0% found this document useful (0 votes)
103 views7 pages

Analysis of Strip Rolling - 2:: R. Chandramouli Associate Dean-Research SASTRA University, Thanjavur-613 401

The document discusses two simplified methods for analyzing strip rolling processes. The first method calculates rolling load based on material flow stress and contact area between roll and strip, assuming no friction. The second method uses slab analysis and plane strain assumptions to derive an equation for average rolling pressure as a function of roll diameter, thickness reduction, flow stress, and friction coefficient. An example calculation applies the second method to determine the rolling load for a given strip rolling problem.

Uploaded by

Devlina Gaharwar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
103 views7 pages

Analysis of Strip Rolling - 2:: R. Chandramouli Associate Dean-Research SASTRA University, Thanjavur-613 401

The document discusses two simplified methods for analyzing strip rolling processes. The first method calculates rolling load based on material flow stress and contact area between roll and strip, assuming no friction. The second method uses slab analysis and plane strain assumptions to derive an equation for average rolling pressure as a function of roll diameter, thickness reduction, flow stress, and friction coefficient. An example calculation applies the second method to determine the rolling load for a given strip rolling problem.

Uploaded by

Devlina Gaharwar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

NPTEL - Mechanical Engineering - Forming

Analysis of strip rolling - 2:

R. Chandramouli
Associate Dean-Research
SASTRA University, Thanjavur-613 401

Joint Initiative of IITs and IISc – Funded by MHRD Page 1 of 7


NPTEL - Mechanical Engineering - Forming

Table of Contents

1.Analysis of strip rolling - 2: ..................................................... 3


1.1 Simplified analysis: .............................................................................................................................. 3
1.2 Slab analysis of strip rolling with friction – another approximate method: ....................................... 4

Joint Initiative of IITs and IISc – Funded by MHRD Page 2 of 7


NPTEL - Mechanical Engineering - Forming

1.Analysis of strip rolling - 2:

1.1 Simplified analysis:


The parameters which influence the rolling process are: roll diameter, friction, material flow
stress, temperature of working etc.

Without considering friction, we can get the rolling load, approximately, from the material flow
stress and the area of contact between roll and strip.

Roll pressure p = -------------------- 9

Where is average flow stress in plane strain compression.

It is given as: ------------------ 10

Here Y is yield strength of the material

Rolling load F is now written as:

F= --------------------------- 11

is the average width of the strip

We have assumed that the area over which the roll force is acting is the projected area of the
arc of contact. Moreover, the above equation is for a single roll.

As we see from the above equation, the roll force increases with increase in roll radius or
increase in reduction of thickness of the strip ( .

Rolli
ng
load

R or
Joint Initiative of IITs and IISc – Funded by MHRD Page 3 of 7
NPTEL - Mechanical Engineering - Forming

Fig. 1.1.1: Variation of rolling load with roll dia or strip thickness reduction

Alternatively, we can write the average flow stress based on true strain during rolling. For a
material which obeys power law relation between plastic stress and strain, in the form:
average flow stress, is given by:

------------------- 12

The true strain in rolling is given as:

---------- 13

Now, roll force F = --------------------14

The above equation is based on the assumption that the material work hardens. In cold rolling,
the work material gets work hardened considerably. Therefore, the above equation is more
appropriate for cold rolling. The mean flow stress is determined from plane strain compression
test, which is discussed in earlier module. It is assumed that the rolls do not undergo elastic
deformation.

1.2 Slab analysis of strip rolling with friction – another approximate


method:
Consider the rolling of a strip of initial thickness ho. The interface between the roll and work
has sliding friction with constant coefficient of friction. We assume that the roll pressure is
constant over the arc of contact.The strain on the work material is plane strain – no strain in
width direction. Further, we assume that there is no elastic deformation of work and also, the
deformation of work is homogeneous.

To apply the slab analysis to the rolling processes, we assume that the rolling is plane strain
compression process. Further, the contact surface between roll and work piece is equal to the
projected area of the arc of contact.

Further, we approximate the deformation zone as a rectangular shape, instead of conical shape
and apply the analysis for plane strain compression.

Assume that the deformation volume of the work piece is in the form of rectangular prism of
width Lp, height ho+hf)/2 and depth unity, as shown in figure

Joint Initiative of IITs and IISc – Funded by MHRD Page 4 of 7


NPTEL - Mechanical Engineering - Forming

x p

μp
h

Lp/2 σx+dσx σx

dx

Fig. 1.2.1: Stresses acting on elemental strip under plane strain rolling

Consider an elemental strip of width dx, height h and depth of unity. The various stresses acting
on the element are as shown in figure.

p is roll pressure, μpisthe shear stress due to friction, σx is normal stress acting on the outward
face of the element, σx + dσx is the stress acting on inner face of the element.

Writing the force balance along the x axis,

---------------------------15

-------------------------------16

Applying the Tresca yield criterion, assuming that p and are principal stresses,

 , --------------------17

where Y’ is plane strain flow stress which is given by:

Joint Initiative of IITs and IISc – Funded by MHRD Page 5 of 7


NPTEL - Mechanical Engineering - Forming

Y’ =

Note: we have taken p as negative here

And also we have: ------------------18

Substituting equation into equation we have:

-----------19

On integration we get:

ln p = ---------------------20

To solve for the constant A, we can apply the boundary condition:

AT x = 0, and from Tresca criterion, we have:

p = Y’ at x=0

Applying this in equation 20 we get: A = ln(Y’)

Substituting the expression for A in equation we get:

ln(p/Y’) = Or -------------------------------21

To get average pressure we can write:

= , Because:

Substituting for p from equation 21 and integrating we get:

---------------------22

The above equation gives the approximate average rolling pressure for plane strain rolling
process, neglecting the curvature of the strip as it passes between the rolls.

The rolling load can be determined from the equation 22 by noting that the area of contact is
taken as projected length of contact multiplied by the depth of the work piece.

Joint Initiative of IITs and IISc – Funded by MHRD Page 6 of 7


NPTEL - Mechanical Engineering - Forming

From the above equation we understand that the rolling load increases with reduction in the
height h of the work or increasing in rill diameter. Below a certain minimum height of the strip(
below a critical thinning), the rolling load increases to very high value, because the resistance of
the sheet increases to very high values. As a result, we may not be able to roll the sheet.
Instead the sheet just gets pushed in between rolls, without appreciable reduction in thickness.
In order to roll thin sheets, we can use rolls of smaller diameter, backed up by large diameter
rolls. Also we understand that the length of arc of contact decreases with roll radius.

Please note that as the coefficient of friction increases, the rolling load also increases.

Example: A 35 mm thick steel slab is hot rolled using a 900 mm roll. There is a reduction of 40%
on the thickness. The coefficient of friction is 0.5. The material flow stress increases from 200
MPa at the entrance of the rolls to 280 MPa at the exit. What is the rolling load calculated by
the approximate method of analysis? Assume a constant width of 800 mm for the slab. Roll
flattening can be ignored.

Solution: Equation 22 gives the average rolling pressure

Let us take Y’ as average of the flow stress at exit and entry.

Y’ = 240 MPa

(ho-hf)/ho = 0.4 Therefore, hf = 21 mm

= (21+35)/2 = 28 mm

Lp = projected arc length = = 112.25 mm

Average roll pressure = 205.73 MPa

Rolling force = 205.73X112.25X800 = 18.5 MN

Joint Initiative of IITs and IISc – Funded by MHRD Page 7 of 7

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy