0% found this document useful (0 votes)
272 views7 pages

CRIM111 Approaches in Crime Causation Subjective Approaches: Will Every Man Is Responsible For His Act

This document discusses several approaches and theories of crime causation. 1. Subjective approaches examine biological and psychological factors that may influence criminal behavior, while objective approaches study social and environmental influences. 2. Major classical theories include utilitarian hedonism proposed by Beccaria and Bentham, which viewed criminals as rational actors seeking pleasure and avoiding pain. The positivist school emphasized scientific study of criminal behavior and traits. 3. Contemporary theories discussed include psychoanalytical theory linking crime to childhood experiences, anomie theory seeing crime result from lack of social norms, and human ecology theory examining environmental influences on criminality.

Uploaded by

Gerlyn Radin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
272 views7 pages

CRIM111 Approaches in Crime Causation Subjective Approaches: Will Every Man Is Responsible For His Act

This document discusses several approaches and theories of crime causation. 1. Subjective approaches examine biological and psychological factors that may influence criminal behavior, while objective approaches study social and environmental influences. 2. Major classical theories include utilitarian hedonism proposed by Beccaria and Bentham, which viewed criminals as rational actors seeking pleasure and avoiding pain. The positivist school emphasized scientific study of criminal behavior and traits. 3. Contemporary theories discussed include psychoanalytical theory linking crime to childhood experiences, anomie theory seeing crime result from lack of social norms, and human ecology theory examining environmental influences on criminality.

Uploaded by

Gerlyn Radin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

CRIM111  Economic Approach – financial security

Approaches in Crime Causation of inadequacy and necessities supporting


Subjective Approaches life as factors to criminality (Merton)
– biological explanation of crimes  Socio-Cultural Approach – institutions,
– forms of abnormalities existing in criminal economic, financial, educations, etc.
before, during, after commission of crime (Tradio, influence to crime (Cohen)
1999)
 Anthropological Approach – physical Contemporary Approaches
characteristics of offender (Hooton) – scientific modes of explaining crime and
 Medical Approach – medical criminal behavior
examinations on criminal explaining – psychoanalytical, psychiatrist, and sociological
mental and physical condition of individual explanations of crime: concepts merged from
prior and after commission of crime different sources (Schmalleger, 1997)
(Positivist)
 Biological Approach – genetic influences Schools of Thought
to criminal behavior, heredity Classical School of Criminology
 Physiological Approach – nature of – group of thinkers of crime and punishment in
human being, physical needs to satisfy 18th and early 19th centuries
oneself (Maslow) – Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham:
 Psychological Approach – deprivation of criminal behavior is an outcome of “human
psychological needs of man (Freud, nature”; hedonistic > own self-interest; rational >
Maslow) which course of action is really self-interest –
 Psychiatric Approach – diagnosis of deterrence: fear of punishment

mental diseases as cause of criminal – Cesare Beccaria (Cesare Bonesara Marchese

behavior (Positivist) de Beccaria) with Jeremy Bentham (1823):

 Psychoanalytical Approach – based on proposed “Utilitarian Hedonism” > seek pleasure,

Freudian Theory, traces behavior as avoid pain

repression of basic drives (Freud) – Cesare Beccaria: “Essay on Crimes and


Punishment” > abolition of torture; absolute free

Objective Approaches will > every man is responsible for his act

– study of groups, social processes and  Freewill (Beccaria) – advocating severe


institutions influencing behavior, from social punishment for people to avoid criminal
sciences (Tradio, 1999) acts; certain punishment for certain crime

 Geographic Approach – topography,  Hedonism (Bentham) – choose pleasure,

natural resources, geographical, and avoid pain

location (Quetelet)
 Ecological Approach – biotic grouping of Neo-Classical School of Criminology – doesn’t

men: migration, competition, social disagree with Classical School but exempts

discrimination, etc. as factors of crime lunatics and children from absolute free will –

