Analysis of Strip Rolling - 2:: R. Chandramouli Associate Dean-Research SASTRA University, Thanjavur-613 401
Analysis of Strip Rolling - 2:: R. Chandramouli Associate Dean-Research SASTRA University, Thanjavur-613 401
R. Chandramouli
Associate Dean-Research
SASTRA University, Thanjavur-613 401
Table of Contents
Without considering friction, we can get the rolling load, approximately, from the material flow
stress and the area of contact between roll and strip.
F= --------------------------- 11
We have assumed that the area over which the roll force is acting is the projected area of the
arc of contact. Moreover, the above equation is for a single roll.
As we see from the above equation, the roll force increases with increase in roll radius or
increase in reduction of thickness of the strip ( .
Rolli
ng
load
R or
Joint Initiative of IITs and IISc – Funded by MHRD Page 3 of 7
NPTEL - Mechanical Engineering - Forming
Fig. 1.1.1: Variation of rolling load with roll dia or strip thickness reduction
Alternatively, we can write the average flow stress based on true strain during rolling. For a
material which obeys power law relation between plastic stress and strain, in the form:
average flow stress, is given by:
------------------- 12
---------- 13
The above equation is based on the assumption that the material work hardens. In cold rolling,
the work material gets work hardened considerably. Therefore, the above equation is more
appropriate for cold rolling. The mean flow stress is determined from plane strain compression
test, which is discussed in earlier module. It is assumed that the rolls do not undergo elastic
deformation.
To apply the slab analysis to the rolling processes, we assume that the rolling is plane strain
compression process. Further, the contact surface between roll and work piece is equal to the
projected area of the arc of contact.
Further, we approximate the deformation zone as a rectangular shape, instead of conical shape
and apply the analysis for plane strain compression.
Assume that the deformation volume of the work piece is in the form of rectangular prism of
width Lp, height ho+hf)/2 and depth unity, as shown in figure
x p
μp
h
Lp/2 σx+dσx σx
dx
Fig. 1.2.1: Stresses acting on elemental strip under plane strain rolling
Consider an elemental strip of width dx, height h and depth of unity. The various stresses acting
on the element are as shown in figure.
p is roll pressure, μpisthe shear stress due to friction, σx is normal stress acting on the outward
face of the element, σx + dσx is the stress acting on inner face of the element.
---------------------------15
-------------------------------16
Applying the Tresca yield criterion, assuming that p and are principal stresses,
, --------------------17
Y’ =
-----------19
On integration we get:
ln p = ---------------------20
p = Y’ at x=0
ln(p/Y’) = Or -------------------------------21
= , Because:
---------------------22
The above equation gives the approximate average rolling pressure for plane strain rolling
process, neglecting the curvature of the strip as it passes between the rolls.
The rolling load can be determined from the equation 22 by noting that the area of contact is
taken as projected length of contact multiplied by the depth of the work piece.
From the above equation we understand that the rolling load increases with reduction in the
height h of the work or increasing in rill diameter. Below a certain minimum height of the strip(
below a critical thinning), the rolling load increases to very high value, because the resistance of
the sheet increases to very high values. As a result, we may not be able to roll the sheet.
Instead the sheet just gets pushed in between rolls, without appreciable reduction in thickness.
In order to roll thin sheets, we can use rolls of smaller diameter, backed up by large diameter
rolls. Also we understand that the length of arc of contact decreases with roll radius.
Please note that as the coefficient of friction increases, the rolling load also increases.
Example: A 35 mm thick steel slab is hot rolled using a 900 mm roll. There is a reduction of 40%
on the thickness. The coefficient of friction is 0.5. The material flow stress increases from 200
MPa at the entrance of the rolls to 280 MPa at the exit. What is the rolling load calculated by
the approximate method of analysis? Assume a constant width of 800 mm for the slab. Roll
flattening can be ignored.
Y’ = 240 MPa
= (21+35)/2 = 28 mm