DESIGN OF RCC PIER (RECTANGULAR SHAPE WITH 90 DEGREE CUT-WATER )

SUMMARY SHEET
BRIDGE NO --- TOP OF BEARING L - SIDE 98.990
SPAN 2 X 9.15 m PSC Slab TOP OF BEARING R - SIDE 98.990
DATE PROP. FORMATION LEVEL 99.855
SECTION -- R.L OF TOP OF PIER CAP 98.990
PROJECT CONCOR WORK R.L OF TOP OF FOUNDATION 93.300
LOADING 25 TONNE LOADING R.L OF BOTTOM OF FND. 92.300
DESIGNED BY -- H.F.L 98.450

NOS OF PROPOSAL R0 BED LEVEL 94.185

Girder /Slab RDSO/B-10263-R
S.NO FOR P1
A LOADS L -Girder R - Girder For this , self wt. of sla
1 DEAD WEIGHT OF ALL GIRDER 182.28 182.28 T GAD 6 pieces
2 LIVE LOAD FOR (O.S.L ) 112.03 112.03 T
3 LIVE LOAD FOR (T.S.L ) 210.6 210.6 T
4 Longitudinal load along track (O.S.L )( 50 % in seismic case ) 48.98 48.98 T fcos0 in skew bridges
5 Longitudinal load along track(T.S.L )( 50 % in seismic case ) 75.00 75.00 T
6 Frictional Force only in case of unequal span 0.00 0.00
7 SPAN
CLEAR SPAN 9.15 9.15 m
EFF. SPAN 9.715 9.715 m
OVER ALL length of slab 10.280 10.280 m
8 Skew angle of Bridge with Track 0 0 Radian
B PROPERTIES OF PIER ( 90 DG. CUT-WATER )
BARREL LENGTH OF PIER( EXCLUDING CUT-WATER) 7.8785 m Length in
WIDTH OF PIER AT TOP 1.17 m sq. dir'n
TOTAL HEIGHT UPTO TOP OF FOUNDATION 5.690 m
HT. OF FIRST CKECKING LEVEL(From Pier-cap Top) 5.6 m
SIDE BATTER TO PIER 1000 m
ECCENCRITY FROM CENTRE OF PIER 0.303 0.303 m
DEPTH OF CUSHION 0.35 m
OUTER DIAMETER OF CYLINDER 0.001 m
C/C PLACING OF CYLINDER 1 m
Shape of Cut Water (Semicircular/Triangular) Triangular
Constant for pier 'K' (semicircular / triangular cut water) 47
C SEISMIC COFF.
ZONE 3
Not to be considered
BASIC HORIZONTAL COEFF.a o 0.04 seismic
span less than 15 mt .
IMPORTANT FACTOR I 0 put Important factor a
b DEPENDING ON FOUND. SYS. 1 zero

D PROPERTIES OF PIER CAP

TOP LENGTH ,( skew in case of skew otherwise sq.) 8.4635 M
Not to be considered
TOP WIDTH Square( Bottom width kept same as top) 1.17 M not provided. Slabs re
BOTTOM LENGTH 8.4635 M of Pier. So thickness
THICKNESS AT EDGE 0.001 M taken only 0.001
THICKNESS AT FACE OF PIER 0.001 M
E GENERAL :-
% of buoyancy assumed 100 %
DENCITY OF MATERIAL 2.5 T/M^3
VELOCITY OF WATER 2 M/S
DEGREE OF CURVE 0 DEG.
MAX. TRAIN SPEED 125 KMPH
F- DETAILS OF FOUNDATION :-
WIDTH OF FOUNDATION ( ACROSS TRACK) 8.9635 m
LENGTH OF FOUNDATION (ALONG. TRACK) 4.4 m Half the distance is co
THICK. AT THE FACE OF PIER 1 m from barrel length of t
THICK. AT THE END 0.5 m
SBC of soil at founding lvl. 23 T/M^2
 OUT PUT DATA BRIDGE NO. ---

Top of Pedes

Cap not necessary

# 8 Links @ 200 mm c/c

#32 @180 mm c/c on

periphery of pier

X X

#32 @180 mm c/c

#16 @150 mm c/c

#8- 4 legs/RM @150 mm c/c #16 @150 mm c/c

#20 @150 mm c/c

c
#20 @150 mm c/c
1000
500
4400 X (8964)

1170

585
# 8 CLOSE LINK @ 200 mm c/c.
#8 open links @200 mm c/c
cc
Barrel leng
7878.5 Connecting alternate main bars

Triangular cutwater on one side only being two track

585
Stirrups 4-legged/mt # 8
@ 150mm c/c Section X-X # 16 @ 150mm c/c
# 16 @ 150mm c/c

1
1

# 12 @ 150mm c/c
# 12 @ 150mm c/c
9049
8463.5
Details of pier cap

Details of R.C.C Pier

FOR FOU
 DETAIL CALCULATION

1 LOAD CALCULATION

1.1 DEAD LOAD CALCULATION

L - GIEDER R- GIRDER
1.1.1 TOTAL WEIGHT OF GIRDER= 182.28 T 182.28
1.1.2 WEIGHT OF P. WAY / girder = 66.82 T 66.82
1.1.3 TOTAL DEAD LOAD = 249.1 T 249.1
REACTION ON PIER = 124.55 124.55
1.2 LIVE LOAD ( including Dynamic Effect)
1.2.1 FOR O.S.L FOR T.S.L
L-GIRDER R-GIRDER
LIVE LOAD = 112.03 112.03 LIVE LOAD = 210.6
C.D.A = 0.641 0.641 C.D.A = 0.451
C.D.A AT TOP OF B.B 0.517 0.517 C.D.A AT TOP OF B.B 0.363
CDA AT Ist CHK. LVL = 0.517 0.517 CDA AT FIRST CHK. LVL = 0.363
CDA AT TOP OF FND. = 0.517 0.517 CDA AT TOP OF FND. = 0.363
CDA AT BOTTOM OF FND. = 0.000 0.000 CDA AT BOTTOM OF FND. = 0.000
LL reaction on each pier LL reaction on each pier UDL (t/m )
AT TOP OF PIER 84.96 84.96 AT TOP OF PIER 143.57 13.97
AT Ist CHK. LVL 84.96 84.96 AT Ist CHK. LVL 143.57 13.97
AT TOP OF FND. 84.96 84.96 AT TOP OF FND. 143.57 13.97
AT BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION 56.02 56.02 @ BOTTOM OF FND 105.30 10.24
1.3 LONG. LOAD (Reaction on each bearing )
L- GIRDER( Tonne ) R - GIEDER(Tonne)
X-Direct'n Y-Direct'n X-Direct'n Y-Direct'n
FOR O.S.L 24.5 0 24.5 0
FOR T.S.L 37.5 0 37.5 0
1.4 DEAD LOAD OF PIER CAP

TOP AREA OF CAP = A1 = 9.902 M^2

BOTTOM AREA OF CAP = A2 = 9.902 M^2
WT. OF TOP REC. PORTION = 0.025 T
WT. OF TRAP. PORTION = 0.000 T
TOTAL WEIGHT = 0.025 T