(Park)
argues that free will can be mitigated by stigmata (man’s inferior/animalistic behavior);
pathology, incompetence, and mental disorder criminal behavior to their psychological
equivalents > moral anomalies
Positivist / Italian School of Criminology –
composed of Italians agreeing that study of crime Types of Criminals by Garofalo
should emphasize on scientific treatment of 1. Murderers – satisfied from
criminals – rejected Classical School’s idea and vengeance/revenge
argued that most serious crimes were committed 2. Violent Criminals – commit very serious
by “primitive or atavistic (failed to evolve to crimes
human civilized state)” individuals 3. Deficient Criminals – commit crime
– scientifically isolating and identifying against property
determining causes of criminal behavior in 4. Lascivious Criminals – commit crime
offenders against chastity
– Cesare Lombroso (1836-1909): Italian leader,
“Father of Modern Criminology”, development of Other advocates of Positivist Criminology
scientific approach to study criminal behavior  Gabriel Tarde (1843-1904) – earliest
reforming criminal law, “Crime: Its Causes and sociological theories of criminal behavior;
Remedies” > classifications of criminals rejected Lombrosian Theory, argued that
crime is learned just as others learned
Classifications of Criminals by Lombroso legitimate trades; laws of imitation >
1. Born Criminals – inherited principles governing process by people
2. Criminal by Passion – influenced by became criminals
great emotions (anger)  Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) – “Anomie
3. Insane Criminals – abnormalities or Theory” > sociological point of positivist
psychological disorders, exempted from school, explaining absence of norms in
criminal liability society provides setting for crime and anti-
4. Criminoloid – less physical stamina / self- social acts
control
5. Occasional Criminal – insignificant Chicago School of Criminology
reasons pushing them at given occasion – early 20th century thru Robert Ezra Park, Erness
6. Pseudo-criminals – kills in self-defense Burgess, and urban sociologist at University of
Chicago
– Enrico Ferri (1856-1929): best-known – 1920’s, they identified five concentric zones,
Lombroso’s associate, parliamentarian, lecturer, including “zone in transition” > most volatile and
etc.; importance of social, economic and political subject to disorder
determinants; criminals were driven to commit – 1940’s, Henry McKay and Clifford R. Shaw
crimes by conditions in their lives focused on Juvenile Delinquents, they were
concentrated in zone of transition
– Raffaele Garofalo (1852-1934): Italian
nobleman, magistrate, senator, etc.; atavistic The Crime Theories
Theory – Greek word, prefix a- “without” and
– like a jigsaw puzzle > solve it nomos “law” > without law
– any system of ideas arranged in rational order – advocated by David Emile Durkheim
– general principles derived from particular facts – absence of norms in society provides
but not dependent on particular thing to be setting to crime and anti-social acts
explained (Kaplan, 1964) 3. The Psychoanalytical Theory
– function: provide puzzles for research (Lewis – defective conscience, emotional
Coser) immaturity, inadequate childhood
– explanation of something socialization, maternal deprivation, and
poor moral development
Crime Theories – Freudian view on criminal behavior
– to understand crime – Sigmund Freud (1835-1918):
– where criminal justice is based from  Criminal behavior is a form
– failed policies: misinterpretation, partial neurosis, that criminality may
implementation, ignorance of criminological result from an over active
theory conscience.
– crime is crime because of law  Crime is the result of the
– criminalization (too many laws) and under compulsive need for punishment
criminalization (not enough laws): legalistic to alleviate guilt and anxiety
approach seems practical  Criminal behavior is a means of
– concerned with etiology (causes or reasons of obtaining gratification of need
crime) but also with law enforcement officers and  Criminal conducts represent a
the victims displaced hostility. Criminality is
– contains assumptions, description of a essentially a representation of
phenomena, explanation of phenomenon psychological conflict.
– keep in mind: accuracy, scope, simplicity, 4. The Human Ecology Theory
falsifiability – Robert Ezra Park (1864-1944)
– scientific method of explaining
1. Demonological Theory criminality
– possessed by good/evil spirits causing – interrelationship of people and
good/bad behavior environment
– criminal behavior caused by evil spirits – crime is a function of social change
and demons occurring along environmental change
– harsh punishments were given – isolation, segregation, competition,
2. The Anomie Theory conflict, social contract, etc., are major
– anomie: condition or malaise in influences of criminal behavior and crimes
individuals > absence or diminution of 5. The Somatotyping Theory
standards or values – William H. Sheldon (1898-1977)
– social unrest > anarchy – relation of body built to behavior
– Survival of the Fittest
– belief of inheritance as primary – form of control, series of both internal
determinants of behavior and physique is and external factors contributes to criminal
reliable indicator of personality behavior
– originated from Ernest Kretschmer – containing external structure and
(1888-1964), German psychiatrist: protective internal structure: defense,
 Asthenic – lean, slightly built, protection, insulation against
narrow shoulders crime/delinquency
 Athletic – medium to tall, strong, 8. Social Class Conflict and Capitalism
muscular, course bones Theory
 Pyknic – medium height, rounded – Karl Marx, Frederick Engel, Willem
figure, massive neck, broad face Bonger (1818-1940)
– Classification of Body Physique by – Marx and Engel say ruling class:
Sheldon: responsible for criminal law and
 Endomorphy – soft, roundness ideological bases in interpretation and
throughout regions of body; with enforcement of laws > crime:
relaxed and comfortable underprivileged, unemployed and
disposition underemployed

 Mesomorphy – athletic type, – Willem Bonger: working about crimes of

normally heavy, hard and firm, economic gain, profit-motive capitalism

sting and tough; routinely active generates egoistic personality > crime as

and aggressive; most likely to inevitable outcome

commit crime 9. The Strain Theory

 Ectomorphy – thin physique, flat – Robert King Merton (1910)

chest, slender, poorly muscled; – failure of man to achieve higher status of

look more fatigue and withdrawn like caused them to commit crimes to

6. The Differential Association Theory attain their goals

– Edwin Sutherland (1883-1950): most – crime is a means to achieve goals and

Important Criminologist of the Twentieth social structure is root of crime problem –

Century; Dean of Modern Criminology people law-abiding but pressure results to

– society composed of group organization crime

having criminalistics and anti-criminalistics 10. Sub-Culture Theory of Delinquency

tradition – Albert Cohen (1918)

– learned through process of – lower class gathered sharing common

communication: learned behavior via problems and forms subculture rejecting

social interaction with others middle class values > reaction formation

7. The Containment Theory – subculture: gang; kids: delinquents

– Walter Reckless (1899-1988) 11. The Neutralization Theory

Containment Theory: relationship between – Gresham Sykes (1922)

personal and social controls – individual will obey or disobey societal


rules by his/her ability to rationalize
whether he is protected from hurt or  Direct: punishment for wrongful
destruction behavior, compliance rewarded by
– people law-abiding when feeling safe parents, family, authority figures
and violate laws when law isn’t favorable  Indirect: youth refrains from
to them delinquency thru superego or
12. Differential Opportunity Theory conscience
– Lloyd Ohlin (1928)  Internal: identification with who
– society leads lower class to want thing influence behavior
and society does things to people  Control through needs
13. Labeling Theory satisfaction: all needs are met, no
– Frank Tennenbaum, Edwin Lemert, need for criminal activity
Howard Becker (1822-1982) 17. Social Disorganization Theory
– or Social Reaction Theory – Chicago School, related to ecological
– social reaction to behavior theories
14. The Rational Choice Theory – crime occurs when mechanisms of
– Utilitarian belief, man is reasoning actor, social control are weakened
weighs means and ends, costs and – social institutions are not able to direct
benefits, and makes rational choice or control groups
– maximize gain, minimize pain – Clifford R. Shaw and Henry D. McKay:
15. The Instrumentalist Theory poverty, population heterogeneity
– Earl Richard Quinney (1934) weakens effectiveness of social control
– state exists as device for controlling 18. The Social Learning Theory
exploited class (laboring class for the – Ronald Akers and Robert Burgess
benefit of ruling class) (1966)
– upper class creates laws to protect their – deviancy by variables encouraging
interests and the unwanted behavior of delinquency
other members of society – learn new behavior thru reinforcement or
– focus on examination of Criminal Justice punishment, or observational learning of
System for clues social actors in environment
16. The Social Control Theory 19. Theory of Evolution
– or Social Bonding Theory – Charles Darwin’s Theory (1809-1882)
– Travis Hirschi: Positivist > Neo-Classical – humans are parasite
> Right Realism – man has animalistic behavior being
– exploiting process of socialization and dependent on others for survival
social learning builds self-control and 20. Charles Goring’s Theory (1870-1919)
reduces anti-social behavior – criminals are physically inferior to
– derived from Functionalist theory normal individuals (shorter and weightless
proposing 4 types of control: than non-criminals)
21. Earnest Hooton’s Theory (1887-1954)
– tall thin men: forgery and fraud; narcotics distribution, prostitution,
undersized men: thieves and burglars; extortion, etc.
short heavy person: assault, rape, sex  Syndicate Crime – organization
crimes; mediocre (average) physique: participating in illicit activity by use of
flounder around other crimes force, intimidation or threats; providing
22. Cartography – Adolphe Quetelet (1796- illicit services which has strong public
1874) demand thru use of secrecy on part of
– social statistics associates; assurance of protection and
– crimes against person: increases at immunity necessary thru political
summer; crimes against property: corruption
increases at winter
2. White-Collar Crimes
Crime Topologies – a.k.a. crime in suits
Crimes in the Modern World – business/economic and political crime
– latest and most dangerous manifestations of – crimes by people of high social position in the
something-for-nothing-complex problems of course of their occupation (Edwin Sutherland)
society – involve significant public harm, victimizes
everyone and no one
1. Organized Crimes – Types of White-Collar Crimes:
– unlawful activities of members of highly  Workplace crime: by employees for
organized, disciplined organization individual pain; occupational crime:
– illegal goods and services (gambling, individual or group’s illegal use of
prostitution, loan sharking) professional position to secure something
– pursue crime as livelihood of value
– lower echelons: criminals, top individuals:  Organizational crime: decision-makers of
legitimate society corporation engage in illegal activity for
– Types of Organized Crimes: organizational advantage
 Political-Social Organized Crime –  Strategic bankruptcy: declares
political criminal activity, guerilla and bankruptcy to avoid paying tax, changes
terrorist groups, militant social movements name like a new organization
using violence (ex. Ku Klux Klan, Molly  Patriotic crime: to achieve important
Maguires, Palestinian Liberation national goals
Organization)
 Mercenary (Predatory) Organized 3. Conventional Crimes – a.k.a. street crimes –
Crime – direct personal profit preying categorized as:
unwilling victim, extortionist gangs (mafia)  Violent Crimes (Index crimes): actual
 In-Group Oriented Organized Crime – physical harm to victim that everyone
psychological gratification (kicks, rep, recognizes as violent (murder, rape,
highs, bopping, trashing), ex. Motorcycle robbery) involving force and intimidation;
gangs and such groups are involved in Forms of Violent Crimes:
1. Interpersonal Violence (forcible  Wire transfer of funds from a fraudulently
rape, murder, serious assault, acquired credit card
family violence, robbery)  On-line auction fraud
2. Political Violence (terrorism)
Cyber Crimes in the Philippines
3. Collective Violence (Riots, mobs,
– Cyber Crime Law of 2013 (RA 10175)
crowds, urban violence)
– unfortunately, it was suspended due to
 Property Crimes (Non-Index Crimes):
individuals and groups filing a TRO with Supreme
economic interest; theft, shoplifting,
Court
vandalism, arson; Forms of Property
Crimes:
5. Victimless Crimes or Public Order Crimes
1. Occasional Property Crimes
– act implies there is perpetrator and victim of
(shoplifting, vandalism, motor
wrongful behavior with EXEMPTION with
vehicle theft, check forgery)
victimless crimes
2. Conventional Property Crimes
– no clear victim is identifiable
(burglary/unlawful entry to commit
– offender: self-destructive behavior
theft, fencing, larceny/theft)
– a.k.a. moral offenses or vice
3. Destructive Property Crimes
– Public Order Crimes: consensual and lacks
(arson, malicious mischief)
complaining participant

4. Cyber Crimes
Common Forms of Victimless Crimes or
– criminal intent in cyberspace
Public Order Crimes
– ILOVEYOU Virus or LOVE BUG by 23-y/o
 Prostitution
student of popular computer university which
 Pornography
steals password in computers having access to
 Drug Abuse/Using
the internet
 Alcoholism
– Common Types of Cyber Crimes already
 Gambling
handled by the Law Enforcement Agencies of
the Country such as the PNP and NBI
 Hacking/Cracking
 Malicious email sending
 Internet Pornography
 Launching of harmful Computer Viruses
 Distributed Denial of Service Attacks
(DDOS)
 Website defacement
 Acquiring credit card information from an
e-commerce website
 Internet shopping using fraudulently
acquired credit cards

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy