives 1 2 3 4 5

3. Organization of information

a. Logical sequence 1 2 3 4 5

b. Directions clear and


concise 1 2 3 4 5

4. Design and format


consideration

a. Visually appealing 1 2 3 4 5
b. Appropriateness of the
format 1 2 3 4 5

Please answer the following questions with as much detail as you feel is necessary:

6. What corrections should be made in the planning and format of the Computer System?
There should be a module in adding sections so that the teacher can easily navigate and print all
the results based on section.

7. What suggestions do you have for making the material more understandable or clear?
Better if the system has admin account system setting showing the number of students takers
who took the exam per day per section with name and time so that tracking is easy.

B. Content of the Computer System Assessments

Rate the following characteristics of the Instructional material on a scale of 1 (poor) to 5


(excellent).
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent
8. Practicality of the material 1 2 3 4 5

9. Content based on current research 1 2 3 4 5

10. Relevance of the content 1 2 3 4 5

11. The material provides new


information 1 2 3 4 5

12. Overall content quality 1 2 3 4 5

Please answer the following questions in as much detail as you feel is needed:

13. What parts of the content do you feel would be the most helpful to teachers? What parts
would be least helpful?
The modules are properly working based on features. System is easy to understand and use

14. What are the strengths of this computer system for Quarterly Assessments
System Logical process design is correct and is very helpful to teachers eliminating manual
recording and preparation of test. Moreover, it lessen paper in printing exam
15. What are the weaknesses of this computer system for Quarterly Assessments?
As recommendation, the system can execute on the spot code during the exam to make sure there
are no possibility of cheating or allowing other students to take exam of their classmates.
C. Approach and methodology

16. Present subject matter logically


using suitable and sufficient
teaching aids 1 2 3 4 5

17. Involve students in active learning


through appropriate and adequate
activities, exercises and other
experiences 1 2 3 4 5

18. Utilize practical applications and


real-life situations whenever
possible 1 2 3 4 5

19. Use strategies that allow for


the development of problem
solving skills and social skills 1 2 3 4 5

20. Develop higher cognitive skills,


critical thinking, creativity and
allows for some student-initiated
activities 1 2 3 4 5

21. Provide for individual differences


(fast and slow, multiple intelligence) 1 2 3 4 5

D. Assessment and evaluation

a. target audience 1 2 3 4 5

b. resources and constraints of


the learning situation 1 2 3 4 5

c. information skills to be acquired 1 2 3 4 5

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy