1) What is the level of personality traits of the respondents according to the Big Five

Personality Traits (EACNO)

Personality
Rating / E A C N O
Categories f % f % f % f % f %
Very Low 1 0.5 0 0 0 0 10 5 0 0
Low 64 32 28 14 54 27 122 61 36 18
Average 135 67.5 172 86 146 73 68 34 164 82
High 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Very High 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 200 100 200 100 200 100 200 100 200 100

2) What is the musical preference of the respondents according to:

Musical Interest
SD D NLND L SL Total
Rating / Categories
f % f % f % f % f % f %
Reflective & Complex 0 0 4 2 78 39 109 54.5 9 4.5 200 100
Intense & Rebellious 2 1 22 11 96 48 65 32.5 15 7.5 200 100
Upbeat &
Conventional 0 0 6 3 30 15 103 51.5 61 30.5 200 100
Energetic & Rhythmic 4 2 20 10 76 38 85 42.5 15 7.5 200 100

3) Is there a significant relationship between personality and musical types?

Correlations
Reflecti
CON NEU OPE veCom
AGE EXT AGR SC RO N plex
AGE Pearson
Correlatio 1 .026 -.017 -.009 -.053 -.053 -.050
n
Sig. (2-
.718 .815 .905 .460 .452 .483
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
EXT Pearson
Correlatio .026 1 .085 .065 .179* .056 .127
n
Sig. (2-
.718 .232 .362 .011 .429 .073
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
AGR Pearson
.224* .387*
Correlatio -.017 .085 1 * -.113 * .125
n
Sig. (2-
.815 .232 .001 .110 .000 .077
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
CONSC Pearson
.224*
Correlatio -.009 .065 * 1 .021 .178* .150*
n
Sig. (2-
.905 .362 .001 .768 .012 .034
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
NEURO Pearson
-
Correlatio -.053 .179* -.113 .021 1 .065
.166*
n
Sig. (2-
.460 .011 .110 .768 .019 .362
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
OPEN Pearson
.387* -
Correlatio -.053 .056 * .178* 1 .085
.166*
n
Sig. (2-
.452 .429 .000 .012 .019 .233
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
Reflective Pearson
Complex Correlatio -.050 .127 .125 .150* .065 .085 1
n
Sig. (2-
.483 .073 .077 .034 .362 .233
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
IntenseRe Pearson
bellious Correlatio .031 .088 .006 .096 -.007 .086 .366**
n
 Sig. (2-
.660 .214 .936 .176 .918 .225 .000
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
UpbeatCo Pearson
.222* -
nventional Correlatio -.059 .047 *
.065 .129 .262**
.150*
n
Sig. (2-
.407 .505 .002 .362 .034 .068 .000
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
Energetic Pearson
Rhytmic Correlatio -.059 -.005 .007 .006 -.129 .123 .276**
n
Sig. (2-
.404 .939 .926 .937 .068 .084 .000
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
SEX Pearson
Correlatio -.049 .040 .084 .047 -.071 .004 -.143*
n
Sig. (2-
.492 .574 .234 .511 .318 .960 .043
tailed)
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200

Correlations
IntenseRebellio UpbeatConvent EnergeticRhytm
us ional ic SE
AGE Pearson Correlation .031 -.059 -.059
Sig. (2-tailed) .660 .407 .404
N 200 200 200
EXT Pearson Correlation .088 .047 -.005
Sig. (2-tailed) .214 .505 .939
N 200 200 200
AGR Pearson Correlation .006 .222 ** .007
Sig. (2-tailed) .936 .002 .926
N 200 200 200
CONSC Pearson Correlation .096 .065 .006
Sig. (2-tailed) .176 .362 .937
N 200 200 200
NEURO Pearson Correlation -.007 -.150* -.129
 Sig. (2-tailed) .918 .034 .068
N 200 200 200
OPEN Pearson Correlation .086 .129 .123
Sig. (2-tailed) .225 .068 .084
N 200 200 200
ReflectiveComplex Pearson Correlation .366** .262** .276**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 200 200 200
IntenseRebellious Pearson Correlation 1 .361** .400**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000
N 200 200 200
UpbeatConventional Pearson Correlation .361** 1 .384**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000
N 200 200 200
EnergeticRhytmic Pearson Correlation .400** .384** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000
N 200 200 200
SEX Pearson Correlation .000 .066 .019
Sig. (2-tailed) .999 .351 .792
N 200 200 200

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

NONPAR CORR
/VARIABLES=AGE EXT AGR CONSC NEURO OPEN ReflectiveComplex IntenseRebellious
UpbeatConventional
EnergeticRhytmic SEX
/PRINT=BOTH TWOTAIL NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.