1.5 DEAD WEIGHT OF PIER

AT FIRST CHK. LVL
TOP AREA = 9.90 M^2 ;width checking lvl. = 1.2 mt.
BOTTOM AREA = 9.90 M^2; Length of pier inclu. Cutwt= 9.0485 mt.
TOTAL WEIGHT = 138.6 T
AT TOP OF FND.
TOP AREA = 9.90 M^2 ;width checking lvl. = 1.17 mt.
BOTTOM AREA = 9.90 M^2;Length along track= 9.05 mt.
TOTAL WEIGHT = 140.8 T
AT BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION
WEIGHT UP TO TOP OF FOUNDATION = 140.8 T
ADDITIONAL WEIGHT OF FOOTING :-
TOP AREA = 11.62 M^2
BOTTOM AREA = 39.4 M^2
WEIGHT OF TRAPOZOIDAL SECTION = 31.91 T
WEIGHT OF RECTANGULAR SECTION = 49.30 T
TOTAL WEIGHT OF FOUNDATION = 81.21 T
TOTAL WEIGHT UP TO BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION = 222.05 T

1.6 BUOYANCY FORCE

AT FIRST CHK. LVL:- Wdt(HFL)= 1.17 Area = 9.90

wt. Of pier = 125.3 T

BUOYANCY FORCE = 50.12 T
AT TOP OF FND.
wt. Of pier = 127.5 T
BUOYANCY FORCE = 51.00 T

AT BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION
BUOYANCY FORCE= 51.00 + 32.48 = 83.48 Tonne
1.7 PRESSURE DUE TO WATER CURRENT :-
WIDTH AT H.F.L = 1.17 ; Length at HFL = 9.05
Pressure intencity = K V^2 = 0.188 t/ m^2 (To be used for cross current )
AT FIRST CHK. LVL AT TOP OF FND
WD. AT Ist CH. LVL = 1.17 WD. AT TOP OF FND. = 1.17
HEIGHT FROM H.F.L 5.06 HEIGHT FROM H.F.L 5.15
AREA IN ELEVATION 5.92 M^2 AREA IN ELEVATION 6.03 M^2
LAT. WATER FORCE .=KAV^2 1.11 LAT. WATER FORCE .=KAV^2 1.13 T
LEAVER ARM = 3.37 LEAVER ARM = 3.43 M
LENGTH OF PIER = 9.05 LENGTH OF PIER = 9.05
Cross current 20 % = 1.72 tonne CROSS CURRENT 20 % = 1.75 TONNE
AT BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION :-
HORZ. FORCE = 1.13 ; CROSS CURRENT= 1.75 TONNE
LEVER ARM = 4.43 M

1.8 SEISMIC FORCE NOT TO BE CONSIDERE

HORZ. SEISMIC COFF. (ALPHA h ) =ALPHA o X BETA X I = 0

VERT. SEISMIC COFF. (ALPHA v) =ALPHA h /2= 0

AT Ist CHK. LVL L- GIRDER R - GIRDER

DESCRIPTION FORCE L.A FORCE L.A
a SFH1= DUE TO L.L O.S.L 0.00 5.60 0.00 5.60
b SFH2= DUE TO L.L T.S.L 0.00 5.60 0.00 5.60
c SFV1= DUE TO L.L O.S.L 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.30
d SFV2= DUE TO L.L T.S.L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
e SHF3= DUE TO D.L OF SUPER STR. 0.00 5.60 0.00 5.60
f SFV3= DUE TO D.L OF SUPER STR. 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.30
g SFH4= DUE TO SELF WT. OF CAP 0.00 5.60 0.00 5.60
h SFV4= DUE TO SELF WT. OF CAP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
I SFH5= DUE TO SELF WT. OF PIER 0.00 2.80 0.00 2.80
j SFV5= DUE TO SELF WT. OF PIER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
k SFH6= DUE TO HYDRODYNAMIC FORCE 0.00 2.17 0.00 2.17
l

AT TOP OF FOUNDATION L- FIRDER R - GIRDER

DESCRIPTION FORCE L.A FORCE L.A
SFH1= DUE TO L.L O.S.L 0.00 5.69 0.00 5.69
SFH2= DUE TO L.L T.S.L 0.00 5.69 0.00 5.69
SFV1= DUE TO L.L O.S.L 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.30
SFV2= DUE TO L.L T.S.L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SHF3= DUE TO D.L OF SUPER STR. 0.00 5.69 0.00 5.69
SFV3= DUE TO D.L OF SUPER STR. 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.30
SFH4= DUE TO SELF WT. OF CAP 0.00 5.69 0.00 5.69
SFV4= DUE TO SELF WT. OF CAP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SFH5= DUE TO SELF WT. OF PIER 0.00 2.85 0.00 2.85
SFV5= DUE TO SELF WT. OF PIER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SFH6= DUE TO HYDRODYNAMIC FORCE 0.00 2.21 0.00 2.21

AT BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION L- FIRDER R - GIRDER

DESCRIPTION FORCE L.A FORCE L.A
SFH1= DUE TO L.L O.S.L 0.00 6.69 0.00 6.69
SFH2= DUE TO L.L T.S.L 0.00 6.69 0.00 6.69
SFV1= DUE TO L.L O.S.L 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.30
SFV2= DUE TO L.L T.S.L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SHF3= DUE TO D.L OF SUPER STR. & pway 0.00 6.69 0.00 6.69
SFV3= DUE TO D.L OF SUPER STR. & Pway 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.30
SFH4= DUE TO SELF WT. OF pier-CAP 0.00 6.69 0.00 6.69
SFV4= DUE TO SELF WT. OF pier-CAP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SFH5= DUE TO SELF WT. OF PIER & pilecap 0.00 3.35 0.00 3.35
SFV5= DUE TO SELF WT. OF PIER & pile-cap 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SFH6= DUE TO HYDRODYNAMIC FORCE 0.00 3.21 0.00 3.21
1.9 HYDRODYNAMIC FORCES IN SUBMERGED PORTIONS

AT Ist CHK. LVL

SUBMERGED HEIGHT = 5.06
RAD. OF ENVP. CYLINDER = 4.52425
HEIGHT / RADIUS RATIO = 1.12
COFF Ce = 0.483 values of 1.5, 2.5, 3.5 added
WT. OF ENVP. CYLINDER =We= 325.22 Tonne
SFH6= Ce X ALPHA h X We = 0.00 Tonne Acting at 0.4286 h= 2.17 mt

AT TOP OF FND.
SUBMERGED HEIGHT = 5.15
RAD. OF ENVP. CYLINDER = 4.52
HEIGHT / RADIUS RATIO = 1.14
COFF Ce = 0.575
WT. OF ENVP. CYLINDER =We= 331.00 Tonne
SFH6= Ce X ALPHA h X We = 0.00 Tonne Acting at 0.4286 h= 2.21 mt

AT BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION
SUBMERGED HEIGHT = 5.15 M
RAD. OF ENVP. CYLINDER = 4.52
HEIGHT / RADIUS RATIO = 1.14
COFF Ce = 0.58
WT. OF ENVP. CYLINDER =We= 331.00 Tonne
SFH6= Ce X ALPHA h X We = 0.00 Tonne Acting at 0.4286 h= 3.21 mt

2.0 Force Due to Curvature :-

Degree Of Curve = 0 deg

Raduis of curve = straight m

EUDL = W = 10.90 t / m
Max Speed = V = 125 kmph

W V2 10.9 x 125 x 125

Horz. Effect = C = = = 0.00 t /m run
127 R 127 x straight

So , Total Force Due To Curveture = C x Span

Final Force , for TSL = 0.00 t
final Force , for OSL = 0.00 t
 SUMMARY OF LOAD & MOMENTS AT FIRST CKECKIING LEVEL
S. LEVER AR
LONG. FORCE
VERT. LOAD
DESCRIPTION PARALLEL X Parallel to L-Gir
NO Y (or LA "
L-Gir R-Gir L-Gir R-Gir X ')
1-A DL Of Girder only 91.14 91.14 - - - 0.30
1-b Self wt of rly track 33.41 33.41 - 0.30
2(a) ( LL)O.S.L 84.96 0.00 - - - 0.30
(b) (LL)T.S.L 71.79 71.79 - - - 0.30
3 Long. Load -
( a ) OSL - - 24.50 24.50 0.00 5.60
( b ) TSL - - 37.50 37.50 0.00 5.60
4 DL of Pier Cap 0.02 - - - 0.00
5 DL of Pier 138.61 0.00
6 Buoyancy Force -50.12 0.00
7 Horz. Water Force - - 1.72 1.11 3.37
8 SEISMIC FORCE
a SFH1= DUE TO L.L O.S.L - - - - 0.00 0.00
b SFH2= DUE TO L.L T.S.L - - - - 0.00 0.00
c SFV1= DUE TO L.L O.S.L 0.00 0.00 - - - 0.00
d SFV2= DUE TO L.L T.S.L 0.00 - - - 0.00
e SHF3= DUE TO D.L OF SUPER STR. & pway - - 0.00 0.00 - 5.60
f SFV3= DUE TO D.L OF SUPER STR. & Pway 0.00 0.00 - - - 0.30
g SFH4= DUE TO SELF WT. OF pier-CAP - - 0.00 - 5.60
h SFV4= DUE TO SELF WT. OF pier-CAP 0.00 - - - 0.00
I SFH5= DUE TO SELF WT. OF PIER & pilecap - - 0.00 - 2.80
j SFV5= DUE TO SELF WT. OF PIER & pile-ca 0.00 - - - 0.00
k SFH6= DUE TO HYDRODYNAMIC FORCE - - 0.00 - 2.17
9-A DUE TO CURVE(TSL) - - - - 0.00 8.97
9-B DUE TO CURVE(OSL) - - - - 0.00 8.97
10 LL without CDA
a) O.S.L 56.02 56.02 - - - 0.30
b) T.S.L 52.65 52.65 - - - 0.30
CAS DESCRIPTION WITH CDA CASE
E P My Mx
I OSL & NO SEISMIC FORCE 422.57 3.75 168.71 V
II TSL & NO SEISMIC FORCE 481.19 3.75 215.81 VI
III OSL + SEISMIC FORCE 422.57 3.75 168.71 VII
IV TSL + SEISMIC FORCE 481.19 3.75 215.81 VIII

STRESSES AT FIRST CHECKING LEVEL

WIDTH AT FIRST CHECKING LVL. = 1.2 Mt
AREA AT FIRST CHECKING LVL. = 9.90 Mt SQ
MOMENT OF INERTIA I xx = 1.09 M^4 ; y=
MOMENT OF INERTIA I yy = 59.417563 M^4 ; y=
Zxx = 1.86 m3 Zyy = 13.13 m3
P Mxx Myy
P max = + +
A Zxx Zyy
P Mxx Myy
P min = - -
A Zxx Zyy

CAS DESCRIPTION WITH CDA

P/A My /Zyy Mx/Zxx P(max) P(min)
E
I OSL & NO SEISMIC FORCE 42.7 0.3 90.5 133.5 -48.1
II TSL & NO SEISMIC FORCE 48.6 0.3 115.8 164.6 -67.5
III OSL + SEISMIC FORCE 42.7 0.3 90.5 133.5 -48.1
IV TSL + SEISMIC FORCE 48.6 0.3 115.8 164.6 -67.5

FINAL DESIGN VALUE Final Design

A) WHEN P(max) IS MAX = 164.64286 t/m2 P=
B) WHEN P(min) IS MIN = -71.32 t/m2 Mx=
 SUMMARY OF LOAD & MOMENTS AT TOP OF FOUNDATION
S. LONG. FORCE
VERT. LOAD LEVER AR
DESCRIPTION PARALLEL X Parallel to Y
NO
L-Gir R-Gir L-Gir R-Gir L-Gir
1-a DL Of Girder only 91.14 91.14 - - - 0.30
1-b Self wt of rly track 33.41 33.41 - 0.30
2(a) ( LL)O.S.L 84.96 0.00 - - - 0.30
(b) (LL)T.S.L 71.79 71.79 - - - 0.30
3.00 Long. Load -
( a ) OSL - - 24.50 24.50 0.00 5.69
( b ) TSL - - 37.50 37.50 0.00 5.69
4.00 Frictional resistance to temp. change 0.00
5.00 DL of Pier Cap 0.02 - - - 0.00
6.00 DL of Pier 140.84 - - - 0.00
7.00 Buoyancy Force -51.00 - - - 0.00
8.00 Horz. Water Force - - 1.75 1.13 3.43
9.00 SEISMIC FORCE
a SFH1= DUE TO L.L O.S.L - - - - 0.00 0.00
b SFH2= DUE TO L.L T.S.L - - - - 0.00 0.00
c SFV1= DUE TO L.L O.S.L 0.00 0.00 - - - 0.00
d SFV2= DUE TO L.L T.S.L 0.00 - - - 0.00
e SHF3= DUE TO D.L OF SUPER STR. & pway - - 0.00 0.00 - 5.69
f SFV3= DUE TO D.L OF SUPER STR. & Pway 0.00 0.00 - - - 0.30
g SFH4= DUE TO SELF WT. OF pier-CAP - - 0.00 - 5.69
h SFV4= DUE TO SELF WT. OF pier-CAP 0.00 - - - 0.00
I SFH5= DUE TO SELF WT. OF PIER & pilecap - - 0.00 - 2.85
j SFV5= DUE TO SELF WT. OF PIER & pile-ca 0.00 - - - 0.00
k SFH6= DUE TO HYDRODYNAMIC FORCE - - 0.00 - 2.21
9-A DUE TO CURVE(TSL) - - - - 0.00 9.06
9-B DUE TO CURVE(OSL) - - - - 0.00 9.06
Non seismic factor :- 1.25 (Gdr wt, self wt pier , pile-cap, pile) ; 2( Track wt),1.7
Seismic factor :- 1.25 (Gdr, wt pier,pile-cap, pile); 2( Track wt);1.75( LL, Longitud
Frictioan force factor ( combination IV ) 1.25 (Gdr, wt pier,pile-cap, pile); 2( Track wt);1.5( friction force

TABLE - 1A
CAS DESCRIPTION ( Vertical loads icludes -ve component of seismic vertical forces )
E
I OSL & NO SEISMIC FORCE ( Factored )
II TSL & NO SEISMIC FORCE ( Factored )
III OSL + SEISMIC FORCE ( Factored )
IV TSL + SEISMIC FORCE ( factored )
V OSL for 12.2 mt span ( for friction force only )

AXIAL LOAD & MOMENT FOR RCC DESIGN OF PIER : - AT FOUNDATION TOP

CASE VERTICAL LOAD P(Tonne) MOMENT My(T.mt.)

I 622.49 5.74
II 725.07 5.80
III 622.49 5.74
IV 725.07 5.80
V 473.82 5.74
 SUMMARY OF LOAD & MOMENTS AT BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION
S. LONG. FORCE
VERT. LOAD PARALLEL to X Parallel to LEVER AR
DESCRIPTION
NO ( Along track) Y
L-Gir R-Gir L-Gir R-Gir L-Gir
1-a DL Of Girder only 91.14 91.14 - - - 0.30
1-b Self wt of rly track 33.41 33.41 - 0.30
2(a) ( LL)O.S.L 56.02 56.02 - - - 0.30
(b) (LL)T.S.L 52.65 52.65 - - - 0.30
3 Long. Load -
( a ) OSL - - 24.50 24.50 0.00 6.69
( b ) TSL - - 37.50 37.50 0.00 6.69
4 Frictional resistance to temp. change - - - 0.00 - -
5 DL of Pier Cap 0.02 - - - 0.00
6 DL of Pier & footing 222.05 - - - 0.00
7 Buoyancy Force -83.48 - - - 0.00
8 Horz. Water Force - - 1.75 1.13 4.43
9 SEISMIC FORCE
a SFH1= DUE TO L.L O.S.L - - - - 0.00 0.00
b SFH2= DUE TO L.L T.S.L - - - - 0.00 0.00
c SFV1= DUE TO L.L O.S.L 0.00 0.00 - - - 0.00
d SFV2= DUE TO L.L T.S.L 0.00 - - - 0.00
e SHF3= DUE TO D.L OF SUPER STR. & pway - - 0.00 0.00 - 6.69
f SFV3= DUE TO D.L OF SUPER STR. & Pway 0.00 0.00 - - - 0.30
g SFH4= DUE TO SELF WT. OF pier-CAP - - 0.00 - 6.69
h SFV4= DUE TO SELF WT. OF pier-CAP 0.00 - - - 0.00
I SFH5= DUE TO SELF WT. OF PIER & pilecap - - 0.00 - 3.35
j SFV5= DUE TO SELF WT. OF PIER & pile-ca 0.00 - - - 0.00
k SFH6= DUE TO HYDRODYNAMIC FORCE - - 0.00 - 3.21
9-A DUE TO CURVE(TSL) - - - - 0.00 10.06
9-B DUE TO CURVE(OSL) - - - - 0.00 10.06
Non seismic factor :- 1.25 (Gdr wt, self wt pier , pile-cap, pile) ; 2( Track wt),1.7
Seismic factor :- 1.25 (Gdr, wt pier,pile-cap, pile); 2( Track wt);1.75( LL, Longitud
TABLE - 1 ( To be used for RCC design of footing )
CAS DESCRIPTION ( Vertical loads icludes +ve component of seismic vertical forces )
E
I OSL & NO SEISMIC FORCE ( Factored )
II TSL & NO SEISMIC FORCE ( Factored )
III OSL + SEISMIC FORCE ( Factored )
IV TSL + SEISMIC FORCE ( factored )
V OSL for 12.2 mt span ( for friction force only )
UNFACTORED FORCES USED FOR CHECKING SBC OF ISOLATED FOOTING
CAS DESCRIPTION ( All the forces are without factor i.e. working loads. And here +ve component of seismic vertical
E forces is considered)
I OSL & NO SEISMIC FORCE
II TSL & NO SEISMIC FORCE
III OSL + SEISMIC FORCE
IV TSL + SEISMIC FORCE
V OSL for 12.2 mt span ( for friction force only )
 CHECKING SBC IN CASE OF ISOLATED FOOTING
Refer Table 2 for calculations below.
BEARING PRESSURE AT FOUNDATION BOTTOM

C/S area of footing = 39.4394 M ^2

MOMENT OF INERTIA I xx = 63.63 M^4 ;
MOMENT OF INERTIA I yy = 264.06 M^4 ;
Zxx = 28.92 m3 Zyy = 58.92 m3
P Mxx Myy
P max = + +
A Zxx Zyy
P Mxx Myy
P min = - -
A Zxx Zyy
CAS DESCRIPTION WITHOUT CDA ( Ton/mt^2)
P/A
My /Zyy Mx/Zxx P(max) P(min)
E
I OSL & NO SEISMIC FORCE 11.3 0.1 6.5 17.9 4.6
II TSL & NO SEISMIC FORCE 12.5 0.1 8.9 21.5 3.5
III OSL + SEISMIC FORCE 11.3 0.1 6.5 17.9 4.6
IV TSL + SEISMIC FORCE 12.5 0.1 8.9 21.5 3.5
V Frictional force 9.8 0.1 0.3 10.2 9.5

BEARING PRESSURE FOR RCC DESIGN IN CASE OF ISOLATED FOOTING

Refer Table 1 for calculations below.

CAS DESCRIPTION WITHOUT CDA ( Ton/mt^2)

P/A My /Zyy Mx/Zxx P(max) P(min)
E
I OSL & NO SEISMIC FORCE 16.04 0.13 11.34 27.51 4.58
II TSL & NO SEISMIC FORCE 18.23 0.13 15.58 33.93 2.53
III OSL + SEISMIC FORCE 16.04 0.13 11.34 27.51 4.58
IV TSL + SEISMIC FORCE 18.23 0.13 15.58 33.93 2.53
V Friction 13.56 0.13 0.40 14.08 13.03
For this , self wt. of slab is multiplied by 2 as ; in
GAD 6 pieces/ track are shown.

fcos0 in skew bridges

Sub str.

Not to be considered as
span less than 15 mt . So
put Important factor as
zero

Not to be considered as Cap is

not provided. Slabs rest on top
of Pier. So thickness of Cap
taken only 0.001 mt.

Half the distance is considered

from barrel length of two tracks.
Top of Pedestal R.L. 98.990
R.L. 98.990

R.L. 93.300

R.L. 92.300

Barrel length is as per GAD for this Bridge

FOR FOUNDATION PRESSURE CHECK ,

REFER LAST PAGE.
NOT TO BE CONSIDERED
MOMENTS AT FIRST CKECKIING LEVEL
LEVER ARM MOMENTS

R-Gir
Mx
(Or LA My
"Y") L-Gir R-Gir Net Mx
0.30 - 27.57 27.57 0.00
0.30 - 10.11 10.11 0.00
0.30 25.70 0.00 25.70
0.30 21.72 21.72 0.00

5.60 0.00 137.20 137.20 137.20

5.60 0.00 210.00 210.00 210.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
3.37 3.75 5.81 5.81

0.00 0.00 - - -
0.00 0.00 - - -
0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
5.60 - 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.30 - 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.60 - 0.00 0.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
2.80 - 0.00 0.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
2.17 - 0.00 0.00
8.97 0.00 - - -
8.97 0.00 - - -

0.30 - 16.94 16.94 16.94

0.30 - 15.93 15.93 0.00
WITHOUT CDA
P My Mx
393.63 3.75 159.95
442.92 3.75 215.81
393.63 3.75 159.95
442.92 3.75 215.81

ECKING LEVEL 0.585 7.8785 0.585

1.17

0.585 MT
4.5243 MT

WITHOUT CDA
P / A My /Zyy Mx/Zxx P(max) P(min)
39.8 0.3 85.8 125.8 -46.3
44.7 0.3 115.8 160.8 -71.3
39.8 0.3 85.8 125.8 -46.3
44.7 0.3 115.8 160.8 -71.3

Final Design Vert. Force(P), Moment (m)

481.19
215.81 My= 3.75451
& MOMENTS AT TOP OF FOUNDATION
MOMENTS
LEVER ARM
Mx
My
R-Gir L-Gir R-Gir Net Mx
0.30 - 27.57 27.57 0.00
0.30 - 10.11 10.11 0.00
0.30 0.00 25.70 0.00 25.70
0.30 0.00 21.72 21.72 0.00

5.69 0.00 139.41 139.41 139.41

5.69 0.00 213.38 213.38 213.38
5.69 0.0 0.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
3.43 3.89 6.02 6.02

0.00 0.00 - - -
0.00 0.00 - - -
0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
5.69 - 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.30 - 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.69 - 0.00 0.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
2.85 - 0.00 0.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
2.21 - 0.00 0.00
9.06 0.00 - - -
9.06 0.00 - - -
5 (Gdr wt, self wt pier , pile-cap, pile) ; 2( Track wt),1.75( LL , Longitudinal)
r, wt pier,pile-cap, pile); 2( Track wt);1.75( LL, Longitudinal); 1.25( seismic forces)
dr, wt pier,pile-cap, pile); 2( Track wt);1.5( friction force); not live & longitudinal

TABLE - 1A
Vert. Fx My Mx
Load P
622.49 45.46 5.74 297.81
725.07 68.21 5.80 382.28
622.49 45.46 5.74 297.81
725.07 68.21 5.80 382.28
473.82 0.00 5.74 8.9

RCC DESIGN OF PIER : - AT FOUNDATION TOP

MOMENT Mx(T.mt.)
297.81
382.28
297.81
382.28
8.87
MOMENTS AT BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION
MOMENTS
LEVER ARM
Mx
My
R-Gir L-Gir R-Gir Net Mx
0.30 - 27.57 27.57 0.00
0.30 - 10.11 10.11 0.00
0.30 0.00 16.94 16.94 16.94
0.30 0.00 15.93 15.93 0.00

6.69 0.00 163.91 163.91 163.91

6.69 0.00 250.88 250.88 250.88
6.69 0.0 0.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
4.43 5.02 7.77 7.77

0.00 0.00 - - -
0.00 0.00 - - -
0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
6.69 - 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.30 - 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.69 - 0.00 0.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
3.35 - 0.00 0.00
0.00 - 0.00 0.00
3.21 - 0.00 0.00
10.06 0.00 - - -
10.06 0.00 - - -
5 (Gdr wt, self wt pier , pile-cap, pile) ; 2( Track wt),1.75( LL , Longitudinal)
r, wt pier,pile-cap, pile); 2( Track wt);1.75( LL, Longitudinal); 1.25( seismic forces)
e used for RCC design of footing )
Vert. Fx My Mx
Load P
632.75 45.46 7.41 327.94
719.00 133.83 7.41 450.49
632.75 45.46 7.41 327.9
719.00 133.83 7.41 450.5
534.73 2.58 7.53 11.5
ED FOOTING
Vert. Fx My Mx
Load P
443.70 26.25 5.02 188.62
492.99 76.75 5.02 258.64
443.70 26.25 5.02 188.62
492.99 76.75 5.02 258.64
387.69 1.75 5.02 7.8
 IN CASE OF ISOLATED FOOTING

8.96

4.40

y x= 2.2 MT
y y= 4.4818 MT

SBC as per soil report

in Tonne /mt^2( 25 %
more in seismic case )
23.0 Okay
23.0 Okay
28.8 Okay
28.8 Okay
23.0 Okay

RCC DESIGN IN CASE OF ISOLATED FOOTING

 RCC DESIGN OF ISOLATED FOOTING
INPUT DATA
1) Ultimate bending moment at face of PIER due to upward press. = 40.1 TM
1a) Ultimate B.M. at face of PIER due to dnward Footing wt.= 4.1 TM *
1b) Net Design ultimate bending moment at face of stem .= 36.0 TM
2) Concrete Mix 35 N/mm^2
3) Reinforcement Fe 500 N/mm^2
4) Overall thickness provided at face of pier 1000 mm
5) Cover to the centre of main steel 75 mm
6)
7) Design ultimate bending moment a 1.000 mt from free end= 9.4 TM
8) Design ultimate bending moment at 1st checking lvl. due to upwor 5.0 TM
9) Design ultimate bending moment at 1st checking lvl. due to dnword 14.4 TM
10) Overall thickness provided at free end of Heel & Toe 500.0 mm

1.615 1.17 1.615

1
0.5 4.4 0.5

4.58
34.37 Tonne/sq. mt 23.44 15.51 Tonne/sq. mt.
29.7 @ distance "d " from face

CALCULATION
As per clause 15.8.3 of CBC footing is designed as flat slab

Design ultimate bending moment at face of pier. = 35.98 tm / RM. Length

= 35.98 tm/RM
Design ultimate bending moment at face of pier. = 35.98 tm/RM
Design ultimate bending moment at Ist ch. Lvl. . = 0.0 tm/RM
( Assuming factor of safety as per Table 12 of CBC )

To calculate depth of section :- ( As per IS 456 )

Mu
Effective Depth d = = 272.9 mm < 925 ok 0.925 mt.
0.138 fckb

0.5 fck b d 4.6 Mu

Ast for under-reinforced section = 1- 1-
fy fck b d2
 = 907.5 mm^2
Ast at first checking level = 0.0 mm^2 d= 734.60
Check for Mu as per CBC Railway cl. 15.4.2.2
1.1 fy Ast
Mu = 0.87fyAst Z ; Z = 1 - xd
fck b d

Z = 910.74
Mu = 829346186 Nmm = 82.93 TM > 35.98 TM Okay
Spacing of 20 mm dia steel on tension side = 346.02 mm c/c
( In one layers ) say 150 mm c/c
0.226 %
Actually provided steel = 2093.4 mm^2 > 907.5 mm^2
Additional 0 # mm @ 300 mm c/c

Spacing of 20 mm dia steel on tension side = #DIV/0! mm c/c

At first checking lvl. say 100 mm c/c
( At 1.000 mt from free end )
Spacing of 20 mm dia steel on tension side = 160.00 mm c/c
At second checking lvl. say 160 mm c/c
( At 5.000 mt from top of wall )

Calculation of steel at bottom in cross direction of Track :-

As per clause 15.8.3 of CBC footing is designed as flat slab

Design ultimate bending moment at face of pier. = 1.07 tm / RM. Length Based on Pmax &
= 1.07 tm/RM moment in
Design ultimate bending moment at face of pier. = 1.07 tm/RM perpendicular
Design ultimate bending moment at Ist ch. Lvl. . = 0.0 tm/RM direction to Track.
( Assuming factor of safety as per Table 12 of CBC )

To calculate depth of section :- ( As per IS 456 )

Mu
Effective Depth d = = 47.2 mm < 925 ok 0.925 mt.
0.138 fckb

0.5 fck b d 4.6 Mu

Ast for under-reinforced section = 1- 1-
fy fck b d2

= 26.7 mm^2
Ast at first checking level = 0.0 mm^2 d= 0
Check for Mu as per CBC Railway cl. 15.4.2.2
Spacing of 20 mm dia steel on tension side = 11752.62 mm c/c
( In one layers ) say 150 mm c/c
0.226 %
Additional 0 # mm @ 300 mm c/c
Use 0.12 % steel on other side parellel to main reinfors 1110 mm^2

spacing of 16 mm dia steel on Top compression side parallel to main = 181.045

Say 150 mm c/c

Use 0.12 % steel on other side perpendicular to main reinforst.= 1110 mm^2
Spacing of 16 mm dia steel on Top compression side = 181.05 mm c/c
( Perpendicular to main steel 0 .12 % ) say 150.00 mm c/c
CHECK FOR SHEAR :- ( Ckd. section at distance " d " as per clause 15.4.3.3 of CBC )

Factored shear on footing at distance " d "= 19.95 Tonne/ RM length

= 19.95 Tonne/RM
Ultimate shear on Heel Vu = 19.95 Tonne/RM
Depth at distance " d " = 638.7 mm
Shear stress = Vu / bd = 0.312 N/mm^2

Permissible shear stress as per table 15 & 16 of CBC 0.344 N/mm^2

for M35 0.226 % steel
Permissible shear stress as per table 15 & 16 of CBC & cl. 15.7 0.344 N/mm^2
Even though v is less than 0.344
Shear reinforcement is given by
Use 3.33 legs/mt. 8 dia steel
Asv 0.87fyv
Sv = = 197.91
b(v+0.4-SVc )

Provide stirrups 8 mm dia at spacing = 150 mm c/c

( four legs / RM )

As v is less than 0.344

No shear reinforcement is required as per Cl. 15.5.4.1.1

Check for two-way Shear :- ( Ckd. section at distance " d/2 " as per clause IS 456 )
( As cl. 15.8.3.2 & 15.5.4.2 of CBC not clear )

C/S area of footing at base = 39.4394 mt^2

Width along critical section d/2 from face = 2.10 mt.
Length along critical section d/2 from face = 9.9735 mt.
C/S area of footing at section at d/2 around pier = 20.89 mt^2
Surface area along critical section = 18.45 mt^2
Factored shear " V "on footing at distance " d/2 " along perifery = 361.15 Tonne
( Apprx. )
tv =V/bodo = 3611541.74 / ( 18450975.00 )
= 0.20 N/mm^2
Permissible shear as per cl. 31.6.3.1 of IS 456,
= Ks tc = 0.629 X 1.48
= 0.93 N/mm^2 > 0.20 N/mm^2
Okay
 RCC DESIGN OF PIER-CAP

INPUT DATA
1) Design ultimate bending moment ( along track) at face of pier-cap. = 6.6 TM
2) Concrete Mix 35 N/mm^2
3) Reinforcement Fe 500 N/mm^2
4) Overall thickness provided 0.001 mt.
5) Cover to the centre of main steel 0.075 mt.
6) Thickness at free end 0.001 mt.
7) Design ultimate bending moment ( across track) at face of pier-cap. = 36.4 TM
8) Length of pier across track ( Equivalent Rectangle including cutwater) 8.4635 mt.
9) Width of cap considered for deisgn 1.17 mt.
10) Cantilever cap projection along track 0 mt.
11) Cantilever cap projection across track 0.00 mt.
12) Actually loaded portion length across track 3.6

# 16 @ 150mm c/c ( In middle strip )

Stirrups6-leggs/*mt # 8 @ 150mm c/c ( In middle strip )

# 12 @ 150mm c/c
# 12 @ 150mm c/c

0.001

REFER SEPARATE SKETCH

( All the details are not shown in above figure )
 CALCULATION
Calculations ( A ) are very less as over hang is only 300 mm. And 20 % load is only on 200 mm area.
So neglected
A) Calculation of loads & BM alongTrack on pier-cap ( Factored load ) :-
a) LL with imapct ( Reaction from OSL on cap only 20 % considered)) 29.73
Lever Arm from face of pier ( Appx. On higher side ) 0.1
b) DL of girder/slab ( Reaction only 20 % considered )) 22.785
Lever Arm from face of pier 0.1
c) DL of Track & ballast ( Reaction 20 % considered ) 13.4
Lever Arm from face of pier 0.1
d) Self wt. of pier-cap ( Overhang portion only with 3.6 mt length ) 0.0
Lever Arm from face of pier ( Apprx ) 0
Total factored BM = 6.59
Total factored Shear = 65.88
factored BM/mt. run = 1.83
factored Shear /mt. run= 18.30
B) Calculation of loads & BM acrossTrack on pier-cap ( Factored Load ) :-
a) Self wt. of pier-cap ( Overhang portion only ) 0.0
Lever Arm from face of pier ( Apprx ) 0
b) Self wt. of OHE Mast/Trolly refuge ( Assumed ) 6.0
Lever Arm from face of pier ( Apprx skew) 2
c) Self wt. of ballast retainer & its seat & ballast 40.6
Lever Arm from face of pier ( Apprx ) 0.6
Total factored BM = 36.36
Total factored Shear = 46.60
factored BM/mt. run = 31.08
factored Shear /mt. run= 39.83

C) RCC design of pier-cap :- Only acorss track is considered

As per clause 15.7 of CBC pier-cap is designed as slab according clause 15.5

Design ultimate bending moment at face of pier = 31.1 tm / mt. run

= 31.1 tm/RM cap width
Design ultimate bending moment at face of pier = 31.08 tm/RM
Design ultimate bending moment at face of pier ( Across track ) = 31.1 tm/RM
( Assuming factor of safety as per Table 12 of CBC )

To calculate depth of section :- ( As per IS 456 )

Mu
Effective Depth d = = 253.7 mm < -0.074 ok -74
0.138 fckb Depth at 1 st ch. Lvl. = 700

0.5 fck b d 4.6 Mu

Ast for under-reinforced section = 1- 1-
( Ast along track ) fy fck b d2

= Err:502 mm^2
Ast across track = Err:502 mm^2
Check for Mu as per CBC Railway cl. 15.4.2.2
1.1 fy Ast
Mu = 0.87fyAst Z ; Z = 1 - xd
fck b d

Z = Err:502
Mu = Err:502 Nmm = Err:502 TM > 31.08 TM
Spacing of 16 mm dia steel on tension side along track= Err:502
say 150 mm c/c
-1.810 %
Spacing of 16 mm dia steel on tension side across track = Err:502
say 150 mm c/c -1.810
For this br, use above steel bothway on top as minimum steel is 0.2 % as per CBC..

Use 0.12 % steel on comp. side parellel to main reinforst.= -88.8 mm^2

spacing of 12 mm dia steel on compression side = -1272.97

Say 150 mm c/c -1.018

Distrbution steel .12 % of C/S area.. -88.8 mm^2

spacing of 12 mm dia steel on compression side = -1273.0 -1.018

Say 150 mm c/c

CHECK FOR SHEAR :-

Factored shear on p-cap = 39.8 Tonne/ mt. run

= 39.83 Tonne/RM
Factored shear on return Vu = 39.83 Tonne/RM

Shear stress = Vu / bd = -5.382 N/mm^2 < 4.44 N/mm^2 Ok

Cl.15.4.3.1 of CBC
Permissible shear stress as per table 15 & 16 of CBC = 0.418 N/mm^2
for M35 & -1.810 % steel
As per cl 15.4 of CBC above is to be multiplied by depth factor " s " of table16
= 0.93
As per cl. 15.4.3.3 factor for Vc will be = 2
Permissible shear stress as per table 15 & 16 of CBC & cl. 15.7of CBC = 0.777 N/mm^2

As v is less than 0.418 No stirrups are necessary. But provide

Shear reinforcement is given by
Use 4 legged /*mt 8 dia steel
Asv 0.87fyv
Sv = = -16.19
b(v+0.4-SVc )

Provide 4 leggs stirru 8 mm dia at spacing = 150 mm c/c

( two legs / RM )
 % steel if stirrupse are considered as distribution steel = 66986.67 % > 0.12 %
okay

SHRINKAGE STEEL ( Cl. 15.9.9 of CBC Railway )

a)Steel in the vertical direction
As = Kr ( Ac - 0.5 Acor )

As = Area of shrinkage reinforcement

Kr = 0.005 for Fe415

Ac = Area of gross c/s of concrete member = 6.85 mm^2
Acor = Area of core of concrete section 250 mm away from surface = -3174994 mm^2

As = 7937.518375 mm^2
Ast provided on tension side = 26886 mm^2 For full length of Abt.
As to be provided on opposite side of tension face = -18949 mm^2

spacing of 16 mm dia steel on each side = -98.10 mm

> provided distribution ;okay

a)Steel in the horizontal direction

Ac = Area of gross c/s of concrete member = 4.085 mm^2

Acor = Area of core of concrete section 250 mm away from surface = -1792496 mm^2
As = 4481.2614625 mm^2 As provided in terms of stirrupse = 4617.7 mm^2
Remaining to be provided = -136.4 mm^2
spacing of 20 mm dia steel on each side = -18804.66 mm
Say 200 c/c

STEEL QUANTITY
Dia Description spacing nos. length total lenth Wt/RM(kg) Total wt.kg.

10 stirrups 100 20 15.5 310 0.616 191.0

stirrups 175 22 13.5 297 0.616 183.0
12 Parallel to main at bottom 120 65 3.1 201.5 0.888 178.9
Distr'n @ bottom 120 17 8.7 147.9 0.888 131.3
16 Distr'n @ Top ( act as main ) 140 21 8.7 182.7 1.58 288.7
Side face one bar 1 22 22 1.58 34.8
Main @ top in end strip 120 35 3.1 108.5 1.58 171.4
25 Top mainin middle strip 120 28 3.1 86.8 3.85 334.2
Total in tonne = 1.51
Total for 13 pier = 19.67
 1mm
75mm
1mm

8464mm
1170mm
0mm
0mm
3600mm

( In middle strip )
 Tonne
mt.
Tonne
mt.
Tonne
mt.
Tonne
mt.
Ton.Mt.
Tonne
Ton.Mt.
Tonne

Tonne
mt.
Tonne
mt.
Tonne
mt.
Ton.Mt.
Tonne
Ton.Mt.
Tonne

tm / mt. run
tm/RM cap width

mm
mm c/c

mm c/c
%

%
TEEL QUANTITY
Total wt.kg.

/pier
Tonne
 RCC DESIGN OF PIER AS PER IS 456 ( SP 16 )
(Refer exp. 6 on page 103 of SP 16 :)
A ] DESIGN OF PIER AT FOUNDATION TOP
Loading Case
I II V IV V
a) Thickness of rectangular pier " D "- 1170 1170 1170 1170 1170
b) Concrete mix 35 35 35 35 35
c) Reinforcement 500 500 500 500 500
d) Factored axial " P " ( Pier -sheet Table 1A ) 6106.7 7113 6106.7 7113.0 4648.2
e) Factored moment {sqrt(Mx^2+My^2)} 2922.1 3750.6 2922.0 3750.6 103.7
f) Effective cover " d' "to 25 mm dia steel 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5
( clear cover to outermost in mm)= 50
g) Length of rectangular pier " b "- 8463.5 8463.5 8463.5 8463.5
h) Effective height of pier ( Table 18 CBC; 1.3 L ) le 7.397

Add for extra moment on account of slender column as per CBC cl. 15.6.5.2 ( If Applicable )
For case II
P hx ^2 0.0035 le
Mty = Miy + le / hx 1 -
1750 hx
7144.8 ^2 0.0258895
= 2922.02 + 7.40 / 1.17 1-
1750 1.17

= 3081.6 Kn.Mt
CASE II- TSL with out seismic
d' / D = 0.05

Pu 7113.0 X 1000
= = 0.021
fck. b.D 35 X8463.5 X 1170

Mu 3750.6 X 1000000
= = 0.009
fck. bD^2 35 X8463.5 X 1170X1170

Refer chart 35 ( page 120 of SP 16 for fy = 500 & d'/D = 0.05 )

p / fck = 0.01

Percent steel = 0.010 X 35 = 0.35 % of total c/s of column

CASE V- With friction for unequal span with 12.2 mt GOVERNING CASE
d' / D = 0.05
Pu 4648.2 X 1000
= = 0.013
fck. b.D 35 X8463.5 X 1170

Mu 103.7 X 1000000
= = 0.000
fck. bD^2 35 X8463.5 X 1170X1170
Refer chart 35( page 120 of SP 16 for fy = 500& d'/D = 0.05 )
p / fck = 0.015

