0% found this document useful (0 votes)
134 views4 pages

Direct Methods For Calculating Wavelength

1) The document provides two methods for directly calculating the wavelength of known period waves in any water depth without iterative computations: Hunt's method and Nielsen's method. 2) Hunt's method uses a Pade' approximation to calculate wavelength and gives results within 0.1% accuracy. 3) Nielsen's method provides an explicit formula for wavelength but is less accurate than Hunt's method, particularly for deeper waters.

Uploaded by

hola732
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
134 views4 pages

Direct Methods For Calculating Wavelength

1) The document provides two methods for directly calculating the wavelength of known period waves in any water depth without iterative computations: Hunt's method and Nielsen's method. 2) Hunt's method uses a Pade' approximation to calculate wavelength and gives results within 0.1% accuracy. 3) Nielsen's method provides an explicit formula for wavelength but is less accurate than Hunt's method, particularly for deeper waters.

Uploaded by

hola732
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

CETN-l-17

Revised

D
LE
DIRECT METHODS FOR CALCULATING WAVELENGTH

PURPOSE: To provide two methods for directly and accurately approximating the

EL
wavelength of known period waves in any water depth. Present methods involv-
ing the solution of the wave dispersion equation require the use of iterative
procedures. Direct approximation using the recommended methods reduces com-

C
puter time for programs requiring a large number of wavelength calculations,
such as those required in wave refraction programs.

AN
GENERAL: The deepwater wve length Lo of a wave is defined by the equation

Lo =g
C
where T is the wave period and g is gravitational acceleration. Exact
computation of the wavelength L in any other water depth d requires the
D

solution of the dispersion equation


LE

L= Lo tanh (T)

which usually requires iterative computations. Values of d/L versus d/Lo


are tabulated in Table C-l of the Shore Protection Msnual (SPM) (1984). These
EL

tabulated values can be used for single calculations of a par titular wave-
length. However, the tabulated values are not suitable when computer programs
are used for wave refraction, and the wavelength must be determined repeti-
C

tively by the refraction program.

HUNT'S METHOD: The equation for wavelength can be restated as


AN

To solve for the wavelength, Hunt (1979), and recently, Chen and Thompson
C

(1985) used a Pade' approximation which gives

U. S. Army Engineer Waternays Experiment Station, Coastal Engineering Research Center


P. 0. Box 631, Vicksburg, Mississippi 39160
D
where the term F is an approximation for the wave celerity and

LE
1
F =G+
1.0 + 0.65226 + 0.4622G2 + 0.0864G4 + 0.0675G5

and

EL
C
The wavelength is then given as

AN
This gives the wavelength to an accuracy of 0.1 percent. Higher accuracy can
be obtained by using a higher order expansion (Hunt 1979).
C
NIELSEN'SMETHOD : Nielsen (1982) gives an explicit formula for L -_
as
follows:
D

L=0Xz-(1-g)
0
LE

This formula gives an accuracy to within 1 percent for 0 L dL _< 0.35 and
becomes increasingly inaccurate at larger depth, i.e., $- >'0.35 (Figure 1).
It should be noted that Nielsen's method should not be usgd for deepwater wave
EL

computation, and Equation 4-b of the SPM (1984) provides a close approximation
for waves in deeper mters (Figure 1).
C

GIVEN: A deepwater wave has a period of 16 sec.


AN

FIND: The wvelength in a wter depth of 100 ft.

SOLUTION: (a) Using Hunt's method

(+?)2
$ = (g)2 loo =
C

G = 0.479
32.174
D

2'
CETN-1-17
Revised
6185

D
LE
1.2
- IMTERMEDIATE RANGE- -DEEPWATER RANGE

- c-SHALLOW WATER

7.0 --------------

EL
-.
-.
0.8 --
-.
---

C
LEGEND

AN
- HUNT’S APPROXIMATION
(- EXACT SOLUTION)
-- NIELSEN’S APPROXIMATION
.a...-SPM APPROXIMATION
C
D

.
LE

Figure 1. Comparison of approximate solutions for wavelength computations

1
F =G+
1 + 0.6522G + 0.4622G2 + 0.0864G4 + 0.0675G5
EL

1
F = .479 +
1 + 0.6522(0.479) + 0.4622(0.479)2 + 0.0864(0.479)4 + 0.0675(0.479)5
C

= 1.181
AN

L = 'Id$ 16 ,/v = 835.1 ft

he exact solution is known to be 834.7 ft. The wavelength obtained using


Hunt's approximation has an error on the order of 0.05 percent.
C

(b) Using Nielsen's method

3
Lo===gT2 1310.887 ft

D
L =,'26 Lo (1 - 5) =+2r(100)(1310.887) (1 - 1;:; 87) = 838.3 ft
.
0

LE
The mvelength obtained using Nielsen's approximation has an error on the
order of 0.43 percent.
***************************************

EL
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Contact Dr. Fred Camfield at (601) 634-2012, Coastal
Design Branch, CERC.

C
REFERENCES :

Chen, H. S. and Thompson, E. F. 1985. "Iterative and Pade' Solutions for the
Water-Wave Dispersion Relation," Miscellaneous Paper CERC-85-4, US Army

AN
Engineer Gterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.

Hunt, John N. 1979. "Direct Solution of Wave Dispersion Equation," Journal


of the bterways, Port, Coastal and Ocean Division, No. WW4, AXE, pp 457-459.

Nielsen, P. 1982. "Explicit Formulae for Practical Wave Calculations,"


C
Coastal Engineering, Vol 6, No. 4, pp 389-398.

Shore Protection Manual. 1984. 14th ed., 2 vols, 'USArmy Engineer Waterways
Experiment Station, Coastal Engineering Research Center, US Government
D

Printing Office, Washington, DC.


LE
EL
C
AN
C
D

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy