CHAPTER - 3

LIBRARY CLASSIFICATION SCHEMES: AN OVERVIEW

3.1 Introduction
The term ‘Classification’ is a derivation from the Latin word “Classis” which connotes
‘Grouping’.1 Classification is a procedure of grouping similar items and objects and is
essential in formulating groups that is known as classifying which results in
Classification. This process helps the user to arrange, organize and make a logical sense
of articles which also assists the user to locate them in an easy manner. Classification is
the ability to distinguish objects through their similarities and dissimilarities which is
distinct in their identities for human beings.

A major objective of libraries is to ensure that optimum use is made of their collections
by leading each user as directly as possible to the material he or she requires. As an aide
to the achievement towards this objective almost all libraries find it helpful and it is
necessary to impose upon their books and other material one or more forms of subject
control. One such form of subject control is known as classification. The classification of
library involves placing together in classes the objects which contain characteristics in
common and to separate from them the objects that do not have same characteristics.
Classification also forms the basis of an order in handling literature and its records. It
reveals the strengths and weaknesses of library collections and it is therefore essential for
a systematic, comprehensive and representative book selection, through revision and
withdrawal of unwanted stock. It also analyses the contents of books for readers through
the medium of catalogue and is extremely helpful in the compilation of Bibliographies. It
facilitates book display and can also be used for recording books issued out to the readers
and when returned by them which allow an easy return of books to the shelves and in
their right places.2

141
Library Classification is related with the arrangement of documents in the library in a
manner that the readers are served in the best possible way. Therefore, it requires a
detailed scheme of classification in which knowledge is divided into a broader
perspective, which is again subdivided into subjects or main classes. Each subject and its
divisions along with their specific aspects are represented by a system of numbers called
Notation. It is the notation that helps in the arrangement of documents on the shelf.
Library classification deals with the organizing of library materials, belongs to a
systematic group.

Library Classification can also be considered to be a process of putting books and other
reading material on a subject in a logical sequence on the shelf, which could be of
immense help to the users. It requires an adept thorough study and practice in the
technique of classification of books, knowledge of the details and handling of the scheme
of classification. A close familiarity with the broad spectrum of learning, its growth and
the interrelationship of various components is also necessary. A good selection of books
is the basis towards a good library collection and proper classification is fundamental in
organizing collection and in the retrieval of specific books for use by the users.
Classification is one of the most important steps in the organization of the libraries and
has been aptly called the “Foundation of Librarianship.”3

According to Berwick Sayers,4 library classification is “the arrangement of books on

shelves or descriptions of them, in the manner which is most useful to those who read.”
Similarly, Dr. S R Ranganathan,5 library classification is meant to be “the translation of
the name of the subject of a book into a preferred artificial language of ordinal numbers,
and the individualization of the several books dealing with the same specific subject by
means of further set of ordinal numbers which represent some features of the book other
than their thought content.”

142
Librarianship consists of the selection, acquisition, organization and dissemination of
knowledge presented in the form of books, periodicals, film, photographs, maps,
gramophone records, audio and video tapes, Compact Discs, DVDs, Microfiche and
Microforms. Knowledge must be organized in a library in an appropriate manner with the
objective of dissemination. Classification is a technique of organizing knowledge in a
library as larger the number of unorganized books; it is all the more difficult to locate a
particular book. Since books are the most common source of knowledge, the term
‘Bibliographic Classification’ is often used as a synonym for ‘Library Classification’.6

3.2 Purpose of Library Classification7

The following are the main purposes of library classification:
1. Helpful Sequence - Classification helps in organizing the documents in a method
most convenient to the users and to the library staff. The documents should be
systematically arranged in classes based on the mutual relationship between them
which would bring together all closely related classes. The basic idea is to bring the
like classes together and separate these from unlike classes. The arrangement
should be such that the user should be able to retrieve the required document as a
result it will make a helpful sequence.
2. Correct Replacement - Documents whenever taken out from shelf should be
replaced in their proper places. It is essential that library classification should
enable the correct replacement of documents after they have been returned from
use. This would require a mechanized arrangement so that arrangement remains
permanent.
3. Mechanized Arrangement - It means to adopt a particular arrangement suitable for
the library so that the arrangement remains permanent. The sequence should be
determined once for all, so that one does not have to pre-determine the sequence of
documents once again when these are returned after being borrowed.
4. Addition of New Document - Library would acquire new documents from time to
time therefore library classification should help in finding the most helpful place for

143
 each of those among the existing collection of the library. There are two
possibilities in this regard. The new books may be or a subject already provided for
in the scheme of library classification, or it may be or a newly emerging subject that
may not have been provided in the existing scheme.
5. Withdrawal of Document from Stock - In this case, the need arises to withdraw a
document from the library collection for some reason, and then library classification
should facilitate such a withdrawal.
6. Book Display - Display is adopted for a special exhibition of books and other
materials on a given topic. The term is used to indicate that the collection in an open
access library is well presented and guided. Library classification should be helpful
in the organization of book displays.
7. Other Purposes –
1. Compilation of bibliographies catalogues and union catalogues
2. Classification of information.
3. Classification of reference queries.
4. Classification of suggestions received from the users.
5. Filing of non book materials such as photographs, films, etc.

3.3 Components of Library Classification8

Library Classification is a process of translating the specific subject of a book into an
artificial language of ordinal numbers, which in classificatory language are helpful in
arriving at a logical arrangement. The essential components of a scheme of library
classification are:
1. Notation – It is a set of symbols which stands for a class or a subject e.g. philosophy
and literature and its sub-division example ethics, English literature representing a
scheme of classification. For the purpose of arranging books, use of names of the
subjects, broad or specific in natural language would neither be practicable nor
convenient so these are translated into artificial language of ordinal numbers. A
Notation is of two types, pure or mixed. Only one species of symbols are used in

144
 pure notation, either numerals such as 1 to 9 or from letters A to Z. In a mixed
notation more than one set of symbols are used. Pure notation is easy to understand
but mixed notation is easier to remember and increases the capacity of the scheme
of library classification.
2. Form Division – Knowledge may be presented in one form of the other, the form
could be text book, manual, history, dictionary and encyclopedia. These forms or
styles of presenting knowledge of a subject could be commonly applied to any
subject. Book classification takes care of representing form in the Call Number (A
number by which a book is called for particularly a closed access library). The
numbers representing the forms of books are called form divisions. They are also
known as common sub-divisions or common-isolates.
3. Generalia Class – There are certain books such as encyclopedias, bibliographies and
collected writings of an author which cannot be classified under any specific subject
since they cover all subjects under the sun and hence are classified under the
Generalia Class.
4. Index – Index is an essential component of a scheme of Library Classification
which is provided at the end of the scheme. It is of immense value to the members
in their handling of a classified part of the catalogue.
5. Call Number – In classifying, each book is provided with a distinguished number
specified to it which can be used for calling the book from the stats and replacing it
on its return to its right place. It is known as a Call Number. This Call Number fixes
the position of a book or any document in a sequence and helps to locate it through
its entry in the catalogue. Each document has its own individual call number which
comprises of class numbers which represents the thought content of the book and
the book number which represents one or more of the following: Author No., Year
of Publication, Accession No. or any other such appropriate feature.

145
3.4 Rationale of Library Classification9
The main objective of library classification is to arrange the library documents in a
filiatory sequence for the convenience of both the readers and the staff in the library. In
fact, According to Dr. S.R. Ranganathan, library classification mechanizes the correct
replacement of library documents after use, fixes the most helpful place for a newly
added document or a book amongst the other books available in the library on a similar
subject and files the most helpful place for the first document on such other already
existing subjects which are related to it. For this purpose, the class number must be
coextensive with the subject of a document and easy subject must be individualized to the
extent that no other subject must share the same class number.
1. It brings like books together – Classification arranges books in an order most
convenient to the readers and the librarians. Readers should find all the related
books together and librarians should minimum time and energy in locating the
documents. Classification brings together all the books on the same subject. Not
only that, books on different branches of the subjects are also collated in a way that
their mutual relationship is clearly displayed.
2. It saves time – Classification is a great time saving device for readers, as well as
librarians and thus fulfils the demand of the fourth law of library science. The
arrangement by subject, a natural consequence of library classification, saves a lot
of time of readers as well as of staff, by bringing together all the related documents.
3. It reveals the weakness and strength of the collection – As classification arranges
books on shelf by subject, it clearly shows which subjects have a good collection,
and which subjects require more attention. In this way, it facilitates the book
selection process and helps in developing all round collection of the library.
Similarly, it assists the librarians in making up their collection, for the departmental
or branch libraries or lending centers, from the central stock.
4. It helps in bibliographic research – Classification is of value in bibliographic
research as it helps in the compilation of bibliographies, catalogues and union
catalogues.

146
 5. It helps in stock verification – Classification plays a significant role in the stock
taking procedure. Generally, verification of stock is done through a shelf list, which
is arranged in classified order. Books on the shelf are also arranged in the same
order. In the stock taking procedure, a person on the shelf goes on calling the call
number of the books while the other person, holding the shelf list goes on pushing
the relevant cards forward. Thus, the process of stock taking is completed within a
relatively short time.

Library classification assists the librarian to make available the requisite book to the
reader in the shortest possible time. The purpose of any library classification scheme is to
allow libraries to arrange the documents in a sequence that will be of immense help to the
readers. The library classification scheme offers the leaders a basis for organizing books
and other reading material so that these can be used by the readers as and when they
desire. A variety of classification schemes have been developed in various countries
throughout the world to maintain the library collections in the most helpful manner
possible.

3.5 Library Classification Schemes

According to the Dictionary of Library and Information Science10, Classification schemes
is defined as “a list of classes arranged according to a set of pre-defined principles for the
purpose of organizing items in a collection or entries in an index, bibliography or catalog
into groups based on their similarities and differences to facilitate access and retrieval.

Library classification schemes are tools that allow us to allocate a class mark – an
artificial notation comprising alphanumeric characters and punctuation marks to every
item based on its subject content so that the library staff can preserve all the related items
together on the library’s shelves. They are the logical arrangements of subjects plus a
system of symbols representing those subjects. Classification schemes aid a classifier to

147
represent the subject content of every document by appropriate notations. A library
classification scheme has a number of objectives:
1. To provide a shelf address – to assign a specific location for every document on the
library’s shelves.
2. To collate items – placing documents on the same or similar subjects together on
the library’s shelves to facilitate users to find items on the same subject in one place
within the library.
3. To link items – to enable users looking for items through a library catalogue can use
call numbers as references to locate items on the shelves; classification is used as a
link between the catalogue record of an item and the item itself on the shelf.
4. To enable browsing facilities – using the structure of a bibliographic classification
to browse a collection on the library’s shelves or in an electronic or in an electronic
collection.

3.6 Features of Classification Scheme11

Classification schemes need to include the following features to prove to be of maximum
benefit to the classifier:
1. Schedules – The term Schedule is used to describe the printed list of all the main
classes, divisions and sub-divisions of the classification scheme. They provide a
logical arrangement of all the subjects encompassed by the classification scheme.
This arrangement usually being hierarchical shows the relationship of specific
subjects to their parent subject. The relevant classification symbol is shown against
each subject.
2. Index – The Index to the classification scheme is an alphabetical list of all the
subjects encompassed by the scheme, with the relevant class mark shown against
each subject. There are two types of index:
• A Relative Index – includes broad topics in its alphabetic arrangement, but
indented below the broad subject heading is a list of all the aspects of the

148
 subject. For e.g. Dewey Decimal Classification Scheme has an excellent
relative index.
• A Specific Index – lists specific subjects in a précis alphabetical sequence. It
does not indent lists of related topics under the broad subject headings. For
example, Brown’s Subject Classification Scheme has a specific index.
3. Notation – Notation is the system of symbols used to represent the terms
encompassed by the classification scheme. The notation can be pure –using one
type of symbol only – or mixed –using more than one kind of symbol. A pure
notation would normally involve only letters of the alphabet or only numerals. A
mixed notation would normally utilize both letters and numerals. Some notations
also involve the use of grammatical signs or mathematical symbols. The notation
usually appears on the spines of library books to facilitate shelving and to ensure
that each book is in its correct place. The notation is also shown on catalogue
entries to help the staff and public to remove books quickly. It therefore serves as:
• A link between the index and the schedules of a classification scheme, and
• A link between the library catalogues and the shelves.
4. Tables – The tables of a classification scheme are additional to the schedules and
provide lists of symbols which can be added to class marks to them more specific
and precise.
5. Form Class – A form class makes provision for those books where form is of
greater importance than subject. Most books of this kind are literary works – fiction,
poetry, plays etc.
6. A Generalities Class – This class caters primarily for books of General knowledge
which could not be allocated to any particular subject class due to their pervasive
subject coverage. In some respects, a generalities class is also a form class since
general bibliographies, general encyclopedias and general periodicals would be
encompassed in it.

149
3.7 Types of Classification Schemes12, 13
On one extreme, a classification scheme can be completely enumerative where every
subject and class ID listed with a pre-defined notation and the classifier has simply to
choose a class and the corresponding notation. On the other hand, a classification scheme
can be fully faceted, where the classifier has to follow a set of rules to construct a class
number. In between these two extremes there is also a classification scheme that to some
extent is enumerative but also makes provision for some sort of synthesis to build the
class number. These are called analytico-synthetic classification schemes.

3.7.1 Enumerative Classification Schemes

An enumerative classification scheme is a scheme where all the possible classes are
enumerated according to certain characteristics. There is a top down approach whereby a
series of subordinate classes are produced and where both simple and complex subjects
are listed. The advantage of this scheme is that the structure of the scheme is shown by
the notation as far as practicable. Users can easily find the coordinate and subordinate
classes and can make a map of the subject. The disadvantage is that it is difficult to
accommodate new subjects and frequent revisions may be required. An enumerative
classification scheme, in some cases, displays hierarchical structures of notation. The
basic tenet of this scheme is that all the possible subjects and topics are listed along with
a predefined class number, and therefore the classifier does not have to create any class
number such as Dewey Decimal Classification.

3.7.2 Analytico-Synthetic Classification Scheme

Analytico-Synthetic classification schemes resolve some of the problems of enumerative
classification schemes. The concept behind this scheme is that the subject of a given
document will be divided into its constituent elements and then the classification scheme
will be used to find notations for each element, which will then be combined according to
the prescribed rules to prepare the final class number. This scheme overcomes the two
major problems of enumerative classification schemes as, by providing various tables,

150
specific notational symbols and rules, they avoid the necessity for a long list of classes,
and thus produce a smaller classification scheme in size; they also provide flexibility to
users as specific numbers can be built and the classifier is not restricted by the
availability of a specific subject. Nevertheless, it makes classifiers job complex since they
have to construct the class numbers as opposed to just selecting one from a list like
Universal Decimal Classification.

3.7.3 Faceted Classification Scheme

A faceted classification scheme is on the other extreme of the scale since instead of
listing of all the classes and the corresponding numbers, it lists the various facets of every
subject or main class and provides a set of rules for constructing class numbers through
facet analysis. The concept of facet analysis was proposed by Dr. S.R. Ranganathan and
was used in his faceted classification scheme called Colon Classification. The basic idea
was that any component or facet of a subject can fit into five fundamental categories:
Personality, Matter, Energy, Space and Time which became the major focus of
classification research from 1930 onwards resulting into the Colon Classification

151
3.8 Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC)

Fig. 3.1: Dewey Decimal Classification

Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is the most popular of all the modern library
classification schemes. It was devised by Melville Dewey in 1876. It provides a
systematic arrangement of all the materials mechanized by notation of great simplicity
and apparent flexibility. With the emergence of DDC, the principle of relative location of
books on shelf according to the subject became perfectly feasible and it replaced the then
existing practice of a fixed location, when a certain number of shelves were allotted to
each subject and each book was identified by the shelf number and its position on the
shelf. As a matter of fact, all our decimal fraction notation, but for the convenience of
remembering the number, the decimal point is inserted after the third digit. Sub-divisions
are carried out decimally and all numbers are read as decimals. At each stage, there are
nine coordinate divisions whenever there are more than nine divisions of equal status, the
eight are named and the remaining are covered in the nine division i.e. ‘others’. The use
of simple and pure notation that is Indian numbers, provision of form division and
relative index has made DDC very popular.14

152
 Melvil Dewey (1851-1931)

Fig. 3.2: Father of Dewey Decimal Classification

Table 3.1: Different Editions of DDC15
Edition Year of Total Pages Editors
Publication
1 1876 44 Melvil Dewey
2 1885 314 Melvil Dewey & W.S. Biscoe
3 1888 416 Melvil Dewey & W.S. Biscoe
4 1891 466 E. May Seymour
5 1894 467 E. May Seymour
6 1899 511 E. May Seymour
7 1911 792 E. May Seymour
8 1913 850 E. May Seymour
9 1915 856 E. May Seymour
10 1919 940 E. May Seymour
11 1922 988 J. Dorkas Fellows
12 1927 1243 J. Dorkas Fellows
13 1932 1647 J. Dorkas Fellows & M.W. Getchell
14 1942 1927 Constantin Mazney & M. W. Getchell
15 1951 716 Milton J. Fergusom
15 (Revised) 1952 927 Godfrey Dewey
16 1958 2439 Benjamin A. Custer & D. Haykin
17 1965 2153 Benjamin A. Custer & D. Haykin
18 1971 2718 Benjamin A. Custer
19 1979 3385 Benjamin A. Custer
20 1989 3388 Benjamin A. Custer
21 1996 4115 J.P. Comaromi
22 2003 4076 J. Mitchell
23 2011 J. Mitchell

153
3.8.1 Features of the Dewey Decimal Classification16
Decimal Classification is an almost enumerative scheme of classification. Since 1876 to
2011 (23rd edition) this scheme did not look back, and its popularity has grown day by
day throughout the world. This statement can be justified by the fact that DC has been
translated into many languages, such as Chinese, Spanish, Danish, Turkish, Japanese,
Hindi, Portuguese, Sinhalese and several other languages across the globe. Dewey
introduced the notion of using notation for the subjects in his scheme and applying the
notation to the book and not to the shelves. But certain features forming the basis of its
present form can be still recognized as follows:
1. Universal Scheme – A distinctive feature of the DC is that its classes reflect all the
areas of specialized knowledge developed in modern society. These specialized
areas are loosely put together in the main classes in the scheme, albeit in this
manner the principle of collation of bringing of related subjects in close proximity
is sometimes violated.
2. Relative Location – In his scheme, Melvil Dewey introduced the brainwave of
‘relative location’ as opposed to ‘fixed location.’ For this purpose, he utilized the
decimal notation consisting of Arabic numerals for the subjects and assigning that
notation to the books on the basis of thought content and not on the basis of the
shelves. In this method, a new book on a given subject may be put in between the
existing sequence at the required position, directed by the notation assigned to that
book and there is no necessity to put the book at the end of the sequence as had
been the practice in “fixed location.”
3. Decimal Notation – Melvil Dewey used decimal fraction notation for the
arrangement of knowledge on the shelves. Indo-Arabic numerals (0 to 9) are used
decimally for the sub-divisions of knowledge. In this process, the universe of
subjects is divided into ten main classes, each of which is again divided into ten
divisions. Again each division is further divided into ten sections. At each stage of
division, a given number is sub-divided decimally. All the class numbers in DC are
decimal fractions.

154
4. Minute Division – The first edition of DC consisted of only 42 pages and at that
time, it was criticized for its being too broad in its sub-division. The number of
pages had since been increasing as shown in Table 1. This growth suggests the
enormous number of sub-divisions which are possible and useful for minute
classification. Dewey emphasized the need of minute division as “the advantage of
close classing is unquestioned if the user knows just what it is.”
5. Mnemonics – Another important feature of DC is mnemonics, which means ‘aid to
memory.’ In DC, mnemonics are available for subject synthesis. The use of
consistent order in the subject division of different classes produces mnemonics.
There are various tables, such as, Area Table, Language Table, Standard Division
Table, etc. which are used to achieve subject synthesis. The user may also find
Scheduled Mnemonics, Systematic Mnemonics and Alphabetical Mnemonics at a
few places in DC.
6. Integrity of Numbers – One of the most important features of DC is the integrity of
numbers. To incorporate new developments and to keep pace with the growth of
knowledge, a scheme of classification should be revised continually, without
changing the basic structure, so that the professionals may accept the revised edition
without hesitation.
7. Auxiliary Tables – Auxiliary tables provide an important basis for preparing
numbers and lead to uniform meanings of numbers when used in various contexts.
A document, which is a source of knowledge, always has some physical form.
Melvil Dewey in the second edition of the scheme published in 1885 introduced the
concept of “Form Divisions” to be used for the sub-divisions of a subject based on
the characteristics of documents, either in accordance with the point of view of the
author, i.e. Bibliographical, Philosophical, Theoretical, Historical or in accordance
with the form of thought content in documents, i.e. Digest, Manual, Monograph,
Dictionary, Periodical or Manual. The “form divisions,” could be attached to any
class number according to the instructions provided therein. The system of ‘form
divisions’ remained in use up to the 12th edition. The 13th edition consisted of 5

155
 “Auxiliary Schedules.” The 14th edition had 4 tables. In the 15th edition, the
conventional 9 form divisions, i.e. 01-09 were annexed along with the tables,
without any detailed sub-divisions. The word ‘Form divisions’ was replaced by
“Standard Subdivisions’ in the 17th edition, along with new area table in volume 2
(Index). The 18th, 19th and 20th editions consist of 7 auxiliary tables which are
detailed under DDC 20.

3.8.2 Structure of Dewey Decimal Classification17

1. Schedule - A basic premise of DDC is that it is arranged by discipline and not by
subject. At the broadest level, the DDC is divided into ten main classes, which
together cover the entire world of knowledge. Each main class is further divided
into ten divisions, and each division into ten sections (not all the numbers for the
divisions and sections have been used). The three summaries of the DDC are as
given:
2. Summaries – Summaries provide an overview of the intellectual and notational
structure of classes. Three types of summaries appear in the schedules and tables of
DDC. The summaries of the schedules as a whole are found at the front of the
schedules (Volume 2-3). Single level summaries in the schedules and tables provide
an overview of classes that have sub-divisions extending over more than two pages.
Multi-level summaries are provided for eight major divisions and the Area Tables
for Europe and North America.

156
The First Summary: Contains the ten main classes. The first digit in each three-digit
number represents the main class.
Table 3.2: First Summary of DDC
000 Computers, information & general reference
100 Religion
200 Philosophy & psychology
300 Social sciences
400 Language
500 Science
600 Technology
700 Arts & recreation
800 Literature
900 History & geography

The Second Summary: Contains the hundred divisions. The second digit in each three-
digit number indicates the division.

Table 3.3: Second Summary of DDC

000 GENERAL WORKS 100 PHILOSOPHY
010 Bibliographies 110 Metaphysics
020 Library & Information Science 120 Epistemology
030 Encyclopedias & Books of Facts 130 Astrology, Parapsychology & The
040 [Unassigned] Occult
050 Magazines, Journals & Serials 140 Philosophical Schools of Thought
060 Associations, Organizations & 150 Psychology & Substance Abuse
Museums 160 Logic
070 Journalism, Publishing & News 170 Ethics
Media 180 Ancient, Medieval & Eastern
080 Quotations Philosophy
090 Manuscripts & Rare Books 190 Modern Western Philosophy
200 RELIGION 300 SOCIAL SCIENCES
210 Philosophy & Theory of Religion 310 Statistics
220 The Bible 320 Political Science & International
230 Christianity & Christian Theology Law
240 Christian Practice & Observance 330 Economics
250 Christian Pastoral Practice & 340 Law
Religious Order 350 Public Administration & Military
260 Church Organization, Social Work Science
& Worship 360 Social Problems & Social Services

157
270 History of Christianity 370 Education
280 Christian Denominations 380 Commerce, Communications &
290 Other Religions Transportation
390 Customs, Etiquette & Folklore
400 LANGUAGE 500 SCIENCE
410 Linguistics 510 Mathematics & Computer
420 English & Old English Languages Technology
430 German & Related Languages 520 Astronomy
440 French & Related Languages 530 Physics
450 Italian, Romanian & Related 540 Chemistry
Languages 550 Earth Sciences & Geology
460 Spanish & Portuguese Languages 560 Fossils & Prehistoric Life
470 Latin & Italic Languages 570 Biology & Life Sciences
480 Classical & Modern Greek 580 Plants (Botany)
Languages 590 Animals (Zoology)
490 Other Languages
600 TECHNOLOGY 700 FINE ARTS & RECREATION
610 Medicine 710 Landscaping & area planning
620 Engineering 720 Architecture
630 Agriculture 730 Sculpture, ceramics & metalwork
640 Home management & hospitality 740 Drawing & decorative arts
industry 750 Painting
650 Management, public relations & 760 Graphic arts
printing 770 Photography
660 Chemical engineering 780 Music
670 Manufacturing 790 Sports, games & entertainment
680 Manufacturing specific products
690 Building & construction
800 LITERATURE & CRITICISM 900 HISTORY
810 American Literature in English 910 Geography & Travel
820 English & Old English Literatures 920 Biography & Genealogy
830 German & Related Literatures 930 History of the Ancient World (to
840 French & Related Literatures 499 A.D.)
850 Italian, Romanian & Related 940 History of Europe (ca.500 A.D. - )
Literatures 950 History of Asia
860 Spanish & Portuguese Literatures 960 History of Africa
870 Latin & Italic Literatures 970 History of North America
880 Classical & Modern Greek 980 History of South America
Literatures 990 History of Other
890 Other Literatures

The Third Summary: contains thousand sections. The third digit in each three-digit
number indicates the section. Thus 530 is used for general works on physics, 531 for

158
classical mechanics, 532 for fluid mechanics, 533 for gas mechanics. Arabic numerals are
used to represent each class in the DDC. A decimal point follows the third digit in a class
number, after which division by ten continues to the specific degree of classification
needed.

3.8.3 Relative Index

Relative index is appended to the schedules of o book classification. It is the most
important feature of this scheme; arranged in an alphabetical order and aims to include all
topics expressed or implied in the main tables together with every likely synonym. The
index is comprehensive one but exhaustive. The topics which are further sub-divided in
the table are entered in the bold face type. The specific items in the sub-divisions are
entered directly under their own name. The index is relative in the sense that each phase
of the subject is noted. If a topic is treated in two or more classes, the number it takes in
each group is taken. The use of the index is not limited to locating topic in the tables, it
has equal value in locating topic on the shelves and in fact the reader’s key to the shelf
arrangement in every library in which the DDC is being used.

3.8.4 Book Numbers in DDC

The DDC number by itself is not sufficient to identify a work from others in the same
category. The book number is a notation used to create a shelf location for each work in
the library. This unique number is the call number, which contains a classification
number and an author notation, which also might be called a book number or cutter
number. It is quite possible that several books in a library would be classified under the
same DDC number hence, it is necessary to use the author number to create this unique
call number. The initial letter in the book number is usually the first letter of the author’s
surname or the first letter of the main entry.18

159
3.8.4.1 Book Number Schemes
The two most frequently used schemes for assigning books numbers are generally used
with the classification with which they are closely associated.
1. Cutter Tables - The most popular book number scheme used with the DDC was
devised by Charles Ammi Cutter. The notations are called cutter numbers and
assigning them is referred to as “cuttering” or “to cutter”. The most frequently used
version of cutter scheme is the Cutter-Sanborn Three Figure Author Table, by Kate
E. Sanborn, where the cutter scheme is altered to have three figures. The cutter table
consists of three or more initial letters from a surname or a surname and a three-
digit number. Letters E, I, J, K, O, U, Y and Z are followed by two-digit numbers.
The cutter number includes the initial letter of the author’s name and then the
corresponding number.
2. Library of Congress Author Numbers - The author notations used with the Library
of Congress classification can also be used with the DDC. The author number
consists of the initial letter of the author’s name or main entry followed by a
number derived according to the directions given in the tables that follow. The
numbers are used decimally.

3.8.5 DDC 23rd Edition19

DDC 23, the four-volume unabridged edition of the Dewey Decimal Classification
(DDC) system, reflects the many changes to the body of human knowledge that have
occurred since DDC 22 was published in 2003. Published in mid-2011, DDC 23 includes
helpful tools that make the classification easier to use, including an introduction, a
glossary and a list of new features. Each of these tools will help to better understand how
the DDC organizes knowledge into a classification that is useful to library users
worldwide. The DDC 23 Introduction is a full reprint from volume 1 of DDC 23,
provides a detailed overview of the DDC, including basic terminology and an explanation
of DDC structure, complete with many helpful examples. The various features of DDC
23rd Editions are:

160
 1. New provisions in 004–006 Computer science and elsewhere to reflect changes in
technology;
2. Updates to provisions for the Orthodox Church and Islam in 200 Religion;
3. Improved provisions in 340 Law for legal systems based on civil law;
4. Updated provisions for food and clothing;
5. Updates to 740 Graphic arts and decorative arts;
6. A new location and expanded development for cinematography and videography at
777;
7. Significant expansions throughout 796 Athletic and outdoor sports and games;
8. Significant expansions in Table 2, with parallel provisions in 930–990, for the
ancient world, Italy, Switzerland, Sweden, Finland, Turkey, Indonesia, Vietnam and
Canada;
9. Updated historical periods throughout 930–990.

3.8.6 Web Dewey20

Users of DDC who started with the print version and later moved on to the Electronic
version had long been requesting for more frequent institutional update of the Dewey
database, hypertext linking and many other enhancements that are most effectively
delivered in a browser-based setting. Apart from this, there is a very strong general trend
from CDS to the Web today. Hence, Web-based access to an enhanced version of the
DDC database is available through what is known as Web Dewey. The key features of
Web Dewey include:
1. An easy to use, browser based interface that allows you to search the DDC (and
related terminology) efficiently and navigate intuitively.
2. Thousands of Relative Index terms and built numbers not available in the print
DDC.
3. Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) that have been intellectually mapped
to Dewey headings by DDC editors.

161
 4. Selected LCSH mappings from the new OCLC Forest Press publication, People,
Places & Things.
5. LCSH that have been statistically mapped to Dewey numbers from records in the
World Cat (the OCLC Online Union Catalog).
6. Links from mapped LCSH to the LCSH authority records.
7. Quarterly updates, incorporating the latest changes to the Classification and new
LCSH mappings, index terms and built numbers.
8. An annotation capability, which allows you to add your own notes into Web Dewey
to reflect local classification practices.

The Web Dewey database includes the most current version of the DDC (DDC 22 and all
updates since its publication in 2003), plus supplemental data. It is updated quarterly and
mainly contains records for Dewey entry numbers from the schedules and tables, records
for entries in the DDC manual, the DDC Relative Index and Library of Congress Subject
Headings (LCSH) associated with Dewey class numbers.

The Web Dewey is available through the Dewey Services option of the OCLC
connection service. There are two basic options: the user can search or browse for a
subject or class number or can simply move to the Dewey schedule or tables, from the
search of the browse screen, and follow the hierarchy of the classes.11

3.8.7 Revision of the Scheme

The main method of revision has been the result of publication of new editions. Revisions
usually take the following forms: Expansion, Relocation, and Reduction and Phoenix
schedules. The last form is the most far-reaching form of revision. However, “DC &
Decimal Classification: additions, notes and decision’ is a beneficial means by which
modifications can be announced in advance of a forthcoming latest edition.

162
3.9 Universal Decimal Classification (UDC)

Fig. 3.3: Universal Decimal Classification

The Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) scheme of classification was developed in
the year 1895 by the Belgium Barrister Paul Otlet and Nobel Prize winner Henri La
Fountaine. The UDC is peculiar in the sense that it consists of a combination of both
enumerative and faceted character of the schemes and hence it is designated as an
Almost-Faceted Scheme of Classification. The UDC is derived from DDC as universal
since it encompasses the whole field of knowledge. It is the multi-lingual general
classification tool for organizing all kinds of recorded knowledge in the library. It is an
international classification system mainly developed for the purpose of indexing and
arranging an enormous card bibliography which not only includes books but also all
kinds of documents, periodical articles, patents, trade catalogues, abstracts and other
micro documents in more than 28 different international languages.

The International Institute of Bibliography (IIB) was organized under the aegis of an
International Conference on Bibliography held in Brussels in 1895. One of the main
objectives was to devise a scheme of classification for its use in indexing world literature.
The existing schemes of classification were found inadequate for the purpose therefore; it
is an international extension and adaptation of the DDC, initially by two Belgians, Paul

163
Otlet and Henry La Fontaine. The first edition appeared in French in 1905 as Manual du
Repertoire Bibliographique Universel, which has 33,000 sub-divisions. The second
edition was also published in French containing 70,000 sub-divisions. The third edition
was published in German in 7 volumes of tables and 3 volumes of alphabetic index
containing 140,000 sub-divisions. Full editions have also appeared in French, Spanish
and Japanese languages. The publication of the English translation was started in 1943
entitled, “Universal Decimal Classification” and was designated as the fourth
international edition. The British Standards Institution published the third revised edition
of the abridged English Edition in 1961. The Abridged edition of the UDC has been
published in 13 different languages.21

Fig. 3.4: The Founders of UDC

Paul Otlet Henri La Fountaine

(1869-1944) (1854-1943)

Table 3.4: Complete Editions of UDC

Editions Year Language Title
1st 1905 French Manual du Repertoire
Bibliographique Universal
2nd 1927-1933 French Classification Decimale
Universelle
3rd 1934 German Dezimal Klassification
4th 1943 English Universal Decimal Classification

164
 Table 3.5: Abridged Editions of UDC
Editions Year
1st 1948
2nd 1957
3rd 1961

3.9.1 Purpose of UDC

UDC is designed to serve the following purposes:
1. To provide a method for arranging books on library shelves in an order which
would be helpful to the users i.e. shelf arrangement.
2. To provide a method of arranging sub-titles of the books themselves in a catalogue
and printed bibliographies.
3. To classify the recorded knowledge.
4. To retrieve the document or locate the document.

3.9.2 Features of UDC

UDC has following features:
1. UDC is a practical scheme based on the demands of pamphlets, reports and
periodical literature rather than the framework of a theory.
2. The scheme is based on DDC and claims to be the first Analytico-synthetic
classification scheme.
3. It lays more stress to achieve co-extensive class numbers i.e. detailed specification
than the achievement of a sequence of subjects for optimum helpfulness.
4. It avoids the lacunae of numerous private classification schemes by providing a
standard system covering all the disciplines and may be used in any type of library.
5. It is a general classification scheme and not a bundle of special classification. It is
rather an integrated whole.
6. The scheme reflects exhaustive enumeration in the schedule with due provision for
synthesis or coordination.
7. It is amenable to adjustments to meet the special needs because a citation order in
any given class allows alternative treatment.

165
 8. The use of synthetic devices like colon (:), permits coordination of concept in
different permutation, thereby minimizing the rigidity in the enumerated
classification scheme.
9. An International body for its maintenance and revision with full cooperation of its
users guarantees the continual existence of the system as a current and up-to-date
one.
10. The terminology used in UDC helps in a comprehensive vocabulary of terms for
indexing purposes.

3.9.3 Principles of UDC

1. It is a classification in the strict sense depending on the analysis of idea, content, so
that the related concepts and groups of concepts are brought together and are
arbitrary or haphazard systemization of alphabetical and other arrangements are
avoided.
2. It is a universal classification system for which an attempt has been made to include
in it every field of knowledge not as a patch work of isolates, self-sufficient
specialists grouping but as an integrated pattern and correlated subjects.
3. It is constructed on the principals of proceeding from general to the more particular
revision of the whole human knowledge into ten main branches each further sub-
divided decimally to the required degree.
4. It is a practical system for retrieval of information in which the order of subjects is
not of much importance than the provision for detailed specifications.
5. It also accepts the principles of mutually exclusive classes, collection of related
subjects and consistency of approach.
6. It has tried to remove national and racial basis to some extent by removing these
factors and performing common facets.
7. Its notation consists of Indo-Arabic numerals used decimally which allows infinite
hospitality and social sciences.

166
 8. It employs certain notational techniques by which it is possible to link simple main
class either which other main number with auxiliaries indicating place, time and
similar commands used for categories.

3.9.4 International Medium Edition (IME-1993)22

The British Standards Institution (BSI) is the authorized agency to bring abridged and
medium editions in English language. The first International Medium Edition was
published in 1987 under BS 1000 M: Part-1: Schedules, 1985 and Part-2: Alphabetical
Subject Index in 1988. The International Medium Edition, English text Edition 2 was
published in 1993 in two parts, under BSI 1000M. Part 1: Systematic tables. Part 2:
Alphabetical Subject Index. This edition was drawn directly from the Master Reference
File (MRF), the database maintained by the UDC Consortium.

A UDC entry contains three number elements viz., the class number at the left column,
the class description at the right column and various amplifications such as notes, cross
references and instructions for the number building.

3.9.5 Notations and Symbols

The UDC is based on the outline and the notational base of the Dewey Decimal
Classification. The basic notation of UDC consists of Indo-Arabic numerals 0-9 used
decimally, the different mathematical symbols and punctuation marks that have
converted its notation into a mixed notation. The naught and decimal point have been
omitted for convenience and have been implied. The numbers are simply indicated that is
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5----. UDC uses single digit numbers and every digit is a significant one.
However, the use of different signs and symbols has added qualities to the notation of
UDC.

167
 Table 3.6: Symbols Used in UDC23
Symbols Expressed as Significance
+ Plus Connection of non consecutive
numbers
/ Stoke Connection of consecutive
numbers
: Colon Relation
[] Square Bracket Relation (Subordinate)
= Equals Language
(0) Brackets naught Form
(1-9) Brackets Place
(=) Brackets equals Race and Nationality
““ Inverted Commas Time
A-Z A to Z Individual Sub-divisions
- Hyphen Special Analytical numbers
.00 Point Double Zero Point of View
.0 Point naught Special Analytical numbers

3.9.6 Structure of UDC

The whole universe of knowledge in UDC is divided into two categories.
1. Systematic Tables - The systematic tables are also called schedules which give the
notational number of all basic class from 0 - 9. The general order and nomenclature
of the main table is the same as DDC. The whole universe of knowledge is divided
into ten main branches denoted by decimal fractions, Indo-Arabic numerals. UDC
uses one-digit numbers for the main class. The main class numbers and their
subdivisions are divided by a continuous extension of the decimal fraction on the
principle of proceeding from general to specific. The practice of DDC to use a dot
after every three digits has been retained in UDC. In UDC, the 4th class is kept
vacant for future subjects.25

168
 Table 3.7: Main Tables in UDC
0 Generalities: Methodology, Documentation, Scripts etc.
1 Philosophy, Metaphysics, Logic, Ethics, Psychology
2 Religion, Theology
3 Social Sciences; including Statistics, Law, Education
4 Vacant
5 Pure Science, Mathematics and Natural Sciences
6 Applied Sciences, Medicine and Technology
7 The Arts including Architecture, Photography, Recreation, Entertainment
8 Language, Linguistics, Literature
9 Geography, Biography, History

2. Auxiliary Tables - The introduction of Auxiliary Tables has alienated UDC from
DDC thereby making it a Faceted Classification Scheme. The auxiliary tables has
made UDC universal, permitting any desired combination and modification of basic
numbers to demote the most complex subject. They are a part of volume 1, which
gives the notational numbers of all categories of common auxiliaries, which are
supposed to add with basic class for sharpening the class numbers. These are
attached to the basic class with their respective symbols. They permit much more
scope for synthesis, which can be achieved with DDC. The auxiliaries are a set of
facets and facet indicators, which enable the classifier to synthesize freely.
Fig. 3.5: Division of Auxiliary Tables
Auxiliary Tables

Common Auxiliaries Special Auxiliaries

Signs Sub-divisions Hyphen Series Point Nought Series Apostrophe Series

E.g.: + / : :: -1 /-9 .01/.09 ‘1/’9

Independent Table
1(c) to 1 (g)

Dependent Table 1(i)

to 1 (k)

169
Common Auxiliary Tables - The common auxiliary tables denote generally recurrent
characteristics meaning features common to all, which are applicable throughout the main
tables and provide means of expressing interactions between subjects, which helps in
eliminating repetition of one and the same concepts such as: language, form, place and
time. The common auxiliaries tables are divided into two types based on the use of
symbols: (a) The Signs and (b) The Sub-divisions. The common auxiliary tables are
indicated by two digits in which the 1st digit indicates the section and the 2nd indicates the
specific table. The signs and symbols are broadly grouped into: Table 1 (a)–Coordination
and Extension and Table 1(b)–Relation, Sub-grouping and Order Fixing. The common
auxiliary subdivisions are divided into two: Independent and dependent. The independent
auxiliary constitutes Table 1(c) to 1(g) and dependent are found at Table 1(i) to 1(k).

3.9.7 Alphabetical Subject Index

Alphabetical Subject Index, the second Part of UDC was published in 1988. It is a
computer generated index, produced by permutation of terms, taken from Part-1
Systematic Tables. The arrangement is word by word. As the cross references were
completely eliminated from the index, a large number of synonymous terms were
included therein.

Most of the terms in the index do not indicate the context in which they appear in Part-1.
However, qualifiers to certain sub-entries, taken mainly from class description, are
provided. This makes imperative for the users to consult the tables to fully understand,
the different contexts of the terms indexed. The index is intended to provide access to
UDC classes set out I the schedule. It is not a substitute for the schedule, but enables fast
access to UDC classes through the index terms arranged alphabetically.26

3.9.8 Revision Policy

The Scheme is revised and updated from time to time by the International Federation for
Information and Documentation (FID). The development and maintenance of UDC is

170
achieved by FID at Hague through its ultimate coordinating body i.e. Central
Classification Committee. This committee is assisted in its work, directly or indirectly by
the National Committees, Special Subject Committees in each Country and International
Subject Committees. Thus, it follows a decentralized procedure for revision of the UDC.
The revision is done in the following three ways:
1. Extension of topics by more detailed sub-divisions.
2. Minor changes in the existing class numbers of sub-divisions.
3. Starvation Policy introduced by Donker Duyvis. This policy assumes a fairly state
of collection and opportunity for re-classification. Donker Duyvis used the unused
notation in the dynamic and rapidly changing subject.

If the users of the UDC want to suggest amendments or extensions to the schedules, they
have to suggest the same to a National Body in their respective Countries. The changes in
the UDC are communicated to its users by a half-yearly bulletin titles Extensions and
Corrections to UDC. From the end of 1991 responsibility and updating was assumed by a
new organization, the UDC Consortium (UDCC) who publishes the bulletin, Extensions
and Corrections of the UDC.

3.9.9 UDC in Computer Based Information Retrieval Systems27

It was suggested that as far back as 1934 that UDC was suitable for `mechanical sorting.’
The Royal Society’s Scientific Information Conference in 1948 noted the need to explore
the potentialities of UDC in mechanized retrieval. But this suggestion did not get for the
desired support for investigation and it did lie dormant in the forties and fifties. However,
the research programs which were carried out in the United States and in other countries
like Britain, Germany, Denmark and Switzerland in the sixties helped UDC to be usable
as indexing languages for computerized control and processing of information in the
fields of knowledge. The most significant research work in this respect was the American
Institute of Physics UDC Project under Freeman and Atherton. The results of this
research work formed the main theme of the first seminar on UDC in mechanized

171
retrieval system held at Copenhagen in 1968. The second seminar in this regard was held
in Frankfurt in 1970. Both the seminars amply demonstrated the feasibility of using UDC
as the indexing language in a mechanized system either in batch processing or interactive
mode. Other experiments carried out during the later sixties in using UDC for special
mechanical applications for example: the indexing of Geo-Science Abstracts and the
maintenance of user-profiles in the metallurgical field clearly supported the use of UDC
for mechanized retrieval systems.

3.9.10 UDC and UNISIST28

It was thought in the FID circles of marking UDC `Roof Scheme’ under which could be
hung the relevant special classifications, thesauri or descriptor lists, as well as the far
more detailed UDC divisions themselves for those who prefer a homogenous UDC based
system. This concept received encouragement in the efforts to make UDC adopted as
`Switching language’ for UNISIST (United Nations Information System in Science and
Technology) the joint project of ICSU/UNESCO for a world scientific information
system. An ASLIB study for the UNISIST stated the UDC, was found the least
satisfactory’ of the major existing schemes. But still there are some reservations on the
part of UNISIST to adopt UDC under its present form unless it can be presented as a
concise, updated and well balanced schedule more satisfactory than the others. Eminent
writers such as Jean Perrault, H. Wellisch and F.A. Schmidt have argued the case for a
radical form. There are now two opinions about the revision of UDC. Some people opine,
as stated already, a thorough revision so as to meet the opportunities afforded by
UNISIST and the challenges posed by mechanization. Others want the revision of UDC
must be made slowly for streamlining and overhauling of classes in an evolutionary way
rather than by a thorough overhaul of the existing structure. It is still to be seen how far
UDC can be adopted by UNISIST for its Broad System of Ordering.

172
3.9.11 UDC CONSORTIUM29
In January 1992, the overall responsibility of UDC has been taken over by the
Consortium. Since then UDC is being operated as a Consortium under the Dutch law in
the form of a non-profit organization and is known as UDCC. It is governed by an
Executive Committee consisting of five leading publishers of Belgium, Japan,
Netherlands, Spain, and United Kingdom, sixth member being the FID. The Secretariat of
the UDCC is the Royal Library, at The Hague. The consortium is collectively responsible
for funding, developing and managing the classification. The UDCC is making all
necessary efforts to develop UDC as a tool for knowledge organization; to transform it in
a versatile tool which may meets the needs of its users in a variety of different
circumstances and areas; and a tool for information retrieval. UDC, therefore, is being
developed revised keeping in view the following:
1. To develop UDC into a fully faceted classification system;
2. To remove those inconsistencies that permeate in the classification and hinder in
providing a synthetic structure;
3. To eliminate compound concepts and enumerate only simple terms leaving
synthesis part for the classifier;
4. To radically revise the schedules.

3.9.12 UDC–Master Reference File30

The UDC Master Reference File (MRF) is a database that contains the UDC schedules
together with records required for administration, maintenance and archiving. It contains
the definitive, the authorized version of the UDC and is maintained as a working tool for
the UDC Consortium. The UDCC creates and maintains the MRF database in order to
manage the content of the UDC, to determine the need and priority for revisions, and to
keep track of changes over time. To safeguard its contents, a duplicate of the database is
used for regular maintenance and updating during the year. Once finalized, this is used to
create the new master file each year (during December/January). The new version of the
MRF containing that year's changes is used to provide the output for distribution to

173
Consortium Members and licence holders and, if their applications are approved, also to
other users.

Proposals for a change to the UDC schedules are published annually in "Extensions and
corrections to the UDC" together with the latest approved changes. Copies of each
annual edition of Extensions and corrections are printed during November and normally
available for sale in December. All agreed cancellations are published on the UDCC web
site. The MRF is the definitive source on which publishers base their UDC publications
or services. Users other than publishers can also benefit from direct access to the MRF,
whether for classification, research or other purposes. They may need to support their
specific use, in particular, by employing a suitable software application.

The MRF database was originally designed using UNESCO's CDS/ISIS software
package that supports international standards for the bibliographical data exchange
format (ISO 2709). At that time the core of 60,000 class numbers was chosen as a
manageable but representative selection of recorded information and knowledge - it is
now over 68,000 numbers (2010). In the period 2007-2009 the UDC MRF database was
migrated to a new mySQL database with many added features including an enhanced
data structure for UDC content management and access. English is the working language
of the Consortium and the output from the MRF is distributed in English.

3.9.13 Significance of UDC31

The UDC is essentially a practical system for numerically coding information, so
designed that any item, once coded and filed correctly, can be readily found from
whatever angle it is sought. It should be regarded as a scientific classification, with the
introduction of an auxiliary apparatus of connection and relation signs, which are lacking
in the original DDC and it has made UDC universal. The significance of the UDC System
lies in its immediate application in classifying whole field of knowledge. Some of the
strengths of UDC that account for the success are:

174
 1. It was the first system of classification, which was designed to provide for the
detailed control of specialized information stores.
2. It now provides a switching code for linking otherwise incompatible languages.
Codes or natural languages in many highly specialized information systems are
proliferated.
3. In the last two decades, experiments in many countries have shown the great
possibility achievable with computers and UDC.
4. It is a classification system in the strictest sense depending on the analysis of ideas
so that related concepts have brought together thus avoiding alphabet arrangement,
which also brings in systemization of an haphazard manner.
5. It is widely used throughout the world.
6. The notation is simple and easily understood.
7. UDC schedules provide the clear directions for the number building.

UDC is universal in the sense:

1. It is a general scheme of classification covering all aspects of knowledge.
2. It aims to specify any combination of concepts necessary whether derived from
within a subject field or between different subjects.

One of the most important features of UDC is its list of auxiliary tables. It is also an
extension of the principle of synthesis. It covers various aspects likely to appear as parts
of several different subjects.

175
3.10 Colon Classification (CC)

Fig. 3.6: Colon Classification

Colon Classification is one of the most systematic schemes of Library Classifications

used in many libraries in India and a few libraries abroad as well. This was devised by the
late Dr. S.R. Ranganathan. He found the existing scheme of library classification unable
to cope with the multidimensional dynamic growth of universe of subjects. Colon
Classification proceeds in a different manner in spite of enumerating all possible subjects
and their sub-divisions, it analyses the subject in its various components and places them
under five fundamental categories known as personality, matter, energy, space and time.
To connect or to synthesize the various components of a subject, different connection
symbols have been provided. Readymade class numbers are also available, but to build a
class number, one has to analyze and pick up the possible isolates belonging to different
fundamental categories which are then put together with the help appropriate connecting
symbols. Colon Classification involves analysis and synthesis that is why it is known as
the `Analytico-synthetic’ scheme of classification. The number building makes the
scheme somewhat complicated and difficult to work with, but once understood and
followed it works efficiently and effectively. The Colon Classification is a general
scheme which aims to classify by subject all kinds of documents - books, periodicals,
reports, pamphlets, microforms and electronic media in all kinds of libraries. CC is a
landmark in the modern classification thought and has greatly influenced the modern
classification research and developments.

176
3.10.1 Genesis of Colon Classification
Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan, the author of Colon Classification began his career as a
teacher of mathematics. However in 1924, he was appointed Librarian of the University
of Madras. He went to England in 1924 to study library science at the University of
London, School of Librarianship. Dissatisfied with the existing schemes of library
classification, his experience led him “to think that a change was necessary in the basic
principles on which schemes of classification are established. While in London,
Ranganathan designed a layout for the new scheme and constructed the schedules of a
few subjects for different facets as samples. In about a year, he found the colon device to
be extremely useful. With the help of few subject specialists, the schedules were
completed in 1927. In 1932, the scheme was ready to be printed. Thus, in 1933, the first
edition of colon classification was released. Till now, six editions including the reprinting
of 6th edition, published in 1963of CC have been published.32

Fig. 3.7: Father of Colon Classification

(1892-1972)

3.10.2 Three Versions of Colon Classification

Three versions of Colon Classification have been recognized: Version 1 (1933-1950):
Rigidly faceted era includes CC1, CC2 and CC3. This version was severely rigid and pre-
determined, though fully faceted. Version 2 (1950-1963): Analytico-Synthetic era
includes CC4, CC5 and CC6, which was a great improvement over the first one, but some

177
rigidity remained with regard to levels of facet within a round. Version 3 (1963-1987):
Freely-Faceted Era includes CC7, which is considered as a freely faceted scheme for
library classification.33

3.10.3 Different Editions of Colon Classification

The Colon Classification (CC) first designed from 1924 to 1928 and published first in
1933 by the Madras Library Association is now in its 7th edition released in 1987. The
sixth edition still the most popular one was published in 1960. A reprint with some
amendments contained in an annexure was issued in 1963. This manual aiming to be a
guide to the use of CC-6, explains the construction of class numbers by this edition
(1963) which was reprinted in 1964 and 1969 by its publishers Asia Publishing House
Bombay. Since 1989 this edition with annexure has been reprinted many times by the
Sarda Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science.

Table 3.8: Editions of CC

Editions Year
1st Edition 1933
2nd Edition 1939
3rd Edition 1950
4th Edition 1952
5th Edition 1957
6th Edition 1960
7th Edition 1987

CC1 (1933) - In the first edition of colon classification, schedules were provided for
diverse facets in each basic class. The colon was used as a notational device for synthesis.
The use of symbol “:” was an important part of the scheme. Therefore, the scheme was
named Colon Classification. The features of CC1 are as follows:
1. It provided schedules for different facets in each basic class.
2. It provided special schedules for common subdivisions, geographical divisions and
language divisions.

178
 3. It provided rules for the construction of class numbers by means of combining the
number taken from different facets within a given basic class.
4. It used mixed notation, consisting of capital letters, small letters, Arabic numerals
and the colon.
5. It used decimal fraction notation, as well as octave notation for the purpose of
hospitality in array.
6. It used eight special devices the colon device, geographical device, chronological
device, favored category device, classic device, alphabetical device, subject device
and bias number device.
7. It gave a new phenomenon for constructing the book number so that the books
having the same class number could be individualized, and
8. It used the concept of phases.

CC2 (1939) - This edition incorporated a number of improvements. It used, for the first
time, the concept of fundamental categories (personality, matter, energy, space and time)
to serve as the basis of classification.
CC3 (1950) - This edition provides a facet formula for each basic class in terms of
fundamental categories.
CC4 (1952) - Different indicator digits for different facets going with different
fundamental categories were made use of, as illustrated below:
, Comma for personality
; Semi-colon for matter
: Colon for energy
. Dot for space
. Dot for time

The introduction of the above indicators digit led to a reconstruction of the scheme. This
edition also introduced the concepts of rounds and levels. The concept of fundamental
categories was used in a concrete manner.

179
CC5 (1957) - It introduced substantial changes in the rules and in various schedules.
CC6 (1960) - Substantial changes were made in the various schedules. An attempt was
made to avoid the use of Greek letters. The sixth edition was reprinted in 1963, with
some important amendment. The major change was the introduction of indicator digit –
the inverted comma (`) instead of dot (.) for the time facet.
CC7 (1987) - The schedule of the seventh edition of Colon Classification has been given
by A. Neelameghan, M.A. Gopinath and S. Seetharama. CC7 provides the small schedule
of basic classes, the isolate going with each facet in different basic classes are given. In
addition, common isolates are also listed thus the class numbers are not readily provided,
but have to be constructed. The schedule in CC7 consists of certain standard unit
schedule, corresponding to standard pieces in a meccano set. By combining these
standard pieces, one can construct a variety of objects. Similarly, by combining the
standard unit schedule through various permutations and combinations, one can construct
the class numbers for different specific subjects. CC7 is a freely faceted analytico-
synthetic scheme, because the sequence of component ideas in a compound subject can
be analyzed on the basis of a set of guiding principles, and not merely determined with
the help of the pre-determined facet formula.

3.10.4 Main Classes in Colon Classification

The concept of main class is traditional and no subject or document is without a basic
class, it means that a main class is always present in the subject. The following are the
main classes:
Table 3.9: Main Classes in CC
Main Name of the Facet Formula Description
Classes Subject
Z Generalia z[P 1 ].[P 2 ][P 3 ],[P 4 ] By ‘Generalia’ is meant a class into
which should go any publication
which deals with several subjects
and cannot go into any other single
main class enumerated in the
schedule of the Main Class. The
bare digit small ‘z’ is to hold only

180
 ordinary exposition of ‘Generalia’.
[P1] and [P2] are to be got by (GD)
and (CD).
2 Library Science 2[P];[M]:[E][2P] [P]is the kind of library. [M] is the
kind of document under process; its
isolates are the same as that of [P] of
a Generalia Bibliography. [E] Cum
[2P] are library techniques,
procedures and processes.
B Mathematics B1 – Arithmetic The main class Mathematics is
B2 – Algebra divided into 9 Canonical Divisions.
B3 – Analysis
B4 – Other Methods
B5 – Trigonometry
B6 – Geometry
B7 – Mechanics
B8 – Physico-
mathematics
B9 – Astronomy
C Physics C1 – Fundamentals The main class Physics is divided
C2 – Properties of into 8 Canonical Divisions
Matter
C3 – Sound
C4 – Heat
C5 – Light, Radiation
C6 – Electricity
C7 – Magnetism
C8 – Cosmic
Hypotheses
D Engineering D[P],[P2]:[E][2P] [P] is the kind of work. [P2] is the
part of work. [P3] is the part of work
of D6. [E] cum [2P] are various
engineering operations.
E Chemistry E[P]:[E][2P] [P] are elements or compounds,
organic and inorganic, collectively
termed as substance number. [P2]
are organic derivatives. [E] cum
[2P] are chemical processes and
manipulations.
F Technology F[P]:[E][2P] [P] is the substance facet. Its isolates
are same as the [P] of E Chemistry.
[E] cum [2P] means the problem
facet as well as the process facet.
Isolates of the problem facet are to

181
 be taken from E chemistry.
G Biology G[P]:[E][2P] [P] is the kind of life. [E] Cum [2P]
is the biological problem of life.
H Geology H1 – Mineralogy The main class Geology is divided
H2 – Petrology into 8 Canonical Divisions
H3 – Structural
Geology
H4 – Dynamic
Geology
H5 – Stratigraphy
H6 – Palaeontology
H7 – Economic
Geology
H8 – Cosmic
Hypotheses
HZ Mining HZ[P],[P2]:[E][2P] [P] is the ore. This forms the
substance facet and is to be taken
from the [P] of E Chemistry. [P2} is
the part of the work. [E] Cum [2P]
forms the process involved in
mining.
I Botany I[P],[2P]:[E][2P] [P] is the natural group. [P2] is the
part or organ of the plant. [E] Cum
[2P] denotes the life processes. Its
isolates are same as that the [E] cum
[2P] of G Biology.
J Agriculture J[P]:[E][2P]:[2E] [P] is denoted as plants – isolate.
The first significant digit of the plant
number is utility number, the second
is the part number and the third is
the favored country number. [E] is
the problem isolate. [2P] is denoted
by substance [2E] is denoted by
operation isolate.
K Zoology K[P]:[E][2P] [P] is the natural group isolate and
[E] and [2P] is the problem isolate,
and are the same as those in [E] [2P]
of the main class G Biology.
KZ Animal KZ [P] is the kind of animal isolate. [E]
Husbandry [P]:[E][2P]:[2E][3P] is the problem isolate and the
techniques of animal husbandry.
{2P] is the extension of [E]. [2E]
and [3P] are the form division.

182
L Medicine LP [P] is the body organ. [E] cum [2P]
[P]:[E][2P]:[2E][3P] is the biological problems of human
life; working and failure of human
machine. [2E] cum [3P] is the
prevention or treatment or pathology
of diseases.
LZ Pharmacognosy LZ3 [P]:[E][2P] This main class has been divided
LZ5 [P], [P2] into canonical classes: LZ3
Pharmacology, LZ5 Pharmacopoeia,
LZ8 Pharmacy. LZ3 in this [P] is the
substance, isolates in this facet are
the same as enumerated in [P] in the
main class E Chemistry. [E] is the
action of the drug. [2P] is the body
organ on which the drug action takes
place which is to be got by (SD).
LZ5 in this [P] is the nation isolate
that stands for the country which is
to be got by (GD). [P2] is the kind
or order isolate in this facet are
enumerated such as official,
secondary and tertiary.
M Useful Arts
∆ Spiritualism ∆[P],[P2]:[E][2P] [P] is the kind of religion, the
domain of spiritual and mystic
experiences. Its isolates are same as
in the [P] of Q religion. [P2] is the
entity isolates or is the agency of
experiences. [E] cum [2P] is the
problem facet which involves
methods, techniques and ultimate
results of mystic and occult
experiences.
N Fine Arts NA Architecture
ND Sculpture
NN Engraving
NQ Painting
NR Music
O Literature O[P],[P2][P3],[P4] [P] stands for language of the
literature. Its isolates are to be taken
from common schedule of languages
given in the Chapter 5 of CC. [P2]
stands for the form of literature that

183
 is drama, poetry or fiction. [P3]
stands for the author facet to be got
by (CD). [P4] stands for the
individual named work of a given
author. It may be got by group
notation or by (AD).
P Linguistics P[P],[P2][P3]:[E][2P] [P] is the language under study. [P2]
is the variant stage and its isolates
are enumerated in the schedule. [P3]
is the linguistic element whereas [E]
cum [2P] are the linguistic
problems.
Q Religion Q[P]:[E][2P] [P] is the religion itself. [E] cum
[2P] enlists the religious practices
and beliefs.
R Philosophy R1 – Logic The main class Philosophy is
R2 – Epistemology divided into 8 Canonical Divisions
R3 – Metaphysics
R4 – Ethics
R5 – Aesthetics
R6 – Favored System
(1) Indian Philosophy
R7 – Favored System
(2)
R8 – Other Systems
by (SD)
S Psychology S[P]:[E][2P] [P] is the individual human being.
[E] and [2P] enlist psychological
activities and processes.
T Education T[P]:[E],[2P],[2P2] [P] is constituted of various types of
educands-the level or kind of
students. [E] is constituted of
educational techniques or problems.
[2P] cover the subject taught which
is to be got by (SD). [2P2] enlists
methods or physical medium of
education.
U Geography U[P].[S]‘[T] The first division is on canonical
lines, rich and varied subjects have
been sparsely enumerated. Space
and time are to be taken from their
respective schedules.
V History V[P],[P2]:[E][2P]‘[T] [P]is the community as
distinguished from the geographical

184
 area. Its focus to be got by (GD).
[P2] is the organ of the government.
[E] and [2P] covers the activities,
functions and policies of the
government.
W Political W[P][P2]:[E][2P] [P] is Type of State [P 2 ] is the organ
Science of the state; its isolates are same as
the [P 2 } of the V History. [E] cum
[2P] cover activities, politics and
function of the state., its isolates are
also same as those of V History.
X Economics X(System), (Specials) [P] is Business or economic agency
[P];[M]:[E][2P] [M] is the medium of currency
which is only applicable to X61
Money and [E][2P] is economic
problems and activities.
Y Sociology Y[P]:[E][2P]:[2E][3P] [P] is the community or social
group-isolates enumerated. It can be
further sharpened by (SID), (GD)
and (SD). [E] and [2P] facet covers
activities, traditions, social
problems. [2E] and [3P]: secondary
problems include conservation,
development, and prevention
correction of social ills.
Z Law Z[P],[P2], [P3],[P4} [P] is the community over which a
given law has the jurisdiction, which
is got by (GD) in case of nation and
by (SD) in case of cultural
community. Here [P] stands for
community and not a subject. [P 2 ]
and [P 3 ] have been termed as Law I
and Law II respectively. [P 3 ]
isolates vary according to [P 2 ]

3.10.5 Notational System

The Notational System of Colon Classification used for assigning numbers to basic
subjects consists of:
1. 23 Roman small letters (a…z excluding i, l, o)
2. 10 Indo Arabic numerals (0-9)
3. 26 Roman Capital letters (A--Z)

185
 4. Bracketed numbers
5. Indicator digit hyphen (-) and asterisk (*)
Z, 0 (zero) or 9 (nine) is used to represent an empty digit. T,V,X & Z are used as
emptying digits, however, when these occur as an initial digit, then they are deemed
semantically rich digit. U, W, & Y have been postulated as empty-emptying digit.

The notational system used by CC to assign numbers to isolate as speciators consist of

the following:
1. Ten Indo-Arabic numerals (0---9)
2. Twenty Six Roman capital letters (A---Z)
3. Twenty Six Roman small letters (a---z excluding i, l, o)
4. Bracketed Numbers
5. Indicator digits * ” ← ) & ‘ . ; , - = + → (

3.10.6 Common Isolates

An isolate in the CC is a fundamental and ultimate unit of knowledge. By itself it cannot
stand; so alone it cannot make a subject. The isolates enumerated once for all and which
remain the same for every main class are veritably termed as Common Isolates. They
represent the auxiliaries and not part of the proper subject. They are the recurring
concepts pertaining to the form of presentation of the extra textual aspects of a document.
Since they are listed once for all, their names and notational symbols remain the same
wherever they occur. They are attachable to most of the classes, though not all. They
stand for divisions such as encyclopedia, dictionary, periodical, commission report and
conference proceeding. Ranganathan divided the common isolates into two categories:
1. Anteriorizing Common Isolates (ACI) – When ACIs are attached to a subject they
give it an anterior position over other subjects of the same class. They do not
require any connecting symbol and documents attached with ACI from the
approach documents on the shelves. They are of three kinds: Applicable before
Space Facet, Applicable after Space Facet, and Applicable after Time Facet

186
2. Posteriorizing Common Isolates (PCI) – PCI are quite different as they give
posterior position to the document to which they are attached. It means a class
number fitted with a PCI will come after the same class number without it and they
require a connecting symbol for their attachment. They are of two kinds: Energy
PCI and Personality PCI. Energy PCI are attached with a colon and Personality PCI
are attached to any class with a comma, mostly pertain to institutions and
associations.

Table 3.10: Anteriorizing Common Isolates (Applicable before Space Facet)

Number Term Facet Formula
A Bibliography a[T]
C Concordance
D Table
E Formula
F Atlas f[T]
K Cyclopedia k[P],[P2]
M Periodical m[P],[P2]
N Serial n[P],[P2]
P Conference Proceedings p[P],[P2]
V History v[S],[T]
W Biography
General w[S],[T]
Individual w[P]
Autobiography w[P],1
Ana w[P],2
Letters w[P],4
X Works (Collection or
Selection x[S],[T]
General x[P]
Individual
y1 Program of Instruction
y2 Syllabus
y3 Synopsis Same as for w
y4 Scope
y7 Case Study
y8 Digest

187
Table 3.11: Anteriorizing Common Isolates (Applicable only after Space Facet)
Number Term Facet Formula
R Administration Report
S Statistics9If Periodicals) s[T]

Table 3.12: Anteriorizing Common Isolates (Applicable only after Time Facet)
s Statistics(if stray) V Source material
t Commission report v5 Literature
t4 Survey v6 Tradition
t5 Plan v7 Archeology etc., (as in V
History)
t6 Ideal v8 Archive (as in V History)

Table 3.13: Posteriorizing Common Isolates: Energy Common Isolates

b1 Calculating f3 Experiment
b2 Designing f4 Discussion
b6 Measuring
G Criticism
c1 Weighing P Drafting
R Reporting
F Investigation U Surveying
f2 Observation

Table 3.14: Posteriorizing Common Isolates: Personality Common Isolates

b Profession f2 Observational
f3 Experimenting
d Institution f4 Discussional
f7 Yogic (Asrama)
e Educational (in
which the subject,
represented by the
host class, is taught )
G Learned society
e2 Lower H Industrial body
e4 Higher K Commercial body
W Administrative
department of
Government
f Investigating

188
3.10.7 Colon Classification Index
The index of CC refers only to elementary terms, never to compound subjects. The
relative aspects of a subject are provided only in the form of class numbers, not being
named as in DDC or UDC. CC6 has provided the following four indexes: General Index;
Geographical Index; Two Indexes to Natural Groups in Botany and Zoology. The entries
have been arranged by word by word order following the principle of nothing before
something.

3.10.8 Book Number and Call Number

Ranganathan is of the view that a document comprises of Gross body (physical carrier)
subtle body (language, style, viewpoint, presentation, etc) and the soul (knowledge and
subject). In a library one cannot arrange books distinctively without accounting for these
physical peculiarities. Therefore, it is generally seen that the class number alone fails to
individualize a book in a library or in a bibliography. Many books in a library may get the
same class number by virtue of having the same specific subject. In such cases, to assign
a unique individual place to a given document - as it is the requirement of every library -
these documents are given a further notation, also called External Notation which, is
based on some non-subject considerations, used to arrange documents within a given
specific subject, is known as a book number. The function of book number starts where
that of a class number ends. Book number may be based on either some or all of the
considerations such as author, title, edition, language, physical form or the year of
publication or even the place of publication.

The Colon Classification book number facet formula along with indicator digit:
[L] [F] [Y] [A].[V]-[S];[C]:g[EVN]
Where in
L – Language of the document
F – Form of the document
Y – Year of publication of the document

189
A – Accession part of the year number
V – Volume number of the document
S – Supplement number of the document
C – Copy number of the document
G - Evaluation number
EVN – Accession part of the evaluation number

3.10.9 Use of Colon Classification

CC is relatively new scheme in at least two respects:
1. With regard to its period of origin, and
2. With regard to its methods.

Since the scheme was first published in 1933, it is comparatively younger than some of
the most famous schemes, like DC, UDC and Bliss Bibliographical classification. Certain
methods used in CC have influenced considerably the improvement work of other
schemes. Considerable research was undertaken on CC mostly by DRTC and also by
CRG, London. The dynamic theory of classification given by Ranganathan has
contributed a lot to the development of general theory of classification. His theory of
classification has influenced the development of a number of subject indexing languages,
such as, thesauro-facet, chain indexing, POPSI, PRECIS.

Table 3.15: Advantages and Disadvantages of Major Classification Scheme

No Name of the Advantages / Disadvantages of the Scheme
Scheme
1. DDC Advantages
1. The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system has a long
history (127 years) of expansion and adaptation to the needs of the
communities it serves.
2. The DDC is published in both full and abridged versions, as well
as, now, online versions of the full and abridged editions in a
format called ‘Web-Dewey.’
3. The DDC uses very well recognized Arabic numerals and the
numbered notation makes it easily understandable from one

190
 culture to another.
4. The DDC breaks down into relatively well structured and ordered
disciplines, divisions, and sections. Thus, the scheme is
hierarchical, like a family tree, showing the relationship of
specific subjects to the parent subject.
5. The DDC has bi-weekly updates to its current edition put out
online.
6. The class numbers are easy to write, type and remember – at least
to hold in one’s mind long enough to get from a library’s
catalogue to the shelves.
7. The Dewey scheme has an excellent relative index and the
schedules are inexpensive.
8. The scheme allows for the close classification (lengthy numbers
for specific subjects) or broad classification (shorter numbers
where fewer details are required).
9. Alternative placing is provided for several subjects so that the
differing libraries can cater to the requirements of their own
clientele.
10. The Classification scheme allows for expansion so that new
subjects can be included. This facility is known as ‘hospitality’.

Disadvantages
1. The provision of only ten main classes’ means that the base is too
short, resulting in lengthy classification numbers.
2. The limitations of division and subdivision by only 10 places
leads to the squeezing of subjects into a conglomerate last division
called ‘others’.
3. The arrangement of classes has been criticized, especially the
separation of language from literature; social sciences from
history; psychology from medicine.
4. There is a bias towards Protestant/American aspects prevalent in
both the history and religion disciplines. These problems are being
addressed in each new revision and edition.
5. Within the DDC there are some disciplines that are closely
related, yet quite separate numerically like literature 800-899 and
languages 400-499.
6. Within the DDC there are also some classes like ‘Technology,’ in
the 600s which the call numbers are very crowded, and others that
are very sparse.
7. The DDC is not as easily expandable as classification systems like
the Library of Congress Classification system when new subjects
or technologies emerge.
8. There is the potential for very large classification call numbers as
a result of number building, and the need for extreme accuracy by

191
 some libraries.
2. UDC Advantages
1. Since UDC is a general scheme of classification, it covers the
whole field of human knowledge. The process of dividing a class
into ten subclasses is carried to the required degree of specificity.
The required degree of detail is achieved with the help of common
and special auxiliaries. The resultant subject description is of
utmost precision.
2. Due to the UDC's incredibly flexible disposition it naturally lends
itself to conversion in a digital computer format.
3. The UDC like the DDC has been published in Full, Abridged, and
Web formats.
4. The UDC lends itself very well to applications in other languages
and scripts. Its notation overcomes all language and provides
worldwide use.
5. Due to its versatility it can be utilized in multiple fields including
museums, archives, libraries, and in documentation.
6. Due to its abbreviated nature and vocabulary it is easily updated
and enables worldwide standardized indexing.
7. It is easier to manipulate the UDC to accommodate advances in
knowledge because of greater scope for creating new synthesized
numbers for concepts or simply inserting a new number as
required without the need to reach general editorial agreement.
8. Its notation consists of numerals and signs, which are understood
internationally. The decimal notation allows maximum hospitality
for the admission of new terms.
9. It forms a carefully organized and comprehensive vocabulary of
terms (in its index) for indexing and retrieval. It may be used as a
thesaurus.
10. It is ideally suited to special libraries, as its full edition contains
subject schedules of minute description. Special subject editions
are also 'separately available. The medium edition can take care of
almost all subjects.

Disadvantages
1. The notation often tends to be long and appears clumsy. As a
result, its use on the shelves becomes difficult.
2. User participation in revision has created unevenness in the
scheme at places. It also delays revision of schedules until they
become out of date.
3. The UDC lacks conformity and exhibits a lack of uniformity
across libraries that use it.
4. The UDC is uneven in its coverage of modern topics and some of

192
 the expansions of UDC are too detailed.
3. CC Advantages
1. Due to a sound theory and the provision of a hospitable notation,
CC is capable of giving a unique number for almost every subject.
2. The systematic order and the degree of detail due to analysis and
synthesis are two great virtues of CC. As a result, it has achieved
two objectives: i) provision of a helpful order in each class, and ii)
facility in locating a given topic whether it is simple, compound or
complex.
3. It is claimed that CC can be effectively used in a computer-aide
document finding system.

Disadvantages
1. The major drawback of CC is that there exists no machinery to
keep up the revision work as in the case of DDC and UDC.
2. The guidance provided in the recently published seventh edition is
not enough and lacks clarity at places.
3. It calls for a manual with numerous examples to explain the
application of various rules.
4. It is far from simple, the virtue most cherished by the users.

Table 3.16: Comparative Study of Three Major Schemes of Classification

S. Description DDC UDC CC
No.
1. Main Outline DDC comprised of The scheme Main classes are
10 Main Classes follows DDC comprised of
with 9 sub-classes except addition of Generalia(1 to 9)
and 9 sub classes of some new sub- and 26 Main Classes
each sub class. That divisions and signs (A to Z) of both
is beginning with of combination for Science and
most general indication of Humanities. The
subjects to more relation of subjects. first 13 classes
specific ones. comprise the Science
and applications and
the last 13 comprises
of Humanities.
2. Notation Notation originally Mixed notation Notation is
was pure; later on consists of figures extremely mixed
some letters have letters and other consisting of Arabic
been used. Three symbols. The numerals, roman
figure minimum decimal point is alphabet (both
notations have been repeated after every capital and small)

193
 used. three figure. and symbols and
signs including
colon. Arabic
numerals (1-9)are
assigned to the
Generalia class and
capital letters of the
roman alphabet are
assigned to the
specific main
classes. Notation is
faceted. It is
synthetic it uses
fraction on principle
for both numbers
and letters and
achieves hospitality
in both array and
chain
3. Form DDC uses series of Form divisions (01- In CC, common sub-
Division nine common form 09) retain the divisions use of
divisions and these original Dewey lower case letters
with minor significance but with decimal sub-
alternatives are used have been divisions where
with same meaning redefined and necessary
throughout the greatly expanded
scheme
4. Mnemonics The principle Number building The scheme is
mnemonics features devices as well as faceted one and
are: Form divisions, auxiliary schedules enjoys a
Geographical are mnemonics considerable
divisions, and features mnemonic quality by
Language divisions the use of same
facets and common
facets
5. Geographical Geographical sub- Place sign (1)-(9) is Common
Divisions divisions are a special table geographical
provided by the use indicating physical divisions have been
of the numbers 930- places. (3)-(9) are marked by decimal
999. Every the regular numbers 1-95 and in
continent, country geographical some cases sub
and division of a numbers of Dewey divisions comprising
country is given a used without the of five figures are
number. It also initial ‘9’ and used.

194
 provide period within brackets.
division
6. Structure Based on the Based on the Based on the
scheme devised by scheme DDC traditional main
Bacon and Harris classes listed under
four zones. Zone 1-
Generalia Class,
Zone 2-Recently
recognized main
classes, Zone-3
Traditional main
classes and Zone-4
Newly emerging
methodologies
7. Index Relative Index-tried Alphabetical Index- Shortest index found
to locate the relative is not so exhaustive in any classification
position of the and developed on scheme and is
different aspects of the basis of chain specific one which
subject at one place procedure does not list
in the index and is composite subject.
very exhaustive.

3.11 Role of International Conferences towards Library Classification34

The themes of discussions of the six international study conferences on Classification
Research held during the period 1957-1997 are the positive indicators of the transitional
requirements in the field of library classification. There have been a plethora of major
developments and change in trends in library classification that have provided an
international perspective as compared to the conventional branches of library science like
cataloguing, indexing and abstracting. During the last four decades, a large number of
conferences have taken place on library classification or knowledge organization by
FID/CR and the International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO). These
conferences became the rallying forum to highlight and project the challenges of
scientific and technological developments. There has been a deluge of published macro
and micro literature and their revolutionary impact on library classification. The Dorking
Conference held in 1957 examined and evaluated the theories propagated by Dr.
Ranganathan to surmount the problems resulting from the use of enumerative

195
classification. It was resolved that the most helpful form of classification scheme for
information retrieval is the one which groups terms (isolate ideas) into well-defined
categories and can be used independently to form compounds and within which the terms
(isolate ideas) can be arranged in an hierarchies. The Conference, therefore, advocated in
positive terms the message that the era of faceted classification has begun.

3.11.1 FID/CR Conferences

Since 1957, FID/CR has organized six International Study Conferences on Classification
Research (ISCCR). The first ISCCR was held at Dorking, England, during May 13-17,
1957. Dr. Ranganathan, in his opening address, dwelt upon "Library Classification as a
Discipline". The recommendations of this conference dealt with: Scope of classification;
Schemes of classification; Need for research; Use of classification schemes; Differences
between systems; Construction and application of schemes; Notation for such visually
scanned systems as the card catalogue; Machine systems; Research projects; A general
scheme for classification; Development of classification schemes; and Furtherance of
Research.

The second ISCCR was held at Elsinore, Denmark, during September 14-18, 1964. Dr.
Ranganathan delivered the presidential address entitled "Library Classification through a
Century". The papers presented to this conference were grouped into five areas: General
theory of classification; Research in mechanized classification; Selected and special
schemes; Evaluation techniques; and Directions for future works.

The third ISCCR was held at Bombay during January 6-11; 1975. The recommendations
of this conference focused on: General aspects of designing ordering systems for global
information networks; Use of empirical methods and theoretical models ford signing
ordering systems for global information networks; Systems evaluation; Interdisciplinary
contents; Education; Needs and problems of developing countries.

196
The fourth ISCCR was held at Augsburg, Germany, during June 28 - July 2, 1982. The
theme of the conference was "Universal Classification, Subject Analysis and Ordering
Systems".

The fifth ISCCR was held at Toronto, Canada during June 24-28, 1991. The theme of the
conference was "Classification Research for Knowledge Representation and
Organization". The papers presented to this; conference fall into three broad categories:
General Principles and Policies; Structure and Logic Classification; and Empirical
Investigation.

The sixth ISCCR was held at University College, London, on June 16-19, 1997 on the
topic "Knowledge Organization for Information Retrieval". The University College,
London, ASLIB, Classification Research Group (CRG) and International Society for
Knowledge Organization (ISKO) sponsored this conference. The themes discussed in this
conference were: Role of classification in information management; Classification
research for retrieval of information published electronically; Automatic methods of
classification; Researcher and the real world; Tools for classification and classification as
a tool; and Data modeling.

3.11.2 International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO) Conferences

Established in the year 1989, the International Society for Knowledge Organization
(ISKO) has organized four international conferences on knowledge organization. The
summary of these conferences, deliberations is presented in the following paragraphs.

The first International ISKO Conference was held at Darmstadt, Technical University,
Germany, on August 15-17, 1990. The theme of the conference was `Tools for
Knowledge Organization and Human Interface'. The papers presented to this conference
covered the following areas: General issues pertaining to knowledge organization;
Algorithmic text analysis; Terminology; Knowledge organization in universal systems;

197
Thesaurus issues; Online retrieval; Knowledge organization in special schemes; Retrieval
from universal systems; and Retrieval technologies and indexing.

The second International ISKO Conference was held at Madras on August 26-28, 1992.
The theme of the conference was `Cognitive Paradigms in Knowledge Organization'. The
papers presented at this conference were grouped into the following areas: Knowledge
and knowledge organization; Knowledge seeking in libraries; Knowledge seeking in
information retrieval; Knowledge seeking in problem solving; Taxonomic approach to
knowledge organization; Analytico-Synthetic approaches to knowledge organization;
Cognitive paradigms and their application; and Cognitive paradigms in knowledge bases.

The third International ISKO Conference was held at the Royal School of Librarianship,
Copenhagen, Denmark, on June 21-24, 1994. The theme of the conference was
`Knowledge Organization and Quality Management'. The papers presented to this
conference were grouped under: Quality in knowledge organization; Theory of
knowledge organization; Future prospects for classification schemes and thesauri;
Knowledge organization in specific domains; Concept representation in systems design;
Linguistics in knowledge organization; Communication and knowledge organization; and
New technologies and knowledge organization.

The fourth International ISKO Conference was held at James Madison Memorial
Building, Library of Congress, Washington, on July 15-19, 1996. The main theme of the
conference was `Knowledge Organization and Change'. The sub-themes on which papers
were presented were: Library of Congress Classification; Management of change in
knowledge organization; Knowledge organization in online environment; Impact of
technologies on bibliographic elements; Users' focus in knowledge organization; Inter-
disciplinary approaches to knowledge organization; Natural language processing; and
Dewey decimal classification.

198
3.12 Role of Organizations towards Library Classification35
During the past five decades, it is not only the individuals but several organizations,
societies and research groups who have taken up the cause of library classification. They
have carried on various research activities to provide a totally new direction to library
classification and to transform it into an effective tool not only for shelf arrangement but
also knowledge organization. The activities of these institutions are briefly presented in
the following subsections.

3.12.1 Library Research Circle (LRC)

The Library Research Circle or LRC was founded in Delhi by S.R. Ranganathan in 1951.
This circle used to meet on Sundays at Ranganathan's residence to pursue research on
various aspects of classification, particularly relating to Colon Classification. Its members
concentrated on fundamental categories, indicator digits, rounds and levels of
manifestation, zone analysis and on requirements for depth classification. The work
entitled “Depth Classification”, published by the Indian Library Association, 1953,
provides ample testimony to the contributions made by members of LRC. Its activities
withered away from 1954.

3.12.2 Fl/DCR
It was on the initiative of Dr. Ranganathan that FID formed a Committee on
Classification Theory (FID/CA) in the year1950. Later in 1961, FID/CA was renamed as
the Committee on Classification Research (FID/CR). This Committee has been
stimulating classification research. The activities of FID/ CR are communicated through a
serial publication entitled FID/CR Newsletter, published four times a year listing
classification research projects in progress. FID/CR has so far organized six international
conferences already referred. The present chairman of FID/CR is Dr. I. C. Mcllwaine.

199
3.12.3 Documentation Research and Training Centre (DRTC)
DRTC was established in Bangalore in 1962 by S.R. Ranganathan. It actively promoted
different levels of research in library classification. These are: I. Development research to
develop depth schedules; 2. Fundamental research to develop postulates and principles;
and 3. Systematic testing of depth schedules developed by faculty and alumni of DRTC.
It has been organizing annual seminars on thrust areas of Library Classification and
Information Science, conducting short term courses and workshops. It is bringing out, in
collaboration with Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science a quarterly
journal "Library Science With Slant `to Documentation and Information Studies" (1964-
).

3.12.4 International Society for Knowledge Organisation (ISKO)

This society was founded at Frankfurt, Germany in 1989. Its founder president is Dr
Ingetraut Dahlberg. The principal aim of this society is "to promote research,
development and application of all methods for organization of knowledge in general and
in particular fields, by integrating especially the conceptual approaches of classification
research and artificial intelligence. The society stresses philosophical, psychological and
systematic approaches for conceptual objects". The society provides for personal contact
and opportunities to the worldwide community of colleagues who devote themselves to
the creation, expansion, revision and application of tools for the organization of
knowledge according to the conceptual point of view. The society has already organized
four international ISKO conferences. The summary of these conferences' deliberations
has been presented in section 15.6.2. The society is also bringing out a quarterly journal
entitled "Knowledge Organization", formerly known as International Classification. This
is devoted to concept theory, classification, indexing and knowledge representation.

3.12.5 Classification Research Group (CRG)

CRG is a group of working librarians and others interested in classification research in
London. When Ranganathan’s ideas of faceted classification began to make an

200
impression in the western world, the Royal Society’s Scientific Information Conference
was held in London in 1948, where classification, as a method of subject organization,
was discussed as one of the themes. Dissatisfied by the prevailing methods of subject
organization, a committee with J.D. Bernal as Secretary was set up to examine the
existing systems and suggest possible improvements. No progress was however, made
until 1951, when B.C. Vickery was invited to form a group to take over the wok of the
committee. This heralded the formation of CRG in 1952. The group consists of people
who are keenly interested in classification research. A perusal of the reports ("Bulletins")
produced by the CRG indicates that the Group has been actively involved in the creation
of several classification schemes for such organizations. The theoretical work of the
Group has involved the study of facet analysis, relational operators and the theory of
Integrative Levels.” The efforts of the group are directed in two directions: classification
and data mining. The classification effort focuses on both methodological research and
particularly novel, non-standard applications. The work in classification has significant
overlap with other areas, including machine learning and pattern recognition, so that the
publications appear in a wide literature. The data mining effort has become focussed
primarily on the emergent areas of pattern discovery and detection and streaming data
analysis.

CRG made a major contribution towards a new general classification scheme, which was
expected to have quite different problems than the special schemes. Each specific subject,
in addition to a few core subjects, has some fringe subjects also, which can be treated
without any due seriousness in a special scheme where they are supposed to be less
important to the subject experts than the core subjects. In a general scheme all subjects
have equal weight-age and should be treated accordingly. It was thought that CRG should
now turn its attention to the more difficult matter of a new general scheme.

201
3.13 Recent Developments in classification36
1. Construction of Thesauri - Various Thesauri have been constructed with the help
of classification schemes since these schemes function as the one of major sources
for selection and getting most of the used terms in thesauri. Hence so many
research projects have been established for the construction of thesauri.
2. Standard Switching Language - Due to the explosion of knowledge, the
requirement of standard switching language was felt for the timely use of
indexing terms and in indexing language and UDC was treated suitable for using
this switching language, as it was at that time suitable for computerized retrieval
and dissemination of information. FID is using UDC for constructing thesauri and
terminology.
3. Automated Classification - By doing so many experiments in the field of
automated classification process and system, the efforts have been made to
develop the same. The use of automated classification in a specific database is
becoming more helpful.
4. Computerized MARC Project - The information storage is being transformed into
micro and machine readable forms. Hence there is a requirement to develop an
advanced classification scheme, which can be useful in this age of information
technology. Library of Congress (LC) and Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC)
Schemes are being used in the MARC project.
5. UNISIST - UNISIST planned for a Universal Information System and Network,
for which the need is to provide classification schemes in a new pattern because
the present classification schemes do not have the efficiency of organizing the
computerized stored information.

3.13.1 Vocabulary Control and Thesaurus Construction

The basic principles of thesaurus construction are of relevance in a study of subject trees,
taxonomies and ontologies. Rowley defined thesaurus as ‘a compilation of words and
phrases showing synonyms, hierarchical and other relationships and dependencies, the

202
function of which is to provide a standardized vocabulary for information storage and
retrieval systems’. The primary function of a thesaurus is to show semantic relationships
between terms: relationships based on their meaning, i.e. what a classification scheme
does, but with terms arranged alphabetically. The thesaurus is also an agent of vocabulary
control showing terms which may or may not be used in an index. Thesaurus construction
bears many similarities to creating a classification scheme.

3.13.2 Subject Trees

Subject trees are familiar to anyone who is using web for information searching. Web
directories utilize a subject tree structure that provides a browsing environment for
searchers. The subject trees provided by web directories like Open Directory
(http://www.dmoz..org) provide the same information structure as traditional enumerative
classification schemes, displaying subjects in a hierarchy and making explicit their
relationships to one another.

3.13.3 Web Directories

Classification schemes provide a subject arrangement of books on shelves and subject
grouping helps browsers because they can identify which part of the library to browse in.
digital information retrieval systems can also organize for browsing. Web directories
provide a browsing environment: menus are used to navigate hierarchies, guiding the user
through a series of choices to increasingly specific information. A subject tree provides a
structured and organized hierarchy of named categories that can be browsed for
information on particular subjects. Under each category or subcategory, links are
provided to further categories or web pages. Web pages are assigned to a category by
their authors or by subject tree administrators.

3.13.4 Taxonomies
The word ‘taxonomy’ has been with us for a very long time and it has most commonly
been used in the context of classifying organisms. The term has more recently been

203
borrowed by computer science and knowledge management to describe the organization
of web-based information and documentation. It provides a means for building subject
trees, showing the relationship between subjects in a hierarchy that can be browsed: the
user can follow the links down the hierarchy to more specific subjects or follow links up
the hierarchy to broader subjects.

3.13.5 Ontologies
A dictionary meaning of ontology is the branch of metaphysics that deals with the nature
and essence of things or of existence. Ontology is a document or file that formally defines
the relations among terms. The power of the ontology can be increased with the inclusion
of equivalence relationships.

3.13.6 Social Classification or Folksonomy

Given the complexities and resource-intensiveness of bibliographic classification
systems, some alternatives approaches to classification of electronic resources have
evolved over the past few years. This unstructured or freely structured approach to
classification with users assigning their own labels is variably referred to as
‘folksonomy’. ‘ethnofolkosonomy’, ‘distributed classification’, ‘social classification’,
‘open tagging’, ‘free tagging’ and ‘faceted hierarchy’. Folkosomy is defined as internet-
based information retrieval methodology consisting of collaboratively generated, open-
ended labels that categories content such as web pages, online photographs, and web
links. It allows user to easily add web pages of their choice to their personal collection of
links, to categorize those sites with keywords, and to share the collection not only among
their own browsers and machines, but also with others.

3.14 Internet and Library Classification Schemes

Internet, the largest storehouse of information, has around 100 million pages of
information. To find the required information contained on the Internet is a complex task.
Attempts have been made to apply library classification schemes for retrieval of

204
information contained on networks. The advantages37 of adopting library classification
schemes are:
1. Enhanced browsing, subject search facilities and navigation;
2. Possibility of offering multilingual access;
3. Interoperability with other services;
4. Facility for partitioning of large databases.
5. More recall and precision through broadening and narrowing search terms
6. Contextual representation of search terms
7. Use of a common classification scheme could make search easier across databases.
8. Users may find it easier to browse, because of the familiarity with the classification
scheme (which they might have been using in libraries).

Moreover,- if the Internet service provider uses an existing and popular classification
scheme, it has better chances of being up-to-date as it is revised at regular intervals and is
popular with users. The library has increasing numbers of electronic resources that need
to be classified. There is currently much interest in the concept of information
architecture which incorporates key elements of library technical processes: cataloguing
(metadata), classification (taxonomy) and indexing and thesaurus construction
(ontology). The latter two concepts are of relevance, where principles of library
classification and classification schemes are examined and extrapolated into digital
information environment with the examination of subject trees, taxonomies and
ontologies.

Although classification schemes were mainly designed for organizing bibliographic items
on the library’s shelves, many researchers have also used library classification schemes
for organizing information resources on the web. Examples of such applications include
CyberDewey and so on. Many heavily used digital libraries and subject gateways also use
bibliographic classification schemes to organize internet information resources, such as
BUBL (uses DDC) and ACM digital library (uses ACM classification).

205
3.14.1 Internet Sites using Library Classification System
A list of Internet sites that uses library classification systems or subject headings can be
found in:
ADAM–Art, Design, Architecture & Media Information Gateway
(http://www.adam.ac.uk/)38
ADAM is a service being developed to help you locate useful, quality-assured
information on the Internet in the following subject areas:
1. Fine Art, including painting, prints and drawings, sculpture and other
contemporary media including those using technology
2. Design, including industrial, product, fashion, graphic, packaging and interior
design
3. Architecture, including town planning and landscape design, but excluding
building construction
4. Applied Arts, including textiles, ceramics, glass, metals, jewellery and furniture
5. Media, including film, television, broadcasting, photography and animation
6. Theory; relevant historical, philosophical and contextual studies
7. Museum studies and conservation
8. Professional Practice related to any of the above

ADAM helps you find the relevant information by providing a searchable on-line
catalogue describing Internet resources such as web sites or electronic mailing lists, in
much the same way as a library catalogue describes bibliographic resources such as
books and journals. The records in the ADAM catalogue are created by a team of
professional librarians, who evaluate the quality of each resource against our selection
guidelines and then use the traditional tools and skills of librarianship (such as
cataloguing rules for keyword indexing, classification and controlled terminology) to
create a detailed description for any resources that are relevant to ADAM's subject scope,
accurate, authoritative, reasonably current and contain a significant amount of unique
information.

206
Biz/ed (www.bized.ac.uk)39
Biz/ed is a subject gateway for business education, which offers an online catalogue of
good quality Internet resources (Like SOSIG Biz/ed also uses the ROADS software for
its gateway). Since its inception in 1996, this catalogue has been using an abridged
version of DDC to classify resources, and to create browsable subject categories. It has
used the business section of DDC to pick out a selection of numbers and classes that
could be used to form the browsable sections on the site.

Blue Web'n Content Categories40

(http://www.kn.pacbell.com/wired/bluewebn/categories.html)
This service gives the facility to browse by subject areas where each subject area and its
sub-divisions are marked by their respective DDC notations. DDC numbers are given as
mere references and the site does not make use of DDC for organizing the resources.

BUBL (www.bubl.ac.uk)41
BUBL uses DDC as the primary organization structure for its catalogue of internet
resources. This figure shows the main catalogue of BUBL resources that are organized
according to the Dewey main Classes; the user can click on any class to reach the
corresponding subcategories that are again arranged according to Dewey numbers.

207
 000 Generalities 500 Science and mathematics
Includes: computing, Internet, Includes: physics, chemistry,
libraries, information science earth sciences, biology, zoology
100 Philosophy and psychology 600 Technology
Includes: ethics, paranormal Includes: medicine, engineering,
phenomena agriculture, management
200 Religion 700 The arts
Includes: bibles, religions of Includes: art, planning,
the world architecture, music, sport
300 Social sciences 800 Literature and rhetoric
Includes: sociology, politics, Includes: literature of specific
economics, law, education languages
400 Language 900 Geography and history
Includes: linguistics, language Includes: travel, genealogy,
learning, specific languages archaeology
Fig.3.8: BUBL Link Catalogue using Dewey Class Numbers for Internet Resources

CyberStacks (www.public.iastate.edu/-CYBERSTACKS/)42
CyberStacks(sm) is a centralized integrated and unified collection of selected digital
resources categorized using the Library of Congress classification scheme. Resources are
organized under one or more relevant Library of Congress class numbers and an
associated publication format and subject description. The majority of resources
incorporated within its collection are monographic or serial works, files, databases or
search services. All of the selected resources in CyberStacks(sm) are full-text, hypertext,
or hypermedia, and of a research or scholarly nature. Using an abridged version of LC,
CyberStacks(sm) allows users to browse through virtual library stacks containing
monographic or serial works, files and databases of search services to identify potentially
relevant information resources. Resources are categorized first within a broad
classification, then within narrower subclasses and resources are listed under a specific
class. Although CyberStacks (sm) is the only site using LC and was a novel application in
that respect, it had not been updated for quite some time.

208
 G Geography, Anthropology and Recreation

H Social Sciences

J Political Science

K Law

Q Science

R Medicine

S Agriculture

T Technology

U Military Science

V Naval Science

Fig. 3.9: Main Menu of CyberStacks(sm)

CyberDewey (http://library.tedankara.k12.tr/dewey/)43
CyberDewey is the catalogue of World Wide Web by David A. Mundie created in 1995.

Canadian Information by Subject44

(http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/caninfo/ecaninfo.htm)
Canadian Information By Subject is an information service developed by the Library and
Archives Canada to provide links to information about Canada from Internet resources
around the world. The subject arrangement is in the form of a "Subject Tree", based on
the structure of the Dewey Decimal Classification system. This service is updated
regularly and is constantly developing and expanding. Be sure to check back often to see
the latest additions.

209
 Subject Tree - Subject Order
0 Computer science, information and general works
1 Philosophy, parapsychology and occultism,
psychology
2 Religion
3 Social sciences
4 Language
5 Natural sciences and mathematics
6 Technology (Applied sciences)
7 Arts. Fine and decorative arts
8 Literature (Belles-lettres) and rhetoric
9 History, geography, and auxiliary disciplines
Fig. 3.10: Canadian Information by Subject

NetFirst (http://www.oclc.org/oclc/netfirst/)45
NetFirst is an authoritative abstracted and indexed database from OCLC. It has used
DDC to organize a browsing structure since October 1996. DDC notations had been
present in their links from the start of the service, but have only recently been made
available for browsing.

PICK: Quality Internet Resources in Library and Information Science46

PICK: Quality Internet Resources in Library and Information Science by University of
Wales Aberystwyth, Thomas Parry Library was using DDC based categories for
browsing. However the service is no longer available.

WEBrary (http://www.nslsilus.org/mgkhome/orrs/webrary.html)47
(Online Ready Reference System) by Morton Grove Public Library has organized their
Web links according to DDC. Each category is identified by respective DDC numbers.

Specialized Classification Schemes

Apart from the traditional classification schemes, there are a number of special
classification scheme which have been devised for organizing information resources in
special subjects or disciplines. The main reason is that the traditional schemes have very

210
little scope to provide sufficient details of any specific areas, so special classification
schemes are becoming popular. It can deal with different aspects and vocabularies of a
subject and therefore can meet special user’s requirements by arranging the order.
However, some drawbacks such as irregular revision, limited documentation regarding
support, training and so on may restrict the use of special classification schemes. ACM
Classification (www.acm.org/class/1998/ccs98.html) is one of the special classification
schemes; these are its main classes:
A General Literature
B Hardware
C Computer Systems Organization
D Software
E Data
F Theory of Computing
G Mathematics of Computing
H Information Systems
I Computing Methodologies
J Computing Applications
K Computing Milieus
Fig. 3.11: Main Classes of ACM Classification

The ACM digital library uses the ACM classification scheme to help users’ access
information resources in the digital library. After conducting a normal search using the
search interface, when users select a specific retrieved item, they can see how the chosen
search term appears in the ACM classification, and this may help them modify the query
by selecting the appropriate category.48

3.22 Conclusion
The discipline library classification is conditioned by the constant multifaceted,
multidimensional and infinite development of the macro and micro knowledge and users’
needs. Change is the law of nature and whatever does not change with the changing needs
and demands become static and redundant like a piece of artifact in a museum.
Accordingly, it has been the attempt of library and information scientists, associations
and institutions to work in the direction of making library classification; a living

211
discipline, a discipline which can cope with the ever-growing and infinite demands and
challenges both of knowledge and users of libraries and information centers.

The library classification is the basic tool for organizing and exploring the documents
stored in a library. In modern times they are the navigation tools for locating and
retrieving documents in more precisely and relevantly. In the era of ICT the electronic
versions of the DDC and UDC make it possible to realize the potential of library
classification to improve subject retrieval; however, much of the renewed interest in
classification as an organizing and retrieval device for information resources has been
sparked by the growth in usage of the Internet and World Wide Web (WWW).

212
References
1. KRISHAN KUMAR. Theory of classification. 1993. Vikas Publishing; New
Delhi. p 1.
2. SHARMA (C D). Use of libraries: A guide to better use of libraries and their
resources. 1978. Metropolitan Book; New Delhi. p-120.
3. SHARMA (C D). Op. cit., p 121.
4. KRISHAN KUMAR. Op.cit., p 4.
5. INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY (IGNOU). Unit 2: Need
and purpose of library classification. IGNOU; New Delhi. p 26.
6. HUSAIN (Shabahat). Library classification: Facets and analyses. 1993. B. R.
Publishing Corporation; Delhi. p 7.
7. KRISHAN KUMAR. Op.cit., p 9-11.
8. SHARMA (C D). Op. cit., p 124-125.
9. HUSAIN (Shabahat). Op.cit. p 18-21.
10. REITZ (Joan M). Dictionary for library and information science. 2004. Libraries
Unlimited; London. p 224.
11. HARRISON (Colin) and BEEHAM (Rosemary). The basics of librarianship.
1985. Clive Bingley; London. p 59-60.
12. DUTTA (Dwijendranath). Library classification: Theory and practice. 1962. The
Western Book Depot; Nagpur. p 48.
13. SHARMA (C D). Op. cit. p 123.
14. RAJU (Addepali Appala Narasimha). Dewey decimal classification (DDC 20):
Theory and practice: A practical and self instructional manual. 1995. T.R.
Publications; Madras. p 4.
15. SCOTT (Mona L). Dewey decimal classification 21st edition: A study manual
and number building guide. 1998. Libraries Unlimited, Englewood. p 15.
16. HUSAIN (Shabahat). Op.cit. p 383-386.
17. CHOWDHURY (G G). Introduction to modern information retrieval. Ed. 3.
2004. Facet Publishing; London. p 89.

213
18. SHARMA (C D). Op. cit. p 126.
19. http://www.oclc.org/dewey/versions/print/new_features.pdf
20. HUSAIN (Shabahat). Op.cit. p 406-409.
21. SHARMA (C D). Op. cit. p 128-132.
22. SARDANA (J L) and SEHGAL (R L). Universal decimal classification:
Structure and methodology. 1983. Ess Ess Publication; New Delhi. p 1.
23. Ibid., p 10-11.
24. RAJU (A A N). Universal decimal classification (IME-1993): Theory and
practice: A self instructional manual. 2007. Ess Ess Publications; New Delhi. p-
4-9.
25. Ibid., p 10-12.
26. HUSAIN (Shabahat). Op.cit. p 427.
27. RAJU (A A N). Op. cit. p 16-17.
28. RAJU (A A N). Op. cit. p 19-20.
29. http://www.udcc.org/members.htm
30. http://www.udcc.org/mrf.htm
31. THAKUR (S). UGC NET/SLET: Library and information science. 2007. Danika
Publishing Company; New Delhi. p 177-178.
32. KRISHAN KUMAR. Op.cit., p 56-57.
33. KRISHAN KUMAR. Op.cit., p 58.
34. INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY (IGNOU). Unit 15:
Current trends in library classification. IGNOU; New Delhi. p 84-87.
35. INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY (IGNOU). Unit 15:
Current trends in library classification. IGNOU; New Delhi. p 86-87.
36. THAKUR (S). UGC NET/SLET: Library and information science. 2007. Danika
Publishing Company; New Delhi. p 174.
37. SUMAN (S) and KARMARKAR (Debanshu). The role of library classification
in organizing the web. In Workshop on information resource management.
March 2002. DRTC; Bangalore. p 3

214
38. http://www.adam.ac.uk/
39. www.bized.ac.uk
40. http://www.kn.pacbell.com/wired/bluewebn/categories.html
41. www.bubl.ac.uk
42. www.public.iastate.edu/-CYBERSTACKS/
43. http://library.tedankara.k12.tr/dewey/
44. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/caninfo/ecaninfo.htm
45. http://www.oclc.org/oclc/netfirst/
46. SUMAN (S) and KARMARKAR (Debanshu). The role of library classification
in organizing the web. In Workshop on information resource management.
March 2002. DRTC; Bangalore. p 9
47. http://www.nslsilus.org/mgkhome/orrs/webrary.html
48. www.acm.org/class/1998/ccs98.html

215