Percent steel = 0.015 X 35 = 0.525 % of total c/s of column

Theorotically required steel = 0.8 % of total c/s of column
Total steel/ pier = 79218.4 mm^2 :
Perifery of pier at centre of main steel= 18959.8 mm
 # 16 20 25 32 Provided %
32 # Provided 0.855
Rqd. No.s provided
Spacing 48.1 75.2 117.4 192.4 180 spa'g Provided 106.0
mm Provide 8 mm dia horizontal links @ 200 mm c/c.
B ] DESIGN OF PIER AT CHECKING LEVEL 8.47 mt. from top
Curtailment at 7.47 mt. from top
Loading Case
I II III IV
a) Thickness of rectangular pier " D "- 1000 1000 mm
b) Concrete mix 35 35
c) Reinforcement 500 500
d) Factored axial " P " ( Pier -sheet Table 1A ) 6760.0 Kn
e) Factored moment 6570.0 Kn.mt
f) Effective cover " d' "to 25 mm dia steel 72.0 72.0 mm
( clear cover to outermost 50 mm )
g) Length of rectangular pier " b "- 8463.5 8463.5 mm
h) Effective length of pier ( Table 18 CBC; 1.3 L ) le 16.393 mt.

Add for extra moment on account of slender column as per CBC cl. 15.6.5.2 ( If Applicable )
For case III
P hx ^2 0.0035 le
Mty = Miy + le / hx 1 -
1750 hx
6760.0 ^2 0.0574
= 6570.00 + 16.39 / 1 1-
1750 1

= 7548.5 Kn.Mt
d' / D = 0.07

Pu 6760.0 X 1000
= = 0.023
fck. b.D 35 X8463.5 X 1000

Mu 7548.5 X 1000000
= = 0.025
fck. bD^2 35 X8463.5 X 1000X1000

Refer chart 31 ( page 116 of SP 16 for fy = 415 & d'/D = 0.05 )

p / fck = 0.02

Percent steel = 0.02 X 35 = 0.7 % of total c/s of column

CASE IV- TSL with seismic

d' / D = 0.07
Pu 0.0 X 1000
= = 0.000
fck. b.D 35 X8463.5 X 1000

Mu 0.0 X 1000000
= = 0.000
fck. bD^2 35 X8463.5 X 1000X1000
Refer chart 31 ( page 116 of SP 16 for fy = 415 & d'/D = 0.05 )
p / fck = 0.02

Percent steel = 0.020 X 35 = 0.7 % of total c/s of column

Theorotically required steel = 0.8 % of total c/s of column
Total steel/ pier = 67708.0 mm^2 :
Perifery of pile at centre of main steel= 7670.0 mm
# 16 20 25 32 Provided %
32 Provided
 # 16 20 25 32 Provided %
32 Provided
Rqd.
Spacing 56.3 87.9 137.4 225.1 180 Provided 0.405
mm Provide 8 mm dia horizontal links @ 200 mm c/c.
mm

Kn
Kn.mt
mm

mm
mt.
 CHECKING OF CRACK WIDTH FOR PIER
1 Concrete Mix
2 Dia of main steel for calculating eff. Depth
3 Provided spacing of main steel
4 Overall depth of member
5 Exposure conditions
6 ( 1-moderate; 2-severe; 3-extreme )
7 Working Moment at section due to live loads/mt. width at foundation top =
8 Working Moment at section due to perment loads/ mt. width at foundation top =
9 Actual clear cover provided to main steel =

Area of tension reinforcement per mt. run

Effective cover provided to main steel =
In sr. no. 8 above, if zero then minimum 1 shall be put.

OUTPUT
Design crack width .= 0.081 mm OK

Permissible crack-width as per conditions 0.200 mm

37 Pier-crackwidth
 Calculations
It has been calculated as per clause 15.9.8.2.1 of IRS CBC -1997

Bending moment at mid-span of bottom slab due to workingload "Mw" =

3 acr em
Design crack width .=
1 + 2 ( acr - cnom ) / ( h - dc )

Where ,

acr =
d = Effective depth of section = 1106 mm
cnom = Actual clear cover provided to main steel = 48 mm
Ceff = Effective cover provided to main steel = 64 mm
h = Overall depth of section = 1170 mm
Es= Elastic modulus of steel = 200000 N/ mm2
dc = Depth of concrete in compression
Calculation of dc ----:
Ec= Elastic modulus of concrete =5000 fck =
e1
es E'c= Long term elastic mod. Of concrete = Ec/2 =
Modular ratio "m"=Es/E'c =
bx2/ 2 = m Ast ( d - x ) ; 500 x2 =
ANA a = 1
b= 120.83948
X c= -133648.5
Lever arm " z " = d - x/3 =
Mw = Ast .fst.z ; 262112010.4
Stress in steel " fst "= 58.5

es = Strain at centre of tension steel= fst / Es = 0.0002925

e1 = Calculated strain at cracked surface as shown in figure= 0.0003161
( Ignoring the stiffening effect of concrete in tension )
em = Calculated strain at level where cracking is being considered allowing for stiffening effect
of concrete in tension zone

3.8 bt h ( a' - dc ) Mq -9
em = e1 - 1- X 10 But not more than e1
es As ( h - dc ) Mg

38 Pier-crackwidth
bt = width of section = 1000 mm

a' = Distance of crack width ( .i.e. over all depth ) =

es = Caculated strain in tension reinforcement ( ) =

As = Area of tension reinforcement =

Mq = Moment at section due to live loads =

Mg = Moment at section due to perment loads =

Therefore ;

3.8 bt h ( a' - dc ) Mq -9
em = e1 - 1- X 10
es As ( h - dc ) Mg

3823030618 252112010
em = 0.0003161 - X 1- X 10-9
1123.98 10000000

= 0.0003161 - 3401333.31 ( 1 - 25.211201 ) X 10-9

= 0.0003161 - 3401333.31 X -2.42E-08

= 0.0003161 - -0.08235036 = 0.082666 > 0.0003160712

Therefore em = 0.000316 ( minimum em & e1 )

To calculate Design crack width ;

3 acr em
Design crack width .=
1 + 2 ( acr - cnom ) / ( h - dc )

0.08954502
=
1 +2( 0.05400225 )

= 0.081 mm

39 Pier-crackwidth
OF CRACK WIDTH FOR PIER
35 M
32 mm
180 mm
1170 mm
1

25.21 T.mt
1.00 T.mt
48 mm

4468.1 mm^2
64 mm

40 Pier-crackwidth
 Calculations

26.21 t.m.

94.4 mm

Ec= Elastic modulus of concrete =5000 fck = 29580.3989 N/ mm2

;Ast provided= 4468.1 mm2
E'c= Long term elastic mod. Of concrete = Ec/2 = 14790.2 N/ mm2
13.5
13.5 X 4,468.1(1106-x )

x = dc = 310.1 mm

1002.6 mm
=4,468.1 x 1,002.6 fst
N/ mm2 < (0.8 x 0.87 fy )
< 348 okay

ing is being considered allowing for stiffening effect

41 Pier-crackwidth
 1170 mm

0.0003

4468.1 mm2

252112010 Nmm

10000000 Nmm

42 Pier-crackwidth