"Micro Finance An Initiative To Promote Social Welfare": "Master of Business Administration"
"Micro Finance An Initiative To Promote Social Welfare": "Master of Business Administration"
Submitted by:
RAKESHA V.K
INTRODUCTION
Microfinance is a category of financial services targeted at individuals and small businesses who
lack access to conventional banking and related services. Microfinance includes microcredit, the
provision of small loans to poor clients; savings and checking accounts; micro insurance
and payment systems. Microfinance services are designed to be more affordable to poor and
socially marginalized customers and to help them become self-sufficient.
Microfinance initially had a limited definition - the provision of microloans to poor entrepreneurs
and small businesses lacking access to credit. The two main mechanisms for the delivery of
financial services to such clients were:
(1) relationship-based banking for individual entrepreneurs and small businesses.
(2) group-based models, where several entrepreneurs come together to apply for loans and other
services as a group. Over time, microfinance has emerged as a larger movement whose object is "a
world in which as everyone, especially the poor and socially marginalized people and households
have access to a wide range of affordable, high quality financial products and services, including
not just credit but also savings, insurance, payment services, and fund transfers.
Malcolm Harper (2002)1 in his paper titled ‘Grameen bank groups and self help groups;
what are the differences?’ showed the advantages and disadvantages of both the system. The
paper described and explained each system and compared their sustainability, their outreach
and impact on the poor and their institutional feasibility. The paper concluded by
summarizing the pros and cons of both the system in a table. The summary table includes the
pluses and minuses for both clients and banks and also the suitable conditions for both the
system to operate smoothly.
Bindu Ananth (2005)2 in her paper titled ‘Financing microfinance – ICICI Bank
partnership model’ analyzed the partnership model of financing microfinance institutions.
The paper compared three financing models for microfinance. The three models were Self
help group bank linkage model, financial intermediation by microfinance institutions and the
partnership model – MFI as a servicer. The paper described in detail the need for partnership
model and the description of how the model worked. The researcher said that the model was
unique in that it combines both debt as well as mezzanine finance to the MFI in a manner that
rapidly lead to the increase in outreach, while it unlocked large amounts of wholesale funds
available in the commercial banking sector in India. The paper also discussed how to build
links to capital markets for financing microfinance through securitization. It concluded by
highlighting key enablers for an environment of rapid microfinance growth including
regulator support for hybrid models of outreach and investments in training and funding of
initial expenses of new or emerging MFIs.
Jamie Bedson (2009)3 edited the report titled ‘Microfinance in Asia: trends, challenges
and opportunities’. The report compiled the wide ranging and voluminous Literature Review
A study on Non-Performing Assets of Microfinance Institutions in Gujarat Page 29 content
presented at the Asia Microfinance Forum 2008 convened in Hanoi, Vietnam in 2008. The
main purpose to publish the report was to equip microfinance practitioners with ideas on how
to successfully grow and strengthen their businesses and better serve the unbanked and the
poor. The report was mainly divided into various sections namely introduction to
microfinance in Asia, executive summary, Asia microfinance industry assessment summary,
financing and investment, savings and asset building, microfinance networks, microfinance
and technology and lastly microfinance and sustainable development.
Bhole B. and Ogden S (2010)4 in their paper titled ‘Group lending and individual lending
with strategic default’ had compared the presence of strategic default between group lending
and individual lending. Secondary data was considered for the purpose of the study. The
study found out results by developing its own strategic model. The paper concluded that
unless group members could impose sufficiently strong social sanctions on their strategically
default partners, or unless the bank used cross reporting mechanism, group lending can
perform worse than individual lending. It was showed that when certain restrictions on group
lending contract were relaxed then group lending yielded higher welfare than individual
lending even in the absence of any social sanctions or cross reporting.
SOURCES OF DATA
Data collection is the method used in collecting data for a particular use or study-The
collected data gives the researcher a clear picture about the research problem chosen
by them and to analyze it.
SECONDARY DATA
Secondary Data is the data which has been already collected or prepared by another
person which will be used by a second person in order to meet the project
requirement. The secondary data will be extracted from articles, journals, magazines.
PLAN OF ANALYSIS
The data collected for the research is mainly on the basis of secondary data. The study
is conducted by observations and will be analyzed and interpreted through simple
analysis technique. By studying write ups, journals the detailed information will be
collected.